Microcephaly unrelated to Zika virus

Posted By: Green Cochoa

Microcephaly unrelated to Zika virus - 02/05/16 12:23 PM

Big Pharma would like to pawn off an inconclusive link to Zika as the cause of the recent spat of microcephaly in South America because, of course, it could never be their vaccines! No, never! But the evidence is so damning in this case as to put them in a tight place with trying to squirm out of anyone recognizing the clear link to their vaccines. They are blaming Zika for lack of any other go-to solution to absolve themselves of liability. Read more at the following link, and, in case it disappears, I'll copy/paste it into the next post.

https://brazilianshrunkenheadbabies.wordpress.com/about/

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: Microcephaly unrelated to Zika virus - 02/05/16 12:24 PM

In late 2014, the Ministry of Health of Brazil announced the introduction of the Tdap (Tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis) vaccine for all pregnant women in that country as part of its routine vaccination program. The move was aimed at trying to contain the resurgence of pertussis in Brazil.

In December 2015, the Brazilian government declared an emergency after 2,400 Brazilian babies were found to be born with shrunken heads (microcephaly) and damaged brains since October.

Brazilian public health officials don’t know what is causing the increase in microcephaly cases in babies born in Brazil, but they are theorizing that it may be caused by a virus known as “Zika,” which is spread by mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti)—in the same way as is the West Nile virus.

The theory is largely based on the fact that they found the Zika virus in a baby with microcephaly following an autopsy of the dead child. The virus was also found in the amniotic fluid of two mothers whose babies had the condition.

Note that Zika is not a new virus; it has been around for decades. No explanation has been given as to why suddenly it could be causing all these cases of microcephaly. No one is seriously asking the question, “What has changed?”

There is no theorizing about the possibility that the cases of microcephaly could be linked to the mandating of the Tdap vaccine for all pregnant women in Brazil about 10 months earlier. The government has “assumed” the cause is a virus.

FACT—Drug companies did not test the safety and effectiveness of giving Tdap vaccine to pregnant women before the vaccines were licensed in the U.S. and there is almost no data on inflammatory or other biological responses to this vaccine that could affect pregnancy and birth outcomes.

FACT—According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adequate testing has not been done in humans to demonstrate safety for pregnant women and it is not known whether the vaccines can cause fetal harm or affect reproduction capacity. The manufacturers of the Tdap vaccine state that human toxicity and fertility studies are inadequate and warn that Tdap should “be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.”

FACT—There are ingredients pertussis containing Tdap vaccine that have not been fully evaluated for potential genotoxic or other adverse effects on the human fetus developing in the womb that may negatively affect health after birth, including aluminum adjuvants, mercury containing (Thimerosal) preservatives and many more bioactive and potentially toxic ingredients.

FACT—There are serious problems with outdated testing procedures for determining the potency and toxicity of pertussis vaccines and some scientists are calling for limits to be established for specific toxin content of pertussis-containing vaccines.

FACT—There are no published biological mechanism studies that assess pre-vaccination health status and measure changes in brain and immune function and chromosomal integrity after vaccination of pregnant women or their babies developing in the womb.

FACT—Since licensure of Tdap vaccine in the U.S., there have been no well designed prospective case controlled studies comparing the health outcomes of large groups of women who get pertussis containing Tdap vaccine during pregnancy either separately or simultaneously compared to those who do not get the vaccines, and no similar health outcome comparisons of their newborns at birth or in the first year of life have been conducted. Safety and effectiveness evaluations that have been conducted are either small, retrospective, compare vaccinated women to vaccinated women or have been performed by drug company or government health officials using unpublished data.

FACT—FACT—The FDA has licensed Tdap vaccines to be given once as a single dose pertussis booster shot to individuals over 10 or 11 years old. The CDC’s recommendation that doctors give every pregnant woman a Tdap vaccination during every pregnancy—regardless of whether a woman has already received one dose of Tdap—is an off-label use of the vaccine.

FACT—Injuries and deaths from pertussis-containing vaccines are the most compensated claims in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) and influenza vaccine injuries and deaths are the second most compensated claim.

FACT—A 2013 published study evaluating reports of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) following vaccination in the U. S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and in a European vaccine reaction reporting system found that pertussis containing DTaP was among the vaccines most frequently associated with brain inflammation in children between birth and age five.

Tdap is manufactured by two pharmaceutical companies: Sanofi Pasteur of France and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) of the United Kingdom.

The Sanofi Pasteur product contains aluminum phosphate, residual formaldehyde, residual glutaraldehyde, and 2-phenoxyethanola, along with the following growth mediums and process ingredients: Stainer-Scholte medium, casamino acids, dimethyl-beta-cyclodextrin, glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, aluminum phosphate, modified Mueller-Miller casamino acid medium without beef heart infusion, ammonium sulfate, 2-phenoxyethanol, water for injection.

The GSK product contains aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, residual formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80), along with the following growth mediums and process ingredients: modified Latham medium derived from bovine casein, Fenton medium containing bovine extract, formaldehyde, Stainer-Scholte liquid medium, glutaraldehyde, aluminum hydroxide.

Unsurprisingly, the Brazilian government announced on January 15, 2016 it will direct funds to a biomedical research center (Sao Paulo-based Butantan Institute) to help develop a vaccine against Zika. Development of the vaccine is expected to take 3-5 years. Again, no consideration to the irony that you may be developing a vaccine to address a problem that may have been CAUSED by a vaccine, and that that new vaccine may COMPOUND the problem No consideration to the possibility that the answer to the problem may not be to do MORE, but rather to do LESS (simply STOP giving Tdcap to pregnant women).

The number of cases iof microcephaly in Brazil has grown to 3,530 babies, as of mid-January 2016. Fewer than 150 such cases were seen in all of 2014.

Most of the microcephaly cases have been concentrated in Brazil’s poor northeast, though cases in Rio de Janeiro and other big cities have also been on the rise, prompting people to stock up on mosquito repellent. Health officials are warning Brazilians—especially pregnant women—to stay inside when possible and wear plenty of bug spray if they have to go out.

Wanna look up the ingredients in mosquito spray? Oh, and what deadly insecticide do you reckon they’ll mass fumigate with? DDT perhaps?

(Note. Contains information pieced together—often copy and pasted—from newspaper articles and information from the National Vaccine Information Center.)
Posted By: Charity

Re: Microcephaly unrelated to Zika virus - 02/05/16 03:49 PM

Good work GC. I'm no expert and I don't know that the vaccine is the true cause but it should be at the top of the list of likely causes and needs attention from the authorities. Thanks for sharing it.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Microcephaly unrelated to Zika virus - 02/06/16 04:38 PM

Tx GC for bringing this forward. From this link ( http://www.atcc.org/products/all/VR-84.aspx#history ) it appears that the Zika virus is owned by the Rockefeller Foundation. I recall seeing some article saying the ebola virus was also created by some scientist who was employed by one of the Elitists corp & the patent of it was in dispute among them.

I think the purpose of this Zika, ebola, and other viruses stored in their freezer is to attempt to reduce the population. It is known that a viral epidemic would be the most effective avenue to reduce a population. Up to now, it appears that they aren't successful to making their viruses airborne and contagious. They have been limited to trick the population by receiving their patented viruses by injection under false pretext as they have done so with the Ebola and the Zika viruses.

It is no secret that for the 1% Elitist that population reduction is of #1 priority. They even made their objective known to the world in 8 differents languages inscribe in stone on the Georgia Guidestones. The first of their "10 commandments" reads "1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature." (see link) This number represents a 93% reduction of the population.

Their Ebola false flag didn't work, and I think the Zika virus story is less likely to work too. But I'm sure they won't stop trying.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: Microcephaly unrelated to Zika virus - 03/04/16 02:56 AM

More evidence in the case of the DTaP causing the microcephaly comes from a carefully studied medical case back in 2014--just before these vaccines were unfortunately mandated for pregnant women causing this epidemic of microcephaly.

http://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-pediatric-neurology/jpn00659

Quote:
Atypical vanishing white matter disease with microcephaly and hepatosplenomegaly provoked after diphtheria pertussis tetanus vaccination

Article type: Research Article

Authors: . Gowda, Vykuntaraju K | Vignesh, Sukanya | V. Madivala, Bhaskar | Mamatha, | Prahalad Kumar, | Premalatha Ramaswamy and, | Sarala H. Gowda,

Affiliations: Department of Pediatric Neurology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India | Department of Pediatrics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India | Department of Neuroradiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India | Department of Anatomy, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Science, Bangalore, India

Note: [] Correspondence: Vykuntaraju K. Gowda, Bangalore Child Neurology and Rehabilitation Center HANS complex, 8/A 1st Main 1st Cross, Manuvana, Near Adhichunchanagiri Choultry, Vijaynagar, Bangalore, 560040, Karnataka, India. Tel.: +91 80 23301212; Mobile: +91 9535212556; Fax: +91 80 26541799; E-mail: drknvraju@hotmail.com, drknvraju@yahoo.co.in

Abstract: Vanishing white matter (VWM) disease is a rare leukoencephalopathy. Normal development in early childhood with regression of milestones after trauma or infection is typical clinical presentation. We are reporting a child with atypical VWM disease. A 1.5-year-old female child presented with fever followed by altered sensorium and convulsions following first booster dose of diphtheria pertussis tetanus vaccination. Her development was normal till 1 yr of age. Her weight and head size were below 3 standard deviations. She had hepatosplenomegaly. Her routine investigations including cerebrospinal fluid examination were normal. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain shows diffuse white matter signals changes (hyperintensity on T2-weighted and hypointensity on T1-weighted images) involving the subcortical "U" fibers sparing basal ganglia. MRI shows diffuse white matter hyperintensity on T2-weighted images with areas of low signal on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, close to the signal of cerebrospinal fluid. Based on MRI findings we diagnosed as VWM disease.

Keywords: Vanishing white matter disease, whole cell DPT vaccine, hepatosplenomegaly, microcephaly

DOI: 10.3233/JPN-140659

Journal: Journal of Pediatric Neurology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 167-170, 2014
Received 21 August 2014
|
Accepted 21 August 2014
|
Published 2014


Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Alchemy

Re: Microcephaly unrelated to Zika virus - 03/07/16 05:26 PM

Green wrote;

"Note that Zika is not a new virus; it has been around for decades. No explanation has been given as to why suddenly it could be causing all these cases of microcephaly. No one is seriously asking the question, “What has changed?”

There is no theorizing about the possibility that the cases of microcephaly could be linked to the mandating of the Tdap vaccine for all pregnant women in Brazil about 10 months earlier. The government has “assumed” the cause is a virus."

Personally, I don't believe vaccines have ever been the answer. Even with Polio there are people contracting Polio even though they received the Polio vaccine!

There is just too much money and power in healthcare for it to be of any benefit to humans.
Posted By: kland

Re: Microcephaly unrelated to Zika virus - 03/08/16 01:56 AM

Looks like using the Tetanus vaccine as the carrier for the sterilization patent method has a few glitches in implementation.

I had heard some thoughts about the insecticide for mosquitoes causing problems but the facts didn't seem to correlate. Didn't know about forcing pregnant women to get vaccinated. Sure, why not? All pregnant women, enjoy, as this is your last baby. Too bad something went wrong. They could have got away with it. Now all this publicity. Better find a scapegoat.... Guess they think they have.
© 2024 Maritime 2nd Advent Christian Believers OnLine Forums Consisting Mainly of Both Members & Friends of the SDA (Seventh-day Adventist) Church