Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB

Posted By: Elle

Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/28/14 08:56 PM

This question was raised from Page 45 of the follwing discussion:
Are The 28 Fundamental Beliefs of the SDA Church a Creed in Itself?

The 3 quotations box is how the discussion proceeded. I brought these here so that we can continue the topic from here. My appology if I didn't bring every thing on the topic here. I should of started this discussion when MM requested it at the first place.

In all that was said below, only 1 Biblical text(Mat 18) was brought forth by Mountain Man to support in favor for disciplining members in disagreement with the FBs of the Body. However, I do not see that texts as a valid support and addressing this question. I would like to dig further into the Bible to see and to know what the Lord think about this question and what would be His Ways and His will for the church body to handle a members that dissagree with the majority of the member's point of view about a certain doctrine or foundamental belief.

Discussion started here :
Quote:
Mountain Man:Kland, what is the underlying motive for rejecting something as plain as Cain killed Able? Why would someone reject something so obvious? If they are so willing to reject something so obvious what else are they willing to reject? There is nothing trivial or light-hearted about rejecting things in the Bible that are so obvious. There are reasons why people do so. Those reasons cannot be good. Would you hold pastors or members in good and regular standing if they understood and rejected the obvious truths in the Bible? Yes, they are free to do so. But the church is free to discipline them. Even obligated.

Elle : Isn't this the same reasoning and spirit the little horn took to discipline their members?

MM: No. I don't think so. How do you envision the SDA Church exercising gospel order, church discipline (Matthew 18)? Do you know of any Bible truths necessary to believe to be translated alive when Jesus arrives?

Elle: I read Mat 18 very quickly and from what I got that it is the Father(the head) that disciplines His children(individuals of the body), I didn't see instructions for the body disciplining other members of the body. In the exception of Mat 18:15-20 where we find Jesus laying out 3 steps to win your brother back when a brother transgress against you personally. This is not about having different doctrinal beliefs. A transgression towards you is something like stealing, bearing false witness against you, etc...

Where do you see that it is written that the Church should discipline other members?

MM : Elle, gospel order and church discipline was practiced by the early Church. Councils were held and doctrines formulated. Members were required to abide accordingly.

E: What(or when) do you mean with "early church". Can you show me your source and tell me the year? We know the early church rapidly deteriorated into the little horn beast system extension within only 300 years. Just because that they did that in the past let’s say around 100yrs AD doesn’t mean it was Biblical and were following the Lord’s ways.

Let’s focus on what the Bible tells us. Is there support that says the Church body is to discipline members for not believing the same as the body?

MM : Please start a thread on this topic.


Then Arnold brought his own understanding discussing with Mountain Man:

Quote:

MM: Arnold, you are not arguing against the truthfulness, the biblical soundness and accuracy of the 28FB. You agree with the 28FB of the SDA Church. Your problem is not with the 28FB. Rather, your problem is with the SDA Church requiring baptismal candidates to agree with them and to live in harmony with them.


Arnold: I have no problem with the content of the 28 FB at this time. But there may come a time when the FB list changes or my beliefs change. Then I will have a problem with the content.

My problem now is with viewing the FB as the standard. The FB itself says that the Bible is our standard. Those who raise the FB as the authoritative standard are rejecting it.

I also have a problem with those who believe it is impossible for the FB to be wrong. History is littered with the carcasses of those who claimed infallibility and those they persecuted. I will not fall for that trap.

BTW, Philip did not require the FB for his baptismal candidates.


MM: Do you feel members and leaders should be free to disagree with one or more of the 28FB and maintain good and regular status and standing? For example, do you feel members and leaders should be free to reject the SDA Church interpretation of the 3AM (as articulated in the SOP)?


A: I feel that enforcement of the FB is an organizational issue, not a moral one. One can reject the FB and still be in good standing with God. But such a one can only be in good standing with the organization if the organization allows for freedom of thought.

MM: Well, it is obvious I am outnumbered on this thread. However, I'm glad the SDA Church voted to approve the 28FB. I'm also glad they print books like The Great Controversy.

A: Would it be righteous for us to take a vote and discipline you for disagreeing with the majority?


MM:I appreciate the humor. Really I do. However, if you were to vote to discipline me because I agree with what Ellen White wrote in The Great Controversy - Do you think the SDA Church would side with you?

On the other hand, would you vote to discipline members or leaders who reject the truth about the Sabbath and the state of the dead? Or, would you vote to grant them membership in good and regular standing?

A: That was intended to be as humorous as your idea that because a bunch a people voted the 28FB in, we must all submit to it. Indeed, it is a joke. If we were to vote to discipline you, it would carry as much moral weight as your beloved, GC-approved FB.

But to correct your misconception that you agree with the Great Controversy, keep this in mind: But God will have a people upon the earth to maintain the Bible, and the Bible only, as the standard of all doctrines and the basis of all reforms. The opinions of learned men, the deductions of science, the creeds or decisions of ecclesiastical councils, as numerous and discordant as are the churches which they represent, the voice of the majority—not one nor all of these should be regarded as evidence for or against any point of religious faith. Before accepting any doctrine or precept, we should demand a plain “Thus saith the Lord” in its support. – {GC 595.1}

Your faith in the majority is misguided. The Bible is our only creed.


MM: On the other hand, would you vote to discipline members or leaders who reject the truth about the Sabbath and the state of the dead? Or, would you vote to grant them membership in good and regular standing?

A: I would vote them out of office, given that they cannot lead if they are blind. If they were not members of the church, I would ask them their motivation for joining a group whose pillar beliefs they do not share. They must count the cost. But in any case, I would ask them to join my SS class so we can search the Scriptures to see if these things are so.



It continue and ended like this before I started this topic :
Quote:

A: From the intro to the 28FB:

Seventh-day Adventists accept the Bible as their only creed and hold certain fundamental beliefs to be the teaching of the Holy Scriptures. These beliefs, as set forth here, constitute the church’s understanding and expression of the teaching of Scripture. Revision of these statements may be expected at a General Conference session when the church is led by the Holy Spirit to a fuller understanding of Bible truth or finds better language in which to express the teachings of God’s Holy Word.

MM: The SDA Church has revised how we word and enumerate our FB, but they have never revised what we believe. Our FB exist today as they did when the Holy Spirit first confirmed them through the spirit of prophecy. We can rest assured He will never debunk them. They are as true now as they will be throughout eternity. Don't have to worry or wonder if He will change His mind. Truth continues to unfold as the scroll of time unrolls. We learn more details about the truth. Details that flesh out the truth. This, too, will continue throughout eternity.

MM : Here's a link to the latest news regarding proposed revisions to the 28FB.

A: “The language of our fundamental beliefs is intended to be a consensus statement of what we agree is the teaching of the Bible, and this language helps us achieve that goal.”

A "consensus statement" is a radically different thing from a "standard by which to judge and discipline each other." One reflects our beliefs, the other defines our beliefs.

MM : Beliefs you believe are Bible-based. Beliefs you believe are right and true. Beliefs you believe the Holy Spirit confirmed through the spirit of prophecy.

You also believe church discipline is necessary when members and leaders reject or refuse to live in harmony with the law of God.

I hope you believe church discipline is necessary when members and leaders reject or refuse to believe our distinctive doctrines, namely, the seventh-day Sabbath, the state of the dead, the spirit of prophecy, the 2300 day prophecy, the investigative judgment, the remnant church, and the mark of the beast.

A : You still don't get it. I think I have made my point as well as I can. You are still stuck on the truth of the beliefs, while I have been focused on the spirit of persecution in your heart.

As one preacher says, we do most of our sinning when we are right.

MM : I don't understand why you are opposing a summary of what you believe. You believe in church discipline. It is biblical. The church is obligated. It is not persecution. Ellen White describes it in no uncertain terms:

Originally Posted By: EGW
I have been shown that our church rules are very deficient. All exhibitions of pride in dress, which is forbidden in the word of God, should be sufficient reason for church discipline. If there is a continuance, in face of warnings and appeals and entreaties, to still follow the perverse will, it may be regarded as proof that the heart is in no way assimilated to Christ. Self, and only self, is the object of adoration, and one such professed Christian will lead many away from God. {4T 647.2}

No church can be in a healthy, flourishing condition unless its leaders shall take firm, decided measures to repress this fault-finding, accusing spirit wherever it exists. Its indulgence should be made a matter of church discipline; for it is a violation of the law of God, a violation of the rules which Christ has laid down for preserving order in the church. If these mischievous talkers are not subjected to church discipline they become confirmed in their evil work, and God charges the guilt upon the church. {RH, October 19, 1886 par. 10}

If members of the church go contrary to these rules, they make themselves subjects for church discipline, and should be under the censure of the church. This matter, so plainly taught in the lessons of Christ, has been treated with strange indifference. The church has either neglected her work entirely in the matter of correcting evil, or has done it with harshness and severity, thus wounding and bruising souls. {RH, April 16, 1895 par. 9}

Christ gives power to the voice of the church. "Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." No such thing is countenanced as one man's starting out upon his own individual responsibility and advocating what views he chooses, irrespective of the judgment of the church. God has bestowed the highest power under heaven upon His church. It is the voice of God in His united people in church capacity which is to be respected. 431 {CCh 241.4}

The Word of God does not give license for one man to set up his judgment in opposition to the judgment of the church, neither is he allowed to urge his opinions against the opinions of the church. If there were no church discipline and government, the church would go to fragments; it could not hold together as a body. There have ever been individuals of independent minds who have claimed that they were right, that God had especially taught, impressed, and led them. Each has a theory of his own, views peculiar to himself, and each claims that his views are in accordance with the word of God. Each one has a different theory and faith, yet each claims special light from God. These draw away from the body, and each one is a separate church of himself. All these cannot be right, yet they all claim to be led of the Lord. {CCh 241.5}

Elders and deacons are chosen to have a care for the prosperity of the church; yet these leaders, especially in young churches, should not feel at liberty, on their own judgment and responsibility, to cut off offending members from the church; they are not invested with such authority. Many indulge a zeal like that of Jehu and rashly venture to make decisions in matters of grave importance, while they themselves have no connection with God. They should humbly and earnestly seek wisdom from the One who has placed them in their position, and should be very modest in assuming responsibilities. They should also lay the matter before the president of their conference and counsel with him. At some appointed time the subject should be patiently considered. In the fear of God, with much humility and sorrow for the erring, who are the purchase of the blood of Christ, with earnest, humble prayer the proper officers should deal with the offenders. How different has been the course when, with self-assumed authority and a hard, unfeeling spirit, accusations have been made and souls have been thrust out of the church of Christ. {12MR 113.1}

Let none speak lightly of the duty of the church to administer censure and rebuke; neither let them criticize the action of the church when this painful task becomes necessary. Christ has given plain instruction regarding the duty of the church toward those who, while professing to be loyal members, are bringing dishonor to the cause of God by their course of action. "Every plant, which my Heavenly Father hath not planted," he says, "shall be rooted up." God has commanded that those who prove themselves unworthy of church-fellowship shall be separated from his body. Those who speak against the exercise of this authority, speak against the authority of Christ. {RH, March 19, 1908 par. 15}


A: I do not protest against the 28 FB, if used as the document itself states: "A consensus statement of what we agree is the teaching of the Bible." I protest when it is used as a standard for orthodoxy. The 28 FB should not "be regarded as evidence for or against any point of religious faith." That's the Bible's job. If someone is in error, take them to the Word of God, not the Cliff's Notes version.


MM: You cannot have it both ways - 1) the 28FB are right and true and biblical, and 2) the church cannot require her members and leaders to believe them.

Either the 28FB are right and true and biblical or they are not. If they are right and true and biblical then the church is obligated to require her members and leaders to believe them, to live in harmony with them. Refusal requires church discipline.

Members and leaders of the church are not free to reject foundation, fundamental Bible truths with impunity. Church discipline preserves the integrity of truth.


Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/28/14 10:27 PM

Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB?

1. The Church.

Matthew
16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
16:19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Acts
2:47 And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.
5:11 And great fear came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things.
8:3 As for Saul, he made havock of the church, entering into every house, and haling men and women committed [them] to prison.
11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.
14:23 And when they had ordained them elders in every church, and had prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord, on whom they believed.
15:22 Then pleased it the apostles and elders, with the whole church, to send chosen men of their own company to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas; [namely], Judas surnamed Barsabas, and Silas, chief men among the brethren:
20:28 Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.

Romans
16:5 Likewise [greet] the church that is in their house. Salute my wellbeloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia unto Christ.

1 Corinthians
4:17 For this cause have I sent unto you Timotheus, who is my beloved son, and faithful in the Lord, who shall bring you into remembrance of my ways which be in Christ, as I teach every where in every church.
10:32 Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God:
11:18 For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it.
12:28 And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.
14:35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

Ephesians
1:22 And hath put all [things] under his feet, and gave him [to be] the head over all [things] to the church,
1:23 Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.
3:10 To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly [places] might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God,
5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
5:24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so [let] the wives [be] to their own husbands in every thing.

Colossians
1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all [things] he might have the preeminence.
4:16 And when this epistle is read among you, cause that it be read also in the church of the Laodiceans; and that ye likewise read the [epistle] from Laodicea.

1 Timothy
3:5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
3:15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.
5:16 If any man or woman that believeth have widows, let them relieve them, and let not the church be charged; that it may relieve them that are widows indeed.

James
5:14 Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord:

3 John
1:9 I wrote unto the church: but Diotrephes, who loveth to have the preeminence among them, receiveth us not.
1:10 Wherefore, if I come, I will remember his deeds which he doeth, prating against us with malicious words: and not content therewith, neither doth he himself receive the brethren, and forbiddeth them that would, and casteth [them] out of the church.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/28/14 10:40 PM

John
20:21 Then said Jesus to them again, Peace [be] unto you: as [my] Father hath sent me, even so send I you.
20:22 And when he had said this, he breathed on [them], and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
20:23 Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; [and] whose soever [sins] ye retain, they are retained.

1 Corinthians
5:9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:
5:10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world.
5:11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.
5:12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?
5:13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.

2 Thessalonians
3:14 And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.
3:15 Yet count [him] not as an enemy, but admonish [him] as a brother.

Galatians
1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any [man] preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

1 Timothy
5:17 Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine.

Titus
2:15 These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with all authority. Let no man despise thee.

Hebrews
13:7 Remember them which have the rule over you, who have spoken unto you the word of God: whose faith follow, considering the end of [their] conversation.
13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
13:9 Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines. For [it is] a good thing that the heart be established with grace; not with meats, which have not profited them that have been occupied therein.
13:17 Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that [is] unprofitable for you.
13:24 Salute all them that have the rule over you, and all the saints. They of Italy salute you.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/28/14 10:43 PM

Acts
15:1 And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, [and said], Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.
15:2 When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question.
15:3 And being brought on their way by the church, they passed through Phenice and Samaria, declaring the conversion of the Gentiles: and they caused great joy unto all the brethren.
15:4 And when they were come to Jerusalem, they were received of the church, and [of] the apostles and elders, and they declared all things that God had done with them.
15:5 But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command [them] to keep the law of Moses.
15:6 And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter.
15:7 And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men [and] brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
15:8 And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as [he did] unto us;
15:9 And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
15:10 Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?
15:11 But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.
15:12 Then all the multitude kept silence, and gave audience to Barnabas and Paul, declaring what miracles and wonders God had wrought among the Gentiles by them.
15:13 And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying, Men [and] brethren, hearken unto me:
15:14 Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
15:15 And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written,
15:16 After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up:
15:17 That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things.
15:18 Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world.
15:19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:
15:20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and [from] fornication, and [from] things strangled, and [from] blood.
15:21 For Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach him, being read in the synagogues every sabbath day.
15:22 Then pleased it the apostles and elders, with the whole church, to send chosen men of their own company to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas; [namely], Judas surnamed Barsabas, and Silas, chief men among the brethren:
15:23 And they wrote [letters] by them after this manner; The apostles and elders and brethren [send] greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia:
15:24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, [Ye must] be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no [such] commandment:
15:25 It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul,
15:26 Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
15:27 We have sent therefore Judas and Silas, who shall also tell [you] the same things by mouth.
15:28 For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;
15:29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.
15:30 So when they were dismissed, they came to Antioch: and when they had gathered the multitude together, they delivered the epistle:
15:31 [Which] when they had read, they rejoiced for the consolation.
15:32 And Judas and Silas, being prophets also themselves, exhorted the brethren with many words, and confirmed [them].
15:33 And after they had tarried [there] a space, they were let go in peace from the brethren unto the apostles.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/28/14 10:49 PM

The Church is a body of believers ruled by ordained leaders who exercise authority in matters of doctrine and discipline.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 12:32 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB?

1. The Church.

Matthew
16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
16:19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Acts
2:47 And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.
5:11 And great fear came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things.
8:3 As for Saul, he made havock of the church, entering into every house, and haling men and women committed [them] to prison.
11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.
14:23 And when they had ordained them elders in every church, and had prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord, on whom they believed.
15:22 Then pleased it the apostles and elders, with the whole church, to send chosen men of their own company to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas; [namely], Judas surnamed Barsabas, and Silas, chief men among the brethren:
20:28 Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.

Romans
16:5 Likewise [greet] the church that is in their house. Salute my wellbeloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia unto Christ.

1 Corinthians
4:17 For this cause have I sent unto you Timotheus, who is my beloved son, and faithful in the Lord, who shall bring you into remembrance of my ways which be in Christ, as I teach every where in every church.
10:32 Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God:
11:18 For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it.
12:28 And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.
14:35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

Ephesians
1:22 And hath put all [things] under his feet, and gave him [to be] the head over all [things] to the church,
1:23 Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.
3:10 To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly [places] might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God,
5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
5:24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so [let] the wives [be] to their own husbands in every thing.

Colossians
1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all [things] he might have the preeminence.
4:16 And when this epistle is read among you, cause that it be read also in the church of the Laodiceans; and that ye likewise read the [epistle] from Laodicea.

1 Timothy
3:5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
3:15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.
5:16 If any man or woman that believeth have widows, let them relieve them, and let not the church be charged; that it may relieve them that are widows indeed.

James
5:14 Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord:

3 John
1:9 I wrote unto the church: but Diotrephes, who loveth to have the preeminence among them, receiveth us not.
1:10 Wherefore, if I come, I will remember his deeds which he doeth, prating against us with malicious words: and not content therewith, neither doth he himself receive the brethren, and forbiddeth them that would, and casteth [them] out of the church.

I read them all in this post, and frankly I don't see any one coming even close to the question. If there's something I'm missing, please highlight the text that address the issue please. I would like to see what you see in here.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 12:47 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
John
20:21 Then said Jesus to them again, Peace [be] unto you: as [my] Father hath sent me, even so send I you.
20:22 And when he had said this, he breathed on [them], and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
20:23 Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; [and] whose soever [sins] ye retain, they are retained.

I don't see this pertaining.



Originally Posted By: Mountain Man

1 Corinthians
5:9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:
5:10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world.
5:11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.
5:12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?
5:13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.


I don't fully grab what Paul's means here about not eating with transgressors or put away that wicked person. Sometimes translations are not accurate. I would need to look at the Greek words and all to have a better handle of what he is saying that can take some time.

However, from verses 1 to 8, it was widely known within the Church that one of their members(could be a leader, Paul does not mention who the person was because everyone already knew) were comiting wide open fornication -- incest to be more exact. Even the unbelievers would be ashamed of. Anyway this text does not address the question about not having different beliefs.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 02:05 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
John
2 Thessalonians
3:14 And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.
3:15 Yet count [him] not as an enemy, but admonish [him] as a brother.


The context of this found from v.6 to 13 seems to be refering of someone that is pretending to work(v.11) in the ministry yet eating off the member's(v.8). Paul talks about they "walketh disorderly, and not afer the tradition which he received of us"(v.6). According to the context it is related to the ministerial work and I don't know if Paul is pointing out that ministers out to work for their bread like Paul was doing in supporting himself in his own tent making business while ministering. Is this the tradition he's refering too? Could be.

Again I don't see this text addressing beliefs.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 02:06 AM

The passages I posted above demonstrate the role of church and church leadership. Church leadership ruled on doctrine and discipline. The first general council held in Jerusalem reflects church leadership deciding doctrine and determining direction for the church. "Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves". "And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him". "If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed." "Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained." "Whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
Posted By: Elle

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 03:41 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Galatians
1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any [man] preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.


This english word "accursed" is one of those mis-understood Greek word and thus mistranslated. The Greek word is Anathema that comes from ana, “up, upward, in the midst,” and tithemi, “to set, put, place.” Gesenius Lexicon defines it as “a thing set up or laid by in order to be kept, specifically, a votive offering.” In other words, like an offering devoted for a sacrifice to the Lord. A lamb offering is not cursed but it is devoted (anathema in Greek and cherem in Hebrew).

I have studied this Hebrew word cherem in the past a few times. Still need to study it again as it is one of those things that is quite deep and I haven't grabbed it completely. So my explaining will be shabby. However something to bring to the Lord to study again and again.

But the meaning of anathema in Greek and cheremin Hebrew comes from the law of devotion found in Lev 27:28 Nevertheless, anything which a man sets apart [cherem, “devotes, consecrates”] to the Lord out of all that he has, of man or animal or of the fields of his own property, shall not be sold or redeemed. Anything devoted [cherem] to destruction is most holy to the Lord.. Paul understood the law of devotion very well as it is transparent in many of his writings.

Meaning, everything devoted to destruction(like our carnal mind or the "old man" like Paul refers to) is not for sale or cannot be redeemed(repurchased by the former owner=us). The land (or us who is made from the dust of the land) now belongs to the Lord and it is most holy to Him. Jericho(including all men and woman) is said to be "devoted"(cherem) to the Lord. (read the Hebrew words translated as destruction in Josh 6:21). This is the same for all other cities the Israelites where sent to bring “judgment” by the “sword”. Basically, anyone that comes under the judgment because of sin like Jericho(like us in the past and the unbelievers that Jericho symbolizes), became devoted to the Lord, meaning became His possession and under His direct authority. Not that we weren't His posession before, but we claim to be "like god" and acted as if we could make the decisions on our own but we all miserably failed and sinned. Judgment puts us back under His authority.

So how does this meaning of this word fit in context that Paul is speaking here about someone preaching another gospel that differ from what was given by Christ?

To try to explain it briefly without digressing further, Paul was “devoting” (or putting) this person under the Lord's direct authority. In another word He was praying something like this "Lord, intervene in this person life and instruct him and discipline him if necessary to bring him to the truth". Being under Christ direct authority and teachings is not a bad thing. The discipline didn’t come from the body, but a member of the body(Paul) put the individual in the hand of the Lord to discipline.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 04:45 AM

What would be the proper discipline? How should it be carried out?
Posted By: Elle

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 05:39 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
What would be the proper discipline? How should it be carried out?


Concerning Gal 1:8,9 was to “devote” (or putting) this person under the Lord's direct authority for Him to discipline the person directly. This text was the first to address this question directly with this person preaching an "other gospel".

I still don't know how discipline should be carried out in many cases for transgression, however I don't think discipline should be carried out concerning an individual not agreeing on fondamental beliefs. I could be wrong for I have never studied this question directly but it seems it would contradict some biblical principles that I know. That's the purpose of this study and still haven't gone thru all of MM's scriptures.

I do agree that the immature members and the unbelievers under the judgment of Christ needs to submit to the leadership of the body of Christ. But that is often a cliche that needs to be properly define like a)who constitute the body, b)what(or who) gives them that authority, c)how to judge transgression, and d)how to know what is the proper discipline.

I'm currently working on a post to address one of MM posts and will be sharing what I understand of a to d. Feel free to share any texts that does address this question.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 06:21 AM

Originally Posted By: EGW
In The Track of Romanism

Those who are enjoined to represent the attributes of the Lord's character, step from the Bible platform, and in their own human judgment devise rules and resolutions to force the will of others. The devisings for forcing men to follow the prescriptions of other men are instituting an order of things that overrides sympathy and tender compassion, that blinds the eyes to mercy, justice, and the love of God. Moral influence and personal responsibility are trodden underfoot. {TM 363.1}

The righteousness of Christ by faith has been ignored by some; for it is contrary to their spirit and their whole life experience. Rule, rule, has been their course of action. Satan has had an opportunity of representing himself. When one who professes to be a representative of Christ engages in sharp dealing and in pressing men into hard places, those who are thus oppressed will either break every fetter of restraint, or they will be led to regard God as a hard master. They cherish hard feelings against God, and the soul is alienated from Him, just as Satan planned it should be. {TM 363.2}

This hardheartedness on the part of men who claim to believe the truth Satan charges to the influence of the truth itself, and thus men become disgusted and turn from the truth. For this reason no man should have a responsible connection with our institutions who thinks it no important matter whether he has a heart of flesh or a heart of steel. {TM 363.3}

Men think they are representing the justice of God, but they do not represent His tenderness and the great love wherewith He has loved us. Their human invention originating with the specious devices of Satan, appears fair enough to the blinded eyes of men, because it is inherent in their nature. A lie, believed, practiced, becomes a truth to them. Thus the purpose of the satanic agencies is accomplished, that men should reach these conclusions through the working of their own inventive minds. {TM 363.4}

But how do men fall into such error? By starting with false premises, and then bringing everything to bear to prove the error true. In some cases the first principles have a measure of truth interwoven with the error, but it does not lead to any just action, and this is why men are misled. In order to reign and become a power, they employ Satan's methods to justify their own principles. They exalt themselves as men of superior judgment, and they have stood as representatives of God. These are false gods. {TM 364.1}
Posted By: dedication

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 10:28 AM

Originally Posted By: APL quoting EGW

Those who are enjoined to represent the attributes of the Lord's character, step from the Bible platform, and in their own human judgment devise rules and resolutions to force the will of others. {TM 363.1}


Force should not be used. What is the definition of "force". The quote is in the context of Romanism that used government agencies and arms to "force" people to follow their dictates.
Originally Posted By: APL quoting EGW

The righteousness of Christ by faith has been ignored by some; for it is contrary to their spirit and their whole life experience. Rule, rule, has been their course of action. Satan has had an opportunity of representing himself. When one who professes to be a representative of Christ engages in sharp dealing and in pressing men into hard places, those who are thus oppressed will either break every fetter of restraint, or they will be led to regard God as a hard master. They cherish hard feelings against God, and the soul is alienated from Him, just as Satan planned it should be. {TM 363.2}

This isn't talking about basic doctrines believers of the church hold in common.
This is talking about people who seek to control others and dominate everything that happens in their church.
So what should be done when someone in the church is obnoxiously dominating, sharply cutting everyone else down so he can rule?

Should the congregation simply let him run over everyone and drive them out of the church?

I know what is usually done if there are God fearing people who are willing to stand for right in the church -- at the next nominating committee the obnoxious one is voted out of office. Then they really show their character defect and need for self exaltation with sparks flying everywhere because of the supposed injustice done to them.

Originally Posted By: APL quoting EGW
This hardheartedness on the part of men who claim to believe the truth Satan charges to the influence of the truth itself, and thus men become disgusted and turn from the truth. For this reason no man should have a responsible connection with our institutions who thinks it no important matter whether he has a heart of flesh or a heart of steel. {TM 363.3}


Well, here it is quite clear, the person who is obnoxiously self asserting, cutting everyone else down so he can rule, needs to be disciplined by the Body.
At the next nominating committee he needs to be voted OUT of office.

These quotes are addressing the problem of a person with a great lack of humility which made the person unfit to lead in God's church.

It is not addressing how to deal with people who are systematically and purposely undermining the basic Biblical doctrines held by the church and causing confusion in the assemblies of worship and in our institutions of learning.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 07:15 PM

Originally Posted By: Elle
Galatians
1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any [man] preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

To try to explain it briefly without digressing further, Paul was “devoting” (or putting) this person under the Lord's direct authority. In another word He was praying something like this "Lord, intervene in this person life and instruct him and discipline him if necessary to bring him to the truth". Being under Christ direct authority and teachings is not a bad thing. The discipline didn’t come from the body, but a member of the body(Paul) put the individual in the hand of the Lord to discipline.

1) Who gave Paul the right, the authority to decide who is right and who is wrong? Discipline is based on whether or not members or leaders agree with Paul's version of the gospel (i.e. the fundamental beliefs of the Bible). Those who disagree with Paul, including angels, are subject to discipline.

2) If acursed means to hand over to Jesus it stands to reason being acursed is an improvement. It implies they were not in the loving hands of Jesus. Now they are. Does it pay to disagree with Paul and preach a different gospel? Paul did not considered himself acursed. Was he not in the loving hands of Jesus?

3) Here are other texts to consider. If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha. 1 Cor 16:22. Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost. 1 Cor 12:3. For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: Rom 9:3. I have confidence in you through the Lord, that ye will be none otherwise minded: but he that troubleth you shall bear his judgment, whosoever he be. Gal 5:10. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person. 1 Cor 5:13.

4) Paul handed some dissenters over to Satan. To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. 1 Cor 5:5. Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme. 1 Tim 1:20.

5) Paul wished that some dissenters got castrated (mutilated, emasculated) - banned from fellowship. Who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth? . . . I would they were even cut off which trouble you. Gal 5:7, 12. He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD. Deut 23:1. Here Paul is dealing with the same thing that inspired him to write - "Let him be acursed."

6) It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. Heb 10:31.
Posted By: dedication

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 11:48 PM

Ezekiel 33:7 So thou, O son of man, I have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel; therefore thou shalt hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me.
33:8 When I say unto the wicked, O wicked [man], thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
33:9 Nevertheless, if thou warn the wicked of his way to turn from it; if he do not turn from his way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.
33:10 Therefore, O thou son of man, speak unto the house of Israel; Thus ye speak, saying, If our transgressions and our sins be upon us, and we pine away in them, how should we then live?
33:11 Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
Posted By: dedication

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 11/29/14 11:58 PM

Church Discipline

"In dealing with erring church-members, God's people are carefully to follow the instruction given by the Saviour in the eighteenth chapter of Matthew. [See Matthew 18:15-18.] {GW 498.1}

Human beings are Christ's property, purchased by Him at an infinite price, bound to Him by the love that He and His Father have manifested for them. How careful, then, we should be in our dealing with one another! Men have no right to surmise evil in regard to their fellow-men. Church-members have no right to follow their own impulses and inclinations in dealing with fellow-members who have erred....

"If thy brother shall trespass against thee," Christ declared, "go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone." Do not tell others of the wrong. One person is told, then another, and still another; and continually the report grows, and the evil increases, till the whole church is made to suffer. Settle the matter "between thee and him alone." This is God's plan. {GW 498.3}

"Go not forth hastily to strive, lest thou know not what to do in the end thereof, when thy neighbor hath
put thee to shame. Debate thy cause with thy neighbor himself; and discover not a secret to another." [Proverbs 25:8, 9.]
Do not suffer sin upon your brother; but do not expose him, and thus increase the difficulty, making the reproof seem like a revenge. Correct him in the way outlined in the word of God. {GW 498.4}

Do not suffer resentment to ripen into malice. Do not allow the wound to fester and break out in poisoned words, which taint the minds of those who hear. Do not allow bitter thoughts to continue to fill your mind and his. Go to your brother, and in humility and sincerity talk with him about the matter. {GW 499.1}

Whatever the character of the offense, this does not change the plan that God has made for the settlement of misunderstandings and personal injuries. Speaking alone and in the spirit of Christ to the one who is in fault, will often remove the difficulty. Go to the erring one, with a heart filled with Christ's love and sympathy, and seek to adjust the matter. Reason with him calmly and quietly. Let no angry words escape your lips. Speak in a way that will appeal to his better judgment. Remember the words, "He which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins." [James 5:20.] {GW 499.2}

Take to your brother the remedy that will cure the disease of disaffection. Do your part to help him. For the sake of the peace and unity of the church, feel it a privilege as well as a duty to do this. If he will hear you, you have gained him as a friend. {GW 499.3}

All heaven is interested in the interview between the one who has been injured and the one who is in
error. As the erring one accepts the reproof offered in the love of Christ, and acknowledges his wrong, asking forgiveness from God and from his brother, the sunshine of heaven fills his heart. The controversy is ended; friendship and confidence are restored. The oil of love removes the soreness caused by the wrong; the Spirit of God binds heart to heart; and there is music in heaven over the union brought about. {GW 499.4}

As those thus united in Christian fellowship offer prayer to God, and pledge themselves to deal justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with God, great blessing comes to them. If they have wronged others, they continue the work of repentance, confession, and restitution, fully set to do good to one another. This is the fulfilling of the law of Christ. {GW 500.1}

"But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established." Take with you those who are spiritually minded, and talk with the one in error in regard to the wrong. He may yield to the united appeals of his brethren. As he sees their agreement in the matter, his mind may be enlightened. {GW 500.2}

"And if he shall neglect to hear them," what then shall be done? Shall a few persons in a board meeting take upon themselves the responsibility of disfellowshiping the erring one? "If he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church." Let the church take action in regard to its members. {GW 500.3}

"But if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican." If he will not heed the voice of the church, if he refuses all the efforts made to reclaim him, upon the church rests the responsibility of separating him from fellowship. His name should then be stricken from the books. {GW 500.4}

No church officer should advise, no committee should recommend, nor should any church vote, that the name of a wrong-doer shall be removed from the church books, until the instruction given by Christ has been faithfully followed. When this has been done, the church has cleared herself before God. The evil must then be made to appear as it is, and must be removed, that it may not become more and more widespread. The health and purity of the church must be preserved, that she may stand before God unsullied, clad in the robes of Christ's righteousness. {GW 501.1}

If the erring one repents and submits to Christ's discipline, he is to be given another trial. And even if he does not repent, even if he stands outside the church, God's servants still have a work to do for him. They are to seek earnestly to win him to repentance. And however aggravated may have been his offense, if he yields to the striving of the Holy Spirit, and by confessing and forsaking his sin gives evidence of repentance, he is to be forgiven and welcomed to the fold again. His brethren are to encourage him in the right way, treating him as they would wish to be treated were they in his place, considering themselves, lest they also be tempted. {GW 501.2}

"Verily I say unto you," Christ continued, "Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." {GW 501.3}

This statement holds its force in all ages. On the church has been conferred the power to act in Christ's stead. It is God's instrumentality for the preservation
of order and discipline among His people. To it the Lord has delegated the power to settle all questions respecting its prosperity, purity, and order. Upon it rests the responsibility of excluding from its fellowship those who are unworthy, who by their unchristlike conduct would bring dishonor on the truth. Whatever the church does that is in accordance with the directions given in God's word, will be ratified in heaven. {GW 502.1}
Posted By: Alchemy

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/05/15 01:40 PM

Well, when E.J. Waggoner brought his views about the Law in Galatians to Minneapolis in 1888, he was already judged as all wrong! Well, he was part right actually. Waggoner was just as right as those against him.

Ellen White later stated that "both" laws were used in Galatians. Meaning, both the ceremonial law and the Moral Law.

We do need to have a forum or platform of some-kind for those with more or different insights into Scripture and doctrine.

Yet, if someone is clearly believing and teaching contrary to the 28 FB's and refuses to repent, then at some point the church need to disfellowship them.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/06/15 07:08 PM

Originally Posted By: Alchemy
Yet, if someone is clearly believing and teaching contrary to the 28 FB's and refuses to repent, then at some point the church need to disfellowship them.
I guess my biggest problem is there wasn't 28 in the past. Someone teaching against the 28th wouldn't be disfellowshiped then, but they would now? What about when the 29th comes out?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/07/15 01:28 AM

It doesn't matter how many times the truth is divided and subdivided. The Bible enumerates doctrines and counsels us to faithfully defend them:

Quote:
Matthew
7:28 And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings, the people were astonished at his doctrine:
7:29 For he taught them as [one] having authority, and not as the scribes.
22:33 And when the multitude heard [this], they were astonished at his doctrine.

John
7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.
7:17 If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or [whether] I speak of myself.

Acts
2:42 And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.
5:28 Saying, Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man's blood upon us.

Romans
6:17 But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you.
16:17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.

1 Timothy
1:3 As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine,
1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: [so do].
6:3 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, [even] the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness;

2 Timothy
3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
4:2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.
4:3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4:4 And they shall turn away [their] ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

Titus
1:9 Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.
2:1 But speak thou the things which become sound doctrine:

Hebrews
6:1 Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God,
6:2 Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.
6:3 And this will we do, if God permit.

2 John
1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
1:10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into [your] house, neither bid him God speed:
1:11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

Jude
1:3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort [you] that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

The 28FB reflect the sound doctrines articulated in the Bible. There is not one thread of human devising or invention in the 28FB. They are pure, solid truth. People who understand them and reject them are guilty of rejecting Bible truth.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/07/15 01:40 AM

Originally Posted By: mm
...not one thread of human devising...
Really... Glad you think so.

What kind of discipline should be administered? Shall we take the wayward member outside the camp and stone them?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/10/15 06:35 PM

Please reread all the Bible passages posted on this thread. It is clearly stated in the Bible that the Church is obligated to proclaim and to defend the truth. Members who reject any one of the truths must be properly disciplined.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/10/15 07:04 PM

Please tell us, what is proper discipline. Stoning? Shunning? Crucifixion? Being swallowed up by the ground? Being bitten by fiery serpents? What? What is the proper discipline???
Posted By: Elle

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/10/15 08:03 PM

Sorry for the delay. Continuing checking MM verses that he views teaches that leaders should discipline members on manners of doctrines.

Up to now, I haven't found any of these texts supporting this.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
1 Timothy
5:17 Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine.


I don't see this one addressing discipline in matters of doctrines.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Titus
2:15 These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with all authority. Let no man despise thee.

Here again it is not saying rebuking in matters of doctrines but in matters of godly behaviors.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Hebrews
13:7 Remember them which have the rule over you, who have spoken unto you the word of God: whose faith follow, considering the end of [their] conversation.
13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
13:9 Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines. For [it is] a good thing that the heart be established with grace; not with meats, which have not profited them that have been occupied therein.
13:17 Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that [is] unprofitable for you.
13:24 Salute all them that have the rule over you, and all the saints. They of Italy salute you.


This is the 2nd text that mentions doctrines in context but also relates to behavior. However, it doesn't come close in saying to discipline members on matters of doctrines.

The translated word "obey' in verse 17 is "peitho" that Strong has define as "to convince (by argument, true or false); by analogy, to pacify or conciliate (by other fair means); reflexively or passively, to assent (to evidence or authority), to rely (by inward certainty)."

So the Concordant version has translated this text as
CLV Hb 13:17 Be |persuaded~ by your *|leaders~, and be deferring to them, for they' are |vigilant for the sake of your *souls, as having to render an account, that they may be doing this with joy, and not with groaning, for this is disadvantageous for you.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/10/15 10:02 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Acts
15:1 And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, [and said], Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.
15:2 When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question.
15:3 And being brought on their way by the church, they passed through Phenice and Samaria, declaring the conversion of the Gentiles: and they caused great joy unto all the brethren.
15:4 And when they were come to Jerusalem, they were received of the church, and [of] the apostles and elders, and they declared all things that God had done with them.
15:5 But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command [them] to keep the law of Moses.
15:6 And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter.
15:7 And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men [and] brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
15:8 And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as [he did] unto us;
15:9 And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
15:10 Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?
15:11 But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.
15:12 Then all the multitude kept silence, and gave audience to Barnabas and Paul, declaring what miracles and wonders God had wrought among the Gentiles by them.
15:13 And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying, Men [and] brethren, hearken unto me:
15:14 Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
15:15 And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written,
15:16 After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up:
15:17 That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things.
15:18 Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world.
15:19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:
15:20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and [from] fornication, and [from] things strangled, and [from] blood.
15:21 For Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach him, being read in the synagogues every sabbath day.
15:22 Then pleased it the apostles and elders, with the whole church, to send chosen men of their own company to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas; [namely], Judas surnamed Barsabas, and Silas, chief men among the brethren:
15:23 And they wrote [letters] by them after this manner; The apostles and elders and brethren [send] greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia:
15:24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, [Ye must] be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no [such] commandment:
15:25 It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul,
15:26 Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
15:27 We have sent therefore Judas and Silas, who shall also tell [you] the same things by mouth.
15:28 For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;
15:29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.
15:30 So when they were dismissed, they came to Antioch: and when they had gathered the multitude together, they delivered the epistle:
15:31 [Which] when they had read, they rejoiced for the consolation.
15:32 And Judas and Silas, being prophets also themselves, exhorted the brethren with many words, and confirmed [them].
15:33 And after they had tarried [there] a space, they were let go in peace from the brethren unto the apostles.


Acts 15 and much of Paul's writings is dealing with Judaizer teachings (that wanted to revert back in keeping OT types and shadows) that was a main problem in the early church as they needed to transit from the OT form of keeping the law to the NT (aka New Covenant) form of keeping the law.

Yes this was a very serious doctrine related problem.

However in any of Paul's texts or Acts 15 relating to this serious doctrinal problem, I did not read yet one disciplinary actions in any form taken towards them. The way they address the problem is trying to persuade them of their errors by teaching(going to the Bible) and sharing revelation the Lord gave them.

MM I appreciate the effort to provide Biblical texts to support your position, however I don't appreciate the fact that most of these texts did not even address disciplinary measure relating to doctrines. You only gave a bunch of texts without underlining or comenting on any of them, alluding there were plenty of evidence and all of these addressed the question. I found it kinda deceitful of your part while not respecting my time and effort in this discussion having to check all of these by reading the whole chapter to see the context trying to see what you saw in these, to see there was nothing in it. I don't think you weren't out to being purposely deceitful, and you are convince in your own mind in this subject; however we need to have some biblical support. Showing text that says the leaders have authority is far from proof that you can discipline other members on question of doctrines.

In all of these texts(17) only three(+-) were of matter of doctrine, however no disciplinary action were mentioned in any.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 02:04 AM

1 Corinthians
5:9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:
5:10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world.
5:11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.
5:12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?
5:13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.

2 Thessalonians
3:6 Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us.
3:14 And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.
3:15 Yet count [him] not as an enemy, but admonish [him] as a brother.

2 John
1:6 And this is love, that we walk after his commandments. This is the commandment, That, as ye have heard from the beginning, ye should walk in it.
1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
1:8 Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward.
1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
1:10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into [your] house, neither bid him God speed:
1:11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

2 Timothy
4:1 I charge [thee] therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom;
4:2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.
4:3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4:4 And they shall turn away [their] ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
4:5 But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.

Jude
1:3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort [you] that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
1:4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
1:5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.
1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
1:8 Likewise also these [filthy] dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.
1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
1:10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.
1:11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.
1:12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds [they are] without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
1:13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.
1:14 And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,
1:15 To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard [speeches] which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.
1:16 These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling [words], having men's persons in admiration because of advantage.
1:17 But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;
1:18 How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.
1:19 These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit.
1:20 But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost,
1:21 Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.
1:22 And of some have compassion, making a difference:
1:23 And others save with fear, pulling [them] out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh.

Titus
1:9 Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.
1:10 For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:
1:11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake.
1:12 One of themselves, [even] a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians [are] alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies.
1:13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;
1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
1:15 Unto the pure all things [are] pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving [is] nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
1:16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny [him], being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 02:11 AM

Jesus Himself gave the Jews "70 weeks" to retain their status as chosen people. But they refused to comply with the conditions. He was forced, therefore, to abandon them. In their place, He raised up the Christian Church. He commissioned them - "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you". People who understand everything Jesus commanded and then reject part or all of it must not be baptized.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 02:46 AM

A baptized member of the church comes into your church service, you believe they do not hold to the 28FB. What do you do?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 02:57 AM

The church member does not agree 1) the seventh-day is the Sabbath, 2) Jesus will return to take us home, and 3) dead people remain in the grave until Jesus returns and resurrects them. The church member is very vocal about it.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 02:58 AM

The passages I posted above describe what to do about it.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 05:42 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The passages I posted above describe what to do about it.
Originally Posted By: elle
however I don't appreciate the fact that most of these texts did not even address disciplinary measure relating to doctrines.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 06:16 PM

The church member does not agree 1) the seventh-day is the Sabbath, 2) Jesus will return to take us home, and 3) dead people remain in the grave until Jesus returns and resurrects them. The church member is very vocal about it. The passages I posted above describe what to do about it. Here they are again:

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
1 Corinthians
5:9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:
5:10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world.
5:11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.
5:12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?
5:13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.

2 Thessalonians
3:6 Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us.
3:14 And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.
3:15 Yet count [him] not as an enemy, but admonish [him] as a brother.

2 John
1:6 And this is love, that we walk after his commandments. This is the commandment, That, as ye have heard from the beginning, ye should walk in it.
1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
1:8 Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward.
1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
1:10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into [your] house, neither bid him God speed:
1:11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

2 Timothy
4:1 I charge [thee] therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom;
4:2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.
4:3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4:4 And they shall turn away [their] ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
4:5 But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.

Jude
1:3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort [you] that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
1:4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
1:5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.
1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
1:8 Likewise also these [filthy] dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.
1:9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
1:10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.
1:11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.
1:12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds [they are] without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
1:13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.
1:14 And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,
1:15 To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard [speeches] which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.
1:16 These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling [words], having men's persons in admiration because of advantage.
1:17 But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;
1:18 How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.
1:19 These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit.
1:20 But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost,
1:21 Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.
1:22 And of some have compassion, making a difference:
1:23 And others save with fear, pulling [them] out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh.

Titus
1:9 Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.
1:10 For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:
1:11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake.
1:12 One of themselves, [even] a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians [are] alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies.
1:13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;
1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
1:15 Unto the pure all things [are] pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving [is] nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
1:16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny [him], being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.

I have highlighted what should be done when church members speak and act contrary to sound doctrine. The Bible is clear about it.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 06:57 PM

And I ask again - a baptized member comes into your congregation who rejects one aspect of the 28FB, what are you going to do? Are you going to physically carry him out of your church so you do not have any "company with him"? WHAT would YOU do? How are you going to "execute judgment? How are you going to separate yourself? You have not answered this question. What is the PRACTICAL application of your quotations? Perhaps you really do not know?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 07:08 PM

I wouldn't do anything. The responsibility rests with the church officers and the church board. The case I spelled out above is one that I am aware of. It ended in disfellowship. It was a long, drawn out process of meetings. He shared his reasons and actually expected the Church to agree and change her doctrines.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 08:00 PM

Your quotes say nothing about only church officers, did I miss something?

What would you do if a disfellowshipped person came to your congregation to worship? Came to your house? You met them on the street?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 08:53 PM

True, Matthew 18 explain the process clearly - 1) one on one, 2) with one or two more, 3) tell the church.

Quote:
Matthew
18:15 Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.
18:16 But if he will not hear [thee, then] take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
18:17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell [it] unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican.
18:18 Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
18:19 Again I say unto you, That if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven.
18:20 For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.

We met a couple on a cruise two years ago. Turns out they are former SDA. They left off going to church and believing the 3AM some 60 years ago. Lovely couple. We enjoy getting together with them one or twice year. We usually share a meal. I feel no need to avoid them.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/11/15 08:55 PM

In the case I mentioned above we did not feel inclined to hang out with them as if nothing was amiss.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/12/15 06:11 PM

Deuteronomy
4:1 Now therefore hearken, O Israel, unto the statutes and unto the judgments, which I teach you, for to do [them], that ye may live, and go in and possess the land which the LORD God of your fathers giveth you.
4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.
4:3 Your eyes have seen what the LORD did because of Baalpeor: for all the men that followed Baalpeor, the LORD thy God hath destroyed them from among you.
4:4 But ye that did cleave unto the LORD your God [are] alive every one of you this day.
4:5 Behold, I have taught you statutes and judgments, even as the LORD my God commanded me, that ye should do so in the land whither ye go to possess it.
4:6 Keep therefore and do [them]; for this [is] your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the nations, which shall hear all these statutes, and say, Surely this great nation [is] a wise and understanding people.
4:7 For what nation [is there so] great, who [hath] God [so] nigh unto them, as the LORD our God [is] in all [things that] we call upon him [for]?
4:8 And what nation [is there so] great, that hath statutes and judgments [so] righteous as all this law, which I set before you this day?
4:9 Only take heed to thyself, and keep thy soul diligently, lest thou forget the things which thine eyes have seen, and lest they depart from thy heart all the days of thy life: but teach them thy sons, and thy sons' sons;
4:10 [Specially] the day that thou stoodest before the LORD thy God in Horeb, when the LORD said unto me, Gather me the people together, and I will make them hear my words, that they may learn to fear me all the days that they shall live upon the earth, and [that] they may teach their children.
4:11 And ye came near and stood under the mountain; and the mountain burned with fire unto the midst of heaven, with darkness, clouds, and thick darkness.
4:12 And the LORD spake unto you out of the midst of the fire: ye heard the voice of the words, but saw no similitude; only [ye heard] a voice.
4:13 And he declared unto you his covenant, which he commanded you to perform, [even] ten commandments; and he wrote them upon two tables of stone.
4:14 And the LORD commanded me at that time to teach you statutes and judgments, that ye might do them in the land whither ye go over to possess it.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/12/15 06:15 PM

The Bible describes in no uncertain terms what happened when Israel failed to live in harmony with God's word and will. The Church is obligated to proclaim and protect the truth and to encourage her members to live accordingly. When members understand and refuse to live accordingly discipline is necessary.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/13/15 12:58 AM

So what is the necessary discipline? How do YOU do it? Just leave to others?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/13/15 01:54 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The church member does not agree 1) the seventh-day is the Sabbath, 2) Jesus will return to take us home, and 3) dead people remain in the grave until Jesus returns and resurrects them. The church member is very vocal about it. The passages I posted above describe what to do about it.

Quote:
2 Thessalonians
3:6 Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us.
3:14 And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.
3:15 Yet count him not as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/13/15 09:46 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The Bible describes in no uncertain terms what happened when Israel failed to live in harmony with God's word and will. The Church is obligated to proclaim and protect the truth and to encourage her members to live accordingly. When members understand and refuse to live accordingly discipline is necessary.
God bore long with Israel. Long. Very long. Even when they went backwards, not forwards, which was from the day they left Egypt. Very very long. That is part of His character.
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/13/15 01:37 PM

We do not all agree on this point. Some of us understand the Scripture as meaning we should keep our church records clear and disfellowship any person who disagrees with us or is not an active member. On the other hand others stress the patience we are to show each other and the responsibility we have in looking after our members.

Many years ago I listened to one of the greatest soul winners we had in the General Conference. I was surpriced to hear him say that he had never in his whole ministry disfellowshipped a church member. He felt it is our obligation to retain a member as long as life lasts and show them brotherly love and compassion, praying for them.

At the beginning of my ministry - about 55 years ago - I visited a church member we never saw in church, and I guess I "threatened" to dismiss him from our memberhip records since he showed so little interest. With his pipe in hand he told me how much that memberhip meant to him, and that he was very proud of being a Seventh-day Adventist.

We need the subduing influence of the Holy Ghost as we approach this task and make a study of the guidelines.

Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/13/15 05:55 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
God bore long with Israel. Long. Very long. Even when they went backwards, not forwards, which was from the day they left Egypt. Very very long. That is part of His character.

Amen! He is longsuffering and abundantly merciful. During the time He bore long with Israel He repeatedly disciplined them - over and over and over again. He "admonished them".
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/13/15 05:58 PM

Originally Posted By: Johann
With his pipe in hand he told me how much that memberhip meant to him, and that he was very proud of being a Seventh-day Adventist. We need the subduing influence of the Holy Ghost as we approach this task and make a study of the guidelines.

Amen! Thank you for sharing, Pastor.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/13/15 05:59 PM

Some cases demand discipline.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The church member does not agree 1) the seventh-day is the Sabbath, 2) Jesus will return to take us home, and 3) dead people remain in the grave until Jesus returns and resurrects them. The church member is very vocal about it. The passages I posted above describe what to do about it.

Quote:
2 Thessalonians
3:6 Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us.
3:14 And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.
3:15 Yet count him not as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/13/15 09:37 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Please reread all the Bible passages posted on this thread. It is clearly stated in the Bible that the Church is obligated to proclaim and to defend the truth. Members who reject any one of the truths must be properly disciplined.
Excepting, as you have stated in the past, when you disagree with them. Do you not understand what how the 28+/- will be changed this next session, after they approve women's ordination? What will you say then? You will agree, but yet you do agree it's not in the Bible. You do know they will reword them to say something to the effect that women can be ordained....
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/14/15 06:39 PM

Kland, good point. Not sure if the Church will rewrite the 28FB to accommodate WO or if they'll add a FB to reflect WO. Since I agree with WO it wouldn't be a problem for me if they did. But if they changed the FB to include a doctrine I believe is wrong or unbiblical I would simply disregard it. I would not, however, reject the Church as unworthy of leadership or conclude it is no longer the voice of God when in GC Session. I have no doubt the Church will uphold the FB until the day Jesus returns. That is, I know in my heart the Church will never change the Sabbath from the seventh-day to the first, or declare the deceased are in heaven in spirit form, etc.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/14/15 06:54 PM

Originally Posted By: mm
But if they changed the FB to include a doctrine I believe is wrong or unbiblical I would simply disregard it.
So you would then accept discipline because you reject part of the FB? OR, you would discipline a member that rejected part of the FB because THEY believed part of a FB was unbiblical? Wow... are the FB a creed? The only creed we should have is the Bible.
Posted By: Alchemy

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/15/15 02:41 AM

We should remember that the Bible is our only creed.

Now, having said that, was does the Bible say about maintaining the discipline and purity of His church? For His church to be a chaste virgin for Christ must involve both discipline and purity!

So, I don't believe the question is "Should Members be disciplined", but when and how should church discipline be administered.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/15/15 04:40 AM

Some cases demand discipline.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The church member does not agree 1) the seventh-day is the Sabbath, 2) Jesus will return to take us home, and 3) dead people remain in the grave until Jesus returns and resurrects them. The church member is very vocal about it. The passages I posted above describe what to do about it.

Quote:
2 Thessalonians
3:6 Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us.
3:14 And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.
3:15 Yet count him not as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/15/15 08:18 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Kland, good point. Not sure if the Church will rewrite the 28FB to accommodate WO or if they'll add a FB to reflect WO. Since I agree with WO it wouldn't be a problem for me if they did.
But you said before that Women's Ordination isn't Biblical. Therefore if it is entered in the FB, then you would be saying the FB includes unbiblical views.

Quote:
But if they changed the FB to include a doctrine I believe is wrong or unbiblical I would simply disregard it.
You would disregard Women's Ordination if they included it?

Quote:
I would not, however, reject the Church as unworthy of leadership or conclude it is no longer the voice of God when in GC Session.
Am I understanding you correctly that you see there could be a possibility of including a doctrine you believe is wrong or unbiblical of which you would disregard, but yet you would not conclude it is not the voice of God?! That is, you are saying the voice of God could include doctrines which you believe are wrong or unbiblical.

Really?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/16/15 03:28 AM

Originally Posted By: kland
M: Kland, good point. Not sure if the Church will rewrite the 28FB to accommodate WO or if they'll add a FB to reflect WO. Since I agree with WO it wouldn't be a problem for me if they did.

K: But you said before that Women's Ordination isn't Biblical. Therefore if it is entered in the FB, then you would be saying the FB includes unbiblical views.

I don't remember saying I think WO is unbiblical. I do not believe the Bible prohibits it.

Originally Posted By: Klnd
M: But if they changed the FB to include a doctrine I believe is wrong or unbiblical I would simply disregard it.

K: You would disregard Women's Ordination if they included it?

See my comment above.

Originally Posted By: Kland
M: I would not, however, reject the Church as unworthy of leadership or conclude it is no longer the voice of God when in GC Session.

K: Am I understanding you correctly that you see there could be a possibility of including a doctrine you believe is wrong or unbiblical of which you would disregard, but yet you would not conclude it is not the voice of God?! That is, you are saying the voice of God could include doctrines which you believe are wrong or unbiblical. Really?

Many decisions are voted on during a GC Session. Do they get every single vote right? I don't know. I have never bothered to check. As it relates to the FB I care very much. So far, all 28 FB are biblically sound. I very much doubt a GC Session will vote to include a false doctrine in the FB. But if they did - it would not lead me to conclude they are not voice of God when in GC Session. Just because they get one thing wrong doesn't mean everything else is wrong. A mute point, however, because so far they have gotten all 28 FB right.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/16/15 03:29 AM

Staying on topic. Some cases demand discipline.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The church member does not agree 1) the seventh-day is the Sabbath, 2) Jesus will return to take us home, and 3) dead people remain in the grave until Jesus returns and resurrects them. The church member is very vocal about it. The passages I posted above describe what to do about it.

Here's one of the passages:

Quote:
2 Thessalonians
3:6 Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us.
3:14 And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.
3:15 Yet count him not as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/16/15 05:45 PM

Galatians
1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any [man] preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

Galatians
5:12 I would they were even cut off [G609: amputate, mutilate the privy parts] which trouble you.
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/18/15 02:12 AM

Does it make a difference if the member is obstinate or ha fallen and needs spirtual guidance? Can we alway be sure if we see the difference?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/18/15 06:03 PM

Excellent question. Yes, church discipline should be tailored to fit the circumstances. Which is why I posted the case-study above in such precise detail. I cannot imagine any church board deciding not to discipline the person described in the case-study I posted above. He was unapologetically aggressive in his campaign to proselytize church members. He was convinced beyond doubt that the church doctrines named above are grossly wrong and that it is his calling and mission in life to save SDA from deception and destruction. There was no question in my mind, or in the minds of anyone else, that the poor man needed to be disfellowshipped. It was a long, loving, laborious process that consumed many months and many tears.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/20/15 04:50 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I very much doubt a GC Session will vote to include a false doctrine in the FB. But if they did - it would not lead me to conclude they are not voice of God when in GC Session. Just because they get one thing wrong doesn't mean everything else is wrong. A mute point, however, because so far they have gotten all 28 FB right.
So you're saying that if the FB included false doctrine, it would still not lead you to "conclude they are not voice of God when in GC Session". That is, the voice of God could include false doctrine.

Which boils down to what we've been asking you. Who gets to determine whether they are Biblical or non-Biblical, the truth or false. So far, all you've offered is that you get to decide.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/20/15 04:54 PM

Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: Alchemy
Yet, if someone is clearly believing and teaching contrary to the 28 FB's and refuses to repent, then at some point the church need to disfellowship them.
I guess my biggest problem is there wasn't 28 in the past. Someone teaching against the 28th wouldn't be disfellowshiped then, but they would now? What about when the 29th comes out?
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
It doesn't matter how many times the truth is divided and subdivided.
What you're really saying here is that the church should discipline members for even that which isn't specified in the 29+/- FB.

So why have them if you are going to use what they don't say against members?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/21/15 07:48 PM

Kland, the 28FB are sound, biblical doctrines. Do you agree? If not, why not? The GC Session has never included false doctrines. I doubt they ever will.
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/22/15 01:43 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Kland, the 28FB are sound, biblical doctrines. Do you agree? If not, why not? The GC Session has never included false doctrines. I doubt they ever will.


In agreement with you, MM. The 28FB is our guideline and it is, or should be, the basis on which we baptize people and accept them into the Seventh-day Adventist Church.

Our church is rather liberal when it does not disfellowship those who come to a slightly different understanding of our basic doctrines. Should we be more conservative?

Is our church on a wrong path when we elect officers who deviate in their acceptance of our basic doctrines?

Is it appropriate for an electronic ministry for Adventists and teaching others the faith of Adventism when it uses "officers" with deviating understanding of our 28FB?

Personally I feel we should be liberal in the views of participating members while it is against the purpose of this mission when moderators are permitted to present views that are in opposition to our basic 28FB.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/22/15 05:31 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Kland, the 28FB are sound, biblical doctrines. Do you agree? If not, why not? The GC Session has never included false doctrines. I doubt they ever will.
If you keep straddling the fence, it may not be good for your health.

You said, "But if they did".

So you're saying that if the FB included false doctrine, it would still not lead you to "conclude they are not voice of God when in GC Session". That is, the voice of God could include false doctrine.

Which boils down to what we've been asking you. Who gets to determine whether they are Biblical or non-Biblical, the truth or false. So far, all you've offered is that you get to decide.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
It doesn't matter how many times the truth is divided and subdivided.
What you're really saying here is that the church should discipline members for even that which isn't specified in the 29+/- FB.

So why have them if you are going to use what they don't say against members?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/22/15 06:16 PM

Originally Posted By: Johann
M: Kland, the 28FB are sound, biblical doctrines. Do you agree? If not, why not? The GC Session has never included false doctrines. I doubt they ever will.

J: In agreement with you, MM. The 28FB is our guideline and it is, or should be, the basis on which we baptize people and accept them into the Seventh-day Adventist Church.

Amen.

Originally Posted By: Johann
Our church is rather liberal when it does not disfellowship those who come to a slightly different understanding of our basic doctrines. Should we be more conservative?

Members who understand and then reject one or more of the FB should honestly and respectfully withdraw their membership. Why would they want to fellowship with people who do not believe as they do? "Can two walk together, except they be agreed?"

Originally Posted By: Johann
Is our church on a wrong path when we elect officers who deviate in their acceptance of our basic doctrines? Is it appropriate for an electronic ministry for Adventists and teaching others the faith of Adventism when it uses "officers" with deviating understanding of our 28FB?

The Church must not tolerate officers who do not agree with the FB of the Church.

Originally Posted By: Johann
Personally I feel we should be liberal in the views of participating members while it is against the purpose of this mission when moderators are permitted to present views that are in opposition to our basic 28FB.

Amen.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 05/22/15 06:40 PM

Originally Posted By: kland
M: But if they changed the FB to include a doctrine I believe is wrong or unbiblical I would simply disregard it. I would not, however, reject the Church as unworthy of leadership or conclude it is no longer the voice of God when in GC Session.

K: Am I understanding you correctly that you see there could be a possibility of including a doctrine you believe is wrong or unbiblical of which you would disregard, but yet you would not conclude it is not the voice of God?! That is, you are saying the voice of God could include doctrines which you believe are wrong or unbiblical. Really?

M: Many decisions are voted on during a GC Session. Do they get every single vote right? I don't know. I have never bothered to check. As it relates to the FB I care very much. So far, all 28 FB are biblically sound. I very much doubt a GC Session will vote to include a false doctrine in the FB. But if they did - it would not lead me to conclude they are not voice of God when in GC Session. Just because they get one thing wrong doesn't mean everything else is wrong. A mute point, however, because so far they have gotten all 28 FB right.

Originally Posted By: kland
M: Kland, the 28FB are sound, biblical doctrines. Do you agree? If not, why not? The GC Session has never included false doctrines. I doubt they ever will.

K: If you keep straddling the fence, it may not be good for your health. You said, "But if they did". So you're saying that if the FB included false doctrine, it would still not lead you to "conclude they are not voice of God when in GC Session". That is, the voice of God could include false doctrine. Which boils down to what we've been asking you. Who gets to determine whether they are Biblical or non-Biblical, the truth or false. So far, all you've offered is that you get to decide.

Obviously, Kland, if a GC Session added to or subtracted from the FB in a way that resulted in false doctrine it would not represent the voice of God. This is purely hypothetical, a mute point because the Church has never voted in GC Session to include false doctrine(s) as part of the FB. Who decides what it true doctrine? The Church while in GC Session. You and I are free to accept or reject their decision. So far, I choose to accept the FB. However, there may be decisions voted on in GC Session (that are not related to the FB) which I may or may not accept.

Originally Posted By: Kland
M: It doesn't matter how many times the truth is divided and subdivided.

K: What you're really saying here is that the church should discipline members for even that which isn't specified in the 29+/- FB. So why have them if you are going to use what they don't say against members?

Again, your argument/question is based on a hypothetical, mute point for the simple reason the Church in GC Session has never voted to include false doctrines as part of the FB. If it ever happens, and I seriously doubt it will, then we can talk about it. Until then, it is a mute point and does not deserve our time and attention. No matter what you say or believe, this one basic truth remains true:

Quote:
There is no need to doubt, to be fearful that the work will not succeed. God is at the head of the work, and He will set everything in order. If matters need adjusting at the head of the work God will attend to that, and work to right every wrong. Let us have faith that God is going to carry the noble ship which bears the people of God safely into port.--2SM 390 (1892). {LDE 52.1}

Has God no living church? He has a church, but it is the church militant, not the church triumphant. We are sorry that there are defective members, that there are tares amid the wheat. . . . Although there are evils existing in the church, and will be until the end of the world, the church in these last days is to be the light of the world that is polluted and demoralized by sin. The church, enfeebled and defective, needing to be reproved, warned, and counseled, is the only object upon earth upon which Christ bestows His supreme regard.--TM 45, 49 (1893). {LDE 52.2}

The bulwarks of Satan will never triumph. Victory will attend the third angel's message. As the Captain of the Lord's host tore down the walls of Jericho, so will the Lord's commandment-keeping people triumph, and all opposing elements be defeated.--TM 410 (1898). {LDE 52.3}

I realize you agree with these insights, so please, resist the temptation to chastise me for posting it.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/01/15 07:40 PM

Quote:
If it ever happens, and I seriously doubt it will, then we can talk about it. Until then, it is a mute point and does not deserve our time and attention.
Do you realize you have said nothing different than what the papacy has said? You have presented it as it has never been wrong, the FB are defined by "the GC in Session", and therefore all this cannot be considered for dispute because it is beyond dispute. And that is what the papacy has said.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/01/15 07:45 PM

God the eternal Father is the Creator, Source, Sustainer and Sovereign of all creation. He is just and holy, merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness. The qualities and powers exhibited in the Son and the Holy Spirit are also revelations of the Father. (Gen. 1:1; Rev. 4:11; 1 Cor. 15:28; John 3:16; 1 John 4:8; 1 Tim. 1:17; Ex. 34:6, 7; John 14:9.)


What should be done to those who do not recognize that the qualities and powers exhibited in Christ are also revelations of the Father? What if someone should say that those qualities and powers exhibited by Christ are only partial revelations of the Father?
Posted By: Alchemy

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/02/15 08:01 AM

Originally Posted By: kland
God the eternal Father is the Creator, Source, Sustainer and Sovereign of all creation. He is just and holy, merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness. The qualities and powers exhibited in the Son and the Holy Spirit are also revelations of the Father. (Gen. 1:1; Rev. 4:11; 1 Cor. 15:28; John 3:16; 1 John 4:8; 1 Tim. 1:17; Ex. 34:6, 7; John 14:9.)


What should be done to those who do not recognize that the qualities and powers exhibited in Christ are also revelations of the Father? What if someone should say that those qualities and powers exhibited by Christ are only partial revelations of the Father?


We are to follow God and His Word. The GC should also be following God and His Word. If the GC were to stop following God and His Word, we should reject their teachings and call for repentance from our leaders.

If the church were to truly teach apostasy, we are to pray and fast and call for revival and reformation. We should never accept false teachings from anyone.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/02/15 10:20 PM

The RCC is a counterfeit. The SDA Church is the Remnant Church of prophecy.
Posted By: JAK

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/03/15 04:36 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The RCC is a counterfeit. The SDA Church is the Remnant Church of prophecy.
The remnant church concept is a fabrication. There is no remnant church, just a remnant people.

We've had this discussion before.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/03/15 08:26 PM

Right, you disagree with the SDA interpretation of the Revelation - "And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." SDA members who understand and reject this FB should be disciplined. I realize you are not a SDA.
Posted By: JAK

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/03/15 09:16 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I realize you are not a SDA.
Well, now, that's not quite fair nor accurate. It is true that I do not fall within your narrow definition of SDA, but I like to read Scripture for what it says, not someone's interpretation of it. NOWHERE in Scripture does it EVER say "remnant church." EVER. It is a remnant people, not a church. If that means I'm not an SDA I'm happy with that. My SDAism is based on my understanding of God's Word as revealed in Holy Writ, not what someone tells me it is supposed to mean.

And what does EGW say about this? Something about "not anybody's name nor number of degrees or any great position nor the swaying of tradition should be taken as proof to support any point, etc., etc., "

You get the point.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/04/15 06:50 AM

I checked your profile to see what you said about being a SDA. You wrote - "I am a Christian who chooses to fellowship with Seventh-day Adventists." I assume that means you are not a baptized SDA member. No big deal. However, it does mean you are not subject to discipline if you reject the FB of the SDA Church.

Also, you are right, the Bible does not say "remnant church" just like it doesn't say "remnant people". The Bible does use the expression "the remnant of the people" just like it says "the remnant of her seed". So, what does the "woman" symbolize in Revelation 12? Mary? Israel? The Church? Individual church members?
Posted By: JAK

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/04/15 07:24 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
"I am a Christian who chooses to fellowship with Seventh-day Adventists."


1 Corinthians 1:13
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/05/15 06:36 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The RCC is a counterfeit. The SDA Church is the Remnant Church of prophecy.
What was that in response to?


My question was:
Originally Posted By: kland
God the eternal Father is the Creator, Source, Sustainer and Sovereign of all creation. He is just and holy, merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness. The qualities and powers exhibited in the Son and the Holy Spirit are also revelations of the Father. (Gen. 1:1; Rev. 4:11; 1 Cor. 15:28; John 3:16; 1 John 4:8; 1 Tim. 1:17; Ex. 34:6, 7; John 14:9.)


What should be done to those who do not recognize that the qualities and powers exhibited in Christ are also revelations of the Father? What if someone should say that those qualities and powers exhibited by Christ are only partial revelations of the Father?
(By the way, if it wasn't clear, the Adventist Review listed that as #3)
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/05/15 06:42 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The RCC is a counterfeit. The SDA Church is the Remnant Church of prophecy.
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Right, you disagree with the SDA interpretation of the Revelation - "And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." SDA members who understand and reject this FB should be disciplined. I realize you are not a SDA.
Is this one of the Fundamental Beliefs, that the SDA church is the remnant church? If so, which one is it? Or is this a case of wanting to "discipline" people with made up reasons?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/05/15 09:49 PM

Kland, please refer to the 28 FB of the SDA Church to learn which one describes the The Remnant and Its Mission.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/05/15 09:52 PM

Just because the RCC counterfeited the authority of the Church it does not mean the the True Church and the Remnant Church cannot exercise her God-given authority unto His honor and glory.
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/15/15 01:55 AM

Originally Posted By: JAK
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
"I am a Christian who chooses to fellowship with Seventh-day Adventists."


1 Corinthians 1:13



1 Corinthians 1:13The Message (MSG)

13-16 I ask you, “Has the Messiah been chopped up in little pieces so we can each have a relic all our own? Was Paul crucified for you? Was a single one of you baptized in Paul’s name?” I was not involved with any of your baptisms—except for Crispus and Gaius—and on getting this report, I’m sure glad I wasn’t. At least no one can go around saying he was baptized in my name. (Come to think of it, I also baptized Stephanas’s family, but as far as I can recall, that’s it.)
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/16/15 05:25 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The RCC is a counterfeit. The SDA Church is the Remnant Church of prophecy.
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Right, you disagree with the SDA interpretation of the Revelation - "And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." SDA members who understand and reject this FB should be disciplined. I realize you are not a SDA.
Originally Posted By: kland
Is this one of the Fundamental Beliefs, that the SDA church is the remnant church? If so, which one is it? Or is this a case of wanting to "discipline" people with made up reasons?
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Kland, please refer to the 28 FB of the SDA Church to learn which one describes the The Remnant and Its Mission.

Try as I might, I cannot find any place in the text of the link you gave any statement stating that the SDA church is the remnant church. If you can find otherwise, please quote such. Otherwise I will consider you wishing to discipline people with made up reasons.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/17/15 04:13 AM

The Remnant Church Adventist Review, 16 June 2015 (Excerpt - Moving in the Same Direction)

2. Commitment to His Church
As Seventh-day Adventists we believe that this church is God’s remnant church. Our thirteenth fundamental belief states: “The universal church is composed of all who truly believe in Christ, but in the last days, a time of widespread apostasy, a remnant has been called out to keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.”

The Seventh-day Adventist Church, from its very inception in 1863, has claimed to be the remnant church of prophecy. We believe that God called this church into existence for the proclamation of the three angels’ messages and that He has had a hand in the organization of this church. This does not mean that only Adventists will be saved. God has His people in all Christian churches (Rev. 18:4), but the Seventh-day Advent-ist Church is God’s visible remnant church through which He brings His final message to the world. The election of Israel was an election not for salvation but for service. Similarly, the Adventist church has been chosen to serve humanity in the time of the end by proclaiming God’s message to a dying world. We are saved as individuals, not by belonging to a particular race or church.

Commitment to God’s remnant church means that we are Adventists first and members of a particular country or race second. Racism in any shape and form has no room in our church. We are a global church, and it is not helpful for the unity of the church when local church organizations decide to go their own way in theological and practical matters, irrespective of the position of the global church.

. . . .

All our doctrines, including the distinctive doctrines of the church, have been formulated, we believe, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit and should be proclaimed with vigor. After more than 40 years of ministry in three different world divisions and personally having observed the progress of the work in about 70 countries of the world, I can say with conviction: Where our distinctive doctrines such as the remnant, the sanctuary, and the gift of prophecy are accepted and proclaimed, the work is growing; where this is not the case, the work is languishing. God cannot bless our ministry if we are not in harmony with the teachings of His Word.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/17/15 04:21 AM

Ellen White on the Remnant Church

Quote:
Seventh-Day Adventists.

I was shown in regard to the remnant people of God taking a name. Two classes were presented before me. One class embraced the great bodies of professed Christians. They were trampling upon God's law and bowing to a Papal institution. They were keeping the first day of the week as the Sabbath of the Lord. {4bSG 54.1}

The other class were but few in number, and were bowing to the great Law-giver. They were keeping the fourth commandment. The peculiar and prominent features of their faith were the observance of the seventh day, and waiting for the appearing of our Lord from Heaven. {4bSG 54.2}

The conflict is between the requirements of God and the requirements of the beast. The first day, a Papal institution which directly contradicts the fourth commandment, is yet to be made a test by the two-horned beast. And then the fearful warning from God declares the penalty of bowing to the beast and his image. They shall drink the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation. {4bSG 54.3}

No name which we can take will be appropriate but that which accords with our profession, and expresses our faith, and marks us as a peculiar people. The name, Seventh-day Adventist, is a standing rebuke to the Protestant world. Here is the line of distinction between the worshipers of God, and those who worship the beast, and receive his mark. The great conflict is between the commandments of God and the requirements of the beast. It is because the saints are keeping all ten of the commandments that the dragon makes war upon them; and if they will lower the standard and yield the peculiarities of their faith, the dragon will be at peace. But God's people excite the ire of the dragon because they have dared to raise the standard, and unfurl their banner in opposition to the Protestant world, who are worshiping the institution of Papacy. {4bSG 54.4}

The name, Seventh-day Adventist, carries the true features of our faith in front, and will convict the inquiring mind. Like an arrow from the Lord's quiver, it will wound the transgressors of God's law, and will lead to repentance toward God, and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. {4bSG 55.1}

I was shown that almost every fanatic who has arisen, who wishes to hide his sentiments that he may lead away others, claims to belong to the church of God. Such a name would excite suspicion at once, for the most absurd errors are concealed under this name. This name is too indefinite for the remnant people of God. The influence of such a name would lead to the supposition that we had a faith we wished to cover up. {4bSG 55.2}

Quote:
The enemy of souls has sought to bring in the supposition that a great reformation was to take place among Seventh-day Adventists, and that this reformation would consist in giving up the doctrines which stand as the pillars of our faith, and engaging in a process of reorganization. Were this reformation to take place, what would result? The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changed. The fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A new organization would be established. Books of a new order would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy would be introduced. The founders of this system would go into the cities, and do a wonderful work. The Sabbath of course, would be lightly regarded, as also the God who created it. Nothing would be allowed to stand in the way of the new movement. The leaders would teach that virtue is better than vice, but God being removed, they would place their dependence on human power, which, without God, is worthless. Their foundation would be built on the sand, and storm and tempest would sweep away the structure. {1SM 204.2}

Quote:
Zechariah's vision of Joshua and the Angel applies with peculiar force to the experience of God's people in the closing up of the great day of atonement. The remnant church will be brought into great trial and distress. Those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus will feel the ire of the dragon and his hosts. Satan numbers the world as his subjects, he has gained control of the apostate churches; but here is a little company that are resisting his supremacy. If he could blot them from the earth, his triumph would be complete. As he influenced the heathen nations to destroy Israel, so in the near future he will stir up the wicked powers of earth to destroy the people of God. All will be required to render obedience to human edicts in violation of the divine law. Those who will be true to God and to duty will be menaced, denounced, and proscribed. They will "be betrayed both by parents, and brethren, and kinsfolks, and friends." {5T 472.2}

Their only hope is in the mercy of God; their only defense will be prayer. As Joshua was pleading before the Angel, so the remnant church, with brokenness of heart and earnest faith, will plead for pardon and deliverance through Jesus their Advocate. They are fully conscious of the sinfulness of their lives, they see their weakness and unworthiness, and as they look upon themselves they are ready to despair. The tempter stands by to accuse them, as he stood by to resist Joshua. He points to their filthy garments, their defective characters. He presents their weakness and folly, their sins of ingratitude, their unlikeness to Christ, which has dishonored their Redeemer. He endeavors to affright the soul with the thought that their case is hopeless, that the stain of their defilement will never be washed away. He hopes to so destroy their faith that they will yield to his temptations, turn from their allegiance to God, and receive the mark of the beast. {5T 473.1}

Satan urges before God his accusations against them, declaring that they have by their sins forfeited the divine protection, and claiming the right to destroy them as transgressors. He pronounces them just as deserving as himself of exclusion from the favor of God. "Are these," he says, "the people who are to take my place in heaven and the place of the angels who united with me? While they profess to obey the law of God, have they kept its precepts? Have they not been lovers of self more than of God? Have they not placed their own interests above His service? Have they not loved the things of the world? Look at the sins which have marked their lives. Behold their selfishness, their malice, their hatred toward one another." {5T 473.2}

The people of God have been in many respects very faulty. Satan has an accurate knowledge of the sins which he has tempted them to commit, and he presents these in the most exaggerated light, declaring: "Will God banish me and my angels from His presence, and yet reward those who have been guilty of the same sins? Thou canst not do this, O Lord, in justice. Thy throne will not stand in righteousness and judgment. Justice demands that sentence be pronounced against them." {5T 474.1}

But while the followers of Christ have sinned, they have not given themselves to the control of evil. They have put away their sins, and have sought the Lord in humility and contrition, and the divine Advocate pleads in their behalf. He who has been most abused by their ingratitude, who knows their sin, and also their repentance, declares: "'The Lord rebuke thee, O Satan.' I gave My life for these souls. They are graven upon the palms of My hands." {5T 474.2}

The assaults of Satan are strong, his delusions are terrible; but the Lord's eye is upon His people. Their affliction is great, the flames of the furnace seem about to consume them; but Jesus will bring them forth as gold tried in the fire. Their earthliness must be removed that the image of Christ may be perfectly reflected; unbelief must be overcome; faith, hope, and patience are to be developed. {5T 474.3}

The people of God are sighing and crying for the abominations done in the land. With tears they warn the wicked of their danger in trampling upon the divine law, and with unutterable sorrow they humble themselves before the Lord on account of their own transgressions. The wicked mock their sorrow, ridicule their solemn appeals, and sneer at what they term their weakness. But the anguish and humiliation of God's people is unmistakable evidence that they are regaining the strength and nobility of character lost in consequence of sin. It is because they are drawing nearer to Christ, and their eyes are fixed upon His perfect purity, that they so clearly discern the exceeding sinfulness of sin. Their contrition and self-abasement are infinitely more acceptable in the sight of God than is the self-sufficient, haughty spirit of those who see no cause to lament, who scorn the humility of Christ, and who claim perfection while transgressing God's holy law. Meekness and lowliness of heart are the conditions for strength and victory. The crown of glory awaits those who bow at the foot of the cross. Blessed are these mourners, for they shall be comforted. {5T 474.4}

The faithful, praying ones are, as it were, shut in with God. They themselves know not how securely they are shielded. Urged on by Satan, the rulers of this world are seeking to destroy them; but could their eyes be opened, as were the eyes of Elisha's servant at Dothan, they would see the angels of God encamped about them, by their brightness and glory holding in check the hosts of darkness. {5T 475.1}

As the people of God afflict their souls before Him, pleading for purity of heart, the command is given, "Take away the filthy garments" from them, and the encouraging words are spoken, "Behold, I have caused thine iniquity to pass from thee, and I will clothe thee with change of raiment." The spotless robe of Christ's righteousness is placed upon the tried, tempted, yet faithful children of God. The despised remnant are clothed in glorious apparel, nevermore to be defiled by the corruptions of the world. Their names are retained in the Lamb's book of life, enrolled among the faithful of all ages. They have resisted the wiles of the deceiver; they have not been turned from their loyalty by the dragon's roar. Now they are eternally secure from the tempter's devices. Their sins are transferred to the originator of sin. And the remnant are not only pardoned and accepted, but honored. "A fair miter" is set upon their heads. They are to be as kings and priests unto God. While Satan was urging his accusations and seeking to destroy this company, holy angels, unseen, were passing to and fro, placing upon them the seal of the living God. These are they that stand upon Mount Zion with the Lamb, having the Father's name written in their foreheads. They sing the new song before the throne, that song which no man can learn save the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth. "These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever He goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the first fruits unto God and to the Lamb. And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before the throne of God." {5T 475.2}

Now is reached the complete fulfillment of those words of the Angel: "Hear now, O Joshua the high priest, thou, and thy fellows that sit before thee: for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring forth My servant the Branch." Christ is revealed as the Redeemer and Deliverer of His people. Now indeed are the remnant "men wondered at," as the tears and humiliation of their pilgrimage give place to joy and honor in the presence of God and the Lamb. "In that day shall the branch of the Lord be beautiful and glorious, and the fruit of the earth shall be excellent and comely for them that are escaped of Israel. And it shall come to pass, that he that is left in Zion, and he that remaineth in Jerusalem, shall be called holy, even everyone that is written among the living in Jerusalem." {5T 476.1}

Quote:
Mysteries into which angels desire to look, which prophets and kings and righteous men desired to understand, the remnant church will carry in messages from God to the world. The prophets prophesied of these things, and they longed to understand that which they foretold; but to them this privilege was not given. They longed to see what we see, and to hear what we hear; but they could not. They will know all when Christ shall come the second time; when, surrounded by a multitude which no man can number, He explains the deliverance wrought out by the great sacrifice He made. {6T 19.4}

The truths of the third angel's message have been presented by some as a dry theory; but in this message is to be presented Christ the Living One. He is to be revealed as the first and the last, as the I AM, the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright and morning Star. Through this message the character of God in Christ is to be manifested to the world. The call is to be sounded: "O Jerusalem, that bringest good tidings, lift up thy voice with strength; lift it up, be not afraid; say unto the cities of Judah, Behold your God! Behold, the Lord God will come with strong hand, and His arm shall rule for Him: behold, His reward is with Him, and His work before Him. He shall feed His flock like a shepherd: He shall gather the lambs with His arm, and carry them in His bosom." Isaiah 40:9-11. {6T 20.1}
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/17/15 05:14 PM

Excellent, MM.

This thread is dealing with the 28FB.

Would the Holy Spirit not indicate that a person whose attitude is in rebellion against any of the 24 FB ought to find a different denomination where s/he feels more comfortable? Otherwise there might be tensions on several levels.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/19/15 10:04 PM

Ideally, I suppose, the Church should labor lovingly to woo and win them. But if they are immovable and unwilling to believe and live in harmony with the FB it is right and reasonable to expect them to move on until they find like-minded believers. Unfortunately, most hang out and cause trouble.
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/20/15 07:39 PM

It appears to me as if the Seventh-day Adventist fundamental bbelief #2 on the Trinity is incompatile with the beliefs of some of our friends participating in these disscussions. Are they moving out of reach of the Holy Spirit in this area?


Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Ideally, I suppose, the Church should labor lovingly to woo and win them. But if they are immovable and unwilling to believe and live in harmony with the FB it is right and reasonable to expect them to move on until they find like-minded believers. Unfortunately, most hang out and cause trouble.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/20/15 09:59 PM

Originally Posted By: mm
Unfortunately, most hang out and cause trouble.
What? You mean they are sinners? We can't have sinners in the church, can we?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/21/15 06:04 PM

The new birth is a rare experience in this age of the world. This is the reason why there are so many perplexities in the churches. Many, so many, who assume the name of Christ are unsanctified and unholy. They have been baptized, but they were buried alive. Self did not die, and therefore they did not rise to newness of life in Christ (MS 148, 1897). {6BC 1075.7}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/21/15 06:07 PM

APL, there is a difference between saints and sinners in the Church. "Saints" are sinners saved by grace. "Sinners" are members who know Jesus and refuse to live in harmony with His will and way and word.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/21/15 06:13 PM

Pastor Johann, I do not understand how members can understand and reject the truth about the Godhead and continue to worship with us. Seems to me they would be happier worshiping elsewhere with like-minded believers. If they insist on converting the Church to a form of anti-trinitarian view the Church would be wise to follow Jesus' counsel in Matthew 18 (how to discipline church members).
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/22/15 06:47 PM

Still was not in your link you gave.

Quote:
Our thirteenth fundamental belief states: “The universal church is composed of all who truly believe in Christ, but in the last days, a time of widespread apostasy, a remnant has been called out to keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.”

Ooops. So does our fundamental belief state or are you saying our fundamental belief is something other than "stated"? If so, it reinforces what others and I have been objecting to your use of such.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/22/15 11:15 PM

Kland, the SDA Church believes it is the Remnant Church of Rev 12. There is no question about it.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/23/15 07:39 PM

Well that may be true. But not one of the fundamental beliefs.
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/24/15 12:30 AM

On this point I am tempted to be in agreement with some: Being a Remnant Church should not be among the 28 FB, even though we count on it. Let's rather be eager to be among the Remnant! And come to an agreement on the 28.
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/24/15 09:31 AM

Quote:
Remnant and Its Mission

The universal church is composed of all who truly believe in Christ, but in the last days, a time of widespread apostasy, a
remnant has been called out to keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus. This remnant announces the arrival
of the judgment hour, proclaims salvation through Christ, and heralds the approach of His second advent. This proclamation
is symbolized by the three angels of Revelation 14; it coincides with the work of judgment in heaven and results in a work
of repentance and reform on earth. Every believer is called to have a personal part in this worldwide witness. (Rev. 12:17;
14:6-12; 18:1-4; 2 Cor. 5:10; Jude 3, 14; 1 Peter 1:16-19; 2 Peter 3:10-14; Rev. 21:1-14.)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/27/15 06:36 PM

Amen, Pastor. Only the SDA Church fits the description above. No other church can be described that way.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/27/15 06:38 PM

Kland, as you know, Ellen White clearly identified the SDA Church as the Remnant Church of Rev 12. It is one of the FB.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/29/15 04:42 PM

MM, you failed to show it is one of the FB. You even said "the SDA Church believes it is the Remnant Church of Rev 12. There is no question about it." Believing and saying not question about it does not make it one of the FB.

What you are really saying, as has been said, is you are using the 28 FB as unspecified and unstated hammers, to change at will against those you disagree with. Ya know, kind of like:

'That's against policy.'

'What policy? Can I see the policy?'

'My policy. It's not printed, so it can be "flexible".'
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/29/15 05:59 PM

Most of our policies are printed but not available to all. The written policies are usually availae to those who know somebody who knows somebody.

In some cases there are other policies that explain the matter where you need to apply it, which may be different from other policies.

A local conference president told me the official Church Manual, although voted by the GC at a regular session, had to be accepted by his conference before it applied in his area.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/29/15 08:20 PM

Originally Posted By: Johann
Most of our policies are printed but not available to all. The written policies are usually availae to those who know somebody who knows somebody. In some cases there are other policies that explain the matter where you need to apply it, which may be different from other policies. A local conference president told me the official Church Manual, although voted by the GC at a regular session, had to be accepted by his conference before it applied in his area.

Jesus Christ is not coming back for a denomination that has proclaimed itself to be special because of its policies and/or fundamental beliefs. Of that we can be sure.

Originally Posted By: Mat. 25:31-46
It is written, "When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. And He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left."

Who are the sheep and in what way does one enter into the congregation of the ones to whom it will be said on that great day, "Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world"? Are they the ones who have 28 Fundamental Beliefs and itch to cast out because of a difference of opinion? Are they the ones who are eager to judge those who do not share their blindsided view? Are they the ones given to an austere lifestyle after one in their midst whom they call spirit of prophecy? Did Jesus Christ say so? Did he authorize anyone to take the goats from the sheep before the time?

///
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/29/15 09:56 PM

Our policies have nothing to do with salvation. They are merely rules developed to make the church as apostolic as possible with the daily routines not directly prescribed in Scripture.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 06/30/15 12:37 AM

Originally Posted By: Johann
Our policies have nothing to do with salvation. They are merely rules developed to make the church as apostolic as possible with the daily routines not directly prescribed in Scripture.

Have you not read where it is written, "Now when He was asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, He answered them and said, 'The kingdom of God does not come with observation; nor will they say, See here! or See there! -- For indeed, the kingdom of God is [in your midst]'" (Luke 17:20-21)? The CHURCH however is the visible entity much in form and function as the nation of Israel divided into tribes; for the CHURCH, the denominations: SDA, Baptists, Mormons, Catholics, Lutherans, etc. Nevertheless, as happened to Israel, so it will happen for the CHURCH.

Quote:
And I heard the number of those who were sealed. A GREAT MANY of all the DENOMINATIONS of the CHURCH were sealed:

SOME from the denomination of SDA,
SOME from the denomination of Baptists,
SOME from the denomination of Mormons,
SOME from the denomination of Catholics,
SOME from the denomination of Lutherans,
etc.

If the SDA denomination feels it incumbent to "discipline Members for disagreeing on [its own] 28FB", then they have that authority; but members who choose to worship within other denominations may still be counted full citizens of the Kingdom of God. It is the Kingdom of God and His principle of Love that is of paramount and definitive importance rather than denominational eccentricity. I guess I'm more interested in the reaction of members who face such disciplinary councils that they should not feel cut off from heaven in making their way out.

///
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/01/15 12:57 AM

James, I have not made myself clear to you. I was responding to KLAND's statement

'That's against policy.'

What I want to make clear is that, even though institutions within the Seventh-day Adventists have policies, those "policies" do not contain any of our teachings, doctrines, nor determining who will be saved or lost. They have more to do with salaries and working conditions, employment, buildings, insurance, which unit should have the title to various properties, etc.

Therefore policies should really not be discussed under our teachings or doctrines, but you could not know that.
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/01/15 03:26 PM

Let me make another point clear. The Seventh-day Adventist church believes God has given this denomination a reposibility of proclaiming certain points which bring us closer to Jesus Christ.

We find honest Christians who love Jesus Christ in most denominations. We invite those brothers and sisters in faith to join us in a closer walk with Christ in particular on the only day he has blessed and sanctified. You should experience this encounter with God.

And as Adventist we do havee a special message to the world that this Jesus is fulfilling His promise by coming again. The Bible teaches us that as the Day approaches there will on the one hand be a great revival and on the other a great confusion, a Babylon.

Through the mist ecchoes this clarion call "Come out of Baylon, my people!"That is a call for a closer union with Jesus Christ going out to all people. We want you, James Peterson, to accept that call as well.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/01/15 05:16 PM

Originally Posted By: Johann
Most of our policies are printed but not available to all. The written policies are usually availae to those who know somebody who knows somebody.
Actually Johann, I wasn't talking about policies of the church. I was talking about how MM uses the 28+/- hammers as some organizations use unwritten policies. Guess those of the church included. But policies are not the 28+/-.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/04/15 05:42 PM

The FB are not hammers - they are eternal truths. Jesus raised up the SDA Church to practice and proclaim them. Yes, there are sincere believers in other churches who will be saved. However, that is not the same as saying Jesus raised them up to proclaim the 3AM, to prepare the world to accept or reject the truth as it is in Jesus. They will leave their churches and join the SDA Church when the call to come out of Babylon is sounded. They will gladly embrace the FB.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/05/15 05:26 AM

Originally Posted By: Johann
Let me make another point clear. The Seventh-day Adventist church believes God has given this denomination a reposibility of proclaiming certain points which bring us closer to Jesus Christ. We find honest Christians who love Jesus Christ in most denominations. We invite those brothers and sisters in faith to join us in a closer walk with Christ in particular on the only day he has blessed and sanctified. You should experience this encounter with God.

And as Adventist we do havee a special message to the world that this Jesus is fulfilling His promise by coming again. The Bible teaches us that as the Day approaches there will on the one hand be a great revival and on the other a great confusion, a Babylon. Through the mist ecchoes this clarion call "Come out of Baylon, my people!"That is a call for a closer union with Jesus Christ going out to all people. We want you, James Peterson, to accept that call as well.

You raise two points:

1. SDA believe they are "in a closer walk with Christ in particular on the only day he has blessed and sanctified". As you must know, there are many other denominations that worship God on Saturdays too. But that doesn't amount to anything before Him because salvation is not by works of the law but by grace through faith (Rom. 3). We are ALL continuing sinners without exception, remember?

2. SDA believe that they will give the "clarion call, 'Come out of Babylon (a great confusion), my people!'" just before the Second Advent; but such a belief is based on an SDA misunderstanding of Rev. 18. The narrative does NOT have the world divided into two camps, but three:
  1. Babylon (v.2),
  2. kings of the earth, representing the secular world (v.9), and
  3. holy apostles and prophets, representing believers in Christ (v.20)
Everyone is urged to leave Babylon just like Lot was urged to leave Sodom. The prophecy is NOT about the end of the world, just about the fall of a city alone (v.15). If SDA misunderstand this very simple prophecy and misapply it, then are they not false prophets, the blind leading the blind? From where then comes this audacity to say to others, "God has given this denomination a responsibility of proclaiming certain points", seeking to "discipline members for disagreeing on [SDA] 28 FB"? Have you become as the Roman Catholics who hated and murdered their brothers for the sake of a doctrine of a trinity?

///
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/05/15 06:00 AM

No - there are only 2 groups
1 - Babylon is the secular/pagan world
2 - True believers

The secular world runs on Babylonian principles. Babylonianism is paganism. Who are the true believers? Those that keep the commandments and have the testimony of Jesus.

Note: many in the SDA church misrepresent who God really is and what He is like, that is sad.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/05/15 06:20 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
No - there are only 2 groups
1 - Babylon is the secular/pagan world
2 - True believers

And the Biblical basis for your interpretation is? Where did you get that from?

///
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/05/15 08:03 AM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: APL
No - there are only 2 groups
1 - Babylon is the secular/pagan world
2 - True believers

And the Biblical basis for your interpretation is? Where did you get that from?

///
From the study of the Bible, particularly Daniel and the study of near eastern religions.

You say the kings of the earth are the secular world. Perhaps you can tell us where kings come from, you seem to know.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/05/15 03:25 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: James Peterson
And the Biblical basis for your interpretation is? Where did you get that from?

From the study of the Bible, particularly Daniel and the study of near eastern religions. You say the kings of the earth are the secular world. Perhaps you can tell us where kings come from, you seem to know.

Johann said SDA believe (1) SDA are the ones depicted by "the other voice from heaven" in Rev. 18:4, and (2) the world will be divided into two camps over SDA 28FB, at least one of them. But Rev. 18 suggests something entirely different. It neither has the world divided into two camps, but three; nor is it about the end of the world at all. From the text itself:
  1. Babylon (v.2),
  2. kings of the earth, representing the secular world (v.9),
  3. holy apostles and prophets, representing believers in Christ (v.20), and of note ...
  4. everyone is urged to leave Babylon just like Lot was urged to leave Sodom. The prophecy is NOT about the end of the world, just about the fall of ONE city (v.15).
You asked about the kings. Well we know they represent the secular world in the prophecy because they do not associate with those who rejoice, i.e. "the holy apostles and prophets (of the believers in Christ)", but weep at the loss of their worldly gain. Read verse 15. Those are the two camps: those who rejoice, those who weep. And then they are those who are deluded and remain in Babylon to fight -- the third group. Again, I repeat, the prophecy is NOT about the Second Advent, just about the fall of ONE city. It's an echo of Mat. 23 and 24.

///
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/05/15 04:07 PM

I asked where do kings some from? How did they originally come into being. This comes from an understanding of near eastern religions. Israel wanted a king. What that so they could be just secular, was religion gone? No. There are only 2 groups. But your are welcome to hold to your belief.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/06/15 11:18 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The FB are not hammers - they are eternal truths. Jesus raised up the SDA Church to practice and proclaim them. Yes, there are sincere believers in other churches who will be saved. However, that is not the same as saying Jesus raised them up to proclaim the 3AM, to prepare the world to accept or reject the truth as it is in Jesus. They will leave their churches and join the SDA Church when the call to come out of Babylon is sounded. They will gladly embrace the FB.
MM, you have gone off to absurdity. Your definition, or failure to define what the 28 +/- FB are is becoming a mockery. You say they are to be proclaimed but yet you say they aren't stated so they can be used at will against whomever when the need to be used against arises? How can they embrace them if they aren't even stated? How can they be judged by them if it is not for the ego of the one(s) supposing oneself in charge.

Or is this a case of "Jump", and the ones you say "embrace them" don't ask how high....

Sorry, you've made a mockery of them.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/10/15 04:51 AM

Kland, your choice of words (absurdity, mockery) is offensive.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/10/15 05:37 PM

I think I added the word, absurdity, to my vocabulary from the various times you've used it.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/10/15 05:41 PM

Quote:
the 1901 General Conference Session, with input from Ellen White, autonomous unions were created,

“[transferring] authority from the General Conference leaders to local leaders, and departments were created that transferred authority over such ministries as Sabbath school, health, temperance, religious liberty, publishing, mission appointments and education from independent stockholders to church leaders, including members, at all levels.
[...]
The unions, on the other hand, were created to act as firewalls between the GC and the conferences, making “dictation” impossible because:
Each union had its own constitution and bylaws and was to be governed by its own constituency.
The officers of each union were to be elected by their own union constituency, and, therefore, could not be controlled, replaced or disciplined by the GC.

Different from what you've implied.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/12/15 07:51 PM

Thinking about the FB and the changes (not necessarily for the good) at the GC, the following from Waggoner comes to mind:

It is part of fallen human nature to make religion consist of forms and ceremonies [ordination?], formulas and doctrines. Sacerdotalism is not peculiar to certain denominations; it is inherent in fallen human nature and just to the extent that one loses sight of God, that formalism will manifest itself even in those who are most sincere. There are just as sincere souls among those whose religion consists of forms as among any people on earth. I have seen among Roman Catholics as much devout sincerity as among any people. Our danger lies in thinking that the truth consists of certain statements-of losing sight of the distinction between truth and the statement of truth. There is just as much difference between these two as there is between the law and the writing out of the law. The real law is living; the writing of it in the book is only a shadow. We are in danger of making a creed, and thinking that that is the truth. {September 30, 1902 EJW, ARSH 8.1}

No human words can express the truth of God. "Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things that God hath prepared for them that love Him. But God hath revealed them unto us by His Spirit." 1 Corinthians 2:9 The fullness of the truth of God cannot be stated in human language; otherwise it could be heard by the ear. It cannot be framed in human thought; otherwise it could enter into the heart of man. Truth can be revealed to man only by the gift of the Spirit of truth. {September 30, 1902 EJW, ARSH 8.2}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/12/15 08:34 PM

I find it difficult to believe that truth is so mysterious that it cannot be expressed in words once the Holy Spirit reveals it unto us. The Bible contains the truths necessary to be set free.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/12/15 08:50 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I find it difficult to believe that truth is so mysterious that it cannot be expressed in words once the Holy Spirit reveals it unto us. The Bible contains the truths necessary to be set free.
Not without the Spirit it can't. If it is so plain as you claim, why so many denominations? Why Ellen White?
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/13/15 04:52 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I find it difficult to believe that truth is so mysterious that it cannot be expressed in words once the Holy Spirit reveals it unto us. The Bible contains the truths necessary to be set free.

Truth in what context? In Science, especially Mathematics, it may be objective. Nobody would deny that you were speeding 20 over the limit if it was so recorded and shown on the meter. In the arts, however, truth is patently subjective. Were you cruising or were you going excessively fast? Compared to what and judging by whom?

The Bible is literature. The proliferation of denominational viewpoints, hence denominations, is therefore expected when it comes to matters it does not address directly. Is Jesus the Messiah? Of course! Mat. 16:16. Is there an investigative judgement of saints? NO. Why, because SDA merely interpreted certain statements to explain away their Great Disappointment.

Christian denominations should NOT base their peculiarity, and hold themselves out as the ONLY light upon a hill, on ideas not explicitly stated or self-evident from the text of the Bible. It is difficult to take anyone seriously, for example, who stridently claims that congregational worship on Saturdays or belief in a trinity of divinities is a determinant of one's salvation. One's creed should be simple: John 13:35, and allow for the proliferation and discussion of ideas without the threat of the stifling of conscience.

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/13/15 06:46 PM

Genesis
2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.
2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

Exodus
20:3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness [of any thing] that [is] in heaven above, or that [is] in the earth beneath, or that [is] in the water under the earth:
20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God [am] a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth [generation] of them that hate me;
20:6 And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
20:7 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
20:8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
20:9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
20:10 But the seventh day [is] the sabbath of the LORD thy God: [in it] thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that [is] within thy gates:
20:11 For [in] six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them [is], and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
20:12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
20:13 Thou shalt not kill.
20:14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.
20:15 Thou shalt not steal.
20:16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
20:17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that [is] thy neighbour's.

John
14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

Luke
10:25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
10:26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
10:27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
10:28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.

Acts
16:30 And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
16:31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/13/15 06:49 PM

It's not rocket science. "But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, [and] easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy." James 3:17.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/14/15 01:10 AM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I find it difficult to believe that truth is so mysterious that it cannot be expressed in words once the Holy Spirit reveals it unto us. The Bible contains the truths necessary to be set free.

Truth in what context? In Science, especially Mathematics, it may be objective. Nobody would deny that you were speeding 20 over the limit if it was so recorded and shown on the meter. In the arts, however, truth is patently subjective. Were you cruising or were you going excessively fast? Compared to what and judging by whom?

The Bible is literature. The proliferation of denominational viewpoints, hence denominations, is therefore expected when it comes to matters it does not address directly. Is Jesus the Messiah? Of course! Mat. 16:16. Is there an investigative judgement of saints? NO. Why, because SDA merely interpreted certain statements to explain away their Great Disappointment.

Christian denominations should NOT base their peculiarity, and hold themselves out as the ONLY light upon a hill, on ideas not explicitly stated or self-evident from the text of the Bible. It is difficult to take anyone seriously, for example, who stridently claims that congregational worship on Saturdays or belief in a trinity of divinities is a determinant of one's salvation. One's creed should be simple: John 13:35, and allow for the proliferation and discussion of ideas without the threat of the stifling of conscience.

///
I think what MM was trying to say,
2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it:
20:10 But the seventh day [is] the sabbath of the LORD thy God:

Isn't that objective, like going 20 over the speed limit, of which nobody can deny?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/14/15 06:47 PM

What God desires for us is not difficult to understand. The plan of salvation is plainly revealed in the Word. Experiencing the plan of salvation is easier than explaining it. Again, it is not brain surgery.
Posted By: Johann

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/14/15 11:24 PM

Quote:

2 Corinthians 3:12-17 J.B. Phillips New Testament

12-17 With this hope in our hearts we are quite frank and open in our ministry. We are not like Moses, who veiled his face to prevent the Israelites from seeing its fading glory. But it was their minds really which were blinded, for even today when the old agreement is read to them there is still a veil over their minds—though the veil has actually been lifted by Christ. Yes, alas, even to this day there is still a veil over their hearts when the writings of Moses are read. Yet if they “turned to the Lord” the veil would disappear. For the Lord to whom they could turn is the spirit of the new agreement, and wherever the Spirit of the Lord is, men’s souls are set free.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/15/15 02:04 AM

Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Christian denominations should NOT base their peculiarity, and hold themselves out as the ONLY light upon a hill, on ideas not explicitly stated or self-evident from the text of the Bible. It is difficult to take anyone seriously, for example, who stridently claims that congregational worship on Saturdays or belief in a trinity of divinities is a determinant of one's salvation. One's creed should be simple: John 13:35, and allow for the proliferation and discussion of ideas without the threat of the stifling of conscience.

I think what MM was trying to say,
2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it:
20:10 But the seventh day [is] the sabbath of the LORD thy God:

Isn't that objective, like going 20 over the speed limit, of which nobody can deny?

It's the reason I said "congregational worship on Saturdays". Indeed the Decalogue does say the seventh day but it must be the seventh day according to one's own time zone and culture. The Sabbath was never meant to be a strictly specific 24-hour period Jerusalem time, else many would have to be awake all night in accordance with the day set there.

Evidently, the commandment is simply asking for one day out of seven which, because the week is cyclic over seven days, means that, mathematically and as commonsense would have it, whatever day you choose becomes the seventh day of rest from the day you started the week. Saturdays? No problem. Sundays? No problem either. The day of congregational worship is always going to be the seventh day (or last day of the week) for that congregation. And you break the commandment when you deviate from the faith of your brethren with whom you worship over the issue. Nevertheless, another congregation does not sin by holding Tuesdays, for example as against Thursdays, as the Sabbath of the Lord any more than American SDA keep Fridays holy judging by Jerusalem time.

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/15/15 02:29 AM

So, yes, within the SDA Church, members who refuse to comply with the 7th day Sabbath should be disciplined in accordance with biblical standards.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/15/15 02:31 AM

Originally Posted By: Johann
Quote:

2 Corinthians 3:12-17 J.B. Phillips New Testament

12-17 With this hope in our hearts we are quite frank and open in our ministry. We are not like Moses, who veiled his face to prevent the Israelites from seeing its fading glory. But it was their minds really which were blinded, for even today when the old agreement is read to them there is still a veil over their minds—though the veil has actually been lifted by Christ. Yes, alas, even to this day there is still a veil over their hearts when the writings of Moses are read. Yet if they “turned to the Lord” the veil would disappear. For the Lord to whom they could turn is the spirit of the new agreement, and wherever the Spirit of the Lord is, men’s souls are set free.


What shall we say then, that the Pharisees (who believed in the resurrection) had the Spirit of the Lord but the Sadducees who denied it did not? Were the latter cut off from the Children of Israel because of it? No. They were all of Abraham and Christ treated them as such.

Even so now, SDA and Roman Catholics are all part of the body of Christ and are treated as such without prejudice by God because the Church was not built on a foundation set in the 18th century around 28 items of faith. I'm sorry; but the Church of Christ was established long before in the 1st century and has as its foundation ONE tenet: "[Jesus of Nazareth is] the Christ, the Son of the Living God." (Mat. 16:18) All other things, though they divide the body, are merely points of interest. (1 Cor. 3:4,11)

///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/15/15 04:56 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
So, yes, within the SDA Church, members who refuse to comply with the 7th day Sabbath should be disciplined in accordance with biblical standards.

I would advise those members to patiently seek another denomination (there are many) if it comes to that and hold fast to their faith in God unto salvation.

///
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/15/15 06:00 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
So, yes, within the SDA Church, members who refuse to comply with the 7th day Sabbath should be disciplined in accordance with biblical standards.
Why do you keep the 7th day?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/15/15 06:47 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
So, yes, within the SDA Church, members who refuse to comply with the 7th day Sabbath should be disciplined in accordance with biblical standards.

I would advise those members to patiently seek another denomination (there are many) if it comes to that and hold fast to their faith in God unto salvation.

Amen! Why remain in a church you do not agree with!
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/15/15 06:48 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
So, yes, within the SDA Church, members who refuse to comply with the 7th day Sabbath should be disciplined in accordance with biblical standards.
Why do you keep the 7th day?

Because Jesus did (does).
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/15/15 06:53 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
So, yes, within the SDA Church, members who refuse to comply with the 7th day Sabbath should be disciplined in accordance with biblical standards.
Why do you keep the 7th day?

Because Jesus did (does).
Really? So if you don't keep the Sabbath, what is Jesus going to do to you?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/16/15 06:23 PM

I do keep the Sabbath. My reward will be proportionate. "And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be." "If thou sayest, Behold, we knew it not; doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it? and he that keepeth thy soul, doth not he know it? and shall not he render to every man according to his works?" "For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works."

Quote:
Chap. 236 - The Reward

Behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. Revelation 22:12. {AG 244.1}

In His divine arrangement, through His unmerited favor, the Lord has ordained that good works shall be rewarded. We are accepted through Christ's merit alone; and the acts of mercy, the deeds of charity, which we perform, are the fruits of faith; and they become a blessing to us; for men are to be rewarded according to their works. It is the fragrance of the merit of Christ that makes our good works acceptable to God, and it is grace that enables us to do the works for which He rewards us. Our works in and of themselves have no merit. . . . We deserve no thanks from God. We have only done what it was our duty to do, and our works could not have been performed in the strength of our own sinful natures. {AG 244.2}

We need . . . to bring the light and grace of Christ into all our works. We need to take hold of Christ and to retain our hold of Him until we know that the power of His transforming grace is manifested in us. We must have faith in Christ if we would reflect the divine character. . . . Faith in the Word of God and in the power of Christ to transform the life will enable the believer to work His works. {AG 244.3}

To His servants Christ commits "His goods"--something to be put to use for Him. He gives "to every man his work." . . . Not more surely is the place prepared for us in the heavenly mansions than is the special place designated on earth where we are to work for God. . . . {AG 244.4}

Christ has paid us our wages, even His own blood and suffering, to secure our willing service. He came to our world to give us an example of how we should work, and what spirit we should bring into our labor. He desires us to study how we can best advance His work and glorify His name in the world. {AG 244.5}

The sanctification of the soul by the working of the Holy Spirit is the implanting of Christ's nature in humanity. Gospel religion is Christ in the life--a living, active principle. It is the grace of Christ revealed in character and wrought out in good works. {AG 244.6}
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/16/15 07:22 PM

Yes - and what is Jesus going to do to you if you do not keep the Sabbath?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/16/15 09:54 PM

We are discussing the answer to your question elsewhere. Let's stay on topic here. SDA members and leaders who refuse to live in harmony with the 28FB should be disciplined.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/16/15 11:35 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
We are discussing the answer to your question elsewhere. Let's stay on topic here. SDA members and leaders who refuse to live in harmony with the 28FB should be disciplined.
It is one topic. I've asked you want discipline you would give way back, and you don't have a straight answer. Christ is our guide, what would Christ do to those who do not hold to the real FBs, the Bible? Hard for you to answer?
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/17/15 12:30 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
So, yes, within the SDA Church, members who refuse to comply with the 7th day Sabbath should be disciplined in accordance with biblical standards.
Why do you keep the 7th day?

Because Jesus did (does).
Really? So if you don't keep the Sabbath, what is Jesus going to do to you?
Well, "discipline" you, of course! So you had better keep the 7th day for the reason of keeping from being "disciplined"!
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/17/15 12:38 AM

So do you suggest that we each have our own speed limits? For that's what you have suggested.
Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Christian denominations should NOT base their peculiarity, and hold themselves out as the ONLY light upon a hill, on ideas not explicitly stated or self-evident from the text of the Bible. It is difficult to take anyone seriously, for example, who stridently claims that congregational worship on Saturdays or belief in a trinity of divinities is a determinant of one's salvation. One's creed should be simple: John 13:35, and allow for the proliferation and discussion of ideas without the threat of the stifling of conscience.

I think what MM was trying to say,
2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it:
20:10 But the seventh day [is] the sabbath of the LORD thy God:

Isn't that objective, like going 20 over the speed limit, of which nobody can deny?

It's the reason I said "congregational worship on Saturdays". Indeed the Decalogue does say the seventh day but it must be the seventh day according to one's own time zone and culture. The Sabbath was never meant to be a strictly specific 24-hour period Jerusalem time, else many would have to be awake all night in accordance with the day set there.
Is anyone here (except maybe "feastkeepers") suggesting we should go with 24-hour period Jerusalem time?

I think most here say the 7th day is based upon our own time zone. Not sure what you mean by "culture".

Quote:
Evidently, the commandment is simply asking for one day out of seven which,
Not true. "Indeed the Decalogue does say the seventh day " I agree. The 7th day. Not a 7th day.

Quote:
because the week is cyclic over seven days, means that, mathematically and as commonsense would have it, whatever day you choose becomes the seventh day of rest from the day you started the week.
Not true. It doesn't say anything about we choosing. It says God chose it.
2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it:


Quote:
Saturdays? No problem. Sundays? No problem either. The day of congregational worship is always going to be the seventh day (or last day of the week) for that congregation. And you break the commandment when you deviate from the faith of your brethren with whom you worship over the issue. Nevertheless, another congregation does not sin by holding Tuesdays, for example as against Thursdays, as the Sabbath of the Lord any more than American SDA keep Fridays holy judging by Jerusalem time.

///
Try that with the patrolman. Say your speed limit happens to be higher than his. Objective? Indeed!
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/17/15 04:08 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
We are discussing the answer to your question elsewhere. Let's stay on topic here. SDA members and leaders who refuse to live in harmony with the 28FB should be disciplined.
It is one topic. I've asked you want discipline you would give way back, and you don't have a straight answer. Christ is our guide, what would Christ do to those who do not hold to the real FBs, the Bible? Hard for you to answer?

The Jews refused to live in harmony with FB and Jesus raised up the Christian Church. The Bible is very clear about what to do when members refuse to live in harmony with FB.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/17/15 04:12 AM

Originally Posted By: kland
A: Why do you keep the 7th day?

M: Because Jesus did (does).

K: Well, "discipline" you, of course! So you had better keep the 7th day for the reason of keeping from being "disciplined"!

I keep the Sabbath because Jesus did (does). I do not fear judgment.

Quote:
Oh, let us contemplate the amazing sacrifice that has been made for us! Let us try to appreciate the labor and energy that Heaven is expending to reclaim the lost, and bring them back to the Father's house. Motives stronger, and agencies more powerful, could never be brought into operation; the exceeding rewards for right-doing, the enjoyment of heaven, the society of the angels, the communion and love of God and His Son, the elevation and extension of all our powers throughout eternal ages--are these not mighty incentives and encouragements to urge us to give the heart's loving service to our Creator and Redeemer? {SC 21.3}

And, on the other hand, the judgments of God pronounced against sin, the inevitable retribution, the degradation of our character, and the final destruction, are presented in God's word to warn us against the service of Satan. {SC 21.4}
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/17/15 05:52 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
We are discussing the answer to your question elsewhere. Let's stay on topic here. SDA members and leaders who refuse to live in harmony with the 28FB should be disciplined.
It is one topic. I've asked you want discipline you would give way back, and you don't have a straight answer. Christ is our guide, what would Christ do to those who do not hold to the real FBs, the Bible? Hard for you to answer?

The Jews refused to live in harmony with FB and Jesus raised up the Christian Church. The Bible is very clear about what to do when members refuse to live in harmony with FB.
The Bible is clear. You are not.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/18/15 11:42 PM

From page 1 of this thread:

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
The passages I posted above demonstrate the role of church and church leadership. Church leadership ruled on doctrine and discipline. The first general council held in Jerusalem reflects church leadership deciding doctrine and determining direction for the church. "Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves". "And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him". "If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed." "Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained." "Whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."

Hebrews
13:7 Remember them which have the rule over you, who have spoken unto you the word of God: whose faith follow, considering the end of [their] conversation.
13:17 Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that [is] unprofitable for you.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/20/15 07:03 PM

Jesus clearly tasked church leaders with responsibility to rule members well. The Holy Spirit gifts certain people with talents to rule and lead church members. "Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine . . . Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear."
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/20/15 08:35 PM

SO - What would you do???? No answer?
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/20/15 09:46 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Jesus clearly tasked church leaders with responsibility to rule members well. The Holy Spirit gifts certain people with talents to rule and lead church members. "Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine . . . Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear."

Yes, but no man is to rule your conscience or sit in the seat of your mind. Discipline for immorality and disrespect, of course; but to have doctrinal police spying on the brethren and reporting to higher authority that this believes that and the other not that is hardly the intended consequence of the "GOOD NEWS" of salvation. Is the communist utopia your idea of heaven?

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/21/15 02:52 AM

James, I always appreciate your sense of rumor (humor). Jesus tasked the Nation of Israel with protecting and proclaiming the truth. Dire was the penalty for rejecting and/or refusing to live in harmony with the FB. "The LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp." Would you label such leadership as totalitarian or communistic? Most people refer to it as a Theocracy. No, I do not believe Jesus will command leaders today to execute capital punishment. Different dispensation. But I do believe the passages posted above make it clear Jesus expects the leaders He ordains to protect and proclaim the truth. Sometimes that involves disciplining members and leaders who refuse to live in harmony with the FB.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/21/15 03:45 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Yes, but no man is to rule your conscience or sit in the seat of your mind. Discipline for immorality and disrespect, of course; but to have doctrinal police spying on the brethren and reporting to higher authority that this believes that and the other not that is hardly the intended consequence of the "GOOD NEWS" of salvation. Is the communist utopia your idea of heaven?

James, I always appreciate your sense of rumor (humor). Jesus tasked the Nation of Israel with protecting and proclaiming the truth. Dire was the penalty for rejecting and/or refusing to live in harmony with the FB. "The LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp." Would you label such leadership as totalitarian or communistic? Most people refer to it as a Theocracy. No, I do not believe Jesus will command leaders today to execute capital punishment. Different dispensation. But I do believe the passages posted above make it clear Jesus expects the leaders He ordains to protect and proclaim the truth. Sometimes that involves disciplining members and leaders who refuse to live in harmony with the FB.

This is neither a matter of capital punishment nor is it frivolous conversation. Israel was a nation governed by civil law. The Church of God, on the other hand, is a movement of volunteers without borders started not in the 19th but the 1st century CE given the over-riding task of telling about the everlasting GOOD NEWS person to person. If SDA feel that they can police the minds of their members, well then .... but the Church is over and above the denomination and its members are those whose names have been registered in heaven. Do you understand that?

The foundation of our faith is not a contrived list of 28 fundamental beliefs laid out in 1980, but in these words of Peter, "[Jesus of Nazareth] is the Christ, Son of the Living God" uttered at the very beginning of the common era. Beyond that, a person is free to follow his own understanding without any threat to his liberty of conscience, as he is taught by God through faith. He is absolutely at liberty to discuss and expound and share with due respect to others. Or have SDA begun to set up an Inquisition?

///
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/21/15 03:51 AM

Originally Posted By: mm
But I do believe the passages posted above make it clear Jesus expects the leaders He ordains to protect and proclaim the truth. Sometimes that involves disciplining members and leaders who refuse to live in harmony with the FB.
And you can't even suggest that the discipline might be. Why not the death penalty?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/21/15 06:04 PM

APL, the Bible passages I posted pertaining to your question are crystal clear. I am not ignoring your question. I have answered it plainly.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/21/15 06:07 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
M: James, I always appreciate your sense of rumor (humor). Jesus tasked the Nation of Israel with protecting and proclaiming the truth. Dire was the penalty for rejecting and/or refusing to live in harmony with the FB. "The LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp." Would you label such leadership as totalitarian or communistic? Most people refer to it as a Theocracy. No, I do not believe Jesus will command leaders today to execute capital punishment. Different dispensation. But I do believe the passages posted above make it clear Jesus expects the leaders He ordains to protect and proclaim the truth. Sometimes that involves disciplining members and leaders who refuse to live in harmony with the FB.

J: This is neither a matter of capital punishment nor is it frivolous conversation. Israel was a nation governed by civil law. The Church of God, on the other hand, is a movement of volunteers without borders started not in the 19th but the 1st century CE given the over-riding task of telling about the everlasting GOOD NEWS person to person. If SDA feel that they can police the minds of their members, well then .... but the Church is over and above the denomination and its members are those whose names have been registered in heaven. Do you understand that? The foundation of our faith is not a contrived list of 28 fundamental beliefs laid out in 1980, but in these words of Peter, "[Jesus of Nazareth] is the Christ, Son of the Living God" uttered at the very beginning of the common era. Beyond that, a person is free to follow his own understanding without any threat to his liberty of conscience, as he is taught by God through faith. He is absolutely at liberty to discuss and expound and share with due respect to others. Or have SDA begun to set up an Inquisition?

Please address my question (in red above).
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/22/15 11:47 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
James, I always appreciate your sense of rumor (humor). Jesus tasked the Nation of Israel with protecting and proclaiming the truth. Dire was the penalty for rejecting and/or refusing to live in harmony with the FB. "The LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp." Would you label such leadership as totalitarian or communistic? Most people refer to it as a Theocracy. No, I do not believe Jesus will command leaders today to execute capital punishment. Different dispensation. But I do believe the passages posted above make it clear Jesus expects the leaders He ordains to protect and proclaim the truth. Sometimes that involves disciplining members and leaders who refuse to live in harmony with the FB.
Do you say, "the FB" back then are the same as detailed today for our church?

This is what some of us are talking about. You mix and mutate and blurify, of which you are even unclear as to what are, changing them at whim, so that you can use "the FB" against anyone whom you see fit.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/23/15 05:54 PM

Kland, you and I are in absolute agreement as to the validity, soundness, and truthfulness of the 28FB. You believe each and every one of them are "sound doctrine".

PS - Dividing fundamental truths into 28FB is simply a matter of convenience. There is nothing sacred about how many ways FB truths are divided and enumerated. Fundamental truths are the same yestersay, today, and forever.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/23/15 11:46 PM

But that is not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about you "dividing" them on the fly as fits your purpose against someone.

And I'm talking about you using them as always in existence as one and the same as the Law of God.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/24/15 12:33 AM

Kland, I don't understand you. Please elaborate. Document.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/24/15 11:57 PM

Sigh.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
We are discussing the answer to your question elsewhere. Let's stay on topic here. SDA members and leaders who refuse to live in harmony with the 28FB should be disciplined.
It is one topic. I've asked you want discipline you would give way back, and you don't have a straight answer. Christ is our guide, what would Christ do to those who do not hold to the real FBs, the Bible? Hard for you to answer?

The Jews refused to live in harmony with FB and Jesus raised up the Christian Church. The Bible is very clear about what to do when members refuse to live in harmony with FB.

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
James, I always appreciate your sense of rumor (humor). Jesus tasked the Nation of Israel with protecting and proclaiming the truth. Dire was the penalty for rejecting and/or refusing to live in harmony with the FB. "The LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp." Would you label such leadership as totalitarian or communistic? Most people refer to it as a Theocracy. No, I do not believe Jesus will command leaders today to execute capital punishment. Different dispensation. But I do believe the passages posted above make it clear Jesus expects the leaders He ordains to protect and proclaim the truth. Sometimes that involves disciplining members and leaders who refuse to live in harmony with the FB.


Show that the Jews, Jesus, has the same FB as "The 28 +/-". All you can say it doesn't matter how they are specified. That's bogus.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/25/15 04:29 AM

Kland, I cannot figure out what you are saying. Jesus is the truth. The truth is, therefore, eternal. I didn't make up the 28FB. Don't blame me if you don't like them.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/25/15 04:41 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Kland, I cannot figure out what you are saying. Jesus is the truth. The truth is, therefore, eternal. I didn't make up the 28FB. Don't blame me if you don't like them.


Right. The 27 FB were "made up" by a group of progressive-leaning Adventists who determined to put their bent into the expression of said beliefs which would then be adopted by the world church. It was an ingenious method of influencing what people perceived to be their own beliefs and doctrines within the church.

I'll believe truth as I see it expressed in the Word of God. I prefer its expression there over any other such expression of it as one might encounter in the world.

Satan himself can express truth. Remember, the three temptations of Christ in the wilderness all employed "truth" from the scriptures. If Satan can use scripture to his own ends, why should any one of us not be leery of such as the 28 Fundamentals purport to portray in their own mode of expression "beside" the Bible?

How you, Mike, can have taken up with the idea that the 28 FB are equivalent and equal to the Bible is beyond me. What saith the LORD on the matter? " We then took the position that the Bible, and the Bible only, was to be our guide; and we are never to depart from this position." Ellen White, Letter 105, 1903.

You have departed, Mike. I cannot, and will not, depart from this position. The Bible ONLY is to be my guide. The Adventist creed is not my guide. The Bible is my only creed.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/25/15 07:06 AM

GC, what does the Bible teach? What is the truth? What is sound doctrine? Are members of the Remnant Church free to believe as they wish? What is false doctrine? Do you and I and everybody else decide what is truth and what is false doctrine? Is the Bible so clear as to not require the inspired guidance of people like Paul and Ellen White - people Jesus raised up to lead and rule the church?

John
20:22 And when he had said this, he breathed on [them], and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
20:23 Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; [and] whose soever [sins] ye retain, they are retained.


Hebrews
13:7 Remember them which have the rule over you, who have spoken unto you the word of God: whose faith follow, considering the end of [their] conversation.
13:17 Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that [is] unprofitable for you.

Galatians
1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any [man] preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

2 Thessalonians
3:14 And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.
3:15 Yet count [him] not as an enemy, but admonish [him] as a brother.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/25/15 07:55 AM

Mike,

If you believe that the 27-28 FB are more clear than the Bible, it is clear to me that you have begun to depart from the teachings of both the Bible and of Mrs. White.

If you wish to imply that the Bible is not sufficiently clear, what is it you are really saying? If the BIble is not clear, how could unisnpired men write a list of beliefs and make them clearer?

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/25/15 06:18 PM

GC, you didn't answer my questions. You also misunderstood my post.

PS - Are you certain the 3AM are so clear as not to require the prophetic guidance of God through Ellen White? "The remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." "Thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy."
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/25/15 06:29 PM

Matthew
18:17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell [it] unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican.
18:18 Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

The Authority Invested in the Church

Christ gives power to the voice of the church. "Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." No such thing is countenanced as one man's starting out upon his own individual responsibility and advocating what views he chooses, irrespective of the judgment of the church. God has bestowed the highest power under heaven upon His church. It is the voice of God in His united people in church capacity which is to be respected. 431 {CCh 241.4}

The Word of God does not give license for one man to set up his judgment in opposition to the judgment of the church, neither is he allowed to urge his opinions against the opinions of the church. If there were no church discipline and government, the church would go to fragments; it could not hold together as a body. There have ever been individuals of independent minds who have claimed that they were right, that God had especially taught, impressed, and led them. Each has a theory of his own, views peculiar to himself, and each claims that his views are in accordance with the word of God. Each one has a different theory and faith, yet each claims special light from God. These draw away from the body, and each one is a separate church of himself. All these cannot be right, yet they all claim to be led of the Lord. {CCh 241.5}

Our Saviour follows His lessons of instruction with a promise that if two or three should be united in asking anything of God it should be given them. Christ here shows that there must be union with others, even in our desires for a given object. Great importance is attached to the united prayer, the union of purpose. God hears the prayers of individuals, but on this occasion Jesus was giving especial and important lessons that were to have a special bearing upon His newly organized church on the earth. There must be an agreement in the things which they desire and for which they pray. It was not merely the thoughts and exercises of one mind, liable to deception; but the petition was to be the earnest desire of several minds centered on the same point. 432 {CCh 242.1}

The church is God's appointed agency for the salvation of men. It was organized for service, and its mission is to carry the gospel to the world. From the beginning it has been God's plan that through His church shall be reflected to the world His fullness and His sufficiency. The members of the church, those whom He has called out of darkness into His marvelous light, are to show forth His glory. The church is the repository of the riches of the grace of Christ; and through the church will eventually be made manifest, even to "the principalities and powers in heavenly places," the final and full display of the love of God. 433 {CCh 242.2}
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/28/15 05:05 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Kland, I cannot figure out what you are saying. Jesus is the truth. The truth is, therefore, eternal. I didn't make up the 28FB. Don't blame me if you don't like them.
And that is where you are wrong. Jesus IS the truth and IS eternal. But that has nothing to do with the 28 +/-. While the 28 may currently be true, they are NOT the truth, they are NOT Jesus, they are NOT eternal. Jesus is NOT one and the same as the 28.

You sound like the papacy. You have mixed and merged, substituted and swapped. You are confused. And you are wrong. And Green is correct in that you are departing from the truth. Come back into the fold brother. Embrace the Bible and Ellen White, not uninspired made up writings of men.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/28/15 06:01 PM

Kland, not one of the 28FB will ever cease being true. You agree. The Church may choose to change the number of ways it subdivides FB, it may increase or decrease the number - but the FB will always be true. If you disagree then please name one or more the FB that you think will cease being true some day. Here is the official SDA list of FB:

Quote:
Seventh-day Adventists accept the Bible as their only creed and hold certain fundamental beliefs to be the teaching of the Holy Scriptures. These beliefs, as set forth here, constitute the church's understanding and expression of the teaching of Scripture. Revision of these statements may be expected at a General Conference session when the church is led by the Holy Spirit to a fuller understanding of Bible truth or finds better language in which to express the teachings of God's Holy Word.

1. The Holy Scriptures:
1. Holy Scriptures: The Holy Scriptures, Old and New Testaments, are the written Word of God, given by divine inspiration through holy men of God who spoke and wrote as they were moved by the Holy Spirit. In this Word, God has committed to man the knowledge necessary for salvation. The Holy Scriptures are the infallible revelation of His will. They are the standard of character, the test of experience, the authoritative revealer of doctrines, and the trustworthy record of God's acts in history. (2 Peter 1:20, 21; 2 Tim. 3:16, 17; Ps. 119:105; Prov. 30:5, 6; Isa. 8:20; John 17:17; 1 Thess. 2:13; Heb. 4:12.)

2. Trinity: There is one God:
Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, a unity of three co-eternal Persons. God is immortal, all-powerful, all-knowing, above all, and ever present. He is infinite and beyond human comprehension, yet known through His self-revelation. He is forever worthy of worship, adoration, and service by the whole creation. (Deut. 6:4; Matt. 28:19; 2 Cor. 13:14; Eph. 4:4-6; 1 Peter 1:2; 1 Tim. 1:17; Rev. 14:7.)

3. Father:
God the eternal Father is the Creator, Source, Sustainer, and Sovereign of all creation. He is just and holy, merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness. The qualities and powers exhibited in the Son and the Holy Spirit are also revelations of the Father. (Gen. 1:1; Rev. 4:11; 1 Cor. 15:28; John 3:16; 1 John 4:8; 1 Tim. 1:17; Ex. 34:6, 7; John 14:9.)

4. Son:
God the eternal Son became incarnate in Jesus Christ. Through Him all things were created, the character of God is revealed, the salvation of humanity is accomplished, and the world is judged. Forever truly God, He became also truly man, Jesus the Christ. He was conceived of the Holy Spirit and born of the virgin Mary. He lived and experienced temptation as a human being, but perfectly exemplified the righteousness and love of God. By His miracles He manifested God's power and was attested as God's promised Messiah. He suffered and died voluntarily on the cross for our sins and in our place, was raised from the dead, and ascended to minister in the heavenly sanctuary in our behalf. He will come again in glory for the final deliverance of His people and the restoration of all things. (John 1:1-3, 14; Col. 1:15-19; John 10:30; 14:9; Rom. 6:23; 2 Cor. 5:17-19; John 5:22; Luke 1:35; Phil. 2:5-11; Heb. 2:9-18; 1 Cor. 15:3, 4; Heb. 8:1, 2; John 14:1-3.)

5. Holy Spirit:
God the eternal Spirit was active with the Father and the Son in Creation, incarnation, and redemption. He inspired the writers of Scripture. He filled Christ's life with power. He draws and convicts human beings; and those who respond He renews and transforms into the image of God. Sent by the Father and the Son to be always with His children, He extends spiritual gifts to the church, empowers it to bear witness to Christ, and in harmony with the Scriptures leads it into all truth. (Gen. 1:1, 2; Luke 1:35; 4:18; Acts 10:38; 2 Peter 1:21; 2 Cor. 3:18; Eph. 4:11, 12; Acts 1:8; John 14:16-18, 26; 15:26, 27; 16:7-13.)

6. Creation:
God is Creator of all things, and has revealed in Scripture the authentic account of His creative activity. In six days the Lord made "the heaven and the earth" and all living things upon the earth, and rested on the seventh day of that first week. Thus He established the Sabbath as a perpetual memorial of His completed creative work. The first man and woman were made in the image of God as the crowning work of Creation, given dominion over the world, and charged with responsibility to care for it. When the world was finished it was ``very good,'' declaring the glory of God. (Gen. 1; 2; Ex. 20:8-11; Ps. 19:1-6; 33:6, 9; 104; Heb. 11:3.)

7. Nature of Man:
Man and woman were made in the image of God with individuality, the power and freedom to think and to do. Though created free beings, each is an indivisible unity of body, mind, and spirit, dependent upon God for life and breath and all else. When our first parents disobeyed God, they denied their dependence upon Him and fell from their high position under God. The image of God in them was marred and they became subject to death. Their descendants share this fallen nature and its consequences. They are born with weaknesses and tendencies to evil. But God in Christ reconciled the world to Himself and by His Spirit restores in penitent mortals the image of their Maker. Created for the glory of God, they are called to love Him and one another, and to care for their environment. (Gen. 1:26-28; 2:7; Ps. 8:4-8; Acts 17:24-28; Gen. 3; Ps. 51:5; Rom. 5:12-17; 2 Cor. 5:19, 20; Ps. 51:10; 1 John 4:7, 8, 11, 20; Gen. 2:15.)

8. Great Controversy:
All humanity is now involved in a great controversy between Christ and Satan regarding the character of God, His law, and His sovereignty over the universe. This conflict originated in heaven when a created being, endowed with freedom of choice, in self-exaltation became Satan, God's adversary, and led into rebellion a portion of the angels. He introduced the spirit of rebellion into this world when he led Adam and Eve into sin. This human sin resulted in the distortion of the image of God in humanity, the disordering of the created world, and its eventual devastation at the time of the worldwide flood. Observed by the whole creation, this world became the arena of the universal conflict, out of which the God of love will ultimately be vindicated. To assist His people in this controversy, Christ sends the Holy Spirit and the loyal angels to guide, protect, and sustain them in the way of salvation. (Rev. 12:4-9; Isa. 14:12-14; Eze. 28:12-18; Gen. 3; Rom. 1:19-32; 5:12-21; 8:19-22; Gen. 6-8; 2 Peter 3:6; 1 Cor. 4:9; Heb. 1:14.)

9. Life, Death, and Resurrection of Christ:
In Christ's life of perfect obedience to God's will, His suffering, death, and resurrection, God provided the only means of atonement for human sin, so that those who by faith accept this atonement may have eternal life, and the whole creation may better understand the infinite and holy love of the Creator. This perfect atonement vindicates the righteousness of God's law and the graciousness of His character; for it both condemns our sin and provides for our forgiveness. The death of Christ is substitutionary and expiatory, reconciling and transforming. The resurrection of Christ proclaims God's triumph over the forces of evil, and for those who accept the atonement assures their final victory over sin and death. It declares the Lordship of Jesus Christ, before whom every knee in heaven and on earth will bow. (John 3:16; Isa. 53; 1 Peter 2:21, 22; 1 Cor. 15:3, 4, 20-22; 2 Cor. 5:14, 15, 19-21; Rom. 1:4; 3:25; 4:25; 8:3, 4; 1 John 2:2; 4:10; Col. 2:15; Phil. 2:6-11.)

10. Experience of Salvation:
In infinite love and mercy God made Christ, who knew no sin, to be sin for us, so that in Him we might be made the righteousness of God. Led by the Holy Spirit we sense our need, acknowledge our sinfulness, repent of our transgressions, and exercise faith in Jesus as Lord and Christ, as Substitute and Example. This faith which receives salvation comes through the divine power of the Word and is the gift of God's grace. Through Christ we are justified, adopted as God's sons and daughters, and delivered from the lordship of sin. Through the Spirit we are born again and sanctified; the Spirit renews our minds, writes God's law of love in our hearts, and we are given the power to live a holy life. Abiding in Him we become partakers of the divine nature and have the assurance of salvation now and in the judgment. (2 Cor. 5:17-21; John 3:16; Gal. 1:4; 4:4-7; Titus 3:3-7; John 16:8; Gal. 3:13, 14; 1 Peter 2:21, 22; Rom. 10:17; Luke 17:5; Mark 9:23, 24; Eph. 2:5-10; Rom. 3:21-26; Col. 1:13, 14; Rom. 8:14-17; Gal. 3:26; John 3:3-8; 1 Peter 1:23; Rom. 12:2; Heb. 8:7-12; Eze. 36:25-27; 2 Peter 1:3, 4; Rom. 8:1-4; 5:6-10.)

11. Growing in Christ:
By His death on the cross Jesus triumphed over the forces of evil. He who subjugated the demonic spirits during His earthly ministry has broken their power and made certain their ultimate doom. Jesus' victory gives us victory over the evil forces that still seek to control us, as we walk with Him in peace, joy, and assurance of His love. Now the Holy Spirit dwells within us and empowers us. Continually committed to Jesus as our Saviour and Lord, we are set free from the burden of our past deeds. No longer do we live in the darkness, fear of evil powers, ignorance, and meaninglessness of our former way of life. In this new freedom in Jesus, we are called to grow into the likeness of His character, communing with Him daily in prayer, feeding on His Word, meditating on it and on His providence, singing His praises, gathering together for worship, and participating in the mission of the Church. As we give ourselves in loving service to those around us and in witnessing to His salvation, His constant presence with us through the Spirit transforms every moment and every task into a spiritual experience. (Ps 1:1, 2; 23:4; 77:11, 12; Col 1:13, 14; 2:6, 14, 15; Luke 10:17-20; Eph 5:19, 20; 6:12-18; 1 Thess 5:23; 2 Peter 2:9; 3:18; 2 Cor. 3:17, 18; Phil 3:7-14; 1 Thess 5:16-18; Matt 20:25-28; John 20:21; Gal 5:22-25; Rom 8:38, 39; 1 John 4:4; Heb 10:25.)

12. Church:
The church is the community of believers who confess Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour. In continuity with the people of God in Old Testament times, we are called out from the world; and we join together for worship, for fellowship, for instruction in the Word, for the celebration of the Lord's Supper, for service to all mankind, and for the worldwide proclamation of the gospel. The church derives its authority from Christ, who is the incarnate Word, and from the Scriptures, which are the written Word. The church is God's family; adopted by Him as children, its members live on the basis of the new covenant. The church is the body of Christ, a community of faith of which Christ Himself is the Head. The church is the bride for whom Christ died that He might sanctify and cleanse her. At His return in triumph, He will present her to Himself a glorious church, the faithful of all the ages, the purchase of His blood, not having spot or wrinkle, but holy and without blemish. (Gen. 12:3; Acts 7:38; Eph. 4:11-15; 3:8-11; Matt. 28:19, 20; 16:13-20; 18:18; Eph. 2:19-22; 1:22, 23; 5:23-27; Col. 1:17, 18.)

13. Remnant and Its Mission:
The universal church is composed of all who truly believe in Christ, but in the last days, a time of widespread apostasy, a remnant has been called out to keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus. This remnant announces the arrival of the judgment hour, proclaims salvation through Christ, and heralds the approach of His second advent. This proclamation is symbolized by the three angels of Revelation 14; it coincides with the work of judgment in heaven and results in a work of repentance and reform on earth. Every believer is called to have a personal part in this worldwide witness. (Rev. 12:17; 14:6-12; 18:1-4; 2 Cor. 5:10; Jude 3, 14; 1 Peter 1:16-19; 2 Peter 3:10-14; Rev. 21:1-14.)

14. Unity in the Body of Christ:
The church is one body with many members, called from every nation, kindred, tongue, and people. In Christ we are a new creation; distinctions of race, culture, learning, and nationality, and differences between high and low, rich and poor, male and female, must not be divisive among us. We are all equal in Christ, who by one Spirit has bonded us into one fellowship with Him and with one another; we are to serve and be served without partiality or reservation. Through the revelation of Jesus Christ in the Scriptures we share the same faith and hope, and reach out in one witness to all. This unity has its source in the oneness of the triune God, who has adopted us as His children. (Rom. 12:4, 5; 1 Cor. 12:12-14; Matt. 28:19, 20; Ps. 133:1; 2 Cor. 5:16, 17; Acts 17:26, 27; Gal. 3:27, 29; Col. 3:10-15; Eph. 4:14-16; 4:1-6; John 17:20-23.)

15. Baptism:
By baptism we confess our faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, and testify of our death to sin and of our purpose to walk in newness of life. Thus we acknowledge Christ as Lord and Saviour, become His people, and are received as members by His church. Baptism is a symbol of our union with Christ, the forgiveness of our sins, and our reception of the Holy Spirit. It is by immersion in water and is contingent on an affirmation of faith in Jesus and evidence of repentance of sin. It follows instruction in the Holy Scriptures and acceptance of their teachings. (Rom. 6:1-6; Col. 2:12, 13; Acts 16:30-33; 22:16; 2:38; Matt. 28:19, 20.)

16. Lord's Supper:
The Lord's Supper is a participation in the emblems of the body and blood of Jesus as an expression of faith in Him, our Lord and Saviour. In this experience of communion Christ is present to meet and strengthen His people. As we partake, we joyfully proclaim the Lord's death until He comes again. Preparation for the Supper includes self-examination, repentance, and confession. The Master ordained the service of foot washing to signify renewed cleansing, to express a willingness to serve one another in Christlike humility, and to unite our hearts in love. The communion service is open to all believing Christians. (1 Cor. 10:16, 17; 11:23-30; Matt. 26:17-30; Rev. 3:20; John 6:48-63; 13:1-17.)

17. Spiritual Gifts and Ministries:
God bestows upon all members of His church in every age spiritual gifts which each member is to employ in loving ministry for the common good of the church and of humanity. Given by the agency of the Holy Spirit, who apportions to each member as He wills, the gifts provide all abilities and ministries needed by the church to fulfill its divinely ordained functions. According to the Scriptures, these gifts include such ministries as faith, healing, prophecy, proclamation, teaching, administration, reconciliation, compassion, and self-sacrificing service and charity for the help and encouragement of people. Some members are called of God and endowed by the Spirit for functions recognized by the church in pastoral, evangelistic, apostolic, and teaching ministries particularly needed to equip the members for service, to build up the church to spiritual maturity, and to foster unity of the faith and knowledge of God. When members employ these spiritual gifts as faithful stewards of God's varied grace, the church is protected from the destructive influence of false doctrine, grows with a growth that is from God, and is built up in faith and love. (Rom. 12:4-8; 1 Cor. 12:9-11, 27, 28; Eph. 4:8, 11-16; Acts 6:1-7; 1 Tim. 3:1-13; 1 Peter 4:10, 11.)

18. The Gift of Prophecy:
One of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is prophecy. This gift is an identifying mark of the remnant church and was manifested in the ministry of Ellen. G. White . As the Lord's messenger, her writings are a continuing and authoritative source of truth which provide for the church comfort, guidance, instruction, and correction. They also make clear that the Bible is the standard by which all teaching and experience must be tested. (Joel 2:28, 29; Acts 2:14-21; Heb. 1:1-3; Rev. 12:17; 19:10.)

19. Law of God:
The great principles of God's law are embodied in the Ten Commandments and exemplified in the life of Christ. They express God's love, will, and purposes concerning human conduct and relationships and are binding upon all people in every age. These precepts are the basis of God's covenant with His people and the standard in God's judgment. Through the agency of the Holy Spirit they point out sin and awaken a sense of need for a Saviour. Salvation is all of grace and not of works, but its fruitage is obedience to the Commandments. This obedience develops Christian character and results in a sense of well-being. It is an evidence of our love for the Lord and our concern for our fellow men. The obedience of faith demonstrates the power of Christ to transform lives, and therefore strengthens Christian witness. (Ex. 20:1-17; Ps. 40:7, 8; Matt. 22:36-40; Deut. 28:1-14; Matt. 5:17-20; Heb. 8:8-10; John 15:7-10; Eph. 2:8-10; 1 John 5:3; Rom. 8:3, 4; Ps. 19:7-14.)

20. Sabbath:
The beneficent Creator, after the six days of Creation, rested on the seventh day and instituted the Sabbath for all people as a memorial of Creation. The fourth commandment of God's unchangeable law requires the observance of this seventh-day Sabbath as the day of rest, worship, and ministry in harmony with the teaching and practice of Jesus, the Lord of the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a day of delightful communion with God and one another. It is a symbol of our redemption in Christ, a sign of our sanctification, a token of our allegiance, and a foretaste of our eternal future in God's kingdom. The Sabbath is God's perpetual sign of His eternal covenant between Him and His people. Joyful observance of this holy time from evening to evening, sunset to sunset, is a celebration of God's creative and redemptive acts. (Gen. 2:1-3; Ex. 20:8-11; Luke 4:16; Isa. 56:5, 6; 58:13, 14; Matt. 12:1-12; Ex. 31:13-17; Eze. 20:12, 20; Deut. 5:12-15; Heb. 4:1-11; Lev. 23:32; Mark 1:32.)

21. Stewardship:
We are God's stewards, entrusted by Him with time and opportunities, abilities and possessions, and the blessings of the earth and its resources. We are responsible to Him for their proper use. We acknowledge God's ownership by faithful service to Him and our fellow men, and by returning tithes and giving offerings for the proclamation of His gospel and the support and growth of His church. Stewardship is a privilege given to us by God for nurture in love and the victory over selfishness and covetousness. The steward rejoices in the blessings that come to others as a result of his faithfulness. (Gen. 1:26-28; 2:15; 1 Chron. 29:14; Haggai 1:3-11; Mal. 3:8-12; 1 Cor. 9:9-14; Matt. 23:23; 2 Cor. 8:1-15; Rom. 15:26, 27.)

22. Christian Behavior:
We are called to be a godly people who think, feel, and act in harmony with the principles of heaven. For the Spirit to recreate in us the character of our Lord we involve ourselves only in those things which will produce Christlike purity, health, and joy in our lives. This means that our amusement and entertainment should meet the highest standards of Christian taste and beauty. While recognizing cultural differences, our dress is to be simple, modest, and neat, befitting those whose true beauty does not consist of outward adornment but in the imperishable ornament of a gentle and quiet spirit. It also means that because our bodies are the temples of the Holy Spirit, we are to care for them intelligently. Along with adequate exercise and rest, we are to adopt the most healthful diet possible and abstain from the unclean foods identified in the Scriptures. Since alcoholic beverages, tobacco, and the irresponsible use of drugs and narcotics are harmful to our bodies, we are to abstain from them as well. Instead, we are to engage in whatever brings our thoughts and bodies into the discipline of Christ, who desires our wholesomeness, joy, and goodness. (Rom. 12:1, 2; 1 John 2:6; Eph. 5:1-21; Phil. 4:8; 2 Cor. 10:5; 6:14-7:1; 1 Peter 3:1-4; 1 Cor. 6:19, 20; 10:31; Lev. 11:1-47; 3 John 2.)

23. Marriage and the Family:
Marriage was divinely established in Eden and affirmed by Jesus to be a lifelong union between a man and a woman in loving companionship. For the Christian a marriage commitment is to God as well as to the spouse, and should be entered into only between partners who share a common faith. Mutual love, honor, respect, and responsibility are the fabric of this relationship, which is to reflect the love, sanctity, closeness, and permanence of the relationship between Christ and His church. Regarding divorce, Jesus taught that the person who divorces a spouse, except for fornication, and marries another, commits adultery. Although some family relationships may fall short of the ideal, marriage partners who fully commit themselves to each other in Christ may achieve loving unity through the guidance of the Spirit and the nurture of the church. God blesses the family and intends that its members shall assist each other toward complete maturity. Parents are to bring up their children to love and obey the Lord. By their example and their words they are to teach them that Christ is a loving disciplinarian, ever tender and caring, who wants them to become members of His body, the family of God. Increasing family closeness is one of the earmarks of the final gospel message. (Gen. 2:18-25; Matt. 19:3-9; John 2:1-11; 2 Cor. 6:14; Eph. 5:21-33; Matt. 5:31, 32; Mark 10:11, 12; Luke 16:18; 1 Cor. 7:10, 11; Ex. 20:12; Eph. 6:1-4; Deut. 6:5-9; Prov. 22:6; Mal. 4:5, 6.)

24. Christ's Ministry in the Heavenly Sanctuary:
There is a sanctuary in heaven, the true tabernacle which the Lord set up and not man. In it Christ ministers on our behalf, making available to believers the benefits of His atoning sacrifice offered once for all on the cross. He was inaugurated as our great High Priest and began His intercessory ministry at the time of His ascension. In 1844, at the end of the prophetic period of 2300 days, He entered the second and last phase of His atoning ministry. It is a work of investigative judgment which is part of the ultimate disposition of all sin, typified by the cleansing of the ancient Hebrew sanctuary on the Day of Atonement. In that typical service the sanctuary was cleansed with the blood of animal sacrifices, but the heavenly things are purified with the perfect sacrifice of the blood of Jesus. The investigative judgment reveals to heavenly intelligences who among the dead are asleep in Christ and therefore, in Him, are deemed worthy to have part in the first resurrection. It also makes manifest who among the living are abiding in Christ, keeping the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus, and in Him, therefore, are ready for translation into His everlasting kingdom. This judgment vindicates the justice of God in saving those who believe in Jesus. It declares that those who have remained loyal to God shall receive the kingdom. The completion of this ministry of Christ will mark the close of human probation before the Second Advent. (Heb. 8:1-5; 4:14-16; 9:11-28; 10:19-22; 1:3; 2:16, 17; Dan. 7:9-27; 8:13, 14; 9:24-27; Num. 14:34; Eze. 4:6; Lev. 16; Rev. 14:6, 7; 20:12; 14:12; 22:12.)

25. Second Coming of Christ:
The second coming of Christ is the blessed hope of the church, the grand climax of the gospel. The Saviour's coming will be literal, personal, visible, and worldwide. When He returns, the righteous dead will be resurrected, and together with the righteous living will be glorified and taken to heaven, but the unrighteous will die. The almost complete fulfillment of most lines of prophecy, together with the present condition of the world, indicates that Christ's coming is imminent. The time of that event has not been revealed, and we are therefore exhorted to be ready at all times. (Titus 2:13; Heb. 9:28; John 14:1-3; Acts 1:9-11; Matt. 24:14; Rev. 1:7; Matt. 24:43, 44; 1 Thess. 4:13-18; 1 Cor. 15:51-54; 2 Thess. 1:7-10; 2:8; Rev. 14:14-20; 19:11-21; Matt. 24; Mark 13; Luke 21; 2 Tim. 3:1-5; 1 Thess. 5:1-6.)

26. Death and Resurrection:
The wages of sin is death. But God, who alone is immortal, will grant eternal life to His redeemed. Until that day death is an unconscious state for all people. When Christ, who is our life, appears, the resurrected righteous and the living righteous will be glorified and caught up to meet their Lord. The second resurrection, the resurrection of the unrighteous, will take place a thousand years later. (Rom. 6:23; 1 Tim. 6:15, 16; Eccl. 9:5, 6; Ps. 146:3, 4; John 11:11-14; Col. 3:4; 1 Cor. 15:51-54; 1 Thess. 4:13-17; John 5:28, 29; Rev. 20:1-10.)

27. Millennium and the End of Sin:
The millennium is the thousand-year reign of Christ with His saints in heaven between the first and second resurrections. During this time the wicked dead will be judged; the earth will be utterly desolate, without living human inhabitants, but occupied by Satan and his angels. At its close Christ with His saints and the Holy City will descend from heaven to earth. The unrighteous dead will then be resurrected, and with Satan and his angels will surround the city; but fire from God will consume them and cleanse the earth. The universe will thus be freed of sin and sinners forever. (Rev. 20; 1 Cor. 6:2, 3; Jer. 4:23-26; Rev. 21:1-5; Mal. 4:1; Eze. 28:18, 19.)

28. New Earth:
On the new earth, in which righteousness dwells, God will provide an eternal home for the redeemed and a perfect environment for everlasting life, love, joy, and learning in His presence. For here God Himself will dwell with His people, and suffering and death will have passed away. The great controversy will be ended, and sin will be no more. All things, animate and inanimate, will declare that God is love; and He shall reign forever. Amen. (2 Peter 3:13; Isa. 35; 65:17-25; Matt. 5:5; Rev. 21:1-7; 22:1-5; 11:15.)

You agree with each and everyone of the FB. You believe they are right and true. So do I.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/28/15 06:06 PM

Any SDA member or leader who understands and rejects one or more of the 28FB must be disciplined in accordance with biblical counsel.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/29/15 07:35 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Any SDA member or leader who understands and rejects one or more of the 28FB must be disciplined in accordance with biblical counsel.

And I would like to take this opportunity to say that such members and leaders should not lose courage or faith at all, but that they should feel free to worship elsewhere in an atmosphere where the liberty of conscience is respected and away from the mind police and inquisition.

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/29/15 05:49 PM

Amen! People are free to worship with like-minded believers wherever they choose (at least in certain countries). They are not free, however, to cause trouble within a church family by insisting its fundamental beliefs and core values are unbiblical. "Can two walk together, except they be agreed?"
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/29/15 10:09 PM

MM, Jesus is NOT the 28 +/-! You did not seem to agree with this.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/30/15 02:04 AM

4. Son:
God the eternal Son became incarnate in Jesus Christ. Through Him all things were created, the character of God is revealed, the salvation of humanity is accomplished, and the world is judged. Forever truly God, He became also truly man, Jesus the Christ. He was conceived of the Holy Spirit and born of the virgin Mary. He lived and experienced temptation as a human being, but perfectly exemplified the righteousness and love of God. By His miracles He manifested God's power and was attested as God's promised Messiah. He suffered and died voluntarily on the cross for our sins and in our place, was raised from the dead, and ascended to minister in the heavenly sanctuary in our behalf. He will come again in glory for the final deliverance of His people and the restoration of all things. (John 1:1-3, 14; Col. 1:15-19; John 10:30; 14:9; Rom. 6:23; 2 Cor. 5:17-19; John 5:22; Luke 1:35; Phil. 2:5-11; Heb. 2:9-18; 1 Cor. 15:3, 4; Heb. 8:1, 2; John 14:1-3.)

25. Second Coming of Christ:
The second coming of Christ is the blessed hope of the church, the grand climax of the gospel. The Saviour's coming will be literal, personal, visible, and worldwide. When He returns, the righteous dead will be resurrected, and together with the righteous living will be glorified and taken to heaven, but the unrighteous will die. The almost complete fulfillment of most lines of prophecy, together with the present condition of the world, indicates that Christ's coming is imminent. The time of that event has not been revealed, and we are therefore exhorted to be ready at all times. (Titus 2:13; Heb. 9:28; John 14:1-3; Acts 1:9-11; Matt. 24:14; Rev. 1:7; Matt. 24:43, 44; 1 Thess. 4:13-18; 1 Cor. 15:51-54; 2 Thess. 1:7-10; 2:8; Rev. 14:14-20; 19:11-21; Matt. 24; Mark 13; Luke 21; 2 Tim. 3:1-5; 1 Thess. 5:1-6.)
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/31/15 05:06 PM

MM, Jesus is NOT the 28 +/-! You did not seem to agree with this.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 07/31/15 06:03 PM

The Bible is not Jesus. Books merely contain truths that enable us to trust and obey Jesus. The 28FB reflect truths articulated in the Bible. Jesus tasked the SDA Church to practice and proclaim the 3AM. He also commanded the SDA Church to discipline members and leaders who reject and/or refuse to comply with FB.
Posted By: Alchemy

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 08/02/15 04:56 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Amen! People are free to worship with like-minded believers wherever they choose (at least in certain countries). They are not free, however, to cause trouble within a church family by insisting its fundamental beliefs and core values are unbiblical. "Can two walk together, except they be agreed?"


MM is correct!

Us, as well as all other churches, should be free to worship in peace with like-minded believers.

Why is this a problem?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 08/03/15 03:48 PM

The problem would be far less if church leaders obeyed inspired counsel. Most notably - "There is need of a more thorough preparation on the part of candidates for baptism. They are in need of more faithful instruction than has usually been given them. The principles of the Christian life should be made plain to those who have newly come to the truth." {6T 91.4}

Quote:
There is need of a much more thorough preparation of the candidates for baptism than has been given them. Satan does not want any one to see the necessity of an entire surrender to God. When the soul fails to make this surrender, sin is not forsaken; appetites and passions are striving for the mastery; temptations confuse the senses, so that true conversion may not take place. Whenever one renounces sin, which is the transgression of the law, his life will be brought into conformity to the law, into perfect obedience. This conformity to the mind and will of Christ is the work of the Holy Spirit. {6MR 156.2}

Before baptism there should be a thorough inquiry as to the experience of the candidate. Let this inquiry be made, not in a cold and distant way, but kindly, tenderly, pointing the new converts to the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sin of the world. Bring the requirement of the gospel to bear upon the candidates for baptism. Christ is represented as bearing the griefs and sorrows caused by sin, and he does this, not only as our sympathizing friend, but as our substitute. Therefore our sins of selfishness, of unamiable temper, of indolence, of wrong habits and practices, are to be positively and firmly put away. The one who breaks with Satan is to give no place to his temptations. Let the souls who come to Christ consider that He is the Sin-bearer, "wounded for our transgressions, bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed." "Himself took our infirmities, and bare our sicknesses." All this is done for the sinner, and as the sinner comes to Christ, helpless, penitent, and humble; as he views the expensive expiation made in his behalf, let the repenting soul lay hold by faith of the provision made to save him, not in his sin, but from his sin. Christ as the sin-bearer must take away the sin and rescue the sinner from his morbid spiritual condition. As he asks for a change of heart, the answer comes, "My son, give me thine heart." "A new heart will I give thee." I will restore you to a pure, holy atmosphere, that you, being dead to sin, may live unto righteousness. {6MR 157.1}

"Thy sins be forgiven thee." These words are spoken to the repentant, believing soul. Wonderful Saviour! All need to understand the process of conversion. The fruit is seen in the changed life. True repentance will be shown to be sincere by producing fruit in good works. None can depend upon their profession of faith as proof that they have a saving connection with Christ. It is by conformity to the will of God in our words, our deportment, our character that we prove our connection with him. We cannot depend on any other one to do our work for us. We must perform our duties for ourselves. We must work the will of God, and delight to do his commandments. Then we shall not lean upon any one but Jesus Christ for support and efficiency. {6MR 157.2}

One of the points upon which those newly come to the faith will need faithful instruction is the subject of dress. In the examination of candidates for baptism this subject should not be lost sight of. Let the new converts be faithfully dealt with. Are they vain in dress? do they cherish pride of heart? The idolatry of dress is a moral disease. It must not be taken over into the new life. In most cases submission to the gospel requirements will demand a decided change in the dress. True conversion of the heart will work wonderful changes in the outward appearance. {6MR 158.1}

"The minds of many are clouded with unbelief because those who unite with the church as the chosen of God do not reveal the virtues that are the fruits of the Spirit. Joining the church is not a sure evidence that a man has joined himself to Christ. The new birth is a rare experience in this age of the world. This is the reason why there are so many perplexities in the churches. Many, so many, who assume the name of Christ are unsanctified and unholy. They have been baptized, but they were buried alive. Self did not die, and therefore they did not rise to newness of life in Christ. {12MR 51.1}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 08/03/15 03:48 PM

This is the reason why there are so many perplexities in the churches.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 08/04/15 04:46 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
This is the reason why there are so many perplexities in the churches.

Jesus advised that the wheat and the tares grow until he sends his angels for the harvest. But I perceive that you wish to take that responsibility on yourself.

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 08/13/15 08:56 PM

James, why do you think so?
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 08/13/15 11:57 PM

Uh, could it be that James thinks you do from the statements you have made?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 08/14/15 06:25 PM

What statements?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 08/29/15 07:10 PM

Kland, please back up your accusation. Or, retract it. Thank you.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 08/30/15 04:45 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
This is the reason why there are so many perplexities in the churches.

Jesus advised that the wheat and the tares grow until he sends his angels for the harvest. But I perceive that you wish to take that responsibility on yourself.

///

Very good Biblical text and point to bring in this discussion. That's exactly what I see the Lord has done 'till this day with a purpose in mind.


I don't have time to comment right now, but there's also the story of King Saul(that represents "the Church") that persecuted David(who represented "the overcomers") for 12 years. The purpose was to form the overcomers
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 08/30/15 10:44 PM

From Dennis Herman:

Chapter 45 Rule of the Levites

Numbers 8:1-4 NLTse The LORD said to Moses, (2) "Give Aaron the following instructions: When you set up the seven lamps in the lampstand, place them so their light shines forward in front of the lampstand." (3) So Aaron did this. He set up the seven lamps so they reflected their light forward, just as the LORD had commanded Moses. (4) The entire lampstand, from its base to its decorative blossoms, was made of beaten gold. It was built according to the exact design the LORD had shown Moses.

I've never noticed this before. The lampstands were designed to direct light in one direction. Moses had to set them up so the lamps directed their light shined forward. We're not told which way was forward. We can assume the proper direction to toward the Ark.

But we should have learned not to assume anything with God. He always seems to have a twist to teach us a lesson. To see if we are paying attention. The first thing to do is what we've always done. Look back for the answer.

Then make the seven lamps for the lampstand, and set them so they reflect their light forward.(Exodus 25:37 NLTse). The first thing we learned is we missed a detail. Or at least I missed this detail. Did you catch it in the first book? Did you notice the light pointed forward? I didn't. My mind was stuck on all the images, paintings, and drawings people created showing the lamps shed light equally in all directions. This may be one of the most difficult things to put aside, widely accepted concepts the world created. This is one of the rays of light shed on Bible Study in general.

This may be one of the most important concepts of Bible Study considering the fact, the vast majority of what people call Bible Study today has nothing to do with learning. It has nothing to do with approaching God's throne to find out what the Infinite Creator of the Universe is trying to teach. The majority of what the world calls Bible Study today is little more than searching scripture to prove a point. To reinforce a preconceived idea. The common concept of the lampstand is a perfect illustration showing how preconceived ideas and popular belief blind people to the most obvious lessons in scripture. Those lessons only become obvious when we carefully look at scripture, accept the way it was recorded, then ask why whenever we see something unusual, and does not agree with the status quo.

I've seen some people claim this type of Bible Study, looking deep into details, and questioning every unusual detail is a type of spiritualism. They claim it is emptying the mind. Something the enemy noticed, distorted, and created a different religion out of. Common sense should tell everyone, you can't expect to dictate the out come of any Bible Study to the Infinite God and expect to get anywhere past the concepts you already know. Then you have to consider where you got those concepts from. To be honest, the only logical and fair answer is from the world. Someone told you what those details. The questions is and always will be, who you gonna trust? Your Creator, or someone who most likely picked up a Bible with the same concept of study they ingrained in everyone following them. Those people claim to have answers, give little if any credit to God, and couldn't explain how to communicate with God to save their lives. So they take one of the devil's lies, and turn it into another lie. To keep the spotlight on themselves, they do all they can to turn souls away from God.

No one can claim to know all the truth. If they did, they would have no problem teaching the over three hundred prophecies Jesus fulfilled, and the recorded fulfillment for each and every one of them. If they had all the answers, they'd be able to explain every problem we see in the world today. If they did know everything, we would see the world flocking to those people to be healed. If they did know everything, they would preach nothing but their eyewitness account of their personal relationship with Christ, His plan of Salvation, and the wonders He shows them in scripture everyday. But I don't know of anyone with that kind of relationship with Christ. All I know is what He shows me everyday. And all of it is amazing.

So let us stop going over the basic teachings about Christ again and again. Let us go on instead and become mature in our understanding. Surely we don't need to start again with the fundamental importance of repenting from evil deeds and placing our faith in God. You don't need further instruction about baptisms, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. And so, God willing, we will move forward to further understanding. For it is impossible to bring back to repentance those who were once enlightened--those who have experienced the good things of heaven and shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the power of the age to come-- and who then turn away from God. It is impossible to bring such people back to repentance; by rejecting the Son of God, they themselves are nailing him to the cross once again and holding him up to public shame. When the ground soaks up the falling rain and bears a good crop for the farmer, it has God's blessing. But if a field bears thorns and thistles, it is useless. The farmer will soon condemn that field and burn it. (Hebrews 6:1-8 NLTse).

But that seems to be the way of the world. Write a set of fundamental beliefs and preach it till your last breath. Never learning. Never seeing how God's Word constantly expands with new truth everyday. Never knowing the real God who patiently waits to share something new everyday. Not knowing the God or His creation designed to fascinate us at every glance. Not know His creation and Word are designed to slow us down, to make us want to spend time with Him. Those people skim over creation never realizing, God created mankind to spend time with us. God planted a garden by hand for Adam after speaking everything into existence. God didn't want Adam to see His power, the way He spoke and everything sprang up. No! The first thing God showed Adam was how He spend time forming the most important things by hand. God wanted Adam to realize, time may be the greatest gift of all. And how you spend that time.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 08/31/15 11:24 PM

The problem would be far less if church leaders obeyed inspired counsel. Most notably - "There is need of a more thorough preparation on the part of candidates for baptism. They are in need of more faithful instruction than has usually been given them. The principles of the Christian life should be made plain to those who have newly come to the truth." {6T 91.4}

Quote:
There is need of a much more thorough preparation of the candidates for baptism than has been given them. Satan does not want any one to see the necessity of an entire surrender to God. When the soul fails to make this surrender, sin is not forsaken; appetites and passions are striving for the mastery; temptations confuse the senses, so that true conversion may not take place. Whenever one renounces sin, which is the transgression of the law, his life will be brought into conformity to the law, into perfect obedience. This conformity to the mind and will of Christ is the work of the Holy Spirit. {6MR 156.2}

Before baptism there should be a thorough inquiry as to the experience of the candidate. Let this inquiry be made, not in a cold and distant way, but kindly, tenderly, pointing the new converts to the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sin of the world. Bring the requirement of the gospel to bear upon the candidates for baptism. Christ is represented as bearing the griefs and sorrows caused by sin, and he does this, not only as our sympathizing friend, but as our substitute. Therefore our sins of selfishness, of unamiable temper, of indolence, of wrong habits and practices, are to be positively and firmly put away. The one who breaks with Satan is to give no place to his temptations. Let the souls who come to Christ consider that He is the Sin-bearer, "wounded for our transgressions, bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed." "Himself took our infirmities, and bare our sicknesses." All this is done for the sinner, and as the sinner comes to Christ, helpless, penitent, and humble; as he views the expensive expiation made in his behalf, let the repenting soul lay hold by faith of the provision made to save him, not in his sin, but from his sin. Christ as the sin-bearer must take away the sin and rescue the sinner from his morbid spiritual condition. As he asks for a change of heart, the answer comes, "My son, give me thine heart." "A new heart will I give thee." I will restore you to a pure, holy atmosphere, that you, being dead to sin, may live unto righteousness. {6MR 157.1}

"Thy sins be forgiven thee." These words are spoken to the repentant, believing soul. Wonderful Saviour! All need to understand the process of conversion. The fruit is seen in the changed life. True repentance will be shown to be sincere by producing fruit in good works. None can depend upon their profession of faith as proof that they have a saving connection with Christ. It is by conformity to the will of God in our words, our deportment, our character that we prove our connection with him. We cannot depend on any other one to do our work for us. We must perform our duties for ourselves. We must work the will of God, and delight to do his commandments. Then we shall not lean upon any one but Jesus Christ for support and efficiency. {6MR 157.2}

One of the points upon which those newly come to the faith will need faithful instruction is the subject of dress. In the examination of candidates for baptism this subject should not be lost sight of. Let the new converts be faithfully dealt with. Are they vain in dress? do they cherish pride of heart? The idolatry of dress is a moral disease. It must not be taken over into the new life. In most cases submission to the gospel requirements will demand a decided change in the dress. True conversion of the heart will work wonderful changes in the outward appearance. {6MR 158.1}

"The minds of many are clouded with unbelief because those who unite with the church as the chosen of God do not reveal the virtues that are the fruits of the Spirit. Joining the church is not a sure evidence that a man has joined himself to Christ. The new birth is a rare experience in this age of the world. This is the reason why there are so many perplexities in the churches. Many, so many, who assume the name of Christ are unsanctified and unholy. They have been baptized, but they were buried alive. Self did not die, and therefore they did not rise to newness of life in Christ. {12MR 51.1}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/01/15 05:52 PM

It was necessary to ferret out Achan. Jesus was unable to bless Israel until Achan's sin was dealt with. No doubt the same thing holds true today. The SDA Church (the Remnant Church of prophecy) is, no doubt, chock full of Achan's. People love their pet sins. It is pandemic. Can Jesus bless His Church while so many members are in rebellion? Consider the following insight:

Quote:
The subject of health reform has been presented in the churches; but the light has not been heartily received. The selfish, health-destroying indulgences of men and women have counteracted the influence of the message that is to prepare a people for the great day of God. If the churches expect strength, they must live the truth which God has given them. If the members of our churches disregard the light on this subject, they will reap the sure result in both spiritual and physical degeneracy. And the influence of these older church members will leaven those newly come to the faith. The Lord does not now work to bring many souls into the truth, because of the church members who have never been converted and those who were once converted but who have backslidden. What influence would these unconsecrated members have on new converts? Would they not make of no effect the God-given message which His people are to bear? {6T 370.3}

"The Lord does not now work to bring many souls into the truth . . ." Why?
Posted By: dedication

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/02/15 02:23 AM

The wheat and tares

Notice wheat and tares are hard to tell apart --
We can't read the heart and pulling tares may result in pull out the wheat. So don't pull the tares.

BUT

1 Cor. 5

This presents a totally opposite picture.
There is no question that the person is out of step and walking in rebellion against God's truth. Yet the church members are "proud" of their tolerance. Paul is pretty forceful that disciplinary action be taken and the person be dismissed from church fellowship.



So scripture gives us both approaches -- and the conditions under which each approach is to be used.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/02/15 05:17 AM

Amen!
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/03/15 01:07 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
What statements?
I've tried to find, but could not locate, a comic with cookie crumbs on the table, and cookie crumbs on a little boy's face with the caption saying, "What cookies?".
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/03/15 01:48 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Amen!

Why do you say amen? Both are not referring to the same signs.

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/03/15 06:58 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
J: Jesus advised that the wheat and the tares grow until he sends his angels for the harvest. But I perceive that you wish to take that responsibility on yourself.

M: James, why do you think so?

K: Uh, could it be that James thinks you do from the statements you have made?

M: What statements?

K: I've tried to find, but could not locate . . .

I have never said I would like to separate the wheat and tares myself. That responsibility rests with Jesus.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/03/15 07:00 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
M: Amen!

J: Why do you say amen? Both are not referring to the same signs.

Signs? What do you mean?
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/03/15 07:41 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Signs? What do you mean?

Signs for judgment.

In the parable of the wheat and tares, the sower sows GOOD SEED IN HIS FIELD. First, it is HIS field and secondly, he sows only GOOD seed: i.e. fruitful seed. Tares do not bear any fruit. What Jesus told his servants in effect was this, "Don't throw anyone out merely because they are pew-warmers, reluctant to speak, is not active among the members, has a low profile ...." The sign of a tare is one who is not actively engaged in multiplying while others are.

You can think of a tare as, for example, an SDA who has lost faith in EGW or the direction of the denomination. He does not actively support the evangelistic ministry of his congregation. From a denominational perspective, he is obviously a fruitless tare distinct from the fruitful wheat. Jesus says not to dis-fellowship such a one, lest others become discouraged by your actions and leave as well. A good example of this is Desmond Ford. They uprooted him and he took with him a "thousand" others, and the denomination fell into the trap of creating a creed for themselves, walling themselves into an ivory tower.

THIS IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT FROM 1 CORINTHIANS 5.

There Paul is advising the congregation rightly to dis-fellowship the immoral, when the signs of abominable behaviour are blatantly obvious. For example, the Vatican was in order in their judgment against their own priests convicted of pedophilia.

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/03/15 11:14 PM

Okay. Good point. I believe time-serving members and leaders who are "unprofitable servants" should not be disfellowshipped for being merely "cumberers" of the ground. However, members and leaders who reject fundamental SDA beliefs and actively work to persuade other SDA to join them should be disciplined subject to disfellowshipment.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/03/15 11:46 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I have never said I would like to separate the wheat and tares myself. That responsibility rests with Jesus.
What cookies.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/03/15 11:48 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
However, members and leaders who reject fundamental SDA beliefs and actively work to persuade other SDA to join them should be disciplined subject to disfellowshipment.
Continuing, by whom?
By whom are you personally urging separation?
Posted By: Alchemy

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/04/15 04:11 AM

Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
However, members and leaders who reject fundamental SDA beliefs and actively work to persuade other SDA to join them should be disciplined subject to disfellowshipment.
Continuing, by whom?
By whom are you personally urging separation?


Generally, I believe the SDA Church has the right to protect its integrity, even by disfellowshipping someone if needed.

Yet, the church has allowed so much confusion into the body now, I don't see how the church can justify such an action these days.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/05/15 06:45 PM

Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I have never said I would like to separate the wheat and tares myself. That responsibility rests with Jesus.
What cookies.

Do you believe me? Or, do you think I want to personally take it upon myself to separate the tares from the wheat?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/05/15 06:46 PM

Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
However, members and leaders who reject fundamental SDA beliefs and actively work to persuade other SDA to join them should be disciplined subject to disfellowshipment.
Continuing, by whom?
By whom are you personally urging separation?

I don't understand your questions. Please rephrase them. Thank you.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/05/15 06:51 PM

Alchemy, I agree. Things have go on for too long. Too many congregations have tolerated too many open sins. Eventually Jesus will shake the church. Only true, dedicated SDA will remain to proclaim the 3AM. Those members and leaders who reject fundamental beliefs will go out and join the ranks of opposition. The time to pray for them is - NOW. The time to work to save them from ruin is - NOW.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/05/15 09:57 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Signs? What do you mean?

Signs for judgment.

In the parable of the wheat and tares, the sower sows GOOD SEED IN HIS FIELD. First, it is HIS field and secondly, he sows only GOOD seed: i.e. fruitful seed. Tares do not bear any fruit. What Jesus told his servants in effect was this, "Don't throw anyone out merely because they are pew-warmers, reluctant to speak, is not active among the members, has a low profile ...." The sign of a tare is one who is not actively engaged in multiplying while others are.

You can think of a tare as, for example, an SDA who has lost faith in EGW or the direction of the denomination. He does not actively support the evangelistic ministry of his congregation. From a denominational perspective, he is obviously a fruitless tare distinct from the fruitful wheat. Jesus says not to dis-fellowship such a one, lest others become discouraged by your actions and leave as well. A good example of this is Desmond Ford. They uprooted him and he took with him a "thousand" others, and the denomination fell into the trap of creating a creed for themselves, walling themselves into an ivory tower.

THIS IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT FROM 1 CORINTHIANS 5.

There Paul is advising the congregation rightly to dis-fellowship the immoral, when the signs of abominable behaviour are blatantly obvious. For example, the Vatican was in order in their judgment against their own priests convicted of pedophilia.

Very good explanation and contrast of the two texts. I agree with it.

There's a difference between disciplining for immoral practice like pedophilia versus disciplining for FB beliefs. Most biblical texts talks about disciplining for immorality and not for Fundamental beliefs.

Fundamental Beliefs(FBs) are like foundational stones(=truth=Jesus) that you build a house(Church) upon. These foundational stones are to be solid to hold the house up forever.

The problem is that we(the Church) are still suppose to be wondering in the desert and living in TENTS (Sukkah) and NOT in Houses. Houses were build only when the church entered the promised land. We are still NOT in the promise land THUS we are to live in TENTS if we want to follow the pillar of cloud and fire.

When the pillar is ready to move, we need to be able to pack up quickly to follow it so to learn our nest lesson prepared by the Lord. These lessons are how we learn about the Lords ways(laws) and come to know His mind. That's how our view of Him and undersding changes as He teaches us. That's the reason why we are not to make the foundational stones yet as they might have to be adjusted by the Lord. We are still in the learning and sanctification process.

There's a time to build houses upon FBs, it will be soon, but it wasn't time in the past as we were still wondering in the wilderness.

Desmond Ford, as Wagonner, and others SDA pioneers that shared new understanding that would of corrected our previous position; however, they were cast out of Church (disciplined). This is the same spirit manifested by King Saul and the RCC church who both persecuted their own people. King Saul couldn't tell the difference between the evil spirit and God's voice as both came from the Lord. King Saul persecuted David for 12 years and many were killed by Saul, the annointed man from God who prophesied. The annointed of the Holy Spirit can wear off and the man/mind that is left is carnal.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/06/15 02:33 AM

Originally Posted By: Elle
There's a difference between disciplining for immoral practice like pedophilia versus disciplining for FB beliefs.

Elle, there is a huge difference between the following two types of people:

1) SDA members and leaders who understand and reject fundamental SDA beliefs and actively work to persuade other SDA to join them in their efforts to tear down fundamental SDA beliefs.

2) SDA members and leaders who understand fundamental SDA beliefs and consciously choose not to use their God-given gifts and talents to build up the body of Christ.

The first type of people require discipline. The second type of people need prayer and careful encouragement.

PS - The fundamental SDA beliefs address morality. It's a huge part.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/06/15 06:27 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
[quote=Elle]... SDA members and leaders who understand and reject fundamental SDA beliefs and actively work to persuade other SDA to join them in their efforts to tear down fundamental SDA beliefs. ... require discipline.

"They [Synagogue of the Freedmen] also set up false witnesses who said, This man [Stephen] does not cease to speak blasphemous words against this holy place and the law; for we have heard him say that this Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and change the customs which Moses delivered to us." (Acts 6:13-14)

And this is what they did to him: "They cried out with a loud voice, stopped their ears, and ran at him with one accord; and they cast him out of the city and stoned him." (7:57-58)

History just keeps on repeating itself, doesn't it?

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/06/15 06:58 PM

James, can you imagine the chaos if the SDA Church tolerated its members and leaders insisting Jesus is not the one and only source of salvation, that salvation is also available through animism, hinduism, buddhism, humanism, judaism, catholicism, etc? And, can you imagine the chaos if the SDA Church tolerated its members and leaders insisting the Seventh-day is not the one and only Sabbath day recognized and required by God, that any day, all days are a Sabbath unto God? Eventually the truth as it is in Jesus must matter. Eventually it must be defended as worthy of allegiance. The idea that it doesn't matter now is blasphemous.

Similarly, can you imagine the chaos if the USA or Canada tolerated its citizens insisting citizenship doesn't matter, that any one can claim citizenship, that everyone is entitled to the benefits of citizenship? Eventually citizenship must matter. Eventually it must be defended as worthy of allegiance. The idea that citizenship doesn't matter is traitorous.

I reject your idea that fundamental beliefs don't matter now. I reject your idea that it doesn't matter what SDA Church members and leaders believe now. The truth as it is in Jesus matters very much. Our salvation depends on it. I reject your idea that fundamental beliefs cannot be known with certainty now, that they are evolving and uncertain, that they are subject to change, that we must be tentative, flexible, open-minded. Our status and standing as the Remnant Church of God hinges on us practicing and boldly proclaiming the truth as it is in Jesus.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/06/15 11:04 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I reject your idea that it doesn't matter what SDA Church members and leaders believe now. The truth as it is in Jesus matters very much. Our salvation depends on it. I reject your idea that fundamental beliefs cannot be known with certainty now, that they are evolving and uncertain, that they are subject to change, that we must be tentative, flexible, open-minded. Our status and standing as the Remnant Church of God hinges on us practicing and boldly proclaiming the truth as it is in Jesus.

Knowledge is progressive. Those that have locked themselves into an ivory tower and thrown away the key are prisoners, not free. They are not children of light. The woman at the well understood this and Jesus enlightened her.

The woman said to Him, "I know that Messiah is coming" (who is called Christ). "When He comes, He will tell us all things." Jesus said to her, "I who speak to you am He." (John 4:25-26) But before this, he told her, "Woman, believe Me, the hour is coming when you will neither on this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, worship the Father. You worship what you do not know; we know what we worship, for salvation is of the Jews. But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship Him. God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth." (4:21-24)

What does it mean to worship God "in spirit and truth", because God is seeking such to worship Him? Notice the radical change in fundamental belief, the obligation placed on her to confirm to the new word of truth. Should she have "disciplined Jesus"? NO, but rather, as I said, knowledge IS progressive; and God has not given us a Spirit of fear "but of love, of power and of a sound mind."

///
Posted By: Alchemy

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/07/15 03:02 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Alchemy, I agree. Things have go on for too long. Too many congregations have tolerated too many open sins. Eventually Jesus will shake the church. Only true, dedicated SDA will remain to proclaim the 3AM. Those members and leaders who reject fundamental beliefs will go out and join the ranks of opposition. The time to pray for them is - NOW. The time to work to save them from ruin is - NOW.


Amen MM.

I do pray for the church at times, I think I need to pray more.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/07/15 08:23 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Knowledge is progressive. Those that have locked themselves into an ivory tower and thrown away the key are prisoners, not free. They are not children of light.

I cannot go my entire life wondering if what I believe is true or false. Yes, the journey to the truth as it is in Jesus is progressive. But eventually we reach a point where the truth sets us free. I have reached that point. I am absolutely certain, beyond doubt, what I believe is true. I am free. As I continue to read and study the Word of God I discover new and fresh reasons to thank God for the truth that sets me free and keeps me free. The fundamental beliefs are biblical, and biblically sound.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/08/15 12:48 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I am absolutely certain, beyond doubt, what I believe is true. I am free. As I continue to read and study the Word of God I discover new and fresh reasons to thank God for the truth that sets me free and keeps me free. The fundamental beliefs are biblical, and biblically sound.

It is obvious to everyone but you that you are in fact in bondage to your 28 fundamental beliefs, ideas conjured up by fallible men. Even your own prophet says so (Counsels to Writers and Editors, pg 33). As an example, consider how you misinterpret Rev. 12:17; yet blindly swear by your own misunderstanding.

Originally Posted By: James Peterson here
Rev. 12:13-17 says ...
  1. Now when the dragon saw that he had been cast to the earth, he persecuted the woman who gave birth to the male Child. But the woman was given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness to her place, where she is nourished for a time and times and half a time, from the presence of the serpent.
    [...]
  2. And the dragon was enraged with the woman, and he went to make war with the [remnant] of her offspring, who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
It is patently obvious that the woman and the [remnant] of her offspring were in two different places at the same time: 1,260 days. During that self same time:
  • the woman was protected IN THE WILDERNESS but
  • the [remnant] of her offspring fell into war AT HOME.
Therefore, SDA prophesy falsely when they appropriate Rev. 12:17 to themselves.

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/08/15 06:16 PM

James, you are free to reject the fundamental beliefs of the SDA Church. However, you are not free to call yourself a SDA. To do so is madness. No one in their right mind would call themselves an American or a Canadian if in fact they reject the constitution upon which it exists. Similarly, no one in their right mind would call themselves a SDA if in fact they reject the fundamental beliefs upon which it exists. You are seriously deluded if you believe Ellen White stands with you in rejecting the fundamental beliefs of the SDA Church. Please do the honest and upright thing and denounce your claim to be a SDA. And, also, please stop posting on this forum. Your opposition here to fundamental SDA beliefs, your abject rejection of them is - unpleasant and nauseating.
Posted By: APL

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/08/15 07:15 PM

MM - you make the 28FB out to be a creed. The Adventist Pioneers could not accept the 28FB as currently published. Shall they be damned? Perhaps you should read what the church recommended to the Gentile converts what to do on joining the church in the book of Acts. Perhaps you should read what Elisha said to Naaman with respect to the worship of the true God. Did God find what they did unpleasant and nauseating?

The Five Steps of Apostasy - by JN Loughbourgh

In setting up of this "abomination that maketh desolate" (Daniel12:11), we see that five distinct steps were taken:- {1907 JNL, COOD 76.1}

1. Forming a creed, expressing their faith in man-made phrases instead of adhering to the word of the Lord.
{1907 JNL, COOD 76.2}

2. Making that man-made creed a test of fellowship, and denouncing all as heretics who would not assent to the exact wording of their creeds.
{1907 JNL, COOD 76.3}

3. Making the creed a rule by which all heretics must be tried. Many were thus declared sinners whose faith was more in harmony with the direct statements of the Bible than that of those who decreed against them.
{1907 JNL, COOD 76.4}

4. Constituting themselves a tribunal for the trial of heretics, and excluding from their fellowship all who would not assent to their creeds. Not content to debar such from church privileges in this world, they declared them subjects for the lake of fire.
{1907 JNL, COOD 76.5}

5. Having thus kindled a hatred in their own hearts against all who did not conform to their creeds, they next invoked and obtained the aid of the civil power to torture, and kill with sword, with hunger, with flame, and with beasts of the earth, those whom they had declared unfit to remain in the world.
{1907 JNL, COOD 77.1}

Then appeared on the stage of action one class of professed Christians with a head over them, actually declaring that he was "God on earth," persecuting another class of Christians who were conscientiously following the Lord and his Word, - a class of whom it might be said, in the light in which God views them (as was said, of the ancient worthies), "of whom the world was not worthy."
Hebrews11:38. {1907 JNL, COOD 77.2}
Posted By: dedication

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/08/15 09:15 PM

Step #1 is something we all do.
Everyone on this forum is doing this.
Expressing their faith and their believes in their own (human) words. We all know that people see the words of scripture differently. Like James insisting the Rev. 12:13 and 17 are talking about the same time, when others see it obviously talking about time before "the earth helps the woman" and after "the earth helps the woman".

So we express our beliefs in our own words so people know how we understand the words in the scriptures.

There is nothing wrong with a denomination to list Bible texts and explain how they conclude what those texts mean. As in the state of the dead -- there are texts that clearly say the dead know NOTHING, etc. but there are other texts that some see as supporting a separation with the soul being in the presence of God. So we write out what we believe on the state of the dead in clear words of that belief.

The only problem in step one is IF
the statement is not in harmony with the word of God.
But if it lists many texts (which our statement of beliefs does) then it is seeking to clarify that this is in harmony with the word of God.

Step #2 The fellowship of like believers is an exercise of freedom of religion. There is no freedom of religion if a denomination MUST abide and accept into fellowship the vocal presence of people who come to denounce the congregations understanding of scripture. To insist that no one can be denied fellowship no matter how antagonistic they are to the beliefs of the congregation, is to deny the freedom of worship.

The problem in step #2 is
calling everyone who believes differently "heretics".
No, we are not condemn them, they are free to believe and to live and worship with like believers in a group that believes as they do.

Steps 3-7 are way out of line as they go beyond the congregation of like believers and start imposing on society in general, seeking civil authority to impose their beliefs on others.
















Posted By: dedication

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/08/15 09:16 PM

The biggest problem in these debates is a confusion over
Denominational statements of belief
And a sacralist creed.

A sacralist creed?

A sacralist church or religion is a concept of "church" that involves the whole of society; (everyone living in the region) this necessitated that all within
the society embraced the same basic religious beliefs for the society to function properly. Those who refused to accept and abide by these religious practices were cast out – exiled or even killed.

Israel in the OT operated as a sacralist church -- everyone in that nation was to embrace the same basic religious beliefs or "be cut off".

In the New Testament Christ introduced a whole new concept of church. It is a concept where church is composed of believers and believers only, who live in a society where most do not believe.
Thus "church" does not conform it's doctrines to society at large, nor does it enforce it's doctrines on society at large.


However, the church itself is composed of BELIEVERS and the "unbelievers" are not part of the church.

The disagreements in these threads comes about when people accuse a church that holds to its beliefs as being a sacralist church when in fact it is only operating as a true NT church within a non-believing society.

To say a church is not allowed to hold to its beliefs is the ecumenical teaching that seeks to have all churches put away their distinctive doctrines and form a sacralist church where church groups with distinctive doctrines are no longer tolerated.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/08/15 11:53 PM

Originally Posted By: dedication
The fellowship of like believers is an exercise of freedom of religion. There is no freedom of religion if a denomination MUST abide and accept into fellowship the vocal presence of people who come to denounce the congregations understanding of scripture. To insist that no one can be denied fellowship no matter how antagonistic they are to the beliefs of the congregation, is to deny the freedom of worship.

This thread was started by Elle who posed the question, "Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB?" Inevitably, people were going to be divided into two camps over the issue, and the posts reflect that. Mountain Man however shouts the loudest with ProdigalOne, going further in demanding the heads of all who say nay, trying desperately to co-op Admin into carrying out his wishes. Doesn't that sound like the lamb-like beast to you? Aren't we seeing a fulfillment of prophecy in miniature before our very eyes?

///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/09/15 12:19 AM

Originally Posted By: dedication
Everyone on this forum is doing this. Expressing their faith and their believes in their own (human) words. We all know that people see the words of scripture differently. Like James insisting the Rev. 12:13 and 17 are talking about the same time, when others see it obviously talking about time before "the earth helps the woman" and after "the earth helps the woman".

Fortunately the spirit of prophecy agrees with me. Because Rev. 13:5-7 says ...
  • And [the Dragon-sponsored Beast] was given a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies, and he was given authority to continue for forty-two months (i.e. 1,260 days).
    -
  • AND WHAT DID HE DO FOR 1,260 DAYS? It says plainly ...
    -
  • Then he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme His name, His tabernacle, and those who dwell in heaven. It was granted to him to make war with the saints and to overcome them. And authority was given him over every tribe, tongue, and nation.
It was to that self-same 1,260 days that, according to Rev. 12:17, "the dragon was enraged with the woman, and he went to make war with the rest of her offspring, who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." And so therefore, it is not right for SDA to appropriate Rev. 12:17 to themselves when that war was waged many long years BEFORE the denomination came up out of the earth.

///
Posted By: ProdigalOne

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/09/15 02:53 PM



"...with ProdigalOne, going further in demanding the heads of all who say nay, trying desperately to co-op Admin into carrying out his wishes."


Strange... I don't recall saying any of the above? Would anyone care to find the post in which I, "demanding the heads of all who say nay"?

If such a post cannot be found, then it would appear to be a lie, deliberately perpetrated by a member of this forum with the express purpose of damaging the reputation of a fellow member.

The same member spreading this lie has also deliberately lied, either in his application and profile, by claiming not to be an SDA member, or in a thread wherein he claimed in fact to be an SDA member: both claims cannot be true.

The last time I checked, "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour." was still Commandment number nine.

Perhaps, obedience of The Ten Commandments is a Fundamental Belief that the "progressive truth" espoused by an increasing number of members, reject?

Interpretive disagreement is acceptable. Outright, commandment breaking on membership applications and on forum threads is another matter!


By the way, no one, including myself, is, "trying desperately to co-op Admin into carrying out our wishes." I have no doubt that Daryl is well aware of all activity on the threads; he has years of experience in these matters and I respect his judgement.


A number of members are simply hoping that the Commandment breaking member will either repent, or do the honorable thing and resign from the site.






Posted By: ProdigalOne

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/09/15 03:10 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Knowledge is progressive. Those that have locked themselves into an ivory tower and thrown away the key are prisoners, not free. They are not children of light.

I cannot go my entire life wondering if what I believe is true or false. Yes, the journey to the truth as it is in Jesus is progressive. But eventually we reach a point where the truth sets us free. I have reached that point. I am absolutely certain, beyond doubt, what I believe is true. I am free. As I continue to read and study the Word of God I discover new and fresh reasons to thank God for the truth that sets me free and keeps me free. The fundamental beliefs are biblical, and biblically sound.


Amen, Mountain Man!

I would add that any new "progressive" revelations of Truth will never contradict the Light we have already been given. Jesus brought us revelations of the New Covenant, but He never contradicted the Old Covenant.

"Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil." Matthew 5:17
Posted By: ProdigalOne

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/09/15 03:36 PM

The attitudes of certain members of this forum strongly remind me of something called "The One Project", a series of seminars intended to "reform" the SDA Church.

The "progressive truth" taught in these, so called, Christ centered SDA Seminars
minimizes and openly mocks our distinctive teachings. It is interesting that such a blatantly anti Adventist movement is not rebuked or disciplined by Church leadership. In fact it is being increasingly embraced...

If there is no thread on this topic I may start one. This is something we should all be aware of!

Here is the link to a Church member's first encounter with The One Project at a two day seminar:

http://advindicate.com/articles/2014/3/4/one-project-present-or-emergent-truth


Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/09/15 06:28 PM

Originally Posted By: ProdigalOne
"...with ProdigalOne, going further in demanding the heads of all who say nay, trying desperately to co-op Admin into carrying out his wishes." Strange... I don't recall saying any of the above? Would anyone care to find the post in which I, "demanding the heads of all who say nay"? If such a post cannot be found, then it would appear to be a lie, deliberately perpetrated by a member of this forum with the express purpose of damaging the reputation of a fellow member.

The same member spreading this lie has also deliberately lied, either in his application and profile, by claiming not to be an SDA member, or in a thread wherein he claimed in fact to be an SDA member: both claims cannot be true. The last time I checked, "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour." was still Commandment number nine. Perhaps, obedience of The Ten Commandments is a Fundamental Belief that the "progressive truth" espoused by an increasing number of members, reject? Interpretive disagreement is acceptable. Outright, commandment breaking on membership applications and on forum threads is another matter! By the way, no one, including myself, is, "trying desperately to co-op Admin into carrying out our wishes." I have no doubt that Daryl is well aware of all activity on the threads; he has years of experience in these matters and I respect his judgement.

According to Matthew 23, Jesus said ...
  • [The Scribes and Pharisees] love the best places at feasts, the best seats in the synagogues, greetings in the marketplaces, and to be called by men: Rabbi, Rabbi. But you, do not be called: Rabbi; for One is your Teacher, the Christ, and you are all brethren. Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven. And do not be called teachers; for One is your Teacher, the Christ. But he who is greatest among you shall be your servant. And whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.
  • But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you shut up the kingdom of heaven against men; for you neither go in yourselves, nor do you allow those who are entering to go in. Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense make long prayers. Therefore you will receive greater condemnation.
  • Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel land and sea to win one proselyte, and when he is won, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.
  • Woe to you, blind guides, who say, Whoever swears by the temple, it is nothing; but whoever swears by the gold of the temple, he is obliged to perform it. Fools and blind! For which is greater, the gold or the temple that sanctifies the gold? And, Whoever swears by the altar, it is nothing; but whoever swears by the gift that is on it, he is obliged to perform it. Fools and blind! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that sanctifies the gift? Therefore he who swears by the altar, swears by it and by all things on it. He who swears by the temple, swears by it and by Him who dwells in it. And he who swears by heaven, swears by the throne of God and by Him who sits on it.
  • Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faith. These you ought to have done, without leaving the others undone. Blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!
  • Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you cleanse the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of extortion and self-indulgence. Blind Pharisee, first cleanse the inside of the cup and dish, that the outside of them may be clean also.
  • Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs which indeed appear beautiful outwardly, but inside are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness. Even so you also outwardly appear righteous to men, but inside you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness.
  • Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because you build the tombs of the prophets and adorn the monuments of the righteous, and say, If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.
  • Therefore you are witnesses against yourselves that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets. Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers’ guilt. Serpents, brood of vipers! How can you escape the condemnation of hell? Therefore, indeed, I send you prophets, wise men, and scribes: some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues and persecute from city to city, that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. Assuredly, I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation.
It is no wonder then that a few Pharisees colluded with Admin to throw him over the cliff, saying, "A number of members are simply hoping that the Commandment breaking member will either repent, or do the honorable thing and resign from the site." History just keeps on repeating itself over and over again.

///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/09/15 07:38 PM

Originally Posted By: ProdigalOne
Amen, Mountain Man! I would add that any new "progressive" revelations of Truth will never contradict the Light we have already been given. Jesus brought us revelations of the New Covenant, but He never contradicted the Old Covenant. "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil." Matthew 5:17

That's not true. Jesus "contradicted" the Old Covenant, and for that he was banned from their website. See Mark 14 and 15.

At his trial, they remembered his posts. They said, "We heard Him say, 'I will destroy this temple made with hands, and within three days I will build another made without hands.'" The Temple was, to the Old Covenant, THE House of God, for which even Jesus himself was filled with fervent zeal. But he told them that a change was coming, about which they disdainfully mocked him as he hung humiliated on the cross, saying, "You who destroy the temple and build it in three days, save Yourself! If You are the Son of God, come down from the cross."

History just keeps on repeating itself, over and over again.

///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/09/15 07:50 PM

Originally Posted By: ProdigalOne
The attitudes of certain members of this forum strongly remind me of something called "The One Project", a series of seminars intended to "reform" the SDA Church. The "progressive truth" taught in these, so called, Christ centered SDA Seminars minimizes and openly mocks our distinctive teachings. It is interesting that such a blatantly anti Adventist movement is not rebuked or disciplined by Church leadership. In fact it is being increasingly embraced...

If there is no thread on this topic I may start one. This is something we should all be aware of! The link to a Church member's first encounter with The One Project at a two day seminar is here.

Thank you, ProdigalOne for the link. It was quite interesting. I myself have always wanted to attend one of their seminars, but never had the opportunity. I hope you can provide another perspective from a more sympathetic attendee so together, we can build a more complete, balanced and just picture of what really transpired. After all, we don't want to "bear false witness against our neighbour" now, do we? And again, as it is written, "Anyone who has rejected Moses’ law dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses" (Heb. 10:28). As always, kind regards.

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/09/15 08:35 PM

James, it looks as though Admin is not going to restrict your participation here. You are free to claim to be SDA and to blatantly bash fundamental SDA beliefs. I view your beliefs as offensive and objectionable. I lament the fact Admin is willing to allow you to participate here without restriction. This is supposed to be a safe haven for SDA to discuss fundamental beliefs.
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/10/15 02:32 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
However, members and leaders who reject fundamental SDA beliefs and actively work to persuade other SDA to join them should be disciplined subject to disfellowshipment.
Continuing, by whom?
By whom are you personally urging separation?

I don't understand your questions. Please rephrase them. Thank you.
You aren't personally hurting someone, but you are urging someone else to? If you are urging, whether technically by your personal self or urging someone else to do it, does that meet what James was talking about?

Reading behind the lines, I suspect you've been on "a preceding" where someone was "disciplined". Am I wrong?
Posted By: kland

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/10/15 02:36 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
to discuss fundamental beliefs.
Again, referenced before, according to your interpretation and adding to them?

But why are you against James. Isn't Jesus in control, James is not doing it without Jesus permitting him to, to work out for good? Does James even have a choice in the matter?
Posted By: Alchemy

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/10/15 03:18 AM

James Peterson wrote;

"That's not true. Jesus "contradicted" the Old Covenant, and for that he was banned from their website. See Mark 14 and 15. "

Jesus never contradicted the Bible in any event in His life. Jesus did teach contrary to the beliefs of the Jewish leaders of His day though.
Posted By: Alchemy

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/10/15 03:29 AM

Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
to discuss fundamental beliefs.
Again, referenced before, according to your interpretation and adding to them?

But why are you against James. Isn't Jesus in control, James is not doing it without Jesus permitting him to, to work out for good? Does James even have a choice in the matter?


Mountain Man correct that we as Seventh-day Adventists have the right to defend our lifestyle and way of believing and practicing our faith.

My concern is that James Peterson's posts show him to be a NON-SDA. So, we shouldn't expect him to believe as we do. So, as long as James Peterson is honest about being a NON-SDA and the Admin here aren't concerned enough about what James says, then we need to accept this is what to expect in the Active Public Forums here.

Personally, I have never noticed James Peterson to agree with Seventh-day Adventists on much at all. And this being an Active Public Forum, I am not troubled about what James says here up to this point.
Posted By: dedication

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/10/15 05:40 AM

I guess it depends what the forum's purpose for being is?

If it's a place where people are invited to shout down Adventist beliefs -- then I suppose we need to either accept it, or move on.

But if it's to be a place where Adventist beliefs are respected and shared in a positive way, it's a different matter -- then the posters should either respect those beliefs or move on.


One thing I've noticed on most forums--

Antagonists to the Adventist beliefs will DEMAND acceptance, but they rarely give it.
They talk much of "freedom in religious beliefs" but will not extend that freedom to Adventists.
Posted By: Alchemy

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/10/15 05:38 PM

Originally Posted By: dedication
I guess it depends what the forum's purpose for being is?

If it's a place where people are invited to shout down Adventist beliefs -- then I suppose we need to either accept it, or move on.

But if it's to be a place where Adventist beliefs are respected and shared in a positive way, it's a different matter -- then the posters should either respect those beliefs or move on.


One thing I've noticed on most forums--

Antagonists to the Adventist beliefs will DEMAND acceptance, but they rarely give it.
They talk much of "freedom in religious beliefs" but will not extend that freedom to Adventists.


Understood.

Hopefully, we can set a good example here.

But, I do agree with the thought that there has to be a limit to what we tolerate from NON-SDA's.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/10/15 07:56 PM

Originally Posted By: dedication
One thing I've noticed on most forums -- Antagonists to the Adventist beliefs will DEMAND acceptance, but they rarely give it. They talk much of "freedom in religious beliefs" but will not extend that freedom to Adventists.

Your "freedom of religious beliefs" is antagonistic to the Great Commission; and vice versa. In much the same way you itch to toss anything contrary to your opinions, so you who feel that right is yours ought not to be amazed and ought not to demonize others who toss you out forthwith as you begin to speak.

///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/10/15 08:11 PM

Originally Posted By: Alchemy
Hopefully, we can set a good example here. But, I do agree with the thought that there has to be a limit to what we tolerate from NON-SDA's.

There was a time when Jesus stood up and said unless anyone ate his flesh and drank his blood, he had no part in him. Many left at that saying and no longer walked with him. So he turned to the twelve and asked if they were going to leave too. "Simon Peter answered Him, 'Lord, to whom shall we go? You have words of eternal life. We have believed and have come to know that You are the Holy One of God.' Jesus answered them, 'Did I Myself not choose you, the twelve, and yet one of you is a devil?'" (John 6:68-70)

Strangely, for SDA that is, we still find Judas at the end sitting at Jesus' table, and Jesus washing his feet. There is a strange disconnect, strange I say, between the Saviour of the world and SDA who walk about in long white robes desiring to abide forever in the caves and rocks, scrubbing and washing their hands seven times a day, and listening only to the sounds of their own voices raised in "holy" unison.

///
Posted By: Alchemy

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/11/15 01:43 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: Alchemy
Hopefully, we can set a good example here. But, I do agree with the thought that there has to be a limit to what we tolerate from NON-SDA's.

There was a time when Jesus stood up and said unless anyone ate his flesh and drank his blood, he had no part in him. Many left at that saying and no longer walked with him. So he turned to the twelve and asked if they were going to leave too. "Simon Peter answered Him, 'Lord, to whom shall we go? You have words of eternal life. We have believed and have come to know that You are the Holy One of God.' Jesus answered them, 'Did I Myself not choose you, the twelve, and yet one of you is a devil?'" (John 6:68-70)

Strangely, for SDA that is, we still find Judas at the end sitting at Jesus' table, and Jesus washing his feet. There is a strange disconnect, strange I say, between the Saviour of the world and SDA who walk about in long white robes desiring to abide forever in the caves and rocks, scrubbing and washing their hands seven times a day, and listening only to the sounds of their own voices raised in "holy" unison.

///


Interesting James Peterson, you apply Liberty of Conscience to abuse the conscience of others. You are no judge in Israel.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/11/15 03:22 PM

Originally Posted By: Alchemy
Interesting James Peterson, you apply Liberty of Conscience to abuse the conscience of others. You are no judge in Israel.

The Lord is the judge of Israel and He will set as judge those that can hear His voice and follow it. For it will be only those that will be able to bring the Lord's judgment and not man's faulty & lacking judgment.

I agree with James' discernment that there is abuse of the conscience of members in the Church. It always has been like that not only in our Church but in all Churches. To deny it will not change the fact that it is the pattern the Lord has establish in scriptures and history via Ishmael persecuting Isaac, Saul ... David, and the RCC Church ... its members.

James is not the only one that perceives this spirit is not of the Lord. Asygo and I has also express that it was the same spirit as the little horn which led to this discussion here(see OP).

Yesterday I read this study which pertains well to this discussion and exposes this little horn spirit in the Church and the Lord's purpose behind it. The Lord works purposes in all things for "all things worked TOGETHER" Let us deligently seek the Lord's purpose and understand His plan in establishing the little horn persecuting spirit in the Church.

The bold and underlined text are my emphasis. I have removed section that doesn't pertain to this discussion. [In Red in brackets are my comments.]

========================= Persecuting Study =================
Daniel 12: Purifying the overcomers
Sep 09, 2015
by Steven Jones

The two cycles of 1,260 years (2,520 total) are coming to an end from 2014-2017. The midpoint was 754 A.D. when the little horn was given power to rule the Papal States.

When we recall that which was written about the little horn in Daniel 7:8 and the angelic interpretation of this in Daniel 7:21, 24, 25, we see that his main work was in “waging war with the saints and overpowering them.” He was given power over the saints for “a time, times, and half a time,” that is, 1,260 years.

Hence, when the angel says in Daniel 12:7 that this same time period ends when “they finish shattering the power of the holy people,” it is clear that this little horn’s “shattering” power extends from 754-2014. In other words, it ends when the full 2,520 year cycle of tribulation comes to an end with the transfer of authority to the saints of the Most High.

...

Daniel wanted to know the outcome of these events (Daniel 12:8), but the angel told him that it was not for him to know. These were things that were reserved for John, whose revelation was to uncover the secrets of the second 1,260 year cycle (754-2014).

...

The Purification of the Saints

Daniel 12:10 says,

10 Many will be purged, purified and refined; but the wicked will act wickedly, and none of the wicked will understand, but those who have insight will understand.

Those who are “purged, purified and refined” are obviously the saints of the Most High during the time that the little horn wages war against them. While there have been martyrs since the beginning when Cain killed Abel, the angel was speaking primarily of the little horn who was to “overcome” the saints for 1,260 years.

History shows how the Roman Church persecuted any and all dissenters in the attempt to unify the Church under one creed. This policy obviously was lacking love, often being devoid of even the most basic elements of common decency. Torture, burning “heretics” at the stake, and forced confessions are not part of the character of Christ, nor does such behavior manifest any fruit of the Spirit. It is merely the exercise of raw power.

Yet these things were foretold in the story of King Saul and his persecution of David. Saul was a type of the Church during the Pentecostal Age, and for this reason, Saul was crowned on the day of wheat harvest (1 Samuel 12:17), which is the Old Testament term for Pentecost. Saul’s 40-year reign prophesied of a 40-Jubilee reign of the Church from the day Pentecost was fulfilled in Acts 2:1 until Pentecost of 1993.

During this time period, the little horn was manifested as an extension of the Roman Empire. The Church thus took on many characteristics of pagan (carnal) Rome in its quest for power. Each year in the life of Saul represented a Jubilee cycle (49 years) in history. In fact, this is the key to understanding Church history.

Saul was disqualified after the war against Amalek (1 Samuel 15), which occurred in his eighteenth year. We know this because this was 414 years after Amalek had been cursed by God for attacking Israel shortly after they had left Egypt (Exodus 17:16). Amalek was put on Cursed Time, and then given a grace period (time to repent) for the next 414 years. When they did not repent, Saul was called to execute judgment upon Amalek. But because he too had a rebellious heart, God rejected him and his dynasty (1 Samuel 15:23) from ruling perpetually, replacing him with David.

The eighteenth year of Saul correlates to the eighteenth jubilee cycle of Church history. Dating from 33 A.D., seventeen jubilees brings us to 866 A.D., and the eighteenth Jubilee cycle was from 866-915 A.D. During this time, the papacy reached its lowest point of morality and decency. Church historians refer to this time period as “the golden age of pornocracy,” a term coined by Liudprand, bishop of Cremona, who lived from 920-972. The term was later used by Cardinal Baronius in the sixteenth century.

There is much history that could be mentioned, but it is enough for our purposes to show the connection between Saul’s disqualification and the immorality and violence that prevailed in the Roman Church during its eighteenth Jubilee cycle.

In 1184 the Medieval Inquisitions began, which included the policy of torturing dissenters and “heretics.” Up to that time, it was normal to impose the death penalty upon such people. In 1229 this became official papal policy, headed by a Grand Inquisitor, and in 1252 torture was officially authorized by Pope Innocent IV in his papal bull, Ad Extirpanda.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_extirpanda

The Spanish Inquisition came later in response to the Protestant Reformation.

This lasted until 1815 after the Holy Alliance was established, but it survived in the Roman Curia until 1904. It was then given a new name, "Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office". In 1965 it evolved into the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. To my knowledge, although the policy has changed to a more benign form of inquisition, the Roman Church has never officially repented of its sin of torturing dissenters.

During those centuries, millions of people were tortured and killed. It is likely that only a small percentage of them were overcomers, or “saints of the Most High,” but certainly there were many saints (in the sight of God) who suffered martyrdom during that time.

The main point to see is that when the angel foretold that “many will be purified, be purged and purified,” he was speaking directly of the little horn’s war against the saints. The Roman Church fulfilled this, as it waged war against the saints. It was not about heretics waging war against the Roman Church. The divine purpose in this portion of tribulation was to purify the saints. All of this was prophesied in the earlier pattern where King Saul persecuted David.

The Temporary Authority of the Church

The Roman Church falsely claims that its power will never end, based on its claim to being “the true church.”[The SDA Church claim the same] But Scripture shows us that King Saul’s reign, however legitimate, was ultimately to end on account of his rebellion, which is as the sin of witchcraft (1 Samuel 15:23 KJV).

Like King Saul, the Roman Church was disqualified during its eighteenth Jubilee cycle. Saul was of the tribe of Benjamin—not Judah—and so when he was crowned king, it was inevitable that his descendants would not sit on the throne forever. So also, we see that Jesus’ disciples, who were mostly from Galilee (i.e., Benjamin), represented the first year of King Saul. Saul did well in his first year, and then began to rebel in his second year (1 Samuel 13:1 KJV). This correlates with the early Church, which did well during the lifetime of the apostles, but then began to deviate from the mind of Christ thereafter.

Saul, of the tribe of Benjamin, was a transition king until such time as David, of the tribe of Judah, was old enough to take the throne. So also the Church under Pentecost was called to exercise spiritual power as a transition to the Church under Tabernacles.

God used Saul to train David and to purify his heart. Likewise, God also used the Roman Church to train the overcomers and to purify their hearts. [The Lord uses the SDA Church and other Churches to purify His Saints that are in those Churches.]

...

- See more at: http://www.gods-kingdom-ministries.net/d...h.VKFcZhCG.dpuf
Posted By: ProdigalOne

Re: Should the Body Discipline Members for disagreeing on 28FB - 09/12/15 09:28 AM

Originally Posted By: dedication
I guess it depends what the forum's purpose for being is?

If it's a place where people are invited to shout down Adventist beliefs -- then I suppose we need to either accept it, or move on.

But if it's to be a place where Adventist beliefs are respected and shared in a positive way, it's a different matter -- then the posters should either respect those beliefs or move on.


One thing I've noticed on most forums--

Antagonists to the Adventist beliefs will DEMAND acceptance, but they rarely give it.
They talk much of "freedom in religious beliefs" but will not extend that freedom to Adventists.



Dedication, I truely hope and pray that this wonderful forum does not degrade into yet another "place where people are invited to shout down Adventist beliefs".

It took many false starts, and painfull experiences in other, supposedly, SDA forums before I was blessed to find (or be guided to) this remarkable place. The members here may not always agree, but for the most part, we are all Seventh Day Adventists or friends of the SDA Church, as the conditions of forum membership clearly state.

In my short time here, this has invariably felt like a safe place, somewhere that I can be among brothers and sisters without having to be constantly on the defensive, as is usually the case elsewhere. In spite of the occasional disagreements over biblical interpretation, I have felt myself to be among friends. This has been a safer place to be than with my own unbelieving family...

Places of endless conflict may be necessary; however, there seems to be an endless supply of such sites. This Forum is special, I might even say it is sanctified: set apart as a sanctuary for battle weary souls.

I pray that it is allowed to remain.
© 2024 Maritime 2nd Advent Christian Believers OnLine Forums Consisting Mainly of Both Members & Friends of the SDA (Seventh-day Adventist) Church