Hidden Character Defects! What?

Posted By: Mountain Man

Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/06/05 04:10 AM

Here some quotes on character defects. What is the truth about "hidden" defective traits of character? Are they sins of ignorance? Does Jesus choose not to reveal them to us until we're better able to deal with them? If we die before they are revealed will Jesus remove them when He returns?

SC 29
One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}

TMK 237
Provision has been made whereby every soul that is struggling under sinful practices may be made free from sin. "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world" (John 1:29). The Christian is not to retain his sinful habits and cherish his defects of character, but he is to be renewed in the spirit of his mind after the divine similitude. Whatever may be the nature of your defects, the Spirit of the Lord will enable you to discern them, and grace will be given you whereby they may be overcome. Through the merits of the blood of Christ you may be a conqueror--yes, more than a conqueror. {TMK 237.2}

AG 80
God has given His holy law to man as His measure of character. By this law you may see and overcome every defect in your character. You may sever yourself from every idol, and link yourself to the throne of God by the golden chain of grace and truth. {AG 80.2}

AA 424
Paul dwelt especially upon the far-reaching claims of God's law. He showed how it extends to the deep secrets of man's moral nature and throws a flood of light upon that which has been concealed from the sight and knowledge of men. What the hands may do or the tongue may utter --what the outer life reveals--but imperfectly shows man's moral character. The law searches his thoughts, motives, and purposes. The dark passions that lie hidden from the sight of men, the jealousy, hatred, lust, and ambition, the evil deeds meditated upon in the dark recesses of the soul, yet never executed for want of opportunity--all these God's law condemns. {AA 424.1}

LHU 346
A well-balanced character is formed by single acts well performed. One defect, cultivated instead of being overcome, makes the man imperfect, and closes against him the gate of the Holy City. He who enters heaven must have a character that is without spot or wrinkle or any such thing. Naught that defileth can ever enter there. In all the redeemed host not one defect will be seen. {LHU 346.4}

MAR 53
God will accept nothing but purity and holiness; one spot, one wrinkle, one defect in the character, will forever debar them from heaven, with all its glories and treasures. {Mar 53.2}

MAR 58
None will be translated to heaven while their hearts are filled with the rubbish of earth. Every defect in the moral character must first be remedied, every stain removed by the cleansing blood of Christ, and all the unlovely, unlovable traits of character overcome. {Mar 58.3}

1SM 317
The work of sanctification is the work of a lifetime; it must go on continually; but this work cannot go on in the heart while the light on any part of the truth is rejected or neglected. The sanctified soul will not be content to remain in ignorance, but will desire to walk in the light and to seek for greater light. {1SM 317.2}

4T 540, 541
Our wrong traits of character are not always visible to ourselves, although they may be very apparent to others. But time and circumstances will surely prove us and bring to light the gold of character or discover the baser metal. Not one of us is known or read of all men, till the crucible of God tests us. Every base thought, every wrong action, reveals some defect in the character. These rugged traits must be brought under the chisel and hammer in God's great workshop, and the grace of God must smooth and polish before we can be fitted for a place in the glorious temple. {4T 540.3}

CC 46
It is by close, testing trials that God disciplines His servants. He sees that some have powers which may be used in the advancement of His work, and He puts these persons upon trial; in His providence He brings them into positions that test their character and reveal defects and weaknesses that have been hidden from their own knowledge. He gives them opportunity to correct these defects and to fit themselves for His service. He shows them their own weakness, and teaches them to lean upon Him; for He is their only help and safeguard. Thus His object is attained. They are educated, trained, and disciplined, prepared to fulfill the grand purpose for which their powers were given them. {CC 46.2}

ST 4-30-1894
It is not through one act that the character is formed, but by a repetition of acts that habits are established and character confirmed. To have a Christ-like character it is necessary to act in a Christlike way. Christians will exhibit a holy temper, and their actions and impulses will be prompted by the Holy Spirit. {ST 4-30-1894}

ML 269
Any one act, either good or evil, does not form the character, but thoughts and feelings indulged prepare the way for acts and deeds of the same kind. {ML 269.4}

6BC 1098
Beholding Christ for the purpose of becoming like Him, the seeker after truth sees the perfection of the principles of God's law, and he becomes dissatisfied with everything but perfection. Hiding his life in the life of Christ, he sees that the holiness of the divine law is revealed in the character of Christ, and more and more earnestly he strives to be like Him. A warfare may be expected at any time, for the tempter sees that he is losing one of his subjects. A battle must be fought with the attributes which Satan has been strengthening for his own use. The human agent sees what he has to contend with--a strange power opposed to the idea of attaining the perfection that Christ holds out. But with Christ there is saving power that will gain for him victory in the conflict. The Saviour will strengthen and help him as he comes pleading for grace and efficiency (MS 89, 1903). {6BC 1098.2}

1T 332, 333
Among God's professed people are corrupt hearts; but they will be tested and proved. That God who reads the hearts of everyone, will bring to light hidden things of darkness where they are often least suspected, that stumbling blocks which have hindered the progress of truth may be removed, and God have a clean and holy people to declare His statutes and judgments. {1T 332.3}

The Captain of our salvation leads His people on step by step, purifying and fitting them for translation, and leaving in the rear those who are disposed to draw off from the body, who are not willing to be led, and are satisfied with their own righteousness. "If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!" No greater delusion can deceive the human mind than that which leads men to indulge a self-confident spirit, to believe that they are right and in the light, when they are drawing away from God's people, and their cherished light is darkness. {1T 333.1}

4T 55, 56
Many who have never been placed in positions of trial appear to be excellent Christians, their lives seem faultless; but God sees that they have traits of character that must be revealed to them before they can perceive and correct them. Simeon prophesied under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, and said unto Mary in reference to Jesus: Behold, this Child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against; (yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed." In the providence of God we are placed in different positions to call into exercise qualities of mind calculated to develop character under a variety of circumstances. Whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all." Professed Christians may live unexceptionable lives so far as outward appearance is concerned; but when a change of circumstances throws them into entirely different positions, strong traits of character are discovered, which would have remained hidden had their surroundings continued the same. {4T 55.2}

TDG 16
The nearer the Christian lives to God, the more he advances in divine illumination of mind. He has more distinct sense of his own littleness, discerns his defects of character, and sees his duty in the light in which God presents it. The more closely he draws to Jesus, the more he has a near and clear sense of his own defects which had before escaped his notice, and he sees the necessity of humbling himself under the mighty hand of God. If lifted up it will not be because he lifts and exalts himself, but because the Lord exalts him. Having his eye fixed upon the purity and perfection of Christ Jesus, and acknowledging and obeying God in all his ways, he is not blinded to his own failures and imperfections. When his deportment in the eyes of men is unblamable and irreprovable, God reads the intents and purposes of the heart. {TDG 16.2}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/06/05 08:15 AM

quote:
Here some quotes on character defects. What is the truth about "hidden" defective traits of character? Are they sins of ignorance? Does Jesus choose not to reveal them to us until we're better able to deal with them? If we die before they are revealed will Jesus remove them when He returns?
The SOP tells us that God will reveal truth to us as fast as we are ready and willing to receive it. This implies that we can have a relationship with God and still not know all truth. Thus there are defects of character of which we may be unaware.

For example, we may think and speak inappropriately regarding God's character.
Posted By: Ikan

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/06/05 11:52 AM

This seems to answer things pretty well about hidden defects ("His servants" cannot mean the unconverted, Mike!)

(All emphasis and punctuation mine):

"It is in mercy that the Lord reveals to men their hidden defects. He would have them :

1)critically examine the complicated emotions and motives of their own hearts and detect that which is wrong,

2)modify their dispositions, and

3)refine their manners. God would have His servants become acquainted with their own hearts.

In order to bring to them a true knowledge of their condition, He permits the fire of affliction to assail them so that they may be purified."--RH, Apr 10, 1894 (ML 92.) {2MCP 617.1}

This is naturally all only possible to those that are in Christ, not the "servants of your father, the devil".
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/06/05 07:21 PM

Ikan, here is the context of Sister White's counsel to Brother G., who is someone God called to the ministry and a leadership position at the head of the work:

4T 83-94
Dear Brother G: I feel very anxious that you should accept light and come out of darkness. You have been greatly tempted of Satan; he has used you as his instrument to hinder the work of God. He has thus far succeeded with you; but it does not follow that you should continue in the path of error. I look upon your case with great trembling. I know that God has given you great light. In your sickness last fall the providence of God was dealing with you that you might bear fruit to His glory. {4T 83.2}

Unbelief was taking possession of your soul, and the Lord afflicted you that you might gain a needed experience. He blessed us in praying for you, and He blessed you in answer to our prayers. The Lord designed to unite our hearts in love and confidence. The Holy Spirit witnessed with your spirit. The power of God in answer to prayer came upon you; but Satan came with temptations, and you did not close the door upon him. He entered and has been very busy. It is the plan of the evil one to work first upon the mind of one, and then, through him, upon others. He has thus sought to hedge up our way and hinder our labors in the very place where our influence should be most felt for the prosperity of the cause. {4T 83.3}

The Lord brought you into connection with His work at ----- for a wise purpose; He designed that you should discover the defects in your character and overcome them. You know how quickly your spirit chafes when things do not move according to your mind. Would that you could understand that all this impatience and irritability must be overcome, or your life will prove an utter failure, you will lose heaven, and it would have been better had you never been born. {4T 84.1}



Our heavenly Father sees the hearts of men, and He knows their characters better than they themselves know them. He sees that some have susceptibilities and powers, which, directed in the right channel, might be used to His glory to aid in the advancement of His work. He puts these persons on trial and in His wise providence brings them into different positions and under a variety of circumstances, testing them that they may reveal what is in their hearts and the weak points in their characters which have been concealed from their own knowledge. He gives them opportunities to correct these weaknesses, to polish off the rough corners of their natures, and to fit themselves for His service, that when He calls them to action they will be ready, and that angels of heaven may unite their labor with human effort in the work that must be done upon the earth. To men whom God designs shall fill responsible positions, He in mercy reveals their hidden defects, that they may look within and examine critically the complicated emotions and exercises of their own hearts, and detect that which is wrong; thus they may modify their dispositions and refine their manners. The Lord in His providence brings men where He can test their moral powers and reveal their motives of action, that they may improve what is right in themselves and put away that which is wrong. God would have His servants become acquainted with the moral machinery of their own hearts. In order to bring this about, He often permits the fire of affliction to assail them that they may become purified… {4T 84.4}



God's work of refining and purifying must go on until His servants are so humbled, so dead to self, that, when called into active service, their eye will be single to His glory. He will then accept their efforts; they will not move rashly, from impulse; they will not rush on and imperil the Lord's cause, being slaves to temptations and passions and followers of their own carnal minds set on fire by Satan. Oh, how fearfully is the cause of God marred by man's perverse will and unsubdued temper! How much suffering he brings upon himself by following his own headstrong passions! God brings men over the ground again and again, increasing the pressure until perfect humility and a transformation of character bring them into harmony with Christ and the spirit of heaven, and they are victors over themselves. {4T 86.2}

God has called men from different states, and has been testing and proving them to see what characters they would develop, to see if they could be trusted to keep the fort at -----, and to see whether or not they would supply the deficiencies of the men already there, and, seeing the failures that these men have made, would shun the example of those who are not fit to engage in the most sacred work of God. He has followed men at ----- with continual warnings, reproof, and counsel. He has poured great light about those who officiate in His cause there, that the way may be plain before them. But if they prefer to follow after their own wisdom, scorning the light, as did Saul, they will surely go astray and involve the cause in perplexity. Light and darkness have been set before them, but they have too often chosen the darkness. {4T 86.3}

The Laodicean message applies to the people of God who profess to believe present truth. The greater part are lukewarm professors, having a name but no zeal. God signified that He wanted men at the great heart of the work to correct the state of things existing there and to stand like faithful sentinels at their post of duty. He has given them light at every point, to instruct, encourage, and confirm them, as the case required. But notwithstanding all this, those who should be faithful and true, fervent in Christian zeal, of gracious temper, knowing and loving Jesus earnestly, are found aiding the enemy to weaken and discourage those whom God is using to build up the work. The term "lukewarm" is applicable to this class. They profess to love the truth, yet are deficient in Christian fervor and devotion. They dare not give up wholly and run the risk of the unbeliever, yet they are unwilling to die to self and follow out closely the principles of their faith. {4T 87.1}



I was pointed to the providence of God among His people and was shown that every trial made by the refining, purifying process upon professed Christians proves some to be dross. The fine gold does not always appear. In every religious crisis some fall under temptation. The shaking of God blows away multitudes like dry leaves. Prosperity multiplies a mass of professors. Adversity purges them out of the church. As a class, their spirits are not steadfast with God. They go out from us because they are not of us; for when tribulation or persecution arises because of the word, many are offended. {4T 89.2}

Let these look back a few months to the time when they were sitting on the cases of others who were in a condition similar to that which they now occupy. Let them carefully call to mind the exercise of their minds in regard to those tempted ones. Had anyone told them then that notwithstanding their zeal and labor to set others right, they would at length be found in a similar position of darkness, they would have said, as did Hazael to the prophet: "Is thy servant a dog, that he should do this great thing?" {4T 89.3}

Self-deception is upon them. During the calm, what firmness they manifest! what courageous sailors they make! But when the furious tempests of trial and temptation come, lo! their souls are shipwrecked. Men may have excellent gifts, good ability, splendid qualifications; but one defect, one secret sin indulged, will prove to the character what the worm-eaten plank does to the ship--utter disaster and ruin! {4T 90.1}

Dear brother, God in His providence brought you from your farm to ----- to bear the tests and trials which you could not have where you were. He has given you some testimonies of reproof, which you professedly accepted; but your spirit was continually chafed under rebuke. You are like those who walked no more with Jesus after He brought close, practical truths to bear upon them. You have not taken hold in faith to correct the defects marked out in your character. You have not humbled your proud spirit before God. You have stood at warfare against the Spirit of God as revealed in reproof. Your carnal, unsubdued heart is not subject to control. You have not disciplined yourself. Time and again your uncontrolled temper, your spirit of insubordination, has gained complete mastery over you. How can such an impulsive, unsubdued soul live among the pure angels? It cannot be admitted into heaven, as you yourself know. If so, you cannot begin too soon to correct the evil in your nature. Be converted, and become as a little child. {4T 90.2}



God calls upon you, Brother G, to repent and be converted, and become as a little child. Unless the truth has a sanctifying influence upon your life to mold your character, you will fail of an inheritance in the kingdom of God. The Lord in His providence selected you to be more directly connected with His cause and work. He took you, like an undisciplined soldier, new to the army, and brought you under rules, regulations, and responsibilities, and through the drilling process. At first you did nobly and tried to be faithful at your post. You bore trial better than ever before in your life. But Satan came with his specious temptations, and you fell a prey to them. The Lord pitied you and laid His hand upon you to save you. He gave you a rich experience, which you have not profited by as you should have done. Like the children of Israel, you soon forgot the dealings of God and His great mercies. Brother G, you were raised up in answer to prayer, and God gave you a new lease of life; but you have let jealousy and envy into your soul, and have greatly displeased Him. He designed to bring you where you would develop character, where you would see and correct your defects. {4T 91.2}



Brother G, you are willing to stand at the head and dictate to others, but you will not be dictated to yourself. Your pride fires in a moment at the attempt. Self-love and a haughty spirit are unruly elements in your character, hindering spiritual advancement. Those who have this temperament must take hold of the work zealously and die to self, or they will lose heaven. God makes no compromise with this element, as do fond, mistaken parents. {4T 92.3}

In my last vision I was shown that if you refuse reproof and correction, choose your own way, and will not be disciplined, God has no further use for you in connection with His holy work. If you had commenced the work of setting your own soul right with the Lord you would have seen so great a work to be done for yourself that you would not have spent so much time over the supposed wrongs of Brother H, dwelling upon them behind his back. The work of the last thirty years should inspire confidence in the integrity of Brother H. "Honor to whom honor is due." {4T 93.1}

Men in responsible positions should improve continually. They must not anchor upon an old experience and feel that it is not necessary to become scientific workers. Man, although the most helpless of God's creatures when he comes into the world, and the most perverse in his nature, is nevertheless capable of constant advancement. He may be enlightened by science, ennobled by virtue, and may progress in mental and moral dignity, until he reaches a perfection of intelligence and a purity of character but little lower than the perfection and purity of angels. With the light of truth shining upon the minds of men, and the love of God shed abroad in their hearts, we cannot conceive what they may become nor what great work they may do. {4T 93.2}

I know that the human heart is blind to its own true condition, but I cannot leave you without making an effort to help you. We love you, and we want to see you pressing on to victory. Jesus loves you. He died for you, and He wants you to be saved. We have no disposition to hold you in -----; but we do want you to make thorough work with your own soul, to right every wrong there, and make every effort to master self, lest you miss heaven. This you cannot afford to do. For Christ's sake, resist the devil, and he will flee from you. {4T 93.3}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/06/05 07:29 PM

Can we read about these faulty individuals and conclude that they are converted and born again, advancing from one stage of perfection to another? Can we conclude that, if Jesus had returned then, that they would have been taken to heaven? Remember, if we conclude that they are born again, then we are testifying that they are ready to enter the kingdom of heaven, along with the thief on the cross.

ML 250
No one who truly loves and fears God will continue to transgress the law in any particular. When man transgresses he is under the condemnation of the law, and it becomes to him a yoke of bondage. Whatever his profession may be he is not justified, which means pardoned. {ML 250.3}

"The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul." Through obedience comes sanctification of body, soul, and spirit. This sanctification is a progressive work, and an advance from one stage of perfection to another. {ML 250.4}
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/07/05 01:40 AM

Mike,

I understand and agree that the Christian cannot condone sin in any form, otherwise he is not a genuine Christian.

However, looking at a text like the one below (and many others similar), we can only conclude that we continue to have defects of character that need to be corrected after conversion:

"How may we know that the Lord is indeed our sin-pardoning Redeemer, and prove what is the blessedness, the grace, the love there is in Him for us? O, we must believe His word implicitly, with contrite and submissive spirit! There is no need to go mourning and ever repenting, and under a cloud of continual condemnation. Believe the Word of God, keep looking unto Jesus, dwelling upon His virtues and mercies, and there will be created in the heart an utter abhorrence of that which is evil. You will be among those who hunger and thirst after righteousness. But the more closely we discern Jesus, the more clearly we shall see our own defects of character." {TDG 89.2}

The solution, I think, is to define "defects of character" as evil tendencies. Evil tendencies do not necessarily lead to sin; with Christ, they can be resisted and overcome, and finally cut away from the character. The problem, however, is that some of these evil tendencies, or defects of character, may pass unnoticed, therefore

"The greatest blessing we can have is a correct knowledge of ourselves, that we may see our defects of character, and by divine grace remedy them." {ST, May 22, 1884 par. 1}

The verbs "remedy" and "correct", frequently used by Ellen White, suggest a process, rather than a punctual experience. You are perfect in God's sight if you are resisting all the evil tendencies you can see in your character at a given moment.

"The religion of Christ is not what many think it is, nor what their lives represent it to be. The love of God in the soul will have a direct influence upon the life, and will call the intellect and the affections into active, healthful exercise. The child of God will not rest satisfied until he is clothed with the righteousness of Christ, and sustained by his life-giving power. When he sees a weakness in his character, it is not enough to confess it again and again; he must go to work with determination and energy to overcome his defects by building up opposite traits of character. He will not shun this work because it is difficult. Untiring energy is required of the Christian; but he is not obliged to work in his own strength; divine power awaits his demand. Every one who is sincerely striving for victory over self will appropriate the promise, 'My grace is sufficient for thee.'" {RH, June 10, 1884 par. 9}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/07/05 07:32 AM

quote:
Can we read about these faulty individuals and conclude that they are converted and born again, advancing from one stage of perfection to another? Can we conclude that, if Jesus had returned then, that they would have been taken to heaven?
You seem to be implying that when one is born again, one is ready for Christ's coming. That's not what SDA's believe. Am I misunderstanding you?
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/07/05 01:49 PM

Mike,

I think I've found an example for you. Twenty years after the crucifixion Peter's prejudice was still deeply ingrained (Acts 10). And even after God had given him a vision to correct him, he relapsed into the same sin (Gal. 2).
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/07/05 08:30 PM

Rosangela, I like how you compared defective traits of character with inherited and cultivated tendencies to evil. I made that connection myself just yesterday. It really does explain everything Sister White wrote about sinful nature and sinful character.

While it is true we inherit defective "traits" of character from our parents, it is not true, however, that we inherit their character. The difference, of course, is the word TRAITS. Yes, we inherit the same traits, tendencies, inclinations, propensities, and undercurrents to evil and wrongdoing that our parents inherited (plus whatever else they added to it).

We do not inherit their character, but we do inherit their defective traits of character. This distinction is very important. Depending on our unique tastes, talents, temperament, and personality, which we receive when we are conceived, we may or may not cultivate the same defective traits of character we inherited from our parents. Some traits may lay dormant for years before they surface, and others may never rear their ugly head. And, still others, which may have skipped several generations, may suddenly reappear like a long, lost relative.

However, whatever the case may be, it is very important to bear in mind that the defective traits of character we inherit from our parents do not constitute sinful character. Our eternal destiny is based on the character we ourselves develop, therefore, the sinful traits of character we inherit will not, and cannot, condemn us in judgment. Of all the defective traits of character we inherit, the only ones that will condemn us, if we refuse to be saved, are the ones we cultivate ourselves. All the uncultivated traits are nothing more than excess baggage. And, praise the Lord, God does not hold us accountable for the sinful traits of character we do not cultivate.

Because we are not replicas, or clones, of our parents or ancestors we will never discover each and every hereditary trait that makes up sinful nature. We will never know the true potential of fallen human nature, its deep and dark secrets. Thank you, Jesus! Again, though, the hidden hereditary defects that we may or may not discover later on in life do not represent sins of igorance, or unknown defective traits of character we possess ignorantly.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/07/05 08:54 PM

Tom, yes, the moment we are born again we are entitled to enter heaven. It is our title to heaven, not our fitness for it, that opens the gates of heaven to us. That's why the thief on the cross and the most mature Christian in the world enter heaven together. Both are without fault and blameless before the throne of God. Both were born again morally perfect, morally complete in Christ. It's just that the mature Christian had more time to develop the sinless traits of character God implanted in both of them the moment they were born again.

Rosangela, the fall of Peter, which elicited the rebuke of Paul, did not indicate Peter possessed an unknown defective trait of character, a trait that he was discovering for the first time. It was nothing more than a lapse of judgment on his part, a sin with which he was very much familiar. It was the same old fears that caused him to deny Jesus three times.

Galatians
2:11 But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
2:12 For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision.
2:13 And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation.
2:14 But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before [them] all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?

AA 197-199
When Peter, at a later date, visited Antioch, he won the confidence of many by his prudent conduct toward the Gentile converts. For a time he acted in accordance with the light given from heaven. He so far overcame his natural prejudice as to sit at table with the Gentile converts. But when certain Jews who were zealous for the ceremonial law, came from Jerusalem, Peter injudiciously changed his deportment toward the converts from paganism. A number of the Jews "dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation." This revelation of weakness on the part of those who had been respected and loved as leaders, left a most painful impression on the minds of the Gentile believers. The church was threatened with division. But Paul, who saw the subverting influence of the wrong done to the church through the double part acted by Peter, openly rebuked him for thus disguising his true sentiments. In the presence of the church, Paul inquired of Peter, "If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?" Galatians 2:13, 14. {AA 197.3}

Peter saw the error into which he had fallen, and immediately set about repairing the evil that had been wrought, so far as was in his power. God, who knows the end from the beginning, permitted Peter to reveal this weakness of character in order that the tried apostle might see that there was nothing in himself whereof he might boast. Even the best of men, if left to themselves, will err in judgment. God also saw that in time to come some would be so deluded as to claim for Peter and his pretended successors the exalted prerogatives that belong to God alone. And this record of the apostle's weakness was to remain as a proof of his fallibility and of the fact that he stood in no way above the level of the other apostles. {AA 198.1}

After all Peter's failures; after his fall and restoration, his long course of service, his intimate acquaintance with Christ, his knowledge of the Saviour's straightforward practice of right principles; after all the instruction he had received, all the gifts and knowledge and influence he had gained by preaching and teaching the word--is it not strange that he should dissemble and evade the principles of the gospel through fear of man, or in order to gain esteem? Is it not strange that he should waver in his adherence to right? May God give every man a realization of his helplessness, his inability to steer his own vessel straight and safe into the harbor. {AA 199.2}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/08/05 08:42 AM

Mike, here's what I wrote, "You seem to be implying that when one is born again, one is ready for Christ's coming. That's not what SDA's believe. Am I misunderstanding you?"

This is because you wrote, "Can we read about these faulty individuals and conclude that they are converted and born again, advancing from one stage of perfection to another? Can we conclude that, if Jesus had returned then, that they would have been taken to heaven?"

There's a difference between being ready for heaven on the event of one's death, and being ready for Christ's return. This is a foundational point of SDAism. Your statement seems to imply that one is ready for Christ's return if one is born again. At least, that's how I understood this part:

"Can we conclude that, if Jesus had returned then, that they would have been taken to heaven?"
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/08/05 01:37 PM

quote:
Rosangela, the fall of Peter, which elicited the rebuke of Paul, did not indicate Peter possessed an unknown defective trait of character, a trait that he was discovering for the first time.
No, Mike, my point is that the episode of the vision revealed to him that he was still cherishing prejudice in his heart - a defective trait of character cultivated by his upbringing.

Edited to correct spelling

[ May 08, 2005, 09:27 PM: Message edited by: Rosangela ]
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/08/05 10:54 PM

Peter is a good choice to consider. There's another defective trait of character, if one wants to use that term, referred to in Galatians, which Peter had had much earlier as well. That is he was not courageous enough to stand up to the young woman who challenged him when Christ was being taken away, and he was also not courageous enough to stand up to the Jews when he left the Gentiles to sit with them, for which he was rebuked by Paul.
Posted By: Ikan

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/09/05 03:16 AM

Come on Mountain man: Can you truly say that God has not revealed(through some experience, person, Bible/SOP study, in prayer or ultra-natural event) at least one unchrist-like flaw about you since your rebirth that surprised you because you didn't "know your heart" in minute detail???
No shameful discoveries, apologies to others, admissions of wrong, weaknesses in understanding love,or sorrow for rashness....none???
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/11/05 06:23 AM

The Holy Spirit is my guide, and yours to, and I know when my manners and behaviour are not in harmony with God. And, by the grace of God, I am quick to repent.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/11/05 06:27 AM

Rosangela, yes, Peter was confused regarding the Gentiles. But God revealed it to him, and then later on he blew it, and Paul rebuked him. But this Paul wrote that we should not keep company with unbelievers or half coverted believers. What did he mean? How does it compare with Peter's attitude toward the unclean before his vision?
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/10/05 08:32 PM

Mike,

I don't know exactly what passages you have in mind, but I believe you mean passages where Paul was referring to a specific kind of association (marriage, partnership, etc.) or to open sinners who weren't interested in changing their lifestyle. This has nothing to do with preaching the gospel to sinners or associating with converted sinners like Cornelius and the gentile brethren mentioned in Galatians.

"This vision conveyed to Peter both reproof and instruction. ... How carefully the Lord worked to overcome the prejudice against the Gentiles that had been so firmly fixed in Peter's mind by his Jewish training! By the vision of the sheet and its contents He sought to divest the apostle's mind of this prejudice and to teach the important truth that in heaven there is no respect of persons; that Jew and Gentile are alike precious in God's sight; that through Christ the heathen may be made partakers of the blessings and privileges of the gospel." {AA 135, 136}
Posted By: Ikan

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/11/05 05:51 AM

Excellent points, Roseangela.

Peter's prejudice was his defect in character AFTER he was already converted!

Peter had to be educated about his attitudes towards Gentiles, or else the Gospel work would suffer horribly.

Peter was a born again racist; God had to snap him outta that, pronto, before Peter's end of probation. Hence the need for a vision right before Cornelius' servant showed up.

But God didn't steal that racist attitude from Peter at rebirth, because God will never break any of His own Commandments (Thou shalt not steal). Peter had to see, confess and willingly give that defect to our High Priest.

That's been my objective for years here Mike!
Neither I nor Tom are suggesting a converted sinner can keep defects and remain in grace!

You said that you asked for forgiveness when Christ pointed out sins to you now. If you are only seeing sinful acts and not an imperfect character in need of a thorough reformation then perhaps it is YOU who are suggesting we keep sinning until He comes!

Is conversion a once-in-a-lifetime event, as all the Sunday-keepers bombard us with, or a process of many conversions?
Posted By: Ikan

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/11/05 05:57 AM

MM: you quoted;
"Among God's professed people are corrupt hearts; but they will be tested and proved. That God who reads the hearts of everyone, will bring to light hidden things of darkness where they are often least suspected, that stumbling blocks which have hindered the progress of truth may be removed, and God have a clean and holy people to declare His statutes and judgments." {1T 332.3}

That sounds just like Peter on the rooftop to me!

"...hidden things of darkness" in God's people are equal to unknown chartacter defects.

It I was unaware that I was a racist, and God brought that to light, wouldn't it be a shame if I cried "I'm born again and have been accepted by God as without defects. So I am not a racist! This is you, the devil or something else, not God convicting me!"
Posted By: Ikan

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/11/05 06:04 AM

The "unknown character defects" or "hidden things of darkness" are hidden from YOU, not God, and frankly rarely hidden from others.

What "hides" them?

Pride, lack of knowledge/experience, habits, fears, cultural norms....and heaps of other things.

Re-formation comes after re-creation.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/11/05 09:00 AM

Mike, I didn't see a response to this, although I've asked a couple of times. I'm interested in your thinking on this, thanks. (following is repost)
---------------------------------------------------

Mike, here's what I wrote, "You seem to be implying that when one is born again, one is ready for Christ's coming. That's not what SDA's believe. Am I misunderstanding you?"

This is because you wrote, "Can we read about these faulty individuals and conclude that they are converted and born again, advancing from one stage of perfection to another? Can we conclude that, if Jesus had returned then, that they would have been taken to heaven?"

There's a difference between being ready for heaven on the event of one's death, and being ready for Christ's return. This is a foundational point of SDAism. Your statement seems to imply that one is ready for Christ's return if one is born again. At least, that's how I understood this part:

"Can we conclude that, if Jesus had returned then, that they would have been taken to heaven?"
Posted By: Ikan

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/11/05 08:01 PM

Below are what I can find about MM's stand on Salvation etc.

I quote this to save other's time and energy and to see if MM still holds these ideas.

MM's answers are bolded:


1. In general, how do you think your view differs from a conventional Adventist view? What would you consider a conventional Adventist view to be?

The conventional SDA view suggests we are born again and then we spend the rest of our lives discovering and overcoming our unknown moral imperfections. My view suggests we crucify our moral imperfections before we are born again.

2. How do you define "morally perfect"?

Free from moral imperfections or defective traits of character.


3. How do you define "dead to sin"?

We do not and cannot commit a known sin while we are walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man.

4. How do you define "free from moral imperfections"?

Most of us are born with an inherent sense of what is morally right and wrong. Being free from moral imperfections means we do not violate our convictions and conscience.

5. What do you mean by "crucify" our sinful defects?

Confess and forsake them.

6. Why does imitating Jesus not include discovering unknown defective traits of character?

Because Jesus did not possess them to discover and overcome.

7. Could you expand on this statement: "To commit a known sin we must resurrect, as it were, the mind of the old man. But the free gift of repentance restores the relationship our sin severs."

We cannot commit a known sin in the mind of the new man, therefore we must resurrect the mind of our old man, which died and was buried when we were born again. When we commit a known sin we disconnect from Jesus, but repentance gives God the right to pardon and restore us to the mind of the new man. The mind of the old man dies and is buried again.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/15/05 12:00 AM

Yes, the above summary of the view I favor is correct. In addition to these insights, it is also helpful to define the differences between inherited and cultivated defects and imperfections. I do not believe we are held accountable for the sinful propensities we inherit. Instead, I believe we are held accountable for the ones we cultivate ourselves, the ones we convert into character. The uncultivated tendencies do not count as character defects.
Posted By: Avalee

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/15/05 01:16 AM

I believe we will be held accountable for our inherited sinful traits if we do not overcome them.

quote:
Amazing Grace
Page 254


Those who put their trust in Christ are not to be enslaved by any hereditary or cultivated habit or tendency. Instead of being held in bondage to the lower nature, they are to rule every appetite and passion. God has not left us to battle with evil in our own finite strength. Whatever may be our inherited or cultivated tendencies to wrong, we can overcome through the power that He is ready to impart.

The strongest temptation cannot excuse sin. However great the pressure brought to bear upon the soul, transgression is our own act. It is not in the power of earth or hell to compel anyone to do evil. Satan attacks us at our weak points, but we need not be overcome. However severe or unexpected the assault, God has provided help for us, and in His strength we may conquer.

How wonderful it is that we have the promise that none need despair over their inherited sinful ways. However when we are convicted of our inherited sinful ways we are to repent and confess. Praise God for His promises to forgive.

quote:
Our High Calling
Page 92


None need despair because of the inherited tendencies to evil, but when the Spirit of God convicts of sin, the wrongdoer must repent and confess and forsake the evil. Faithful sentinels are on guard to direct souls in right paths.

Either the evil angels or the angels of God are controlling the minds of men. Our minds are given to the control of God, or to the control of the powers of darkness; and it will be well for us to inquire where we are standing today--whether under the bloodstained banner of Prince Emmanuel, or under the black banner of the powers of darkness.

To be clothed in white raiment and in order not to be blotted out of the book of life this says we are not only to overcome our cultivated tendencies but our inherited tendencies. Isn't God a wonderful helper? I think it is so wonderful that God has given us all this help overcome ALL sin.

quote:
"Thou hast a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with Me in white: for they are worthy. He that overcometh his own inherited and cultivated tendencies), the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life; but I will confess his name before My Father, and before His angels" [Rev. 3:4, 5]. {19MR 384.1}
Posted By: Ikan

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/15/05 05:55 PM

Amen, Avalee! No spot or wrinkle can be over-looked, therefore He must do the looking for us, as we have a nasty habit of justifying ourselves.
It is a all too self-centered tendency not to expose our souls, even to God. Therein lies the danger, I feel, in any claim of purity from defects of any kind before being given a new heart at rebirth.
Posted By: John H.

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/16/05 08:03 AM

There's a great sermon by Dennis Priebe that touches on a lot of these things, called "What Is Sin?", at

http://www.advent-hope.org/?module=audio&func=display&aid=142

I especially like the way he differentiates between "evil" and "guilt," and between "temptation" and "sin."
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/16/05 11:00 PM

If we are guilty of sinning because we inherit the fallen propensities of our parents, then Jesus, who also inherited them, was guilty of sinning. Obviously, therefore, we are not guilty of sinning simply because we inherited sinful nature. We are not guilty until we act out the unholy thoughts and feelings generated and communicated by sinful nature. If we habitually do this we cultivate sinful character, and it is character that determines our eternal reward in judgment.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/17/05 01:26 AM

Mike,

When Ellen White says that Jesus had no propensities to sin, she obviously refers to both inherited and cultivated propensities.
Posted By: Avalee

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 05/21/05 03:38 PM

We will be held accountable for even our evil thoughts, not just acting them out.

Mat 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

This scripture here makes it very plain that we can committ sin also by our evil thoughts.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/09/05 11:31 PM

I haven't read the whole thread through, but about a week ago I was reading 1 John and I thought of you MM. I've been meaning to ask you since then, how does this passage fit into your understanding of conversion and perfection -


"If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us." 1 John 1:8.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/11/05 06:31 AM

I lost track of this thread. I’m glad it has been brought back up.

Rosangela, do you still believe, after all the studying we have been doing on other threads, that Jesus did not inherit the same sinful flesh nature we inherit? We both agree He did not inherit a carnal mind, and that He never cherished an unholy thought and never acted out, either in word or deed, the unholy thoughts and feelings produced by His fallen nature, and that, as such, He never cultivated or developed sinful traits of character. But, do you believe Jesus never inherited the same propensities to sin that born again believers (i.e., as opposed to unconverted people) must recognize and resist on a daily basis?

Avalee, yes, even our thoughts must, and may, praise the Lord, be under the controlling influence of Jesus, under the control of a sanctified mind and will. In fact, as you know, if our thoughts are right then our words and behaviour will be right. “If the thoughts are right, the words will be right.” (RC 163) “If the thoughts are wrong, the feelings will be wrong; and the thoughts and feelings combined make up the moral character.” (HP 164) “The Christian brings all his passions under control to God. Then if the thoughts are brought into captivity to Jesus Christ, there is a healthful growth in beauty and grace of character.” (TMK 147)

2 Corinthians
10:4 (For the weapons of our warfare [are] not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;)
10:5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;
10:6 And having in a readiness to revenge all disobedience, when your obedience is fulfilled.

2MCP
No one but yourself can control your thoughts. In the struggle to reach the highest standard, success or failure will depend much upon the character and the manner in which the thoughts are disciplined. If the thoughts are well girded, as God directs they shall be each day, they will be upon those subjects that will help us to greater devotion. If the thoughts are right, then as a result the words will be right; the actions will be of that character to bring gladness and comfort and rest to souls. {2MCP 655.3}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/10/05 07:19 PM

Mark, as you know, context is everything. So, here’s the context of the verse you quoted:

1 John
1:5 This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.
1:6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:
1:7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us [our] sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
2:1 My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for [the sins of] the whole world.
2:3 And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.

It is generally believed that John is here addressing the Gnostics of Alexandria who advocated a distinction between deeds done in the flesh and deeds done in the spirit. According to their philosophy, which is based on Greek mysticism, we are not guilty of the sins we commit in the flesh, that God only holds us accountable for the deeds done in the spirit. And, in their opinion, it requires flesh to commit a sin, and since the spirit is not flesh the spirit cannot sin. Thus, they divorce flesh and spirit, as if they exist independent of one another.

When John came along preaching rebirth and repentance these Gnostics had a hard time grasping the concept of sin and guilt. They were taught by the Greeks to believe they are sinless because they are not in the flesh but in the spirit, and, since the gods are worshipped in spirit, sin and guilt and repentance cannot apply to them. Thus, in response to John’s message they declared, "'We have not sinned… we have no sin.' Consequently, we have no reason to repent."

But John made it clear that all have sinned and that all must repent. However, he did not intend for us to take his words to mean the blood of Jesus cannot “cleanse us from all sin” or that it cannot “cleanse us from all unrighteousness” or that it is impossible for us to go and “sin not”. We come to Jesus sinners full of sin, but He does not leave us in that condition. Instead, He cleanses us and sets us free, and then He tells us to "go, and sin no more." At that precise moment we are without sin, we have no known sin, no hidden moral imperfections or uncrucified character defects. Plus, our past sins have been forgiven and forsaken and God considers us to be sinless.

Rebirth, however, does not rob us of our ability to sin. We are free to sin, but sinning is not inevitable. We can, by the grace of God, choose not to sin. Nevertheless, “if any man sin” repentance and restoration is available through the blood and mediation of Jesus Christ. Notice, however, that he did not say “when men sin”, as if sinning is inevitable and unavoidable. Also, the phrase, “if we keep his commandments”, implies, first of all, that commandment keeping is possible, and, secondly, that obedience is the fruit of faith, the evidence that we are saved.

Anyhow, that's what make sense to me. What does 1 John 1:8 mean to you?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/10/05 09:40 PM

quote:
At that precise moment we are without sin, we have no known sin, no hidden moral imperfections or uncrucified character defects.
This is mixing two different things together. One is known sin. The other is hidden moral imperfections. What does this mean? If "moral" implies "known" then your statement is meaningless, as it would be equivalent to saying we have no hidden known imperfections, or to put it another way, we have no unknown known imperfections. If "moral" means something contrary to God's law, then the statement is obviously false, since someone like Luther, for example, had the hidden moral imperfection of not keeping the Sabbath.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/10/05 11:01 PM

quote:
But, do you believe Jesus never inherited the same propensities to sin that born again believers (i.e., as opposed to unconverted people) must recognize and resist on a daily basis?
Mike,

As I've said in the other thread, there are human passions and evil/sinful passions.
Evil/sinful passions = evil/sinful propensities = pride, covetousness, malice, vanity, etc.
Yes, I still believe Jesus didn't possess these.
Human passions = physical/bodily appetites and passions, and passions not evil in themselves, like anger and ambition.
Jesus, as all human beings, possessed these.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/11/05 01:30 AM

quote:
Evil/sinful passions = evil/sinful propensities = pride, covetousness, malice, vanity, etc.
Yes, I still believe Jesus didn't possess these.
Human passions = physical/bodily appetites and passions, and passions not evil in themselves, like anger and ambition.
Jesus, as all human beings, possessed these.

I somehow missed this from the other thread. This is a useful list.

To possess the first list would imply actual participation in sin, wouldn't it? That's what it would sound like to me, at any rate. I would never say Christ possessed pride, as that sounds to me like saying He committed sin. OTOH Christ took part of the same flesh we have, and had whatever genetic inclinations that flesh has. So if Mary (or her ancestors) had a genetic inclination to pride, for example, then Christ would have had that same genetic inclination; however, Christ never yielded to that inclination. He always had the "mind of Christ", which was one of humility and submission to His Father's will.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/11/05 01:37 AM

To keep us focused, please, if we bring in thoughts on the human nature of Christ, they should relate in some way to this thread which is on the character of converted believers.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/11/05 01:44 AM

Before I say more, MM, about that text in 1 John I quoted, let me ask you what you think of this one as well:

quote:

Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ Jesus. Philipians 3:12

I’ll quote the context too for easy reference:

quote:
3:8 Yea doubtless, and I count all things [but] loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them [but] dung, that I may win Christ,
3:9 And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:
3:10 That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death;
3:11 If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.
3:12 Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ Jesus.
3:13 Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but [this] one thing [I do], forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before,
3:14 I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.
3:15 Let us therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded: and if in any thing ye be otherwise minded, God shall reveal even this unto you.
3:16 Nevertheless, whereto we have already attained, let us walk by the same rule, let us mind the same thing.
3:17 Brethren, be followers together of me, and mark them which walk so as ye have us for an ensample.
3:18 (For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, [that they are] the enemies of the cross of Christ:
3:19 Whose end [is] destruction, whose God [is their] belly, and [whose] glory [is] in their shame, who mind earthly things.)
3:20 For our conversation is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ:
3:21 Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.
Philipians

Posted By: Charity

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/11/05 01:53 AM

I noticed in the verse right after my main quote there is an interesting statement - "forgetting those things that are behind." Since our theology in one area tends to integrate with others, maybe you could also comment on your views of 'memory purging/correction' - if you think it has a bearing.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/11/05 02:47 PM

Here is one more passage, MM: The passage indicates that the members of the early church had a work to do in overcoming. This is the same work addressed seven times to the seven churches – ‘to him that overcometh. . .’ If the church was already perfect at conversion what would it need to overcome? Or, why would God chasten and scourge people who are perfect? Verse 12:6 below. Why would we be called lame if we are perfect? Verse 12:13.

Biblical perfection involves more than not consciously sinning by doing evil. The more crucial aspect of perfection is sacrificial service to God and mankind. There are many Christians who loose out on the best aspects of life by living morally but not sacrificially. Those who are on the right hand of Christ when the sheep are separated are the ones who loved their fellow man. They are perfect within the meaning of the final verses below – ‘perfect in every good work’. Can we say we are perfect at conversion when we may have hardly begun to minister unselfishly to others?

quote:

12:1 Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset [us], and let us run with patience the race that is set before us,
12:2 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of [our] faith, . . .
12:5 And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him:
12:6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. . . .
12:11 Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby.
12:12 Wherefore lift up the hands which hang down, and the feeble knees;
12:13 And make straight paths for your feet, lest that which is lame be turned out of the way; but let it rather be healed. . . .
13:20 Now the God of peace, that brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant,
13:21 Make you perfect in every good work to do his will, working in you that which is wellpleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ; to whom [be] glory for ever and ever. Amen. Hebrews

Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/11/05 08:23 PM

Tom, do you consider sins of ignorance moral imperfections? I don’t. A moral sin is when someone wilfully violates their conscience or convictions. Luther did not wilfully break the Sabbath, therefore, he wasn’t guilty of a moral imperfection, at least, not as it pertained to the Sabbath.

Rosangela, thank you for the clarification. And, as you know, I do not agree. I believe Jesus possessed the same lower nature, the same appetites and passions that born again believers possess. There is a huge difference, of course, between converted and unconverted people as it relates to the lower nature. The difference has to do with control. In born again believers, who actively and aggressively partake of the divine nature, the appetites and passions are under the control of a sanctified mind and will. In spite of the unholy clamorings produced by their lower nature, they develop sinless traits of character. Thus it was in Jesus’ case.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/11/05 09:08 PM

quote:
3:12 Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ Jesus.
3:13 Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but [this] one thing [I do], forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before,
3:14 I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.
3:15 Let us therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded: and if in any thing ye be otherwise minded, God shall reveal even this unto you.

The phrase “as many as be perfect” refers to morally perfect Christians. As you know, there is a difference between being morally perfect and moral maturity. Eternity isn’t long enough to exhaust our potential to become more perfect, more like Jesus. That’s what Paul meant when he wrote he hadn’t yet himself attained unto perfection. We will never reach a point where we can no longer become more perfect. Sanctification is a progressive work, and an advance from one stage of perfection to another.

This “work of progression will not cease, but will continue throughout eternity.” (HP 186) “‘The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.’ Through obedience comes sanctification of body, soul, and spirit. This sanctification is a progressive work, and an advance from one stage of perfection to another.” (ML 250)

“Sanctification is a state of holiness, without and within, being holy and without reserve the Lord’s, not in form, but in truth. Every impurity of thought, every lustful passion, separates the soul from God; for Christ can never put His robe of righteousness upon a sinner, to hide his deformity. . . . There must be a progressive work of triumph over evil, of sympathy with good, a reflection of the character of Jesus. We must walk in the light, which will increase and grow brighter unto the perfect day. This is real, substantial growth, which will finally attain to the full stature of men and women in Jesus Christ.” (OHC 214)

quote:
I noticed in the verse right after my main quote there is an interesting statement - "forgetting those things that are behind." Since our theology in one area tends to integrate with others, maybe you could also comment on your views of 'memory purging/correction' - if you think it has a bearing.

Personally, I don’t think this insight has to do with Jesus blotting out our record and memory of specific sins during the investigative judgment of the living. As I read it, in this context, it simply means we should not dwell on past mistakes.

quote:
If the church was already perfect at conversion what would it need to overcome?

As you know, corporate and individual perfection are two different aspects of the plan of salvation. It is not until the church is purified by the shaking and the latter rain that it is considered perfect and fit for translation.

quote:
There are many Christians who loose out on the best aspects of life by living morally but not sacrificially.

I believe both are necessary in order to have right to the name – Christian. “All such who claim to be Christians, have no right to assume this name; for a Christian is one who is Christlike.” (TE 68)

quote:
Can we say we are perfect at conversion when we may have hardly begun to minister unselfishly to others?

Perfection is progressive. Like a plant we are perfect at each stage of development. The part of the plant that has not yet bloomed, however, is not sin, but inherent perfection. "This sanctification is a progressive work, and an advance from one stage of perfection to another.” Not from one stage of imperfection to a lesser stage of imperfection.

We are not saved based on our fitness for heaven. Rather, we are saved based on our title to heaven. As such, the thief on the cross and the mighty apostle Paul are no different. Good works are good and required, but they do not save us. They merely reflect the fact we are saved. The longer we live in a saved state the more and mightier will be our corresponding good works.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/12/05 01:26 AM

quote:
At that precise moment we are without sin, we have no known sin, no hidden moral imperfections or uncrucified character defects.
If sins or ignorance are not hidden moral imperfections, then what is? Just what did you have in mind by the phrase "hidden moral imperfections?" What could this possibly mean besides unknown sin? You tell me, since you wrote the phrase.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/12/05 01:32 AM

quote:
Biblical perfection involves more than not consciously sinning by doing evil. The more crucial aspect of perfection is sacrificial service to God and mankind. There are many Christians who loose out on the best aspects of life by living morally but not sacrificially. Those who are on the right hand of Christ when the sheep are separated are the ones who loved their fellow man. They are perfect within the meaning of the final verses below – ‘perfect in every good work’. Can we say we are perfect at conversion when we may have hardly begun to minister unselfishly to others?
Very nice thoughts Mark. But is it possible to live morally without living sacrifically? I don't think so, because morality means being like God, and God is self-sacrificing.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/12/05 05:46 AM

quote:
If sins [of] ignorance are not hidden moral imperfections, then what is? Just what did you have in mind by the phrase "hidden moral imperfections?" What could this possibly mean besides unknown sin? You tell me, since you wrote the phrase.

Tom, at the beginning of this thread a bunch of quotes was posted. If you haven’t read them lately then you might want to consider doing so. The following two quotes are the last ones posted there:

4T 55, 56
Many who have never been placed in positions of trial appear to be excellent Christians, their lives seem faultless; but God sees that they have traits of character that must be revealed to them before they can perceive and correct them… In the providence of God we are placed in different positions to call into exercise qualities of mind calculated to develop character under a variety of circumstances. “Whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all." Professed Christians may live unexceptionable lives so far as outward appearance is concerned; but when a change of circumstances throws them into entirely different positions, strong traits of character are discovered, which would have remained hidden had their surroundings continued the same. {4T 55.2}

TDG 16
The nearer the Christian lives to God, the more he advances in divine illumination of mind. He has more distinct sense of his own littleness, discerns his defects of character, and sees his duty in the light in which God presents it. The more closely he draws to Jesus, the more he has a near and clear sense of his own defects which had before escaped his notice, and he sees the necessity of humbling himself under the mighty hand of God. If lifted up it will not be because he lifts and exalts himself, but because the Lord exalts him. Having his eye fixed upon the purity and perfection of Christ Jesus, and acknowledging and obeying God in all his ways, he is not blinded to his own failures and imperfections. When his deportment in the eyes of men is unblamable and irreprovable, God reads the intents and purposes of the heart. {TDG 16.2}

At first glance these quotes seem to say we are riddled with unconquered moral imperfections. But in truth that’s not what she’s saying. As you know, all of us inherit a host of unlovely traits of character from our parents. It’s important to note that we inherit only their traits, we do not inherit their character. We are not, as you know, guilty of these traits until we ourselves turn them into character. Character traits are converted into character by repeatedly acting them out in thought, word, or deed.

None of us live long enough to develop everyone of the defective traits of character we inherit from our parents. We only develop the ones that agree with our unique talents and personality and predispositions. The rest remain dormant and unknown, never to surface in our lifetime. But there comes a time when God wants to employ us in new situations where certain circumstances will bring to light one or more of these dormant defects.

To prepare for us service in new fields, God arranges things ahead of time that draws our attention to the very dormant defects that have the potential to cause us trouble and to bring reproach upon the cause if not held in subjection to a sanctified mind and will. These are some of those hidden traits of character we never knew about and, consequently, never cultivated.

It is not necessary to sin first before we become aware of them. That’s not how God works. He will not allow us to be tempted above His ability to empower us to recognize and resist it unto His honor and glory. Nor are we guilty of possessing an uncrucified cultivated trait of character. We didn’t know it existed because we never cultivated it. Neither are we guilty before God because dormant defects reside within us. We are not guilty of them unless or until we cultivate them.

This is what I mean when I say “hidden moral imperfections” are not sins of ignorance. Instead, they are unknown, dormant defective traits of character we inherited from our parents, but never cultivated or turned into character. Sins of ignorance, on the other hand, are things we know we are doing but have no idea we are sinning. It’s not considered a moral imperfection because we are not violating our conscience or convictions.
Posted By: rhammen

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/12/05 06:48 AM

Mountain Man,

Your name wouldn't happen to be Mike, would it?

Anyway, just back from Costa Rica, here. Let me know if it's you.

Dick
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/12/05 07:57 PM

Yep, that's me. See ya later.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/12/05 11:40 PM

Previously you wrote:

quote:
At that precise moment we are without sin, we have no known sin, no hidden moral imperfections or uncrucified character defects.
Now you wrote:

quote:
This is what I mean when I say “hidden moral imperfections” are not sins of ignorance. Instead, they are unknown, dormant defective traits of character we inherited from our parents, but never cultivated or turned into character. Sins of ignorance, on the other hand, are things we know we are doing but have no idea we are sinning. It’s not considered a moral imperfection because we are not violating our conscience or convictions.
I underlined the part where you defined the meaning of the phrase "hidden moral imperfections" -- which is "unknown, dormant defective traits of character we inherited from our parents, but never cultivated." Notice in your above quote you assert that when is born again, we have no hidden moral imperfections.

So this means, using your own definition, that at the moment a person is born again, said person no longer has unknown, dormant defective traits of character which are inherited from one's parents.

If when one is born again one no longer has these traits, where did they go? Does one's genetic code instantly change at conversion?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/13/05 03:15 AM

quote:
At that precise moment we are without sin, we have no known sin, no hidden moral imperfections or uncrucified character defects.
My bad. It is confusing. Let me reword this sentence.

When we are born again we are born without our former cultivated traits of character. They are crucified. Nothing survived that needs to be crucified later on, except, of course, if we were born again with sins of ignorance, which do not count as known moral imperfections.

We are also born again with all of our inherited, yet dormant, defective traits of character (aka, hidden moral imperfections, which now I realize is a bad choice of words), which may or may not rear their ugly head in the form of temptations. We are not guilty of them until or unless we cherish them in thought, or act them out in word or behaviour. Neither do they count against us as moral imperfections or cultivated defects of character.

There. Hopefully that eliminates the confusion my first sentence caused.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/13/05 07:08 AM

Here are you original questions:

quote:
What is the truth about "hidden" defective traits of character? Are they sins of ignorance? Does Jesus choose not to reveal them to us until we're better able to deal with them? If we die before they are revealed will Jesus remove them when He returns?
According your definition, hidden defective traits of character are inherited traits which are lying dormant. So they are not sins of ignorance. Jesus does reveal them to us when we're better able to deal with them. To the last question, yes(?)

I'm tring to answer your questions from your perspective. Was I correct? The one I'm most uncertain about is the last one.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/13/05 08:50 PM

It might be helpful to place inherited and cultivated defective traits of character side by side and compare them together, and then study them separately. We receive from our parents, as a legacy, defective traits of character. Many of them date back three or four generations, if not more. These inherited traits do not, obviously, constitute character. Character is not inherited. Rather, character is the stuff of choices and consequences.

Character is what we ourselves develop and cultivate as we act out the traits, which we inherited from our parents, in thought, word or deed. Through repetition specific traits of character are transformed into corresponding character traits. The traits of character we inherit and the character traits we cultivate are mirror images of one another.

Sinful character is the manifestation or personification of sinful flesh. Paul wrote, “Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these …”, and then he goes on to list 17 nasty character defects. He ended his list by saying, “… and such like.” (Gal 5:19-22) Again, cultivated character traits and inherited traits of character are essentially twins.

However, as mentioned earlier, we will never cultivate all of the traits of character we inherited from our parents. Many traits will lie dormant or hidden until the day we die and, when Jesus returns, we will be resurrected without them, that is, if we are a part of the first resurrection. Our uncultivated, dormant, hidden defective traits of character do not count against us in judgment.

There is no such thing as an unknown cultivated character trait. Character is the result of doing the same thing over and over again, and, as such, we are not ignorant of it. All of us are aware of our basic strengthens and weaknesses. Latent within every child of Adam is an inborn, inherent, instinctive knowledge of what is morally right and wrong, except, of course, for biblical insights like, for example, the Sabbath and diet reform, which are morals issues that must be intellectually learned later on in life.

Again, innate within all of us is a conscious knowledge of what is right and wrong. For instance, no one has to be told that lying, stealing, cheating or murder is wrong. Since we, the human race, were originally created in the image and likeness of God, we just know naturally that these types of things are morally unacceptable. Paul made this point clear when he wrote:

“For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: which show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another.” (Rom 2:13-15)

In the case of born-again believers, however, our knowledge of our moral imperfections is transformed by the cross. During the process of conversion, before we experience the miracle of rebirth, before our “old man” (a.k.a., our cultivated defective character traits) is crucified and buried, the Holy Spirit gingerly and gradually reveals to us, little by little, in light of the cross, our individual moral imperfections.

As we behold our sinful character traits in light of the cross we are motivated to confess them. When we confess our final defect, when we confess the last one revealed to us, our “old man” dies and is buried. At that precise moment we experience a transformation that is nothing less than miraculous. God implants within us the sinless seed or mind of the new man. It comes complete with all the righteous fruit and character attributes of God. Not one is missing.

We begin at rebirth where Jesus began at birth, that is, we begin with a clean slate. Sister White describes it this way: “The new birth consists in having new motives, new tastes, new tendencies. Those who are begotten unto a new life by the Holy Spirit have become partakers of the divine nature, and in all their habits and practices, they will give evidence of their relationship to Christ.” (LHU 123) “When we live by faith on the Son of God, the fruits of the Spirit will be seen in our lives; not one will be missing.” (DA 676)

If, before we are born-again, we refuse to confess a character trait revealed to us by the Holy Spirit, if we choose to retain it, even if it is only one trait, then we will not and cannot experience the miracle of rebirth. “If one sin is cherished in the soul, or one wrong practice retained in the life, the whole being is contaminated.” (DA 313) No one is truly born again if, during the process of conversion, they refuse to confess a cherished sin.

Again, there is no such thing as an unknown or hidden cultivated moral imperfection (a.k.a., developed defective character trait). Even before we are converted and born again we are aware of what is morally right and wrong with our character. And when we are converted and receive the divinely implanted mind of the new man we are endowed with the “eye salve” of spiritual discernment, which empowers us to see with crystal clarity, as never before, our crucified habits of sin. Nothing can escape our notice.

We are not left to our own unaided human powers and abilities to detect and discard our moral imperfections. Once confessed and crucified we are empowered by God Himself to prevent ourselves from ever resurrecting them again, which requires a continual, constant connection to Christ. “No renewed heart can be kept in a condition of sweetness without the daily application of the salt of the Word. Divine grace must be received daily, or no man will stay converted.” (OHC 215)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/13/05 09:02 PM

quote:
According your definition, hidden defective traits of character are inherited traits which are lying dormant. So they are not sins of ignorance. Jesus does reveal them to us when we're better able to deal with them. To the last question, yes(?)

I'm tring to answer your questions from your perspective. Was I correct? The one I'm most uncertain about is the last one.

"Jesus does reveal them to us when we're better able to deal with them." Only if Jesus determines that it is necessary. Otherwise, they will remain dormant and hidden from us.

"To the last question, yes(?)" The only ones that Jesus will remove when He returns are the dormant defects. He will not remove the cultivated ones when He returns. "When Christ shall come, He will not change the character of any individual." (4T 429) "The change from earth to heaven will not change men's characters ..." (6BC 1072)

EDIT: I posted an explanation at the bottom of page 2, please read it, too. Thanx.

[ August 13, 2005, 06:15 PM: Message edited by: Mountain Man ]
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/14/05 08:00 AM

The way you put things is odd, IMO, but I agree with much of what you say. The way I would put it is that we have unconscious sin, which does not cause us to be lost, but nevertheless dishonors God. If all we are concerned about is getting to heaven, then we don't need to worry about them. OTOH if we are concerned about His honor and glory, we will pray that God will reveal these unconsious sins to us.

Also I believe that we do grow in Christ, in ways which involve repentance.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/14/05 08:32 AM

quote:
The way I would put it is that we have unconscious sin, which does not cause us to be lost, but nevertheless dishonors God.
Tom, I haven't heard the expression "unconscious sins" before. In what way is it different than sins of ignorance? Can you name an example or some quotes?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/14/05 10:14 AM

Sister White says the books of heaven record the sins we would have committed had we had the opportunity. This would be unconscious sin. If you would refer this to as a sin of ignorance, then I don't see a difference between the two terms.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/15/05 06:12 AM

quote:
The way I would put it is that we have unconscious sin, which does not cause us to be lost, but nevertheless dishonors God.
Tom, this is very interesting to me. I have more questions now. Where did Sister White say heaven records the sins we would have committed if the opportunity had presented itself? Can you name examples? How do sins we neglected to do, or were unable to do, dishonor God? Does the atoning blood of Jesus cover them in the same way it covers sins of ignorance? Jesus also possessed the potential to sin, did heaven impute the sins He was capable of committing but never did? If not, how is His case different than that of born-again believers?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/14/05 09:55 PM

MM: Tom, this is very interesting to me. I have more questions now. Where did Sister White say heaven records the sins we would have committed if the opportunity had presented itself?

Tom: I thought you might be interested in the quote, so I went hunting for it in case you asked. Here it is:

quote:
God's law reaches the feelings and motives, as well as the outward acts. It reveals the secrets of the heart, flashing light upon things before buried in darkness. God knows every thought, every purpose, every plan, every motive. The books of heaven record the sins that would have been committed had there been opportunity. God will bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing. By His law He measures the character of every man. As the artist transfers to the canvas the features of the face, so the features of each individual character are transferred to the books of heaven. God has a perfect photograph of every man's character, and this photograph He compares with His law. He reveals to man the defects that mar his life, and calls upon him to repent and turn from sin (ST July 31, 1901). {5BC 1085.4}
MM: Can you name examples?

Tom: At the 1888 General Conference session EGW says those present who rejected the message God was giving through His messengers would have treated Christ as the Jews did had He been present among them. That's an example.

MM: How do sins we neglected to do, or were unable to do, dishonor God?

Tom: I don't know the best way of expressing the idea. Maybe the phrase "dishonor God" isn't the best way of putting it. We can unwittingly misrepresent God's character, which in a sense dishonrs Him (although certainly not in the same way that knowingly sinning does). Those who present God as tortuing the wicked for all eternity in hell, or that believe that God predestines people to be lost would fall into this category. They second Satan's lies of God. Even though they may be saved, they are still dishonoring God by misrepresenting His character.

MM: Does the atoning blood of Jesus cover them in the same way it covers sins of ignorance?

Tom: I wrote " The way I would put it is that we have unconscious sin, which does not cause us to be lost, but nevertheless dishonors God." which contains the answer to your question in it.

MM: Jesus also possessed the potential to sin, did heaven impute the sins He was capable of committing but never did?

Tom: No, because there was no sin Christ would have committed had He had the opportunity.

MM: If not, how is His case different than that of born-again believers?

Tom: Christ had no unconscious sin.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/15/05 12:56 AM

Tom, thank you for finding that quote. I can see what you mean about it being difficult to give an example of it. It sounds more like known sins we would have committed had there been the right opportunity.

Your examples of "unconscious sin" sounds more like sins of ignorance to me. Ignorantly advocating a doctrine that unwittingly misrepresents the truth or the character of God certainly isn't a known sin.

quote:
The way I would put it is that we have unconscious sin, which does not cause us to be lost, but nevertheless dishonors God.
I'm scratching my head here trying to think of an example of an "unconscious sin" but I'm not coming up with anything. It's not an intentional sin, and it's not an unintentional sin, it's not a sin of ignorance, and it's not an unpardonable sin.

The only other types of sin I can think of are sins of omission [i.e., good deeds purposely left undone] and faithless sins [i.e., good deeds done for the wrong reasons]. But both of these types of sins are considered known sins, and would, therefore, not qualify as "unconscious sins".
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/15/05 01:41 AM

quote:
While the investigative judgment is going forward in heaven, while the sins of penitent believers are being removed from the sanctuary, there is to be a special work of purification, of putting away of sin, among God's people upon earth.(GC 425)
I agree with comments that you have made that sin does not need to be committed in order to be put away. You have spoken of inherited inclinations which lie dormant, that God can make people aware of, and put away. This would be an example of the principle involved, even though this specific example wouldn't involve sin.

Given that the books of heaven record the sins we would have committed had we had the opportunity, it seems to me that this must include unknown sin as well as known sin. Surely we are not aware of all the sins we would commit if given the opportunity, and not being aware of them, they must be unknown.

The above paragraph speaks of a special work being done among God's people while the sanctuary is being cleansed of putting away sin. This indicates that the Spirit of God is searching deeper, and revealing things which were not previously known.

The sin of sins is our involvement in the crucifixion of Christ, and this is one in particular of which we have the dullest comprehension of. I'm sure that the preparation of character of the 144,000 will involve a much deeper perception of the cross of Christ and our involvement in the sin of crucifying Christ.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/15/05 02:53 AM

quote:
I agree with comments that you have made that sin does not need to be committed in order to be put away.

We are in a minority, aren’t we? Do you know of others who believe it, too?

quote:
Given that the books of heaven record the sins we would have committed had we had the opportunity, it seems to me that this must include unknown sin as well as known sin.

In this case, what is an “unknown sin”? Are you referring to sins we haven’t committed in the past yet, but might or could in the future? For example, crack babies as adults may or may not use crack, but they might or could in the future. Are these the kinds of sins that are recorded in heaven?

I'm more inclined, however, to think they involve certain cherished sins that we are only lacking opportunities to act out. For example, if so and so wasn't watching me I would do such and such. Pride of reputation is all that motivates us to restrain ourselves, which is in and of itself a sin. We are as guilty as if we had actually acted upon it. Perhaps what Jesus said about lusting after someone or something but being unable to act it out are the types of sins that are recorded in heaven?

quote:
I'm sure that the preparation of character of the 144,000 will involve a much deeper perception of the cross of Christ and our involvement in the sin of crucifying Christ.

No doubt about it, and may God help us.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/15/05 03:48 AM

Old Tom:I agree with comments that you have made that sin does not need to be committed in order to be put away.

MM: We are in a minority, aren’t we? Do you know of others who believe it, too?

Tom: Yes, I know many who believe this. It was preached by Jones and Waggoner, so anyone familiar with their writings, who agrees with their teachings, is likely to believe this.

Old Tom: Given that the books of heaven record the sins we would have committed had we had the opportunity, it seems to me that this must include unknown sin as well as known sin.

MM: In this case, what is an “unknown sin”?

Tom: When Wesley passed a drunk in the gutter, so goes a story, he replied, "There but for the grace of God go I." The sin of another human being, except for the grace of God, is our sin.

If we don't commit adultery because we just don't happen to be in the position to do so, but we would if we were, that would be an example. If we would break the Sabbath to make some extra money, but don't because we don't have the opportunity, that would be another.

The best example, however, I believe is the crucifixion of Christ. This is the sin of sins which we would have comitted had we had the opportunity.

MM: Are you referring to sins we haven’t committed in the past yet, but might or could in the future?

Tom: Well I didn't make the statement, Ellen White did. So were' really asking what she was referring to. I have given you my opinion just above.

MM: For example, crack babies as adults may or may not use crack, but they might or could in the future. Are these the kinds of sins that are recorded in heaven?

Tom: No, I don't think so.

MM: I'm more inclined, however, to think they involve certain cherished sins that we are only lacking opportunities to act out.

Tom: I think it involves more than this, specifically a realization of our role in the death of Christ.

MM: For example, if so and so wasn't watching me I would do such and such.

Tom: I think this is an excellent example.

MM: Pride of reputation is all that motivates us to restrain ourselves, which is in and of itself a sin. We are as guilty as if we had actually acted upon it. Perhaps what Jesus said about lusting after someone or something but being unable to act it out are the types of sins that are recorded in heaven?

Tom: Yes, this agrees with an example I gave.

Old Tom: I'm sure that the preparation of character of the 144,000 will involve a much deeper perception of the cross of Christ and our involvement in the sin of crucifying Christ.

MM: No doubt about it, and may God help us.

Tom: Hey, we agree on this!
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/15/05 06:55 AM

quote:
I think this is an excellent example.

And here's another point on which we agree. I also agree with your comments regarding the cross of Christ. I guess we also agree on dormant defects, too.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/15/05 04:19 PM

"God knows every thought, every purpose, every plan, every motive. The books of heaven record the sins that would have been committed had there been opportunity."

Guys, the text is self-explanatory. Ellen White is just referring to thoughts, purposes, plans and motives which couldn't have been executed for lack of opportunity. But of course the very thoughts, purposes, plans and motives are considered as if they were the act itself.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/15/05 07:14 PM

What is the "just" qualifying? That is, she is referring to "just" what follows as opposed to what?
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/16/05 02:43 PM

Tom,

As opposed to your theory of “unconscious sins”.
I understood what you proposed as being expressed by the following example: there are two people interested in renting the house next to yours. One is an 81-year-old granny, the other is a beautiful 25-year-old girl. But the granny arrives ten minutes earlier and rents the house. If the girl had rented the house, you would have committed adultery with her, and this is registered in the books of heaven.
Ellen White is speaking about the following example: the 25-year-old girl rents the house, but she has a handsome boyfriend and would never be interested in you. However, every time you see her, you have impure thoughts. This is registered in the books of heaven.
What is registered in the books of heaven is concrete sins, those you have committed (even in thought or intention), not “potential” sins that no one can prove you would ever commit one day.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/17/05 06:31 AM

quote:
What is registered in the books of heaven is concrete sins, those you have committed (even in thought or intention), not “potential” sins that no one can prove you would ever commit one day.
EGW's quote says "The books of heaven record the sins that would have been committed had there been opportunity." This is referring to sins that *aren't* committed, not concrete sins. They are sins that aren't committed because there was no opportunity. They "would have been" committed, meaning they weren't committed.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/16/05 08:26 PM

They weren´t committed because they exist only in "thought", "purpose", "plan", or "motive", that is, they didn´t become acts - but it is the same as if the act had been committed.
Posted By: Will

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/16/05 09:53 PM

Jesus laid the principle out that if you think it in your heart then you are guilty of having done it. If we confess our sins He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
Yes there is a hope!
God Bless,
Will
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/17/05 12:41 AM

quote:
They weren´t committed because they exist only in "thought", "purpose", "plan", or "motive", that is, they didn´t become acts - but it is the same as if the act had been committed.
I think what you're trying to say is that, to use your example, one would be guilty of committing adultery because one would have committed adultery if the other party had been willing. And your point is that this is something which I, in the example, would have been aware of. So the quote doesn't deal with sins of which we aren't aware.

However, the sin of sins for which we are all guilty is the crucifixion of Christ. And this is a sin of which we have the dimmest sense of responsibility. As we become aware of our resonsibilitity, or repentance deepens, if we do not rebel against the Holy Spirit.

The Spirit of Prophesy, in dealing with the 1888 GC in Minneapolis states that the Holy Spirit was insulted; that if Christ had been physically present there He would be been treated the way the Jews treated Him (i.e. crucified) and that this sin would remain on the books of heaven until it is repented of.

These are a couple of examples of sin of which we are unaware.

The work of the Holy Spirit involves convicting us of sin. Until He does this, we are often unaware that we have committed sin. This is another example of sins of which we are unaware. That is, we may have been treating someone in an unChristlike way, without being aware of what we were doing. The Holy Spirit makes us aware of that, and invites us to repent.

Did someone mention this quote? I think Mark did:

quote:
In seasons of temptations we seem to lose sight of the fact that God tests us that our faith may be tried, and be found unto praise and honor and glory at the appearing of Jesus. The Lord places us in different positions to develop us. If we have defects of character of which we are not aware, he gives us discipline that will bring those defects to our knowledge, that we may overcome them. It is his providence that brings us into varying circumstances. In each new position, we meet a different class of temptations. How many times, when we are placed in some trying situation, we think, "This is a wonderful mistake. How I wish I had stayed where I was before." But why is it that you are not satisfied?--It is because your circumstances have served to bring new defects in your character to your notice; but nothing is revealed but that which was in you. What should you do when you are tried by the providences of the Lord? --You should rise to the emergency of the case, and overcome your defects of character. {RH, August 6, 1889 par. 3}
This seems to be dealing with the same principle, that we commit sins of which we are not aware.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/17/05 05:14 PM

Tom,

I’m getting confused about what you mean. Although Peter was not aware of it, he was harboring prejudice against the gentiles, and the Holy Spirit convicted him of his sin. He was not aware of it, but he had been committing that sin. This sin is an unconscious sin, but it cannot be classified as a sin “that would have been committed had there been opportunity”.

What you seem to be referring to is sinful traits of character yet unmanifested. For instance, until I faced suffering, I was not aware I was prone to self-pity.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/17/05 05:23 PM

Let's take the specific case of the crucifixion of Christ. Any of us, apart from the grace of God, would have killed Him. We are all alike guilty of that sin.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/18/05 03:27 PM

No, you have to distinguish things. We are not guilty of the physical crucifixion of Christ. We are responsible for His mental suffering, and we are aware of the sins which caused this mental suffering (at least of most of them).
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/18/05 05:38 PM

I disagree. We are guilty of the murder of Christ. The important issue is not the physical death of Christ, but the murderous intent of the heart. We all have this by nature, being enemies of God in our mind. If we are not aware of our murderous intent, how can God heal us of this sin?

Any one of us, apart from the grace of God, would have murdered the Son of God. There's more to the cross than simply our sins causing mental suffering to Christ. The cross reveals to us who we really are (in contrast to who God is).
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/19/05 06:47 AM

Tom, we are guilty of killing Christ because our sins killed Him. But it is unfounded to say that if we were there we would have killed Him. His disciples did not kill Him. His mother did not kill Him. Symon the Cyrenian pitied Him. The women of Jerusalem pitied Him. They were not believers in Him and many of them would perish in the destruction of Jerusalem, but they pitied Him.

"Not a few women are in the crowd that follow the Uncondemned to His cruel death. Their attention is fixed upon Jesus. Some of them have seen Him before. Some have carried to Him their sick and suffering ones. Some have themselves been healed. The story of the scenes that have taken place is related. They wonder at the hatred of the crowd toward Him for whom their own hearts are melting and ready to break. And notwithstanding the action of the maddened throng, and the angry words of the priests and rulers, these women give expression to their sympathy. As Jesus falls fainting beneath the cross, they break forth into mournful wailing.
This was the only thing that attracted Christ's attention. Although full of suffering, while bearing the sins of the world, He was not indifferent to the expression of grief. He looked upon these women with tender compassion. They were not believers in Him; He knew that they were not lamenting Him as one sent from God, but were moved by feelings of human pity. He did not despise their sympathy, but it awakened in His heart a deeper sympathy for them. 'Daughters of Jerusalem,' He said, 'weep not for Me, but weep for yourselves, and for your children.' From the scene before Him, Christ looked forward to the time of Jerusalem's destruction. In that terrible scene, many of those who were now weeping for Him were to perish with their children" (DA 742, 743).
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/19/05 06:53 AM

quote:
We all have this by nature, being enemies of God in our mind.
It's interesting that you say that. If all have this by nature is this also true of Jesus?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/18/05 11:43 PM

No, He had the mind of Christ. The flesh He took tempted Him, but He never yielded to temptation, so His mind was ever the mind of Christ. We have yielded to temptation, so our minds have become infected by sin and are in need of healing. We all see God as He is not. Christ saw God as He is. As we receive His vision of God, our minds are healed.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/19/05 12:07 AM

I should probably add to my previous comment that what we are by nature is not what Christ was by nature, although He took our nature. This may sound confusing, but it's not when we realize that Christ was not a man by nature; He was God. By nature, Christ was sinless and divine. We are not. Even though our flesh was identical to Christ's flesh, our minds are different than Christ's mind.
Posted By: Will

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/19/05 01:53 PM

We are told in the Bible to have the mind of Christ.
quote:

Philippians 2:4-6
4 Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others.
5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:

God Bless,
Will
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/19/05 05:38 PM

Right! The mind of Christ to look not to one's own interests, but to the interests of others. This is easier said than done, isn't it!
Posted By: Charity

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/27/05 12:21 AM

I was reading a chapter today in Ty Gibson's book, 'An Endless Falling in Love'. In chapter 17 Gibson gives his view of the Investigative Judgment. According to him, the revelation of unchristlike facets of our character after conversion is THE purpose of the investigative judgment which he equates with the process of sanctification. He backs this up well with several quotes from scripture. Better still, he gives a good explanation of how to co-operate with God in the process.

I've noted this in other threads, but I'll say it again - the book is well worth reading. I'm reading it through a second time in as many months.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/27/05 12:26 AM

It's a great book. How do you like the parable? (with the king who falls in love with the lady from the village).
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/07/05 06:11 AM

Dormant defects are not sins of ignorance. We feel absolutely no shame or quilt when we commit a sin of ignorance. But not so with defective traits of character. Whether active or dormant when a defective trait of character surfaces we feel shame and guilt. Why? Because we naturally and instinctively know we are guilty of wrongdoing. It is a known sin.

All of us possess dormant defective traits of character, that is, inherited traits we haven't discovered or cultivated yet. As a boy Jesus Himself possessed them. Of course He became aware of them later on. Dormant defects are nothing more than inherited traits of character we have not, for one reason or another, developed or cultivated. We will never, in this lifetime, become aware of all of them.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/07/05 05:56 PM

Does God hold us accountable and guilty for possessing dormant defective traits of character?

What is the difference between dormant traits and cultivated traits?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/08/05 01:49 AM

Mike:Does God hold us accountable and guilty for possessing dormant defective traits of character?

Tom:Using your definition, would even Christ have had dormant defective traits of character? If I understood your definition correctly (which I may not have) dormant defective traits of character refer to genetic predispositions we have to certain sins which have been passed to us from our ancestors. Even Christ had these. Yet, of course, He never developed any of these.

Assuming I am correctly understanding your definition, the answer would be no, we are not held accountable for these things.

However, if one were to understand dorment defective traits of characters as defective traits of character which we currently possess but are ignorant of, that's a different matter. We are responsible for light we either openly reject or purposely avoid pursuing. The real issue isn't being held accountable for these things, but dishonoring our heavenly Father by misrepresenting His character to others.

Mike:What is the difference between dormant traits and cultivated traits?

Tom:Genetic/potential vs. developed/actual traits.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/08/05 05:30 PM

Tom, as I see it, a dormant defective trait of character is an inherited trait we haven’t cultivated yet, and may never cultivate. It could be drug addictions, or it could be things we will never encounter, for example, temptations pertaining to royalty or political leaders.

I do not believe, however, that dormant defects include inherited traits of character we have cultivated accidentally or unwittingly or ignorantly. It is impossible to cultivate a character trait without realizing it. The very nature of character development itself is what makes it impossible.

Sinful character is the result of wilfully, knowingly violating our conscience and convictions by habitually thinking, speaking or behaving in a way we know is wrong. As such, it is impossible to possess an unknown sinful trait of character, or a character trait we do not know is sinful.

Do you see what I mean?
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/08/05 07:41 PM

Look, guys, this is completely unrealistic. How does someone discover that he has a tendency for lasciviousness, for instance, without having a lascivious thought?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/08/05 08:56 PM

No Mike, I don't see what you mean. You seem to have made a definition which is circular, and hence meaningless. You assert it's impossible for us to have an unknown sinful trait of character because all sinful traits of character are known. If this is the case, the very phrase "unknown sinfual trait of character" is completely unhelpful, since you don't believe there is such a thing. You are simply asserting you don't believe it's possible for a born -again person to have sinful traits of character.

As far as I can tell, according to your definition, Christ had dorment defective traits of character, since these are nothing more than genetic predispositions to sin which need not be developed. Am I correct that this is your view? Obviously if Christ could have defective dorment traits of character, such traits cannot be sinful.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/08/05 08:57 PM

quote:
Look, guys, this is completely unrealistic.
What is "this"? One can discover genetic dispositions without participating in sin. To be tempted is not to sin.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/05 04:25 AM

quote:
How does someone discover that he has a tendency for lasciviousness, for instance, without having a lascivious thought?

Rosangela, I agree with Tom – “One can discover genetic dispositions without participating in sin.” It’s not necessary to sin first in order to discover new or dormant defects. Jesus didn’t have to sin first to be tempted.

All temptations begin as unholy thoughts and feelings. Having a new lascivious thought or feeling, therefore, isn’t a sin. Otherwise, it wouldn’t be possible to be tempted without being guilty of sinning first.

The question is – Can we develop sinful character without realizing it?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/05 04:45 AM

Tom, I do not appreciate you referring to my view of sinful character as “meaningless”.

Besides, you misunderstood what I posted. Do you understand the difference between inherited traits of character and cultivated traits of character? If so, then you should have no problem with my view of dormant defective traits of character.

And, if you understand how character is developed you shouldn’t have any problem understanding why there can be no such thing as an unknown cultivated sinful trait of character. It's impossible to cultivate a sinful trait of character without realizing it. Do you know why?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/05 07:32 AM

Mike:Tom, I do not appreciate you referring to my view of sinful character as “meaningless”.

Tom:Mike, please reread what I wrote. I said your statement that one cannot have unknown sinful traits of character is meaningless according to your definition, because you do not believe a sinful trait of character can be unknown. You see the differenct between my saying your statement is meaningless and your view is meaningless, correct?

Mike:Besides, you misunderstood what I posted. Do you understand the difference between inherited traits of character and cultivated traits of character? If so, then you should have no problem with my view of dormant defective traits of character.

Tom:What I was commenting on what that for you to say that one cannot have unknown sinful traits of character is meaningless, according to your ideas, because you do not believe that a sinful trait of character can be unknown. I've correctly understood you, haven't I? I have no idea why you think I have misunderstood your post. I think I understand your idea perfectly, at least on this point. If you think I have misunderstood you, please quote some statement of mine with which you disagree and point out where I have misunderstood you.

Mike:And, if you understand how character is developed you shouldn’t have any problem understanding why there can be no such thing as an unknown cultivated sinful trait of character.

Tom:For you to say something like, "I do not believe there is such a thing as an unknown sinful trait of character" is fine and meaninful, but for you to say, "Born again believers do not have unknown sinful traits of character" is not meaningful, or useful might be a better word, because you don't believe there is such a thing. You would communicate your idea more clearly by simply stating that you do not believe there is such a thing as an unknown sinful trait of character.

Mike:It's impossible to cultivate a sinful trait of character without realizing it. Do you know why?

Tom:I know why you think this. You think this because you think all sinful traits of character are known.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/05 02:56 PM

quote:
All temptations begin as unholy thoughts and feelings. Having a new lascivious thought or feeling, therefore, isn’t a sin. Otherwise, it wouldn’t be possible to be tempted without being guilty of sinning first.
Unholy suggestions is not the same as unholy thoughts. You have an unholy thought when the suggestion pleases you. If you have an unholy thought you have already yielded to a certain degree to the temptation and sinned. But you can only discover that you have a sinful trait of character when you verify that the unholy suggestion pleases you.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/05 05:32 PM

quote:
You see the differenct between my saying your statement is meaningless and your view is meaningless, correct?

No, Tom, I don’t. So, please refrain from using derogatory words like “meaningless” when referring to my posts. Thank you. Even if you think you understand what I mean there is no good that can come from you critiquing my way of expressing myself. You are not my English or grammar teacher, right? Therefore, keep all such comments to yourself. Okay?

Are you saying we agree on the differences between inherited and cultivated traits of character?

Are you saying we agree on the state and status of dormant defective traits of character?

Do you agree that character is developed by habitually thinking, feeling, speaking, and behaving in ways contrary to our conscience and convictions?

Or, do you believe it is possible, as born again believers, to develop certain sinful character traits without realizing they are morally wrong? If so, please name a few (with inspired quotes, please).

Which one of the following fruits of the flesh do you believe we can develop and/or possess, as Spirit-led born again believers, endowed with spiritual eye salve and discernment, without realizing it?

Galatians
5:16 [This] I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.
5:17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.
5:18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are [these]; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
5:20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
5:21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told [you] in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/05 05:49 PM

Rosangela, I agree. A sinful suggestion becomes a sinful thought when we own it or cherish it. And even though sinful suggestions enter our mind it doesn't mean we are guilty of cherishing sinful thoughts, right?

Jesus was tempted in all points, that is, sinful suggstions entered His mind in the same way they enter the minds of born again believers. Do you agree that all such sinful suggestions revealed His potential, as a human being, to sin? If so, do you also agree He never consented to own or cherish them, therefore, He was sinless and guiltless of them?

And, if you can agree to these things, can you also agree that the same things apply to Spirit-led, born again believers? In other words, do you believe that when sinful suggestions enter their mind that it reveals their potential to sin? and that just because they enter their minds they are not, if they resist them like Jesus did, guilty of them?

quote:
But you can only discover that you have a sinful trait of character when you verify that the unholy suggestion pleases you.
Are we guilty of sinning if the sinful suggestion is pleasing (like overindulging cake and ice cream) so long as we resist it, in spite of how we think and feel about it?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/05 07:40 PM

Old Tom:You see the differenct between my saying your statement is meaningless and your view is meaningless, correct?

Mike:No, Tom, I don’t.

Tom:Ok, I'll try to clarify this then. I didn't write, "Your view is meaningless" or "Your post is meaningless". I wrote that your sentence did not convey meaningful information. You wrote that no born again believe has unknown sinful traits of character. But you don't believe there is such a thing as an unknown sinful trait of character, so the sentence you wrote was confusing -- it did not convey meaningful information.

Mike:So, please refrain from using derogatory words like “meaningless” when referring to my posts. Thank you.

Tom:The sentence was meaningless, for the reason I explained. Not the theory. Not the post. Just the sentence. It was meaningless in the sense that it did not convey any userful information. That's all I meant in the criticism of your sentence. Nothing more than that.

Mike:Even if you think you understand what I mean there is no good that can come from you critiquing my way of expressing myself. You are not my English or grammar teacher, right? Therefore, keep all such comments to yourself. Okay?

Tom:The reason for my comment was not to critique your grammar. I let all that stuff slide by. It was only for the purpose of discussing the concept. What you wrote was confusing the issue. It's confusing for you to write that born-again believers cannot have unknown sinful traits of character because the normal inference from such a statement is that you believe there is such a thing as unknown sinful traits of character. But you don't. Hence the confusion.

Mike:Are you saying we agree on the differences between inherited and cultivated traits of character?

Tom:The language used is a bit different than I would use, but as far as I understand the concepts you are conveying I would say that yes, I agree with you on this point.

Mike:Are you saying we agree on the state and status of dormant defective traits of character?

Tom:I'm not sure. I've asked a couple of times if you agree that Christ had these things, but I haven't noticed that you responded to this question. If you will respond to this question, I can answer yours.

Mike:Do you agree that character is developed by habitually thinking, feeling, speaking, and behaving in ways contrary to our conscience and convictions?

Tom:Our character is developed by our habitual thinking, feeling, speaking and behaving. This is irrespective as to whether or not these things are contrary to our conscience or convictions. That is, regardles of what our conscience or convictions tell us, we are developing character.

Mike:Or, do you believe it is possible, as born again believers, to develop certain sinful character traits without realizing they are morally wrong? If so, please name a few (with inspired quotes, please).

Tom:It depends on how one defines "sinful character traits".

Mike:Which one of the following fruits of the flesh do you believe we can develop and/or possess, as Spirit-led born again believers, endowed with spiritual eye salve and discernment, without realizing it?

Tom:It's possible for us to think we are rich in our understanding of the Gospel and God's character when we are really poor. If we have a warped view of God's character, then we cannot help but represent Him incorrectly. For all of us, this is a work in progress.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/05 06:19 AM

Tom, yes, Jesus inherited dormant defective traits of character. But, unlike us, He eventually became aware of all of them. Remember, a dormant defect is an inherited trait of character we either do not know about or do not choose to cultivate.

Is the Laodicean condition an example of a Spirit-led, born again believer who unwittingly develops and possesses unknown sinful traits of character? Is being willingly ignorant and self-deceived and self-serving an example of a born again believer possessing unknown character flaws and defects and imperfections?

Which one of the fruits of the flesh, that Paul listed in Galatians, can a Spirit-led, born again believer, who is walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, who is actively and aggressively partaking of the divine nature, which one of the fruits of the flesh can such a person develop and/or possess without realizing it is morally wrong?

What is a sinful trait of character? As I understand it, a sinful trait of character is an inherited trait that we ourselves cultivate or turn into character by habitually thinking, feeling, speaking, and behaving in ways that contradict our conscience and convictions.

If it isn't the result of violating our conscience and convictions, that is, violating what we believe is morally right and wrong, then such things fall under the category of sins of ignorance, which, of course, do not count against us in judgment or character.

Character is the result of choice, not chance. We cannot ignorantly develop character. Character is who we are. It's our thoughts and feelings combined, our normal way of being and behaving. It's the result of the conscious choices we make as we react and respond to the things that affect us on a daily basis.

So again, please name an example, with quotes, of an unknown character defect that a born again believer, who is walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, who is actively and aggressively partaking of the divine nature, can develop and/or possess without realizing it is morally wrong.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/05 09:51 AM

quote:
As I understand it, a sinful trait of character is an inherited trait that we ourselves cultivate or turn into character by habitually thinking, feeling, speaking, and behaving in ways that contradict our conscience and convictions.

If it isn't the result of violating our conscience and convictions, that is, violating what we believe is morally right and wrong, then such things fall under the category of sins of ignorance, which, of course, do not count against us in judgment or character....

So again, please name an example, with quotes, of an unknown character defect that a born again believer, who is walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, who is actively and aggressively partaking of the divine nature, can develop and/or possess without realizing it is morally wrong.

You deny the possibility of being able to unwittingly develop unknown character defects, and redefine these as sins of ignorance. Any example I could give you you would deny and reclassify as a sin of ignorance, so there's no point in even trying.

You've already been given quotes. I think Mark provided them.

Regarding Laodecia, if I am reading your comments correctly, you do not believe that this (i.e. the Laodecian condition) is describing one who is born again. Have I understood you correctly?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/05 06:58 AM

Tom, please do not give up so quickly. Surely you can name a character defect that a Spirit-led, born again believer can cultivate and/or possess without realizing it is morally wrong, that is, one that isn't considered a sin of ignorance in the eyes of God, one that He winks at until He can reveal it to them.

In your mind what is the difference between a known sin (moral defect) and a sin of ignorance (intellectual defect)in the case of born again believers who are actively and agressively partaking of the divine nature? Can you name some examples?

In your mind what is the difference between a known sinful character trait and what you call an "unknown" one in the case of Spirit-led, born again believers? Can you name some examples?

Who is responsible for a spiritually connected, born again believer not being aware of his or her "unknown" sinful traits of character? If they are walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man how or why is it that they can be ignorant of a moral (versus intellectual) imperfection?

I assume you agree that no born again believer, who is abiding in Christ, can develop and/or possess one of the fruits of the flesh that Paul listed in Galatians without realizing it. Am I correct?

Yes, a lukewarm Christian is not a converted, connected, born again believer in the eyes of God. They may have experienced the miracle of rebirth at one time but obviously they did not maintain it.

What do you believe? Are lukewarm Laodiceans considered born again in the eyes of God? I say "in the eyes of God" because we as humans cannot make such judgments about our fellow humans.

Tom, please be as thorough as you normally are when answering these questions. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/05 08:30 PM

Mike:Tom, please do not give up so quickly. Surely you can name a character defect that a Spirit-led, born again believer can cultivate and/or possess without realizing it is morally wrong, that is, one that isn't considered a sin of ignorance in the eyes of God, one that He winks at until He can reveal it to them.

Tom:You're asking for an unknown character defect which is not a sin of ignorance. But all character defects are sins, and if they are unknown, they are sins of ignorance. So it seems like you're asking me to name a sin of ignorance which is not a sin of ignorance.

Mike:In your mind what is the difference between a known sin (moral defect) and a sin of ignorance (intellectual defect)in the case of born again believers who are actively and agressively partaking of the divine nature? Can you name some examples?

Tom:The difference would be one is known and one is unknown. Any sin of ignorance would be an example.

Mike:In your mind what is the difference between a known sinful character trait and what you call an "unknown" one in the case of Spirit-led, born again believers? Can you name some examples?

Tom:Any sin of ignorance would be an example of an unknown sin. An unknown character defect would be one where this sin of ignorance is a part of the character.

Mike:Who is responsible for a spiritually connected, born again believer not being aware of his or her "unknown" sinful traits of character? If they are walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man how or why is it that they can be ignorant of a moral (versus intellectual) imperfection?

Tom:I'm not sure quite what you're asking, especially the moral vs. intellectual part. Ellen White used to pray, "Lord, show me the worse of my case." David prayed that the Lord search his heart. I think the answer to your question as to who is responsible for not being aware is both God and man. God is responsible to show us things as we are ready, and we are responsible to be open to what He shows us.

Mike:I assume you agree that no born again believer, who is abiding in Christ, can develop and/or possess one of the fruits of the flesh that Paul listed in Galatians without realizing it. Am I correct?

Tom:Selfishness would cover everything, wouldn't it? So it seems to me your question is tantamount to asking if one can be selfish without realizing it. If so, I would say yes, one can be selfish without realizing it.

Mike:Yes, a lukewarm Christian is not a converted, connected, born again believer in the eyes of God. They may have experienced the miracle of rebirth at one time but obviously they did not maintain it.

Tom:I don't think this is obvious.

Mike:What do you believe? Are lukewarm Laodiceans considered born again in the eyes of God? I say "in the eyes of God" because we as humans cannot make such judgments about our fellow humans.

Tom, please be as thorough as you normally are when answering these questions. Thank you.

Tom: I was going to be briefer, in light of Mark's suggestion, but decided to go back into verbose mode. The Laodecian question would be a very interesting one to pursue as a topic. I think I'll post it.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/05 07:28 AM

Tom, sense you believe "selfishness" counts as an unknown character defect at what point is a born again believer "free from sin"? When is the old man dead? See Romans 6.

In your opinion, can a Spirit-led, born again believer, endowed with spiritual discernment, be guilty of verbally abusing their spouse or children without realizing it?

Also, do you see any difference between a born again believer who is abiding in Christ and one who isn't?

Finally, again, can a born again believer who is partaking of the divine nature be guilty of any of the fruits of the flesh Paul listed in Galatians without realizing it? If so, please name one of the ones Paul listed. I'm asking specifically about Paul's list here. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/05 08:05 AM

Mike:Tom, sense you believe "selfishness" counts as an unknown character defect at what point is a born again believer "free from sin"? When is the old man dead? See Romans 6.

Tom:One if freed from sin when one believes in Christ. When one is reconciled to God through faith in Christ one is simultaneously reconciled to God's law, which is the transcript of God's character.

Mike:In your opinion, can a Spirit-led, born again believer, endowed with spiritual discernment, be guilty of verbally abusing their spouse or children without realizing it?

Tom:It depends on how loosely one defines "verbally abusing". It's certainly possible to hurt someone with one's words without realizing it. We've seen evidence of that on this very forum.

Mike:Also, do you see any difference between a born again believer who is abiding in Christ and one who isn't?

Tom:What does it mean to be a born again believer who is not abiding in Christ?

Mike:Finally, again, can a born again believer who is partaking of the divine nature be guilty of any of the fruits of the flesh Paul listed in Galatians without realizing it? If so, please name one of the ones Paul listed. I'm asking specifically about Paul's list here. Thank you.

Tom:As I stated, I think all of them would be covered by selfishness. Why is the particular list in Galatians important to you? The law of God is what defines sin. That law is covered by two main principles, love to God and love to one's neighbor. It is possible, IMO, to not love God with one's whole heart and not be aware of it.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/05 05:30 PM

quote:
One i[s] freed from sin when one believes in Christ.

That’s what I believe, too. But your previous posts seem to imply that we can be born again with all manner of what you call “unknown” defective traits of character and not be aware of them.

quote:
It's certainly possible to hurt someone with one's words without realizing it.

Is it the result of “unknown” defects? Or, is it the result of ignorance? Do you see a difference between the two sources of sin?

quote:
What does it mean to be a born again believer who is not abiding in Christ?

You don’t know? Or, are you just wanting to know what I think? It would be nice if you would answer the question, too.

quote:
As I stated, I think all of them would be covered by selfishness. Why is the particular list in Galatians important to you?

Okay, do you believe then it is possible to be born again and to unwittingly or unknowingly develop and/or possess one or more of the traits Paul listed while partaking of the divine nature? As soon as you answer this simple question with a direct answer I’ll explain why the list is so important to me.

quote:
It is possible, IMO, to not love God with one's whole heart and not be aware of it.

Is such a state possible while walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man as a born again believer?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/13/05 06:06 AM

Old Tom:One i[s] freed from sin when one believes in Christ.

Mike:That’s what I believe, too. But your previous posts seem to imply that we can be born again with all manner of what you call “unknown” defective traits of character and not be aware of them.

Tom:I think you're reading that into my posts. In particular, I don't think I've used the term "unknown defective traits of character." That sounds very vague to me, and I doubt I've ever used it.

Old Tom: It's certainly possible to hurt someone with one's words without realizing it.

Mike:Is it the result of “unknown” defects? Or, is it the result of ignorance? Do you see a difference between the two sources of sin?

Tom:The two sources being unknown defects and ignorance? "Unknown" and "ignorance" seem to be denoting the same thing to me.

Old Tom: What does it mean to be a born again believer who is not abiding in Christ?

Mike:You don’t know? Or, are you just wanting to know what I think? It would be nice if you would answer the question, too.

Tom:No, I don't know. It doesn't make sense to me.

Old Tom: As I stated, I think all of them would be covered by selfishness. Why is the particular list in Galatians important to you?

Mike:Okay, do you believe then it is possible to be born again and to unwittingly or unknowingly develop and/or possess one or more of the traits Paul listed while partaking of the divine nature? As soon as you answer this simple question with a direct answer I’ll explain why the list is so important to me.

Tom:I've said they're all covered by selfishness, and it's possible to be selfish without knowing it. To me that's a perfectly adequate answer to your question. I don't understand why you don't consider your question to have been answered.

Old Tom: It is possible, IMO, to not love God with one's whole heart and not be aware of it.

Mike:Is such a state possible while walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man as a born again believer?

Tom:Yes. It's easy for our heart to deceive us. God can reveal things to us which we were unaware of. I mentioned Ellen White would pray, "Lord, show me the worst of my case." This implies there was something to be shown. Similarly David prayed that God would search his heart, "if there be any wicked way in me."

We also have the Laodecian condition, which I haven't gotten around to posting as a topic. But I am unaware of the Laodecian as being considered as not born again in our (i.e. SDA) tradition. A. T. Jones had a number of sermons in either the 1893 or 1895 General Conference Bulletin which addressed this (my guess would by 1895), and he did not consider the Laodecian to be non-born-again ("un born-again" (?)). The Spirit of Prophesy refers to the message he gave as "the message of God to the Laodecian church," so it seems likely to me that he had it right.

BTW it doesn't appear to me that I'm in that much disagreement with you on these points that we are discussing. I know there's some disagreement which is not purely symantical, but I'm not sure yet exactly how to define that.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/13/05 06:29 AM

quote:
Jesus was tempted in all points, that is, sinful suggstions entered His mind in the same way they enter the minds of born again believers. Do you agree that all such sinful suggestions revealed His potential, as a human being, to sin? If so, do you also agree He never consented to own or cherish them, therefore, He was sinless and guiltless of them?

And, if you can agree to these things, can you also agree that the same things apply to Spirit-led, born again believers? In other words, do you believe that when sinful suggestions enter their mind that it reveals their potential to sin? and that just because they enter their minds they are not, if they resist them like Jesus did, guilty of them?

Yes, I agree Mike.

quote:
Are we guilty of sinning if the sinful suggestion is pleasing (like overindulging cake and ice cream) so long as we resist it, in spite of how we think and feel about it?
It depends on the suggestion. Some suggestions just appeal to our human condition and they are not sinful in themselves. There is sin only if you yield to these suggestions independently of God’s will. The suggestion of eating of the fruit was pleasing to Eve, of course, but it would only become a sin if she ate of the fruit.
But would you agree that a suggestion for you to commit adultery with your neighbor is sinful in itself and if you find it pleasing this reveals a sinful tendency in your heart and already constitutes a sin?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/05 07:11 PM

quote:
But would you agree that a suggestion for you to commit adultery with your neighbor is sinful in itself and if you find it pleasing this reveals a sinful tendency in your heart and already constitutes a sin?
Pardon my jumping in please.

I don't agree with this. I'm practicing being brief.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/13/05 02:47 PM

Tom,

"We should preserve the strictest chastity in thought, and word, and deportment. Let us remember that God sets our secret sins in the light of His countenance. There are thoughts and feelings suggested and aroused by Satan that annoy even the best of men, but if they are not cherished, if they are repulsed as hateful, the soul is not contaminated with guilt, and no other is defiled by their influence. O that we each might become a savor of life unto life to those around us!" {TMK 140.2}

If it is possible to find something at the same time pleasing and hateful, then you can be correct. If you think that Jesus could ever find such a suggestion pleasing (which to me is blasphemy), then you can be correct.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 06:04 AM

quote:
If it is possible to find something at the same time pleasing and hateful, then you can be correct. If you think that Jesus could ever find such a suggestion pleasing (which to me is blasphemy), then you can be correct.
It certainly is possible for something to be simultaneously both pleasing and hateful. Paul discusses this at length. Being a human being, I'm sure you experience this personally. This is what temptation is all about. It's not a sin to be tempted. It's not blashphemous to think that Christ was tempted.

Temptation is defined as being enticed by one's own desire (James). If there is no desire to succumb, then there is no temptation. We are not tempted by things which are unpleasant to us, but pleasant.

There's a quote in the Spirit of Prophesy which speaks to temptation being strongly moved to do something, and that this was the ordeal that Christ went through. I'm sorry I was unable to find the quote. Maybe you're familiar with it.

At any rate, the bottom line is:
1)Temptation is not sin.
2)There must be something alluring, or pleasant, about the temptation, or it is not temptation.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 06:25 AM

quote:
But would you agree that a suggestion for you to commit adultery with your neighbor is sinful in itself …

Yes, it’s a sinful suggestion, but, No, I would not be guilty of it, at least not initially. It is not a sin to be tempted, even with adultery.

quote:
… and if you find it pleasing this reveals a sinful tendency in your heart and already constitutes a sin?

No. We possess a sinful nature, therefore, we will be tempted. All temptations are “pleasing”, in one way or another, otherwise it wouldn’t be a temptation. If we have no interest or inclination whatsoever then we couldn’t be tempted. If must wrestle, agonize, labor, and strive to resist a certain temptation it does not mean we are guilty of sinning. Even Jesus sweat great drops of blood resisting temptation in the garden of Gethsemane.

quote:
“There are thoughts and feelings suggested and aroused by Satan that annoy even the best of men ….”

I like her use of the word “annoy” better than my use of the word “pleasing”. But in reality, not all temptations are annoying or hateful. Take, for instance, the example I cited a few posts ago. The temptation to indulge a second helping of your favorite dessert is hardly annoying or hateful. Some temptations are not so evil as others.

But, why do some temptations “annoy” us, and others disgust us?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 06:37 AM

Tom, one more question before I tell you why I am so interested in Paul's list in Galatians.

I take it, from what you have posted so far, that it is possible for a born again believer (who is actively and aggressively abiding in Jesus and partaking of the divine nature) to develop and/or possess one or more of the sinful traits of character Paul named without realizing it is morally wrong.

Okay, here's the question - Do you also believe that such believers are also in a saved state?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/13/05 11:50 PM

I think to be in an unsaved state one must be actively fighting against the Spirit of God. Please let me know if this response does not answer your question.

Tom
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 12:06 AM

quote:
It certainly is possible for something to be simultaneously both pleasing and hateful. Paul discusses this at length. Being a human being, I'm sure you experience this personally.
When your heart is divided it is because you still love that sin. Romans 7 doesn't describe the experience of the born-again believer. And this is not my experience after I have overcome a particular sin.

quote:
There's a quote in the Spirit of Prophesy which speaks to temptation being strongly moved to do something, and that this was the ordeal that Christ went through. I'm sorry I was unable to find the quote. Maybe you're familiar with it.
I'm familiar with the quote. But the devil won't waste his time tempting me to do what I find hateful or disgusting. He won't tempt me to use drugs, or to smoke, or to drink, or to engage in illicit sex, or to steal. And of course he didn't tempt Christ to do what Christ found hateful.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 12:22 AM

quote:
But in reality, not all temptations are annoying or hateful. Take, for instance, the example I cited a few posts ago. The temptation to indulge a second helping of your favorite dessert is hardly annoying or hateful. Some temptations are not so evil as others.
And that’s in essence the same I posted in reply to that post of yours:

“It depends on the suggestion. Some suggestions just appeal to our human condition and they are not sinful in themselves. There is sin only if you yield to these suggestions independently of God’s will. The suggestion of eating of the fruit was pleasing to Eve, of course, but it would only become a sin if she ate of the fruit.
But would you agree that a suggestion for you to commit adultery with your neighbor is sinful in itself and if you find it pleasing this reveals a sinful tendency in your heart and already constitutes a sin?”
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 12:35 AM

Rosangela, I can't see how according to what your saying Christ could possibly have been tempted. For example, you write:

quote:
the devil won't waste his time tempting me to do what I find hateful or disgusting. He won't tempt me to use drugs, or to smoke, or to drink, or to engage in illicit sex, or to steal. And of course he didn't tempt Christ to do what Christ found hateful.
So what would be an example of something Christ wouldn't find hateful? And what sense to I make out of this temptation?

quote:
8Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;

9And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. (Matt 4:8, 9)

How does this fit in with your logic above? It would seem to follow from what you said that the temptation to worship Satan was not hateful or disgusting to Christ. Doesn't that follow?

Also you write:

quote:
When your heart is divided it is because you still love that sin.
I don't see how Christ could possibly have been tempted to do any sin, since that would imply, according to your reasoning, that Christ's heart was divided in relation to the sin that Christ was being tempted to do.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 02:14 AM

Tom,

quote:
So what would be an example of something Christ wouldn't find hateful?
Eating bread after a forty-day fast, proving that He was the Son of God, avoiding suffering and death, for example.

quote:
It would seem to follow from what you said that the temptation to worship Satan was not hateful or disgusting to Christ.
Oh, my, do you think worshipping the devil constituted the temptation? Worshipping Satan was the means to achieve what the temptation proposed. The essence of the last temptation didn’t consist in worshipping Satan, but in avoiding suffering, in obtaining power over the world without having to die on a cross.

“This last temptation was the most alluring of the three. Satan knew that Christ's life must be one of sorrow, hardship, and conflict. And he thought he could take advantage of this fact to bribe Christ to yield his integrity. Satan brought all his strength to bear upon this last temptation, for this last effort was to decide his destiny as to who should be victor. He claimed the world as his dominion, and he was the prince of the power of the air. He bore Jesus to the top of an exceeding high mountain, and then in a panoramic view presented before him all the kingdoms of the world that had been so long under his dominion, and offered them to him in one great gift. He told Christ he could come into possession of the kingdoms of the world without suffering or peril on his part. Satan promises to yield his scepter and dominion, and Christ shall be rightful ruler for one favor from him. All he requires in return for making over to him the kingdoms of the world that day presented before him, is, that Christ shall do him homage as to a superior.
“The eye of Jesus for a moment rested upon the glory presented before him; but he turned away and refused to look upon the entrancing spectacle. He would not endanger his steadfast integrity by dallying with the tempter. When Satan solicited homage, Christ's divine indignation was aroused, and he could no longer tolerate the blasphemous assumption of Satan, or even permit him to remain in his presence. Here Christ exercised his divine authority, and commanded Satan to desist.” {RH, September 1, 1874}

quote:
I don't see how Christ could possibly have been tempted to do any sin, since that would imply, according to your reasoning, that Christ's heart was divided in relation to the sin that Christ was being tempted to do.
Sin does not consist merely in doing wrong things. It may consist in not doing right things, or in doing right things in the wrong way or with a wrong motivation.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 02:39 AM

A temptation has to be something you want to do. Obviously Christ would not want to worship Satan, but would he want the earthly kingdoms Satan offered Him? As you point out, that's where the temptation lied. But why should earthly kingdoms hold any allure to Christ?

If temptation to sin only applies to a divided heart, then how could Christ be tempted by an earthly kingdom?

Another question I'm curious to know your response to, could Christ be tempted to look at a woman with impure thoughts?
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 02:50 AM

quote:
But why should earthly kingdoms hold any allure to Christ?
Christ came exactly to obtain the dominion of the world and its kingdoms, and it is this that was secured by the cross and will happen at last (Rev. 11:15).

quote:
Another question I'm curious to know your response to, could Christ be tempted to look at a woman with impure thoughts?
Would you be tempted to look at your mother, your sister or your daughter with impure thoughts? If not, why not?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 06:05 AM

Old Tom:Another question I'm curious to know your response to, could Christ be tempted to look at a woman with impure thoughts?

R:Would you be tempted to look at your mother, your sister or your daughter with impure thoughts? If not, why not?

Tom:I take it this means no, Christ was not tempted to look at a woman with impure thoughts. Extrapolating I would take it that you believe Christ was never tempted sexually once His whole life, correct? Is sexual temptation a sin? In and of itself? (pardon my jumping around here, but I'm just going where your answer seems to be logically leading;if I'm misjudging your thoughts, please correct me)

Given this is the case (Christ was not sexually tempted), how do you understand this?

quote:
15For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.

16Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.

1For every high priest taken from among men is ordained for men in things pertaining to God, that he may offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins:

2Who can have compassion on the ignorant, and on them that are out of the way; for that he himself also is compassed with infirmity.(Heb. 4:14-5:2)

Or this?

quote:
But Jesus accepted humanity when the race had been weakened by four thousand years of sin. Like every child of Adam He accepted the results of the working of the great law of heredity. What these results were is shown in the history of His earthly ancestors. He came with such a heredity to share our sorrows and temptations, and to give us the example of a sinless life.(DA 49)
How can Christ give us help in time of need if He knows nothing of our problems? The DA quote says that Christ accepted the results of the working of the law of heredity after 4,000 years of sin, which results were shown by His ancestors, which would be every sort of sin and vice, correct? So having this heredity, how could it possible for Christ not to be affected by that flesh? If Christ was exempt from any temptations of the flesh, how could He share in our temptations?

I also don't understand how if one can only be tempted when one has a divided heart, how Christ could be tempted in any way whatsoever. Let's take the world kingdoms example. You suggest He was tempted because this was a way to cut short His mission, to make it easier (at least, that's how I understood your explanation). But if Christ's heart was undivided regarding not taking the easy way out, how could He be tempted to do this?

Thank you for your responses Rosangela. I'm very interested in your thinking here.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 03:43 PM

quote:
Tom:I take it this means no, Christ was not tempted to look at a woman with impure thoughts.
When I was in the world, I looked at people in one way; after I was born again, I began to look at people with other eyes. This didn’t happen at once; it was a process. It depends on the way your mind works. You can see people as sexual objects or as objects of your tenderness and compassion.

quote:
Extrapolating I would take it that you believe Christ was never tempted sexually once His whole life, correct?
This is improbable but, as I said, one thing is to be the object of a sinful suggestion, and quite another is to find the sinful suggestion pleasing.
First, Christ closed all doors to temptation; He didn’t have one moment in which He wasn’t busy doing something. Second, the task Christ came to do in the world was of such magnitude that it absorbed all His interest and energies.

quote:
How can Christ give us help in time of need if He knows nothing of our problems?
How can Christ help a homosexual, a drunkard or a drug addict if He knows nothing of their problems? As I have already said, the forms are different, but the essence of temptation is always the same. Of one thing we may be sure – Christ’s temptations were much stronger than ours can possibly be.

quote:
If Christ was exempt from any temptations of the flesh, how could He share in our temptations?
Who said He was exempt from any temptations of the flesh?

quote:
I also don't understand how if one can only be tempted when one has a divided heart, how Christ could be tempted in any way whatsoever.
Look, we were discussing what is definitely sinful in itself – if you find the suggestion pleasing it is because you haven’t yet overcome that sin, or your love for that sin.

quote:
But if Christ's heart was undivided regarding not taking the easy way out, how could He be tempted to do this?
There is nothing intrinsically wrong in taking the easy way out. Only masochists like to suffer. Who would like to die a horrible death, and be extremely tortured, both physically and spiritually? Who would like to experience hell, like Christ did, not needing to do that? Who wouldn’t recoil from this experience? Who wouldn’t try to avoid it? We can never even begin to imagine what this experience was.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/14/05 05:47 PM

Tom, let me see if I understand you correctly. By piecing together your sparse answers and insights here’s what I’m coming up with (please let me know if I’ve gotten it wrong):

You believe born again believers, who are partaking of the divine nature, can develop and/or possess one or more of the sinful character traits Paul listed in Galatians while working and cooperating with the Holy Spirit, rather than fighting against Him, and that they are considered saved in the eyes of God.

Alright, here’s the list again:

1. Adultery
2. Fornication
3. Uncleanness
4. Lasciviousness
5. Idolatry
6. Witchcraft
7. Hatred
8. Variance
9. Emulations
10. Wrath
11. Strife
12. Seditions
13. Heresies
14. Envyings
15. Murders
16. Drunkenness
17. Revellings

Now, you believe a born again believer can be guilty of one or more of these things without realizing it because Holy Spirit hasn’t yet revealed it to him or her. But here’s what Paul wrote about this list of sinful traits: “This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.”

After listing all the things born again believers will not do Paul goes on to say, “Of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.” Tom, would you agree that your view of Paul’s list is different than the view he shared about it?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/15/05 01:16 AM

When a person grows in Christ, he may act, think, or speak selfishly without being aware of it. Our characters do not become instantly mature once we are born again. We still need to grow up to the full stature of Christ.

If one ignorantly does one of the things on your list, that does not mean he is walking according to the flesh. For example, one could practice fornication without being aware that it is a sin (e.g. be married to more than one woman), but this would not be walking according to the flesh, provided the person was not aware it was a sin.

Or perhaps idolatry would be a better example. Idolatry does not simply cover worshiping idols made of wood or stone, but includes having false concepts of God's character (the Spirit of Prophesy talks about this in the Great Controversy). So one could easily be practicing in ignorance a subtle form of idolatry, which would not count as walking in the flesh provided the Spirit of God had not yet revealed the false concept of God's character to the believer.

To answer your question, no, I don't believe my view of Paul's list is different than his.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/16/05 05:26 PM

quote:
Romans 7 doesn't describe the experience of the born-again believer. And this is not my experience after I have overcome a particular sin.

Rosangela, the man of Romans 7 is a born again believer who understands it is his sinful flesh nature that generates unholy suggestions and feelings. He knows they are nothing more than temptations, and that his new man mind isn’t the one doing it. The “doing it” refers to his flesh communicating sinful suggestions and feelings. It’s talk about actually committing a sin. We know this is true because sinful flesh nature cannot commit a sin; it can only communicate unholy temptations.

quote:
And of course [Satan] didn't tempt Christ to do what Christ found hateful.

Jesus’ experience with sin and temptation, while He walked the earth as a human, would suggest that it is possible for Satan to tempt us with things we find annoying and hateful and disgusting. It is clear that Jesus was tempted in all points that born again believers are tempted in, nevertheless, He found all sin and temptations to be repugnant and repulsive. And yet, He was tempted.

quote:
Sin does not consist merely in doing wrong things. It may consist in not doing right things, or in doing right things in the wrong way or with a wrong motivation.

Amen. But this doesn’t mean Jesus was tempted to do wrongs, too. He was, after all, tempted in all points, right?

quote:
This is improbable but, as I said, one thing is to be the object of a sinful suggestion, and quite another is to find the sinful suggestion pleasing.

Amen. Jesus was tempted in all points as a born again believer, not as an unbeliever. However, He was, nevertheless, tempted in all points. Of course, He was disgusted by them and resisted them immediately, without hesitation, the same as a born again believer.

quote:
Christ’s temptations were much stronger than ours can possibly be.

Amen.

quote:
Look, we were discussing what is definitely sinful in itself – if you find the suggestion pleasing it is because you haven’t yet overcome that sin, or your love for that sin.

But not all temptations, right? Some are less sinful than others and, as such, not as readily resisted or disgusting (i.e., the favorite dessert example).
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/17/05 06:00 AM

quote:
When a person grows in Christ, he may act, think, or speak selfishly without being aware of it.

Tom, please, show me an inspired quote that teaches born again believers, who are growing “in Christ, who walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, who are partaking of the divine nature, who are endowed with eye salve and spiritual discernment, can think, speak, or behave in a selfish manner without realizing it is morally wrong either 1) during the sin, or 2) immediately after the fact.

quote:
Our characters do not become instantly mature once we are born again. We still need to grow up to the full stature of Christ.

I agree. The same was true of Jesus as He grew in grace and knowledge from childhood to manhood. He was born morally perfect (complete), and He became morally perfect (mature) as He developed His character.

quote:
If one ignorantly does one of the things on your list, that does not mean he is walking according to the flesh.

Tom, please, the credit for the list belongs to Paul, and ultimately, to God.

quote:
For example, one could practice fornication without being aware that it is a sin (e.g. be married to more than one woman), but this would not be walking according to the flesh, provided the person was not aware it was a sin.

You’re right, having more than one wife, not realizing it violates the law, is not a sin. But, polygamy isn’t a part of the list, is it? God commanded the married brother-in-law of a childless widow to take her to wife and to raise seed unto his brother.

quote:
Idolatry does not simply cover worshiping idols made of wood or stone, but includes having false concepts of God's character (the Spirit of Prophesy talks about this in the Great Controversy). So one could easily be practicing in ignorance a subtle form of idolatry, which would not count as walking in the flesh provided the Spirit of God had not yet revealed the false concept of God's character to the believer.

I agree with you that a born again believer might ignorantly believe things about God that are not true, but I disagree he or she would worship such ideas as idols. Innocently believing an untruth and worshipping it are two totally different things. A truly born again believer would not be guilty of worshipping a concept or a doctrine, whether true or untrue.

Let’s take a closer look at the quote you referred to. Here it is:

GC 583
In rejecting the truth, men reject its Author. In trampling upon the law of God, they deny the authority of the Law-giver. It is as easy to make an idol of false doctrines and theories as to fashion an idol of wood or stone. By misrepresenting the attributes of God, Satan leads men to conceive of Him in a false character. With many, a philosophical idol is enthroned in the place of Jehovah; while the living God, as He is revealed in His word, in Christ, and in the works of creation, is worshiped by but few. Thousands deify nature while they deny the God of nature. Though in a different form, idolatry exists in the Christian world today as verily as it existed among ancient Israel in the days of Elijah. The god of many professedly wise men, of philosophers, poets, politicians, journalists--the god of polished fashionable circles, of many colleges and universities, even of some theological institutions--is little better than Baal, the sun-god of Phoenicia. {GC 583.1}

Are you suggesting that born again believers, who walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, who are partaking of the divine nature, who are endowed with eye salve and spiritual discernment, can be innocently ignorant of rejecting the truth, and in its place cherish a false doctrine or theory? I know that’s not what Paul had in mind when he penned his list. And I know that’s not what Sister White intended to imply. Check out the context of her quote and you’ll see what I mean.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/16/05 07:13 PM

Old Tom:When a person grows in Christ, he may act, think, or speak selfishly without being aware of it.

Mike:Tom, please, show me an inspired quote that teaches born again believers, who are growing “in Christ, who walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, who are partaking of the divine nature, who are endowed with eye salve and spiritual discernment, can think, speak, or behave in a selfish manner without realizing it is morally wrong either 1) during the sin, or 2) immediately after the fact.

Tom:A couple of things to look at would be "The Two Worshippers" in Christ's Object Lessons, and the history of 1888. Those who rejected the message were committing sin, and did so persistently for many years, which the Spirit of Prophesy pointed out, but she did not state that these people were in a lost condition (although she warned of that possibility if they continued resisting the Holy Spirit)

Old Tom: Our characters do not become instantly mature once we are born again. We still need to grow up to the full stature of Christ.

Mike:I agree. The same was true of Jesus as He grew in grace and knowledge from childhood to manhood. He was born morally perfect (complete), and He became morally perfect (mature) as He developed His character.

Tom:Yes, but Christ never sinned and never ignorantly committed sin.

Old Tom: If one ignorantly does one of the things on your list, that does not mean he is walking according to the flesh.

Mike:Tom, please, the credit for the list belongs to Paul, and ultimately, to God.

Tom:That's kind of a frivilous comment. The "your list" means nothing more than "the list you cited". We've been talking about Galatians. Everyone knows you didn't write that, Mike.

Old Tom: For example, one could practice fornication without being aware that it is a sin (e.g. be married to more than one woman), but this would not be walking according to the flesh, provided the person was not aware it was a sin.

Mike:You’re right, having more than one wife, not realizing it violates the law, is not a sin.

Tom:It's fornication, which is on the list.

Mike:But, polygamy isn’t a part of the list, is it? God commanded the married brother-in-law of a childless widow to take her to wife and to raise seed unto his brother.

Tom:God winked at polygamy before Christ came.

Old Tom: Idolatry does not simply cover worshiping idols made of wood or stone, but includes having false concepts of God's character (the Spirit of Prophesy talks about this in the Great Controversy). So one could easily be practicing in ignorance a subtle form of idolatry, which would not count as walking in the flesh provided the Spirit of God had not yet revealed the false concept of God's character to the believer.

Mike:I agree with you that a born again believer might ignorantly believe things about God that are not true, but I disagree he or she would worship such ideas as idols. Innocently believing an untruth and worshipping it are two totally different things. A truly born again believer would not be guilty of worshipping a concept or a doctrine, whether true or untrue.

Let’s take a closer look at the quote you referred to. Here it is:

GC 583
In rejecting the truth, men reject its Author. In trampling upon the law of God, they deny the authority of the Law-giver. It is as easy to make an idol of false doctrines and theories as to fashion an idol of wood or stone. By misrepresenting the attributes of God, Satan leads men to conceive of Him in a false character. With many, a philosophical idol is enthroned in the place of Jehovah; while the living God, as He is revealed in His word, in Christ, and in the works of creation, is worshiped by but few. Thousands deify nature while they deny the God of nature. Though in a different form, idolatry exists in the Christian world today as verily as it existed among ancient Israel in the days of Elijah. The god of many professedly wise men, of philosophers, poets, politicians, journalists--the god of polished fashionable circles, of many colleges and universities, even of some theological institutions--is little better than Baal, the sun-god of Phoenicia. {GC 583.1}

Tom:This is the quote I had in mind. Well done! Notice it says, "It is as easy to make an idol of false doctrines and theories as to fashion an idol of wood or stone." How easy is it to fashion an idol of wood or stone? Pretty easy, right? That's just how easy it is to make an idol of false doctrines and theories.

Mike:Are you suggesting that born again believers, who walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, who are partaking of the divine nature, who are endowed with eye salve and spiritual discernment, can be innocently ignorant of rejecting the truth, and in its place cherish a false doctrine or theory?

Tom:Yes, and this is obviously the case of what's happening on this very forum. We have differing ideas and theories. One of us is obviously wrong (or both). Unless you wish to ascribe intent to one of us, or propose that one of us isn't born again, the false theories we hold are being held in ignorance.

Mike: I know that’s not what Paul had in mind when he penned his list.

Tom:What's "that"? How do you know?

Mike:And I know that’s not what Sister White intended to imply. Check out the context of her quote and you’ll see what I mean.

Tom:I've looked at the quote, and noticed, as I pointed out, that it's as easy to make an idol out of a false doctrine or theory as it is to fashion one out of wood or stone, which is an exceedingly easy thing to do.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/17/05 04:54 AM

quote:
Rosangela, the man of Romans 7 is a born again believer who understands it is his sinful flesh nature that generates unholy suggestions and feelings.
I disagree, Mike. There is a clear contrast between Romans 7 and Romans 8.
Besides, the context of the quotations of EGW imply that Paul is describing his pre-conversion experience:

“It is not enough to perceive the loving-kindness of God, to see the benevolence, the fatherly tenderness, of His character. It is not enough to discern the wisdom and justice of His law, to see that it is founded upon the eternal principle of love. Paul the apostle saw all this when he exclaimed, ‘I consent unto the law that it is good.’ ‘The law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.’ But he added, in the bitterness of his soul-anguish and despair, ’I am carnal, sold under sin.’ Romans 7:16, 12, 14. He longed for the purity, the righteousness, to which in himself he was powerless to attain, and cried out, ‘O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from this body of death?’ Romans 7:24, margin. Such is the cry that has gone up from burdened hearts in all lands and in all ages. To all, there is but one answer, ‘Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.’ John 1:29.” {SC 19.1}

“Paul realized his weakness, and well he might distrust his own strength. Referring to the law, he says, ‘The commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.’ He had trusted in the deeds of the law. He says, concerning his own outward life, that as ‘touching the law’ he was ‘blameless;’ and he put his trust in his own righteousness. But when the mirror of the law was held up before him, and he saw himself as God saw him, full of mistakes, stained with sin, he cried out, ‘O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?’ Paul beheld the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world. He heard the voice of Christ saying, ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life; no man cometh unto the Father but by me.’ He determined to avail himself of the benefits of saving grace, to become dead to trespasses and sins, to have his guilt washed away in the blood of Christ, to be clothed with Christ's righteousness, to become a branch of the Living Vine.” {ST, November 24, 1890 par. 6}

quote:
Jesus’ experience with sin and temptation, while He walked the earth as a human, would suggest that it is possible for Satan to tempt us with things we find annoying and hateful and disgusting.
Of course Satan can tempt us with things that we find hateful, but he will concentrate his efforts in things we find pleasing.

quote:
But not all temptations, right? Some are less sinful than others and, as such, not as readily resisted or disgusting (i.e., the favorite dessert example).
That’s the point. There is nothing wrong in finding a dessert pleasing.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/17/05 05:04 AM

quote:
Mike:But, polygamy isn’t a part of the list, is it? God commanded the married brother-in-law of a childless widow to take her to wife and to raise seed unto his brother.
Mike, polygamy is a transgression of the 7th commandment, and there is no evidence that God commanded the married brother-in-law of a childless widow to take her for wife.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/17/05 06:03 AM

quote:
It is clear that Jesus was tempted in all points that born again believers are tempted in, nevertheless, He found all sin and temptations to be repugnant and repulsive.
Does this make sense? How could He find all temptations repugnant? "Repugnant" means "abhorrent" "repulsive". We are not tempted by things we find abhorrent or repulsive, but by things we find pleasant. If we found no pleasure in the suggestion, it would not be temptation.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/17/05 06:12 AM

Mike:Rosangela, the man of Romans 7 is a born again believer who understands it is his sinful flesh nature that generates unholy suggestions and feelings.

Rosangela:I disagree, Mike. There is a clear contrast between Romans 7 and Romans 8.
Besides, the context of the quotations of EGW imply that Paul is describing his pre-conversion experience:

Tom:I agree that Romans 7 and 8 are in contrast, and the Romans 7 is not describing the experience of faith, seeing as how it describes defeat instead of victory (Galatians 5 is similar in describing the fight, but in it victory is inevitable, rather than defeat -- that's the result of faith). However, while it's true it's not speaking of the experience of faith of a born-again believer, that does not discount the truth that temptations come to us through the flesh.

It is Satan's desire to reach the mind by way of the flesh. The flesh is his realm. The flesh will be a thorn to our side until Christ's Second coming when this corruptible becomes incorruptible. It is God's desire to get the flesh to yield by way of the mind.

Christ partook of the same flesh we have, and was subject to the same temptations. But whereas we have all yielded to the temptations of the flesh, Christ never did.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/17/05 05:46 PM

Rosangela, maybe we can start a thread on Romans 7? It is very clear to me that Pual is talking about a born again believer recognizing and resisting the unholy suggestions and feelings generated and communicated to his new man mind by his sinful flesh nature.

Tom, you seem convinced that a Spirit-led believer can be guilty of fornication without realizing it. I guess there isn't anything else we can study, at this point. Unless you have more to say?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/18/05 06:19 AM

Mike, given that:
1)Polygamy is fornication.
2)There have been those who have practised polygame, while being in a saved condition.

then my conclusion must follow, right? So you'd have to disagree with 1) or 2) to disagree with this conclusion.

Also there's the idolatry example.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/18/05 05:15 PM

Tom, your examples, in my mind, do not constitute character defects, at least, not in the judgment sense. In other words, they will not be counted against them in judgment. The way I see it, only those defects that are developed as a result of violating ones conscience and convictions will count in judgment.

A born again believer may indeed, though it is highly unlikely in developed countries, practice polygamy without realizing it is biblically and morally wrong in the eyes of God. If such a case were true, they would be guiltless in the eyes of God because they are not deliberately violating their conscience or convictions. That's the key.

In the case of making an idol out of an idea, I am completely convinced that no one is guiltless in the eyes of God, especially not a born again believer. In the light of the SOP quote, cited above, no born again believer can reject the truth in favor of damnable heresy without realizing it is morally wrong. Rejecting the truth requires a conscious, deliberate choice. One must fight the convicting voice of the Holy Spirit to reject the truth.

I agree with you that it's possible for a born again believer to mistakenly believe false doctrines without realizing it is untrue. But I disagree it constitutes a moral defective trait of character, one that counts against them in judgment.

Neither do I agree with you that a person can reject the truth or idolize an idea, even if it's right, and still be in a saved state.

Also, I do not believe a lukewarm Christian is in a saved state.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/18/05 08:02 PM

Mike:Tom, your examples, in my mind, do not constitute character defects, at least, not in the judgment sense. In other words, they will not be counted against them in judgment. The way I see it, only those defects that are developed as a result of violating ones conscience and convictions will count in judgment.

Tom:I was treating the list, and showed that one could ignorantly commit items on the list although born again.

Mike:A born again believer may indeed, though it is highly unlikely in developed countries, practice polygamy without realizing it is biblically and morally wrong in the eyes of God. If such a case were true, they would be guiltless in the eyes of God because they are not deliberately violating their conscience or convictions. That's the key.

Tom:This suffices, then, to show that one can committ something on the list ignorantly, which is what I set out to show.

Mike:In the case of making an idol out of an idea, I am completely convinced that no one is guiltless in the eyes of God, especially not a born again believer. In the light of the SOP quote, cited above, no born again believer can reject the truth in favor of damnable heresy without realizing it is morally wrong.

Tom:You have a tendency to add qualifications which make your statements non-falsifiable. For example, here your add "damnable heresy." Of course God will not allow one to ignorantly commit a "damnable heresy"! God's not willing that any should perish. He's not going to sit by and let someone be lost without letting the person know what's happening.

But that's not what we were discussing. We were discussing whether one could ignorantly committ items on the list while being born again. If it is really as easy to fashion idols from false ideas as it is to make them from wood or stone, the answer is clearly yes.

If you add qualifications to arguments that disprove your ideas to make them non-falsifiable, there's not much point in carrying on a discussion.

Mike:Rejecting the truth requires a conscious, deliberate choice. One must fight the convicting voice of the Holy Spirit to reject the truth.

Tom:Certainly, but again, this isn't what we were discussing.

Mike:I agree with you that it's possible for a born again believer to mistakenly believe false doctrines without realizing it is untrue. But I disagree it constitutes a moral defective trait of character, one that counts against them in judgment.

Tom:Again, you're switching the conversation.

Mike:Neither do I agree with you that a person can reject the truth or idolize an idea, even if it's right, and still be in a saved state.

Tom:None of us on this site agrees with you on all your ideas, so are all of us lost, except for you?

Mike:Also, I do not believe a lukewarm Christian is in a saved state.

Tom:This would make an interesting topic. If the Laodecian condition represents the SDA church, then if you're idea is true, the SDA church is in an unsaved state.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/19/05 05:39 PM

Tom, polygamy isn't one of the things listed by Paul. You added it. And then you assumed if a born again believer has more than one wife he is ignorantly guilty of committing fornication, and that he, therefore, has a defective trait of character.

Well, fornication is premarital sexual relations, and adultery is extra-marital sexual relations. So, technically, if a person is married to more than one spouse it isn't either one.

Either way, it is not possible to ignorantly commit fornication or adultery. It takes a deliberate choice to have sexual relations with someone you are not legally married to. And no born again believer, who is abiding in Jesus, can commit a known sin. Here’s what John said about it:

1 John
3:6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
3:7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
3:8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
3:9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Tom, please, we were discussing the SOP quote where she uses the words “rejecting the truth” and “false doctrines”. Peter uses the words “damnable heresy”. Paul uses the word “fables”. So, I’m not making “non-falsifiable” statements, or adding qualifications that change the meaning of previous posts. Such things are called “synonyms”, and I use them to clarify the point, not to change the meaning.

Here’s the quote again:

quote:
GC 583
In rejecting the truth, men reject its Author. In trampling upon the law of God, they deny the authority of the Law-giver. It is as easy to make an idol of false doctrines and theories as to fashion an idol of wood or stone. By misrepresenting the attributes of God, Satan leads men to conceive of Him in a false character. With many, a philosophical idol is enthroned in the place of Jehovah; while the living God, as He is revealed in His word, in Christ, and in the works of creation, is worshiped by but few. Thousands deify nature while they deny the God of nature. Though in a different form, idolatry exists in the Christian world today as verily as it existed among ancient Israel in the days of Elijah. The god of many professedly wise men, of philosophers, poets, politicians, journalists--the god of polished fashionable circles, of many colleges and universities, even of some theological institutions--is little better than Baal, the sun-god of Phoenicia. {GC 583.1}

You cited this quote to prove that born again believers can ignorantly make an idol out of false doctrine, which is damnable heresy, without realizing it is morally wrong. You did this to prove that it is possible for a born again believer to develop and/or possess one of the character defects Paul listed in Galatians without realizing it is morally wrong. I don’t see how you can quote this passage to prove your point. The insights in this quote do not support the conclusions you derive from it.

Also, I didn’t change the subject. The topic of this thread is “hidden character defects”. Character is the result of choice, not chance. It requires habitual, repetitious actions, whether in thought, word, or deed. To develop sinful traits of character a person must wilfully, knowingly, deliberately choose to violate his or her conscience and convictions.

A defective trait of character is not the result of doing something you believe is right, even if it is wrong. For example, if you honestly and truly believe it is God’s will for you to have more than one spouse, and you believe you are obeying the word and voice of God, then, in the eyes of God, you are not guilty of fornication or adultery, or any other sin. Nor is it considered a hidden character defect.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/19/05 05:42 PM

quote:
None of us on this site agrees with you on all your ideas, so are all of us lost, except for you?

Tom, please, refrain from posting such unlovely things. It does not promote a healthly study environment. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/20/05 06:25 AM

Mike, you chopped off what you wrote. That's not cool. My statement makes no sense taken out of context. Here's what you wrote:

Old Mike:Neither do I agree with you that a person can reject the truth or idolize an idea, even if it's right, and still be in a saved state.

To this I responded, "None of us on this site agrees with you on all your ideas, so are all of us lost, except for you?"

If you assert that one cannot reject the truth and be in a saved state, then when you disagree with someone, either you or the other person are either not rejecting truth, and hence, based on your own statement, not in a saved state. If you disagree with this, then your statement (the Old Mike one) is false.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/19/05 07:54 PM

Mike:Tom, polygamy isn't one of the things listed by Paul. You added it.

Tom:Fornication is on the list. I was addressing fornication.

Mike:And then you assumed if a born again believer has more than one wife he is ignorantly guilty of committing fornication, and that he, therefore, has a defective trait of character.

Tom:No, I didn't assume any of this. I stated that a believer could be practicing polygamy, which would be an example of a believer doing something which was on the list, which is what you asked me to provide.

Mike:Well, fornication is premarital sexual relations, and adultery is extra-marital sexual relations. So, technically, if a person is married to more than one spouse it isn't either one.

Tom:Are you trying to get a job as a lawyer?

Mike:Either way, it is not possible to ignorantly commit fornication or adultery. It takes a deliberate choice to have sexual relations with someone you are not legally married to.

Tom:If a person did not know one was doing something wrong, then it could be done in ignorance. You seem to be assuming that any born again person could only have sexual relations while being married to one person without being convicted that they were doing something wrong. I disagree with your assumption.

Mike:And no born again believer, who is abiding in Jesus, can commit a known sin.

Tom:Now you're talking about known sin. A known sin would not be one done in ignorance, which is what I was talking about.

Mike:Tom, please, we were discussing the SOP quote where she uses the words “rejecting the truth” and “false doctrines”. Peter uses the words “damnable heresy”. Paul uses the word “fables”. So, I’m not making “non-falsifiable” statements, or adding qualifications that change the meaning of previous posts. Such things are called “synonyms”, and I use them to clarify the point, not to change the meaning.

Here’s the quote again:

quote: GC 583
In rejecting the truth, men reject its Author. In trampling upon the law of God, they deny the authority of the Law-giver. It is as easy to make an idol of false doctrines and theories as to fashion an idol of wood or stone. By misrepresenting the attributes of God, Satan leads men to conceive of Him in a false character. With many, a philosophical idol is enthroned in the place of Jehovah; while the living God, as He is revealed in His word, in Christ, and in the works of creation, is worshiped by but few. Thousands deify nature while they deny the God of nature. Though in a different form, idolatry exists in the Christian world today as verily as it existed among ancient Israel in the days of Elijah. The god of many professedly wise men, of philosophers, poets, politicians, journalists--the god of polished fashionable circles, of many colleges and universities, even of some theological institutions--is little better than Baal, the sun-god of Phoenicia. {GC 583.1}

You cited this quote to prove that born again believers can ignorantly make an idol out of false doctrine, which is damnable heresy, without realizing it is morally wrong. You did this to prove that it is possible for a born again believer to develop and/or possess one of the character defects Paul listed in Galatians without realizing it is morally wrong. I don’t see how you can quote this passage to prove your point. The insights in this quote do not support the conclusions you derive from it.

Tom:Yes they do. I've pointed this out several times, but you are either ignoring it or haven't noticed. The quote says that it is as easy to make idols out of false ideas as it is to fashion them out of wood or stone. That means it's a very easy thing to do. A person can easily have a wrong idea, even a "damnable heresy" and be in a saved condition. I'll give you a specific example.

Take the doctrine of eternal hell. Ellen White speaks of this as a "damnable heresy" to use you rule of synomyns. Yet there are many Christians, most in fact, who are in a saved condition, yet hold to this false doctrine.

Mike:Also, I didn’t change the subject. The topic of this thread is “hidden character defects”. Character is the result of choice, not chance. It requires habitual, repetitious actions, whether in thought, word, or deed. To develop sinful traits of character a person must wilfully, knowingly, deliberately choose to violate his or her conscience and convictions.

A defective trait of character is not the result of doing something you believe is right, even if it is wrong. For example, if you honestly and truly believe it is God’s will for you to have more than one spouse, and you believe you are obeying the word and voice of God, then, in the eyes of God, you are not guilty of fornication or adultery, or any other sin. Nor is it considered a hidden character defect.

Tom:This is the non-falsiable thing again.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/20/05 05:46 PM

Tom, no born again believer can be guilty of fornication without realizing it is wrong. Period. Your polygamy example does not prove it is possible to develop and/or possess a sinful trait of character related to fornication and still be in a saved state. A polygamist is legally married and is not guilty of fornication. Paul clearly says that anybody guilty of any one of the sinful traits he listed will not inherit the kingdom of God. No amount of twisting or wrangling can undo or undermine what he wrote.

quote:
You seem to be assuming that any born again person could only have sexual relations while being married to one person without being convicted that they were doing something wrong. I disagree with your assumption.

In what way is being married to one person wrong? Why would God convict them of wrongdoing if they are monogamous?

quote:
Yes they do. I've pointed this out several times, but you are either ignoring it or haven't noticed. The quote says that it is as easy to make idols out of false ideas as it is to fashion them out of wood or stone. That means it's a very easy thing to do. A person can easily have a wrong idea, even a "damnable heresy" and be in a saved condition. I'll give you a specific example.

No, Tom, that’s not what the she meant. She’s condemning idolizing the false doctrine, not ignorantly believing it. You are mixing meanings here. Nobody can make an idol out of anything, right or wrong, and be in a saved state. Innocently and honestly believing in "hell" isn't a defective trait of character.

quote:
Mike: Also, I didn’t change the subject. The topic of this thread is “hidden character defects”. Character is the result of choice, not chance. It requires habitual, repetitious actions, whether in thought, word, or deed. To develop sinful traits of character a person must wilfully, knowingly, deliberately choose to violate his or her conscience and convictions.

A defective trait of character is not the result of doing something you believe is right, even if it is wrong. For example, if you honestly and truly believe it is God’s will for you to have more than one spouse, and you believe you are obeying the word and voice of God, then, in the eyes of God, you are not guilty of fornication or adultery, or any other sin. Nor is it considered a hidden character defect.

Tom:This is the non-falsiable thing again.

You’ll need to do better than that, Tom. Please address the point. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/20/05 07:24 PM

Does the sentence "Period" add anything to an argument? E.g.

quote:
Tom, no born again believer can be guilty of fornication without realizing it is wrong. Period.
I'm not sure how to go about counteracting the "Period". Maybe "Exclamation point!".

Mike, a born again believer can be guilty of fornication without realizing it is wrong. Exclamation point!

You seem to want to use this definition for fornication:

"voluntary sexual intercourse between persons not married to each other"

I don't think this is the Biblical defnition, as I believe polygamy would be covered under the Biblical definition, but let's go with yours. Under your theory, it would be impossible for a person to be born again without realizing it's a sin to have sexual relations with someone to whom they are not married. I think that's a unreasonable presumption. There are many people who have to be educated about things like this. There are many who feel that if they are in a monogomous committed relationship, they did not need to have that sanctioned by a piece of paper. Just because they accept Jesus Christ as their Savior doesn't all of a sudden make them omniscient. People need to learn these things.

Regarding the idols quote, please notice she says it is as easy to make idols out of false ideas as it is to fashion them out of wood or stone. That means it's a very easy thing to do.

Also I gave you a specific example. Most Christians hold to the false idea that God will torture the wicked. This is a "damnable heresy". Yet they are not lost. Only if one knows what is wrong and rejects the truth does one enter into rebellion against God.

OK, here's another item on the list, "heresies". That's even better than idolatry, since one need not idolize the false idea to have it and be on the list. Simply having the heresy suffices. So my example of believing in eternal hell serves even better here. Millions of Christians hold to heresies, yet they are not lost, provided they do so in ignorance. Since one can ignorantly hold to a heresy, one can possess an item in ignorance which is on Paul's list.

QED
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/21/05 05:17 PM

quote:
You’ll need to do better than that, Tom. Please address the point. Thank you.

Please refer to my last post. Thank you.

quote:
There are many who feel that if they are in a monogomous committed relationship, they did not need to have that sanctioned by a piece of paper.

If they believe they are married in the eyes of God then it isn’t fornication. Paul was talking about actual, bona fide fornication, a sinful disregard of the law of God - not all these exceptions you keep coming up with. No one is in saved state if they wilfully violate their conscience or convictions, or if they are deliberately guilty of developing and/or possessing one of the sinful traits Paul named.

Paul wrote, “Of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.” Do you agree with him?

quote:
Since one can ignorantly hold to a heresy, one can possess an item in ignorance which is on Paul's list.

Paul isn’t talking about a born again believer innocently believing in a false doctrine. He’s talking about being a heretic, which is someone who wilfully rejects the truth in favor of a lie, usually because the truth disallows a cherished sin. The following passage elaborates on this point:

2 Thessalonians
2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Tom, I must confess. I have never known you to fight so hard to contradict the Bible. Why? Paul plainly says no one can be guilty of the things he listed and be saved. Why do you disagree?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/22/05 06:26 AM

Old Tom:You’ll need to do better than that, Tom. Please address the point. Thank you.

Mike:Please refer to my last post. Thank you.

Tom:Addressing the non-falsability of your methodology *is* addressing the point.

Old Tom: There are many who feel that if they are in a monogomous committed relationship, they did not need to have that sanctioned by a piece of paper.

Mike:If they believe they are married in the eyes of God then it isn’t fornication.

Tom:Here's exactly a case in point. Here you are redefining the word "fornication" and sin in general. Fornication can be practiced in ignorance, just like most any other sin. The fact that one ignorantly believes something which is not true does not change the truth. Fornication is fornication, regardless of what one believes.

If one believes one is married, but is not, the fact that one believes oneself to be married does not change the fact of one's marrital status; nor does it transform fornication into a non sinful act.

Mike:Paul was talking about actual, bona fide fornication, a sinful disregard of the law of God - not all these exceptions you keep coming up with.

Tom:If you have sex with someone who is not your spouse, the *is* bona-fide fornication.

Mike:No one is in saved state if they wilfully violate their conscience or convictions, or if they are deliberately guilty of developing and/or possessing one of the sinful traits Paul named.

Tom:I wasn't addressing this issue. I was merely showing that an item on Paul's list could be performed ignorantly, which I have shown. Your redefining words to agree with your beliefs doesn't change the fact that it is possible to commit an act on Paul's list in ignorance.

Mike:Paul wrote, “Of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.” Do you agree with him?

Tom:I agree with Paul. I disagree with you.

Old Tom: Since one can ignorantly hold to a heresy, one can possess an item in ignorance which is on Paul's list.

Mike:Paul isn’t talking about a born again believer innocently believing in a false doctrine.

Tom:I didn't claim he was. I claimed one could commit an act on Paul's list in ignorance.

Mike: He’s talking about being a heretic, which is someone who wilfully rejects the truth in favor of a lie, usually because the truth disallows a cherished sin. The following passage elaborates on this point:

2 Thessalonians
2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Tom:This is not relevant to the point I was making, which was that one could commit an act on Paul's list in ignorance.

Mike:Tom, I must confess. I have never known you to fight so hard to contradict the Bible. Why? Paul plainly says no one can be guilty of the things he listed and be saved. Why do you disagree?

Tom:I don't disagree with Paul. I disagree with you. You are not Paul.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/23/05 06:05 AM

Never mind! So long as you believe it is possible to develop and/or possess one of the sinful traits Paul listed in Galatians, and enter into the kingdom of God, then there is nothing more to discuss.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/23/05 06:38 AM

It's up to you Mike, but if you wished, we could discuss something I actually believed and wrote. Just a thought.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/23/05 05:27 PM

Please, then, state your position clearly. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/23/05 07:10 PM

Mike, just read what I've written! I've been clear the whole time. My very first response to your list was this:

quote:
When a person grows in Christ, he may act, think, or speak selfishly without being aware of it. Our characters do not become instantly mature once we are born again. We still need to grow up to the full stature of Christ.

If one ignorantly does one of the things on your list, that does not mean he is walking according to the flesh.

This is clear, isn't it? I haven't deviated from this, but merely repeated it and adduced proof that my conclusions were correct.

At no point did I write anything even remotely resembling this:

quote:
So long as you believe it is possible to develop and/or possess one of the sinful traits Paul listed in Galatians, and enter into the kingdom of God, then there is nothing more to discuss.
You do see the difference between what I said, and what you said I said, don't you? If you don't, let's explore that.

Thanks,

Tom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/24/05 05:03 PM

Okay, then, how do you define "shall not inherit the kingdom of God"?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/24/05 10:56 PM

The light shining from the cross draws everying to God. Those who do not resist will be led to repentance. They will inherite the kingdom of God (i.e. go to heaven). Those who continually resist will be lost. The first class of people will exhibit the behavior of the list that includes the fruit of the Spirit. The second class will exhibit the behavior of the other list.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/25/05 02:03 AM

Amen. But what about people who die before they finish switching lists?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/25/05 08:06 AM

God will take anyone to heaven who would be happy there. Those who would "long to flee from that holy place" God will in mercy leave to their choice. The choice to be exlcuded from heaven is voluntary.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/25/05 07:15 PM

But what about the people who failed to finish switching lists?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/25/05 09:32 PM

God will take everybody to heaven who will be happy there. It's not about lists; it's about loving God with one's heart and soul. Those who love God will be happy in heaven, and God will take them there. Those who hate God would be unhappy there, so out of mercy God won't take them there.

Paul talks about the fight between the Spirit and the flesh. Those who resist the Spirit will be lost, and those who don't resist will be saved. The saved are characterized by manifesting the fruit of the Spirit, but it is not manifesting that fruit that saves them. Similarly those who resist the Spirit of characterized by manifesting the items on the flesh list, but it is not manifesting these things which cause them to be lost. They are lost because they resist the Spirit of God.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/26/05 04:57 PM

... and if they do not finish switching from one list to the other?

I agree with what you posted the last two times, but you haven't answered my question. You have been insisting that it's possible for a born again believer to innocently and ignorantly possess and/or develop one or more of the sinful traits of character on the flesh list and still be in a saved state.

So, what if they die before they finish switching from the fruits of the flesh list to the fruits of the Spirit list? Will they be raised in the first resurrection? And if so, will Jesus change their character? Will He help them finish switching?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/26/05 05:24 PM

Does ignorantly doing something wrong change one's character? Why would their character need to be changed?

The answer I provided DOES answer the question. God will take those to heaven who would be happy there, which is all those who do not persistenly resist His Spirit doing their earthly life. That's the answer.

The lists are descriptive, not proscriptive.

Tom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/27/05 05:03 PM

Okay, it sounds like we're beginning to say the same thing. Innocently and ignorantly believing a false doctrine, for example, does not effect ones character.

Developing and/or possessing a sinful trait of character is the direct result of deliberately and habitually choosing to think, say, or do things that violate ones moral conscience and convictions.

Nobody, especially a born again believer, can accidentally develop and/or possess a cultivated (as opposed to inherited) sinful trait of character without realizing it is morally wrong.

Do you agree?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/28/05 06:59 AM

It depends on how the terms are defined. For example, in the fornication example I gave earlier, I would maintain that fornication is fornication, regardless of whether or not one is deluded as to one's matrimonial state. Similarly Sabbath-breaking is Sabbath-breaking, regardless of one's ignorance of the Sabbath.

It's true that God winks in times of ignorance, and that for purposes of judgment one's light is taken into account. However, ignorance does not prevent bad effects of transgression from occuring. For example, one might no know that smoking is unhealthful, but that lack of knowledge will no deter the delerious effects of smoking.

So one could in ignorance possess character flaws, however not in a sense that would prevent one from dying and going to heaven. Being ready to meet Christ at His Second Coming is another matter.

We've never really discussed this, so this might be a good time to bring it up. I perceive that being ready for Christ's second coming does not require the same preparation as being ready for death. You've written some things which cause me to suspect you may disagree with this, but I'm not sure.

This would make a good topic, BTW.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/28/05 08:55 PM

Yeah, I suspected we were not in agreement regarding sins of ignorance and character. But it sounds like we are in agreement concerning some of the differences between the resurrected saints and the translated saints. Both points have to do with the same issue.

Here's what I mean. I believe there is a fundamental difference, as it relates to our salvation status, between intellectual and moral imperfections. You are probably familiar with my thinking on this point.

Polygamy, sabbath keeping, diet and health reform, the sanctuary message, etc., are mental (intellectual) issues that require Bible study to know the difference between right and wrong. As such, people who are totally ignorant of these Bible truths are not guilty of known or wilfull sin.

Since it is character that determines our eternal destiny in judgment, it is clear to me that sins of ignorance cannot and do not impact character development. Innocently and ignorantly violating an intellectual Bible truth does not affect our character, and do not count against us in judgment.

The same cannot be said of moral Bible truths, things we know naturally from birth. Whether or not someone is ignorant of the Bible there are certain truths we as human beings know instinctively. The last six commandments deal with such truths. No one can ignorantly violate one of them without realizing it is morally wrong.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/28/05 10:10 PM

I agree there are points we hold in common. One point I'm not clear on is regarding translation and resurrection. Do you see that one could be ready for death without being ready for translation? I've very interested in your thoughts on this.

There's two points I disagree with from your post. First of all, it appears to me you see that character only deals with that which is judged. I disagree with this.

That is, one can be morally innocent of committing some act, and will be judged (or not judged) accordingly, but the impact of those acts done ignorantly does have an impact upon the character. It has to. The character is that which is formed by repeated actions/decisions/thoughts. One may be ignorantly committing a given sin (and thus not held liable for it in judgment) but the committing of that sin still impacts the character, because the character is fed by the bad habit.

Hopefully I'm being clear about this.

The second point I disagree with is that you believe there are certain things we know are wrong from birth. I think that's a position which is completely untenable. Can you present any evidence that there is anything we know from birth to be wrong? I contend that all moral issues involving wrong and right are learned.

Consider modesty (dealing with nakedness). Is the sin of immodesty something we know from birth? It seems to me, given your definitions of intellectual vs. known-from-birth sins, immodesty would have to fall in the known-from-birth side. But what is immodest varies tremendously from one culture to another, and from one person to another. For example, in one part of the world, a woman's exposing her breasts would not be seen as immodest, but exposing an ankle would be strictly taboo. So is it a sin for a woman to expose her breasts? Is this something known from birth? Or an intellectual sin?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/01/05 05:46 AM

Tom, sorry I disappeared all of a sudden. A crazy thunderstorm thrashed our neck of the woods and left a huge mess in its wake; nothing like Katrina or Rita, though.

Yes, I believe the difference between those who are resurrected and those who are translated when Jesus arrives has to do with intellectual perfection (please refer to my last few posts regarding specific examples of mental or intellectual issues). That is, the translated saints will be perfect both morally and intellectually. Whereas, the resurrected saints, dating all the way back to the beginning, may or may not have experienced intellectual perfection. But there is no difference between the two groups so far as moral perfection is concerned (other than some may be more mature than others).

quote:
One may be ignorantly committing a given sin (and thus not held liable for it in judgment) but the committing of that sin still impacts the character, because the character is fed by the bad habit.

Not as I see it. Remember, I make a huge distinction between mental and moral perfection. Faithfully keeping the Sabbath six days early, though unbiblical, doesn’t cause the person to develop bad character.

quote:
Can you present any evidence that there is anything we know from birth to be wrong? I contend that all moral issues involving wrong and right are learned.

Yes. Romans 2:13-15 is evidence. “As through Christ every human being has life, so also through Him every soul receives some ray of divine light. Not only intellectual but spiritual power, a perception of right, a desire for goodness, exists in every heart.” (RC 106)

Morality is not only known from birth, but it is also culturally relevant. Every culture has its own standards of morality, which coincide, in one way or another, with the last six commandments. The commandment forbids adultery, not going around topless.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/01/05 07:34 AM

It seems to me that I basically agree with the concepts you are stating here, although the language you use is very far different from what I would use. You express yourself in ways which to me is very odd indeed, which makes it difficult for me to understand what you're saying.

I agree there is a difference between resurrection and translation, and the difference is I think pretty much in concept how you see the difference. I also believe that Christ is the light who lightens everyone who comes into the world, although the quote and your statement appears to me to be supporting my point of view that morality is learned, since light implies learning. So I think you've made my point, not yours, but if your basic concept involves Christ's giving light to everyone, I agree with that.

It doesn't sound like you were damaged by the storm. Glad to hear that.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/02/05 05:50 PM

Thanx. Yeah, the storm beat up the area (Southwest Colorado), but most of us made it out just fine. Mold and mildew could be a problem later on, but there are chemicals to cure it.

In what way do you think human beings must learn morality (i.e., things relating to the last six commandments)? What about tribes that have never seen or heard of the Bible? How did they learn about them?

Do you see a difference between things that can be learned only from the Bible (i.e., the seventh-day sabbath, diet and dress reform, and doctrines like the state of the dead and the 2300 day prophecy) and tribes (that have never heard of the Bible) that abide by moral standards that are, at least in principle, in harmony with the last six commandments?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/02/05 08:52 PM

Mike:In what way do you think human beings must learn morality (i.e., things relating to the last six commandments)?

Tom:In every way. We don't know morality by instinct. We are taught it.

Mike:What about tribes that have never seen or heard of the Bible? How did they learn about them?

Tom:From their parents, and other members of the tribe, and from God's revelation of Himself through nature and the Holy Spirit.

Mike:Do you see a difference between things that can be learned only from the Bible (i.e., the seventh-day sabbath, diet and dress reform, and doctrines like the state of the dead and the 2300 day prophecy) and tribes (that have never heard of the Bible) that abide by moral standards that are, at least in principle, in harmony with the last six commandments?

Tom:Not in the context that morality is learned. In both cases you have cited, morality is leanred. It's simply the source of that learning which has changed. That is, in neither case (2300 days, or how tribes practice morality) was it known by birth.

This is easily seen by considering what would happen if you took a new born infant from a tribe and switched it with a new born from a typical SDA family here in the states. The infant from the tribe would learn SDA morality, and the one from here would learn tribe morality. If morality was something we obtained from birth, rather than being learned, this wouldn't be the case.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/03/05 05:35 PM

Okay, that explains why we disagree. I believe we are born with an instinctive knowledge of what is morally right and wrong, and you don't. I believe there is a difference between what is known instinctively and what is learned intellectually through Bible study, and you don't.

This explains why we understand "hidden" character defects differently. I believe it is exclusively intellectually related, whereas you believe it is both. In other words, I do not believe born again believers, who are walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, are ignorant of what is morally right and wrong, or ignorant of their potential weaknesses and predispositions.

Because of these fundamental differences of opinion, I don't see how we can ever hope to agree on what constitutes "hidden" character defects. What do you think?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/03/05 07:41 PM

I'm not sure I can answer your question because I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. If you would be kind enough to comment on the example I gave of the tribe baby and non-tribe baby, that would help.

That is, the tribe baby would have learned non-tribe morality in my example, and the non-tribe baby would have learned tribe morality. This would argue that morality is not something one is born with, but is something which is learned.

I don't know how you can assert that morality is not learned. That seems to me to fly in the face of all known observation. Didn't you first learn what was right and wrong from your parents?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/05/05 06:06 AM

There are no differences between tribal and non-tribal babies so far as moral issues are concerned. All human beings are born with an instinctive knowledge of right and wrong as defined by the last six commandments. All cultures have the same moral foundation - honoring parents, murdering, adultery, stealing, lying, and coveting. The reason morality is universal is because it is instinctive. Children who are not raised in noraml situations know it by instinct. For example, feral children know the difference between right and wrong.

http://www.feralchildren.com/en/index.php

Paul wrote about non-Jews who obeyed the law, no doubt referring to the last six commandments, by following their natural instincts. The last six commandments are part of the human DNA. They are written in our hearts and we know them naturally.

Romans
2:13 (For not the hearers of the law [are] just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
2:14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
2:15 Which show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and [their] thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/05/05 12:52 AM

Mike, the web site you cited seems to me to be making my case.

quote:
Gesell summed up Kamala's progress, saying that at the age of 16, after nine years in the care of the orphanage, she still had the mind of a three and a half year old.
This is bringing out the importance of learning to human beings. There's very little human beings do not learn how to do.

I don't see how you've presented any evidence whatsoever that morality is not learned. Was there something from the web site in particular you had in mind?

Allow me to present a specific example. Is bearing one's breasts in public (for a woman, of course) immoral? For someone in our culture, it would be, wouldn't it? The tribal girl baby raised non-tribally would have learned this (but exposing an ankle is OK) but a non-tribal baby raised tribally would have learned that exposing one's breasts is fine (but ankles must be guarded).

I have given you a specific example to counter your theory. Can you present a specific example in favor? What is a specific example of morality which is not learned? (by specific, I mean an actual act)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/05/05 05:49 PM

Tom, the feral children knew that it was wrong to lie and steal. Their animal foster parents didn't teach them, they knew it instinctively.

Going topless is not adultery. There is nothing immoral about it in those cultures where it is normal and acceptable.

Romans 2:13-15 makes it abundantly clear that Gentiles who follow their conscience naturally obeyed the law.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/06/05 03:24 AM

Mike, is it your position that all moral issues are known from birth, and that only intellectual ones are learned afterwards? And that these intellectual ones do not have to do with character?

I'm asking these questions by way of clarification, to see if I have understood your position correctly.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/08/05 05:28 AM

Yes, as I understand the differences between moral and mental matters, we know the moral ones from birth, but the mental (biblical) ones we must learn later on in life. As far as character development is concerned, the intellectual matters we do not know about cannot affect it.

For example, there isn't a diet reform character trait. However, there is a trait related to gluttony, which does not necessarily require knowledge of diet reform.

Character development is related to the choices we make, the habits we form, in relation to our conscience and convictions.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/08/05 06:53 AM

Let's consider sexual morals for a moment. Does one know from birth that monogamy is moral? Does one know from birth that one should be married before having sex?

How do you know which matters are moral and which ones aren't?

Given the 10 commandments is "the moral law", doens't it follow that anything the law condemns is be definition immoral?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/08/05 07:17 PM

Yes, the moral law accommodates morality. Anything we do that violates the law of God constitutes immorality. In cultures where incest or polygamy are not considered immoral God winks at their ignorance. Such ignorance does not affect character development. Character is the result of deliberate choices - not accident or ignorance.

Yes, children know from birth that it is morally right to be faithful to the person or persons they call spouse. We instinctively know it is wrong to cheat on our spouse.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/09/05 12:03 AM

Mike, thank you for your response, but you answered different questions than I was asking.

I asked, "Does one know from birth that monogamy is moral?" You answered that in certain cultures where polygamy or incest is practiced that God winks at ignorance, and these things are not considered immoral. Then a bit later you write that we instinctively know that it is wrong to cheat on one's spouse. These two ideas are in conflict with one another, unless by "one's spouse" you mean any of one's spouses (spice?) or a sibling. I still don't know the answer to the question I asked, which is if we know from birth that monogamy is moral. I'm guessing, based on what you wrote, that the answer is no.

I asked, "Does one know from birth that one should be married before having sex?" You didn't answer this.

I asked, "How do you know which matters are moral and which ones aren't?" You didn't answer this.

I asked, "Given the 10 commandments is "the moral law", doesn't it follow that anything the law condemns is be definition immoral?" You answered that the moral law "accomodates morality". Is this really what you meant? "Accomodate" means "to oblige". What do you mean by saying that the 10 Commandments accommodates morality? This makes no sense to me.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/09/05 05:00 PM

quote:
These two ideas are in conflict with one another, unless by "one's spouse" you mean any of one's spouses (spice?) or a sibling.
Yes, that's what I meant.

quote:
I still don't know the answer to the question I asked, which is if we know from birth that monogamy is moral. I'm guessing, based on what you wrote, that the answer is no.

We know from birth that it is wrong to commit adultery, to cheat on our spouse[s]. I am not promoting polygamy.

quote:
I asked, "Does one know from birth that one should be married before having sex?"

Yes. Marriage is not the same in all cultures. In some cultures having sex is getting married (i.e., Isaac and Rebekah [Gen 24:67]).

quote:
I asked, "How do you know which matters are moral and which ones aren't?"
It all depends on whether we obey or disobey our conscience and convictions. To obey is moral, to disobey is immoral. Immoral means more than sexual perversion. It means going against anything we know instinctively to be morally right as defined by the last six commandments (and the first four if we know about them).

quote:
What do you mean by saying that the 10 Commandments accommodate morality?
They account for morality. They make allowance for, provide for, take into consideration, etc. Morality is defined by the law.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/11/05 07:04 AM

Old Tom: I still don't know the answer to the question I asked, which is if we know from birth that monogamy is moral. I'm guessing, based on what you wrote, that the answer is no.

Mike:We know from birth that it is wrong to commit adultery, to cheat on our spouse[s]. I am not promoting polygamy.

Tom:I'm not suggesting you are promoting polygamy. What I was asking if we know from birth that monogamy is moral. It seems to me that your answer to this question is no, we don't know this from birth.

Old Tom: I asked, "Does one know from birth that one should be married before having sex?"

Mike:Yes. Marriage is not the same in all cultures. In some cultures having sex is getting married (i.e., Isaac and Rebekah [Gen 24:67]).

Tom:All cultures recognize the difference between sex and marriage. Isaac and Rebekah were not married because they had sex. This is an aside to our conversation, but a point worth noting.

Old Tom: I asked, "How do you know which matters are moral and which ones aren't?"

Mike:It all depends on whether we obey or disobey our conscience and convictions.

Tom:But what if our conscience and convictions tell us to disobey the law? This is where your whole theory falls apart, it seems to me. No one has a conscience or convictions which are totally in line with the law of God. It's only a matter of degree how much one is off from another. The only chance we have to be even remotely close is if we are raised in an godly home with knowledge of the Scriptures. You seem to have in mind some minimum standard -- a least common denominator of morality if you will. But this least common denominator will vary from culture to culture and from home to home within that culture, and from person to person within that home.

Mike: To obey is moral, to disobey is immoral.

Tom: This is circular reasoning. The law defines morality, not one's conscience. One is judged according to what one knows, but ignorance does not turn an immoral act into a moral one. This is the point you keep stumbling on, IMO.

Mike: Immoral means more than sexual perversion. It means going against anything we know instinctively to be morally right as defined by the last six commandments (and the first four if we know about them).

Tom: Once again, what we know instinctively to be morally right is a moving target, depending on a number of factors. But morality is perfectly defined by God's law; it's not a moving target.

Old Tom: What do you mean by saying that the 10 Commandments accommodate morality?

Mike:They account for morality. They make allowance for, provide for, take into consideration, etc. Morality is defined by the law.

Tom:I still don't know what you're saying here. On the one hand you say is makes allowance for, provides for, takes into consideration etc. This is one thought. Then you have another thought, which is it accounts for and defines morality.

I agree with you that morality is defined by the law. But this is a totally different idea than that morality is accomoadated by the law, or that the law makes allowances for morality.

Even according to your own concept of the atonement what you're saying doesn't appear to me to make sense, because if the law makes allowances for disobedience, then, by your way of thinking, Christ would not have had to die. It is because the law does NOT accomodate that Christ had to die.

So it appears to me you are presenting two conflicting thoughts. Either the law accomodates morality, or it defines morality. It can't do both. At least I don't see how. Perhaps you could flesh this out a bit more.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/12/05 06:25 AM

quote:
What I was asking if we know from birth that monogamy is moral. It seems to me that your answer to this question is no, we don't know this from birth.

Correct. But we do know, from birth, that adultery is morally wrong. Polygamy is not considered immoral, in the eyes of God, if one does not know better. Immorality is the result of deliberately violating ones moral conscience and convictions, which we inherit at birth.

quote:
One is judged according to what one knows, but ignorance does not turn an immoral act into a moral one.

Because we are born with an instinctive knowledge of what is morally right and wrong, as defined by the last six commandments, no one can innocently or ignorantly be immoral. It’s not a moving target. We are judged by what we know and whether or not we walk accordingly. That’s what Paul meant in Rom 2:13-15. Gentiles will be saved by the blood of Jesus and because they did not violate their conscience and convictions. It’s the same standard of righteousness.

quote:
I agree with you that morality is defined by the law.

Fine. If you don’t like my use of the word “accommodate”, then forget I ever used it. But don't try and make it seem like I'm contradicting myself or the truth. You know better.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/12/05 07:48 AM

Correct. But we do know, from birth, that adultery is morally wrong. Polygamy is not considered immoral, in the eyes of God, if one does not know better. Immorality is the result of deliberately violating ones moral conscience and convictions, which we inherit at birth.

How can you speak for all of humanity? I don't understand this. How do you know what things a person in China knows from birth? How do you decide what's immoral and what isn't? What's your criteria? You can't just say the last 6 commandments because they mean different things for different people. I doubt any two people would interpret "covet" exactly the same way. And what about the first 4? Why do they get a free pass? Why doesn't a person know instinctively that worshipping idols is wrong?

Because we are born with an instinctive knowledge of what is morally right and wrong, as defined by the last six commandments, no one can innocently or ignorantly be immoral. It’s not a moving target. We are judged by what we know and whether or not we walk accordingly. That’s what Paul meant in Rom 2:13-15. Gentiles will be saved by the blood of Jesus and because they did not violate their conscience and convictions. It’s the same standard of righteousness.

I disagree that the fact that those who do not have the law have consciences means they were born with them. Why couldn't they have developed them? That seems to me far more likely. Consider Romans 1:18 and following, which points out that the truth about God is known because God has shown it to them. There's nothing in inspiration anywhere that I'm aware of that states that we are born with our consciences and convictions already formed. In fact, I would ask you for one example of a conviction that one has at birth. Human beings don't even know how to swim from birth.

I agree with you that morality is defined by the law.

Fine. If you don’t like my use of the word “accommodate”, then forget I ever used it. But don't try and make it seem like I'm contradicting myself or the truth. You know better.

I don't know why you're upset. You did contradict yourself; at least it sure seems like it to me. I'm not "acting". I pointed out the source of what was confusing me.

It looked to me like you were misusing the word "accomoate" and I asked for clarification. You clarified that the law "makes allowance" for morlity, which is indeed what accomate means. So this makes it seem like you really wanted to say "accomodate". But now you're upset at me for taking issue with your use of the word. So now I'm more confused than before.

Did you relly mean to say that the law "accomodates" morality; that is "makes allowance" for it? If so, then please explain how. If not, then please explain what you meant to say.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/12/05 05:56 PM

Tom, I believe Rom 2:13-15 teaches people have a natural knowledge of what is morally right and wrong which harmonizes with the last six commandments. You do not agree.

An example? How about Rom 2:13-15. What about the feral children? What about the fact basic morals are the same all over the world? Sure there are variations of the same morals, but there is a commonality.

The word "acommodate" accomodates what I was trying to say quite nicely - except in your mind. So, please, disregard it, and move on. I get tired of your word games. You know exactly what I mean. The law defines morality.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/12/05 10:50 PM

Tom, I believe Rom 2:13-15 teaches people have a natural knowledge of what is morally right and wrong which harmonizes with the last six commandments. You do not agree.

In Romans 1 it says that people know the truth because God has told them. John 1:9 also says the same thing in saying that Christ is the true light that lightens everyone who comes into the world. So while I'm sure there is a hard-wiring of morality into humanity to some extent, the specifics as to how this is implemented in one's life is almost completely learned, IMO.

An example? How about Rom 2:13-15.

This is a poor example, because this is the passage under dispute.

What about the feral children?

This is a better example. I wasn't able to find the exactly thing you were referring to. This was very interesting.

What about the fact basic morals are the same all over the world? Sure there are variations of the same morals, but there is a commonality.

This is a good example. However an equally plausible explanation to the fact that there is a comonality of morality throughtout the world is that the same God is communicating truth to all peoples. The fact that there is commonality of morals does not necessarily argue that these morals are known instinctually rather then learned.

The word "acommodate" accomodates what I was trying to say quite nicely - except in your mind.

How so? You are implying there is something unique about my understanding of the word "accomodate", but I just referred to the dictionary definition. It appears to me that the word "accomodate" does not accomodate what you were trying to say, except in your mind.

So, please, disregard it, and move on. I get tired of your word games. You know exactly what I mean. The law defines morality.

I'm just asking for clarification. I don't know why you are making this personal. I STILL don't know what you mean, even though you claim I know exactly what you mean. I DON'T.

When I asked for clarification of "accomodate" you suggested "make allowance for," which is a fine definition. So let's throw away "accomoodate" and use "make allowance for". Make allowance for what? What is it you are trying to say?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/13/05 05:48 PM

Tom, one more time, please forget I eve used the word "accommodate". Thank you. You know I believe the law defines morality. That's what I mean. Nothin more, nothing less.

I'm glad we agree that humans have some degree of instinctive knowledge of morality as defined by the law. Since we were originally made in the image and likeness of God morality is latent, in greater or lesser degree, within all of us.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/14/05 06:05 AM

quote:
Since we were originally made in the image and likeness of God morality is latent, in greater or lesser degree, within all of us.
I agree with this.

I disagree with the idea that there is nothing moral that we learn, which is what you position is, correct? (I'm basing this on your assertion that we know all moral things instinctively at birth).
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/15/05 06:14 AM

Yes, there are details regarding biblical morality that we can learn, and must learn if we hope to be translated alive when Jesus returns. But everyone is born with a basic, instinctive knowlegde of what is morally right and wrong, as defined by the last six commandments, which is why I believe no born again believer can be ignorant of their moral imperfections, as defined by the ten commandments (except, of course, the sabbath commandment, in certain cases).

Back to the original question - What is a hidden character defect? Again, I believe it is uncultivated inherited traits of character (not character) that lie dormant within us, traits that come to the surface when God takes us through experiences that bring them to our attention. We are not guilty of them, they do not represent unknown cultivated sinful traits of character, traits that we ignorantly developed over time by making habitual choices. They are nothing more than uncultivated inherited traits of character.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/15/05 08:03 AM

quote:
But everyone is born with a basic, instinctive knowlegde of what is morally right and wrong, as defined by the last six commandments, which is why I believe no born again believer can be ignorant of their moral imperfections, as defined by the ten commandments (except, of course, the sabbath commandment, in certain cases).
I agree there is some basic morality which is "hard-wired" into us, but believe much of our morality is learned, some being taught to us directly by God through nature and the Holy Spirit, and some through our parents, friends and other acquaintences. If I were going to guess, I would say the largest influence is by our parents, then other people, then God, and finally least important would be the hard-wired part. It seems you are saying the only important part is the hard-wired part; that we don't learn ANY morality. I find this to be a fantastic claim, and totally out of line with both inspiration and scientific discoveries. There is certainly arguments in the nature/nurture question (i.e. to what extent are things genetic and to what extent environmental) but I know of no one who suggests that anything is 100% genetic. This would make men basically like animals, it would seem to me, and destined to play out whatever their genetics destine them to. Well, this fits in logically with the Calvinistic perspective you hold, so perhaps there's some tie here. It's a very different perspective than what I hold, and as I've pointed out, one which seems to me to be very out of harmony with both inspiration and observed behavior.

I've asked for any evidence you might have from inspiration, and I think you've only suggested Romans 2, around vs. 13 to 15. However, these verses should be read in the context of Romans 1, which immediately preceeds it, and points out that all are without excuse because of the things God has shown them.

I apologize in advance if I have misunderstood or mischarterized your views. If so, please point out where I've misunderstood.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/16/05 06:09 AM

Yes, Tom, there is one point you left out:

quote:
Yes, there are details regarding biblical morality that we can learn, and must learn, if we hope to be translated alive when Jesus returns.
Also, Romans 1 is talking about reprobate Jews, not Gentiles.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/16/05 05:56 AM

I noticed the statement about translation, but I didn't really changed anything in terms of our discussion.

I've never heard the suggestion that Romans 1 is talking about reprobate Jews. Here a comment from the first Commentary I consulted:

quote:
Not only by the declarations of the Holy Scriptures, and his judgments, but by nature's teachings, and by the human conscience. Ungodliness. Irreligiousness. This is the fountain of unrighteousness. Hold the truth in unrighteousness. There is a measure of truth revealed to every man.
Here's from the second one:

quote:
Here he begins to show why God's wrath is manifest. They are inexcusable because "that which may be known of God is manifest in them." The next verse shows what may be known of God by all.
Here's from the third one:
quote:
For what is to be known of God - Those great principles which are indispensably necessary to be known. Is manifest in them; for God hath showed it to them - By the light which enlightens every man that cometh into the world.
(There are all from Crosswalk.com, online study helps.)

Paul's argument is that all are guilty, whether Jew or Gentile. The principles laid out in Romans 1 are not limited to Jews. If they were limited to anyone, it would be Gentiles, because the Jews had the Scriptures. Paul is making the point that even the Gentiles are without excuse, because God has manifest the truth to them. John communicates the same thought in John 1:9 that Christ is the true light that lightens every man who comes into the world.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/16/05 05:46 PM

Romans
1:31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

Paul was obviously referring to OT Jews. Why? Because they were God’s covenant people, and only they could be covenant breakers. God did not enter into a covenant with the Gentiles until the NT. After writing that even the Gentiles can, by nature, obey the principles of the law, He wrote:

Romans
2:17 Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God,
2:18 And knowest [his] will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law;
2:19 And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness,
2:20 An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/17/05 06:49 AM

quote:
Paul was obviously referring to OT Jews. Why? Because they were God’s covenant people, and only they could be covenant breakers.
If it were obvious, then someone besides you would have seen this, don't you think? I consulted a number of commentaries, and not a one suggested that Rom. 1:31 was dealing with Jews. The term "coventbreakers" was not dealing with the covenant God made with the Jews, but covenants in general. That is, these were people who didn't keep their promises. Every commentary I consulted gave this same explanation.

I also gave the explanation of Roman 1:18 and following. It is a universal principle which Paul is expounding, which is that ALL are without excuse, because that which can be known of God is known because God has shown it to them.

Keep in mind the context of Paul's argument. He is arguing that ALL are without excuse; ALL need Christ. The principle Paul gives here is the same as that expressed by John in John 1:9 (as at least one of the commentaries noted).
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/17/05 05:25 PM

In Romans chapters 1 and 2 Paul recounts the historical record of a people who held "the truth in unrighteousness" and turned their backs on God and committed all manner of sins. It is true that Gentiles were, in some cases, aware of the truth. But they were not chosen by God to share it with the rest of the world.

Where in the Bible does it say God made a covenant with the Gentiles, a covenant to hold the truth in righteousness? The Gentiles were guilty of the things Paul named from the very beginning. They didn't start off with the truth and then later on "changed the truth of God into a lie." In Romans 2:13-15 Paul says they did not know the law.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/17/05 08:26 PM

In Romans Paul is developing an argument that all are guilty, and need to be saved by Christ. First Paul starts out his argument treating Gentiles. Then he goes on to the Jews. This covers everybody, after which Paul concludes that all are guilty.

Every Commentary I've ever seen sees the framework. If you look at Bibles with section headings, you'll see this too. (e.g. the NIV has "God's wrath against mankind" for Romans 1:18ff, and then a bit later "the Jews and the law")

In addition to Romans 1, you have John 1:9 and Ps. 19 which speak of how God communicates the truth to all men. Jesus is the true light which lightens every person in the world. It is through Christ that God communicates truth to us. We are not like animals which act purely (or even primarily) by instinct.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/18/05 05:29 PM

Okay, once again, Tom, we must agree to disagree. No problem. We're used to it by now, eh? I believe Rom 2:13-15 is talking about those Gentiles who “have not the law”. What does it mean to have and not have the law? I believe to have the law means to have it the way the Jews did. God gave them the law on Sinai to cherish and to protect and to obey and to share with the rest of the world.

Not having the law means the opposite. In other words, God did not entrust them with it. He did not commission the Gentiles to preserve in the Ark of the Covenant or to obey it or to share it with the rest of the world. They were not God’s chosen people to protect and to proclaim the law.

Nevertheless, they did by nature the things contained in the law. They followed their conscience and convictions and God accepted it as law keeping. It showed that the "work" of the law was written in their hearts. The question is - When were these works written in their hearts? I believe it was written in their hearts in Adam. That is, it is left over from being a descendent of Adam, who was made in the image and likeness of God. It is akin to the instincts that govern animal behaviour.

"For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: which show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another."
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/18/05 09:28 PM

Just to clarify, everyone agrees Rom. 2:13-15 is dealing with Gentiles. There's no disagreement there. The disagreement is regarding Romans 1:18ff where you believe it's talking about the Jews and everybody else believes otherwise.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/19/05 05:15 PM

The reason I quoted Rom 2:13-15 is to prove that we are born with an instinctive knowledge of what is fundamentally morally right and wrong as defined by the last six commandments. And, from what I can tell, we both agree. We also agree there are moral details we can, and must, learn later on in life through Bible study and prayer.

However, it appears we disagree as to what constitutes hidden character defects. I believe they are dormant inherited traits of character residing within us of which we are ignorant and have not, therefore, cultivated or turned into character. You do not agree.

I also believe character is the direct result of willfully, knowingly, deliberately choosing to obey or disobey our conscience and convictions. A born again, Spirit-filled believer will not and cannot unwittingly, ignorantly or accidentally possess or develop one of the sinful traits of character Paul listed in Galatians 5. No one, whether converted or unconverted, who possesses or develops one or more of them will inherit the kingdom of God. You disagree.

Do you have anything more you’d like to add?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/19/05 09:18 PM

The reason I quoted Rom 2:13-15 is to prove that we are born with an instinctive knowledge of what is fundamentally morally right and wrong as defined by the last six commandments. And, from what I can tell, we both agree. We also agree there are moral details we can, and must, learn later on in life through Bible study and prayer.

I think it's wrong to emphasize the instinctive part. I think that a minor portion of what we know. God should receive much greater credit for the active role He takes. Jesus Christ is the light which lightens every man who comes into the world. The Gentiles know what they do, not by birth, but because of what God has revealed to them. This is the consistent revelation of inspiration, including, for example, Ps. 19, John 1:9, and Romans 1. Here's a statement from the Spirit of Prophecy:

quote:
Those whom Christ commends in the judgment may have known little of theology, but they have cherished His principles. Through the influence of the divine Spirit they have been a blessing to those about them. Even among the heathen are those who have cherished the spirit of kindness; before the words of life had fallen upon their ears, they have befriended the missionaries, even ministering to them at the peril of their own lives. Among the heathen are those who worship God ignorantly, those to whom the light is never brought by human instrumentality, yet they will not perish. Though ignorant of the written law of God, they have heard His voice speaking to them in nature, and have done the things that the law required. Their works are evidence that the Holy Spirit has touched their hearts, and they are recognized as the children of God.(DA 638)
1)They cherished His priniples.
2)Through the influence of the Spirit they have been a blessin.
3)They have heard His voice speaking to them in nature.
4)The Holy Spirit has touched their hearts

Notice she doesn't attribute their knowledge or ability to keep the law to anything instinctual, but rather as a result of the direct working of God. I don't see that have you provided any evidence to support your claim that our moral knowledge is only instinctual. I've provided evidence that it comes through the working of God, but you have not acknolwedged this.

Also I wouldn't limit what God teaches to the last six commandments. I see no reason to do so. Romans 1 specifically states that God has revealed Himself, so they all should give thanks to Him, so this is entering into areas covered by the first four commandments.


However, it appears we disagree as to what constitutes hidden character defects. I believe they are dormant inherited traits of character residing within us of which we are ignorant and have not, therefore, cultivated or turned into character. You do not agree.

I don't think I disagree too much with the concept you are trying to present regarding what I would call sins of ignorance, but I do disagree with the words you have used to present your idea. It makes no sense to me for you to speak of hidden character defects given you do not see the dormant inherited traits as either defective nor having to do with character.

I also believe character is the direct result of willfully, knowingly, deliberately choosing to obey or disobey our conscience and convictions. A born again, Spirit-filled believer will not and cannot unwittingly, ignorantly or accidentally possess or develop one of the sinful traits of character Paul listed in Galatians 5. No one, whether converted or unconverted, who possesses or develops one or more of them will inherit the kingdom of God. You disagree.

I'm not sure I disagree with the concept you are presenting here. Once again, it's more the words. For example the phrase "accidentally possess one the sinful traits of character"; what exactly does that mean? Is it possible to do accidentally possess one of the sinful traits of character listed? This seems like a meaningless phrase to me, and if it does mean something, I have no idea what that would be.

Here's how I would state it. Paul in Galatians 5 is discussing the difference of those who walk according to the Spirit and those who walk according to the flesh. Those who walk according to the Spirit will develop the fruit of the Spirit. Those who resist the Spirit, and insist and walking according to the flesh, will develop the works, or fruit, of the flesh and will not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

The cause of not entering into heaven is not having the works of the flesh, but of refusing to respond to the Spirit. The sign of those who resist are the works of the flesh.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/20/05 03:46 AM

quote:
I've provided evidence that it comes through the working of God, but you have not acknolwedged this.

quote:
We also agree there are moral details we can, and must, learn later on in life through Bible study and prayer.
The heathens who worshipped God ignorantly, the ones Sister White referred to, did they know Him as Jesus Christ, the Son of God who bought their salvation on Calvary? Did they observe the seventh-day sabbath? Did they forbid graven images?

I totally agree with the last two paragraphs in your last post. However, I cannot but help recalling you believe born again believers can innocently and ignorantly possess and develop one or more of the sins Paul listed in Galatians 5. How does that fit into your statement above?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/20/05 04:43 AM

MM, I think you're misquoting me again. Please quote something I said that you have in mind. I don't recall saying what you are saying I said. I think I've expalined myself half a dozen times or so about this, but you keep misquoting me. But if you can produce a statement where I say that a born-again believer can ignorantly develop and possess one or more of the sins on Paul's list, I'll apologize.

Waiting with baited breath,

Tom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/21/05 06:04 AM

quote:
The heathens who worshipped God ignorantly, the ones Sister White referred to, did they know Him as Jesus Christ, the Son of God who bought their salvation on Calvary? Did they observe the seventh-day sabbath? Did they forbid graven images?

Also, somewhere on the many threads that you and I study on you have concluded that someone who is walking "in the Spirit" can indeed innocently and ignorantly practice one or more of the dreadful sins Paul listed In Galatians 5.

For examples to prove this point you named polygamy, smoking, selfish ambitions, and believing in the natural immortality of the soul (which, you said, misrepresents the character of God and is, therefore, a form of idolatry and a defective trait of character). Do remember ever posting anything like this? If not, then do you disagree with it?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/21/05 06:44 AM

The heathens who worshipped God ignorantly, the ones Sister White referred to, did they know Him as Jesus Christ, the Son of God who bought their salvation on Calvary? Did they observe the seventh-day sabbath? Did they forbid graven images?

The quote from DA addresses the first question. The second one would be no, unless some missionary had presented that truth at some point. The last question would probably depend on the heathens in question.

Also, somewhere on the many threads that you and I study on you have concluded that someone who is walking "in the Spirit" can indeed innocently and ignorantly practice one or more of the dreadful sins Paul listed In Galatians 5.

Once again you are not using language I have used. I would prefer that you use the language I actually use. I've never, to my knowledge, concluded what you are saying here that I have concluded, nor have I used language, I don't believe, which should cause you to think I have concluded this. Once again, I suggest you read what I actually wrote. To reaffirm what I have said, you stated that no one could do any of the things on the list in ignorance, and I showed that they could. The problem is you are addressing a different issue than Paul is. I am disagreeing with you, not with Paul. I agree with Paul.

For examples to prove this point you named polygamy, smoking, selfish ambitions, and believing in the natural immortality of the soul (which, you said, misrepresents the character of God and is, therefore, a form of idolatry and a defective trait of character). Do remember ever posting anything like this? If not, then do you disagree with it?

I did use these examples, but not to disprove what Paul said, but what you said. What needs to made clear is that you are not saying the same thing Paul is. I stated in my own words what I believe Paul is saying:

quote:
Here's how I would state it. Paul in Galatians 5 is discussing the difference of those who walk according to the Spirit and those who walk according to the flesh. Those who walk according to the Spirit will develop the fruit of the Spirit. Those who resist the Spirit, and insist and walking according to the flesh, will develop the works, or fruit, of the flesh and will not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Do you agree with this summary?

You stated that no one could ignorantly do one of the things on Paul's list. This is NOT what Paul said. This is what YOU said. Paul's list includes things people do as a result of walking in the flesh. He did not claim it was impossible to do any of the things on the list in ignorance. YOU have claimed that, without providing any evidence that this is true. I HAVE provided evidence that it is not true, but you have ignored the arguments, preferring instead to ignore them and misinterpret what I have written as disagreeing with Paul.

I hope I have made clear that I do not disagree with Paul, but only with you, and why I disagree with you (but not Paul). If I haven't been clear enough, I'll try again.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/22/05 04:14 AM

quote:
Tom: Also I wouldn't limit what God teaches to the last six commandments. I see no reason to do so. Romans 1 specifically states that God has revealed Himself, so they all should give thanks to Him, so this is entering into areas covered by the first four commandments.

Mike: The heathens who worshipped God ignorantly, the ones Sister White referred to, did they know Him as Jesus Christ, the Son of God who bought their salvation on Calvary? Did they observe the seventh-day sabbath? Did they forbid graven images?

Tom: The quote from DA addresses the first question [I assume you mean - No]. The second one would be no, unless some missionary had presented that truth at some point [does her quote indicate such a possibility]. The last question would probably depend on the heathens in question [are there any heathens that do not have graven images to represent their gods].

Your answers above imply heathens do not obey the first commandments unless they've been taught them. Do you agree?
quote:
To reaffirm what I have said, you stated that no one could do any of the things on the list in ignorance, and I showed that they could.

[Paul] did not claim it was impossible to do any of the things on the list in ignorance. YOU have claimed that, without providing any evidence that this is true. I HAVE provided evidence that it is not true …

I have said all along that born again believers, who are walking “in the Spirit” (Gal 5:16), cannot possess and/or develop any of the sins Paul listed in Galatians 5 AND “enter the kingdom of God”. I have also specified that they will not and cannot, either knowingly or unknowingly, possess them at any time subsequent to their conversion – if they are walking in the Spirit. Do you agree?

My evidence that it’s true is Galatians 5:16. "This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh." And then he names the very sins they will not do. But you seem to be insisting that it is possible to do them without realizing it. Or, did I misunderstand your position?

What is your evidence that a born again believer, who is walking in the Spirit, can possess and/or develop one or more the sins Paul listed without realizing it is wrong? Are you referring to polygamy, smoking, selfish ambition, and false doctrine? Did Paul name these specific sins in his list? If so, please show me. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/22/05 07:13 AM

Regarding the heathen, Romans 1 says those who reject God are without excuse, because they are not thankful to Him. Hence what God reveals about His character is enough for the heathen to recognize His goodness to the point they know to be thankful to Him. Whether or not there is some quote from the Spirit or Prophesy talking about missionaries visiting them and talking about the Sabbath, such a thing is obviously possible. Pitcairn Island is an example. Regarding heathens and idoaltry, there was a time in Egpyt's history where they were apparently monotheistic, so that's one example. I saw on the net references to ancient Near Eastern monotheistic cultures, so that would be another. To think that every heathen who ever lived worshipped idols is pretty far-fetched sounding to me.

Regarding Galatians 5, I think I have stated at least a half dozen times now that what I was disagreeing with was your statement that it is impossible for a born-again believer to ignorantly do any of the items on Paul's list. This is clearly false. "Selfish ambition" is in the NJKV version, which I pointed out. I don't remember citing "false doctrine". However I did cite "heresies". An example of a heresy is believing that God will torture the wicked.

quote:
It is beyond the power of the human mind to estimate the evil which has been wrought by the heresy of eternal torment. The religion of the Bible, full of love and goodness, and abounding in compassion, is darkened by superstition and clothed with terror. When we consider in what false colors Satan has painted the character of God, can we wonder that our merciful Creator is feared, dreaded, and even hated? (GC 536)
It's certainly possible for born-again believers to hold this heresy in ignorance, given that most, in fact, do.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/23/05 04:52 AM

quote:
Regarding the heathen, Romans 1 says those who reject God are without excuse, because they are not thankful to Him. Hence what God reveals about His character is enough for the heathen to recognize His goodness to the point they know to be thankful to Him.

When heathens worship god ignorantly are they worshipping God as we know Him? Are they thankful to the same God we are? Is their concept of God the same as ours? If not, does it count as obeying the first commandment?

quote:
Whether or not there is some quote from the Spirit or Prophesy talking about missionaries visiting them and talking about the Sabbath, such a thing is obviously possible.

Tom, I’m not referring to the SOP in general. I am referring specifically to the quote you posted to prove your point. DA 638. Can heathens obey the first four commandments, like an informed believer, if they have never been taught them from the Bible?

quote:
To think that every heathen who ever lived worshipped idols is pretty far-fetched sounding to me.

Did the Egyptians and the Near Eastern religions you cited refuse to use idols as part of their worship? to represent their god?

quote:
Regarding Galatians 5, I think I have stated at least a half dozen times now that what I was disagreeing with was your statement that it is impossible for a born-again believer to ignorantly do any of the items on Paul's list. This is clearly false.

Did Paul make such an exception? Did he say, “Walk in the Spirit and you may very well accidentally commit one or more of the following sins”?

What is about - "Walk in the Spirit and ye shall not fulfill the lusts of the flesh ... which are these ..." - that makes you think Paul was saying what I said above?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/23/05 10:05 AM

Mike, I don't understand what you're trying to get at regarding the heathen questions.

Here's what I originally wrote:

-----------------------------------------------
I think it's wrong to emphasize the instinctive part. I think that a minor portion of what we know. God should receive much greater credit for the active role He takes. Jesus Christ is the light which lightens every man who comes into the world. The Gentiles know what they do, not by birth, but because of what God has revealed to them. This is the consistent revelation of inspiration, including, for example, Ps. 19, John 1:9, and Romans 1. Here's a statement from the Spirit of Prophecy:

quote:
Those whom Christ commends in the judgment may have known little of theology, but they have cherished His principles. Through the influence of the divine Spirit they have been a blessing to those about them. Even among the heathen are those who have cherished the spirit of kindness; before the words of life had fallen upon their ears, they have befriended the missionaries, even ministering to them at the peril of their own lives. Among the heathen are those who worship God ignorantly, those to whom the light is never brought by human instrumentality, yet they will not perish. Though ignorant of the written law of God, they have heard His voice speaking to them in nature, and have done the things that the law required. Their works are evidence that the Holy Spirit has touched their hearts, and they are recognized as the children of God.(DA 638)
1)They cherished His priniples.
2)Through the influence of the Spirit they have been a blessin.
3)They have heard His voice speaking to them in nature.
4)The Holy Spirit has touched their hearts

Notice she doesn't attribute their knowledge or ability to keep the law to anything instinctual, but rather as a result of the direct working of God. I don't see that have you provided any evidence to support your claim that our moral knowledge is only instinctual. I've provided evidence that it comes through the working of God, but you have not acknolwedged this.

Also I wouldn't limit what God teaches to the last six commandments. I see no reason to do so. Romans 1 specifically states that God has revealed Himself, so they all should give thanks to Him, so this is entering into areas covered by the first four commandments.
----------------------------------------------

You seem to be disagreeing with my last point, thinking that only the last six commandments are known to man by God's revelation of Himself through nature and through His Spirit. Can you support your view?

Also please note the point I made above, which I'll repeat here:

quote:
Notice she doesn't attribute their knowledge or ability to keep the law to anything instinctual, but rather as a result of the direct working of God.
It appears to me the Spirit of Prophecy is presenting a completely differnt interpretation than you are. You ascribe the heathen's knowledge of God to be 100% instinctual and limited to the last six commandments. She does neither.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/23/05 10:13 AM

Regarding Galatians 5, I think I have stated at least a half dozen times now that what I was disagreeing with was your statement that it is impossible for a born-again believer to ignorantly do any of the items on Paul's list. This is clearly false.

Did Paul make such an exception?

No, Paul did not make express your idea, that a person can not ignorantly do one of the items on the list. This idea of yours is yours alone.

Did he say, “Walk in the Spirit and you may very well accidentally commit one or more of the following sins”?

No, he did not discuss ignorantly doing one of the items on his list. This was your idea.

What is about - "Walk in the Spirit and ye shall not fulfill the lusts of the flesh ... which are these ..." - that makes you think Paul was saying what I said above?

I don't understand your question.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/24/05 06:21 AM

quote:
It appears to me the Spirit of Prophecy is presenting a completely differnt interpretation than you are. You ascribe the heathen's knowledge of God to be 100% instinctual and limited to the last six commandments. She does neither.

Actually, I have been saying that their knowledge of God, as revealed in scriptures, is non-existent. Their conception of God is not based on Bible truth. Yes, they worshipped a god because they were impressed through the nature and the ever present influence of the Holy Spirit that there is a creator-god. But they did not worship God as defined and described in the Bible. Nor did they worship God in accordance with the first four commandments.

God, nevertheless, accepted their worship of their god[s] as valid and legitimate. They ignorantly worshipped Him. Paul tried, though unsuccessfully, for the most part, to appeal to the heathens' desire to worship a god[s] by explaining to them the god that they worshipped as the unknown god was actually Jesus Christ, the one and only true God.

The evidence that what I am saying is true is the fact no one or no group of people, who never heard Bible truths, worshipped God according to the first four commandments. But it is clear that they obeyed the last six commandments – both instinctively and as they learned them more thoroughly from their culture and surroundings.

Why is this point important? I believe no one is guiltless of violating one of the last six commandments because no one is ignorant of them. We know them naturally, instinctively. Thus, God will determine our eternal reward in judgment based on whether or not we lived up to our conscience and convictions. No one can claim to have not known it was wrong to develop a trait of character in violation of one or more of the last six commandments.

A hidden character defect, therefore, is not a cultivated trait that ignorantly or accidentally violates one or more of the last six commandments.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/24/05 06:28 AM

quote:
Mike: Did he say, “Walk in the Spirit and you may very well accidentally commit one or more of the following sins”?

Tom: No, he did not discuss ignorantly doing one of the items on his list. This was your idea.

Mike: What is it about - "Walk in the Spirit and ye shall not fulfill the lusts of the flesh ... which are these ..." - that makes you think Paul was saying what I said above?

Tom: I don't understand your question.

When you read verse 16 what is it about it that makes you think Paul is saying a born again believer can ignorantly possess and/or develop one or more of the sins Paul listed?

Since you have admitted that's not what he was saying, why, then, do you believe it? Is there somewhere else where he or someone else said so?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/23/05 09:59 PM

The evidence that what I am saying is true is the fact no one or no group of people, who never heard Bible truths, worshipped God according to the first four commandments. But it is clear that they obeyed the last six commandments – both instinctively and as they learned them more thoroughly from their culture and surroundings.

So your theory is based on a personal observation, not on Scripture.

Why is this point important? I believe no one is guiltless of violating one of the last six commandments because no one is ignorant of them. We know them naturally, instinctively.

Again, this is just a personal theory, correct?

Thus, God will determine our eternal reward in judgment based on whether or not we lived up to our conscience and convictions.

I agree with this. This is Scriptural. However, there's nothing in Scripture which suggests that what is known of God is purely , or primarily, instinctual. Also, there's nothing in Scripture which limits the judgment to the last six commandments. It is true that God accepts the imperfect obedience of the heathen, winking at their ignorance, but this winking applies just as much to the last six commandments as to the first four.

No one can claim to have not known it was wrong to develop a trait of character in violation of one or more of the last six commandments.

If this statement were true, it would also applty to the first four. The standard of judgment is not the Six Commandments; it's the Ten.

A hidden character defect, therefore, is not a cultivated trait that ignorantly or accidentally violates one or more of the last six commandments.

A hidden character defect is a defect of character which one has of which one is ignorant. This can apply to any of the Ten Commandments. We can ignorantly break any one of them. When we begin to understand the breadth of the commandments, and to understand Christ's obedience to them, we may begin to comprehend our ignorance.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/25/05 06:03 AM

quote:
So your theory is based on a personal observation, not on Scripture.

No. I cited Rom 2:13-15 as proof, but you categorically rejected it. Do you also reject the fruits as seen in reality?

quote:
It is true that God accepts the imperfect obedience of the heathen, winking at their ignorance, but this winking applies just as much to the last six commandments as to the first four.

Can you provide an example? If a heathen, against his conscience and convictions, steals something, will God wink at it in judgment (I'm not saying you believe this)?

quote:
If this statement were true, it would also applty to the first four. The standard of judgment is not the Six Commandments; it's the Ten.

Do you think there will be people in heaven who never heard of Jesus in this lifetime? If so, then upon what basis were they admitted?

quote:
We can ignorantly break any one of them.

Do you think this applies to a born again believer? That is, do you believe it is possible for a born again believer to lie, steal, cheat, murder, commit adultery, without realizing, during or shortly after the fact, it is wrong? I’m not talking about unwittingly doing something wrong, something you know is wrong but didn’t realize you did it (like not realizing you killed the neighbors cat by backing up the car over it).
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/24/05 09:38 PM

So your theory is based on a personal observation, not on Scripture.

No. I cited Rom 2:13-15 as proof, but you categorically rejected it. Do you also reject the fruits as seen in reality?

Yes, you did cite Rom. 2:13-15, but it seems to me your idea is more a product of observation than what the text says. Even in this thread you are asking me to provide an example to my assertion that God's winking applies as much to the first four commandments as to the last six.

There's nothing in Rom. 2:13-15 which suggests that what the heathen know by nature is limited, or even primarily, something instinctual. Rom. 1 talks about how man knows what can be known of God because God has shown it to them. From the Spirit of Prophesy statement in DA we read that the heathen have cherished God's princples which God communicated to them through His Spirit and by His voice speaking in nature. There was no mention of them knowing something instinctually; rather it is by virtue of God's communicating to them.

I didn't understand your question about fruits.


It is true that God accepts the imperfect obedience of the heathen, winking at their ignorance, but this winking applies just as much to the last six commandments as to the first four.

Can you provide an example? If a heathen, against his conscience and convictions, steals something, will God wink at it in judgment (I'm not saying you believe this)?

God's winks at ignorance. This principle applies to the first four commandments as well as to the last six. One example of breaking one of the last six commandments in ignorance would be polygamy. Another example would be not loving your enemy. Coveting comes to mind. Is coveting something one knows instinctually is wrong? That seems doubtful. Paul says he wouldn't have known coveting was wrong except the law said, "Thou shalt not covet" which implies this commandment is not something one knows instinctually. According to the Spirit of Prophecy, the prohibition against bearing false witness encompasses much more than simply not lying. This broader perspective is not something one would know instinctually, so God would wink at it. That's four examples. I could provide more.

None of the commandments are known in their entirety, as they were revealed in Christ, by instinct. All of them involving learning, and winking.


If this statement were true, it would also applty to the first four. The standard of judgment is not the Six Commandments; it's the Ten.

Do you think there will be people in heaven who never heard of Jesus in this lifetime? If so, then upon what basis were they admitted?

Take a look at the DA statement I quoted above. The answer is there. "They have cherished His principles." This is no different than for those who have heard of Jesus. Those who cherish the principles of God will be taken to heaven because they will be happy there. Those who would not be happy in heaven, God will in mercy allow to die. (GC 541-543)

We can ignorantly break any one of them.

Do you think this applies to a born again believer?

Yes. When one considers how the law was kept by Christ, one becomes aware that one breaks them ignorantly all the time. None of us keeps the law as perfectly as Christ did. We are not held accountable for what we don't know, but this doesn't change the fact that in ignorance we break the law. The simplest example of this is the Sabbath command. Another example that comes to mind would be Catholics who have a saving relationship with Christ yet nevertheless break the second commandment to some extent. The Spirit of Prophecy tells us we can committ idolatry by holding to some personal opinion, which is something I reckon we're all guilty of to varying degrees.

That is, do you believe it is possible for a born again believer to lie, steal, cheat, murder, commit adultery, without realizing, during or shortly after the fact, it is wrong? I’m not talking about unwittingly doing something wrong, something you know is wrong but didn’t realize you did it (like not realizing you killed the neighbors cat by backing up the car over it).

Yes, it's possible. If you read "Thoughts from the Mount of Blessing" you will realise that the commandments do not only cover negative things, but positive as well. One could easily read something from that book and realise that one has been in ignorance breaking one of the principles. For example, one might have been subtly gossiping or telling "white lies" without being convicted of this, but the Holy Spirit brings some point to mind which was previously unknown. The law is "exceeding broad." There is much for us to learn. We don't know everything about the law all at once when we are first converted.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 10/25/05 05:21 PM

Thanx, Tom, for spelling out clearly what you believe about the law and sinning and rebirth. I don't have any further quesitons for you at this time.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/31/06 03:51 PM

This is from another thread, but it in fact belongs here:

Quote:

Whether his dissembling was 20 years later or not does not imply he was guilty of it all along. His was a moment of indiscretion, not 20 years of sinning ignorantly.



How carefully the Lord worked to overcome the prejudice against the Gentiles that had been so firmly fixed in Peter's mind by his Jewish training! By the vision of the sheet and its contents He sought to divest the apostle's mind of this prejudice and to teach the important truth that in heaven there is no respect of persons; that Jew and Gentile are alike precious in God's sight; that through Christ the heathen may be made partakers of the blessings and privileges of the gospel. {AA 136.3}
“While Peter was meditating on the meaning of the vision, the men sent from Cornelius arrived in Joppa and stood before the gate of his lodginghouse. Then the Spirit said to him, ‘Behold, three men seek thee. Arise therefore, and get thee down, and go with them, doubting nothing: for I have sent them.’ {AA 136.4}
To Peter this was a trying command, and it was with reluctance at every step that he undertook the duty laid upon him; but he dared not disobey." {AA 137.1}

Quote:

That is, was Peter blameless in the eyes of God because he was unaware of his sin?




Acts 17:30 The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all men everywhere to repent,

“God does not deal thus with His creatures. His wrath is never visited upon sins of ignorance. Before His judgments are brought upon the earth, the light in regard to this sin must be presented to the world, that man may know why these judgments are to be inflicted, and may have opportunity to escape them.” {ST, November 1, 1899 par. 7}

“They will not be condemned because they do not know the way, the truth, and the life. The truth that has reached their understanding, the light which has shone on the soul, that has not been cherished, and which they have neglected, or refused to be led by, will condemn them. What more could have been done for God's vineyard than has been done? Light, precious light, shines upon his people; but the light will not save them, unless they consent to be saved by it.” {RH, August 23, 1881 par. 9}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 08/31/06 06:56 PM

MM: Whether his dissembling was 20 years later or not does not imply he was guilty of it all along. His was a moment of indiscretion, not 20 years of sinning ignorantly. All born again believers possess the potential to slip in and out of sin. But doing so does not constitute an unknown defective trait of character, a fault the Holy Spirit has been unable to bring to their attention. Besides, Peter was well of aware of his wrongdoing. It did not represent an unknown moral imperfection. His fall from grace was consensual.

R: Mike, I replied in the thread "Hidden Character Defects! What?" in the Bible Study section.

MM: My point is that Peter was not ignorant of his lapse of judgment in Antioch. He had long before confessed his “natural prejudice” on the housetop in Joppa, and had declared his conversion in Caesarea at Cornelius’ house. “Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath showed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.” (Acts 10:28)

Peter’s fall in Antioch was not the result of an unknown weakness, an unknown defective trait of character, an imperfection the Hoy Spirit had not yet revealed to him. He was fully aware of his wrongdoing. Therefore, we cannot cite his sin as an example of a born again believer sinning ignorantly due to an unknown, unconquered defective trait of character.

Again, there is no such thing as an unknown defective trait of character in born again believers who are walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man. All defects and weaknesses must be confessed before they can experience the miracle of rebirth. This does not mean, however, that born again believers are incapable of committing a known sin. But such subsequent falls do not mean they were ignorant of their sin, or the weaknesses that led to it.

SC 29
One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/03/06 01:07 AM

MM: My point is that Peter was not ignorant of his lapse of judgment in Antioch. He had long before confessed his “natural prejudice” on the housetop in Joppa, and had declared his conversion in Caesarea at Cornelius’ house. “Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath showed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.” (Acts 10:28)

Mike,

I was referring to Joppa, as you can see from the AA passage I quoted. I was speaking from memory. In fact this must have happened some 13-14 years after the crucifixion.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/04/06 07:18 PM

Peter's thoughts and feelings regarding Gentiles before his Joppa experience and education were not the result of unrevealed, unknown moral imperfections or defective traits of character. Instead, they were the result of misinterpreting the Bible. Romans, like Canaanites, were considered beyond hope. Why worry about them? Jesus ordered the OT Jews to eradicate the Canaanites – not to share the gospel with them.

No, Peter’s problem was not a moral one, instead it was a mental one, an educational one. Again, there is no such thing as an unknown defective trait of character in born again believers who are walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man. All defects and weaknesses must be confessed before they can experience the miracle of rebirth. This does not mean, however, that born again believers are incapable of committing a known sin. But such subsequent falls do not mean they were ignorant of their sin, or the weaknesses that led to it.

SC 29
One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ. {SC 29.1}

"Every spot" means every defective cultivated trait of character. Nothing is left unrevealed to be learned later on. True, there are certain intellectual errors that may need correcting later on, but the Holy Spirit will not overlook even the least of our moral imperfections during the process of conversion (before we are born again).
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/05/06 04:48 PM

Quote:

No, Peter’s problem was not a moral one, instead it was a mental one, an educational one.



"Prejudice" belongs to the moral realm, and our "educational problems" are cultivated tendencies to evil.

"Every unselfish action makes the character more Christlike. When self is crucified, a change takes place in the life. The heart responds to the touch of the heavenly angels. The wrong tendencies transmitted as a birthright and strengthened by education are dropped out of the life. The current of the thought is changed. A love, broad, deep, noble, Christlike, fills the heart and overflows to all Christ's children." {10MR 55.5}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/05/06 05:37 PM

Okay, but the quote you posted teaches us that "when" we are born again, when self is crucified our defective traits of character are "dropped out of the life" - not after years of gradually discovering them. It is during the process of conversion, which leads up to rebirth and conversion, that we confess the defects and imperfections brought to our attention for the first time in light of the cross by the Holy Spirit. When we complete this process then we are born again.

Please note the when-then relationship described in the following quotes, the amazing grace contrast before and after rebirth:

“Show that true conversion is a change of heart, of thoughts and purposes. Evil habits are to be given up. The sins of evil-speaking, of jealousy, of disobedience, are to be put away. A warfare must be waged against every evil trait of character.” (6T 95)

“There is not a stain in the character because God is enthroned in the heart and Christ does not war against Christ.” (1 S&T 246)

“When in conversion the sinner finds peace with God through the blood of the atonement, the Christian life has but just begun.” (FLB 117)

“When He gives you the mind of Christ, your will becomes as His will, and your character is transformed to be like Christ’s character.” (5T 515)

“When a soul is truly converted, old habits and natural evil besetments are done away in Christ Jesus and all things become new.” (TMK 247)

“When we submit ourselves to Christ, the heart is united with His heart, the will is merged in His will, the mind becomes one with His mind, the thoughts are brought into captivity to Him; we live His life.” (COL 311)

“When true conversion takes place in the heart, it is made manifest in a transformation of character, for those who are converted become Christlike.” (TMK 62)

“You have confessed your sins, and in heart put them away. You have resolved to give yourself to God. Now go to Him, and ask that He will wash away your sins and give you a new heart. Then believe that He does this because He has promised.” (SC 49)

“We must gain the victory over self, crucify the affections and lusts; and then begins the union of the soul with Christ.” (5T 47)

“But Jesus was ever presenting before them that these [defective traits of character] must be given up, emptied from the soul, that he might implant a new nature therein.” (RH 10-5-1897)

“Your self-esteem will be hurt, your high opinion of yourself will be cut away by the ax and the hammer, and the roughness of your character will be smoothed off; and when self and carnal propensities are worked away, then the stone will assume proper proportions for the heavenly building, and then the polishing, refining, subduing, burnishing processes will begin, and you will be molded after the model of Christ’s character.” (YI 1-3-1895)

“The fountain of the heart must be purified before the streams can become pure. He who is trying to reach heaven by his own works in keeping the law is attempting an impossibility. There is no safety for one who has merely a legal religion, a form of godliness. The Christian’s life is not a modification or improvement of the old, but a transformation of nature. There is a death to self and sin, and a new life altogether. This change can be brought about only by the effectual working of the Holy Spirit.” (DA 172)

“By an agency as unseen as the wind, Christ is constantly working upon the heart. Little by little, perhaps unconsciously to the receiver, impressions are made that tend to draw the soul to Christ. These may be received through meditating upon Him, through reading the Scriptures, or through hearing the word from the living preacher. Suddenly, as the Spirit comes with more direct appeal, the soul gladly surrenders itself to Jesus. By many this is called sudden conversion; but it is the result of long wooing by the Spirit of God; a patient, protracted process.” (DA 172)

“When the Spirit of God takes possession of the heart, it transforms the life. Sinful thoughts are put away, evil deeds are renounced; love, humility, and peace take the place of anger, envy, and strife. Joy takes the place of sadness, and the countenance reflects the light of heaven. No one sees the hand that lifts the burden, or beholds the light descend from the courts above. The blessing comes when by faith the soul surrenders itself to God. Then that power which no human eye can see creates a new being in the image of God.” (DA 173)

“The light shining from the cross reveals the love of God. His love is drawing us to Himself. If we do not resist this drawing, we shall be led to the foot of the cross in repentance for the sins that have crucified the Saviour. Then the Spirit of God through faith produces a new life in the soul. The thoughts and desires are brought into obedience to the will of Christ. The heart, the mind, are created anew in the image of Him who works in us to subdue all things to Himself. Then the law of God is written in the mind and heart, and we can say with Christ, ‘I delight to do Thy will, O my God.’” (DA 176)

“All righteous attributes of character dwell in God as a perfect, harmonious whole, and every one who receives Christ as a personal Saviour is privileged to possess these attributes.” (COL 330)

“When we live by faith on the Son of God, the fruits of the Spirit will be seen in our lives; not one will be missing.” (DA 676)

“New faculties are not supplied, but a thorough change is made in the employment of those faculties. The natural inclinations are softened and subdued. New thoughts, new feelings, new motives are implanted. But while every faculty is regenerated, man does not lose his identity.” (TDG 186)

“The appetites and passions must be held in subjection to the higher powers of the mind.” (CC 271) “Those who overcome will follow the example of Christ by bringing bodily appetites and passions under the control of enlightened conscience and reason.” (CON 74)

“The characters formed in this life will determine the future destiny. When Christ shall come, He will not change the character of any individual.” (4T 429)

“When men who claim to be Christians retain all their natural defects of character and disposition, in what does their position differ from that of the worldling? They do not appreciate the truth as a sanctifier, a refiner. They have not been born again.” (6 BC 1101)

“Communion with God imparts to the soul an intimate knowledge of His will. But many who profess the faith know not what true conversion is. They have no experience in communion with the Father through Jesus Christ, and have never felt the power of divine grace to sanctify the heart. Praying and sinning, sinning and praying, their lives are full of malice, deceit, envy, jealousy, and self-love. The prayers of this class are an abomination to God.” (4T 534)
Posted By: John H.

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/06 04:06 AM

Mike, I haven't read all the many pages that constitute this thread, and don't plan on doing so. But I am well acquainted with your views on instant character perfection upon conversion.

Let me ask you this -- have you never run an SOP search using phrases such as "character defects," "defects of character," and the like? EGW wrote many times about and to people who had character flaws that were unknown to them, and these were people who had been converted SDAs for many years. So according to God's prophet, your views on this subject cannot be correct.

Furthermore, I've seen you talk about how you've attained to moral perfection, in keeping with your views; but Sis. White again wrote repeatedly about people who make such claims. She said that those who lay claim to religious perfection of any kind are really the ones who are the farthest from it. Those who draw the closest to God are those who most deeply feel their unworthiness. Such truly holy people would never claim to be perfect, morally or in any other way.

I could post many quotations here in support of what I'm saying, but I think it might be more fruitful if you'd run the searches and discover these things for yourself.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/06 04:16 AM

Yes, I know a person who used to say that he hadn't sinned in 20 years.

I don't know if he is still saying this today though.
Posted By: gordonb1

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/06 05:32 AM

Hello John,

Your recent statement - "EGW wrote many times about and to people who had character flaws that were unknown to them, and these were people who had been converted SDAs for many years." - prompts some questions.

It is true that EGW wrote often to others urging their reform and complete consecration, sometimes in very strong terms. It appears she had a burden for their souls, which at times she declared were imperiled.

But were these flaws unknown to themselves, or rather were these flaws denied, glossed over and covered up? Can a truly converted Christian have soul-damning flaws/sins and be unaware of them? This would seem to lay the charge at Christ's feet for not informing his members of deadly danger.

And can you be sure these were truly converted SDAs "for years". Perhaps they had experienced conversion long before, but had backslidden to lukewarmness (which does not enter the gates, but is spued out), or open sin, as with J.H. Waggoner. Perhaps they were long in the church, but never truly converted, as Peter was admonished "when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren." Luke 22:32.

Perhaps you have ample SOP evidence to support your assertions. If so, could you provide it?

It does not seem possible that EGW would need to write to truly converted Christians to warn them of soul destroying sins.

Please elaborate and clarify your statement,

Thank you,

Gordon
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/06 07:53 AM

A couple of minor corrections, Gordon.

1.If you are thinking of Rev. 3 in regards to the lukewarmness, Christ does not spue the lukewarm out of His mouth. Rather He feels sick to His stomach. It's like lukewarm water makes you want to vomit. But the Greek says Christ is "about" to spue them out of His mouth. When this expression is used elsewhere in the NT, it describes an action which is about to take place, but doesn't. For example, John was "about" to write down something before he was told not to.

2.Peter had been truly converted before his fall. Both Scripture and the Spirit of Prophecy bear this out. He was converted, and then fell, and then re-converted. Judas was the only one of the disciples who was never converted.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/06 04:10 PM


Some good food for thought Gordon, especially your point that if we remain in a soul-destroying sin after conversion through genuine ignorance, that would strongly suggest that God was somehow at fault in not enlightening us. We know that that isn't possible. God will enlighten anyone who is willing to be enlightened regarding salvation.

What is a soul-destroying sin though? The only one that can't be pardoned is the sin against the Holy Spirit - refusing to be enlightened on any point.

MM is saying that after conversion we are enlightened and no longer sin ignorantly. Yesterday I came across this statement by Martin Luther in his Preface to Romans. Luther says that after conversion we are justified but not just. Conversion and sanctification are both aspects of the same thing, salvation, and both are works of a life-time. Luther would add, both are the work of Christ in us through the gifts and none of it is our own work.
Quote:


“Grace” and “gift” differ in that grace actually denotes God's kindness or favor which he has toward us and by which he is disposed to pour Christ and the Spirit with his gifts into us, as becomes clear from chapter 5, where Paul says, "Grace and gift are in Christ, etc." The gifts and the Spirit increase daily in us, yet they are not complete, since evil desires and sins remain in us which war against the Spirit, as Paul says in chapter 7, and in Galations, chapter 5. And Genesis, chapter 3, proclaims the enmity between the offspring of the woman and that of the serpent. But grace does do this much: that we are accounted completely just before God. God's grace is not divided into bits and pieces, as are the gifts, but grace takes us up completely into God's favor for the sake of Christ, our intercessor and mediator, so that the gifts may begin their work in us.

In this way, then, you should understand chapter 7, where St. Paul portrays himself as still a sinner, while in chapter 8 he says that, because of the incomplete gifts and because of the Spirit, there is nothing damnable in those who are in Christ. Because our flesh has not been killed, we are still sinners, but because we believe in Christ and have the beginnings of the Spirit, God so shows us his favor and mercy, that he neither notices nor judges such sins. Rather he deals with us according to our belief in Christ until sin is killed.


Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/06 05:28 PM

JH: Mike, I haven't read all the many pages that constitute this thread, and don't plan on doing so. But I am well acquainted with your views on instant character perfection upon conversion.

MM: From what you’ve posted here it is clear to me you are not as familiar with the view of conversion, rebirth, and moral perfection I have embraced as you say you are. The Bible and the SOP quotes posted throughout this thread, especially the ones posted above, make it clear that truly born again believers are reborn morally complete in Christ.

JH: Let me ask you this -- have you never run an SOP search using phrases such as "character defects," "defects of character," and the like? EGW wrote many times about and to people who had character flaws that were unknown to them, and these were people who had been converted SDAs for many years. So according to God's prophet, your views on this subject cannot be correct.

MM: Yes, I have done an extensive search. In fact, this thread deals with those findings. You might want to reconsider your unwillingness to read it.

JH: Furthermore, I've seen you talk about how you've attained to moral perfection, in keeping with your views; but Sis. White again wrote repeatedly about people who make such claims. She said that those who lay claim to religious perfection of any kind are really the ones who are the farthest from it. Those who draw the closest to God are those who most deeply feel their unworthiness. Such truly holy people would never claim to be perfect, morally or in any other way.

MM: Moral perfection is a gift we receive the moment we experience the miracle of rebirth. Jesus implants within us the sinless seed or mind of the new man. It comes complete with all the righteous fruit and attributes of God’s character. See quotes above. Although we are born again with all of the righteous traits and tendencies of God’s character we are not, however, born again morally mature. Sanctification is the lifelong process, including eternal life, of maturing in the fruits of Spirits, of developing the traits and tendencies we received the moment we were born again.

JH: I could post many quotations here in support of what I'm saying, but I think it might be more fruitful if you'd run the searches and discover these things for yourself.

MM: Again, John, it has already been done and posted on this thread. Please take a minute to read it. Thank you.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/06 08:24 PM

DF: Yes, I know a person who used to say that he hadn't sinned in 20 years. I don't know if he is still saying this today though.

MM: Daryl, do you know of anyone on MSDAOL who is claiming not to have sinned for such and such a period of time? If so, please repost it here. Thank you. Also, what prompted you to post such a thing on this thread?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/09/06 09:37 PM

MS: MM is saying that after conversion we are enlightened and no longer sin ignorantly.

MM: Mark, I have gone to great lengths to explain the difference between moral and mental sins. No one, especially a born again believer, can commit a moral sin without realizing it. Not even heathens. Everyone knows before and after they are converted whether they are guilty of committing a moral sin or not. See Romans 2:13-15.

However, a sincerely converted believer can, in theory, be guilty of committing certain sins ignorantly, that is, without realizing it. I'm not talking about unintentional sins. An unintentional sin is one that we know is wrong but it slipped out of his spontaneously. We repent of it immediately. Neither am I talking about breaking anyone of the last six commandments. Again, everyone, whether born again or not, knows when they are guilty of breaking one of the last six commandments. We are naturally born with such knowledge.

A sin of ignorance is a mental or intellectual issue. It has to do with Biblical insights which require Bible study and conviction before we can be aware of such wrongdoing. We are not born with this knowledge. We must first read about it in the Bible and then experience conviction regarding it before we can be aware of it.

There is no such thing as a sin of ignorance as it pertains to the last six commandments. It only applies to those things that must first be learned through Bible study and conviction. Do you see the same difference?
Posted By: gordonb1

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 03:39 AM

Hello Tom,

Thank you for your reply. Primarily I am asking John if there is evidence to support his statement that ‘EGW wrote to converted Christians to warn them of unknown character flaws.’ I do not recall reading such statements or sentiments from her pen.

This morning I reviewed the corrections you posted.

1. Yes, I refer to ‘lukewarm’ as spoken in Rev. 3:16, and applied to the church of the Laodiceans. The word you have keyed upon is 'will', as highlighted below:

Rev. 3:16 - So then because thou art likewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.

You assert this action will not happen, based upon the Greek. I find otherwise, that based upon the NT Greek, this action will come to pass. This word ‘mello’ (Strong’s 3195 - to intend ) occurs over one hundred times in the NT and the following verses give context to actions which came to pass, as evidenced by Scriptural record.

Matt. 2:13 - Herod will seek the young child (Christ) - Herod did seek
Matt. 17:12 - Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them - He did.
Matt. 17:22 - The Son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of men - He was
John 7:39 - the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive - they did
John 11:51 - he prophesied that Jesus should die - Jesus died
John 14:22 - how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us - Jesus did
Acts 3:3 - seeing Peter and John about to go into the temple - they did
Acts 11:28 - that there should be great dearth in the world: which came to pass
Acts 20:7 - Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow - he did depart
Rev. 12:4 - woman which was ready to be delivered - she did deliver

Other references relate to intended actions which were interrupted by Providence (as in your example of John in Rev. 10:4 - "I was about to write...and I heard a voice...write them not"), or to prophecies yet unfulfilled:

Matt. 16:27 - the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father - He will
Matt. 24:6 - And ye shall hear of wars - we do
Acts 17:31 - a day, in the which he will judge the world - He will
Acts 24:15 - that there shall be a resurrection of the dead - there will be
Heb. 1:14 - who shall be heirs of salvation? - they shall
Rev. 3:10 - hour of temptation which shall come upon all the world - it will
Rev. 3: 16 - I will spue thee out - He will
Rev. 8:13 - three angels, which are yet to sound! - they will

I believe these examples, when read in context, will confirm that mello can define a finished action. Only zealous repentance can elicit a pardon from the sentence “I will spue thee out”.

(Tepid or lukewarm water is my regular beverage, without ill effect - I recommend it)

The following post will quote from EGW sources using ‘lukewarm’ in the Rev. 3:16 context.

Gordon
Posted By: gordonb1

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 04:20 AM

Hello Tom,

Here are some Ellen White observations on the church, or assembly of those found in the Laodicean condition, labelled by Christ as “lukewarm”. Included are some of the warnings EGW sent to professing Christians, but she makes it very clear they are not converted.

The great mass of professing Christians will meet with bitter disappointment in the day of God. They have not upon their foreheads the seal of the living God. Lukewarm and halfhearted, they dishonor God far more than the avowed unbeliever. - 7BC 970

There are a large number of professing Christians who do not really follow Jesus. They do not bear the cross by proper self-denial and self-sacrifice. Although making a great profession of being earnest Christians, they weave into the fabric of their character so many of the threads of their own imperfections that the beautiful pattern is spoiled. Of them Christ says: "You boast of being rich and increased with supposed spiritual attainments. In reality you are neither cold nor hot, but are filled with vain conceit. Unless converted, you cannot be saved; for you would mar heaven with your unsanctified wisdom. I cannot endorse your spirit and your work. You do not act according to the divine Example. You are following a pattern merely of your own invention. Because you are lukewarm, I must spew you out of My mouth." - 7BC 962

There are those who, though professedly serving God, are witnessing against Him. To them the message to the Laodicean church is given. Christ says to them, "I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot." When the avenging angel shall pass through the land, Christ cannot say of them, "Touch them not. I have graven them upon the palms of my hands." No; of these halfhearted ones He says, "I will spew them out of my mouth. They are offensive to me" - 7BC 963

Christ can not present before the Father those who are lukewarm ...”I will spue thee out” (Rev. 3:16, 17 quoted) - General Conference Bulletin, April 6, 1903.


  I saw that many measure themselves among themselves, and compare their lives with the lives of others. This should not be. No one but Christ is given us as an example. He is our true Pattern, and each should strive to excel in imitating Him. We are co-workers with Christ, or co-workers with the enemy. We either gather with Christ or scatter abroad. We are decided, wholehearted Christians, or none at all. Says Christ: "I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spew thee out of My mouth." - 1T 126.

So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spew thee out of My mouth." Were you cold, there would be some hope that you would be converted; but where self-righteousness girds one about, instead of the righteousness of Christ, the deception is so difficult to be seen, and the self-righteousness so hard to be put away, that the case is the most difficult to reach. An unconverted, godless sinner stands in a more favorable condition than such.

You are a stumbling block to sinners. Your lack of consecration is marked. You are scattering from Christ instead of gathering with Him...you are--just that which God cannot accept, just that which, if you remain the same, will be stubble for the fire to consume in the day of God. - 2T 176

Sins exist in the church that God hates, but they are scarcely touched for fear of making enemies. Opposition has risen in the church to the plain testimony. Some will not bear it.

When the church depart from God they despise the plain testimony, and complain of severity and harshness. It is a sad evidence of the lukewarm state of the church.

     Just as long as God has a church, he will have those who will cry aloud and spare not, who will be his instruments to reprove selfishness and sins, and will not shun to declare the whole counsel of God, whether men will hear or forbear. I saw that individuals would rise up against the plain testimonies. It does not suit their natural feelings. They would choose to have smooth things spoken unto them, and have peace cried in their ears. I view the church in a more dangerous condition than they ever have been. Experimental religion is known but by a few. The shaking must soon take place to purify the church. 2 Spiritual Gifts, 283, 284. (c.1858)

Many of our people are lukewarm. They occupy the position of Meroz, neither for nor against, neither cold nor hot. They hear the words of Christ, but do them not. If they remain in this state, He will reject them with abhorrence. - 5T 76-77

This is a long post , but it speaks with one voice. There is no hint or even slight suggestion from Ellen White that those in the Laodicean/lukewarm state will be saved. To search ‘Lukewarm’ on the EGW Estate yields 168 hits, many multiple entries. The only hope for Laodicea is zealous repentance. Those unrepentant, unconverted, will be shaken out and rejected.

Upon what basis do you make your assertions, Tom? They are diametrically oppossed to the plain testimony. We are in dangerous error to explain away such prophecies uttered in warning and love from our Saviour. I see no basis for your claims, but please bring forth your evidence.

Thank you for prompting this revealing study, which has blessed my understanding.

In a later post I'll respond to your statement on Peter's conversion.

Bro. Gordon
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 06:27 AM

I agree with the point that if one does not repent, then one will be rejected. There are those who take the Rev. 3 statement and argue that God has rejected, or will reject, the SDA church, because of its lukewarmness, and point to this verse to make their case.

The reason for rejection is brought out by Jesus Christ:

18He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

19And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

20For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. (John 3)


Here is a portion of a sermon by A. T. Jones:

"I COUNSEL thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see. As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent. Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in unto him, and will sup with him, and he with me." Rev.3:10-20.

GCBD93 page 0200 paragraph 8 This is the counsel that we want to study to-night. I counsel thee. Who is this? [Congregation: Christ.] What is he called in the 14th verse? [Congregation: Faithful and True Witness.] He will make quite a good counselor, will he? The faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God, comes and counsels you and me. Isn't that a good deal of condescension, considering the place from whence the counselor comes? That which we have been studying during the several lessons that are past, that which has come before us so constantly and so fully a few days past now, that word sent to the Laodicean church as to what we are, and how we do not know it - that has come to us from every point of the compass, hasn't it, the last few days? It has come from every side, and from every mouth that has spoken, and the Lord with all the rest has spoken direct to us in the word that was read yesterday upon that very thing. Well, I suppose that all now are ready to confess that what he says is so. So I will not repeat any of that to-night.

He has told us that, and now if we confess that that is so, we shall be ready to take his counsel and appreciate it, and will profit by his counsel, because it is only those persons whom he counsels. Those who receive his testimony; those who are spoken of just before this; he counsels those who are poor, wretched, miserable, blind and naked and do not know it; those that are lukewarm - that is the people to whom this counsel is given. Well, having been brought to that place by the word and testimony, and in every way the Lord has dealt with us these days that are past, in all the lessons that have been given us, then he stoops down and counsels us. Isn't that so? Then, brethren, let us not be so slow to take this counsel as we were the other. Let us not be so slow to come to a place where we can adopt this, as we were to get into a place where we could adopt the other.


This is from another:

Now the question as to whether there is any need of it. Suppose we say we do not see anything to confess at all. That does not touch the matter in any way. When God sends us word that we are sinful, it is for us to say we are so, whether we can see it or not. That should be our experience. We feel rich and increased in goods, and know not that we are wretched and miserable and blind and naked. This is just our condition exactly, whether we can see it or not. When God sends us a message and tells us to believe it, it is time for us to be about it. When he sends out these instructions, it is time that we should confess our sins, and set about to remove them, and to see how long a time it will take, just notice this example in 2Sam.12, where the Lord sent the prophet Nathaniel to David, who said "Thou art the man."

These are from the 1893 General Conference session. The first comment is from A. T. Jones, the second by W. W. Prescott.

This is from Ellen White:

"For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe" [1 Thess. 2:13]. The word of God cannot work effectually in the heart when it is barred out by unbelief. The message which the messengers have been proclaiming is the message to the Laodicean church. [Rev. 3:14-20, quoted.] (1888 Materials, 1051)

I had in mind A. T. Jones' message, which EGW recognizes as being from God. A. T. Jones makes constant reference to the Laodicean message as referring to ourselves. We all are poor, wretched, miserable, blind and naked, and have need to repent.

Perhaps I should not have commented because this is really not the same context as the discussion MM was bringing up. But we can continue the discussion if you wish.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 06:34 AM

Quote:

Mark, I have gone to great lengths to explain the difference between moral and mental sins. No one, especially a born again believer, can commit a moral sin without realizing it. Not even heathens. Everyone knows before and after they are converted whether they are guilty of committing a moral sin or not. See Romans 2:13-15.




Romans 2 doesn't say what you are asserting. It doesn't say that there is *all* moral sins are known by heathens, but that there is *some* moral sin which they know. Paul's whole point is that God has revealed enough to the heathen that they are without excuse should they not respond to God. It is not his point that there is no moral sin which they do not know.

Your distinction between mental sins and moral sins does not exist. Anywhere. In either Scripture or the Spirit of Prophecy. Not once does inspiration anywhere speak of "mental" sins in contract to "moral" sins. Ever.

Inspiration does recognize sins of ignorance and known sin. But both types are moral. In fact, there is no sin which is not moral, because sin is transgression of the law, and the law is moral. It is called "the moral law." Any sin against the moral law is a moral sin.

One can ignorantly commit a moral sin, but one cannot commit any sin which is not moral.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 05:42 PM

Tom, I fervently disagree with your view of morality as it relates to law and light, guilt and condemnation. According to Webster: “Morality is conduct that conforms to an accepted standard of right and wrong.” Jesus will judge Gentiles based on whether or not they lived in harmony with the accepted standard of conduct. That’s what Paul meant in Romans 2:13-15.

Furthermore, a cursory study of cultural ethics and morality around the world, among first, second, and third world communities, reveals clearly everyone everywhere upholds the standards as outlined in the last six commandments. The only variations that exist around the world from the beginning of time have to do with the first four commandments and the laws of Moses.

Again, Jesus does not hold anyone morally guilty of violating one of His moral codes of conduct if they are truly ignorant of them. It is not viewed as a moral sin if they have no idea what they are doing breaks one of Jesus’ laws.

Morality involves a conscious choice to obey or disobey. Thus, no one can ignorantly violate one of the last six commandments. Why? Because no one is ignorant of them. However, there are literally millions of people who innocently and ignorantly violated dozens of Jesus' moral laws. And not one of them is counted guilty or immoral for it.

Labeling the differences between moral and mental sins the way I have may not suit your theology, Tom, but it does make perfect sense to me, and plenty of others. Again, no one is guilty of immorality if they are truly ignorant of their wrongdoing.

5BC 1145
Men will not be judged for light they have never had. But those who have kept Sunday, whose attention has been called to this error, but who would not open their eyes to behold wondrous things out of the law, will be judged according to the light that has come to them (RH Sept. 13, 1898). {5BC 1145.5}

5T 436
The mistakes that are the natural result of blindness of mind are, when pointed out, no longer sins of ignorance or errors of judgment; but unless there are decided reforms in accordance with the light given, they then become presumptuous sins. The moral darkness that surrounds you will become more dense; your heart will become harder and harder, and you will be more offensive in the sight of God. {5T 435.3}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 05:45 PM

Brother Gordon, thank you for sharing your views on this thread. The inspired quotes and insights you share are a breath of fresh air. I also greatly appreciate the kind and patient manner in which you state the truth. Thank you.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 06:07 PM

Mike, the Ten Commandments are the moral law.

His {God's} laws were not alone for the Jewish nation. The moral law was given before the people called Jews were in existence. The law of ten commandments was of universal obligation. (Sons and Daughters of God 44)

Here we see that the law of ten commandments, not six, is of universal obligation. This law of ten commandments is the "moral law." To break one of these commandments, any one of them, is not a mental sin, but a moral sin. If broken in ignorance, it is a moral sin of ignorance. If broken intentionally, it is a moral sin not done in ignorance.

There is nothing in Scripture or the Spirit of Prophecy which suggests that one can commit a sin which does not violate the moral law. I noticed you presented no evidence from inspiration to support your ideas. (The texts you did present support the position I've been presenting, dealing with sins of ignorance.)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 06:47 PM

TE: Mike, the Ten Commandments are the moral law.

MM: I agree. We can also include the laws of Moses. To knowingly violate any one of them is a moral sin, too.

TE: To break one of these commandments, any one of them, is not a mental sin, but a moral sin. If broken in ignorance, it is a moral sin of ignorance.

MM: I disagree. Please refer to my previous post as to why. Thank you.

TE: There is nothing in Scripture or the Spirit of Prophecy which suggests that one can commit a sin which does not violate the moral law.

MM: I agree.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 07:23 PM

His {God's} laws were not alone for the Jewish nation. The moral law was given before the people called Jews were in existence. The law of ten commandments was of universal obligation. (Sons and Daughters of God 44)

MM, you didn't comment on the main point. All Ten Commandments are universal! Not just six.

Inspiration knows nothing of your idea that the last six commandments are universal and violating them is moral sin whereas the first four are just mental sins. Inspiration presents all ten commandments as being moral and universal. Breaking any one of them is, of course, a moral sin.

Inspiration is quite clear in treating sins of ignorance. Why add a new category, "mental sins," of which inspiration knows nothing?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 07:41 PM

Yes, Tom, the law is universal. It is the standard by which everyone will be sentenced in judgment. Everyone is born with an instinctive knowledge of the last six commandments. Since everyone is aware of what is morally right and wrong, as defined by the last six commandments, no one can break them ignorantly.

But no one is born with an instinctive knowledge of the first four commandments, or most of the laws of Moses. It requires Bible study and conviction before Jesus will hold anyone morally accountable for breaking them.

Knowingly violating one of Jesus’ commandments is a moral sin. Breaking one of them ignorantly is not a moral sin. Morality involves conscious choice. No one is guilty of immorality if they sin innocently and ignorantly.

Again, the blood of Jesus is applied to sins of ignorance if they reach judgment unknown and unrepented.
Posted By: Will

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 10:35 PM

MM,
[QUOTE]
Again, the blood of Jesus is applied to sins of ignorance if they reach judgment unknown and unrepented.
[/QUOTE]

Does this not apply to when a person knowingly sins, and then feels guilt and confesses his or her sins and repents? COuld you elaborate on your above statement.
God Bless,
Will
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 11:04 PM

Yes, Will, Jesus will apply the benefits of His blood to make atonement for confessed and forsaken known sins. He will not, however, justify unconfessed, unforsaken known sins.

It is different in the case of sins of igorance in that Jesus will apply the benefits of His blood to atone for them in judgment - even if they make it there unknown and unconfessed.

The reason for making this point is because Tom disagrees. He believes the blood of Jesus is not required to atone for sins of ignorance if they make it to judgment unknown and unconfessed. He maintains sins of ignorance require blood atonement only if the sinner becomes aware of them and confesses them before he dies.

What do you think?
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 11:12 PM

Quote:

DF: Yes, I know a person who used to say that he hadn't sinned in 20 years. I don't know if he is still saying this today though.
---
MM: Daryl, do you know of anyone on MSDAOL who is claiming not to have sinned for such and such a period of time? If so, please repost it here. Thank you. Also, what prompted you to post such a thing on this thread?



No, what was posted reminded me of somebody at church who used to say that he hadn't sinned in 20 years. That was several years ago. I don't know whether or not this person still makes the same claim. I strongly question those who make such a claim.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 11:15 PM

Tom,

Do you, as MM posted, believe the blood of Jesus is not required to atone for sins of ignorance if they make it to judgment unknown and unconfessed?

Do you, as MM also posted, maintain sins of ignorance require blood atonement only if the sinner becomes aware of them and confesses them before he dies?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 11:23 PM

MM, let me make clear my position. If you look at Leviticus and Numbers where it speaks of the atonement for sins of ignorance, you will see that that offering is made *after* the person becomes aware that they had sinned ignorantly. That is, the sinner commits a sin in ignorance, becomes aware, and then confesses the sin and makes the offering.

If you think about what the atonement, or "at-one-ment," is all about, it makes perfect sense. If we are doing something harmful to a relationship, but don't know it, there nothing that can be done to heal the wounds caused by the harmful action, until that harmful action becomes known. After it becomes known, then the wound can be healed.

It's not a matter of applying rules to satisfy legal requirements. The plan of salvation is not about legal loopholes. It's about restoring relationships. Sin destroys our relationship with God. The atonement is the means by which God restores the relationship which sin has harmed.

The atonement is effect by God's making known His true character to us in Jesus Christ. This is what brings about our healing.

The earth was dark through misapprehension of God. That the gloomy shadows might be lightened, that the world might be brought back to God, Satan's deceptive power was to be broken. This could not be done by force. The exercise of force is contrary to the principles of God's government; He desires only the service of love; and love cannot be commanded; it cannot be won by force or authority. Only by love is love awakened. To know God is to love Him; His character must be manifested in contrast to the character of Satan. This work only one Being in all the universe could do. Only He who knew the height and depth of the love of God could make it known. Upon the world's dark night the Sun of Righteousness must rise, "with healing in His wings." Mal. 4:2. (DA 22)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/10/06 11:49 PM

Tom, I agree with the SOP that Jesus made manifest the loving kingdom and character of the Godhead. No doubt about it. Jesus never has used, nor ever will use, force to compel people to obey or disobey. But this insight in no way means Jesus never has, nor ever will, punish and destroy sinners with fire.

Regarding atoning for sins of ignorance that make it to judgment unknown and unconfessed: it is clear to me that the reason Jesus applies the benefits of His blood to atone for them is because the law requires death for sin.

According to the law, sin is sin whether known or unknown, and the law demands that God 1) punish sinners according to their sinfulness, and then 2) destroy them. I realize you disagree with this insight.

Also, regarding defective traits of character: no one can violate one of the last six commandments without at least initially feeling guilty of wrongdoing. This is true of believers and unbelievers alike.

Everyone is born with an instinctive knowledge of what is morally right and wrong as outlined in the last six commandments. Thus, no one can cultivate a defective trait of characer which violates one of the last six commandments without realizing it is morally wrong.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 12:09 AM

This is one of the texts being referenced to here in this part of the discussion in this topic:

Quote:


Lev. 4:22
When a ruler has sinned and through ignorance has acted against one of the commands of Jehovah his God, which is not to be done, and is guilty;
23 or if his sin which he has sinned shall be made known to him, he shall bring his offering, a kid of the goats, a male without blemish.
24 And he shall lay his hand on the head of the goat and kill it in the place where he kills the burnt offering before Jehovah. It is a sin offering.



The key word here is if.

The question here seems to be, what if his sin is never made known to him, then what?

Will his sin still be forgiven him even though he isn't aware that he had sinned?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 01:11 AM

Daryl, more specifically the question is - Will Jesus forgive sins of ignorance without applying the benefits of His blood that make it to judgment unknown and unconfessed?
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 01:29 AM

The quote I was posting when the forum was hacked:

"The nearer the Christian lives to God, the more he advances in divine illumination of mind. He has more distinct sense of his own littleness, discerns his defects of character, and sees his duty in the light in which God presents it. The more closely he draws to Jesus, the more he has a near and clear sense of his own defects which had before escaped his notice, and he sees the necessity of humbling himself under the mighty hand of God. If lifted up it will not be because he lifts and exalts himself, but because the Lord exalts him. Having his eye fixed upon the purity and perfection of Jesus Christ, and acknowledging and obeying God in all his ways, he is not blinded to his own failures and imperfections. When his deportment in the eyes of men is unblamable and irreprovable, God reads the intents and purposes of the heart." {TDG 16.2}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 02:33 AM

The question as to whether God will forgive sins performed in ignorance is wonderfully revealed by Jesus Christ: "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do."

If we think of the atonement in terms of "at-one-ment," as dealing with loving relationships between individuals, rather than as trying to solve legal problems, the whole think is as easy as pie to understand.

If you are doing something in ignorance which is harming our relaitonship, I need to be made aware of what I'm doing in order for our relationship to be healed. It's just that simple. Until I'm aware of what I'm doing, you have the option of forgiving me of the harmful thing I'm doing, or to hold it against me in spite of my ignorance. We have ample evidence that God will never hold any sin against anyone where the sin is committed in ingnorance, providing the person didn't deliberately avoid evidence that would make known the harmful act.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 02:37 AM

MM, you seem to have the idea that Christ can apply the benfits of His blood in a way which doesn't in any way impact the sinner. Please present some evidence for this idea.

Every example I found in the Spirit of Prophecy which speaks of benefits of the atonement involve the sinner repenting and exercising faith in Christ.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 03:57 AM

Rosangela, the context of the quote you posted makes it clear that Sister White is addressing health retreat leaders who were guilty of wilfully twisting the testimonies to serve their distorted notions. They were not ignorant of their wrongdoing. Their defects were clearly revealed to them and they chose to disregard the counsel of God.

20MR 120-122 St. Helena Rural Health Retreat Not To Be Closed; Divine Counsel To Be

I say in regard to the Health Retreat that it has had a hard time. The curse of God is not on the Crystal Springs institution, but the Lord is displeased with those who have followed their own course of action and not the ways of the Lord, and then have uttered their denouncement of the institution. If Crystal Springs is to be the furnace to try the character to detect the dross and worthless metal, as it has done, and to reveal the gold, let it live, for this is an essential work, to test the metal of men to see how self has been mingled with their plans and course of action.

Yet you flattered yourself, and talked to others of your great desire to help the cause of God and to do a great and good work. You will help the cause of God if you can do it and follow out your own plans and after your own order, to please yourself, but you see no light in following any other plan than that which you desire. You have the matter plainly stated in what I have written to you from time to time. Please read these testimonies. You cannot be clear before God until you make these things right by going over the ground at the Health Retreat and making a different showing and manifesting a different spirit than when you were there before.

But this decided statement is passed over, and you gather up my words and interpret them to favor the closing of the Health Retreat. Now, my words were all opposed to this. I had the statement of your plans, and I say these plans will not carry. You presented to yourself formidable objections to the Retreat's being where it is now located. You talked of the heavy indebtedness upon the institution, and I could but call to mind the report brought by the unfaithful spies. You need the mold of Christ, then good material will be brought into your character building.

The Lord bears long with men, and when they manifest a determination to follow their own judgments, the Lord allows them to do so. I have been made to see the weakness and ignorance of fallen man, even in his best estate. As man goes deeper and deeper in his studies, improving in learning the will and ways of the Lord, he sees more of his own ignorance, thus revealing that he has made decided progress from the beginning.

The nearer the Christian lives to God, the more he advances in divine illumination of mind. He has more distinct sense of his own littleness, discerns his defects of character, and sees his duty in the light in which God presents it. The more closely he draws to Jesus, the more he has a near and clear sense of his own defects which had before escaped his notice, and he sees the necessity of humbling himself under the mighty hand of God. If lifted up it will not be because he lifts and exalts himself, but because the Lord exalts him. Having his eyes fixed upon the purity and perfection of Christ Jesus, and acknowledging and obeying God in all his ways, he is not blinded to his own failures and imperfections. When his deportment in the eyes of men is unblamable and irreprovable, God reads the intents and purposes of the heart.

Christian humility is a wonderful grace--the very antidote to the apostasy of Satan, which has unholy ambition and every delusion that he can frame. The grace of humility through Christ Jesus will make an imperfect man discern his imperfections and make him meet for the inheritance of the saints, where God is all and in all.

I know from the light given me of God that there should be no closing up of the Health Retreat. Should the perplexities in which the Retreat is now involved result in its closing up, Satan would triumph. If those who have hurt the institution by their unwise movements, by their blindness of perception, by their own spirit and narrow action, would come to the right position and all work to remove the stigma they have brought upon it by their own plans, the institution would live and prosper. But when Satan makes a determined effort to assault this instrumentality of God, there are those who ought to know better who unite with the powers of darkness to weaken and discourage and uproot it. But God has said, "Let it live," and it will live if the people of the Lord will do their duty.

Has not the Lord reproved your course, Dr. M.? Why do you maintain your own way nevertheless? Never, never be guilty of yielding to a deceitful, false tongue. Both of you have entrusted capabilities that may be improved greatly and be made efficacious under the discipline of God. Then His righteousness will go before you, and the glory of the Lord will be your rereward. "Without Me," says Christ, "ye can do nothing." [bIf you set at naught His counsel, then you are in danger. You may both be a blessing to the Health Retreat if you bring to it a right spirit and take hold of it as God's work, and not to receive the adulation of man and turn the attention of the people to yourselves to bind them to you, but fasten them to Jesus.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 04:04 AM

TE: MM, you seem to have the idea that Christ can apply the benfits of His blood in a way which doesn't in any way impact the sinner. Please present some evidence for this idea.

MM: The investigative judgment of the dead is all about Jesus doing things that do not affect the sinner while alive. Applying the benefits of His blood in cases of unknown and unconfessed sins of ignorance pertains only to those who are dead.

Hebrews
9:22 And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 06:50 AM

Are you thinking of this statement?

But before this can be accomplished, there must be an examination of the books of record to determine who, through repentance of sin and faith in Christ, are entitled to the benefits of His atonement. (GC 421)

Please note that it is those who "through repentance of sin and faith in Christ" who are entitled to the benefits of the atonement.

Regarding Heb. 9:22, please consider the following:

YOU will find the text in the ninth chapter of Hebrews, and the twenty-second verse: "And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission. This text has in it the very soul and center and secret of all true Christian consecration. The idea has obtained that God was angry with men because of sin, that God's wrath must be satisfied; and so an arrangement must be made by which he could pour out his wrath upon his Son, and thus satisfy his justice. And while this wrath was waiting for full satisfaction when it should be poured out on his Son, a system of sacrifice was instituted which would appease his wrath temporarily, and hold it in abeyance. But this idea of atonement, or reconciliation, separates entirely between the Father and the Son, making the Father so stern and hard that he demands his full "pound of flesh," so to speak, and the Son so kind, so good, that he gives it out of his own heart that we may be set free. Thus, instead of Christ revealing the Father, the two are opposite - entirely separated. But no, "He that hath seen the Son hath seen the Father." And if you want to know how God feels toward sin, notice how Christ hated sin. If you want to know how God feels toward the sinner, notice how Christ loved the sinner. God's wrath burns eternally against sin, and never will be appeased; but it will consume the sinner in the end. His love is unending, unchanging, for the sinner. And just as we have learned that the moral law is not an arbitrary thing, but a statement of everlasting love and life, so, my brethren, may we learn that, although the ceremonies have passed away by limitation, yet the meaning of those ceremonies is just as true to-day as then. And it still is true that "without the shedding of blood there is no remission." (Fifield, Sermon #2, 1897 GCB)

It is true that without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin (for human beings), but the question is why? Peter gives us the answer:

For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: (1 Pet. 3:18)

The purpose of the blood is to bring us to God. Paul brings out the same point:

For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell;And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled. (Col. 1:19-21)

Jesus brings out the same point:

And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (John 3:14-16)

The Spirit of Prophecy tells us that the whole purpose of Christ's mission on earth was to reveal God to us that we might be set right with Him. She was right!
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 02:56 PM

Quote:

Rosangela, the context of the quote you posted makes it clear that Sister White is addressing health retreat leaders who were guilty of wilfully twisting the testimonies to serve their distorted notions. They were not ignorant of their wrongdoing. Their defects were clearly revealed to them and they chose to disregard the counsel of God.



Mike, the context makes it clear that Ellen White is speaking of the determination of those leaders to follow their own judgment - which showed that lack of humility was a character defect in them. They were far from Jesus, because the more closely a person draws to Him, the clearer he discerns his own defects of character which had before escaped his notice and sees the necessity of humbling correcting them (not of persisting in them, as those leaders were doing). In this context she makes the statement we are considering. The statement is clear and there is only one way to interpret it.

“The Lord bears long with men, and when they manifest a determination to follow their own judgments, the Lord allows them to do so. I have been made to see the weakness and ignorance of fallen man, even in his best estate. As man goes deeper and deeper in his studies, improving in learning the will and ways of the Lord, he sees more of his own ignorance, thus revealing that he has made decided progress from the beginning.

The nearer the Christian lives to God, the more he advances in divine illumination of mind. He has more distinct sense of his own littleness, discerns his defects of character, and sees his duty in the light in which God presents it. The more closely he draws to Jesus, the more he has a near and clear sense of his own defects which had before escaped his notice, and he sees the necessity of humbling himself under the mighty hand of God. If lifted up it will not be because he lifts and exalts himself, but because the Lord exalts him. Having his eyes fixed upon the purity and perfection of Christ Jesus, and acknowledging and obeying God in all his ways, he is not blinded to his own failures and imperfections. When his deportment in the eyes of men is unblamable and irreprovable, God reads the intents and purposes of the heart.

”Christian humility is a wonderful grace--the very antidote to the apostasy of Satan, which has unholy ambition and every delusion that he can frame. The grace of humility through Christ Jesus will make an imperfect man discern his imperfections and make him meet for the inheritance of the saints, where God is all and in all.”
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 06:14 PM

TE: The Spirit of Prophecy tells us that the whole purpose of Christ's mission on earth was to reveal God to us that we might be set right with Him. She was right!

MM: By “set right” are you referring to the justification Jesus made possible and available to us through His blood atonement? Or, do mean Jesus will empower us to live in harmony with the will of God as expressed in the Bible? In other words, are you referring to sanctification? Or, both?

The following quotes provide insights as to the purpose of Jesus’ life and death:

Matthew
1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

1 John
3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
3:5 And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin.
3:6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
3:7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
3:8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
3:9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

TE: The purpose of the blood is to bring us to God.

MM: Tom, that is only one reason why Jesus had to die as our substitute. A very good reason, though. Thank you, Jesus! But there are other reasons, too.

Tom, do you agree that 1) the law requires God to punish sinners in proportion to their sinfulness the moment they sin, 2) that the law then requires God to destroy them, that 3) God is obligated to satisfy the demands of the law, that 4) Jesus’ substitutionary death satisfies the demands of the law and appeases the wrath of God, and that 5) Jesus’ death gives God the legal right to pardon us and to empower us to live without sinning and to cultivate the righteous traits of Jesus’ character?

Also, do you agree that no one can unknowingly cultivate an unholy trait of character that violates one of the last six commandments? Do you agree that it is impossible to possess a cultivated sinful trait of character, as condemned by the last six commandments, without realizing it is morally unacceptable?

Again, Jesus cannot ignore or dismiss unknown and unconfessed sins of ignorance during the investigative judgment of the dead. He is required by aw to apply the benefits of His blood to atone for them.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 06:33 PM

Rosangela, do you agree that the retreat leaders were not ignorant of their defects, that they were fully aware of their wrongdoing?

“Has not the Lord reproved your course, Dr. M.? Why do you maintain your own way nevertheless? Never, never be guilty of yielding to a deceitful, false tongue.”

Do you agree that the retreat leaders were resisting the potential for growth in grace as described in the following sentences?

“The nearer the Christian lives to God, the more he advances in divine illumination of mind. He has more distinct sense of his own littleness, discerns his defects of character, and sees his duty in the light in which God presents it.”

Do you agree that the defects and imperfections the retreat leaders were guilty of had not escaped their notice, that they were fully aware of them?

“The more closely he draws to Jesus, the more he has a near and clear sense of his own defects which had before escaped his notice, and he sees the necessity of humbling himself under the mighty hand of God.”
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 07:02 PM

Quote:

Do you agree that the defects and imperfections the retreat leaders were guilty of had not escaped their notice, that they were fully aware of them?



Mike, I'm not following you. They lacked humility and persisted in their ways despite the counsel of the Lord. By way of contrast, Ellen White is showing what their behavior should have been. She is stating that the more closely the true Christian draws to Jesus, “the more he has a near and clear sense of his own defects which had before escaped his notice, and he sees the necessity of humbling himself under the mighty hand of God.” This is a universal truth; it does not reflect the behavior of the retreat leaders.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/11/06 10:16 PM

I understand "set right" to be referring to justification and "kept right" to sanctification. She applies Christ's mission to both:

The only way in which he could set and keep men right was to make himself visible and familiar to their eyes. That men might have salvation he came directly to man, and became a partaker of his nature. (ST 1/20/90)


Regarding Jesus' saving us from our sins, taking away our sins, and destroying the work of the devil, these things are true, and agree with what I've been presenting. Sin will kill us, so to save us, God must separate us from our sins. This He does by drawing us to Himself. Every sin which is acknowledge with a contrite heart, God will remove.

The work of the devil is to misrepresent God's character, and thus deceive us into a life of sin. Jesus Christ destroys the work of the devil by revealing the truth about God.

Quote:

Tom, do you agree that 1) the law requires God to punish sinners in proportion to their sinfulness the moment they sin, 2) that the law then requires God to destroy them, that 3) God is obligated to satisfy the demands of the law, that 4) Jesus’ substitutionary death satisfies the demands of the law and appeases the wrath of God, and that 5) Jesus’ death gives God the legal right to pardon us and to empower us to live without sinning and to cultivate the righteous traits of Jesus’ character?





1.Not in an arbitrary sense. People suffer in proportion to their sin because sin causes suffering. The more sin, the more suffering. The law recognizes the reality of sin, but doesn't create any additional guilt or punishmenst. The punishment is inherent in the sin.

2.The law is not a sentient being who rules God. The law is a transcript of God's character.

3.Same answer as 2.

4.I agree with Waggoner's statement here:

A propitiation is a sacrifice. The statement then is simply that Christ is set forth to be a sacrifice for the remission of our sins. "Once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself." Heb. 9:26. Of course the idea of a propitiation or sacrifice is that there is wrath to be appeased. But take particular notice that it is we who require the sacrifice, and not God. He provides the sacrifice. The idea that God's wrath has to be propitiated in order that we may have forgiveness finds no warrant in the Bible (Waggoner on Romans)."

I agree with the statement that Jesus' death satisfies the demands of the law, and understand this statement in the same way that Waggoner speaks of it. Also EGW in this statement:

As the sinner, drawn by the power of Christ, approaches the uplifted cross, and prostrates himself before it, there is a new creation. A new heart is given him. He becomes a new creature in Christ Jesus. Holiness finds that it has nothing more to require. God Himself is "the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus." Rom. 3:26. (COL 162)

(This is exactly the same thing Waggoner says about Rom. 3:26)

5.God doesn't need to do anything to obtain the legal right to pardon us. He is God. He can pardon whoever He wants. God's offer of pardon to Lucifer demonstrates that there is no legal prerequisite.

Regarding the second part of your question, the law is a transcript of God's character, so when one is brought into harmony with God, one is of necessity brought into harmony with His law.

Quote:

Also, do you agree that no one can unknowingly cultivate an unholy trait of character that violates one of the last six commandments? Do you agree that it is impossible to possess a cultivated sinful trait of character, as condemned by the last six commandments, without realizing it is morally unacceptable?




As I've repeatedly pointed out, there are 10 commandments which are of universal scope, not 6! Actually not I, but Ellen White says that, and she gets it from Scripture. So no, I do not believe in your 6 commandment theory. I have repeatedly asked you to present some evidence for it, and so far you haven't. I don't expect you ever to do so, because I don't believe there is any.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/06 04:28 AM

TE: Sin will kill us, so to save us, God must separate us from our sins. This He does by drawing us to Himself. Every sin which is acknowledge with a contrite heart, God will remove.

MM: How does God prevent sin from killing us right now?

TE: 1. The more sin, the more suffering.

MM: Isn’t this the result of God making it possible for to live a long life of sinning without dying? How much suffering we would experience if God allowed the first sin to kill us?

TE: 2. The law is not a sentient being who rules God.

MM: Is God above the law? Is the law a god?

TE: 3.Same answer as 2.

MM: Can God disregard the just demands of the law? Or, is He obligated by law to execute the death penalty?

AG 139
Justice demands that sin be not merely pardoned, but the death penalty must be executed. God, in the gift of His only-begotten Son, met both these requirements. By dying in man's stead, Christ exhausted the penalty and provided a pardon. {AG 139.2}

TE: 4.I agree with Waggoner's statement here:

MM: Do you also agree with the following insight:

AG 138
Does God turn from justice in showing mercy to the sinner? No; God cannot dishonor His law by suffering it to be transgressed with impunity. Under the new covenant, perfect obedience is the condition of life. If the sinner repents and confesses his sins, he will find pardon. By Christ's sacrifice in his behalf, forgiveness is secured for him. Christ has satisfied the demands of the law for every repentant, believing sinner. {AG 138.4}

TE: So no, I do not believe in your 6 commandment theory. I have repeatedly asked you to present some evidence for it, and so far you haven't. I don't expect you ever to do so, because I don't believe there is any.

MM: Tom, as you know, Jesus articulated the differences between the first four and last commandments. True, it is one law, not ten. To break one is to break them all, and vice versa. Sister White goes on to explain why certain heathens will not perish in spite of the fact they were wholly ignorant of God’s law. It is because their good works were in harmony with the last six commandments.

DA 607
The first four of the Ten Commandments are summed up in the one great precept, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart." The last six are included in the other, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself." {DA 607.2}

DA 638
Even among the heathen are those who have cherished the spirit of kindness; before the words of life had fallen upon their ears, they have befriended the missionaries, even ministering to them at the peril of their own lives. Among the heathen are those who worship God ignorantly, those to whom the light is never brought by human instrumentality, yet they will not perish. Though ignorant of the written law of God, they have heard His voice speaking to them in nature, and have done the things that the law required. Their works are evidence that the Holy Spirit has touched their hearts, and they are recognized as the children of God. {DA 638.2}
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/06 04:55 AM

TE: Sin will kill us, so to save us, God must separate us from our sins. This He does by drawing us to Himself. Every sin which is acknowledge with a contrite heart, God will remove.

MM: How does God prevent sin from killing us right now?

He doesn't reveal the truth to us in doses that would result in our death.

We should not try to lessen our guilt by excusing sin. We must accept God's estimate of sin, and that is heavy indeed. Calvary alone can reveal the terrible enormity of sin. If we had to bear our own guilt, it would crush us. (MB 116)

TE: 1. The more sin, the more suffering.

MM: Isn’t this the result of God making it possible for to live a long life of sinning without dying? How much suffering we would experience if God allowed the first sin to kill us?

If we lived less, we would suffer less. Is that what you're asking? If we were to die before sinning at all, we wouldn't suffer at all.

TE: 2. The law is not a sentient being who rules God.

MM: Is God above the law?

Exactly my point. God always abides by His law. He doesn't kill, lie or steal. The law is a transcript of His character.

Is the law a god?

You're writing makes it appear you think so. You keep expressing yourself as if God were obligated to act in certain ways because of the law, rather than presenting the law as expressing His character.

TE: 3.Same answer as 2.

MM: Can God disregard the just demands of the law?

Do you mean can God act contrary to His character? If that's what you mean, the answer is no. If you mean something else, you'll have to explain what you mean.

Or, is He obligated by law to execute the death penalty?

No, God is not obligated by anybody or anything. He is God. He acts the way He does because of His character, which is defined by love. Love is the fulfilling of the law, and defines God's actions.

AG 139
Justice demands that sin be not merely pardoned, but the death penalty must be executed. God, in the gift of His only-begotten Son, met both these requirements. By dying in man's stead, Christ exhausted the penalty and provided a pardon. {AG 139.2}

TE: 4.I agree with Waggoner's statement here:

MM: Do you also agree with the following insight:

AG 138
Does God turn from justice in showing mercy to the sinner? No; God cannot dishonor His law by suffering it to be transgressed with impunity. Under the new covenant, perfect obedience is the condition of life. If the sinner repents and confesses his sins, he will find pardon. By Christ's sacrifice in his behalf, forgiveness is secured for him. Christ has satisfied the demands of the law for every repentant, believing sinner. {AG 138.4}

Yes. I see it to be saying the same thing as Waggoner's statement, and the statement from COL from Ellen White herself which I quoted.


TE: So no, I do not believe in your 6 commandment theory. I have repeatedly asked you to present some evidence for it, and so far you haven't. I don't expect you ever to do so, because I don't believe there is any.

MM: Tom, as you know, Jesus articulated the differences between the first four and last commandments.

Never in terms of "mental" sins and "moral" sins. All sins not done in ignorance are moral sins.

True, it is one law, not ten. To break one is to break them all, and vice versa. Sister White goes on to explain why certain heathens will not perish in spite of the fact they were wholly ignorant of God’s law. It is because their good works were in harmony with the last six commandments.

No!!! It is because their good works were in harmony with ALL TEN commandments. As you mentioned, it's one law. The WHOLE law is summed up by the principle, "Thou shalt love they neighbor as thyself."

If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. (James 2:8-10)

What is the royal law? The six commandments?

The apostle James, who wrote after the death of Christ, refers to the Decalogue as "the royal law" and "the perfect law of liberty." (GC 466)


DA 607
The first four of the Ten Commandments are summed up in the one great precept, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart." The last six are included in the other, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself." {DA 607.2}

DA 638
Even among the heathen are those who have cherished the spirit of kindness; before the words of life had fallen upon their ears, they have befriended the missionaries, even ministering to them at the peril of their own lives. Among the heathen are those who worship God ignorantly, those to whom the light is never brought by human instrumentality, yet they will not perish. Though ignorant of the written law of God, they have heard His voice speaking to them in nature, and have done the things that the law required. Their works are evidence that the Holy Spirit has touched their hearts, and they are recognized as the children of God. {DA 638.2}

These statements are in hamony with what I've been saying. They do not support the idea of:

1.First four commandments = mental sin.
2.Last six commandments = moral sin.

Your idea does not exist in either Scripture or the Spirit of Prophecy.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/06 06:03 AM

TE: He doesn't reveal the truth to us in doses that would result in our death.

MM: So darkness and ignorance is bliss?

TE: If we lived less, we would suffer less. Is that what you're asking?

MM: Sort of. More specifically, though, none of us would have to suffer for more than one sin if God allowed sin to run its natural course, right? Which means God is responsible for the suffering sinners will experience in the lake of fire above and beyond the first sin, right?

TE: No, God is not obligated by anybody or anything.

MM: Justice demands that sin be not merely pardoned, but the death penalty must be executed. God, in the gift of His only-begotten Son, met both these requirements. By dying in man's stead, Christ exhausted the penalty and provided a pardon. Do you agree?

TE: No!!! It is because their good works were in harmony with ALL TEN commandments. As you mentioned, it's one law. The WHOLE law is summed up by the principle, "Thou shalt love they neighbor as thyself."

MM: Tom, do you believe the heathens she wrote about kept the seventh-day sabbath holy?

TE: The WHOLE law is summed up by the principle, "Thou shalt love they neighbor as thyself."

MM: The first four of the Ten Commandments are summed up in the one great precept, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart." The last six are included in the other, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself." Do you agree?

TE: Your idea does not exist in either Scripture or the Spirit of Prophecy.

MM: Tom, I strongly disagree. There are people who will be in heaven who never knew the law of God, or the son of God. There is no way they could have obeyed the first four commandments under such circumstances. But their works testify as to whether or not they lived in harmony with the last six commandments – the golden rule.

Jesus can safely take them to heaven because He knows that they would have lived in harmony with the first four commandments had they known about them. “Blessed is the man unto whom the LORD imputeth not iniquity, and in whose spirit there is no guile.”

By the way, what do you think I mean by the labels mental and moral sins?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/06 06:57 AM

R: Mike, I'm not following you…. This is a universal truth; it does not reflect the behavior of the retreat leaders.

MM: Right, that’s my point, too. The truth she describes does not apply to certain types of moral defects and imperfections. So, what criteria do we use? What types of defects and imperfections can we apply it to? I suspect you and I would answer this question differently.

Since I do not believe it is possible to unknowingly or ignorantly cultivate traits of character that violate the last six commandments I do not believe it is possible to possess an unknown defective trait of character that is condemned by the last six commandments.

“It is not through one act that the character is formed, but by a repetition of acts that habits are established and character confirmed.” (ST 4-30-1894) Again, no one can repeat the same behaviour over and over again until it becomes a character trait that violates one of the six commandments without realizing it is morally wrong. Especially not a born again, Spirit-led, believer endowed with spiritual eye salve. Do you agree?

Of course, the same cannot be said of those commandments that require Bible study and conviction. For example, a truly born again believer can innocently and ignorantly break the seventh-day Sabbath or the Levitical laws of health without realizing it. Such things, however, do not constitute a defective trait of character. To qualify as a "defective" trait of character conscious disobedience is required. Otherwise, it is considered a sin of ignorance instead of a moral imperfection. Do you agree?
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/06 07:51 AM

TE: He doesn't reveal the truth to us in doses that would result in our death.

MM: So darkness and ignorance is bliss?

This is how you understand the idea that God mercifully reveals truth to us only to the degree that we are willing and able to respond to it? You do realize that this idea is direct from the Spirit of Prophecy, don't you?

TE: If we lived less, we would suffer less. Is that what you're asking?

MM: Sort of. More specifically, though, none of us would have to suffer for more than one sin if God allowed sin to run its natural course, right? Which means God is responsible for the suffering sinners will experience in the lake of fire above and beyond the first sin, right?

To the same extent that God is responsible for sin at all, since He created invidividuals who sin. It seems twisted to me to blame this on God, however.

TE: No, God is not obligated by anybody or anything.

MM: Justice demands that sin be not merely pardoned, but the death penalty must be executed.

Justice is no more capable of acting on its own than the law. "Justice" or "the law" are simply concepts; they are not sentient beings! God is a Being who exercises His will. If "justice" demands that sin not merely be pardoned, but the death penalty executed, then this simply means that God demands that sin not merely be pardoned, but that the death pentalty be executed.

God, in the gift of His only-begotten Son, met both these requirements. By dying in man's stead, Christ exhausted the penalty and provided a pardon. Do you agree?

Not in the way you do. I don't believe that God is being driven by forces outside of Himself, as you seem to, by your means of expressing yourself.

I believe that God so loved the world that He gave His Son, that whosoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. God was motivated by love, not obligated by law.

The law is a transcript of God's character. It reveals His will; it does not create it.


TE: No!!! It is because their good works were in harmony with ALL TEN commandments. As you mentioned, it's one law. The WHOLE law is summed up by the principle, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself."

MM: Tom, do you believe the heathens she wrote about kept the seventh-day sabbath holy?

Do you believe the whole law is summed up by the principle, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself"?

TE: The WHOLE law is summed up by the principle, "Thou shalt love they neighbor as thyself."

MM: The first four of the Ten Commandments are summed up in the one great precept, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart." The last six are included in the other, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself." Do you agree?

TE: Your idea does not exist in either Scripture or the Spirit of Prophecy.

MM: Tom, I strongly disagree.

Then produce some evidence for your view. Where does either Scripture or the Spirit of Prophecy suggest that the first four commandments are "mental" whereas the last six are "moral"?

There are people who will be in heaven who never knew the law of God, or the son of God. There is no way they could have obeyed the first four commandments under such circumstances.

No one will be saved who transgresses the law. The doers of the law will be justified.

Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie. (Rev. 22:14, 15)

9Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

10Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. (1 Cor. 6:9,10)


No idolater will enter heaven. That's in the first group of four.

MM, where, in either Scripture or the Spirit or Prophecy, does it teach that anyone who transgresses the first four commandments will be in heaven?


But their works testify as to whether or not they lived in harmony with the last six commandments – the golden rule.

One is not saved by living in harmony with only six commandments. That's not a Scriptural view. There is not evidence for this idea.

Jesus can safely take them to heaven because He knows that they would have lived in harmony with the first four commandments had they known about them.

There's no basis for this idea in inspiration either. NEVER does either Scripture or the Spirit of Prophecy state that God decides the fate of someone based on something they *would* have done. This is a completely groundless assertion. You cannot produce one statement that says anything other than that a person will be judged based on their actual works, not on what they might have done.

“Blessed is the man unto whom the LORD imputeth not iniquity, and in whose spirit there is no guile.”

By the way, what do you think I mean by the labels mental and moral sins?

By "mental" you mean sins of igonrance. By "moral" you mean sin which are not sins of ignorance. If you stuck to these meanings (and better yet, stuck to these phrases, which everyone knows and understands the meaning of), without introducing the idea about the last six commandments being something which people know instictively whereas the first four aren't, there wouldn't be any problem. The difficult comes when you introduce theories which have no basis in inspiration, and are contrary to reason as well.
Posted By: Tom

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/06 08:02 AM

Quote:

Since I do not believe it is possible to unknowingly or ignorantly cultivate traits of character that violate the last six commandments I do not believe it is possible to possess an unknown defective trait of character that is condemned by the last six commandments.




MM, you seem to take the position that your idea is the only important thing. Rather than letting your idea be shaped by evidence, it seems to me you shape the evidence according to your idea.

Here, for example, you write, "Since I do not believe it is possible to unknowingly or ignorantly cultivate traits of character that violate the last six commandments ..." and then reason from there. This shouldn't be your starting point! Your starting point should be on the basis of evidence, such as Scripture. From *there* you should reason to your conclusion, not from the basis of ideas you already hold.

The problem with making one's ideas the basis by which one reasons is that there is no possible evidence that can be presented that could persuade one that he or she is in error.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/06 09:04 PM

MM: Tom, do you believe the heathens she wrote about kept the seventh-day sabbath holy?

TE: Do you believe the whole law is summed up by the principle, "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself"? … No one will be saved who transgresses the law. The doers of the law will be justified.

MM: Why did Jesus say, On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. Also, do you believe the heathens Sister White wrote about in DA 638 kept holy the seventh-day sabbath? If not, do you believe they will be saved? If so, why?

Matthew
22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
22:38 This is the first and great commandment.
22:39 And the second [is] like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
22:40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

TE: If "justice" demands that sin not merely be pardoned, but the death penalty executed, then this simply means that God demands that sin not merely be pardoned, but that the death pentalty be executed.

MM: Okay, then, but do you believe God demanded in addition to pardon that the death penalty be executed upon Christ as our substitute, and that His death satisfies both requirements (i.e., pardon and death)?

MM: By the way, what do you think I mean by the labels mental and moral sins?

TE: By "mental" you mean sins of igonrance. By "moral" you mean sin which are not sins of ignorance.

MM: Right.

TE: Here, for example, you write, "Since I do not believe it is possible to unknowingly or ignorantly cultivate traits of character that violate the last six commandments ..." and then reason from there. This shouldn't be your starting point! Your starting point should be on the basis of evidence, such as Scripture.

MM: The starting point is based on the Bible and the SOP. It’s just that you disagree. What distinction, if any, do you make between sins of ignorance and sinful traits of character cultivated wilfully and knowingly?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/12/06 10:30 PM

It has been postulated that the Holy Spirit does not reveal to us all of our defects and imperfections during the process of conversion, before we are converted and born again, that He waits to reveal certain types of defects and imperfection until sometime later, after we are born again.

In light of the following quote, which defects and imperfections does the Holy Spirit wait to reveal to born again believers until they are ready to overcome them?

“One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ.” SC 29)

“When a soul is truly converted, old habits and natural evil besetments are done away in Christ Jesus and all things become new.” (TMK 247)

“There is not a stain in the character because God is enthroned in the heart and Christ does not war against Christ.” (1 S&T 246)

“He who has determined to enter the spiritual kingdom will find that all the powers and passions of unregenerate nature, backed by the forces of the kingdom of darkness, are arrayed against him. Each day he must renew his consecration, each day do battle with evil. Old habits, hereditary tendencies to wrong, will strive for the mastery, and against these he is to be ever on guard, striving in Christ's strength for victory.” (AA 476)

“Every day hereditary tendencies to wrong will strive for the mastery. Every day you are to war against your objectionable traits of character, until there are left in you none of those things which need to be separated from you. Then you will think candidly and wisely how to take yourself to the Lord. You will foresee the evils which will come unless you change by avoiding the cause which produces the effect.” (6MR 84)

“The work of redemption involves consequences of which it is difficult for man to have any conception. ‘Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love Him.’ 1 Cor. 2:9. As the sinner, drawn by the power of Christ, approaches the uplifted cross, and prostrates himself before it, there is a new creation. A new heart is given him. He becomes a new creature in Christ Jesus. Holiness finds that it has nothing more to require. God Himself is ‘the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.’ Rom. 3:26. And ‘whom He justified, them He also glorified.’ Rom. 8:30. Great as is the shame and degradation through sin, even greater will be the honor and exaltation through redeeming love. To human beings striving for conformity to the divine image there is imparted an outlay of heaven’s treasure, an excellency of power, that will place them higher than even the angels who have never fallen.” (COL 162)

“The old nature, born of blood and the will of the flesh, cannot inherit the kingdom of God. The old ways, the hereditary tendencies, the former habits, must be given up; for grace is not inherited. The new birth consists in having new motives, new tastes, new tendencies. Those who are begotten unto a new life by the Holy Spirit, have become partakers of the divine nature, and in all their habits and practices they will give evidence of their relationship to Christ. When men who claim to be Christians retain all their natural defects of character and disposition, in what does their position differ from that of the worldling? They do not appreciate the truth as a sanctifier, a refiner. They have not been born again.” (6 BC 1101)

“Communion with God imparts to the soul an intimate knowledge of His will. But many who profess the faith know not what true conversion is. They have no experience in communion with the Father through Jesus Christ, and have never felt the power of divine grace to sanctify the heart. Praying and sinning, sinning and praying, their lives are full of malice, deceit, envy, jealousy, and self-love. The prayers of this class are an abomination to God.” (4T 534)

“Often the question arises, Why, then, are there so many, claiming to believe God’s word, in whom there is not seen a reformation in words, in spirit, and in character? Why are there so many who cannot bear opposition to their purposes and plans, who manifest an unholy temper, and whose words are harsh, overbearing, and passionate? There is seen in their lives the same love of self, the same selfish indulgence, the same temper and hasty speech, that is seen in the life of the worldling. There is the same sensitive pride, the same yielding to natural inclination, the same perversity of character, as if the truth were wholly unknown to them. The reason is that they are not converted. They have not hidden the leaven of truth in the heart. It has not had opportunity to do its work. Their natural and cultivated tendencies to evil have not been submitted to its transforming power. Their lives reveal the absence of the grace of Christ, an unbelief in His power to transform the character.” (COL 99, 100)

“Many are sensible of their great deficiency, and they read, and pray, and resolve, and yet make no progress. They seem to be powerless to resist temptation. The reason is, they do not go deep enough. They do not seek for a thorough conversion of the soul, that the streams which issue from it may be pure, and the deportment may testify that Christ reigns within. All defects of character originate in the heart. Pride, vanity, evil temper, and covetousness proceed from the carnal heart unrenewed by the grace of Christ. If the heart is refined, softened, and ennobled, the words and actions will testify to the fact. When the soul has been entirely surrendered to God, there will be a firm reliance upon His promises, and earnest prayer and determined effort to control the words and actions.” (OHC 336)

“Many who profess to follow Christ have not genuine religion. They do not reveal in their lives the fruit of true conversion. They are controlled by the same habits, the same spirit of fault-finding and selfishness, which controlled them before they accepted Christ. No one can enter the city of God who has not a knowledge of genuine conversion. In true conversion the soul is born again. A new spirit takes possession of the temple of the soul. A new life begins. Christ is revealed in the character. The spirit of a new life works within.” (RH 7-30-1901)

"You are in the greatest danger of bringing reproach upon the cause of God. Satan knows your weakness. His angels communicate your weak points to those who are deceived by his lying wonders, and they are already counting you as one of their number. Satan exults to have you pursue an unwise course because you place yourself upon his ground and give him advantage over you. He well knows that the indiscretion of men who advocate the law of God will turn souls from the truth. You have not taken upon your soul the burden of the work and labored carefully and earnestly in private to favorably impress minds in regard to the truth. You too frequently become impatient, irritable, and childish, and make yourself enemies by your abrupt manners. Unless you are on your guard, you prejudice souls against the truth. Unless you are a transformed man, and will carry out in your life the principles of the sacred truths you present in the desk, your labors will amount to but little. {3T 241, 242)
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/13/06 06:08 PM

Quote:

In light of the following quote, which defects and imperfections does the Holy Spirit wait to reveal to born again believers until they are ready to overcome them?



Mike, if you were in a dark place and a ray of light broke in through an orifice, would you see everything perfectly? Or just the things that were in the course of that ray of light? As the orifice gets bigger and bigger, your vision gets better and better.
David and Solomon had the law of God. Why were they polygamous? Slavery is a transgression of the law of God. Why did the early Christians have slaves?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Hidden Character Defects! What? - 09/13/06 07:20 PM

Rosangela, one ribbon of light seeping through a small opening would only illuminate a small area.

R: David and Solomon had the law of God. Why were they polygamous? Slavery is a transgression of the law of God. Why did the early Christians have slaves?

MM: Are you suggesting that 1) they were guilty of intentionally sinning? that they were guilty of cultivating defective traits of character?

2. Or, were they sinning ignorantly? And, if so, were they also guilty of cultivating defective traits of character.

3. Is it possible to ignorantly cultivate a defective trait of character? Or, is character the result of conscious and informed and repetitious choices?

4. Is there such a thing as innocent defective traits of character?

Also, regarding the affects of “one ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ” once it penetrates the soul: I have a few questions –

5. What types of defects and deformities escape unnoticed? Which ones does the Holy Spirit wait to reveal until sometime after rebirth? And why?

“One ray of the glory of God, one gleam of the purity of Christ, penetrating the soul, makes every spot of defilement painfully distinct, and lays bare the deformity and defects of the human character. It makes apparent the unhallowed desires, the infidelity of the heart, the impurity of the lips. The sinner's acts of disloyalty in making void the law of God, are exposed to his sight, and his spirit is stricken and afflicted under the searching influence of the Spirit of God. He loathes himself as he views the pure, spotless character of Christ.” SC 29)