prophetic cartoon?

Posted By: John H.

prophetic cartoon? - 03/12/04 02:11 AM

It's interesting how the secular media can foretell events sometimes in spite of themselves --

This appeared in the Daytona Beach (Florida) News-Journal on Feb. 26, 2004:

http://www.news-journalonline.com/downloads/022604beat.gif


An alternate way to view is to go to cartoonist Bruce Beattie's index page at

http://www.news-journalonline.com/column/beattie/index.html

and click on the date Feb. 26 (then scroll back up)
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/12/04 04:24 AM

Pretty wild, eh! Thanx for sharing the link. I'm taking it to church this sabbath.
Posted By: myarsman

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/13/04 09:22 AM

It never ceases to amaze me how we SDA are so convinced that we know how the future is going to unfold........

I believe that we should always keep in mind that God did not give us prophecies so that we would know the future. He gave us prophecies so that when the prophesied event is fulfilled, we will know that He is God and that He knows all.

Those individuals who are convinced that the 100+ year old interpretation of the Mark of the Beast prophecy is to be fulfilled with the Universal Sunday Law are in danger of being sorely disappointed and embarrassed, just like our founding fathers were at the Great Disappointment of 1844.

It appears that we have yet to learn our lesson concerning the proper way to understand God's foreknowledge.

Bob
Posted By: Ikan

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/13/04 01:09 PM

To lump Wm. Miller with EGW is a bit on the side of oversimplification.
But that all depends on how you feel about who EGW was, function-wise; a Messenger or an old lady that founded another denomination.
The Sunday Law event is not a mystical, wishy-washy prediction. It is a statement of future fact.
But men are at liberty to think what they like, as long as they understand that there are no neutrals.
Sure: Adventists can make heaps of mistakes...if they don't read EGW, especially, along with their Bibles...
Gee... then this must be part of that 100+ year old "mistake", I suppose:

"When Sunday observance shall be enforced by law, and the world shall be enlightened concerning the obligation of the true Sabbath, then whoever shall transgress the command of God, to obey a precept which has no higher authority than that of Rome, will thereby honor popery above God. He is paying homage to Rome, and to the power which enforces the institution ordained by Rome. He is worshiping the beast and his image. As men then reject the institution which God has declared to be the sign of His authority, and honor in its stead that which Rome has chosen as the token of her supremacy, they will thereby accept the sign of allegiance to Rome,--"the mark of the beast." And it is not until the issue is thus plainly set before the people, and they are brought to choose between the commandments of God and the commandments of men, that those who continue in transgression will receive "the mark of the beast."
--The Great Controversy, p. 449. (1888)
Posted By: Avalee

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/13/04 05:34 PM

quote:
God designed to prove his people. His hand covered a mistake in the reckoning of the prophetic periods. Adventists did not discover the error, nor was it discovered by the
most learned of their opponents. The latter said: "Your reckoning of the prophetic periods is correct. Some great event is about to take place; but it is not what Mr. Miller predicts; it is the conversion of the world, and not the second advent of Christ." {GC88 373.2}

The time of expectation passed, and Christ did not appear for the deliverance of his people. Those who with sincere faith and love had looked for their Saviour, experienced a bitter disappointment. Yet the purposes of God were being accomplished: he was testing the hearts of those who professed to be waiting for his appearing. There were among them many who had been actuated by no higher motive than fear. Their profession of faith had not affected their hearts or their lives. When the expected event failed to take place, these persons declared that they were not disappointed; they had never believed that Christ would come. They were among the first to ridicule the sorrow of the true believers. {GC88 374.1}

God was in control of the matters then as He is in control of the matters now. And we are being tested now also. Are we going to stay firm and pass the test

John thank you for posting this, I too have made a copy and will share it.
Posted By: myarsman

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/13/04 08:41 PM

It appears that the point that I am attempting to make is being sorely missed.

On several occasions Jesus told his disciples of future events and explained to them that they would not understand what He meant until the time of the fulfillment of the event. When the foretold event has been fulfilled, then they would know that He was who He said He was and that what He had said was Truth.

Jesus gave us prophecy, not so that we would know the future, but so that as the prophecied event takes place,(and we recognize its fulfillment) we would then know that He is truly the Son of God.

The SDA Church has placed its faith in EGW and other founding fathers, who have stated that they understand how the future will unfold. For 100+ years we have waited for just one of these interpretations to be fulfilled and not one of them has been fulfilled.

And yet.......

Prophecy is being fulfilled and the SDA church does not recognize its fulfillment.

History is repeating itself.

The Jews thought that they knew exactly how the Messianic prophecies would be fulfilled and yet when the True Messiah walked amongst them they crucified Him.

It is time to place our faith squarely where it belongs. We must allow the Holy Spirit to be our sole guide in the understanding of the fulfillment of Biblical prophecies.

It is of the utmost importance that we be aware of these Biblical prophecies and that we continually compare these prophecies to current events in order to discern whether they are being fulfilled. As Jesus said, "Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:"

My friends....The Fig Tree is putting forth leaves......But no one is noticing, because they are looking elsewhere.

Bob
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/13/04 10:06 PM

Bob, your view of Sister White's interpretation of unfulfilled prophecy is not new or unique. Personally I'm not interested in what you don't believe. Such information is useless to me. I am more interested in learning what you do believe. It is more rewarding as a student searching for truth learn what is right rather than only what is wrong.

So, please tell us what you do believe about prophecy. Looking back over the past 100 years which prophecy do you think has been fulfilled. Thank you for sharing.
Posted By: John H.

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/13/04 10:08 PM

Bob, what exactly is it that no one is noticing?
Posted By: myarsman

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/13/04 10:33 PM

This discussion seems to be centered around the prophecies found in Revelation 13 regarding the "Image to the Beast" and the "Mark of the Beast", so I will restrict my remarks to this chapter only.

I will also try to be brief.

First of all the First Beast is representative of the Pagan Roman Empire. This empire was unique in that it was the greatest empire that ever existed. Most of all, it established a government that was the "first of its kind". This government was called a "Democratic Republic". What made this government unique was that it was a representative form of government. The people chose who would be their leaders and who would establish/enforce their laws. (Note: Compare this form of government to the previous monarchy governments of the past.)

The guiding principle of a Democratic Republic is that each human being has certain rights that must be protected/upheld. Human Rights.

Now compare this form of government with a Theocracy, which was the form of government that God attempted to establish here on this earth....first with Adam and Eve, then with the Israelites.

Compare a Theocracy with a Democracy and see if you can see opportunity for conflict and controversy.

In a Theocracy...God establishes and enforces the Laws......God chooses the leaders, political and spiritual......God is sovereign and He alone receives worship.

In a Democracy....Man establishes and enforces the Laws.....Man chooses the leaders, political and spiritual.....Man is sovereign and He can worship whoever/whatever he pleases.

Now comes along the second beast.....the United States. When the United States was founded the principles of government established by the Roman Empire were closely emulated. The separation of powers was established. The principle of human rights was established. The one man...one vote principle was practiced.

The Image of the Beast is created.

Now let us look at past and current events......

The United States has set out on a mission to introduce Democracy into all of the world. They have fought and are currently fighting wars with the purpose of convincing the world that Democracy is the only form of government that should be practiced. The United States is willing to kill those who do not agree with this principle.

The only thing that remains to be fulfilled is the "Mark of the Beast".

One thing for certain, it is not the "Sunday Law".

In order for a Universal Sunday Law to be established in this world a fundamental principal of Democracy must be done away with. The inalienable right to "worship as one pleases" must be voided. If this were to happen, it would not only threaten the SDA church, but also all Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Atheists, etc.

It will never happen.

The SDA Church is looking in the wrong direction.
Posted By: John H.

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/13/04 10:41 PM

Bob, if you're right, then Ellen White was a false prophet, all of the pioneers of this movement were wrong, the three angels' messages as given by this movement are bogus, and there's really no reason to be an SDA. We're just another religious country club.

But I don't think you're right, for many reasons easily demonstrated.
Posted By: vastergotland

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/14/04 04:02 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Ikan:
To lump Wm. Miller with EGW is a bit on the side of oversimplification.
But that all depends on how you feel about who EGW was, function-wise; a Messenger or an old lady that founded another denomination.
The Sunday Law event is not a mystical, wishy-washy prediction. It is a statement of future fact.
But men are at liberty to think what they like, as long as they understand that there are no neutrals.
Sure: Adventists can make heaps of mistakes...if they don't read EGW, especially, along with their Bibles...
Gee... then this must be part of that 100+ year old "mistake", I suppose:


Hmm, unless the story about how Wm Miller turned from farmer to preacher is a lie, he too was a messenger. And who are we to make one of Gods messengers higher than another? Or is the amounth of messages delivered what we are to compare them with?

to Bob, anicent rome was a democratic republic? First of all, Rome didnt invent "democracy", the greeks where first, secound only free citizens of Rome could vote, you where free citizen if you could trace your family to one of the free families of the early rome. Comparing that to US it would be like only decendants of the original mayflower colonists could vote and noone else, or perhaps only decendants of the puritans of the brittish colonies. In all cases, a little minority of the people within the borders. I would also be interested in why anicent rome was the greatest empire ever... what makes it greater than anicent china, india, great zimbabwe, inca, maya or egypt? Also about the role models of the early american statemakers, according to a teacher of history at the University of Göteborg, it wasnt Rome but the Athenean citystate. Anyway, just a few questions of things not in accord with todays historical understanding.

/Thomas
Posted By: John H.

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/14/04 05:29 AM

Thomas,

William Miller wasn't a prophet of God. A godly man, mightily led of God, yes. Inspired prophet, no.

Ellen White was an inspired prophet. There's a big difference.
Posted By: myarsman

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/14/04 07:39 AM

John,

It is only fair that you demonstrate to us the numerous reasons why the interpretation that I have shared is wrong.

I will leave it up to you to draw your own conclusions concerning the validity of EGW, her messages, and the doctrines of the SDA Church.

Thomas,

You are correct in stating that the term Democracy did not originate with the Romans. It was first practiced by the Greeks, in a limited fashion, but the Romans incorporated it and expanded upon it in the formation of their government.

I seem to recall a period in America's history where slaves and women did not have the right to vote. Today it is possible for all citizens of the USA to be able to vote.

The apostle Paul was a Jew and yet a Roman citizen. Did he not have the same rights as a Roman by birth?

To call the Roman Empire the "greatest empire of all" is, of course, a matter of perspective. There are many things(i.e. government, judicial, engineering, etc.) in this world that can trace their origin to the time of the Roman Empire. There are many other empires/dynasty that can claim greatness, but the Roman Empire had the greatest impact upon this world.

The primary point that I have attempted to make is that the United States Government has "imaged" its government structure after that of the Roman Empire.
Posted By: vastergotland

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/14/04 03:21 PM

quote:
Originally posted by John:
Thomas,

William Miller wasn't a prophet of God. A godly man, mightily led of God, yes. Inspired prophet, no.

Ellen White was an inspired prophet. There's a big difference.

John

What is a prophet? And what is the differnece between a prophet and an inspired prophet? If a prophet must get information about the future, in that case, how was John the baptist or some of the "minor" prophets in the OT prophets?

/Thomas
Posted By: John H.

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/14/04 11:04 PM

Bob wrote,
quote:
John,

It is only fair that you demonstrate to us the numerous reasons why the interpretation that I have shared is wrong.

Okay, we'll go into this a bit. But not exhaustively; these are things any SDA can study pretty easily with materials readily available.

You said that "the First Beast is representative of the Pagan Roman Empire." This premise is faulty, and faulty premises lead to faulty conclusions. It's obvious that the first beast of Revelation 13 represents the papacy, not the pagan Roman Empire. This beast continued "forty and two months" (verse 5); a period of 1260 years. Pagan Rome didn't fulfill this aspect, while the papacy did so very exactly.

The second beast, the U.S., is seen coming up out of the earth at about the same time as the first beast receives its deadly wound. Verses 10,11. Pagan Rome fell in A.D. 476. It would be another 1300 years before the U.S. came upon the scene; so your identification of the first beast with pagan Rome quite simply doesn't fit the facts of the prophecy. Only the career of the papacy fulfills the particulars of this first beast.

Moving on, we see that the image to the first beast can't be what you say it is either, since the first beast isn't the pagan Roman empire.

The first beast is papal Rome, and she says herself that her "mark" of authority is the fact that she changed the sabbath to Sunday.

Then you say,
quote:
In order for a Universal Sunday Law to be established in this world a fundamental principal of Democracy must be done away with. The inalienable right to "worship as one pleases" must be voided. If this were to happen, it would not only threaten the SDA church, but also all Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Atheists, etc.

It will never happen.

Ellen White wrote,

"As America, the land of religious liberty, shall unite with the papacy in forcing the conscience and compelling men to honor the false sabbath, the people of every country on the globe will be led to follow her example." 6T 18.
I believe I'll go along with what was written by an inspired prophet of God.

How is it that you claim better knowledge of prophecy than the rest of us, while at the same time you openly reject the Holy Spirit as manifested in the work of Sister White?
Posted By: John H.

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/14/04 11:31 PM

Thomas,
quote:
What is a prophet?
A prophet is, literally, God's mouthpiece.

"Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but He revealeth His secret unto His servants the prophets." Amos 3:7

"God hath spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began." Acts 3:21

The gift of prophecy is second only to that of being an apostle; 1 Corinthians 12:28.

God speaks to prophets in visions and dreams. Numbers 12:6.

A prophet is God's messenger, giving directly inspired messages straight from Him. Their messages are authoritative, and are to be treated as coming straight from God. The Scriptures have this type of inspired authority.

There are many examples of noncanonical prophets in the Bible whose prophecies are not recorded; but their prophecies were no less inspired than the ones that are recorded in Scripture. The same Holy Spirit inspired them. But their prophecies were judged by God to be of temporary or local interest only, and so were not included in the canon.

Into this category come the prophetic writings and speeches of Ellen White. However, her work has a special character, since she was the first bona fide prophet to surface in 17½ centuries, and she arrived on the scene for the purpose of providing special guidance at the conclusion of the 2300-day prophecy, to prepare a people for the 2nd coming of Jesus.

William Miller was a messenger of God in one respect, but he was not directly inspired by God in the way Ellen White and all the other prophets were. The same is true of the Protestant Reformers such as Luther, Calvin, Knox, Huss, Zwingli, etc. They were mightily used of God, but not inspired by Him in the same direct way that prophets are.

For more on how inspiration works, see "The Dynamics of Inspiration", at

http://www.whiteestate.org/issues/dynamics.html

and "Inspiration/Revelation: What It Is and How It Works", at

http://www.whiteestate.org/issues/rev-insp.html



quote:
And what is the differnece between a prophet and an inspired prophet?
They'd be the same thing.



quote:
If a prophet must get information about the future, in that case, how was John the baptist or some of the "minor" prophets in the OT prophets?
Prophets don't necessarily foretell the future, though most do. Abraham was a prophet (Genesis 20:7), yet we don't have any record of him making predictions regarding the future. John the Baptist foretold the future in a limited way in heralding the coming of Christ; but his role was primarily to "prepare...the way of the Lord, make His paths straight." Matthew 3:3.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: prophetic cartoon? - 03/14/04 11:53 PM

This topic has been moved into the Prophetic Studies forum.
© 2024 Maritime 2nd Advent Christian Believers OnLine Forums Consisting Mainly of Both Members & Friends of the SDA (Seventh-day Adventist) Church