Will Jesus change our character when He returns?

Posted By: Mountain Man

Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/23/08 04:36 AM

I am reposting material from a different thread to be discussed here.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/23/08 04:37 AM

Tom, the new mind and heart is what Jesus implants within people when they complete the process of rebirth. It is during the process of converting from worldliness to obeying and observing everything Jesus commanded that the Holy Spirit reveals their sinful habits and practices in light of the cross.

After they have confronted, confessed, and crucified everything that stands in the way of them experiencing the miracle of rebirth - self dies and they rise to newness of life. The question is, therefore, which sinful habits and practices must be crucified before they can experience rebirth, before they can receive the implanted mind and heart of the new man?

You seem to think there are all kinds of sinful habits and practices that the Holy Spirit does not reveal before they experience the miracle of rebirth. You seem to be saying that the Holy Spirit waits until after they are born again to reveal the rest of their sinful habits and practices, that He is too kind and merciful to reveal certain sins because they are unwilling and able to confront them, to confess them, and to crucify them.

When I ask for examples of sinful habits and practices the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until after they are born again you list things like - saying "gee", being impatient, being proud, nursing old wounds, breaking the Sabbath, and believing things about God that are untrue. Given the types of things you list, I am led to ask, What did He reveal to them?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/23/08 04:38 AM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
MM, what you are describing in regards to being born again doesn't fit with reality. I was born again when I was 15, and even thought it's been many years, I remember the experience well. A girl presented the Gospel to me, I recognized that Jesus Christ died for my sins, I was convinced these things were true, and realized I had a decision to make. Would I accept Jesus Christ as my Savior or not? Thankfully, I decided in favor.

There was a complete change me, there's no doubt about that. My friends and family couldn't help but notice it. I was interested in reading Scripture, fellowshipping with other Christians, and discovering all I could about Christ.

However, there was none of the long, drawn out process you seem to be describing. I was aware that I was a sinner, and I needed Christ. That was enough. *After* being born again, the Holy Spirit started revealing things to me in regards to my character. There was much that needed changing (and still, believe it or not, I'm still not perfect).

I see nothing in my experience, or the experience of anybody I know, or have read about, that corresponds to what you are suggesting. When I read what others have written about justification by faith, like Waggoner, or Wesley, or Luther, I see that their descriptions match mine.

Ellen White endorsed the teachings of these great men, and I see her writings in regards to justification by faith to be in harmony with theirs.

I see the experience of the publican to be straightforward and easy to understand:

 Quote:
13The publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.

14I tell you, this man went down to his house justified. (Luke 9)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/23/08 04:38 AM

 Quote:
TE: However, there was none of the long, drawn out process you seem to be describing.

She refers to conversion as "the result of long wooing by the Spirit of God,--a patient, protracted process." The following quotes describe her view nicely:

SD 300
The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man. With the new man, Christ Jesus, are to be put on "kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering." {SD 300.3}

DA 172
Little by little, perhaps unconsciously to the receiver, impressions are made that tend to draw the soul to Christ. These may be received through meditating upon Him, through reading the Scriptures, or through hearing the word from the living preacher. Suddenly, as the Spirit comes with more direct appeal, the soul gladly surrenders itself to Jesus. By many this is called sudden conversion; but it is the result of long wooing by the Spirit of God,--a patient, protracted process. {DA 172.3}

DA 330
"Learn of Me," says Jesus; "for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest." We are to enter the school of Christ, to learn from Him meekness and lowliness. Redemption is that process by which the soul is trained for heaven. This training means a knowledge of Christ. It means emancipation from ideas, habits, and practices that have been gained in the school of the prince of darkness. The soul must be delivered from all that is opposed to loyalty to God. {DA 330.2}

 Quote:
TE: I was aware that I was a sinner, and I needed Christ. That was enough. *After* being born again, the Holy Spirit started revealing things to me in regards to my character. There was much that needed changing (and still, believe it or not, I'm still not perfect).

In light of the quotes posted above, are you sure you experienced the miracle of rebirth the instant you believed in Jesus? She says, "impressions are made that tend to draw the soul to Christ. These may be received through meditating upon Him, through reading the Scriptures, or through hearing the word from the living preacher." These are things that happen before rebirth occurs.

Also, you seem to feel you are not perfect yet because the Holy Spirit still hasn't revealed things about your character that need changing. Are these things that will keep you out of heaven if they are not confessed and crucified? Or, can you take them with you to heaven and work on changing them there? The reason I ask is due to the following insight:

4T 429
The characters formed in this life will determine the future destiny. When Christ shall come, He will not change the character of any individual. Precious, probationary time is given to be improved in washing our robes of character and making them white in the blood of the Lamb. To remove the stains of sin requires the work of a lifetime. Every day renewed efforts in restraining and denying self are needed. Every day there are new battles to fight and victories to be gained. Every day the soul should be called out in earnest pleading with God for the mighty victories of the cross. {4T 429.2}

LDE 295
If you would be a saint in heaven you must first be a saint on earth. The traits of character you cherish in life will not be changed by death or by the resurrection. You will come up from the grave with the same disposition you manifested in your home and in society. Jesus does not change the character at His coming. The work of transformation must be done now. Our daily lives are determining our destiny. Defects of character must be repented of and overcome through the grace of Christ, and a symmetrical character must be formed while in this probationary state, that we may be fitted for the mansions above.--13MR 82 (1891). {LDE 295.1}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/23/08 04:39 AM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
In light of the quotes posted above, are you sure you experienced the miracle of rebirth the instant you believed in Jesus?


Yes, I'm sure.

 Quote:
3These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.(1 John 5)


 Quote:
4For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

15For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.

16The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: (Romans 8)


It's not possible to believe in Jesus and not be born again, because to believe in Jesus is to be born again. That's what the phrase "believe in Jesus" means. It means, to be converted, to be born again, to be justified by faith, to be pardoned, to have the law written in the heart, to be under the New Covenant; to be in Christ; these are all synonyms.

 Quote:
She says, "impressions are made that tend to draw the soul to Christ. These may be received through meditating upon Him, through reading the Scriptures, or through hearing the word from the living preacher." These are things that happen before rebirth occurs.


She said these "may" be received through the items she mentioned, but I wasn't doing any of these things. I have no doubt that the Spirit was drawing me unconsciously, but it way by other mechanisms. God is not limited in how He works.

 Quote:
Also, you seem to feel you are not perfect yet because the Holy Spirit still hasn't revealed things about your character that need changing.


No, I didn't say this.

 Quote:
Are these things that will keep you out of heaven if they are not confessed and crucified? Or, can you take them with you to heaven and work on changing them there? The reason I ask is due to the following insight:


To me the issue is very simple. If we were in God's presence, would we like Him? Would we want to be around Him? Would we long to be in His presence? Would we wish to live by the principles of His government?

GC speaks of this:

 Quote:
Could those whose lives have been spent in rebellion against God be suddenly transported to heaven and witness the high, the holy state of perfection that ever exists there,-- every soul filled with love, every countenance beaming with joy, enrapturing music in melodious strains rising in honor of God and the Lamb, and ceaseless streams of light flowing upon the redeemed from the face of Him who sitteth upon the throne,--could those whose hearts are filled with hatred of God, of truth and holiness, mingle with the heavenly throng and join their songs of praise? Could they endure the glory of God and the Lamb? No, no; years of probation were granted them, that they might form characters for heaven; but they have never trained the mind to love purity; they have never learned the language of heaven, and now it is too late. A life of rebellion against God has unfitted them for heaven. Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them. The destiny of the wicked is fixed by their own choice. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, and just and merciful on the part of God. (GC 542, 543)


So I'll be in the one group or the other; either I'll long to flee from God, or long to be in His presence. My disposition one way or the other will decide my destiny.

She also writes:

 Quote:
It is not the fear of punishment, or the hope of everlasting reward, that leads the disciples of Christ to follow Him. They behold the Saviour's matchless love, revealed throughout His pilgrimage on earth, from the manger of Bethlehem to Calvary's cross, and the sight of Him attracts, it softens and subdues the soul. Love awakens in the heart of the beholders. They hear His voice, and they follow Him. (DA 480)


What should motivate us in following Christ is not whether or not we will be saved, but the loveliness of His character.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/23/08 04:42 AM

On this thread I would like to study the following aspect of this ongoing discussion:

 Quote:
Also, you seem to feel you are not perfect yet because the Holy Spirit still hasn't revealed things about your character that need changing. Are these things that will keep you out of heaven if they are not confessed and crucified? Or, can you take them with you to heaven and work on changing them there? The reason I ask is due to the following insight:

4T 429
The characters formed in this life will determine the future destiny. When Christ shall come, He will not change the character of any individual. Precious, probationary time is given to be improved in washing our robes of character and making them white in the blood of the Lamb. To remove the stains of sin requires the work of a lifetime. Every day renewed efforts in restraining and denying self are needed. Every day there are new battles to fight and victories to be gained. Every day the soul should be called out in earnest pleading with God for the mighty victories of the cross. {4T 429.2}

LDE 295
If you would be a saint in heaven you must first be a saint on earth. The traits of character you cherish in life will not be changed by death or by the resurrection. You will come up from the grave with the same disposition you manifested in your home and in society. Jesus does not change the character at His coming. The work of transformation must be done now. Our daily lives are determining our destiny. Defects of character must be repented of and overcome through the grace of Christ, and a symmetrical character must be formed while in this probationary state, that we may be fitted for the mansions above.--13MR 82 (1891). {LDE 295.1}

Will Jesus change our character when He returns?
Posted By: asygo

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/23/08 07:09 AM

No. Change must happen before that time.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/23/08 05:52 PM

Does this apply to everyone, or just the final generation of saints who are translated alive?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/23/08 05:56 PM

SC 29
One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}

"One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character."

Question - Which character defect is not included in this statement? Which character defect does the Holy Spirit wait to reveal until years after a person experiences the miracle of rebirth? Which character defect remains to be changed when Jesus returns and resurrects people?
Posted By: Rick H

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/23/08 06:04 PM

It seems you all are discussing Justification but mostly leaving out Sanctification.......or did I miss a part of the discussion..?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/23/08 07:09 PM

Richard, sanctification retains the blessings of justification. Justification occurs the moment we completely surrender our souls to Jesus' care and keeping. No one is justified who refuses to confess and crucify the character defects the Holy Spirit reveals to them during the process that leads to rebirth.

The question is - Will Jesus change our character when He returns? Or, will there be time and grace to confess and crucify unconquered character defects in heaven?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/24/08 03:59 AM

Here's a question that came to mind. The following is assumed.

1.Because our prayers pass through the corrupt channels of humanity, the intercession of Christ is required.

2.At some point (e.g., the close of probation), Christ ceases His work of intercession).

3.Therefore there are people (i.e. the 144,000) who stand before God without a mediator.


The question is, did those who go to heaven need an Intercessor just before they died? If so, why?

A.We can rule out that the "corrupt channels of humanity" refers to our flesh, because if this were the case, the 144,000 could not stand before God without a mediator, since their flesh is not changed.

B.Given that the character does not change at death, it could not be the character which necessitates intercession, since just before death it is the same as it is in heaven.

So why is Christ's intercession necessary for the righteous, a short time before they die?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/25/08 11:19 PM

SC 29
One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}

Questions:

1. Which character defect is not included in this statement?

2. Which character defect does the Holy Spirit wait to reveal until years after a person experiences the miracle of rebirth?

3. Which character defect remains to be changed when Jesus returns and resurrects people?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/26/08 05:03 AM

 Quote:
1. Which character defect is not included in this statement?


Any character defects not made known.

 Quote:
2. Which character defect does the Holy Spirit wait to reveal until years after a person experiences the miracle of rebirth?


How many years? Why do you say "years"?

 Quote:
3. Which character defect remains to be changed when Jesus returns and resurrects people?


Before Jesus comes again, He stops His work as intercessor. So how could there be any character defects remaining to be changed?

What's your response to my question in post #98588?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/27/08 08:06 PM

 Quote:
1. Which character defect is not included in this statement?

TE: Any character defects not made known.

What? She said, "One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character." She doesn't leave room for your answer, does she?

 Quote:
2. Which character defect does the Holy Spirit wait to reveal until years after a person experiences the miracle of rebirth?

TE: How many years? Why do you say "years"?

Let's assume Sister White is wrong. Let's say one ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, does not make every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and does not lay bare every deformity and defect of the human character. What is an example of a sinful habit the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until one day after they are born again, and what are examples of sinful habits He waits until one week, one month, and one year afterwards to reveal?

 Quote:
3. Which character defect remains to be changed when Jesus returns and resurrects people?

TE: Before Jesus comes again, He stops His work as intercessor. So how could there be any character defects remaining to be changed?

Does this apply only to the translated saints? Or, does it also apply to the resurrected saints? Will Jesus change their uncrucified defective traits of character when He resurrects them? For example, does the thief on the cross have uncrucified defective traits of character that need to be changed when Jesus resurrects him?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/27/08 09:55 PM

 Quote:
1. Which character defect is not included in this statement?

TE: Any character defects not made known.

What? She said, "One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character." She doesn't leave room for your answer, does she?


Yes, she does. This is similar to the Romans 1 passage where Paul said that "everything" that could be known of God was revealed to them. Yet clearly one does not know of the Sabbath by nature. So the "everything" obviously means everything which God reveals. It's similar here. We could not possibly bear to have all of our sins revealed at once. There's far too many of them. It would be the end of us. God knows our frame, that we are but dust.

The context is speaking of the Holy Spirit's revealing the one's need for Christ by way of revealing one's sinfulness. One's need is made clear by the Holy Spirit. No possible excuse is left uncovered.

Regarding the second question, let's not assume EGW is wrong.

3. Which character defect remains to be changed when Jesus returns and resurrects people?

 Quote:
TE: Before Jesus comes again, He stops His work as intercessor. So how could there be any character defects remaining to be changed?

Does this apply only to the translated saints?


Before the close of probation, Jesus intercedes for untranslated saints, so this question applies to the 144,000.

 Quote:
Or, does it also apply to the resurrected saints?
Will Jesus change their uncrucified defective traits of character when He resurrects them? For example, does the thief on the cross have uncrucified defective traits of character that need to be changed when Jesus resurrects him?


This looks like another way of asking the questions I was asking.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/27/08 10:01 PM

Tom, in the following passage Sister White observed that the moment one ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrates the soul and makes every spot of defilement plain to sinners that it causes them a lot of pain. When every spot of defilement is exposed to their sight, the spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. They loathe themselves as they view the pure, spotless character of Christ.

Does this sound to you like something Jesus would do? I thought you told me the Holy Spirit is too kind and merciful to reveal all of their sinful habits at once, that He exposes their sinful habits slowly so as not to cause them undue pain and agony. If so, why does she say they become aware of "every spot of defilement" and that it causes them to feel stricken and smitten and painful?

SC 29
One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/27/08 10:26 PM

 Quote:
1. Which character defect is not included in this statement?

TE: Any character defects not made known.

MM: What? She said, "One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character." She doesn't leave room for your answer, does she?

TE: Yes, she does. This is similar to the Romans 1 passage where Paul said that "everything" that could be known of God was revealed to them. Yet clearly one does not know of the Sabbath by nature. So the "everything" obviously means everything which God reveals. It's similar here. We could not possibly bear to have all of our sins revealed at once. There's far too many of them. It would be the end of us. God knows our frame, that we are but dust.

The context is speaking of the Holy Spirit's revealing the one's need for Christ by way of revealing one's sinfulness. One's need is made clear by the Holy Spirit. No possible excuse is left uncovered.

Tom, if you're going to interpret what she wrote in this way you'll have to provide quotes to prove your point. Where does she say explain what she meant the way you have here? Based on what you've said, the phrase "every spot of defilement [and] deformity and defects of the human character" can mean one sinful habit to the exclusion of dozens of others. Where does she say such a thing? Why didn't she say it in the context of SC?

 Quote:
TE: Regarding the second question, let's not assume EGW is wrong.

Your interpretation begs the question. So, let's say one ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, does not make every spot of defilement they possess painfully distinct, and does not lay bare every deformity and defect of character they have cultivated.

Let's say it only includes the ones the Holy Spirit chooses to reveal. With this idea in mind, what is an example of a sinful habit the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until one day after they are born again, and what are examples of sinful habits He waits until one week, one month, and one year afterwards to reveal?

 Quote:
3. Which character defect remains to be changed when Jesus returns and resurrects people?

TE: Before Jesus comes again, He stops His work as intercessor. So how could there be any character defects remaining to be changed?

MM: Does this apply only to the translated saints?

TE: Before the close of probation, Jesus intercedes for untranslated saints, so this question applies to the 144,000.

Okay, but my question was about resurrected saints, right? So, again, what kind of cultivated defective traits of character can the Holy Spirit leave unrevealed and uncrucified until after a born again person is resurrected?

 Quote:
MM: Or, will Jesus change their uncrucified defective traits of character when He resurrects them? For example, does the thief on the cross have uncrucified defective traits of character that need to be changed when Jesus resurrects him?

TE: This looks like another way of asking the questions I was asking.

I believe the answers to the two questions above is, No. What do you believe?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/27/08 10:37 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
What's your response to my question in post #98588?

Here's the question:

 Quote:
The question is, did those who go to heaven need an Intercessor just before they died? If so, why?

A.We can rule out that the "corrupt channels of humanity" refers to our flesh, because if this were the case, the 144,000 could not stand before God without a mediator, since their flesh is not changed.

B.Given that the character does not change at death, it could not be the character which necessitates intercession, since just before death it is the same as it is in heaven.

So why is Christ's intercession necessary for the righteous, a short time before they die?

I agree with A and B. Jesus intercedes on our behalf for many reasons. I do not know all of them. One reason is to hold in check the four winds of the earth until the 144,000 are numbered and sealed. Another reason is to apply the benefits of His blood when we sin and require repentance and forgiveness and reconciliation. Another reason is to make our prayers and praise acceptable and pleasing to God. Certain aspects of His intercession will cease when probation closes, but not all of them.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/28/08 12:32 AM

 Quote:
Another reason is to make our prayers and praise acceptable and pleasing to God.


My question is regarding this aspect. Why is this necessary? EGW writes it's because the prayers pass through the "corrupt channels" of humanity. But what corrupts these channels? It can't be our flesh, because then the 144,000 could not stand before God without a Mediator. It seems like it must have to do with our character. But if the character doesn't change when one dies, then can those who are about to die and go to heaven (i.e., their characters are in harmony with heaven) pray without Christ's having to intercede for them? If not, why not?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/28/08 12:42 AM

 Quote:
Tom, if you're going to interpret what she wrote in this way you'll have to provide quotes to prove your point. Where does she say explain what she meant the way you have here? Based on what you've said, the phrase "every spot of defilement [and] deformity and defects of the human character" can mean one sinful habit to the exclusion of dozens of others. Where does she say such a thing? Why didn't she say it in the context of SC?


If I'm understanding your interpretation correctly, that's not the point she's making, and it (your interpretation) does not correspond to reality. People do not become instantly perfect when they are born again.

 Quote:
Your interpretation begs the question. So, let's say one ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, does not make every spot of defilement they possess painfully distinct, and does not lay bare every deformity and defect of character they have cultivated.

Let's say it only includes the ones the Holy Spirit chooses to reveal. With this idea in mind, what is an example of a sinful habit the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until one day after they are born again, and what are examples of sinful habits He waits until one week, one month, and one year afterwards to reveal?


If I recall correctly, I think I said I'm taking a break on this question for awhile. Isn't that right?

 Quote:
Okay, but my question was about resurrected saints, right? So, again, what kind of cultivated defective traits of character can the Holy Spirit leave unrevealed and uncrucified until after a born again person is resurrected?


I think I addressed this by pointing out that the character is not changed at resurrection.

 Quote:
MM: Or, will Jesus change their uncrucified defective traits of character when He resurrects them? For example, does the thief on the cross have uncrucified defective traits of character that need to be changed when Jesus resurrects him?

TE: This looks like another way of asking the questions I was asking.

I believe the answers to the two questions above is, No. What do you believe?


I suppose it depends upon one defines things. Given the thief on the cross died within hours of being converted, he had no time to undergo much in the way of character development. So whatever character defects are revealed when one is converted would apply to him.

I take it your position is that God never reveals any character defects to any converted person ever, because they were already revealed when they were converted? Is this correct? If so, that's not realistic, IMO.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/28/08 06:31 AM

TE: If I'm understanding your interpretation correctly, that's not the point she's making, and it (your interpretation) does not correspond to reality. People do not become instantly perfect when they are born again.

MM: What do they become the instant they are born again? If they have some of the sinful habits they had prior to rebirth, in what way are they different?

---

TE: "So, again, what kind of cultivated defective traits of character can the Holy Spirit leave unrevealed and uncrucified until after a born again person is resurrected?" I think I addressed this by pointing out that the character is not changed at resurrection.

MM: Do you think they will have time to confess and crucify unrevealed and uncrucified defective traits of character in heaven? For example, the sinful habits the thief didn't have time to discover and crucify, will he correct them in heaven?

---

TE: I take it your position is that God never reveals any character defects to any converted person ever, because they were already revealed when they were converted? Is this correct? If so, that's not realistic, IMO.

MM: God does not wait until after someone is born again to reveal to them a cultivated defective trait of character. He does, however, reveal to them uncultivated, dormant traits in order to prepare them for a new line of work. But these are traits they never knew existed, traits they have not turned into character by sinning repetitiously.

Regarding reality as it relates to the experience of most professing believers? Here's what she wrote about it. Do you think things have gotten better since she gave us these facts and figures?

Much of the faith which we see is merely nominal; the real, trusting, persevering faith is rare. {CC 85.3}

Such patient, prayerful, and persevering fidelity as was possessed by these saints of God [Caleb, Hannah, and Dorcas] is rare; yet the church cannot prosper without it. {CSW 159.1}

Genuine faith, sustained by works, is rare. {CS 152.3}

With many, religious faith and principles are mingled with worldly customs and practices, and pure and undefiled religion is rare. {CT 478.1}

Religious faith and principles have become deteriorated, mingled with worldly customs and practices, and for this reason pure and undefiled religion is rare. {MM 38.4}

A character unsullied before God is rare. {4T 622.2}

The new birth is a rare experience in this age of the world. This is the reason why there are so many perplexities in the churches. Many, so many, who assume the name of Christ are unsanctified and unholy. They have been baptized, but they were buried alive. Self did not die, and therefore they did not rise to newness of life in Christ. {6BC 1075.7}

It is a solemn statement that I make to the church, that not one in twenty whose names are registered upon the church books are prepared to close their earthly history, and would be as verily without God and without hope in the world as the common sinner. {ChS 41.1}

Not one in a hundred among us is doing anything beyond engaging in common, worldly enterprises. We are not half awake to the worth of the souls for whom Christ died. {ChS 81.5}

I saw that there is not one in twenty of the youth who knows what experimental religion is. {MYP 383.3}

There is not one in twenty who knows the beauty, the real essence, of Christ's ministry. {1MCP 185.3}

There is not one in one hundred who understands for himself the Bible truth on this subject (the plan of salvation) that is so necessary to our present and eternal welfare. {1SM 359.2}

Not one in twenty of those who have a good standing with Seventh-day Adventists is living out the self-sacrificing principles of the word of God. {1T 632.2}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/29/08 12:15 AM

 Quote:
TE: If I'm understanding your interpretation correctly, that's not the point she's making, and it (your interpretation) does not correspond to reality. People do not become instantly perfect when they are born again.

MM: What do they become the instant they are born again?


Forgiven.

 Quote:
If they have some of the sinful habits they had prior to rebirth, in what way are they different?


Before they were at war with God, now they are at peace with Him. Before they lived for self; now they live for God. Before they were not at harmony with God, nor with the principles of His kingdom; now they are.

The publican is a good example. He smote his breast, asked for mercy, and went away justified.

 Quote:
TE: "So, again, what kind of cultivated defective traits of character can the Holy Spirit leave unrevealed and uncrucified until after a born again person is resurrected?" I think I addressed this by pointing out that the character is not changed at resurrection.

MM: Do you think they will have time to confess and crucify unrevealed and uncrucified defective traits of character in heaven? For example, the sinful habits the thief didn't have time to discover and crucify, will he correct them in heaven?


It seems pretty clear that the thief on the cross had no character defects that would keep him from entering heaven.

 Quote:
TE: I take it your position is that God never reveals any character defects to any converted person ever, because they were already revealed when they were converted? Is this correct? If so, that's not realistic, IMO.

MM: God does not wait until after someone is born again to reveal to them a cultivated defective trait of character. He does, however, reveal to them uncultivated, dormant traits in order to prepare them for a new line of work. But these are traits they never knew existed, traits they have not turned into character by sinning repetitiously.


So it sounds like you are agreeing with my characterization of your position. If so, I don't agree that one instantly becomes cured of all of ones defects. I don't believe such a thing is possible. It takes time for us to comprehend our defects. Our brains are not such that we grasp these things in a moment.

Regarding your "rare" quotes, I agree that these things are rare, and I believe the reason is because of an unfamiliarity with the Gospel. Had the message God gave us through Jones and Waggoner been accepted, long ago the world (and the church, of course) would have been prepared for the coming of Christ.
Posted By: vastergotland

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/29/08 12:30 AM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall

It seems pretty clear that the thief on the cross had no character defects that would keep him from entering heaven.
You are joking, right? Exactly how is it clear that a criminal deserving the capital punishment had no character defects?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/29/08 01:19 AM

I didn't say that. I said "no character defects that would keep him from entering heaven."
Posted By: vastergotland

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/29/08 08:43 AM

And what kind of character defects would that be? That lead you to criminal activity but wouldn't keep you out of heaven? Or better yet, what kind of character defect would keep you out of heaven?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/29/08 07:09 PM

Rebellion against God is a character defect that would keep you out of heaven. Living for self is another.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/29/08 08:12 PM

Thomas, there are plenty of examples of cultivated defective traits of character that would keep someone out of heaven. Paul lists lots of them in Galatians 5.

Galatians
5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are [these]; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
5:20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
5:21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told [you] in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

The thing I'm still trying to learn from Tom is which ones will not keep people out of heaven, sinful habits they can take to the grave and work on in heaven after the resurrection. So far it is not clear to me what he thinks about it. Hopefully he'll get around to addressing the concern before too long.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/29/08 08:55 PM

 Quote:
TE: If I'm understanding your interpretation correctly, that's not the point she's making, and it (your interpretation) does not correspond to reality. People do not become instantly perfect when they are born again.

MM: What do they become the instant they are born again?

TE: Forgiven.

Tom, you wrote, "People do not become instantly perfect when they are born again." But they are instantly forgiven, right? In the eyes of God, aren't they also perfect at that same instant?

 Quote:
MM: If they have some of the sinful habits they had prior to rebirth, in what way are they different?

TE: Before they were at war with God, now they are at peace with Him. Before they lived for self; now they live for God. Before they were not at harmony with God, nor with the principles of His kingdom; now they are. The publican is a good example. He smote his breast, asked for mercy, and went away justified.

I agree, but perhaps you misunderstood my question. I'm talking about people who are born again with some of their former sinful habits still in tact. Are these people living in harmony with God and the principles of His kingdom? If so, which principles?

 Quote:
TE: "So, again, what kind of cultivated defective traits of character can the Holy Spirit leave unrevealed and uncrucified until after a born again person is resurrected?" I think I addressed this by pointing out that the character is not changed at resurrection.

MM: Do you think they will have time to confess and crucify unrevealed and uncrucified defective traits of character in heaven? For example, the sinful habits the thief didn't have time to discover and crucify, will he correct them in heaven?

TE: It seems pretty clear that the thief on the cross had no character defects that would keep him from entering heaven.

I agree. But, are you leaving room for cultivated sinful habits he didn't confess and crucify? If so, will he have time to confess and crucify them in heaven? Also, please name an example of a cultivated sinful habit that will not keep someone out of heaven.

 Quote:
TE: I take it your position is that God never reveals any character defects to any converted person ever, because they were already revealed when they were converted? Is this correct? If so, that's not realistic, IMO.

MM: God does not wait until after someone is born again to reveal to them a cultivated defective trait of character. He does, however, reveal to them uncultivated, dormant traits in order to prepare them for a new line of work. But these are traits they never knew existed, traits they have not turned into character by sinning repetitiously.

TE: So it sounds like you are agreeing with my characterization of your position. If so, I don't agree that one instantly becomes cured of all of ones defects. I don't believe such a thing is possible. It takes time for us to comprehend our defects. Our brains are not such that we grasp these things in a moment.

That's not what I believe either. Let me explain. It is during the long "patient, protracted process" of conversion that the Holy Spirit lovingly reveals all of our defective traits of character in light of the cross. "... it is the result of long wooing by the Spirit of God,--a patient, protracted process." (DA 172) Do you see the difference?

Also, please understand that they must labor, agonize, wrestle, and strive (the l.a.w.s of fighting the good fight of faith) to abide in Jesus, to keep their former defects and imperfections from resurfacing. Although dead and buried, our old man habits of sin are never far from the surface, never more than a heartbeat away from enslaving us again. We must abide in Jesus or perish with our sins.

 Quote:
TE: Regarding your "rare" quotes, I agree that these things are rare, and I believe the reason is because of an unfamiliarity with the Gospel. Had the message God gave us through Jones and Waggoner been accepted, long ago the world (and the church, of course) would have been prepared for the coming of Christ.

I agree, but it didn't happen. Why? Is it because people are still resisting the message? Is it because people do not believe we are born again dead to sin and awake to righteousness? Is it because people believe we are born again with some of our sinful habits still in tact? Is it because these same people blame it on the Holy Spirit?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/30/08 12:00 AM

 Quote:
Tom, you wrote, "People do not become instantly perfect when they are born again." But they are instantly forgiven, right? In the eyes of God, aren't they also perfect at that same instant?


No, not in the sense of "perfect" in the context of my statement and our discussion. E.g., they are not instantly made aware of all sins/sinful habits/character defects the moment they are born again.

 Quote:
I agree, but perhaps you misunderstood my question. I'm talking about people who are born again with some of their former sinful habits still in tact. Are these people living in harmony with God and the principles of His kingdom? If so, which principles?


The following comes into play in this situation:

 Quote:
If light comes, and that light is set aside, or rejected, then comes condemnation and the frown of God; but before the light comes there is no sin, for there is no light for them to reject. (Spiritual Gifts Volume 4b (1864), page 3)


 Quote:
I agree. But, are you leaving room for cultivated sinful habits he didn't confess and crucify? If so, will he have time to confess and crucify them in heaven?


Since he had not cultivated sinful habits that would keep him out of heaven, it is not necessary to give him time to do so.

What keeps people out of heaven is being out of harmony with God. When one decided to repent, God reveals to the person that which he needs to know in order to be made right with Him. No inspired statement says that God has to reveal everything evil about ourselves before this can happen. It seems to me that one must vastly underestimate our wickedness to even consider this a possibility.

 Quote:
Also, please name an example of a cultivated sinful habit that will not keep someone out of heaven.


Polygamy.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/30/08 12:16 AM

 Quote:
That's not what I believe either. Let me explain. It is during the long "patient, protracted process" of conversion that the Holy Spirit lovingly reveals all of our defective traits of character in light of the cross. "... it is the result of long wooing by the Spirit of God,--a patient, protracted process." (DA 172) Do you see the difference?


The "patient, protracted process" isn't talking about a revelation of all of our defective traits of character. It's talking about our being converted.

Conversion has to do with a change of mind. Before being converted, we think one way. Self is the king. The law is not written in the heart. After conversion, we live for Christ. We are in harmony with God, and the principles of His kingdom.

The protracted process has to do with the Holy Spirit preparing the soil, so that the appeal can be made at the best possible time, when the soul has the best chance of responding, because God, above all, wants success (unfortunately, many choose not to respond, even so, as the parable of the seed cast to the ground on different soils illustrates).

 Quote:
person may not be able to tell the exact time or place, or to trace all the circumstances in the process of conversion; but this does not prove him to be unconverted. By an agency as unseen as the wind, Christ is constantly working upon the heart. Little by little, perhaps unconsciously to the receiver, impressions are made that tend to draw the soul to Christ.(DA 172)


This isn't speaking of our defective traits being brought to mind, but of our being brought to Christ. What we need to be saved is not a revelation of all of our character defects (which is more than we could bear) but Christ. So God gives us what we need, which is Christ.

If there are sins which we need to repent of so that we are willing and able to accept Christ, the Holy Spirit reveals these to us. But the goal is Christ, not the revelation of every character defect. Only that which gets in the way of our receiving Christ needs to be revealed.

 Quote:
Also, please understand that they must labor, agonize, wrestle, and strive (the l.a.w.s of fighting the good fight of faith) to abide in Jesus, to keep their former defects and imperfections from resurfacing. Although dead and buried, our old man habits of sin are never far from the surface, never more than a heartbeat away from enslaving us again. We must abide in Jesus or perish with our sins.


I think is a misplaced emphasis. Instead our emphasis should be on beholding Christ.

 Quote:
I agree, but it didn't happen. Why? Is it because people are still resisting the message?


No doubt this has to do with it.

 Quote:
Is it because people do not believe we are born again dead to sin and awake to righteousness? Is it because people believe we are born again with some of our sinful habits still in tact? Is it because these same people blame it on the Holy Spirit?


No, I dont' think so. I don't see that any of these things were a part of the message. However, that sin, all sin, could be, and needed to be overcome *was* a part of the message. Jones, in particular, during his General Conference messages talked of this. He died in Christ, Christ taking our human nature, and Christ's overcoming of sin to our victory over sin.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 04/30/08 06:01 PM

 Quote:
Tom, you wrote, "People do not become instantly perfect when they are born again." But they are instantly forgiven, right? In the eyes of God, aren't they also perfect at that same instant?

TE: No, not in the sense of "perfect" in the context of my statement and our discussion. E.g., they are not instantly made aware of all sins/sinful habits/character defects the moment they are born again.

I agree. Instead, they were gradually made of aware of all their cultivated sinful habits and traits of character during the long, patient, protracted process of conversion. They were born again without them. Otherwise, they did not experience true, genuine rebirth as defined in the Bible and SOP, which we both admit is "rare". Nevertheless, they might not have been made aware of certain sins of ignorance before they experienced the miracle of rebirth.

The Holy Spirit might not have opened their eyes to things like Sabbath keeping, diet and dress reform, and other distinctive doctrines that require Bible study and prayer. But all the sinful habits and behaviors "such as is common to man", ways that are offensive to people, do not qualify as sins of ignorance and are, therefore, revealed to them in light of the cross and must be confessed and crucified before they can experience rebirth.

 Quote:
I agree, but perhaps you misunderstood my question. I'm talking about people who are born again with some of their former sinful habits still in tact. Are these people living in harmony with God and the principles of His kingdom? If so, which principles?

TE: The following comes into play in this situation: "If light comes, and that light is set aside, or rejected, then comes condemnation and the frown of God; but before the light comes there is no sin, for there is no light for them to reject. (Spiritual Gifts Volume 4b (1864), page 3)

Amen. But I suspect we have a different list of what is light and what is not light before and after a person experiences rebirth. I hope not.

 Quote:
I agree. But, are you leaving room for cultivated sinful habits [the thief on the cross] didn't confess and crucify? If so, will he have time to confess and crucify them in heaven?

TE: Since he had not cultivated sinful habits that would keep him out of heaven, it is not necessary to give him time to do so. What keeps people out of heaven is being out of harmony with God. When one decided to repent, God reveals to the person that which he needs to know in order to be made right with Him.

No inspired statement says that God has to reveal everything evil about ourselves before this can happen. It seems to me that one must vastly underestimate our wickedness to even consider this a possibility.

Regarding the first paragraph, the first sentence, did you mean - "Since he had no unconfessed, uncrucified cultivated sinful habits that would keep him out of heaven, it is not necessary to give him time to do so." If this is what you meant, then I totally agree.

But your second paragraph concerns me. Here's why. You seem to be implying that born again believers possess certain forms of evil and wickedness that the Holy Spirit may or may not reveal to them before they go to heaven. You also imply that these forms of evil and wickedness are not out of harmony with God's will, that they will not keep them out of heaven. I cannot imagine such a thing. Please cite examples. Thank you.

 Quote:
Also, please name an example of a cultivated sinful habit that will not keep someone out of heaven.

TE: Polygamy.

In what way is polygamy a sinful habit? Why won't it keep people out of heaven?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/01/08 05:22 AM

 Quote:
I agree. Instead, they were gradually made of aware of all their cultivated sinful habits and traits of character during the long, patient, protracted process of conversion.


If we switch "conversion" with "sanctification," I agree. Sanctification is the process of a lifetime, during which God makes known our cultivated sinful habits and traits of character. Thankfully, however, this is not a pre-condition to being forgiven.

 Quote:
How, then, are we to be saved? "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness," so the Son of man has been lifted up, and everyone who has been deceived and bitten by the serpent may look and live. "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29. The light shining from the cross reveals the love of God. His love is drawing us to Himself. If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. The thoughts and desires are brought into obedience to the will of Christ. The heart, the mind, are created anew in the image of Him who works in us to subdue all things to Himself. Then the law of God is written in the mind and heart, and we can say with Christ, "I delight to do Thy will, O my God." Ps. 40:8.

In the interview with Nicodemus, Jesus unfolded the plan of salvation, and His mission to the world. In none of His subsequent discourses did He explain so fully, step by step, the work necessary to be done in the hearts of all who would inherit the kingdom of heaven. (DA 175,176)


According the the SOP, Jesus never explained the plan of salvation so fully as with Nicodemus. He we see that the light shining from the cross draws us to Himself, and that if we do not resist, we will be led to repentance at the foot of the cross, at which point the law is written in heart. Since the law is a transcript of God's character, this signifies that the sinner has been brought into harmony with God, and the principles of His government. He has been converted, born again.

Where in what Jesus said is found this theory that a long process of disclosing every sinful habit, every character defect, to be found?


 Quote:
They were born again without them. Otherwise, they did not experience true, genuine rebirth as defined in the Bible and SOP, which we both admit is "rare".


Again, where is Jesus teaching is this idea expressed? What I see taught is that when we repent of our sins and accept Christ as our personal Savior, we are born again.

 Quote:
Nevertheless, they might not have been made aware of certain sins of ignorance before they experienced the miracle of rebirth.


Might?

 Quote:
The Holy Spirit might not have opened their eyes to things like Sabbath keeping, diet and dress reform, and other distinctive doctrines that require Bible study and prayer. But all the sinful habits and behaviors "such as is common to man", ways that are offensive to people, do not qualify as sins of ignorance and are, therefore, revealed to them in light of the cross and must be confessed and crucified before they can experience rebirth.


Where did Jesus teach this?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/01/08 10:18 PM

 Quote:
I agree, but perhaps you misunderstood my question. I'm talking about people who are born again with some of their former sinful habits still in tact. Are these people living in harmony with God and the principles of His kingdom? If so, which principles?

TE: The following comes into play in this situation: "If light comes, and that light is set aside, or rejected, then comes condemnation and the frown of God; but before the light comes there is no sin, for there is no light for them to reject. (Spiritual Gifts Volume 4b (1864), page 3)

Amen. But I suspect we have a different list of what is light and what is not light before and after a person experiences rebirth. I hope not.

 Quote:
I agree. But, are you leaving room for cultivated sinful habits [the thief on the cross] didn't confess and crucify? If so, will he have time to confess and crucify them in heaven?

TE: Since he had not cultivated sinful habits that would keep him out of heaven, it is not necessary to give him time to do so. What keeps people out of heaven is being out of harmony with God. When one decided to repent, God reveals to the person that which he needs to know in order to be made right with Him.

No inspired statement says that God has to reveal everything evil about ourselves before this can happen. It seems to me that one must vastly underestimate our wickedness to even consider this a possibility.

Regarding the first paragraph, the first sentence, did you mean - "Since he had no unconfessed, uncrucified cultivated sinful habits that would keep him out of heaven, it is not necessary to give him time to do so." If this is what you meant, then I totally agree.

But your second paragraph concerns me. Here's why. You seem to be implying that born again believers possess certain forms of evil and wickedness that the Holy Spirit may or may not reveal to them before they go to heaven. You also imply that these forms of evil and wickedness are not out of harmony with God's will, that they will not keep them out of heaven. I cannot imagine such a thing. Please cite examples. Thank you.

 Quote:
Also, please name an example of a cultivated sinful habit that will not keep someone out of heaven.

TE: Polygamy.

In what way is polygamy a sinful habit? Why won't it keep people out of heaven?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/01/08 10:51 PM

 Quote:
I agree. Instead, they were gradually made of aware of all their cultivated sinful habits and traits of character during the long, patient, protracted process of conversion.

TE: If we switch "conversion" with "sanctification," I agree. Sanctification is the process of a lifetime, during which God makes known our cultivated sinful habits and traits of character. Thankfully, however, this is not a pre-condition to being forgiven.

Are you saying sanctification is the lifelong process whereby God gradually make us aware of the sinfulness of the unholy traits and habits we have been cultivating all along ignorantly? If so, please quote inspired references. Thank you.

By the way, I agree with you that sins of ignorance do prevent God from forgiving the sins we confess and forsake. Nor do they prevent us from experiencing the miracle of rebirth. However, I suspect we disagree as to what constitutes a sin of ignorance, sinful traits and habits God can afford to wait to reveal to us until sometime after we experience the miracle of rebirth.

Until recently, though, I was certain we agreed sins of ignorance could not include sinful traits and habits that offend people around us, that cause them to question our profession, that cause them to despise the gospel, that cause them to conclude we are no different than before we were supposedly born again. Do we still agree on this point?

 Quote:
How, then, are we to be saved? "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness," so the Son of man has been lifted up, and everyone who has been deceived and bitten by the serpent may look and live. "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29. The light shining from the cross reveals the love of God. His love is drawing us to Himself. If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. The thoughts and desires are brought into obedience to the will of Christ. The heart, the mind, are created anew in the image of Him who works in us to subdue all things to Himself. Then the law of God is written in the mind and heart, and we can say with Christ, "I delight to do Thy will, O my God." Ps. 40:8.

In the interview with Nicodemus, Jesus unfolded the plan of salvation, and His mission to the world. In none of His subsequent discourses did He explain so fully, step by step, the work necessary to be done in the hearts of all who would inherit the kingdom of heaven. (DA 175,176)

TE: According the the SOP, Jesus never explained the plan of salvation so fully as with Nicodemus. He we see that the light shining from the cross draws us to Himself, and that if we do not resist, we will be led to repentance at the foot of the cross, at which point the law is written in heart. Since the law is a transcript of God's character, this signifies that the sinner has been brought into harmony with God, and the principles of His government. He has been converted, born again.

Where in what Jesus said is found this theory that a long process of disclosing every sinful habit, every character defect, to be found?

Where? Both in what you said above and in the quote you posted. People cannot have the law of God written in their heart, cannot be in harmony with the principles of government, and retain their former old man habits of sin. Jesus told Nicodemus, "That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." It's one or the other, not both. Jesus said, "No man can serve two masters."

 Quote:
They were born again without them. Otherwise, they did not experience true, genuine rebirth as defined in the Bible and SOP, which we both admit is "rare".

TE: Again, where is Jesus teaching is this idea expressed? What I see taught is that when we repent of our sins and accept Christ as our personal Savior, we are born again.

Yes, born again abiding in Jesus, walking in the Spirit and seed of the new man. "Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever." "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God."

 Quote:
Nevertheless, they might not have been made aware of certain sins of ignorance before they experienced the miracle of rebirth.

TE: Might?

Yes, people can experience rebirth before they learn how to obey and observe everything Jesus commanded. This applies to sins of ignorance, of which we have yet to agree on. But, there are times when people are properly prepared for baptism and they learn how to obey and observe everything Jesus commanded.

Matthew
28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.

 Quote:
The Holy Spirit might not have opened their eyes to things like Sabbath keeping, diet and dress reform, and other distinctive doctrines that require Bible study and prayer. But all the sinful habits and behaviors "such as is common to man", ways that are offensive to people, do not qualify as sins of ignorance and are, therefore, revealed to them in light of the cross and must be confessed and crucified before they can experience rebirth.

TE: Where did Jesus teach this?

Please see quotes posted above. Now it's your turn to provide quotes from Jesus where He teaches people are born again with some of their cultivated sinful traits and habits in tact, that they will remain unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified until the day the Holy Spirit decides to reveal it to them. Also, please name a modern day example. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/02/08 02:05 AM

 Quote:
Amen. But I suspect we have a different list of what is light and what is not light before and after a person experiences rebirth. I hope not.


Before rebirth a person needs to know Christ. IOW Christ is the light that people need to know. Not some list.

 Quote:
Regarding the first paragraph, the first sentence, did you mean - "Since he had no unconfessed, uncrucified cultivated sinful habits that would keep him out of heaven, it is not necessary to give him time to do so." If this is what you meant, then I totally agree.


I meant he can't have any character defects that would keep him out of heaven because Jesus told him he was going to heaven.

 Quote:
But your second paragraph concerns me. Here's why. You seem to be implying that born again believers possess certain forms of evil and wickedness that the Holy Spirit may or may not reveal to them before they go to heaven. You also imply that these forms of evil and wickedness are not out of harmony with God's will, that they will not keep them out of heaven. I cannot imagine such a thing. Please cite examples. Thank you.


The same examples as before. As the thief lay hanging on the cross, there was a limited amount of things God could reveal to him, and he obviously had very little time to correct his habits. What could have been revealed to him?

 Quote:
To Jesus in His agony on the cross there came one gleam of comfort. It was the prayer of the penitent thief. Both the men who were crucified with Jesus had at first railed upon Him; and one under his suffering only became more desperate and defiant. But not so with his companion. This man was not a hardened criminal; he had been led astray by evil associations, but he was less guilty than many of those who stood beside the cross reviling the Saviour. He had seen and heard Jesus, and had been convicted by His teaching, but he had been turned away from Him by the priests and rulers. Seeking to stifle conviction, he had plunged deeper and deeper into sin, until he was arrested, tried as a criminal, and condemned to die on the cross. In the judgment hall and on the way to Calvary he had been in company with Jesus. He had heard Pilate declare, "I find no fault in Him." John 19:4. He had marked His godlike bearing, and His pitying forgiveness of His tormentors. On the cross he sees the many great religionists shoot out the tongue with scorn, and ridicule the Lord Jesus. He sees the wagging heads. He hears the upbraiding speeches taken up by his companion in guilt: "If Thou be Christ, save Thyself and us." Among the passers-by he hears many defending Jesus. He hears them repeat His words, and tell of His works. The conviction comes back to him that this is the Christ. Turning to his fellow criminal he says, "Dost not thou fear God, seeing thou art in the same condemnation?" The dying thieves have no longer anything to fear from man. But upon one of them presses the conviction that there is a God to fear, a future to cause him to tremble. And now, all sin-polluted as it is, his life history is about to close. "And we indeed justly," he moans; "for we receive the due reward of our deeds: but this Man hath done nothing amiss."

There is no question now. There are no doubts, no reproaches. When condemned for his crime, the thief had become hopeless and despairing; but strange, tender thoughts now spring up. He calls to mind all he has heard of Jesus, how He has healed the sick and pardoned sin. He has heard the words of those who believed in Jesus and followed Him weeping. He has seen and read the title above the Saviour's head. He has heard the passers-by repeat it, some with grieved, quivering lips, others with jesting and mockery. The Holy Spirit illuminates his mind, and little by little the chain of evidence is joined together. In Jesus, bruised, mocked, and hanging upon the cross, he sees the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world. Hope is mingled with anguish in his voice as the helpless, dying soul casts himself upon a dying Saviour. "Lord, remember me," he cries, "when Thou comest into Thy kingdom."

Quickly the answer came. Soft and melodious the tone, full of love, compassion, and power the words: Verily I say unto thee today, Thou shalt be with Me in paradise. (DA 749, 750)


There's no list here, MM. He recognized Christ and his need, and that was that.

 Quote:
In what way is polygamy a sinful habit? Why won't it keep people out of heaven?


What do you mean in what way? You agree that it's a sin. In the way that it's a sin. You agree that many who practiced polygamy will be in heaven, don't you?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/02/08 08:06 PM

 Quote:
MM: I agree, but perhaps you misunderstood my question. I'm talking about people who are born again with some of their former sinful habits still in tact. Are these people living in harmony with God and the principles of His kingdom? If so, which principles?

TE: The following comes into play in this situation: "If light comes, and that light is set aside, or rejected, then comes condemnation and the frown of God; but before the light comes
there is no sin, for there is no light for them to reject. (Spiritual Gifts Volume 4b (1864), page 3)

MM: Amen. But I suspect we have a different list of what is light and what is not light before and after a person experiences rebirth. I hope not.

TE: Before rebirth a person needs to know Christ. IOW Christ is the light that people need to know. Not some list.

The list of light represents the truth as it in Jesus. Knowing Jesus, therefore, includes knowing the list of light. Jesus warned against being deceived by false christs. Jesus said, "The words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life."

No one can experience rebirth accidentally. It is the result of long wooing; a patient, protracted process. It doesn't happen the instant they learn about Jesus. Rebirth means our old man habits of are dead and buried; it means we have received the mind of the new man, which comes complete with all the righteous fruits and attributes of God's character.

 Quote:
MM: I agree. But, are you leaving room for cultivated sinful habits [the thief on the cross] didn't confess and crucify? If so, will he have time to confess and crucify them in heaven?

TE: Since he had not cultivated sinful habits that would keep him out of heaven, it is not necessary to give him time to do so. What keeps people out of heaven is being out of harmony with God. When one decided to repent, God reveals to the person that which he needs to know in order to be made right with Him.

No inspired statement says that God has to reveal everything evil about ourselves before this can happen. It seems to me that one must vastly underestimate our wickedness to even consider this a possibility.

MM: Regarding the first paragraph, the first sentence, did you mean - "Since he had no unconfessed, uncrucified cultivated sinful habits that would keep him out of heaven, it is not necessary to give him time to do so." If this is what you meant, then I totally agree.

But your second paragraph concerns me. Here's why. You seem to be implying that born again believers possess certain forms of evil and wickedness that the Holy Spirit may or may not reveal to them before they go to heaven. You also imply that these forms of evil and wickedness are not out of harmony with God's will, that they will not keep them out of heaven. I cannot imagine such a thing. Please cite examples. Thank you.

TE: I meant he can't have any character defects that would keep him out of heaven because Jesus told him he was going to heaven. The same examples as before. As the thief lay hanging on the cross, there was a limited amount of things God could reveal to him, and he obviously had very little time to correct his habits. What could have been revealed to him?

I agree with you that the thief has no unrevealed, unconfessed, uncrucified sinful traits and habits that must be revealed, confessed, and crucified in heaven. Any and all sinful traits and habits were crucified before he died because any and all uncrucified sinful traits and habits will keep him out heaven. He didn't need time to correct them because they were crucified, dead and buried.

But I'm not sure what you mean by - "No inspired statement says that God has to reveal everything evil about ourselves before [rebirth] can happen. It seems to me that one must vastly underestimate our wickedness to even consider this a possibility." You seem to be suggesting that there are certain forms or evil and wickedness that will not keep people out of heaven, that they will have time in heaven to crucify them. Please explain what you have in mind. Thank you.

 Quote:
MM: Also, please name an example of a cultivated sinful habit that will not keep someone out of heaven.

TE: Polygamy.

MM: In what way is polygamy a sinful habit? Why won't it keep people out of heaven?

TE: What do you mean in what way? You agree that it's a sin. In the way that it's a sin. You agree that many who practiced polygamy will be in heaven, don't you?

I mean, in what way is having more than one spouse at a time a sinful habit? Sinful habits are formed by repeating the same behavior over and over again until it becomes ingrained and spontaneous. Sinful habits become sinful traits of character. Polygamy isn't a trait of character. Having more than one spouse at a time is not a repetitious behavior.

So, my question is - What is an example of a cultivated sinful trait and habit that will *not* keep someone out of heaven, that they will have time in heaven to crucify?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/02/08 08:08 PM

Tom, please address #98943 (two posts above this one). Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/02/08 08:36 PM

 Quote:
Are you saying sanctification is the lifelong process whereby God gradually make us aware of the sinfulness of the unholy traits and habits we have been cultivating all along ignorantly? If so, please quote inspired references. Thank you.

By the way, I agree with you that sins of ignorance do prevent God from forgiving the sins we confess and forsake. Nor do they prevent us from experiencing the miracle of rebirth. However, I suspect we disagree as to what constitutes a sin of ignorance, sinful traits and habits God can afford to wait to reveal to us until sometime after we experience the miracle of rebirth.

Until recently, though, I was certain we agreed sins of ignorance could not include sinful traits and habits that offend people around us, that cause them to question our profession, that cause them to despise the gospel, that cause them to conclude we are no different than before we were supposedly born again. Do we still agree on this point?


We're talking apples and oranges here. I don't conceive of things the way you do. Life is not about God's revealing some list to us.

Sin has wrecked us. When we come to Christ, we start a process of healing. During this process of healing, we learn more about Christ, and about ourselves. We become more and more like Him, as we see Him more clearly as He truly is.

This is how I think of things.

 Quote:
Where? Both in what you said above and in the quote you posted. People cannot have the law of God written in their heart, cannot be in harmony with the principles of government, and retain their former old man habits of sin. Jesus told Nicodemus, "That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." It's one or the other, not both. Jesus said, "No man can serve two masters."


Serving a master and having a habit are two different things. Take a habit like swearing. There's a process involved.

1.Oh, swearing is bad. I shouldn't do that.
2.Person swears, catches himself.
3.Person catches himself before swearing, but still thinks it.
4.Person substitutes some innocuous though in place of the swearing in the thought process.
5.Person is healed.

Not every born again person stops swearing the instant they are born again. One *starts* the process of healing when one is born again.

As one continues to walk with Christ, one learns to speak more and more like Him. One learns that simply not swearing is just a beginning. In addition to not swearing, one should bless others with one's words.

 Quote:
Yes, born again abiding in Jesus, walking in the Spirit and seed of the new man. "Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever." "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God."


This is a really poor approach to theology. You're taking a passage which is not addressing the subject of conversion and applying it to a subject it is not addressing. In addition, this is a passage which in heavily controverted as to its meaning. So you're using a passage which isn't addressing a subject, and one which whose meaning is contested, to develop a theology.

Instead, it would be better to develop a theology based on incontrovertible teachings which are addressing the subject. Take Jesus, for example. Please demonstrate something from the teachings of Jesus, who taught a great deal about conversion, where He teaches that before one can be converted they need to go through a long laundry list of sins.

Look at the parables He gave. The prodigal Son. The lost sheep. The publican praying. Look at His life, when He pardoned. The paralytic, the woman caught in adultery. Jesus was quick to forgive, as soon as their was a genuine interest on the part of the penitent sinner.

As David said, a contrite heart, God will not despise. All God needs is our hearts. Then healing can begin. Through the healing process, bad habits like swearing and others will be addressed.

 Quote:
Nevertheless, they might not have been made aware of certain sins of ignorance before they experienced the miracle of rebirth.

TE: Might?

Yes, people can experience rebirth before they learn how to obey and observe everything Jesus commanded. This applies to sins of ignorance, of which we have yet to agree on. But, there are times when people are properly prepared for baptism and they learn how to obey and observe everything Jesus commanded.


You appear to think it's possible that a person can be made aware of every sin of ignorance they have before they are converted, or baptized. That this is just a matter of being properly taught by a minister. It appears to me that you are vastly underestimating our sinfulness, by several orders of magnitude.

 Quote:
Please see quotes posted above. Now it's your turn to provide quotes from Jesus where He teaches people are born again with some of their cultivated sinful traits and habits in tact, that they will remain unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified until the day the Holy Spirit decides to reveal it to them. Also, please name a modern day example. Thank you.


What quotes? I don't see anything you've presented from Jesus Christ that would support the ideas you are suggesting. This simply isn't the way forgiveness works.

Let's say you do something to offend you. I'm upset at you. But I misunderstood what you did. You didn't really do the thing I thought you did. But I stay upset at me for years, and do all sorts of wrong things, like say bad things about you behind your back, and think bad things about you.

Then one day I discover my mistake. Really the bad thing I thought you did was a good thing. Oh no! I go to you and apologize. I ask you for forgiveness. I start to tell you how I was wrong to think badly of you, and so on.

What do you do? Do you make me tell you every bad thing I thought or did? Or do you see that I'm genuinely sorry, and forgive me?

Hopefully you would respond like a normal, decent human being and forgive me on the spot.

This is how God forgives us. As soon as He sees we are sincerely repentant, we are forgiven. In order for us to repent, we need to see the truth about the bad things we thought God was doing, that they were really good. Our sins may lead us to misinterpret God, so we need to see them too (the ones that are getting in our way of reconciliation). It is the goodness of God that leads us to repentance.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/03/08 06:35 PM

 Quote:
MM: Are you saying sanctification is the lifelong process whereby God gradually make us aware of the sinfulness of the unholy traits and habits we have been cultivating all along ignorantly? If so, please quote inspired references. Thank you.

By the way, I agree with you that sins of ignorance do not prevent God from forgiving the sins we confess and forsake. Nor do they prevent us from experiencing the miracle of rebirth. However, I suspect we disagree as to what constitutes a sin of ignorance, sinful traits and habits God can afford to wait to reveal to us until sometime after we experience the miracle of rebirth.

Until recently, though, I was certain we agreed sins of ignorance could not include sinful traits and habits that offend people around us, that cause them to question our profession, that cause them to despise the gospel, that cause them to conclude we are no different than before we were supposedly born again. Do we still agree on this point?

TE: We're talking apples and oranges here. I don't conceive of things the way you do. Life is not about God's revealing some list to us. Sin has wrecked us. When we come to Christ, we start a process of healing. During this process of healing, we learn more about Christ, and about ourselves. We become more and more like Him, as we see Him more clearly as He truly is. This is how I think of things.

The Bible is full of lists of "dos and don'ts". Judgment is all about lists of right and wrong. God is clearly concerned about it; otherwise, He wouldn't make them or keep them. The reason it keeps coming up as we study together is because you seem to believe the list's do not matter, that all that matters is we learn to love and appreciate the character of God.

But this sounds more like a cop out than an answer to the questions I've been asking. List's aren't important to you until it becomes clear you believe there are certain sinful traits and habits the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until after people experience rebirth. You explain that these unrevealed, uncrucified traits and habits are not the types of sinning that cause people around them to despise the gospel or to conclude they are no better off than the common worldling.

You also explain that this process of gradually becoming aware of and crucifying non-offending, uncrucified sinful traits and habits is the process of sanctification. Obviously you have certain types of sinful traits and habits in mind, but you are usually hesitant to list them because you feel doing so isn't important. And when you do name one, it tuns out not to fit. it doesn't fall into the category you've identified as sinful traits and habits the Holy Spirit can wait to reveal to them until some later date. Then you get disgusted and tell me it just doesn't matter. But it does matter, Tom. It matters to me. Your idea that the Holy Spirit does not open my eyes to certain of my sinful ways until He thinks I'm ready to deal with it is disturbing, to say the least.

 Quote:
MM: Where? Both in what you said above and in the quote you posted. People cannot have the law of God written in their heart, cannot be in harmony with the principles of His government, and retain their former old man habits of sin. Jesus told Nicodemus, "That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." It's one or the other, not both. Jesus said, "No man can serve two masters."

TE: Serving a master and having a habit are two different things. Take a habit like swearing. There's a process involved.

1.Oh, swearing is bad. I shouldn't do that.
2.Person swears, catches himself.
3.Person catches himself before swearing, but still thinks it.
4.Person substitutes some innocuous though in place of the swearing in the thought process.
5.Person is healed.

Not every born again person stops swearing the instant they are born again. One *starts* the process of healing when one is born again. As one continues to walk with Christ, one learns to speak more and more like Him. One learns that simply not swearing is just a beginning. In addition to not swearing, one should bless others with one's words.

Tom, you're kidding me, right? What you just described is nothing less than the theory of evolution or devolution. There is no way you can support this view of sanctification from the Bible or the SOP. But if you think can support it, then please post the necessary quotes from the Bible or the SOP. Please, do not quote Jones or Waggoner if that’s where you got this idea from. I need to see it in the Bible or SOP first. Thank you.

By the way, is swearing and cursing one of those sinful traits and habits the Holy Spirit can wait to reveal to newborn babes until they are ready to deal with it? If not, then where does it say born again believers can swear while they are abiding in Jesus, while they are walking in the Spirit and in the mind of the new man?

Also, what do you mean by - "Serving a master and having a habit are two different things." Are you suggesting that serving Jesus and gradually outgrowing the sinful habit of swearing happens simultaneously? If so, please substantiate it from the Bible or the SOP. Thank you.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/03/08 06:51 PM

 Quote:
TE: Let's say you do something to offend you. I'm upset at you. But I misunderstood what you did. You didn't really do the thing I thought you did. But I stay upset at me for years, and do all sorts of wrong things, like say bad things about you behind your back, and think bad things about you.

Then one day I discover my mistake. Really the bad thing I thought you did was a good thing. Oh no! I go to you and apologize. I ask you for forgiveness. I start to tell you how I was wrong to think badly of you, and so on.

What do you do? Do you make me tell you every bad thing I thought or did? Or do you see that I'm genuinely sorry, and forgive me?

Hopefully you would respond like a normal, decent human being and forgive me on the spot.

This is how God forgives us. As soon as He sees we are sincerely repentant, we are forgiven. In order for us to repent, we need to see the truth about the bad things we thought God was doing, that they were really good. Our sins may lead us to misinterpret God, so we need to see them too (the ones that are getting in our way of reconciliation). It is the goodness of God that leads us to repentance.

Tom, your analogy describes a sin of ignorance. Of course God forgives sins of ignorance. If fact, He does not count us guilty of them because the blood of Jesus serves as an atonement. But the moment we discover our fault, God expects us to repent in order for Him to continue covering it with the blood of Jesus.

I agree with you in that we must repent first in order for God to forgive a know sin. God does not cover unconfessed, unforgiven known sins with the blood of Jesus. Nor does God count us born again before we confess and crucify every single one of our known and cultivated sinful traits and habits. They must first be revealed in light of the cross and confessed and crucified before genuine rebirth can take place. Do you agree?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/03/08 08:56 PM

 Quote:
Tom, your analogy describes a sin of ignorance.


The analogy was dealing with one who comes to Christ. In the analogy, I have misunderstood your intentions, and because of this, been upset at you. But you were innocent. When my eyes were opened, the path was cleared for reconciliation.

Similarly, the cross reveals the truth about God. We see that He is innocent of the evil thoughts we had attributed to Him, and the path is cleared for reconciliation. Not of God towards us, because there was never a need on God's side, since God has no self that can be offended -- He is simply love -- but we need to be reconciled to Him. But we will never choose to be reconciled to God as long as we hate Him and misunderstand Him.

 Quote:
Of course God forgives sins of ignorance. If fact, He does not count us guilty of them because the blood of Jesus serves as an atonement.


I was talking about this, although, even here, "where there is no light, there is no sin."

 Quote:
But the moment we discover our fault, God expects us to repent in order for Him to continue covering it with the blood of Jesus.


The driving factor is not the expectations of God, but the reality of our need. *We* need to recognize the truth, or *we* will never choose to be reconciled to God.

 Quote:
I agree with you in that we must repent first in order for God to forgive a know sin.


This depends upon what sense you are speaking of. In one sense, God has forgiven everyone of there sins, in accordance with Jesus' prayer ("Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.). Love keeps no record of wrong (1 Cor. 13). However, although God has no personal need, no self that needs to be satisfied, no demands on His part that must be met in order for Him to forgive, *we* require repentance in order for God to be able to forgive us in the sense that we experience His forgiveness.

I realize this concept is a bit difficult to communicate. Let's go back to the previous example to make this clear. Let's say I've misunderstood you, and am upset at you, and you're aware of this. Let's say you've been praying for me, that God would open my eyes to see the truth, and recognize that you had been working for good and not for evil. This demonstrates an attitude of forgiveness on your part. Clearly, you've already forgiven me, or you wouldn't be praying for me. So in one sense, you've already forgiven me.

However, I cannot experience your forgiveness without repentance. As long as I'm angry at you, reconciliation is impossible.

The purpose of the blood is to get us to the point of reconciliation. It's a one-way operation. It's to "bring us to God," as Peter puts it. It reveals the truth, that God had been working for good, and not for evil.

It clears the path for reconciliation.

 Quote:
God does not cover unconfessed, unforgiven known sins with the blood of Jesus. Nor does God count us born again before we confess and crucify every single one of our known and cultivated sinful traits and habits. They must first be revealed in light of the cross and confessed and crucified before genuine rebirth can take place. Do you agree?


We're talking apples and oranges here. In order for us to be healed, we need to know the truth. As long as we are angry at God, and feel that He is being unjust, we cannot be forgiven. This problem I'm speaking of is not a legal one. Even if there was a legal problem involved, it's importance would be minuscule in comparison with the issues I'm discussing here.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/05/08 01:16 AM

 Quote:
MM: Are you saying sanctification is the lifelong process whereby God gradually make us aware of the sinfulness of the unholy traits and habits we have been cultivating all along ignorantly? If so, please quote inspired references. Thank you.

By the way, I agree with you that sins of ignorance do not prevent God from forgiving the sins we confess and forsake. Nor do they prevent us from experiencing the miracle of rebirth. However, I suspect we disagree as to what constitutes a sin of ignorance, sinful traits and habits God can afford to wait to reveal to us until sometime after we experience the miracle of rebirth.

Until recently, though, I was certain we agreed sins of ignorance could not include sinful traits and habits that offend people around us, that cause them to question our profession, that cause them to despise the gospel, that cause them to conclude we are no different than before we were supposedly born again. Do we still agree on this point?

TE: We're talking apples and oranges here. I don't conceive of things the way you do. Life is not about God's revealing some list to us. Sin has wrecked us. When we come to Christ, we start a process of healing. During this process of healing, we learn more about Christ, and about ourselves. We become more and more like Him, as we see Him more clearly as He truly is. This is how I think of things.

The Bible is full of lists of "dos and don'ts". Judgment is all about lists of right and wrong. God is clearly concerned about it; otherwise, He wouldn't make them or keep them. The reason it keeps coming up as we study together is because you seem to believe the list's do not matter, that all that matters is we learn to love and appreciate the character of God.

But this sounds more like a cop out than an answer to the questions I've been asking. List's aren't important to you until it becomes clear you believe there are certain sinful traits and habits the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until after people experience rebirth. You explain that these unrevealed, uncrucified traits and habits are not the types of sinning that cause people around them to despise the gospel or to conclude they are no better off than the common worldling.

You also explain that this process of gradually becoming aware of and crucifying non-offending, uncrucified sinful traits and habits is the process of sanctification. Obviously you have certain types of sinful traits and habits in mind, but you are usually hesitant to list them because you feel doing so isn't important. And when you do name one, it tuns out not to fit. it doesn't fall into the category you've identified as sinful traits and habits the Holy Spirit can wait to reveal to them until some later date. Then you get disgusted and tell me it just doesn't matter. But it does matter, Tom. It matters to me. Your idea that the Holy Spirit does not open my eyes to certain of my sinful ways until He thinks I'm ready to deal with it is disturbing, to say the least.

 Quote:
MM: Where? Both in what you said above and in the quote you posted. People cannot have the law of God written in their heart, cannot be in harmony with the principles of His government, and retain their former old man habits of sin. Jesus told Nicodemus, "That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." It's one or the other, not both. Jesus said, "No man can serve two masters."

TE: Serving a master and having a habit are two different things. Take a habit like swearing. There's a process involved.

1.Oh, swearing is bad. I shouldn't do that.
2.Person swears, catches himself.
3.Person catches himself before swearing, but still thinks it.
4.Person substitutes some innocuous though in place of the swearing in the thought process.
5.Person is healed.

Not every born again person stops swearing the instant they are born again. One *starts* the process of healing when one is born again. As one continues to walk with Christ, one learns to speak more and more like Him. One learns that simply not swearing is just a beginning. In addition to not swearing, one should bless others with one's words.

Tom, you're kidding me, right? What you just described is nothing less than the theory of evolution or devolution. There is no way you can support this view of sanctification from the Bible or the SOP. But if you think can support it, then please post the necessary quotes from the Bible or the SOP. Please, do not quote Jones or Waggoner if that’s where you got this idea from. I need to see it in the Bible or SOP first. Thank you.

By the way, is swearing and cursing one of those sinful traits and habits the Holy Spirit can wait to reveal to newborn babes until they are ready to deal with it? If not, then where does it say born again believers can swear while they are abiding in Jesus, while they are walking in the Spirit and in the mind of the new man?

Also, what do you mean by - "Serving a master and having a habit are two different things." Are you suggesting that serving Jesus and gradually outgrowing the sinful habit of swearing happens simultaneously? If so, please substantiate it from the Bible or the SOP. Thank you.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/05/08 01:28 AM

TE: We're talking apples and oranges here. In order for us to be healed, we need to know the truth. As long as we are angry at God, and feel that He is being unjust, we cannot be forgiven. This problem I'm speaking of is not a legal one. Even if there was a legal problem involved, it's importance would be minuscule in comparison with the issues I'm discussing here.

MM: What about all the sinners out there who are not mad at God? They are perfectly happy to serve sin and Jesus. They perceive God as too kind and loving and merciful to execute justice and judgment against those who merely fall short of keeping the law. "Let us consider what the Bible teaches further concerning the ungodly and unrepentant, whom the Universalist places in heaven as holy, happy angels."

GC 539, 540
God has given in His word decisive evidence that He will punish the transgressors of His law. Those who flatter themselves that He is too merciful to execute justice upon the sinner, have only to look to the cross of Calvary. The death of the spotless Son of God testifies that "the wages of sin is death," that every violation of God's law must receive its just retribution. Christ the sinless became sin for man. He bore the guilt of transgression, and the hiding of His Father's face, until His heart was broken and His life crushed out. All this sacrifice was made that sinners might be redeemed. In no other way could man be freed from the penalty of sin. And every soul that refuses to become a partaker of the atonement provided at such a cost must bear in his own person the guilt and punishment of transgression. {GC 539.3}

Let us consider what the Bible teaches further concerning the ungodly and unrepentant, whom the Universalist places in heaven as holy, happy angels. {GC 540.1}

"I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely." Revelation 21:6. This promise is only to those that thirst. None but those who feel their need of the water of life, and seek it at the loss of all things else, will be supplied. "He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be My son." Verse 7. Here, also, conditions are specified. In order to inherit all things, we must resist and overcome sin. {GC 540.2}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/05/08 04:45 AM

 Quote:
The Bible is full of lists of "dos and don'ts". Judgment is all about lists of right and wrong. God is clearly concerned about it; otherwise, He wouldn't make them or keep them.


Not at all. When dealing with children, you have to work on a level that children understand. However, the hope is that children will grow up.

 Quote:
It is not the fear of punishment, or the hope of everlasting reward, that leads the disciples of Christ to follow Him. They behold the Saviour's matchless love, revealed throughout His pilgrimage on earth, from the manger of Bethlehem to Calvary's cross, and the sight of Him attracts, it softens and subdues the soul. Love awakens in the heart of the beholders. They hear His voice, and they follow Him.(DA 480)


Paul talks about this when he mention milk and meat.

 Quote:
The reason it keeps coming up as we study together is because you seem to believe the list's do not matter, that all that matters is we learn to love and appreciate the character of God.


My argument is not against lists per se, but in the way they are being used. Regarding the last part, to learn to love and appreciate the character of God is what it means to truly have faith.

 Quote:
He desires that the creatures of His hands shall love Him because He is worthy of love. He would have them obey Him because they have an intelligent appreciation of His wisdom, justice, and benevolence. And all who have a just conception of these qualities will love Him because they are drawn toward Him in admiration of His attributes.(GC 541)


To love God is the first and greatest of all the commandments. If we are motivated by appreciation, our chances of deep healing are great.

 Quote:
But this sounds more like a cop out than an answer to the questions I've been asking.


Why do you feel this way?

 Quote:
List's aren't important to you until it becomes clear you believe there are certain sinful traits and habits the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until after people experience rebirth.


??? You think then lists become important to me?

 Quote:
You explain that these unrevealed, uncrucified traits and habits are not the types of sinning that cause people around them to despise the gospel or to conclude they are no better off than the common worldling.


Where did I say this?

 Quote:
You also explain that this process of gradually becoming aware of and crucifying non-offending, uncrucified sinful traits and habits is the process of sanctification.


Where did I say this?

 Quote:
Obviously you have certain types of sinful traits and habits in mind, but you are usually hesitant to list them because you feel doing so isn't important.


I don't have anything in mind. I'm not hesitant; it's just not something I think about.

 Quote:
And when you do name one, it tuns out not to fit. it doesn't fall into the category you've identified as sinful traits and habits the Holy Spirit can wait to reveal to them until some later date.


Why do you say this?

 Quote:
Then you get disgusted and tell me it just doesn't matter. But it does matter, Tom. It matters to me.


This is the only reason I'm discussing it, is because it matters to you. I've spent hours and hours discussing something with you that doesn't matter to me because it matters to you.

 Quote:
Your idea that the Holy Spirit does not open my eyes to certain of my sinful ways until He thinks I'm ready to deal with it is disturbing, to say the least.


Would you reveal to a child something he's not ready to deal with? Should the child resent you because you, in your superior wisdom, choose to reveal things to it at the time you deem proper? Why would you find it disturbing that God uses wisdom and judgment in revealing things to us?

Regarding swearing, why would think I'm kidding? Your comment seems a bid ingenuous. What I described is exactly how the process works. How do you think it works? It's certainly possible God could work a miracle, and instantaneously cure a person from swearing at a moment's notice, but I've never met anyone that's happened to. The process I described is what happens in real life, all the time.

Smoking would be another example. Some people stop smoking in a moment, and report that God miraculously took away all desire to smoke. But for many it's a more difficult process. Because a person has a desire to smoke, or even gives in to the desire before finally kicking the habit, does not mean the person is not born again.

I'm at a loss both to understand why you think the examples I've given do not apply, nor why you would think I was joking when I describe a perfectly natural process that presumably anyone would be familiar with.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/05/08 04:54 AM

 Quote:
MM: What about all the sinners out there who are not mad at God? They are perfectly happy to serve sin and Jesus. They perceive God as too kind and loving and merciful to execute justice and judgment against those who merely fall short of keeping the law.


The law is a description of the principles of God's kingdom. The law of life for the universe is to receive from God in order to give. It is to love others, especially God, instead of loving self. It describes the only way of life and happiness.

The issue is not that God is to this or that to do something, but that it's simply not possible to live if one chooses to live for self. Living for self is not a principle that gives life. It leads to death. Regardless of what one things God will do, if one lives for self, one will die.

How does God lead one away from a life of selfishness? "The goodness of God leads to repentance." The only way is for God to reveal His goodness. This is what the cross does wonderfully.

If you continue further on from 540 yet get to the following:

 Quote:
The principles of kindness, mercy, and love, taught and exemplified by our Saviour, are a transcript of the will and character of God. Christ declared that He taught nothing except that which He had received from His Father. The principles of the divine government are in perfect harmony with the Saviour's precept, "Love your enemies."...

Those who have chosen Satan as their leader and have been controlled by his power are not prepared to enter the presence of God. Pride, deception, licentiousness, cruelty, have become fixed in their characters....

What source of enjoyment could heaven offer to those who are wholly absorbed in earthly and selfish interests?...

A life of rebellion against God has unfitted them for heaven. Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them. The destiny of the wicked is fixed by their own choice. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, and just and merciful on the part of God. (GC 541-543)


The wicked are excluded from heaven not because God does something to them, but because of what they have done to themselves. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary. They don't wish to be in heaven.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/05/08 08:08 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
This is the only reason I'm discussing it, is because it matters to you. I've spent hours and hours discussing something with you that doesn't matter to me because it matters to you.

 Quote:
Your idea that the Holy Spirit does not open my eyes to certain of my sinful ways until He thinks I'm ready to deal with it is disturbing, to say the least.

Would you reveal to a child something he's not ready to deal with? Should the child resent you because you, in your superior wisdom, choose to reveal things to it at the time you deem proper? Why would you find it disturbing that God uses wisdom and judgment in revealing things to us?

Regarding swearing, why would think I'm kidding? Your comment seems a bid ingenuous. What I described is exactly how the process works. How do you think it works? It's certainly possible God could work a miracle, and instantaneously cure a person from swearing at a moment's notice, but I've never met anyone that's happened to. The process I described is what happens in real life, all the time.

Smoking would be another example. Some people stop smoking in a moment, and report that God miraculously took away all desire to smoke. But for many it's a more difficult process. Because a person has a desire to smoke, or even gives in to the desire before finally kicking the habit, does not mean the person is not born again.

I'm at a loss both to understand why you think the examples I've given do not apply, nor why you would think I was joking when I describe a perfectly natural process that presumably anyone would be familiar with.

Tom, thank you for spending so much time studying this with me. I really appreciate it.

Regarding waiting to tell a child about certain sinful habits, no, I cannot think of any sinful habit that I, as a father, would overlook until a better day to tell him or her.

Regarding gradually outgrowing swearing or smoking as it relates to the process of sanctification, no, I do not view it the same way you do. Instead, I see it this way:

1. During the process of conversion, before we are born again, the Holy Spirit gradually reveals to us, in light of the cross, all of our cultivated sinful traits and habits. This may take many months or many years.

2. As each sinful trait and habit is revealed we confess that they are sinful and deserving of death.

3. The moment we confess our last sinful trait and habit our old man dies and is buried. In the same moment we are born again and Jesus implants within us the sinless seed of the new man, which comes complete with all the righteous fruits and traits of God's character.

4. As we abide in Jesus, as we partake of the divine nature, as we walk in the Spirit and mind of the new man, we do not and cannot commit a known sin.

5. The instant we neglect to abide in Jesus we resurrect our old man and resume sinning.

6. The instant we receive the gift of repentance we are empowered to confess and forsake our sin, God then pardons us, next He restores the relationship our sin severed, and finally we resume abiding in Jesus, growing in grace and maturing in the fruits of the Spirit.

As this applies to your example of swearing and smoking, I see it this way - Before we experience rebirth we may be able to stop swearing and smoking through shear force of willpower. However, it doesn't count as "righteousness and true holiness". Not until we are born again and begin abiding in Jesus do our resulting good works count as righteousness by faith.

The fact born again believers backslide from time to time, in this case if they swear or smoke, it does not mean they did not truly experience rebirth. Instead, it simply means they neglected to abide in Jesus. Anytime born again believers commit a known sin it simply means they neglected to abide in Jesus. It is impossible to commit a known sin while abiding in Jesus.

Every time they are tempted to swear or smoke, or whatever, and they overcome the urge or impulse by choosing to abide in Jesus, it becomes easier to abide in Jesus the next time they are tempted.

In some cases, the urge or impulse to swear or smoke diminishes until it ceases to exist or to tempt them. But some temptations do not lose their power or appeal, and they have to labor hard to resist them every time they present themselves.

But it doesn't mean they are not born again, neither does it mean they are guilty of sinning. So long as they keep their master passions and appetites under the control of a sanctified will and mind, so long as they abide in Jesus, they are victorious.

Do you see a difference in the way I see it and the way you see it?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/05/08 08:29 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
MM: What about all the sinners out there who are not mad at God? They are perfectly happy to serve sin and Jesus. They perceive God as too kind and loving and merciful to execute justice and judgment against those who merely fall short of keeping the law.


The law is a description of the principles of God's kingdom. The law of life for the universe is to receive from God in order to give. It is to love others, especially God, instead of loving self. It describes the only way of life and happiness.

The issue is not that God is to this or that to do something, but that it's simply not possible to live if one chooses to live for self. Living for self is not a principle that gives life. It leads to death. Regardless of what one things God will do, if one lives for self, one will die.

How does God lead one away from a life of selfishness? "The goodness of God leads to repentance." The only way is for God to reveal His goodness. This is what the cross does wonderfully.

If you continue further on from 540 yet get to the following:

 Quote:
The principles of kindness, mercy, and love, taught and exemplified by our Saviour, are a transcript of the will and character of God. Christ declared that He taught nothing except that which He had received from His Father. The principles of the divine government are in perfect harmony with the Saviour's precept, "Love your enemies."...

Those who have chosen Satan as their leader and have been controlled by his power are not prepared to enter the presence of God. Pride, deception, licentiousness, cruelty, have become fixed in their characters....

What source of enjoyment could heaven offer to those who are wholly absorbed in earthly and selfish interests?...

A life of rebellion against God has unfitted them for heaven. Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them. The destiny of the wicked is fixed by their own choice. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, and just and merciful on the part of God. (GC 541-543)


The wicked are excluded from heaven not because God does something to them, but because of what they have done to themselves. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary. They don't wish to be in heaven.

Tom, you seem to be suggesting sinners are naturally suicidal, that they would sooner kill themselves than live indefinitely. But this isn't the impression one gets from reading about it in the Bible or the SOP. Satan motivates sinners to think they can defeat God and gain access to the tree of life and live forever. The only thing that stops them is the fact God rains fire down upon them.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/05/08 08:44 PM

I disagree completely with this. In particular, with step 3.

 Quote:
3.The moment we confess our last sinful trait and habit our old man dies and is buried. In the same moment we are born again and Jesus implants within us the sinless seed of the new man, which comes complete with all the righteous fruits and traits of God's character.


Without being born again, one doesn't even have an interest in overcoming sinful habits. One is born again when one confesses one's sin and accepts Christ as one's personal Savior. This was a very marked experience in my life, and I know precisely when it happened. A young lady shared the Gospel with me, the Holy Spirit revealed Christ to me, I thought about it awhile, and made the decision to accept Christ as my person Savior, and, as the Scripture says, I became a new creation; the Holy Spirit testified to me that I was a child of God.

At that point it became a priority of mine to live for Christ, and the process of overcoming sinful habits began.

This is in harmony with Scripture, reason, and experience.

From the SOP:

 Quote:
How, then, are we to be saved? "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness," so the Son of man has been lifted up, and everyone who has been deceived and bitten by the serpent may look and live. "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29. The light shining from the cross reveals the love of God. His love is drawing us to Himself. If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. The thoughts and desires are brought into obedience to the will of Christ. The heart, the mind, are created anew in the image of Him who works in us to subdue all things to Himself. Then the law of God is written in the mind and heart, and we can say with Christ, "I delight to do Thy will, O my God." Ps. 40:8.(DA 175, 176)


Here are the steps:

a.The light shining from the cross reveals the love of God.
b.If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour.
c.Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul.
d.The thoughts and desires are brought into obedience to the will of Christ.

This is not a long, protracted process. This happens quickly. The long, protracted process you refer to has to do with God's bringing the soul to the point to where Christ can be presented in a way that the soul may respond.

 Quote:
Little by little, perhaps unconsciously to the receiver, impressions are made that tend to draw the soul to Christ. These may be received through meditating upon Him, through reading the Scriptures, or through hearing the word from the living preacher. Suddenly, as the Spirit comes with more direct appeal, the soul gladly surrenders itself to Jesus. By many this is called sudden conversion; but it is the result of long wooing by the Spirit of God,--a patient, protracted process.(DA 172)


Notice it says, "suddenly ... the soul gladly surrenders itself to Jesus." The surrender itself is sudden. The process of getting the soul to where it gladly makes this surrender is what takes time, but this is time which *God* takes, not the human being. It's not a protracted process where the sinner and God work together to get through a list of sinful habits, and when the last sinful habit is finally checked off, God pronounces the sinner born again.

Here's another example:

 Quote:
The publican had gone to the temple with other worshipers, but he soon drew apart from them as unworthy to unite in their devotions. Standing afar off, he "would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast," in bitter anguish and self-abhorrence. He felt that he had transgressed against God, that he was sinful and polluted. He could not expect even pity from those around him, for they looked upon him with contempt. He knew that he had no merit to commend him to God, and in utter self-despair he cried, "God be merciful to me, a sinner." He did not compare himself with others.

Overwhelmed with a sense of guilt, he stood as if alone in God's presence. His only desire was for pardon and peace, his only plea was the mercy of God. And he was blessed. "I tell you," Christ said, "this man went down to his house justified rather than the other."(COL 151)


We have the example of Abraham as well. And David:

 Quote:
David's repentance was sincere and deep. There was no effort to palliate his crime. No desire to escape the judgments threatened, inspired his prayer. But he saw the enormity of his transgression against God; he saw the defilement of his soul; he loathed his sin. It was not for pardon only that he prayed, but for purity of heart. David did not in despair give over the struggle. In the promises of God to repentant sinners he saw the evidence of his pardon and acceptance.


"For Thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it:
Thou delightest not in burnt offering.
The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit:
A broken and a contrite heart, O God, Thou wilt not despise."
Psalm 51:16, 17. (PP 725)


What are the common points in these conversions? A conviction of one's sin, one's need for Christ, and a contrite heart. Not a list of sinful habits that finally gets checked off, but a contrite heart.

In the way you are describing it, the person would have to be working to check off these sinful habits one by one until he got to the last one, and then he would be converted. But one cannot even *start* the process, let alone complete it, without being converted. Given the person is not converted, how is he overcoming these sinful habits?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/07/08 09:28 PM

TE: One is born again when one confesses one's sin and accepts Christ as one's personal Savior.

MM: Which sins? Since you do not believe it includes all of their sinful traits and habits, you must have in mind specific sinful traits and habits that are not confessed and crucified until some time after rebirth, right? But didn't we agree it cannot include those kinds of traits and habits that cause people around them to despise the gospel (and I'm not referring to the righteous traits and habits that goad people to madness)?

---

TE: At that point it became a priority of mine to live for Christ, and the process of overcoming sinful habits began.

MM: According to the Bible and the SOP "overcoming" sinful habits means subduing them, preventing them from resurfacing, keeping them under the control of a sanctified will and mind. It doesn't imply the evolutionary process you described above.

---

TE: Here are the steps:

a.The light shining from the cross reveals the love of God.
b.If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour.
c.Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul.
d.The thoughts and desires are brought into obedience to the will of Christ.

MM: That's exactly what I wrote above, right? B follows A; and B precedes C. D and C occur simultaneously. The difference between me and you is that I believe B includes all of our cultivated sinful traits and habits; whereas, you believe it excludes some of them.

---

TE: In the way you are describing it, the person would have to be working to check off these sinful habits one by one until he got to the last one, and then he would be converted. But one cannot even *start* the process, let alone complete it, without being converted. Given the person is not converted, how is he overcoming these sinful habits?

MM: Converted to what - to a slow, evolutionary process of gradually sinning less and less intensely until they quit sinning altogether? According to the Bible and the SOP we must first crucify our cultivated old man habits of sinning before we can begin the lifelong process of maturing in the fruits of the Spirit.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/07/08 09:29 PM

Tom, please address #99051 (above). Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/07/08 10:09 PM

 Quote:
Tom, you seem to be suggesting sinners are naturally suicidal, that they would sooner kill themselves than live indefinitely. But this isn't the impression one gets from reading about it in the Bible or the SOP.


I just quoted from the SOP. I just suggested what I had quoted. Here's what I said:

 Quote:
The wicked are excluded from heaven not because God does something to them, but because of what they have done to themselves. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary. They don't wish to be in heaven.


Here's what I quoted:

 Quote:
What source of enjoyment could heaven offer to those who are wholly absorbed in earthly and selfish interests?...

A life of rebellion against God has unfitted them for heaven. Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them. The destiny of the wicked is fixed by their own choice. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, and just and merciful on the part of God. (GC 541-543)


 Quote:
Satan motivates sinners to think they can defeat God and gain access to the tree of life and live forever. The only thing that stops them is the fact God rains fire down upon them.


That's not so. First of all, one can see this isn't the case from what I just quoted. "Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves." This means it is something they themselves choose. That's what "voluntary" means.

Secondly, even in the GC description, you will see that it is not literal fire the stops their charge, but it is the revelation of truth that does so. The truth is revealed, and the wicked stop in their tracks. It's right there in GC!
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/09/08 11:05 PM

So, Satan does not motivate and marshal the troops to believe they can overthrow the New Jerusalem and access the tree of life to live forever?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/10/08 12:22 AM

Satan starts to lead them on a mad charge, but they stop when the truth is revealed to them.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/10/08 07:08 PM

I'm away from my computer right now, can you post the quote from GC. Thanx.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/10/08 08:56 PM

If you're away from your computer, how can you read what I post?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/10/08 09:25 PM

In the presence of the assembled inhabitants of earth and heaven the final coronation of the Son of God takes place. And now, invested with supreme majesty and power, the King of kings pronounces sentence upon the rebels against His government and executes justice upon those who have transgressed His law and oppressed His people. Says the prophet of God: "I saw a great white throne, and Him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works." Revelation 20:11, 12.

As soon as the books of record are opened, and the eye of Jesus looks upon the wicked, they are conscious of every sin which they have ever committed. They see just where their feet diverged from the path of purity and holiness, just how far pride and rebellion have carried them in the violation of the law of God. The seductive temptations which they encouraged by indulgence in sin, the blessings perverted, the messengers of God despised, the warnings rejected, the waves of mercy beaten back by the stubborn, unrepentant heart--all appear as if written in letters of fire.

Above the throne is revealed the cross; and like a panoramic view appear the scenes of Adam's temptation and fall, and the successive steps in the great plan of redemption. The Saviour's lowly birth; His early life of simplicity and obedience; His baptism in Jordan; the fast and temptation in the wilderness; His public ministry, unfolding to men heaven's most precious blessings; the days crowded with deeds of love and mercy, the nights of prayer and watching in the solitude of the mountains; the plottings of envy, hate, and malice which repaid His benefits; the awful, mysterious agony in Gethsemane beneath the crushing weight of the sins of the whole world; His betrayal into the hands of the murderous mob; the fearful events of that night of horror--the unresisting prisoner, forsaken by His best-loved disciples, rudely hurried through the streets of Jerusalem; the Son of God exultingly displayed before Annas, arraigned in the high priest's palace, in the judgment hall of Pilate, before the cowardly and cruel Herod, mocked, insulted, tortured, and condemned to die--all are vividly portrayed.(GC 666,667)[/quote]

There's too much to put the whole thing, or even a major part of it. But what happens is the wicked start to storm the city, and they are stopped by the revelation of truth. Rebellion started by way of the lies of Satan, who hid the truth about God. When the truth about God is revealed, rebellion is stopped in its tracks.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/12/08 12:31 AM

Not long after the scene you quoted we read:

 Quote:
Notwithstanding that Satan has been constrained to acknowledge God's justice and to bow to the supremacy of Christ, his character remains unchanged. The spirit of rebellion, like a mighty torrent, again bursts forth. Filled with frenzy, he determines not to yield the great controversy. The time has come for a last desperate struggle against the King
672
of heaven. He rushes into the midst of his subjects and endeavors to inspire them with his own fury and arouse them to instant battle. But of all the countless millions whom he has allured into rebellion, there are none now to acknowledge his supremacy. His power is at an end. The wicked are filled with the same hatred of God that inspires Satan; but they see that their case is hopeless, that they cannot prevail against Jehovah. Their rage is kindled against Satan and those who have been his agents in deception, and with the fury of demons they turn upon them. {GC 671.2}

Saith the Lord: "Because thou hast set thine heart as the heart of God; behold, therefore I will bring strangers upon thee, the terrible of the nations: and they shall draw their swords against the beauty of thy wisdom, and they shall defile thy brightness. They shall bring thee down to the pit." "I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. . . . I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee. . . . I will bring thee to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all them that behold thee. . . . Thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any more." Ezekiel 28:6-8, 16-19. {GC 672.1}

"Every battle of the warrior is with confused noise, and garments rolled in blood; but this shall be with burning and fuel of fire." "The indignation of the Lord is upon all nations, and His fury upon all their armies: He hath utterly destroyed them, He hath delivered them to the slaughter." "Upon the wicked He shall rain quick burning coals, fire and brimstone and an horrible tempest: this shall be the portion of their cup." Isaiah 9:5; 34:2; Psalm 11:6, margin. Fire comes down from God out of heaven. The earth is broken up. The weapons concealed in its depths are drawn forth. Devouring flames burst from every yawning chasm. The very rocks are on fire. The day has come that shall burn as an oven. The elements melt with fervent heat, the earth also, and the works that are therein are burned up. Malachi 4:1; 2 Peter 3:10. The earth's surface seems one molten mass--a vast, seething
673
lake of fire. It is the time of the judgment and perdition of ungodly men--"the day of the Lord's vengeance, and the year of recompenses for the controversy of Zion." Isaiah 34:8. {GC 672.2}

The wicked receive their recompense in the earth. Proverbs 11:31. They "shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the Lord of hosts." Malachi 4:1. Some are destroyed as in a moment, while others suffer many days. All are punished "according to their deeds." The sins of the righteous having been transferred to Satan, he is made to suffer not only for his own rebellion, but for all the sins which he has caused God's people to commit. His punishment is to be far greater than that of those whom he has deceived. After all have perished who fell by his deceptions, he is still to live and suffer on. In the cleansing flames the wicked are at last destroyed, root and branch--Satan the root, his followers the branches. The full penalty of the law has been visited; the demands of justice have been met; and heaven and earth, beholding, declare the righteousness of Jehovah. {GC 673.1}

It appears they become preoccupied with killing one another. In the midst of this slaughter God rains fire down upon them.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/13/08 04:41 AM

MM, you wrote:

 Quote:
Satan motivates sinners to think they can defeat God and gain access to the tree of life and live forever. The only thing that stops them is the fact God rains fire down upon them.


What stops them is not God raining literal fire down upon them.

The exclusion of the wicked from heaven is voluntary with themselves. "Voluntary" means it's something they choose.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/13/08 08:14 PM

Tom, surely you agree with the idea that Satan will be able to initially motivate the wicked to overthrow the New Jerusalem, to gain access to the tree of life, to eat and live forever. But if sinning causes sinners to desire death, why, then, will they desire to live forever after they are resurrected? True, they voluntarily will not want to live with saints or Jesus, but they will not want to die either.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/14/08 05:02 AM

What changes their minds is the revelation of the truth.

We are temporarily in a situation where we are veiled from God's glory, which is His character. ("The glory of God is His character." -- GAG "What is God's Glory" page 322) After the judgment, this will no longer be the case. God's glory will be revealed everywhere. Given this reality, the unrighteous do not wish to live.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/14/08 07:57 PM

Tom, surely you agree with the idea that Satan will be able to initially motivate the wicked to overthrow the New Jerusalem, to gain access to the tree of life, to eat and live forever. Do you agree?

But if sinning causes sinners to desire death, why, then, will they desire to live forever after they are resurrected? True, they will not desire to live with saints or Jesus, but they will not want to die either. Do you agree?

---

The glory of God is more than His character. This expression is used in many different ways, and means many different things. Both John and Stephen saw the glory of God and it didn't kill him.

Pslam 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth his handiwork.

John 11:4 When Jesus heard [that], he said, This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the Son of God might be glorified thereby. 11:40 Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?

Acts 7:55 But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God,

Revelation
15:8 And the temple was filled with smoke from the glory of God, and from his power; and no man was able to enter into the temple, till the seven plagues of the seven angels were fulfilled. 21:11 Having the glory of God: and her light [was] like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal; 21:23 And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb [is] the light thereof.

It is the glory of God to give His virtue to His children. {AA 530.2}

The glory of God is displayed in His handiwork. {CG 49.2} All these proclaim the love and skill of the heavenly Artist and show forth the glory of God. {CG 534.2}

God's holy word needs not the torchlight glimmer of earth to make its glories distinguishable. It is light in itself--the glory of God revealed, and beside it every other light is dim. {COL 111.1}

The Old Testament sheds light upon the New, and the New upon the Old. Each is a revelation of the glory of God in Christ. Both present truths that will continually reveal new depths of meaning to the earnest seeker. {COL 128.3}

The glory of God, His majesty and power, were to be revealed in all their prosperity. {COL 288.3}

Their countenances were lighted up with the glory of God; and they shone with the glory, as did the face of Moses when he came down from Sinai. {CET 95.3}

When John in his mortal state beheld the glory of God, he fell as one dead: he was not able to endure the sight. {CET 233.1}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/15/08 01:42 AM

 Quote:
Tom, surely you agree with the idea that Satan will be able to initially motivate the wicked to overthrow the New Jerusalem, to gain access to the tree of life, to eat and live forever. Do you agree?


Do you have some quote in mind here? Satan is capable of a great deal. I wouldn't put this past him.

 Quote:
But if sinning causes sinners to desire death, why, then, will they desire to live forever after they are resurrected?


They haven't understood the truth.

 Quote:
True, they will not desire to live with saints or Jesus, but they will not want to die either. Do you agree?


When they understand the truth, they will no longer desire to live is what I think. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves. There will be no place to hide from the glory of God, which is to them a consuming fire.

---

 Quote:
The glory of God is more than His character.


No, it's not "The glory of God is more than His character."

 Quote:
The glory of God is His character. While Moses was in the mount, earnestly interceding with God, he prayed, "I beseech thee, show me thy glory." In answer God declared, "I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the Lord before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy." The glory of God--His character--was then revealed: "The Lord passed by before him, and proclaimed, The Lord, The Lord God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty" (Exodus 33:18, 19; 34:6, 7).


It's the glory of God *is* His character. She repeats the thought, and explains why from Scripture.

 Quote:
This expression is used in many different ways, and means many different things. Both John and Stephen saw the glory of God and it didn't kill him.


The glory of God is His character. Why should that kill John and Stephen?

 Quote:
Pslam 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth his handiwork.


The heavens declare the character God is exactly what this means. It's the same thought as Romans 1 around vs. 20 where it tells us that that which can be known of God is revealed by the things He has made.

John 11:4 When Jesus heard [that], he said, This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the Son of God might be glorified thereby. 11:40 Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?

Acts 7:55 But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God,

Revelation
15:8 And the temple was filled with smoke from the glory of God, and from his power; and no man was able to enter into the temple, till the seven plagues of the seven angels were fulfilled. 21:11 Having the glory of God: and her light [was] like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal; 21:23 And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb [is] the light thereof.

It is the glory of God to give His virtue to His children. {AA 530.2}[/quote]

There's too many to comment on every one, but clearly this is saying that it is according to God's character to give His virtue to His children.

 Quote:
The glory of God is displayed in His handiwork. {CG 49.2} All these proclaim the love and skill of the heavenly Artist and show forth the glory of God. {CG 534.2}


Similarly here, the glory of God is His character, as displayed in His handiwork. That is, God's handiwork displays His character. That's true of everyone (their character is displayed by their handiwork).

 Quote:
God's holy word needs not the torchlight glimmer of earth to make its glories distinguishable. It is light in itself--the glory of God revealed, and beside it every other light is dim. {COL 111.1}


I'll comment on one more. Here's something from the Desire of Ages:

 Quote:
His name shall be called Immanuel, . . . God with us." "The light of the knowledge of the glory of God" is seen "in the face of Jesus Christ." From the days of eternity the Lord Jesus Christ was one with the Father; He was "the image of God," the image of His greatness and majesty, "the outshining of His glory." It was to manifest this glory that He came to our world. To this sin-darkened earth He came to reveal the light of God's love,--to be "God with us." Therefore it was prophesied of Him, "His name shall be called Immanuel."


Notice that "the light of the knowledge of the glory of God" is seen "in the face of Jesus Christ." It was too manifest the glory of God that Jesus Christ came. What does this mean? It means that He came to reveal God's character.

Here's another one:

 Quote:
In Christ was arrayed before men the paternal grace and the matchless perfections of the Father. In his prayer just before his crucifixion, he declared, "I have manifested thy name." "I have glorified thee on the earth; I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do." When the object of his mission was attained,--the revelation of God to the world,--the Son of God announced that his work was accomplished, and that the character of the Father was made manifest to men.(ST 1/20/90)


Jesus Christ glorified God by revealing Him.

 Quote:
The Old Testament sheds light upon the New, and the New upon the Old. Each is a revelation of the glory of God in Christ. Both present truths that will continually reveal new depths of meaning to the earnest seeker. {COL 128.3}


This is clearly referring to God's character.

 Quote:
The glory of God, His majesty and power, were to be revealed in all their prosperity. {COL 288.3}


This too. The Gospel is the power of God, and the Gospel reveals God's character.

 Quote:
Their countenances were lighted up with the glory of God; and they shone with the glory, as did the face of Moses when he came down from Sinai. {CET 95.3}

When John in his mortal state beheld the glory of God, he fell as one dead: he was not able to endure the sight. {CET 233.1}


The character of God is awesome!
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/15/08 09:42 PM

 Quote:
DA 107, 108
To sin, wherever found, "our God is a consuming fire." Heb. 12:29. In all who submit to His power the Spirit of God will consume sin. But if men cling to sin, they become identified with it. Then the glory of God, which destroys sin, must destroy them. Jacob, after his night of wrestling with the Angel, exclaimed, "I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved." Gen. 32: 30. Jacob had been guilty of a great sin in his conduct toward Esau; but he had repented. His transgression had been forgiven, and his sin purged; therefore he could endure the revelation of God's presence. But wherever men came before God while willfully cherishing evil, they were destroyed. At the second advent of Christ the wicked shall be consumed "with the Spirit of His mouth," and destroyed "with the brightness of His coming." 2 Thess. 2:8. The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked. {DA 107.4}

"The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked." It is not God's character that causes sinners to die; rather, it is the light that shines out from Him physical person that causes sinners to die. The light that radiates from God's physical person causes sinners to suffer and die - not His character.

Also, the expression - the glory of God - is used in many different ways, and means many different things. It doesn't always and only refer to the character traits of God. The quotes I posted above demonstrate it.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/15/08 10:29 PM

 Quote:
MM: This expression is used in many different ways, and means many different things. Both John and Stephen saw the glory of God and it didn't kill him.

TE: The glory of God is His character. Why should that kill John and Stephen?

For the same reason God had to shield His glory when He showed it to Moses on the mount. Sinful flesh cannot withstand the intense, radiant light that shine forth from God's physical person. Not even Jesus, while here in sinful flesh, could appear in the unveiled presence of God without being consumed.

"Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth." Zech 14:12

 Quote:
MM: Tom, surely you agree with the idea that Satan will be able to initially motivate the wicked to overthrow the New Jerusalem, to gain access to the tree of life, to eat and live forever. Do you agree?

TE: Do you have some quote in mind here? Satan is capable of a great deal. I wouldn't put this past him.

Yes, the following passage describes what happens after Jesus raises the wicked at the end of time: 1) they see the glory of God without being consumed by it, 2) the force of truth causes them to acknowledge Jesus without it causing them to seek death, 3) they prepare to take the New Jerusalem by force, and 4) the brightness of God's glory encompasses the earth and sinners without causing them to die.

 Quote:
At the close of the thousand years, Christ again returns to the earth. He is accompanied by the host of the redeemed and attended by a retinue of angels. As He descends in terrific majesty He bids the wicked dead arise to receive their doom. They come forth, a mighty host, numberless as the sands of the sea. What a contrast to those who were raised at the first resurrection! The righteous were clothed with immortal youth and beauty. The wicked bear the traces of disease and death. {GC 662.1}
Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips. As the wicked went into their graves, so they come forth with the same enmity to Christ and the same spirit of rebellion. They are to have no new probation in which to remedy the defects of their past lives. Nothing would be gained by this. A lifetime of transgression has not softened their hearts. A second probation, were it given them, would be occupied as was the first in evading the requirements of God and exciting rebellion against Him. {GC 662.2}
Christ descends upon the Mount of Olives, whence, after His resurrection, He ascended, and where angels repeated the promise of His return. Says the prophet: "The Lord my God
663
shall come, and all the saints with Thee." "And His feet shall stand in that day upon the Mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the Mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof, . . . and there shall be a very great valley." "And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and His name one." Zechariah 14:5, 4, 9. As the New Jerusalem, in its dazzling splendor, comes down out of heaven, it rests upon the place purified and made ready to receive it, and Christ, with His people and the angels, enters the Holy City. {GC 662.3}
Now Satan prepares for a last mighty struggle for the supremacy. While deprived of his power and cut off from his work of deception, the prince of evil was miserable and dejected; but as the wicked dead are raised and he sees the vast multitudes upon his side, his hopes revive, and he determines not to yield the great controversy. He will marshal all the armies of the lost under his banner and through them endeavor to execute his plans. The wicked are Satan's captives. In rejecting Christ they have accepted the rule of the rebel leader. They are ready to receive his suggestions and to do his bidding. Yet, true to his early cunning, he does not acknowledge himself to be Satan. He claims to be the prince who is the rightful owner of the world and whose inheritance has been unlawfully wrested from him. He represents himself to his deluded subjects as a redeemer, assuring them that his power has brought them forth from their graves and that he is about to rescue them from the most cruel tyranny. The presence of Christ having been removed, Satan works wonders to support his claims. He makes the weak strong and inspires all with his own spirit and energy. He proposes to lead them against the camp of the saints and to take possession of the City of God. With fiendish exultation he points to the unnumbered millions who have been raised from the dead and declares that as their leader he is well able to overthrow the city and regain his throne and his kingdom.
664
{GC 663.1}
In that vast throng are multitudes of the long-lived race that existed before the Flood; men of lofty stature and giant intellect, who, yielding to the control of fallen angels, devoted all their skill and knowledge to the exaltation of themselves; men whose wonderful works of art led the world to idolize their genius, but whose cruelty and evil inventions, defiling the earth and defacing the image of God, caused Him to blot them from the face of His creation. There are kings and generals who conquered nations, valiant men who never lost a battle, proud, ambitious warriors whose approach made kingdoms tremble. In death these experienced no change. As they come up from the grave, they resume the current of their thoughts just where it ceased. They are actuated by the same desire to conquer that ruled them when they fell. {GC 664.1}
Satan consults with his angels, and then with these kings and conquerors and mighty men. They look upon the strength and numbers on their side, and declare that the army within the city is small in comparison with theirs, and that it can be overcome. They lay their plans to take possession of the riches and glory of the New Jerusalem. All immediately begin to prepare for battle. Skillful artisans construct implements of war. Military leaders, famed for their success, marshal the throngs of warlike men into companies and divisions. {GC 664.2}
At last the order to advance is given, and the countless host moves on--an army such as was never summoned by earthly conquerors, such as the combined forces of all ages since war began on earth could never equal. Satan, the mightiest of warriors, leads the van, and his angels unite their forces for this final struggle. Kings and warriors are in his train, and the multitudes follow in vast companies, each under its appointed leader. With military precision the serried ranks advance over the earth's broken and uneven surface to the City of God. By command of Jesus, the gates of the New Jerusalem are closed, and the armies of Satan surround the city and make ready for the onset.
665
{GC 664.3}
Now Christ again appears to the view of His enemies. Far above the city, upon a foundation of burnished gold, is a throne, high and lifted up. Upon this throne sits the Son of God, and around Him are the subjects of His kingdom. The power and majesty of Christ no language can describe, no pen portray. The glory of the Eternal Father is enshrouding His Son. The brightness of His presence fills the City of God, and flows out beyond the gates, flooding the whole earth with its radiance. {GC 665.1}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/16/08 05:44 AM

 Quote:
"The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked." It is not God's character that causes sinners to die; rather, it is the light that shines out from Him physical person that causes sinners to die. The light that radiates from God's physical person causes sinners to suffer and die - not His character.


No, it's the revelation of His character. God's glory is His character, not light that shines from His physical person.

The whole issue from beginning to end is one of character. Satan causes a rebellion by misrepresenting God's character. The whole Great Controversy is about making clear the truth about God's character. The whole purpose of Jesus' mission was the revelation of God's character. The last message of mercy to be given to the world, which will prepare the world for the coming of Christ, is a message of God's character.

The other half of the equation regarding the light of the glory of God slaying the wicked is that it gives life to the wicked. That which gives life is to know God (John 17:3,4). It is not light shining from His physical presence, but the knowledge of God that gives life. His character is the important thing.

 Quote:
Also, the expression - the glory of God - is used in many different ways, and means many different things. It doesn't always and only refer to the character traits of God. The quotes I posted above demonstrate it.


"The glory of God is His character" EGW writes. A short while later, she writes, "God's glory - His character" repeating the thought.

The glory of God, His character, is revealed by Jesus Christ, who is a stone of stumbling for the unbelieving, but the way of life for those who believe. When we've seen Jesus, we've seen the Father, and knowing God is life eternal.

 Quote:
Not even Jesus, while here in sinful flesh, could appear in the unveiled presence of God without being consumed.


I've seen you assert this quite a few times, but I haven't seen any support for the idea. You remember that Jesus was God, right? So God would be consumed by God just by being in His presence?

Everything I've seen about God's being a consuming fire has to do with sin, but Jesus was sinless, so why should He be consumed? I guess because He had flesh, but why should having flesh cause Him to be consumed by God's physical presence?

 Quote:
"Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth." Zech 14:12


This is talking about the wicked, right? But Jesus was sinless, so this would hardly apply to Him.

MM, you wrote this:

 Quote:
Tom, surely you agree with the idea that Satan will be able to initially motivate the wicked to overthrow the New Jerusalem, to gain access to the tree of life, to eat and live forever. Do you agree?


I didn't see anything in the passage about this. I looked a little bit in EGW's writings, and couldn't find anywhere that made this assertion. Do you have some passage in mind that talks about the wicked wanting to gain access to the tree of life say they can live forever?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/16/08 07:45 PM

DA 107
At the second advent of Christ the wicked shall be consumed "with the Spirit of His mouth," and destroyed "with the brightness of His coming." 2 Thess. 2:8. The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked. {DA 107.4}

Tom, in this quote it says the "light" is what causes the righteous to live and the wicked to die. Sinful flesh cannot survive the brightness of God's unveiled light. The light of God's glory, like sunlight, effects things differently depending on its material composition. Like sunlight, God's light can take life or give life.

---

TE: The whole Great Controversy is about making clear the truth about God's character. The whole purpose of Jesus' mission was the revelation of God's character.

MM: Not at the end of time. By then the GC will have been settled. The only thing left to do is to execute the death penalty on those sinners who rejected Jesus. Common phrases like "the execution of judgment" and "the execution of the death penalty" make it clear that resurrected sinners will not die of natural causes. When someone dies of natural causes nobody says, God executed the death penalty on them.

For example, here's how Sister White uses the phrase: "Under the Roman rule the Sanhedrin could not execute the sentence of death." (DA 698) It should be obvious from the context that executing the death sentence means killing someone - not allowing them to die of natural causes. Here it is again:

GC 299
"Behold," he declared, "the Lord cometh with ten thousands of His saints, to execute judgment upon all." Jude 14, 15. {GC 299}

EW 52
Said the angel, "It is the wrath of God and the Lamb that causes the destruction or death of the wicked. At the voice of God the saints will be mighty and terrible as an army with banners, but they will not then execute the judgment written. The execution of the judgment will be at the close of the one thousand years." {EW 52.1}

---

TE: Everything I've seen about God's being a consuming fire has to do with sin, but Jesus was sinless, so why should He be consumed? I guess because He had flesh, but why should having flesh cause Him to be consumed by God's physical presence?

MM: Jesus became sin for us; thus, His sinful flesh humanity wold have consumed in the unveiled physical presence of God. "To sin, wherever found, 'our God is a consuming fire.'" Of course, Jesus' divinity would not have been consumed.

"Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth." (Zech 14:12) This is what happens to sinful flesh when it is exposed to the unveiled brightness of God.

---

TE: I didn't see anything in the passage about this. I looked a little bit in EGW's writings, and couldn't find anywhere that made this assertion. Do you have some passage in mind that talks about the wicked wanting to gain access to the tree of life say they can live forever?

MM: Again, the passage posted above describes what happens after Jesus raises the wicked at the end of time:

1) they see the glory of God without being consumed by it,

2) the force of truth causes them to acknowledge Jesus without it causing them to seek death,

3) they prepare to take the New Jerusalem by force, and

4) the brightness of God's glory encompasses the earth and sinners without causing them to die.

First of all, please notice that neither the truth nor the brightness of God's glory causes the sinners to die or to desire death. This totally refutes your assertions, right? Next, in spite of being exposed to the truth and the light of God's brightness, they marshal their forces to take the New Jerusalem by force. Thus, again, disproving your claims.

Now, why are they motivated to take the New Jerusalem by force? Why do they want to occupy it? Inside the city is the tree of life, right? Is it stretching the truth too much to imagine them wanting free access to the tree of life in order to live forever? I don't think so. In light of the following insights, it makes perfect sense to me:

SR 27
His followers were seeking him, and he aroused himself and, assuming a look of defiance, informed them of his plans to wrest from God the noble Adam and his companion Eve. If he could in any way beguile them to disobedience, God would make some provision whereby they might be pardoned, and then himself and all the fallen angels would be in a fair way to share with them of God's mercy. If this should fail, they could unite with Adam and Eve, for when once they should transgress the law of God they would be subjects of God's wrath, like themselves. Their transgression would place them, also, in a state of rebellion, and they could unite with Adam and Eve, take possession of Eden, and hold it as their home. And if they could gain access to the tree of life in the midst of the garden, their strength would, they thought, be equal to that of the holy angels, and even God Himself could not expel them. {SR 27.3}

EW 51
I was pointed to Adam and Eve in Eden. They partook of the forbidden tree and were driven from the garden, and then the flaming sword was placed around the tree of life, lest they should partake of its fruit and be immortal sinners. The tree of life was to perpetuate immortality. I heard an angel ask, "Who of the family of Adam have passed the flaming sword and have partaken of the tree of life?" I heard another angel answer, "Not one of Adam's family has passed that flaming sword and partaken of that tree; therefore there is not an immortal sinner. The soul that sinneth it shall die an everlasting death--a death that will last forever, from which there will be no hope of a resurrection; and then the wrath of God will be appeased. {EW 51.2}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/17/08 05:00 AM

Regarding the light of God's glory, I did a search of every reference I could find from the Spirit of Prophecy, and could not find a single reference where it represents a physical light shining from God's physical presence. I'll present some of the texts I found:

 Quote:
The light of the knowledge of the glory of God" is seen "in the face of Jesus Christ." (DA 19)


She says this many times. This is obviously not speaking of God's physical presence.

 Quote:
Lucifer in heaven had sinned in the light of God's glory. Lucifer in heaven had sinned in the light of God's glory. To him as to no other created being was given a revelation of God's love.(DA 761)


Here she clearly links the light of God's glory with His character ("a revelation of God's love").

 Quote:
From the days of eternity the Lord Jesus Christ was one with the Father; He was "the image of God," the image of His greatness and majesty, "the outshining of his glory." It was to manifest this glory that He came to our world. To this sin-darkened earth He came to reveal the light of God's love--to be "God with us." (GAG 45)


Here she links the "outshining of his glory" with "the light of God's love."

 Quote:
No church can have light if it fails to diffuse the glory it receives from the throne of God. (GAG 95)


This is clearly not referencing light from God's physical presence.

 Quote:
His face and form were all aglow with the light of the glory of God. (Story of Jesus 42)


This is an especially clear one, as it uses the very phrase "light of the glory of God." This is speaking of Jesus Christ in the flesh, so is clearly not speaking of God's physical presence.

 Quote:
It is the light from God that discovers our darkness and destitution. When the divine glory was revealed to Daniel, he exclaimed, "My comeliness was turned in me into corruption, and I retained no strength" (Daniel 10:8).” (Ye Shall Receive Power 27)


This is a particularly good reference as well as it brings out the effect of the revelation of God's character. Here we see its effect upon a saint! Imagine what the effect upon the wicked would be.

 Quote:
And in this last generation the parable of the mustard seed is to reach a signal and triumphant fulfillment. The little seed will become a tree. The last message of warning and mercy is to go to "every nation and kindred and tongue" (Revelation 14:6-14), "to take out of them a people for His name" (Acts 15:14; Revelation 18:1). And the earth shall be lightened with His glory. (COL 79)


Here she speaks of the earth being lightened by the glory of God. (btw, she often relates this lightening to the 1888 message). Notice that it is a message which does this. Here's another reference to this message:

 Quote:
It is the darkness of misapprehension of God that is enshrouding the world. Men are losing their knowledge of His character. It has been misunderstood and misinterpreted. At this time a message from God is to be proclaimed, a message illuminating in its influence and saving in its power. His character is to be made known. Into the darkness of the world is to be shed the light of His glory, the light of His goodness, mercy, and truth....The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love. (COL 415)


Yet again theh "light of His glory" is related not to His physical presence, but to God's character.

Over and over and over again we see this connection made. The light which destroys, or gives life, is not physical light, but spiritual light.

Ok, not for the coup de grace. Here's the statement in question:

 Quote:
The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.


Notice what follows!

 Quote:
In the time of John the Baptist, Christ was about to appear as the revealer of the character of God. His very presence would make manifest to men their sin. Only as they were willing to be purged from sin could they enter into fellowship with Him. Only the pure in heart could abide in His presence. (DA 108)


The context makes extremely clear what's happening here. This is speaking of the "character of God," just as we would suspect!
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/17/08 05:07 AM

 Quote:
TE: Everything I've seen about God's being a consuming fire has to do with sin, but Jesus was sinless, so why should He be consumed? I guess because He had flesh, but why should having flesh cause Him to be consumed by God's physical presence?

MM: Jesus became sin for us; thus, His sinful flesh humanity wold have consumed in the unveiled physical presence of God.


You've argued in other posts that the flesh of itself cannot sin. When she writes about God's glory consuming, she speaks of Jesus Christ as being the one who exemplifies this!!

 Quote:
The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.

In the time of John the Baptist, Christ was about to appear as the revealer of the character of God. His very presence would make manifest to men their sin. Only as they were willing to be purged from sin could they enter into fellowship with Him. Only the pure in heart could abide in His presence. (DA 108)


See, this is speaking of Jesus Christ as the revealer of the character of God. He is the light of the glory of God that gives life to the righteous but slays the wicked, because He is the revealer of God's character. Notice it says that only the pure in heart could abide in His presence.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/17/08 05:26 AM

 Quote:
First of all, please notice that neither the truth nor the brightness of God's glory causes the sinners to die or to desire death. This totally refutes your assertions, right? Next, in spite of being exposed to the truth and the light of God's brightness, they marshal their forces to take the New Jerusalem by force. Thus, again, disproving your claims.


MM, I must admit I don't understand you're argument here. This whole discussion started because you claimed that the only thing that stops the wicked from attacking the New Jerusalem is literal fire from heaven. But simply reading the GC shows this is not so. God reveals the truth to them, and that stops them in their tracks. The fire from heaven which destroys them is the same thing she speaks about in DA 108. She explains clearly how this works:

 Quote:
In all who submit to His power the Spirit of God will consume sin. But if men cling to sin, they become identified with it. Then the glory of God, which destroys sin, must destroy them. Jacob, after his night of wrestling with the Angel, exclaimed, "I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved." Gen. 32: 30.

Jacob had been guilty of a great sin in his conduct toward Esau; but he had repented. His transgression had been forgiven, and his sin purged; therefore he could endure the revelation of God's presence. But wherever men came before God while willfully cherishing evil, they were destroyed. At the second advent of Christ the wicked shall be consumed "with the Spirit of His mouth," and destroyed "with the brightness of His coming." 2 Thess. 2:8. The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.

In the time of John the Baptist, Christ was about to appear as the revealer of the character of God. His very presence would make manifest to men their sin. Only as they were willing to be purged from sin could they enter into fellowship with Him. Only the pure in heart could abide in His presence. (DA 107, 108)


You claim that the truth does not cause the wicked to desire death, but it's easy to see that it does.

 Quote:
Those who have chosen Satan as their leader and have been controlled by his power are not prepared to enter the presence of God. Pride, deception, licentiousness, cruelty, have become fixed in their characters. Can they enter heaven to dwell forever with those whom they despised and hated on earth? Truth will never be agreeable to a liar; meekness will not satisfy self-esteem and pride; purity is not acceptable to the corrupt; disinterested love does not appear attractive to the selfish. What source of enjoyment could heaven offer to those who are wholly absorbed in earthly and selfish interests?

Could those whose lives have been spent in rebellion against God be suddenly transported to heaven and witness the high, the holy state of perfection that ever exists there,-- every soul filled with love, every countenance beaming with joy, enrapturing music in melodious strains rising in honor of God and the Lamb, and ceaseless streams of light flowing upon the redeemed from the face of Him who sitteth upon the throne,--could those whose hearts are filled with hatred of God, of truth and holiness, mingle with the heavenly throng and join their songs of praise? Could they endure the glory of God and the Lamb? No, no; years of probation were granted them, that they might form characters for heaven; but they have never trained the mind to love purity; they have never learned the language of heaven, and now it is too late. A life of rebellion against God has unfitted them for heaven. Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them. The destiny of the wicked is fixed by their own choice. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, and just and merciful on the part of God.(GC 542, 543)


Note in particular the underlined part (in the quote above).

 Quote:
God is the fountain of life; and when one chooses the service of sin, he separates from God, and thus cuts himself off from life. He is "alienated from the life of God." Christ says, "All they that hate Me love death."(DA 764)


The "love" here means "choose" or "prefer" (similar to "hate" having to do with preference, as in Christ's speaking of the necessity of "hating" one's family members).

The wicked choose death. They prefer it to spending eternity with God. Their exclusion from eternal life is voluntary with themselves, and just and merciful on the part of God.

Your interpretation is totally contrary to the principles EGW is expressing.

 Quote:
Rebellion was not to be overcome by force. Compelling power is found only under Satan's government. The Lord's principles are not of this order. His authority rests upon goodness, mercy, and love; and the presentation of these principles is the means to be used. God's government is moral, and truth and love are to be the prevailing power.(DA 759)


She says that rebellion was not to be overcome by force, but you say it is. She says that compelling power is found only under Satan's government, but you say it's only compelling power that stops the wicked. She says that the presentation of goodness, mercy and love is the means to be used, which is just what I've been saying. It is by means of the presentation of goodness, mercy, and love that the rebellion is put down. Not by force, violence, or compelling power.

There are two roads one can travel. One road is based on the principles of God, which is the law of life for the universe. It is characterized by receiving from God, and giving to others (God, and one's fellow). On this road lies joy, peace, and life.

The other road is based on the principles of the enemy. It is a road where one lives by taking from God and from others that which is not one's property. These principles are the principles of lying, thievery, and murder. On this road lies suffering, pain, and death.

God does all He can to convince us to walk on the road of blessing, the road of life. He will not compel us to walk on this road, because He is a God of love, and love is based on freedom.

If we choose the road of selfishness, we will die. Not because God burns us for having the audacity of disobeying Him, but because there can be no end but death on the road of selfishness. Selfishness is not a principle that can give life. It just can't. The death of those who serve self is not due to an arbitrary act of God's power, but is the result of one's own choice.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/17/08 11:00 PM

Tom, thank you for that enlightening study on the light of the glory of God. I appreciate all the time and effort you invested. I did a similar search. In many cases the word “light” refers to the truth. In other cases it refers to godly traits of character. And in some cases it refers to a divine physical form of light, and has been witnessed in different settings – in the air, around the throne, or reflected on people’s faces, as in the cases of Jesus, Moses, Stephen, etc.

It is evident in Scripture that God must regulate the intensity of the divine light that radiates from His physical form; otherwise, sinful flesh cannot endure it, cannot survive in its presence. The best example of this is the following passage:

 Quote:
Exodus
33:17 And the LORD said unto Moses, I will do this thing also that thou hast spoken: for thou hast found grace in my sight, and I know thee by name.
33:18 And he said, I beseech thee, show me thy glory.
33:19 And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the LORD before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy.
33:20 And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live.
33:21 And the LORD said, Behold, [there is] a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock:
33:22 And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by:
33:23 And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen.

34:5 And the LORD descended in the cloud, and stood with him there, and proclaimed the name of the LORD.
34:6 And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth,
34:7 Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear [the guilty]; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth [generation].
34:8 And Moses made haste, and bowed his head toward the earth, and worshipped.

34:29 And it came to pass, when Moses came down from mount Sinai with the two tables of testimony in Moses' hand, when he came down from the mount, that Moses wist not that the skin of his face shone while he talked with him.
34:30 And when Aaron and all the children of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of his face shone; and they were afraid to come nigh him.
34:31 And Moses called unto them; and Aaron and all the rulers of the congregation returned unto him: and Moses talked with them.
34:32 And afterward all the children of Israel came nigh: and he gave them in commandment all that the LORD had spoken with him in mount Sinai.
34:33 And [till] Moses had done speaking with them, he put a veil on his face.
34:34 But when Moses went in before the LORD to speak with him, he took the veil off, until he came out. And he came out, and spake unto the children of Israel [that] which he was commanded.
34:35 And the children of Israel saw the face of Moses, that the skin of Moses' face shone: and Moses put the veil upon his face again, until he went in to speak with him.

The interesting thing about this story is the effect that the light that radiates from God’s physical person had upon Moses’ exposed skin, his face. It made the skin on his face shine. And the light was so intense he had to wear veil to prevent it from hurting those around him.

From this I am encouraged to conclude that the light that radiates from God’s physical person is so intense that it causes sinful flesh to consume away like wax. “Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.” Thus, God is forced to hide the full intensity of radiant glory or we shall melt in His presence.

The following passages represent the different forms and effects of the light that radiates from God's physical person:

DA 137
The next day John sees Jesus coming. With the light of the glory of God resting upon him, the prophet stretches out his hands, declaring, "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world! {DA 137.1}

EW 198
As Stephen stood before his judges, the light of the glory of God rested upon his countenance. "And all that sat in the council, looking steadfastly on him, saw his face as it had been the face of an angel." {EW 198.1}

LHU 78
Direct from the throne proceeded the light of the glory of God. The heavens were opened, and beams of light and glory proceeded therefrom and assumed the form of a dove, in appearance like burnished gold. {LHU 78.5}

ML 33
Let us raise our eyes to the open door of the sanctuary above, where the light of the glory of God shines in the face of Christ, who "is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by Him." {ML 33.5}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/17/08 11:05 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
TE: Everything I've seen about God's being a consuming fire has to do with sin, but Jesus was sinless, so why should He be consumed? I guess because He had flesh, but why should having flesh cause Him to be consumed by God's physical presence?

MM: Jesus became sin for us; thus, His sinful flesh humanity wold have consumed in the unveiled physical presence of God.


You've argued in other posts that the flesh of itself cannot sin. When she writes about God's glory consuming, she speaks of Jesus Christ as being the one who exemplifies this!!

 Quote:
The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.

In the time of John the Baptist, Christ was about to appear as the revealer of the character of God. His very presence would make manifest to men their sin. Only as they were willing to be purged from sin could they enter into fellowship with Him. Only the pure in heart could abide in His presence. (DA 108)


See, this is speaking of Jesus Christ as the revealer of the character of God. He is the light of the glory of God that gives life to the righteous but slays the wicked, because He is the revealer of God's character. Notice it says that only the pure in heart could abide in His presence.

And yet Judas abode in the unveiled presence of Jesus without ill effect. Not so with Moses. God was forced to veil His face because it would have consumed the flesh right off Moses; as it was, seeing God's "back parts" caused the skin on Moses' face to shine so brightly that those around him could not bear to behold it.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/18/08 01:10 AM

TE: God reveals the truth to them, and that stops them in their tracks. You claim that the truth does not cause the wicked to desire death, but it's easy to see that it does.

MM: Not according to the passage I quoted above. It says the exact opposite. Neither the truth nor the brightness of God's glory causes the sinners to die or to desire death. Instead, they are motivated to marshal their forces to take the New Jerusalem by force. It's right there in black and white, Tom.

Later on, in the same chapter, after the Great White Throne judgment is ended, they turn upon one another. In the throes of this slaughter, God causes fire from above and below to engulf the planet. Sinners suffer in duration and in proportion to their sinfulness. The same fires burn up the rubble of earth along with the wicked dead. The truth, therefore, is far from what you wrote. Instead, everything that happens to them after the second resurrection causes them to fight - not desire death.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/18/08 01:11 AM

TE: The whole Great Controversy is about making clear the truth about God's character. The whole purpose of Jesus' mission was the revelation of God's character.

MM: Not at the end of time. By then the GC will have been settled. The only thing left to do is to execute the death penalty on those sinners who rejected Jesus. Common phrases like "the execution of judgment" and "the execution of the death penalty" make it clear that resurrected sinners will not die of natural causes. When someone dies of natural causes nobody says, God executed the death penalty on them.

For example, here's how Sister White uses the phrase: "Under the Roman rule the Sanhedrin could not execute the sentence of death." (DA 698) It should be obvious from the context that executing the death sentence means killing someone - not allowing them to die of natural causes. Here it is again:

GC 299
"Behold," he declared, "the Lord cometh with ten thousands of His saints, to execute judgment upon all." Jude 14, 15. {GC 299}

EW 52
Said the angel, "It is the wrath of God and the Lamb that causes the destruction or death of the wicked. At the voice of God the saints will be mighty and terrible as an army with banners, but they will not then execute the judgment written. The execution of the judgment will be at the close of the one thousand years." {EW 52.1}

---

TE: Everything I've seen about God's being a consuming fire has to do with sin, but Jesus was sinless, so why should He be consumed? I guess because He had flesh, but why should having flesh cause Him to be consumed by God's physical presence?

MM: Jesus became sin for us; thus, His sinful flesh humanity wold have consumed in the unveiled physical presence of God. "To sin, wherever found, 'our God is a consuming fire.'" Of course, Jesus' divinity would not have been consumed.

"Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth." (Zech 14:12) This is what happens to sinful flesh when it is exposed to the unveiled brightness of God.

---

TE: I didn't see anything in the passage about this. I looked a little bit in EGW's writings, and couldn't find anywhere that made this assertion. Do you have some passage in mind that talks about the wicked wanting to gain access to the tree of life say they can live forever?

MM: Again, the passage posted above describes what happens after Jesus raises the wicked at the end of time:

1) they see the glory of God without being consumed by it,

2) the force of truth causes them to acknowledge Jesus without it causing them to seek death,

3) they prepare to take the New Jerusalem by force, and

4) the brightness of God's glory encompasses the earth and sinners without causing them to die.

First of all, please notice that neither the truth nor the brightness of God's glory causes the sinners to die or to desire death. This totally refutes your assertions, right? Next, in spite of being exposed to the truth and the light of God's brightness, they marshal their forces to take the New Jerusalem by force. Thus, again, disproving your claims.

Now, why are they motivated to take the New Jerusalem by force? Why do they want to occupy it? Inside the city is the tree of life, right? Is it stretching the truth too much to imagine them wanting free access to the tree of life in order to live forever? I don't think so. In light of the following insights, it makes perfect sense to me:

SR 27
His followers were seeking him, and he aroused himself and, assuming a look of defiance, informed them of his plans to wrest from God the noble Adam and his companion Eve. If he could in any way beguile them to disobedience, God would make some provision whereby they might be pardoned, and then himself and all the fallen angels would be in a fair way to share with them of God's mercy. If this should fail, they could unite with Adam and Eve, for when once they should transgress the law of God they would be subjects of God's wrath, like themselves. Their transgression would place them, also, in a state of rebellion, and they could unite with Adam and Eve, take possession of Eden, and hold it as their home. And if they could gain access to the tree of life in the midst of the garden, their strength would, they thought, be equal to that of the holy angels, and even God Himself could not expel them. {SR 27.3}

EW 51
I was pointed to Adam and Eve in Eden. They partook of the forbidden tree and were driven from the garden, and then the flaming sword was placed around the tree of life, lest they should partake of its fruit and be immortal sinners. The tree of life was to perpetuate immortality. I heard an angel ask, "Who of the family of Adam have passed the flaming sword and have partaken of the tree of life?" I heard another angel answer, "Not one of Adam's family has passed that flaming sword and partaken of that tree; therefore there is not an immortal sinner. The soul that sinneth it shall die an everlasting death--a death that will last forever, from which there will be no hope of a resurrection; and then the wrath of God will be appeased. {EW 51.2}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/18/08 05:52 AM

 Quote:
Tom, thank you for that enlightening study on the light of the glory of God. I appreciate all the time and effort you invested. I did a similar search. In many cases the word “light” refers to the truth. In other cases it refers to godly traits of character. And in some cases it refers to a divine physical form of light, and has been witnessed in different settings – in the air, around the throne, or reflected on people’s faces, as in the cases of Jesus, Moses, Stephen, etc.


Regarding Moses' face shining, here are some SOP statements:

 Quote:
Soon we heard the voice of God like many waters, which gave us the day and hour of Jesus' coming. The living saints, 144,000 in number, knew and understood the voice, while the wicked thought it was thunder and an earthquake. When God spoke the time, He poured upon us the Holy Ghost, and our faces began to light up and shine with the glory of God, as Moses' did when he came down from Mount Sinai. Christian Experience and Teachings of Ellen G. White (1922), page 58


Note the faces of the 144,000 shine with the glory of God, as did Moses', because of being filled by the Holy Ghost.

 Quote:
During that long time spent in communion with God, the face of Moses had reflected the glory of the divine Presence; unknown to himself his face shone with a dazzling light when he descended from the mountain. Such a light illumined the countenance of Stephen when brought before his judges; "and all that sat in the council, looking stedfastly on him, saw his face as it had been the face of an angel" (Acts 6:15).” (To Be Like Jesus 35)


Note that Stephen's face shone like Moses' did. What is it that causes this shining of the face? Clearly it's not a physical manifestation of God, but a spiritual one.

 Quote:
By this brightness God designed to impress upon Israel the sacred, exalted character of His law, and the glory of the gospel revealed through Christ. While Moses was in the mount, God presented to him, not only the tables of the law, but also the plan of salvation. He saw that the sacrifice of Christ was prefigured by all the types and symbols of the Jewish age; and it was the heavenly light streaming from Calvary, no less than the glory of the law of God, that shed such a radiance upon the face of Moses. That divine illumination symbolized the glory of the dispensation of which Moses was the visible mediator, a representative of the one true Intercessor. (ibid 35)


This explains further the spiritual nature of this light of glory reflected on Moses' face.

 Quote:
The glory upon the face of Moses was exceedingly painful to the children of Israel because of their transgression of God's holy law. This is an illustration of the feelings of those who violate the law of God. They desire to remove from its penetrating light which is a terror to the transgressor, while it seems holy, just, and good to the loyal. (1SM 232)


This ties into our discussion regarding the destruction of the wicked. Notice the similarity to the statement in DA 107, 108. To the righteous, the light is desirable. But to the unrighteous, the light is painful. Why? Because they have sinful flesh? No, since the righteous also have sinful flesh. It is a "penetrating light" which is a terror to the transgressor.

Do you see what's going on, MM? This light is light which opens the soul.

 Quote:
As soon as the books of record are opened, and the eye of Jesus looks upon the wicked, they are conscious of every sin which they have ever committed. They see just where their feet diverged from the path of purity and holiness, just how far pride and rebellion have carried them in the violation of the law of God. The seductive temptations which they encouraged by indulgence in sin, the blessings perverted, the messengers of God despised, the warnings rejected, the waves of mercy beaten back by the stubborn, unrepentant heart--all appear as if written in letters of fire. (GC 666)


This is the same thing. This is the light of the glory of God. It's a revelation of the truth by Jesus Christ. Notice that what Christ reveals "all appear as if written in letters of fire."

Jesus Christ is the light of the glory of God, who gives life to the righteous, but slays the wicked. Notice the revelation of truth "all appear as if written in letters of fire." This is the fire that comes down from heaven that destroys the wicked.

This is a spiritual truth, MM. The fire, the light of the glory of God, are spiritual things, spiritual manifestations.

How can God communicate spiritual truths in a vision? He does so by physical symbols. It's up to us to interpret these symbols. God has certainly given us more than an ample amount of material to do so.

Jesus Christ is the light of the glory of God. It is He who gives life to the righteous. Notice when the unrighteous are advancing upon the city, what happens to stop them?

 Quote:
At last the order to advance is given, and the countless host moves on--an army such as was never summoned by earthly conquerors, such as the combined forces of all ages since war began on earth could never equal. ... With military precision the serried ranks advance over the earth's broken and uneven surface to the City of God. By command of Jesus, the gates of the New Jerusalem are closed, and the armies of Satan surround the city and make ready for the onset.

Now Christ again appears to the view of His enemies. Far above the city, upon a foundation of burnished gold, is a throne, high and lifted up. Upon this throne sits the Son of God, and around Him are the subjects of His kingdom. The power and majesty of Christ no language can describe, no pen portray.


It is the uplifting of Jesus Christ! Not force, but light. Not physical light, but spiritual light, namely the "light of the world."

Let's go back to DA 108 for a moment:

[quote]The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.In the time of John the Baptist, Christ was about to appear as the revealer of the character of God. His very presence would make manifest to men their sin.[quote]

See how this all ties together? Jesus Christ, the revealer of the character of God, is the light of the glory of God. "light" = "revealer"; "character" = "glory." It all fits together wonderfully.

I hope you see the light. \:\)
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/18/08 06:12 AM

 Quote:
And yet Judas abode in the unveiled presence of Jesus without ill effect. Not so with Moses. God was forced to veil His face because it would have consumed the flesh right off Moses; as it was, seeing God's "back parts" caused the skin on Moses' face to shine so brightly that those around him could not bear to behold it.


First of all, regarding Jesus:

 Quote:
So Christ was to come in "the body of our humiliation" (Philippians 3:21, R. V.), "in the likeness of men." In the eyes of the world He possessed no beauty that they should desire Him; yet He was the incarnate God, the light of heaven and earth. His glory was veiled, His greatness and majesty were hidden, that He might draw near to sorrowful, tempted men.(DA 23)


Jesus' glory was veiled.

Regarding Moses, I've dealt with most of this in detail, but I'll make one more point. The glory of God is His character. I'm not understanding how you're missing this in regards to Moses. This can be plainly seen from Scripture. Moses asked God to reveal His glory, and the Lord caused His goodness to pass before him. The Lord revealed His character to Moses. This is very clear.

EGW explains the same thing.

 Quote:
The glory of God is His character. While Moses was in the mount, earnestly interceding with God, He prayed, "I beseech Thee, show me Thy glory." In answer God declared "I will make all My goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the Lord before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy."

The glory of God--His character--was then revealed: "The Lord passed by before him, and proclaimed, The Lord, The Lord God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty."

This character was revealed in the life of Christ. That He might by His own example condemn sin in the flesh, He took upon Himself the likeness of sinful flesh. Constantly He beheld the character of God; constantly He revealed this character to the world. (ST 9/3/02)


That Moses could only see the backside of God is signifying that He could only receive a partial revelation of God's character. It's not talking about God's literal backside. What Moses saw was God's character. What caused his face to shine, was the revelation of God's character.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/18/08 06:18 AM

Regarding #99442, you said that it is only literal fire from heaven that stops the wicked from advancing upon the city. But this is wrong. It is the uplifting of Jesus Christ which stops them.

What caused rebellion in the first place was confusion regarding the character of God. The revelation of the God's character stops it.

That the wicked choose death is stated in DA 764. GC 543 also tells us that their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, while DA 759, and many other passages, tell us that force is not a principle of God's government, but rather of Satan's, and that the rebellion is not overcome by force.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/18/08 06:33 AM

 Quote:
First of all, please notice that neither the truth nor the brightness of God's glory causes the sinners to die or to desire death.


According to DA 108, the light of the glory of God "slays the wicked." According to DA 764 and GC 543, the unrighteous chose death, and voluntarily choose to be excluded from heaven.


 Quote:
This totally refutes your assertions, right?


No, it doesn't. My assertions are clear from DA 764 and GC 543.

 Quote:
Next, in spite of being exposed to the truth and the light of God's brightness, they marshal their forces to take the New Jerusalem by force. Thus, again, disproving your claims.


You've got the events backwards. The revelation of truth and light comes *after* they marshal their forces to take the New Jerusalem by force, not before.

 Quote:
Now, why are they motivated to take the New Jerusalem by force? Why do they want to occupy it? Inside the city is the tree of life, right? Is it stretching the truth too much to imagine them wanting free access to the tree of life in order to live forever? I don't think so. In light of the following insights, it makes perfect sense to me:


It looks like GC 663 explains why the New Jerusalem is attacked.

 Quote:
The wicked are Satan's captives. In rejecting Christ they have accepted the rule of the rebel leader. They are ready to receive his suggestions and to do his bidding. Yet, true to his early cunning, he does not acknowledge himself to be Satan. He claims to be the prince who is the rightful owner of the world and whose inheritance has been unlawfully wrested from him. He represents himself to his deluded subjects as a redeemer, assuring them that his power has brought them forth from their graves and that he is about to rescue them from the most cruel tyranny. The presence of Christ having been removed, Satan works wonders to support his claims. He makes the weak strong and inspires all with his own spirit and energy. He proposes to lead them against the camp of the saints and to take possession of the City of God. With fiendish exultation he points to the unnumbered millions who have been raised from the dead and declares that as their leader he is well able to overthrow the city and regain his throne and his kingdom.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/18/08 05:37 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
Tom, thank you for that enlightening study on the light of the glory of God. I appreciate all the time and effort you invested. I did a similar search. In many cases the word “light” refers to the truth. In other cases it refers to godly traits of character. And in some cases it refers to a divine physical form of light, and has been witnessed in different settings – in the air, around the throne, or reflected on people’s faces, as in the cases of Jesus, Moses, Stephen, etc.


Regarding Moses' face shining, here are some SOP statements:

 Quote:
Soon we heard the voice of God like many waters, which gave us the day and hour of Jesus' coming. The living saints, 144,000 in number, knew and understood the voice, while the wicked thought it was thunder and an earthquake. When God spoke the time, He poured upon us the Holy Ghost, and our faces began to light up and shine with the glory of God, as Moses' did when he came down from Mount Sinai. Christian Experience and Teachings of Ellen G. White (1922), page 58


Note the faces of the 144,000 shine with the glory of God, as did Moses', because of being filled by the Holy Ghost.

 Quote:
During that long time spent in communion with God, the face of Moses had reflected the glory of the divine Presence; unknown to himself his face shone with a dazzling light when he descended from the mountain. Such a light illumined the countenance of Stephen when brought before his judges; "and all that sat in the council, looking stedfastly on him, saw his face as it had been the face of an angel" (Acts 6:15).” (To Be Like Jesus 35)


Note that Stephen's face shone like Moses' did. What is it that causes this shining of the face? Clearly it's not a physical manifestation of God, but a spiritual one.

 Quote:
By this brightness God designed to impress upon Israel the sacred, exalted character of His law, and the glory of the gospel revealed through Christ. While Moses was in the mount, God presented to him, not only the tables of the law, but also the plan of salvation. He saw that the sacrifice of Christ was prefigured by all the types and symbols of the Jewish age; and it was the heavenly light streaming from Calvary, no less than the glory of the law of God, that shed such a radiance upon the face of Moses. That divine illumination symbolized the glory of the dispensation of which Moses was the visible mediator, a representative of the one true Intercessor. (ibid 35)


This explains further the spiritual nature of this light of glory reflected on Moses' face.

 Quote:
The glory upon the face of Moses was exceedingly painful to the children of Israel because of their transgression of God's holy law. This is an illustration of the feelings of those who violate the law of God. They desire to remove from its penetrating light which is a terror to the transgressor, while it seems holy, just, and good to the loyal. (1SM 232)


This ties into our discussion regarding the destruction of the wicked. Notice the similarity to the statement in DA 107, 108. To the righteous, the light is desirable. But to the unrighteous, the light is painful. Why? Because they have sinful flesh? No, since the righteous also have sinful flesh. It is a "penetrating light" which is a terror to the transgressor.

Do you see what's going on, MM? This light is light which opens the soul.

 Quote:
As soon as the books of record are opened, and the eye of Jesus looks upon the wicked, they are conscious of every sin which they have ever committed. They see just where their feet diverged from the path of purity and holiness, just how far pride and rebellion have carried them in the violation of the law of God. The seductive temptations which they encouraged by indulgence in sin, the blessings perverted, the messengers of God despised, the warnings rejected, the waves of mercy beaten back by the stubborn, unrepentant heart--all appear as if written in letters of fire. (GC 666)


This is the same thing. This is the light of the glory of God. It's a revelation of the truth by Jesus Christ. Notice that what Christ reveals "all appear as if written in letters of fire."

Jesus Christ is the light of the glory of God, who gives life to the righteous, but slays the wicked. Notice the revelation of truth "all appear as if written in letters of fire." This is the fire that comes down from heaven that destroys the wicked.

This is a spiritual truth, MM. The fire, the light of the glory of God, are spiritual things, spiritual manifestations.

How can God communicate spiritual truths in a vision? He does so by physical symbols. It's up to us to interpret these symbols. God has certainly given us more than an ample amount of material to do so.

Jesus Christ is the light of the glory of God. It is He who gives life to the righteous. Notice when the unrighteous are advancing upon the city, what happens to stop them?

 Quote:
At last the order to advance is given, and the countless host moves on--an army such as was never summoned by earthly conquerors, such as the combined forces of all ages since war began on earth could never equal. ... With military precision the serried ranks advance over the earth's broken and uneven surface to the City of God. By command of Jesus, the gates of the New Jerusalem are closed, and the armies of Satan surround the city and make ready for the onset.

Now Christ again appears to the view of His enemies. Far above the city, upon a foundation of burnished gold, is a throne, high and lifted up. Upon this throne sits the Son of God, and around Him are the subjects of His kingdom. The power and majesty of Christ no language can describe, no pen portray.


It is the uplifting of Jesus Christ! Not force, but light. Not physical light, but spiritual light, namely the "light of the world."

Let's go back to DA 108 for a moment:

 Quote:
The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.In the time of John the Baptist, Christ was about to appear as the revealer of the character of God. His very presence would make manifest to men their sin.


See how this all ties together? Jesus Christ, the revealer of the character of God, is the light of the glory of God. "light" = "revealer"; "character" = "glory." It all fits together wonderfully.

I hope you see the light. \:\)

TE: How can God communicate spiritual truths in a vision? He does so by physical symbols. It's up to us to interpret these symbols. God has certainly given us more than an ample amount of material to do so.

MM: There is nothing symbolic about the light that radiates from God's physical person. Neither was there anything symbolic about the light that radiated from Moses' face. Light is real; it is not symbolic.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/18/08 05:54 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
And yet Judas abode in the unveiled presence of Jesus without ill effect. Not so with Moses. God was forced to veil His face because it would have consumed the flesh right off Moses; as it was, seeing God's "back parts" caused the skin on Moses' face to shine so brightly that those around him could not bear to behold it.


First of all, regarding Jesus:

 Quote:
So Christ was to come in "the body of our humiliation" (Philippians 3:21, R. V.), "in the likeness of men." In the eyes of the world He possessed no beauty that they should desire Him; yet He was the incarnate God, the light of heaven and earth. His glory was veiled, His greatness and majesty were hidden, that He might draw near to sorrowful, tempted men.(DA 23)


Jesus' glory was veiled.

I was responding to what you wrote, not to the SOP. Here's what you posted:

"See, this is speaking of Jesus Christ [in the time of John the Baptist, DA 108] as the revealer of the character of God. He is the light of the glory of God that gives life to the righteous but slays the wicked, because He is the revealer of God's character. Notice it says that only the pure in heart could abide in His presence."

The way you worded things it made me think you were saying only the pure in heart could abide Jesus' presence without being slain by the light of His glory and brightness. But now you are making it clear this didn't happen while Jesus was here in the flesh. And, of course, I agree.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Regarding Moses, I've dealt with most of this in detail, but I'll make one more point. The glory of God is His character. I'm not understanding how you're missing this in regards to Moses. This can be plainly seen from Scripture. Moses asked God to reveal His glory, and the Lord caused His goodness to pass before him. The Lord revealed His character to Moses. This is very clear.

EGW explains the same thing.

 Quote:
The glory of God is His character. While Moses was in the mount, earnestly interceding with God, He prayed, "I beseech Thee, show me Thy glory." In answer God declared "I will make all My goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the Lord before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy."

The glory of God--His character--was then revealed: "The Lord passed by before him, and proclaimed, The Lord, The Lord God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty."

This character was revealed in the life of Christ. That He might by His own example condemn sin in the flesh, He took upon Himself the likeness of sinful flesh. Constantly He beheld the character of God; constantly He revealed this character to the world. (ST 9/3/02)


That Moses could only see the backside of God is signifying that He could only receive a partial revelation of God's character. It's not talking about God's literal backside. What Moses saw was God's character. What caused his face to shine, was the revelation of God's character.

God didn't "show" His character to Moses on the mount; instead, God expressed it in words. He named several of His traits of character, which was by no means is an exhaustive list of His character traits. And, it wasn't the words that God spoke that made the skin on Moses' face shine so brightly that it hurt people around him; rather, it was light radiating from His physical person that caused Moses' skin to shine.

So, yes, I disagree with the idea that the expression "the glory of God" always and only refers to His many different traits of character. Depending on the contect, it can mean one of many different things.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/18/08 06:23 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
Regarding #99442, you said that it is only literal fire from heaven that stops the wicked from advancing upon the city. But this is wrong. It is the uplifting of Jesus Christ which stops them.

What caused rebellion in the first place was confusion regarding the character of God. The revelation of the God's character stops it.

That the wicked choose death is stated in DA 764. GC 543 also tells us that their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, while DA 759, and many other passages, tell us that force is not a principle of God's government, but rather of Satan's, and that the rebellion is not overcome by force.

Tom, regarding the effect of the truth and the glory of God on the resurrected wicked, please notice the following points highlighted in bold:

 Quote:
At the close of the thousand years, Christ again returns to the earth. He is accompanied by the host of the redeemed and attended by a retinue of angels. As He descends in terrific majesty He bids the wicked dead arise to receive their doom. They come forth, a mighty host, numberless as the sands of the sea. What a contrast to those who were raised at the first resurrection! The righteous were clothed with immortal youth and beauty. The wicked bear the traces of disease and death. {GC 662.1}

Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips. As the wicked went into their graves, so they come forth with the same enmity to Christ and the same spirit of rebellion. They are to have no new probation in which to remedy the defects of their past lives. Nothing would be gained by this. A lifetime of transgression has not softened their hearts. A second probation, were it given them, would be occupied as was the first in evading the requirements of God and exciting rebellion against Him. {GC 662.2}

Christ descends upon the Mount of Olives, whence, after His resurrection, He ascended, and where angels repeated the promise of His return. Says the prophet: "The Lord my God shall come, and all the saints with Thee." "And His feet shall stand in that day upon the Mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the Mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof, . . . and there shall be a very great valley." "And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and His name one." Zechariah 14:5, 4, 9. As the New Jerusalem, in its dazzling splendor, comes down out of heaven, it rests upon the place purified and made ready to receive it, and Christ, with His people and the angels, enters the Holy City. {GC 662.3}

Now Satan prepares for a last mighty struggle for the supremacy. While deprived of his power and cut off from his work of deception, the prince of evil was miserable and dejected; but as the wicked dead are raised and he sees the vast multitudes upon his side, his hopes revive, and he determines not to yield the great controversy. He will marshal all the armies of the lost under his banner and through them endeavor to execute his plans. The wicked are Satan's captives. In rejecting Christ they have accepted the rule of the rebel leader. They are ready to receive his suggestions and to do his bidding. Yet, true to his early cunning, he does not acknowledge himself to be Satan. He claims to be the prince who is the rightful owner of the world and whose inheritance has been unlawfully wrested from him. He represents himself to his deluded subjects as a redeemer, assuring them that his power has brought them forth from their graves and that he is about to rescue them from the most cruel tyranny. The presence of Christ having been removed, Satan works wonders to support his claims. He makes the weak strong and inspires all with his own spirit and energy. He proposes to lead them against the camp of the saints and to take possession of the City of God. With fiendish exultation he points to the unnumbered millions who have been raised from the dead and declares that as their leader he is well able to overthrow the city and regain his throne and his kingdom. {GC 663.1}

In that vast throng are multitudes of the long-lived race that existed before the Flood; men of lofty stature and giant intellect, who, yielding to the control of fallen angels, devoted all their skill and knowledge to the exaltation of themselves; men whose wonderful works of art led the world to idolize their genius, but whose cruelty and evil inventions, defiling the earth and defacing the image of God, caused Him to blot them from the face of His creation. There are kings and generals who conquered nations, valiant men who never lost a battle, proud, ambitious warriors whose approach made kingdoms tremble. In death these experienced no change. As they come up from the grave, they resume the current of their thoughts just where it ceased. They are actuated by the same desire to conquer that ruled them when they fell. {GC 664.1}

Satan consults with his angels, and then with these kings and conquerors and mighty men. They look upon the strength and numbers on their side, and declare that the army within the city is small in comparison with theirs, and that it can be overcome. They lay their plans to take possession of the riches and glory of the New Jerusalem. All immediately begin to prepare for battle. Skillful artisans construct implements of war. Military leaders, famed for their success, marshal the throngs of warlike men into companies and divisions. {GC 664.2}

At last the order to advance is given, and the countless host moves on--an army such as was never summoned by earthly conquerors, such as the combined forces of all ages since war began on earth could never equal. Satan, the mightiest of warriors, leads the van, and his angels unite their forces for this final struggle. Kings and warriors are in his train, and the multitudes follow in vast companies, each under its appointed leader. With military precision the serried ranks advance over the earth's broken and uneven surface to the City of God. By command of Jesus, the gates of the New Jerusalem are closed, and the armies of Satan surround the city and make ready for the onset. {GC 664.3}

Now Christ again appears to the view of His enemies. Far above the city, upon a foundation of burnished gold, is a throne, high and lifted up. Upon this throne sits the Son of God, and around Him are the subjects of His kingdom. The power and majesty of Christ no language can describe, no pen portray. The glory of the Eternal Father is enshrouding His Son. The brightness of His presence fills the City of God, and flows out beyond the gates, flooding the whole earth with its radiance. {GC 665.1}

Please notice that the wicked behold the glory of Jesus, and that the force of the truth causes their unwilling lips to proclaim, "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" Neither the revelation of the truth, nor the glory of Christ causes them to desire death. The instant Jesus withdraws from their view, Satan is able to motivate them to try and take the city by force. Far from wanting to die, as you are asserting, they are eager to gain control of New Jerusalem.

Just before they attack the city, the glory of Christ sweeps out over the earth. "The brightness of His presence fills the City of God, and flows out beyond the gates, flooding the whole earth with its radiance." Again, the radiant brightness of Jesus' physical person engulfs the wicked without killing them or causing them to desire death.

Even after the Great White Throne judgment is ended, they do not desire to die; instead, they turn upon one another to vent their rage and anger. In the midst of such mayhem, Jesus rains down fire from above and raises up fire from below to punish each one in duration and inn proportion to their sinfulness. So, not once do the wicked desire to die. They fight tooth and nail to the bitter end.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/19/08 01:34 AM

 Quote:
TE: How can God communicate spiritual truths in a vision? He does so by physical symbols. It's up to us to interpret these symbols. God has certainly given us more than an ample amount of material to do so.

MM: There is nothing symbolic about the light that radiates from God's physical person. Neither was there anything symbolic about the light that radiated from Moses' face. Light is real; it is not symbolic.


After all those quotes, you're still not seeing that it wasn't God's physical presence that caused Moses' face to shine? The quotes pointed out:

1.The face of the 144,000 shine when they are filled with the Holy Ghost. This isn't due to God's physical presence.

2.The face of Stephen shone. This wasn't due to God's physical presence.

3.In the case of Moses, it was truth which caused His face to shine. The revelation of the plan of salvation caused his face to shine.

4.His face shining was a problem only to the unrighteous. If it a simple physical phenomenon, it wouldn't be the case that the righteous respond favorably to this light.

5.There is a similarity between the light shining on Moses' face and DA 108, where the light of the glory of God gives life to the righteous, but slays the wicked.

Conclusion: The light of the glory of God is Jesus Christ, not a physical manifestation of God's presence.

 Quote:
I was responding to what you wrote, not to the SOP. Here's what you posted:

"See, this is speaking of Jesus Christ [in the time of John the Baptist, DA 108] as the revealer of the character of God. He is the light of the glory of God that gives life to the righteous but slays the wicked, because He is the revealer of God's character. Notice it says that only the pure in heart could abide in His presence."

The way you worded things it made me think you were saying only the pure in heart could abide Jesus' presence without being slain by the light of His glory and brightness. But now you are making it clear this didn't happen while Jesus was here in the flesh. And, of course, I agree.


I have no clue what point you're trying to make here.

 Quote:
God didn't "show" His character to Moses on the mount; instead, God expressed it in words.


?? Moses requested of God, "Show me Thy glory." You are saying God didn't respond to Moses' request?

 Quote:
And, it wasn't the words that God spoke that made the skin on Moses' face shine so brightly that it hurt people around him; rather, it was light radiating from His physical person that caused Moses' skin to shine.


MM, if you will consider the post I wrote candidly, #99451, it should be easy to put to rest this idea that this is a physical manifestation. The evidence does not support this idea.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/19/08 01:48 AM

Regarding #99468, from DA 108 we read:

 Quote:
The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.

In the time of John the Baptist, Christ was about to appear as the revealer of the character of God.


The principle is right here. Note:

1.What slays the wicked gives life to the righteous.
2.Christ is the revealer of the character of God.

Conclusion:
1.Jesus Christ is the light of the glory of God.
2.Jesus Christ reveals the character of God.
3.This revelation is life to the righteous but death to the wicked.

One is reminded of John 17, where Jesus explained that to know God is life eternal. In ST 1/20/90 EGW explained that the "whole purpose" of Christ's mission was "the revelation of God." He did so in order "to set men right with God." This setting man right with God is what gives them life. How does He do so? By the revelation of God, because to know God is life eternal.

Regarding the choice of the wicked, in GC 543, EGW explains that the exclusion of the wicked from heaven is voluntary with themselves. In DA 764 she explains that their death is the result of their own choice, and quotes Christ who says that those who "hate" Him love (choose) death. The choice is between Christ, who is life, and death. The wicked prefer death to Christ. This is brought out in GC 543.

 Quote:
A life of rebellion against God has unfitted them for heaven. Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them.


Their choice is very clear.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/19/08 04:26 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
Regarding #99468, from DA 108 we read:

 Quote:
The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.

In the time of John the Baptist, Christ was about to appear as the revealer of the character of God.


The principle is right here. Note:

1.What slays the wicked gives life to the righteous.
2.Christ is the revealer of the character of God.

Conclusion:
1.Jesus Christ is the light of the glory of God.
2.Jesus Christ reveals the character of God.
3.This revelation is life to the righteous but death to the wicked.

One is reminded of John 17, where Jesus explained that to know God is life eternal. In ST 1/20/90 EGW explained that the "whole purpose" of Christ's mission was "the revelation of God." He did so in order "to set men right with God." This setting man right with God is what gives them life. How does He do so? By the revelation of God, because to know God is life eternal.

Regarding the choice of the wicked, in GC 543, EGW explains that the exclusion of the wicked from heaven is voluntary with themselves. In DA 764 she explains that their death is the result of their own choice, and quotes Christ who says that those who "hate" Him love (choose) death. The choice is between Christ, who is life, and death. The wicked prefer death to Christ. This is brought out in GC 543.

 Quote:
A life of rebellion against God has unfitted them for heaven. Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them.


Their choice is very clear.

Tom, if it is as you say, why, then, is not reflected in the GC passage I quoted above? Why is totally different than you are describing?

Please notice that the wicked behold the glory of Jesus, and that the force of the truth causes their unwilling lips to proclaim, "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" Neither the revelation of the truth, nor the glory of Christ causes them to desire death. The instant Jesus withdraws from their view, Satan is able to motivate them to try and take the city by force. Far from wanting to die, as you are asserting, they are eager to gain control of New Jerusalem.

Just before they attack the city, the glory of Christ sweeps out over the earth. "The brightness of His presence fills the City of God, and flows out beyond the gates, flooding the whole earth with its radiance." Again, the radiant brightness of Jesus' physical person engulfs the wicked without killing them or causing them to desire death.

Even after the Great White Throne judgment is ended, they do not desire to die; instead, they turn upon one another to vent their rage and anger. In the midst of such mayhem, Jesus rains down fire from above and raises up fire from below to punish each one in duration and inn proportion to their sinfulness. So, not once do the wicked desire to die. They fight tooth and nail to the bitter end.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/19/08 04:31 PM

No, Tom, I do not agree with you regarding the light of the glory of God. You perceive it in a light totally different than I do. I agree there is a spiritual application of the expression, but, unlike you, I also believe there is a physical aspect.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/19/08 04:34 PM

PS - It seems though as we both agree Jesus will not change our character when He returns. In the case of the thief on the cross, he confessed and crucified any and all sinful traits and habits that would have barred against him the pearly gates. There were no unconfessed traits or habits that were overlooked that would have to be dealt with later on in heaven.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/19/08 10:19 PM

 Quote:
Tom, if it is as you say, why, then, is not reflected in the GC passage I quoted above? Why is totally different than you are describing?


Well, I'm just citing what Ellen White described, so the difference you're seeing isn't between something EGW says and something I say, but between two things EGW is saying.

Sometimes EGW is writing down what she saw. Sometimes she writes down the meaning of what she saw. One needs to put these things together to come up with a right understanding. It's not a simple thing to do, or else there wouldn't be so many different ideas. Spiritual things are spiritually understood. As we grow spiritually, our understanding of spiritual things grows as well.

 Quote:
Please notice that the wicked behold the glory of Jesus, and that the force of the truth causes their unwilling lips to proclaim, "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" Neither the revelation of the truth, nor the glory of Christ causes them to desire death. The instant Jesus withdraws from their view, Satan is able to motivate them to try and take the city by force. Far from wanting to die, as you are asserting, they are eager to gain control of New Jerusalem.

Just before they attack the city, the glory of Christ sweeps out over the earth. "The brightness of His presence fills the City of God, and flows out beyond the gates, flooding the whole earth with its radiance." Again, the radiant brightness of Jesus' physical person engulfs the wicked without killing them or causing them to desire death.

Even after the Great White Throne judgment is ended, they do not desire to die; instead, they turn upon one another to vent their rage and anger. In the midst of such mayhem, Jesus rains down fire from above and raises up fire from below to punish each one in duration and inn proportion to their sinfulness. So, not once do the wicked desire to die. They fight tooth and nail to the bitter end.


DA 764 and GC 543 explain the points I made. Rather, I should say, I made the points I made because that's what it says in DA 764 and GC 543.

 Quote:
No, Tom, I do not agree with you regarding the light of the glory of God. You perceive it in a light totally different than I do. I agree there is a spiritual application of the expression, but, unlike you, I also believe there is a physical aspect.


I'm not denying there's a physical aspect. However, there isn't only a physical aspect, which is the idea you seem to have. I think you're missing the spiritual aspect, in relation to DA 108, for example (i.e. the light of the glory of God, which gives life to the righteous, slays the wicked).

 Quote:
PS - It seems though as we both agree Jesus will not change our character when He returns.


Yes.

 Quote:
In the case of the thief on the cross, he confessed and crucified any and all sinful traits and habits that would have barred against him the pearly gates. There were no unconfessed traits or habits that were overlooked that would have to be dealt with later on in heaven.


I think there's a better way of looking at this. Instead of looking at sins as things which keep one out of heaven, there's a simpler idea. Simply ask the question, "Would (whoever) be happy in heaven?" If the answer is "yes," then God will take that person to heaven.

In regards to the thief on the cross, the answer was "Yes!" Jesus saw this in his request, "Remember me in your kingom," and so responded, "Verily, verily, I saw unto you today, You will be with Me in paradise."

It's not that God has arbitrary requirements that must be satisfied in order for a person to go to heaven. It's simply a question of whether or not a person would be happy there.

In the GC 543 passage, we see that the unrighteous would not be happy in heaven, and voluntarily choose not to be there. DA 764 tells us they choose death. God agrees with their decision (GC 543). In mercy, He gives them what they choose. He does not compel them to do something contrary to their will.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/21/08 07:23 PM

TE: Sometimes EGW is writing down what she saw. Sometimes she writes down the meaning of what she saw. One needs to put these things together to come up with a right understanding. It's not a simple thing to do, or else there wouldn't be so many different ideas. Spiritual things are spiritually understood. As we grow spiritually, our understanding of spiritual things grows as well.

MM: Tom, are you saying we cannot take literally what Sister White wrote in GC 662-665?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/22/08 12:47 AM

 Quote:
TE: Sometimes EGW is writing down what she saw. Sometimes she writes down the meaning of what she saw. One needs to put these things together to come up with a right understanding. It's not a simple thing to do, or else there wouldn't be so many different ideas. Spiritual things are spiritually understood. As we grow spiritually, our understanding of spiritual things grows as well.

MM: Tom, are you saying we cannot take literally what Sister White wrote in GC 662-665?


I suppose it depends what you mean by this. For example:

 Quote:
Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips.


I believe every eye will see the glory of the Son of God, but I don't believe every person will at the same exact moment of time say the exact words "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" Do you?

I don't believe EGW intended that what she wrote be taken this way either.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/22/08 08:40 PM

"With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!"

TE: I believe every eye will see the glory of the Son of God, but I don't believe every person will at the same exact moment of time say the exact words "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" Do you?

MM: Of course I do. That's exactly what she said, right? "With one voice." If she didn't intend for us to take it literally, why didn't she say so? Why do you find it so unbelievable that "every person will at the same exact moment of time say the [same] exact words"?

Your outlook here helps me understand why you cannot agree that the chronological events described in GC 662-665 reflect reality, why you cannot take them literally. It explains why you cannot believe the points I listed above. Here they are again:

Four observations based on the sequence of events described in GC 662-665:

1) the resurrected wicked see the glory of God without being consumed by it,

2) the force of truth causes them to acknowledge Jesus without it causing them to seek death,

3) they prepare to take the New Jerusalem by force, and

4) the brightness of God's glory encompasses the earth without causing them to die.

 Quote:
GC 662-665
At the close of the thousand years, Christ again returns to the earth. He is accompanied by the host of the redeemed and attended by a retinue of angels. As He descends in terrific majesty He bids the wicked dead arise to receive their doom. They come forth, a mighty host, numberless as the sands of the sea. What a contrast to those who were raised at the first resurrection! The righteous were clothed with immortal youth and beauty. The wicked bear the traces of disease and death. {GC 662.1}

Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips. As the wicked went into their graves, so they come forth with the same enmity to Christ and the same spirit of rebellion. They are to have no new probation in which to remedy the defects of their past lives. Nothing would be gained by this. A lifetime of transgression has not softened their hearts. A second probation, were it given them, would be occupied as was the first in evading the requirements of God and exciting rebellion against Him. {GC 662.2}

Christ descends upon the Mount of Olives, whence, after His resurrection, He ascended, and where angels repeated the promise of His return. Says the prophet: "The Lord my God shall come, and all the saints with Thee." "And His feet shall stand in that day upon the Mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the Mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof, . . . and there shall be a very great valley." "And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and His name one." Zechariah 14:5, 4, 9. As the New Jerusalem, in its dazzling splendor, comes down out of heaven, it rests upon the place purified and made ready to receive it, and Christ, with His people and the angels, enters the Holy City. {GC 662.3}

Now Satan prepares for a last mighty struggle for the supremacy. While deprived of his power and cut off from his work of deception, the prince of evil was miserable and dejected; but as the wicked dead are raised and he sees the vast multitudes upon his side, his hopes revive, and he determines not to yield the great controversy. He will marshal all the armies of the lost under his banner and through them endeavor to execute his plans. The wicked are Satan's captives. In rejecting Christ they have accepted the rule of the rebel leader. They are ready to receive his suggestions and to do his bidding. Yet, true to his early cunning, he does not acknowledge himself to be Satan. He claims to be the prince who is the rightful owner of the world and whose inheritance has been unlawfully wrested from him. He represents himself to his deluded subjects as a redeemer, assuring them that his power has brought them forth from their graves and that he is about to rescue them from the most cruel tyranny. The presence of Christ having been removed, Satan works wonders to support his claims. He makes the weak strong and inspires all with his own spirit and energy. He proposes to lead them against the camp of the saints and to take possession of the City of God. With fiendish exultation he points to the unnumbered millions who have been raised from the dead and declares that as their leader he is well able to overthrow the city and regain his throne and his kingdom. {GC 663.1}

In that vast throng are multitudes of the long-lived race that existed before the Flood; men of lofty stature and giant intellect, who, yielding to the control of fallen angels, devoted all their skill and knowledge to the exaltation of themselves; men whose wonderful works of art led the world to idolize their genius, but whose cruelty and evil inventions, defiling the earth and defacing the image of God, caused Him to blot them from the face of His creation. There are kings and generals who conquered nations, valiant men who never lost a battle, proud, ambitious warriors whose approach made kingdoms tremble. In death these experienced no change. As they come up from the grave, they resume the current of their thoughts just where it ceased. They are actuated by the same desire to conquer that ruled them when they fell. {GC 664.1}

Satan consults with his angels, and then with these kings and conquerors and mighty men. They look upon the strength and numbers on their side, and declare that the army within the city is small in comparison with theirs, and that it can be overcome. They lay their plans to take possession of the riches and glory of the New Jerusalem. All immediately begin to prepare for battle. Skillful artisans construct implements of war. Military leaders, famed for their success, marshal the throngs of warlike men into companies and divisions. {GC 664.2}

At last the order to advance is given, and the countless host moves on--an army such as was never summoned by earthly conquerors, such as the combined forces of all ages since war began on earth could never equal. Satan, the mightiest of warriors, leads the van, and his angels unite their forces for this final struggle. Kings and warriors are in his train, and the multitudes follow in vast companies, each under its appointed leader. With military precision the serried ranks advance over the earth's broken and uneven surface to the City of God. By command of Jesus, the gates of the New Jerusalem are closed, and the armies of Satan surround the city and make ready for the onset. {GC 664.3}

Now Christ again appears to the view of His enemies. Far above the city, upon a foundation of burnished gold, is a throne, high and lifted up. Upon this throne sits the Son of God, and around Him are the subjects of His kingdom. The power and majesty of Christ no language can describe, no pen portray. The glory of the Eternal Father is enshrouding His Son. The brightness of His presence fills the City of God, and flows out beyond the gates, flooding the whole earth with its radiance. {GC 665.1}

Four observations based on the sequence of events described above:

1) the resurrected wicked see the glory of God without being consumed by it,

2) the force of truth causes them to acknowledge Jesus without it causing them to seek death,

3) they prepare to take the New Jerusalem by force, and

4) the brightness of God's glory encompasses the earth without causing them to die.

Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/23/08 01:47 AM

 Quote:
"With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!"

TE: I believe every eye will see the glory of the Son of God, but I don't believe every person will at the same exact moment of time say the exact words "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" Do you?

MM: Of course I do. That's exactly what she said, right? "With one voice." If she didn't intend for us to take it literally, why didn't she say so? Why do you find it so unbelievable that "every person will at the same exact moment of time say the [same] exact words"?


Because it doesn't make sense. Many people don't know English.

 Quote:
Your outlook here helps me understand why you cannot agree that the chronological events described in GC 662-665 reflect reality, why you cannot take them literally. It explains why you cannot believe the points I listed above. Here they are again:

Four observations based on the sequence of events described in GC 662-665:

1) the resurrected wicked see the glory of God without being consumed by it,

2) the force of truth causes them to acknowledge Jesus without it causing them to seek death,

3) they prepare to take the New Jerusalem by force, and

4) the brightness of God's glory encompasses the earth without causing them to die.



I'll try to make clear my thoughts on these points.

1.The resurrected unrighteous will be destroyed by the glory of God:

 Quote:
By a life of rebellion, Satan and all who unite with him place themselves so out of harmony with God that His very presence is to them a consuming fire. The glory of Him who is love will destroy them.(DA 764)


2.The wicked choose death:

 Quote:
God is the fountain of life; and when one chooses the service of sin, he separates from God, and thus cuts himself off from life. He is "alienated from the life of God." Christ says, "All they that hate Me love death."(DA 764)


The exclusion of the wicked from heaven is voluntary with themselves:

 Quote:
Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them. The destiny of the wicked is fixed by their own choice. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, and just and merciful on the part of God.(GC 543)


3.I agree that the wicked prepare to take the New Jerusalem by force.

4.I believe the light of the glory of God, which gives life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.

 Quote:
The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.(DA 108)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/23/08 06:34 PM

TE: Because it doesn't make sense. Many people don't know English.

MM: And for this reason you're willing to reject a plainly worded truth?

---

TE: 1.The resurrected unrighteous will be destroyed by the glory of God:

MM: Are you basing your observations on the account recorded in GC 662-665? Because it certainly doesn't say what you observed, right? It says exactly what I outlined above. Yes, the glory of God will eventually consume them, but it doesn't happen in the pages I quoted. Your observation is described later on in the book. Do you agree? If so, then it is obvious the truth and the glory of God do not cause the wicked to desire death. That's my point.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/23/08 07:52 PM

 Quote:
TE: Because it doesn't make sense. Many people don't know English.

MM: And for this reason you're willing to reject a plainly worded truth?


I'm rejecting your ideas in regards to this. Are you thinking God will perform a miracle so that those who have never heard English will be able to pronounce it? They will utter words of which they have no idea of the meaning?

---

 Quote:
TE: 1.The resurrected unrighteous will be destroyed by the glory of God:

MM: Are you basing your observations on the account recorded in GC 662-665?


I'm basing this on DA 764, which is why I put "DA 764" after it.

 Quote:
Because it certainly doesn't say what you observed, right?


You mean it contradicts DA 764? If that's what you're asking, no, I don't think so. I think your ideas regarding the GC passage contradict DA 764. I think your ideas are incorrect. I think the problem lies in your interpretation of the GC passage. I interpret it differently. In the way I interpret, it's in harmony with DA 764. That's one of the reasons I prefer my interpretation to yours.

Also I perceive my interpretation as being in harmony with what Jesus Christ revealed about God's character. I see your interpretation as presenting God acting violently, using force, and being cruel, not of which I believe He does.

 Quote:
It says exactly what I outlined above. Yes, the glory of God will eventually consume them, but it doesn't happen in the pages I quoted. Your observation is described later on in the book.


We're talking about different books, aren't we?

 Quote:
Do you agree? If so, then it is obvious the truth and the glory of God do not cause the wicked to desire death. That's my point.


That the wicked choose death is stated in the DA 764 quote. Regarding the desire of the wicked, that's made clear in the GC 543 quote. I'll repeat a portion here:

 Quote:
(C)ould those whose hearts are filled with hatred of God, of truth and holiness, mingle with the heavenly throng and join their songs of praise? Could they endure the glory of God and the Lamb? No, no; years of probation were granted them, that they might form characters for heaven; but they have never trained the mind to love purity; they have never learned the language of heaven, and now it is too late. A life of rebellion against God has unfitted them for heaven. Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them. The destiny of the wicked is fixed by their own choice. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, and just and merciful on the part of God.(GC 542, 543)


This is dealing with the judgment.

Here's my approach. I see in this GC passage (GC 541-543) as well as GC 35-57, DA 764, DA 108 (and others) principles which apply to the judgment. I see in the GC passage that you quoted from a description of a vision. Visions have elements which are symbolic and elements which are literal. We have to figure out which is which. I'm using these other passages to help me figure this out.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/25/08 03:58 AM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
TE: Because it doesn't make sense. Many people don't know English.

MM: And for this reason you're willing to reject a plainly worded truth?

TE: I'm rejecting your ideas in regards to this. Are you thinking God will perform a miracle so that those who have never heard English will be able to pronounce it? They will utter words of which they have no idea of the meaning?

So, yes, you are willing to reject a plainly worded truth because you cannot imagine or envision how it can be true. Thank you for answering my question.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
TE: I think your ideas regarding the GC passage contradict DA 764. I think your ideas are incorrect. I think the problem lies in your interpretation of the GC passage. I interpret it differently. . . I see in the GC passage that you quoted from a description of a vision. Visions have elements which are symbolic and elements which are literal. We have to figure out which is which. I'm using these other passages to help me figure this out.

It's not a symbolic vision, Tom. She is telling it like it is. That's the purpose of the book GC. Again, here is what she plainly says:

Four observations based on the sequence of events described in GC 662-665:

1) the resurrected wicked see the glory of God without being consumed by it,

2) the force of truth causes them to acknowledge Jesus without it causing them to seek death,

3) they prepare to take the New Jerusalem by force, and

4) the brightness of God's glory encompasses the earth without causing them to die.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/25/08 06:41 PM

 Quote:
So, yes, you are willing to reject a plainly worded truth because you cannot imagine or envision how it can be true. Thank you for answering my question.


Let's trace this a bit.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!"

TE: I believe every eye will see the glory of the Son of God, but I don't believe every person will at the same exact moment of time say the exact words "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" Do you?

MM: Of course I do. That's exactly what she said, right? "With one voice." If she didn't intend for us to take it literally, why didn't she say so? Why do you find it so unbelievable that "every person will at the same exact moment of time say the [same] exact words"?

TE:Because it doesn't make sense. Many people don't know English.

MM: And for this reason you're willing to reject a plainly worded truth?

TE:I'm rejecting your ideas in regards to this. Are you thinking God will perform a miracle so that those who have never heard English will be able to pronounce it? They will utter words of which they have no idea of the meaning?

MM:So, yes, you are willing to reject a plainly worded truth because you cannot imagine or envision how it can be true. Thank you for answering my question.

(moving on to the present post)

TE:Apparently you think everyone in heaven will speak English? I pointed out that:

1.I was rejecting your ideas in regards to this question.
2.I asked you, "Are you thinking God will perform a miracle so that those who have never heard English will be able to pronounce it?"
3.I asked you, "They will utter words of which they have no idea of the meaning?"

Your response to my questions is "So, yes, you are willing to reject a plainly worded truth because you cannot imagine or envision how it can be true. Thank you for answering my question."

Do you not see that your response here is a rather unreasonable? In particular, I find the "so yes" ... and "thank you" parts are rather puerile and unpleasant.

The plain truth I understand EGW to be expressing is what Paul said:

 Quote:
Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:

10That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;

11And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Phil. 2:9-11)


Now Paul's comments no more imply that the unrighteous will all miraculously speak Greek any more than Ellen White's comments imply they will speak English.

Regarding visions not being symbolic, they are symbolic. For example:

 Quote:
I also stated that "Satan appeared to be by the throne, trying to carry on the work of God." I will give another sentence from the same page: "I turned to look at the company who were still bowed before the throne." Now this praying company was in this mortal state, on the earth, yet represented to me as bowed before the throne. I never had the idea that these individuals were actually in the New Jerusalem. Neither did I ever think that any mortal could suppose that I believed that Satan was actually in the New Jerusalem. But did not John see the great red dragon in heaven? Certainly. "And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns." Revelation 12:3. What a monster to be in heaven! Here seems to be as good a chance for ridicule as in the interpretation which some have placed upon my statements. (EW 92, 93)


The question of what is symbolic and what is literal has always been one of debate. Everyone knows that visions and dreams are symbolic; the question is which part is which.

The difficulty I have with your interpretations of the GC passage is that they do not appear to take into account what EGW has written in other places, such as DA 764 and GC 541-543. I believe what we should do in regards to understanding the judgment is to take all of the data we have regarding the subject, and by putting it all together, come up with an idea which harmonizes with all that we have.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/26/08 03:22 AM

"With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!"

TE: Now Paul's comments no more imply that the unrighteous will all miraculously speak Greek any more than Ellen White's comments imply they will speak English.

MM: Tom, you seem to be implying they they will not exclaim these words with "one voice", that they will exclaim this sentiment with a multitude of different voices. In my mind, the best way to understand "one voice" is to assume they will be resurrected speaking one language, which may or may not be English.

---

TE: The difficulty I have with your interpretations of the GC passage is that they do not appear to take into account what EGW has written in other places, such as DA 764 and GC 541-543. I believe what we should do in regards to understanding the judgment is to take all of the data we have regarding the subject, and by putting it all together, come up with an idea which harmonizes with all that we have.

MM: Good luck with that enterprise, Tom. I doubt you'll get very many people, especially non-SDAs, to go along with your symbolic interpretation of GC 662-665. It is too plainly worded to be misunderstood. What are you going to do with the rest of the book, are you going to spiritualize away everything else that is worded too plainly to be misunderstood?

Which parts of the following excerpt from GC 662 are literal and which parts are symbolic? This is the first two paragraphs of chapter 42 entitled "The Controversy Ended" reformatted for ease of discussion:

1. At the close of the thousand years, Christ again returns to the earth. [Literal or Symbolic]

2. He is accompanied by the host of the redeemed and attended by a retinue of angels. [Literal or Symbolic]

3. As He descends in terrific majesty He bids the wicked dead arise to receive their doom. [Literal or Symbolic]

4. They come forth, a mighty host, numberless as the sands of the sea. [Literal or Symbolic]

5. What a contrast to those who were raised at the first resurrection! The righteous were clothed with immortal youth and beauty. The wicked bear the traces of disease and death. [Literal or Symbolic]

6. Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. [Literal or Symbolic]

7. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" [Literal or Symbolic]

8. It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. [Literal or Symbolic]

9. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips. [Literal or Symbolic]

10. As the wicked went into their graves, so they come forth with the same enmity to Christ and the same spirit of rebellion. [Literal or Symbolic]

11. They are to have no new probation in which to remedy the defects of their past lives. Nothing would be gained by this. A lifetime of transgression has not softened their hearts. [Literal or Symbolic]

12. A second probation, were it given them, would be occupied as was the first in evading the requirements of God and exciting rebellion against Him. [Literal or Symbolic]
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/26/08 07:39 AM

 Quote:
"With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!"

TE: Now Paul's comments no more imply that the unrighteous will all miraculously speak Greek any more than Ellen White's comments imply they will speak English.

MM: Tom, you seem to be implying they they will not exclaim these words with "one voice", that they will exclaim this sentiment with a multitude of different voices. In my mind, the best way to understand "one voice" is to assume they will be resurrected speaking one language, which may or may not be English.


Everyone will be resurrected speaking the language or languages they knew when they died. Nobody's identity or character is changed when they are resurrected, and language impacts us profoundly.

Why would you think everyone will speak one language?

 Quote:
MM: Good luck with that enterprise, Tom.


This seems sarcastic.

 Quote:
I doubt you'll get very many people, especially non-SDAs, to go along with your symbolic interpretation of GC 662-665.


On the contrary, I think if you asked 100 people what they think it means when it says that all the wicked will with one voice "Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!" that maybe 1 or 2 would agree with your interpretation, and many times more than that would agree with mine.

 Quote:
It is too plainly worded to be misunderstood.


I agree that it's difficult to misunderstand.

 Quote:
What are you going to do with the rest of the book, are you going to spiritualize away everything else that is worded too plainly to be misunderstood?


This seems sarcastic again.

 Quote:
Which parts of the following excerpt from GC 662 are literal and which parts are symbolic? This is the first two paragraphs of chapter 42 entitled "The Controversy Ended" reformatted for ease of discussion:

1. At the close of the thousand years, Christ again returns to the earth. [Literal or Symbolic]

2. He is accompanied by the host of the redeemed and attended by a retinue of angels. [Literal or Symbolic]

3. As He descends in terrific majesty He bids the wicked dead arise to receive their doom. [Literal or Symbolic]

4. They come forth, a mighty host, numberless as the sands of the sea. [Literal or Symbolic]

5. What a contrast to those who were raised at the first resurrection! The righteous were clothed with immortal youth and beauty. The wicked bear the traces of disease and death. [Literal or Symbolic]

6. Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. [Literal or Symbolic]

7. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" [Literal or Symbolic]

8. It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. [Literal or Symbolic]

9. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips. [Literal or Symbolic]

10. As the wicked went into their graves, so they come forth with the same enmity to Christ and the same spirit of rebellion. [Literal or Symbolic]

11. They are to have no new probation in which to remedy the defects of their past lives. Nothing would be gained by this. A lifetime of transgression has not softened their hearts. [Literal or Symbolic]

12. A second probation, were it given them, would be occupied as was the first in evading the requirements of God and exciting rebellion against Him. [Literal or Symbolic]


I fear if I say something is not literal that you will misunderstand and think it's not real. Everything that's written here will really happen, but what exactly happens requires reason and intellect to understand.

For example, when she writes that the wicked are as numberless as the sands of the sea, this is not literally true. For one thing, the sands of the sea are not literally numberless (which means not countable, which is to say infinite). For another, there are many orders of magnitude more sands of the sea than there are wicked people at the judgment. However, anyone with a little reason and intellect can easily understand the meaning here, which actually quoting from Scripture, which is that will a whole lot of people involved.

Similarly when she writes that the wicked with one voice will exclaim "Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord," it seems clear to me that she has the same thing in mind that Paul does when he writes in Phil. 2 that all will acknowledge that Christ is Lord.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/26/08 07:52 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
TE: Everyone will be resurrected speaking the language or languages they knew when they died. Nobody's identity or character is changed when they are resurrected, and language impacts us profoundly.

Why would you think everyone will speak one language?

Tom, do you have a quote to back up what you’re saying? Because the quote I posted says exactly the opposite of what you’re saying. That’s why I believe God will resurrect everyone with “one voice”. The same applies, no doubt, to the resurrected saints. Otherwise, what are we supposed to believe – people will not be able to communicate until they learn each others’ languages?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
TE: This seems sarcastic.

If you were here in person, and saw the look on my face and heard the tone in my voice, you would not suspect I was being sarcastic. I am dubious, doubtful, incredulous – but certainly not sarcastic. But thank you for calling me on it. I hope you accept my answer.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
TE: I fear if I say something is not literal that you will misunderstand and think it's not real. Everything that's written here will really happen, but what exactly happens requires reason and intellect to understand.

I’m glad you agree what she says and describes in the following quote is “real”. Don’t worry about confusing me, you’ve already accomplished that by saying what she wrote here isn’t real, that we cannot take what she wrote literally because it is a vision, and visions must be interpreted using information collected from other books and passages. Which you haven’t done yet, that is, you haven’t quoted other places where she describes the exact same scenes with different conclusions. Yes, you’ve quoted other things she has written, but they do not cover the same scenes.

At any rate, I’ll answer the following questions by making the right answer bold. I've also included a few comments here and there. Tell me if you agree or disagree, and why.

 Quote:
Which parts of the following excerpt from GC 662 are literal and which parts are symbolic? This is the first two paragraphs of chapter 42 entitled "The Controversy Ended" reformatted for ease of discussion:

1. At the close of the thousand years, Christ again returns to the earth. [Literal or Symbolic]

2. He is accompanied by the host of the redeemed and attended by a retinue of angels. [Literal or Symbolic]

3. As He descends in terrific majesty He bids the wicked dead arise to receive their doom. [Literal or Symbolic]

4. They come forth, a mighty host, numberless as the sands of the sea. [Literal or Symbolic] The expression “numberless as” does not mean it is impossible to count. Nor does it mean there are as many wicked raised as there are grains of sand. It simply means there are a lot of people that come forth.

5. What a contrast to those who were raised at the first resurrection! The righteous were clothed with immortal youth and beauty. The wicked bear the traces of disease and death. [Literal or Symbolic]

6. Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. [Literal or Symbolic] They literally see the glory of Christ without dying or desiring to die.

7. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" [Literal or Symbolic] I already know you disagree with me on this point.

8. It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. [Literal or Symbolic]

9. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips. [Literal or Symbolic] I’m pretty sure you disagree with me on this one, since you do not believe God employs force or compulsion. Also, please notice that the "truth" does not cause them to die nor does it cause them to desire death. I mention this point because you commented earlier that the truth will cause them to seek death.

10. As the wicked went into their graves, so they come forth with the same enmity to Christ and the same spirit of rebellion. [Literal or Symbolic] I’m not sure if you agree with me on this one, since I’m not sure if you believe everyone who is lost is rebellious.

11. They are to have no new probation in which to remedy the defects of their past lives. Nothing would be gained by this. A lifetime of transgression has not softened their hearts. [Literal or Symbolic]

12. A second probation, were it given them, would be occupied as was the first in evading the requirements of God and exciting rebellion against Him. [Literal or Symbolic] Again, I’m not sure if you agree with me on this one for the same reason mentioned above.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/26/08 09:48 PM

 Quote:
Tom, do you have a quote to back up what you’re saying?


Here's a quote:

 Quote:
All whom God has blessed with reasoning powers are to become intellectual Christians. They are not requested to believe without evidence; therefore Jesus has enjoined upon all to search the Scriptures. Let the ingenious inquirer, and the one who would know for himself what is truth, exert his mental powers to search out the truth as it is in Jesus. (RH 3/8/87)


This quote tells us we should use our reasoning powers. It's not reasonable to assume that all the resurrected wicked will know English.

 Quote:
Because the quote I posted says exactly the opposite of what you’re saying.


Only if one doesn't use reasoning powers when reading it. Again, it's not reasonable to suppose that everyone will know English, nor that Ellen White had this in mind when she said this. This reminds one of the incident where people complained of her vision that spoke of Satan being in the heavenly sanctuary:

 Quote:
I also stated that "Satan appeared to be by the throne, trying to carry on the work of God." I will give another sentence from the same page: "I turned to look at the company who were still bowed before the throne." Now this praying company was in this mortal state, on the earth, yet represented to me as bowed before the throne. I never had the idea that these individuals were actually in the New Jerusalem. Neither did I ever think that any mortal could suppose that I believed that Satan was actually in the New Jerusalem. But did not John see the great red dragon in heaven? Certainly. "And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns." Revelation 12:3. What a monster to be in heaven! Here seems to be as good a chance for ridicule as in the interpretation which some have placed upon my statements. (EW 92, 93)


 Quote:
That’s why I believe God will resurrect everyone with “one voice”. The same applies, no doubt, to the resurrected saints. Otherwise, what are we supposed to believe – people will not be able to communicate until they learn each others’ languages?


You're not going far enough here, MM. She says that everyone will say with one voice, "Blessed is the One who comes in then name of the Lord!" (from memory; might be slightly wrong). This means, if you're going to take this literally, that everyone will be resurrected knowing English.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/26/08 10:13 PM

 Quote:
If you were here in person, and saw the look on my face and heard the tone in my voice, you would not suspect I was being sarcastic. I am dubious, doubtful, incredulous – but certainly not sarcastic. But thank you for calling me on it. I hope you accept my answer.


I accept your answer. Please keep in mind that I don't have the luxury of hearing your tone of voice, and so forth, so reading certain things can be painful. Given it is not your intention to be hurtful, please read what you are writing before posting it, as if you were reading it from someone to yourself and see how it sounds.

I'm not saying I'm guiltless in this regard, as I may inadvertently say painful things to you as well. I will say that I very often tone down what I'm writing to you because I'm aware of this unfortunate circumstance in conversing on the internet that you've pointed out, regarding the lack of being able to hear one's tone of voice, body language, etc.

 Quote:
TE: I fear if I say something is not literal that you will misunderstand and think it's not real. Everything that's written here will really happen, but what exactly happens requires reason and intellect to understand.

I’m glad you agree what she says and describes in the following quote is “real”. Don’t worry about confusing me, you’ve already accomplished that by saying what she wrote here isn’t real,


I just said it was real. I never said it wasn't real. Why are you saying I'm confusing you by saying what she wrote her isn't real when I said the reverse? If you decide to take what I write to be the reverse of what I'm writing, that will no doubt lead to confusion.

 Quote:
that we cannot take what she wrote literally because it is a vision, and visions must be interpreted using information collected from other books and passages. Which you haven’t done yet, that is, you haven’t quoted other places where she describes the exact same scenes with different conclusions.


I've mentioned DA 764, GC 541-543, DA 108 many, many times.

 Quote:
Yes, you’ve quoted other things she has written, but they do not cover the same scenes.


Clearly DA 764 is dealing with the destruction of the wicked, as well as GC 541-543 and DA 108.

 Quote:
At any rate, I’ll answer the following questions by making the right answer bold. I've also included a few comments here and there. Tell me if you agree or disagree, and why.


I already commented regarding this on #99656. For example, I wrote this.

 Quote:
For example, when she writes that the wicked are as numberless as the sands of the sea, this is not literally true. For one thing, the sands of the sea are not literally numberless (which means not countable, which is to say infinite). For another, there are many orders of magnitude more sands of the sea than there are wicked people at the judgment. However, anyone with a little reason and intellect can easily understand the meaning here, which actually quoting from Scripture, which is that will a whole lot of people involved.


Do you disagree with this? Or do you think there will be an infinite number of wicked? Do you think there are as many wicked as there are sands in the sea?

The number of grains of sand in the world are estimated at 10^22. Of course, many of these are not on the sea, but it's easy to see this is a much higher number than the number of wicked, which would be in the order of 10^9. So the true number is not even close. Obviously this phrase was not meant to be taken literally.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/27/08 05:55 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
This quote tells us we should use our reasoning powers. It's not reasonable to assume that all the resurrected wicked will know English.

Tom, this quote does not support your interpretation. It doesn’t even support your opinion. You could apply this principle to any anything, whether true or false. If a person is unable to back up a particular theory with inspired quotes, then do you think it would be smart or safe to advocate it publicly?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
You're not going far enough here, MM. She says that everyone will say with one voice, "Blessed is the One who comes in then name of the Lord!" (from memory; might be slightly wrong). This means, if you're going to take this literally, that everyone will be resurrected knowing English.

Well, considering the fact nearly all the world knows English, it is not all that difficult to believe Jesus will resurrect them with “one voice”. Do you really believe God is incapable of raising everyone speaking one voice?

Do you also reject the story in the Bible where God made everyone all of sudden speak in different languages? One minute everyone is speaking with one voice, and the next minute they are speaking many different languages. How do you explain it? Did God use force or compulsion? Did He violate their freedom of choice?
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/27/08 06:35 PM

"With one voice" means "in full agreement."

If we were to take it to the EXTREME literal, it would mean that somehow only one voice in the crowd was speaking! Obviously, that is not the case. Even the best choir in the world will not sound like one voice.

I do not believe that "with one voice" necessarily means the words are the same, nor that they are spoken in the same cadence, rhythm, or timing...only that their minds are in complete agreement, and their message is the same.

 Quote:

Unanimity is complete agreement by everyone. When unanimous, everybody is of same mind and acting together as an undiversified whole. Many groups consider unanimous decisions a sign of agreement, solidarity, and unity.


Modern Example:

"With one voice, House OKs teen driving bill...SPRINGFIELD - Without a single dissenting vote, the Illinois House on Wednesday sent to the governor..."

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/27/08 06:45 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
If you were here in person, and saw the look on my face and heard the tone in my voice, you would not suspect I was being sarcastic. I am dubious, doubtful, incredulous – but certainly not sarcastic. But thank you for calling me on it. I hope you accept my answer.


I accept your answer. Please keep in mind that I don't have the luxury of hearing your tone of voice, and so forth, so reading certain things can be painful. Given it is not your intention to be hurtful, please read what you are writing before posting it, as if you were reading it from someone to yourself and see how it sounds.

I'm not saying I'm guiltless in this regard, as I may inadvertently say painful things to you as well. I will say that I very often tone down what I'm writing to you because I'm aware of this unfortunate circumstance in conversing on the internet that you've pointed out, regarding the lack of being able to hear one's tone of voice, body language, etc.

You've got it, buddy. I definitely appreciate the effort you put forth to ensure your posts do not unnecessarily offend. I will try to do better in the future.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
TE: I fear if I say something is not literal that you will misunderstand and think it's not real. Everything that's written here will really happen, but what exactly happens requires reason and intellect to understand.

MM: I’m glad you agree what she says and describes in the following quote is “real”. Don’t worry about confusing me, you’ve already accomplished that by saying what she wrote here isn’t real...

TE: I just said it was real. I never said it wasn't real. Why are you saying I'm confusing you by saying what she wrote her isn't real when I said the reverse? If you decide to take what I write to be the reverse of what I'm writing, that will no doubt lead to confusion.

MM: ... that we cannot take what she wrote literally because it is a vision, and visions must be interpreted using information collected from other books and passages. Which you haven’t done yet, that is, you haven’t quoted other places where she describes the exact same scenes with different conclusions.

TE: I've mentioned DA 764, GC 541-543, DA 108 many, many times.

MM: Yes, you’ve quoted other things she has written, but they do not cover the same scenes.

TE: Clearly DA 764 is dealing with the destruction of the wicked, as well as GC 541-543 and DA 108.

Tom, here’s what you wrote earlier: “I think your ideas regarding the GC passage contradict DA 764. I think your ideas are incorrect. I think the problem lies in your interpretation of the GC passage. I interpret it differently. In the way I interpret, it's in harmony with DA 764. That's one of the reasons I prefer my interpretation to yours. I see in the GC passage that you quoted from a description of a vision. Visions have elements which are symbolic and elements which are literal. We have to figure out which is which. I'm using these other passages to help me figure this out.”

From this I gather you believe GC 662-665 is a description of a vision. Do you also think she is attempting to share her interpretation of the vision? Or, is she leaving it up to the non-SDA reader to research her other books in order to decode and decipher it? I say non-SDA reader because of the fact the GC was written to non-SDA readers.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: At any rate, I’ll answer the following questions by making the right answer bold. I've also included a few comments here and there. Tell me if you agree or disagree, and why.

TE: I already commented regarding this on #99656. For example, I wrote this: For example, when she writes that the wicked are as numberless as the sands of the sea, this is not literally true. For one thing, the sands of the sea are not literally numberless (which means not countable, which is to say infinite). For another, there are many orders of magnitude more sands of the sea than there are wicked people at the judgment. However, anyone with a little reason and intellect can easily understand the meaning here, which actually quoting from Scripture, which is that will a whole lot of people involved.

Do you disagree with this? Or do you think there will be an infinite number of wicked? Do you think there are as many wicked as there are sands in the sea?

The number of grains of sand in the world are estimated at 10^22. Of course, many of these are not on the sea, but it's easy to see this is a much higher number than the number of wicked, which would be in the order of 10^9. So the true number is not even close. Obviously this phrase was not meant to be taken literally.

I addressed this point in my previous post, but I’ll speak more about it here, too. Again, here is what she wrote: “They come forth, a mighty host, numberless as the sands of the sea.” As you said, this expression is biblical. It is a Jewish expression. It is similar to the following passage: “After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues.”

Either it is true or it is a hyperbole. There is no reason why we cannot accept it at face value. When John wrote this it was true. The technology did not exist for one man in those days to number such a vast throng of people. I doubt it can be done today with all of our advancements. Think of what it would take for us today to count billions upon billions of people all by ourselves. You might be able to do it if everyone cooperated like they supposed to during a census count, and if you had a good computer.

But John wasn’t thinking of a computer when he said the great multitude was so numerous as to be impossible to count. Instead, he was thinking of the technology available to him, which indeed was inadequate to do the job. So, with this in mind, I have no trouble believing John literally meant it was impossible for one man to count them by himself.

So, again, which parts of the following excerpt from GC 662 are literal and which parts are symbolic? I've given my answers, do you agree with them? Please note that I've also made comments and asked questions.

1. At the close of the thousand years, Christ again returns to the earth. [Literal or Symbolic]

2. He is accompanied by the host of the redeemed and attended by a retinue of angels. [Literal or Symbolic]

3. As He descends in terrific majesty He bids the wicked dead arise to receive their doom. [Literal or Symbolic]

4. They come forth, a mighty host, numberless as the sands of the sea. [Literal or Symbolic] The expression “numberless as” does not mean it is impossible to count. Nor does it mean there are as many wicked raised as there are grains of sand. It simply means there are a lot of people that come forth.

5. What a contrast to those who were raised at the first resurrection! The righteous were clothed with immortal youth and beauty. The wicked bear the traces of disease and death. [Literal or Symbolic]

6. Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. [Literal or Symbolic] They literally see the glory of Christ without dying or desiring to die. Do you agree?

7. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" [Literal or Symbolic] I already know you disagree with me on this point. Can you prove it?

8. It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. [Literal or Symbolic]

9. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips. [Literal or Symbolic] I’m pretty sure you disagree with me on this one, since you do not believe God employs force or compulsion. Also, please notice that the "truth" does not cause them to die nor does it cause them to desire death. I mention this point because you commented earlier that the truth will cause them to seek death. Right?

10. As the wicked went into their graves, so they come forth with the same enmity to Christ and the same spirit of rebellion. [Literal or Symbolic] I’m not sure if you agree with me on this one, since I’m not sure if you believe everyone who is lost is rebellious. What do you believe?

11. They are to have no new probation in which to remedy the defects of their past lives. Nothing would be gained by this. A lifetime of transgression has not softened their hearts. [Literal or Symbolic]

12. A second probation, were it given them, would be occupied as was the first in evading the requirements of God and exciting rebellion against Him. [Literal or Symbolic] Again, I’m not sure if you agree with me on this one for the same reason mentioned above.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/27/08 06:49 PM

Green Cochoa, yes, it is true we sometimes use the expression "with one voice" to mean "in full agreement". However, even in the example you cited they said the exact same thing - Yea. Not one of them said, Nay. So, as we can see, the expression "with one voice" can mean saying the same thing.

Nevertheless, do you agree with Tom that the following insights imply the wicked will die or desire to die the instant they are exposed to the truth and the glory of God?

GC 662
Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/27/08 08:11 PM

I simply meant the message was the same, but not necessarily the actual words. It doesn't concern me whether they all speak the same language or not. I don't believe that is at all a part of what Mrs. White is trying to say, though I certainly agree that in God's power, it could happen. It matters not. As for the wicked? They will not _want_ to die. They may wish to hide themselves from God, but I don't believe they are desirous of death. Why would they be taking up arms against the city? Nay, but they will be fighting for their lives.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/28/08 12:55 AM

 Quote:
Tom, this quote does not support your interpretation. It doesn’t even support your opinion.


My opinion is what the quote said, which spoke of the importance of using our reasoning powers and intellect.

 Quote:
You could apply this principle to any anything, whether true or false.


The quote has to do with reasoning, so yes, it can be applied to anything, whether true or false. We should use our reasoning powers and intellect to analyze the meaning of a given statement, whether true or false.

 Quote:
If a person is unable to back up a particular theory with inspired quotes, then do you think it would be smart or safe to advocate it publicly?


Yes, that's possible. Certainly much of what Ellen White wrote she was unable to back up with inspired quotes (e.g., much of what she wrote about the fall of Lucifer, or the fall of man).

If the theory has to do with Scripture, of course one should be able to use Scripture to back up one's theory. However, it's not necessary for the theory itself to be in an inspired quote.

 Quote:
From this I gather you believe GC 662-665 is a description of a vision. Do you also think she is attempting to share her interpretation of the vision? Or, is she leaving it up to the non-SDA reader to research her other books in order to decode and decipher it? I say non-SDA reader because of the fact the GC was written to non-SDA readers.


What she wrote in GC 541-543 is from the same book, intended for the same readers. Indeed, if one read the book in order, one would have already read what she wrote there, and one could use that to help understand what she wrote later in the book.

 Quote:
4. They come forth, a mighty host, numberless as the sands of the sea. [Literal or Symbolic] The expression “numberless as” does not mean it is impossible to count. Nor does it mean there are as many wicked raised as there are grains of sand. It simply means there are a lot of people that come forth.


You say this is literal, but then qualify it in a way that it is not literal. The statement is true, but not literal. If it were literal, then there would be as many wicked as there are grains of sand, which there aren't.

I think I already commented on this, didn't I?

Regarding proving that not everyone will speak English, simply common sense dictates that it is not a reasonable interpretation that everyone will speak English. It's difficult for me to comprehend that you would even consider this as a possibility, or think that Ellen White could possibly have had this in mind. I can just imagine if someone were to ridicule what she wrote here on the basis that not everybody will speak English, that her response would be similar to that in EW 92, that she never intended that what she wrote be interpreted in that way any more than John intended that he be understood as believing that there are dragons in heaven.

 Quote:
Nevertheless, do you agree with Tom that the following insights imply the wicked will die or desire to die the instant they are exposed to the truth and the glory of God?


I didn't say this, MM. I would like to ask you, yet again, to please present my ideas with my own words, or at least express my meaning accurately. Here you've added the words "the instant" which I've never said, not even once, and which are not to be found in inspiration.

Here's what I've said regarding this:

 Quote:
The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.(DA 108)


The same thing which gives life to the righteous will slay the wicked. What is the light of the glory of God? The glory of God is His character.

 Quote:
The glory of God is His character. While Moses was in the mount, earnestly interceding with God, he prayed, "I beseech thee, show me thy glory." In answer God declared, "I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the Lord before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy." The glory of God--His character--was then revealed: "The Lord passed by before him, and proclaimed, The Lord, The Lord God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty" (Exodus 33:18, 19; 34:6, 7). (GAG 322)


Given that the glory of God is His character, and the light of the glory of God gives life to the righteous, how should we understand this phrase? Is not Jesus Christ the life of the righteous? Is it not He who reveals the character of God? Then is it not clear that Jesus Christ is the light of the glory of God?

Now how do the wicked respond to the revelation of the truth? In the GC passage quoted, it says that Christ is uplifted, and by one glance of Christ the wicked's true condition is made known (they become aware of every sin, every place on their path where they turned, etc.) In GC 542, 3 we read:

 Quote:
Those who have chosen Satan as their leader and have been controlled by his power are not prepared to enter the presence of God. Pride, deception, licentiousness, cruelty, have become fixed in their characters. Can they enter heaven to dwell forever with those whom they despised and hated on earth? Truth will never be agreeable to a liar; meekness will not satisfy self-esteem and pride; purity is not acceptable to the corrupt; disinterested love does not appear attractive to the selfish. What source of enjoyment could heaven offer to those who are wholly absorbed in earthly and selfish interests?

Could those whose lives have been spent in rebellion against God be suddenly transported to heaven and witness the high, the holy state of perfection that ever exists there,-- every soul filled with love, every countenance beaming with joy, enrapturing music in melodious strains rising in honor of God and the Lamb, and ceaseless streams of light flowing upon the redeemed from the face of Him who sitteth upon the throne,--could those whose hearts are filled with hatred of God, of truth and holiness, mingle with the heavenly throng and join their songs of praise? Could they endure the glory of God and the Lamb? No, no; years of probation were granted them, that they might form characters for heaven; but they have never trained the mind to love purity; they have never learned the language of heaven, and now it is too late. A life of rebellion against God has unfitted them for heaven. Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them. The destiny of the wicked is fixed by their own choice. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, and just and merciful on the part of God.(GC 542-543)


This brings out how the wicked do not wish to be in heaven. DA 764 gives us more information:

 Quote:
This is not an act of arbitrary power on the part of God. The rejecters of His mercy reap that which they have sown. God is the fountain of life; and when one chooses the service of sin, he separates from God, and thus cuts himself off from life. He is "alienated from the life of God." Christ says, "All they that hate Me love death." Eph. 4:18; Prov. 8:36. God gives them existence for a time that they may develop their character and reveal their principles. This accomplished, they receive the results of their own choice. By a life of rebellion, Satan and all who unite with him place themselves so out of harmony with God that His very presence is to them a consuming fire. The glory of Him who is love will destroy them.(DA 764)


So when we put this altogether we see that:

a.The wicked do not wish to be in heaven (their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves).
b.They long to flee from God, from heaven.
c.They love (choose) death.
d.They are destroyed as a result of their own decisions, as opposed to by the power of God.
e.Their destruction comes as a result of the harm they have caused to their own character, which causes God to be to them a consuming fire.

How did EGW know all this? From the visions/dreams she was given by God, and from her own understanding of things, based on her life experience, the teaching of the Holy Spirit, her study of the Scriptures, and so forth.

It seems likely to me that all of these accounts (DA 108, DA 764, GC 543, the latter GC passage) are all based on the same vision. In one account of the vision, towards the end of the GC, she presents a view which is closer to what she actually saw. In the other passages she interprets what she saw, on the basis of her understanding of Scripture, God's character, etc., and we get the comments from DA 108, DA 764, and GC 541-543.

So what I've tried to do is to put these things together in a way that makes sense, so that all four descriptions harmonize.

For example, it seems likely to me that EGW saw fire coming down from heaven to destroy the wicked, and wrote that in the passage from GC towards the end of the book. However, in all the other descriptions of this same event, she describes God as a consuming fire. She doesn't talk about a literal fire anywhere. She says the destruction of the wicked is not due to an arbitrary act of power of God, which would describe God's engulfing them with literal fire, but rather a result of their own choice, describing the result of ruining their characters so that God Himself is to them a consuming fire.

At any rate, I don't see any way of harmonizing the idea that God engulfs the wicked with literal fire with the idea that the same thing which gives life to the righteous slays the wicked. Obviously literal fire does not give life to the righteous. God gives life. Is He represented as fire in Scripture? Yes, He is. Is He literal fire? No.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/28/08 10:34 PM


 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
MM: Tom, this quote does not support your interpretation. It doesn’t even support your opinion.

TE: My opinion is what the quote said, which spoke of the importance of using our reasoning powers and intellect.

But I asked you to post a quote to support your theory, which you haven’t done yet. Do you really believe God is incapable of raising everyone speaking the same language? Doesn’t the incident at the tower of Babel prove God is able to cause people to speak different languages?

 Quote:
MM: From this I gather you believe GC 662-665 is a description of a vision. Do you also think she is attempting to share her interpretation of the vision? Or, is she leaving it up to the non-SDA reader to research her other books in order to decode and decipher it? I say non-SDA reader because of the fact the GC was written to non-SDA readers.

TE: What she wrote in GC 541-543 is from the same book, intended for the same readers. Indeed, if one read the book in order, one would have already read what she wrote there, and one could use that to help understand what she wrote later in the book.

Those pages are not talking about the same scene described on pages 662-665. She says they are exposed to the truth and to the glory of God without dying or desiring death. It couldn’t be worded more plainly.

 Quote:
TE: Regarding proving that not everyone will speak English, simply common sense dictates that it is not a reasonable interpretation that everyone will speak English.

Does something have to make sense to you before you are willing to accept it? How far are you willing to take this idea? What about Jonah? Does it sound reasonable to believe he survived 72 hours in the belly of a fish? What about Lazarus? Is it reasonable to believe he came to life after being dead for four days? What about the tower of Babel? Is it reasonable to believe God made them speak different languages?

 Quote:
MM: Nevertheless, do you agree with Tom that the following insights imply the wicked will die or desire to die the instant they are exposed to the truth and the glory of God?

TE: I didn't say this, MM. I would like to ask you, yet again, to please present my ideas with my own words, or at least express my meaning accurately. Here you've added the words "the instant" which I've never said, not even once, and which are not to be found in inspiration.

Here's what I've said regarding this:

a.The wicked do not wish to be in heaven (their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves).
b.They long to flee from God, from heaven.
c.They love (choose) death.
d.They are destroyed as a result of their own decisions, as opposed to by the power of God.
e.Their destruction comes as a result of the harm they have caused to their own character, which causes God to be to them a consuming fire.

GC 622-665 is not talking about the wicked being in heaven or not wanting to be in heaven. They are on earth. They are exposed to the truth and to the glory of God without dying or without desiring death. Instead, they are motivated to take the New Jerusalem by force. They are about to attack the city when once again the glory of God engulfs them - without causing them to die or to desire death. God rains fire from above and raises fire from below. In this fiery environment the wicked turn upon one another with murderous intentions. They eventually die.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/28/08 11:11 PM

 Quote:
But I asked you to post a quote to support your theory, which you haven’t done yet.


I did. I produced the quote on using reasoning and intellect.

 Quote:
Do you really believe God is incapable of raising everyone speaking the same language?


I didn't argue this.

 Quote:
Doesn’t the incident at the tower of Babel prove God is able to cause people to speak different languages?


That God has the physical power to cause everyone to speak English is not the issue. The point is, it doesn't make any sense to interpret the passage literally. I also quoted this:

 Quote:
I also stated that "Satan appeared to be by the throne, trying to carry on the work of God." I will give another sentence from the same page: "I turned to look at the company who were still bowed before the throne." Now this praying company was in this mortal state, on the earth, yet represented to me as bowed before the throne. I never had the idea that these individuals were actually in the New Jerusalem. Neither did I ever think that any mortal could suppose that I believed that Satan was actually in the New Jerusalem. But did not John see the great red dragon in heaven? Certainly. "And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns." Revelation 12:3. What a monster to be in heaven! Here seems to be as good a chance for ridicule as in the interpretation which some have placed upon my statements.


I think, if Ellen White were alive, she would be shocked at the thought that someone was interpreting her statement that the wicked would with one voice proclaim "Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord" meant she thought God would cause everyone in the resurrection to speak English.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/28/08 11:18 PM

 Quote:
Those pages are not talking about the same scene described on pages 662-665. She says they are exposed to the truth and to the glory of God without dying or desiring death. It couldn’t be worded more plainly.


It's clear to me that GC 662-665, DA 764, and GC 541-543 are all dealing with the subject of the destruction of the wicked. For example, from the GC 541-543 passage:

 Quote:
The principles of kindness, mercy, and love, taught and exemplified by our Saviour, are a transcript of the will and character of God. Christ declared that He taught nothing except that which He had received from His Father. The principles of the divine government are in perfect harmony with the Saviour's precept, "Love your enemies." God executes justice upon the wicked, for the good of the universe, and even for the good of those upon whom His judgments are visited. (GC 541)


Isn't it clear this is dealing with the judgment of the unrighteous?

 Quote:
GC 622-665 is not talking about the wicked being in heaven or not wanting to be in heaven. They are on earth. They are exposed to the truth and to the glory of God without dying or without desiring death. Instead, they are motivated to take the New Jerusalem by force. They are about to attack the city when once again the glory of God engulfs them - without causing them to die or to desire death. God rains fire from above and raises fire from below. In this fiery environment the wicked turn upon one another with murderous intentions. They eventually die.


I don't understand how you could read GC 541-543, or DA 764, and not understand that this is dealing with the judgment of the wicked. I've already quoted from GC 541 regarding this. From DA 764:

 Quote:
Then the end will come. God will vindicate His law and deliver His people. Satan and all who have joined him in rebellion will be cut off. Sin and sinners will perish, root and branch, (Mal. 4:1),--Satan the root, and his followers the branches. The word will be fulfilled to the prince of evil, "Because thou hast set thine heart as the heart of God; . . . I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. . . . Thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any more." Then "the wicked shall not be: yea, thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be;" "they shall be as though they had not been." Ezek. 28:6-19; Ps. 37:10; Obadiah 16. (DA 764)


Isn't it clear that this is dealing with the thing as GC 622-625?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/28/08 11:36 PM

 Quote:
Does something have to make sense to you before you are willing to accept it? How far are you willing to take this idea? What about Jonah? Does it sound reasonable to believe he survived 72 hours in the belly of a fish? What about Lazarus? Is it reasonable to believe he came to life after being dead for four days? What about the tower of Babel? Is it reasonable to believe God made them speak different languages?


I skipped this inadvertently.

The Scriptures tell us that we should be able to give a reason for the hope that is within us. Ellen White urges us to use sound arguments, that will bear close examination. This requires the use of reason. If we read something, and come up with some interpretation which we find unreasonable, then we must reject our interpretation, or change our minds regarding what causes us to perceive our interpretation as unreasonable.

I believe that God created all things, including this earth in 6 days. So I have no doubt that God has the power to do whatever He wants. So, for example, that God raised Lazarus makes perfect sense to me, as anyone with the power and ability to create the Universe would have the power and ability to raise the dead.

Regarding everyone raised speaking English, it seems to me that it doesn't take much intelligence to recognize that the reason that Ellen White wrote that the wicked would say "Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord" was simply because she herself spoke English, and thus wrote the phrase in English, not because she had any idea that those raised would all speak English. Similarly, if her native language had been some other language than English, say Portuguese, she would have written "Bendito Aquele que vem no nome do Senhor!" which would have no more implied that all will speak Portuguese than her writing it the way she did implies they will all speak English.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/31/08 05:39 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
Those pages are not talking about the same scene described on pages 662-665. She says they are exposed to the truth and to the glory of God without dying or desiring death. It couldn’t be worded more plainly.


It's clear to me that GC 662-665, DA 764, and GC 541-543 are all dealing with the subject of the destruction of the wicked. For example, from the GC 541-543 passage:

 Quote:
The principles of kindness, mercy, and love, taught and exemplified by our Saviour, are a transcript of the will and character of God. Christ declared that He taught nothing except that which He had received from His Father. The principles of the divine government are in perfect harmony with the Saviour's precept, "Love your enemies." God executes justice upon the wicked, for the good of the universe, and even for the good of those upon whom His judgments are visited. (GC 541)


Isn't it clear this is dealing with the judgment of the unrighteous?

 Quote:
GC 622-665 is not talking about the wicked being in heaven or not wanting to be in heaven. They are on earth. They are exposed to the truth and to the glory of God without dying or without desiring death. Instead, they are motivated to take the New Jerusalem by force. They are about to attack the city when once again the glory of God engulfs them - without causing them to die or to desire death. God rains fire from above and raises fire from below. In this fiery environment the wicked turn upon one another with murderous intentions. They eventually die.


I don't understand how you could read GC 541-543, or DA 764, and not understand that this is dealing with the judgment of the wicked. I've already quoted from GC 541 regarding this. From DA 764:

 Quote:
Then the end will come. God will vindicate His law and deliver His people. Satan and all who have joined him in rebellion will be cut off. Sin and sinners will perish, root and branch, (Mal. 4:1),--Satan the root, and his followers the branches. The word will be fulfilled to the prince of evil, "Because thou hast set thine heart as the heart of God; . . . I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. . . . Thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any more." Then "the wicked shall not be: yea, thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be;" "they shall be as though they had not been." Ezek. 28:6-19; Ps. 37:10; Obadiah 16. (DA 764)


Isn't it clear that this is dealing with the thing as GC 622-625?

They're not describing the "same scenes". GC 662-665 includes specific details not covered in the other passages. Yes, they are talking about the same general time period, but they do not describe the same details. GC 662-665 makes it clear that the wicked do not die or wish to die during their initial exposure to truth and the glory of God. This point is indisputable. Yes, they will eventually die. But they will not wish to die. They will fight to live. True, if they were forced into heaven, forced to live with the saints in a sinless world they would wish to escape or die, but this point is merely theoretical since it will never happen.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 05/31/08 05:50 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
Does something have to make sense to you before you are willing to accept it? How far are you willing to take this idea? What about Jonah? Does it sound reasonable to believe he survived 72 hours in the belly of a fish? What about Lazarus? Is it reasonable to believe he came to life after being dead for four days? What about the tower of Babel? Is it reasonable to believe God made them speak different languages?


I skipped this inadvertently.

The Scriptures tell us that we should be able to give a reason for the hope that is within us. Ellen White urges us to use sound arguments, that will bear close examination. This requires the use of reason. If we read something, and come up with some interpretation which we find unreasonable, then we must reject our interpretation, or change our minds regarding what causes us to perceive our interpretation as unreasonable.

I believe that God created all things, including this earth in 6 days. So I have no doubt that God has the power to do whatever He wants. So, for example, that God raised Lazarus makes perfect sense to me, as anyone with the power and ability to create the Universe would have the power and ability to raise the dead.

Regarding everyone raised speaking English, it seems to me that it doesn't take much intelligence to recognize that the reason that Ellen White wrote that the wicked would say "Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord" was simply because she herself spoke English, and thus wrote the phrase in English, not because she had any idea that those raised would all speak English. Similarly, if her native language had been some other language than English, say Portuguese, she would have written "Bendito Aquele que vem no nome do Senhor!" which would have no more implied that all will speak Portuguese than her writing it the way she did implies they will all speak English.

As you know, much of what you deem "reasonable" the rest of the world deems fiction or fairy tales. Your argument doesn't hold water. How can billions of people, speaking hundreds of different languages, exclaim with "one" voice, "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!"? I am willing to allow for the fact it might not be English, but it will be the same language. Otherwise, it would sound like chaos, not like one voice.

"Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips."
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/03/08 02:14 AM

 Quote:
They're not describing the "same scenes". GC 662-665 includes specific details not covered in the other passages.


This is not a significant point. Each of the descriptions discusses different points. That doesn't meant they're dealing with different subjects.

 Quote:
Yes, they are talking about the same general time period, but they do not describe the same details. GC 662-665 makes it clear that the wicked do not die or wish to die during their initial exposure to truth and the glory of God. This point is indisputable. Yes, they will eventually die. But they will not wish to die. They will fight to live. True, if they were forced into heaven, forced to live with the saints in a sinless world they would wish to escape or die, but this point is merely theoretical since it will never happen.


You're not considering the other statements. You don't deny that GC 541-543 is dealing with the final judgment of the wicked, do you? Or DA 764? Or DA 108? From these passages we learn that certain principles apply to the judgment. For example, from DA 108 we learn that the wicked choose to die, that their death is the result of their own choice, as opposed to something God does to them. In GC 543 we learn that the choice of the wicked to be excluded from heaven is voluntary with themselves.

I'm not seeing how your ideas are taking into account these insights in regards to the judgment of the wicked.

 Quote:
As you know, much of what you deem "reasonable" the rest of the world deems fiction or fairy tales. Your argument doesn't hold water. How can billions of people, speaking hundreds of different languages, exclaim with "one" voice, "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!"? I am willing to allow for the fact it might not be English, but it will be the same language. Otherwise, it would sound like chaos, not like one voice.

"Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips."


My whole point was that it wouldn't be in English. Given that you accept this to be true, I'm at a bit of a loss as to why you didn't just so say immediately, rather than dispute this point as you have been.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/15/08 02:16 AM

"Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips."

The point is - GC 662-665 makes it clear that the wicked do not die or wish to die during their initial exposure to truth and the glory of God.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/16/08 01:28 AM

 Quote:
"Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the glory of the Son of God. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. The force of truth urges the words from unwilling lips."

The point is - GC 662-665 makes it clear that the wicked do not die or wish to die during their initial exposure to truth and the glory of God.


It's been awhile since we last spoke, but I think the points I was making was that in GC 543 we see that the exclusion of the wicked from heaven is voluntary with themselves. The do not wish to be in heaven, for the reasons pointed out there.

I've also made the point that the light of the glory of God, which gives life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.

Regarding the quote you reference, isn't this before God has revealed the wicked their sins?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/16/08 05:34 PM

GC 662-665 describes the resurrection of the wicked and their initial exposure to the truth and to the glory of God - and they do not die, nor do they desire to die. That's the point. You seem to be arguing against this point. Why?

Even after they endure exposure to the truth and to the glory of God during the Great White Throne of judgment of their sins, they do not die, nor do they desire to die. Which is also the point.

By the way, her comments about the wicked not enjoying being in heaven in with the righteous is purely theoretical. It will never happen. The wicked will never be in heaven to learn they wouldn't enjoy it. Nevertheless, she doesn't conclude they would die or desire to die. They would simply rather live somewhere else.

So, I'm not finding support for your idea that the truth and the glory of God is what causes the resurrected wicked to die or to desire to die at the end of time. Instead, it is fire rained down from above and raised up from below that causes the wicked to suffer and die in duration and in proportion to their sinfulness. Which is also the point.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/16/08 05:40 PM

With these things in mind - Will Jesus change our character when He returns? Or, must the necessary and required changes happen before we die? How does this apply to the thief on the cross? Did he change his character sufficiently so that no further changes were necessary for him to be admitted to heaven? Or, did he possess certain unknown defective character traits that must be dealt with en route to heaven before being admitted therein?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/18/08 05:31 AM

 Quote:
GC 662-665 describes the resurrection of the wicked and their initial exposure to the truth and to the glory of God - and they do not die, nor do they desire to die. That's the point. You seem to be arguing against this point. Why?


I've haven't been addressing this point one way or the other, because this doesn't have to do with the point I was making. I have been pointing out that the exclusion of the wicked is voluntary with themselves, that they do not wish to be in God's presence, and so forth. I have been pointing out that the light of the revelation of God, which gives life to the righteous, will slay the wicked. I have been pointing out that the destruction of the wicked is the result of their own choice.

 Quote:
Even after they endure exposure to the truth and to the glory of God during the Great White Throne of judgment of their sins, they do not die, nor do they desire to die. Which is also the point.


"Enduring exposure" isn't the right way to look at this, IMO. If you look at the description of what happens in the judgment, and compare the statements in GC 541-543 and DA 764, it seems very clear that the wicked voluntary choose to be excluded from heaven, that their destruction is due to their own choices, and that the light of the glory of God, which gives lift to the righteous will slay the wicked. These are the points I've been making.

 Quote:
By the way, her comments about the wicked not enjoying being in heaven in with the righteous is purely theoretical. It will never happen. The wicked will never be in heaven to learn they wouldn't enjoy it.


Heaven is being in God's presence. The wicked will experience this, and will not desire it.

 Quote:
Nevertheless, she doesn't conclude they would die or desire to die. They would simply rather live somewhere else.


DA 764 says this, quoting Christ ("All they that hate me love (choose) death").

 Quote:
So, I'm not finding support for your idea that the truth and the glory of God is what causes the resurrected wicked to die or to desire to die at the end of time.


DA 108 is very clear about this. Read the part about the glory of God destroying sin wherever it is found, and how those who insist on clinging to it will be destroyed. Also there's the statement I've been repeated citing which states that the light of the glory of God, which gives life to the righteous, will destroy the wicked. Also there's the statement in DA 764 which says that the glory of Him who is love will destroy them.

 Quote:
Instead, it is fire rained down from above and raised up from below that causes the wicked to suffer and die in duration and in proportion to their sinfulness. Which is also the point.


This isn't considering DA 108, DA 764, GC 541-543, and other places where she describes the judgment. It's just looking at a description of the vision, without considering the principles involved. Please consider DA 764, the two paragraphs starting with her stating that the destruction of the wicked is *not* due to an arbitrary act of power on God's part. It seems to me you keep asserting that it is.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/18/08 05:54 PM

Tom, if what you believe is true, how do you explain the fact that the resurrected sinners are neither slain or destroyed during their initial exposure to the truth or to the glory of God nor do they desire to die?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/18/08 05:59 PM

With these things in mind - Will Jesus change our character when He returns? Or, must the necessary and required changes happen before we die? How does this apply to the thief on the cross? Did he change his character sufficiently so that no further changes were necessary for him to be admitted to heaven? Or, did he possess certain unknown defective character traits that must be dealt with en route to heaven before being admitted therein?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/18/08 07:21 PM

 Quote:
Tom, if what you believe is true, how do you explain the fact that the resurrected sinners are neither slain or destroyed during their initial exposure to the truth or to the glory of God nor do they desire to die?


From DA:

 Quote:
To sin, wherever found, "our God is a consuming fire." Heb. 12:29. In all who submit to His power the Spirit of God will consume sin. But if men cling to sin, they become identified with it. Then the glory of God, which destroys sin, must destroy them. (DA 107)


This happens during the judgment. In the even you are speaking of, the judgment has not yet taken place; it is just starting.

 Quote:
With these things in mind - Will Jesus change our character when He returns?


How would He do this? Our character is formed by the decisions we make. How could Jesus change it in between when we died and when we were resurrected? To do so He would have to make decisions for us.

 Quote:
Or, must the necessary and required changes happen before we die? How does this apply to the thief on the cross? Did he change his character sufficiently so that no further changes were necessary for him to be admitted to heaven?


This is an odd way of putting it. A simpler way of putting it is that he was converted. Those who accept Christ as their personal Savior (assuming they don't turn away from Christ) go to heaven when they die.

 Quote:
Or, did he possess certain unknown defective character traits that must be dealt with en route to heaven before being admitted therein?


You're assuming there's an "or" here, as if it's either this or that. Specifically you are assuming that one cannot have unknown defective character traits and go to heaven. But having unknown defective character traits has never been a test. The thief on the cross accepted Christ, so he is fine.

The thief asked Christ, "Remember me in your kingdom," so Christ will. Christ will remember anyone who makes this request sincerely with a contrite heart, as the penitent thief did.

Basically there's one question to ask. Would (whoever) be happy in heaven? GC 543 describes how those who have rejected Christ would "long to flee from that holy place." Those who have refused to die to self would not be in happy. Since it is contrary to God's will to cause unnecessary suffering (they have no capacity to repent), he will not take them there. The theif on the cross would be happy there (indeed, wanted to go, and asked to do so), and so he will be there.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/19/08 05:30 PM

 Originally Posted By: MM
Tom, if what you believe is true, how do you explain the fact that the resurrected sinners are neither slain or destroyed during their initial exposure to the truth or to the glory of God nor do they desire to die?

You didn't address this question. Quoting DA 107 does not address it.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Those who accept Christ as their personal Savior (assuming they don't turn away from Christ) go to heaven when they die.

"When they die"? Don't you mean when Jesus returns?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Specifically you are assuming that one cannot have unknown defective character traits and go to heaven. But having unknown defective character traits has never been a test. The thief on the cross accepted Christ, so he is fine.

What constitutes an "unknown defective trait of character"? That has been my question from the beginning. Do you still agree it cannot include habits that cause people to despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/20/08 07:24 AM

 Quote:
Tom, if what you believe is true, how do you explain the fact that the resurrected sinners are neither slain or destroyed during their initial exposure to the truth or to the glory of God nor do they desire to die?

You didn't address this question. Quoting DA 107 does not address it.


Yes I did. I didn't just quote DA 107. What I wrote following that was also addressing this question.

 Quote:

Originally Posted By: Tom
Those who accept Christ as their personal Savior (assuming they don't turn away from Christ) go to heaven when they die.

"When they die"? Don't you mean when Jesus returns?


Of course. Just like Paul.

 Quote:
Originally Posted By: Tom
Specifically you are assuming that one cannot have unknown defective character traits and go to heaven. But having unknown defective character traits has never been a test. The thief on the cross accepted Christ, so he is fine.

What constitutes an "unknown defective trait of character"?


A defective trait of which one is unaware.

 Quote:
That has been my question from the beginning. Do you still agree it cannot include habits that cause people to despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ?


People can despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ for any reason, can't they? What would be an example of something for which a person could not despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ? Judas despised the Gospel of Jesus Christ because it didn't involve a kindgom that would be established on the basis of selfish glory.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/25/08 08:01 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: Tom, if what you believe is true, how do you explain the fact that the resurrected sinners are neither slain or destroyed during their initial exposure to the truth or to the glory of God nor do they desire to die? You didn't address this question. Quoting DA 107 does not address it.

TE: Yes I did. I didn't just quote DA 107. What I wrote following that was also addressing this question.

GC 662 does not agree with your interpretation and application of the principles outlined in DA 107. Again, the resurrected sinners are neither slain or destroyed during their initial exposure to the truth or to the glory of God. Nor do they desire to die. You have yet to explain this truth.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: What constitutes an "unknown defective trait of character"? That has been my question from the beginning. Do you still agree it cannot include habits that cause people to despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ?

TE: A defective trait of which one is unaware. People can despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ for any reason, can't they? What would be an example of something for which a person could not despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ? Judas despised the Gospel of Jesus Christ because it didn't involve a kindgom that would be established on the basis of selfish glory.

Are you suggesting Judas' selfishness constitutes an example of an unknown defective trait of character which God waits to reveal to people because it would be too painful for them to confront and confess and crucify before they experience the miracle of rebirth?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/25/08 08:32 PM

 Quote:
GC 662 does not agree with your interpretation and application of the principles outlined in DA 107.


It does! I formulated by understanding of GC 662 precisely because of DA 107. Otoh, I've not seen you incorporate DA 107, or DA 764, or GC 541-543 into your thoughts regarding GC 662 at all.

 Quote:
Again, the resurrected sinners are neither slain or destroyed during their initial exposure to the truth or to the glory of God. Nor do they desire to die. You have yet to explain this truth.


They're irrelevant to my view. There's nothing to explain. DA 107, nor the other passages, do not discuss "initial exposures" to truth. This is an idea you have. I've never said anything about "initial exposures."

 Quote:
TE: A defective trait of which one is unaware. People can despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ for any reason, can't they? What would be an example of something for which a person could not despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ? Judas despised the Gospel of Jesus Christ because it didn't involve a kingdom that would be established on the basis of selfish glory.

Are you suggesting Judas' selfishness constitutes an example of an unknown defective trait of character which God waits to reveal to people because it would be too painful for them to confront and confess and crucify before they experience the miracle of rebirth?


No. I was pointing out that Judas despised the Gospel of Jesus Christ because it didn't involve a kingdom that would be established on the basis of selfish glory. Thus Judas despised the Gospel of Jesus Christ even though Jesus had done nothing wrong.

You asked:

 Quote:
MM: What constitutes an "unknown defective trait of character"? That has been my question from the beginning. Do you still agree it cannot include habits that cause people to despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ?


I pointed out that people can reject the Gospel for many reasons, including reasons which do not involve wrongdoing on the part of the one whom they are using as a scapegoat for their rejection.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/27/08 11:54 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
GC 662 does not agree with your interpretation and application of the principles outlined in DA 107.


It does! I formulated by understanding of GC 662 precisely because of DA 107. Otoh, I've not seen you incorporate DA 107, or DA 764, or GC 541-543 into your thoughts regarding GC 662 at all.

Obviously neither the truth nor the glory of God causes the resurrected sinners to die or to desire to die. Thus, it must be something else that causes them to die. I believe it is the fire God rains down upon them from above and raises up from beneath. The truth and God's unveiled glory also contribute to the agony and anguish they experience in the lake of fire.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
 Quote:
Again, the resurrected sinners are neither slain or destroyed during their initial exposure to the truth or to the glory of God. Nor do they desire to die. You have yet to explain this truth.


They're irrelevant to my view. There's nothing to explain. DA 107, nor the other passages, do not discuss "initial exposures" to truth. This is an idea you have. I've never said anything about "initial exposures."

Here it is again: "Every eye in that vast multitude is turned to behold the [1] glory of the Son of God. With one voice the wicked hosts exclaim: "Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord!" It is not love to Jesus that inspires this utterance. The force of [2] truth urges the words from unwilling lips." {GC 662.2} This passage describes their initial exposure to the truth and to the glory of God. Please note that neither one causes them to die or to desire to die.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
 Quote:
TE: A defective trait of which one is unaware. People can despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ for any reason, can't they? What would be an example of something for which a person could not despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ? Judas despised the Gospel of Jesus Christ because it didn't involve a kingdom that would be established on the basis of selfish glory.

MM: Are you suggesting Judas' selfishness constitutes an example of an unknown defective trait of character which God waits to reveal to people because it would be too painful for them to confront and confess and crucify before they experience the miracle of rebirth?


No. I was pointing out that Judas despised the Gospel of Jesus Christ because it didn't involve a kingdom that would be established on the basis of selfish glory. Thus Judas despised the Gospel of Jesus Christ even though Jesus had done nothing wrong.

You asked:

 Quote:
MM: What constitutes an "unknown defective trait of character"? That has been my question from the beginning. Do you still agree it cannot include habits that cause people to despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ?


I pointed out that people can reject the Gospel for many reasons, including reasons which do not involve wrongdoing on the part of the one whom they are using as a scapegoat for their rejection.

Do you still agree, then, that an unknown defective trait of character cannot include *sinful* habits that cause people to despise the Gospel of Jesus Christ? Please note that I added the word "sinful".
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 06/28/08 07:08 AM

Regarding the destruction of the wicked, we're discussing this on another thread. Rather than repeat my whole post there, I'll just point out that she writes that the same thing that gives life to the righteous is what slays the wicked, so unless literal fire gives life to the righteous, I think that pretty much puts an end to the idea that literal fire slays the wicked.

Regarding your last question, you ask questions that have false assumptions in them (at least, what I would regard as false assumptions) routinely, and that makes them difficult to respond to, as I have to deal with the false assumption, meaning I don't really get to the question. Here the false assumption is highlighted by the word "still." I've been disagreeing with you all along. I've never agree with what you're saying in the first place. What you are considering as my agreeing with you was my disagreeing with another question you put in way that couldn't be answered "no." The fact that I couldn't answer the question "no," didn't mean I was agreeing with you then either.

I've been pointing out to you that people can despise the Gospel of Christ even if one does nothing wrong. Given this to be the case, the answer to your question must be "no," since people can despise the Gospel for reasons including sinful habits, non-sinful habits, or no habits at all.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/02/08 02:25 AM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
Regarding the destruction of the wicked, we're discussing this on another thread. Rather than repeat my whole post there, I'll just point out that she writes that the same thing that gives life to the righteous is what slays the wicked, so unless literal fire gives life to the righteous, I think that pretty much puts an end to the idea that literal fire slays the wicked.

Did literal fire give or take life in the furnace on the plain of Dura?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Regarding your last question, you ask questions that have false assumptions in them (at least, what I would regard as false assumptions) routinely, and that makes them difficult to respond to, as I have to deal with the false assumption, meaning I don't really get to the question. Here the false assumption is highlighted by the word "still." I've been disagreeing with you all along. I've never agree with what you're saying in the first place. What you are considering as my agreeing with you was my disagreeing with another question you put in way that couldn't be answered "no." The fact that I couldn't answer the question "no," didn't mean I was agreeing with you then either.

I've been pointing out to you that people can despise the Gospel of Christ even if one does nothing wrong. Given this to be the case, the answer to your question must be "no," since people can despise the Gospel for reasons including sinful habits, non-sinful habits, or no habits at all.

What are you saying then? Will people who come up in the first resurrection have cultivated sinful traits of character that must be changed before they can enter heaven? If not, does that mean they crucified them before they died? if so, how does this apply to the thief on the cross?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/02/08 03:50 AM

 Quote:
TE:Regarding the destruction of the wicked, we're discussing this on another thread. Rather than repeat my whole post there, I'll just point out that she writes that the same thing that gives life to the righteous is what slays the wicked, so unless literal fire gives life to the righteous, I think that pretty much puts an end to the idea that literal fire slays the wicked.

MM:Did literal fire give or take life in the furnace on the plain of Dura?


Did literal fire give life to the righteous on the plain of Dura?

 Quote:
Regarding your last question, you ask questions that have false assumptions in them (at least, what I would regard as false assumptions) routinely, and that makes them difficult to respond to, as I have to deal with the false assumption, meaning I don't really get to the question. Here the false assumption is highlighted by the word "still." I've been disagreeing with you all along. I've never agree with what you're saying in the first place. What you are considering as my agreeing with you was my disagreeing with another question you put in way that couldn't be answered "no." The fact that I couldn't answer the question "no," didn't mean I was agreeing with you then either.

I've been pointing out to you that people can despise the Gospel of Christ even if one does nothing wrong. Given this to be the case, the answer to your question must be "no," since people can despise the Gospel for reasons including sinful habits, non-sinful habits, or no habits at all.

What are you saying then? Will people who come up in the first resurrection have cultivated sinful traits of character that must be changed before they can enter heaven?


This is kind of a pointless question, isn't it? If they are in the first resurrection, they are going to heaven, so how could they have any cultivated sinful traits of character that must changed before they can enter heaven, since they're there?

Anyway, focusing on cultivated sinful traits isn't the right thing to focus on, IMO. If a person is right with God, the character will testify to that. It is not cultivated sinful traits that keep out of heaven, but rejection of the Holy Spirit. One is a cause, the other a symptom. The root problem must be taken care of; just treating the symptom without getting at the root won't work.

 Quote:
If not, does that mean they crucified them before they died? if so, how does this apply to the thief on the cross?


The thief on the cross is a good example of my point. Obviously he didn't have time to deal with every sinful habit, but he had time to repent of the ones the Holy Spirit convicted him of, and that was enough. He could go to heaven because he was right with God, which is the requirement. This requirement is not an arbitrary one, God has no arbitrary rules which must be met, but simply reflects the reality of the situation, which is that one must be right with God to spend eternity in heaven (and the new earth) because otherwise one would be miserable. God would be subjecting such a one to the equivalent of endless torment.

Christ saw the thief on the cross would be happy in paradise, and that was enough. Certainly Christ did not have time to go through an inventory of every sinful habit. What did Christ see? He saw a person who was repentant; He recognized he was talking to one who was responding to the Holy Spirit, which was manifest in the thief's being able to recognize who Christ was.

That was enough for Christ. He assured him he would be in paradise.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/02/08 09:10 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
TE:Regarding the destruction of the wicked, we're discussing this on another thread. Rather than repeat my whole post there, I'll just point out that she writes that the same thing that gives life to the righteous is what slays the wicked, so unless literal fire gives life to the righteous, I think that pretty much puts an end to the idea that literal fire slays the wicked.

MM:Did literal fire give or take life in the furnace on the plain of Dura?

TE: Did literal fire give life to the righteous on the plain of Dura?

No. But neither is "the light of the glory of God" the source that gives life to the righteous. They are already alive, so obviously it isn't the source of life. True, it adds to their life, but how?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
TE: Regarding your last question, you ask questions that have false assumptions in them (at least, what I would regard as false assumptions) routinely, and that makes them difficult to respond to, as I have to deal with the false assumption, meaning I don't really get to the question. Here the false assumption is highlighted by the word "still." I've been disagreeing with you all along. I've never agree with what you're saying in the first place. What you are considering as my agreeing with you was my disagreeing with another question you put in way that couldn't be answered "no." The fact that I couldn't answer the question "no," didn't mean I was agreeing with you then either.

I've been pointing out to you that people can despise the Gospel of Christ even if one does nothing wrong. Given this to be the case, the answer to your question must be "no," since people can despise the Gospel for reasons including sinful habits, non-sinful habits, or no habits at all.

MM: What are you saying then? Will people who come up in the first resurrection have cultivated sinful traits of character that must be changed before they can enter heaven?

TE: This is kind of a pointless question, isn't it? If they are in the first resurrection, they are going to heaven, so how could they have any cultivated sinful traits of character that must changed before they can enter heaven, since they're there?

Anyway, focusing on cultivated sinful traits isn't the right thing to focus on, IMO. If a person is right with God, the character will testify to that. It is not cultivated sinful traits that keep out of heaven, but rejection of the Holy Spirit. One is a cause, the other a symptom. The root problem must be taken care of; just treating the symptom without getting at the root won't work.

So, are people born again without the root of the problem? If so, does that mean they are also born again without the corresponding fruits, that is, sinful cultivated traits of character?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: If not, does that mean they crucified them before they died? if so, how does this apply to the thief on the cross?

TE: The thief on the cross is a good example of my point. Obviously he didn't have time to deal with every sinful habit, but he had time to repent of the ones the Holy Spirit convicted him of, and that was enough. He could go to heaven because he was right with God, which is the requirement. This requirement is not an arbitrary one, God has no arbitrary rules which must be met, but simply reflects the reality of the situation, which is that one must be right with God to spend eternity in heaven (and the new earth) because otherwise one would be miserable. God would be subjecting such a one to the equivalent of endless torment.

Christ saw the thief on the cross would be happy in paradise, and that was enough. Certainly Christ did not have time to go through an inventory of every sinful habit. What did Christ see? He saw a person who was repentant; He recognized he was talking to one who was responding to the Holy Spirit, which was manifest in the thief's being able to recognize who Christ was.

That was enough for Christ. He assured him he would be in paradise.

Will the thief be resurrected with the sinful cultivated traits of character he did not have time to confess and crucify?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/07/08 01:47 AM

 Quote:
No. But neither is "the light of the glory of God" the source that gives life to the righteous.


Yes, He is.

 Quote:
They are already alive, so obviously it isn't the source of life.{/quote]

They live by Christ.

[quote]True, it adds to their life, but how?


Christ is their life.

 Quote:
The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked. (DA 108)


This says the light of the glory of God gives life to the righteous.

 Quote:
MM: What are you saying then? Will people who come up in the first resurrection have cultivated sinful traits of character that must be changed before they can enter heaven?

TE: This is kind of a pointless question, isn't it? If they are in the first resurrection, they are going to heaven, so how could they have any cultivated sinful traits of character that must changed before they can enter heaven, since they're there?

Anyway, focusing on cultivated sinful traits isn't the right thing to focus on, IMO. If a person is right with God, the character will testify to that. It is not cultivated sinful traits that keep out of heaven, but rejection of the Holy Spirit. One is a cause, the other a symptom. The root problem must be taken care of; just treating the symptom without getting at the root won't work.

So, are people born again without the root of the problem? If so, does that mean they are also born again without the corresponding fruits, that is, sinful cultivated traits of character?


I'm not following you. I was pointing out that you asked a pointless question, since you asked if people going to heaven would be kept out of heaven because of some characteristic they had. Obviously not, since they're going to heaven.

I also pointed out that I think focusing on sinful habits isn't the right thing to focus on. It seems like you're pretty much ignoring the points I made, and simply focussing on that which I just pointed out isn't the right thing to focus on.

 Quote:
Will the thief be resurrected with the sinful cultivated traits of character he did not have time to confess and crucify?


Give an example please. I'm not sure what you're asking here.

It seems like there are two possibilities.

1.The theif on the cross was perfect.
2.He wasn't, but was going to heaven anyway (on the basis of something other than being perfect).

Are you asserting that 1. is the case? If not, then in what way was the thief on the cross not perfect?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/09/08 09:57 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
No. But neither is "the light of the glory of God" the source that gives life to the righteous.

Yes, He is.

The “light” in this quote is referring to the divine light that radiates from God’s person – not Jesus. If she had meant Jesus she would capitalized it (i.e. Light).

MH 36
The followers of Christ are to be the light of the world; but God does not bid them make an effort to shine. {MH 36.3}

MH 419
Christ, the Light of the world, veiled the dazzling splendor of His divinity and came to live as a man among men, that they might, without being consumed, become acquainted with their Creator. {MH 419.1}

EW 198
As Stephen stood before his judges, the light of the glory of God rested upon his countenance. {EW 198.1}

DA 137
The next day John sees Jesus coming. With the light of the glory of God resting upon him, the prophet stretches out his hands, declaring, "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world! {DA 137.1}

LHU 78
Direct from the throne proceeded the light of the glory of God. The heavens were opened, and beams of light and glory proceeded therefrom and assumed the form of a dove, in appearance like burnished gold. The dovelike form was emblematical of the meekness and gentleness of Christ. {LHU 78.5}

Do you see the comparisons and contrasts in these passages?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
 Quote:
They are already alive, so obviously it isn't the source of life.

They live by Christ.

 Quote:
True, it adds to their life, but how?

Christ is their life.

 Quote:
The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked. (DA 108)

This says the light of the glory of God gives life to the righteous.

When - at the resurrection? Also, are you implying the phrase, The light of the glory of God, is referring to Jesus? If so, does that mean Jesus will slay the wicked?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: What are you saying then? Will people who come up in the first resurrection have cultivated sinful traits of character that must be changed before they can enter heaven?

TE: This is kind of a pointless question, isn't it? If they are in the first resurrection, they are going to heaven, so how could they have any cultivated sinful traits of character that must changed before they can enter heaven, since they're there?

Anyway, focusing on cultivated sinful traits isn't the right thing to focus on, IMO. If a person is right with God, the character will testify to that. It is not cultivated sinful traits that keep out of heaven, but rejection of the Holy Spirit. One is a cause, the other a symptom. The root problem must be taken care of; just treating the symptom without getting at the root won't work.

MM: So, are people born again without the root of the problem? If so, does that mean they are also born again without the corresponding fruits, that is, sinful cultivated traits of character?

TE: I'm not following you. I was pointing out that you asked a pointless question, since you asked if people going to heaven would be kept out of heaven because of some characteristic they had. Obviously not, since they're going to heaven.

I also pointed out that I think focusing on sinful habits isn't the right thing to focus on. It seems like you're pretty much ignoring the points I made, and simply focussing on that which I just pointed out isn't the right thing to focus on.

You wrote, “Obviously not, since they're going to heaven.” I agree. But my question is – When did they crucify the cultivated traits of character that would have prevented them from going to heaven? I’m focusing on victory, not sin.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: Will the thief be resurrected with the sinful cultivated traits of character he did not have time to confess and crucify?

TE: Give an example please. I'm not sure what you're asking here. It seems like there are two possibilities.

1.The theif on the cross was perfect.
2.He wasn't, but was going to heaven anyway (on the basis of something other than being perfect).

Are you asserting that 1. is the case? If not, then in what way was the thief on the cross not perfect?

“Will the thief be resurrected with the sinful cultivated traits of character he did not have time to confess and crucify?” My answer to this question is – No. He crucified all of his sinful cultivated traits of character before he died. He experienced the following:

 Quote:
SC 29, 31, 35
One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}

If you see your sinfulness, do not wait to make yourself better. How many there are who think they are not good enough to come to Christ. Do you expect to become better through your own efforts? "Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil." Jeremiah 13:23. There is help for us only in God. We must not wait for stronger persuasions, for better opportunities, or for holier tempers. We can do nothing of ourselves. We must come to Christ just as we are. {SC 31.1}

As you see the enormity of sin, as you see yourself as you really are, do not give up to despair. It was sinners that Christ came to save. We have not to reconcile God to us, but--O wondrous love!--God in Christ is "reconciling the world unto Himself." 2 Corinthians 5:19. He is wooing by His tender love the hearts of His erring children. No earthly parent could be as patient with the faults and mistakes of his children, as is God with those He seeks to save. No one could plead more tenderly with the transgressor. No human lips ever poured out more tender entreaties to the wanderer than does He. All His promises, His warnings, are but the breathing of unutterable love. {SC 35.3}

We have been great sinners, but Christ died that we might be forgiven. The merits of His sacrifice are sufficient to present to the Father in our behalf. Those to whom He has forgiven most will love Him most, and will stand nearest to His throne to praise Him for His great love and infinite sacrifice. It is when we most fully comprehend the love of God that we best realize the sinfulness of sin. When we see the length of the chain that was let down for us, when we understand something of the infinite sacrifice that Christ has made in our behalf, the heart is melted with tenderness and contrition. {SC 35.4}

In other words, he experienced a full and complete death to sin, self, and Satan. Nothing survived or was overlooked to be revealed later on. You, on the other hand, seem to be saying he died with all manner of cultivated sinful traits of character uncrucified. Or, did I misunderstand you?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/10/08 03:39 AM

MM, I think I can answer all your cultivated sinful trait questions at once simply by stating that I don't believe that when we are born again that we are morally perfect.

Regarding Jesus being the light of the glory of God, it's easy to see this in three ways:

1.The same thing, the "light of the glory of God," that gives life to the righteous slays the wicked. Jesus Christ gives life to the righteous. Therefore He is the "light of the glory of God." Clearly it cannot be the light that physically emanates from God because that light doesn't give life to the righteous.

2.Light = Revelation, Glory = Character. Jesus Christ is the revealer of the character of God; therefore He is the light of the glory of God.

3.The very next sentence after the "light of the glory of God statement" is: "In the time of John the Baptist, Christ was about to appear as the revealer of the character of God."

Seeing this last sentence is what made me hit my forehead in disbelief at my slowness of comprehension. How many times had I quoted this sentence, about the light of the glory of God, without realizing it was Jesus Christ? As soon as I thought of it, it was easy to see how it all fits together.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/10/08 06:27 PM

Tom, if you do not believe people are born again morally perfect, does that mean you believe they are born again morally imperfect? Do you believe the thief died morally imperfect? If so, do you believe he will be resurrected morally imperfect?

Also, I agree with you that the title "the Light of the glory of God" refers to Jesus; however, I do not agree with you that the phrase "the light of the glory of God" refers to Jesus. I believe it refers to the brightness of His glory. "His countenance outshines the dazzling brightness of the noonday sun." GC 641.

AA 117
When the glory was withdrawn, and Saul arose from the ground, he found himself totally deprived of sight. The brightness of Christ's glory had been too intense for his mortal eyes; and when it was removed, the blackness of night settled upon his vision. {AA 117.3}

CON 29
He saw the brightness of the Father's glory overshadowing the form of Jesus, thus pointing out in that crowd the One whom He acknowledged as His Son with unmistakable assurance. Con 29.1}

FLB 353
At the coming of Christ the wicked are blotted from the face of the whole earth--consumed with the spirit of His mouth, and destroyed by the brightness of His glory. Christ takes His people to the city of God, and the earth is emptied of its inhabitants. {FLB 353.2}

AG 369
"And they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light" (Rev. 22:5). The light of the sun will be superseded by a radiance which is not painfully dazzling, yet which immeasurably surpasses the brightness of our noontide. The glory of God and the Lamb floods the Holy City with unfading light. The redeemed walk in the sunless glory of perpetual day. {AG 369.3}

There are many forms of light, some are harmless and helpful, while others are dangerous and destructive. Surely you can see from the passages quoted above that the light of God's glory is literal light. Do you?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/10/08 07:21 PM

 Quote:
Tom, if you do not believe people are born again morally perfect, does that mean you believe they are born again morally imperfect? Do you believe the thief died morally imperfect? If so, do you believe he will be resurrected morally imperfect?

Also, I agree with you that the title "the Light of the glory of God" refers to Jesus; however, I do not agree with you that the phrase "the light of the glory of God" refers to Jesus.


Capitalizing a letter isn't what determines if to what or whom a passage refers. The context does.

 Quote:
I believe it refers to the brightness of His glory. "His countenance outshines the dazzling brightness of the noonday sun." GC 641.


The context doesn't fit. I presented you with 3 arguments demonstrated that "the light of the glory of God" refers to Jesus Christ. The easiest way to see this is by considering the very next sentence! "In the time of John the Baptist, Christ was about to appear as the revealer of the character of God."

"Light of the glory of God" = "Revelation (or revealer) of the character of God"

Here's an example that your idea of capitalization is off. She refers to Christ as "the revealer of the character of God." The "r" in "revealer" is not capitalized, yet you can see that this refers to Christ, right?

 Quote:
There are many forms of light, some are harmless and helpful, while others are dangerous and destructive. Surely you can see from the passages quoted above that the light of God's glory is literal light. Do you?


In the passage under consideration, in DA 108, it's clearly *not* literal light, as the light referred to gives life to the righteous. Literal light does not give life to the righteous. I've made this point many times now. I don't believe you've acknowledged this point, which is easy to see. The same thing that gives life to the righteous destroys the wicked. You have never had an explanation for this.

Regarding the passages you gave, I'm not going to go through each one, but I'll consider the first one:

 Quote:
When the glory was withdrawn, and Saul arose from the ground, he found himself totally deprived of sight. The brightness of Christ's glory had been too intense for his mortal eyes; and when it was removed, the blackness of night settled upon his vision. {AA 117.3}


This could not have been a literal physical bright light because Saul was the only one who saw it.

Anyway, the fact that some passage somewhere speaks of literal light does not mean the one in DA 108 is. In fact, it is clear that it isn't, because the light referred to in DA 108 gives life to the righteous. Who gives life to the righteous? Jesus Christ.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/10/08 07:49 PM

 Quote:
Tom, if you do not believe people are born again morally perfect, does that mean you believe they are born again morally imperfect?


I would say people are not born again morally perfect. Regarding the other two questions, I'm not sure how you would define "morally imperfect." It would be difficult to characterize one in heaven as morally imperfect. Perhaps "morally immature" would be a better term.

When one referred to Jesus as "good," Jesus replied, "Why do you call me good? Only God is good." I would have the same reaction to "morally perfect" as Jesus did to "good."

MM, if you think of yourself as morally perfect, then you have no need for mercy, do you?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/18/08 07:12 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
Also, I agree with you that the title "the Light of the glory of God" refers to Jesus; however, I do not agree with you that the phrase "the light of the glory of God" refers to Jesus.

Capitalizing a letter isn't what determines if to what or whom a passage refers. The context does.

Every time she capitalizes a word, as in the word "Light" quoted above, it refers to a title, especially when it refers to Divine titles. In this case, the title "Light" is referring to Jesus, and it may or may not be a reference to the brightness of His radiant glory. But when the word "light" (lower case) is used, instead of the word "Light" (upper case), it almost always refers to the dazzling brightness of His radiant glory, which outshines the sun.

Can you think of a different word she uses to describe the fact Jesus glows, shines more brightly than our sun?

 Originally Posted By: tom
 Quote:
I believe it refers to the brightness of His glory. "His countenance outshines the dazzling brightness of the noonday sun." GC 641.

The context doesn't fit. I presented you with 3 arguments demonstrated that "the light of the glory of God" refers to Jesus Christ. The easiest way to see this is by considering the very next sentence! "In the time of John the Baptist, Christ was about to appear as the revealer of the character of God."

Here's the context (what you call the very next sentence is actually in the very next paragraph):

DA 107, 108
To sin, wherever found, "our God is a consuming fire." Heb. 12:29. In all who submit to His power the Spirit of God will consume sin. But if men cling to sin, they become identified with it. Then the glory of God, which destroys sin, must destroy them. Jacob, after his night of wrestling with the Angel, exclaimed, "I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved." Gen. 32: 30. Jacob had been guilty of a great sin in his conduct toward Esau; but he had repented. His transgression had been forgiven, and his sin purged; therefore he could endure the revelation of God's presence. But wherever men came before God while willfully cherishing evil, they were destroyed. At the second advent of Christ the wicked shall be consumed "with the Spirit of His mouth," and destroyed "with the brightness of His coming." 2 Thess. 2:8. The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked. {DA 107.4}

Let’s take a closer look at this paragraph. “To sin, wherever found, ‘our God is a consuming fire.’ Heb. 12:29. In all who submit to His power the Spirit of God will consume sin.” The Holy Spirit is compared to a consuming fire. He consumes sin in penitent sinners. This form of fire obviously does not consume sinful flesh.

The next part reads: “But if men cling to sin, they become identified with it. Then the glory of God, which destroys sin, must destroy them.” This form of fire destroys sin, but it also destroys sinful flesh in the process. Sinners are, in this case, collateral damage.

Moving on to the next section: “Jacob, after his night of wrestling with the Angel, exclaimed, "I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved." Gen. 32: 30. Jacob had been guilty of a great sin in his conduct toward Esau; but he had repented. His transgression had been forgiven, and his sin purged; therefore he could endure the revelation of God's presence.” In this case, the revelation of God’s physical presence, seeing Him face to face, did not destroy sinful flesh.

And then: “But wherever men came before God while willfully cherishing evil, they were destroyed.” In such cases, the revelation of God’s physical presence destroyed sinful flesh. I suppose she has Nadab and Abihu in mind.

Finally: “At the second advent of Christ the wicked shall be consumed ‘with the Spirit of His mouth,’ and destroyed ‘with the brightness of His coming.’ 2 Thess. 2:8. The light of the glory of God, which imparts life to the righteous, will slay the wicked.” Here she compares “the light of the glory of God” to “the brightness of His coming”, which destroys the wicked when Jesus arrives in the clouds of glory. This same bright, divine light source imparts life to the righteous. See my comments below.

 Originally Posted By: tom
"Light of the glory of God" = "Revelation (or revealer) of the character of God"

Here's an example that your idea of capitalization is off. She refers to Christ as "the revealer of the character of God." The "r" in "revealer" is not capitalized, yet you can see that this refers to Christ, right?

You’re right, Tom, she didn’t always capitalize titles. But note the following capitalized titles:

COL 37
Ever since the fall of man, Christ had been the Revealer of truth to the world. {COL 37.1}

PK 499
Their lives were spared because of Daniel's connection with the Revealer of secrets. {PK 499.3}

4BC 1166
He is revealed as the monarch of the universe, about to set up His everlasting kingdom--the Ancient of days, the living God, the Source of all wisdom, the Ruler of the present, the Revealer of the future. {4BC 1166.4}

 Originally Posted By: tom
 Quote:
There are many forms of light, some are harmless and helpful, while others are dangerous and destructive. Surely you can see from the passages quoted above that the light of God's glory is literal light. Do you?

In the passage under consideration, in DA 108, it's clearly *not* literal light, as the light referred to gives life to the righteous. Literal light does not give life to the righteous. I've made this point many times now. I don't believe you've acknowledged this point, which is easy to see. The same thing that gives life to the righteous destroys the wicked. You have never had an explanation for this.

Actually, Tom, literal light is a source of life and death in many different situations. Too much or too little light is a contributing factor in death. Just the right amount and kind of light is a contributing factor in life. Check out these links:

http://www.astronomynotes.com/light/s3.htm
http://sciencelinks.jp/content/view/33/33/

The light of the glory of God is a form of light that can give life or take life. Of course, it is not the only factor involved. Whether or not a person lives or dies in the presence of divine light depends on the type of flesh they have: sinful flesh cannot withstand the unveiled light of God’s radiant glory., whereas, sinless flesh thrives in it.

 Originally Posted By: tom
Regarding the passages you gave, I'm not going to go through each one, but I'll consider the first one:

 Quote:
When the glory was withdrawn, and Saul arose from the ground, he found himself totally deprived of sight. The brightness of Christ's glory had been too intense for his mortal eyes; and when it was removed, the blackness of night settled upon his vision. {AA 117.3}

This could not have been a literal physical bright light because Saul was the only one who saw it.

Here is the context of the light:

 Quote:
AA 114, 115
While Saul, with his companions, gazed with admiration on the fruitful plain and the fair city below, "suddenly," as he afterward declared, there shone "round about me and them which journeyed with me" "a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun" (Acts 26:13), too glorious for mortal eyes to bear. Blinded and bewildered, Saul fell prostrate to the ground. {AA 114.1}

While the light continued to shine round about them, Saul heard, "a voice speaking . . . in the Hebrew tongue" (Acts 26:14), "saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou Me? And he said, Who art Thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks." {AA 114.2}

Filled with fear, and almost blinded by the intensity of the light, the companions of Saul heard a voice, but saw no man. But Saul understood the words that were spoken, and to him was clearly revealed the One who spoke --even the Son of God. In the glorious Being who stood before him he saw the Crucified One. Upon the soul of the stricken Jew the image of the Saviour's countenance was imprinted forever. The words spoken struck home to his heart with appalling force. Into the darkened chambers of his mind there poured a flood of light, revealing the ignorance and error of his former life and his present need of the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit. {AA 115.1}

I’m not sure how she could have stated it more clearly, Tom. Paul’s companions saw the light, too. They didn’t understand the voice, but they clearly saw the light. The light was literal light, don’t you agree? It had a physical effect of Paul. It caused blindness, and perhaps lifetime damage (not all agree this was the cause of Paul's "thorn in the flesh").

 Originally Posted By: tom
Anyway, the fact that some passage somewhere speaks of literal light does not mean the one in DA 108 is. In fact, it is clear that it isn't, because the light referred to in DA 108 gives life to the righteous. Who gives life to the righteous? Jesus Christ.

Jesus created us in such a way that several things are necessary to live eternally: 1) the breath of life, 2) the tree of life, 3) the water of life, and 4) the light of life. It is this form of light that she is referring to in DA 108. It gives life to those who possess sinless flesh and it takes life from those who posses sinful flesh. It is a physical light that has a physical effect and physical things.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/18/08 07:35 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
 Quote:
Tom, if you do not believe people are born again morally perfect, does that mean you believe they are born again morally imperfect? Do you believe the thief died morally imperfect? If so, do you believe he will be resurrected morally imperfect?

I would say people are not born again morally perfect.

You wrote: "I would say people are not born again morally perfect." Thank you for answering my question. It is helpful to know what you believe when discussing the miracle of rebirth. I like how Sister White put it in the following passage:

AA 476
"If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." 2 Corinthians 5:17. Through the power of Christ, men and women have broken the chains of sinful habit. They have renounced selfishness. The profane have become reverent, the drunken sober, the profligate pure. Souls that have borne the likeness of Satan have become transformed into the image of God. This change is in itself the miracle of miracles. A change wrought by the Word, it is one of the deepest mysteries of the Word. We cannot understand it; we can only believe, as declared by the Scriptures, it is "Christ in you, the hope of glory." {AA 476.1}

When the Spirit of God controls mind and heart, the converted soul breaks forth into a new song; for he realizes that in his experience the promise of God has been fulfilled, that his transgression has been forgiven, his sin covered. He has exercised repentance toward God for the violation of the divine law, and faith toward Christ, who died for man's justification. "Being justified by faith," he has "peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ." Romans 5:1. {AA 476.2}

But because this experience is his, the Christian is not therefore to fold his hands, content with that which has been accomplished for him. He who has determined to enter the spiritual kingdom will find that all the powers and passions of unregenerate nature, backed by the forces of the kingdom of darkness, are arrayed against him. Each day he must renew his consecration, each day do battle with evil. Old habits, hereditary tendencies to wrong, will strive for the mastery, and against these he is to be ever on guard, striving in Christ's strength for victory. {AA 476.3}

Again, she wrote: "Through the power of Christ, men and women have broken the chains of sinful habit. They have renounced selfishness." You seem to qualify this insight by saying she obviously isn't referring to all sinful habits or to all selfishness. Do you have quotes where she qualifies it in this way?

She also wrote: "He who has determined to enter the spiritual kingdom will find that all the powers and passions of unregenerate nature, backed by the forces of the kingdom of darkness, are arrayed against him. Each day he must renew his consecration, each day do battle with evil. Old habits, hereditary tendencies to wrong, will strive for the mastery, and against these he is to be ever on guard, striving in Christ's strength for victory." You seem to interpret this to mean they will discover new sinful habits after they are born again, or that they will gradually see their sinfulness and selfishness in a new and proper light.

 Originally Posted By: tom
Regarding the other two questions, I'm not sure how you would define "morally imperfect." It would be difficult to characterize one in heaven as morally imperfect. Perhaps "morally immature" would be a better term.

Would you apply the same term to the sinful habits and traits of character the thief took to the grave with him? Or, will they change names or titles after Jesus resurrects him? Can we really refer to uncrucified sinful habits and traits of character as "morally immature?" Where is sin referred to in this way in the inspired writings?

 Originally Posted By: tom
MM, if you think of yourself as morally perfect, then you have no need for mercy, do you?

Mercy will continue to be a reality throughout eternity, even after the extermination of our sins in the lake of fire. In Christ we are complete, morally perfect, lacking nothing - so far as our salvation status in concerned. Of course, we will continue to mature in the fruits of the Spirit. This maturation process will go on throughout eternity. Eternity isn't long enough for us to exhaust our potential to become more like Jesus. Oh blessed eternity!
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/18/08 09:11 PM

 Quote:
T:Regarding the other two questions, I'm not sure how you would define "morally imperfect." It would be difficult to characterize one in heaven as morally imperfect. Perhaps "morally immature" would be a better term.

MM:Would you apply the same term to the sinful habits and traits of character the thief took to the grave with him? Or, will they change names or titles after Jesus resurrects him?


You're serious? They change names or titles after Jesus resurrects him? How can this be a serious question?

 Quote:
Can we really refer to uncrucified sinful habits and traits of character as "morally immature?" Where is sin referred to in this way in the inspired writings?


You mean "character," not "sin." Here's an example:

 Quote:
The germination of the seed represents the beginning of spiritual life, and the development of the plant is a beautiful figure of Christian growth. As in nature, so in grace; there can be no life without growth. The plant must either grow or die. As its growth is silent and imperceptible, but continuous, so is the development of the Christian life. At every stage of development our life may be perfect; yet if God's purpose for us is fulfilled, there will be continual advancement. Sanctification is the work of a lifetime. As our opportunities multiply, our experience will enlarge, and our knowledge increase. We shall become strong to bear responsibility, and our maturity will be in proportion to our privileges. (COL 65)


 Quote:
TE:MM, if you think of yourself as morally perfect, then you have no need for mercy, do you?

MM:Mercy will continue to be a reality throughout eternity, even after the extermination of our sins in the lake of fire. In Christ we are complete, morally perfect, lacking nothing - so far as our salvation status in concerned.


You didn't say "In Christ" before. It seems to me we've had this conversation before, and I pointed out the same thing, and you agreed you should say "in Christ."
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/19/08 04:20 PM

 Quote:
AA 476
"If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." 2 Corinthians 5:17. Through the power of Christ, men and women have broken the chains of sinful habit. They have renounced selfishness. The profane have become reverent, the drunken sober, the profligate pure. Souls that have borne the likeness of Satan have become transformed into the image of God. This change is in itself the miracle of miracles. A change wrought by the Word, it is one of the deepest mysteries of the Word. We cannot understand it; we can only believe, as declared by the Scriptures, it is "Christ in you, the hope of glory." {AA 476.1}

When the Spirit of God controls mind and heart, the converted soul breaks forth into a new song; for he realizes that in his experience the promise of God has been fulfilled, that his transgression has been forgiven, his sin covered. He has exercised repentance toward God for the violation of the divine law, and faith toward Christ, who died for man's justification. "Being justified by faith," he has "peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ." Romans 5:1. {AA 476.2}

But because this experience is his, the Christian is not therefore to fold his hands, content with that which has been accomplished for him. He who has determined to enter the spiritual kingdom will find that all the powers and passions of unregenerate nature, backed by the forces of the kingdom of darkness, are arrayed against him. Each day he must renew his consecration, each day do battle with evil. Old habits, hereditary tendencies to wrong, will strive for the mastery, and against these he is to be ever on guard, striving in Christ's strength for victory. {AA 476.3}

In the above quote, Sister White wrote - "Through the power of Christ, men and women have broken the chains of sinful habit. They have renounced selfishness."

You seem to qualify this insight by saying she obviously isn't referring to all sinful habits or to all selfishness. Do you have quotes where she qualifies it in this way?

She also wrote - "He who has determined to enter the spiritual kingdom will find that all the powers and passions of unregenerate nature, backed by the forces of the kingdom of darkness, are arrayed against him. Each day he must renew his consecration, each day do battle with evil. Old habits, hereditary tendencies to wrong, will strive for the mastery, and against these he is to be ever on guard, striving in Christ's strength for victory."

You seem to interpret this to mean they will discover certain, hitherto unrevealed sinful habits after they are born again; or, you seem to say they will gradually see their unrevealed sinfulness and selfishness in a new and proper light as the Holy Spirit is able to get through to them. Where does she articulate this idea?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/19/08 05:11 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
TE:Regarding the other two questions, I'm not sure how you would define "morally imperfect." It would be difficult to characterize one in heaven as morally imperfect. Perhaps "morally immature" would be a better term.

MM:Would you apply the same term to the sinful habits and traits of character the thief took to the grave with him? Or, will they change names or titles after Jesus resurrects him?

TE: You're serious? They change names or titles after Jesus resurrects him? How can this be a serious question?

I took what you wrote seriously. That is, I assumed you were serious when you addressed my two questions by saying the moral imperfections the thief took with him to the grave would be regarded as "morally immature" in the resurrection. Please explain how his sinful habits will go from moral imperfections to merely morally immature habits in the "twinkling of an eye".

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: Can we really refer to uncrucified sinful habits and traits of character as "morally immature?" Where is sin referred to in this way in the inspired writings?

TE: You mean "character," not "sin." Here's an example:

"The germination of the seed represents the beginning of spiritual life, and the development of the plant is a beautiful figure of Christian growth. As in nature, so in grace; there can be no life without growth. The plant must either grow or die. As its growth is silent and imperceptible, but continuous, so is the development of the Christian life. At every stage of development our life may be perfect; yet if God's purpose for us is fulfilled, there will be continual advancement. Sanctification is the work of a lifetime. As our opportunities multiply, our experience will enlarge, and our knowledge increase. We shall become strong to bear responsibility, and our maturity will be in proportion to our privileges. (COL 65)

I meant cultivated sinful traits of character. Character is not neutral; it is either sinful or sinless. You said the thief took certain uncrucified cultivated sinful traits of character with him to the grave. Then you said in the resurrection these certain sinful traits of character will be reclassified as "morally mature", that it wouldn't make sense to label them "moral imperfections". Do you really believe this, or did I misunderstand you?

By the way, the quote you posted above does not address this situation. Instead, she is describing the process of sanctification, which happens before people die. She wrote - "At every stage of development our life may be perfect; yet if God's purpose for us is fulfilled, there will be continual advancement."

You seem to think this means the Holy Spirit will be able to gradually make born again believers aware that certain of their habits and cultivated traits of character are sinful, and that these things need to be confessed and crucified. But the "continual advancement" she is referring to has to do with "perfecting holiness", not unperfecting unholiness. Here's how she put it elsewhere:

ML 250
"The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul." Through obedience comes sanctification of body, soul, and spirit. This sanctification is a progressive work, and an advance from one stage of perfection to another. {ML 250.4}

HP 186
It is your work to advance toward perfection, making constant improvement, until at last you are pronounced worthy to receive immortal life. And even then the work of progression will not cease, but will continue throughout eternity. {HP 186.6}

Do you see what I mean? "... an advance from one stage of perfection to another." Not an advance from one stage of imperfection to a lesser stage of imperfection until we achieve perfection. It's not a process of devolution.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
TE: MM, if you think of yourself as morally perfect, then you have no need for mercy, do you?

MM: Mercy will continue to be a reality throughout eternity, even after the extermination of our sins in the lake of fire. In Christ we are complete, morally perfect, lacking nothing - so far as our salvation status in concerned.

TE: You didn't say "In Christ" before. It seems to me we've had this conversation before, and I pointed out the same thing, and you agreed you should say "in Christ."

I didn't say anything about it before this recent volley. I was merely addressing your observation regarding my moral perfection and whether or not I still need mercy. I answered it as you have instructed me. I thought I was being a good student.

In case you misunderstood me, though, let me clarify. By "in Christ" I do not mean certain of our sinful habits and cultivated traits of character are unknown to us, and that in Christ God winks at them until the Holy Spirit is finally able to get through to us, or that in Christ God treats us as if we are sinless whereas in reality we are very faulty and defective. Do you see what I mean?

Instead, I am implying that although people experience moral perfection the moment they crucify their old man habits of sin, their cultivated sinful traits of character, it does not mean they have learned how to obey and observe "all things whatsoever" Jesus commanded. See Matthew 28:19-20. For example, they might not have learned how to obey and observe the 7th day Sabbath before they experienced the miracle of rebirth. This is not a moral or immoral issue until they are convicted of the truth. Do you know what I mean?
Posted By: gordonb1

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/19/08 06:09 PM

With 'Christ in you, the hope of glory', there should be no desire to sin, for He never had such desire. Sin found no responding chord in His mind.

The real issue is surrender, subjection, but these are only accomplished by faith. Peter had not fully surrendered his own will when he thrice denied the Saviour. If we are in subjection to Christ and His Spirit dwells within us, our motives and actions will be heaven directed. Our choices will be correct. When we see light, we will not call it darkness and thereby grieve the Spirit.

Though never a Sabbathkeeper or monogamous, a Spirit-led soul will advance from strength to strength as Christ leads him into all truth. This I understand to be sanctification, accepting the light as it comes and walking in it. The thief on the cross surrendered fully and was ready to follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth.

The 'partially converted' man wants to serve two masters because he cannot trust and fully surrender to His Creator and the Head of the Church, Jesus Christ. This is not surrender, but rebellion, choosing his own will over God's will.

To clarify, I understand sanctification as living up to all the light God shows us. Such will be no burden for the human who is subject to Christ. There will be no conflict.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/19/08 07:04 PM

"Will Jesus change our character when He returns?"

NO.

Sorry, I haven't read the entire discussion, but just thought I would enter my response.

Jesus will change our character NOW, if, and only if, we are beholding Him. By beholding, we become changed. At the time of Jesus' arrival, it is then too late to perfect our characters.

However, we will never stop learning. Knowledge and character are two separate things.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/20/08 05:11 AM

 Quote:
TE:Regarding the other two questions, I'm not sure how you would define "morally imperfect." It would be difficult to characterize one in heaven as morally imperfect. Perhaps "morally immature" would be a better term.

MM:Would you apply the same term to the sinful habits and traits of character the thief took to the grave with him? Or, will they change names or titles after Jesus resurrects him?

TE: You're serious? They change names or titles after Jesus resurrects him? How can this be a serious question?

I took what you wrote seriously. That is, I assumed you were serious when you addressed my two questions by saying the moral imperfections the thief took with him to the grave would be regarded as "morally immature" in the resurrection. Please explain how his sinful habits will go from moral imperfections to merely morally immature habits in the "twinkling of an eye".


You asked, "Would you apply the same term to the sinful habits and traits of character the thief took to the grave with him? Or, will they change names or titles after Jesus resurrects him?"

Change to what, for example? What good would changing the name or title of a term do? Why are you asking this question?
Posted By: Aaron

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/20/08 06:16 AM

Green Cochoa

What is being talked about in 1 Cor. 15:50-53. What is changed at the last trumpet if it isnt our character?

Aaron
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/20/08 09:26 PM

 Originally Posted By: Aaron
Green Cochoa

What is being talked about in 1 Cor. 15:50-53. What is changed at the last trumpet if it isnt our character?

Aaron


Aaron,

That's a very important question. I would encourage you to read it carefully again, and ponder exactly what is being said. However, I will honor your question with an answer.

We now have mortal, diseased, and weakened bodies due to sin. Our bodies will be changed into new ones. When the Bible (KJV) speaks of "incorruptible," it is referring to the fact that our bodies will no longer see death and disease. From Jesus' words to the Sadducees, we can also deduce another change that will happen with our bodies at that time: we will become like angels, which do not marry. I believe we'll be able to fly in Heaven. Does this mean we'll have wings? I'm hoping to be able to have greater hearing and vision. We truly don't know all of what God has planned, but I trust we will be well satisfied.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/20/08 09:58 PM

 Quote:
Character is not neutral; it is either sinful or sinless.


What do you mean by this? In particular, do you think a born again person has a sinless character? (i.e. all born again people have sinless characters).
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/23/08 12:46 AM

Tom, please consider the following:

 Quote:
AA 476
"If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." 2 Corinthians 5:17. Through the power of Christ, men and women have broken the chains of sinful habit. They have renounced selfishness. The profane have become reverent, the drunken sober, the profligate pure. Souls that have borne the likeness of Satan have become transformed into the image of God. This change is in itself the miracle of miracles. A change wrought by the Word, it is one of the deepest mysteries of the Word. We cannot understand it; we can only believe, as declared by the Scriptures, it is "Christ in you, the hope of glory." {AA 476.1}

When the Spirit of God controls mind and heart, the converted soul breaks forth into a new song; for he realizes that in his experience the promise of God has been fulfilled, that his transgression has been forgiven, his sin covered. He has exercised repentance toward God for the violation of the divine law, and faith toward Christ, who died for man's justification. "Being justified by faith," he has "peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ." Romans 5:1. {AA 476.2}

But because this experience is his, the Christian is not therefore to fold his hands, content with that which has been accomplished for him. He who has determined to enter the spiritual kingdom will find that all the powers and passions of unregenerate nature, backed by the forces of the kingdom of darkness, are arrayed against him. Each day he must renew his consecration, each day do battle with evil. Old habits, hereditary tendencies to wrong, will strive for the mastery, and against these he is to be ever on guard, striving in Christ's strength for victory. {AA 476.3}

In the above quote, Sister White wrote - "Through the power of Christ, men and women have broken the chains of sinful habit. They have renounced selfishness."

You seem to qualify this insight by saying she obviously isn't referring to all sinful habits or to all selfishness. Do you have quotes where she qualifies it in this way?

She also wrote - "He who has determined to enter the spiritual kingdom will find that all the powers and passions of unregenerate nature, backed by the forces of the kingdom of darkness, are arrayed against him. Each day he must renew his consecration, each day do battle with evil. Old habits, hereditary tendencies to wrong, will strive for the mastery, and against these he is to be ever on guard, striving in Christ's strength for victory."

You seem to interpret this to mean they will discover certain, hitherto unrevealed sinful habits after they are born again; or, you seem to say they will gradually see their unrevealed sinfulness and selfishness in a new and proper light as the Holy Spirit is able to get through to them. Where does she articulate this idea?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/23/08 01:04 AM

 Originally Posted By: gordonb1
With 'Christ in you, the hope of glory', there should be no desire to sin, for He never had such desire. Sin found no responding chord in His mind.

The real issue is surrender, subjection, but these are only accomplished by faith. Peter had not fully surrendered his own will when he thrice denied the Saviour. If we are in subjection to Christ and His Spirit dwells within us, our motives and actions will be heaven directed. Our choices will be correct. When we see light, we will not call it darkness and thereby grieve the Spirit.

Though never a Sabbathkeeper or monogamous, a Spirit-led soul will advance from strength to strength as Christ leads him into all truth. This I understand to be sanctification, accepting the light as it comes and walking in it. The thief on the cross surrendered fully and was ready to follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth.

The 'partially converted' man wants to serve two masters because he cannot trust and fully surrender to His Creator and the Head of the Church, Jesus Christ. This is not surrender, but rebellion, choosing his own will over God's will.

To clarify, I understand sanctification as living up to all the light God shows us. Such will be no burden for the human who is subject to Christ. There will be no conflict.

Amen. I also like how "true sanctification" is defined and described in the following passages:

"True sanctification is a Bible doctrine. The apostle Paul, in his letter to the Thessalonian church, declares: "This is the will of God, even your sanctification." And he prays: "The very God of peace sanctify you wholly." 1 Thessalonians 4:3; 5:23. The Bible clearly teaches what sanctification is and how it is to be attained. The Saviour prayed for His disciples: "Sanctify them through Thy truth: Thy word is truth." John 17:17. And Paul teaches that believers are to be "sanctified by the Holy Ghost." Romans 15:16. What is the work of the Holy Spirit? Jesus told His disciples: "When He, the Spirit of truth, is come, He will guide you into all truth." John 16:13. And the psalmist says: "Thy law is the truth." By the word and the Spirit of God are opened to men the great principles of righteousness embodied in His law. And since the law of God is "holy, and just, and good," a transcript of the divine perfection, it follows that a character formed by obedience to that law will be holy. Christ is a perfect example of such a character. He says: "I have kept My Father's commandments." "I do always those things that please Him." John 15:10; 8:29. The followers of Christ are to become like Him--by the grace of God to form characters in harmony with the principles of His holy law. This is Bible sanctification. {GC 469.2}

"Obedience to the law of God is sanctification. There are many who have erroneous ideas in regard to this work in the soul, but Jesus prayed that His disciples might be sanctified through the truth, and added, "Thy word is truth" (John 17:17). Sanctification is not an instantaneous but a progressive work, as obedience is continuous. Just as long as Satan urges his temptations upon us, the battle for self-conquest will have to be fought over and over again; but by obedience, the truth will sanctify the soul. Those who are loyal to the truth will, through the merits of Christ, overcome all weakness of character that has led them to be molded by every varying circumstance of life. {FW 85.2}

"True sanctification is nothing more or less than to love God with all the heart, to walk in His commandments and ordinances blameless. Sanctification is not an emotion but a heaven-born principle that brings all the passions and desires under the control of the Spirit of God; and this work is done through our Lord and Saviour. {FW 87.1}

"Sanctification is not the work of a moment, an hour, a day, but of a lifetime. It is not gained by a happy flight of feeling, but is the result of constantly dying to sin, and constantly living for Christ. Wrongs cannot be righted nor reformations wrought in the character by feeble, intermittent efforts. It is only by long, persevering effort, sore discipline, and stern conflict, that we shall overcome. {FLB 116.5}

"The Sabbath given to the world as the sign of God as the Creator is also the sign of Him as the Sanctifier. The power that created all things is the power that recreates the soul in His own likeness. To those who keep holy the Sabbath day it is the sign of sanctification. True sanctification is harmony with God, oneness with Him in character. It is received through obedience to those principles that are the transcript of His character. And the Sabbath is the sign of obedience. He who from the heart obeys the fourth commandment will obey the whole law. He is sanctified through obedience. {AG 156.3}

"Sanctification is not merely a theory, an emotion, or a form of words, but a living, active principle, entering into the everyday life. It requires that our habits of eating, drinking, and dressing be such as to secure the preservation of physical, mental, and moral health, that we may present to the Lord our bodies--not an offering corrupted by wrong habits but--"a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God." Romans 12:1. {CH 67.1}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/23/08 01:14 AM

MM, I asked a simple question:

 Quote:
MM:Character is not neutral; it is either sinful or sinless.

TE:What do you mean by this? In particular, do you think a born again person has a sinless character? (i.e. all born again people have sinless characters).


Is your answer, "yes"?

Regarding sinful habits, I understand here to mean habits which are known, not habits which are unknown. Do you have some statement in mind where she says that when a person is born again that all unknown sinful habits are made known? I don't understand how you could maintain such a position if you have known any born again people. Either that, or you have an entirely different idea of what it means to be born again than is customary (which seems very likely; it appears to me that you don't believe one is born again when one accepts Christ as one's personal Savior, but rather that you understand "born again" to mean "perfect in character.")

Where's the thread where you are discussing this with Rosangela? I agree with what she's been saying regarding sinful habits being revealed.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/23/08 01:53 AM

 Originally Posted By: Tom Ewall
TE: Regarding the other two questions, I'm not sure how you would define "morally imperfect." It would be difficult to characterize one in heaven as morally imperfect. Perhaps "morally immature" would be a better term.

MM: Would you apply the same term to the sinful habits and traits of character the thief took to the grave with him? Or, will they change names or titles after Jesus resurrects him?

TE: You're serious? They change names or titles after Jesus resurrects him? How can this be a serious question?

MM: I took what you wrote seriously. That is, I assumed you were serious when you addressed my two questions by saying the moral imperfections the thief took with him to the grave would be regarded as "morally immature" in the resurrection. Please explain how his sinful habits will go from moral imperfections to merely morally immature habits in the "twinkling of an eye".

TE: You asked, "Would you apply the same term to the sinful habits and traits of character the thief took to the grave with him? Or, will they change names or titles after Jesus resurrects him?" Change to what, for example? What good would changing the name or title of a term do? Why are you asking this question?

Tom, you wrote – “It would be difficult to characterize one in heaven as morally imperfect. Perhaps "morally immature" would be a better term.” This is what I have been trying to understand. Are you saying the moral imperfections (i.e. the cultivated sinful traits of character) the thief took with him to the grave will change into "morally immature" habits when he is resurrected? If so, what will cause the change, the transformation?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: Can we really refer to uncrucified sinful habits and traits of character as "morally immature?" Where is sin referred to in this way in the inspired writings?

TE: You mean "character," not "sin." Here's an example:

"The germination of the seed represents the beginning of spiritual life, and the development of the plant is a beautiful figure of Christian growth. As in nature, so in grace; there can be no life without growth. The plant must either grow or die. As its growth is silent and imperceptible, but continuous, so is the development of the Christian life. At every stage of development our life may be perfect; yet if God's purpose for us is fulfilled, there will be continual advancement. Sanctification is the work of a lifetime. As our opportunities multiply, our experience will enlarge, and our knowledge increase. We shall become strong to bear responsibility, and our maturity will be in proportion to our privileges. (COL 65)

MM: I meant cultivated sinful traits of character. Character is not neutral; it is either sinful or sinless.

TE: “Character is not neutral; it is either sinful or sinless.” What do you mean by this? In particular, do you think a born again person has a sinless character? (i.e. all born again people have sinless characters).

Yes, people who experience the miracle of rebirth in God’s appointed way, as opposed to a counterfeit way, are born again morally complete, morally perfect (but not necessarily mentally perfect, that is, they may not have learned certain truths which require Bible and prayer to arrive at, such as Sabbath-keeping and health reform).

People are born with an instinctive knowledge of what is morally right and wrong as defined by the last six commandments. Thus they are not ignorant of the wrongness of the habits and traits they have cultivated. Non-believers feel guilt and shame when they do things that are morally wrong. However, they might not understand why they feel bad or realize that their habits and traits violate the law of God.

During the process of conversion, the Holy Spirit gradually reveals to these people, for the first time, their cultivated sinful habits and traits of character in light of the cross. Of course they were already aware their moral wrongness, but seeing them in light of the cross is a whole new revelation of their sins, and it causes them to love Jesus and to hate their sinfulness properly. They want to be born again, to die to sin, self, and Satan.

The moment they confess and crucify their old man habits and traits of character they experience the miracle of rebirth. Their sinful character dies, and God implants within them all of His righteous traits of character, all of the fruits of the Spirit. Not one is missing. They are born again with sinless traits of character, which they begin cultivating immediately. They begin as babes, and day by day, year after year, they grow in grace and mature in the fruits of the Spirit in exactly the same way Jesus did. This process begins here, but eternity isn’t long enough to exhaust it.

“We need to understand that imperfection of character is sin. All righteous attributes of character dwell in God as a perfect, harmonious whole, and every one who receives Christ as a personal Saviour is privileged to possess these attributes. {COL 330.2}

“The life of the vine will be manifest in fragrant fruit on the branches. "He that abideth in Me," said Jesus, "and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without Me ye can do nothing." When we live by faith on the Son of God, the fruits of the Spirit will be seen in our lives; not one will be missing. {DA 676.4}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/23/08 01:58 AM

Tom, you said the thief took certain uncrucified cultivated sinful traits of character with him to the grave. Then you said in the resurrection these certain sinful traits of character will be reclassified as "morally mature", that it wouldn't make sense to label them "moral imperfections". Do you really believe this, or did I misunderstand you?

By the way, the quote you posted earlier (COL 65) does not address this situation. Instead, she is describing the process of sanctification, which happens before people die. She wrote - "At every stage of development our life may be perfect; yet if God's purpose for us is fulfilled, there will be continual advancement."

You seem to think this means the Holy Spirit will be able to gradually make born again believers aware that certain of their habits and cultivated traits of character are sinful, and that these things need to be confessed and crucified. But the "continual advancement" she is referring to has to do with "perfecting holiness", not unperfecting unholiness. Here's how she put it elsewhere:

 Quote:
"The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul." Through obedience comes sanctification of body, soul, and spirit. This sanctification is a progressive work, and an advance from one stage of perfection to another. {ML 250.4}

It is your work to advance toward perfection, making constant improvement, until at last you are pronounced worthy to receive immortal life. And even then the work of progression will not cease, but will continue throughout eternity. {HP 186.6}

Do you see what I mean? "... an advance from one stage of perfection to another." Not an advance from one stage of imperfection to a lesser stage of imperfection until we achieve perfection. It's not a process of devolution.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
TE: MM, if you think of yourself as morally perfect, then you have no need for mercy, do you?

MM: Mercy will continue to be a reality throughout eternity, even after the extermination of our sins in the lake of fire. In Christ we are complete, morally perfect, lacking nothing - so far as our salvation status in concerned.

TE: You didn't say "In Christ" before. It seems to me we've had this conversation before, and I pointed out the same thing, and you agreed you should say "in Christ."

I didn't say anything about it before this recent volley. I was merely addressing your observation regarding my moral perfection and whether or not I still need mercy. I answered it as you have instructed me. I thought I was being a good student.

In case you misunderstood me, though, let me clarify. By "in Christ" I do not mean certain of our sinful habits and cultivated traits of character are unknown to us, and that in Christ God winks at them until the Holy Spirit is finally able to get through to us, or that in Christ God treats us as if we are sinless whereas in reality we are very faulty and defective.

Do you see what I mean?

Instead, I am implying that although people experience moral perfection the moment they crucify their old man habits of sin, their cultivated sinful traits of character, it does not mean they have learned how to obey and observe "all things whatsoever" Jesus commanded. See Matthew 28:19-20. For example, they might not have learned how to obey and observe the 7th day Sabbath before they experienced the miracle of rebirth. This is not a moral or immoral issue until they are convicted of the truth.

Do you know what I mean?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/23/08 03:58 AM

 Quote:
Tom, you said the thief took certain uncrucified cultivated sinful traits of character with him to the grave.


MM, let's start with this. Where did I say this?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/23/08 04:00 AM

 Quote:
Then you said in the resurrection these certain sinful traits of character will be reclassified as "morally mature"


Where did I say this?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/23/08 04:01 AM

 Quote:
You seem to think this means the Holy Spirit will be able to gradually make born again believers aware that certain of their habits and cultivated traits of character are sinful, and that these things need to be confessed and crucified.


Where did I say this?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/23/08 04:02 AM

 Quote:
Do you see what I mean? "... an advance from one stage of perfection to another." Not an advance from one stage of imperfection to a lesser stage of imperfection until we achieve perfection. It's not a process of devolution.


I agree with what she wrote, and have been saying the same thing. I didn't say anything about advancing from one stage of imperfection to another, did I? If so, where?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/23/08 04:06 AM

 Quote:
TE: You didn't say "In Christ" before. It seems to me we've had this conversation before, and I pointed out the same thing, and you agreed you should say "in Christ."

I didn't say anything about it before this recent volley.


Yes, you did, but evidently forgot. You forgot the "in Christ" part. I brought this to your attention, and you agreed with me.

 Quote:
I was merely addressing your observation regarding my moral perfection and whether or not I still need mercy. I answered it as you have instructed me. I thought I was being a good student.


I don't know. Is this what you really believe? Do you believe you are morally perfect? Or that you are morally perfect in Christ? Or are these both the same?

 Quote:
Instead, I am implying that although people experience moral perfection the moment they crucify their old man habits of sin, their cultivated sinful traits of character, it does not mean they have learned how to obey and observe "all things whatsoever" Jesus commanded. See Matthew 28:19-20. For example, they might not have learned how to obey and observe the 7th day Sabbath before they experienced the miracle of rebirth. This is not a moral or immoral issue until they are convicted of the truth.


What I don't understand is why you single out the Sabbath. This same principle applies to any unknown behavior.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/24/08 05:33 AM

Tom, regarding your posts #101117, 101118, and 101119 you wrote - Where did I say this? It takes too long to go back and find the quotes. Please just address the points. Thank you.

1. Do you believe the thief took certain uncrucified cultivated sinful traits of character with him to the grave? If not, do you believe he confessed and crucified all of his cultivated sinful traits and habits before he died?

2. Do you believe after the resurrection that all uncrucified cultivated sinful traits of character will be reclassified as "morally mature"? If not, will they still be considered sinful? If so, how and when will they be crucified?

3. Do you believe the Holy Spirit gradually make born again believers aware that certain of their habits and cultivated traits of character are sinful? And, does He expect them to confess and crucify them after they are convicted of the truth?

4. How do you define the difference between sins of ignorance and cultivated sinful traits of character?

5. How do you define the difference between inherited traits of character and cultivated traits of character?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/24/08 05:51 AM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Do you believe you are morally perfect? Or that you are morally perfect in Christ? Or are these both the same?

Either both are true or neither one is.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
What I don't understand is why you single out the Sabbath. This same principle applies to any unknown behavior.

Would you include any of the following behaviors in 1) a list of sins of ignorance, or 2) a list of cultivated traits of character the Holy Spirit might wait to address until after a person experiences the miracle of rebirth?

Galatians
5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are [these]; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
5:20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
5:21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told [you] in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

Also, what do you exclude from the phrase "and such like", that is, which behaviors do you believe do not belong in this list, behaviors the Holy Spirit might wait to address until after a person experiences the miracle of rebirth? What would He wink at before rebirth happens?

In the past you have listed polygamy as a sinful practice the Holy Spirit might wait to address until after a person experiences the miracle of rebirth; however, you have also argued that polygamy is adultery, which is a sin that prevents people from inheriting the kingdom of God (a phrase that is synonymous with rebirth and justification, see quotes below).

John
3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
3:4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and [of] the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

1 Corinthians
6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
6:10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
6:11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/24/08 09:17 PM

 Quote:
Do you believe you are morally perfect? Or that you are morally perfect in Christ? Or are these both the same?

Either both are true or neither one is.


This answers the first question as "yes," which explains why you refer to yourself as morally perfect. I guess it answers the other two questions as well, since you used the word "both." This implies you see these as two different things, both of which are true.

I commented I don't understand why you restrict unknown sins to not keeping the Sabbath. You didn't explain this. I wrote the same principle applies to any unknown behavior. I don't know how your questions to me relate to my comment. Please explain the link, and I'll respond.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/24/08 09:31 PM

 Quote:
Tom, regarding your posts #101117, 101118, and 101119 you wrote - Where did I say this? It takes too long to go back and find the quotes. Please just address the points. Thank you.


The point is, I never said these things. That's why I asked you to show me where, because you can't. It's not that it would take too long, but that it can't be done.

You state that I believe this, I believe that when the things you say do not even remotely address how I think, which is how I know I didn't say these things. I read what you say, and think to myself, "How could I have said this? I don't think this way."

Regarding your questions, to 1., I do not believe the thief on the cross was perfect. I do not believe he was ready for translation. I believe he was ready for death, by virtue of accepting Christ as His personal Savior. Had he lived longer, I believe he would have had sins to overcome, just like other Christians.

Regarding 2, no, they won't be reclassified. Regarding their being crucified, they were crucified on the cross.

Regarding 3, I believe God reveals truth as quickly as we are willing and able to respond to it. I agree with what Rosangela has been saying in regards to this.

Regarding 4, sins of ignorance are sins committed without being aware either that one is doing the sin, or that the thing being done is a sin. A cultivated sinful trait of character is a cherished sin.

Regarding 5, I already treated half of this. To the hereditary part, these are things passed to us genetically, or by non-genetic pre-natal influence, which predispose us to respond to certain temptations.

For your convenience, here are your questions:

 Quote:
1. Do you believe the thief took certain uncrucified cultivated sinful traits of character with him to the grave? If not, do you believe he confessed and crucified all of his cultivated sinful traits and habits before he died?

2. Do you believe after the resurrection that all uncrucified cultivated sinful traits of character will be reclassified as "morally mature"? If not, will they still be considered sinful? If so, how and when will they be crucified?

3. Do you believe the Holy Spirit gradually make born again believers aware that certain of their habits and cultivated traits of character are sinful? And, does He expect them to confess and crucify them after they are convicted of the truth?

4. How do you define the difference between sins of ignorance and cultivated sinful traits of character?

5. How do you define the difference between inherited traits of character and cultivated traits of character?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 07/28/08 11:36 PM

Hey,

Just a quick note to say I'm out and about and will be unable post very often for the next few weeks.

Blessings,

Mike
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/11/08 09:08 PM

1. Tom, did the thief take certain cultivated sinful traits to the grave? What do you mean by "sins to overcome"?

2. What do you mean by "crucified on the cross"?

3. Is revealing the truth and revealing cultivated sinful traits of character the same thing?

4. Are people born again with cultivated sinful traits of character?

5. Are people guilty of sinning because they possess inherited traits of character? Did Jesus possess them?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/12/08 07:47 AM

 Quote:
1. Tom, did the thief take certain cultivated sinful traits to the grave? What do you mean by "sins to overcome"?


Unless he was sinless, he would have had to, wouldn't he?

 Quote:
2. What do you mean by "crucified on the cross"?


You didn't provide any context, but my guess would be I meant being crucified.

 Quote:
3. Is revealing the truth and revealing cultivated sinful traits of character the same thing?


No.

 Quote:
4. Are people born again with cultivated sinful traits of character?


Are people born again sinless? I simply don't understand how you can confuse "believe in Christ" with "must be sinless" (unless I'm confused here, and am misunderstanding you; it certainly seems like your idea is that you must be perfect before you can be born again).

 Quote:
5. Are people guilty of sinning because they possess inherited traits of character?


People are guilty of sinning when they do something they know is wrong.


 Quote:
Did Jesus possess them?

This is an odd question. I suppose you could say He did in that He became sin for us. Is this what you were thinking?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/13/08 07:33 PM

1. What do you mean by "sins to overcome"?

1. What do you mean by "sinless"?

2. What do you mean "they [the uncrucified cultivated sinful traits the thief took with him to the grave] were crucified on the cross"?

3. What is the difference, in light of your posts above, between "revealing the truth and revealing cultivated sinful traits of character"?

4. What do you mean by "born again sinless"?

4. Are people born again sinful?

5. Is it a sin to possess inherited (uncultivated) traits of character?

5. How do people know when they are doing something wrong?

5. Did Jesus inherit the same traits of character we inherit at conception?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/14/08 03:10 AM

 Quote:
1. What do you mean by "sins to overcome"?


Unknown sins.

 Quote:
1. What do you mean by "sinless"?


Without sin; not having any sins.

 Quote:
2. What do you mean "they [the uncrucified cultivated sinful traits the thief took with him to the grave] were crucified on the cross"?


I don't remember.

 Quote:
3. What is the difference, in light of your posts above, between "revealing the truth and revealing cultivated sinful traits of character"?


Truth encompasses more than simply sinful traits of character.

 Quote:
4. What do you mean by "born again sinless"?


Born again without any sins.

 Quote:
4. Are people born again sinful?


No. "Sinful" implies willful disobedience. "Sinless" implies more than "not sinful."

 Quote:
5. Is it a sin to possess inherited (uncultivated) traits of character?


How could this be sin?

 Quote:

5. How do people know when they are doing something wrong?


Their conscience and the Holy Spirit.

 Quote:
5. Did Jesus inherit the same traits of character we inherit at conception?


If this is a nature of Christ question, you know I'm post-lapsarian. If you have something else in mind, you'll have to clarify.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/15/08 06:09 PM

By "sinless", then, do you mean they have 1) no cultivated sinful traits to confess and crucify, and 2) no sins of ignorance to discover and crucify? Or, can they be viewed as "sinless", in the eyes of God, if they have no cultivated sinful traits of character to crucify but still sin ignorantly or unwittingly?

You say the thief took certain cultivated sinful traits of character with him to the grave, but you haven't clearly explained what will become of them in the resurrection. Will Jesus change them or crucify them in the resurrection? If not, what will become of them?

Since it is not a sin to possess uncultivated inherited traits of character, then is it correct to conclude Jesus inherited them and possessed them to, that He was not tainted or sinful because He had them? If so, can this also be applied to uncultivated inherited sinful tendencies, inclinations, propensities? That is, did Jesus also inherit them like we do? Does anyone incur guilt and condemnation because they inherit them?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/16/08 04:57 AM

 Quote:
By "sinless", then, do you mean they have 1) no cultivated sinful traits to confess and crucify, and 2) no sins of ignorance to discover and crucify?


Let's run the video tape:

 Quote:
1. Tom, did the thief take certain cultivated sinful traits to the grave? What do you mean by "sins to overcome"?

Unless he was sinless, he would have had to, wouldn't he?


It looks like the context is "cultivated sinful traits," doesn't it?

 Quote:
Or, can they be viewed as "sinless", in the eyes of God, if they have no cultivated sinful traits of character to crucify but still sin ignorantly or unwittingly?


Try using other language please.

 Quote:
You say the thief took certain cultivated sinful traits of character with him to the grave, but you haven't clearly explained what will become of them in the resurrection. Will Jesus change them or crucify them in the resurrection? If not, what will become of them?


I think what happened is I asked you a question, which you didn't answer. A person can have a cultivated trait of which he is ignorant. I think this may be what's missing.

 Quote:
Since it is not a sin to possess uncultivated inherited traits of character, then is it correct to conclude Jesus inherited them and possessed them to, that He was not tainted or sinful because He had them?


This is unfamiliar language to me. I would say that Jesus Christ took upon Him the same flesh we have, with the temptations common to man, that are passed genetically.

 Quote:
If so, can this also be applied to uncultivated inherited sinful tendencies, inclinations, propensities? That is, did Jesus also inherit them like we do? Does anyone incur guilt and condemnation because they inherit them?


As previous response.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/16/08 10:40 PM

Okay, then what will happen to the uncrucified cultivated sinful traits of character the thief took with him to the grave when Jesus returns and resurrects him?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/17/08 03:01 AM

I'm assuming you're talking about things the thief didn't know about. He will be told about them.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/26/08 09:29 PM

I'm talking about his cultivated sinful traits of character, not the sins he committed ignorantly. Will Jesus change these when he returns and resurrects the thief?

By the way, can you name a sin the thief might have cultivated ignorantly?

And, do cultivated sins of ignorance become a part of ones character?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/29/08 04:51 PM

Bump.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/29/08 06:13 PM

 Quote:
I'm talking about his cultivated sinful traits of character, not the sins he committed ignorantly. Will Jesus change these when he returns and resurrects the thief?


How would He change them?

 Quote:
By the way, can you name a sin the thief might have cultivated ignorantly?


Self-pity.

 Quote:

And, do cultivated sins of ignorance become a part of ones character?


What do you mean?

Here's how I see things. The character determines what a person will do in a certain situation. Of primary concern is how a person would be in heaven. Would he be happy? Would he be a good citizen? Regarding the thief on the cross, the answer to these questions was evident to Jesus Christ, who answered him, "Yes" when requested to be a part of His kingdom.

I'm sure Jesus wasn't considering his cultivated sins or ignorance, nor cultivated sins at all. It was enough to see that he was responding to the Holy Spirit, and knew who He (Jesus Christ) was and was interested in being a part of His kingdom.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/31/08 04:35 PM

1. Did the thief take the cultivated sinful habit of self-pity to the grave? If so, will he be resurrected with it when Jesus returns?

2. Also, since character is formed through repetition, how could the thief have been ignorant of sinful traits like self-pity?

3. Was Jesus ignorant of it? If not, why didn't He say anything about it to the thief on the cross?

4. By not saying anything about it on the cross, was Jesus in essence saying it didn't matter so far as his salvation was concerned?

5. And, if it doesn't matter, is that the same thing as saying sinners who possess certain cultivated sinful habits going into the grave will not be resurrected with them when Jesus returns?

6. If not, what will happen to the uncrucified cultivated sinful traits of character when a person is resurrected?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 08/31/08 07:52 PM

What did you think of this:

 Quote:
Here's how I see things. The character determines what a person will do in a certain situation. Of primary concern is how a person would be in heaven. Would he be happy? Would he be a good citizen? Regarding the thief on the cross, the answer to these questions was evident to Jesus Christ, who answered him, "Yes" when requested to be a part of His kingdom.

I'm sure Jesus wasn't considering his cultivated sins or ignorance, nor cultivated sins at all. It was enough to see that he was responding to the Holy Spirit, and knew who He (Jesus Christ) was and was interested in being a part of His kingdom.


1.I've tried to make sense of this question in different ways, but have been unable to. So please repeat it.

2.Your conclusion doesn't follow from the premise. That is, the fact that character is formed by repeitition does not prevent people of being ignorant of certain things they do.

3.Probably.

4.Yes.

5.No.

6.The person won't sin after being resurrected, if that's what you're asking.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/02/08 08:34 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
What did you think of this:

Here's how I see things. The character determines what a person will do in a certain situation. Of primary concern is how a person would be in heaven. Would he be happy? Would he be a good citizen? Regarding the thief on the cross, the answer to these questions was evident to Jesus Christ, who answered him, "Yes" when requested to be a part of His kingdom.

I'm sure Jesus wasn't considering his cultivated sins or ignorance, nor cultivated sins at all. It was enough to see that he was responding to the Holy Spirit, and knew who He (Jesus Christ) was and was interested in being a part of His kingdom.

I agree that it is possible to predict what a person "will do" based on their character, that is, based on their history of choices. Jesus was able to determine that the thief would be happy in heaven, that he would be a good citizen, but it wasn't based on his character or on his history of choices, which clearly indicated he was unfit for the society of heaven.

Instead, the thief was not a hardened criminal. When he first believed in Jesus, the Jewish leaders led him astray. Kicking against the pricks he fell in with the wrong crowd. Watching Jesus during His final hours filled the thief with hope and repentance. His was an eleventh hour conversion and, as such, his conversion was full and complete, lacking nothing, that is, no cultivated character defects were left uncrucified to be handled later on in the resurrection. Here's how she described it:

 Quote:
"This man was not a hardened criminal; he had been led astray by evil associations, but he was less guilty than many of those who stood beside the cross reviling the Saviour. He had seen and heard Jesus, and had been convicted by His teaching, but he had been turned away from Him by the priests and rulers. Seeking to stifle conviction, he had plunged deeper and deeper into sin, until he was arrested, tried as a criminal, and condemned to die on the cross.

"In the judgment hall and on the way to Calvary he had been in company with Jesus. He had heard Pilate declare, "I find no fault in Him." John 19:4. He had marked His godlike bearing, and His pitying forgiveness of His tormentors. On the cross he sees the many great religionists shoot out the tongue with scorn, and ridicule the Lord Jesus. He sees the wagging heads. He hears the upbraiding speeches taken up by his companion in guilt: "If Thou be Christ, save Thyself and us." Among the passers-by he hears many defending Jesus. He hears them repeat His words, and tell of His works.

"The conviction comes back to him that this is the Christ. Turning to his fellow criminal he says, "Dost not thou fear God, seeing thou art in the same condemnation?" The dying thieves have no longer anything to fear from man. But upon one of them presses the conviction that there is a God to fear, a future to cause him to tremble. And now, all sin-polluted as it is, his life history is about to close. "And we indeed justly," he moans; "for we receive the due reward of our deeds: but this Man hath done nothing amiss." {DA 749.3}

"There is no question now. There are no doubts, no reproaches. When condemned for his crime, the thief had become hopeless and despairing; but strange, tender thoughts now spring up. He calls to mind all he has heard of Jesus, how He has healed the sick and pardoned sin. He has heard the words of those who believed in Jesus and followed Him weeping. He has seen and read the title above the Saviour's head. He has heard the passers-by repeat it, some with grieved, quivering lips, others with jesting and mockery.

"The Holy Spirit illuminates his mind, and little by little the chain of evidence is joined together. In Jesus, bruised, mocked, and hanging upon the cross, he sees the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world. Hope is mingled with anguish in his voice as the helpless, dying soul casts himself upon a dying Saviour. "Lord, remember me," he cries, "when Thou comest into Thy kingdom." {DA 750.1}

"While the leading Jews deny Him, and even the disciples doubt His divinity, the poor thief, upon the brink of eternity, calls Jesus Lord. Many were ready to call Him Lord when He wrought miracles, and after He had risen from the grave; but none acknowledged Him as He hung dying upon the cross save the penitent thief who was saved at the eleventh hour. {DA 750.3}

"Such faith may be represented by the eleventh hour laborers who receive as much reward as do those who have labored for many hours. The thief asked in faith, in penitence, in contrition. He asked in earnestness, as if he fully realized that Jesus could save him if He would. And the hope in his voice was mingled with anguish as he realized that if He did not, he would be lost, eternally lost. He cast his helpless, dying soul and body on Jesus Christ." {5BC 1125.1}

"Some among the redeemed will have laid hold of Christ in the last hours of life, and in heaven instruction will be given to these, who, when they died, did not understand perfectly the plan of salvation. {Mar 320.2}

Concerning eleventh hour laboreres, Sister White wrote:

 Quote:
Thousands in the eleventh hour will see and acknowledge the truth. . . . These conversions to truth will be made with a rapidity that will surprise the church, and God's name alone will be glorified.--2SM 16 (1890). {LDE 212.1}

There will be thousands converted to the truth in a day who at the eleventh hour see and acknowledge the truth and the movements of the Spirit of God.--EGW'88 755 (1890). {LDE 212.2}

The time is coming when there will be as many converted in a day as there were on the Day of Pentecost, after the disciples had received the Holy Spirit.--Ev 692 (1905). {LDE 212.3}

"But I speak not my own words when I say that God's Spirit will pass by those who have had their day of test and opportunity, but who have not distinguished the voice of God or appreciated the movings of His Spirit. Then thousands in the eleventh hour will see and acknowledge the truth. {2SM 16.1}

"The law of God is made void, and even among those who advocate its binding claims are some who break its sacred precepts. The Bible will be opened from house to house, and men and women will find access to these homes, and minds will be opened to receive the Word of God; and, when the crisis comes, many will be prepared to make right decisions, even in the face of the formidable difficulties that will be brought about through the deceptive miracles of Satan. Although these will confess the truth and become workers with Christ at the eleventh hour, they will receive equal wages with those who have wrought through the whole day. There will be an army of steadfast believers who will stand as firm as a rock through the last test. . . . {3SM 390.3}

"The sands of your life are nearly run out, and now if you will come to God just as you are, without one plea but that He has died to save the chiefest of sinners, you will find pardon even in this the eleventh hour. Man must cooperate with God. Christ did not die to have the power to cover transgression unrepented of and unconfessed. Not all sins are to be confessed publicly, but some are to be confessed alone to God and the parties that have been injured. {TSB 133.4}

"Many who are now the bitterest opponents of truth are acting up to their honest convictions of duty, but they will yet see the truth, and become its warm advocates. Those who now treat them with ridicule, who manifest a harsh spirit toward them, will fall under temptation, and bring reproach upon the cause of God, and cause the loss of souls through their indiscretion. Many who go into the field at the call made at the eleventh hour, will through the grace of Christ so present the truth, that they will be accounted first. {VSS 241.2}

The thief, and other eleventh hour converts, are not ignorant of sanctifying truths. The thief was familiar with Jesus' teachings. On the cross, the thief experienced the following:

". . . when the light from Christ shines into our souls, we shall see how impure we are; we shall discern the selfishness of motive, the enmity against God, that has defiled every act of life. Then we shall know that our own righteousness is indeed as filthy rags, and that the blood of Christ alone can cleanse us from the defilement of sin, and renew our hearts in His own likeness. {SC 28.3}

"One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}

The thief's life of sin passed before his eyes. He saw himself as is he really was. Painful though it was he saw "every spot of defilement" that defiled his defective character. To all of these he was crucified and converted anew. Nothing was overlooked to be dealt with later on. He confessed and crucified every spot of defiling cultivated trait of character.

He will come up in the resurrection with the same character he took with him to the grave. Jesus will not have to overlook or change one single spot or stain in his character for the simple reason he crucified every last one of them on the cross before he died. He did not, as you seem to believe, die with certain cultivated defective traits of character which he did not have time to confess and crucify.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/02/08 09:17 PM

1. Did the thief take the cultivated sinful habit of self-pity to the grave? If so, will he be resurrected with it when Jesus returns?

TE: I've tried to make sense of this question in different ways, but have been unable to. So please repeat it.

MM: You gave the sin of self-pity as an example of a cultivated sinful trait of character the thief might not have had time to confess and crucify on the cross before he died. Since people are raised with the same cultivated character traits they possessed when they died, it is obvious, therefore, the thief will be resurrected with the sinful character traits he did not crucify before he died. Here is how she describes it:

 Quote:
The characters formed in this life will determine the future destiny. When Christ shall come, He will not change the character of any individual. (4T 429)

There is really no place in heaven for these dispositions. A man with such a character will only make heaven miserable, because he himself is miserable. “Except ye be born again,” said Christ, “ye cannot enter the kingdom of heaven.” To enter heaven, a man must have Christ formed within, the hope of glory, and take heaven with him. The Lord Jesus alone can fashion and change the character. For want of patience, kindness, forbearance, unselfishness, and love, the revealings of the traits flash forth involuntarily when off guard, and unchristian words, unchristlikeness of character burst forth sometimes to the ruin of the soul. (FE 279)

If you would be a saint in heaven you must first be a saint on earth. The traits of character you cherish in life will not be changed by death or by the resurrection. You will come up from the grave with the same disposition you manifested in your home and in society. Jesus does not change the character at His coming. The work of transformation must be done now. Our daily lives are determining our destiny. Defects of character must be repented of and overcome through the grace of Christ, and a symmetrical character must be formed while in this probationary state, that we may be fitted for the mansions above. (LDE 295)

The characters formed in this life will determine the future destiny. When Christ shall come, He will not change the character of any individual. Precious, probationary time is given to be improved in washing our robes of character and making them white in the blood of the Lamb. To remove the stains of sin requires the work of a lifetime. Every day renewed efforts in restraining and denying self are needed. Every day there are new battles to fight and victories to be gained. Every day the soul should be called out in earnest pleading with God for the mighty victories of the cross. (4T 429)

So, the question is, based on what you've said about the thief, When will the thief confess and crucify the cultivated sinful traits of character he did not have time to confess and crucify on the cross before he died?

2. Also, since character is formed through repetition, how could the thief have been ignorant of sinful traits like self-pity?

TE: Your conclusion doesn't follow from the premise. That is, the fact that character is formed by repeitition does not prevent people of being ignorant of certain things they do.

MM: True, but can we apply this to sinful traits of character like self-pity? I agree it applies to truths, like the Sabbath, which require Bible study and prayer, but what about those sins, like self-pity, that even worldings have identified as evil and counterproductive? Self-pity is a temptation "such as is common to man." 1 Cor 10:13. It doesn't take Bible study and prayer to discern the fact self-pity is destructive. She says:

 Quote:
By their actions those connected with our institutions give proof of the worth, or worthlessness, of their judgment. Those who enter the service of the institution with a spirit of unwillingness to help, who do their allotted tasks with a feeling of compulsion, in sullen submission, who act as if they would gladly escape from the drudgery of the necessary daily duties which someone must do, are very little help to the institution. A mechanical obedience may hide the smoldering fire of rebellion, but it is ready to break out at any time against restraint. In the service of such there is no peace or light or love. The atmosphere surrounding their souls is not fragrant. The influence of their words and actions is felt by others, and this influence is a harm even to those who are trying to do their best in any position in which they are placed. Self-pity is deteriorating to the characters of those who cherish it, and it exerts an influence that spoils the happiness of others. {MM 177.3}

We need to beware of self-pity. Never indulge the feeling that you are not esteemed as you should be, that your efforts are not appreciated, that your work is too difficult. Let the memory of what Christ has endured for us silence every murmuring thought. We are treated better than was our Lord. "Seekest thou great things for thyself? seek them not." Jeremiah 45:5. The Lord has no place in His work for those who have a greater desire to win the crown than to bear the cross. He wants men who are more intent upon doing their duty than upon receiving their reward--men who are more solicitous for principle than for promotion. {MH 476.2}

Your self-pity is an injury to you; you sympathize with yourself, feel that you are not esteemed as you should be, that your work is altogether too hard, and your best efforts are unappreciated. These feelings are the result of a spiritual disease, which can be cured only through faith in Christ. The temptation seizes you when you are weary or perplexed; but when the first symptoms appear, and the enemy works to make you grumble and murmur, look unto Jesus, trust in your Saviour. This is the only cure for this spiritual malaria. . . . If you allow your mind to be occupied with these things, the enemy will see that you are kept busy. He puts his magnifying glass before your eyes, and mole hills of difficulty are made to appear as mountains. . . . You need to understand how to repose in God. A wise heart, molded by the Holy Spirit, it is your privilege to have; and this is the foundation of all true happiness. . . . {SD 298.2}

God would have you trust in His love, and be constantly guarding your soul by locking the gate of your thoughts, that they shall not become unmanageable; for when you allow your mind to indulge these thoughts of self-pity, the enemy comes in to suggest the most unkind and unreasonable things in regard to those who would do you good, and only good. {SD 298.3}

In light of what she wrote about the injurious effects of self-pity, it is hard for me to agree with you that the thief will be resurrected with this sinful trait of character.

3. Was Jesus ignorant of it? If not, why didn't He say anything about it to the thief on the cross?

TE: Probably.

MM: Do you really believe Jesus did not know which cultivated sinful traits of character the thief possessed?

4. By not saying anything about it on the cross, was Jesus in essence saying it didn't matter so far as his salvation was concerned?

TE: Yes

MM: After reading what Sister White wrote about self-pity, do you still believe he will be resurrected with it?

5. And, if it doesn't matter, is that the same thing as saying sinners who possess certain cultivated sinful habits going into the grave will not be resurrected with them when Jesus returns?

TE: No.

MM: What then? Will the thief be resurrected with the cultivated sinful traits of character he did not have time to confess and crucify on the cross before he died?

6. If not, what will happen to the uncrucified cultivated sinful traits of character when a person is resurrected?

TE: The person won't sin after being resurrected, if that's what you're asking.

MM: I agree that resurrected saints will not sin. But what do you think will happen to the cultivated sinful traits of character they did not have time to confess and crucify before they died? Again, here is what she wrote about it: "The traits of character you cherish in life will not be changed by death or by the resurrection. You will come up from the grave with the same disposition you manifested in your home and in society. Jesus does not change the character at His coming."
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/03/08 12:52 AM

 Quote:
So, the question is, based on what you've said about the thief, When will the thief confess and crucify the cultivated sinful traits of character he did not have time to confess and crucify on the cross before he died?


Let's look at one of the quotes you cited:

 Quote:
There is really no place in heaven for these dispositions. A man with such a character will only make heaven miserable, because he himself is miserable. “Except ye be born again,” said Christ, “ye cannot enter the kingdom of heaven.” To enter heaven, a man must have Christ formed within, the hope of glory, and take heaven with him. The Lord Jesus alone can fashion and change the character. For want of patience, kindness, forbearance, unselfishness, and love, the revealings of the traits flash forth involuntarily when off guard, and unchristian words, unchristlikeness of character burst forth sometimes to the ruin of the soul. (FE 279)


She's talking about someone who is not converted. She is saying that one needs to be converted, or born again, before going to heaven. The thief on the cross was converted. So his character did not need to change.

One is made ready for heaven by accepting Christ as one's personal savior.

 Quote:
2. Also, since character is formed through repetition, how could the thief have been ignorant of sinful traits like self-pity?

TE: Your conclusion doesn't follow from the premise. That is, the fact that character is formed by repeitition does not prevent people of being ignorant of certain things they do.

MM: True, but can we apply this to sinful traits of character like self-pity?


Sure, why not? I mentioned this as a possibility because Rosangela mentioned it. Is it your position that Rosangela was not converted before she realized she had unknowingly been exercising self-pity?

 Quote:
I agree it applies to truths, like the Sabbath, which require Bible study and prayer, but what about those sins, like self-pity, that even worldings have identified as evil and counterproductive? Self-pity is a temptation "such as is common to man." 1 Cor 10:13. It doesn't take Bible study and prayer to discern the fact self-pity is destructive.


Well Rosangela says she wasn't aware of it. I believe her.

 Quote:
In light of what she wrote about the injurious effects of self-pity, it is hard for me to agree with you that the thief will be resurrected with this sinful trait of character.


What? I didn't say this. Please be more careful.

 Quote:
3. Was Jesus ignorant of it? If not, why didn't He say anything about it to the thief on the cross?

TE: Probably.

MM: Do you really believe Jesus did not know which cultivated sinful traits of character the thief possessed?


Yes, very unlikely. Why would He? Please remember He was being crucified. I think what He knew was that His desire to be with Christ was genuine, and that was enough.

 Quote:
4. By not saying anything about it on the cross, was Jesus in essence saying it didn't matter so far as his salvation was concerned?

TE: Yes

MM: After reading what Sister White wrote about self-pity, do you still believe he will be resurrected with it?


I never said this.

 Quote:
5. And, if it doesn't matter, is that the same thing as saying sinners who possess certain cultivated sinful habits going into the grave will not be resurrected with them when Jesus returns?

TE: No.

MM: What then? Will the thief be resurrected with the cultivated sinful traits of character he did not have time to confess and crucify on the cross before he died?


I think you're scratching where it doesn't itch. What determines whether a person will be saved or lost is not unknown traits of character, but what one thinks of Jesus Christ. (by "thinks of" I'm including a personal relationship with Christ)

 Quote:
6. If not, what will happen to the uncrucified cultivated sinful traits of character when a person is resurrected?

TE: The person won't sin after being resurrected, if that's what you're asking.

MM: I agree that resurrected saints will not sin. But what do you think will happen to the cultivated sinful traits of character they did not have time to confess and crucify before they died? Again, here is what she wrote about it: "The traits of character you cherish in life will not be changed by death or by the resurrection. You will come up from the grave with the same disposition you manifested in your home and in society. Jesus does not change the character at His coming."


Ok, let's consider breaking the Sabbath. Is that a sin? Well, it's one of the 10 commandments, so not keeping it is a sin by the definition that sin is that transgression of the law. So say a person was not keeping the Sabbath, and goes to heaven as a Sabbath-breaker. Upon arriving in heaven, the person will learn the truth and respond accordingly. Why would other unknown traits be different?

Let's take another example, the one you brought up about spontaneously loving others. Now since you believe a person who is born again may not have this, I expect you believe a person could die and go to heaven without having this, or else being born again would not be sufficient for going to heaven, which I doubt you would assert. So what happens in heaven? Won't this person spontaneously love others? So did his character change?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/04/08 07:36 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Is it your position that Rosangela was not converted before she realized she had unknowingly been exercising self-pity?

As I recall, Rosangela said she was slightly aware that her self-pity was wrong, but that she didn't do anything about it at first, that she waited until later on to address it.

Here's how self-pity is defined and described in the SOP:

 Quote:
By their actions those connected with our institutions give proof of the worth, or worthlessness, of their judgment. Those who enter the service of the institution with a spirit of unwillingness to help, who do their allotted tasks with a feeling of compulsion, in sullen submission, who act as if they would gladly escape from the drudgery of the necessary daily duties which someone must do, are very little help to the institution. A mechanical obedience may hide the smoldering fire of rebellion, but it is ready to break out at any time against restraint. In the service of such there is no peace or light or love. The atmosphere surrounding their souls is not fragrant. The influence of their words and actions is felt by others, and this influence is a harm even to those who are trying to do their best in any position in which they are placed. Self-pity is deteriorating to the characters of those who cherish it, and it exerts an influence that spoils the happiness of others. {MM 177.3}

We need to beware of self-pity. Never indulge the feeling that you are not esteemed as you should be, that your efforts are not appreciated, that your work is too difficult. Let the memory of what Christ has endured for us silence every murmuring thought. We are treated better than was our Lord. "Seekest thou great things for thyself? seek them not." Jeremiah 45:5. The Lord has no place in His work for those who have a greater desire to win the crown than to bear the cross. He wants men who are more intent upon doing their duty than upon receiving their reward--men who are more solicitous for principle than for promotion. {MH 476.2}

Your self-pity is an injury to you; you sympathize with yourself, feel that you are not esteemed as you should be, that your work is altogether too hard, and your best efforts are unappreciated. These feelings are the result of a spiritual disease, which can be cured only through faith in Christ. The temptation seizes you when you are weary or perplexed; but when the first symptoms appear, and the enemy works to make you grumble and murmur, look unto Jesus, trust in your Saviour. This is the only cure for this spiritual malaria. . . . If you allow your mind to be occupied with these things, the enemy will see that you are kept busy. He puts his magnifying glass before your eyes, and mole hills of difficulty are made to appear as mountains. . . . You need to understand how to repose in God. A wise heart, molded by the Holy Spirit, it is your privilege to have; and this is the foundation of all true happiness. . . . {SD 298.2}

God would have you trust in His love, and be constantly guarding your soul by locking the gate of your thoughts, that they shall not become unmanageable; for when you allow your mind to indulge these thoughts of self-pity, the enemy comes in to suggest the most unkind and unreasonable things in regard to those who would do you good, and only good. {SD 298.3}

"Self-pity is deteriorating to the characters of those who cherish it, and it exerts an influence that spoils the happiness of others."

"Your self-pity is an injury to you . . . These feelings are the result of a spiritual disease, which can be cured only through faith in Christ."

". . . for when you allow your mind to indulge these thoughts of self-pity, the enemy comes in to suggest the most unkind and unreasonable things in regard to those who would do you good, and only good."

It's hard to imagine the thief, or anyone else, experiencing the miracle of rebirth while cultivating the sin of self-pity. Since it shuts out Jesus, since it lets Satan in, since it deteriorates the character, since it requires faith in Jesus to overcome - it stands to reason self-pity is one of many sins that must be confessed and crucified before a person can experience the miracle of rebirth.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Why would other unknown traits be different?

I'm not sure I understand what you believe about "other unknown traits". In comparing them to your Sabbath example, are you referring to sins of ignorance only? Or, are you also talking about cultivated sinful traits of character? To make matters easier to discuss here are two definitions:

1. Cultivated sins of ignorance. Doing things over and over again until they become habitual, but having no idea whatsoever that it is wrong or sinful. Does not result in sinful traits of character. Does not need to be confessed or crucified in order to be resurrected in the first resurrection.

2. Cultivated sinful traits of character. Kicking against a pricking conscience, contrary to conviction, doing something wrong over and over again until it becomes habitual. Does result in sinful traits of character. Must be confessed and crucified in order to be resurrected in the first resurrection.

Given these definitions, how do you classify your Sabbath example? And, how do you classify your self-pity example?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Let's take another example, the one you brought up about spontaneously loving others. Now since you believe a person who is born again may not have this, I expect you believe a person could die and go to heaven without having this, or else being born again would not be sufficient for going to heaven, which I doubt you would assert. So what happens in heaven? Won't this person spontaneously love others? So did his character change?

Actually, what I said was newborn babes in Christ are not usually born again mature enough to have experience described in the following quote consistently, that they usually backslide from time to time until they gain enough momentum and experience to do it "constantly and spontaneously":

 Quote:
"Let us not love in word," the apostle writes, "but in deed and in truth." The completeness of Christian character is attained when the impulse to help and bless others springs constantly from within. It is the atmosphere of this love surrounding the soul of the believer that makes him a savor of life unto life and enables God to bless his work. {AA 551.1}

Supreme love for God and unselfish love for one another --this is the best gift that our heavenly Father can bestow. This love is not an impulse, but a divine principle, a permanent power. The unconsecrated heart cannot originate or produce it. Only in the heart where Jesus reigns is it found. "We love Him, because He first loved us." In the heart renewed by divine grace, love is the ruling principle of action. It modifies the character, governs the impulses, controls the passions, and ennobles the affections. This love, cherished in the soul, sweetens the life and sheds a refining influence on all around. {AA 551.2}

John strove to lead the believers to understand the exalted privileges that would come to them through the exercise of the spirit of love. This redeeming power, filling the heart, would control every other motive and raise its possessors above the corrupting influences of the world. And as this love was allowed full sway and became the motive power in the life, their trust and confidence in God and His dealing with them would be complete. They could then come to Him in full confidence of faith, knowing that they would receive from Him everything needful for their present and eternal good. "Herein is our love made perfect," he wrote, "that we may have boldness in the day of judgment: because as He is, so are we in this world. There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear." "And this is the confidence that we have in Him, that, if we ask anything according to His will, He heareth us: and if we know that He hear us, . . . we know that we have the petitions that we desired of Him." {AA 551.3}

PS - Do you agree with the assessment of the thief in #102263 above on this thread?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/04/08 07:43 PM

 Originally Posted By: Rosangela
For instance, there was a time in my life I didn't see self-pity as a sin. God brought me to a circumstance which showed me self-pity as part of my character. I had a vague notion it was sinful, but since I was suffering I thought I had the right to indulge it. Today I see it as a sin in a way I didn't see before, but it took me some years to really come to see things in this light.

#100023 from the thread titled - Are we born again with uncrucified sinful habits?

http://www.maritime-sda-online.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=100761&fpart=19
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/04/08 09:24 PM

Wouldn't a person with no uncrucified sinful habits be perfect? So aren't you asking if a person who is born again is perfect?

Another way of addressing your question is that you are implying Rosangela wasn't born again at the time this happened. I disagree with this idea.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/04/08 09:44 PM

 Quote:
I'm not sure I understand what you believe about "other unknown traits". In comparing them to your Sabbath example, are you referring to sins of ignorance only? Or, are you also talking about cultivated sinful traits of character?


The entire discussion is in reference to sins of ignorance. For example, Rosangela said she had "a vague notion." This is a reference to a sin of ignorance.

 Quote:
Let's take another example, the one you brought up about spontaneously loving others. Now since you believe a person who is born again may not have this, I expect you believe a person could die and go to heaven without having this, or else being born again would not be sufficient for going to heaven, which I doubt you would assert. So what happens in heaven? Won't this person spontaneously love others? So did his character change?

Actually, what I said was newborn babes in Christ are not usually born again mature enough to have experience described in the following quote consistently, that they usually backslide from time to time until they gain enough momentum and experience to do it "constantly and spontaneously":


So it's not something that the born again person has. So I repeat my questions. What happens in heaven? Does the person in heaven now spontaneously and consistently love others? Is he given a shot of momentum at the resurrection? Does his character change?

Regarding the thief on the cross, I agree with EGW's comments.

I believe he was converted, but not perfect. For example, I've been discussing cursing on another thread. I described to Arnold a process whereby one goes from cursing to not cursing. I won't repeat it here, as I'm assuming you've seen it (if you want me to post it, I will). It seems likely to me that the thief on the cross would have used cursed words. It seems unlikely to me that he would have at his conversion been instantly changed so that he wouldn't even think of these words.

I wouldn't characterize this as an uncrucified habit though. I would characterize it as something that he would have needed to work on, and which he would have overcome with time, which he didn't have.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/07/08 08:25 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Wouldn't a person with no uncrucified sinful habits be perfect? So aren't you asking if a person who is born again is perfect?

Yes to the first question, and no to the last one.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Another way of addressing your question is that you are implying Rosangela wasn't born again at the time this happened. I disagree with this idea.

Rosangela confessed - "I had a vague notion it was sinful, but since I was suffering I thought I had the right to indulge it." Can born again believers justify sinning? Of course they can. Being born again doesn't mean losing the ability to sin. However, born again believers do not justify or excuse sinful behavior while abiding in Jesus. Instead, they reign in their sinful tendencies. "Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not." 1 John 3:6.

I'm sure Rosangela agrees with these insights.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/07/08 09:21 PM

 Quote:
Wouldn't a person with no uncrucified sinful habits be perfect? So aren't you asking if a person who is born again is perfect?

M:Yes to the first question, and no to the last one.


Your question is if people are born again with uncrucified sinful habits. Since you say the answer to the question "Wouldn't a person with no uncrucified sinful habits be perfect?" as "Yes," it's pretty easy to see that your question, "Is a born again person born with uncrucified sinful habits?" is indeed asking if such a person is perfect.

Regarding Rosangela and self-pity, your theology would demand that Rosangela was not converted. I doubt Rosangela would agree with this. You could ask her.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/07/08 09:33 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
The entire discussion is in reference to sins of ignorance. For example, Rosangela said she had "a vague notion." This is a reference to a sin of ignorance.

Here's how she stated the matter - "I had a vague notion it was sinful, but since I was suffering I thought I had the right to indulge it." It doesn't sound to me like she was ignorant. Instead, it sounds like she was excusing it.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: Actually, what I said was newborn babes in Christ are not usually born again mature enough to have the experience described in the following quote consistently, that they usually backslide from time to time until they gain enough momentum and experience to do it "constantly and spontaneously":

TE: So it's not something that the born again person has. So I repeat my questions. What happens in heaven? Does the person in heaven now spontaneously and consistently love others? Is he given a shot of momentum at the resurrection? Does his character change?

Character is the result of conscious, repetitious choices and corresponding behavior. This takes time. So, in the case of believers who die the day they experience rebirth, I suppose it is safe to say the character they are resurrected with is limited in comparison to the character Paul will be raised up with. They will gain the momentum and develop the traits of character in heaven they didn't have time to here. But the point is they will not come up with uncrucified sinful traits of character.

What do you think of the following insights:

 Quote:
1. Any one act, either good or evil, does not form the character; but thoughts and feelings indulged prepare the way for acts and deeds of the same kind. It is . . . by a repetition of acts that habits are established and character confirmed. (CG 199)

2. It is not through one act that the character is formed, but by a repetition of acts that habits are established and character confirmed. (ST 4-30-1894)

3. Character does not come by chance. It is not determined by one out-burst of temper, one step in the wrong direction. It is the repetition of the act that causes it to become habit, and molds the character either for good or for evil. (CG 164)

4. A well-balanced character is formed by single acts well performed. One defect, cultivated instead of being overcome, makes the man imperfect, and closes against him the gate of the Holy City. (FLB 44)

I'm especially interested in your thoughts on #4 above. I hear her saying one uncrucified defective trait of character closes the gates of heaven. How does this tie in with your idea that people often go into the grave with uncrucified defective traits of character?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Regarding the thief on the cross, I agree with EGW's comments. I believe he was converted, but not perfect. For example, I've been discussing cursing on another thread. I described to Arnold a process whereby one goes from cursing to not cursing. I won't repeat it here, as I'm assuming you've seen it (if you want me to post it, I will). It seems likely to me that the thief on the cross would have used cursed words. It seems unlikely to me that he would have at his conversion been instantly changed so that he wouldn't even think of these words.

Are you saying the thief might have been guilty of cursing in his mind? Or, are you saying curse words might have entered his mind as temptations? Certainly it is not a sin to be tempted to own the curse words that enter the mind.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
I wouldn't characterize this as an uncrucified habit though. I would characterize it as something that he would have needed to work on, and which he would have overcome with time, which he didn't have.

What do you mean by "overcome"? I thought overcoming something meant keeping it under the control of a sanctified will and mind. It sounds like you are implying it means reaching a point where it no longer comes into mind, no longer tempts.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/07/08 09:53 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
TE: Wouldn't a person with no uncrucified sinful habits be perfect? So aren't you asking if a person who is born again is perfect?

MM: Yes to the first question, and no to the last one.

TE: Your question is if people are born again with uncrucified sinful habits. Since you say the answer to the question "Wouldn't a person with no uncrucified sinful habits be perfect?" as "Yes," it's pretty easy to see that your question, "Is a born again person born with uncrucified sinful habits?" is indeed asking if such a person is perfect.

My question on this thread is - Will Jesus change our character when He returns?

But, yes, I believe people who experience rebirth in God's appointed way are born again without cultivated sinful traits of character. True, they are born again with sinful flesh nature, but they are not born again with their former sinful traits of character, that is, they do not practice the same sinful habits they cultivated before they experienced rebirth. "The sins that were practiced before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." SD 300.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Regarding Rosangela and self-pity, your theology would demand that Rosangela was not converted. I doubt Rosangela would agree with this. You could ask her.

Again, being born again or converted does not mean people lose the ability to excuse or indulge sin. Indeed, only people who are abiding in Jesus are truly free to sin. People who are not abiding in Jesus cannot not sin. “All that man can do without Christ is polluted with selfishness and sin.” (SC 59) Believers must choose daily, moment by moment, to abide in Jesus; otherwise, they are no better off than before they were reborn, no better off than unbelievers.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/08/08 02:25 AM

 Quote:
Here's how she stated the matter - "I had a vague notion it was sinful, but since I was suffering I thought I had the right to indulge it." It doesn't sound to me like she was ignorant. Instead, it sounds like she was excusing it.


Didn't she volunteer this as an example of a sin of ignorance?

 Quote:
Character is the result of conscious, repetitious choices and corresponding behavior. This takes time. So, in the case of believers who die the day they experience rebirth, I suppose it is safe to say the character they are resurrected with is limited in comparison to the character Paul will be raised up with. They will gain the momentum and develop the traits of character in heaven they didn't have time to here. But the point is they will not come up with uncrucified sinful traits of character.


What does "gain momentum" mean? How is what you're saying here different than my position? (You may wish to quote something I've said).

 Quote:
I hear her saying one uncrucified defective trait of character closes the gates of heaven. How does this tie in with your idea that people often go into the grave with uncrucified defective traits of character?


Please don't use characterizations like "your idea" without quoting something I've said. It is not my idea that people "often go into the grave with uncrucified defective traits of character." I looked over this entire thread, and don't see myself saying anything even close to this.

I see you used the word "defective" a couple of dozen times. I used it only a couple of times, and always in the context of responding to your use of it. We're clearly dealing with an idea of yours here, not mine. So for you to pass this off as an idea of mine is not cricket.

Regarding the last statement that you are particularly interested in, it seems clear to me that this involves the sin of rebellion. A person is convicted something is contrary to God's principles, and is determined to do this anyway. I believe such behavior ties into this:

 Quote:
By a life of rebellion, Satan and all who unite with him place themselves so out of harmony with God that His very presence is to them a consuming fire.(DA 764)


Here's a comment by Ty Gibson:

 Quote:
Christianity is intended to be an ever-deepening journey into the heart of God, by which the beholding of His glory gradually transforms the believer into the same character likeness (2 Cor. 3:18). For those who persist in sin to the ruin of their inner capacity to discern and reflect God's love, that fire of divine love which would have cleansed them will, on the day of final reckoning, ignite in their souls a destructive measure of shame and guilt. The glory of Him who is love will be more than the conscience can bear. On the day of unveiled encounter, they will experience psychological and emotional meltdown in God's immediate presence. (Mal. 4:1,2 quoted)

Everyone will eventually meet God in all the radiance of His glorious love. Some will be consumed, while others are healed by the very same encounter. (Shades of Grace 99)


I agree with Ty's explanation here (evidently inspired by DA 764).

Regarding the thief and pure speech, I'm saying it's likely that the thief's speech would have involved bad language, as that was likely to a part of the world in which he lived. He, like other Christians, would have had to learn pure speech.

 Quote:
It sounds like you are implying it means reaching a point where it no longer comes into mind, no longer tempts.


No, I'm not talking about temptation. I'm talking about speech (which can be internal; before one speaks, one thinks of what one is going to say).
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/08/08 02:37 AM

 Quote:
My question on this thread is - Will Jesus change our character when He returns?


Anyone who is familiar with what the SOP wrote about this and believes what she wrote would say no. The question then becomes, what is it that characterizes our character. I would say that it is characterized by decisions that we knowingly make. So when you say that we aren't raised with "uncrucified sinful traits of character" I would agree with this if by this you meant sins that are knowingly committed, knowing they are contrary to God's principles. It seems to me that you include any sins, except sins you characterize as "mental" sins, such as the Sabbath. Actually, I could agree with this, if "mental" sins were a broader characterization than you seem to have in mind. I would include sins which are committed of which one is unaware, or "vaguely" aware of, to use Rosangela's word.

 Quote:
But, yes, I believe people who experience rebirth in God's appointed way are born again without cultivated sinful traits of character.


I disagree with this because of unknown sinful traits of character. What happens to them? They are overcome with in time, as one begins to walk in the Spirit and become known to the believer.

 Quote:
True, they are born again with sinful flesh nature, but they are not born again with their former sinful traits of character, that is, they do not practice the same sinful habits they cultivated before they experienced rebirth. "The sins that were practiced before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." SD 300.


I would say this clearly refers to known sins. How could unknown sins be put off? They need to be made known, which happens during one's walk with Christ.

One needn't be perfect to be born again. One need simply believe in Christ. Then one begins the work toward perfection.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/09/08 08:48 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: Here's how she stated the matter - "I had a vague notion it was sinful, but since I was suffering I thought I had the right to indulge it." It doesn't sound to me like she was ignorant. Instead, it sounds like she was excusing it.

TE: Didn't she volunteer this as an example of a sin of ignorance?

Here's what she wrote: Don't you think there are things in our lives that we didn't see as sins for a period but that from a certain moment onward we began to see as sins? For instance, there was a time in my life I didn't see self-pity as a sin. God brought me to a circumstance which showed me self-pity as part of my character. I had a vague notion it was sinful, but since I was suffering I thought I had the right to indulge it. Today I see it as a sin in a way I didn't see before, but it took me some years to really come to see things in this light. How would you classify this kind of sin?

 Quote:
MM: Character is the result of conscious, repetitious choices and corresponding behavior. This takes time. So, in the case of believers who die the day they experience rebirth, I suppose it is safe to say the character they are resurrected with is limited in comparison to the character Paul will be raised up with. They will gain the momentum and develop the traits of character in heaven they didn't have time to here. But the point is they will not come up with uncrucified sinful traits of character.

TE: What does "gain momentum" mean? How is what you're saying here different than my position? (You may wish to quote something I've said).

People are born again with all the righteous traits of God character. Not one is missing. These traits are not, however, mature and fully developed at the time Jesus implants them. The more times a particular behavior is repeated the easier it is to do again. A certain momentum is accrued. Regularly "perfecting holiness" establishes a momentum, which makes it easier to be like Jesus in those particular ways. This differs from what you are saying in that I'm not talking about gradually realizing certain habits and practices are sinful.

 Quote:
EGW: A well-balanced character is formed by single acts well performed. One defect, cultivated instead of being overcome, makes the man imperfect, and closes against him the gate of the Holy City.

MM: I hear her saying one uncrucified defective trait of character closes the gates of heaven. How does this tie in with your idea that people often go into the grave with uncrucified defective traits of character?

TE: Please don't use characterizations like "your idea" without quoting something I've said. It is not my idea that people "often go into the grave with uncrucified defective traits of character." I looked over this entire thread, and don't see myself saying anything even close to this.

I see you used the word "defective" a couple of dozen times. I used it only a couple of times, and always in the context of responding to your use of it. We're clearly dealing with an idea of yours here, not mine. So for you to pass this off as an idea of mine is not cricket.

You didn't answer my question. I'll rephrase it. Do you agree that one cherished character defect will prevent someone from entering heaven?

Also, as you see it, what is the difference between sinful trait of character and defective trait of character? And, do think people often go into the grave with one but not the other?

 Quote:
TE: Regarding the last statement that you are particularly interested in, it seems clear to me that this involves the sin of rebellion. A person is convicted something is contrary to God's principles, and is determined to do this anyway. I believe such behavior ties into this:

 Quote:
By a life of rebellion, Satan and all who unite with him place themselves so out of harmony with God that His very presence is to them a consuming fire.(DA 764)

Here's a comment by Ty Gibson:

 Quote:
Christianity is intended to be an ever-deepening journey into the heart of God, by which the beholding of His glory gradually transforms the believer into the same character likeness (2 Cor. 3:18). For those who persist in sin to the ruin of their inner capacity to discern and reflect God's love, that fire of divine love which would have cleansed them will, on the day of final reckoning, ignite in their souls a destructive measure of shame and guilt. The glory of Him who is love will be more than the conscience can bear. On the day of unveiled encounter, they will experience psychological and emotional meltdown in God's immediate presence. (Mal. 4:1,2 quoted)

Everyone will eventually meet God in all the radiance of His glorious love. Some will be consumed, while others are healed by the very same encounter. (Shades of Grace 99)



I agree with Ty's explanation here (evidently inspired by DA 764).

Here's the quote I posted: "A well-balanced character is formed by single acts well performed. One defect, cultivated instead of being overcome, makes the man imperfect, and closes against him the gate of the Holy City." (FLB 44) I agree with you that she is talking about willful sinning.

Regarding Ty's comment: "On the day of unveiled encounter, they will experience psychological and emotional meltdown in God's immediate presence." Where else is this scenario described? I've read where the same unveiled glory of God's radiant presence consumes sinners and rubbish alike. For example:

". . . the manifestation of His glory is to them a consuming fire." (GC 37) "Fire comes down from God out of heaven. . . . While God is to the wicked a consuming fire, He is to His people both a sun and a shield. . . . The fire that consumes the wicked purifies the earth." (GC 672-674)

How can the fire of God's unveiled radiant glory burn up rubbish but only have an emotional effect on sinners? I can understand why it wouldn't burn up things in heaven or burn up sinless beings, but how can it burn up rubbish but not burn up sinners?

 Quote:
TE: Regarding the thief and pure speech, I'm saying it's likely that the thief's speech would have involved bad language, as that was likely to a part of the world in which he lived. He, like other Christians, would have had to learn pure speech.

Does having a heavy history of cursing mean a person born again yesterday did not crucified the sin of cursing? What are you saying? What does it matter what a person was like yesterday if they experienced the miracle of rebirth today? What do past mistakes have to do with present realities so far as rebirth and salvation are concerned?

 Quote:
MM: It sounds like you are implying it means reaching a point where it no longer comes into mind, no longer tempts.

TE: No, I'm not talking about temptation. I'm talking about speech (which can be internal; before one speaks, one thinks of what one is going to say).

Yeah, that's what I meant. With this in mind, are you saying the sin of cursing isn't overcome until curse words no longer pop into mind? Are people guilty of sinning every time a curse word enters their mind?

If so, can this principle be applied to all the sinful thoughts and feelings that come into mind? That is, is it an evidence a certain sin or defect hasn't been overcome if temptations related to it still come into mind?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/09/08 09:28 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
"The sins that were practiced before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." SD 300.

I would say this clearly refers to known sins. How could unknown sins be put off? They need to be made known, which happens during one's walk with Christ. One needn't be perfect to be born again. One need simply believe in Christ. Then one begins the work toward perfection.

You prefaced your interpretation by saying, "I would say", but it would be more meaningful to me if she said it. Please post quotes where she says it. IOW, post quotes where she says people are born again first, and then they begin the gradual process of discovering and putting away the sins they practiced before they were reborn. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/09/08 09:57 PM

 Quote:
Post quotes where she says people are born again first, and then they begin the gradual process of discovering and putting away the sins they practiced before they were reborn.This is easily shown to be the case, even without quotes.


Sabbath-breaking is an example. One doesn't need to become a Sabbath-keeper before one can be born again does one?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/09/08 10:00 PM

Duplicate post
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/09/08 10:14 PM

 Quote:
MM: Here's how she stated the matter - "I had a vague notion it was sinful, but since I was suffering I thought I had the right to indulge it." It doesn't sound to me like she was ignorant. Instead, it sounds like she was excusing it.

T: Didn't she volunteer this as an example of a sin of ignorance?

MM:Here's what she wrote: Don't you think there are things in our lives that we didn't see as sins for a period but that from a certain moment onward we began to see as sins? For instance, there was a time in my life I didn't see self-pity as a sin. God brought me to a circumstance which showed me self-pity as part of my character. I had a vague notion it was sinful, but since I was suffering I thought I had the right to indulge it. Today I see it as a sin in a way I didn't see before, but it took me some years to really come to see things in this light. How would you classify this kind of sin?


This is describing a sin of ignorance. "Don't you think there are things in our lives that we didn't see as sins for a period but that from a certain moment onward we began to see as sins?"

 Quote:
MM: I hear her saying one uncrucified defective trait of character closes the gates of heaven. How does this tie in with your idea that people often go into the grave with uncrucified defective traits of character?

TE: Please don't use characterizations like "your idea" without quoting something I've said. It is not my idea that people "often go into the grave with uncrucified defective traits of character." I looked over this entire thread, and don't see myself saying anything even close to this.

I see you used the word "defective" a couple of dozen times. I used it only a couple of times, and always in the context of responding to your use of it. We're clearly dealing with an idea of yours here, not mine. So for you to pass this off as an idea of mine is not cricket.

MM:You didn't answer my question.


You didn't acknowledge my point. I didn't respond to your question because it wasn't fair, for the reason I pointed out.


 Quote:
MM:I'll rephrase it. Do you agree that one cherished character defect will prevent someone from entering heaven?


It could.

 Quote:
Also, as you see it, what is the difference between sinful trait of character and defective trait of character? And, do think people often go into the grave with one but not the other?


Well, these are phrases you use, not me. I would read these as synonymns.

I don't think of this in these terms. I think of it in terms of would a person be happy in heaven. If yes, then God will take him there. If not, then God won't.

To return to your phrases, if the sinful trait is something known and cherished, and the person has been fighting against the Holy Spirit who has been urging the person that this thing must be given up or he will lost, and the person refuses, I don't see how such a person would be raised in the first resurrection. If it's something of which the person is unaware, then that's a different matter.

I think the "Would the person be happy in heaven?" way of thinking of it is better (easier to understand, more to the point).
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/12/08 04:28 AM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: Post quotes where she says people are born again first, and then they begin the gradual process of discovering and putting away the sins they practiced before they were reborn.This is easily shown to be the case, even without quotes.

TE: Sabbath-breaking is an example. One doesn't need to become a Sabbath-keeper before one can be born again does one?

Do you have quotes supporting your claim that 1) ignorantly breaking the Sabbath is viewed by God as a "sinful practice" or a "defective trait of character", and 2) one doesn't need to be a Sabbath-keeper before experiencing rebirth.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/12/08 04:40 AM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
TE: This is describing a sin of ignorance. "Don't you think there are things in our lives that we didn't see as sins for a period but that from a certain moment onward we began to see as sins?"

I agree. But the example she gave doesn't describe a sin of ignorance. Here's what she wrote: "I had a vague notion it was sinful, but since I was suffering I thought I had the right to indulge it. Today I see it as a sin in a way I didn't see before, but it took me some years to really come to see things in this light. How would you classify this kind of sin?" She didn't know how to classify her example, so she asked.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: Do you agree that one cherished character defect will prevent someone from entering heaven?

TE: It could.

Can you think of an example where a cherished character defect will not bar the gates of heaven against them?

 Originally Posted By: Tom
I think the "Would the person be happy in heaven?" way of thinking of it is better (easier to understand, more to the point).

The resurrected sinners will unite with Satan in an attempt to gain control of the New Jerusalem and the New Earth. If God were to simply walk away and let them have their way I suppose they would manage at least as well as they did before the Flood.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/12/08 08:26 AM

 Quote:
MM: Post quotes where she says people are born again first, and then they begin the gradual process of discovering and putting away the sins they practiced before they were reborn.This is easily shown to be the case, even without quotes.

T: Sabbath-breaking is an example. One doesn't need to become a Sabbath-keeper before one can be born again does one?

MM:Do you have quotes supporting your claim that 1) ignorantly breaking the Sabbath is viewed by God as a "sinful practice" or a "defective trait of character", and 2) one doesn't need to be a Sabbath-keeper before experiencing rebirth.


Regarding your first question, do you have quotes supporting your claim that it is my claim that ignorantly breaking the Sabbath is viewed by God as a sinful practice or a defective trait of character?

Regarding the second question, do you believe that one needs to be a Sabbath-keeper before experiencing rebirth? If you don't, why are you asking for a quote to establish something you believe is false?

 Quote:
T: This is describing a sin of ignorance. "Don't you think there are things in our lives that we didn't see as sins for a period but that from a certain moment onward we began to see as sins?"

MM:I agree. But the example she gave doesn't describe a sin of ignorance. Here's what she wrote: "I had a vague notion it was sinful, but since I was suffering I thought I had the right to indulge it. Today I see it as a sin in a way I didn't see before, but it took me some years to really come to see things in this light. How would you classify this kind of sin?" She didn't know how to classify her example, so she asked.


I think you're jumping to an unwarranted conclusion here. You are assuming the reason she asked you how you would classify "this kind of sin" was that she was interested in what you thought. That you would assume she didn't know seems rather presumptuous on your part.

It looks to me like she is describing a sin of ignorance. Given the context of the discussing, it seems likely to me that she was giving this as an example precisely because she viewed it as a sin of ignorance. Why do you think she presented this as an example?

Look at what was said here:

 Quote:
This is describing a sin of ignorance. "Don't you think there are things in our lives that we didn't see as sins for a period but that from a certain moment onward we began to see as sins?"


Then she said:

 Quote:
I had a vague notion it was sinful, but since I was suffering I thought I had the right to indulge it. Today I see it as a sin in a way I didn't see before, but it took me some years to really come to see things in this light.


So she *was* giving this as an example of "things in our lives that we didn't see as sins for a period but that from a certain moment onward we began to see as sins?" which you just agreed is a sin of ignorance.

So why are you saying her example is not describing a sin of ignorance?

 Quote:
Can you think of an example where a cherished character defect will not bar the gates of heaven against them?


If by "cherished character defect" you mean something which is done rebelliously, then any such defect that was repented of would not bar such a person from the gates of heaven. However, I think you're not looking at this from the best angle. A better way of considering things is from the standpoint of if the person would be happy in heaven. If yes, then the person will be admitted. If the person doesn't want heaven, he won't be. The wicked are excluded from heaven because that's their choice.

 Quote:
T:I think the "Would the person be happy in heaven?" way of thinking of it is better (easier to understand, more to the point).

M:The resurrected sinners will unite with Satan in an attempt to gain control of the New Jerusalem and the New Earth. If God were to simply walk away and let them have their way I suppose they would manage at least as well as they did before the Flood.


I don't see what point you're trying to make. My point was that if the person would be happy in heaven, God would admit him to heaven. Otherwise if the person chooses to be excluded from heaven, he will be excluded.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/13/08 03:31 AM

Tom, much of what we're discussing here is being discussed elsewhere. So, based on the title of this thread, what sayest thou? Will people be resurrected in the first resurrection with cultivated defective traits of character?

If you answer, no, then please explain why not. If you answer, yes, then please explain why. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/13/08 04:57 AM

AFAIK no one has disagreed with the idea that our character will not be changed after death, which the SOP asserts. Regarding cultivated defective traits of character, if you don't include sins of ignorance as a defective trait of character, then I would agree.

Regarding why, our minds define who are how; that is, how we think. As a person thinks in his heart, so is he. When we are resurrected, we continue to think in our heart in the same manner we did before death. If we love God and His principles, we continue doing so when awakened. Any wrong habits would be ignorant ones. When we learn the truth, we will willingly and eagerly follow it.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/13/08 07:06 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
Regarding cultivated defective traits of character, if you don't include sins of ignorance as a defective trait of character, then I would agree.

I'm glad you agree sins of ignorance do not include cultivated sinful traits of character.

 Originally Posted By: Tom
When we are resurrected, we continue to think in our heart in the same manner we did before death. If we love God and His principles, we continue doing so when awakened. Any wrong habits would be ignorant ones. When we learn the truth, we will willingly and eagerly follow it.

Please give examples of "wrong habits" some people will be resurrected with in the first resurrection.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/14/08 06:58 AM

 Quote:
T:Regarding cultivated defective traits of character, if you don't include sins of ignorance as a defective trait of character, then I would agree.

M:I'm glad you agree sins of ignorance do not include cultivated sinful traits of character.


Please take a look at what I said, and what you said. They are not the same. Do you see why?

 Quote:
T:When we are resurrected, we continue to think in our heart in the same manner we did before death. If we love God and His principles, we continue doing so when awakened. Any wrong habits would be ignorant ones. When we learn the truth, we will willingly and eagerly follow it.

M:Please give examples of "wrong habits" some people will be resurrected with in the first resurrection.


Not keeping the Sabbath.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/14/08 08:31 PM

Nope, to the first question.

How does ignorantly not keeping the Sabbath become a wrong habit?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/14/08 10:24 PM

I'm guessing you're asking why not keeping the Sabbath should be considered a wrong habit. Is that right?

If so, two thoughts come to mind. One is, would you consider not brushing your teeth to be a bad habit?

Second, not only was he not keeping Sabbath, but he was keeping Sunday. Keeping Sunday instead of Sabbath is certainly a wrong habit (given that "wrong habit" means a habit of doing something incorrect -- keeping Sunday, as opposed to a habit of doing something correct -- keeping Sabbath)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/15/08 05:13 AM

Are you suggesting that ignorantly not keeping the Sabbath becomes a wrong habit because he was ignorantly observing Sunday? Are you saying ignorantly observing Sunday is a wrong habit? What makes it wrong? In what sense is it wrong?

What is the difference between a wrong habit and a sinful habit as it relates to cultivating sinful traits of character? Keeping in mind habits result in character, and character determines our eternal destiny in judgment.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/15/08 06:18 AM

It's wrong because it isn't right. Sunday is not the Sabbath.

Actually these are your terms, not mine, so it would probably be good if you explained the difference.

You've been using "sinful habit" to mean something someone does that he knows is wrong. A "wrong habit" would be something that's wrong, regardless of whether or not the person knows it. This is how it seemed to me you've been using these terms at any rate.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/15/08 09:09 PM

Does ignorantly observing Sunday as the Sabbath result in a sinful habit? Or, is it just wrong? If so, what is the difference between wrong and sinful?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/16/08 12:06 AM

Not the way you have been using the term. Yes, just wrong. As you are using the terms, it appears to me, "sinful habit" means something one does habitually which one knows to be wrong. "Wrong habit" means doing a habit which is not correct. For example, keeping Sunday instead of Sabbath.

But, again, these are your terms, so perhaps you would like to define them. I'm just taking my best guess at what you mean by them.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/16/08 05:53 PM

You introduced the word "wrong". I see the no difference between wrong, not right, and sinful. A sinful habit can be cultivated ignorantly. The difference so as far as guilt and condemnation is concerned has to do with accountability. Does God hold them accountable? Does He count them guilty? If so, then it is a sinful habit which must be confessed and crucified before they can experience the miracle of rebirth.

Ignorantly not keeping the Sabbath, whether they observe Sunday or not, represents a sin of ignorance, but it does not count as a sinful habit. Not doing something is not habit forming. Habits are formed by doing something.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/16/08 09:15 PM

Ok, if I introduced it, I know what I meant. I meant a habit that is incorrect, regardless if what you know you are doing something wrong or not.

Since by "sinful habit" you mean a habit which someone knows to be wrong, how could it be cultivated ignorantly?

The problem is not with God holding people accountable, but with their being accountable. That is, the issue has to do with sin and the conscience, not with what God is doing.

Not doing something is habit forming. For example, not brushing your teeth after eating a meal. You could express this as a habit of doing something else other than brushing your teach if you wanted to, although this is clumsy, since the something else could be anything.

Not flossing is another example. If I go a few days without flossing, I get in the habit of not doing it.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/17/08 07:28 PM

Not keeping the Sabbath is not habit forming if you have no idea about Sabbath. Forming a habit requires conscious choice. Habits result in related traits of character, and character determines our eternal destiny in judgment.

Jesus will not change any habit or its related traits of character when He returns. Therefore, any habit or trait of character that will bar the gates of heaven must be confessed and crucified before death occurs if they hope to be in heaven.

Where we differ is which habits you believe do not have to be confessed and crucified before death occurs to be admitted to heaven. You have a long list of sinful habits and traits you believe will not keep resurrected people out of heaven.

You also believe they will simply leave off their habits after Jesus resurrects them and explains to them the truth. If He can explain it to them after they are resurrected and they willingly give them up, why can't He tell them before they die? Remember, they go into the grave with the same disposition they come out with.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/17/08 10:49 PM

 Quote:
Not keeping the Sabbath is not habit forming if you have no idea about Sabbath. Forming a habit requires conscious choice. Habits result in related traits of character, and character determines our eternal destiny in judgment.


Choosing to keep Sunday is a conscious decision. This is forming the habit of Sunday-keeping.

 Quote:
Jesus will not change any habit or its related traits of character when He returns.


Then I guess heaven will just have to accommodate the Sunday-keepers.

 Quote:
Where we differ is which habits you believe do not have to be confessed and crucified before death occurs to be admitted to heaven. You have a long list of sinful habits and traits you believe will not keep resurrected people out of heaven.


My only "list" includes whether or not the habit is something known to be wrong or not. It actually sounds to me like we agree on this point, since you've agreed with me (I think) that habit that do not involve doing something you know is wrong will not keep you from heaven. So our disagreement seems to stem from the idea you have that no violation of the last table of the law can be a sin of ignorance. I think on this point you're on your own.

 Quote:
You also believe they will simply leave off their habits after Jesus resurrects them and explains to them the truth.


I suspect you believe this too. Either that, or heaven will have to accommodate the Sunday-keepers.

 Quote:
If He can explain it to them after they are resurrected and they willingly give them up, why can't He tell them before they die?


Because he wasn't aware of it.

 Quote:
Remember, they go into the grave with the same disposition they come out with.


"Disposition" is a good word to use. Yes, the disposition is the same. But the knowledge is different.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/19/08 05:11 AM

TE: Choosing to keep Sunday is a conscious decision. This is forming the habit of Sunday-keeping.

MM: True. But in light of our current discussion it is not analogous to not keeping the Sabbath.

...

TE: Then I guess heaven will just have to accommodate the Sunday-keepers.

MM: I thought you agreed that sins of ignorance do not count as defective traits of character? The habit of keeping Sunday does not form sinful traits of character, and will not, therefore, keep them out of heaven. Do you agree?

...

TE: Because he wasn't aware of it.

MM: Why didn't God reveal it to him before he died? Do you have an example in mind? I'm asking you because I cannot think of one. To make things less confusing, let's set the stage for your answer. In the following scenario, what do you think would be an example of a habit that need never be crucified before a person dies, a habit that could wait until after the resurrection to deal with:

 Quote:
There is need of a more thorough preparation on the part of candi-dates for baptism. They are in need of more faithful instruction than has usually been given them. The principles of the Christian life should be made plain to those who have newly come to the truth. . . . The line of demarcation will be plain and distinct between those who love God and keep His commandments, and those who love Him not and disregard His precepts. . . .

Satan does not want anyone to see the necessity of an entire surrender to God. When the soul fails to make this surrender, sin is not forsaken; the appetites and passions are striving for the mastery; temptations con-fuse the conscience, so that true conversion does not take place. If all had a sense of the conflict which each soul must wage with satanic agencies that are seeking to ensnare, entice, and deceive, there would be much more diligent labor for those who are young in the faith. . . .

Baptism is a most sacred and important ordinance, and there should be a thorough understanding as to its meaning. It means repentance for sin, and the entrance upon a new life in Christ Jesus. There should be no undue haste to receive the ordinance. . . .

Read to them the teaching of the Bible in regard to conversion. Show what is the fruit of conversion, the evidence that they love God. Show that true conversion is a change of heart, of thoughts and purposes. Evil habits are to be given up. The sins of evil-speaking, of jealousy, of disobedience, are to be put away. A warfare must be waged against every evil trait of character. . . .

The test of discipleship is not brought to bear as closely as it should be upon those who present themselves for baptism. It should be under-stood whether they are simply taking the name of Seventh-day Advent-ists, or whether they are taking their stand on the Lord’s side, to come out from the world and be separate, and touch not the unclean thing. Be-fore baptism there should be a thorough inquiry as to the experience of the candidates. Let this inquiry be made, not in a cold and distant way, but kindly, tenderly, pointing the new converts to the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world. Bring the requirements of the gospel to bear upon the candidates for baptism. . . .

All who study the life of Christ and practice His teachings will be-come like Christ. Their influence will be like His. They will reveal soundness of character. As they walk in the humble path of obedience, doing the will of God, they exert an influence that tells for the advance-ment of the cause of God and the healthful purity of His work. In these thoroughly converted souls the world is to have a witness to the sanctify-ing power of truth upon the human character.

The knowledge of God and of Jesus Christ, expressed in character, is an exaltation above everything that is esteemed in earth or in heaven. It is the very highest education. It is the key that opens the portals of the heavenly city. This knowledge it is God’s purpose that all who put on Christ by baptism shall possess. And it is the duty of God’s servants to set before these souls the privilege of their high calling in Christ Jesus. (6T 91-97)
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/19/08 09:53 PM

 Quote:
TE: Choosing to keep Sunday is a conscious decision. This is forming the habit of Sunday-keeping.

MM: True. But in light of our current discussion it is not analogous to not keeping the Sabbath.


Well, keeping Sunday is obvious not keeping the Sabbath. I'm guessing what you meant to say is purpose choosing to break the Sabbath(?)

 Quote:
T: Then I guess heaven will just have to accommodate the Sunday-keepers.

MM: I thought you agreed that sins of ignorance do not count as defective traits of character? The habit of keeping Sunday does not form sinful traits of character, and will not, therefore, keep them out of heaven. Do you agree?


This is easier if you quote enough of the conversation to get the context. Then I wouldn't have to go back to get it.

 Quote:
MM:Jesus will not change any habit or its related traits of character when He returns.

T:Then I guess heaven will just have to accommodate the Sunday-keepers.


Ok, here we go. Here you say, and I quote, "Jesus will not change any habit." Is Sunday-keeping a habit? Yes it is. If this habit doesn't change, then we'll have to accommodate Sunday-keepers.

 Quote:
TE: Because he wasn't aware of it.

MM: Why didn't God reveal it to him before he died?


Again this would be easier if you quoted more of the context. Who is "he"? What is "it"? I'm assuming "it" is keeping the Sabbath and "who" is Miller. So you're asking why God didn't reveal to Miller before he died the truth regarding the Sabbath. Why are you asking me this? How would I be privy to God's decisions in regards to what He decided to reveal to Miller?

 Quote:
Do you have an example in mind?


An example of what?

 Quote:
I'm asking you because I cannot think of one. To make things less confusing, let's set the stage for your answer. In the following scenario, what do you think would be an example of a habit that need never be crucified before a person dies, a habit that could wait until after the resurrection to deal with:


Keeping Sunday instead of Sabbath is an example.
Posted By: I Am His

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/20/08 04:11 AM

I have no idea where you two are at now. Don't have the time to wade through your side trips. But I figured I would answer the question as posed in this thread.

Will our characters be changed when Jesus comes?

If they aren't ... I have no desire to go to Heaven.

I don't see any current person who is living or who has lived their life on this planet ... that I would trust in Heaven.

We are sinners. And we can't take that sin with us to Heaven. But, we ARE saved. That is secured in Jesus. But I would not want to live with the saved in Heaven. There has to be some kind of change in a moment in the twinkling of an eye ... that would make me desire to be with you folks in Heaven.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/22/08 06:46 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: Under the following specific circumstances (quoted below), what do you think would be an example of a habit that need never be crucified before a person dies, a habit that could wait until after the resurrection to deal with:

 Quote:
There is need of a more thorough preparation on the part of candidates for baptism. They are in need of more faithful instruction than has usually been given them. The principles of the Christian life should be made plain to those who have newly come to the truth. . . . The line of demarcation will be plain and distinct between those who love God and keep His commandments, and those who love Him not and disregard His precepts. . . .

Satan does not want anyone to see the necessity of an entire surrender to God. When the soul fails to make this surrender, sin is not forsaken; the appetites and passions are striving for the mastery; temptations con-fuse the conscience, so that true conversion does not take place. If all had a sense of the conflict which each soul must wage with satanic agencies that are seeking to ensnare, entice, and deceive, there would be much more diligent labor for those who are young in the faith. . . .

Baptism is a most sacred and important ordinance, and there should be a thorough understanding as to its meaning. It means repentance for sin, and the entrance upon a new life in Christ Jesus. There should be no undue haste to receive the ordinance. . . .

Read to them the teaching of the Bible in regard to conversion. Show what is the fruit of conversion, the evidence that they love God. Show that true conversion is a change of heart, of thoughts and purposes. Evil habits are to be given up. The sins of evil-speaking, of jealousy, of disobedience, are to be put away. A warfare must be waged against every evil trait of character. . . .

The test of discipleship is not brought to bear as closely as it should be upon those who present themselves for baptism. It should be understood whether they are simply taking the name of Seventh-day Adventists, or whether they are taking their stand on the Lord’s side, to come out from the world and be separate, and touch not the unclean thing. Before baptism there should be a thorough inquiry as to the experience of the candidates. Let this inquiry be made, not in a cold and distant way, but kindly, tenderly, pointing the new converts to the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world. Bring the requirements of the gospel to bear upon the candidates for baptism. . . .

All who study the life of Christ and practice His teachings will become like Christ. Their influence will be like His. They will reveal soundness of character. As they walk in the humble path of obedience, doing the will of God, they exert an influence that tells for the advancement of the cause of God and the healthful purity of His work. In these thoroughly converted souls the world is to have a witness to the sanctifying power of truth upon the human character.

The knowledge of God and of Jesus Christ, expressed in character, is an exaltation above everything that is esteemed in earth or in heaven. It is the very highest education. It is the key that opens the portals of the heavenly city. This knowledge it is God’s purpose that all who put on Christ by baptism shall possess. And it is the duty of God’s servants to set before these souls the privilege of their high calling in Christ Jesus. (6T 91-97)

TE: Keeping Sunday instead of Sabbath is an example.

Tom, you cannot be serious. What makes you think under such thorough indoctrination the Sabbath would not be fully addressed?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/22/08 07:08 PM

 Originally Posted By: Tom
MM: Where we differ is which habits you believe do not have to be confessed and crucified before death occurs to be admitted to heaven. You have a long list of sinful habits and traits you believe will not keep resurrected people out of heaven.

You also believe they will simply leave off these habits after Jesus resurrects them and explains to them the truth. If He can explain it to them after they are resurrected and they willingly give them up, why can't He tell them before they die? Remember, they go into the grave with the same disposition they come out with.

TE: Because he wasn't aware of it.

MM: Why didn't God reveal it to him before he died?

TE: Again this would be easier if you quoted more of the context. Who is "he"? What is "it"?

"He" refers to the people you say go into the grave with uncrucified sinful habits and traits. "It" refers to the sinful habits and traits they take with them to the grave. So, the question is - Since they willingly give them up when Jesus explains it to them after the resurrection, why doesn't He tell them the same thing before they die? Why does He allow them to live with them until they die?

To make this discussion more focused, more practical, please name a sinful habit and trait Jesus allows the thoroughly indoctrinated person Ellen describes above to live with until they die. Thank you.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/22/08 07:13 PM

 Originally Posted By: I Am His
We are sinners. And we can't take that sin with us to Heaven. But, we ARE saved. That is secured in Jesus. But I would not want to live with the saved in Heaven. There has to be some kind of change in a moment in the twinkling of an eye ... that would make me desire to be with you folks in Heaven.

If Jesus can wave a magic wand and change sinners to saints, why didn't He do it Adam and Eve before they had children? Or, why doesn't He do it now? Why wait until after the resurrection? Also, who could be lost if Jesus can change sinners to saints after they die?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/22/08 08:21 PM

 Quote:
MM: (Requests an example of) a habit that could wait until after the resurrection to deal with:

T: Keeping Sunday instead of Sabbath is an example.

MM:Tom, you cannot be serious. What makes you think under such thorough indoctrination the Sabbath would not be fully addressed?


Ok, you're talking about an SDA example, and saying this wouldn't apply to an SDA. This is more difficult, since we are SDA's, so it's difficult to give an example of something we aren't aware of, since we are aware of all the things we are aware of. But something analogous to not keeping the Sabbath would be a general answer.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/22/08 08:28 PM

 Quote:
"He" refers to the people you say go into the grave with uncrucified sinful habits and traits.


Where did I say this? Please quote something.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/22/08 10:14 PM

TE: But something analogous to not keeping the Sabbath would be a general answer.

MM: Like what? The question is - Since they willingly give them up when Jesus explains it to them after the resurrection, why doesn't He tell them the same thing before they die? Why does He allow them to live with them until they die?

...

TE: Where did I say this? Please quote something.

MM: I don't want to take the time to search for it. But you something like the thief on the cross died with many uncrucified sinful habits. But I admit it has been difficult to discern what you believe since you are not always clear in your answers. Just when I think you're about to answer my question clearly you back off and say, The important thing is to study the character of God revealed in the life and death of Jesus.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/22/08 10:20 PM

The following insights are powerful:

No conversion is genuine which does not change both the character and the conduct of those who accept the truth. {5BC 1144.2}

A genuine conversion changes hereditary and cultivated tendencies to wrong. {6BC 1101.3}

I do not hear Ellen saying - Please understand that this doesn't mean people are born again or converted without their former sinful habits and traits. What this means is people are born again first and then they begin the slow, gradual process of discovering and crucifying the sinful habits and traits they cultivated before they were reborn.

Do you hear her saying this here or anywhere else?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/23/08 02:13 AM

 Quote:
The following insights are powerful:

No conversion is genuine which does not change both the character and the conduct of those who accept the truth. {5BC 1144.2}


This is obvious. Conversion involved the writing of the law on the heart and on the mind.

 Quote:
A genuine conversion changes hereditary and cultivated tendencies to wrong. {6C 1101.3}


It changes everything about a person, because as a man thinks in his heart, so is he. When one's way of thinking changes, everything about one changes. This doesn't imply instant perfection, however, or that one will suddenly have no bad habits to be overcome.

 Quote:
I do not hear Ellen saying - Please understand that this doesn't mean people are born again or converted without their former sinful habits and traits.


Too many negatives here. I do not hear Ellen saying this does not mean people are converted without their former sinful habits. If "sinful habit" is as you have defined it, doing something which one knows to be wrong, then I agree. I've been commenting on the unknown habits people have.

 Quote:
What this means is people are born again first and then they begin the slow, gradual process of discovering and crucifying the sinful habits and traits they cultivated before they were reborn.


As to my position, this is a straw man.

 Quote:
Do you hear her saying this here or anywhere else?


No, not what you said, given your definitions.

However, I don't think she even looks at the question the way you've framed it. Here's something she wrote which I think is germane:

 Quote:
In every command or injunction that God gives there is a promise, the most positive, underlying the command. God has made provision that we may become like unto Him, and He will accomplish this for all who do not interpose a perverse will and thus frustrate His grace.(MB 77)


Perfection has not so much to do with negatives, like uncrucified habits, as with positives, like becoming "like unto Him." As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he.

 Quote:
By the revelation of the attractive loveliness of Christ, by the knowledge of His love expressed to us while we were yet sinners, the stubborn heart is melted and subdued ... (ibid)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/25/08 01:45 AM

TE: It changes everything about a person because as a man thinks in his heart, so is he. When one's way of thinking changes, everything about one changes.

MM: What does the word "everything" exclude?

TE: This doesn't imply instant perfection, however, or that one will suddenly have no bad habits to be overcome.

MM: Suddenly? Here's what Ellen wrote about it: "Little by little, perhaps unconsciously to the receiver, impressions are made that tend to draw the soul to Christ. These may be received through meditating upon Him, through reading the Scriptures, or through hearing the word from the living preacher. Suddenly, as the Spirit comes with more direct appeal, the soul gladly surrenders itself to Jesus. By many this is called sudden conversion; but it is the result of long wooing by the Spirit of God,--a patient, protracted process. {DA 172.3}

Apparently there is nothing "sudden" about the "long, patient, protracted process" of conversion that ends in rebirth. Thus, there are two questions:

1. Which unChristlike habits and traits are revealed, confessed, and crucified during the long, patient, protracted process that ends in rebirth?

2. Which unChristlike habits and traits are overlooked during the long, patient, protracted process that ends in rebirth?

It would seem, Tom, that you and I both agree none of the habits and traits known to be unChristlike by the baptismal candidate are overlooked during the long, patient, protracted process that ends in rebirth. These must be crucified before rebirth and baptism can occur. The temptations associated with these former habits and traits may or may not lessen or cease altogether, but this does not mean they are guilty. Being tempted is not a sin or a sign that they weren't truly born again.

However, we seem to disagree as to which unChristlike habits and traits are overlooked during the long, patient, protracted process that ends in rebirth, which ones are placed on the back burner, as it were, to be dealt with later on after they are reborn and baptized.

Perhaps it would be helpful to focus on baptismal candidates who are properly indoctrinated by an SDA in accordance with the counsel contained in the SOP. Hopefully we agree it is important to live in harmony with the precepts and principles of truth as outlined in the 28 fundamental beliefs. If so, at what point should they learn them - 1) during the long, patient, protracted process that ends in rebirth, or 2) sometime afterward? Also, which unChristlike habits and traits should be overlooked to be dealt with later on?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/25/08 06:12 AM

 Quote:
MM: Suddenly? Here's what Ellen wrote about it: "Little by little, perhaps unconsciously to the receiver, impressions are made that tend to draw the soul to Christ. These may be received through meditating upon Him, through reading the Scriptures, or through hearing the word from the living preacher. Suddenly, as the Spirit comes with more direct appeal, the soul gladly surrenders itself to Jesus. By many this is called sudden conversion; but it is the result of long wooing by the Spirit of God,--a patient, protracted process. {DA 172.3}

Apparently there is nothing "sudden" about the "long, patient, protracted process" of conversion that ends in rebirth.


You're confusing the wooing of the Holy Spirit with the conversion of the individual. The wooing is what is the "long, patient, protracted process," not the conversion. The conversion is the *result* of the patient, protracted process, not the process itself.

 Quote:
1. Which unChristlike habits and traits are revealed, confessed, and crucified during the long, patient, protracted process that ends in rebirth?


Maybe none. This isn't the issue. What is the wooing process doing? "Impressions are made that tend to draw the soul to Christ." The wooing is to draw the soul to Christ.

 Quote:
2. Which unChristlike habits and traits are overlooked during the long, patient, protracted process that ends in rebirth?


Again, not the issue. God is not trying to deal with habits and traits, but to draw the soul to Christ.

 Quote:
It would seem, Tom, that you and I both agree none of the habits and traits known to be unChristlike by the baptismal candidate are overlooked during the long, patient, protracted process that ends in rebirth.


I don't agree with this. This would depend upon the candidate and the one doing the preparation, wouldn't it? Also this would be only be dealing with certain habits. How many possible habits could a person possibly have? A million? At least thousands, don't you think? How many of these would a preparation for baptism cover? A dozen or two?

 Quote:
However, we seem to disagree as to which unChristlike habits and traits are overlooked during the long, patient, protracted process that ends in rebirth, which ones are placed on the back burner, as it were, to be dealt with later on after they are reborn and baptized.


Yes, this looks like a fair statement, as you seem to think none are overlooked, and I think that many could be overlooked.

 Quote:
Which unChristlike habits and traits should be overlooked to be dealt with later on?


This is assuming some should be overlooked. Are you talking about the Holy Spirit here, or someone preparing someone else for baptism?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/26/08 01:41 AM

 Quote:
MM: . . . which unChristlike habits and traits are overlooked during the long, patient, protracted process that ends in rebirth, which ones are placed on the back burner, as it were, to be dealt with later on after they are reborn and baptized.

TE: . . . I think that many could be overlooked.

MM: Which unChristlike habits and traits should be overlooked to be dealt with later on?

TE: This is assuming some should be overlooked. Are you talking about the Holy Spirit here, or someone preparing someone else for baptism?

Let's focus on people who are properly indoctrinated in accordance with the baptismal counsel described in the SOP. At what point should they be taught how to think and live in harmony with the 28 fundamental beliefs - 1) during the long, patient, protracted process that ends in rebirth, or 2) sometime afterward?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/26/08 05:39 AM

The long, patient, protracted process is the wooing of the Holy Spirit. The fact that a person is interested in studying to be baptized of itself indicates it's likely this long wooing process of the Holy Spirit has already taken place.

If a person is not born again, that means nothing more or less than that they do no know Jesus Christ. Nothing matters if a person doesn't know Christ. So if a person is not born again, by all means said person should be introduced to Christ!
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/29/08 06:20 AM

Did you answer my question? If so, please explain it to me. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 09/29/08 06:29 AM

Your question had a false assumption. It's difficult to respond to questions of this sort.

If a person is not born again, then they don't know Christ. If that's the case, baptizing them will do little good, and could do harm. So the thing to do would be to introduce them to Christ ASAP.

In Christ alone is life. Not in religiousity or baptism certificates.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 10/07/08 08:57 PM

Okay, here's the question again reworded:

Let's focus on people who are properly indoctrinated in accordance with the baptismal counsel described in the SOP. At what point should they be taught how to think and live in harmony with the 28 fundamental beliefs - 1) before they are baptized, or 2) sometime afterward?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 10/08/08 01:37 AM

How could one suggest that a person shouldn't be taught about the 28 fundamental beliefs until after being baptized? How does that make sense? What would be the argument for doing this?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/04/08 06:19 PM

The point of the question is to determine which cultivated sinful traits and habits you think might be overlooked to be dealt with sometime after baptism.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/04/08 07:43 PM

I'm having a strong case of deja vu. How about self pity?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/05/08 05:01 AM

Do you really believe the Holy Spirit would overlook the sin of self-pity and self-centeredness? Just in case you are tempted to think so I am posting several statements which clearly teach otherwise. Please, Tom, read them carefully. You will find Ellen does not support the idea you are suggesting. No one can indulge self-pity while abiding in Jesus. Listen:

Self-pity, that shrank from fellowship with Christ in suffering, prompted Peter's remonstrance, "Pity Thyself, Lord: this shall not be unto Thee." Matthew 16:22, margin. His words expressed the thought and feeling of the Twelve. {Ed 88.3}

Self-pity, which shrank from fellowship with Christ in suffering, prompted Peter's remonstrance. It was to the disciple a bitter lesson, and one which he learned but slowly, that the path of Christ on earth lay through agony and humiliation. But in the heat of the furnace fire he was to learn its lesson. {AA 525.1}

We may do the children and the youth a lifelong good by teaching them to meet bravely these troubles and burdens. While we should give them sympathy, let it never be such as to foster self-pity. What they need is that which stimulates and strengthens rather than weakens. {CG 157.2}

Self-pity is deteriorating to the characters of those who cherish it, and it exerts an influence that spoils the happiness of others. {MM 177.3}

We need to beware of self-pity. Never indulge the feeling that you are not esteemed as you should be, that your efforts are not appreciated, that your work is too difficult. Let the memory of what Christ has endured for us silence every murmuring thought. {MH 476.2}

Your self-pity is an injury to you; you sympathize with yourself, feel that you are not esteemed as you should be, that your work is altogether too hard, and your best efforts are unappreciated. These feelings are the result of a spiritual disease, which can be cured only through faith in Christ. {SD 298.2}

God would have you trust in His love, and be constantly guarding your soul by locking the gate of your thoughts, that they shall not become unmanageable; for when you allow your mind to indulge these thoughts of self-pity, the enemy comes in to suggest the most unkind and unreasonable things in regard to those who would do you good, and only good. {SD 298.3}

Time is short; you have no time to stop and pity yourself; go to work for the Master. Do your duty to the very best of your ability; do not give up to discouragement; walk humbly with God; seek communion with God. Do not let your disappointment make you self-centered, to think of yourself, talk of yourself. {TSB 58.1}

We cannot be self-centered. We are living in the time of special conflict between the powers of light and those of darkness. Go forth; let your light shine; diffuse its rays to all the world. {CH 35.3}

Watch against the stealthy approach of the enemy, watch against old habits and natural inclinations, lest they assert themselves; force them back, and watch. Watch the thoughts, watch the plans, lest they become self-centered. {AG 332.5}

The soul finds rest only in cherishing meekness and lowliness of heart. The peace of Christ is never found where selfishness reigns. The soul cannot grow in grace when it is self-centered and proud. {1MCP 45.2}

How can we improve these opportunities if our thoughts are centered upon self? He who is self-centered loses countless opportunities for doing that which would have brought blessing to others and to himself. {1SM 86.3}

Go to work in the cause of God, doing good, and the Lord will bless you. Do not become self-centered. Think of someone's soul; think of the self-denying, self-sacrificing life of Jesus. Turn your attention away from yourself to Jesus and His life and His character. {TSB 57.1}

There is work given of God for everyone to do. There are to be no idle ones. Not one is to be selfish and self-centered. It is very easy to become thus, and Satan is constantly working that this selfish spirit shall be manifested by professed Christians. {UL 175.4}

Let every weak, tempest-tossed soul find anchorage in Jesus Christ and not become so self-centered that he can think only of his little disappointments and the interruption of his plans and hopes. {UL 377.4}

Christians will give evidence that they are converted men and women. They will show that they are Bible readers, Bible believers, and they obey every injunction of the Word of God. They will not seek to create sympathy for themselves by speaking in disfavor of wife or husband. They will not become self-centered, but they will have a heart to do others good and to be a blessing to humanity, for this is Christlike. {WM 218.2}
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/05/08 03:58 PM

Suppose the person hasn't read all those quotes, especially compiled together as they are in your post?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/05/08 08:44 PM

Rosangela, please bear in mind I am referring to someone who is properly prepared for baptism in accordance with Ellen's counsel.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Let's focus on people who are properly indoctrinated in accordance with the baptismal counsel described in the SOP. At what point should they be taught how to think and live in harmony with the 28 fundamental beliefs - 1) before they are baptized, or 2) sometime afterward?

Here's what she wrote about it:

Quote:
There is need of a more thorough preparation on the part of candidates for baptism. They are in need of more faithful instruction than has usually been given them. The principles of the Christian life should be made plain to those who have newly come to the truth. . . . The line of demarcation will be plain and distinct between those who love God and keep His commandments, and those who love Him not and disregard His precepts. . . .

Satan does not want anyone to see the necessity of an entire surrender to God. When the soul fails to make this surrender, sin is not forsaken; the appetites and passions are striving for the mastery; temptations confuse the conscience, so that true conversion does not take place. If all had a sense of the conflict which each soul must wage with satanic agencies that are seeking to ensnare, entice, and deceive, there would be much more diligent labor for those who are young in the faith. . . .

Baptism is a most sacred and important ordinance, and there should be a thorough understanding as to its meaning. It means repentance for sin, and the entrance upon a new life in Christ Jesus. There should be no undue haste to receive the ordinance. . . . Read to them the teaching of the Bible in regard to conversion. Show what is the fruit of conversion, the evidence that they love God. Show that true conversion is a change of heart, of thoughts and purposes. Evil habits are to be given up. The sins of evil-speaking, of jealousy, of disobedience, are to be put away. A warfare must be waged against every evil trait of character. . . .

The test of discipleship is not brought to bear as closely as it should be upon those who present themselves for baptism. It should be understood whether they are simply taking the name of Seventh-day Adventists, or whether they are taking their stand on the Lord’s side, to come out from the world and be separate, and touch not the unclean thing. Before baptism there should be a thorough inquiry as to the experience of the candidates. Let this inquiry be made, not in a cold and distant way, but kindly, tenderly, pointing the new converts to the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world. Bring the requirements of the gospel to bear upon the candidates for baptism. . . .

All who study the life of Christ and practice His teachings will become like Christ. Their influence will be like His. They will reveal soundness of character. As they walk in the humble path of obedience, doing the will of God, they exert an influence that tells for the advancement of the cause of God and the healthful purity of His work. In these thoroughly converted souls the world is to have a witness to the sanctifying power of truth upon the human character.

The knowledge of God and of Jesus Christ, expressed in character, is an exaltation above everything that is esteemed in earth or in heaven. It is the very highest education. It is the key that opens the portals of the heavenly city. This knowledge it is God’s purpose that all who put on Christ by baptism shall possess. And it is the duty of God’s servants to set before these souls the privilege of their high calling in Christ Jesus. (6T 91-97)

"Show that true conversion is a change of heart, of thoughts and purposes. Evil habits are to be given up. The sins of evil-speaking, of jealousy, of disobedience, are to be put away. A warfare must be waged against every evil trait of character."

Based on what she wrote about preparing people for baptism and what she wrote about self-pity, do you think the sin of self-pity and self-centeredness would be overlooked, that the person preparing the baptismal candidate for baptism would purposely say nothing about it intending to address it later on after they are baptized? If so, to what purpose?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/05/08 08:56 PM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Suppose the person hasn't read all those quotes, especially compiled together as they are in your post?

"Self-pity is deteriorating to the characters of those who cherish it, and it exerts an influence that spoils the happiness of others. {MM 177.3}

Ignorance is not bliss - it's darkness. Not knowing self-pity is sinful and self-serving will protect no one against its deteriorating effects. Self-pity is self-destroying. No one can serve self and serve Jesus. The two are incompatible. The one cancels out the other. This is true whether or not it is known.

"The life spent on self is like the grain that is eaten. It disappears, but there is no increase. A man may gather all he can for self; he may live and think and plan for self; but his life passes away, and he has nothing. The law of self-serving is the law of self-destruction. {DA 624.1}

"Where are the self-denying, self-sacrificing ones? Where are the cross bearers? Self and self-interest have swallowed up high and noble principles. Things of eternal moment bear with no special weight upon the mind. God requires them individually to come up to the point to make an entire surrender. "Ye cannot serve God and mammon." You cannot serve self and at the same time be servants of Christ. {2T 128.2}

"The divine Spirit reveals its working on the human heart. When the Holy Spirit operates upon the mind, the human agent will understand the statement made by Christ, "He shall receive of Mine, and shall show it unto you." Subjection to the word of God means the restoration of one's self. Let Christ work by His Holy Spirit, and awaken you as from the dead, and carry your minds along with His. Let Him employ your faculties. He has created your every capability that you may better honor and glorify His name. Consecrate yourself to Him, and all associated with you will see that your energies are inspired of God, that your noblest powers are called into exercise to do God's service. The faculties once used to serve self and advance unworthy principles, once serving as members of unrighteous purposes, will be brought into captivity to Jesus Christ and become one with the will of God. {TM 396.1}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/05/08 11:48 PM

MM do you think a born again person is perfect? (i.e. has no sin, does not sin) I don't mean knowing doing something contrary to he knows is right, but unknown sin. That is, if a person is properly indoctrinated, do you believe such a person, being born again, will have no sin?
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/07/08 12:26 AM

Quote:
Rosangela, please bear in mind I am referring to someone who is properly prepared for baptism in accordance with Ellen's counsel.

Mike, some people are prone to self-pity; others, to greed; others, to impatience; others, to sarcasm; others, to vanity; others, to depression; others, to anxiety; and the list goes. Suppose the person has a sin the poor Bible instructor forgot to talk about?
By the way, I've found a list of sins. There may be other lists.
http://www.downpour.org/images/12443.pdf.../Resources.aspx

Do you think a similar list should be added to the Bible studies?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/07/08 06:52 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
MM do you think a born again person is perfect? (i.e. has no sin, does not sin) I don't mean knowing doing something contrary to he knows is right, but unknown sin. That is, if a person is properly indoctrinated, do you believe such a person, being born again, will have no sin?

Here's how Peter described babes in Christ: "Wherefore laying aside all malice, and all guile, and hypocrisies, and envies, and all evil speakings, as newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby: if so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious." (1 Peter 2:1-3)

"Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin; that he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God." (1 Peter 4:1, 2)

"And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge; and to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness; and to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity. For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins." (2 Peter 1:5-9)

Here's a list of sins Paul says newborn believers do not commit while walking in the Spirit: "Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God." (Gal 5:19-21)

I believe these descriptions describe believers who have been properly indoctrinated in the way of righteousness and true holiness. There is nothing they are ignorant of, no sin which they might practice ignorantly. They are without spot or blame in the sight of God. But, of course, this is only true of them while they are abiding in Jesus. "Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not." (1 John 3:6)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/07/08 07:08 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
Rosangela, please bear in mind I am referring to someone who is properly prepared for baptism in accordance with Ellen's counsel.

Mike, some people are prone to self-pity; others, to greed; others, to impatience; others, to sarcasm; others, to vanity; others, to depression; others, to anxiety; and the list goes. Suppose the person has a sin the poor Bible instructor forgot to talk about? By the way, I've found a list of sins. There may be other lists.

http://www.downpour.org/images/12443.pdf.../Resources.aspx

Do you think a similar list should be added to the Bible studies?

The sins listed on the link you posted are common to man and are listed on non-Christian lists as attitudes which must be reined in to experience peace and happiness. People are born with an instinctive knowledge of what is morally right and wrong.

Possessing or being prone to defects and weaknesses is not the problem - not reining them in is. The quotes I posted above make it clear born again believers, while abiding in Jesus, keep their hereditary and cultivated traits of character under the control of a sanctified will and mind. They are victorious and Christlike.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/07/08 07:50 AM

MM, I don't see how the quotes you presented answer my questions. For your convenience, I'll repeat them:

Quote:
MM do you think a born again person is perfect? (i.e. has no sin, does not sin) I don't mean knowing doing something contrary to he knows is right, but unknown sin. That is, if a person is properly indoctrinated, do you believe such a person, being born again, will have no sin?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/07/08 07:52 AM

Rosangela, what's that list from?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/08/08 06:43 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
MM, I don't see how the quotes you presented answer my questions. For your convenience, I'll repeat them: MM do you think a born again person is perfect? (i.e. has no sin, does not sin) I don't mean knowing doing something contrary to he knows is right, but unknown sin. That is, if a person is properly indoctrinated, do you believe such a person, being born again, will have no sin?

Here's how Peter described babes in Christ: "Wherefore laying aside all malice, and all guile, and hypocrisies, and envies, and all evil speakings, as newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby: if so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious." (1 Peter 2:1-3)

"Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin; that he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God." (1 Peter 4:1, 2)

"And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge; and to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness; and to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity. For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins." (2 Peter 1:5-9)

Here's a list of sins Paul says newborn believers do not commit while walking in the Spirit: "Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God." (Gal 5:19-21)

I believe these descriptions describe believers who have been properly indoctrinated in the way of righteousness and true holiness. There is nothing they are ignorant of, no sin which they might practice ignorantly. They are without spot or blame in the sight of God. But, of course, this is only true of them while they are abiding in Jesus. "Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not." (1 John 3:6)
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/09/08 12:28 AM

This is the third time I'm asking you this. It can be answered "yes" or "no." You can explain any answer you make.

Quote:
If a person is properly indoctrinated, do you believe such a person, being born again, will have no sin?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/09/08 01:53 AM

Of course they have a history of sinning. "All have sinned."
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/09/08 04:41 AM

I'm not referring to a history, of course. Let's try a fourth time!

Quote:
If a person is properly indoctrinated, do you believe such a person, being born again, will have no sin?


That is, the person, while abiding is Jesus, will not be sinning at all (including unknown sins).
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/09/08 09:20 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I believe these descriptions describe believers who have been properly indoctrinated in the way of righteousness and true holiness. There is nothing they are ignorant of, no sin which they might practice ignorantly. They are without spot or blame in the sight of God. But, of course, this is only true of them while they are abiding in Jesus. "Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not." (1 John 3:6)
Posted By: Colin

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/11/08 05:15 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
I'm not referring to a history, of course. Let's try a fourth time!

Quote:
If a person is properly indoctrinated, do you believe such a person, being born again, will have no sin?


That is, the person, while abiding is Jesus, will not be sinning at all (including unknown sins).
It is the doctrine of not sinning while abiding in Christ, since the power of the Spirit of Christ precludes sinning when we are in submission to it and harness it. That we have lapses in concentration of submitting to God's Spirit and harnessing God's power means we do lapse into sinning, but the principle remains viable and true.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/11/08 08:58 AM

Colin, you agree with MM's ideas on this? That is, it is impossible for a properly indoctrinated SDA to commit a sin of ignorance, if abiding in Jesus? MM distinguishes between properly indoctrinated SDA's and others. So a non-SDA, or an improperly indoctrinated SDA could sin ignorantly. Do you agree with this? He also believes that no person anywhere can commit a sin of ignorance which involves any of the last 6 commandments, whether born again or not. Do you agree with this?
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/11/08 01:02 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
Colin, you agree with MM's ideas on this? That is, it is impossible for a properly indoctrinated SDA to commit a sin of ignorance, if abiding in Jesus? MM distinguishes between properly indoctrinated SDA's and others. So a non-SDA, or an improperly indoctrinated SDA could sin ignorantly. Do you agree with this? He also believes that no person anywhere can commit a sin of ignorance which involves any of the last 6 commandments, whether born again or not. Do you agree with this?

Tom, are you not embarrassed to misquote MM this way? MM clearly said that they would not sin ignorantly "while they are abiding in Jesus." I realize that with this forum it is not possible in the reply window, when you have chosen to quote the most recent poster, to see and remember the exact words of posters before that. Perhaps you just did not see what MM wrote, and became fuzzy on the details while posting. It happens. But for me, I try to pay attention to those kinds of things, so I find that it helps to open a second browser window at the same time that I can view the discussion from while posting in the first window.

As for sinning ignorantly, I have a great deal of respect for my father, and his studies, and he has pointed out to me that every sin we do is a sin of ignorance. We would not choose to do it if we could truly see the pain it causes Christ, and know how greatly it harms us and others. All of the sacrifices of the Jews were for sins of ignorance. God did not ordain any sacrifices for sins other than for sins of ignorance.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Colin

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/11/08 06:01 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
Colin, you agree with MM's ideas on this? That is, it is impossible for a properly indoctrinated SDA to commit a sin of ignorance, if abiding in Jesus? MM distinguishes between properly indoctrinated SDA's and others. So a non-SDA, or an improperly indoctrinated SDA could sin ignorantly. Do you agree with this? He also believes that no person anywhere can commit a sin of ignorance which involves any of the last 6 commandments, whether born again or not. Do you agree with this?
I don't think about "sins of ignorance"; Green Cochoa has a good point on all sins likely being sins of ignorance: I think that when we consciously abide in Jesus we don't sin, as a pragmatic principle.

The difference between the full Adventist message and a diluted version isn't who believes which but that the teachings of each speak of more or less power: whichever message one actually believes doesn't dictate how much divine power one can tap into, so the lines aren't as theoretical as we like them to be when highlighting the full message. We may and can each overcome temptation whatever our Christian beliefs, except perhaps our spiritual expectations holding us back. It takes using the faith of Jesus to overcome sin, but if we don't use it we don't gain the victory: unless & until we fulfil Rom 1:17b every minute of the day there'll be slip-ups.

It's intriguing that that clause can be rendered, "Those who live by faith shall be righteous." That makes the point better doesn't it, and states how sin is overcome - or rather how we are and can be righteous...
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/11/08 08:42 PM

Have you heard Wieland's ideas on this? He speaks of how we have unknown selfish motivations, and how the cross lays bares these motivations. He also speaks of the Old Covenant principle, of obedience motivated by hope of reward or fear of punishment. Do you agree with his ideas? How he speaks of this makes sense to me.

Waggoner and Jones allude to similar ideas, but not as specifically.

Waggoner's message certainly included victory over sin. For example:

Quote:
Stop and think what this means; let the full force of the announcement impress itself upon your consciousness. "Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law,"--from not continuing in all its righteous requirements. We need not sin any more. He has snapped asunder the cords of sin that bound us, so that we have but to accept His salvation in order to be free from every besetting sin. It is not necessary for us any longer to spend our lives in earnest longings for a better life, and in vain regrets for desires unrealized. Christ raises no false hopes, but He comes to the captives of sin, and cries to them, "Liberty! Your prison doors are open. Go forth." What more can be said? Christ has gained the complete victory over "this present evil world," over "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," and our faith in Him makes His victory ours. We have but to accept it. (The Glad Tidings)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/14/08 08:35 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
T: MM do you think a born again person is perfect? (i.e. has no sin, does not sin) I don't mean knowing doing something contrary to he knows is right, but unknown sin. That is, if a person is properly indoctrinated, do you believe such a person, being born again, will have no sin?

MM: Here's how Peter described babes in Christ: "Wherefore laying aside all malice, and all guile, and hypocrisies, and envies, and all evil speakings, as newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby: if so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious." (1 Peter 2:1-3)

"Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin; that he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God." (1 Peter 4:1, 2)

"And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge; and to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness; and to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity. For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins." (2 Peter 1:5-9)

Here's a list of sins Paul says newborn believers do not commit while walking in the Spirit: "Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God." (Gal 5:19-21)

I believe these descriptions describe believers who have been properly indoctrinated in the way of righteousness and true holiness. There is nothing they are ignorant of, no sin which they might practice ignorantly. They are without spot or blame in the sight of God. But, of course, this is only true of them while they are abiding in Jesus. "Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not." (1 John 3:6)

Does this answer your question?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/14/08 08:37 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
Colin, you agree with MM's ideas on this? That is, it is impossible for a properly indoctrinated SDA to commit a sin of ignorance, if abiding in Jesus? MM distinguishes between properly indoctrinated SDA's and others. So a non-SDA, or an improperly indoctrinated SDA could sin ignorantly. Do you agree with this? He also believes that no person anywhere can commit a sin of ignorance which involves any of the last 6 commandments, whether born again or not. Do you agree with this?

Tom, do you think people like Paul and John were guilty of sinning ignorantly after they experience the miracle of rebirth? What about the 144,000?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/15/08 02:16 AM

Peter committed the same basic sin as he did earlier when Paul rebuked him.

I don't think the 144,000 will be ignorantly sinning.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/15/08 02:19 AM

Regarding #104621, no, that doesn't answer my question. You can answer this "yes" or "no." I'll ask it this way: Do you think a properly indoctrinated SDA can commit any sin (including unknown sins) while abiding in Jesus?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/15/08 06:14 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
Peter committed the same basic sin as he did earlier when Paul rebuked him.

I don't think the 144,000 will be ignorantly sinning.

Was Peter abiding in Jesus when he sinned against the Gentiles?

Has anyone this side of the 144,000 ever lived without sinning ignorantly? Besides Jesus, of course.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/15/08 06:30 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
Do you think a properly indoctrinated SDA can commit any sin (including unknown sins) while abiding in Jesus?

The point is there is no such thing as unknown sins in cases involving properly, thoroughly indoctrinated SDAs. They cannot, while abiding in Jesus, commit a sin ignorantly because there is no sin they are not aware of. They are, in this sense, like the 144,000.

Yes, they are full of defects and imperfections, but possessing them is not the same thing as cherishing them in thought or acting them out in word or deed. In the same way Jesus inherited and possessed fallen traits and tendencies, so too they possess them. Like Jesus, they rein them in and keep them under the control of a sanctified will and mind.

I'm not saying they will never make a innocent mistake. For example, they might, when asked, accidentally pass the salt instead of the pepper. Such mistakes are laughable. They in no way constitute a sin.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/16/08 02:37 AM

Quote:
Do you think a properly indoctrinated SDA can commit any sin (including unknown sins) while abiding in Jesus?

The point is there is no such thing as unknown sins in cases involving properly, thoroughly indoctrinated SDAs. They cannot, while abiding in Jesus, commit a sin ignorantly because there is no sin they are not aware of. They are, in this sense, like the 144,000.


I disagree. I think we, even you, commit sins all the time of which we, and you, are not aware.

Quote:
Yes, they are full of defects and imperfections, but possessing them is not the same thing as cherishing them in thought or acting them out in word or deed.


These defects and imperfection must not involve sin, right?

Quote:
In the same way Jesus inherited and possessed fallen traits and tendencies, so too they possess them.


Are you saying that Jesus had defects and imperfections?

Quote:
Like Jesus, they rein them in and keep them under the control of a sanctified will and mind.


This refers to temptations, not sins. Temptations are not defects or imperfections.

Quote:
I'm not saying they will never make a innocent mistake. For example, they might, when asked, accidentally pass the salt instead of the pepper. Such mistakes are laughable. They in no way constitute a sin.


I guess you don't think it's possible that a person could do or desire something with a wrong motivation without knowing it? For example, desire that Christ come to take us away in clouds of glory so our time in this sinful world could be cut short.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/16/08 11:32 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
T: Do you think a properly indoctrinated SDA can commit any sin (including unknown sins) while abiding in Jesus?

M: The point is there is no such thing as unknown sins in cases involving properly, thoroughly indoctrinated SDAs. They cannot, while abiding in Jesus, commit a sin ignorantly because there is no sin they are not aware of. They are, in this sense, like the 144,000.

T: I disagree. I think we, even you, commit sins all the time of which we, and you, are not aware.

Does this apply to the numbered and sealed saints, the 144,000? If not, why not? And, why doesn't the same thing (whatever your answer is to the previous question) apply to properly, thoroughly indoctrinated SDAs now?

Quote:
M: Yes, they are full of defects and imperfections, but possessing them is not the same thing as cherishing them in thought or acting them out in word or deed.

T: These defects and imperfection must not involve sin, right?

Right. Just because properly, thoroughly indoctrinated SDAs, who are abiding in Jesus, possess defects, weaknesses, and imperfections which predispose them to sinning, it does not mean they are sinning.

Quote:
M: In the same way Jesus inherited and possessed fallen traits and tendencies, so too they possess them.

T: Are you saying that Jesus had defects and imperfections?

He was born with the same sinful flesh nature every child of Adam is born with. His human nature came burdened with inherited traits and tendencies which tempted Him from within to indulge the sins common to mankind.

Quote:
M: Like Jesus, they rein them in and keep them under the control of a sanctified will and mind.

T: This refers to temptations, not sins. Temptations are not defects or imperfections.

His sinful, defective, imperfect human nature tempted Him from within to indulge sin. It is not a sin to be tempted from within in this manner or for those reasons.

Quote:
M: I'm not saying they will never make a innocent mistake. For example, they might, when asked, accidentally pass the salt instead of the pepper. Such mistakes are laughable. They in no way constitute a sin.

T: I guess you don't think it's possible that a person could do or desire something with a wrong motivation without knowing it? For example, desire that Christ come to take us away in clouds of glory so our time in this sinful world could be cut short.

I see no sin in your example. Ellen often felt that way:

After beholding the glory of the temple, we went out, and Jesus left us and went to the city. Soon we heard His lovely voice again, saying: "Come, My people, you have come out of great tribulation, and done My will, suffered for Me, come in to supper; for I will gird Myself and serve you." We shouted, "Alleluia, glory," and entered the city. Here I saw a table of pure silver; it was many miles in length, yet our eyes could extend over it. I saw the fruit of the tree of life, the manna, almonds, figs, pomegranates, grapes, and many other kinds of fruit. I asked Jesus to let me eat of the fruit. He said: "Not now. Those who eat of the fruit of this land, go back to earth no more. But in a little while, if faithful, you shall both eat of the fruit of the tree of life and drink of the water of the fountain. And," said He, "you must go back to the earth again, and relate to others what I have revealed to you." Then an angel bore me gently down to this dark world. Sometimes I think I can stay here no longer, all things of earth look so dreary. I feel very lonely here, for I have seen a better land. Oh that I had wings like a dove, then would I fly away and be at rest. {1T 69.2}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/16/08 11:35 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
Peter committed the same basic sin as he did earlier when Paul rebuked him.

I don't think the 144,000 will be ignorantly sinning.

Was Peter abiding in Jesus when he sinned against the Gentiles?

Has anyone this side of the 144,000 ever lived without sinning ignorantly? Besides Jesus, of course.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/17/08 01:28 AM

Quote:
Does this apply to the numbered and sealed saints, the 144,000? If not, why not? And, why doesn't the same thing (whatever your answer is to the previous question) apply to properly, thoroughly indoctrinated SDAs now?


No, because the 144,000 understand the Gospel. When I say the Gospel, I mean as it began to be presented in 1888.

My questions regarding Jesus were because you wrote:

Quote:
M: Yes, they are full of defects and imperfections, but possessing them is not the same thing as cherishing them in thought or acting them out in word or deed.


and then started speaking of Jesus,

Quote:
In the same way Jesus inherited and possessed fallen traits and tendencies, so too they possess them.


which is a bit confusing, since it implies that Jesus "in the same way" was "full of defects and imperfections."

Quote:
T: I guess you don't think it's possible that a person could do or desire something with a wrong motivation without knowing it? For example, desire that Christ come to take us away in clouds of glory so our time in this sinful world could be cut short.

R:I see no sin in your example. Ellen often felt that way:


Ok. If you see no sin, you see no sin.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/18/08 02:26 AM

Tom, do you understand the Gospel? Or, does the Gospel even exist yet? Are we waiting for God to reveal it?

Do you think Jesus inherited and possessed sinful flesh full of defects and imperfections?

What do you consider sin in your example?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/18/08 02:27 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
Peter committed the same basic sin as he did earlier when Paul rebuked him.

I don't think the 144,000 will be ignorantly sinning.

Was Peter abiding in Jesus when he sinned against the Gentiles?

Has anyone this side of the 144,000 ever lived without sinning ignorantly? Besides Jesus, of course.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/18/08 09:36 AM

Quote:
Tom, do you understand the Gospel?


EGW said that the "whole purpose" of Christ's mission was the "revelation of God". I consider this mission of Christ, the revelation of God, to be the Gospel.

Quote:
Or, does the Gospel even exist yet? Are we waiting for God to reveal it?


Yes, it exists. God revealed it in Christ. The Gospel, or Good News, is about God.

Quote:
Do you think Jesus inherited and possessed sinful flesh full of defects and imperfections?


I wouldn't say Jesus was full of defects and imperfections. This is the language you used. You said, "Yes, they are full of defects and imperfections." I wouldn't say this of Jesus Christ.

His flesh was the flesh of humanity.

Quote:
Was Peter abiding in Jesus when he sinned against the Gentiles?


No. However, before he sinned, he may not have been aware of his prejudice. It is this unknown sin I was referring to.

Quote:
Has anyone this side of the 144,000 ever lived without sinning ignorantly? Besides Jesus, of course.


No. Everyone has sinned.

Quote:
What do you consider sin in your example?


Doing something with an egocentric motivation is an example.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/19/08 02:57 AM

1. Tom, since the Gospel exists, since you understand it - does that mean you are as sinless as the 144,000 will be? If not, why not?

2. In what way was Jesus' human nature different than ours? Did His sinful flesh war against Him in the same way it wars against us? If not, why not?

3. Paul rebuked Peter for dissembling. By that time Peter was fully aware of the sinfulness of prejudicial feelings and behavior. Do I understand you correctly in saying you believe Peter was not abiding in Jesus when he dissembled?

4. Do you know of anyone who has ceased sinning? If so, who?

5. Do you think wanting to be in heaven to escape hell and hardships, to be free of temptations and trials, are selfish and sinful motives? If so, why?

SC 21
Motives stronger, and agencies more powerful, could never be brought into operation; the exceeding rewards for right-doing, the enjoyment of heaven, the society of the angels, the communion and love of God and His Son, the elevation and extension of all our powers throughout eternal ages--are these not mighty incentives and encouragements to urge us to give the heart's loving service to our Creator and Redeemer? {SC 21.3}

And, on the other hand, the judgments of God pronounced against sin, the inevitable retribution, the degradation of our character, and the final destruction, are presented in God's word to warn us against the service of Satan. {SC 21.4}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/19/08 03:42 AM

1.The Gospel is a black and white thing. There is more light to come:

Quote:
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love. (COL 415)


The 1888 Message was the beginning of the "light which is to fill the world with glory." So that's a good starting point, but there's more to come.

Also, I've not claimed to "understand it." I will say that what I have understood of the Gospel has warmed my heart, and I've tried to share these concepts.

Quote:
2. In what way was Jesus' human nature different than ours? Did His sinful flesh war against Him in the same way it wars against us? If not, why not?


Why are you asking me this? You should know my answer to this. I just presented a quote on this subject which you noted.

Quote:
3. Paul rebuked Peter for dissembling. By that time Peter was fully aware of the sinfulness of prejudicial feelings and behavior. Do I understand you correctly in saying you believe Peter was not abiding in Jesus when he dissembled?


"Dissembled"? What do you mean? Whatever you mean by this term, I answered your question just above: "No. However, before he sinned, he may not have been aware of his prejudice. It is this unknown sin I was referring to."

Quote:
4. Do you know of anyone who has ceased sinning? If so, who?


Why are you asking this? How would I know if someone has ceased sinning? Isn't the only think I could attest to is that I never saw so-and-so sin? There's no way I could know what a person is doing when he's not in my presence, is there? Also, am I an infallible judge as to what is sin and what isn't?

Quote:
5. Do you think wanting to be in heaven to escape hell and hardships, to be free of temptations and trials, are selfish and sinful motives? If so, why?


They're at least childish. They're like the flower-girl at a wedding who has no desire for the groom, but is just there for the ice cream. One judge a child for such an attitude, but the bride of Christ should grow in love to desire *His* honor and glory; that's what will be motivating the 144,000, not an ego-centric desire to be in heaven or avoid hell.

The SC quotes are lowest-level appeals. There is a place for such appeals, especially for someone just coming to Christ (which is the context of her comments). The Bible has these types of appeals as well.

But there are higher-level appeals. For example:

Quote:
It is not the fear of punishment, or the hope of everlasting reward, that leads the disciples of Christ to follow Him. They behold the Saviour's matchless love, revealed throughout His pilgrimage on earth, from the manger of Bethlehem to Calvary's cross, and the sight of Him attracts, it softens and subdues the soul. Love awakens in the heart of the beholders. They hear His voice, and they follow Him.(DA 480)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/23/08 06:26 PM

1. Has God revealed everything we need to experience the gospel unto perfection? Or, is He withholding certain truths so that we cannot experience the gospel like the 144,000 will in the future?

2. Is the fact our nature wars against us an indication it is sinful, defective, and imperfect? Did Jesus' human nature war against Him in the same way it wars against us?

3. Peter "withdrew and separated himself" from the Gentiles. That is he "dissembled". See Galatians 2:12 and 13. Paul rebuked him. Do you believe Peter was ignorant of his sin at this time? And, do you believe he was abiding in Jesus when he dissembled?

4. Have you read about someone in the Bible who reached the point where they ceased sinning while abiding in Jesus?

5. When people respond to the "lowest-level appeals" are they guilty of sinning ignorantly, guilty of fostering selfish and sinful motives?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/25/08 03:23 AM

Quote:
1. Has God revealed everything we need to experience the gospel unto perfection? Or, is He withholding certain truths so that we cannot experience the gospel like the 144,000 will in the future?


Our reception of truth is not dependent solely upon what God reveals. For example, it depends upon the reception of that truth. For example, the beginning of the latter rain started in 1888, but that truth was not received. So this is not a matter of God's withholding something, but with what He has sent not being received.

Quote:
2. Is the fact our nature wars against us an indication it is sinful, defective, and imperfect? Did Jesus' human nature war against Him in the same way it wars against us?


I'm not sure why you're asking me this. Do you have some reason to think I would answer these questions differently than you would?

Quote:
3. Peter "withdrew and separated himself" from the Gentiles. That is he "dissembled". See Galatians 2:12 and 13. Paul rebuked him. Do you believe Peter was ignorant of his sin at this time? And, do you believe he was abiding in Jesus when he dissembled?


I addressed this.

Quote:
4. Have you read about someone in the Bible who reached the point where they ceased sinning while abiding in Jesus?


This question doesn't make sense to me. Could you rephrase it?

Quote:
5. When people respond to the "lowest-level appeals" are they guilty of sinning ignorantly, guilty of fostering selfish and sinful motives?


I would put it more in terms of their being "guilty" of being childish. When we first come to Christ, we have no choice but to respond to these lower level motivations, as this is all we know. But, as EGW points out:

Quote:
It is not the fear of punishment, or the hope of everlasting reward, that leads the disciples of Christ to follow Him. They behold the Saviour's matchless love, revealed throughout His pilgrimage on earth, from the manger of Bethlehem to Calvary's cross, and the sight of Him attracts, it softens and subdues the soul. Love awakens in the heart of the beholders. They hear His voice, and they follow Him.(DA 480)


This is what our motivation should be. No the "fear of punishment," nor the "hope of reward," but "the Saviour's matchless love" which awakens love in the heart of those who behold Christ.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/25/08 08:03 PM

1. Has God revealed everything we need to know to experience the gospel fully like the 144,000 will? Or, is there more truth yet to be revealed? Can we experience the gospel now as fully as the 144,000 will?

2. Is the fact our nature wars against us an indication it is sinful, defective, and imperfect? Did Jesus' human nature war against Him in the same way it wars against us? I have no idea how you will answer this question.

3. Peter "withdrew and separated himself" from the Gentiles. That is he "dissembled". See Galatians 2:12 and 13. Paul rebuked him. Do you believe Peter was ignorant of his sin at this time? And, do you believe he was abiding in Jesus when he dissembled? I do not recall your answer to this question.

4. Have you read about someone in the Bible who reached the point where they ceased sinning while abiding in Jesus? Did anyone in the Bible stop sinning? Or, did everyone sin ignorantly in one way or another? Did they all die before attaining unto the sinlessness Adam enjoyed in Eden? "Everyone who by faith obeys God's commandments will reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression. {HP 146.5}

5. People who are "guilty of being childish" are they required to eventually confess and repent of sin? Is it a sin to initially respond to the offer of salvation for selfish, childish, self-serving reasons? Does it represent an unknown sin?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/26/08 12:01 AM

I answered 1 in the post right above yours.

Regarding 2, yes, Jesus' human nature was like ours.

Regarding 3, that's too bad. I like the way I put it, but don't recall what I said. Maybe you can find it.

Regarding 4, I haven't asserted that people must go on sinning until they die. Since the Bible doesn't specifically address the points you are asking about (specific people), I can't address that. I'll say in general terms that I believe in victory over sin.

Regarding 5, this would depend upon the Holy Spirit, in terms of whether confession is required. It's not necessarily a sin to be childish, but to choose to remain childish after being shown a better alternative seems to me like it could be something one should repent of.

I think the original context for my remark was doing things from an egocentric motivation. That seems to me like sin. Do you disagree?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/26/08 09:07 PM

1. I did not understand your answer. Please elaborate. Also, please answer my question. Thank you.

2. It is in this sense Jesus was sinful, defective, and imperfect.

3. If I recall right you said, no, Peter was not abiding in Jesus when he dissembled. You also said. no, Peter was not ignorant of his sin. Is this what you believe? The reason I ask is because you cited this story as an example of a born again, converted believer retaining a cultivated sinful trait of character, of ignorantly breaking one of the last six commandments.

4. "Everyone who by faith obeys God's commandments will reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression. {HP 146.5} Does this promise only apply to the 144,000?

5. Do you have an example of a egocentric motivation that is sinful and requires repentance?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/27/08 09:25 AM

I never had this happen before. I was just finishing a long answer to this, and the applications I had open just closed. I completely lost my session. Everything gone, poof!

First of all, you've got the first post on a new page, without any reference to anything before. So I have no idea what 1 or 2 is talking about, without going back and looking. Assuming your post in on a new page for you as well, this should be obvious for you as well as for me, and it would be a courtesy to provide a context for your reader. If this isn't the first post on a new page for you, please disregard my comment.

Regarding 1, you asked:

Quote:
1. Has God revealed everything we need to experience the gospel unto perfection? Or, is He withholding certain truths so that we cannot experience the gospel like the 144,000 will in the future?


I answered:

Quote:
Our reception of truth is not dependent solely upon what God reveals. For example, it depends upon the reception of that truth. For example, the beginning of the latter rain started in 1888, but that truth was not received. So this is not a matter of God's withholding something, but with what He has sent not being received.


You asked this again. I pointed out I answered it, and where. Now you're asking it a third time, and asking that I answer your question, a question I already answered, and pointed out where it was answered.

I see that you are also asking for an elaboration, that you didn't understand my answer. But in this case, if you need an elaboration, then it is clear that you understand that I answered your question, since you're asking for an elaboration of that answer.

So I don't understand your request that I answer your question.

My answer made three points:

1.Our reception of truth is not dependent solely upon what God reveals.
2.As an example of this, it depends upon the reception of that truth.
3.As a further example, the beginning of the latter rain started in 1888, but that truth was not received.

Regarding if the 144,000 will know more truth than we do, certainly the answer must be yes. The truth that God started giving us in 1888 was never received. Surely the 144,000 will know that truth. This was the beginning of the light which is to fill the earth with glory. They must know the beginning, middle and end of this light. The beginning was aborted. At some point, it will be recovered, and built upon. The 144,000 will embrace all of that light, which is light we haven't even seen yet, so it is clear they will know more truth than we do.


Quote:
M: 2. Is the fact our nature wars against us an indication it is sinful, defective, and imperfect? Did Jesus' human nature war against Him in the same way it wars against us? I have no idea how you will answer this question.

T:Regarding 2, yes, Jesus' human nature was like ours.

M:2. It is in this sense Jesus was sinful, defective, and imperfect.


Yikes! Jesus was sinless, without defect, and perfect. The human nature which Christ assumed was sinful, defective and imperfect, but Christ did not wholly consist of His human nature. EGW speaks of this point when she says that Christ was not "altogether human, such an one as ourselves."

I know what you mean, MM, but we are counseled to be very careful in how we phrase these things, and I don't think the way you've put it here is careful. It's very liable to be misunderstood.

Regarding 3, I drew a distinction between Peter's unknown sin of prejudice and his known sin of abandoning the Gentiles. Regarding your statement that I cited this story as an example of a born again, converted believer retaining a cultivated sinful trait of character, I'm sure I didn't cite Peter in this context. I wouldn't have cited anyone as an example of what you are asking for, because such an example cannot exist, as you define your terms. I've made this point to you many times.

Regarding citing Peter as an example of ignorantly breaking one of the last six commandments, that I would agree with.

Regarding 4, I looked at the context of the statement you cited, and given that context I would answer your question "no."

Regarding 5, an egocentric motivation to do anything would be sin, wouldn't it? Egocentric means focused on self. Christo-centric would be focused on Christ. An egocentric desire to follow Christ would be an example of what you are asking for. Indeed, this is just what Christ's disciples had, right before Christ's death on the cross.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/27/08 09:22 PM

1. Okay. I hear you saying God was unable to finish revealing the truth necessary to fully experience the gospel because people back 1888 did not receive the beginning of it. Did I hear you right?

2. Okay. I hear you saying "The human nature which Christ assumed was sinful, defective and imperfect . . ." Did I hear you right? I also understand that Jesus wasn't altogether human like we are. He was also God. Certain aspects of His human nature were sinful, defective, and imperfect. But not His character. There was nothing sinful, defective,or imperfect about His character.

3. You wrote, "I drew a distinction between Peter's unknown sin of prejudice and his known sin of abandoning the Gentiles." Are you saying Peter was ignorantly prejudiced against the Gentiles by the time he dissembled and Paul rebuked him? You also wrote, ". . . a born again, converted believer retaining a cultivated sinful trait of character . . . such an example cannot exist, as you define terms." What about the 144,000? Will they retain cultivated sinful traits of character?

4. "Everyone who by faith obeys God's commandments will reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression. {HP 146.5} Does this promise only apply to the 144,000? To this question you answered, No. Is this experience available to us now? Has it been available to everyone since the fall of A&E? If so, why? If not, why not?

5. Okay. I hear you saying wanting to love and obey Jesus merely to reap the benefits of joy, peace, and happiness, and to escape being miserable now and to escape hellfire at the end of time are egocentric motivations and as such are sinful. Did I hear you right? If so, does God expect them to eventually repent?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 11/27/08 11:16 PM

1.God began to give the loud cry of the third angel's message, the latter rain, in the form of a message. Here's how A. G. Daniels put it:

Quote:
God's messages and providences are always great with meaning. They are always necessary for the accomplishment of the particular work with which they are connected. He orders them for the fulfilment of His purposes. They cannot be set aside. They cannot fail. Sooner or later they will be understood, accepted, and given their proper place. Therefore it must be expected that the message of Righteousness by Faith, which came so definitely to the church in 1888, will be accorded a dominat place in the closing period of the great movement with which we are connected.

(Christ Our Righteousness, 18)


2.Christ's assumed human nature was identical to ours; it's what one receives from the "great law of heredity" which Christ accepted. This nature is referred to as "degraded and defiled by sin." It is also called "offending," as well as "sinful" or "fallen." However, Jesus Christ Himself was none of these things, so it would be a great mistake to says that Jesus Christ was "sinful" or "defiled" or anything like that.

3.Regarding Peter, it was actually Rosangela who gave Peter as an example. I think these questions wanting to go into greater depth should be addressed to her. But I believe the general idea is that Peter was prejudiced against the Gentiles in a way that he was unaware of.

4.I think you need to read the whole context of what Ellen White wrote, and not just pluck a sentence out of it. Regarding the 144,000, God began to give a message, the purpose of which was to obtain a harvest, which is the 144,000. Without the message, there can be no harvest. So we cannot have the experience of the 144,000. Now this is not the same thing as saying that it's inevitable that we sin. EGW speaks of some few in every generation who have had experiences similar to Enoch or Elijah (I can't remember exactly how she puts it). But in regards to experiencing what the 144,000 experience, only the 144,000 experience this, so it is necessary to take part of the 144,000 to experience it. They have a special experience, which is spoken of in both Scripture and the SOP.

Without the message that prepares the harvest, it is not possible for anyone to experience what the 144,000 experience, because there can be no 144,000 without the message which produces the harvest.

5.I said they were childish. I gave an example. I quoted the following from the SOP:

Quote:
It is not the fear of punishment, or the hope of everlasting reward, that leads the disciples of Christ to follow Him. They behold the Saviour's matchless love, revealed throughout His pilgrimage on earth, from the manger of Bethlehem to Calvary's cross, and the sight of Him attracts, it softens and subdues the soul. Love awakens in the heart of the beholders. They hear His voice, and they follow Him.(1SM 235)


I haven't characterized these motivations as "sinful." "Sinful" is a loaded word, so it can mean different things depending on how it's understood.

I asked you the question if an egocentric motivation to do something would not be sin. But you didn't answer my question. So I think for the time being I won't go beyond what I've already said, lest my meaning be interpreted differently than what I'm intending. So what we can get on the same page, let me as again, do you thing that an egocentric motivation to do something is sin? ("egocentric" meaning centered on self).
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/01/08 08:11 PM

1. Do we have the light and truth necessary to fully experience the gospel now? Or, do we lack the light and truth we need now to fully experience the gospel? Is it possible to fully experience the gospel with the light and truth we now have?

2. Do you think my last comment agrees with your last comment? Do you think they are saying the same things? If not, why not?

3. I am interested in what you believe, Tom, that's why I'm asking you. So, you believe Peter was ignorantly prejudiced against the Gentiles (when he dissembled and Paul rebuked him) after God revealed it to him in a dream and through a personal experience with Cornelius?

4. I agree the 144,000 will experience things no one else will experience. However, my question doesn't concern this. Instead, I would like to know if you believe the 144,000 are the only ones who can "reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression"?

"He came to this world and lived a sinless life, that in his power his people might also lead lives of sinlessness. {AU Gleaner, January 17, 1906 par. 5}

"He came to be tempted as man is tempted, to pass through the vicissitudes through which human beings are called to pass, and to live a life of sinlessness, showing to all the "better part" that they may obtain by living for God, through the grace received from heaven. {ST, December 20, 1905 par. 1}

5. ". . . do you thing that an egocentric motivation to do something is sin?" Paul said, "Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling." He also said, "Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith." Apparently there is a healthy way to focus on self.

"Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith." Many . . . may immediately respond, "Why, yes; I am in the faith, I believe every point of the truth." But do you practice what you believe? Are you at peace with God and with your brethren? Can you pray with sincerity, "Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors"? ... Is there no bitterness in your hearts, no envying, no jealousy, no evil surmising? ... Is there no emulation, no desire for special favor and honors, no wish to have the supremacy? . . . {OHC 336.2}

We do well to examine ourselves to see what manner of spirit we are cherishing. Let us learn to speak gently, quietly, even under circumstances the most trying. Let us control not only our words, but our thoughts and imaginations. Let us be kind, be courteous. {OHC 336.3}

Many are sensible of their great deficiency, and they read, and pray, and resolve, and yet make no progress. They seem to be powerless to resist temptation. The reason is, they do not go deep enough. They do not seek for a thorough conversion of the soul, that the streams which issue from it may be pure, and the deportment may testify that Christ reigns within. All defects of character originate in the heart. Pride, vanity, evil temper, and covetousness proceed from the carnal heart unrenewed by the grace of Christ. If the heart is refined, softened, and ennobled, the words and actions will testify to the fact. When the soul has been entirely surrendered to God, there will be a firm reliance upon His promises, and earnest prayer and determined effort to control the words and actions. {OHC 336.4}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/01/08 09:59 PM

Quote:
1. Do we have the light and truth necessary to fully experience the gospel now? Or, do we lack the light and truth we need now to fully experience the gospel? Is it possible to fully experience the gospel with the light and truth we now have?


According to the SOP, the 1888 message was the beginning of the loud cry of the third angels message, the beginning of the latter rain. She writes:

Quote:
By exciting that opposition Satan succeeded in shutting away from our people, in a great measure, the special power of the Holy Spirit that God longed to impart to them. The enemy prevented them from obtaining that efficiency which might have been theirs in carrying the truth to the world, as the apostles proclaimed it after the day of Pentecost. The light that is to lighten the whole earth with its glory was resisted, and by the action of our own brethren has been in a great degree kept away from the world.(1SM 234)


A. G. Daniels reaffirmed this, and pointed out that the message was never received and communicated as it should have been. This is just the beginning of the latter rain, MM. Do you think it's possible for the Gospel to be fully experienced without the latter rain?

Quote:
2. Do you think my last comment agrees with your last comment? Do you think they are saying the same things? If not, why not?


I don't know what comments you are referring to.

Quote:
3. I am interested in what you believe, Tom, that's why I'm asking you. So, you believe Peter was ignorantly prejudiced against the Gentiles (when he dissembled and Paul rebuked him) after God revealed it to him in a dream and through a personal experience with Cornelius?


Your question looks to be self-contradictory. God revealed that the Gospel was to go to the Gentiles as well. He didn't reveal to Peter in this dream that Peter was ignorantly prejudiced against the Gentiles, which looks to be what your question is implying.

Quote:
4. I agree the 144,000 will experience things no one else will experience. However, my question doesn't concern this. Instead, I would like to know if you believe the 144,000 are the only ones who can "reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression"?


If you have in mind by "reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression" the same thing EGW was talking about in the quote from which this phrase is taken, no, the 144,000 aren't the only ones.

Quote:
5. ". . . do you thing that an egocentric motivation to do something is sin?" Paul said, "Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling." He also said, "Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith." Apparently there is a healthy way to focus on self.


I wouldn't characterize this as focusing on self. I think we're better of focusing on Christ. I'm sure Paul would agree with this. However, in the process of focusing on Christ, it is inevitable that the Holy Spirit will reveal things about our own character (e.g. egocentric motivation) which are un-Christlike. Indeed, this revelation is a part of the process of the cleansing of the sanctuary.

I don't understand what your question here has to do with being egocentric, however. If you were examining yourself to make sure you were OK, so that you could go to heaven, that would egocentric. If you were examining yourself to make sure you weren't dishonoring God's holy name, that would not be egocentric.

It's not the actions which make a thing egocentric, but the motivation. Why are you doing what you are doing? If it is for the exaltation of self, then that's not a good motivation.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/04/08 12:12 AM

1. "Do you think it's possible for the Gospel to be fully experienced without the latter rain?" Yes. People must reach a "condition of sinlessness" before they can receive the LR and give the LC. The LR does not empower SDAs to live without sinning. That's what the FR does. The LR empowers SDAs to boldly proclaim the 3AMS and to call people out of Babylon into the Remnant Church.

Quote:
I saw that none could share the "refreshing" unless they obtain the victory over every besetment, over pride, selfishness, love of the world, and over every wrong word and action. We should therefore be drawing nearer and nearer to the Lord and be earnestly seeking that preparation necessary to enable us to stand in the battle in the day of the Lord.--EW 71 (1851). {LDE 192.2}

It is left with us to remedy the defects in our characters, to cleanse the soul temple of every defilement. Then the latter rain will fall upon us as the early rain fell upon the disciples on the Day of Pentecost.--5T 214 (1882). {LDE 192.3}

Again, do you think we (as the Remnant Church) possess the light and truth necessary to fully experience the gospel now? Or, do we need light and truth we do not now possess?

2. I wrote: Okay. I hear you saying "The human nature which Christ assumed was sinful, defective and imperfect . . ." Did I hear you right? I also understand that Jesus wasn't altogether human like we are. He was also God. Certain aspects of His human nature were sinful, defective, and imperfect. But not His character. There was nothing sinful, defective,or imperfect about His character.

In response to this, you wrote: Christ's assumed human nature was identical to ours; it's what one receives from the "great law of heredity" which Christ accepted. This nature is referred to as "degraded and defiled by sin." It is also called "offending," as well as "sinful" or "fallen." However, Jesus Christ Himself was none of these things, so it would be a great mistake to says that Jesus Christ was "sinful" or "defiled" or anything like that.

So again, do you think my last comment agrees with your last comment? Do you think they are saying the same things? If not, why not?

3. You wrote: He didn't reveal to Peter in this dream that Peter was ignorantly prejudiced against the Gentiles, which looks to be what your question is implying.

Do you think Peter was still ignorant of his prejudicial feelings against the Gentiles after his dream and experience with Cornelius? Do you think he was ignorant of his prejudices when he dissembled and Paul rebuked him?

4. How do you explain the phrase "will reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression" in following quote? "Those who believe on Christ and obey His commandments are not under bondage to God's law; for to those who believe and obey, His law is not a law of bondage, but of liberty. Everyone who believes on Christ, everyone who relies on the keeping power of a risen Saviour that has suffered the penalty pronounced upon the transgressor, everyone who resists temptation and in the midst of evil copies the pattern given in the Christ life, will through faith in the atoning sacrifice of Christ become a partaker of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust. Everyone who by faith obeys God's commandments will reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression. {HP 146.5}

Does this quote teach that a "condition of sinlessness" is available to us now? If not, what does it mean?

5. You wrote: It's not the actions which make a thing egocentric, but the motivation. Why are you doing what you are doing? If it is for the exaltation of self, then that's not a good motivation.

Can a born again believer, who is abiding in Jesus, be guilty of having sinful egocentric motivations? Is it possible to abide in Jesus and be sinfully egocentric?

Do you agree that the following description applies to new born babes in Christ? If not, why not?

Quote:
The law of God is the only true standard of moral perfection. That law was practically exemplified in the life of Christ. He says of Himself, "I have kept my Father's commandments" (John 15:10). Nothing short of this obedience will meet the requirements of God's word. "He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked" (1 John 2:6). We cannot plead that we are unable to do this, for we have the assurance, "My grace is sufficient for thee" (2 Cor. 12:9). As we look into the divine mirror, the law of God, we see the exceeding sinfulness of sin, and our own lost condition as transgressors. But by repentance and faith we are justified before God, and through divine grace enabled to render obedience to His commandments. {SL 80.3}

It is not only the privilege but the duty of every Christian to maintain a close union with Christ and to have a rich experience in the things of God. Then his life will be fruitful in good works. Said Christ, "Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit" (John 15:8). When we read the lives of men who have been eminent for their piety we often regard their experiences and attainments as far beyond our reach. But this is not the case. Christ died for all; and we are assured in His word that He is more willing to give His Holy Spirit to them that ask Him than are earthly parents to give good gifts to their children. The prophets and apostles did not perfect Christian character by a miracle. They used the means which God had placed within their reach; and all who will put forth the same effort will secure the same results. {SL 83.3}

"His servants ye are to whom ye obey" (Rom. 6:16). If we indulge anger, lust, covetousness, hatred, selfishness, or any other sin, we become servants of sin. "No man can serve two masters" (Matt. 6:24). If we serve sin, we cannot serve Christ. The Christian will feel the promptings of sin, for the flesh lusteth against the Spirit; but the Spirit striveth against the flesh, keeping up a constant warfare. Here is where Christ's help is needed. Human weakness becomes united to divine strength, and faith exclaims, "Thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Cor. 15:57)! {SL 92.2}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/04/08 09:29 PM

Quote:
1. "Do you think it's possible for the Gospel to be fully experienced without the latter rain?" Yes.


I think what's lacking is precisely the Gospel. One cannot proclaim what one does not know. God has been seeking to communicate to us what we need to know, starting in 1888.

God started to communicate a message, a message whose was to prepare a harvest, which is the 144,00. That message was not received. Was God mistaken? Is this message not needed? Assuming God was not mistaken, the message is needed, and the harvest cannot occur without it.

Quote:
People must reach a "condition of sinlessness" before they can receive the LR and give the LC. The LR does not empower SDAs to live without sinning. That's what the FR does. The LR empowers SDAs to boldly proclaim the 3AMS and to call people out of Babylon into the Remnant Church.


The issue isn't best understood in terms of sinning/not sinning IMO, but in terms of God's character.

[qutoe]It is the darkness of misapprehension of God that is enshrouding the world. Men are losing their knowledge of His character. It has been misunderstood and misinterpreted. At this time a message from God is to be proclaimed, a message illuminating in its influence and saving in its power. His character is to be made known. Into the darkness of the world is to be shed the light of His glory, the light of His goodness, mercy, and truth....

Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.(COL 415)[/quote]

The determining thing which drives everything is the message. The reason Christ hasn't returned yet is simple: the message which prepares for His coming has never been proclaimed. When that message is proclaimed, He will come quickly, just as EGW outlined in 1SM 234, 235.

Regarding Christ's human nature, I think you and I are on the same page regarding this. I took issue with something you wrote which I perceived as a bit careless, in the sense that it could give someone else a wrong impression. But in terms of what you actually think regarding this, I think we're quite close. I wasn't disagreeing with your last comment, which I think is fine, but trying to make clear my own understanding.

More later.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/04/08 11:04 PM

Quote:
T:3. You wrote: He didn't reveal to Peter in this dream that Peter was ignorantly prejudiced against the Gentiles, which looks to be what your question is implying.

M:Do you think Peter was still ignorant of his prejudicial feelings against the Gentiles after his dream and experience with Cornelius? Do you think he was ignorant of his prejudices when he dissembled and Paul rebuked him?


Again, this would be better asked of Rosangela, since it is her example, but I think this is possible.

Quote:
4. How do you explain the phrase "will reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression" in following quote? "Those who believe on Christ and obey His commandments are not under bondage to God's law; for to those who believe and obey, His law is not a law of bondage, but of liberty. Everyone who believes on Christ, everyone who relies on the keeping power of a risen Saviour that has suffered the penalty pronounced upon the transgressor, everyone who resists temptation and in the midst of evil copies the pattern given in the Christ life, will through faith in the atoning sacrifice of Christ become a partaker of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust. Everyone who by faith obeys God's commandments will reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression. {HP 146.5}


It looks like she is referring to this:

Quote:
Everyone who believes on Christ, everyone who relies on the keeping power of a risen Saviour that has suffered the penalty pronounced upon the transgressor, everyone who resists temptation and in the midst of evil copies the pattern given in the Christ life, will through faith in the atoning sacrifice of Christ become a partaker of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.


This is a long sentence!! The next sentence seems to be speaking of the same thing as this long sentence, so it looks to be referring to every believer, since her thought starts "Everyone who believes on Christ."

Quote:
T:5. You wrote: It's not the actions which make a thing egocentric, but the motivation. Why are you doing what you are doing? If it is for the exaltation of self, then that's not a good motivation.

M:Can a born again believer, who is abiding in Jesus, be guilty of having sinful egocentric motivations?


I'll rephrase the question slightly: "Can a born again believer, who is abiding in Jesus, have sinful egocentric motivations?" Yes, this happens.

Quote:
Is it possible to abide in Jesus and be sinfully egocentric?


I'm not sure what you mean by "sinfully egocentric," but given how I think you would define it, I'll answer no.

Do you agree that the following description applies to new born babes in Christ? If not, why not?[/quote]

Yes. I believe in perfection of character, and victory over sin, as I've mentioned on a number of occasions. There are just some unique ideas you have that I have questions about.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/05/08 06:42 PM

1. Amen! I agree with you that what the world needs now is an accurate and righteous demonstration of the love and character of God. Such a thing is the fruit of abiding in Jesus in truth and righteousness and true holiness. But my question to you is - Do we as a church possess the truths necessary to demonstrate the love and character of God? Or, are we still waiting for God to resume revealing it (assuming He was unable to finish revealing it in 1888)?

2. Yeah, I though we were in agreement on the human and divine natures of Jesus. Thank you for sharing your concerns over the way I expressed it. We cannot be too careful.

3. ". . . I think this is possible." Please consider the following passage as to whether or not Peter was still ignorant of prejudicial feelings by the time he dissembled and Paul rebuked him:

Quote:
When Peter, at a later date, visited Antioch, he won the confidence of many by his prudent conduct toward the Gentile converts. For a time he acted in accordance with the light given from heaven. He so far overcame his natural prejudice as to sit at table with the Gentile converts. But when certain Jews who were zealous for the ceremonial law, came from Jerusalem, Peter injudiciously changed his deportment toward the converts from paganism. A number of the Jews "dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation." This revelation of weakness on the part of those who had been respected and loved as leaders, left a most painful impression on the minds of the Gentile believers. The church was threatened with division. But Paul, who saw the subverting influence of the wrong done to the church through the double part acted by Peter, openly rebuked him for thus disguising his true sentiments. In the presence of the church, Paul inquired of Peter, "If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?" Galatians 2:13, 14. {AA 197.3}

Peter saw the error into which he had fallen, and immediately set about repairing the evil that had been wrought, so far as was in his power. God, who knows the end from the beginning, permitted Peter to reveal this weakness of character in order that the tried apostle might see that there was nothing in himself whereof he might boast. Even the best of men, if left to themselves, will err in judgment. God also saw that in time to come some would be so deluded as to claim for Peter and his pretended successors the exalted prerogatives that belong to God alone. And this record of the apostle's weakness was to remain as a proof of his fallibility and of the fact that he stood in no way above the level of the other apostles. {AA 198.1}

4. I agree she is talking about all believers. But how do you explain the phrase "will reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression" in that quote? Does this apply to all believers? Will all believers reach a condition of sinlessness if they continue to abide in Jesus? Or, do some die before they reach it? Also, how long does it take the average believer to reach it?

5. "Yes, this happens." While abiding in Jesus? How is that possible?

6. You wrote - "I believe in perfection of character, and victory over sin, as I've mentioned on a number of occasions. There are just some unique ideas you have that I have questions about." Please describe these unique ideas. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/05/08 09:29 PM

Quote:
1. Amen! I agree with you that what the world needs now is an accurate and righteous demonstration of the love and character of God. Such a thing is the fruit of abiding in Jesus in truth and righteousness and true holiness. But my question to you is - Do we as a church possess the truths necessary to demonstrate the love and character of God? Or, are we still waiting for God to resume revealing it (assuming He was unable to finish revealing it in 1888)?


You right that "such a thing is the fruit of abiding in Jesus in truth and righteousness and true holiness." This is only true to a point, because the church is a body. That is, the body of Christ depends upon the church as a whole contributing. This is why Christ hasn't come. As EGW puts it, there have always been a few in each generation which have been faithful as Enoch was, but this isn't enough. There needs to be a Corporate work. So when a message is sent by God, and that message is rejected, the church as a whole suffers. The message which prepares the harvest to present the final message mentioned in COL 415 never is given a chance to do its work, so the revelation of God's character mentioned never takes place.

Quote:
2. Yeah, I though we were in agreement on the human and divine natures of Jesus. Thank you for sharing your concerns over the way I expressed it. We cannot be too careful.


True. Even when the concepts are perfectly communicated, there is still confusion, so it behooves us to be as careful as possible. Recently I've been referring to "Christ's assumed human nature" which seems like a pretty clear phrase.

3.Yes, it seems possible, reading over the description. She refers to Peter having "so far overcame his natural prejudice," which looks to be indicated he failed in this regard at the meeting where he left the Gentiles.

Quote:
4.I agree she is talking about all believers. But how do you explain the phrase "will reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression" in that quote?


It looks like she's talking about the same thing as in the previous sentence. She says all will "will through faith in the atoning sacrifice of Christ become a partaker of the divine nature". I think she's talking about this.

Quote:
Does this apply to all believers? Will all believers reach a condition of sinlessness if they continue to abide in Jesus? Or, do some die before they reach it? Also, how long does it take the average believer to reach it?


It looks like she's saying all believers have this. It's not something they reach, but something they have when believing in Jesus.

She communicates the same principle here:

Quote:
By His perfect obedience He has made it possible for every human being to obey God's commandments. When we submit ourselves to Christ, the heart is united with His heart, the will is merged in His will, the mind becomes one with His mind, the thoughts are brought into captivity to Him; we live His life. This is what it means to be clothed with the garment of His righteousness. Then as the Lord looks upon us He sees, not the fig-leaf garment, not the nakedness and deformity of sin, but His own robe of righteousness, which is perfect obedience to the law of Jehovah. (COL 312)


I think this is saying exactly the same thing as the other quote, and is easier to understand.

Quote:
5. "Yes, this happens." While abiding in Jesus? How is that possible?


Because people aren't aware of what they are doing. They need to be shown that a motivation they have is self-centered, or, more likely, has a self-centered aspect to it. It's not likely that a converted person would be doing something which is totally self-centered. However, a person could do something thinking his motives are 100% pure when they're not. This isn't a willful sin, of course.

For example, desiring to go to heaven because it's better than being here smacks of an ego-centric motivation. One hears these sorts of prayers all the time "Come soon to take us away from this sin-cursed earth in clouds of glory." As opposed to praying that Christ may come so that He may receive *His* reward, and be crowned King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

If a person believes God will torture and kill you if you don't do what He says, it seems inevitable to me that such a person will have egocentric motivations creeping into the picture. I don't see how this could be avoided. That doesn't necessarily mean the person is not saved, or not abiding in Jesus, but his perception of God's character would be contributing to unknown sin and egocentric motivations.

Quote:
6. You wrote - "I believe in perfection of character, and victory over sin, as I've mentioned on a number of occasions. There are just some unique ideas you have that I have questions about." Please describe these unique ideas. Thank you.


These are the things we've been discussing in a number of threads. For example, your idea that no one can commit a sin of ignorance which involves the last 6 commandments, or that a properly indoctrinated SDA cannot commit any known sin at all. Or the idea that being born again involves a prolonged process of confessing all one's sinful habits, and when one gets to the last one, only then is one born again.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/07/08 03:02 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
1. Your idea that no one can commit a sin of ignorance which involves the last 6 commandments.

2. Or that a properly indoctrinated SDA cannot commit any known sin at all.

4. Or the idea that being born again involves a prolonged process of confessing all one's sinful habits, and when one gets to the last one, only then is one born again.

1. Everyone is born with an instinctive knowledge of what is morally right and wrong (as defined by the last six commandments). This is not to say everyone can recite the last six commandments. People naturally know it is wrong to dishonor their parents, to murder someone, to cheat on their spouse, to steal, to lie, and to want something that is not theirs to have. Thus, there is no such thing as a sin of ignorance so far as the last six commandments are concerned.

2. Properly indoctrinated SDAs who are abiding in Jesus, who are walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, who are partaking of the divine nature, "doth not and cannot" commit a sin, that is, any kind of sin. They must first neglect to abide in Jesus and then all they can do is sin.

3. People experience the miracle of rebirth the instant their old man (cultivated sinful traits and habits) is crucified. It is the result of a "long, patient, protracted process" which involves confessing their cultivated sinful traits and habits in light of the cross as the Holy Spirit reveals them. The moment they finish confessing the last cultivated sinful trait and habit revealed to them by the Holy Spirit, their old man dies and they are resurrected, as it were, with the sinless mind of the new man which comes complete with all the righteous fruits and attributes of God's character. They then begin the lifelong process of maturing in the fruits of Spirit. Eternity isn't long enough to exhaust their ability to become more and more mature in the fruits of the Spirit.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/07/08 03:10 AM

Again, it is clear in the Bible and the SOP that people who experience real rebirth, the genuine article, are reborn dead to sin and awake to righteousness. They are born again without their former old man traits and habits. Should they die before the Second Advent, Jesus will not need to change their character. This is true of everyone from the thief on the cross to the apostle Paul. Nor will He need to change the characters of the 144,000. Everyone who experiences the miracle of rebirth is born again without their former cultivated sinful traits and habits. They are new creatures in Christ. The old is gone, behold, everything is new.

Romans
6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
6:5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also [in the likeness] of [his] resurrection:
6:6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with [him], that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
6:7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.

2 Corinthians
5:17 Therefore if any man [be] in Christ, [he is] a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.

1 John
3:3 And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure.
3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
3:5 And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin.
3:6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
3:7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
3:8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
3:9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

The old nature, born of blood and the will of the flesh, cannot inherit the kingdom of God. The old ways, the hereditary tendencies, the former habits, must be given up; for grace is not inherited. The new birth consists in having new motives, new tastes, new tendencies. Those who are begotten unto a new life by the Holy Spirit, have become partakers of the divine nature, and in all their habits and practices they will give evidence of their relationship to Christ. When men who claim to be Christians retain all their natural defects of character and disposition, in what does their position differ from that of the worldling? They do not appreciate the truth as a sanctifier, a refiner. They have not been born again (RH April 12, 1892). {6BC 1101.1}

The old sinful life is dead; the new life entered into with Christ by the pledge of baptism. Practise the virtues of the Saviour's character. Let His wisdom dwell in you richly in all wisdom; "teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord. And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him." . . . The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man. With the new man, Christ Jesus, are to be put on "kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering." {SD 300.3}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/07/08 09:19 AM

Quote:
1. Everyone is born with an instinctive knowledge of what is morally right and wrong (as defined by the last six commandments).


This is true to some extent. It's also true for the first four commandments. The Sabbath is a special case in regards to which day is the Sabbath, but that one should take time to rest, and contemplate God is something people have an intuitive or instinctive knowledge about. One sees this principle in virtually every religion.

Quote:
This is not to say everyone can recite the last six commandments. People naturally know it is wrong to dishonor their parents, to murder someone, to cheat on their spouse, to steal, to lie, and to want something that is not theirs to have. Thus, there is no such thing as a sin of ignorance so far as the last six commandments are concerned.


Your last sentence is a claim I've never seen before (besides by you). I'm not aware of any evidence that this is the case. I can think of many counter-examples to this idea. For example, someone asked:

Quote:
But does all sinful behavior result in sinners suffering? For example, will two non-believers, who are unmarried in the eyes of God, naturally feel shame and guilt?

Does ignorance cancel out the results of sinning? Or, does sin pay its wages irrespective of ignorance? If not, how can we say sinners reap what they sow?


These are good questions, which rightly bring out that people can cohabit ignorantly.

Quote:

2. Properly indoctrinated SDAs who are abiding in Jesus, who are walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, who are partaking of the divine nature, "doth not and cannot" commit a sin, that is, any kind of sin. They must first neglect to abide in Jesus and then all they can do is sin.


Of course this is self-contradictory, since neglecting to abide in Jesus is of itself a sin. It seems to me that you have a limited view of sin, and that this is the only way one could make an assertion like this.

Quote:
3. People experience the miracle of rebirth the instant their old man (cultivated sinful traits and habits) is crucified.


This is backwards! Being born again is what comes first. The old man is crucified when one is born again. Being born again means to be converted, which is a transformation of mind and heart, motivated by the love of God shining from the cross. Only as one responds to that love can the old man be crucified.

Quote:
It is the result of a "long, patient, protracted process" which involves confessing their cultivated sinful traits and habits in light of the cross as the Holy Spirit reveals them.


Not at all! This isn't what the SOP statement says at all.

Quote:
By an agency as unseen as the wind, Christ is constantly working upon the heart. Little by little, perhaps unconsciously to the receiver, impressions are made that tend to draw the soul to Christ. These may be received through meditating upon Him, through reading the Scriptures, or through hearing the word from the living preacher. Suddenly, as the Spirit comes with more direct appeal, the soul gladly surrenders itself to Jesus. By many this is called sudden conversion; but it is the result of long wooing by the Spirit of God,--a patient, protracted process.(DA 172)


The patient, protracted process has nothing to do with confessing cultivated traits of character! It has to do with the soul surrendering itself to Jesus as a response to a direct appeal of the Spirit. The patient, protracted process refers to the preparation of the Spirit to prepare the human heart to be as susceptible as possible to its appeal.

Quote:
The moment they finish confessing the last cultivated sinful trait and habit revealed to them by the Holy Spirit, their old man dies and they are resurrected, as it were, with the sinless mind of the new man which comes complete with all the righteous fruits and attributes of God's character. They then begin the lifelong process of maturing in the fruits of Spirit. Eternity isn't long enough to exhaust their ability to become more and more mature in the fruits of the Spirit.


I really don't have any idea how or why you have this idea of how conversion works. The way conversion works is just as the above quote describes it. Here's another description:

Quote:
How, then, are we to be saved? "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness," so the Son of man has been lifted up, and everyone who has been deceived and bitten by the serpent may look and live. "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29. The light shining from the cross reveals the love of God. His love is drawing us to Himself. If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. (DA 175)


Here's another one:

Quote:
The publican had gone to the temple with other worshipers, but he soon drew apart from them as unworthy to unite in their devotions. Standing afar off, he "would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast," in bitter anguish and self-abhorrence. He felt that he had transgressed against God, that he was sinful and polluted. He could not expect even pity from those around him, for they looked upon him with contempt. He knew that he had no merit to commend him to God, and in utter self-despair he cried, "God be merciful to me, a sinner." He did not compare himself with others.

Overwhelmed with a sense of guilt, he stood as if alone in God's presence. His only desire was for pardon and peace, his only plea was the mercy of God. And he was blessed. "I tell you," Christ said, "this man went down to his house justified rather than the other." (COL 151)


This one is great! This is exactly right, exactly what happens.

Regarding your next post, I agree with the SOP statements that rebirth is a transformation. I think a large part of our disagreement has to do with our conception as to what is important. You seem to have a very rules-based orientation, viewing sin as having to do with a rather limited set of behaviors. You don't present sin as having to do with motivations or with conceptions of God's character.

When one is converted, one's desire is to serve God. When I was first converted I knew nothing about theology. I studied Calvinism, and agreed with its ideas. By the way, one of the reasons I'm sensitive to Calvinism entering into Adventism is because of this background. I had to "unlearn" what I had learned as a Calvinist in becoming an Adventist. It is very odd to come across these same ideas in Adventism that I had left behind in becoming an Adventist, but I digress.

As a Calvinist, I unwittingly presented false ideas about God's character. In one sense, this is sin. If I claim that God will have people tormented for all eternity to pay for sins they have committed if they do not accept Christ, I am misrepresenting His character, which certainly isn't a righteous thing to do. However, in another sense, this isn't sin, if I do so ignorantly:

Quote:
Said the angel, "If light comes, and that light is set aside, or rejected, then comes condemnation and the frown of God; but before the light comes there is no sin, for there is no light for them to reject." (4SG 3)


This is the essence of unknown sin, or sins of ignorance. Now surely the thief on the cross did not understand perfectly God's character. We know from the parable of Lazarus and the rich man that the idea that the soul would immediately go to heaven upon death was commonplace, so it is not unlikely that the thief on the cross had the very misconception I had before becoming an Adventist.

However, he had surrendered his heart to Christ, and this was enough.

This is not enough for the for work of the 144,000. For that work, it's necessary to have a mature understanding of the character of God.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/08/08 06:36 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
These are good questions, which rightly bring out that people can cohabit ignorantly.

As you very well know I was the one who asked those questions, and you also know I addressed them later on in a totally different way than you did here. I said sin always pays its wages. People who shack up feel a sense of emptiness. There is a God-sized hole in their heart that they cannot satisfactorily fill while living in sin. It matters not whether they live in sin ignorantly or intentionally. Sin always pays its wages.

Originally Posted By: Tom
. . . neglecting to abide in Jesus is of itself a sin.

Not so. It results in sin. A&E were not guilty of sin until they actually ate the forbidden fruit. Separation results in sin.

Originally Posted By: Tom
I really don't have any idea how or why you have this idea of how conversion works.

I believe people are born again without their former sinful old man traits and habits. "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man. With the new man, Christ Jesus, are to be put on "kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering." {SD 300.3} They are dead to sin and awake to righteousness. Not one single sin survives. They are resurrected, as it were, without their former sins.

You seem to think people are ignorantly born again with certain old man traits and habits in tact. Do you have any Bible or SOP passages to back up your assertion?

I also believe that those "who are begotten unto a new life by the Holy Spirit, have become partakers of the divine nature, and in all their habits and practices they will give evidence of their relationship to Christ." {6BC 1101.1} IOW, all of their habits and practices are in harmony with the will of God. Not one habit or practice comes short of the glory of God.

You seem to think people ignorantly retain some of their sinful habits and practices after they experience rebirth. Why are they ignorant of them? Do you apply this to people who have been properly indoctrinated in accordance with biblical and SOP counsel?

Originally Posted By: Tom
You seem to have a very rules-based orientation, viewing sin as having to do with a rather limited set of behaviors.

What a curious thing to accuse me of, especially since I just said I believe people are born again without any of their previously cultivated sinful habits and practices. This view is completely comprehensive. It is not limited in any way.

Originally Posted By: Tom
You don't present sin as having to do with motivations or with conceptions of God's character.

This is also a curious accusation in light of what I have been repeatedly saying. "The new birth consists in having new motives, new tastes, new tendencies." Abiding in Jesus is everything. It is the key to glorifying God in all we think, say, and do. Focusing on Jesus is the fountain of faith, hope, and love. There is a thorough searching of mind and heart that happens when people know God. Nothing escapes His attention to remain as a source of darkness and sin.

"One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/08/08 10:57 AM

Quote:
T:These are good questions, which rightly bring out that people can cohabit ignorantly.

M:As you very well know I was the one who asked those questions, and you also know I addressed them later on in a totally different way than you did here. I said sin always pays its wages. People who shack up feel a sense of emptiness. There is a God-sized hole in their heart that they cannot satisfactorily fill while living in sin. It matters not whether they live in sin ignorantly or intentionally. Sin always pays its wages.


I agree!

Quote:
. . . neglecting to abide in Jesus is of itself a sin.

Not so. It results in sin. A&E were not guilty of sin until they actually ate the forbidden fruit. Separation results in sin.


Before I asked you if it was a sin, and you said it was.

Ok, let's leave that aside, and go with the idea that neglecting to abide in Jesus Christ is not a sin. I think it's easy to demonstrate this is false. Let's make the following assumptions:

a.When one is abiding in Jesus, one has communion with God through the Holy Spirit.

b.Before one can cease to abide in Jesus, one must resist the Holy Spirit, who warns the believer not to sever this connection.

c.Resisting the Holy Spirit is sin.

Quote:
You seem to think people ignorantly retain some of their sinful habits and practices after they experience rebirth. Why are they ignorant of them?


Because they don't know about them. I realize this is just rephrasing your question other words, but you're asking why people don't know something they don't know. There's no way to answer this other than by saying they don't know what they don't know.

Quote:
Do you apply this to people who have been properly indoctrinated in accordance with biblical and SOP counsel?


Of course. There's no way a person could be indoctrinated on every possible sin. It would take many centuries to complete such a course. We'd have no new SDA's, because all prospects would die before they could be baptized.

Quote:
T:You seem to have a very rules-based orientation, viewing sin as having to do with a rather limited set of behaviors.

MM:What a curious thing to accuse me of, especially since I just said I believe people are born again without any of their previously cultivated sinful habits and practices. This view is completely comprehensive. It is not limited in any way.


T:The fact you think this is possible is evidence if the view being limited. It's like thinking that's it's possible to count the sands of a beach. If someone said, "I believe a people are born again when they confess every grain of sand on a beach" that would indicate a limited view as to how many grains of sand there are on a beach.

Quote:
T:You don't present sin as having to do with motivations or with conceptions of God's character.

M:This is also a curious accusation in light of what I have been repeatedly saying. "The new birth consists in having new motives, new tastes, new tendencies."


This is a passing reference. You spend hundreds of times more effort and time dealing with behaviors than motives. For example, you ask over and over and over for lists of sins which fall into certain categories. I don't recall you're bringing up sin in terms of misconceptions of God's character at all. It could just be faulty memory on my part, but it's certainly not a common theme of yours.

Quote:
Abiding in Jesus is everything. It is the key to glorifying God in all we think, say, and do. Focusing on Jesus is the fountain of faith, hope, and love.


I took the liberty of underlining the last sentence here. This is certainly true.

Quote:
There is a thorough searching of mind and heart that happens when people know God. Nothing escapes His attention to remain as a source of darkness and sin.


I agree with this too, but this takes time. This isn't completed the moment one first comes to Jesus.

Consider an alcoholic who gives His life to Christ, and is cured of his addiction. There are many accounts of this happening. Do you think such a fellow is lost? Do you think he has he no sinful habits? I don't know which of these you would throw out, but one moment the fellow is a destitute bum, the next he is a Son of God, and has just started learning what "proper behavior" for a Christian is. Do you think all of a sudden this person no longer swears? Do you think 100% of these people gave up smoking? Do you think they immediately broke up with any girlfriends they may have had to whom they were not married?

This view just isn't realistic. It doesn't fit either reality, or the description in inspiration as to how a person is converted. Consider the story of the publican:

Quote:
Overwhelmed with a sense of guilt, he stood as if alone in God's presence. His only desire was for pardon and peace, his only plea was the mercy of God. And he was blessed. "I tell you," Christ said, "this man went down to his house justified rather than the other." (COL 151)


There's no procession of sins to confess. There is an overwhelming sense of guilt, and a plea for mercy. That's it!

This fits exactly my conversion. *After* I was converted, the Holy Spirit began to draw my attention to different things. But the conversion itself took a moment (even though the process leading up to it was a protracted, prolonged process, as the SOP points out). I saw I was lost, and asked God for help. Actually I didn't even ask God for help, I just expressed my hopelessness. God presented the cross to me, and said, "This is all you need." I was amazed. I responded, and was converted, just like the publican.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/09/08 01:08 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
Resisting the Holy Spirit is sin.

True. But neglecting to abide in Jesus does not require consciously resisting the Holy Spirit. Thus, it is not in and of itself a sin. Consciously resisting the Holy Spirit constitutes a willful, deliberate, intentional, premeditated sin. This is not happens when a born again believer neglects to abide in Jesus.

Originally Posted By: Tom
M: You seem to think people ignorantly retain some of their sinful habits and practices after they experience rebirth. Why are they ignorant of them?

T: Because they don't know about them. I realize this is just rephrasing your question other words, but you're asking why people don't know something they don't know. There's no way to answer this other than by saying they don't know what they don't know.

It is the office and duty of the Holy Spirit to convict people, in light of the cross, to confess and crucify the sinful habits and practices they have cultivated throughout their earthly sojourn. “He will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness.” (John 16:8) “To convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed.” (Jude 1:15)

It is logical, therefore, to infer from these inspired passages that it is the Holy Spirit who makes people aware of the sinfulness of their sinful habits and practices in a new and fresh and saving way. Consequently, all the sinful habits and practices people confess and crucify when they experience the miracle of rebirth is a direct result of the work of the Holy Spirit.

But you, Tom, believe people are reborn with certain sinful habits and practices in tact. You also seem to believe they are ignorant of them, that they continue practicing them unaware of the fact they are sinning. When asked why you think they are ignorant of them you reply – “There's no way to answer this other than by saying they don't know what they don't know.”

On the flipside of this issue, I assume you understand why they know what they know, that is, I assume you know it’s because the Holy Spirit revealed it to them. Wouldn’t make it sense, then, to deduce they don’t know what they don’t know because the Holy Spirit has not yet revealed it to them? If this is the case, then it begs another question – Why didn’t the Holy Spirit reveal it to them along with all the other sinful habits and practices He revealed to them? Why wait to reveal it to them after they are born again and baptized?

Originally Posted By: Tom
M: Do you apply this to people who have been properly indoctrinated in accordance with biblical and SOP counsel?

T: Of course. There's no way a person could be indoctrinated on every possible sin. It would take many centuries to complete such a course. We'd have no new SDA's, because all prospects would die before they could be baptized.

If it takes “many centuries” to finish confessing and crucifying our sinfulness, how, then, will the 144,000 be able to stand before God spotless and without blame?

Also, does this insight imply we will finish confessing and crucifying our sinful habits and practices in heaven? If so, doesn’t this also imply will be sinning in heaven until we get around to completing confessing and crucifying the last of our sins?

Originally Posted By: Tom
T:You seem to have a very rules-based orientation, viewing sin as having to do with a rather limited set of behaviors.

MM:What a curious thing to accuse me of, especially since I just said I believe people are born again without any of their previously cultivated sinful habits and practices. This view is completely comprehensive. It is not limited in any way.

T:The fact you think this is possible is evidence if the view being limited. It's like thinking that's it's possible to count the sands of a beach. If someone said, "I believe a people are born again when they confess every grain of sand on a beach" that would indicate a limited view as to how many grains of sand there are on a beach.

I’m not talking about confessing the thousands of sins people have committed by the time they experience the miracle of rebirth. I’m talking about the resulting traits of character, what you (or Waggoner) refer to as “representative sins”. When boiled down to their lowest common denominator all sins fall under the same heading – Selfishness. Yes, there are subtitles and groupings of similar sins, but these are not so many that they cannot be confessed in a relatively short period of time. Again, listen:

One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}

Originally Posted By: Tom
M: There is a thorough searching of mind and heart that happens when people know God. Nothing escapes His attention to remain as a source of darkness and sin.

T: I agree with this too, but this takes time. This isn't completed the moment one first comes to Jesus.

Neither do people experience rebirth the instant they begin responding to the wooing of the Holy Spirit. Some people spend time meditating on Jesus, reading the Bible, and listening to sermons in church before they are born again and consent to be baptized and join the church. Others, unfortunately, get baptized and join the church before they crucify their old man habits and practices. These people and their sins become a source of perplexity in the church. Listen:

By an agency as unseen as the wind, Christ is constantly working upon the heart. Little by little, perhaps unconsciously to the receiver, impressions are made that tend to draw the soul to Christ. These may be received through meditating upon Him, through reading the Scriptures, or through hearing the word from the living preacher. Suddenly, as the Spirit comes with more direct appeal, the soul gladly surrenders itself to Jesus. By many this is called sudden conversion; but it is the result of long wooing by the Spirit of God,--a patient, protracted process. {DA 172.3}

The new birth is a rare experience in this age of the world. This is the reason why there are so many perplexities in the churches. Many, so many, who assume the name of Christ are unsanctified and unholy. They have been baptized, but they were buried alive. Self did not die, and therefore they did not rise to newness of life in Christ (MS 148, 1897). {6BC 1075.7}

Originally Posted By: Tom
*After* I was converted, the Holy Spirit began to draw my attention to different things. But the conversion itself took a moment (even though the process leading up to it was a protracted, prolonged process, as the SOP points out). I saw I was lost, and asked God for help. Actually I didn't even ask God for help, I just expressed my hopelessness. God presented the cross to me, and said, "This is all you need." I was amazed. I responded, and was converted, just like the publican.

Thank you for sharing your testimony. I know how you must have felt when you finally gave your heart to Jesus. I have fond memories of the day I gave my heart to Jesus. Like you, though, I didn’t understand everything. Unlike you, I suppose, my coarse and callused ways became a source of stress for many of the members at church. Newcomers saw me and judged the church unworthy of their time and attention. They reasoned within themselves, “If this wretched man is an example of the fruit of this church and its doctrines, well, thanks, but no thanks.” Like a bull in a china shop, I was. Oh dreadful days of my life!
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/09/08 03:21 AM

Quote:
T:Resisting the Holy Spirit is sin.

MM:True. But neglecting to abide in Jesus does not require consciously resisting the Holy Spirit. Thus, it is not in and of itself a sin. Consciously resisting the Holy Spirit constitutes a willful, deliberate, intentional, premeditated sin. This is not happens when a born again believer neglects to abide in Jesus.


Before you said it was a sin. I think your original version was correct.

You agree on the one hand that resisting the Holy Spirit is a sin, but then turn around and say that it isn't, because you can do it unconsciously. So you seem to think it's not a big deal, neglecting to abide in Christ. At the very least, the Holy Spirit seems not to think it's a big deal, since He allows you to neglect to do so without conscious effort.

Quote:
On the flipside of this issue, I assume you understand why they know what they know, that is, I assume you know it’s because the Holy Spirit revealed it to them. Wouldn’t make it sense, then, to deduce they don’t know what they don’t know because the Holy Spirit has not yet revealed it to them? If this is the case, then it begs another question – Why didn’t the Holy Spirit reveal it to them along with all the other sinful habits and practices He revealed to them? Why wait to reveal it to them after they are born again and baptized?


Since the Holy Spirit doesn't reveal every sinful habit before a person is born again, it's clear this isn't necessary for conversion. Here's a description of conversion:

Quote:
How, then, are we to be saved? "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness," so the Son of man has been lifted up, and everyone who has been deceived and bitten by the serpent may look and live. "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29. The light shining from the cross reveals the love of God. His love is drawing us to Himself. If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. (DA 175)


Here's another one:

Quote:
Overwhelmed with a sense of guilt, he stood as if alone in God's presence. His only desire was for pardon and peace, his only plea was the mercy of God. And he was blessed. "I tell you," Christ said, "this man went down to his house justified rather than the other." (COL 151)


We are converted when we recognize our need for Christ, and surrender to the appeal of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit does not require that every sinful habit we have be confessed before He makes an appeal to us. If there is some particular sin or sins which prevent us from giving our hearts to the Lord, He makes us aware of that.

Quote:
Neither do people experience rebirth the instant they begin responding to the wooing of the Holy Spirit.


As soon as a person believes in Christ, He is born again. The DA 172 text, speaking of the protracted process, is dealing with preparing the soul so that it will respond to the appeal the Holy Spirit make to accept Christ, as described in the two quotes I provided. The text itself that you quote from in DA 172 explains this. It says nothing about confessing every sin before being able to be born again. It speaks about responding to the appeal of the Holy Spirit in relation to Christ.

We need Christ to be saved. Not a works program of confession.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/10/08 10:39 PM

Tom, you skipped over so much of what I posted that I hardly understand what you're responding to. You did not do justice to my post.

You seem to be saying people sin when they unconsciously fail to abide in Jesus. If so, which commandment do you think is violated?

You also seem to agree the Holy Spirit waits to reveal certain sinful habits until sometime after people are born again. But you didn't explain why? Why does the Holy Spirit wait to reveal them?

If a person dies before the Holy Spirit finishes revealing all of their old man habits of sin what will Jesus do about it when He resurrects them? Will He simply raise them without their uncrucified sinful habits? Or, will they rise up and resume where they left off ignorantly sinning?

Given your understanding of rebirth, that is, since you believe people are born again with certain cultivated sinful habits unrevealed and uncrucified, how would you explain and apply the following passages? For example, would you point out that the sinful habits people retain after they are born again do not count as "self" or "attributes of Satan" and do not cause "perplexities" in the church? Would you also explain that rebirth happens more frequently nowadays?

Quote:
The new birth is a rare experience in this age of the world. This is the reason why there are so many perplexities in the churches. Many, so many, who assume the name of Christ are unsanctified and unholy. They have been baptized, but they were buried alive. Self did not die, and therefore they did not rise to newness of life in Christ (MS 148, 1897). {6BC 1075.7}

The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man. With the new man, Christ Jesus, are to be put on "kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering." {SD 300.3}

The gospel seed often falls among thorns and noxious weeds; and if there is not a moral transformation in the human heart, if old habits and practices and the former life of sin are not left behind, if the attributes of Satan are not expelled from the soul, the wheat crop will be choked. The thorns will come to be the crop, and will kill out the wheat. {COL 50.3}

When a soul is truly converted, old habits and natural evil besetments are done away in Christ Jesus and all things become new. (TMK 247)

There is not a stain in the character because God is enthroned in the heart and Christ does not war against Christ. (1 S&T 246)

Transformation of heart means an entire change of the entire man. (TDG 48)

Finally, taking into consideration what you believe about rebirth and uncrucified sinful habits, how would you reword or paraphrase the following quotes to plainly state your position so as to avoid any confusion? For example, would you clarify or replace the word "every" to make it clear that not every sinful habit is revealed during the process that leads to rebirth? And, would you explain it is possible to reveal Jesus "in all their habits and practices" while at the same time retaining some of "the old ways, the hereditary tendencies, the former habits . . . their natural defects of character and disposition"?

Quote:
One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}

The old nature, born of blood and the will of the flesh, cannot inherit the kingdom of God. The old ways, the hereditary tendencies, the former habits, must be given up; for grace is not inherited. The new birth consists in having new motives, new tastes, new tendencies. Those who are begotten unto a new life by the Holy Spirit, have become partakers of the divine nature, and in all their habits and practices they will give evidence of their relationship to Christ. When men who claim to be Christians retain all their natural defects of character and disposition, in what does their position differ from that of the worldling? They do not appreciate the truth as a sanctifier, a refiner. They have not been born again (RH April 12, 1892). {6BC 1101.1}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/11/08 03:52 AM

Quote:
You seem to be saying people sin when they unconsciously fail to abide in Jesus. If so, which commandment do you think is violated?


It is your idea that a person must stop abiding in Jesus before he can sin. This is not something I am saying. Please, don't ascribe this to me!

Originally *you* said ceasing to abide in Jesus was a sin. Then apparently you changed your mind and say it isn't. I said what you originally said made more sense than what you are saying now, but neither what you said before nor what you are saying now is my idea, or something I am saying.

I already explained my logic. If you want me to pick a commandments, how about the first one! Please note also that I did not say this was something they did unconsciously, but this was your idea too.

Quote:
You also seem to agree the Holy Spirit waits to reveal certain sinful habits until sometime after people are born again. But you didn't explain why? Why does the Holy Spirit wait to reveal them?


Both Rosangela and I have spent a great deal of time dealing with these questions. Both she and I have explained why.

Quote:
If a person dies before the Holy Spirit finishes revealing all of their old man habits of sin what will Jesus do about it when He resurrects them? Will He simply raise them without their uncrucified sinful habits? Or, will they rise up and resume where they left off ignorantly sinning?


The truth will be explained to the person, and that will take care of the matter. Think of the Sabbath as an example.

Quote:
Given your understanding of rebirth, that is, since you believe people are born again with certain cultivated sinful habits unrevealed and uncrucified, how would you explain and apply the following passages? For example, would you point out that the sinful habits people retain after they are born again do not count as "self" or "attributes of Satan" and do not cause "perplexities" in the church? Would you also explain that rebirth happens more frequently nowadays?


When self dies, one lives to serve Christ, and does not willfully rebel against Him, but seeks to please Him. The converted person begins a new walk, where he beings to learn new things including behavior, the character of God, his own motivations.

Quote:
Finally, taking into consideration what you believe about rebirth and uncrucified sinful habits, how would you reword or paraphrase the following quotes to plainly state your position so as to avoid any confusion? For example, would you clarify or replace the word "every" to make it clear that not every sinful habit is revealed during the process that leads to rebirth? And, would you explain it is possible to reveal Jesus "in all their habits and practices" while at the same time retaining some of "the old ways, the hereditary tendencies, the former habits . . . their natural defects of character and disposition"?


One could add "that one is aware of" at appropriate spots. I, myself, wouldn't think this to be necessary, as it seems obvious to me, but in regards to how you are reading her statement, that would be my suggestion.

I really don't understand how you can have the theory of conversion that you have. We have complete descriptions of it which I provided for you. They say nothing of lists of sins to confess. The description that she gave is both my experience, and the experience of other believers I have met.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/12/08 02:32 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
M: You seem to be saying people sin when they unconsciously fail to abide in Jesus. If so, which commandment do you think is violated?

T: It is your idea that a person must stop abiding in Jesus before he can sin. This is not something I am saying. Please, don't ascribe this to me! Originally *you* said ceasing to abide in Jesus was a sin. Then apparently you changed your mind and say it isn't. I said what you originally said made more sense than what you are saying now, but neither what you said before nor what you are saying now is my idea, or something I am saying. I already explained my logic. If you want me to pick a commandments, how about the first one! Please note also that I did not say this was something they did unconsciously, but this was your idea too.

Now that you've made it clear what you don't believe, please explain what you do believe. You sort of left me hanging. I seem to remember you saying somewhere that people do indeed sin while abiding in Jesus, that abiding in Jesus does not mean they do not sin, that people regularly sin and repent while abiding in Jesus. If this is what you believe?

Quote:
M: You also seem to agree the Holy Spirit waits to reveal certain sinful habits until sometime after people are born again. But you didn't explain why? Why does the Holy Spirit wait to reveal them?

T: Both Rosangela and I have spent a great deal of time dealing with these questions. Both she and I have explained why.

Did I state your position correctly? If not, please explain it. Thank you. It's not clear to me what you believe.

I do seem to remember you saying the Holy Spirit waits to reveal certain sinful habits and practices until sometime after a person is reborn for several reasons, but I'm not sure I understood them all. It sounded to me like you were saying one reason is because it would be too painful or overwhelming for people to deal with confessing and giving up certain sins, and, so as not to blow them away, the Holy Spirit allows them to remain in ignorance until the time is right to reveal them. I also seem to remember you saying another reason is because they are too hard-hearted to give up certain sins.

Quote:
M: If a person dies before the Holy Spirit finishes revealing all of their old man habits of sin what will Jesus do about it when He resurrects them? Will He simply raise them without their uncrucified sinful habits? Or, will they rise up and resume where they left off ignorantly sinning?

T: The truth will be explained to the person, and that will take care of the matter. Think of the Sabbath as an example.

So, besides truths like the Sabbath, what else would the Holy Spirit purposely overlook and wait to reveal because people would be blown away if they were told too soon or before they died? IOW, which sins would not count as "self" or the "attributes of Satan" and would not cause "perplexities" in the church?

Quote:
M: Given your understanding of rebirth, that is, since you believe people are born again with certain cultivated sinful habits unrevealed and uncrucified, how would you explain and apply the following passages? For example, would you point out that the sinful habits people retain after they are born again do not count as "self" or "attributes of Satan" and do not cause "perplexities" in the church? Would you also explain that rebirth happens more frequently nowadays?

T: When self dies, one lives to serve Christ, and does not willfully rebel against Him, but seeks to please Him. The converted person begins a new walk, where he beings to learn new things including behavior, the character of God, his own motivations.

Tom, you did not answer my questions at all. Please address them straight forwardly. I asked very specific questions. Thank you.

Quote:
M: Finally, taking into consideration what you believe about rebirth and uncrucified sinful habits, how would you reword or paraphrase the following quotes to plainly state your position so as to avoid any confusion? For example, would you clarify or replace the word "every" to make it clear that not every sinful habit is revealed during the process that leads to rebirth? And, would you explain it is possible to reveal Jesus "in all their habits and practices" while at the same time retaining some of "the old ways, the hereditary tendencies, the former habits . . . their natural defects of character and disposition"?

T: One could add "that one is aware of" at appropriate spots. I, myself, wouldn't think this to be necessary, as it seems obvious to me, but in regards to how you are reading her statement, that would be my suggestion.

What is it about those specific quotes which lead you to believe she didn't mean exactly what she wrote, that she intended for us to interpret what she wrote to mean something different? Why would she write something so plainly if she didn't intend for us to take it as plainly as she wrote it? It seems rather reckless to state something so strongly, so plainly and yet not mean it.

Originally Posted By: Tom
I really don't understand how you can have the theory of conversion that you have. We have complete descriptions of it which I provided for you. They say nothing of lists of sins to confess. The description that she gave is both my experience, and the experience of other believers I have met.

As you know, Ellen testified that rebirth was rare in her day. Would you say rebirth is more common nowadays? Do you know of any place in the Bible or the SOP where it plainly says rebirth will be more common in the lasts days?

You seem to believe people are born again ignorant of certain cultivated sins, that they are reborn practicing some of the same sinful habits and practices they did prior to accepting Jesus as their Savior. You seem to believe quotes like the following one should be interpreted to agree with this position: "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." (SD 300)

Is this what you believe? Or, have I misunderstood your position? You have yet to answer this question plainly enough for me to know precisely what you believe. I would appreciate a definitive answer. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/13/08 11:50 PM

Quote:
Now that you've made it clear what you don't believe, please explain what you do believe. You sort of left me hanging. I seem to remember you saying somewhere that people do indeed sin while abiding in Jesus, that abiding in Jesus does not mean they do not sin, that people regularly sin and repent while abiding in Jesus. If this is what you believe?


What do you mean by "abide in Jesus"?

Regarding what I believe, I believe people sin in ignorance regularly. I believe the Holy Spirit educates people, and that the process of leaning one's sins of ignorance takes time. I believe the 1888 message accelerates this process, which was simply the beginning of the latter rain. Later messages, which are not simply the beginning, should accelerate it even more.

Quote:
Did I state your position correctly? If not, please explain it. Thank you. It's not clear to me what you believe.


On this specific point, it should be clear, as both Rosangela and I have explained it clearly. A person may not understand that a given thing is sin, not because of any lack on the part of God, but because of the person's one shortcomings.

Quote:
I do seem to remember you saying the Holy Spirit waits to reveal certain sinful habits and practices until sometime after a person is reborn for several reasons, but I'm not sure I understood them all.


The principle one is that it does not good to tell someone something they can't understand.

Quote:
It sounded to me like you were saying one reason is because it would be too painful or overwhelming for people to deal with confessing and giving up certain sins, and, so as not to blow them away, the Holy Spirit allows them to remain in ignorance until the time is right to reveal them. I also seem to remember you saying another reason is because they are too hard-hearted to give up certain sins.


The first one seems possible, but not the second.

Quote:
M: If a person dies before the Holy Spirit finishes revealing all of their old man habits of sin what will Jesus do about it when He resurrects them? Will He simply raise them without their uncrucified sinful habits? Or, will they rise up and resume where they left off ignorantly sinning?

T: The truth will be explained to the person, and that will take care of the matter. Think of the Sabbath as an example.

So, besides truths like the Sabbath, what else would the Holy Spirit purposely overlook and wait to reveal because people would be blown away if they were told too soon or before they died? IOW, which sins would not count as "self" or the "attributes of Satan" and would not cause "perplexities" in the church?


The Sabbath is fine as an example. Any other sins of ignorance would be another example.

Quote:
M: Given your understanding of rebirth, that is, since you believe people are born again with certain cultivated sinful habits unrevealed and uncrucified, how would you explain and apply the following passages? For example, would you point out that the sinful habits people retain after they are born again do not count as "self" or "attributes of Satan" and do not cause "perplexities" in the church? Would you also explain that rebirth happens more frequently nowadays?

T: When self dies, one lives to serve Christ, and does not willfully rebel against Him, but seeks to please Him. The converted person begins a new walk, where he beings to learn new things including behavior, the character of God, his own motivations.

Tom, you did not answer my questions at all. Please address them straight forwardly. I asked very specific questions. Thank you.


MM, you're trying to put words in my mouth. I can't answer your first question as stated because it's a FOTAP question (fallacy of the assumed premise.)

Regarding your other questions, I do not disagree with the EGW said, so no, I would not put things in the way you suggested.

What I said is how I would put things.

Quote:
What is it about those specific quotes which lead you to believe she didn't mean exactly what she wrote, that she intended for us to interpret what she wrote to mean something different? Why would she write something so plainly if she didn't intend for us to take it as plainly as she wrote it? It seems rather reckless to state something so strongly, so plainly and yet not mean it.


I think the problem is not that the didn't mean exactly what she wrote, but that you are not understanding what she meant by what she wrote. In the Nicodemus chapter, from DA, that I have quoted several times, she asks the question, "What, then, must one do to be saved"? She describes the love of God revealed by the cross, and points out that one will be saved if one does not resist this drawing. I believe this description to be accurate, and not missing anything (like long lists of confessions).

Your conception of God's character is much different than mine, in the fact that you even think that God would be interested in what you're suggesting. I look at Jesus Christ's dealings with the Pharisees, and see a completely different picture. "The Kingdom of God is within you." Being born again involves a change from within. It's not something that can be obtained by a protracted, prolonged experience of confessing wrongdoings. Being born again involves Christ; believing Him, and receiving Him as one's personal Savior.

Quote:
As you know, Ellen testified that rebirth was rare in her day. Would you say rebirth is more common nowadays? Do you know of any place in the Bible or the SOP where it plainly says rebirth will be more common in the lasts days?


These are FOTAP questions. I've not said anything about rebirth being more common now than previously.

Quote:
You seem to believe people are born again ignorant of certain cultivated sins, that they are reborn practicing some of the same sinful habits and practices they did prior to accepting Jesus as their Savior. You seem to believe quotes like the following one should be interpreted to agree with this position: "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." (SD 300)

Is this what you believe? Or, have I misunderstood your position? You have yet to answer this question plainly enough for me to know precisely what you believe. I would appreciate a definitive answer. Thank you.


What I have said is that people when they are born again are not instantly perfect. There are still sins of ignorance that they have to learn about. In particular, sins regarding misrepresenting God's character, or one's motivation for following God are sins of ignorance which seem very common to me.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/14/08 08:46 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
M: You seem to believe people are born again ignorant of certain cultivated sins, that they are reborn practicing some of the same sinful habits and practices they did prior to accepting Jesus as their Savior. You seem to believe quotes like the following one should be interpreted to agree with this position: "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." (SD 300) Is this what you believe? Or, have I misunderstood your position? You have yet to answer this question plainly enough for me to know precisely what you believe. I would appreciate a definitive answer. Thank you.

T: What I have said is that people when they are born again are not instantly perfect. There are still sins of ignorance that they have to learn about. In particular, sins regarding misrepresenting God's character, or one's motivation for following God are sins of ignorance which seem very common to me.

Is there a sin that you know of that does not misrepresent the character of God? If not, why, then, does it seem like you are setting it apart as distinct and unique? Also, do you know of a sinful reason for following God, reasons or motivations that require repentance? Would such reasons and motivations exclude a person from entering the kingdom of God should they die before progressing to sinless reasons and motivations for following God?

Finally, the thing that I am having the hardest time understanding, the one thing you have yet to plainly explain, is why you interpret insights like the following one to mean the Holy Spirit does not reveal to people all of the sins they practiced before rebirth, that insights like this one mean the Holy Spirit waits to reveal certain sinful practices until some time after they are reborn:

"The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." (SD 300)

It would be extremely helpful if you would supply inspired quotes from the Bible and/or the SOP which plainly say people who experience genuine rebirth are born again with some of their sinful practices unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified, that they are born again in certain ways no different than they were before they experienced rebirth in that they still practice some of the sins they cultivated before they accepted Jesus as their Savior.

Also, I realize you are loathe to name concrete examples of sinful practices the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until some time after people are born again, therefore, please simply quote the examples used in the Bible or the SOP. If there aren't any examples in the Bible or the SOP, then please explain why? Thank you.

PS - I hope I have stated my question adequately enough for you to answer it adequately.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/14/08 09:02 PM

Quote:
Is there a sin that you know of that does not misrepresent the character of God? If not, why, then, does it seem like you are setting it apart as distinct and unique?


Any sin would misrepresent God's character of course, but one could misrepresent God's character without doing something outwardly wrong, which the Pharisees demonstrated.

Quote:
Also, do you know of a sinful reason for following God, reasons or motivations that require repentance?


Yes. Judas is an example.

Quote:
Would such reasons and motivations exclude a person from entering the kingdom of God should they die before progressing to sinless reasons and motivations for following God?


I think this question presupposes an invalid way of looking at things. The love shining from the cross draws us to Christ. If we do not resist this drawing, we will be in the kingdom of heaven.

When a person is born again, they lay aside the sinful practices of which they are aware. Any sinful practice of which they are not aware, such as breaking the Sabbath, or ignorantly living in sin, or ignorantly smoking or drinking, impure speech, to name a couple, would be an examples of sinful practices a born again believer could have after conversion.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/14/08 09:17 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
M: I seem to remember you saying somewhere that people do indeed sin while abiding in Jesus, that abiding in Jesus does not mean they do not sin, that people regularly sin and repent while abiding in Jesus. Is this what you believe?

T: What do you mean by "abide in Jesus"?

What did you mean by it when you wrote those things about it? My goal here is to understand what you are saying about it. Did I represent your view correctly above? If not, please plainly explain your view.

Now, as for what I think it means. I believe it means being died to sin and awake to righteousness, it means being transformed, it means walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, it means partaking of the divine nature, it means being like Jesus. God does not share the throne of our soul-temple with sin, self, or Satan. We are either all of His and free of sin or we are none of His and full of sin. "Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his." (Rom 8:9) There is no neutral ground. Listen:

Quote:
Jesus invites us to accept His presence; we are to open the door of the heart, and let Him in. But He will not share a divided heart. . . He will not take up His abode with us until the soul-temple has been emptied and cleansed. {OHC 55.4}

God will not be trifled with; He will not accept a divided heart. He claims entire, wholehearted service. He has paid the ransom money of His own life for every son and daughter of Adam. {OHC 101.4}

God will not occupy a divided heart or reign from a divided throne. Every rival that holds the affections and diverts them from the God of love must be dethroned. The Lord demands all that there is of us, and there must be no reserve. {TMK 63.3}

The whole being must be consecrated to God, for our precious Saviour never shares a divided heart. Our inclinations and desires must be under the control of the Spirit of God, and then we shall be strengthened to fight the good fight of faith. {TMK 92.5}

Those who really desire to glorify God will be thankful for the exposure of every idol and every sin, that they may see these evils and put them away; but the divided heart will plead for indulgence rather than denial. {4T 354.2}

The Saviour prayed for His disciples, "Sanctify them through Thy truth: Thy word is truth." But if the receiver of Bible knowledge makes no change in his habits or practices to correspond to the light of truth, what then? The spirit is warring against the flesh, and the flesh against the spirit; and one of these must conquer. If the truth sanctifies the soul, sin is hated and shunned, because Christ is accepted as an honored guest. But Christ cannot share a divided heart; sin and Jesus are never in copartnership. {TM 160.1}

One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/14/08 09:30 PM

PS - Tom, I see that you posted a response while I was writing my last one. I assume you are going to finish addressing it. If not, then please do so. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/14/08 09:44 PM

At first glance, your description of what it means to "abide in Jesus" seems to be in harmony with what I think. I would express "abiding in Jesus" as simply continuing in the process of being justified by faith.

Regarding people sinning while abiding in Jesus, since justification by faith means in terms of the definition of the terms being used, "obedience to the law by faith," and using the definition that "sin is transgression of the law" (i.e. knowingly doing so), it wouldn't be possible to both obey and sin at the same time. However, if one considers sins of ignorance, it is possible to commit a sin of ignorance while one is being justified by faith. These sins do not bring condemnation, however:

Quote:
Said the angel: "Ye shall understand, but not yet, not yet." Said the angel: "If light come, and that light is set aside or rejected, then comes condemnation and the frown of God; but before the light comes, there is no sin, for there is no light for them to reject."(EW 73)


Regarding #106706, I don't know what you're referring to.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/16/08 09:58 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
Regarding #106706, I don't know what you're referring to.

I'm referring to this portion of #106066:

Finally, the thing that I am having the hardest time understanding, the one thing you have yet to plainly explain, is why you interpret insights like the following one to mean the Holy Spirit does not reveal to people all of the sins they practiced before rebirth, that insights like this one mean the Holy Spirit waits to reveal certain sinful practices until some time after they are reborn:

"The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." (SD 300)

It would be extremely helpful if you would supply inspired quotes from the Bible and/or the SOP which plainly say people who experience genuine rebirth are born again with some of their sinful practices unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified, that they are born again in certain ways no different than they were before they experienced rebirth in that they still practice some of the sins they cultivated before they accepted Jesus as their Savior.

Also, I realize you are loathe to name concrete examples of sinful practices the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until some time after people are born again, therefore, please simply quote the examples used in the Bible or the SOP. If there aren't any examples in the Bible or the SOP, then please explain why? Thank you.

PS - I hope I have stated my question adequately enough for you to answer it adequately.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/16/08 10:27 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
Regarding people sinning while abiding in Jesus, since justification by faith means in terms of the definition of the terms being used, "obedience to the law by faith," and using the definition that "sin is transgression of the law" (i.e. knowingly doing so), it wouldn't be possible to both obey and sin at the same time. However, if one considers sins of ignorance, it is possible to commit a sin of ignorance while one is being justified by faith. These sins do not bring condemnation, however:

The definition of sin you quoted includes sins of ignorance. Sin is the transgression of the law whether a person knows it or not. The difference is God does not count people guilty when they sin ignorantly. Nevertheless, death still has to happen in consequence of sins of ignorance. Sin cannot be simply ignored or dismissed as if it never happened or doesn't matter.

Jesus paid the sin debt of death for all the sins of the world which includes sins of ignorance. No sin is innocuous or immune. God earned the legal right not to impute guilt and condemnation in cases involving sins of ignorance by virtue of the fact Jesus paid the penalty for all sins including the sins of ignorance.

On a different note, I agree with you that people can abide in Jesus while also unwittingly committing some of the sins they practiced and cultivated ignorantly before they experienced rebirth. But this isn't saying much since we disagree greatly as to what constitutes or qualifies as sins of ignorance.

I have a sneaky suspicion you have the ability to logically argue, to your satisfaction, that any and all sins can, under the right situation, qualify as a sin of ignorance. Let me ask you a question to verify my suspicions: Can you name a sin that under no circumstances qualifies as a sin of ignorance? By "under no circumstances" I am including Paul's Gentiles and Ellen's savages who effectively live in harmony with the law of God without ever having read or heard about Jesus.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/17/08 01:43 AM

Quote:
Finally, the thing that I am having the hardest time understanding, the one thing you have yet to plainly explain, is why you interpret insights like the following one to mean the Holy Spirit does not reveal to people all of the sins they practiced before rebirth...


I thought we agree that there were too many sins for God to reveal all of them, that what He does instead is to reveal certain representative sins.

Quote:
It would be extremely helpful if you would supply inspired quotes from the Bible and/or the SOP which plainly say people who experience genuine rebirth are born again with some of their sinful practices unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified, that they are born again in certain ways no different than they were before they experienced rebirth in that they still practice some of the sins they cultivated before they accepted Jesus as their Savior.


She makes the point that known sins are put away. Of course this is the case. She is counteracting the idea of some that because one is under grace, it is OK to continue with known sins. She has statements that make it clear that she didn't believe in instant sanctification, that there were things, sins, that God would need to reveal to us during our growth as Christians. I know Rosangela has cited some of these to you.

Quote:
Also, I realize you are loathe to name concrete examples of sinful practices the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until some time after people are born again, therefore, please simply quote the examples used in the Bible or the SOP. If there aren't any examples in the Bible or the SOP, then please explain why? Thank you.


This is like a bad virus that won't go away. You've asked me this question probably over 50 times, and I've responded many, many, many times. You can use the search utility to find some answers.

Quote:
The definition of sin you quoted includes sins of ignorance.


No it doesn't.

Quote:
Said the angel, "If light comes, and that light is set aside, or rejected, then comes condemnation and the frown of God; but before the light comes there is no sin, for there is no light for them to reject."(SG4b page 3; emphasis mine)


Also this is verifiable by actual experience. Christians do commit sins of ignorance after being born again. Smoking, drinking, and not keeping the Sabbath are examples I've given.

I disagree with your whole conception of the problem of sin, and the solution. I see the problem being that outlined by EGW in the first chapter of "The Desire of Ages."

In the beginning, God was revealed in all the works of creation. It was Christ that spread the heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth. It was His hand that hung the worlds in space, and fashioned the flowers of the field. "His strength setteth fast the mountains." "The sea is His, and He made it." Ps. 65:6; 95:5. It was He that filled the earth with beauty, and the air with song. And upon all things in earth, and air, and sky, He wrote the message of the Father's love.

Now sin has marred God's perfect work, yet that handwriting remains. Even now all created things declare the glory of His excellence. There is nothing, save the selfish heart of man, that lives unto itself. No bird that cleaves the air, no animal that moves upon the ground, but ministers to some other life. There is no leaf of the forest, or lowly blade of grass, but has its ministry. Every tree and shrub and leaf pours forth that element of life without which neither man nor animal could live; and man and animal, in turn, minister to the life of tree and shrub and leaf. The flowers breathe fragrance and unfold their beauty in blessing to the world. The sun sheds its light to gladden a thousand worlds. The ocean, itself the source of all our springs and fountains, receives the streams from every land, but takes to give. The mists ascending from its bosom fall in showers to water the earth, that it may bring forth and bud.

The angels of glory find their joy in giving,--giving love and tireless watchcare to souls that are fallen and unholy. Heavenly beings woo the hearts of men; they bring to this dark world light from the courts above; by gentle and patient ministry they move upon the human spirit, to bring the lost into a fellowship with Christ which is even closer than they themselves can know.

But turning from all lesser representations, we behold God in Jesus. Looking unto Jesus we see that it is the glory of our God to give. "I do nothing of Myself," said Christ; "the living Father hath sent Me, and I live by the Father." "I seek not Mine own glory," but the glory of Him that sent Me. John 8:28; 6:57; 8:50; 7:18. In these words is set forth the great principle which is the law of life for the universe. All things Christ received from God, but He took to give. So in the heavenly courts, in His ministry for all created beings: through the beloved Son, the Father's life flows out to all; through the Son it returns, in praise and joyous service, a tide of love, to the great Source of all. And thus through Christ the circuit of beneficence is complete, representing the character of the great Giver, the law of life.

In heaven itself this law was broken. Sin originated in self-seeking. Lucifer, the covering cherub, desired to be first in heaven. He sought to gain control of heavenly beings, to draw them away from their Creator, and to win their homage to himself. Therefore he misrepresented God, attributing to Him the desire for self-exaltation. With his own evil characteristics he sought to invest the loving Creator. Thus he deceived angels. Thus he deceived men. He led them to doubt the word of God, and to distrust His goodness. Because God is a God of justice and terrible majesty, Satan caused them to look upon Him as severe and unforgiving. Thus he drew men to join him in rebellion against God, and the night of woe settled down upon the world.

The earth was dark through misapprehension of God. That the gloomy shadows might be lightened, that the world might be brought back to God, Satan's deceptive power was to be broken. This could not be done by force. The exercise of force is contrary to the principles of God's government; He desires only the service of love; and love cannot be commanded; it cannot be won by force or authority. Only by love is love awakened. To know God is to love Him; His character must be manifested in contrast to the character of Satan. This work only one Being in all the universe could do. Only He who knew the height and depth of the love of God could make it known. Upon the world's dark night the Sun of Righteousness must rise, "with healing in His wings." Mal. 4:2. (DA 20-22)


I quoted more than usual. Even in inspiration, there are high points. For example, John 3:16, Isa. 53, 1 Cor. 13. For me, this is such a high point in the SOP writings. The first chapter of "The Desire of Ages" is just an amazing piece of writing. It's beautifully written, and the principles are profound. I love the "circuit of beneficence" concept, the way she illustrated it, and how she fit it into the Plan of Salvation. This chapter has strongly influenced how I look at things.

To summarize in my own words what she outlined here:
a.There is a law of life for the universe, which is characterized by self-sacrificing love. This is the "circuit of beneficence" she speaks of, where one receives from the hand of God to give to others (including back to God Himself).
b.This law was broken, by Lucifer, who sought to exalt himself, which is the essence of sin.
c.Satan, in order to exalt himself, misrepresented God. This is how he deceived both angels and men.
d.The world became dark with misunderstanding in relation to God. In order to set things straight, God sent His Son, with healing in His wings, to reveal the truth about God.

In ST 1/20/90 she says this was the "whole purpose" of His mission on earth.

I understand the atonement in this context. I understand all the statements you quote from her in this context.

Quote:
On a different note, I agree with you that people can abide in Jesus while also unwittingly committing some of the sins they practiced and cultivated ignorantly before they experienced rebirth. But this isn't saying much since we disagree greatly as to what constitutes or qualifies as sins of ignorance.


Actually I think this is an important clarification. You agree that 1 John 3:9 does not mean that a Christian cannot ignorantly sin, a point I have been stressing. If we are simply disagreeing as to what constitutes "sins of ignorance," that's a much small difference than if we are disagreeing as to what the text is saying.

Quote:
I suspect you could argue that any and all sins can, under the right situation, qualify as a sin of ignorance. Let me ask you a question to verify my suspicions: Can you name a sin that under no circumstances could qualify as a sin of ignorance? I have in mind Paul's Gentiles and Ellen's savages who effectively live in harmony with the law of God without ever having read or heard about Jesus.


Romans 1 speaks of no one being without excuse for acknowledging God and giving Him thanks, because He has made Himself known, so that would be an example.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/19/08 01:24 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
M: Finally, the thing that I am having the hardest time understanding, the one thing you have yet to plainly explain, is why you interpret insights like the following one to mean the Holy Spirit does not reveal to people all of the sins they practiced before rebirth, that insights like this one mean the Holy Spirit waits to reveal certain sinful practices until some time after they are reborn: "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." (SD 300)

T: I thought we agree that there were too many sins for God to reveal all of them, that what He does instead is to reveal certain representative sins.

We’re talking about “sinful practices”, not the zillions of sins people commit before they experience rebirth. We both agree the zillions of different ways people sin fall under a handful of headings and subheadings. So, once again, you have not addressed a critical point and question. Please, Tom, do me a favor and address this point, answer the question. Again, here's the question:

Finally, the thing that I am having the hardest time understanding, the one thing you have yet to plainly explain, is why you interpret insights like the following one to mean the Holy Spirit does not reveal to people all of the sins they practiced before rebirth, that insights like this one mean the Holy Spirit waits to reveal certain sinful practices until some time after they are reborn: "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." (SD 300)

Quote:
M: It would be extremely helpful if you would supply inspired quotes from the Bible and/or the SOP which plainly say people who experience genuine rebirth are born again with some of their sinful practices unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified, that they are born again in certain ways no different than they were before they experienced rebirth in that they still practice some of the sins they cultivated before they accepted Jesus as their Savior.

T: She makes the point that known sins are put away. Of course this is the case. She is counteracting the idea of some that because one is under grace, it is OK to continue with known sins. She has statements that make it clear that she didn't believe in instant sanctification, that there were things, sins, that God would need to reveal to us during our growth as Christians. I know Rosangela has cited some of these to you.

You did it again, Tom. You totally avoided my earnest request. I am begging you, please, please, please, honor my request. In the past you have posted quotes to prove Ellen believed people are born again with some of their former sinful habits and practices in tact, that is, unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified; but it turns out that’s not what she was saying at all.

Instead, in those quotes you have posted in the past, she is describing the fact that even after rebirth, even while abiding in Jesus, believers must still continue to labor, agonize, wrestle, and strive to keep under control, to rein in, to prevent their hereditary and cultivated weaknesses, defects, and tendencies from resurfacing, from regaining control of them.

However, she never once says having these hereditary and cultivated weaknesses, defects, and tendencies is a sin, or having to rein them in is a sin. Being tempted from within by these unhappy aspects of fallen nature is not a sin; having to fight every minute of every day to beat them back, to withstand their attacks, to prevent them from gaining the ascendancy is not a sin. Successfully keeping them under the control of a sanctified will and mind is what it means to overcome as Christ overcame. It’s not something believers must eventually rid themselves of to achieve righteousness or sanctification.

Sanctification is the work of a lifetime including eternal life. Sanctification is the eternal process of becoming more and more mature in the fruits of the Spirit. But some people seem to think sanctification is the gradual process of sinning less and less until they cease sinning altogether. But this view is not found or supported in the Bible or the SOP.

Again, it would be extremely helpful if you would supply inspired quotes from the Bible and/or the SOP which plainly say (by “plainly say” I mean quotes which do require any type of interpretation or extrapolation) people who experience genuine rebirth continue practicing some of their former sinful habits because the Holy Spirit thought it best, for whatever reason, not to reveal those particular sinful practices to them.

Quote:
M: Also, I realize you are loathe to name concrete examples of sinful practices the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until some time after people are born again, therefore, please simply quote the examples used in the Bible or the SOP. If there aren't any examples in the Bible or the SOP, then please explain why? Thank you.

T: This is like a bad virus that won't go away. You've asked me this question probably over 50 times, and I've responded many, many, many times. You can use the search utility to find some answers.

Yeah, I know what you mean about this issue being a bad virus that won’t go away. I’ve repeatedly asked it and you normally say you’ve answered it dozens of times, and yet I cannot find them. I do recall, however, you naming things like self-pity, polygamy, smoking, and social drinking as examples of sinful practices the Holy Spirit often waits to reveal until some time after they experience rebirth and baptism and join a church. You claim reality supports your view, but you have never actually posted inspired quotes to support your assertions. I'm asking now. You can put this virus to rest by simply posting inspired quotes which clearly state your position (by “clearly state” I mean quotes which do require any type of interpretation or extrapolation). Thank you.

Quote:
M: The definition of sin you quoted includes sins of ignorance.

T: No it doesn't. “Said the angel, "If light comes, and that light is set aside, or rejected, then comes condemnation and the frown of God; but before the light comes there is no sin, for there is no light for them to reject."(SG4b page 3; emphasis mine) Also this is verifiable by actual experience. Christians do commit sins of ignorance after being born again. Smoking, drinking, and not keeping the Sabbath are examples I've given.

See what I mean? You just reiterated what I recalled you saying in the past about this issue. The idea that the biblical definition of sin excludes sins committed in ignorance is unbiblical. True, God does not impute guilt and condemnation in cases involving sins of ignorance, but this insight in no way implies no sin has been committed. The fact such things are referred to as “sins” of ignorance makes it clear they are considered sins.

Also, pointing to Christians who smoke and drink and break the Sabbath as proof people are born again before they confess and crucify such sinful practices puts the cart before the horse, it begs the question. One could just as easily “prove” Sabbath-keeping is no longer required by pointing out the fact most Christians do not keep it. Just because people do something doesn’t prove it is right or wrong. The law of God is the great standard of right, the revealer of righteousness and the detector of sin. Just because the majority of Christians sin doesn’t mean sinning is right or normal.

Quote:
T: I disagree with your whole conception of the problem of sin, and the solution. I see the problem being that outlined by EGW in the first chapter of "The Desire of Ages." To summarize in my own words what she outlined here:

a.There is a law of life for the universe, which is characterized by self-sacrificing love. This is the "circuit of beneficence" she speaks of, where one receives from the hand of God to give to others (including back to God Himself).
b.This law was broken, by Lucifer, who sought to exalt himself, which is the essence of sin.
c.Satan, in order to exalt himself, misrepresented God. This is how he deceived both angels and men.
d.The world became dark with misunderstanding in relation to God. In order to set things straight, God sent His Son, with healing in His wings, to reveal the truth about God.

In ST 1/20/90 she says this was the "whole purpose" of His mission on earth. I understand the atonement in this context. I understand all the statements you quote from her in this context.

Amen! Yes, Jesus came to set the record straight about the character and kingdom of God. No doubt about it. And, yet, we are still here 2,000 years later. Why? The fact we are still here implies Jesus has not yet won the GC. He said the end will come when everyone everywhere decides for or against the gospel. It doesn’t matter as much, then, what Jesus did 2,000 years ago, what matters more is what Jesus is doing now.

So, what is Jesus doing now? What are His goals? What must He do before He can win the GC? Does it depend on what He does in heaven? Or, does it depend more on what He does in and through saints and sinners on earth? I believe it is the latter. To win the GC, to restore paradise lost, to put an end to sin and sinners – Jesus must produce His bride, a church without spot or wrinkle. Listen:

"When the fruit is brought forth, immediately he putteth in the sickle, because the harvest is come." Christ is waiting with longing desire for the manifestation of Himself in His church. When the character of Christ shall be perfectly reproduced in His people, then He will come to claim them as His own. {COL 69.1}

We can study what Jesus did 2,000 years ago for the next 10,000 years and it wouldn’t make the end come any sooner. It is not enough to study what Jesus experienced while He was here, we need to experience it, too. Until we do, we shall have to continue wandering in the wilderness of sin.

“One subject of emulation must swallow up all others--who will most nearly resemble Christ in character? who will most entirely hide self in Jesus? {6T 42.2} “Christ in you, the hope of glory.” That’s what it’s all about. Not, as you seem to think, Jesus by Himself apart from us. “Abide in me, and I in you . . . that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples.” (John 15:4, 8)

Quote:
M: On a different note, I agree with you that people can abide in Jesus while also unwittingly committing some of the sins they practiced and cultivated ignorantly before they experienced rebirth. But this isn't saying much since we disagree greatly as to what constitutes or qualifies as sins of ignorance.

T: Actually I think this is an important clarification. You agree that 1 John 3:9 does not mean that a Christian cannot ignorantly sin, a point I have been stressing. If we are simply disagreeing as to what constitutes "sins of ignorance," that's a much small difference than if we are disagreeing as to what the text is saying.

Since studying with you I have changed my mind about 1 John 3:9. I now believe John is describing a fully justified and sanctified born again believer. I do not believe he is referring to Christians who have not yet attained unto perfection of character, who have not yet learned how to obey everything Jesus commanded, who are still ignorantly violating certain commandments and requirements. So, again, we may agree it is possible to abide in Jesus while sinning ignorantly, it’s just that I do not believe John is talking about this in 1 John 3:9. So again, our greatest disagreement has to do with what constitutes and qualifies as a sin of ignorance.

Quote:
M: I suspect you could argue that any and all sins can, under the right situation, qualify as a sin of ignorance. Let me ask you a question to verify my suspicions: Can you name a sin that under no circumstances could qualify as a sin of ignorance? I have in mind Paul's Gentiles and Ellen's savages who effectively live in harmony with the law of God without ever having read or heard about Jesus.

T: Romans 1 speaks of no one being without excuse for acknowledging God and giving Him thanks, because He has made Himself known, so that would be an example.

But it’s not an example of a sin of ignorance, is it? I mean, how can it be if they are without excuse, if they know God? What you just wrote could be taken to mean there is no such thing as sins of ignorance. Here’s the question again: Can you name a sin that under no circumstances could qualify as a sin of ignorance?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/19/08 02:32 AM

Quote:
M:Finally, the thing that I am having the hardest time understanding, the one thing you have yet to plainly explain, is why you interpret insights like the following one to mean the Holy Spirit does not reveal to people all of the sins they practiced before rebirth, that insights like this one mean the Holy Spirit waits to reveal certain sinful practices until some time after they are reborn: "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." (SD 300)


Clearly these are sins the person being converted is aware of. He can't put away sins he's not aware of. That there are such sins are clear in that there have been Christians who drank (e.g. Luther), smoked (e.g. Charles Spurgeon), didn't keep the Sabbath (William Miller).

Quote:
Again, it would be extremely helpful if you would supply inspired quotes from the Bible and/or the SOP which plainly say (by “plainly say” I mean quotes which do require any type of interpretation or extrapolation) people who experience genuine rebirth continue practicing some of their former sinful habits because the Holy Spirit thought it best, for whatever reason, not to reveal those particular sinful practices to them.


I've cited some examples. There was a time when Ellen White didn't keep the Sabbath, so there's another one.

Quote:
You claim reality supports your view, but you have never actually posted inspired quotes to support your assertions. I'm asking now.


There's an inspired quote that says that William Miller will be in heaven.

Quote:
M: The definition of sin you quoted includes sins of ignorance.

T: No it doesn't. “Said the angel, "If light comes, and that light is set aside, or rejected, then comes condemnation and the frown of God; but before the light comes there is no sin, for there is no light for them to reject."(SG4b page 3; emphasis mine) Also this is verifiable by actual experience. Christians do commit sins of ignorance after being born again. Smoking, drinking, and not keeping the Sabbath are examples I've given.

M:See what I mean?


No. What do you mean?

Quote:
You just reiterated what I recalled you saying in the past about this issue.


I'll probably do the same thing when you ask me about it again.

Quote:
The idea that the biblical definition of sin excludes sins committed in ignorance is unbiblical.


No it's not. The meaning of words depends upon their context. "Sin" may or may not mean a sin of ignorance. In the case quoted above, "sin" clearly does not include sins of ignorance. Indeed, this point could not be more clearly articulated than it was: "there is no sin."

Quote:
True, God does not impute guilt and condemnation in cases involving sins of ignorance, but this insight in no way implies no sin has been committed.


The statement "there is no sin" implies that there is no sin.

Quote:
The fact such things are referred to as “sins” of ignorance makes it clear they are considered sins.

Also, pointing to Christians who smoke and drink and break the Sabbath as proof people are born again before they confess and crucify such sinful practices puts the cart before the horse, it begs the question. One could just as easily “prove” Sabbath-keeping is no longer required by pointing out the fact most Christians do not keep it. Just because people do something doesn’t prove it is right or wrong. The law of God is the great standard of right, the revealer of righteousness and the detector of sin. Just because the majority of Christians sin doesn’t mean sinning is right or normal.


Saying that William Miller will be in heaven even though he did not give up the sinful practice of breaking the Sabbath is not putting the cart before the horse. We both know that Sabbath-breaking is a sinful practice. That's not under dispute. You have a theory of instant sanctification, that people, when born again, no longer commit sinful practices, but William Miller is a perfect counter example to this theory. We have inspired evidence that he will be in heaven, yet he did not give up this sinful practice.

I think it's very likely Luther will be in heaven, don't you? He drank.

I think it's likely Spurgeon will be in heaven. He smoked.

This doesn't mean that smoking, drinking, or Sabbath-breaking are not sinful practices, but that these are sins of ignorance which born-again people may commit, which disproves your theory.

Regarding your comment from Amen on, I didn't understand your point. Especially this:

Quote:
Not, as you seem to think, Jesus by Himself apart from us.


Where did you get such a goofy idea? I've not in the 5 or 6 years we've been discussing things suggested such an idea in any way.

Quote:
Since studying with you I have changed my mind about 1 John 3:9. I now believe John is describing a fully justified and sanctified born again believer.


John says, "whosoever is born of God." You think this means not "whosoever is born of God," but "some of those who are born of God"?

Quote:
So again, our greatest disagreement has to do with what constitutes and qualifies as a sin of ignorance.


Actually, I think we agree on this. A sin which one does in ignorance is a sin of ignorance. You agree with this, right?

Where we disagree is that you don't think a properly indoctrinated SDA can commit any sins of ignorance, or, to state the matter in a different way, any possible sin which can be committed is known by any properly indoctrinated SDA. It is because you hold this view that I think your view of sin is woefully inadequate. You also don't believe any person whatsoever can commit a sin of ignorance which involves the last 6 commandments, to which I would make the same observation.

Quote:
M: I suspect you could argue that any and all sins can, under the right situation, qualify as a sin of ignorance. Let me ask you a question to verify my suspicions: Can you name a sin that under no circumstances could qualify as a sin of ignorance? I have in mind Paul's Gentiles and Ellen's savages who effectively live in harmony with the law of God without ever having read or heard about Jesus.

T: Romans 1 speaks of no one being without excuse for acknowledging God and giving Him thanks, because He has made Himself known, so that would be an example.

M:But it’s not an example of a sin of ignorance, is it?


No, it's an example of a sin which cannot be a sin of ignorance, which is what you asked for (see underlined portion).

Quote:
I mean, how can it be if they are without excuse, if they know God? What you just wrote could be taken to mean there is no such thing as sins of ignorance. Here’s the question again: Can you name a sin that under no circumstances could qualify as a sin of ignorance?


Here's the answer again: Romans 1 speaks of no one being without excuse for acknowledging God and giving Him thanks, because He has made Himself known.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/21/08 01:03 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
M:Finally, the thing that I am having the hardest time understanding, the one thing you have yet to plainly explain, is why you interpret insights like the following one to mean the Holy Spirit does not reveal to people all of the sins they practiced before rebirth, that insights like this one mean the Holy Spirit waits to reveal certain sinful practices until some time after they are reborn: "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." (SD 300) NOTE: We’re talking about “sinful practices”, not the zillions of sins people commit before they experience rebirth. We both agree the zillions of different ways people sin fall under a handful of headings and subheadings.

T: Clearly these are sins the person being converted is aware of. He can't put away sins he's not aware of. That there are such sins are clear in that there have been Christians who drank (e.g. Luther), smoked (e.g. Charles Spurgeon), didn't keep the Sabbath (William Miller).

Clearly? Not so. "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." (SD 300) She obviously is talking about Christians who were fully informed of everything Jesus commanded us to obey. She could not have been talking about believers who lived during the Dark Ages like the ones you named. It is unsound and dangerous to dismiss the obvious meaning of her words in favor of your personal view. It is always and only safe to let the prophets speak for themselves. Therefore, please post passages where she interprets these words to mean what you say they mean. Thank you.

Quote:
M: Again, it would be extremely helpful if you would supply inspired quotes from the Bible and/or the SOP which plainly say (by “plainly say” I mean quotes which do require any type of interpretation or extrapolation) people who experience genuine rebirth continue practicing some of their former sinful habits because the Holy Spirit thought it best, for whatever reason, not to reveal those particular sinful practices to them.

T: I've cited some examples. There was a time when Ellen White didn't keep the Sabbath, so there's another one.

Pointing to the sins Christians committed during the Dark Ages as proof Ellen didn’t mean what she wrote is hardly fair to her. It borders on blasphemy. I do not trust you to be unbiased. There is too much at stake. I need to hear it from her. Therefore, please post passages where she interprets these words to mean what you say they mean. Thank you.

Quote:
M: The definition of sin you quoted includes sins of ignorance.

T: No it doesn't. “Said the angel, "If light comes, and that light is set aside, or rejected, then comes condemnation and the frown of God; but before the light comes there is no sin, for there is no light for them to reject."(SG4b page 3; emphasis mine) Also this is verifiable by actual experience. Christians do commit sins of ignorance after being born again. Smoking, drinking, and not keeping the Sabbath are examples I've given.

M: The idea that the biblical definition of sin excludes sins committed in ignorance is unbiblical.

T: No it's not. The meaning of words depends upon their context. "Sin" may or may not mean a sin of ignorance. In the case quoted above, "sin" clearly does not include sins of ignorance. Indeed, this point could not be more clearly articulated than it was: "there is no sin."

M: True, God does not impute guilt and condemnation in cases involving sins of ignorance, but this insight in no way implies no sin has been committed. The fact such things are referred to as “sins” of ignorance makes it clear they are considered sins.

T: The statement "there is no sin" implies that there is no sin.

Your quote (see below) is dealing specifically with whether the Sabbath should commence at 6pm or at some other time. The meaning of “even” in relation to the Sabbath had not yet been made clear to the young Adventists.

Quote:
I saw it was even so, "From even unto even shall ye celebrate your Sabbath." Said the angel, "Take the word of God, read it, understand, and ye cannot err. Read carefully, and ye shall there find what even is, and when it is." I asked the angel if the frown of God had been upon his people for commencing the Sabbath as they have. I was directed back to the first rise of the Sabbath. I followed the people of God up to this time, and did not see that God was displeased, or frowned upon them. I inquired why it had been thus, that at this late day we must change the time of commencing the Sabbath. Said the angel, "Ye shall understand, but not yet, not yet." Said the angel, "If light comes, and that light is set aside, or rejected, then comes condemnation and the frown of God; but before the light comes there is no sin, for there is no light for them to reject." I saw that it was in the minds of some that the Lord had shown that the Sabbath commenced at six o'clock, when I had only seen that it commenced at "even," and it was inferred that even was at six. I saw the servants of God must draw together, press together. {4bSG 3.3}

The truth never changes. And the truth is it is a sin to violate the Sabbath even by one minute. It does not matter if it is violated in ignorance. As with all sins of ignorance God does not impute guilt or condemnation. Nevertheless, sin happens. We cannot twist this quote to mean sin does not happen if people have no idea what they are doing is a sin. Ignorance does not cancel sin.

Quote:
M: Also, pointing to Christians who smoke and drink and break the Sabbath as proof people are born again before they confess and crucify such sinful practices puts the cart before the horse, it begs the question. One could just as easily “prove” Sabbath-keeping is no longer required by pointing out the fact most Christians do not keep it. Just because people do something doesn’t prove it is right or wrong. The law of God is the great standard of right, the revealer of righteousness and the detector of sin. Just because the majority of Christians sin doesn’t mean sinning is right or normal.

T: Saying that William Miller will be in heaven even though he did not give up the sinful practice of breaking the Sabbath is not putting the cart before the horse. We both know that Sabbath-breaking is a sinful practice. That's not under dispute. You have a theory of instant sanctification, that people, when born again, no longer commit sinful practices, but William Miller is a perfect counter example to this theory. We have inspired evidence that he will be in heaven, yet he did not give up this sinful practice.

I think it's very likely Luther will be in heaven, don't you? He drank.

I think it's likely Spurgeon will be in heaven. He smoked.

This doesn't mean that smoking, drinking, or Sabbath-breaking are not sinful practices, but that these are sins of ignorance which born-again people may commit, which disproves your theory.

Again, just because people during the Dark Ages experienced rebirth before they learned how to obey everything Jesus commanded does not prove the SOP quotations which depict believers being born again without the sinful practices they cultivated prior to rebirth should be interpreted to mean the Holy Spirit often waits nowadays to reveal certain sinful practices until sometime after they experience rebirth. That’s what we’re really talking about here.

You wrote, “You have a theory of instant sanctification, that people, when born again, no longer commit sinful practices . . .” Do you have proof of this accusation? I can assure you I do not believe this way.

Quote:
T: Regarding your comment from Amen on, I didn't understand your point. Especially this: “Not, as you seem to think, Jesus by Himself apart from us.” Where did you get such a goofy idea? I've not in the 5 or 6 years we've been discussing things suggested such an idea in any way.

Here’s what I wrote: We can study what Jesus did 2,000 years ago for the next 10,000 years and it wouldn’t make the end come any sooner. It is not enough to study what Jesus experienced while He was here, we need to experience it, too. Until we do, we shall have to continue wandering in the wilderness of sin.

“One subject of emulation must swallow up all others--who will most nearly resemble Christ in character? who will most entirely hide self in Jesus? {6T 42.2} “Christ in you, the hope of glory.” That’s what it’s all about. Not, as you seem to think, Jesus by Himself apart from us. “Abide in me, and I in you . . . that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples.” (John 15:4, 8)

This was written in response to what you wrote. “The world became dark with misunderstanding in relation to God. In order to set things straight, God sent His Son, with healing in His wings, to reveal the truth about God. In ST 1/20/90 she says this was the "whole purpose" of His mission on earth. I understand the atonement in this context. I understand all the statements you quote from her in this context.”

You stated this so strongly it made me think you believe everything needs to be interpreted in the context of what Jesus did to disprove Satan’s accusations and to prove the truth about God’s character. Turns out I was wrong. You think such an idea is goofy. Now I know. However, I still don’t know what you believe. I believe the focus of everything is “Christ in you, the hope of glory”. Do you agree?

Quote:
M: Since studying with you I have changed my mind about 1 John 3:9. I now believe John is describing a fully justified and sanctified born again believer.

T: John says, "whosoever is born of God." You think this means not "whosoever is born of God," but "some of those who are born of God"?

It's talking about those who are born again without their former sinful practices. This obviously doesn’t apply to those who are born again nowadays with some of their sinful practices in tact.

Quote:
M: So again, our greatest disagreement has to do with what constitutes and qualifies as a sin of ignorance.

T: Actually, I think we agree on this. A sin which one does in ignorance is a sin of ignorance. You agree with this, right? Where we disagree is that you don't think a properly indoctrinated SDA can commit any sins of ignorance, or, to state the matter in a different way, any possible sin which can be committed is known by any properly indoctrinated SDA. It is because you hold this view that I think your view of sin is woefully inadequate. You also don't believe any person whatsoever can commit a sin of ignorance which involves the last 6 commandments, to which I would make the same observation.

As I said, “Our greatest disagreement has to do with what constitutes and qualifies as a sin of ignorance.”

Quote:
M: I suspect you could argue that any and all sins can, under the right situation, qualify as a sin of ignorance. Let me ask you a question to verify my suspicions: Can you name a sin that under no circumstances could qualify as a sin of ignorance? I have in mind Paul's Gentiles and Ellen's savages who effectively live in harmony with the law of God without ever having read or heard about Jesus.

T: Romans 1 speaks of no one being without excuse for acknowledging God and giving Him thanks, because He has made Himself known, so that would be an example.

M:But it’s not an example of a sin of ignorance, is it?

T: No, it's an example of a sin which cannot be a sin of ignorance, which is what you asked for (see underlined portion).

Okay, I misread what you wrote. So, I hear you saying no one can ignorantly fail to acknowledge God or give Him thanks. That is, everyone knows God and not giving Him thanks is inexcusable. Is this the only example you can think of? In other words, can you name any other sin that under no circumstances could qualify as a sin of ignorance? Or, can you argue that all other sins can, under the right situation, qualify as a sin of ignorance?

Quote:
M: It would be extremely helpful if you would supply inspired quotes from the Bible and/or the SOP which plainly say people who experience genuine rebirth are born again with some of their sinful practices unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified, that they are born again in certain ways no different than they were before they experienced rebirth in that they still practice some of the sins they cultivated before they accepted Jesus as their Savior.

T: She makes the point that known sins are put away. Of course this is the case. She is counteracting the idea of some that because one is under grace, it is OK to continue with known sins. She has statements that make it clear that she didn't believe in instant sanctification, that there were things, sins, that God would need to reveal to us during our growth as Christians. I know Rosangela has cited some of these to you.

You did it again, Tom. You totally avoided my earnest request. I am begging you, please, please, please, honor my request. In the past you have posted quotes to prove Ellen believed people are born again with some of their former sinful habits and practices in tact, that is, unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified; but it turns out that’s not what she was saying at all.

Instead, in those quotes you have posted in the past, she is describing the fact that even after rebirth, even while abiding in Jesus, believers must still continue to labor, agonize, wrestle, and strive to keep under control, to rein in, to prevent their hereditary and cultivated weaknesses, defects, and tendencies from resurfacing, from regaining control of them.

However, she never once says having these hereditary and cultivated weaknesses, defects, and tendencies is a sin, or having to rein them in is a sin. Being tempted from within by these unhappy aspects of fallen nature is not a sin; having to fight every minute of every day to beat them back, to withstand their attacks, to prevent them from gaining the ascendancy is not a sin. Successfully keeping them under the control of a sanctified will and mind is what it means to overcome as Christ overcame. It’s not something believers must eventually rid themselves of to achieve righteousness or sanctification.

Sanctification is the work of a lifetime including eternal life. Sanctification is the eternal process of becoming more and more mature in the fruits of the Spirit. But some people seem to think sanctification is the gradual process of sinning less and less until they cease sinning altogether. But this view is not found or supported in the Bible or the SOP.

Again, it would be extremely helpful if you would supply inspired quotes from the Bible and/or the SOP which plainly say (by “plainly say” I mean quotes which do require any type of interpretation or extrapolation) people who experience genuine rebirth continue practicing some of their former sinful habits because the Holy Spirit thought it best, for whatever reason, not to reveal those particular sinful practices to them.

Quote:
M: Also, I realize you are loathe to name concrete examples of sinful practices the Holy Spirit waits to reveal until some time after people are born again, therefore, please simply quote the examples used in the Bible or the SOP. If there aren't any examples in the Bible or the SOP, then please explain why? Thank you.

T: This is like a bad virus that won't go away. You've asked me this question probably over 50 times, and I've responded many, many, many times. You can use the search utility to find some answers.

Yeah, I know what you mean about this issue being a bad virus that won’t go away. I’ve repeatedly asked it and you normally say you’ve answered it dozens of times, and yet I cannot find them. I do recall, however, you naming things like self-pity, polygamy, smoking, and social drinking as examples of sinful practices the Holy Spirit often waits to reveal until some time after they experience rebirth and baptism and join a church. You claim reality supports your view, but you have never actually posted inspired quotes to support your assertions. I'm asking now. You can put this virus to rest by simply posting inspired quotes which clearly state your position (by “clearly state” I mean quotes which do require any type of interpretation or extrapolation). Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/21/08 06:06 AM

Quote:
Clearly? Not so. "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man." (SD 300) She obviously is talking about Christians who were fully informed of everything Jesus commanded us to obey.


No she's not. She's talking about people who are born again, the same as the passage to Nicodemus. She's not talking about a special subset of those who have had Bible Studies by properly indoctrinated SDA's.

Quote:
She could not have been talking about believers who lived during the Dark Ages like the ones you named.


William Miller, Dark Ages? Until recently, there were many Christians who smoked. It wasn't widely known that there was anything wrong with smoking until the 1960's. That's here. Other countries lagged behind.

Quote:
It is unsound and dangerous to dismiss the obvious meaning of her words in favor of your personal view.


If these were the obvious meaning of her words, shouldn't everyone share your point of view regarding them? I can't think of anyone who does. This isn't an argument that your view is incorrect, but it certainly demonstrates that it's not "obvious."

Quote:
It is always and only safe to let the prophets speak for themselves. Therefore, please post passages where she interprets these words to mean what you say they mean. Thank you.


Why don't you post some passage which presents the view you are suggesting? There aren't any. Since there aren't, all I can do is present passages which present what she actually says, like this one:

Quote:
How, then, are we to be saved? "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness," so the Son of man has been lifted up, and everyone who has been deceived and bitten by the serpent may look and live. "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29. The light shining from the cross reveals the love of God. His love is drawing us to Himself. If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. (DA 175)


Here is a simple, easy to understand explanation of how one is saved. None of the things you're suggesting are included here.

Going back to the passages you quotes, there is absolutely nothing to suggest that she had in mind some subset of people, that the principles she was speaking of didn't included people like Luther, Spurgeon, or William Miller who lived in the "Dark Ages."
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/21/08 12:34 PM

Quote:
T:I've cited some examples. There was a time when Ellen White didn't keep the Sabbath, so there's another one.

M:Pointing to the sins Christians committed during the Dark Ages as proof Ellen didn’t mean what she wrote is hardly fair to her. It borders on blasphemy. I do not trust you to be unbiased. There is too much at stake. I need to hear it from her. Therefore, please post passages where she interprets these words to mean what you say they mean. Thank you.


I don't understand this. First of all, Ellen White did not live in the Dark Ages. Neither did Spurgeon or William Miller. Secondly, I'm not offering proof that Ellen didn't mean what she wrote, but that your interpretation of what she wrote is wrong. Thirdly, why would presenting counter examples of your ideas be blasphemy? Fourth, I've presented statements of her explaining what's involved in conversion. For example, DA 175. You are the one going beyond this to suggest things she never said. Under your view, no one who smokes or drinks can be born again. This isn't true even in post Dark Ages time. If it were true in Dark Ages time, that fact alone would be sufficient to disprove your ideas in regards to conversion, because the principles of conversion haven't changed since Adam fell.

Quote:
You wrote, “You have a theory of instant sanctification, that people, when born again, no longer commit sinful practices . . .” Do you have proof of this accusation? I can assure you I do not believe this way.


This whole thread you've been arguing that born again Christians have no sinful practices. At least, this is what I've been understanding you to say. If this isn't what you believe, please cite for me some sinful practice that you believe born again Christs have.

Quote:
Here’s what I wrote: We can study what Jesus did 2,000 years ago for the next 10,000 years and it wouldn’t make the end come any sooner.


I'm not sure what you would say this. Surely you're aware of the following:

Quote:
It would be well for us to spend a thoughtful hour each day in contemplation of the life of Christ. We should take it point by point, and let the imagination grasp each scene, especially the closing ones. As we thus dwell upon His great sacrifice for us, our confidence in Him will be more constant, our love will be quickened, and we shall be more deeply imbued with His spirit. If we would be saved at last, we must learn the lesson of penitence and humiliation at the foot of the cross. (DA 83)


Quote:
It is not enough to study what Jesus experienced while He was here, we need to experience it, too.


I don't understand why you feel this is a point worth making.

Quote:
T: Regarding your comment from Amen on, I didn't understand your point. Especially this: “Not, as you seem to think, Jesus by Himself apart from us.” Where did you get such a goofy idea? I've not in the 5 or 6 years we've been discussing things suggested such an idea in any way.

M:You stated this so strongly [I said I interpreted the quotes you cited in the context of ST 1/20/90, that the whole purpose of Christ's mission on earth was the revelation of God] it made me think you believe everything needs to be interpreted in the context of what Jesus did to disprove Satan’s accusations and to prove the truth about God’s character. Turns out I was wrong. You think such an idea is goofy. Now I know. However, I still don’t know what you believe. I believe the focus of everything is “Christ in you, the hope of glory”. Do you agree?


I've never written anything that would warrant your comment "Not, as you seem to think, Jesus by Himself apart from us." We've been discussing things for more than 5 years now, I think, and I can't believe you've been so careless in reading what I've said not to know that I believe in victory over sin. There's hardly any point in dialoging if you can't reach that level of understanding from our conversations.

The idea I labeled as "goofy" is your original comment, which I noted by "especially," not this new thing you're saying here. I agree with what you're saying here (the part underlined). The SOP tells us that the whole purpose of Christ's mission was the revelation of God. I'm simply saying that I interpret everything in the light of what was identified as being the whole purpose of His mission. Is there anything wrong with that?

Quote:
M: Since studying with you I have changed my mind about 1 John 3:9. I now believe John is describing a fully justified and sanctified born again believer.

T: John says, "whosoever is born of God." You think this means not "whosoever is born of God," but "some of those who are born of God"?

M:It's talking about those who are born again without their former sinful practices. This obviously doesn’t apply to those who are born again nowadays with some of their sinful practices in tact.


I don't understand your point. Are you suggesting people nowadays are born again differently than when John was writing? I really don't know what you're trying to say here. Please flesh it out.

Quote:
T: No, it's an example of a sin which cannot be a sin of ignorance, which is what you asked for (see underlined portion).

Okay, I misread what you wrote.


I just responded to your request. You asked for an example, so I gave you one.

Quote:
So, I hear you saying no one can ignorantly fail to acknowledge God or give Him thanks. That is, everyone knows God and not giving Him thanks is inexcusable. Is this the only example you can think of? In other words, can you name any other sin that under no circumstances could qualify as a sin of ignorance?


Why should I MM? What's your point? Suppose I name another one, and then you say "Are these the only two you can think of?" And then I name a third, and you say, "Are these the only three you can think of?"

You asked for an example, and I gave you one. I suppose you had some reason for asking for the example, so I gave you one in good faith without asking why. Now you have your example. Please make whatever point you wanted to make once you had an example.

Quote:
Or, can you argue that all other sins can, under the right situation, qualify as a sin of ignorance?


I'll wait for your comment on the example I gave before giving more.

Quote:
In the past you have posted quotes to prove Ellen believed people are born again with some of their former sinful habits and practices in tact, that is, unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified; but it turns out that’s not what she was saying at all.


You've accused me of this quite a few times, but I've never admitted to it. So I'm ignoring this request, and the rest of the paragraphs following, since you're asking me to substantiate something I've not claimed.

Quote:
Yeah, I know what you mean about this issue being a bad virus that won’t go away. I’ve repeatedly asked it and you normally say you’ve answered it dozens of times, and yet I cannot find them.


Why not save them somewhere where you have ready access to them?

Quote:
I do recall, however, you naming things like self-pity, polygamy, smoking, and social drinking as examples of sinful practices the Holy Spirit often waits to reveal until some time after they experience rebirth and baptism and join a church.


This is poorly stated.

Quote:
You claim reality supports your view, but you have never actually posted inspired quotes to support your assertions.


This is incorrect.

Quote:
I'm asking now. You can put this virus to rest by simply posting inspired quotes which clearly state your position (by “clearly state” I mean quotes which do require any type of interpretation or extrapolation). Thank you.


There's the quote of Ellen White that William Miller will be in heaven. William Miller broke the Sabbath.

By the way, I would appreciate it if you would quote something and ask me questions about that, as opposed to stating something in you own words as if that's what I believed, and asking me questions about that (unless you're asking me if you're correctly understanding what I believe). It is this sort of thing that causes me to respond with the FOTAP comments. When you do this, I can't respond to your question without tacitly agreeing to your implicit assumptions as to what my position is.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/24/08 04:19 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. (DA 175)

Here is a simple, easy to understand explanation of how one is saved. None of the things you're suggesting are included here.

Ellen is here saying the same thing she says elsewhere, namely, people repent of their sins before they experience rebirth. Please notice she specifies what she means by saying "the sins that have crucified the Saviour." I have no reason to believe she is excluding a subclass class of sins that did not crucify Jesus, that do not require repentance, that can wait to be revealed and confessed and crucified until some time after they experience rebirth. You seem to take it for granted that's what she means, and yet nowhere does she say such a thing. If she had written such a thing you would be quoting it over and over again.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/24/08 05:46 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
T: I've cited some examples. There was a time when Ellen White didn't keep the Sabbath, so there's another one.

M:Pointing to the sins Christians committed during the Dark Ages as proof Ellen didn’t mean what she wrote is hardly fair to her. It borders on blasphemy. I do not trust you to be unbiased. There is too much at stake. I need to hear it from her. Therefore, please post passages where she interprets these words to mean what you say they mean. Thank you.

T: I don't understand this. First of all, Ellen White did not live in the Dark Ages. Neither did Spurgeon or William Miller. Secondly, I'm not offering proof that Ellen didn't mean what she wrote, but that your interpretation of what she wrote is wrong. Thirdly, why would presenting counter examples of your ideas be blasphemy? Fourth, I've presented statements of her explaining what's involved in conversion. For example, DA 175. You are the one going beyond this to suggest things she never said. Under your view, no one who smokes or drinks can be born again. This isn't true even in post Dark Ages time. If it were true in Dark Ages time, that fact alone would be sufficient to disprove your ideas in regards to conversion, because the principles of conversion haven't changed since Adam fell.

The Dark Ages did not end until some time after God raised up the Remnant Church. You are the one disregarding the obvious meaning of the quote I posted. Here it is again: The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man. With the new man, Christ Jesus, are to be put on "kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering." {SD 300.3}

No unbiased reader can read this and conclude she obviously intended for us to understand that certain “sins that were practiced before conversion” will continue to be practiced after they experience rebirth. There is absolutely no reason to think she didn’t mean “the sins that were practiced before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man.”

Quote:
M: You wrote, “You have a theory of instant sanctification, that people, when born again, no longer commit sinful practices . . .” Do you have proof of this accusation? I can assure you I do not believe this way.

T: This whole thread you've been arguing that born again Christians have no sinful practices. At least, this is what I've been understanding you to say. If this isn't what you believe, please cite for me some sinful practice that you believe born again Christs have.

I have been talking about the SD 300 quote. Here it is again: The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man. With the new man, Christ Jesus, are to be put on "kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering."

There is nothing instantaneous about sanctification. “Sanctification is not the work of a moment, an hour, a day, but of a lifetime. . . Sanctification is the result of lifelong obedience.” {AA 560.3} “This sanctification is a progressive work, and an advance from one stage of perfection to another.” {ML 250.4} This “work of progression will not cease, but will continue throughout eternity.” {HP 186.6}

I get the impression you believe the progressive work of sanctification described above includes outgrowing some of the sinful habits that were practiced prior to rebirth. If so, please post inspired passages to substantiate this assertion. Thank you.

Quote:
T: Regarding your comment from Amen on, I didn't understand your point. Especially this: “Not, as you seem to think, Jesus by Himself apart from us.” Where did you get such a goofy idea? I've not in the 5 or 6 years we've been discussing things suggested such an idea in any way.

M:You stated this so strongly [I said I interpreted the quotes you cited in the context of ST 1/20/90, that the whole purpose of Christ's mission on earth was the revelation of God] it made me think you believe everything needs to be interpreted in the context of what Jesus did to disprove Satan’s accusations and to prove the truth about God’s character. Turns out I was wrong. You think such an idea is goofy. Now I know. However, I still don’t know what you believe. I believe the focus of everything is “Christ in you, the hope of glory”. Do you agree?

T: I've never written anything that would warrant your comment "Not, as you seem to think, Jesus by Himself apart from us." We've been discussing things for more than 5 years now, I think, and I can't believe you've been so careless in reading what I've said not to know that I believe in victory over sin. There's hardly any point in dialoging if you can't reach that level of understanding from our conversations.

The idea I labeled as "goofy" is your original comment, which I noted by "especially," not this new thing you're saying here. I agree with what you're saying here (the part underlined). The SOP tells us that the whole purpose of Christ's mission was the revelation of God. I'm simply saying that I interpret everything in the light of what was identified as being the whole purpose of His mission. Is there anything wrong with that?

So, you agree with the following summary of what you believe: “You believe everything needs to be interpreted in the context of what Jesus did to disprove Satan’s accusations and to prove the truth about God’s character.” This is precisely what I disagree with.

I do not agree with you that “everything” must be interpreted in light of what Jesus did. The plan of salvation is not all about God. The focus is “Christ in you, the hope of glory”. It’s all about God saving mankind. In the process of saving sinners, the Universe learns the truth about everything else.

Quote:
M: Since studying with you I have changed my mind about 1 John 3:9. I now believe John is describing a fully justified and sanctified born again believer.

T: John says, "whosoever is born of God." You think this means not "whosoever is born of God," but "some of those who are born of God"?

M:It's talking about those who are born again without their former sinful practices. This obviously doesn’t apply to those who are born again nowadays with some of their sinful practices in tact.

T: I don't understand your point. Are you suggesting people nowadays are born again differently than when John was writing? I really don't know what you're trying to say here. Please flesh it out.

The people in John’s day were instructed to how obey everything Jesus commanded. That’s what he’s talking about in 1 John 3:9. During the Dark Ages many truths were lost sight of, and people began to experience rebirth before learning how to obey everything Jesus commanded. Then God raised up the Remnant Church to “restore the breach”.

Once again people can now, by studying with a qualified SDA, learn how to obey everything Jesus commanded before making a decision for baptism. In such cases 1 John 3:9 describes them. Of course people nowadays can still experience rebirth before they learn how to obey everything Jesus commanded.

Quote:
M: So, I hear you saying no one can ignorantly fail to acknowledge God or give Him thanks. That is, everyone knows God and not giving Him thanks is inexcusable. Is this the only example you can think of? In other words, can you name any other sin that under no circumstances could qualify as a sin of ignorance?

T: Why should I MM? What's your point? Suppose I name another one, and then you say "Are these the only two you can think of?" And then I name a third, and you say, "Are these the only three you can think of?" You asked for an example, and I gave you one. I suppose you had some reason for asking for the example, so I gave you one in good faith without asking why. Now you have your example. Please make whatever point you wanted to make once you had an example.

The fact is I do not agree with the example you gave. That is, I do not agree with you that everyone knows God and not giving Him thanks is inexcusable. There are no doubt millions of people who have lived and died without ever knowing God. Paul did say everyone everywhere knows God. I have demonstrated to you elsewhere what Paul was addressing in Romans 1 and 2. But rather than redress the issue, I opted to ask you for another example of a sin that can never qualify as a sin of ignorance. I suspect you can argue that any sin can be committed in ignorance by someone somewhere sometime.

Quote:
M: In the past you have posted quotes to prove Ellen believed people are born again with some of their former sinful habits and practices in tact, that is, unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified; but it turns out that’s not what she was saying at all.

T: You've accused me of this quite a few times, but I've never admitted to it. So I'm ignoring this request, and the rest of the paragraphs following, since you're asking me to substantiate something I've not claimed.

That’s it? You’re not going to set the record straight? You’re going to just leave me hanging here not knowing what you believe? Are you saying people are *not* born again with some of their former habits of sin in tact? Or, are you saying Ellen never said it? Why must you keep me in the dark about what you believe?

Quote:
M: I'm asking now. You can put this virus to rest by simply posting inspired quotes which clearly state your position (by “clearly state” I mean quotes which do require any type of interpretation or extrapolation). Thank you.

T: There's the quote of Ellen White that William Miller will be in heaven. William Miller broke the Sabbath.

Again, Tom, we’re talking about two quotes, namely, SD 300 (quoted above) and 1 John 3:9. Do you apply these two passages to William Miller's situation of not embracing the Sabbath? If so, please explain your position so that a child can grasp your meaning. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/24/08 11:24 AM

Quote:
If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. (DA 175)

T:Here is a simple, easy to understand explanation of how one is saved. None of the things you're suggesting are included here.

M:Ellen is here saying the same thing she says elsewhere, namely, people repent of their sins before they experience rebirth.


Of course people must repent. Repentance means a change of mind. Before seeing the cross, man is at enmity with God. One cannot become a member of God's family while being at enmity with Him. It's necessary to be reconciled, and repentance is necessary for reconciliation to take place.

Quote:
Please notice she specifies what she means by saying "the sins that have crucified the Saviour." I have no reason to believe she is excluding a subclass class of sins that did not crucify Jesus, that do not require repentance, that can wait to be revealed and confessed and crucified until some time after they experience rebirth.


Yes you do. You've already admitted that not every sin that one commits is included in this repentance, so you do see a reason to believe she is excluding a subclass of sins.

Quote:
You seem to take it for granted that's what she means, and yet nowhere does she say such a thing.


You do too.

Quote:
If she had written such a thing you would be quoting it over and over again.


I've quoted this over and over again, because it's clear, and describes conversion simply and accurately. There's no need to quote something else.

I've also quoted the conversion of the publican a number of times. That's also an excellent explanation.

Quote:
The publican had gone to the temple with other worshipers, but he soon drew apart from them as unworthy to unite in their devotions. Standing afar off, he "would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast," in bitter anguish and self-abhorrence. He felt that he had transgressed against God, that he was sinful and polluted. He could not expect even pity from those around him, for they looked upon him with contempt. He knew that he had no merit to commend him to God, and in utter self-despair he cried, "God be merciful to me, a sinner." He did not compare himself with others. Overwhelmed with a sense of guilt, he stood as if alone in God's presence. His only desire was for pardon and peace, his only plea was the mercy of God. And he was blessed. "I tell you," Christ said, "this man went down to his house justified rather than the other." (COL 151)
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/24/08 11:56 AM

Quote:
The Dark Ages did not end until some time after God raised up the Remnant Church.


Quote:
The Italian Scholar, Francesco Petrarca called Petrarch, was the first to coin the phrase. He used it to denounce Latin literature of that time; others expanded on this idea to express frustration with the lack of Latin literature during this time or other cultural achievements. While the term dark ages is no longer widely used, it may best be described as Early Middle Ages -- the period following the decline of Rome in the Western World. The Middle Ages is loosely considered to extend from 400 to 1000 AD. (http://www.allabouthistory.org/the-dark-ages.htm)


As you can see, even considering Luther as a part of the Dark Ages is a stretch.

Quote:
You are the one disregarding the obvious meaning of the quote I posted. Here it is again: The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man. With the new man, Christ Jesus, are to be put on "kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering." {SD 300.3}

No unbiased reader can read this and conclude she obviously intended for us to understand that certain “sins that were practiced before conversion” will continue to be practiced after they experience rebirth. There is absolutely no reason to think she didn’t mean “the sins that were practiced before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man.”


MM, I'm not disagreeing with the obvious meaning of the quote, but with your interpretation. You say "no unbiased reader," but as far as I'm aware, no one shares your interpretation of this quote, which would mean there are no unbiased readers but you. I'm not discounting the possibility that you many not have uncovered some truth that others haven't seen, but surely the reason wouldn't be that it's because your the only unbiased reader, wouldn't you agree?

In order to disprove your interpretation of the quote, I've posited Luther, William Miller, and Spurgeon as counter-examples.

Quote:
T: This whole thread you've been arguing that born again Christians have no sinful practices. At least, this is what I've been understanding you to say. If this isn't what you believe, please cite for me some sinful practice that you believe born again Christs have.

I have been talking about the SD 300 quote. Here it is again: The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man. With the new man, Christ Jesus, are to be put on "kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering."

There is nothing instantaneous about sanctification. “Sanctification is not the work of a moment, an hour, a day, but of a lifetime. . . Sanctification is the result of lifelong obedience.” {AA 560.3} “This sanctification is a progressive work, and an advance from one stage of perfection to another.” {ML 250.4} This “work of progression will not cease, but will continue throughout eternity.” {HP 186.6}

I get the impression you believe the progressive work of sanctification described above includes outgrowing some of the sinful habits that were practiced prior to rebirth. If so, please post inspired passages to substantiate this assertion. Thank you.


You seem to believe that when one is born again, if properly indoctrinated, one does not commit any sins. Most people (I think, actually, everyone) would call this "sanctification." If it happens the instant one is born again, then this is "instant sanctification." That you can site a statement from the SOP explaining that sanctification is not instantaneous should be cause to discard the theory you're suggesting.

Quote:
So, you agree with the following summary of what you believe: “You believe everything needs to be interpreted in the context of what Jesus did to disprove Satan’s accusations and to prove the truth about God’s character.” This is precisely what I disagree with.

I do not agree with you that “everything” must be interpreted in light of what Jesus did. The plan of salvation is not all about God. The focus is “Christ in you, the hope of glory”. It’s all about God saving mankind. In the process of saving sinners, the Universe learns the truth about everything else.


Ok, we disagree about this. I think the Plan of Salvation *is* all about God. I think "Christ in you, the hope of glory" comes under this heading as well.

Quote:
T: I don't understand your point. Are you suggesting people nowadays are born again differently than when John was writing? I really don't know what you're trying to say here. Please flesh it out.

The people in John’s day were instructed to how obey everything Jesus commanded. That’s what he’s talking about in 1 John 3:9. During the Dark Ages many truths were lost sight of, and people began to experience rebirth before learning how to obey everything Jesus commanded. Then God raised up the Remnant Church to “restore the breach”.

Once again people can now, by studying with a qualified SDA, learn how to obey everything Jesus commanded before making a decision for baptism. In such cases 1 John 3:9 describes them. Of course people nowadays can still experience rebirth before they learn how to obey everything Jesus commanded.


Ok, so you are saying that conversion is different depending upon the time period involved. You don't believe that 1 John 3:9 applies to people of the "Dark Ages" like Luther, William Miller, Ellen White, or Charles Spurgeon.

Quote:
The fact is I do not agree with the example you gave.


Ok, then we can discuss the example, but that's not a reason to ask me for another one without commenting on the one I gave.

Quote:
That is, I do not agree with you that everyone knows God and not giving Him thanks is inexcusable.


What Romans 1 says is that people are without excuse for not giving thanks to God because the truth regarding God is known to them, because God has made it known to them. Therefore it is not possible for this sin to be a sin of ignorance.

Quote:
I suspect you can argue that any sin can be committed in ignorance by someone somewhere sometime.


I don't see why you would suspect this when I've given proof this isn't true.

Quote:
That’s it? You’re not going to set the record straight? You’re going to just leave me hanging here not knowing what you believe? Are you saying people are *not* born again with some of their former habits of sin in tact? Or, are you saying Ellen never said it? Why must you keep me in the dark about what you believe?


MM, you wrote:

Quote:
In the past you have posted quotes to prove Ellen believed people are born again with some of their former sinful habits and practices in tact, that is, unrevealed, unconfessed, and uncrucified; but it turns out that’s not what she was saying at all.


I deny that I've posted this. It's up to you to substantiate your allegation.

I've repeatedly asked you to post things I've actually written. If you will do so, and wish for some clarification, I'm happy to oblige.

Quote:
M: I'm asking now. You can put this virus to rest by simply posting inspired quotes which clearly state your position (by “clearly state” I mean quotes which do require any type of interpretation or extrapolation). Thank you.

T: There's the quote of Ellen White that William Miller will be in heaven. William Miller broke the Sabbath.

Again, Tom, we’re talking about two quotes, namely, SD 300 (quoted above) and 1 John 3:9. Do you apply these two passages to William Miller's situation of not embracing the Sabbath? If so, please explain your position so that a child can grasp your meaning. Thank you.


I don't believe that a person must confess every sinful practice before being born again. I believe that people can sin in ignorance. I believe that when people are born again, they begin a walk with God, wherein God reveals truth to the believer, and former sins of ignorance are put away, by the grace of God.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/31/08 10:34 PM

Originally Posted By: Tom
EGW: If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. (DA 175)

T:Here is a simple, easy to understand explanation of how one is saved. None of the things you're suggesting are included here.

M:Ellen is here saying the same thing she says elsewhere, namely, people repent of their sins before they experience rebirth.

T: Of course people must repent. Repentance means a change of mind. Before seeing the cross, man is at enmity with God. One cannot become a member of God's family while being at enmity with Him. It's necessary to be reconciled, and repentance is necessary for reconciliation to take place.

You undermine her meaning by excluding a host of sins that were practiced prior to rebirth and insisting they are carried over into the new life. You are implying "the sins that have crucified the Saviour" do not include certain sinful habits and practices. She has never said anything that alludes to this interpretation. If she had, you would be quoting it repeatedly.

Quote:
M: Please notice she specifies what she means by saying "the sins that have crucified the Saviour." I have no reason to believe she is excluding a subclass class of sins that did not crucify Jesus, that do not require repentance, that can wait to be revealed and confessed and crucified until some time after they experience rebirth.

T: Yes you do. You've already admitted that not every sin that one commits is included in this repentance, so you do see a reason to believe she is excluding a subclass of sins.

No I didn’t. Like 1 John 3:9 I believe Ellen is referring to believers who were thoroughly indoctrinated in obeying everything Jesus commanded. “Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.” Do you also think Jesus intended for us to interpret His words here to mean certain sinful habits and practices will be continued afterward in the new life?

Quote:
M: If she had written such a thing you would be quoting it over and over again.

T: I've quoted this over and over again, because it's clear, and describes conversion simply and accurately. There's no need to quote something else.

Really? Coming from someone who aggressively argues elsewhere we must take everything she wrote on a particular topic into consideration before arriving at hardcore conclusions, I’m surprised you feel this way here.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 12/31/08 11:14 PM

Quote:
M: The Dark Ages did not end until some time after God raised up the Remnant Church.

T: As you can see [from the following quote], even considering Luther as a part of the Dark Ages is a stretch.

[quote]The Italian Scholar, Francesco Petrarca called Petrarch, was the first to coin the phrase. He used it to denounce Latin literature of that time; others expanded on this idea to express frustration with the lack of Latin literature during this time or other cultural achievements. While the term dark ages is no longer widely used, it may best be described as Early Middle Ages -- the period following the decline of Rome in the Western World. The Middle Ages is loosely considered to extend from 400 to 1000 AD. (http://www.allabouthistory.org/the-dark-ages.htm)

Here's what I mean by Dark Ages:

Quote:
The accession of the Roman Church to power marked the beginning of the Dark Ages. As her power increased, the darkness deepened. {GC 55.1}

The claim that men can hold intercourse with evil spirits is regarded as a fable of the Dark Ages. But spiritualism, which numbers its converts by hundreds of thousands, yea, by millions, which has made its way into scientific circles, which has invaded churches, and has found favor in legislative bodies, and even in the courts of kings-- this mammoth deception is but a revival, in a new disguise, of the witchcraft condemned and prohibited of old. {GC 556.2}

Thus the false science of the present day, which undermines faith in the Bible, will prove as successful in preparing the way for the acceptance of the papacy, with its pleasing forms, as did the withholding of knowledge in opening the way for its aggrandizement in the Dark Ages. {GC 572.3}

The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. . . . They are working in blindness. They do not see that if a Protestant government sacrifices the principles that have made them a free, independent nation, and through legislation brings into the Constitution principles that will propagate papal falsehood and papal delusion, they are plunging into the Roman horrors of the Dark Ages.--RH Extra, Dec. 11, 1888. {LDE 125.3}

The past--the history of the Jewish economy from beginning to the end--instead of being spoken of contemptuously and sneered at as "the dark ages," will reveal light, and still more light, as it is studied. {UL 96.4}

In our day, people talk of the dark ages, and boast of progress. But with this progress wickedness and crime do not decrease. We deplore the absence of natural simplicity, and the increase of artificial display. Health, strength, beauty, and long life, which were common in the so-called "Dark Ages," are rare now. Nearly everything desirable is sacrificed to meet the demands of fashionable life. {Te 147.1}

"The accession of the Roman Church to power marked the beginning of the Dark Ages. As her power increased, the darkness deepened." The dark ages, as it were, persist unto to this day. It denotes ignorance of certain truths. As such people who are baptized and join a church before learning to obey "everything Jesus commanded" are in darkness in those areas they did not learn.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 01/01/09 01:33 AM

The Dark Ages is a period of time, in which neither Ellen White, nor William Miller, nor Spurgeon lived (and arguably not Luther). You dismissed the counterexamples I gave to your theory of these people because they lived in the Dark Ages. This assertion of yours was incorrect; they didn't live in the Dark Ages.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 01/01/09 01:46 AM

Quote:
T: Of course people must repent. Repentance means a change of mind. Before seeing the cross, man is at enmity with God. One cannot become a member of God's family while being at enmity with Him. It's necessary to be reconciled, and repentance is necessary for reconciliation to take place.

M:You undermine her meaning by excluding a host of sins that were practiced prior to rebirth and insisting they are carried over into the new life. You are implying "the sins that have crucified the Saviour" do not include certain sinful habits and practices. She has never said anything that alludes to this interpretation. If she had, you would be quoting it repeatedly.


MM, the idea you are suggesting is one I've never heard of. She met many odd ideas, and spoke to them, but apparently yours is one she never came across. That she did not speak against your idea is not evidence that it is true.

She never suggested that rebirth means confessing sinful habits one by one until the last one is reached. You are misunderstanding what is involved in conversion. She described conversion eloquently here:

Quote:
How, then, are we to be saved? "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness," so the Son of man has been lifted up, and everyone who has been deceived and bitten by the serpent may look and live. "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29. The light shining from the cross reveals the love of God. His love is drawing us to Himself. If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. (DA 175)


She doesn't say anything here about confessing all ones sinful habits, nor anywhere else.

That your interpretation is not accurate is easily disproved by considering the cases I've cited of Luther, Ellen White herself, William Miller and Spurgeon.

Quote:
M: Please notice she specifies what she means by saying "the sins that have crucified the Saviour." I have no reason to believe she is excluding a subclass class of sins that did not crucify Jesus, that do not require repentance, that can wait to be revealed and confessed and crucified until some time after they experience rebirth.

T: Yes you do. You've already admitted that not every sin that one commits is included in this repentance, so you do see a reason to believe she is excluding a subclass of sins.

M:No I didn’t. Like 1 John 3:9 I believe Ellen is referring to believers who were thoroughly indoctrinated in obeying everything Jesus commanded. “Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.” Do you also think Jesus intended for us to interpret His words here to mean certain sinful habits and practices will be continued afterward in the new life?


MM, she speaks of the "sins which have crucified the Savior." Are you saying this only includes the sins of people who were properly indoctrinated?

Quote:
M: If she had written such a thing you would be quoting it over and over again.

T: I've quoted this over and over again, because it's clear, and describes conversion simply and accurately. There's no need to quote something else.

M:Really? Coming from someone who aggressively argues elsewhere we must take everything she wrote on a particular topic into consideration before arriving at hardcore conclusions, I’m surprised you feel this way here.


MM, you have a theory on conversion I've never heard before. That she didn't speak specifically against it is not evidence that it is true. I quoted for you what she actually did say. She never said that one, whether properly indoctrinated or not, had to confess every sinful habit one might have, including unknown ones, in order to be converted, which the cases I've cited (Luther, etc.) make clear.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 01/03/09 04:55 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
M: The Dark Ages did not end until some time after God raised up the Remnant Church.

T: As you can see [from the following quote], even considering Luther as a part of the Dark Ages is a stretch.

"The Italian Scholar, Francesco Petrarca called Petrarch, was the first to coin the phrase. He used it to denounce Latin literature of that time; others expanded on this idea to express frustration with the lack of Latin literature during this time or other cultural achievements. While the term dark ages is no longer widely used, it may best be described as Early Middle Ages -- the period following the decline of Rome in the Western World. The Middle Ages is loosely considered to extend from 400 to 1000 AD. (http://www.allabouthistory.org/the-dark-ages.htm)

M: Here's what I mean by Dark Ages:

Quote:
The accession of the Roman Church to power marked the beginning of the Dark Ages. As her power increased, the darkness deepened. {GC 55.1}

The claim that men can hold intercourse with evil spirits is regarded as a fable of the Dark Ages. But spiritualism, which numbers its converts by hundreds of thousands, yea, by millions, which has made its way into scientific circles, which has invaded churches, and has found favor in legislative bodies, and even in the courts of kings-- this mammoth deception is but a revival, in a new disguise, of the witchcraft condemned and prohibited of old. {GC 556.2}

Thus the false science of the present day, which undermines faith in the Bible, will prove as successful in preparing the way for the acceptance of the papacy, with its pleasing forms, as did the withholding of knowledge in opening the way for its aggrandizement in the Dark Ages. {GC 572.3}

The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. . . . They are working in blindness. They do not see that if a Protestant government sacrifices the principles that have made them a free, independent nation, and through legislation brings into the Constitution principles that will propagate papal falsehood and papal delusion, they are plunging into the Roman horrors of the Dark Ages.--RH Extra, Dec. 11, 1888. {LDE 125.3}

The past--the history of the Jewish economy from beginning to the end--instead of being spoken of contemptuously and sneered at as "the dark ages," will reveal light, and still more light, as it is studied. {UL 96.4}

In our day, people talk of the dark ages, and boast of progress. But with this progress wickedness and crime do not decrease. We deplore the absence of natural simplicity, and the increase of artificial display. Health, strength, beauty, and long life, which were common in the so-called "Dark Ages," are rare now. Nearly everything desirable is sacrificed to meet the demands of fashionable life. {Te 147.1}

"The accession of the Roman Church to power marked the beginning of the Dark Ages. As her power increased, the darkness deepened." The dark ages, as it were, persist unto to this day. It denotes ignorance of certain truths. As such people who are baptized and join a church before learning to obey "everything Jesus commanded" are in darkness in those areas they did not learn.

T: The Dark Ages is a period of time, in which neither Ellen White, nor William Miller, nor Spurgeon lived (and arguably not Luther). You dismissed the counterexamples I gave to your theory of these people because they lived in the Dark Ages. This assertion of yours was incorrect; they didn't live in the Dark Ages.

The article you posted above begins with the following line - "The Dark Ages as a term has undergone many evolutions; its definition depends on who is defining it." The author said Petrarch, who coined the phrase, "used it to denounce Latin literature of that time; others expanded on this idea to express frustration with the lack of Latin literature during this time or other cultural achievements."

But Ellen defined it differently. Here's how she used the label, "The accession of the Roman Church to power marked the beginning of the Dark Ages. As her power increased, the darkness deepened." This darkness persists today. It denotes ignorance of certain truths. As such, people who are baptized and join a church before learning to how obey "everything Jesus commanded" are in darkness in those areas.

So, which dark age are you referring to - 1) Darkness as it relates to Latin literature, or 2) Darkness as it relates to saving truths?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 01/03/09 05:16 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
M: Like 1 John 3:9 I believe Ellen is referring to believers who were thoroughly indoctrinated in obeying everything Jesus commanded. “Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.”

Do you also think Jesus intended for us to interpret His words here to mean certain sinful habits and practices will be continued afterward in the new life?

T: MM, she speaks of the "sins which have crucified the Savior." Are you saying this only includes the sins of people who were properly indoctrinated?

I'm talking about one class of people, namely, people who were properly indoctrinated to obey everything Jesus commanded. We can talk about other classes of people at another time. I would like to come to an agreement concerning this one class first.

In this case, having been taught everything Jesus commanded, the phrase, "the sins which have crucified the Savior", must necessarily include any and all sinful habits humans have cultivated since the Fall.

Thus, they would definitely *not* be born again ignorantly practicing one of their preconversion sinful habits. “Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you” cannot mean overlooking certain sinful habits. Or, do you think Jesus intended for us to interpret His words to mean certain sinful habits will continue to be practiced ignorantly after learning how to obey everything He commanded?

Referring to the class of believers who have learned how to obey everything Jesus commanded, Ellen wrote: "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man. With the new man, Christ Jesus, are to be put on "kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering." {SD 300.3}

She also described this way, "One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}

PS - Remember, I would like to stick with this one class of believers. So, please, limit your comments to these cases. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 01/03/09 12:26 PM

Quote:
The article you posted above begins with the following line - "The Dark Ages as a term has undergone many evolutions; its definition depends on who is defining it." The author said Petrarch, who coined the phrase, "used it to denounce Latin literature of that time; others expanded on this idea to express frustration with the lack of Latin literature during this time or other cultural achievements."


No one defines it in a way that would include Spurgeon, Miller or White.

Quote:
But Ellen defined it differently. Here's how she used the label, "The accession of the Roman Church to power marked the beginning of the Dark Ages. As her power increased, the darkness deepened." This darkness persists today. It denotes ignorance of certain truths. As such, people who are baptized and join a church before learning to how obey "everything Jesus commanded" are in darkness in those areas.


She said the darkness persisted, not that the Dark Ages persisted. Ellen White never said she lived in the Dark Ages.

Quote:
So, which dark age are you referring to - 1) Darkness as it relates to Latin literature, or 2) Darkness as it relates to saving truths?


The "Dark Ages" is a term which refers to a period of time which began when the Roman Church began its ascendancy. One could disagree as to when it ended, which is why I said one could make an argument as to whether or not Luther should be included, but there's no question that Ellen White, William Miller, and Charles Spurgeon did not live in the Dark Ages. This was the Industrial Age, which is after the Renaissance, which is after the Dark Ages.

Quote:
I'm talking about one class of people, namely, people who were properly indoctrinated to obey everything Jesus commanded.


You're alone in this. John wasn't speaking of a certain subclass of people, but was communicating truths that would stand the test of time.

Quote:
1Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.

2Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

3And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure.

4Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

5And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin.

6Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.

7Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.

8He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

9Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

10In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

11For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another.

12Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous.

13Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you.

14We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.

15Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.

16Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.

17But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?

18My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.

19And hereby we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before him.

20For if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things.

21Beloved, if our heart condemn us not, then have we confidence toward God.

22And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.

23And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.

24And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. (1 John 3)


This is all true. Even during the Dark Ages this was all true.

Regarding properly indoctrinated believers, not all sins that one can commit are things that a properly indoctrinated believer would necessarily come across. For example, a properly indoctrinated believe could unknowingly have erroneous views regarding God's character, presenting Him in a false light.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 01/06/09 12:34 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
M: The article you posted above begins with the following line - "The Dark Ages as a term has undergone many evolutions; its definition depends on who is defining it." The author said Petrarch, who coined the phrase, "used it to denounce Latin literature of that time; others expanded on this idea to express frustration with the lack of Latin literature during this time or other cultural achievements."

T: No one defines it in a way that would include Spurgeon, Miller or White.

Given that the label "Dark Ages" has evolved into an ambiguous and undefinable time period, according to the author you quoted, it would be impossible to prove your point that "no one defines it in a way . . ."

Quote:
M: But Ellen defined it differently. Here's how she used the label, "The accession of the Roman Church to power marked the beginning of the Dark Ages. As her power increased, the darkness deepened." This darkness persists today. It denotes ignorance of certain truths. As such, people who are baptized and join a church before learning to how obey "everything Jesus commanded" are in darkness in those areas.

T: She said the darkness persisted, not that the Dark Ages persisted. Ellen White never said she lived in the Dark Ages.

What matters more in light of the point I'm trying to make (which I restate below, so read on)?

Quote:
M: So, which dark age are you referring to - 1) Darkness as it relates to Latin literature, or 2) Darkness as it relates to saving truths?

T: The "Dark Ages" is a term which refers to a period of time which began when the Roman Church began its ascendancy. One could disagree as to when it ended, which is why I said one could make an argument as to whether or not Luther should be included, but there's no question that Ellen White, William Miller, and Charles Spurgeon did not live in the Dark Ages. This was the Industrial Age, which is after the Renaissance, which is after the Dark Ages.

Again, the author you quoted does not agree with your placement of the Dark Ages. It is a meaningless, nondescript label. The way Ellen referred to it it is obvious the darkness perpetrated by the RCC began in apostolic times and deepened over time and persists unto this day. During the Protestant Reformation people began to make their way up and out of the pit of darkness but not until after the Millerite Movement and the establishment of the SDA Church did certain people completely emerge out of the darkness. Of course there are still people in darkness nowadays in and out of the SDA Church.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 01/06/09 01:03 AM

Originally Posted By: Tom
Originally Posted By: MM
I'm talking about one class of people, namely, people who were properly indoctrinated to obey everything Jesus commanded. In this case, having been taught everything Jesus commanded, the phrase, "the sins which have crucified the Savior", must necessarily include any and all sinful habits humans have cultivated since the Fall.

Thus, they would definitely *not* be born again ignorantly practicing one of their preconversion sinful habits. “Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you” cannot mean overlooking certain sinful habits. Or, do you think Jesus intended for us to interpret His words to mean certain sinful habits will continue to be practiced ignorantly after learning how to obey everything He commanded?

Referring to the class of believers who have learned how to obey everything Jesus commanded, Ellen wrote: "The sins that were practised before conversion, are to be put off, with the old man. With the new man, Christ Jesus, are to be put on "kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering." {SD 300.3}

She also described it this way, "One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}

T: You're alone in this. John wasn't speaking of a certain subclass of people, but was communicating truths that would stand the test of time. Regarding properly indoctrinated believers, not all sins that one can commit are things that a properly indoctrinated believer would necessarily come across. For example, a properly indoctrinated believe could unknowingly have erroneous views regarding God's character, presenting Him in a false light.

Tom, you seem to think people who have been taught how to obey and observe everything Jesus commanded will still ignorantly practice some of the sinful habits they cultivated prior to rebirth. Is this what you believe? If not, then please explain what the experience of such people is like as it relates to the sinful habits they practiced ignorantly prior to rebirth. Thank you.

However, if you believe people who are obeying and observing everything Jesus commanded still ignorantly practice some of the sinful habits they cultivated prior to rebirth then I can understand why you would interpret 1 John 3 the way you do. I can see why you believe “doth not sin and cannot sin” (verse 9) obviously excludes a long list of sinful habits and practices.

Do you interpret all the other promises in the Bible that are like 1 John 3:9 to mean people are still ignorantly practicing some of the sinful habits they cultivated prior to rebirth? Or, do you know of any promises that mean what I believe, namely, that they are living in harmony with everything Jesus commanded, that, like Jesus, they are living without sinning?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Will Jesus change our character when He returns? - 01/06/09 05:42 AM

Quote:
Given that the label "Dark Ages" has evolved into an ambiguous and undefinable time period, according to the author you quoted, it would be impossible to prove your point that "no one defines it in a way . . ."


No, MM, it's not impossible. It's not possible to pinpoint it exactly, but it's possible to know, for example, that the Dark Ages does not include David or Solomon on the low end, or Ellen White or Spurgeon on the high end.

Here's an easy way to see the Dark Ages could not have included Ellen White or Spurgeon:

Quote:
The Industrial Revolution was a period in the late 18th and early 19th centuries when major changes in agriculture, manufacturing, production, and transportation had a profound effect on the socioeconomic and cultural conditions in Britain. The changes subsequently spread throughout Europe, North America, and eventually the world. The onset of the Industrial Revolution marked a major turning point in human society; almost every aspect of daily life was eventually influenced in some way. (wiki)


The Dark Ages were before the Industrial Revolution, which began before Ellen White or Spurgeon lived.

Regarding the wiki statement, here it is again:

Quote:
The dating of the "Dark Ages" has always been fluid, but the concept was originally intended to denote the entire period between the fall of Rome in the 5th century and the "Renaissance" or "rebirth" of classical values.


Now while this says the timing is "fluid" it doesn't say it's not defined at all. it says it is "between" the fall of Rome in the 5th century and the Renaissance. Now the Reneaissance was before the Industrial Age, which is when Ellen White and Spurgeon lived, so categorizing the time the lived as the Dark Ages, isn't even close. You're off be a couple of ages.

Quote:
Tom, you seem to think people who have been taught how to obey and observe everything Jesus commanded will still ignorantly practice some of the sinful habits they cultivated prior to rebirth. Is this what you believe? If not, then please explain what the experience of such people is like as it relates to the sinful habits they practiced ignorantly prior to rebirth. Thank you.


I just responded to this on another thread. We must have a duplicate conversation going on.

Quote:
However, if you believe people who are obeying and observing everything Jesus commanded still ignorantly practice some of the sinful habits they cultivated prior to rebirth then I can understand why you would interpret 1 John 3 the way you do. I can see why you believe “doth not sin and cannot sin” (verse 9) obviously excludes a long list of sinful habits and practices.


I don't think John had in mind at all what you do; that is, his subject matter is different than what you have in mind. If you read the third chapter of John's letter, you can see that the subject matter has to do with how one who is born again lives. He loves his brother; He gives his life for him; He takes care of those in need. 1 John 3:9 fits into this context.

Quote:
Do you interpret all the other promises in the Bible that are like 1 John 3:9 to mean people are still ignorantly practicing some of the sinful habits they cultivated prior to rebirth?


Do you interpret all the other promised in the Bible that are like 1 John 3:9 to exclude anyone who is not properly indoctrinated?

What kind of question is this? Please, be more careful with these types of questions.

Quote:
Or, do you know of any promises that mean what I believe, namely, that they are living in harmony with everything Jesus commanded, that, like Jesus, they are living without sinning?


We're on different planets MM. I don't see that the promises are even dealing with the same things you do. Your conception of sin involves the ability to keep certain rules. Your conception of justice is retributive. My conception is that sin involves relationships, taking care of your brother, of putting others or other things before God. My conception of justice is restorative.

For example, I see the following as being in perfect harmony with what John was saying:

Quote:
6Wherewith shall I come before the LORD, and bow myself before the high God? shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old?

7Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams, or with ten thousands of rivers of oil? shall I give my firstborn for my transgression, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?

8He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? (Micah 6:6-8)


Saying that these are in perfect harmony isn't enough. They're saying the same thing. What is righteousness? It is feeding the hungry, caring for the orphan, clothing the naked. It is doing justly, loving mercy, and walking humbly with God. Or as John puts it:

Quote:
16Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.

17But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?

18My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth. (1 John 3)


The promises of God are that we, by faith, can be this type of a person, a person like Christ was, who loves God and takes care of his neighbor.
© 2024 Maritime 2nd Advent Christian Believers OnLine Forums Consisting Mainly of Both Members & Friends of the SDA (Seventh-day Adventist) Church