Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'.

Posted By: Charity

Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/27/02 01:45 AM

In the last several years, an increasing number of SDA’s have begun to teach that the sacrifice of Christ was not a substitution for the sinner’s death - that a broader and more enlightened view is available in Scripture. In order to introduce this topic I am going to attempt to put two statements in writing that summarize the traditional view and the new view. I may not give the new view the emphasis or completeness that those who advocate it would like. This is not intentional. The best advocate of an idea is someone who believes it. So my apologies in advance, but I‘ll do my best, and those who hold the new view will have the first opportunity to round out what I write.

Old SDA view:

The death of Jesus was necessary to satisfy the demands of the broken law of God. Christ bore our sins, He was our substitute for what the law demanded. "Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God." Romans 3:24 and 25 "Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin." Psalm 32:1

New view of some SDA’s

Like all SDA’s those who hold this view believe the death of Christ is what redeems us. His blood is important. But Christ did not suffer for our guilt. Instead, he suffered the consequences of what our guilt would eventually cost us if we do not repent and turn to the light. Rather than being our substitute, rather than paying our debt, he is our example, he enlightens. He did not pay the penalty for our sin. No one can do that. Instead, he lived a perfect life for us, setting us an example.

Some of the points raised in favour of the new view are:
1) Just prior to His death Jesus said that His work was finished. In contrast the old view holds that the main mission of Christ was to die a substitute for the sins of the world. If that was true, why would Christ say his work was finished before he died?

2) The old view makes God out to be vengeful. Sister White and scripture say that God and the Son have always been one. If God kills His own Son in His wrath against sin, God is taking vengeance, and the unity of the Father and Son is destroyed.

3) The old view defies logic. If someone today is guilty of a crime, what judge will be willing to allow someone else to take the punishment? The purpose of the punishment is to deal with the offender.

4) The old view is autocratic. God looks like a dictator by killing an innocent person for a guilty person.

5) The bible phrases like ‘died for our sins’, and ‘bore our sin’ and others need to be understood differently. They mean that Jesus as he lived and suffered here bore the consequences of sin, the malevolence that springs from the twisted nature of humanity as the result of sin. This is a crucial point and difference between the old and new view because in the new view, this is what God is trying to fix, our fallen, self-centered natures. Christ was not required to bear the guilt of our individual sins. Instead, he bore the suffering, the malignity, that is the result of fallen human nature. Our fallen natures are the thing God is concerned with, not the guilt or sin.

There are likely several more points, nuances, arguments etc. that I’ve missed. I’ve had a hard time wrapping my mind around these ideas, and I don’t think I have succeeded but I hope I’ve said enough to introduce the topic. Danilo, or someone who holds the new views, please take it from here and round out what I’ve posted above with your views.

=======

Email Notification activated - Daryl [Smile]

[ April 04, 2003, 05:28 PM: Message edited by: Daryl Fawcett ]
Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/27/02 04:53 AM

The Signs of the Times----DT- 05-02-92
The Fullness of Christ's Grace

"The grace of Jesus Christ alone can change the heart of stone to a heart of flesh, and make it alive unto God. Men may perform great deeds in the eyes of the world; their achievements may be many and of a high order in the sight of men, but all the talent, all the skill, all the ability of the world will fail to transform the character and make a degraded child of sin a child of God, an heir of heaven. Men have no power to justify the soul, to sanctify the heart. Moral disease cannot be healed save through the power of the great Physician. The highest gift of heaven, even the Only-begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth, is alone able to redeem the lost. What gratitude, what love, should fill our hearts as we contemplate the love of God! The heart should be softened and subdued as we meditate upon the risk that Jesus took in order that man might be elevated and restored. The world's Redeemer
endured sufferings commensurate to all the guilt of a lost world. The sacrifice of Christ on Calvary's cross is a consideration that surpasses all the overwhelming power of sin; and when a sense of sin presses upon the heart of the sinner, and the burden seems intolerable, Jesus invites him to look to him and live.
There is power in Christ to cleanse the soul. "Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord; though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool."

Without God sending His Son to die/pay the wage for our sins that we may have His free gift of eternal life, we are lost. The sanctuary services teach us the real meaning of the atonement.

The alternate theory is teaching us we must save ourselves, based on the life of Jesus, which means that His death meant nothing. It would take a very strong twist of the "atonement" truth to come to this conclusion. This is the theory of Babal.

Advent Review and Sabbath Herald--T- 09-22-96
Our Advocate and Our Adversary

"Satan would cover the people of God with blackness, and ruin them; but Jesus interposes. Although they had sinned, yet Jesus took the guilt of their sins upon his own soul. He snatched the race as a brand from the fire. With
his long human arm he encircled humanity, while with his divine arm he grasped the throne of the infinite God. And thus man has strength given him
that he may overcome Satan, and triumph in God. Help is brought within the reach of perishing souls; the adversary is rebuked."

Praise the Lord,

[ August 26, 2002, 11:00 PM: Message edited by: Charlene Van Hook ]
Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/28/02 05:03 PM

To deny that Jesus was our substitute, to deny He paid the price for our transgressions is to call the Spirit of Prophecy a liar. Let us just accept the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ, and not the teachings of man.

Steps to Christ---- God's Love for Man---PG- 14

"Jesus said, "Therefore doth My Father love Me,
because I lay down My life, that I might take it again."
John 10:17. That is, "My Father has so loved you
that He even loves Me more for giving My life to
redeem you. In becoming your Substitute and Surety, by surrendering My life, by taking your liabilities, your transgressions, I am endeared to My Father; for by My sacrifice, God can be just, and yet the Justifier of him who believeth in Jesus.

None but the Son of God could accomplish our
redemption; for only He who was in the bosom of
the Father could declare Him. Only He who knew
the height and depth of the love of God could make
it manifest. Nothing less than the infinite sacrifice made by Christ in behalf of fallen man could express the Father's love to lost humanity.

"God so loved the world, that He gave His
only-begotten Son." He gave Him not only to live among men, to bear their sins, and die their sacrifice. He gave Him to the fallen race. Christ was to identify Himself with the interests and needs of humanity. He who was one with God has linked Himself with the children of men by ties that are never to be broken. Jesus is "not ashamed to call them brethren" (Hebrews 2:11); He is our Sacrifice, our Advocate, our Brother, bearing our human form before the Father's
throne, and through eternal ages one with the race
He has redeemed--the Son of man. And all this that
man might be uplifted from the ruin and degradation of sin that he might reflect the love of God and share the joy of holiness.

Such love is without a parallel. Children of the
heavenly King! Precious promise! Theme for the
most profound meditation! The matchless love of
God for a world that did not love Him! The thought
has a subduing power upon the soul and brings the
mind into captivity to the will of God. The more we study the divine character in the light of the cross, the more we see mercy, tenderness, and forgiveness blended with equity and justice, and the more clearly we discern innumerable evidences of a love that is infinite and a tender pity surpassing a mother's yearning sympathy for her wayward child."

Praise God for His unspeakable Gift
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/29/02 12:52 PM

I would like to hear out those who hold the alternative view. I've questioned many of those who hold this view on how they reconcile their views with the SOP myself, but most if not all are basing their views on scripture. Our focus on this thread will need to be mainly on scripture.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/29/02 04:22 PM

I would also include any SOP quotes that point to Bible texts.
Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/29/02 05:25 PM

What you are saying then Mark is:

You want to hear from those that do not believe in the Spirit of Prophecy and misinterpret the scriptures. Is this right? Are we soliciting error? What would our motive be? What purpose would this serve?

May I suggest that we place the truth, Bible and SOP, here and pray that none disagree with it. Let us not make a case for the alternate view. Truth automatically exposes error. This is a subtle teaching, the truth needs to be inbedded in our hearts that we may not be decieved.

Just my thoughts
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/30/02 08:06 AM

Greetings to all and peace. It is my prayer that we consider truth as it is Jesus. I invite dialoque, questions and comments. May God bless you all.

The common understanding of the Substitute Sacrifice in salvation misses the mark entirely. It is based upon the concept of the 'penalty of death' to satisfy the demands of God's law (righteousness). Then it takes the position that despite his righteousness God loved us so much that he provided a Substitute Sacrifice to pay the penalty of his law (righteousness). In this manner his righteousness is satisfied and God can now forgive us and accept us, if (upon the condition that) we believe that Christ died in our place and paid the penalty for our sins, and if we ask that his death be applied to our record.

Thus in the substitute doctrine, man is saved from the penalty for sin, rather than from sin itself. This means that man is saved from God's righteousness, which means from God himself. This is why so many feel that they have to hide 'behind' Christ, and that Christ represents their case before God. In this manner Christ is their Advocate before the father. They have a saviour for sin, and not a saviour from sin.

I would like to draw special attention to the prepositions. They are of most vital importance.

Too many see themselves only saved from the results of committed sinful deeds (Past, present, future). Too many think that a 'sinner' is one who simply is 'not perfect'. One, who is perhaps 'prone to err', and therefore he needs a Saviour who is 'perfect'. They look forward to the day when they will receive a new body that is not prone to err and offers no temptation, and to live in surroundings where there is no temptation. Such an understanding of the sin problem does not even begin to realize the problem. Satan was in heaven, next to Christ, living in the presence of God where there was no sin, in a glorious body; yet, he fell from grace. Think about that, he fell from grace, he fell from God's glory.

This is the question that needs to be asked. What do we need to be saved from?

Do we need to be saved from the penalty for sin? Do we need to be saved from God's righteousness? Do we need to be saved from the righteous requirements of God's Law? No! We definitely do not need to be saved from God and his righteousness. But we need to be saved from Sin and Satan, to God and his righteousness. We need to be saved back to grace, and to God's glory.

May God give us mercy and grace to understand this great difference.

First we must consider four crucial thought concepts. The crucial thought concepts of
  • 'Substitute'
  • 'Risk'
  • 'Penalty'
  • 'Satisfying the demands of God's righteousness'
Please note that none of the above words/phrase are found in the scripture. The reader is invited to check the Strong’s Concordance.
The above words are not found/used in scripture. Yet it is significant to note that they are The crucial thought concepts in the doctrines they espouse. In fact, let's think for a moment, without them the doctrines could not exist! Yet…they are not in the…scriptures? Those who wrote the scriptures did not think with these thought concepts.
In order that we arrive to truth and not presupposed understanding, we need to carefully examine our comprehension/thought. One principle that should be an early warning sign is if we use vocabulary that is not in the scripture. Sometimes the expression may be a summary of many ideas. Then we must examine whether the contents of these ideas are consistent with the bible.

The beginning of the crucial thought concept is in the idea of 'Penalty'. It stems from the presupposed understanding of Genesis 2:17. But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat of it; for in the day of your eating from it you shall surely die. The presupposition is that this meant that God would kill Adam as a penalty for disobedience; that the law has such penalties for making wrongs right. Let us stop and consider these two fundamental principles of what is considered to be God’s righteousness.
  • That God has made a law for the purpose that it's transgressors would then be found guilty of transgression and sentenced to death.
  • That the law has such penalties for making wrongs right.
Let us consider. Is this the kind of relationship that God had created with Adam? Was God arbitrarily issuing a command and then vigilantly enforcing "the immutable law"? Is this the way of life in the kingdom of heaven? Is this God’s righteousness? Is God’s righteousness a legal-istic righteousness? Is his righteousness a righteousness of the law?
The fundamental problem lies even in this erroneous view and understanding of God's righteousness.
Is this God's righteousness? If it is, then God's righteousness would be of the law, and he would be under the curse. But this is not God's righteousness! Because the law works wrath (Rom. 4:15)

That very concept is from a sinner's mind: one that is devoid of the knowledge of God's way, his life, and his righteousness. For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse (Gal.3: 10). God tells us: "for my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither your ways my ways. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts higher than your thoughts" (Is. 55: 8,9).

Now the righteousness of God, without the law , is manifested … even the righteousness of God by faith of Jesus Christ … For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God. (Rom. 3:21-23) God's righteousness is not a 'righteousness of the law' but it is a 'righteousness of faith'.

The kind of relationship that God established when he created man is a benevolent one. Faith was the default relationship in creation. God counseled and instructed Adam even as a Father his son. The nature of the instruction can easily be seen in the following example: 'If you touch that stove you will surely be burned', as opposed to 'if you touch that stove I will surely burn you'. He gave Adam good knowledge.

The instruction: of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat; for in the day of your eating from it you shall surely die did not mean that God would have to kill him to satisfy his righteousness. But it meant that Adam would pass from life to death. That he would pass from faith (living by God's word) to the domain of 'evil knowledge', which separates man from God and establishes self as the source and produces a 'legal-istic righteousness' (Sin) that uses the instruction of God, which was unto life, to produce death . For sin taking occasion by the commandment deceived me and by it slew me … Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceedingly sinful. (Rom. 7:11-13) Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us … (Gal.3:13) Satan is the author of sin, self-righteousness. Sin originated in heaven, and it originated there because there was one who turned from faith in God to himself. Satan broke the relationship of faith in God and became his own source. He espoused in himself the legal-istic righteousness which judges on the outward (actions) and not the inward (spirit). To justify himself he has to oppose God. When man listened to him he became partaker of that same righteousness.

Sin is fall from faith, that is: rejection of God's judgment and assertion of ones own judgment. This by nature is and can only be opposed to God's judgment. In this manner self-righteousness is established. Sin therefore is a righteousness, which has established itself in opposition to God, is at enmity with God and wars against God. This righteousness is legal-istic in nature; that is, it is accusative and condemns others in order to self-justify. This righteousness, Sin, is graceless, merciless, self-seeking. It is debasing, demeaning and destructive. The wages of this righteousness is death. It thinks that the ultimate righteousness is reached when a transgressor is brought to 'justice' and full payment is made in death. This righteousness can only produce death. And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission. (Heb 9,22)

Let us think for a moment. A righteousness which is based upon the law (a written set of rules) can only be enacted if someone transgresses, and then it can only find fault and condemn. It is the curse of the law.

Salvation is not legalistic. Salvation is not from penalty of God's law.

Salvation is benevolent. Salvation is from sin. Sin is whatever is not of faith. Faith is, trusting God in so that I receive his judgment as mine. In this manner his righteousness is mine. God's righteousness is based on faith. God's righteousness is full of grace, mercy, goodwill, and longsuffering. God's righteousness is life giving. His judgments are enlightening. It ennobles, nurtures, and lifts ever higher and higher. It is everlasting as the life he gives is. God's righteousness delights to forgive transgression and sin and iniquity (those who oppose themselves against God) and to save them from their folly, sin, their righteousness, death. It is the gift of God. It is his glory.
'For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God'.

It is for this cause that Jesus spoke, " go ye and learn what this means, I will have mercy and not sacrifice"

The sin problem is not a problem of what God should do with imperfect or evil works, nor the record of them. It is the problem of God seeking how to save us, his enemy, from ourselves, from our perverted idea of righteousness so that we may have life. How to cut through the prison of sin and our blindness and our projection of our righteousness and judgment upon God, and reveal unto us the truth of his nature and character which is unlike ours in thought and spirit. This for the purpose so that we may be saved (become new bottles holding the new wine, receive the altogether new garment) and pass from death unto life.

The author of our legalis-istic righteousness being Satan, the accuser of the brethren, the murderer, the strongman of this world. Christ came to bind him so that then he may spoil his house. Satan, the father of lies, has continually challenged God's judgment and righteousness as can be seen in the book of Job, in Zechariah 3, in Jude 9. Foremost, he has challenged the righteousness of God.

The Father sent his Son into this world to manifest eternal life, his glory. Fallen nature being so opposed to life could endure him but a little while. Satan and his angels gathered their forces to beguile, tempt, draw away, threaten, torture, intimidate, and finally by the fear of death cause in someway that Christ should fall away from faith (the foundation of God's righteousness). That Christ should in someway, in anyway, fall prey to Satan's view, reasoning, and thus lose faith in his Father. But Christ was victorious, through death. Satan's head was crushed, while Christ's heel was bruised. And the heavens declared: Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power and glory and honour … and there was no more place found in heaven for the Dragon and his angels (none would hear, no heart would receive). And the accuser of the brethren was cast out into the earth. (Rev 5:12-13; 12:7-13) I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven … the prince of this world comes and in me he finds nothing. Now is the judgment of this world, now shall the prince of this world be cast out. This is your hour and the power of darkness. (Luke 10:18; 22:53; John 12:31; 14:30;) Christ is the 'ransom'. A ransom is not a 'legal payment' but something extorted while someone is held kidnapped. God gave not required, he gave that we might be saved from the clutches of the enemy. But we, oh, we agreed with the enemy. Forasmuch then as children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil. And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage. (Heb 2:14,15)

What does it mean to abide in death? What does it mean to pass from death unto life? (John 5:24)

Is your salvation from the 'penalty', 'wages for sin'? Or, have you received 'eternal life' - 'the gift of God' that being dead wherein you were once held, having been 'servants of sin' reaping the 'wages of sin' (the wages that sin pays), have become the servants of righteousness receiving the reward - eternal life? (Rom. ch. 6)

The scriptures tell us that while we were enemies, we were reconciled to God … the carnal mind is at enmity with God. Let us stop and consider. Who is the enemy of whom?

The Soul that sins, it shall die. … But if the wicked will turn from all his sins … and keep all my statutes, he shall surely live, he shall not die. All his transgressions that he has committed, they shall not be mentioned unto him … Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? Says the Lord GOD: and not that he should return from his ways and live? (Ezek.18: 20-23). … Say unto them, As I live, says the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn you, turn you from your evil ways; for why will you die, O house of Israel? … Yet you say the way of the Lord is not equal. O you house of Israel, I will judge you every one after his ways. (Ezek. 33: 11-20)

Why the thought that God's way is not equal? Is it not that man has acquired a legal-istic righteousness in opposition to God, an enemy of God? But God will judge every one according to that person's righteousness!

Would you not rather have God's righteousness, his mind, his thoughts, and his heart to think and live by? His righteousness is life giving. His judgments are glorious. O Father, glorious is thy name!

I hope this will open thought and understanding as to what is being discussed.

Shalom

[ August 30, 2002, 02:21 AM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/30/02 12:57 PM

Thanks John. Let me look this over for a day. I'll probably be back on Sabbath. Shalom.
Posted By: Garywk

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/31/02 03:09 AM

Hi All,

I haven't studied this whole article yet, but from what I've read I'm not impressed with its truthfulness about the SDA positon. This argument is based upon the abberations that the Faith Alone crowd is putting forth as the Gospel.

quote:
Greetings to all and peace. It is my prayer that we consider truth as it is Jesus. I invite dialoque, questions and comments. May God bless you all.

The common understanding of the Substitute Sacrifice in salvation misses the mark entirely. It is based upon the concept of the 'penalty of death' to satisfy the demands of God's law (righteousness). Then it takes the position that despite his righteousness God loved us so much that he provided a Substitute Sacrifice to pay the penalty of his law (righteousness). In this manner his righteousness is satisfied and God can now forgive us and accept us, if (upon the condition that) we believe that Christ died in our place and paid the penalty for our sins, and if we ask that his death be applied to our record.

The bolded sentence above is a true strawman argument. To say that despite God's righteousness... is hardly the historical position of the SDA church. We have always held that it is because of God's righteousness that He provided a substitute. The sentence as written is an absolute falsehood. I know no one who has ever said God has saved us despite His righteousness. It sure is easy to argue against a statement like that, for that thought is truly reprehensible. I see this whole article, since it is based upon these kinds of misrepresetation, as deceptive.

quote:
Thus in the substitute doctrine, man is saved from the penalty for sin, rather than from sin itself. This means that man is saved from God's righteousness, which means from God himself. This is why so many feel that they have to hide 'behind' Christ, and that Christ represents their case before God. In this manner Christ is their Advocate before the father. They have a saviour for sin, and not a saviour from sin.
I also know of no one, other than Faith Alone proponents who believe this. It is most definitely not taught by Ellen White or the SDA church. The church's stand on sanctification has always denied this lie. Once again this is a reprehensibile position that is easy to castigate, but it is not the historical SDA position.

quote:
I would like to draw special attention to the prepositions. They are of most vital importance.

Too many see themselves only saved from the results of committed sinful deeds (Past, present, future). Too many think that a 'sinner' is one who simply is 'not perfect'. One, who is perhaps 'prone to err', and therefore he needs a Saviour who is 'perfect'. They look forward to the day when they will receive a new body that is not prone to err and offers no temptation, and to live in surroundings where there is no temptation. Such an understanding of the sin problem does not even begin to realize the problem. Satan was in heaven, next to Christ, living in the presence of God where there was no sin, in a glorious body; yet, he fell from grace. Think about that, he fell from grace, he fell from God's glory.

Once again I see another strawman here. Only the Faith Alone crowd preaches this doctrine. This is not the historical SDA Church position. We have always taught that justification is only one part of the process of salvation. And, that with the power and influence of the Holy Spirit in our lives we no longer need to be people who continually commit sin. While we are always "sinners," we are no longer slaves to sin when in a saving relationship with Jesus. The church has always taught that Jesus came to "save us from our sins."

quote:
This is the question that needs to be asked. What do we need to be saved from?

Do we need to be saved from the penalty for sin? Do we need to be saved from God's righteousness? Do we need to be saved from the righteous requirements of God's Law? No! We definitely do not need to be saved from God and his righteousness. But we need to be saved from Sin and Satan, to God and his righteousness. We need to be saved back to grace, and to God's glory.

I don't see where the historical SDA position has ever stated the bolded part above. I have never been taught that, and I went through 12 years of SDA education. This is once again a straw man. It does not address the real position, and as such it is very easy to argue against. It is a very deceptive argument.

quote:
May God give us mercy and grace to understand this great difference.

First we must consider four crucial thought concepts. The crucial thought concepts of

'Substitute'
'Risk'
'Penalty'
'Satisfying the demands of God's righteousness'
Please note that none of the above words/phrase are found in the scripture. The reader is invited to check the Strong’s Concordance.
The above words are not found/used in scripture. Yet it is significant to note that they are The crucial thought concepts in the doctrines they espouse. In fact, let's think for a moment, without them the doctrines could not exist! Yet…they are not in the…scriptures? Those who wrote the scriptures did not think with these thought concepts.
In order that we arrive to truth and not presupposed understanding, we need to carefully examine our comprehension/thought. One principle that should be an early warning sign is if we use vocabulary that is not in the scripture. Sometimes the expression may be a summary of many ideas. Then we must examine whether the contents of these ideas are consistent with the bible.

The beginning of the crucial thought concept is in the idea of 'Penalty'. It stems from the presupposed understanding of Genesis 2:17. But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat of it; for in the day of your eating from it you shall surely die. The presupposition is that this meant that God would kill Adam as a penalty for disobedience; that the law has such penalties for making wrongs right. Let us stop and consider these two fundamental principles of what is considered to be God’s righteousness.

That God has made a law for the purpose that it's transgressors would then be found guilty of transgression and sentenced to death.
That the law has such penalties for making wrongs right.
Let us consider. Is this the kind of relationship that God had created with Adam? Was God arbitrarily issuing a command and then vigilantly enforcing "the immutable law"? Is this the way of life in the kingdom of heaven? Is this God’s righteousness? Is God’s righteousness a legal-istic righteousness? Is his righteousness a righteousness of the law?
The fundamental problem lies even in this erroneous view and understanding of God's righteousness.
Is this God's righteousness? If it is, then God's righteousness would be of the law, and he would be under the curse. But this is not God's righteousness! Because the law works wrath (Rom. 4:15)

Once again what is being argued against right here is what the Faith Alone crowd disseminates. It is not based upon historical SDA teachings. This argument is based upon a misrepresentation of what SDA's have historically believed. The statements that God has put forth a plan of salvation despite His righteousness and that we have to hide behind Christ because saving from sin itself is not a part of salvation are two misrepresetations that I find most disagreeable, and totally false misrepresentations. I also know of no one who has taught that God's righteousness is legalistic, other than those of the Faith Alone persuasion when they argue against the idea that part of the plan of salvation is the changing of our sinful characters into the image of the character of God. As these three premises are the basis for this whole article I leave you to make up your own minds as to the agenda of it's author.

I may comment upon this some more, but I doubt it. As the basis for this article is false, so are any conclusions that it will draw in what it says about what the SDA church has always taught. Anytime you reason from a false premise for your basis you will come to a faulty conclusion. You can't get around it.

[ August 30, 2002, 09:11 PM: Message edited by: Gary K ]
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/31/02 03:33 AM

Gary,

You may also wish to check out the parallel topic in the SDA Church Issues forum.

I am not making any comments here yet until this topic here has developed further.
Posted By: Avalee

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/31/02 04:23 AM

I was doing my Sabbath School lesson the other night and the following verse was part of it. When I read it my mind thought about this topic.

Deu 12:30
Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou inquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise.
Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/31/02 04:25 AM

Gary K

Thank you for your comments. And Please post more ....this is a false doctrine that needs to be exposed.

I know you have time constraints, i appreciate that, so when you have time... hope to hear from you

Charlene
Posted By: Donovan Wallace

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/31/02 06:29 AM

The doctrine of vicarious substitution creates a few problems.

I see an issue with the concept of forgiveness.

Jer 36:3 ...that I may forgive their iniquity and their sin.

Psalm 85:2 Thou hast forgiven the iniquity of thy people, thou hast covered all their sin.

Acts 5:31 Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins.


How is it that God forgives us yet at the same time exacts a penalty for wrong? These concepts are are mutually exclusive either you forgive someone a debt or you insist on payment. To attempt both is an oxymoron. Of course consequences may still remain but the core issue is guilt and the dispensing of it.

If Christ's death paid the penalty of sin then were all the acts of forgiveness before the cross tentative.. only credit transactions not true payments?

If ultimately all "debts" must be paid then is God not able to forgive? If he can't forgive then requiring us to forgive one another with no strings attached could be called unfair. One might say that our acts of foregiveness are more noble than His. This can't be!

Is the scriptural concept of forgiveness different from our contemporary meaning?

The question of forgiveness I believe leads to our view of the law.

1Tim 1:9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,

Gal 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.


These and other New Test text present the law as a consequence or a necessity brought about by sin. A law can't forgive but a person can. Do we serve God or the law?
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/31/02 12:47 PM

Hello DW. Thanks a lot for joining us.

I don't put much weight in so called scholarship, but there is a learned Jew that I've read that I'm going to quote from below. You've brought up forgiveness, and so, the connection between your comments and what I've posted below is my view of the biblical model of forgiveness.

In the sacrificial system, we’re told almost all things were cleansed by blood, and without blood, there was no cleansing of sin. The Mosaic law contained a prohibition against eating blood, the reason being that the life of the animal is in its blood. In symbol therefore, the blood, which is the animal’s life, is used to make atonement for the individual. Rather than requiring the blood and life of the sinner, the blood and life of the animal is substituted.

Alfred Edershiem, a converted Jew who researched ancient Judaism and wrote on the temple and the sacrificial system summarizes the essence of the sacrificial system in this way:
quote:
The fundamental idea of sacrifice in the Old Testament is that of substitution, which again seems to imply everything else - atonement and redemption, vicarious punishment and forgiveness. The first fruits go for the whole products; the firstlings for the flock; the redemption-money for that which cannot be offered; and the life of the sacrifice, which is in its blood (Lev. 17:11) for the life of the sacrificer. Hence also the strict prohibition to partake of the blood. Even in the ‘Korban” gift (Mark 7:11) or free-will offering, it is still the gift for the giver. The idea of substitution as introduced, adopted, and sanctioned by God Himself, is expressed by the sacrificial term rendered in our version ‘atonement’, but which really means covering, the substitute in the acceptance of God taking the place of, and so covering, as it were, the person of the offerer.

Hence the Scriptural experience; “Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered… unto whom the Lord imputeth not iniquity” (Ps. 32:12, 1); and perhaps also the Scriptural prayer: “Behold, O God, our shield, and look upon the face of Thine Anointed’ (Ps. 84:9). Such sacrifices, however, necessarily pointed to a mediatorial priesthood, through whom alike they and the purified worshippers should be brought near to God, and kept in fellowship with Him. Yet these priests themselves continually changed; their own persons and services needed purification, and their sacrifices required constant renewal, since, in the nature of it, such substitution conld not be perfect. In short, all this was symbolical. . . Til He should come to whom it all pointed, and who had all along given reality to it; He whose Priesthood was perfect, and who on a perfect altar brought a perfect sacrifice, once for all - -a perfect Substitute, and a perfect Mediator. The Temple - Its Ministry and Services by Alfred Edersheim, page 76.

The idea that Christ bore my particular sins Himself creates a direct link between myself and Him. I think “Amazing! awesome! He did that for me?!? My sins put Him on the cross and yet He loves me even more for having taken my place and paid my debt? This is hard to believe. It’s too good to be true.” But inside I know it is true. It is a wonderful assurance. This isn’t just a feeling, however.

If Christ did not bear my sin and guilt there is no personal connection between His sacrifice and me. The relationship becomes impersonal because Christ has died not for what I did - something very concrete - but for the results of what I did - something I cannot possibly comprehend. I can no more understand the results of my sin than Adam could comprehend a fraction of the consequences of his disobedience at the fall. And there is no payment of my debt. Instead of a direct link between all parties, there is a mysterious, incomprehensible fix that goes on behind the scenes. Whereas with Christ as my surety, the debt I owe the bank (that is, the Law) is paid by Christ directly on my account, now, the bank (Law) is paid off in general (by the IMF - The Intergalactic Morality Fund?) not because there is a debt I personally owe, but because it is good policy to keep the moral economy of the universe afloat.

So in this model, the biblical concepts of mercy and justice and the love of God are changed. You who hold this view teach that God is not directly concerned with sin. How did you arrive here? One of the things I see, is the fruit of the idea that God does not directly ever punish sin. Instead, He allows sin to take its course and the person eventually reaps what he has sown. But God never punishes - directly. If He never punishes directly, He never forgives - directly. If He does neither directly, there is no personal connection between God and humanity.

But the gospel tells me the opposite. God is directly dealing with sinners and sin. You who think otherwise, do you not see the good news that Christ paid your debt personally? By not acknowledging this aren't you are creating a gulf between yourselves and Him. Christ is a personal Saviour. He didn't come to deal with sin at an impersonal level. He came to fix your heart and mine. The only way to do that is to atone for the evil that we have done - our evil deeds. God has consigned all to disobedience that He might have mercy on all Paul says. He did not consign all to an evil nature, He consigned all to disobedience. His atonement is for evil actions, thoughts and motives, because these are the root of the problem.

[ August 31, 2002, 07:13 AM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Garywk

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/31/02 02:30 PM

quote:
The doctrine of vicarious substitution creates a few problems.
The concept of ga'al, which is the principle upon which Boaz redeemed Ruth, is based upon this. In Hebrew, and in some other Middle Eastern law, vicarious substitution was a valid principle. For further study see Job 19:25, Psalm 19:40, Psalm 78:35, Proverbs 23:11, Isaiah 41:14, 43:14, 44:6, 24, 47:4, 48:17, 49:7, 49:26, 54:5, 54:8, 59:20, 60:16, 63:16, and Jeremiah 50:34. In each of these verses the word translated as Redeemer, each and every one specific references to Christ, is ga'al.

quote:
H1350
גּאל
gâ'al
gaw-al'
A primitive root, to redeem (according to the Oriental law of kinship), that is, to be the next of kin (and as such to buy back a relative’s property, marry his widow, etc.): - X in any wise, X at all, avenger, deliver, (do, perform the part of near, next) kinsfolk (-man), purchase, ransom, redeem (-er), revenger.

quote:
H1350
גּאל
gâ'al
BDB Definition:
1) to redeem, act as kinsman-redeemer, avenge, revenge, ransom, do the part of a kinsman
1a) (Qal)
1a1) to act as kinsman, do the part of next of kin, act as kinsman-redeemer
1a1a) by marrying brother’s widow to beget a child for him, to redeem from slavery, to redeem land, to exact vengeance
1a2) to redeem (by payment)
1a3) to redeem (with God as subject)
1a3a) individuals from death
1a3b) Israel from Egyptian bondage
1a3c) Israel from exile
1b) (Niphal)
1b1) to redeem oneself
1b2) to be redeemed
Part of Speech: verb
A Related Word by BDB/Strong’s Number: a primitive root
Same Word by TWOT Number: 300

While the proponents of the Moral Influence theory do not like vicarious substitution this principle is clearly taught all the way through the OT. In fact, every time you see the word Redeemer in the OT it has been translated as such from ga'al. So, to keep on promoting something quite contrary to vicarious substitution clearly is against the prophecies of the OT, and the principle of redemption that God used to teach His people about Himself and the coming Ga'al throughout the OT.

The Moral Influence people have a huge problem with this. They cannot explain this away. Their doctrine would do away with a Redeemer. Their doctrine would do away with their being Redeemed by our Elder Brother. Our closest relative capable of redeeming us from spiritual Egypt, from paying the price for our redemption. They obviously have not studied their OT closely enough, when they want to do away with each and every reference to their Redeemer.

[ August 31, 2002, 08:31 AM: Message edited by: Gary K ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/31/02 03:45 PM

Gery, it would be interesting to look at other middle eastern examples of substitution outside of the Jewish system, but I don't think we need to. The examples in the Mosaic Law are the ones that are divinely inspired, and are the major theme. You've given another good example.

Many more exist. The laws covering the redemption of slaves. The laws of purification from contact with the dead. The laws governing the Nazarite vow., etc. But the primary illustration, the one that God most often called the attention of Israel back to, the one that is the cornerstone of the sanctuary system is the Passover ritual, a symbol of Israel's redemption from spiritual slavery. I think it would be good to focus on that and look at the symbolism.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/31/02 04:05 PM

Good morning and Sabbath blessings to you all.

I would not have put this subject in the setting that Mark did, such as old and new, but as Mark said he was in someway trying to work his way to bring up the subject of the purpose and place of Christ's death and it's meaning in salvation.

The subject we are dealing with predates time, as it is really the subject of "the kingdom of God and his righteousness" and more specifically how it is revealed in redemption. I trust that we all desire to have a full and true understanding, to know Him, and to be partakers of his kingdom and his righteousness.

In my reference to the common understanding, I am not addressing historic Adventism, I am speaking of the 'current prevailing common understanding'. There are certainly many variations, and those who hold things substantially different. I think that the reader should be able to know the difference of their position and the virtue of it. It is precisely this that is wanted, that we may know the virtue of what we hold. Let each one bring forth that which is dear to them, the virtue of their realizations, and as we question and answer we may all be enriched.

In order to communicate meaningfully we need to stay away from 'prejudged, prepackaged, labeled, references', as they close the mind, and the reader may not know what is referred to.

Hi Gary, I agree that people do not 'say' despite , but … well, would you please tell us how the because works.

Hi Mark, interesting post. I will comment soon.

Hi Donovan, yes good point. How do we see forgiveness?

Gary, Christ most certainly is our Redeemer, this is the specific of out topic. To understand redemption, what it is, and what it is not, from who, what, and to who, what.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 08/31/02 04:33 PM

Just two passages on the Passover:

ICorinthians 5:7
5:7 . . . For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:

Exodus 12
12:1 And the Lord spake unto Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt, saying, 12:2 This month [shall be] unto you the beginning of months: it [shall be] the first month of the year to you. 12:3 Speak ye unto all the congregation of Israel, saying, In the tenth [day] of this month they shall take to them every man a lamb, according to the house of [their] fathers, a lamb for an house: 12:4 And if the household be too little for the lamb, let him and his neighbour next unto his house take [it] according to the number of the souls; every man according to his eating shall make your count for the lamb. 12:5 Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male of the first year: ye shall take [it] out from the sheep, or from the goats: 12:6 And ye shall keep it up until the fourteenth day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it in the evening. 12:7 And they shall take of the blood, and strike [it] on the two side posts and on the upper door post of the houses, wherein they shall eat it. 12:8 And they shall eat the flesh in that night, roast with fire, and unleavened bread; [and] with bitter [herbs] they shall eat it. 12:9 Eat not of it raw, nor sodden at all with water, but roast [with] fire; his head with his legs, and with the purtenance thereof. 12:10 And ye shall let nothing of it remain until the morning; and that which remaineth of it until the morning ye shall burn with fire. 12:11 And thus shall ye eat it; [with] your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and ye shall eat it in haste: it [is] the Lord's passover. 12:12 For I will pass through the land of Egypt this night, and will smite all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment: I [am] the Lord. 12:13 And the blood shall be to you for a token upon the houses where ye [are]: and when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy [you], when I smite the land of Egypt. 12:14 And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the Lord throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/01/02 12:42 AM

Greetings from Michigan
Having read several posting about why Jesus had to die and just exactly what his death did or did not do for us I would suggest another e-mail group that really gets into this subject. Try converstions about ****** all one word of course. Or you can find it also at *******.
Both of these sites offer stimulating idea's that will drive you to your knee's and your bible.
Here is a question for you: The sop says that Jesus death was for sinless angles. Why did he have to die for sinless beings?

In his love

Rod Dunneback

==============

Until we, the moderators and I, have a chance to check out these sites, I have edited them out of this post. If we approve these sites, I will edit them back in again.

Daryl Fawcett
Administrator

[ August 31, 2002, 06:50 PM: Message edited by: Daryl Fawcett ]
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/01/02 01:31 AM

Hi Mark. I had a chance to review your post.

Yes indeed. God is directly dealing with sinners and sin, and Christ is indeed a personal Saviour. There is a truth (understood correctly) in him bearing your particular sins himself, which is a direct link between you and him.

But I do have a problem understanding your statement of you not comprehending that he died for the 'results of what you did' (not that I profess that) and at the same time being delighted that he took your place and paid your 'debt'. Is the 'debt' not the 'result of what you did'? How did you obtain your debt and to whom are you indebted, and who exacted it?

Also I would like you to explain how did Christ die for what you did? What you did is an action said and done, something 'concrete', unless the action was that of you crucifying him. Is this a spiritual application or does it reflect back to the 'debt' which is the 'result'? Or do you mean that "whosoever has done it unto the least of these has done it unto me", which means it is your action against Christ, so he suffered your actions? If so, how does that pay your debt? I am sorry I cannot comprehend what you are saying, please explain.

In reference to your bank analogy, I am fairly lost with the IMF, you will need to define.

In the bible Christ gave parables of debt. The debt was personal and to a person. The King frankly forgave them both. (Luke 7:42) How does forgiveness enter your picture?

God is directly concerned with sin, the deeds or the results of them. However that is not where the problem in salvation is. We find that this debt can be personally frankly forgiven. It is his glory to forgive! Christ did not die for that which we can be forgiven, or to enable God to forgive. He died to save us from Sin-the Master, so that we may be set free and become the sons of God. He died as the Shepherd facing the wolf.
Well, there will be more on that but first I would like to hear your answers.

In reference to your comments regarding God judging the world and his direct involvement. Absolutely, everyone ia accountable before God, and therefore indeed he can forgive. This is a very good point. However the common understanding of the purposes he judges for and the standards he judges by is missing the mark. This has to do with the understanding of God's righteousness, and I will post more on that later.

One more thought. You quoted "God has consigned all to disobedience …". The scripture says concluded, shut up in disobedience . There is a difference. The statement reflects an assessed situation (something after the fact) and not consigned which means 'sent into'. God did not send us into sin, disobedience, but he is a faithful judge, speaking truth. He assessed, concluded, shut up all 'under sin'. So that none may argue the point and justify himself, but so that the promise might be given to those who are of the faith of Jesus Christ. (Gal: 3,22-29)

Look forward to your post.
Shalom
Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/01/02 01:43 AM

Rod,
When you refer to a quote by the SOP, would you please add the reference.

Off the top of my head, and without studying your quote, i would offer this.

Jesus not only died for the sinner but for all beings in all worlds and universes. There were questions that needed answering about sin/Satan...Redeemer/Saviour. There were reasons why the cup of iniquity needed to be filled. The worlds needed to understand sin and its awfulness so it would never rise again. God is on trial in front of the entire universe......The victory was won on the cross and the reavelation of His character will be perfectly reproduced in His Saved people. This will ever be proof of His enabling Power and His Love, Mercy and justice. His perfect plan.
Posted By: Edward F Sutton

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/01/02 07:21 AM

Rod,
I assume this is what you are refering to with the portion of the reference you mentioned.
************
quote:
SOP
Desire of Ages
"Chap. 79 - "It is Finished"

Christ did not yield up His life till He had accomplished the work which He came to do, and with His parting breath He exclaimed, "It is finished." John 19:30. The battle had been won. His right hand and His holy arm had gotten Him the victory. As a Conqueror He planted His banner on the eternal heights. Was there not joy among the angels? All heaven triumphed in the Saviour's victory. Satan was defeated, and knew that his kingdom was lost. {DA 758.1}

To the angels and the unfallen worlds the cry, "It is finished," had a deep significance. It was for them as well as for us that the great work of redemption had been accomplished. They with us share the fruits of Christ's victory. {DA 758.2}

Not until the death of Christ was the character of Satan clearly revealed to the angels or to the unfallen worlds. The archapostate had so clothed himself with deception that even holy beings had not understood his principles. They had not clearly seen the nature of his rebellion. {DA 758.3}

It was a being of wonderful power and glory that had set himself against God. Of Lucifer the Lord says, "Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty." Ezek. 28:12. Lucifer had been the covering cherub. He had stood in the light of God's presence. He had been the highest of all created beings, and had been foremost in revealing God's purposes to the universe. After he had sinned, his power to deceive was the more deceptive, and the unveiling of his character was the more difficult, because of the exalted position he had held with the Father. {DA 758.4}

God could have destroyed Satan and his sympathizers as easily as one can cast a pebble to the earth; but He did not do this. Rebellion was not to be overcome by force. Compelling power is found only under Satan's government. The Lord's principles are not of this order. His authority rests upon goodness, mercy, and love; and the presentation of these principles is the means to be used. God's government is moral, and truth and love are to be the prevailing power. {DA 759.1}

It was God's purpose to place things on an eternal basis of security, and in the councils of heaven it was decided that time must be given for Satan to develop the principles which were the foundation of his system of government. He had claimed that these were superior to God's principles. Time was given for the working of Satan's principles, that they might be seen by the heavenly universe. {DA 759.2}

Satan led men into sin, and the plan of redemption was put in operation. For four thousand years, Christ was working for man's uplifting, and Satan for his ruin and degradation. And the heavenly universe beheld it all. {DA 759.3}

When Jesus came into the world, Satan's power was turned against Him. From the time when He appeared as a babe in Bethlehem, the usurper worked to bring about His destruction. In every possible way he sought to prevent Jesus from developing a perfect childhood, a faultless manhood, a holy ministry, and an unblemished sacrifice. But he was defeated. He could not lead Jesus into sin. He could not discourage Him, or drive Him from a work He had come on earth to do. From the desert to Calvary, the storm of Satan's wrath beat upon Him, but the more mercilessly it fell, the more firmly did the Son of God cling to the hand of His Father, and press on in the bloodstained path. All the efforts of Satan to oppress and overcome Him only brought out in a purer light His spotless character. {DA 759.4}

All heaven and the unfallen worlds had been witnesses to the controversy. With what intense interest did they follow the closing scenes of the conflict. They beheld the Saviour enter the garden of Gethsemane, His soul bowed down with the horror of a great darkness. They heard His bitter cry, "Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from Me." Matt. 26:39. As the Father's presence was withdrawn, they saw Him sorrowful with a bitterness of sorrow exceeding that of the last great struggle with death. The bloody sweat was forced from His pores, and fell in drops upon the ground. Thrice the prayer for deliverance was wrung from His lips. Heaven could no longer endure the sight, and a messenger of comfort was sent to the Son of God. {DA 759.5}

Heaven beheld the Victim betrayed into the hands of the murderous mob, and with mockery and violence hurried from one tribunal to another. It heard the sneers of His persecutors because of His lowly birth. It heard the denial with cursing and swearing by one of His best-loved disciples. It saw the frenzied work of Satan, and his power over the hearts of men. Oh, fearful scene! the Saviour seized at midnight in Gethsemane, dragged to and fro from palace to judgment hall, arraigned twice before the priests, twice before the Sanhedrin, twice before Pilate, and once before Herod, mocked, scourged, condemned, and led out to be crucified, bearing the heavy burden of the cross, amid the wailing of the daughters of Jerusalem and the jeering of the rabble. {DA 760.1}

Heaven viewed with grief and amazement Christ hanging upon the cross, blood flowing from His wounded temples, and sweat tinged with blood standing upon His brow. From His hands and feet the blood fell, drop by drop, upon the rock drilled for the foot of the cross. The wounds made by the nails gaped as the weight of His body dragged upon His hands. His labored breath grew quick and deep, as His soul panted under the burden of the sins of the world. All heaven was filled with wonder when the prayer of Christ was offered in the midst of His terrible suffering,--"Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do." Luke 23:34. Yet there stood men, formed in the image of God, joining to crush out the life of His only-begotten Son. What a sight for the heavenly universe! {DA 760.2}

The principalities and powers of darkness were assembled around the cross, casting the hellish shadow of unbelief into the hearts of men. When the Lord created these beings to stand before His throne, they were beautiful and glorious. Their loveliness and holiness were in accordance with their exalted station. They were enriched with the wisdom of God, and girded with the panoply of heaven. They were Jehovah's ministers. But who could recognize in the fallen angels the glorious seraphim that once ministered in the heavenly courts? {DA 760.3}

Satanic agencies confederated with evil men in leading the people to believe Christ the chief of sinners, and to make Him the object of detestation. Those who mocked Christ as He hung upon the cross were imbued with the spirit of the first great rebel. He filled them with vile and loathsome speeches. He inspired their taunts. But by all this he gained nothing. {DA 760.4}

Could one sin have been found in Christ, had He in one particular yielded to Satan to escape the terrible torture, the enemy of God and man would have triumphed. Christ bowed His head and died, but He held fast His faith and His submission to God. "And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of His Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night." Rev. 12:10. {DA 761.1}

Satan saw that his disguise was torn away. His administration was laid open before the unfallen angels and before the heavenly universe. He had revealed himself as a murderer. By shedding the blood of the Son of God, he had uprooted himself from the sympathies of the heavenly beings. Henceforth his work was restricted. Whatever attitude he might assume, he could no longer await the angels as they came from the heavenly courts, and before them accuse Christ's brethren of being clothed with the garments of blackness and the defilement of sin. The last link of sympathy between Satan and the heavenly world was broken. {DA 761.2}

Yet Satan was not then destroyed. The angels did not even then understand all that was involved in the great controversy. The principles at stake were to be more fully revealed. And for the sake of man, Satan's existence must be continued. Man as well as angels must see the contrast between the Prince of light and the prince of darkness. He must choose whom he will serve. {DA 761.3}

In the opening of the great controversy, Satan had declared that the law of God could not be obeyed, that justice was inconsistent with mercy, and that, should the law be broken, it would be impossible for the sinner to be pardoned. Every sin must meet its punishment, urged Satan; and if God should remit the punishment of sin, He would not be a God of truth and justice. When men broke the law of God, and defied His will, Satan exulted. It was proved, he declared, that the law could not be obeyed; man could not be forgiven. Because he, after his rebellion, had been banished from heaven, Satan claimed that the human race must be forever shut out from God's favor. God could not be just, he urged, and yet show mercy to the sinner. {DA 761.4}

But even as a sinner, man was in a different position from that of Satan. Lucifer in heaven had sinned in the light of God's glory. To him as to no other created being was given a revelation of God's love. Understanding the character of God, knowing His goodness, Satan chose to follow his own selfish, independent will. This choice was final. There was no more that God could do to save him. But man was deceived; his mind was darkened by Satan's sophistry. The height and depth of the love of God he did not know. For him there was hope in a knowledge of God's love. By beholding His character he might be drawn back to God. {DA 761.5}

Through Jesus, God's mercy was manifested to men; but mercy does not set aside justice. The law reveals the attributes of God's character, and not a jot or tittle of it could be changed to meet man in his fallen condition. God did not change His law, but He sacrificed Himself, in Christ, for man's redemption. "God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself." 2 Cor. 5:19. {DA 762.1}

The law requires righteousness,--a righteous life, a perfect character; and this man has not to give. He cannot meet the claims of God's holy law. But Christ, coming to the earth as man, lived a holy life, and developed a perfect character. These He offers as a free gift to all who will receive them. His life stands for the life of men. Thus they have remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God. More than this, Christ imbues men with the attributes of God. He builds up the human character after the similitude of the divine character, a goodly fabric of spiritual strength and beauty. Thus the very righteousness of the law is fulfilled in the believer in Christ. God can "be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus." Rom. 3:26. {DA 762.2}

God's love has been expressed in His justice no less than in His mercy. Justice is the foundation of His throne, and the fruit of His love. It had been Satan's purpose to divorce mercy from truth and justice. He sought to prove that the righteousness of God's law is an enemy to peace. But Christ shows that in God's plan they are indissolubly joined together; the one cannot exist without the other. "Mercy and truth are met together; righteousness and peace have kissed each other." Ps. 85:10. {DA 762.3}

By His life and His death, Christ proved that God's justice did not destroy His mercy, but that sin could be forgiven, and that the law is righteous, and can be perfectly obeyed. Satan's charges were refuted. God had given man unmistakable evidence of His love. {DA 762.4}

Another deception was now to be brought forward. Satan declared that mercy destroyed justice, that the death of Christ abrogated the Father's law. Had it been possible for the law to be changed or abrogated, then Christ need not have died. But to abrogate the law would be to immortalize transgression, and place the world under Satan's control. It was because the law was changeless, because man could be saved only through obedience to its precepts, that Jesus was lifted up on the cross. Yet the very means by which Christ established the law Satan represented as destroying it. Here will come the last conflict of the great controversy between Christ and Satan. {DA 762.5}

That the law which was spoken by God's own voice is faulty, that some specification has been set aside, is the claim which Satan now puts forward. It is the last great deception that he will bring upon the world. He needs not to assail the whole law; if he can lead men to disregard one precept, his purpose is gained. For "whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all." James 2:10. By consenting to break one precept, men are brought under Satan's power. By substituting human law for God's law, Satan will seek to control the world. This work is foretold in prophecy. Of the great apostate power which is the representative of Satan, it is declared, "He shall speak great words against the Most High, and shall wear out the saints of the Most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand." Dan. 7:25. {DA 763.1}

Men will surely set up their laws to counterwork the laws of God. They will seek to compel the consciences of others, and in their zeal to enforce these laws they will oppress their fellow men. {DA 763.2}

The warfare against God's law, which was begun in heaven, will be continued until the end of time. Every man will be tested. Obedience or disobedience is the question to be decided by the whole world. All will be called to choose between the law of God and the laws of men. Here the dividing line will be drawn. There will be but two classes. Every character will be fully developed; and all will show whether they have chosen the side of loyalty or that of rebellion. {DA 763.3}

Then the end will come. God will vindicate His law and deliver His people. Satan and all who have joined him in rebellion will be cut off. Sin and sinners will perish, root and branch, (Mal. 4:1),--Satan the root, and his followers the branches. The word will be fulfilled to the prince of evil, "Because thou hast set thine heart as the heart of God; . . . I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. . . . Thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any more." Then "the wicked shall not be: yea, thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be;" "they shall be as though they had not been." Ezek. 28:6-19; Ps. 37:10; Obadiah 16. {DA 763.4}

This is not an act of arbitrary power on the part of God. The rejecters of His mercy reap that which they have sown. God is the fountain of life; and when one chooses the service of sin, he separates from God, and thus cuts himself off from life. He is "alienated from the life of God." Christ says, "All they that hate Me love death." Eph. 4:18; Prov. 8:36. God gives them existence for a time that they may develop their character and reveal their principles. This accomplished, they receive the results of their own choice. By a life of rebellion, Satan and all who unite with him place themselves so out of harmony with God that His very presence is to them a consuming fire. The glory of Him who is love will destroy them. {DA 764.1}

At the beginning of the great controversy, the angels did not understand this. Had Satan and his host then been left to reap the full result of their sin, they would have perished; but it would not have been apparent to heavenly beings that this was the inevitable result of sin. A doubt of God's goodness would have remained in their minds as evil seed, to produce its deadly fruit of sin and woe. {DA 764.2}

But not so when the great controversy shall be ended. Then, the plan of redemption having been completed, the character of God is revealed to all created intelligences. The precepts of His law are seen to be perfect and immutable. Then sin has made manifest its nature, Satan his character. Then the extermination of sin will vindicate God's love and establish His honor before a universe of beings who delight to do His will, and in whose heart is His law. {DA 764.3}

Well, then, might the angels rejoice as they looked upon the Saviour's cross; for though they did not then understand all, they knew that the destruction of sin and Satan was forever made certain, that the redemption of man was assured, and that the universe was made eternally secure. Christ Himself fully comprehended the results of the sacrifice made upon Calvary. To all these He looked forward when upon the cross He cried out, "It is finished."
{DA 764.4}



[ September 01, 2002, 01:29 AM: Message edited by: Edward F Sutton ]
Posted By: Edward F Sutton

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/01/02 09:06 AM

Justification & sanctification in microcosm. No splitting hairs. All are sinners & complete obedience is simply duty - saved or lost. Acceptance is in the beloved alone. But presumption can not abide in the beloved at all. Before Jesus returns all the dead & living will be judged and saved or lost according to the decision upon each individual case. Jesus will bring the results of that judgement. The idea of paper record or forensic salvation without conversion & sanctification is no salvation at all. Christ must fulfil His work within a person on Earth before the person is preadvent judged in Heaven.

If there are places you want more texts - feel free to look them up. All texts are KJV for your reference purposes.

John 3:1-21

Matthew 1:21

Isaiah 53:6 - 12

Ecclesiastes 12:13 - 14

Revelation 14:7

Matthew 22:1 - 14

Luke 20:35 (accounted worthy = imputed & imparted worthiness)
Luke 21:36 (accounted worthy = imputed & imparted worthiness)

The accounting worthy through the merits of the Beloved occurs before the seal of the living God is authorized to be written in the forehead, and the seal of the living God is the proof of being accounted worthy through the merits of the Beloved and ratified by Heaven. It is the sealing of sanctification while on sinful Earth, to continue eternally in Heaven.

Ezekiel 20:12

Ezekiel 36:23

John 17:17 - 26

Ephesians 1:6 - 11

***********************
Christ must cleanse His children internally & externally & they must cooperate to their uttermost. They can not remain defiled and enter Heaven. The unveiled glory of God consumes all traces of sin & sinners. Atonement for sin is accomplished by death alone. Either the death & resurrection & mediation of Jesus & the seal of the living God - or obliteration in the lake of fire. No other options offered in Scripture & SOP.

1 John 3:3 - 10

Colossians 1:27

2 Peter 1:1 - 12

Revelation 21:27

Hebrews 7:25 - 26

Ephesians 5:25 - 27

Hebrews 12:22 - 29

Deuteronomy 4:23 - 26

Nahum 1:1- 15

************************
The atonement on Calvary must be mediated before God the Father by His appointed High Priest in behalf of fallen humanity.

1 Corinthians 15:12-28
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/01/02 02:09 PM

Thanks Ed for posting the DA at length. The SOP view of the great controversy between Christ and Satan is a treasure that few of us appreciate as we should. Who else on the face of the earth has been able to set out the characters of God, Christ and Satan like Ellen White? I can imagine that Christ would say of her, none born of women were greater than her, but he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than she.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/01/02 03:18 PM

I'm not sure if I have time to give full answers now but I'll make a start John.

You asked:
quote:
Is the 'debt' not the 'result of what you did'? How did you obtain your debt and to whom are you indebted, and who exacted it?

The wages of sin is death. The results of sin are death too. But it my sin that is the cause and root of the problem. It is the debt. It is the disease. The results are the symptoms of the disease.

How I obtained the debt is found in the definition of sin - transgession of the Law.

These things have all been said before though. Let's not cover the same ground. You may not agree with what I've said, but let's not ask each other to repeat ourselves. It might be helpful to paraphrase what the other person is saying and ask if the paraphrase is the intended idea.

quote:
Christ did not die for that which we can be forgiven, or to enable God to forgive. He died to save us from Sin-the Master, so that we may be set free and become the sons of God. He died as the Shepherd facing the wolf.

This is your clearest statement so far. It says that God can forgive without the need for Christ to die. Of course you know John that in my view, this statement of is a repudiation of the entire scriptural plan of salvation. It is a denial of the deity and priesthood of Christ. The war is between Christ, Michael and Satan. God has spoken from heaven, this is my beloved Son. Listen to Him.

Re consigned vs. committed, the issue I was addressing is did God consign or commit all to the results of disobedience - a warped character - or to disobedience itself?

How if we look at the Passover ritual? Do you have any comments

[ September 01, 2002, 09:45 AM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/01/02 04:47 PM

Here are a few verses from the New Testament that seem to stand out regarding forgiveness of sins. How do we understand these verses if his death/blood was not required for the forgiveness of sins?

Matthew 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission (forgiveness) of sins.

Hebrews 9:22 And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission (forgiveness).

Colossians 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:

Hebrews 9:15 And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/02/02 04:02 AM

Thanks for joining us LL. Good texts.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/02/02 01:30 PM

John, at my age I still get impatient at times. I should do better. The sentence about your clearest statement so far wasn't meant as a put down. Sorry.

You wrote:
quote:
However the common understanding of the purposes he judges for and the standards he judges by is missing the mark. This has to do with the understanding of God's righteousness, and I will post more on that later.

I'll wait to hear more.

I understood that you believe Christ is a created being. Is that right?

I said above that your position is a denial of the deity and priesthood of Christ. I say that because the idea that Christ is a lesser member of the deity makes him no member at all. A being is either God or is not. There can be no such thing as degrees of God. And if Christ is not fully God, then neither is His remedy for sin - His sacrifice of Himself - fully divine. And if the sacrifice is not fully divine, it would be easy to mentally discard it.

I see a connection between the two.

And you're conclusions would be right regarding His priesthood if Christ is not fully God. His priesthood is based on His divinity as much as it is on his humanity. He has life unborrowed and original within himself. This is why he is a priest after Melchizadeck's order - His native eternal nature, which in the plans of Providence is a prerequisite to his unchanging priesthood.

Christ was never begotten in the sense of time. Speaking of himself he said he is the "I am", the self-existant one. He was however begotten into the priesthood by virture of his perfect human life. This is the treasure that the Father has given us - Christ as fully God and as fully Man.

In SDA history, many of the pioneers were confused on the nature of Christ. Many of them had Arian leanings. But Christ was leading our movement, and we were given a flood of light on the issues of the great controversy. You'll not find a clearer picture in Christendom of the war that has raged between Christ and Satan. The way that we arrived at this picture is through a clearer understanding of the exhalted position of Christ. In obedience to the command of heaven, we have listened to Him.

From the beginning, the role of Christ has been that of the Word, of Captian of the Host. Satan became jellous and ever since has attempted to undermine Him. He would like nothing more than to do away with His sacrifice in the minds of humanity because this is the only means of our redemption and he will have us in his power.

Do you see no danger John in telling people that God can forgive us without Christ. Think about the implications if you are wrong. If God is saying, Christ my son is the sacrifice for sin, and you say No His isn't and just one person is lead astray as a result, what will you say to God in the judgment?

[ September 02, 2002, 08:06 AM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/03/02 01:05 AM

Peace be with you all.

I haven't posted because I have been prayerfully considering how to answer you, Mark. I am sorry that I tested your patience. I did not mean to.

There is something to be realized. From the time of Satan's fall to the cross, the whole Universe was in a state of spiritual Babel. There was confusion of thought, understanding and meaning. When God spoke of righteousness, he meant one thing, when Satan spoke of righteousness he meant another thing. When God spoke of justice, he meant one thing, when Satan spoke of justice he meant another thing. When God spoke of mercy, he meant one thing, when Satan spoke of mercy he meant another thing. When God spoke of forgiveness, he meant one thing, when Satan spoke of forgiveness he meant another thing. And so on, whatever God said Satan twisted the meaning to be something else, that is, he misrepresented it. This spiritual Babel is still in this world in which we live.

You probably can identify with others having prejudiced ideas that are ill informed against Adventists. I can assure you that there are Adventists that likewise have prejudiced ideas that are ill informed. Often times people themselves do not know what they are talking about or what they hold. The point is, in this spiritual Babel, the same words are used with different meaning. If we are to communicate meaningfully we have to be patient and willing to define our thought until we both understand them as the other means it

As default I use scriptural definition/meaning of words. That of course may or may not be what others understand it to be, so we need to communicate. I can adapt to other language temporarily but it is necessary to define it.

The purpose of asking is not to repeat yourself. But what may seem obvious to you, could be far from that to others. Second, are you able to examine your thought in context of the questions asked? How about in the context of what you yourself are saying? In the DA quotations that Edward brought forth is much truth. What do you hear?

The whole is meaningful, but to focus re forgiveness I will repeat here a couple paragraphs.
quote:

In the opening of the great controversy, Satan had declared that the law of God could not be obeyed, that justice was inconsistent with mercy, and that, should the law be broken, it would be impossible for the sinner to be pardoned. Every sin must meet its punishment, urged Satan; and if God should remit the punishment of sin, He would not be a God of truth and justice. When men broke the law of God, and defied His will, Satan exulted. It was proved, he declared, that the law could not be obeyed; man could not be forgiven. Because he, after his rebellion, had been banished from heaven, Satan claimed that the human race must be forever shut out from God's favor. God could not be just, he urged, and yet show mercy to the sinner. {DA 761.4}

By His life and His death, Christ proved that God's justice did not destroy His mercy, but that sin could be forgiven , and that the law is righteous, and can be perfectly obeyed. Satan's charges were refuted. God had given man unmistakable evidence of His love. {DA 762.4}


It says here He proved that God … can forgive. not enabled, made possible

How does that compare with your statement?

quote:

This is your clearest statement so far. It says that God can forgive without the need for Christ to die. Of course you know John that in my view, this statement of is a repudiation of the entire scriptural plan of salvation. It is a denial of the deity and priesthood of Christ. The war is between Christ, Michael and Satan. God has spoken from heaven, this is my beloved Son. Listen to Him.

Here is the statement I made
quote:

Christ did not die for that which we can be forgiven, or to enable God to forgive. He died to save us from Sin-the Master, so that we may be set free and become the sons of God. He died as the Shepherd facing the wolf.

Please give it some thought.

It is indeed so that 'The war is between Christ, Michael and Satan. God has spoken from heaven, this is my beloved Son. Listen to Him.'

Christ came to declare and reveal the truth of God's character. He certified it by his blood. The Father certified it by raising him from the dead.

Just to clarify possible misconception. I would like to state the following.

The Law is holy, just, and good. There is nothing the matter with the Law. It was given by God for the purpose of being unto life. However Sin taking occasion by the law deceived me and by it slew me. There is therefore in every man naturally the law of sin and death. This I have called the Legal-istic righteousness. While there is more to it, this is one very important part which blinds men so they cannot see God. The 'Law of the spirit of life' in Christ Jesus has set me free from the 'Law of Sin and death'.

I am sorry Mark, please, it is not fair to make a statement that will prejudice others and raise a topic, which according to Forum rules, I cannot answer meaningfully. Would it be fair for me to say that you do not believe that Jesus is the Son of God according to scripture, and then not allow you to answer meaningfully? Mark, I stand before the Father and his Son.

That which is highly esteemed among men is foolishness with God, and he who will be greatest let him be as the lesser!

By the way Mark, It is not consigned vs. committed. It is consigned, committed vs. concluded. Anyhow I know that we know that we want to address that which is concluded

I will be posting on the Righteousness of God soon.

Shalom
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/03/02 01:55 AM

Regarding other personal beliefs, your right that we don't want to widen the focus too much. But on the other hand its helpful to know the basic assumptions that we are using. So, for example, you're about to post about the righteousness of God. That's likely going to be helpful so that I understand better what you're saying on this topic. Regarding the deity of Christ, because it has a direct bearing on His Priesthood which is at the root of this topic, the moderators shouldn't object. So long as there is a fairly clear connection with the topic I think were fine. (If they do object, a separate thread can be started.)

Back to your statement:

quote:
Christ did not die for that which we can be forgiven, or to enable God to forgive. He died to save us from Sin-the Master, so that we may be set free and become the sons of God. He died as the Shepherd facing the wolf.

In your last post you seem to be saying I have mistated your thought.

I gave it some thought and I don't see it. What I see is a minimization of the role of Christ. One of the tests of any doctrine is does it magnify the Word - Jesus. Please show how it does this.

Well, I should close for now.
Posted By: sherlynnu

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/03/02 03:39 AM

I know the Bible says the wages of sin is death and that Jesus came to free us from sin and bondage. Jesus was the lamb of scafrifice, the only one who COULD die for us, no angel could make the sacrific, no humane either.Jesus made the plan of salavation with the Father before the foundation of the world. Also Jesus said "No greater love is there than a man lay down his life for his friend"
Jesus has done all and everything there is for our salavation, there is not one thing I could (DO) to save myself, not even to follow Christ example would save me,only the blood of the cross can do that.Jesus presious blood, and belive me to God it is very presious,can WASH my sins away.

quote:
Originally posted by Charlene Van Hook:
The Signs of the Times----DT- 05-02-92
The Fullness of Christ's Grace

"The grace of Jesus Christ alone can change the heart of stone to a heart of flesh, and make it alive unto God. Men may perform great deeds in the eyes of the world; their achievements may be many and of a high order in the sight of men, but all the talent, all the skill, all the ability of the world will fail to transform the character and make a degraded child of sin a child of God, an heir of heaven. Men have no power to justify the soul, to sanctify the heart. Moral disease cannot be healed save through the power of the great Physician. The highest gift of heaven, even the Only-begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth, is alone able to redeem the lost. What gratitude, what love, should fill our hearts as we contemplate the love of God! The heart should be softened and subdued as we meditate upon the risk that Jesus took in order that man might be elevated and restored. The world's Redeemer
endured sufferings commensurate to all the guilt of a lost world. The sacrifice of Christ on Calvary's cross is a consideration that surpasses all the overwhelming power of sin; and when a sense of sin presses upon the heart of the sinner, and the burden seems intolerable, Jesus invites him to look to him and live.
There is power in Christ to cleanse the soul. "Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord; though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool."

Without God sending His Son to die/pay the wage for our sins that we may have His free gift of eternal life, we are lost. The sanctuary services teach us the real meaning of the atonement.

The alternate theory is teaching us we must save ourselves, based on the life of Jesus, which means that His death meant nothing. It would take a very strong twist of the "atonement" truth to come to this conclusion. This is the theory of Babal.

Advent Review and Sabbath Herald--T- 09-22-96
Our Advocate and Our Adversary

"Satan would cover the people of God with blackness, and ruin them; but Jesus interposes. Although they had sinned, yet Jesus took the guilt of their sins upon his own soul. He snatched the race as a brand from the fire. With
his long human arm he encircled humanity, while with his divine arm he grasped the throne of the infinite God. And thus man has strength given him
that he may overcome Satan, and triumph in God. Help is brought within the reach of perishing souls; the adversary is rebuked."

Praise the Lord,

Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/03/02 06:02 AM

Sherlynnu,

Thank you for reposting this very simple truth.

God Bless,
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/03/02 09:52 AM

SL, I think you're right: This is at the root of the discussion. You said:
quote:
. . . there is not one thing I could (DO) to save myself, not even to follow Christ example would save me,only the blood of the cross can do that. Jesus presious blood, and belive me to God it is very presious,can WASH my sins away.

Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/04/02 04:25 AM

There are two passages in the Bible that have always intrigued me. (See below.) The reason that they do is that they are written by John the Beloved, the one closest to Christ and most like Him in character, and because he writes these statements as though they are his most profound thoughts. Here they are:
quote:

19:34 But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water. 19:35 And he that saw [it] bare record, and his record is true: and he knoweth that he saith true, that ye might believe. 19:36 For these things were done, that the scripture should be fulfilled, A bone of him shall not be broken. 19:37 And again another scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced. John 19:34-37.

5:5 Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God? 5:6 This is he that came by water and blood, [even] Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth. 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. 5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one. . . . 5:10 He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son. 5:11 And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. 5:12 He that hath the Son hath life; [and] he that hath not the Son of God hath not life. 5:13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God. I John 5:5-13

Clearly, sublime truths are being revealed here to mortals. A merciful and gracious God is stooping down and bending low to lift us up. No one can grasp the full depth of what is being said. But what are the basic ideas being expressed? We have six witnesses. Three in heaven and three on earth. One is both in heaven and on earth - the Spirit. What are the implications? Why aren't there seven witnesses, or are there? What do they say? Why is it the water and the blood that speak on earth? Why does John suddenly interrupt his narrative to give his personal testimony at the scene where the side of Christ is pierced and water and the blood come gushing out? Why does he draw special attention to the fact that Christ "came by water and blood, [even] Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood."

[ September 03, 2002, 11:07 PM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/04/02 04:57 AM

This topic in part is Did Christ bear our sin/guilt?

Was Christ sacrificed for us?

quote:
1 Corinthians 5:7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:
This text not only says that Christ was sacrificed for us but refers to Christ as our passover.

What does Christ being our passover being sacrificed for us mean?
Posted By: Bob Pickle

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/04/02 07:22 AM

Hello, all.

I had a church member that was steeped in this stuff. Three years of dialoguing with him gave me a big opportunity to sort through quite a bit.

quote:
2 Peter 2:1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
Notice that this text predicts that there would be heresies so dangerous that they could cause people to be lost. Notice also that part of that heresy would be a denying that Christ has bought us. Thus this text actually predicts that we would have reason in these last days to have a discussion like this. This topic on this forum is therefore a fulfillment of prophecy.

quote:
Hebrews 10:29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
My member's wife went so far as to tell me that Christ dying in our place, shedding His blood, meeting the claims of the law that demands the death of the sinner, was PAGAN. She was thus counting the blood of the covenant that had sanctified her an unholy thing. Another fulfillment of prophecy.

quote:
These theories, followed to their logical conclusion, sweep away the whole Christian economy. They do away with the necessity for the atonement and make man his own savior. These theories regarding God make His word of no effect, and those who accept them are in great danger of being led finally to look upon the whole Bible as a fiction. (MH 428, 429)
That's speaking of pantheistic theories. Peculiarly, much of what she wrote about the alpha of apostasy is also true about this theology. We know what the Jewish economy was, the sacrificial system. This theology does away with the Christian economy, the antitype of the Jewish economy. The blood meeting the claims of the law, sprinkled toward the ark, the lambs dying in the place of the sinner, all this is made of none effect.

In fact, the lady who sends out Graham Maxwell's tapes and books, one of the prinicpal proponents of this theology, told me that Graham thinks there probably isn't a sanctuary in heaven, but if there is, it's a sandbox illustration for the angels who need it. Now since we are told that one of the heresies at the end would be the idea that there is no sanctuary, and since the conclusions of this theology mimic those of the alpha, one wonders if all this might be part of the omega. Perhaps we are discussing a part of the teachings that will form the omega of apostasy.

One of my teachers in college, Dick Winn, was into this stuff. He eventually came to look upon the Bible as a fable. Perhaps he doesn't now. I hope he doesn't. yet that is exactly what EGW said was part of the results of pantheistic theories.

If there is no transfer of sin from the sinner to Christ, and thus none from Christ to the heavenly sanctuary, and thus none to cleanse the sanctuary of in 1844, and if Christ did not have to die as our substitute, then why would anyone have to suffer the penalty of sin after the 1000 years? In other words, why would the wicked have to burn in hell fire? if God is merciful that He isn't just, and if He would forgive us even if Jesus didn't pay the price, why would the wicked be punished by anything other than natural results?

Usually people think of this when they think of this theology, not of the atonement. yet there is a major problem with this idea.

Remember what EW and GC88 and GC11 say that the saints will be doing in heaven during the 1000 years? Judging the wicked, deciding with Jesus how long they are going to burn. Some burn longer, and some burn shorter. It all depends on their sins, and what Jesus and the saints decide.

Are they getting their questions answered? Sure, but EW and GC don't mention that. They only mention the sentencing.

If we only get our questions answered, if we only see if God is fair, then we aren't judging the world, the lost angels, the wicked like Paul and EGW said. Instead we are judging the Judge. If we sentence the wicked, then we are judging the very ones Paul and EGW said we would be judging.

One last point: EGW never said that righteousness by faith is the third angel's message in verity. She said that justification by faith is. Now justification is judicial pardon. You will notice that those who are into this theology don't really like the word justification. They prefer the word righteousness. To them the third angel's message is a revelation fo God's character to the world, but for them the attribute of justice is removed from love. For them, for those who have thought it through, the third angel's message becomes a repudiation of the doctrine of justification, that through faith in the blood of the Substitute, the Father judicially pardons us and transforms us. So in essence, those who have thought through and accepted this theology believe that the third angel's message is a repudiation of the very thing that EGW said that the third angel's message is.

Perhaps it is indeed part of the omega.

It is so hard to get through to those into this stuff. It's part of a spiritual ego trip. Those who are spiritually mature believe this way. those those still immature, those who still believe they need a mediator between them and a holy God, there is one available, they say. But they have arrived, and they know the truth, that they can be saved without a mediator.

Present a text or quote that says otherwise, and they will tell you, "That's God speaking our language to get our attention." Never mind that the illustration doesn't fit, that language communicates thoughts, that the thoughts in the Word or the Testimonies tell us that we need a substitute, the blood, the sanctuary, or justification. Never mind that language is just words, and that the thoughts are still valid. Encased in such faulty logic, no text, no quote can phase them, for everything that doesn't fit becomes God speaking our language to get our attention, screaming and hollering like some parent out of control, but He isn't really that way, they say.

How do they know? How do they know that it isn't the other way around? That God is all justice and no mercy, that He just speaks that way in His Word and the Testimonies to hook us?

Much more sound is to believe it all. For all others are "fools" (Lk. 24:25).
Posted By: Edward F Sutton

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/04/02 09:29 AM

Daryl,
The contrast is that when God judged this group of the living, one group He would (pass over), one group He would (pass through). The difference in passing over and passing through, was the blood of the lamb slain to be roasted whole & not sodden. That lamb typified the One who would die, yet have His life retained in Himself, and would die via the Second Death experience that would torment Him but not force His life from Him, but be the time He would voluntarily lay it down after drinking it's full penalty in our behalf.

Jesus Christ on Calvary is the only one who fits. The lamb & its applied blood in the Egypt of the Exodus time, were then present symbols of Calvary & the work done there and after His ressurection as He mediated the merits of His life (what the blood symbolizes).

Because God's representative passed over the homes with the token of faith in Calvary yet future spared them, but roasted the Lamb Himself instead of them. The took Him into themselves in symbolic lessons by eating of the lamb representing Him after the manner relayed to them by Moses.

No where else were they to eat unsodden meat. The symbolism = righteousness imputed - lamb's blood on the door, righteousness imparted - lamb's blood in the meat.

No blood on the door also = no blood in the meat -no passover lamb. No passing over by the death angel, they themselves are that night held responsible for their sins, without a Saviour.

*************

Bob thanks for replying.

The 4 SOP quotes found by phrase search "is the third angel's message in verity." = 4 hits

1.
Christ and His Righteousness.--Christ and His righteousness--let this be our platform, the very life of our faith.--Review and Herald, Aug. 31, 1905. {Ev 190.2}

The Third Angel's Message in Verity.--Several have written to me, inquiring if the message of justification by faith is the third angel's message, and I have answered, "It is the third angel's message in verity."-- Review and Herald, April 1, 1890. {Ev 190.3}

It Presents an Uplifted Saviour.--This message was to bring more prominently before the world the uplifted Saviour, the sacrifice for the sins of the whole world. It presented justification through faith in the Surety; it invited the people to receive the righteousness of Christ, which is made manifest in obedience to all the commandments of God. Many had lost sight of Jesus. They needed to have their eyes directed to His divine person, His merits, and His changeless love for the human family. All power is given into His hands, that He may dispense rich gifts unto men, imparting the priceless gift of His own righteousness to the helpless human agent. This is the message that God commanded to be given to the world. It is the third angel's message, which is to be proclaimed with a loud voice, and attended with the outpouring of His Spirit in a large measure. {Ev 190.4}

The uplifted Saviour is to appear in His efficacious work as the Lamb slain, sitting upon the throne, to dispense the priceless covenant blessings, the benefits He died to purchase for every soul who should believe on Him. John could not express that love in words; it was too deep, too broad; he calls upon the human family to behold it. Christ is pleading for the church in the heavenly courts above, pleading for those for whom He paid the redemption price of His own lifeblood. Centuries, ages, can never diminish the efficacy of this atoning sacrifice. The message of the gospel of His grace was to be given to the church in clear and distinct lines, that the world should no longer say that Seventh-day Adventists talk the law, the law, but do not teach or believe Christ. {Ev 191.1}

The efficacy of the blood of Christ was to be presented to the people with freshness and power, that their faith might lay hold upon its merits. . . . {Ev 191.2}

For years the church has been looking to man, and expecting much from man, but not looking to Jesus, in whom our hopes of eternal life are centered. Therefore God gave to His servants a testimony that presented the truth as it is in Jesus, which is the third angel's message, in clear, distinct lines.--Testimonies to Ministers, pp. 91-93. (1896) {Ev 191.3}

Christ vs. Penance.--When the third angel's message is preached as it should be, power attends its proclamation, and it becomes an abiding influence. It must be attended with divine power, or it will accomplish nothing. . . . {Ev 191.4}

Penances, mortifications of the flesh, constant confession of sin, without sincere repentance; fasts, festivals, and outward observances, unaccompanied by true devotion--all these are of no value whatever. The sacrifice of Christ is sufficient; He made a whole, efficacious offering to God; and human effort without the merit of Christ, is worthless. . . . {Ev 192.1}

The plan of salvation is not understood to be that through which divine power is brought to man in order that his human effort may be wholly successful. . . . {Ev 192.2}

Without the transforming process which can come alone through divine power, the original propensities to sin are left in the heart in all their strength, to forge new chains, to impose a slavery that can never be broken by human power.--Review and Herald, Aug. 19, 1890. {Ev 192.3}

***************

2.
Several have written to me, inquiring if the message of justification by faith is the third angel's message,
200
and I have answered, "It is the third angel's message in verity."--1SM 372 (1890). {LDE 199.4}

The Lord in His great mercy sent a most precious message to His people through Elders [E.J.] Waggoner and [A. T.] Jones. This message was to bring more prominently before the world the uplifted Saviour, the sacrifice for the sins of the whole world. It presented justification through faith in the Surety; it invited the people to receive the righteousness of Christ, which is made manifest in obedience to all the commandments of God. {LDE 200.1}

Many had lost sight of Jesus. They needed to have their eyes directed to His divine person, His merits, and His changeless love for the human family. All power is given into His hands, that He may dispense rich gifts unto men, imparting the priceless gift of His own righteousness to the helpless human agent. This is the message that God commanded to be given to the world. It is the third angel's message, which is to be proclaimed with a loud voice, and attended with the outpouring of His Spirit in a large measure.--TM 91, 92 (1895). {LDE 200.2}

The message of Christ's righteousness is to sound from one end of the earth to the other to prepare the way of the Lord. This is the glory of God, which closes the work of the third angel.--6T 19 (1900). {LDE 200.3}
*****************

3.
Some of our brethren have expressed fears that we shall dwell too much upon the subject of justification by faith, but I hope and pray that none will be needlessly alarmed; for there is no danger in presenting this doctrine as it is set forth in the Scriptures. If there had not been a remissness in the past to properly instruct the people of God, there would not now be a necessity of calling a special attention to it.... The exceeding great and precious promises given us in the Holy Scriptures have been lost sight of to a great extent, just as the enemy of all righteousness designed that they should be. He has cast his own dark shadow between us and our God, that we may not see the true character of God. The Lord has proclaimed Himself to be "merciful and gracious, long-suffering, and abundant in goodness and truth." {1SM 372.1}

Several have written to me, inquiring if the message of justification by faith is the third angel's message, and I have answered, "It is the third angel's message, in verity."-- The Review and Herald, April 1, 1890. {1SM 372.2}
*************

4.
Several have written to me, inquiring if the message of justification by faith is the third angel's message, and I have answered, "It is the third angel's message in verity." The prophet declares, "And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory." Brightness, glory, and power are to be connected with the third angel's message, and conviction will follow wherever it is preached in demonstration of the Spirit. How will any of our brethren know when this light shall come to the people of God? As yet, we certainly have not seen the light that answers to this description. God has light for his people, and all who will accept it will see the sinfulness of remaining in a lukewarm condition; they will heed the counsel of the True Witness when he says, "Be zealous therefore, and repent. Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me." {RH, April 1, 1890 par. 8}

[ September 04, 2002, 03:47 AM: Message edited by: Edward F Sutton ]
Posted By: Edward F Sutton

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/04/02 12:19 PM

June 11, 1902 The Abiding Trust
By Mrs. E. G. White.

The Gospel
The gospel -- what a treasure-house of knowledge! It is not as a pool that evaporates; not as a broken cistern that loses its treasure, leaving mud and decaying vegetation behind; not as a fountain that once sent forth a living, refreshing, cooling stream, but has ceased to send forth its cooling waters. Your life may be a living spring, that leaps from rock to rock, clear and sparkling with life, refreshing the weary, the thirsty, the heavy-laden. {GH, June 11, 1902 par. 1}

These promises are not made to a few, but to all who will come to the heavenly banquet that God has prepared in sending his Son to our world to die in our behalf, that through faith in him we should become one with God. The praise and glory of his grace, power, and wisdom is the effectual salvation of a peculiar people, zealous of good works. {GH, June 11, 1902 par. 2}

Predestination.
Wonderful possibilities are provided for every one who has faith in Christ. No walls are built to keep any living soul from salvation. The predestination, or election, of which God speaks, includes all who will accept Christ as a personal Saviour, who will return to their loyalty, to perfect obedience to all God's commandments. This is the effectual salvation of a peculiar people, chosen by God from among men. All who are willing to be saved by Christ are the elect of God. It is the obedient who are predestinated from the foundation of the world. "To as many as received him, to them he gave power to become the sons of God, even to as many as believed on him." {GH, June 11, 1902 par. 3}

Seal of God
What is the seal of the living God, which is placed in the foreheads of his people? It is a mark which angels, not human eyes, can read; for the destroying angel must see this mark of redemption. The intelligent mind has seen the sign of the cross of Calvary in the Lord's adopted sons and daughters. The sin of the transgression of the law of God is taken away. They have on the wedding garment, and are obedient and faithful to all God's commands. {GH, June 11, 1902 par. 4}

The Church
The Lord's church is to him the dearest object on earth. Creation itself was originated in the purpose of God that he might glorify himself in the redemption of his people. {GH, June 11, 1902 par. 5}

The Plan of Redemption
By Christ the work upon which the fulfillment of God's purpose rests, was accomplished. This was the agreement in the councils of the God-head. The Father purposed in counsel with his Son that the human family should be tested and proved, to see whether they would be allured by the temptations of Satan, or whether they would make Christ their righteousness, keeping God's commandments, and live. God gave to his Son all who would be true and loyal. Christ covenanted to redeem them from the power of Satan, at the price of his own life. {GH, June 11, 1902 par. 6}

The Holy Spirit's Work
When Christ ascended to heaven, the Holy Spirit took his place, and was a perfect representation of him. It is the work of the Spirit to administer the richest grace, and make it effectual in the hearts of God's people, that the elect may be gathered into one family. We need more quiet, abiding trust in God, and then the very best and highest activities will be put forth. Not one false movement will be made. {GH, June 11, 1902 par. 7}
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/04/02 12:27 PM

Bob, you're the second person in the short life of the thread to mention Maxwell. I'm not sure if the people I know are familiar with him, but you are right about the similarity between their beliefs and Maxwell's.

It is significant to me that this theology is being contrasted to the theology of 1888.

I have heard the same charges by others - not by John or my friends - that you mentioned - that substitution is Pagan. This person was also influenced by Maxwell.
Posted By: Bob Pickle

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/04/02 03:55 PM

Mark,

You will find that many medical professionals espouse this, since he taught theology for years out at Loma Linda. And his teaching the SS lessons 6 weeks early, and then sending out tapes of those classes, has spread his ideas hither and yon.

After hearing these things, the lingo and all, in my SS class, I was visiting family in another state. A visiting teacher taught the class. He said, "Let's summarize what we've been studying thus far," and he then proceeded to ignore the lesson. He redefined the sin problem, and then asked what the solution might be.

He was using the same lingo as my church member. I shot up my hand and said, "You find a substitute." He said, "How would that work." I explained it, and then he said, "That's a thought. Anyone else have a thought?"

If you know what to listen for, you can tell who has been listening to those tapes.

I wrote a critique of Servants and Friends. Eventually the lady who sends out his books and tapes got ahold of it and called me. She was mad. At one point she said that I had misunderstood, a common ploy of theirs, and that if I had questions about what he was saying, I should have asked him instead of just going by his books and tapes.

I pondered that for awhile and then wrote her and asked her to get Maxwell to say whether he agreed or disagreed with four propositions. If he agreed, then I was indeed mistaken, and would apologize to all who had seen my critique.

She wrote back and said that if I had questions I could read Maxwell's books and listen to his tapes.

After a friend of mine urged me to dialogue with Maxwell, I wrote again and proposed that we dialogue with one ground rule: If one of us provided three inspired statements spanning something like 30 years, the other would agree that what those statements said was the truth. I never heard from either the lady or him.

If someone who claims to be an Adventist can't say that something is true when God said it was, then there really is no point in discussing the matter with them. By every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God we are to live. "It is written."
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/05/02 02:03 AM

If Jesus died merely to demonstrate God's undying love for us, why did He wait until 31 AD? And why did He allow the Jews and the Romans to nail Him to a cross? Why didn't the Father do it?
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/05/02 04:00 AM

Bob, my brother is a doctor, an LLU grad, and he attended several SS classes with Maxwell. He was vexed by what he heard, especially as he saw the results of Maxwell's teaching played out in the lives of some of his closest friends.

You suggest that we shouldn't dialogue unless there are some ground rules, the main one being that we give scripture its obvious and intended meaning based on the common usage of language. I think that's a good idea, and I think John would agree to that.

In the Alpha crises, Sister White did not cut off discussion with Kellogg at any point that I am aware of. She met his arguments and wrote at length about Kellogg’s ideas in Volume 8 of the Testimonies. I think it becomes us to encourage dialogue.

Also, any time our ideas are closely tested, we should learn something. John and others likely have some valid points in what they are saying. If there wasn’t a fair bit of truth in their arguments, their would be no challenge in meeting them.
Posted By: Dedreic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/05/02 05:39 AM

I, like many others I assume, am carefully reading and weighing the arguments/positions of this very 'critical' topic.

For now, this is just a message to all posters in this forum. I would like to pose my own questions when I have fully digested (if I can), all that has been written.

Please contributors, (maybe I am talking for others that are viewing this forum, maybe not), but please try to make clear concise statements. Maybe this is just my problem I am not sure, but it is difficult to follow a long post when having to scroll up and down, up and down to check, double check, and sometimes triple check what has been written. We are reading what you have spent considerable time to lay out for us, and I thank you all so much for the time you invest.

One thing though, maybe I have missed it, but is there a short, real short, table like document that could be had to line up the "older view" with the "newer view" so that at a glance we can see the major differences? That way, I would be able to quickly reference a thought/position that arises in a post to see which 'view' the particular thought/position applies to.

Continue to grow... always in Christ.

Dedreic
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/05/02 05:58 AM

Thank you for the quotes Ed. I'm sure you're getting at something.

I nominate Bob to set out the old view. Would you mind Bob? I think you're more knowledgable about this than most of us who hold the old view. Do it however you think is best.
Posted By: Dedreic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/05/02 06:26 AM

Sorry, me again, I must apologize for the appearance of my previous message. I realize mpw that I was reading the first page of this forum and that my post would occur at the bottom of page two, where the message looks out of place.

My inquiry still stands as to the availability of a "cheat sheet" to help decipher the opposing views.

Continue to grow.... always in Christ.

Dedreic
Posted By: Edward F Sutton

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/05/02 08:11 AM

Why the stress upon "I am he" & "for if ye believe not that I am he ye shall die in your sins." What is it about the "I am he" that takes away any & all sins ?

John 8:
21 ¶ Then said Jesus again unto them, I go my way, and ye shall seek me, and shall die in your sins: whither I go, ye cannot come.
22 Then said the Jews, Will he kill himself? because he saith, Whither I go, ye cannot come.
23 And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world.
24 I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.

John 8:
28 Then said Jesus unto them, When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he, and that I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things.

******************

What do you do to reconcile Isaiah ch 53:if Jesus was just a moral theory?
Isaiah 53:
1 ¶ Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the LORD revealed?
2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.
3 He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
4 ¶ Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.
5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.
8 He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken.
9 And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.
10 ¶ Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand.
11 He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.
12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.

********************

Romans 3:
24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

1 John 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.

1 John 4:10 Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.

Romans 3:25 Whom <3739> God <2316> hath set forth <4388> (5639) to be a propitiation <2435> through <1223> faith <4102> in <1722> his <846> blood <129>, to <1519> declare <1732> his <846> righteousness <1343> for <1223> the remission <3929> of sins <265> that are past <4266> (5761), through <1722> the forbearance <463> of God <2316>;

1 John 2:2 And <2532> he <846> is <2076> (5748) the propitiation <2434> for <4012> our <2257> sins <266>: and <1161> not <3756> for <4012> ours <2251> only <3440>, but <235> also <2532> for <4012> the sins of the whole <3650> world <2889>.

1 John 4:10 Herein <1722> <5129> is <2076> (5748) love <26>, not <3754> that <3756> we <2249> loved <25> (5656) God <2316>, but <235> that <3754> he <846> loved <25> (5656) us <2248>, and <2532> sent <649> (5656) his <846> Son <5207> to be the propitiation <2434> for <4012> our <2257> sins <266>.

2434 ilamov hilasmos hil-as-mos’

a root word; TDNT-3:301,362; n m

AV-propitiation 2; 2

1) an appeasing, propitiating
2) the means of appeasing, a propitiation

2435 ilasthrion hilasterion hil-as-tay’-ree-on

from a derivative of 2433; TDNT-3:318,362; n n

AV-propitiation 1, mercyseat 1; 2

1) relating to an appeasing or expiating, having placating or expiating force, expiatory; a means of appeasing or expiating, a propitiation
1a) used of the cover of the ark of the covenant in the Holy of Holies, which was sprinkled with the blood of the expiatory victim on the annual day of atonement (this rite signifying that the life of the people, the loss of which they had merited by their sins, was offered to God in the blood as the life of the victim, and that God by this ceremony was appeased and their sins expiated); hence the lid of expiation, the propitiatory
1b) an expiatory sacrifice
1c) a expiatory victim

2435. ilasthrion hilasterion hil-as-tay’-ree-on; neuter of a derivative of 2433; an expiatory (place or thing), i.e. (concretely) an atoning victim, or (specially) the lid of the Ark (in the Temple):—mercyseat, propitiation.

**************

Messiah - Lived above the mercy seat of the ark, in His pre-incarnate form. He was & still is the Shekinah Himself.

"Christ was their instructor. As He had been with them in the wilderness, so He was still to be their teacher and guide. In the tabernacle and the temple His glory dwelt in the holy shekinah above the mercy seat. In their behalf He constantly manifested the riches of His love and patience. " {COL 288.1}
******************
"Israel had been a favored people; God had made their temple His habitation; it was "beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth." Ps. 48:2. The record of more than a thousand years of Christ's guardian care and tender love, such as a father bears his only child, was there. In that temple the prophets had uttered their solemn warnings. There had the burning censers waved, while incense, mingled with the prayers of the worshipers, had ascended to God. There the blood of beasts had flowed, typical of the blood of Christ. There Jehovah had manifested His glory above the mercy seat. There the priests had officiated, and the pomp of symbol and ceremony had gone on for ages. But all this must have an end. {DA 576.2}
***************

Two lovely cherubs, one on each end of the ark, stood with their wings outstretched above it, and touching each other above the head of Jesus as He stood before the mercy seat. Their faces were turned toward each other, and they looked downward to the ark, representing all the angelic host looking with interest at the law of God. Between the cherubim was a golden censer, and as the prayers of the saints, offered in faith, came up to Jesus, and He presented them to His father, a cloud of fragrance arose from the incense, looking like smoke of most beautiful colors. Above the place where Jesus stood, before the ark, was exceedingly bright glory that I could not look upon; it appeared like the throne of God. As the incense ascended to the Father, the excellent glory came from the throne to Jesus, and from Him it was shed upon those whose prayers had come up like sweet incense. Light poured upon Jesus in rich abundance and overshadowed the mercy seat, and the train of glory filled the temple. I could not long look upon the surpassing brightness. No language can describe it. I was overwhelmed and turned from the majesty and glory of the scene. {EW 252.1}

I was also shown a sanctuary upon the earth containing two apartments. It resembled the one in heaven, and I was told that it was a figure of the heavenly. The furniture of the first apartment of the earthly sanctuary was like that in the first apartment of the heavenly. The veil was lifted, and I looked into the holy of holies and saw that the furniture was the same as in the most holy place of the heavenly sanctuary. The priest ministered in both apartments of the earthly. He went daily into the first apartment, but entered the most holy only once a year, to cleanse it from the sins which had been conveyed there. I saw that Jesus ministered in both apartments of the heavenly sanctuary. The priests entered into the earthly with the blood of an animal as an offering for sin. Christ entered into the heavenly sanctuary by the offering of His own blood. The earthly priests were removed by death; therefore they could not continue long; but Jesus was a priest forever. Through the sacrifices and offerings brought to the earthly sanctuary, the children of Israel were to lay hold of the merits of a Saviour to come. And in the wisdom of God the particulars of this work were given us that we might, by looking to them, understand the work of Jesus in the heavenly sanctuary. {EW 252.2}

As Jesus died on Calvary, He cried, "It is finished," and the veil of the temple was rent in twain, from the top to the bottom. This was to show that the services of the earthly sanctuary were forever finished, and that God would no more meet with the priests in their earthly temple, to accept their sacrifices. The blood of Jesus was then shed, which was to be offered by Himself in the heavenly sanctuary. As the priest entered the most holy once a year to cleanse the earthly sanctuary, so Jesus entered the most holy of the heavenly, at the end of the 2300 days of Daniel 8, in 1844, to make a final atonement for all who could be benefited by His mediation, and thus to cleanse the sanctuary. {EW 253.1}

[ September 05, 2002, 02:13 AM: Message edited by: Edward F Sutton ]
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/06/02 06:23 AM

Just posting a note to let you all know that Bob informed me that he will be away until Monday, therefore, unless he gets on a computer while he is away, you may not hear from him again until then regarding your request for Bob to provide, and I quote, "the old view."
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/05/02 07:20 PM

God Bless you all.

I am observing all this discussion and would like to comment and perhaps tie together some of the various thoughts that have been put forth. First of all, I would like to say that we (John and I) do believe in the exalted position of Christ. We accept all that the Bible says about God's
Son. It is man's doctrines and interpretations that we lay aside so that we may see what God has to say to us in His word about His glorious character and purposes for man. Often, words, expressions, cliches are used without really stopping to think what they mean. Bible texts can be quoted without really stopping to think about what is meant for our interpretation is pre-formed or pre-judged. This inhibits genuine thought and growth. For example; let's stop and think:

When the Saviour said:"this is my body and this is my blood" "take eat and take drink" we know he was instituting a symbolic service. We know that the blood represents the life. Jesus said, 'the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit and they are life'. We know that words are thoughts. We know that the Saviour said He spoke not his own thoughts but the thoughts of the Father. So as we think about the meaning here we see that Jesus was bringing to us the mind of God, His thoughts and purposes. As we eat them, take them into our own thoughts and make them ours we become one with God and with His Son as the Saviour prayed for in the garden. It was and is the purpose of the Son to bring many sons to his Father in heaven. In order to do this we must let the Saviour, by his spirit, into our hearts and minds that we may become sons and daughters. It is the spirit of the Son in us that cries, Abba, Father.

The question that was posted deals with How does Christ save Us? What did His death do for me as far as my salvation? What did His life do for me? And what is He doing for me now? How did he fulfill all the rituals of the law that were given to point men to Him and to prophesy His coming"? Was His death necessary in order for God to forgive? Or is it because something more than forgiveness is needed in order for the universe to be secure forever.

I would like to put forth scriptural answers to these questions beginning with the last one.
In Hebrews chapter 10 it says that the sacrifices could not make perfect those who offered them. They were but a reminder of their sins. Christ said that God did not desire sacrifice and offering (though the law required them) but He came to do the will of God and by that will we are sanctified. It says that the covenant He will make with them will be to put His laws in their hearts and minds.

In Isaiah 55:7 the sinner is invited to come to God, for He will have mercy and abundantly or freely pardon. God has always been willing to forgive and to cast our sins into the depths of the sea and remember them no more. But something more is needed for the universe to be secure. The heart had to be changed from a heart of stone and a new heart of flesh and new spirit placed within man. That is accomplished when we let the blood (spirit) of the Son of God cleanse us from sin. When the spirit of the Son of God, who said, 'lo I come to do thy will, my God and not my will but Thy will', comes into our hearts and lives, we die and are born again a new creature delighting to do the will of God, and are empowered to do that will by the living Saviour who dwells within.
Was that too long a sentence? Can you follow me?
Going backward in my list of questions.

How did he fulfill the shadow of the law that were given to point men to Him and to prophesy His coming? Mark, you asked about the passover and of course there are so many more that pointed to Him. He was the Lamb, the wave-sheaf or first fruits, He is the bread, the manna, He is the cleanser of the old leaven of sin, the blood upon the door, the serpent in the wilderness, the water that flowed from the rock and on and on the old testament fortold the wonderful power and ability of the Saviour to do in us all that we could never do for ourselves. And there were those who saw beyond the symbol to the purpose God was trying to accomplish. They entered in by faith into that Son relationship and became the faithful of Hebrews chapter 11. They were the friends of God who walked with Him and talked with Him and were used by Him to help others to follow.

What did His life do for me and what is He doing for me now? Now, in heaven He is a priest after the order of Melchizadek ministering to me the things of God. All that He lived in this life, living the life of the Son of God, He freely gives to those who allow His spirit to enter their hearts.

Now, to the last and perhaps most sought after answer:

What did His death do for me as far as my salvation? In Philippians 2 it says that He was obedient even unto the death of the cross. The Saviour said in Mark 8:34 that whoever would follow Him must take up his cross. Where did the Lord take His cross? To Calvary , to be crucified on it. We must do the same. We each are given a cross and it is whatever in our lives that God will use to put to death all self-will , all desire for self-exaltation, all self-righteousness so that we can truly say with the Saviour, I delight to do thy will, oh my God. To be obedient unto death, the death of self that the Son of God may be born in our hearts. When this happens old things pass away and all things become new. The scales fall off our eyes and we who were blind now see. We are given a robe of His righteousness, but it is not a robe covering our filthiness beneath. It is the only robe we wear! Underneath is a man washed in the blood (spirit) of the Son of God, a new creature, a new life. A life that is really Christ in us, the hope of glory. A life of the faith of the Son of God. Who loved us and gave himself for us. The word used in that verse, propitiation, means to make favourable. Who is it that needed to be made favourable? Did God need to be made favourable to us? It was He who so loved the world that He gave us His Son. We are the ones who had strayed from Him. We are the sheep that needed to be brought back to the fold. The shepherd did not need to be made more loving or forgiving. It is man who is at enmity with Him. We need the change. Forgiveness alone could not do it. The Son of God had to live that life of faith and be able to give it to us. And He did and does. Praise the Lord!

Do you see why we emphasize what God emphasized in His word? Why Jesus is called the SON of God? It is His faith as a Son that has given Him the exalted position He holds. Philippians. He is at the right hand of God, sharing His throne, receiving the adoration of men and angels. He is our Lord and God because He made the Father His Lord and God. If we let Him live His life of faith in us we also will sit with him on his throne even as He sits on His father's throne. Not that we will be Him. But we will be sons and daughters like Him. One with Him and with His Father. One in thought, character and purpose. The universe will be one and forever secure because the issues have been dealt with. Praise the Lord!

There is more to His life and death, such as the conflict with Satan, and the revelation of the Fathers glory, but so much for now.

But the things of earth will grow strangely dim in the light of his glory and grace.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/05/02 09:50 PM

Debbie, thank you that beautiful explanation. But it left me with a question: what did Jesus do for my salvation that I cannot do for myself?
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/06/02 12:35 AM

Hi Debbie. It's good to hear from you. I'm so glad you joined us. I don't mean to flatter, but you have a talent for writing that I didn't know about.

One of the main ideas that I am hearing expressed here in different ways is that God loved us and it was not necessary for Christ to die in order for God to love us. This is true enough, but it was because the Father, the Son and the Spirit loved us that together they devised a way of lifting us from our moral ruin. It was not enough to love us only. We had to be restored. The love of the Deity for humanity was truly the prime mover. But it moved according to the plans they concluded amoung themselves for our restoration.

The Blood of Christ is spirit and life, but it also cleanses. It is not enough to recieve the water of life from the side of Jesus, we must also be cleaned and rejuvinated by the blood. John stresses that, besides the Spirit, the other witnesses are not just the water only, - that is enlightenment - but are the water and the blood - enlightnement and life. The life is in the blood, because it is the blood that cleanses from sin. The washing of water is by the Word which enligbtens us. The washing of blood is by Word which cleanses us. What do you think?
Posted By: Piper

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/06/02 04:48 AM

Oh boy, am I confused - I thought that Christ's sacrifice was the only way to God...am I naive??/
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/06/02 05:19 AM

Hi Mike,

I would like to give a few scriptures in answer to your question

Romans ch.7
24 O wretched man that I am ! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. …
Romans ch.8
1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
3 For what the law could not do (what I could not do), in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.
10 And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.

Hebrews ch.2
14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;
15 And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.

Mathew ch.12
28 But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you.
29 Or else how can one enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house.

Ephesians ch.2
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,
6 To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.
7 In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins according to the riches of his grace;

Romans ch.3
25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through the faith by his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

And yes Mark, what you said in your last post in reference to the love of God and man's need is indeed correct, and it is what I stated in my first post in different words.

The entire significant difference is in man's understanding of the character of God. God's Love & Forgiveness. God loved and was able and willing to forgive at any time. We were not able to receive the forgiveness and his love, due to the bondage of fear of death (our legal-istic righteousness).

Yes indeed we needed to be saved, not from God's righteousness, but from our righteousness (Sin).

The idea of paying the penalty of God's Law establishes our righteousnes, imposes it upon God. Whereas the truth of his glory(righteousness) breaks the power of the enemy,which has kept us in bondage of fear of death. Christ came to bring us this glory.

John ch.17
22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:
23 I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.

Exodus ch.34
5 And the LORD descended in the cloud, and stood with him there, and proclaimed the name of the LORD.
6 And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth,
7 Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children’s children, unto the third and to the fourth generation.

Shalom
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/06/02 05:54 AM

There is no need to be confused.

Christ shed His blood so that you can be forgiven, for without the shedding of blood there is no remission, or forgiveness, of sin.

Who knows where that is in the Bible?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/06/02 06:13 AM

Matthew 26
28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

Hebrews 9
22 And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/06/02 06:26 AM

John, thank you for those clear answers from the word of God.

Genesis 2
16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

Well, they didn't die the day they ate the forbidden fruit. Why not? Is God a liar? Or did someone else die in their place?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/06/02 06:47 AM

Dear Brother Mike: I'll take your question at face value and answer like this:

There is no part of salvation we can do for ourselves except to give Him our sin and self-polluted hearts and let Him give us a new one! The trouble man often has is that he has no problem seeing what sin is; that he knows is wrong. But what gives sin its power and authority in our lives is self and self is tied up so much with our righteousness and self-value that only the power of God can break through and conquer it.

For example I was once talking with a sister who was sharing with me something that she struggled with the most. It gave her more trouble than anything else, caused her more distress and caused her to be most un-Christlike. It was - a clean house! Why did it give her so much trouble? Why couldn't she give it up? Because it was good. It was not a sin. It was something she valued. It represented all her value as a woman and wife and housekeeper. Yet it made her sin and she could not see how to give it up. Many Christians have similar struggles and yet they BELIEVE THAT CHRIST DIED FOR THEM. In order to live with themselves as Christians they have to convince themselves that they are saved, so they just say that they are sinners and Christ knows their hearts. They somehow feel that someday they will overcome these things but this is not what saves them anyway, it's BELIEVING THAT CHRIST DIED FOR THEM.

But in their lives there is no joy, no testimony, no spiritual life. Their Christian lives become a round of just doing what they have always believed is God's will. What they know is right. But if they were honest they would admit that something is missing. Like the rich young ruler they would say: "All these things have I done from my youth, what lack I yet?" But when the Saviour says, "Sell all thou hast and follow me," they cannot. Why? Because what they have is their righteousness. All their Sabbath-keeping and tithe paying and vegetarianism and all the other good things that go with it. All that E.G.White says children and home and marriage should be, all their ideals. But Christ says, "I want them all". Lay them down at my feet and don't you pick one of them up. I will give you my righteousness in my way in my time and you will know that it is I who does it all. When I give it to you, you will not have to fight for it or defend it. I will do it.

Do you know what happens when we experience this? The ropes are cut and life with Christ becomes a glorious adventure of Faith! Everyday is an experience of watching Him do for me what I KNOW I could never do or be. Do you know what this experience does to marriage! To any trial or difficulty? It all becomes the glorious wearing of that beautiful robe of His righteousness! But it costs something. We can no longer fit into other people's moulds of what they think we should be or do. A precious relationship with God through His Son is born and your loyalty is to Him alone. You can never go back. Heaven's windows and doors are opened to you and you can't get enough. His word becomes as if you never read it before. It becomes the voice of God to your soul. And it's food. Hymns you have sung all your life take on new meaning and you wonder how you never heard it before.

May God grant to every reader of these words this glorious experience!

And I know exactly what someone is going to say: "Does that mean you're perfect and you never sin?"

It means, you become a son or daughter of God. Yes, He disciplines His children and He prunes His vines and you will experience it as never before. But it's because you're His child that He does it. And you will wonder why these things never bothered you before. But you will have His joy, peace and approval knowing that you are His and that there is nothing standing between you and Him.

1 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman.
2 Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.
3 Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you.
4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.
5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
Posted By: Dedreic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/06/02 05:21 PM

What is the 'death' that Paul teaches that is the wages of sin?

Is this death an eternal separation from God? Is this new or old? or is it one truth that stays the same?

Jesus is the bridge across the gulf that separates us from the Father (at least I have always believe this). If Jesus is not this, how do we regain the perfection, (Be ye perfect just as your Father is perfect)? How do we face the eternal death for our/human actions without this bridge?

If you do not take Jesus as the bridge, then we need a clear, concise definition of just who, what, Jesus was or is?

Which view do I fall in?

Remembering to grow... always in Christ.

Dedreic
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/07/02 06:29 AM

Debbie, I totally agree with your description of life in Christ. And it is unfortunate that some people object by asking - "So, you never sin?" I believe conversion is a process and product. During the process of conversion the Holy Spirit influences us to lay aside our defects of character. Once this process is completed we experience the miracle of rebirth, we are born again a new man in Christ. We are dead to sin and awake to Christ and His righteousness. We are free from moral sin, and free to grow in grace and mature in the fruits of the Spirit.

We are also finally free to sin and free not to sin. We are no longer the slaves of sin. Romans 6 makes all this very clear. We do not and cannot sin so long as we are connected to Christ, so long as we are walking in the Spirit and the mind of the new man we will not choose to sin. 1 John 3 makes this very clear. In order to sin we must first resurrect the mind of the old man and then we can only sin. To restore the relationship our sin severed we must experience the gift of repentance. 1 John 2:1,2.

Debbie, here's where I'm not sure what you're saying about sin, death and Jesus. The wages of sin is death. The Bible makes that very clear. But how come I'm able to sin without dying? The first death cannot be the wages of sin because that's what the second death is all about. Can you please explain why we are able to sin without dying the second death?
Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/07/02 01:22 AM

When we sin, we do die, we die spiritually. Separation from the Spirit of life is death. "In the day that thow eatest thereof, ye shall surley die", Spiritual death is exactly what happened. The execution of second death is not until the end of the thousand years, but it remains a spiritual death unless one [reconects with the sourse of eternal life. Adam and Eve hid themselves and were afraid of God...never again were they to speak to Him Face to face...They died a spiritual death then and there and would not have ever had a chance to be saved, unless they repented and were converted just as the sinners today. "As soon as there was sin there was a Saviour"...A new birth was needed for this sinful pair, or they would have been eternally separated from God and destined for the fires of Hell. The same with us ...when we sin knowingly, we separate oursilves from The Saviour, and the connection is broken, not because of God , but because we choose to sever the relationship by sin. We live until our natural death, but without a new birth in Christ....We are spiritually dead and eternally lost.

If Jesus Christ was not willing to take our guilt, Die our Second/eternal death as our substitute.....there would have been no plan of Salvation, all would have been lost and Satan would be the Victor.

Let us rejoice, for we know who is the winner of this great controversy, Jesus Christ our Example/substitute/Saviour.

Thank you God for your unspeakable Gift.

[ September 06, 2002, 07:27 PM: Message edited by: Charlene Van Hook ]
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/07/02 04:04 PM

Thank you Mike for your brief and meaningful statements on Christian life. It is more than we heard from pastors for over four decades. God bless you.

Good questions deserve good answers. We'll be posting soon.

Thank you also Charlene about the spiritual death answer. This is also what I said in my first post
quote:

The instruction: of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat; for in the day of your eating from it you shall surely die did not mean that God would have to kill him to satisfy his righteousness. But it meant that Adam would pass from life to death. That he would pass from faith (living by God's word) to the domain of 'evil knowledge', which separates man from God and establishes self as the source and produces a 'legal-istic righteousness' (Sin) that uses the instruction of God, which was unto life, to produce death . For sin taking occasion by the commandment deceived me and by it slew me … Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceedingly sinful. (Rom. 7:11-13) Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us … (Gal.3:13) Satan is the author of sin, self-righteousness. Sin originated in heaven, and it originated there because there was one who turned from faith in God to himself. Satan broke the relationship of faith in God and became his own source. He espoused in himself the legal-istic righteousness which judges on the outward (actions) and not the inward (spirit). To justify himself he has to oppose God. When man listened to him he became partaker of that same righteousness.

But what does man know about the 'second death'?

Where in the scriptures does it say that the Saviour died the 'second death'?

Shalom

[ September 07, 2002, 10:14 AM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Leif

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/07/02 09:36 PM

I have followed this thread with interest, and would like to briefly share some thoughts. I will present 3 small statements, and follow it with the scriptures that these thoughts are based on. This is not necessarily a reply to the previous post.

1. Since Adam's sin, we are subjects of the law and its consequences. All have been concluded under sin, and every person is guilty before God.

Rom. 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

Gal 3:22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.

Rom. 2:9 What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; 10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:

Rom 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. 20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

Also see Romans 7:2-4

2. Unless the Son of God had died on the cross, we could not have been freed from the curse and bondage of the law. The curse of the law is that it demands perfect obedience, and without perfect obedience the sinner is condemned to death. It (the law) can not offer forgiveness; salvation and justification are not possible
through it.


Gal 3:10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. 11 But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. 12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. 13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: 14 That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the
Spirit through faith.

Gal. 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, 5 To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.

3. By becoming a curse for us, through his death on the cross, he has redeemed us from this curse, which, if we were to bear, would mean eternal death to us. In 2 Corinthians 5:21 it is stated that "he was made sin for us, who knew no sin", which is an equivalent phrase to him "being made a curse for us". Through this redemption, we can now have forgiveness of sins through his blood.

Col. 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:

Mat. 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

His death has redeemed the believer from the curse of the law unto the adoption of sons. Without his death, this would not have been possible, for he redeemed them that were under the law, that they MIGHT receive the adoption of sons (Gal. 4:4).

Romans 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. 15 For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. 16 The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: 17 And if children, then
heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.

It is my hope and prayer that we may all gain further insight to truth through meaningful discourse in forums like this. Sabbath blessings to all.

Leif

[ September 07, 2002, 03:42 PM: Message edited by: Leif ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/08/02 04:23 PM

Welcome Leif. Good to have you with us.

I read an aritcle by S. Bacchiocchi recently that comments on Colosians 2:14.

quote:
The attempts to read into Colossians 2:14 either the ceremonial law or the both the moral/ceremonial laws, are unfounded for at least two reasons. First, because in the whole of the epistle the word "law - nomos" is not used at all. Second, because these interpretations detract from the immediate argument (v. 13) designed to prove the fullness of God's forgiveness. The wiping out of the moral and/or ceremonial law would hardly provide Christians with the divine assurance of forgiveness. Guilt is not removed by destroying law codes. The latter would only leave mankind without moral principles.

What was nailed to the Cross was not the "law - nomos" but the cheirographon, a term which occurs only in Colossians 2:14. Its meaning has been clarified by its occurrence in apocalyptic literature where cheirographon is used to designate the "record-book of sin" or "the certificate of sin-indebtedness" but not the moral or ceremonial law.38

By this daring metaphor Paul affirms that through Christ, God has "cancelled," "set aside," "nailed to the cross" "the written record of our sins which because of the regulations was against us." The legal basis of the record of sins was "the binding statutes, regulations" (tois dogmasin) but what God destroyed on the Cross was not the legal ground (law) for our entanglement in sin, but the written record of our sins.

The function of the metaphor of the nailing to the Cross the record of our sins, is simply to reassure believers of the totality of God's forgiveness. There is no reason therefore for Christians to feel incomplete and to seek the help of inferior mediators, as taught by the Colossians' false teachers, since Christ has provided complete redemption and forgiveness. Interested readers are welcomed to read the extensive analysis of this text in both FROM SABBATH TO SUNDAY and THE SABBATH UNDER CROSSFIRE.


One of the implications of the idea that God can forgive at any time is that there is no record of our sins being recorded, or if they are recorded, they can be arbitarily blotted out. So how is this handled John in your mind. Are our actions recorded. Are they blotted out? What books are kept in heaven?

(I should add that I don't think Sister White's application of this text to the cerimonial law is wrong as SB believes. Like the apostles, at times Sister White makes unexpected applications of other scriptures.)

[ September 08, 2002, 12:12 PM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Edward F Sutton

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/09/02 12:20 PM

Adam's sin = immediate death.

Jesus Christ - stepped in and took the stroke and put it on a promissory note(His own life & salvation & right to exist) - in the upper room & Gethsemene - that note was called & on Calvary paid.

Adam's sin called for the immediate death of the human race. Christ immediatly made Himself surity for the human race or they would have died then.

*************

SOP quotes begin

"There was to be co-operation between man and God. But this plan was greatly interfered with by Adam's transgression. Satan led him to sin, and the Lord would not communicate with him after he had sinned as he did when he was without sin. {CC 20.5}

After the fall Christ became Adam's instructor. He acted in God's stead toward humanity, saving the race from immediate death. He took upon him the office of mediator. Adam and Eve were given a probation in which to return to their allegiance, and in this plan all their posterity were embraced. {CC 20.6}

Without the atonement of the Son of God there could have been no communication of blessing or salvation from God to man. God was jealous for the honor of His law. The transgression of that law had caused a fearful separation between God and man. To Adam in his innocence was granted communion, direct, free, and happy, with his Maker. After his transgression, God would communicate to man only through Christ and angels. {CC 20.7}
*****************

"If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth: but if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin. 1 John 1:6, 7. {HP 153.1}

The degree of light given is the measure of responsibility. The path to heaven will be made plain to all who are faithful in the use of the knowledge they may obtain in regard to the future life. . . . Look at the first act of transgression in the Garden of Eden. To Adam and Eve were plainly stated the laws of Paradise, with the penalty for willful disobedience. They disobeyed, and disobedience brought its sure result. Death entered the world. {HP 153.2}

Transgression is disobedience to the commands of God. Had these commands always been obeyed, there would have been no sin. The penalty of transgression is always death. Christ averted the immediate execution of the death sentence by giving His life for man. . . . Justice requires that men shall have light, and it also requires that he who refuses to walk in the Heaven-given light, the giving of which cost the death of the Son of God, must receive punishment. It is a principle of justice that the guilt of the sinner shall be proportionate to the knowledge given, but not used, or used in a wrong way. God expects human beings to walk in the light, to testify before angels and before men that they acknowledge Christ as the great propitiation for sin and that they respect His sacrifice as their greatest blessing. . . . {HP 153.3}

For time and for eternity the sacrifice of the Son of God to save the fallen race will have a binding claim on man. If God had failed to act His part, if He had not fully revealed His will, if He had given human beings any reason for neglecting the great salvation, man might plead ignorance as a valid excuse. But He has made the way plain. He would have all men to be saved. To some is given greater light than to others. Each will be judged by the light given him. . . . God designed that you should cherish as sacred the light given you. {HP 153.4}

****************
"Those only who acknowledge the binding claim of the moral law can explain the nature of the atonement. Christ came to mediate between God and man, to make man one with God by bringing him into allegiance to His law. There was no power in the law to pardon its transgressor. Jesus alone could pay the sinner's debt. But the fact that Jesus has paid the indebtedness of the repentant sinner does not give him license to continue in transgression of the law of God; but he must henceforth live in obedience to that law. {1SM 229.2}

The law of God existed before the creation of man or else Adam could not have sinned. After the transgression of Adam the principles of the law were not changed, but were definitely arranged and expressed to meet man in his fallen condition. Christ, in counsel with His Father, instituted the system of sacrificial offerings; that death, instead of being immediately visited upon the transgressor, should be transferred to a victim which should prefigure the great and perfect offering of the Son of God. {1SM 230.1}

The sins of the people were transferred in figure to the officiating priest, who was a mediator for the people. The priest could not himself become an offering for sin, and make an atonement with his life, for he was also a sinner. Therefore, instead of suffering death himself, he killed a lamb without blemish; the penalty of sin was transferred to the innocent beast, which thus became his immediate substitute, and typified the perfect offering of Jesus Christ. Through the blood of this victim, man looked forward by faith to the blood of Christ which would atone for the sins of the world. {1SM 230.2}
*******************
5 (John 1:1-3, 14; Phil. 2:5-8; Heb. 2:14-18; see EGW on Acts 15:11). Acting in God's Stead.--Adam and Eve were given a probation in which to return to their allegiance; and in this plan of benevolence all their posterity were embraced. After the Fall, Christ became Adam's instructor. He acted in God's stead toward humanity, saving the race from immediate death. He took upon Him the work of mediator between God and man. In the fullness of time He was to be revealed in human form. He was to take His position at the head of humanity by taking the nature but not the sinfulness of man (ST May 29, 1901). {7BC 912.8}
(Acts 4:12; Heb. 7:25; 9:22; 1 John 1:7-9.) Faith in the Blood of Christ.--God is approached through Jesus Christ, the Mediator, the only way through which He forgives sins. God cannot forgive sins at the expense of His justice, His holiness, and His truth. But He does forgive sins and that fully. There are no sins He will not forgive in and through the Lord Jesus Christ. This is the sinner's only hope, and if he rests here in sincere faith, he is sure of pardon and that full and free. There is only one channel and that is accessible to all, and through that channel a rich and abundant forgiveness awaits the penitent, contrite soul and the darkest sins are forgiven. {7BC 912.9}
Posted By: Edward F Sutton

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/09/02 12:27 PM

Mark,

Sins forgiven are forgiven provisionally. Until the time of the blotting out of sin that concurs with the time of sealing, any living person can return to those sins or if unforgiving of others have the old forgiveness annulled and the guilt restored them .

Those sins are laid upon Jesus and stored in the Heavenly Sanctuary till the blotting out work, which then frees up those sins to be removed and in the king of kings function - as king of kings - Jesus puts the sins upon Azazal prepatory to having him lead away and securely restrained. (remind me to give references later).
Posted By: Edward F Sutton

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/09/02 12:41 PM

Appendix C - The Atonement

Appendix C
Part I--Atoning Sacrifice

I. Centrality of the Atoning Cross

The sacrifice of Christ as atonement for sin is the great truth around which all other truths cluster.--Gospel Workers, p. 315. {7ABC 457.1}

It [the cross] is the central pillar on which hangs the far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory which is for those who accept that cross. Under and around the cross of Christ, that immortal pillar, sin shall never revive, nor error obtain control.--Letter 124, 1900. {7ABC 457.2}

The Sacrifice of Christ as an atonement for sin is the great truth around which all other truths cluster. In order to be rightly understood and appreciated, every truth in the Word of God, from Genesis to Revelation, must be studied in the light that streams from the cross of Calvary. I present before you the great, grand monument of mercy and regeneration, salvation and redemption,--the Son of God uplifted on the cross. This is to be the foundation of every discourse given by our ministers.--Gospel Workers, p. 315. {7ABC 457.3}

The cross of Calvary challenges, and will finally vanquish every earthly and Hellish power. In the cross all influence centers, and from it all influence goes forth. It is the great center of attraction; for on it Christ gave up His life for the human race. This sacrifice was offered for the purpose of restoring man to his original perfection; yea, more. It was offered to give him an entire transformation of character, making him more than a conqueror. . . . {7ABC 457.4}

If the cross does not find an influence in its favor, it creates an influence. Through generation succeeding generation, the truth for this time is revealed as present truth. Christ on the cross was the medium whereby mercy and truth met together, and righteousness and peace kissed each other. This is the means that is to move the world.-- Manuscript 56, 1899. {7ABC 457.5}

There is one great central truth to be kept ever before the mind in the searching of the Scriptures--Christ and Him crucified. Every other truth is invested with influence and power corresponding to its relation to this theme. It is only in the light of the cross that we can discern the exalted character of the law of God. The soul palsied by sin can be endowed with life only through the work wrought out upon the cross by the Author of our salvation.--Manuscript 31, 1890. {7ABC 458.1}

Hanging upon the cross Christ was the gospel. . . . This is our message, our argument, our doctrine, our warning to the impenitent, our encouragement for the sorrowing, the hope for every believer. If we can awaken an interest in men's minds that will cause them to fix their eyes on Christ, we may step aside, and ask them only to continue to fix their eyes upon the Lamb of God.-- Manuscript 49, 1898. {7ABC 458.2}

Gather up the strongest affirmative statements regarding the atonement made by Christ for the sins of the world. Show the necessity for this atonement.--Evangelism, p. 187. {7ABC 458.3}

The fact that the companions of Christ in His crucifixion were placed the one on His right hand and the other on His left is a significant one; His cross is placed in the very center of the world . --Manuscript 52, 1897. {7ABC 458.4}

Christ and Him crucified, is the message God would have His servants sound through the length and breadth of the world. The law and the gospel will then be presented as a perfect whole.-- The Review and Herald, Sept. 29, 1896. {7ABC 458.5}

Never should a sermon be preached, or Bible instruction in any line be given, without pointing the Hearers to "the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29. Every true doctrine makes Christ the center, every precept receives force from His words.--Testimonies, vol. 6, p. 54. {7ABC 458.6}

To remove the cross from the Christian would be like blotting out the sun from the sky. The cross brings us near to God, reconciling us to Him. . . . Without the cross, man could have no union with the Father. On it depends our every hope.--The Acts of the Apostles, pp. 209, 210. {7ABC 458.7}

The study of the incarnation of Christ, His atoning sacrifice, and mediatorial work, will employ the mind of the diligent student as long as time shall last.--Gospel Workers, p. 251. {7ABC 458.8}

Christ crucified for our sins, Christ risen from the dead, Christ ascended on high, is the science of salvation that we are to learn and to teach.--Testimonies, vol. 8, p. 287. {7ABC 459.1}

No discourse should ever be presented without presenting Christ and Him crucified as the foundation of the gospel.--Ibid., vol. 4, p. 394. {7ABC 459.2}

We must become exponents of the efficacy of the blood of Christ, by which our own sins have been forgiven.--Ibid., vol. 6, p. 82. {7ABC 459.3}

Science is too limited to comprehend the atonement; the mysterious and wonderful plan of redemption is so far-reaching that philosophy can not explain it; it will ever remain a mystery that the most profound reason can not fathom. If it could be explained by finite wisdom, it would lose its sacredness and dignity. It is a mystery that One equal with the eternal Father should so abase Himself as to suffer the cruel death of the cross to ransom man; and it is a mystery that God so loved the world as to permit His son to make this great sacrifice.--The Signs of the Times, Oct. 24, 1906. {7ABC 459.4}

It is Satan's studied purpose to keep souls from believing in Christ as their only hope; for the blood of Christ that cleanseth from all sin is efficacious in behalf of those only who believe in its merit.--Gospel Workers, p. 162. {7ABC 459.5}

II. Complete Sacrificial Atonement Made on Cross

He [Christ] planted the cross between Heaven and earth, and when the Father beheld the sacrifice of His Son, He bowed before it in recognition of its perfection. "It is enough," He said. "The Atonement is complete."--The Review and Herald, Sept. 24, 1901. {7ABC 459.6}

Type met antitype in the death of Christ, the Lamb slain for the sins of the world. Our great High Priest has made the only sacrifice that is of any value in our salvation. When He offered Himself on the cross, a perfect atonement was made for the sins of the people. We are now standing in the outer court, waiting and looking for that blessed hope, the glorious appearing of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.--The Signs of the Times, June 28, 1899. {7ABC 459.7}

Our great High Priest completed the sacrificial offering of Himself when He suffered without the gate. Then a perfect atonement was made for the sins of the people. Jesus is our Advocate, our High Priest, our Intercessor. Our present position therefore is like that of the Israelites, standing in the outer court, waiting and looking for that blessed hope, the glorious appearing of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.--Manuscript 128, 1897. {7ABC 459.8}

The time had come for the universe of Heaven to accept their King. Angels, cherubim and seraphim, would now stand in view of the cross. . . . The Father accepts the Son. No language could convey the rejoicing of Heaven or God's expression of satisfaction and delight in His only begotten Son as He saw the completion of the atonement.--The Signs of the Times, Aug. 16, 1899. {7ABC 460.1}

The Father demonstrates His infinite love for Christ, who paid our ransom with His blood, by receiving and welcoming Christ's friends as His friends. He is satisfied with the atonement made. He is glorified by the incarnation, the life, death, and mediation of His Son.--Testimonies, vol. 6, p. 364. {7ABC 460.2}

The Father gave all honor to the Son, seating Him at His right hand, far above all principalities and power. He expressed His great joy and delight in receiving the Crucified One and crowning Him with glory and honor. And all the favors He has shown to His Son in His acceptance of the great atonement are shown to His people. . . . God loves them as He loves His son. . . . The seal of Heaven has been affixed to Christ's atonement. His sacrifice is in every way satisfactory.--The Signs of the Times, Aug. 16, 1899. {7ABC 460.3}

The sacrifice of Christ is sufficient; He made a whole, efficacious offering to God; the human effort without the merit of Christ, is worthless.--The Review and Herald, Aug. 19, 1890 (March 24, 1896). {7ABC 460.4}

As the sacrifice in our behalf was complete, so our restoration from the defilement of sin is to be complete.--The Ministry of Healing, p. 451. {7ABC 460.5}

His death on the cross of Calvary was the climax of His humiliation. His work as a redeemer is beyond finite conception. Only those who have died to self, whose lives are hid with Christ in God, can have any conception of the completeness of the offering made to save the fallen race.--Letter 196, 1901. {7ABC 460.6}

III. Incarnation Prerequisite to Atoning Sacrifice

Christ has purchased the world by making a ransom for it, by taking human nature. He was not only the offering, but He Himself was the Offerer. He clothed His divinity with humanity, and voluntarily took upon Him human nature, making it possible to offer Himself as a ransom.--Manuscript 92, 1899. {7ABC 460.7}

Not one of the angels could have become surety for the human race: their life is God's; they could not surrender it. The angels all wear the yoke of obedience. They are the appointed messengers of Him who is the commander of all Heaven. But Christ is equal with God, infinite and omnipotent. He could pay the ransom for man's freedom. He is the eternal, self-existing Son, on whom no yoke had come; and when God asked, "whom shall I send?" He could reply, "Here am I; send me." He could pledge Himself to become man's surety; for He could say that which the highest angel could not say,--I have power over My own life, "power to lay it down, and . . . power to take it again."--The Youth's Instructor, June 21, 1900. {7ABC 461.1}

Man could not atone for man. His sinful, fallen condition would constitute him an imperfect offering, an atoning sacrifice of less value than Adam before his fall. God made man perfect and upright, and after his transgression there could be no sacrifice acceptable to God for him, unless the offering made should in value be superior to man as He was in his state of perfection and innocency. {7ABC 461.2}

The divine Son of God was the only sacrifice of sufficient value to fully satisfy the claims of God's perfect law. The angels were sinless, but of less value than the law of God. They were amenable to law. They were messengers to do the will of Christ, and before him to bow. They were created beings, and probationers. Upon Christ no requirements were laid. He had power to lay down his life, and to take it again. No obligation was laid upon him to undertake the work of atonement. It was a voluntary sacrifice that He made. His life was of sufficient value to rescue man from his fallen condition.--The Spirit of Prophecy, vol. 2 (1877 ed.), pp. 9, 10. {7ABC 461.3}

IV. Spotless Christ Was Perfect Offering

Christ could not have done this work had He not been personally spotless. Only One who was Himself perfection could be at once the sin bearer and the sin pardoner. He stands before the congregation of His redeemed as their sin-burdened, sin-stained surety, but it is their sins He is bearing. All through His life of humiliation and suffering, from the time that He was born an infant in Bethlehem till He hung on the cross of Calvary, and cried in a voice that shook the universe, "It is finished," the Saviour was pure and spotless.--Manuscript 165, 1899. {7ABC 461.4}

Christ was without sin, else His life in human flesh and His death on the cross would have been of no more value in procuring grace for the sinner than the death of any other man. While He took upon Him humanity, it was a life taken into union with Deity. He could lay down His life as priest and also victim. He possessed in Himself power to lay it down and take it up again. He offered Himself without spot to God.--Manuscript 92, 1899. {7ABC 461.5}

When He uttered the cry "It is finished," Christ knew that the battle was won. As a moral conqueror, He planted His banner on the eternal heights. Was there not joy among the angels? Not a son, not a daughter of Adam, but could now lay hold on the merits of the spotless Son of God, and say, Christ has died for me. He is my Saviour.--Manuscript 111, 1897. {7ABC 462.1}

As the sinbearer, and priest and representative of man before God, He [Christ] entered into the life of humanity, bearing our flesh and blood. The life is in the living, vital current of blood, which blood was given for the life of the world. Christ made a full atonement, giving His life as a ransom for us. He was born without a taint of sin, but came into the world in like manner as the human family. He did not have a mere semblance of a body, but He took human nature, participating in the life of humanity. According to the law Christ Himself gave, the forfeited inheritance was ransomed by the nearest of kin. Jesus Christ laid off His royal robe, His kingly crown, and clothed His divinity with humanity, in order to become a substitute and surety for humanity, that dying in humanity He might by His death destroy him who had the power of death. He could not have done this as God, but by coming as man Christ could die. By death He overcame death. The death of Christ bore to the death him who had the power of death, and opened the gates of the tomb for all who receive Him as their personal Saviour.--Letter 97, 1898. {7ABC 462.2}

V. Guilt and Punishment Transferred to Substitute

In dying upon the cross, He transferred the guilt from the person of the transgressor to that of the divine Substitute, through faith in Him as his personal Redeemer. The sins of a guilty world, which in figure are represented as "red as crimson," were imputed to the divine Surety.--Manuscript 84a, 1897. {7ABC 462.3}

The holy Son of God has no sins or griefs of His own to bear: He was bearing the griefs of others; for on Him was laid the iniquity of us all. Through divine sympathy He connects Himself with man, and as the representative of the race He submits to be treated as a transgressor. He looks into the abyss of woe opened for us by our sins, and proposes to bridge the gulf of man's separation from God.--Bible Echo and Signs of the Times, Aug. 1, 1892. {7ABC 462.4}

He was overwhelmed with horror at the fearful work that sin had wrought. His burden of guilt, because of man's transgression of the Father's law, was so great that human nature was inadequate to bear it. The sufferings of martyrs can bear no comparison with the agony of Christ. The divine presence was with them in their sufferings; but the Father's face was hidden from His dear Son.--Ibid. {7ABC 463.1}

In the Garden of Gethsemane, Christ suffered in man's stead, and the human nature of the Son of God staggered under the terrible horror of the guilt of sin. . . . {7ABC 463.2}

The power that inflicted retributive justice upon man's substitute and surety, was the power that sustained and upheld the suffering One under the tremendous weight of wrath that would have fallen upon a sinful world. Christ was suffering the death that was pronounced upon the transgressors of God's law.--Manuscript 35, 1895. {7ABC 463.3}

What sustained the Son of God in His betrayal and trial? He saw of the travail of His soul and was satisfied. He caught a view of the expanse of eternity and saw the happiness of those who through His humiliation should receive pardon and everlasting life. He was wounded for their transgressions, bruised for their iniquities. The chastisement of their peace was upon Him, and with His stripes they were healed. His ear caught the shout of the redeemed. He heard the ransomed ones singing the song of Moses and the Lamb.--Testimonies, vol. 8, pp. 43, 44. {7ABC 463.4}

VI. Christ Both Sacrificial Offering and Officiating Priest

The infinite sufficiency of Christ is demonstrated by His bearing the sins of the whole world. He occupies the double position of offerer and of offering, of priest and of victim. He was holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate from sinners. "The prince of this world cometh," He declares, "and findeth nothing in Me." He was a Lamb without blemish, and without spot.--Letter 192, 1906. {7ABC 463.5}

As the high priest laid aside his gorgeous pontifical robes, and officiated in the white linen dress of a common priest, so Christ emptied Himself, and took the form of a servant, and offered the sacrifice, Himself the priest, Himself the victim.--The Southern Watchman, Aug. 6, 1903. {7ABC 463.6}
VII. The Cross Central in the Atonement

The cross must occupy the central place because it is the means of man's atonement and because of the influence it exerts on every part of the divine government.--Testimonies, vol. 6, p. 236. {7ABC 464.1}

The atonement of Christ is not a mere skillful way to have our sins pardoned; it is a divine remedy for the cure of transgression and the restoration of spiritual health. It is the heaven-ordained means by which the righteousness of Christ may be not only upon us, but in our hearts and characters.--Letter 406, 1906. {7ABC 464.2}

Without shedding of blood there is no remission for sin. He must suffer the agony of a public death on the cross, that witness of it might be borne without the shadow of a doubt.--Manuscript 101, 1897. {7ABC 464.3}

Adam listened to the words of the tempter, and yielding to his insinuations, fell into sin. Why was not the death penalty at once enforced in his case?--Because a ransom was found. God's only begotten Son volunteered to take the sin of man upon Himself, and to make an atonement for the fallen race. There could have been no pardon for sin had this atonement not been made. Had God pardoned Adam's sin without an atonement, sin would have been immortalized, and would have been perpetuated with a boldness that would have been without restraint.--The Review and Herald, April 23, 1901. {7ABC 464.4}

In the councils of heaven the cross was ordained as the means of atonement. This was to be God's means of winning men to Him. Christ came to this earth to show that in humanity He could keep the holy law of God.--Manuscript 165, 1899. {7ABC 464.5}

Christ gave Himself an atoning sacrifice for the saving of a lost world.--Testimonies, vol. 8, p. 208. {7ABC 464.6}

VIII. Atoning Provisions Embrace All Mankind

Christ's atonement includes the whole human family. No one, high or low, rich or poor, free or bond, has been left out of the plan of redemption.--Letter 106, 1900. {7ABC 464.7}

Christ suffered without the gates of Jerusalem, for Calvary was outside the city walls. This was to show that He died, not for the Hebrews alone, but for all mankind. He proclaims to a fallen world that He is their Redeemer, and urges them to accept the salvation He offers.--The Watchman, Sept. 4, 1906. {7ABC 464.8}

As the high priest sprinkled the warm blood upon the mercy-seat while the fragrant cloud of incense ascended before God, so, while we confess our sins and plead the efficacy of Christ's atoning blood, our prayers are to ascend to heaven, fragrant with the merits of our Saviour's character. Notwithstanding our unworthiness, we are to remember that there is One who can take away sin, and who is willing and anxious to save the sinner. With His own blood He paid the penalty for all wrong-doers.--The Review and Herald, Sept. 29, 1896. {7ABC 464.9}

Jesus refused [after the resurrection] to receive the homage of His people until He had the assurance that His sacrifice was accepted by the Father. He ascended to the heavenly courts, and from God Himself heard the assurance that His atonement for the sins of men had been ample, that through His blood all might gain eternal life.--The Desire of Ages, p. 790. {7ABC 465.1}

The sins of the people were transferred in figure to the officiating priest, who was a mediator for the people. The priest could not himself become an offering for sin, and make an atonement with his life, for he was also a sinner. Therefore, instead of suffering death himself, he killed a lamb without blemish; the penalty of sin was transferred to the innocent beast, which thus became his immediate substitute, and typified the perfect offering of Jesus Christ. Through the blood of this victim, man looked forward by faith to the blood of Christ which would atone for the sins of the world.--The Signs of the Times, March 14, 1878. {7ABC 465.2}

IX. Manifold Results of the Atonement

The atonement of Christ sealed forever the everlasting covenant of grace. It was the fulfilling of every condition upon which God suspended the free communication of grace to the human family. Every barrier was then broken down which intercepted the freest fulness of the exercise of grace, mercy, peace and love to the most guilty of Adam's race.--Manuscript 92, 1899. {7ABC 465.3}

In our behalf He died on the cross of Calvary. He has paid the price. Justice is satisfied. Those who believe in Christ, those who realize that they are sinners, and that as sinners they must confess their sins, will receive pardon full and free.--Letter 52, 1906. {7ABC 465.4}

By transgression man was severed from God, the communion between them was broken, but Jesus Christ died upon the cross of Calvary, bearing in His body the sins of the whole world; and the gulf between heaven and earth was bridged by that cross. Christ leads men to the gulf, and points to the bridge by which it is spanned, saying, "If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me." God gives us a probation in which we may prove whether or not we will be loyal to Him.--Manuscript 21, 1895. {7ABC 465.5}

The atoning sacrifice seen through faith brings peace and comfort and hope to the trembling soul weighed down beneath the sense of guilt. The law of God is the detector of sin, and as the sinner is drawn to the dying Christ, he sees the grievous character of sin, and repents and lays hold on the remedy, the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sin of the world.--The Review and Herald, Sept. 2, 1890. {7ABC 466.1}

Thus, through the crucifixion of Christ, human beings are reconciled to God. Christ adopts the outcasts, and they become His special care, members of the family of God, because they have accepted His Son as their Saviour. To them is given power to become the Sons of God, heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ. They gain an intelligent knowledge of what Christ is to them and of the blessings they may receive as members of the lord's family. And in His infinite condescension God is pleased to stand to them in the relation of Father.--Letter 255, 1904. {7ABC 466.2}

The world does not acknowledge that, at an infinite cost, Christ has purchased the human race. They do not acknowledge that by creation and by redemption He holds a just claim to every human being. But as the Redeemer of the fallen race, He has been given the deed of possession, which entitles Him to claim them as His property.--Letter 136, 1902. {7ABC 466.3}

Christ pledged Himself to become his substitute and surety, giving man a second trial. When man transgressed even the smallest precept of Jehovah, it was disobedience just the same as though the test were larger. But how is the grace, mercy, and love provided! The divinity of Christ undertook to bear the sins of the transgressor. This ransom is on solid ground; this pledged peace is for the heart that receives Jesus Christ. And in receiving Him by faith we are blessed with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ.--Manuscript 114, 1897. {7ABC 466.4}

Christ received His death wound, which was the trophy of His victory, and the victory of all who believe in Him. These wounds annihilated the power of Satan over every loyal, believing subject in Jesus Christ. By the suffering and death of Christ, human intelligences, fallen because of the sin of Adam, are through their acceptance of Christ and faith in Him, elevated to become heirs of immortality and an eternal weight of glory. The gates of the heavenly Paradise are thrown open to the inhabitants of this fallen world. Through faith in the righteousness of Christ, rebels against the law of God may lay hold upon the Infinite, and become partakers of everlasting life.--Letter 103, 1894. {7ABC 466.5}

"And I, if I be lifted up, will draw all men unto me. This he said, signifying what death he should die." This is the crisis of the world. If I become the propitiation for the world, it will be lighted up. The defaced image of God would be reproduced and restored, and a family of believing saints will finally inhabit the heavenly home. This is the result of the crucifixion of Christ and the restoration of the world.--Manuscript 33, 1897. {7ABC 467.1}

Our ransom has been paid by our Saviour. No one need be enslaved by Satan. Christ stands before us as our divine example, our all powerful Helper. We have been bought with a price that it is impossible to compute. Who can measure the goodness and mercy of redeeming love?--Manuscript 76, 1903. {7ABC 467.2}

God testified to the great work of atonement in reconciling the world to Himself, by giving Christ's followers a true understanding of the kingdom which He was establishing upon the earth, the foundation of which His own hand had laid. {7ABC 467.3}

The Father gave all honor to His Son, seating Him at His right hand, far above all principalities and power. He expressed His great joy and delight in receiving the Crucified One, and crowning Him with glory and honor. And all the favors He has shown to His Son in His acceptance of the great atonement are shown to His people. Those who have united their interests in love with Christ are accepted in the Beloved. They suffer with Christ, and His glorification is of great interest to them, because they are accepted in Him. God loves them as he loves his Son.--The Signs of the Times, Aug. 16, 1899. {7ABC 467.4}

X. Righteousness Provided Through Atonement

It was evident to him that the law did not abate one jot of its justice, but through the atoning sacrifice, through the imputed righteousness of Christ, the repentant sinner stands justified before the law. {7ABC 467.5}

Christ bore the penalty that would have fallen upon the transgressor; and through faith the helpless, hopeless sinner becomes a partaker of the divine nature, escaping the corruption that is in the world through lust. Christ imputes His perfection and righteousness to the believing sinner when he does not continue in sin, but turns from transgression to obedience of the commandments.-- The Review and Herald, May 23, 1899. {7ABC 467.6}

The only One who could with hope approach God in humanity was the only begotten Son of God. That sinful, repentant human beings might be received by the Father, and clothed with the robe of righteousness, Christ came to the earth, and made an offering of such value that he redeemed the race. Through the sacrifice made on Calvary is offered to everyone the sanctification of grace. --Letter 67, 1902. {7ABC 468.1}

It is only through faith in Christ that sinners may have the righteousness of Christ imputed unto them, and that they may be "made the righteousness of God in him." Our sins were laid on Christ, punished in Christ, put away by Christ, in order that his righteousness might be imputed to us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. Although sin was charged to His account on our behalf, yet He remained perfectly sinless.--The Signs of the Times, May 30, 1895. {7ABC 468.2}

The Lord made a full and complete sacrifice upon the cross, the shameful cross, that men might be complete in the great and precious gift of His righteousness. We have God's pledge that He will bind men closely to His great heart of infinite love in the bonds of the new covenant of grace. All who will give up their hope of paying for their salvation, or earning it, and will come to Jesus just as they are, unworthy, sinful, and fall upon His merits, holding in their plea the pledged word of God to pardon the transgressor of His law, confessing their sins and seeking pardon, will find full and free salvation.--Letter 148, 1897. {7ABC 468.3}

XI. Redemptive Price Completely Paid on Calvary

The ransom paid by Christ--the atonement on the cross--is ever before them.--Testimonies, vol. 5, p. 190. {7ABC 468.4}

On the cross of Calvary He paid the redemption price of the race. And thus He gained the right to rescue the captives from the grasp of the great deceiver, who by a lie framed against the government of God, caused the fall of man, and who thus forfeited all claim to be called a loyal subject of God's kingdom. {7ABC 468.5}

Satan refused to let his captives go. He held them as his subjects because of their belief of his lie. He had thus become their jailor. But he had no right to demand that a price be paid for them; because he had not obtained possession of them by lawful conquest, but under false pretense. {7ABC 468.6}

God, being the creditor, had a right to make any provision for the redemption of human beings. Justice demanded that a certain price be paid. The Son of God was the only One who could pay
this price.
He volunteered to come to this earth and pass over the ground where Adam fell. He came as the redeemer of the lost race, to conquer the wily foe, and by His steadfast allegiance to right, to save all who should accept Him as their Saviour.--Letter 20, 1903. {7ABC 468.7}

Christ alone could bear the message of man's deliverance. He came with a full and complete ransom. He came to bring life and immortality within the reach of the fallen race. As the Life-giver, He assumed our nature, that He might reveal the character of God, and stamp His image on all who would receive Him. He became man that through His infinite sacrifice God might receive the homage of the restored race. . . . The science of redemption is as high as heaven, and its value is infinite. This truth is so broad, so deep, so high, that beside it all the wisdom of earth's wisest men sinks into insignificance. In comparison with the knowledge of God, all human knowledge is as chaff. And the way of salvation can be made known only by God.--Manuscript 69, 1897. {7ABC 469.1}

All that God and Christ could do has been done to save sinners. Transgression placed the whole world in jeopardy, under the death sentence. But in heaven there was heard a voice saying, I have found a ransom. Jesus Christ, who knew no sin, was made sin for fallen man. "God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." Christ gave Himself as a ransom. He laid off His royal robe. He laid aside His kingly crown, and stepped down from His high command over all heaven, clothing His divinity with humanity that He might carry all the infirmities and bear all the temptations of humanity.--Letter 22, 1900. {7ABC 469.2}

XII. Justice and Mercy Blend at Cross

Justice and Mercy stood apart, in opposition to each other, separated by a wide gulf. The Lord our Redeemer clothed His divinity with humanity, and wrought out in behalf of man a character that was without spot or blemish. He planted His cross midway between heaven and earth, and made it the object of attraction which reached both ways, drawing both Justice and Mercy across the gulf. Justice moved from its exalted throne, and with all the armies of heaven approached the cross. There it saw One equal with God bearing the penalty for all injustice and sin. With perfect satisfaction Justice bowed in reverence at the cross, saying, It is enough.--General Conference Bulletin, Fourth Quarter, 1899, vol. 3, p. 102. {7ABC 469.3}

Christ's death proved God's administration and government to be without a flaw. Satan's charge in regard to the conflicting attributes of justice and mercy was forever settled beyond question. Every voice in heaven and out of heaven will one day testify to the justice, mercy, and exalted attributes of God. It was in order that the heavenly universe might see the conditions of the covenant of redemption that Christ bore the penalty in behalf of the human race.--Manuscript 128, 1897. {7ABC 470.1}

His [Christ's] object was to reconcile the prerogatives of justice and mercy, and let each stand separate in its dignity, yet united. His mercy was not weakness, but a terrible power to punish sin because it is sin; yet a power to draw to it the love of humanity. Through Christ Justice is enabled to forgive without sacrificing one jot of its exalted holiness.--General Conference Bulletin, Fourth Quarter, 1899, vol. 3, p. 102. {7ABC 470.2}

Justice demands that sin be not merely pardoned, but the death penalty must be executed. God, in the gift of His only begotten Son, met both these requirements. By dying in man's stead, Christ exhausted the penalty and provided a pardon.--Manuscript 50, 1900. {7ABC 470.3}

God bowed His head satisfied. Now justice and mercy could blend. Now He could be just, and yet the Justifier of all who should believe on Christ. He [God] looked upon the victim expiring on the cross, and said, "It is finished. The human race shall have another trial." The redemption price was paid, and Satan fell like lightning from heaven.
--Youth's Instructor, June 21, 1900. {7ABC 470.4}

The only-begotten Son of God took upon Him the nature of man, and established His cross between earth and heaven. Through the cross, man was drawn to God, and God to man. Justice moved from its high and awful position, and the heavenly hosts, the armies of holiness, drew near to the cross, bowing with reverence; for at the cross justice was satisfied. Through the cross the sinner was drawn from the stronghold of sin, from the confederacy of evil, and at every approach to the cross his heart relents and in penitence he cries, "It was my sins that crucified the Son of God." At the cross he leaves his sins, and through the grace of Christ His character is transformed. The Redeemer raises the sinner from the dust, and places him under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.--The Signs of the Times, June 5, 1893.

(471) {7ABC 470.5}
XIII. Atonement Vindicates God's Changeless Law

The cross speaks to the hosts of heaven, to worlds unfallen, and to the fallen world, the value which God has placed upon men, and of His great love wherewith He has loved us. It testifies to the world, to angels, and to men, the immutability of the divine law. The death of God's only begotten Son upon the cross in the sinner's behalf is the unanswerable argument as to the changeless character of the law of Jehovah.--The Review and Herald, May 23, 1899. {7ABC 471.1}

The cross of Christ testifies to the sinner that the law is not changed to meet the sinner in his sins, but that Christ has made an offering of Himself that the transgressors of the law might have an opportunity to repent. As Christ bore the sins of every transgressor so the sinner who will not believe in Christ as his personal Saviour, who rejects the light that comes to him, and refuses to respect and obey the commandments of God, will bear the penalty of his transgression.--Manuscript 133, 1897. {7ABC 471.2}

The death of Christ was to be the convincing, everlasting argument that the law of God is as unchangeable as His throne. The agonies of the garden of Gethsemane, the insult, the mockery, the abuse heaped upon God's dear Son, the horrors and ignominy of the crucifixion, furnish sufficient and thrilling demonstration that God's justice, when it punishes, does the work thoroughly. The fact that His own Son, the Surety for man, was not spared, is an argument that will stand to all eternity before saint and sinner, before the universe of God, to testify that He will not excuse the transgressor of His law.--Manuscript 58, 1897. {7ABC 471.3}

Satan is continuing the work on earth that he commenced in heaven. He leads men to transgress the commandments of God. The plain "Thus saith the Lord" is put aside for the "thus saith" of men. The whole world needs to be instructed in the oracles of God, to understand the object of the atonement, the at-one-ment, with God. The object of this atonement was that the divine law and government might be maintained. The sinner is pardoned through repentance toward God and faith in our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. There is forgiveness of sin, and yet the law of God stands immutable, eternal as His throne. There is no such thing as weakening or strengthening the law of Jehovah. As it has always been, so it is. It cannot be repealed or changed in one principle. It is eternal, immutable as God Himself.--Manuscript 163, 1897. {7ABC 471.4}

Satan endeavored to keep hidden from the world the great atoning sacrifice which reveals the law in all its sacred dignity, and impresses hearts with the force of its binding claims. He was warring against the work of Christ, and united all his evil angels with human instrumentalities in opposition to that work. But while he was carrying on this work, heavenly intelligences were combining with human instrumentalities in the work of restoration. The cross stands as the great center of the world, bearing a certain testimony that the cross of Christ will be the condemnation of every transgressor of the law of God. Here are the two great powers, the power of truth and righteousness and the working of Satan to make of none effect the law of God.--Manuscript 61, 1899. {7ABC 472.1}

The death of Christ removes every argument that Satan could bring against the precepts of Jehovah. Satan has declared that men could not enter the kingdom of heaven unless the law was abolished, and a way devised by which transgressors could be reinstated into the favor of God, and made heirs of heaven. He made the claim that the law must be changed, that the reins of government must be slackened in heaven, that sin must be tolerated, and sinners pitied and saved in their sins. But every such plea was cast aside when Christ died as a substitute for the sinner. --The Signs of the Times, May 21, 1912. {7ABC 472.2}

XIV. Atonement Result of Divine Love

The atonement of Christ was not made in order to induce God to love those whom He otherwise hated; and it was not made to produce a love that was not in existence; but it was made as a manifestation of the love that was already in God's heart, an exponent of the divine favor in the sight of heavenly intelligences, in the sight of worlds unfallen, and in the sight of a fallen race. . . . We are not to entertain the idea that God loves us because Christ has died for us, but that He so loved us that He gave His only-begotten Son to die for us.--The Signs of the Times, May 30, 1893. {7ABC 472.3}

As the Saviour is lifted up before the people, they will see His humiliation, His self-denial, His self-sacrifice, His goodness, His tender compassion, His sufferings to save fallen man, and will realize that the atonement of Christ was not the cause of God's love, but the result of that love. Jesus died because God loved the world. --The Review and Herald, Sept. 2, 1890. {7ABC 472.4}

The Father loves us, not because of the great propitiation, but He provided the propitiation because He loves us. Christ was the medium through which He could pour out His infinite love upon a fallen world. "God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself." God suffered with His Son, in the agony of Gethsemane, the death of Calvary; the heart of Infinite Love paid the price of our redemption--The Home Missionary, April, 1893. {7ABC 472.5}

XV. Atoning Provision Greater Than Man's Need

Justice demanded the sufferings of a man. Christ, equal with God, gave the sufferings of a God. He needed no atonement. His suffering was not for any sin He had committed; it was for man --all for man; and His free pardon is accessible to all. The suffering of Christ was in correspondence with His spotless purity; His depth of agony, proportionate to the dignity and grandeur of His character. Never can we comprehend the intense anguish of the spotless Lamb of God, until we realize how deep is the pit from which we have been rescued, how grievous is the sin of which mankind is guilty, and by faith grasp the full and entire pardon.--The Review and Herald, Sept. 21, 1886. {7ABC 473.1}

The divine Son of God was the only sacrifice of sufficient value to fully satisfy the claims of God's perfect law. The angels were sinless, but of less value than the law of God. They were amenable to law. They were messengers to do the will of Christ, and before Him to bow. They were created beings, and probationers. Upon Christ no requirements were laid. He had power to lay down His life, and to take it again. No obligation was laid upon Him to undertake the work of atonement. It was a voluntary sacrifice that He made. His life was of sufficient value to rescue man from his fallen condition.--The Review and Herald, Dec. 17, 1872. {7ABC 473.2}

The work of God's dear Son in undertaking to link the created with the Uncreated, the finite with the Infinite, in His own divine person, is a subject that may well employ our thoughts for a lifetime. This work of Christ was to confirm the beings of other worlds in their innocency and loyalty, as well as to save the lost and perishing of this world. He opened a way for the disobedient to return to their allegiance to God, while by the same act He placed a safeguard around those who were already pure, that they might not become polluted.--The Review and Herald, Jan. 11, 1881. {7ABC 473.3}

XVI. Typical Sacrifices Prefigure Lamb of God

The sacrificial offerings, and the priesthood of the Jewish system, were instituted to represent the death and mediatorial work of Christ. All those ceremonies had no meaning, and no virtue, only as they related to Christ, who was Himself the foundation of, and who brought into existence, the entire system. The Lord had made known to Adam, Abel, Seth, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, and the ancient worthies, especially Moses, that the ceremonial system of sacrifices and the priesthood, of themselves, were not sufficient to secure the salvation of one soul. {7ABC 474.1}

The system of sacrificial offerings pointed to Christ. Through these, the ancient worthies saw Christ, and believed in Him.-- The Review and Herald, Dec. 17, 1872. {7ABC 474.2}

Christ, in counsel with His Father, instituted the system of sacrificial offerings; that death, instead of being immediately visited upon the transgressor, should be transferred to a victim which should prefigure the great and perfect offering of the Son of God. {7ABC 474.3}

The sins of the people were transferred in figure to the officiating priest, who was a mediator for the people. The priest could not himself become an offering for sin, and make an atonement with his life, for he was also a sinner. Therefore, instead of suffering death himself, he killed a lamb without blemish; the penalty of sin was transferred to the innocent beast, which thus became his immediate substitute, and typified the perfect offering of Jesus Christ. Through the blood of this victim, man looked forward by faith to the blood of Christ which would atone for the sins of the world.--The Signs of the Times, March 14, 1878. {7ABC 474.4}

The great truth that was to be kept before men, and imprinted upon mind and heart, was this, "Without shedding of blood is no remission." In every bleeding sacrifice was typified "the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." Christ Himself was the originator of the Jewish system of worship, in which, by types and symbols, were shadowed forth spiritual and heavenly things. Many forgot the true significance of these offerings; and the great truth that through Christ alone there is forgiveness of sin, was lost to them. The multiplying of sacrificial offerings, the blood of bulls and goats, could not take away sin.-- The Signs of the Times, Jan. 2, 1893. {7ABC 474.5}

The great lesson embodied in the sacrifice of every bleeding victim, impressed in every ceremony, inculcated by God Himself was that through the blood of Christ alone is forgiveness of sins; yet how many carry the galling yoke and how few feel the force of this truth and act upon it, personally, and derive the blessings they might through a perfect faith in the blood of the Lamb of God, realizing that through Him only is forgiveness of sins, believing that when repented of He forgives them, whether great or small. O! What a blessed Saviour!--Letter 12, 1892. {7ABC 474.6}

By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain. . . . Through the shed blood he looked forward to the future sacrifice, Christ dying on the cross of Calvary; and trusting in the atonement that was there to be made, he had witness that he was righteous, and his offering accepted.--Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 72. {7ABC 475.1}

XVII. The Cross Gave Death Stroke to Satan

He [Christ] died on the cross to give the death-stroke to Satan, and to take away the sin of every believing soul.--Manuscript 61, 1903. {7ABC 475.2}

What right had Christ to take the captives out of the enemy's hands? The right of having made a sacrifice that satisfies the principles of justice by which the kingdom of heaven is governed. He came to this earth as the Redeemer of the lost race, to conquer the wily foe, and, by His steadfast allegiance to right, to save all who accept Him as their Saviour. On the cross of Calvary He paid the redemption price of the race. And thus He gained the right to take the captives from the grasp of the great deceiver, who, by a lie, framed against the government of God, caused the fall of man, and thus forfeited all claim to be called a loyal subject of God's glorious everlasting kingdom.--The Signs of the Times, Sept. 30, 1903. {7ABC 475.3}

Christ on the cross not only draws men to repentance toward God for the transgression of His law--for whom God pardons He first makes penitent--but Christ has satisfied justice; He has proffered Himself as an atonement. His gushing blood, His broken body satisfy the claims of the broken law, and thus He bridges the gulf which sin has made. He suffered in the flesh that with His bruised and broken body He might cover the defenseless sinner. The victory gained at His death on Calvary broke forever the accusing power of Satan over the universe and silenced his charges that self-denial was impossible with God and therefore not essential in the human family.--Manuscript 50, 1900. {7ABC 475.4}

He [Christ] planted His cross midway between heaven and earth, that He might wrestle with and overcome the powers of darkness. He gave His life for the life of sinners, and Satan, the prince of the world, was cast out.--Manuscript 44, 1901. {7ABC 475.5}

Soon was to be offered the great Sacrifice to which all the Jewish offerings pointed. When with the cross before Him, the Saviour uttered the sublime prediction, "Now shall the prince of this world be cast out. And I, if I be lifted up, shall draw all men unto me," He saw that the great apostate, who had been expelled from heaven, was the central power in the earth. Looking for Satan's throne, He found it set up where God's should have been. He saw all men worshiping the apostate, who inspired them with rebellion. The inhabitants of this world had prostrated themselves at Satan's feet. Christ declared, Where stands Satan's throne, there shall stand My cross, the instrument of humiliation and suffering.--Manuscript 165, 1899. {7ABC 476.1}

Christ was crucified, but in wondrous power and glory He rose from the tomb. He took in His grasp the world over which Satan claimed to preside, and restored the human race to favor with God. And at this glorious completion of His work, songs of triumph echoed and re-echoed through the unfallen worlds. Angel and archangel, cherubim and seraphim, joined in the chorus of victory.--The Youth's Instructor, April 16, 1903. {7ABC 476.2}

XVIII. Atonement Never to Be Repeated

The death of Christ upon the cross made sure the destruction of him who has the power of death, who was the originator of sin. When Satan is destroyed, there will be none to tempt to evil; the atonement will never need to be repeated; and there will be no danger of another rebellion in the universe of God. That which alone can effectually restrain from sin in this world of darkness, will prevent sin in heaven. The significance of the death of Christ will be seen by saints and angels. Fallen men could not have a home in the paradise of God without the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. Shall we not then exalt the cross of Christ?--The Signs of the Times, Dec. 30, 1889. {7ABC 476.3}

Part II--High-Priestly Application of Atoning
Sacrifice

I. Ministers the Benefits of Complete Atoning Sacrifice

These are our themes--Christ crucified for our sins, Christ risen from the dead, Christ our intercessor before God; and closely connected with these is the office work of the Holy Spirit.-- Evangelism, p. 187. {7ABC 476.4}

The great Sacrifice had been offered and had been accepted, and the Holy Spirit which descended on the day of Pentecost carried the minds of the disciples from the earthly sanctuary to the heavenly, where Jesus had entered by His own blood, to shed upon His disciples the benefits of His atonement.--Early Writings, p. 260. {7ABC 477.1}

Our Saviour is in the sanctuary pleading in our behalf. He is our interceding High Priest, making an atoning sacrifice for us, pleading in our behalf the efficacy of His blood.--Fundamentals of Christian Education, p. 370. {7ABC 477.2}

Every one who will break from the slavery and service of Satan, and will stand under the blood-stained banner of Prince Immanuel, will be kept by Christ's intercessions. Christ, as our Mediator, at the right hand of the Father, ever keeps us in view, for it is as necessary that He should keep us by His intercessions as that He should redeem us with His blood. If He lets go His hold of us for one moment, Satan stands ready to destroy. Those purchased by His blood, He now keeps by His intercession.-- Manuscript 73, 1893. {7ABC 477.3}

Thank God that He who spilled His blood for us, lives to plead it, lives to make intercession for every soul who receives Him. . . . We need to keep ever before us the efficacy of the blood of Jesus. That life-cleansing, life-sustaining blood, appropriated by living faith, is our hope. We need to grow in appreciation of its inestimable value, for it speaks for us only as we by faith claim its virtue, keeping the conscience clean and at peace with God. {7ABC 477.4}

This is represented as the pardoning blood, inseparably connected with the resurrection and life of our Redeemer, illustrated by the ever-flowing stream that proceeds from the throne of God, the water of the river of life.--Letter 87, 1894. {7ABC 477.5}

Christ died to make an atoning sacrifice for our sins. At the father's right hand He is interceding for us as our High Priest. By the sacrifice of His life He purchased redemption for us. His atonement is effectual for every one who will humble himself, and receive Christ as his example in all things. If the Saviour had not given His life as a propitiation for our sins, the whole human family would have perished. They would have had no right to heaven. It is through His intercession that we, through faith, repentance, and conversion, are enabled to become partakers of the divine nature, and thus escape the corruption that is in the world through lust.--Manuscript 29, 1906. {7ABC 477.6}

(stopped paragraph spacing here)

This prayer [of John 17] is a lesson regarding the intercession that the Saviour would carry on within the veil, when His great sacrifice in behalf of men, the offering of Himself, should have been completed. Our Mediator gave His disciples this illustration of His ministration in the heavenly sanctuary in behalf of all who will come to Him in meekness and humility, emptied of all selfishness, and believing in His power to save.--Manuscript 29, 1906 (SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 5, p. 1145). {7ABC 478.1}
II. Ministry Applies and Completes Transaction of Cross

The intercession of Christ in man's behalf in the sanctuary above is as essential to the plan of salvation as was His death upon the cross. By His death He began that work which after His resurrection He ascended to complete in heaven. We must by faith enter within the veil, "whither the forerunner is for us entered." Hebrews 6:20. There the light from the cross of Calvary is reflected. There we may gain a clearer insight into the mysteries of redemption.--The Great Controversy, p. 489. {7ABC 478.2}
Christ's words on the mountainside were the announcement that His sacrifice in behalf of man was full and complete. The conditions of the atonement had been fulfilled; the work for which He came to this world had been accomplished. He had won the kingdom. He had wrested it from Satan, and had become heir of all things. He was on His way to the throne of God, to be honored by angels, principalities, and powers. He had entered upon His mediatorial work. Clothed with boundless authority, He gave His commission to the disciples, "Go ye therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world."--Manuscript 138, 1897. {7ABC 478.3}
Thank God that He who spilled His blood for us, lives to plead it, lives to make intercession for every soul who receives Him. "If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." The blood of Jesus Christ cleanses us from all sin. It speaketh better things

(479)

than the blood of Abel, for Christ ever liveth to make intercession for us. We need to keep ever before us the efficacy of the blood of Jesus.--Letter 87, 1894. {7ABC 478.4}
Jesus stands before the Father, continually offering a sacrifice for the sins of the world. He is the minister of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man. The typical offerings of the Jewish tabernacle no longer possess any virtue. A daily and yearly atonement is no longer necessary. But because of the continual commission of sin, the atoning sacrifice of a heavenly Mediator is essential. Jesus, our great high priest, officiates for us in the presence of God, offering in our behalf His shed blood.-- The Youth's Instructor, April 16, 1903. {7ABC 479.1}
By His spotless life, His obedience, His death on the cross of Calvary, Christ interceded for the lost race. And now, not as a mere petitioner does the Captain of our salvation intercede for us, but as a conqueror claiming His victory. His offering is complete, and as our intercessor He executes His self-appointed work, holding before God the censer containing His own spotless merits and the prayers, confessions, and thanksgiving of His people. Perfumed with the fragrance of His righteousness, these ascend to God as a sweet savor. The offering is wholly acceptable, and pardon covers all transgression. To the true believer Christ is indeed the minister of the sanctuary, officiating for him in the sanctuary, and speaking through God's appointed agencies.--The Signs of the Times, Feb. 14, 1900. {7ABC 479.2}
In the courts above, Christ is pleading for His church-- pleading for those for whom He has paid the redemption price of His blood. Centuries, ages, can never lessen the efficacy of His atoning sacrifice. Neither life nor death, height nor depth, can separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus; not because we hold Him so firmly, but because He holds us so fast.--The Acts of the Apostles, pp. 552, 553. {7ABC 479.3}
Jesus is our great High Priest in heaven. And what is He doing?--He is making intercession and atonement for His people who believe in Him.--Testimonies to Ministers, p. 37. {7ABC 479.4}
God is approached through Jesus Christ, the Mediator, the only way through which He forgives sins. God cannot forgive sins at the expense of His justice, His holiness, and His truth. But He does forgive sins and that fully. There are no sins He will not forgive in and through the Lord Jesus Christ. This is the sinner's only hope, and if he rests here in sincere faith, he is sure of

(480)

pardon and that full and free. There is only one channel and that is accessible to all, and through that channel a rich and abundant forgiveness awaits the penitent, contrite soul and the darkest sins are forgiven. {7ABC 479.5}
These lessons were taught to the chosen people of God thousands of years ago; repeated in various symbols and figures that the work of truth might be riveted in every heart, that without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins.--Letter 12, 1892. {7ABC 480.1}
Christ died for us, and receiving His perfection, we are entitled to heaven. To all who believe in Him, He gives power to become the sons of God. Because He lives, we shall live also. He is our Advocate in the courts above. This is our only hope.-- Manuscript 29, 1906. {7ABC 480.2}
By pledging His own life, Christ has made Himself responsible for every man and woman on the earth. He stands in the presence of God, saying, Father, I take upon Myself the guilt of that soul. It means death to him if he is left to bear it. If he repents, he shall be forgiven. My blood shall cleanse him from all sin. I gave My life for the sins of the world. {7ABC 480.3}
If the transgressor of God's law will see in Christ his atoning sacrifice, if he will believe in Him who can cleanse from all unrighteousness, Christ will not have died for him in vain.--The Review and Herald, Feb. 27, 1900. {7ABC 480.4}
"In all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God [mark the words], to make reconciliation for the sins of the people," through the atonement. The repenting sinner is to believe in Christ as his personal Saviour. This is his only hope. He may lay hold on the merits of the blood of Christ, presenting to God the crucified and risen Saviour as his worthiness. Thus through Christ's offering of Himself, the innocent for the guilty, every obstruction is removed, and the pardoning love of God flows forth in rich streams of mercy to fallen man.-- Letter 91, 1895. {7ABC 480.5}
As we acknowledge before God our appreciation of Christ's merits, fragrance is given to our intercessions. Oh, who can value this great mercy and love. As we approach God through the virtue of Christ's merits, we are clothed with His priestly vestments. He places us close by His side, encircling us with His human arm, while with His divine arm He grasps the throne of the Infinite. He puts His merits, as sweet incense, in a censer in their

(481)

hands, in order to encourage their petitions. He promises to hear and answer their supplications.--Letter 22, 1898. {7ABC 480.6}
Today He [Christ] is making an atonement for us before the Father. "If any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous." Pointing to the palms of His hands, pierced by the fury and prejudice of wicked men, He says of us, "I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands" [Isa. 49:16]. The Father bows in recognition of the price paid for humanity, and the angels approach the cross of Calvary with reverence. What a sacrifice is this! Who can fathom it! It will take the whole of eternity for man to understand the plan of redemption. It will open to him line upon line, here a little and there a little.-- Manuscript 21, 1895. {7ABC 481.1}
III. Christ Ministering in Heavenly Sanctuary

We are in the great day of atonement, and the sacred work of Christ for the people of God that is going on at the present time [1882] in the heavenly sanctuary, should be our constant study. --Testimonies, vol. 5, p. 520. {7ABC 481.2}
O that all could behold our precious Saviour as He is, a Saviour. Let His hand draw aside the veil which conceals His glory from our eyes. It shows Him in His high and holy place. What do we see? Our Saviour, not in a position of silence and inactivity. He is surrounded with heavenly intelligences, cherubims and seraphims, ten thousand times ten thousand of angels. All these heavenly beings have one object above all others, in which they are intensely interested,--His church in a world of corruption.--Letter 89c, 1897. {7ABC 481.3}
He is in His holy place, not in a state of solitude and grandeur, but surrounded by ten thousand times ten thousand of heavenly beings who wait to do their Master's bidding. And He bids them go and work for the weakest saint who puts his trust in God. High and low, rich and poor, have the same help provided. --Letter 134, 1899. {7ABC 481.4}
Do not place your influence against God's commandments. That law is just as Jehovah wrote it in the temple of heaven. Man may trample upon its copy here below, but the original is kept in the ark of God in heaven; and on the cover of this ark, right above that law, is the mercy seat. Jesus stands right there before that ark to mediate for man.--Manuscript 6a, 1886 (SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 1, p. 1109).

(482) {7ABC 481.5}
We all need to keep the subject of the sanctuary in mind. God forbid that the clatter of words coming from human lips should lessen the belief of our people in the truth that there is a sanctuary in heaven, and that a pattern of this sanctuary was once built on this earth. God desires His people to become familiar with this pattern, keeping ever before their minds the heavenly sanctuary, where God is all and in all.--Letter 233, 1904. {7ABC 482.1}
Jesus is our advocate, our High Priest, our Intercessor. Our position is like that of the Israelites on the Day of Atonement. When the High Priest entered the most holy place, representing the place where our High Priest is now pleading, and sprinkled the atoning blood upon the mercy seat, no propitiatory sacrifices were offered without. While the priest was interceding with God, every heart was to be bowed in contrition, pleading for the pardon of transgression.--The Signs of the Times, June 28, 1899. {7ABC 482.2}
IV. Second Phase of Priesthood Embraces Judgment

He fulfilled one phase of His priesthood by dying on th
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/09/02 08:23 PM

Thanks so much Ed. I've read a sampling, and I plan to read it all carefully. As I read her statements I was impressed again that Ellen White knew God like no other modern writer.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/10/02 07:53 PM

John asked: "Where in the scriptures does it say that the Saviour died the 'second death'?"

John, I believe Jesus "tasted" (Heb 2:9) the second death when He consumed the cup of trembling on Calvary. I don't think He died the second death. I believe He conquered sin and the second death for all mankind. He is now the lawful owner of sin and the keys of hell and of death.

The sanctuary message makes it very clear that Satan, the scapegoat, dies the second death in the lake of fire with the sins of the saved at the end of the millennium. Jesus, the Lord's goat, does not die the second death.

Jesus tasted, consumed and conquered the second death, therefore, He earned the right to own our sin and second death. As lawful owner it is His responsibility to eliminate them at the end of time. But if Jesus had died the second death it is already eliminated and Satan would not die with the sins of the saved. He would die with only his sins.

Because Jesus drained the dregs of the cup, born again believers do not have to pay the second death penalty for their own sins and guilt. That's why Adam and Eve did not die the second death the very moment they ate the forbidden fruit. Jesus isolated the consequences and penalty of sin within Himself by drinking the cup. He did not die the second death, rather He quarantined it within Himself.

What do you think?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/10/02 09:22 PM

Mark,

I think you really missed the point about ga'al. Ga'al is a term based in the legal system of the Hebrews. It is also based upon the principle of one person being able to pay a debt for a relative, and redeem that person from the obligation of a debt that he/she could not pay. This tieing of the Redeemer of Isreal to a legal principle of redemption, or paying a debt that the debtor could not pay, shows that we do have a legal debt. One that we cannot pay ourselves. Thus anything at all that denies that Jesus, our Kinsman-Redeemer(ga'al), paid a legal debt for us, denies clear scriptural evidence to the contrary.

The Passover, while an excellent example of how God works is not a legal principle, but an institution, a ceremony to remind of how God has passed over our sins when we claim the blood of Jesus.

I'm not putting down the Passover in way, shape, or form, but am saying that ga'al is clear evidence of payment of a legal debt.
Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/11/02 02:01 AM

I would like to submit the following quote for your consideration, what death did Jesus die?

Bible Training School--- 09-01-15---Gethsemane

In the garden of Gethsemane Christ suffered in man's stead, and the human nature of the Son of God staggered under the terrible horror of the
guilt of sin, until from His pale and quivering lips was forced the agonizing cry, "O My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from Me:" but if there be no other way by which the salvation of man may be accomplished, then "not as I will, but as Thou wilt." Human nature would then and there have died under the horror of the sense of sin, had not an angel from heaven
strengthened Him to bear the agony. The power that inflicted retributive justice upon man's substitute and surety, was the power that sustained and upheld the suffering One under the tremendous weight of wrath that would have fallen upon a sinful world. Christ was suffering the death that was pronounced upon the transgressors of God's law.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/11/02 04:00 AM

Can't get much clearer than that, Charlene.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/11/02 06:28 AM

Daryl and Charlene, please note what the quote says and doesn't say: "Christ was suffering the death that was pronounced upon the transgressors of God's law."

Drinking the cup of trembling was indeed painful and caused superhuman suffering. But please notice that the quote does not say that Jesus died the second death. If Jesus had died the second death there would have been no resurrection on Sunday morning.

Also, please explain why the Scapegoat dies the second death and not the Lord's goat.
Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/11/02 03:15 PM

1Jo 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin [is] death; but the gift of God [is] eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Mike, It seems clear form these texts what the outcome was/will be...Deity does not die, Jesus being fully God and fully man with sinful nature humanity......His sinful human nature and the sins of all humanity [wages] experienced the second death according to the scriptures and the quote by SOP. His resurrection is our assurance that when our sinful nature is crucified, and we drink the cup that He asks us to drink, we will in His strength raise from our grave to eternal life.

What was the wage that had to be paid? Eternal death. Who paid it? Jesus, A willing victim, because of our transgressions
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/11/02 05:59 PM

Charlene, I'm sorry, but I don't find in the Bible or the SOP where Jesus died the second death. It clear that He suffered tasting and conquering the second death by drinking the cup of God's wrath, but nowhere does it say that He died the second death.

Please show me a plain statement in the Bible or the SOP where it says Jesus died the second death. It just doesn't exist.

On the cross Jesus was still very much alive when He cried, "It is finished." John 19:30. What He came to accomplish for us in the outer court, while a man on earth, was finished BEFORE He died. He conquered the second death before He died the first death. Death is defeat, not victory. The suffering of the second death is what separates it from the first death. The suffering of the second death is the wages of sin, death itself is relief from the suffering. And Jesus survived this suffering and lived to declare, It is finished. He defeated the second death, not the other way round.

If Jesus had died the second death, then upon His resurrection (which, according to the Bible is not possible) the great controversy would have ended then and there. Nothing further would have been required of Him as our Saviour - no work in the holy place, and no work in the most holy place. For, in the lake of fire, where the second death happens, sin is eliminated.

If Jesus had died the second death, instead of consuming it completely, then death would have been the winner on the cross. How much more was left over if Jesus died before the cup was empty? But if He emptied the cup before He died, then He defeated the second death. And His journey in and out of the tomb of the first death was merely to demonstrate His ownership of the keys of hell and of death, which He used to enter and exit the grave.

To conquer and to defeat the second death on the cross accomplishes more for our salvation than to succomb to it. There can be no question as to whether or not Jesus defeated the second death on the cross since He was alive after He won. Now that He is the lawful owner of our sin and second death, it is His responsibility to eliminate them in the lake of fire at the end of time. This He will do by transferring them upon the head of Satan, the scapegoat. It is the Devil that dies the second, eternal death with our sin, not Jesus.

I realize that people who resist this understanding of the second death are concerned that if Jesus did not die the second death then He cannot be our Saviour. But the furthest thing is the truth. Because Jesus conquered, consumed and defeated the second death on the cross of Calvary is precisely what makes Him our dear, precious Saviour. By draining the entire cup of wrath there was nothing left over for us to drink. He had to be alive in order to drain the cup, and by living through the entire experience He proved to be victorious, not defeated.

Charlene, please answer my question about the Scapegoat, the Lord's goat, and the second death.

[ September 11, 2002, 12:11 PM: Message edited by: Mike Lowe ]
Posted By: Garywk

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/11/02 08:56 PM

Mike,

quote:
Heb 9:22 And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.
quote:
Gal 3:13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
So, without a death there is no remission of sins. Jesus was made a curse for us. So, what penalty did Jesus suffer for us then? We all pay the penalty of the first death, Christian or no. So, if Jesus died the first death, what meaning does it have. It appears to have no efficaciousness at all. His death is not saving us from the first death. We are all paying that penalty. The only real penalty that we have left is the second death. That is the only penalty--debt--we owe that we cannot pay.

Since Jesus is our Kinsman-Redeemer, who paid the debt we cannot pay, how did He pay it? How did His dying the first death pay--fulfill--our debt to the second death? How could his not dying the death that will come to all of us who do not accept His sacrifice of Himself pay the debt?

Is not the second death the real curse of the law? If it wasn't then we are all paying the debt ourselves, for we are all dying.

Your argument is not making sense to me.
Posted By: Bob Pickle

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/11/02 09:24 PM

Got back from a trip and just looked at the thread. On whether Christ technically died the second death:
quote:
In consequence of Adam's sin, death passed upon the whole human race. All alike go down into the grave. And through the provisions of the plan of salvation, all are to be brought forth from their graves. (GC 544)
So the truth of the matter is that if Christ had not died, if there had been no plan of salvation, then there would be no second death.

I don't think it's a vital point to quibble over, but I think it technically incorrect to say that Jesus died the second death. There are definitely similarites between the two, like the horrible anguish the lost will feel.

Mark, I'm glad to hear your brother was vexed. As far as the old view goes,

quote:
Important truths concerning the atonement were taught the people by this yearly service. In the sin offerings presented during the year, a substituted had been accepted in the sinner's stead; but the blood of the victim had not made full atonement for the sin. It had only provided a means by which the sin was transferred to the sanctuary. By the offering of blood, the sinner acknowledged the authority of the law, confessed the guilt of his transgression, and expressed his faith in Him who was to take away the sin of the world; but he was not entirely released from the condemnation of the law. On the Day of Atonement the high priest, having taken an offering for the congregation, went into the most holy place with the blood and sprinkled it upon the mercy seat, above the tables of the law. Thus the claims of the law, which demanded the life of the sinner, were satisfied. Then in his character of mediator the priest took the sins upon himself, and, leaving the sanctuary, he bore with him the burden of Israel's guilt. At the door of the tabernacle he laid his hands upon the head of the scapegoat and confessed over him "all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat." And as the goat bearing these sins was sent away, they were, with him, regarded as forever separated from the people. Such was the service performed "unto the example and shadow of heavenly things." Hebrews 8:5. (PP 355, 356)
It is quite apparent that the law of god demands the death of the sinner, but Christ's death, Christ's blood, meets those claims. It is also apparent that sin is something that can be transferred from sinner to Substitute to the sanctuary through the blood.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/12/02 04:45 AM

Gary, thank you for your response. There is no difference between the first and second death, so far as being dead is concerned. The difference has to do with drinking the cup of wrath BEFORE dying. The shame, guilt and suffering that precedes death is the second death experience.

By drinking this cup on our behalf, Jesus earned the right to own our sin and second death. Draining the cup as our Substitute satisfies the demands of the law. He conquered death by 1) drinking the cup of the second death and, 2) by entering and exiting the portals of the first death. He is twice a winner.

As lawful owner of sin and death, it is His responsibility to eliminate them in the lake of fire at the end of time. This He will do by transferring our sin and second death upon the head of Satan, the scapegoat, who will die the eternal death with our sin in the lake of fire.

If we say Jesus died the second death, then we are also saying He is the scapegoat. This would be a terrible mistake.

I hope that makes more sense.

[ September 11, 2002, 10:55 PM: Message edited by: Mike Lowe ]
Posted By: Linda Sutton

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/12/02 05:21 AM

Sept. 12, 1891. God's Love for Us. "He that spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things?" Jesus took the sinner's place. He became "sin for us, who knew no sin." The God of justice did not spare His Son. In the secret place of the Most High a voice was heard: "Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, and against the man that is my fellow, saith the Lord of hosts." The whole debt for the transgressor of God's law was demanded from our Mediator. A full atonement was required. How appropriate are the words of Isaiah, "It pleased the Lord to bruise Him; He hath put Him to grief." His soul was made "an offering for sin." "He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities."

Jesus suffered the extreme penalty of the law for our transgressions, and justice was fully satisfied. The law is not abrogated; it has lost not one jot of its force. Instead, it stands forth in holy dignity, Christ's death on the cross testifying to its immutability. Its demands have been met, its authority maintained. God spared not His only begotten Son. To show the depth of His love for man, He delivered Him up for us all. "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." Behold Him dying on the cross. Behold Him who was equal with God, mocked and derided by the mob. Behold Him in Gethsemane, bowed under the burden of the sins of the whole world.

Was the penalty remitted because He was the Son of God? Were the vials of wrath withheld from Him who was made sin for us? Without abatement the penalty fell upon our divine-human Substitute.

Hear His cry, "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?" He was treated as a sinner that we might be treated as righteous, that God might be just and yet the justifier of the sinner.

I ask the impenitent, What greater evidence do you want that God is a God of justice? If the sword of justice woke in its might against the Fellow of the Almighty, and was not sheathed until bathed in the blood of God's only begotten Son, what will be the punishment of those who refuse to accept the atoning sacrifice? When the Son of God interposed in man's behalf, and humbled Himself on Calvary, angels drew back in amazement. Can those for whom this great sacrifice was made escape the wrath of God if they are indifferent to this great salvation? Those who choose to continue in sin will be without a shadow of excuse. Calvary is the only argument that will be used against them.

The love existing between the Father and His Son cannot be portrayed. It is measureless. In Christ God saw the beauty and perfection of excellence that dwells in Himself. Wonder, O heavens, and be astonished. O earth, for God spared not His own Son, but gave Him up to be made sin for us, that those who believe may be made the righteousness of God in Him. "God commendeth His love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us."

Language is too feeble for us to attempt to portray the love of God. We believe it, we rejoice in it, but we cannot comprehend it.
Giving Christ, God has given everything. Nothing greater, nothing more costly, could He bestow. In giving His Son, He gave all heaven, not because of any goodness or righteousness that we possess, but because He loved us. {18MR 335-77}
_________________________________________

Satan with his fierce temptations wrung the heart of Jesus. The Saviour could not see through the portals of the tomb. Hope did not present to Him His coming forth from the grave a conqueror, or tell Him of the Father's acceptance of the sacrifice. He feared that sin was so offensive to God that Their separation was to be eternal. Christ felt the anguish which the sinner will feel when mercy shall no longer plead for the guilty race. It was the sense of sin, bringing the Father's wrath upon Him as man's substitute, that made the cup He drank so bitter, and broke the heart of the Son of God. {DA 753}

~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_

If Jesus didn't die the second death, how is it he couldn't see beyone the portals of the tomb? He paid the whole debt demanded by the law and that debt is the second death, eternal separation from God.

quote:
But those who have not, through repentance and faith, secured pardon, must receive the penalty of transgression--"the wages of sin." They suffer punishment varying in duration and intensity, "according to their works," but finally ending in the second death. Since it is impossible for God, consistently with His justice and mercy, to save the sinner in his sins, He deprives him of the existence which his transgressions have forfeited and of which he has proved himself unworthy. Says an inspired writer: "Yet a little while, and the wicked shall not be: yea, thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be." And another declares: "They shall be as though they had not been." Psalm 37:10; Obadiah 16. Covered with infamy, they sink into hopeless, eternal oblivion. {GC 544.2}

The sinner is not immortal; for God has said, "The soul that sinneth, it shall die" (Eze. 18:4). This means all that it expresses. It reaches farther than the death which is common to all; it means the second death 1SM 297

Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/12/02 09:04 AM

Linda wrote:

"If Jesus didn't die the second death, how is it he couldn't see beyone the portals of the tomb? He paid the whole debt demanded by the law and that debt is the second death, eternal separation from God."

At that particular moment He couldn't see beyond the portals of tomb, but just before He cried, It is finished, the sense of His Father's disfavor was withdrawn, He had won the battle, He was victorious before He died. He accomplished what He set out to do before He died. He knew His resurrection was forthcoming.

The Desire of Ages, page 756, paragraph 3
Amid the awful darkness, apparently forsaken of God, Christ had drained the last dregs in the cup of human woe. In those dreadful hours He had relied upon the evidence of His Father's acceptance heretofore given Him. He was acquainted with the character of His Father; He understood His justice, His mercy, and His great love. By faith He rested in Him whom it had ever been His joy to obey. And as in submission He committed Himself to God, the sense of the loss of His Father's favor was withdrawn. By faith, Christ was victor.

The Desire of Ages, page 758, paragraph 1
Christ did not yield up His life till He had accomplished the work which He came to do, and with His parting breath He exclaimed, "It is finished." John 19:30. The battle had been won. His right hand and His holy arm had gotten Him the victory. As a Conqueror He planted His banner on the eternal heights. Was there not joy among the angels? All heaven triumphed in the Saviour's victory. Satan was defeated, and knew that his kingdom was lost.

[ September 12, 2002, 03:04 AM: Message edited by: Mike Lowe ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/12/02 02:19 PM

Mike, you're making too fine a distinction. There is no substantial difference between dying the second death and having died the second death. If I understand you right, you're saying Christ did the former not the latter. In the sanctuary service, both goats died on the Day of Atonement.

John, it seems like no one is willing to create a cheat sheet for the alternate view. How about you. I did a short list in the first post but one of the members wants something more complete.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/12/02 03:13 PM

Greetings Mark, Mike and friends.

Sorry I do not mean to delay. It is taking a little longer to prepare, but is coming. With all the other work, time has been tight.

We have been following the thread. The discussion on the second death is interesting. I was going to ask the question, What is the second death? The last two posts seem to shed some info.
'eternal separation from god' is one thought.
'suffering the wrath' is another. or the two are the same? Perhaps a definiton would be helpful.

What is the meaning of the 'eternal' if it can fit into a few hours?

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/12/02 07:42 PM

Bob Pickle wrote:

"I don't think it's a vital point to quibble over, but I think it technically incorrect to say that Jesus died the second death."

I agree that the distinction is minute and technical, but I also believe that since the Bible makes the distinction it is an important one.

Mark, technically the scapegoat did not die the second death with the sins of the saved on the day of atonement. The second death occurs at the end of the millennium, not in the outer court, at the beginning of the sanctuary service, when Jesus died on the altar of burnt offerings.

Lev 16:10
But the goat, on which the lot fell to be the scapegoat, shall be presented alive before the LORD, to make an atonement with him, and to let him go for a scapegoat into the wilderness.

The Great Controversy, page 658, paragraph 1
"In like manner, when the work of atonement in the heavenly sanctuary has been completed, then in the presence of God and heavenly angels and the hosts of the redeemed the sins of God's people will be placed upon Satan; he will be declared guilty of all the evil which he has caused them to commit. And as the scapegoat was sent away into a land not inhabited, so Satan will be banished to the desolate earth, an uninhabited and dreary wilderness."

The experience associated with the second death, which for Satan will be his first death, does not begin until the unsaved are cast alive in the lake of fire. Jesus died at the begining of the sanctuary service, not at the end with the scapegoat.

Rev 20:14
And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

Rev 21:8
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Drinking the cup of God's unmingled wrath is the experience of the second death. The actual death that follows this experience is physically no different than the first death, except that there will be no resurrection afterwards.

Rev 14:9,10
And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:

In order for Jesus to be our Sacrifice and Saviour it was necessary for Him to completely drain the cup before laying down His life. Death did not defeat Jesus on the Cross. Jesus defeated death by first draining the dregs of the cup, and then He willingly laid down His life and took it up again three days later. Nothing killed Him. He was not murdered. Nothing took His life from Him. Sin did not kill Him. He won the battle first, while He was still alive, and then He Himself laid down His life.

John 10:17,18
Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.

Jesus made atonement for mankind while He was still alive. "Christ did not yield up His life till He had accomplished the work which He came to do, and with His parting breath He exclaimed, "It is finished." John 19:30. The battle had been won." DA 758.

Does this mean He did not die for our sins? How can God die? His humanity died, not His divinity!!! So, did He really die? I believe He did, but in a way we cannot perfectly comprehend.

Selected Messages Book 1, page 301, paragraph 1
"I am the resurrection, and the life" (John 11:25). He who had said, "I lay down my life, that I might take it again" (John 10:17), came forth from the grave to life that was in Himself. Humanity died; divinity did not die. In His divinity, Christ possessed the power to break the bonds of death. He declares that He has life in Himself to quicken whom He will.

[ September 12, 2002, 01:52 PM: Message edited by: Mike Lowe ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/13/02 11:59 AM

Here are a few of the clearer quotes from the SOP. When I started the thread, I intended to stick to scripture only, but I want to quote just a few SOP paragraphs. Those of you who have come to question her gift and/or have come to believe it's Biblical to select parts that are inspired and discard parts that aren't (and I believe that not everything she wrote is directly inspired too, but in a different way) I hope you'll reconsider the binding claims of her gift. As Paul writes, "The spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets" I Cor. 14:32.

quote:
The power that inflicted retributive justice upon man's substitute and surety, was the power that sustained and upheld the suffering One under the tremendous weight of wrath that would have fallen upon a sinful world. Christ was suffering the death that was pronounced upon the transgressors of God's law.--Manuscript 35, 1895. {7ABC 463.3}

The cross must occupy the central place because it is the means of man's atonement and because of the influence it exerts on every part of the divine government.--Testimonies, vol. 6, p. 236. {7ABC 464.1}

The atonement of Christ is not a mere skillful way to have our sins pardoned; it is a divine remedy for the cure of transgression and the restoration of spiritual health. It is the heaven-ordained means by which the righteousness of Christ may be not only upon us, but in our hearts and characters.--Letter 406, 1906. {7ABC 464.2}




[ September 13, 2002, 06:10 AM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/13/02 05:50 PM

Manuscript Releases Volume Eighteen, page 163, paragraph 3
Christ took upon Himself the nature of humanity, to make it possible for Him to suffer and to die as a propitiation for the sins of the fallen race.

S.D.A. Bible Commentary Vol. 7, page 925, paragraph 6
He could not have done this as God, but by coming as man Christ could die.

Selected Messages Book 1, page 301, paragraph 1
Humanity died; divinity did not die.

Did Jesus really, truly die since divinity did not die?
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/14/02 09:02 AM

Sorry for the confusion Mike. When I said I would post "a few of the clearer quotes" I was referring to Sister White's statements on the subsitutionary death of Christ, not on whether He died the second death.

Regarding the use of Sister White here, there has been a lot of quoting, but we've seen a lot of scripture cited as well - on both sides.

One way that this issue would be settled quickly though is by referring to the writings of Sister White because her position cannot be misunderstood. Above I asked the alternate view side to reconsider her inspiration based on the evidence.

What evidence? All of the scriptural tests of a prophet.

Because of our fallen natures we have a great capacity to set up our own opinions in the place of Biblical truth. Even while we do this, we are all inclined to think that we simply have a correct interpretation of scripture. But if the Spirit of God has spoken through one prophet and the evidence of that is rejected, the door is now open to sit in judgement on the messages of all prophets. It is inevitable that the same reasoning will be applied to their messages that don't harmonize with our understanding. Our only safeguard is to closely examine ourselves to see whether we are prepared to submit our firmly held opinions to the counsel of all prophetic messages.

[ September 14, 2002, 03:05 AM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/14/02 09:31 AM

I learned recently that Dr. Bacchiocchi has begun to espouse the view that prophecy from New Testament times and forward is a "mixed bag!" (His words.) This is probably the most recent notable example of an individual within the church who began with the idea that he could be selective with Ellen White. Now this fine scholar is mired in the quicksand of selective inspiration at the Biblical level.

How tragic that people who ought to be giving the clearest and most ringing endorsements of the Word of God as the only authoritative rule of faith and practice, because they are unwilling to be subject to the spirit of the prophets, are now denying the authority of the Word and undermining its influence. At this point in time Dr. Bacchiocchi is saying that the lesser prophets of the New Testament spoke truth and error but he continues to make the apostles the standard. But how long will this view hold up. How is the Spirit of God mixed with the spirit of error in some people and not in others?

But when a spirit of error is accepted, men will accept the most untenable ideas, such as the idea that God will mingle false messages with true. We are witnessing a great phenomena, possibly the greatest phenomena: the spirit of error that places the mark of a false prophet - one who mingles truth and error - as a characteristic of a true prophet. Surprising and amazing but we should have known this. How else can Satan make the Spirit of Prophecy of no effect? The most effective means is to place on all of the prophets, including Sister White, the title of prophet, but to strip her and her associates of all genuine authority.

[ September 14, 2002, 03:36 AM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/14/02 04:49 AM

Let us not get too far astray from this topic. [Smile]
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/14/02 05:18 AM

Sabbath blessings to you all

Several questions have been put forth about sin, death, second death, wages of sin, remission, shedding of blood, and the place that the death of Jesus has in this. In this post we will address some of these.

Wages of sin is death
Romans 6:23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

It says the wages of sin, not wages for sin. Please, the prepositions are important. (It makes big difference whether one is being kept in sin or kept from sin . All that changed was the preposition.) It is sin that pays the wages, not God. In contrast to that God offers us a Gift of eternal life. The whole chapter six of Romans deals with the issue of two masters and the rewards they give. This should be very clear. We should not charge God with the wages of sin. He is the giver of the Gift which is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
Romans 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Romans 5:21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

What is this death?
We see here that primarily this death is spiritual death. As has been said in previous posts.
John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
Romans 7:5 For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.
Romans 7:24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
Romans 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
Romans 8:6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
1 John 3:14 We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.

To realize the meaning of death, we need to see it in the light of eternal life. For death is an intruder in the kingdom of God, it did not exist. It was brought in by Sin. Satan holds the power of death. (Hebrews 2:14 … that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;). Death is not a product of God's righteousness. It is a process and product of Satan's Righteousness. In the wisdom of God, Christ, by subjecting himself to the power of Satan overthrew it. We see that in Satan's righteousness there is no faith, no trust, for the law is not of faith. Everything is by the letter of the law, for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. In this righteousness there is no room for forgiveness, mercy, love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, meekness, temperance, for these are not of the law. When Satan talks of any of these, everything becomes measured and paid.

To understand this meaningfully, we need to understand where Satan derives his power.
Romans 7:11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.
1 Corinthians 15:56 The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law.

Please note very carefully that Satan derives his power of death from the law of God.

How did he obtain it?

By deceiving!

What is the deception?

The deception is that he takes God's word, which is unto life, and uses it unlawfully for the purpose of demanding and causing death. The unlawful use of the law is to find fault, to accuse, to condemn, to self justify. This he does in the name of justice (his idea of justice), and in the name of the law.
John 12:50 And I know that his commandment is life everlasting:
Romans 7:10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.
Romans 7:13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
1 Timothy 1:8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;

Satan, using the law established his own righteousness, a legal-istic righteousness that can only produce death. As a parasite he derives his power from the law, for the strength of sin is the law. Further he imposed it in the minds of man and his sympathizers that this is of God. In this manner he set himself (his principles) as God. For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Thus he keeps in bondage all his subjects. (preventing them through fear of death from coming to the living God)
Genesis 3:10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.
Exodus 20:19 And they said unto Moses, Speak thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God speak with us, lest we die.
Hebrews 2:15 And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.

Under the Law.
It may be interesting to note how many indeed consider that ultimate justice means ultimate exaction. We need to realize what is meant in the scripture when it speaks about those who are, under the law, by the law, of the law, under sin. In all these is found a righteousness that is not from God, a righteousness which is their own, whose author is Satan. Sin holds dominion upon all them that are of this righteousness. Sin declares that there can be no forgiveness. Satan urges, by the law that the sinner cannot be pardoned. So all who are under the law are possessors of a legal-istic righteousness, the curse of the law, which is not of God, but of Satan. Death is the power of that righteousness. It thrives on penalties.
Romans 10:3 For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
Romans 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
Romans 7:5 For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.
Romans 6:14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
Romans 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.
Romans 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty(one who lost his suit) before God.

Every man born in this world is affected by this righteousness to a greater or lesser degree. What does all this mean? It means that when men read Hebrews 9:22 And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission; they understand it to be God's righteousness, payment of penalty. They cannot understand that Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law; Hebrews 9:8 They cannot comprehend that God is not satisfied by anything which is by the law. That without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Hebrews 11:6 And the law is not of faith: Galatians 3:12. And, the sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise. Psalms 51:17

Until the day dawn and the daystar arise in your hearts:
But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance. Realization of God's righteousness, justice, shall not happen until the veil is removed from the eyes. But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the veil (the righteousness which is by the law) is upon their heart. Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord (faith), the veil (the righteousness which is by the law) shall be taken away.. But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second. By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. (2 Corinthians 3:15,16 Galatians 3:23 Galatians 4:4,5)

But now the righteousness of God without (apart from) the law is manifested,
What does it mean that God's righteousness is apart from the law? It means that God's righteousness is not by the law, of the law, under the law. It is not subject to law. What is it based on? Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ. For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith. What is this faith? It is the faith, which receives the spirit of our heavenly Father. This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? What kind of hearing is that? It is the hearing that receives the mind of God, his understanding, his judgment, his justice. What is the fruit of it? But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.

For all have sinned (partaken of the legal-istic righteousness that kills, under the law) and come short of the glory of God. For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. What is the Glory of God? And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty… against such there is no law. God's righteousness is not one thing and his love another thing. God is Love, his love is righteousness, his righteousness is love. His mercy, grace, goodwill, justice is his righteousness; his righteousness is mercy, grace, goodwill, justice. What is his justice? Psalms 82:3 Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy. Justice is to succor the afflicted and needy. The justice of God is not to exact, but to defend.
God is light and in him is no darkness at all. Light is life. Death is work of darkness and not light

To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons
It was necessary to break the veil of sin (legal-istic righteousness). It was necessary to shed the light of the glory of God in this dark place of sin and death; to break the bonds of sin. To reveal that God's righteousness is not, of, under, by the law; but that it is by faith, the faith of Jesus. What faith? The Faith that maketh a son.

Shalom

This is PART 1 - PART 2 to follow

[ September 16, 2002, 10:45 PM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/14/02 05:22 AM

Mark, surely God has worked through EGW. Amen!!

The wages of sin is death. But why? Is it because sin kills us? Or is it because God kills us? In the Bible it says we die because God prevents us from eating the fruit of the tree of life.

Genesis 3:22
And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

Patriarchs and Prophets, page 60, paragraph 3
"In order to possess an endless existence, man must continue to partake of the tree of life. Deprived of this, his vitality would gradually diminish until life should become extinct. It was Satan's plan that Adam and Eve should by disobedience incur God's displeasure; and then, if they failed to obtain forgiveness, he hoped that they would eat of the tree of life, and thus perpetuate an existence of sin and misery. But after man's fall, holy angels were immediately commissioned to guard the tree of life. Around these angels flashed beams of light having the appearance of a glittering sword. None of the family of Adam were permitted to pass the barrier to partake of the life-giving fruit; hence there is not an immortal sinner."

We die, therefore, because we cannot eat the fruit of the tree of life. Sin does not kill us, rather, not being able to eat the fruit does. And the reason we cannot eat the fruit is because God does not want us to be immortal sinners. So, in essence God kills us. Consequently, God is in control - not sin or death.

The wages of sin is death. Why? Because God will not allow sinners to eat the fruit of the tree of life. Jesus would have eventually died of old age if He hadn't died on the cross. Would dying of old age have qualified Jesus to be our Substitute?

1. Since Jesus "did not yield up His life till He had accomplished the work which He came to do" (DA 758) - what purpose did His death serve?

2. "The divinity of Christ is the believer's assurance of eternal life." DA 530. Since "divinity did not die" (1 SM 301) - what purpose did His death serve?
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/14/02 12:30 PM

Mike you ask what purpose did the death of Christ serve. John's point is that it was not a substitution - it was an example of faith.

And it was an example of faith. We agree on that. What kind of faith? A faith that was obedient to the will of the Father to the point of death. Christ proved this at the beginning of his ministry in the wilderness when he fell dying to the earth and angels ministered to Him. He proved it again at the end. So we have a double witness in the life of Christ of his fidelity as required in the Law.

When Christ was in the garden, asking the Father to remove the cup from Him, his faith was put to the test. It was such an extreme test that he sweat blood, not just a little. Great drops of blood were forced to the surface of his skin. But the process of dying didn't end there. His physical endurance was extended again just as it had been in the wilderness so that his suffering would be prolonged and completed. The Father commissioned Gabriel the replacement of Satan, to strengthen His Son.

On the cross, the drama continued. As before, in the garden, when Christ withdrew a stone's throw from even his closest disciples to prevent them from closely viewing his supreme agony, the Father veiled the final most excruciating spiritual agonies from view. An impenetrable cloud has kept all of us from understanding the full meaning of the sufferings of Christ.

The entire life of Christ was a sacrifice - a dying process. When he rested in the tomb, the process was complete. But it was the act of dying that mattered. He lived to die. His sacrifice is not his death, it is the dying process. Once the sacrifice was complete, he said “it is finished”. Then he laid his life down. This act was a pure voluntary choice. But it was the preceding process that has all the merit.

By faith we can begin to comprehend the justice and mercy of God in providing a ransom for our souls. It is a mistake to give Satan credit for any kind of righteousness. Righteousness means right doing, something that became foreign to Satan before the creation of man. Satan is a liar and the father of them, a murderer with no righteous motives. He is Leviathan, gilded by pride and hatred, devoid of love and sympathy, a destroyer.

In God’s eyes there is none righteous among mortals. And according to Him there is one way only to get righteousness. Genuine faith will ask for a righteousness outside of ourselves to be appropriated to our own account. We have no righteousness within ourselves, legalistic or otherwise. What righteousness we have is a counterfeit called self-righteousness. When the Word refers to those who seek to establish their own righteousness it is referring to a counterfeit. That counterfeit is anything that is not the righteousness of Christ.

The deficiency in what John proposes is this: that the righteousness of Christ is not a real commodity that we must have in the place of and as a substitute for our own unrighteousness. In this system Christ is an ideal that we copy, but there can be no such thing as a real exchange of spiritual clothing. The righteousness of Christ is not something that God actually grants us. Why? Because if Christ is not our substitute, His righteousness cannot be substituted for our self-righteousness in any real sense and take the place of our total lack. Unless faith grasps the fact that Christ has a wardrobe full of wedding garments, how can anyone put them on? They are not real to the person without faith. Those who do this, instead of claiming the blood of Christ as the men of faith have done down through the centuries as our sole hope of salvation, are offering to God the fruit of Cain.

The faith that is commended by God is the faith exercised by Abel. “By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh.” Hebrews 11:4. As John points out, it was not the sacrifice itself that God desired. It is the faith. Not just faith in an ideal however. Genuine faith appropriates the merits of Christ represented by the sacrifice. This is the faith that Abel had and that must be ours.

[ September 14, 2002, 06:33 AM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 01:46 AM

John, I reread my last post, and the tone of it might make you think I’m not open to what you wrote. So, I want you to know I’m still spending quite a bit of time combing through your last post to try and understand you better, and see if there is anything in what you’re saying that we can agree on.

You say the righteousness of God is revealed apart from the Law, which means that God’s righteousness is not based on the law. In another place you say that God’s justice is in showing mercy. Doesn’t the Bible combine the concepts of mercy and justice? Mercy and justice are like the positive and negative charges of electricity. You do not have electricity unless there is a difference in charges. If you had only positive, you would not have electricity. If you had only negative, you still do not have a charge. Electricity is defined as the movement of electrons, so by definition, electricity only exists where there is positive and negative. In the same way mercy and justice define each other. Justice is the negative and mercy the positive. Together they are the righteousness, the electricity, the power of God. We call this Grace.

Justice says what ought to be done and not done. It defines righteousness in terms of absolute values which are rooted in the character of the Deity. The Law defines not only the character of the Father, it defines the character of the Son and the Spirit. The Law is their character. Their character is the Law. This is where we seem to be parting ways. You attribute a new kind of righteousness to God ‘not based on the law’. In the biblical model though, the Law is at the heart of the sanctuary. If the law was the evil that you are saying it is, why is it the focal point of the sanctuary? Why were the stone tables placed in the Ark and the blood sprinkled just above them on the mercy seat.

This picture shows that the Law is foundational. The Ark represents God’s government, his throne. It is based squarely on His character or Law. But the Law is encased in mercy. So mercy triumphs over justice, but it is only together that they define righteousness.

[ September 14, 2002, 07:56 PM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 01:51 AM

Mark, thank you for sharing those good words. Jesus is awesome, and altogether lovely. Only His righteousness and death saves us from mortal ruin and eternal loss. Amen!

I believe Jesus' death on the cross has something to do with my salvation, I'm just not exactly sure how and why. I'm not sure why His perfect life and death makes it possible for God to forgive me and to save me in His eternal kingdom. It doesn't make sense to me. But I accept it by faith.

God's goal is NOT to kill us in the lake of fire, but to save us from a life of sin now, so that we are safe to save eternally. Somehow the life and death of Jesus makes it all possible. But why and how? Was it His perfect life that makes us safe to save? or was it His perfect death? or both?

Because of what Jesus did, we are motivated to hate sin, to love Him, to crucify our sinful old man defects of character, and to mature in the fruits of the Spirit. Had Jesus not given His life and death for our us, salvation would not have been desirable, we would not have longed for fellowship with Him.

Setting us free from sin, so that we no longer sin is, however, and for some reason, not enough. Death for past sins is also necessary, although I'm not exactly sure why. My human mind reasons that ceasing from sin should be good enough. But the Bible makes it clear that the wages of sin is death, even if we eventually cease sinning.

Perhaps death is the only way to completely rid the universe of sin - if all the sinners were dead, sin would cease to exist. God will blot out the memory and record of our specific sins, but they will still exist in Christ, and unless they perish with someone in the lake of fire, sin will continue to exist.

That's where Satan comes in - Jesus will transfer the sins of the saved upon the head of Satan, the scapegoat, and he will die with them (not for them) in the lake of fire. Once Satan, and the host of the unsaved, are dead and reduced to ashes, sin will cease to exist. It is the scapegoat who dies the second death in my place.

Since Satan perishes with sin in the lake of fire, thus eliminating sin from the universe, I'm not totally sure what the death of Jesus accomplished for us. He accomplished what He came to do BEFORE He died on the cross. He earned the right to own our sin and death when He drained the dregs of the cup. Which, to me, means He earned the right to transfer our sin and death to Satan at the end of time.

Do you see what I mean? There's more to this than Jesus merely providing a substitute for my sin and death because God requires death for sin.

[ September 14, 2002, 07:53 PM: Message edited by: Mike Lowe ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 02:23 AM

Mike, you're asking me about what I said above?
quote:
...it was the act of dying that mattered. He lived to die. His sacrifice is not his death, it is the dying process. Once the sacrifice was complete, he said “it is finished”. Then he laid his life down. This act was a pure voluntary choice. But it was the preceding process that has all the merit.

I say the dying process had all the merit, not the death itself, which might be an overstatement, but I'll explain a bit.

Christ died of a broken heart. It was the breaking process that saves us. When he bowed his head and yeilded up his spirit to the Father, it seems that this was the conclusion, the period. Heaven seems to have understood this because unlike the disciples who viewed the death of Jesus as a complete disaster, heaven viewed it as a complete triumph. He went to the grave a conquorer.

So is their merit in lying in the tomb. I don't think so. There is merit though in submission to the father's will, in faith that trusts even when all earthly and divine consolations are cut off. And you're right I think that there is merit in yeilding up His life. But isn't the merit to be found in all of his conscious living decisions? Including the decision to yield up his life?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 02:41 AM

Mark, I agree with you that everything Jesus accomplished before He laid down His own life is what saves us - His complete and total submission to do the will of His Father, which involved drinking the cup of wrath and laying down His own life.

I think it is very important that we understand Jesus was not killed or that He died of natural causes. He makes it clear that He laid down His own life. Nothing killed Jesus on the cross - not sin, not death, not Satan, not man, not anything. He laid down His own life, but not before He earned the right to save us, which He did before He laid down His own life.

Since He purchased our salvation before He laid down His own life, I'm not exactly sure why He laid down His own life, unless it was to demonstrate that He is the lawful owner of the keys of hell and of death, which He proved by entering and exiting the domain of death. And perhaps He laid down His own life in order to rid Himself of His sinful flesh nature and to resurrect Himself with a sinless flesh nature.

What do you think?
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 08:59 AM

Mike you raised a number of questions in regards to death and the tree of life.

There are two factors to consider. One is that death is primarily spiritual and secondarily (result) physical. The other is that eternal life is primarily spiritual and secondarily (result) physical. We need to understand the true meaning of life.

When man broke faith, he fell under the dominion of death, death immediately began to reign in man. This is the spiritual death that kills by establishing a legal-istic righteousness. We can see this plainly in the fear, accusations, and blaming for purpose of self justification.

10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.
11 And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?
12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.
13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.

Since death was reigning in Adam, The issue is the reign of Sin and Death. If God allowed Adam to continue to eat of the tree of life then Death would continue to reign eternally, Sin and death would be immortalized. Man would not be able to recognize death or sin. Satan's dominion would be established.

By not allowing man to go back and eat of the tree of life, God prevented the dominion of Satan, sin, and death to reign eternally, and by the same token actually provided a way for man to be saved and restored back from death to eternal life..

Romans 5:14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
Romans 5:17 For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)
Romans 5:21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

Thus it was that in reality God interposed to sustain life, by placing it in the realm of time, on a level where the powers of life and death could be manifested, so that we could come to the realization of eternal life and take hold of eternal life.

Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

God indeed is in control, not sin nor death. Had God permitted man to continue eating of the tree of life, sin and death would have ruled the day.

Mark,
You said that it is a mistake to give Satan credit for any kind of righteousness. I believe that it is clear from my post that I do not acknowledge his righteousness as righteousness. But it is important to realize that man in his fallen state (all those under the law) thinks it is so, and more than that, he thinks it is of God. There is the deception. The following scriptures should give the perspective.
Matthew 5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven
Isaiah 64:6 But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.

You said, 'If the Law was the evil that you are saying it is' … stop right there. I never said any such thing. The law is just and good. The law has a vital part in being a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ. Without the Law, death reigned without our awareness. But when the Law came, sin revived and I died. It is the law of sin and death which sin established in us using the Law of God unlawfully that is the evil.
3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Verily, verily I say unto you, he that hears my word and believes on him that sent me has everlasting life, and …is passed from death unto life. John 6:63. It is the spirit that quickens (gives life); the flesh profits nothing: the words that I speak unto you are spirit, and are life.
Is there a reality of life that the scriptures teach, which has not entered in the mind of man? The source of life is the spirit - not the body. It is the spirit that gives life; the flesh profits nothing: the words that I speak unto you are spirit, and are life. John 6:63

You stated that I propose that Christ is an Ideal that we copy. I cannot tell where you obtain that thought. It is rather the substitute doctrine that maintains the separation between the Saviour and man by dealing with sin in a remote judicial setting. My position is summarized in the following scripture.
Colossians 1:27 To whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:

Sorry Mark your concept of the electrical charges, negative and positive, in respect of Justice and Mercy would not work. That would be a short-circuit.

I am preparing part two, which will deal with how Jesus through death destroyed him that had the power of death, that is the Devil. His current ministry, and eternal life.

Shalom
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 01:08 PM

I should read more carefully. Your many references to legalistic righteousness and a righteousness divorced from the law gave me the impression that you viewed the law negatively. So the law is good, but it is unrelated to His love and justice? You wrote:

quote:
God's righteousness is not one thing and his love another thing. God is Love, his love is righteousness, his righteousness is love. His mercy, grace, goodwill, justice is his righteousness; his righteousness is mercy, grace, goodwill, justice. What is his justice? Psalms 82:3 Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy. Justice is to succor the afflicted and needy. The justice of God is not to exact, but to defend.

I made another incorrect assumption about what you are saying: That without substitution, you must be teaching that it is impossible to put on the robe of Christ's righteousness. You say no:

quote:
You stated that I propose that Christ is an Ideal that we copy. I cannot tell where you obtain that thought. It is rather the substitute doctrine that maintains the separation between the Saviour and man by dealing with sin in a remote judicial setting. My position is summarized in the following scripture.
Colossians 1:27 To whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:

So we can receive the robe or spirit of Christ without Biblical justification? John this is spiritualistic. In the history of Adventism, spiritualistic teachings have appeared many times, and as far as I am aware they were always caused by men who placed their own opinions above inspiration - who taught that they could discern which parts of the Testimonies or scripture should be given more weight than others.

The robe Christ offers is His righteousness. His righteousness is his sinless life. He never disobeyed. He delighted in the Father's will. He magnified the Law and made it honorable. His life of complete obedience to the Divine will, the Law, is substitional for ours.

In order for the power of God to flow, there has to be justice based on law, and mercy based on law. Even a short circuit must have a differnce in charges in order for the power to flow.

[ September 15, 2002, 07:40 AM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 01:19 PM

Mike, you wrote:

quote:
I'm not exactly sure why He laid down His own life, unless it was to demonstrate that He is the lawful owner of the keys of hell and of death, which He proved by entering and exiting the domain of death. And perhaps He laid down His own life in order to rid Himself of His sinful flesh nature and to resurrect Himself with a sinless flesh nature.

I think both of these are true, but at the root of it is the covenant that the Father, Son and Spirit made with each other that Christ would taste both the sufferings of death, and death itself in order to spoil its domains. It was part of the plan, and Jesus set the example of obedience and submission here as in everything else.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 05:49 PM

One more thought on justice and mercy based on law. The most basic concept of justice and social order in constitution based societies is the rule of law. It's no coinsidence that successful modern nations always based their legal systems on the rule of law - they are mimicing the Divine order.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 05:57 PM

Mark, thank you. What you said about death being a part of God's plan for Jesus makes sense. But I'm still not 100% sure about all the why's and wherefore's. By faith I accept that His death had something to do with my ransome and redemption.

John, I like what you wrote about the spiritual aspect of death, but I am more inclined to believe that death is first physical and then secondarily spiritual. The real thing usually comes first, and then metaphors are derived from that.

Question: Does Satan, the scapegoat, die the second death in place of the saved? Or, did Jesus accomplish that for the saved?
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 07:06 PM

Mark
Galatians
21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

Romans 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

The law came in to reveal sin and not to establish righteousness. God's righteousness is revealed apart from the law. Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus. Rom 3:21,22

Yes Mark you need to read a lot, a lot more closer than you do. It is not edifying to make prejudiced labels. Please specify the thought that concerns you and why. No Mark, in a short-circuit there is no flow of electricity. Electricity would produce immediate destruction of such circuit until the circuit is no more.

I would like to mention a few things in regards to the discussion on the death and dying, suffering of Christ. There have been some meaningful thoughts there. While at first the thought presented was that the death was that which was required to satisfy the demands of 'god's law', to make atonement for sin, a substitute death for man. It seemed to be realised that such is not scriptural or proper. The focus shifted to the suffering and victory over death that was obtained before he laid down his life. This is indeed much more in the light of truth. While it was stated that the difference is minimal, or technical, I would like to present that there is a world of difference in the two.
The first thought establishes death as the supreme ruler and arbiter of righteousness. It establishes death as the supreme god, which even God had to satisfy before he could forgive. So we see that Satan's righteousness is supreme in this first view and death is the master ruler. The second view sees death as an enemy of God that was overcome and Christ was victorious over, and thereby effected salvation. This is scriptural and true. There are some thoughts in the second view, which have not yet been realised.

Questions for thought.
In the Passover experience, what did the blood on the door posts save them from? The destroying angel, or Egypt? Why was the destroying angel there? Why was the whole situation happening? What was the purpose?

Mike, there is no life to the spirit apart from the body. Is there thought in the grave? If death were physical first, then there would be no salvation, no repentance, and no possibility of any spiritual anything.
Sin occurs first. Death enters the mind and spirit and abides there. It is there that the Saviour overcame death and was victorious. The physical death and resurrection are a seal of the victory.
In like manner death must be overcome and eternal life must find its abode in our spirit first before it is safe for God to give us immortality.

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 08:57 PM

Mike, you asked, 'Does Satan, the scapegoat, die the second death in place of the saved? Or, did Jesus accomplish that for the saved?'

Neither.
In simple terms, Satan is the accuser of the brethren. All his accusations will be returned to him, the rightful owner. Matthew 7:2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Thus his own righteousness shall be upon his head. It should not be difficult to see how dreadful that will be.

As far as any of us who are the rightful owners of the sin-righteousness. The Lord says what we must do. Matthew 16:24 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. Where? To Golgotha, that self-righteousness may be crucified with Christ.

Romans 6:10 For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God. Romans 5: 3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? 4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. 5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection: 6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. 7 For he that is dead is freed from sin. 8 Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him: 9 Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him. 10 For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God. 11 Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Christ never came to satisfy death. He came to overcome it, and He overcame and is able to save them that come to God by Him. Hebrews 2:18 For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted. Hebrews 7:25 Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.

The second death is an event in time and place at the end of time, and it cannot be pre-evented. It was never the purpose of God that the second death nor any death would need to be satisfied. Rather, that death should be overcome, so that death would have no power over us.
Revelation 2:11 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death. Revelation 20:6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years. Hallelujah!

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/15/02 11:27 PM

John, thank you. From what I've read, faith in the blood of the passover lamb saved them from the destroying angel.

If Satan, the scapegoat, does not die the second death in place of the saved, how and when will God eliminate the sins of the saved? In what way does the scapegoat make an atonement?

Lev 16:10
But the goat, on which the lot fell to be the scapegoat, shall be presented alive before the LORD, to make an atonement with him, and to let him go for a scapegoat into the wilderness.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/16/02 03:43 AM

John 5:24
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.

It seems fairly obvious that Jesus is here talking about the second death, since many believers have passed from life to death.

Rev 20:6
Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.

But there is also a spiritual way in which we can experience death (in a metaphorical way).

Rom 8:6
For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.

1 Tim 5:6
But she that liveth in pleasure is dead while she liveth.

2 Cor 4:12
So then death worketh in us, but life in you.

1 John 3:14
We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.

So, the question remains: did Jesus die spiritually or physically in order to reconcile us to God?

Rom 5:10
For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/17/02 06:08 AM

If Jesus had died of cancer, or of an accident, or of old age, His death would not have accomplished what He came to do. So, how is laying down His own life on the cross any different?

And what about the example of Abraham and Isaac? The father did not end up sacrificing his own son. A scapegoat died instead. Doesn't this teach us that Jesus did not die to redeem us from the penalty of sin? And doesn't it teach us that Satan dies as our scapegoat?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/17/02 12:46 AM

Mike and Mark: Since John does not have time to respond now, I'd like to comment on some of these questions that have been brought up.

Mike, you said: "…His perfect life and death makes it possible for God to forgive me…" and Mark, you said in one of your previous posts something about God keeping a record of our sins on the books of heaven that somehow Jesus helps to blot out.

In Exodus 34:7 God is described as being compassionate and gracious, abounding in love and faithfulness, FORGIVING WICKEDNESS, REBELLION AND SIN…In Psalms 86:5,103:3 He is said to be loving and forgiving. In Psalms 103:3 it says: If you, O Lord, kept a record of sins, O Lord, who could stand? But with you there is forgiveness…" In Jeremiah He says He will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more. He will blot out their transgressions. In Micah 7:19 it says that He "will have compassion on us; and…will tread our sins underfoot and hurl all our iniquities into the depths of the sea."

When God forgives He does not keep a record of sins. That I see clearly from all these verses. I would also like to make the observation that the word used for forgiveness in the New Testament means something different. It is 859 in Strongs and it means freedom; to send forth (out of bondage). As I said before something more than forgiveness is needed to make the universe secure. God can forgive and remember our sins no more, but until the Saviour gives us His Spirit, His mind and heart, the axe will not have been laid to the root of the tree. Not only that, but sin would rise up again even if Satan and sinners are destroyed in the lake of fire. The issues at the heart of sin must be dealt with in order for the universe to be secure. After all, sin began in heaven where there was no sin nor sinners nor Satan (before his fall). The Saviour came to save His people FROM their sins.

Now, as far as the books of heaven, obviously something is spoken about in Daniel and Revelation (7 and 20). There are the books from which the dead are judged and there is the book of life. If our names are in the book of life then our sins are not in the other books, right? But, as is talked about in Ezekial 33, if we turn from righteousness and do evil, not all our righteousness will be remembered. But if we do righteousness and turn from evil, not all our evil will be remembered. Isn't that what scripture teaches?

Also, Mike, you said at the end of a post that Jesus resurrected himself. You will not find one scripture that says that. All the verses dealing with the resurrection say that the Father raised him from the dead. You also said "...nothing killed Jesus on the cross…He laid down His own life." He did not kill himself; that is not Calvary. Yes, He willingly gave himself into the hands of wicked men; He did not have to do it. No one required it of Him, not His Father nor the law. It was love that led Him to Calvary. He came from heaven to live the life of the Son of God here on earth, with all the limitations of humanity. And He did! He lived by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of the Father, but he died at the hand of the enemy, not because the enemy was stronger. But because by allowing the enemy to do so, the enemy was overcome. (consider the situation with Job)

"Men of Israel, listen to this…this man was handed over to you by God's set purpose and foreknowledge; and you, with wicked hands, put him to death by nailing him to the cross. But God raised him from the dead…" Acts 2:22-24

The Saviour said in John 17:"I have brought you glory on earth by completing the work you gave me to do…I have revealed you … I have given them your word and the world has hated them." The Saviour's work was completed and then He died. Why did the blood of the martyrs accomplish so much? Because when people saw innocent and godly men and women tortured and killed by religious and self-righteous men, and yet with peace and love on their faces, they were convicted of sin and turned to God and were reconciled; they shared in the sufferings of Christ, their Elder Brother. Men saw in their death a greater reality than this physical life.

May we all experience the fellowship of that death that we may share in His glorious Life! This is my prayer. Amen.
When I read your comment, Mike, on John 5:24 the verse that came into my mind was : Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things?" Was Jesus talking metaphorically when He talked about the need to be born again? Or is this a spiritual reality? The flesh profiteth nothing, it is the Spirit that giveth life. The depth of spiritual life that the Saviour came to impart is more real than anything physical. His death that reconciles us to God is so because He received it at the hands of self-righteousness men. It is this reality that convicts us of sin and turns our hearts to Him to ask forgiveness and mercy. Jesus did not die the second death or even suffer it. He did not die the first death for us for we all die that death. The death that He died is a death, which turns us to life, and it is by that death that we are reconciled.

The destroying Angel came to give God's judgement on Egypt not on God's people. The blood kept them from being identified with Egypt; they were saved from Egypt, not from the angel or from God!

The next question is, of course, what was all the symbolism of the sanctuary and it's services? Remember what Hebrews says: "If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the law was given to the people), why was there still need for another priest to come-one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron? For when there is a change of the priesthood, there must also be a change of the law… the former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless (for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God."Heb.7:11-18
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/17/02 03:16 AM

Mike, in the last few posts, you and I have been discussing the final hours and death of Christ and where the merit of it is. We need to be careful not to minimize any part of it. There is Bible support that places emphasis on Christ tasting the sufferings of death for every man - that is, His final hours - but the consent of Christ to come under the dominion of death is also important. If it wasn’t necessary for our atonement, it wouldn’t have been done. In a sense, death is the ultimate humiliation to God, the Living One, and it is an integral part of His perfect sacrifice, all of which is the ransom paid to release us from our bondage to sin.

John takes some exception to my characterizing his teaching as spiritualistic. Spiritualism has many forms, especially ‘Christian’ forms. The common denominators of Christian Spiritualism are:
1) Love is divorced from the Law. Mercy and justice, concepts that to most minds and the scripture are rooted in law and define love, become unmoored from concrete standards. They become attributes of a love that defies definition, strong on sentimentalism but short on substance.
2) The authority of Christ as commander of the host, as mediator of the New Covenant, as both Priest and Sacrifice is minimized. With these views of love in a vacuum, there is little room for the intercession of Christ. As Graham Maxwell, who teaches similar doctrines says, “the father himself loveth you”. Because God already loves us and forgives us, the grace ministered by Christ is no longer a remedy for sin. The sin is already gone.
3) The Holy Spirit and/or God the Father and/or the Son become an influence(s) as opposed to a person(s). Isn’t it true John that you believe the Holy Spirit is just the spirit of the Father - His soul? In the case of other spiritualistic variations, Christ becomes a pervasive, impersonal Spirit. In others the Father. But in effect, all of the Deity is reduced to an influence and therefore your doctrine which has had a significant following down through the centuries has been correctly called The Moral Influence Theory. It is spiritualism.
4) The spiritualist is selective in his treatment of scripture because he reasons that he has direct access to the Spirit and his mind is sanctified so that he can give ‘proper weight’ to scripture. The church therefore cannot sit in judgment on his opinions. His mind becomes a beacon of light with the ability to assign true meanings to the text. Meanings unfortunately and tragically that are not there.

If Christ's blood is the payment for your sin John, but you say no and rob others of that payment what will you say to Him? Please, have a second look at Ed's post on page 3 I think - the compilation of quotes from the SOP on the substitutionary death of Christ.

[ September 16, 2002, 09:21 PM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/17/02 05:04 AM

Greetings to all

Mike, thank you for your questions. I want to say that I appreciate your questions and I want to answer them. Your questions deal with understanding thought. With the questions you placed I see that definition is needed on a wider base, and I hope to be posting soon. It is important to understand.

Mark, thank you for your effort in defining spiritualism. It is however improper for you to define what I am saying. That is for me to do, for you to see if you can understand, to comment as to why you agree or disagree, and give scriptural reasoning. It would be helpful if you would define what you are saying. For example, What do you mean by atonement, what transaction is it, in concrete terms? I have commented my observations of the discussion on the suffering and death of Christ. Do you see the point of my observation? Do you agree or disagree, and why? What is the vital difference? Let us address the subject instead of all sorts of characterizations. Mark you in the beginning said that we are to stay with scripture, I have seen very little scripture from you.

Now in relation to some of your statements on the following scriptures as spiritualistic or otherwise, please define the proper meaning of them.

John 16:27 For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from God.

Romans 3:21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;

Romans 3:22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:

Galatians 5:22,23 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.

Romans 10:4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.

11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.

Galatians 3:12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.

In addition to these I have put forth many more scriptures. Why are they wrong? What is the right understanding?

In Christian Love

[ September 16, 2002, 11:07 PM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/17/02 05:43 AM

Mike,
One of your questions, 'How and when will God eliminate the sins of the saved?' From all that has been said I see that the definition of 'sin' is at variance in our understanding. Would you please define the 'sins' in the above question?

Thank you
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/18/02 11:35 AM

Substitutionary atonement gives balance to our understanding of the human condition. It brings home to our consciences our unworthiness of heaven’s solicitude for our welfare, but at the same time reassures us of the love of God. God’s love appears in its fullness to us only as we understand in some small measure how unworthy we are of it.

By denying the atonement, John you claim to advocate a more loving God, but the effect is the opposite. Your views exalt human merit and there is a corresponding demerit in the love and character of God. Denying the atonement dwarfs the love of God because the love of God is shown in this: that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for (in the place of) the ungodly. Christ did this because I am a trangressor of the Law. He came to restore me to harmony with that law. Love divorced from the Law becomes an unholy spiritual love.

[ September 18, 2002, 07:10 AM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/18/02 11:47 AM

Regarding more scripture, there is already enough here that has been posted by myself and others. You disagree, but many of the texts that you have quoted are strong evidence themselves of substitutionary atonement. The only thing that I think is left for us to do is to discuss our ideas and their implications between ourselves.

We could also discuss the ideas of modern commentators on the subject. I recently found my Volume 8 of the Testimonies. Do you mind if I quote more from there? Kelloggs' ideas were a variation on the Moral Influence Theory, and so, what she wrote not only about his ideas but also about spiritualism in general is insightful. I found it fascinating.

[ September 18, 2002, 06:09 AM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/19/02 08:19 AM

Mark, it is true that the substitutionary doctrine does confirm our guilt and our worthiness of death. At the same time reassures us of a love of God through which He sent His Son to pay the penalty so that we don't have to die. This does create a gratefulness and zeal for God and endeavour to do better and try harder not to sin. Though it reveals to us our worthiness of death, it nevertheless strengthens and establishes in man the righteousness under the law. For man remains thinking that it was his sins (transgressions of the law), and they are grievious, for which Christ died for, to clear our record and satisfy the demands of God's righteousness. Man recognizes that he should not sin, but despite his best efforts he finds that he still sins. Man in due course resigns himself to that state and accepts the substitutionary sacrifice for himself on an ongoing basis. He concludes himself to be a sinner and his only hope is that somehow in the resurrection he will be made perfect so that he will not sin any more.
Since the Substitutionary doctrine establishes in man the righteousness under the law. Indeed it hides it and he does not recognize nor see that it is his righteousness that crucified the Lord. He does not see that his righteousness is under the law of sin and death. He does not see that it is his righteousness that causes him to sin. yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service. So man remains a slave of sin and is not saved from his sin-righteousness, neither indeed can be. He remains separated from God, and cannot enter into fellowship with him. Man is religious.

True understanding of atonement does indeed convict man of sin. Not only does he realize that it is wrong to do what he knows to be wrong. His guiltiness and worthiness of death is more increased by the fact when he realizes that it was his righteousness which crucified the Lord. When he sees how different God's righteousness is to his own. How God loves his enemies. When he hears, Father forgive them for they 'know not what they do'. When he is broken, and self-righteousness is no more. He comes to God and falls on his face, no claims, no justification, just falling at the mercy of God, asking for mercy. He then experiences that which no substitutionary doctrine can give. He experiences forgiveness, and his Father's embrace, and reconciliation. He realizes that faith is not, believing doctrines about God, but that Faith is implicit trust in God personally. He believes God as 'son'. He now is ready to receive of his Father's righteousness. He ceases to live by his own righteousness (which crucified the Lord) and trusts in God's judgment, becomes a partaker of God's judgment, and lives by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. He is saved from Sin, and Satan has no more dominion over him. He has become partaker of eternal life.

Shalom
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/19/02 08:21 AM

Mark: God is real. His Son is real. The work they have and are doing for our salvation is real. There is atonement, an at-one-ment, by which our loving Heavenly Father is making us one with Himself. In that atonement He is cleansing us from sin and self. He is saving us from eternal death. There is nothing we can do to make ourselves one with Him. There is no human merit or element. We have all sinned and can only come to the mercy of God. We do not deserve to be saved, yet He loves us and has provided a way in which we can be reconciled to Him. His Son showed that way. The cross. If we desire to be saved we must go there to be crucified with Christ. To die with our Saviour that we may be raised to newness of life. The Saviour did not nor cannot die that death FOR us. We must die it WITH Him. This atonement is experiencial; it is real. It makes sons and daughters of God. What the Moral Influence theory is I know not. But the power of God's word to uplift and strengthen, to enoble and challenge the human mind is know by all who take Him at His word. That His word is real and that all His promises are for me, that is real. The substitutionary doctrine says that Christ died in my place. What death? The first one? We all die that one. The second one? That is ETERNAL separation from God. Christ was resurrected. He lives. He sits on the right hand of the Father. He has not been eternally separated from Him. So, He has not died that death for us. Which death is it He died or suffered? Is it not the death that crucifies self-will? In Hebrews it says that when He came to the cross He said "Lo, I come to do thy will oh, God….and by that will we are sanctified…" This is not a legal transaction that cleans up the books of heaven. This is a real transaction that cleans up the human heart!
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/19/02 12:35 PM

There is a segment in Adventism that in the last 5 decades has grown to the place where they are in the majority and they believe as you state that man is doomed to sin. But this is not what the church taught from the beginning and it is still not officially accepted today.

One of the promises that is dearest to me is the one you quoted, 'Sin shall not have dominion over you'. If Christ cannot deliver us from sin today, His power in the church is limited and we are still slaves of evil. We have only been partially set free. But if we are not fully liberated, we are still slaves. I agree that the gospel teaches complete deliverence from sin. God does everthing well. He is a professional.

The death He died was the death required by the Law. Justice demanded the death of the transgressor, not just that our sins are pardoned.

It is true that it is impossible to live a sinless life on our own. We do have to accept the wedding garmet by faith. The wedding garment is Christ's life of obedience in the place of our rebellion. If we do not see sin in relation to the Law, and forgiveness in relation to the Law, the wedding garement becomes unholy. It is Christ's obedience that we need in the place of our disobedience. This is the only thing that sanctifies us.

The law defines righteousness. It is God's character. And God's character is the Law. By beholding it we become changed. Everything comes together at the focal point which is the cross where mercy and truth, righteousness and peace are combined and the law is magnified and made honourable.
Posted By: Garywk

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/19/02 05:43 PM

quote:
Since the Substitutionary doctrine establishes in man the righteousness under the law. Indeed it hides it and he does not recognize nor see that it is his righteousness that crucified the Lord. He does not see that his righteousness is under the law of sin and death. He does not see that it is his righteousness that causes him to sin. yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service. So man remains a slave of sin and is not saved from his sin-righteousness, neither indeed can be. He remains separated from God, and cannot enter into fellowship with him. Man is religious.
This is just not true. I belive in substitutionary atonement, and I do not think like this at all.

What you are arguing against is not vicarious atonement, but rather "faith alone." It is "faith alone" that leads to the condition that you are attributing to vicarious atonement. Just as I said in my first post in this thread, your arguments are specious, for your arguments are directed against the wrong theology.

If your arguments were true, then Ellen White, who wrote:
quote:
All true obedience comes from the heart. It was heart work with Christ. And if we consent, He will so identify Himself with our thoughts and aims, so blend our hearts and minds into conformity to His will, that when obeying Him we shall be but carrying out our own impulses. The will, refined and sanctified, will find its highest delight in doing His service. When we know God as it is our privilege to know Him, our life will be a life of continual obedience. Through an appreciation of the character of Christ, through communion with God, sin will become hateful to us. D of A page 688
could not have written this:
quote:
As man's substitute and surety, the iniquity of men was laid upon Christ; He was counted a transgressor that He might redeem them from the curse of the law. . . . He, the Sin-Bearer, endures judicial punishment for iniquity and becomes sin itself for man. The Faith I Live By, page 104, paragraph 5
As a clear supporter and believer in vicarious atonement Ellen White clearly did not teach or beleive what you are saying is the outworking of vicarious atonement.

To blame the outworkings of "faith alone" upon vicarious atonement is completely misplaced. I know of people who reject vicarious atonement and reject the idea of God being able to empower human beings to become obedient to Him. Many of Jack Sequira's followers do not believe that man, through the power of the Holy Spirit, can obey God's law. And Jack Sequira is the the guru for "in Christ", a theology based upon the rejection of vicarious atonement.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/20/02 01:11 PM

The official church position on the vicarious atonement of Christ is posted along with the other 27 fundimental beliefs of the Seventh-day Adventist Church at www.adventist.org. I was happy to see that #9 and #10 are clear on the victory that believers enjoy in Christ. We do not accept the idea that substitutionary atonement leads to defeat.

quote:
9. The Life, Death, and Resurrection of Christ:
In Christ's life of perfect obedience to God's will, His suffering, death, and resurrection, God provided the only means of atonement for human sin, so that those who by faith accept this atonement may have eternal life, and the whole creation may better understand the infinite and holy love of the Creator. This perfect atonement vindicates the righteousness of God's law and the graciousness of His character; for it both condemns our sin and provides for our forgiveness. The death of Christ is substitutionary and expiatory, reconciling and transforming. The resurrection of Christ proclaims God's triumph over the forces of evil, and for those who accept the atonement assures their final victory over sin and death. It declares the Lordship of Jesus Christ, before whom every knee in heaven and on earth will bow. (John 3:16; Isa. 53; 1 Peter 2:21, 22; 1 Cor. 15:3, 4, 20-22; 2 Cor. 5:14, 15, 19-21; Rom. 1:4; 3:25; 4:25; 8:3, 4; 1 John 2:2; 4:10; Col. 2:15; Phil. 2:6-11.)

10. The Experience of Salvation:
In infinite love and mercy God made Christ, who knew no sin, to be sin for us, so that in Him we might be made the righteousness of God. Led by the Holy Spirit we sense our need, acknowledge our sinfulness, repent of our transgressions, and exercise faith in Jesus as Lord and Christ, as Substitute and Example. This faith which receives salvation comes through the divine power of the Word and is the gift of God's grace. Through Christ we are justified, adopted as God's sons and daughters, and delivered from the lordship of sin. Through the Spirit we are born again and sanctified; the Spirit renews our minds, writes God's law of love in our hearts, and we are given the power to live a holy life. Abiding in Him we become partakers of the divine nature and have the assurance of salvation now and in the judgment. (2 Cor. 5:17-21; John 3:16; Gal. 1:4; 4:4-7; Titus 3:3-7; John 16:8; Gal. 3:13, 14; 1 Peter 2:21, 22; Rom. 10:17; Luke 17:5; Mark 9:23, 24; Eph. 2:5-10; Rom. 3:21-26; Col. 1:13, 14; Rom. 8:14-17; Gal. 3:26; John 3:3-8; 1 Peter 1:23; Rom. 12:2; Heb. 8:7-12; Eze. 36:25-27; 2 Peter 1:3, 4; Rom. 8:1-4; 5:6-10.)


Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/20/02 11:22 PM

Maybe my experience is abnormal, but I simply do not feel guilty and unworthy when I fall into sin. I immediately receive and experience the gift of repentance the moment I find myself in sin, but I do not feel guilty or unworthy. Am I weird, or what?

My sins are not the premeditated type. When I fall into sin it's the unintentional kind. Thus, I do not feel like some big fat creepy sinner. Of course, I am sorry I have fallen victim to sin, and I am happy to repent. But the sorrow I feel is intellectual. Can anybody relate?

So, for me, this whole discussion about self righteousness and sin is going over my head. But what does make sense to me is that Jesus lived and died the perfect life and death to make atonement, reconcilation and redemption possible for sinners like me.

I think probably the most encompassing definition of sin is - "Whatsoever is not of faith is sin." Rom 14:23. This one definition includes all other definitions:

James 4
17 Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.

1 John 3
4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

1 John 5
17 All unrighteousness is sin.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/20/02 09:26 PM

You are blessed Mike. This gift comes from above. There is now no condemnation to them who are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh but after the spirit. The reason why you do not have guilt is because you do not own the sin. Repentance disowns the sin. Sorrow is for lack of watchfulness, awareness, similar to a child having done something he did not realize was wrong, until being informed.
All who repent at first awareness are guiltless, as well as those who do not seek their own glory.

Guilt enters when one begins to justify him self, thereby becoming the owner of the sin. In premeditated or habitual sin this self-justification occurs in advance and or habitually. Thus establishing self-righteousness.

Thank you for the meaningful definition of sin.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/23/02 08:27 AM

Thank you, John. I like the way you explained my experience with sin and guilt. God is so good. Jesus became the lawful owner of my sin and second death when He lived and died the perfect life and death. Now, in Christ, I am free from guilt and condemnation. Thank you Jesus!

[ September 23, 2002, 02:30 AM: Message edited by: Mike Lowe ]
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/24/02 06:35 AM

Hello John & Debbie!

Nice to "see you" again!

I appreciate the way you have tried to bring out the implication of God's love, in your last post above.

As usual; I have lots of questions, but only time for one tonight. [Smile]

John, I will quote your above post briefly, then ask the question:

"Mark, it is true that the substitutionary doctrine does confirm our guilt and our worthiness of death. At the same time reassures us of a love of God through which He sent His Son to pay the penalty so that we don't have to die."

We are talking here, it seems, about the Atonement. You have stated above that God "sent" His Son.

Now, let me quote Scripture; and ask you to explain the difference, which I will bold for you:

"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son.." (Jo.3:16)

Now, in Jo.3:17:

For God sent not His Son into the world, to condemn the world...."

Can you share with us how to reconcile the differences in wording, from these two verses, and in light of the above quote I took from your post?

The reason I am asking, is because I suspect that many do not have a correct idea of the nature of the first Advent of Christ, and this casts a pall over sound Biblical explanations of what the Atonement is, or is not.

Why the differences of those two verses between "sent," and "gave?" How would the answer to this affect your above quote that I used?

I will look forward to your reply.

David T Battler
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/25/02 05:26 AM

I thought I might write the following experience, to perhaps give a little perspective.

Being a third generation Adventist I was brought up with full knowledge and understanding of Adventist doctrine. At the age of six I read the whole Bible from cover to cover. This was a special year in my life. I witnessed a personal answer to prayer in the life of my uncle as he sought God's leading in his life. I covenanted then that when I grow up I will seek God's leading in my life. Growing up in poverty in a communist country meant that our religion had to mean more than a friendly church. We were ridiculed, persecuted, fined for not going to school on Sabbath, and left the country one week before my parents would have been imprisoned and us children taken from them. From early childhood days we learned to stand for our faith. It was easier to stand in those days, for the enemy was known.

When we came to Austria, the situation changed. We were now in a friendly country, excused from school on Sabbath, and had freedom. At this time I was 10 years old and seeing some prosperity and freedom I relaxed. My childhood desires began to tempt me, all in the gray areas naturally. I made some friends and did questionable things. The enemy from outside I had known, but this enemy from within I knew not. Some self-justification, some repentance, some indulgence, some sorrow. I was tossed back and forth. Guilt set in. The knowledge that Christ paid the penalty for me did not remove my guilt but rather increased my fear of the Father. I knew that in order for the sacrifice to be accepted in my place, there would need to be fruit meet of repentance. This I could not muster.

When I was 13 we moved to Canada. I resolved to turn a new leaf. I would not make any friends in the world. This did not trouble me, as I knew what it was like not to have friends for the first 10 years of my life. All my friends were in the church. This I thought was safe. New things, television; Satan found a way to bring the world into our home, the acceptable setting. Teenage years brought more temptations, and though I was resolved to be true to God, I garnered some sins. Guilt increased. I longed to be made right with God. I sorrowed for sin, and had fear. Repentance? What was repentance when inclination to sin was there?

At 16 I was baptized. It was my sincere commitment, hope, and desire that all things should be new. I believed everything the church taught. I believed that Christ was my redeemer, and that through the merits of his blood my past sins would be erased. I knew that he lived a perfect life and believed that his sacrifice was sufficient to atone for my sin. I was hoping for the power of the Holy Spirit in my life, to set me free from my transgressions. But it did not come. I was in every church activity, participating or leading out. Fully engaged in evangelistic programs and prayer meetings. But there was no victory. I wondered why, what did I do wrong? I had no assurance of salvation and did not know how to obtain it. From conversation of Adventist friends, old and young I learned that it was no different with them but it did not seem to bother them. To continue in this way and keep claiming the blood of Christ was like crucifying the Lord afresh. From pastors I heard that we will never know if we are saved until the judgment day. God was up there and we were down here. I continued fully active in the church, not missing in anything, and continued praying for deliverance.

At 22 years of age I determined that this was no good. Things were going nowhere. If there was salvation then it was for now, and not someday. To wait for the judgment day was a foolish thing to do in my mind. My childhood covenant stayed with me. I resolved come what may that I was going to seek audience with God. Immediately I was convicted and stopped watching television. Now I had a couple of hours or more extra each day to spend in seeking the Lord. I came to God not claiming the blood, nor worrying about penalties, not thinking how he would be appeased, made satisfied, nor how my record would be cleansed. I came to him for Salvation.

I came to him with my need. I came at his mercy. My fear and guilt left me. I came to receive from him, for him to show me his will and his way. I received forgiveness. I found strength and victory. I would be convicted almost each day of something and immediately it was as a done thing. Repentance came freely. This is not to say that the carnal nature disappeared, but that it had no more power over me. The Lord began to show me the wretchedness of my religious righteousness. I realized that it was just such a righteousness that crucified him, and I shuddered at the thought. I saw to what great cost heaven went to bring life and salvation to me. I realized that faith is 'trusting him', not believing things about him. I knew that my whole governance of my being was amiss. I began to experience his approval, faith and love. I began to realize the faith of the Son of God and his life in me that I may be a son.

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/25/02 05:31 AM

Well Mike your conclusion is ??

If we are to maintain the definition of sin, and guilt as stated, then for Christ to become the rightful owner of your sin. He would have had to break faith, to transgress, and then to keep the guilt and condemnation, he would need to self justify. That would of necessity invalidate any atonement.

Mike what do you mean when you say that?

I see there is a concern about how it is all cleaned up with God. How you will stand before him and not have to die.

Mike what you want is forgiveness not a substitute payment, personal forgiveness where you experience him receiving you and setting you free. There is no peace or reconciliation in substitute payment.

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/25/02 06:49 AM

Greetings David, God be with you.

Yes it has been some time. Thank you for your observations.

Your question is great and I do not know that I will be able to answer it in one post.

I believe the contrasting message in the two verses defines the meaning of the 'gave' and 'sent' well.

John 3:16 tells us what God is doing
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

For God so loved, that he gave (this would be meaningless if the giving was so he could satisfy himself, his own requirements, demands), For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son. Why? Because we needed him. For what purpose? that whosoever believeth in him. This is a personal faith in a person. The just shall live by faith. It is faith that man needs. Not as Israel of old who said Let not God speak to us lest we die - that was a faith, belief about God, that kept them from life. It kept them offering sacrifices to God. They would not trust God personally. We need the faith of the Son, so that we could become sons. The word 'in' in that whosoever believeth in him really means 'into' - a point reached or entered - as the saviour said abide in me and I in you. So that we may not perish, but have everlasting life. Everlasting life - the servant abideth not in the house forever, but the son abideth ever. Everlasting life can only be had as sons. Christ is the author and finisher of our faith. What faith? The faith of a son. Where there is personal faith there is no distrust. There is reconciliation and peace. Eternal life. God so loved that he gave.

…and on earth peace, good will toward men.

John 3:17 tells us what God is not doing
For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

Man was full of guilt and condemnation. Sin does that. God did not send (dispatch) his son for the purpose of condemning us. There was enough of that in this world. The Son came to set free those who are in bondage. Bondage to what? God's penalty for sin? No. But rather from the darkness and slavery of sin. The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised. That the world through him might be saved.

John 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/25/02 07:59 AM

John, I believe Jesus is the lawful owner of sin and the second death for all mankind. I believe He earned the right to own our sin and second death when He consumed the cup of God's wrath beginning in Gethsemane and ending on Golgotha.

Because Jesus owns all sin and death, which He accomplished before He laid down His own life, we are able to sin without immediately incurring the consequences of sin, which is eternal death. Our Lord has quarantined sin and death within the most holy place of the heavenly sanctuary.

He will one day transfer the sin and death of the saved upon the head of Satan, the scapegoat. The devil will die with the sins of the saved in the lake of fire, the second death. This is the final process of the atonement for mankind.

Jesus is our substitute in the sense that He earned the right to own our sin and death, and to transfer it upon the head of Satan. Sin and death did not defeat Jesus on the cross, rather He defeated them, and became our substitute, which gives Him the legal right to eliminate them as He sees fit.

The love He demonstrated for us, on behalf of the Godhead, by willingly living and dying for us can set us free, if we are willing to comply with the conditions of salvation - namely, accept Jesus as our personal Saviour.

That's what makes sense to me. What about you?

[ September 25, 2002, 02:05 AM: Message edited by: Mike Lowe ]
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/25/02 09:18 AM

Thanks for your reply brother John

Let me quote from your post first:

"I believe the contrasting message in the two verses defines the meaning of the 'gave' and 'sent' well."

This is a good approach for Bible study...looking into the text itself for our answers. I appreciate seeing that.

It looks like you have some other remarks planned that you have not yet posted because of time limitations...I will be looking forward to reading what you have to say.

I have a question about the context of your use of Luke 2;14 above. ("peace on earth, good will to men..."). The most correct rendering of this text seems to suggest "peace on earth to men of good will..." so I am not sure why you used that text here. it would be of interest to hear that explained better. [Smile]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/25/02 05:20 PM

John, I don't believe Jesus had to sin and die in order to be our substitute. He was able to own our sin and death by drinking the cup of God's wrath in our place. The fact He lived through completely consuming the cup is evidence He conquered sin and death. He carried our sin and death within Himself and deposited them in the most holy place, where they remain to this day awaiting elimination in the lake of fire upon the head of Satan.

We can incur the wrath of God at the end of time by neglecting or rejecting to receive Jesus as our personal Saviour. If we go to our grave without embracing the gift of Jesus, then we shall return from the grave to be eliminated with our own sin and death in the lake of fire.

When we receive Jesus into our hearts and minds we are free from the guilt and condemnation that makes up the cup of God's wrath. It is the truth that sets us free, the truth as it is in Jesus, the truth concerning sin and salvation. There is no freedom if we do not believe that in Jesus we are free from sin.

The unholy thoughts and feelings that torment born again believers, who are walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, are only temptations, and must be seen as such. Otherwise, they are likely to assume that they are not experiencing the victory over sin promised them in Jesus. And then they will be forced to concoct new theories in order to account for the existent of the unholy thoughts and feelings that torment them.
Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/25/02 10:31 PM

Our High Calling--- Blending the Law and Gospel
-PG- 141
-
What is to bring the sinner to the knowledge of his sins unless he knows what sin is? The only definition of sin in the Word of God is
given us in 1 John 3:4. "Sin is the transgression of the law."
The sinner must be made to feel that he is a transgressor. Christ dying upon the
cross of Calvary is drawing his attention. Why did Christ die? Because it was the only means for man to be saved. . . . He took upon Himself our sins that He might impute His righteousness to all who believe in Him. . . . The goodness and the love of God lead the sinner to repentance
toward God and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ. The awakened sinner . . . is pointed to the law he has transgressed. It calls to him to
repent, yet there is no saving quality in law to pardon the transgression of law, and his case seems hopeless. But the law draws him to Christ. However deep are his sins of transgression, the blood of Jesus Christ can cleanse him from all sin. . . ."
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/26/02 05:09 AM

Thank you David for the comments on Luke 2:14.

I find virtue in both translations.

The interlinear reads: Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, in men goodwill.

The reason I quoted that scripture is because it was a message from heaven to man upon the birth of Christ. In giving us his Son the Father was offering peace and goodwill to man. As we see in the world there is little goodwill so there is no peace. The way Sin uses the law of God, and establishes in man a legal-istic righteousness it makes no room for goodwill and gives no peace.

The Father in giving us his Son offered us peace and goodwill. As man by sin is afraid of God, and thinks that God is after him to get him, this message is especially meaningful.

It is also true that those who have goodwill have peace. For goodwill is a grace of Love.

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/26/02 05:12 AM

Yes Charlene, the law came in to expose sin, that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful. Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. For I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good. Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.

It is of necessity that wherever there is the breakdown of faith between persons rules come in. But no rules or law can ever reestablish the faith that has been lost. Faith is established when the distrusting one realizes that his reasons for distrust are false and spurious, and moreover when he realizes that the one distrusted is better than he. So yes indeed, the goodness and love of God leadeth thee to repentance.

We need to affirm the scriptural definition of sin as Mike quoted, and I agree with him that the first is the most encompassing definition of sin and that this one definition includes all other definitions:

Rom 14:23 "Whatsoever is not of faith is sin.".

James 4: 17 Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.

1 John 3: 4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

1 John 5: 17 All unrighteousness is sin.

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/27/02 01:46 PM

Thank you for your patience Mike.

In your last post, you voiced concern regarding possible confusion between sin and temptation. It should stand to reason that anyone, who has been victorious over temptation, should know the difference. The confusion that I have seen is that some think, that to have victory is to have no temptation. That is no victory at all.

Mike I know you don't believe that Jesus had to sin and die to be our substitute. That would be self-defeating.

As I have been following your thought in regards to Christ earning the right to be the legal owner of your sin, I see a parallel thought in scripture which I would like to bring out.

First you made a definition if I understand you correctly: that the cup of God's wrath is made up of our guilt and condemnation. This understood correctly is definitely true. Now our guilt and condemnation is a product of our legal-istic self-righteousness, and Christ said that with what measure (judgment) you mete it shall be measured to you again. So we come to see what I have written in 'part one' is the problem of sin in that it has taken the law of God and deceived me and established a righteousness in man that is destructive.

Second, you said that Jesus is our substitute in the sense that He earned the right to own our sin and death … which gives Him the legal right to eliminate them as He sees fit. This thought, though it is fettered, is paralleling the gospel in scripture. (This I am covering in 'part two', hopefully soon to be ready for posting.)

The thought is that Christ earned the right/authority/respect/adoration/faithfulness to judge us, the whole universe, and Satan.
    Philippians 2:
    8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
    9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:
    10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;

    John 5:27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.

    John 12:32 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.

    Hebrews 2:17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.

    John 12:31 Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.

    Revelation 12:
    9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole wornd: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
    10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.
    11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.

The perspective of the controversy between Christ and Satan can be seen in Job. Where God's judgment is contradicted and Job is accused. It was necessary therefore to silence the accuser/accusations. This could only be by revelation of the nature of Satan's righteousness and God's righteousness; namely the truth. These two met at the cross in a revelation that is profound. Heaven has seen it, and Satan was cast out and there was no more room found for him in heaven. And so it is with each man when he will realize this revelation, and accept Christ as his Judge, and receive his judgment, that Satan will be cast out of his life and there shall no more room be found for Satan in him. And they shall overcome him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony; and they shall love not their lives unto the death.

The most common question that arises in people's minds is how can judgment save them. That is because the only judgment they know is accusative, condemning. The revelation of God's righteousness, and judgment which is restorative, up-building, life-giving, needs to be realized and received. His judgment is life.
    Matthew 12:20 A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall he not quench, till he send forth judgment unto victory.

    Isaiah 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.

    Psalm 9:
    8 And he shall judge the world in righteousness, he shall minister judgment to the people in uprightness.
    9 The LORD also will be a refuge for the oppressed, a refuge in times of trouble.
    10 And they that know thy name will put their trust in thee: for thou, LORD, hast not forsaken them that seek thee.

There is much more to be said but does this open up, reconcile any thoughts with you?

Shalom
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/27/02 03:30 PM

Salvation is not legalistic. Salvation is not from the penalty of God's
law.


John

The above is a quote from your first post here. Can you further explain your statement, in light of the following Scripture?

Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us … (Gal.3:13)

What is your understanding of "the curse of the law?" Is this "curse" something different than "the penalty of sin?" (or the consequences of breaking the
law?).
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/27/02 05:08 PM

Greetings David

While I have addressed the principles of your question in part one, part one post stops exactly at the point of your question, which is the beginning of part two

Curse of the Law
We need to realize what is meant in the scripture when it speaks about those who are, under the law, by the law, of the law, under sin. In all these is found a righteousness that is not from God, a righteousness which is their own, whose author is Satan. Sin holds dominion upon all them that are of this righteousness. Sin declares that there can be no forgiveness. Satan urges, by the law that the sinner cannot be pardoned. So all who are under the law are possessors of a legal-istic righteousness, the curse of the law, which is not of God, but of Satan. Death is the power of that righteousness. It thrives on penalties.
    Romans 10:3 For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
    Romans 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
    Romans 7:5 For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.
I agree that it is the wages of / penalty of Sin. But it is not the wages for / penalty for Sin. In other words it is not of God's righteousness but of Satan's righteousness/sin. The possessors of sin reap the wages from their master (Satan). We may not ascribe to God that which is of the Devil, though the Devil would like it so. Christ came to redeem us from Satan's righteousness/sin to God's righteousness/love.

Being made a curse for us
From Gethsemane to 'It is finished', Christ and scripture tells us, was the work of darkness. It was permitted upon Christ that which was not permitted on Job. Satan was allowed to impose upon Christ his mind, his view of God, his accusative idea of justice/righteousness. We can see from the sweat of blood how foreign this thought and mind was to Christ. We can also see from the testimony of Christ before this and after resurrection of his thoughts of the Father and his righteousness. We can see from what was done to Christ the meaning of
    John 19:7 The Jews answered him, We have a law, and by our law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God.
It was Satan's purpose at all cost if possible to break the faith of the Son, to sway him from trusting his Father. But the righteousness of God is greater than death, Christ was victorious, He knew His Father differently. The righteousness which is of Faith triumphed over the righteousness/curse of the law.
This is a brief answer, I hope to post part two sometime this weekend.
God Bless and Shalom

[ September 27, 2002, 11:20 AM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/28/02 01:36 PM

Some advice from Sister White:

quote:
Do not place your influence against God's commandments. That law is just as Jehovah wrote it in the temple of heaven. Man may trample upon its copy here below, but the original is kept in the ark of God in heaven; and on the cover of this ark, right above that law, is the mercy seat. Jesus stands right there before that ark to mediate for man.--Manuscript 6a, 1886 (SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 1, p. 1109).

(482) {7ABC 481.5}
We all need to keep the subject of the sanctuary in mind. God forbid that the clatter of words coming from human lips should lessen the belief of our people in the truth that there is a sanctuary in heaven, and that a pattern of this sanctuary was once built on this earth. God desires His people to become familiar with this pattern, keeping ever before their minds the heavenly sanctuary, where God is all and in all.--Letter 233, 1904. {7ABC 482.1}

Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/28/02 10:31 PM

Mark

Who on earth are you talking to in your last post? How are any of us to know what or who you refer to?

=============

The URL has been removed as it was placed here without first obtaining permission. - Daryl

[ September 28, 2002, 04:40 PM: Message edited by: Daryl Fawcett ]
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/29/02 01:01 AM

In wrapping up the account of your early Christian experience on the last page John you wrote:
quote:
Now I had a couple of hours or more extra each day to spend in seeking the Lord. I came to God not claiming the blood, nor worrying about penalties, not thinking how he would be appeased, made satisfied, nor how my record would be cleansed. I came to him for Salvation.
At the risk of sounding judgmental, this is where you began to go off track. You set up your own experience as the test of faith here rather than bringing your experience to be tested by the Word. Now you judge the Word by your experience.

You continue:

quote:
I came to him with my need. I came at his mercy. My fear and guilt left me. I came to receive from him, for him to show me his will and his way. I received forgiveness. I found strength and victory. I would be convicted almost each day of something and immediately it was as a done thing. Repentance came freely. This is not to say that the carnal nature disappeared, but that it had no more power over me.
You seem to be saying that victory comes naturally to you now. If there is no law, it would. Have you considered that what you consider to be victory is simply that when you do wrong, your conscience has been re-educated to test itself by your ego (the term used by psycologists to refer to self) rather than the Law of God. And so you are truly dead to the Law. But is this a wholesome death?

When you decided to seek salvation without regard to the Law, so that you are not completely without standards you've created in your mind a new kind of righteousness. Nature abhors a vacuum, and you've filled the void created by discarding the standard of conduct, the Law, with a new righteouness "apart from the law." The problem is it is not Biblical. God is a God of mercy but mercy is only mercy where there are rules. The mercy seat, God's throne, rests on the Law. Mercy covers the Law, as a magnifying glass making it honourable. And the Law is the foundation of mercy.

[ September 28, 2002, 07:09 PM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/29/02 01:28 AM

Amen Mark,

And for many, this is the problem:

Selected Messages Book 3--- The Reception of the Messages----PG- 83--- Secure From Satan's Seductive Delusions.

-"Men may get up scheme after scheme, and the enemy will seek to seduce souls from the truth, but all who believe that the Lord has spoken through Sister White, and has given her a message, will be safe from the many delusions that will come in these last days."--Letter 50,
1906.

Early Writings of Ellen G. White--- Spiritual Gifts----PG- 256

"Many who embraced the third message had not had an experience in the two former messages. Satan understood this, and his evil eye was upon them to overthrow them; but the third angel was pointing them to the most holy place, and those who had had an experience in the past messages were pointing them the way to the heavenly sanctuary. Many saw the perfect chain of truth in the angels' messages, and gladly received them in their order, and followed Jesus by faith into the heavenly sanctuary. These messages were represented to me as an anchor to the people
of God. Those who understand and receive them will
be kept from being swept away by the many delusions of Satan."

The first Angel's message points us to the santuary..."for the hour of His judgement is come"
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 09/29/02 02:38 PM

Thank you kindly Mark for your thoughts and concerns.

That would indeed be a very sad situation. You seem to have missed the fact that it was to him I came not to self. By their fruits you shall know them.

Do you not hear that your reasoning follows along the lines of those who condemned the Lord. I suppose the paralytic that was healed should not have accepted forgiveness, for the forgiveness he received was not by the law. He offered no sacrifice, did not go though any ceremonial procedure, but dropped in through the roof. He accepted it upon the authority of him who healed him. Was not Christ censured for forgiving him? If Christ was able to speak those words to him, is he not able to speak those words to me? Or do I have to go through the system, the shadow, which could not make the comers thereunto perfect, and impose the shadow on the real. Is not Christ the Way, the Truth, and the Life? Are you not holding the atonement doctrine out of perspective?

This conflict in understanding of the law & righteousness has been going on since the beginning of sin, but has been crystallized with the arrival of the Messiah.

You know Mark, the law is a witness, and it witnesses to the righteousness that is of Faith, that it is righteousness. Romans 3:21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; Nevertheless those who were under the law could not see it as long as the veil was on their face.

Now the contest here is not the Law, but it is the righteousness under the law, which is preventing the righteousness of God that is by Faith. But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully; The issue is what is the lawful use of the law.

Since no one has yet defined the "Adventist" view. It appears that the issue in your mind is the death penalty. Correct me if I am wrong, but this is what I seem to be getting from all you have said so far, that in your mind. The death penalty seems to make or break the law. If there is no death penalty, then there is no Law. That God's righteousness is fulfilled in executing the death penalty, and that this is immutable. This immutable death penalty is the virtue of the law. The strength of God's righteousness is the law. The whole plan of atonement rotates around dealing with the death penalty. If there is no death penalty then you do not see any need for Christ to die. Forgiveness is effected by God providing a substitute sacrifice to die to satisfy the demands of the law (penalty). And we, if we follow the understanding of the shadow, 'by faith' apply all those to Christ and ourselves, are then safe.
To sum it:
That God has made a law for the purpose that it’s transgressors would then be found guilty of transgression and sentenced to death.
That the law has such penalties for making wrongs right.

I would like an answer from you in regards to this issue of penalty.

Shalom

[ September 29, 2002, 09:11 AM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/01/02 05:05 AM

Mark & Gary

I just went back & re read this thread in detail. I can see why you & others have gotten your backs up with some of John's writings.

You have both quoted from his testimony on page five, in the sense of accusing him of spiritualism. Is what you have done Biblical? Even tho you quoted Bible?

First of all, it is rare that a person's personal testimony, is intended as an exposition on some point of theology. You have both treated his testimony as his giving us a precise theological statement.

I think the reason you are so threatened by what he wrote, is because John has very accurately described a very real dilema with many others in the church, who do not have any real assurance of their salvation, or in the Atonement.

John has shared a very personal journey, (1 Jo.1:1-3), along with some personal impressions along the way, and this is not easy to do publicly; but I believe he deserves more credit than you give him; and I believe that you have let your own preconceived opinions get in the way of what is really going on here. The Bible calls something like this idolatry...when we hold our opinions so close, that they cannot see the proper sphere of another's opinions. Let us not forget, the way you have taken little snippets of John's testimony, and made them out to be apostate, new age belief, reflects sin on your part. Intelligent Bible study would have been much more preferable.

RH.1887-06-28.005
The greatest detriment to our churches, that which brings them into weakness and disfavor with God, is unhappy jealousies and differences. "Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these, adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revelings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God." Then let every soul examine himself, and see if he is approaching the committal of any such sins.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/01/02 05:29 AM

Hello John: We've been up to our elbows in tomatos the last few days. I hope to give an answer before long, but don't let that stop anyone else. Shalom.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/01/02 08:15 AM

John, I'm not sure I'm following your logic. Please help me out. Are you suggesting that death is not the penalty for transgressing God's law? And are you also saying that there is no connection between death and transgressing God's law?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/01/02 07:06 PM

Linda, Charlene, Daryl and others, I have repeatedly suggested that Satan, the scapegoat, is the one who will "make an atonement" (Lev 16:10) by dying the second death with the sins of the saved. Jesus did not die the second death, instead He "tasted" (Heb 2:9) and consumed the cup of God's wrath (the second death), thereby earning the right to own our sin and second death, and that He "accomplished the work which He came to do" (DA 758) before He laid down and took up His own life.

But so far no one has addressed these issues. Why? Please show me in the Bible or SOP where it says Jesus, and not Satan, dies the second death of the saved with their sins.

Why would the Devil have to die with the sins of the saved if Jesus has already eliminated them by dying the second death? If Jesus died the second death why was He resurrected with the sins of the saved? If Jesus died the second death why wasn't the plan of salvation completed then and there?
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/02/02 02:39 PM

Greetings Mike, peace be with you all:

Your question
quote:
John, I'm not sure I'm following your logic. Please help me out. Are you suggesting that death is not the penalty for transgressing God's law? And are you also saying that there is no connection between death and transgressing God's law?
Yes, I affirm that there is no penalty for transgression of God's Law. But there definitely is death as a reality of transgressing God's law. I thought I had made it clear from the beginning that Penalty is not scriptural and that the word is not used in scripture even once. This is a crucial thought concept. I invite you to reread my posts.

Let us try and understand this. I will present this using another perspective. Penalties exist only in Arbitrary Laws and never in Real Laws. Real Laws never carry Penalties.

Arbitrary Laws
What makes an Arbitrary Law? An Arbitrary Law is arbitrary because it expects you to 'get away with it' unless there is a penalty, and unless someone enforces it. Arbitrary Laws change with times and circumstances. This world is full of Arbitrary Laws. All governments of this world deal in Arbitrary Laws. Arbitrary Laws are not necessarily bad. Arbitrary Laws need enforcement, and the only way to enforce Arbitrary Laws is by intervention (if caught). Man's Laws are mostly Arbitrary Laws

Real Laws
Real Laws on the other hand never need penalties because they are real. That is to say there is no possibility of 'getting away with it'. For example the Law of Gravity is a Real Law in this world for us. If someone throws a rock straight up in clear space and remains standing there, the fact that it will come down on his head is not a penalty. It is reality. Real Laws need no enforcement, and so in Real Laws the only way to be saved from the results is by intervention (if there is time). And so there are many Real Laws that I am sure you all can think of.

God's Laws are Real Laws, not Arbitrary Laws.
In fact all the Real Laws that man is aware of, God has established. Now as in the physical realm so it is also in the spiritual realm. God established a Real Law for the spirit and its governance. Transgressing the Law of Life results in death. No penalties, just reality. Now you might say, then why are we not all dead? Just one minute. First we must understand the Real Law. When God told Adam in the day you eat of it you shall surely die, he told him reality. He did not promise him a penalty. Let us understand this.

Now God is above all physical laws. I think that is easy enough for all to agree. When the three young men in Babylon were thrown into the fire, we see it. Israel crossing the Red Sea. I am sure you all can think of many more occasions when God intervened with laws greater than our realm to create, change or void the result.

In similar manner the Law of Sin and Death is real, but God's Law of Life is greater than death as can be attested to by the resurrection from the dead. Now some might view this as only physical. The scripture however draws a spiritual parallel reality. The resurrection of the spirit and soul is not only physical, but is of necessity spiritual and deals with the Law of Sin versus the Law of Faith (Life). As I have said in an earlier post, as soon as man sinned, God stepped in with a special dispensation of Life, to give time, so that as many as would be saved could be saved. In other words God has provided safety (mercy) measures, so that that which was imminent, might be avoided.

To understand Salvation is to understand the glory of the righteousness of God, which is by faith (the Law of Life), which sets us free from the Law of Sin and Death. To understand redemption is to understand the purpose and reality of what was accomplished in the life and death of Christ.

Therefore I bear witness that Salvation is not from the penalty of God's Law, thereby from God's righteousness, thereby from God Himself. There is no such thing. This, as stated in previous posts, is a concept that Satan deceived man into. Salvation is rather from the Law of Sin and Death to the Law of Life, thereby to God's righteousness, thereby reconciling us with God. This is primarily and foremost spiritual, and then afterwards physical, since God has already established temporary (time based) measures to sustain physical life, while the outworking of Salvation is accomplished.

Shalom

[ October 02, 2002, 12:49 PM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/02/02 03:45 PM

Hello John

While I see some of the personal remarks made about you here as out of line; your last post does raise some questions, when combined with certain other things you have been saying. I think that one or two legitimate concerns about doctrine may have been raised.

Let me quote from your above post to summarize my concern/question:

"Yes, I affirm that there is no penalty for transgression of God's Law."

If I may ask you some questions first, I would like to know:

a) Do you see "penalty" or "substitution" for our sins, or for transgression of God's law, as denigrating God's character, as that of a loving God? Can you explain your answers from Scripture?

b) Let us consider this and related Scriptures

Romans 5:11 And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement

What does/should this verse mean to

a) Christians

b) non-Christians?

Have you, according to this Scripture, received this Atonement? If so, how do you know? And, if so, do you NOW "joy in God," because of it, as did the apostle? Please explain.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/02/02 03:49 PM

Mark

Please forgive me for yelling at you on the internet again...

One of these days I will stop hitting the rock twice when God says "once." [Smile]

You are lucky you have tomatoes to worry about...we had snow yesterday and I had to cycle 10 miles in it...but I enjoyed it so it wasn't as bad for me, as for others.

If I may Mark; I would like to ask you the same questions above in my last post, that I just asked our brother John.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/02/02 03:54 PM

Mike

Your above post was VERY confusing to me.

First of all, I checked out the page number reference you gave for DA. There is nothing there about Satan having any part of the Atonement.

I am quite surprised to see you talk along this line, as if Jesus somehow did not pay it all, as the song goes.

It might help if you check your above reference, and give us the specific quote you are referring to; (and try to re-explain it), and if I may also ask you the above questions I just asked John & Mark; I would appreciate it very much. [Smile]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/04/02 02:38 AM

John, thank you for clarifying your thoughts on penalty and sin. I like the distinction you made between arbitary and real laws. But I would argue that since God can bypass the laws of nature, that means that not even the "real" laws of nature are, strictly speaking, free from being arbitary.

And death, from what is written in Gen 3:20-22, is not independent from the penalty God imposed upon mankind, i.e., God disallowed access to the fruit of the tree of life, which perpetuates life, because man sinned. Thus, sin and death seem related. The relation is based on a penalty imposed by God. Otherwise, man would have lived forever having access to the fruit of life.

Do you see what I mean?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/04/02 02:51 AM

David, this computer I'm using is very slow so it's not real easy to repost the quotes. However, they are in an earlier post somewhere.

I totally believe our atonement, so far as it has to do with our salvation, is 100% based upon the work Jesus accomplished for us. He lived and died the perfect life and death.

But I also happen to believe that the atonement, so far as sin and the second death is concerned, is not complete until Satan dies with the sins of the saved. Jesus secured our salvation by defeating the second death. His sojourn in the tomb involved the first death, as evidenced by, 1) His resurrection and, 2) the fact Satan dies in place of the saved with their sins.

Do you see what I mean?
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/04/02 04:24 AM

I think this is the text that Mike is referring to:

quote:

Leviticus 16:7 And he shall take the two goats, and present them before the LORD at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.
8 And Aaron shall cast lots upon the two goats; one lot for the LORD, and the other lot for the scapegoat.
9
And Aaron shall bring the goat upon which the LORD'S lot fell, and offer him for a sin offering.
10 But the goat, on which the lot fell to be the scapegoat, shall be presented alive before the LORD, to make an atonement with him, and to let him go for a scapegoat into the wilderness.

What is this text actually telling us about the two goats, particularly the scapegoat?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/04/02 02:57 PM

Daryl

Thankyou for adding this text for us to refer to. [Smile]

Mike

No matter how you put it now, your above post seems solid in asserting that Jesus does not, did not quite pay all that was needed for the Atonement; and that Satan, somehow, possesses atleast a small role, in a final disposition of our sins. This is shocking to me that someone would interpet these passages so, and I have to wonder if other churches are not correct when they say we have often missed the boat on this one; if your post reflects our official teaching.

I am still waiting for you to address my question re the Desire Of Ages quote you made above. It would be helpful, I feel, to see where you were coming from there.

Also, to anyone following this topic; let us remember, there were actually 3 distinct rituals that took place in the OT sanctuary, in accordance with God's instructions for the Day Of Atonement Services therein.

Is it not a mistake to isolate this Azazel Rite from the other two that took place on that day?

Also, I have a related question about Lev.16:21

21 And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness:

What is the signifigance of the phrase:

"by the hands of a fit man?"
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/05/02 06:46 AM

Mike you said:
quote:
I have repeatedly suggested that Satan, the scapegoat, is the one who will "make an atonement" (Lev 16:10) by dying the second death with the sins of the saved.
Atonement under the sacrificial system is by blood. The scapegoat makes no atonement in that sense, but once the sins of God's people are removed from themselves and the sanctuary, they are eventually transferred to the scapegoat. There is no virtue in the scapegoat as part of the atonement however. The cleansing is all by virtue of the Lord's goat and bull. And the transferring of sin to the scapegoat is by virtue of the Lord's goat and the work of the High Priest.

John is right in this: The punishment of Satan has nothing to do directly with our atonement. His punishment is only reaping his own harvest. It does not reflect back on us. But it appears as though the very sins satan has tempted us with consume him.

John you asked:
quote:
I would like an answer from you in regards to this issue of penalty.

God does punish. But not vindictively. God says vengence is mine. But not vindictiveness. As Mike pointed out, He barred the way to the tree of life so that Adam would not immortalize sin.

The serpent disputed the existance of this death penalty at first. He said you will not surely die. Now we have sin and death but he still says the same thing - you will not die - eternally.

Several posts back you asked how Christ could die the second death in a few hours. It is a mystery but the scripture says that Christ offered himself through the eternal Spirit. In other words His sacrifice trancends time. Like Christ Himself, it is Eternal. As he hung on the cross, the Father clothed the final sufferings of Christ in impenatrible blackness. He went into the 'black hole' of eternal death, but came out victorious. Faith does not fully understand this - it is clothed by the Father in mystery - but faith claims this fact. The Patriarchs obtained the same salvation as we have because their faith laid hold on the eternal sacrifice of Christ.

Christ is who He claims to be - the Eternal living One. And the Spirit is who He claims to be - an all present personal being. The Father is who he claims to be - the Eternal One. These three are in fellowship with each other. They work together for our salvation - to bring us into harmony with the Divine Will, the Law.

Please don't be insulted by this, but when Dr. Kellogg was advocating similar ideas to yours, Sister White never told him that everything he said was wrong. It was the opposite. She said that much of what he said might have some truth to it. The problem with his teaching was it was speculative. He used scripture to back up everything, but not correctly. So she wrote many pages in Testimonies Volume 8 on the dangers of speculative knowledge.

For many people, their imaginations are not so active, and this is not much of a trap. But I am like you; I like to think out-of-the-box. That can be a great thing. but ... ... ...

If we force fit our own ideas on the testimony of the scripture about the Law, and the Law givers, we are sure to loose our way. This is speculation and it leads to spiritualism.

[ October 04, 2002, 01:11 PM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Greg Goodchild

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/04/02 10:53 PM

The Scapegoat doctrine is always one that brings out the best and worst of people. In the closing chapters of GC EGW brings out the fact that when Jesus comes He places the sins of His people, removed from the sanctuary, on the head of satan. He bears these sins in the wilderness for 1000 years and eventually is destroyed with these sins on him. The good news is that all of our sins have been removed from us and placed on him. When all of sin has been consumed the atonement will have been completed in all of its aspects and heaven and the universe will be cleansed and everything will be in harmony with God and each other.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/05/02 04:05 AM

I'm going to ask someone else to do my research this time. Greg, does it say in the GC that Satan bears our sins during the 1000 years, or is it at the end, afterwards.

Actually, on second thought, I'll take your word for it. It makes sense because the 1000 years would be the antitype of the time that the goat lives in the wilderness in solitude before dying. But Satan bearing sin in the wilderness does not seem to me to have any atoning merit for the saints. It is the blood of Christ that exclusively has merit. Satan's blood, his punishment does nothing to save us, except in the sense that everything God does is done with the welfare of His creatures in mind.

[ October 04, 2002, 10:27 PM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Dora

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/05/02 08:13 AM

No, Satan's death does nothing to atone for our sins, what it does bring about is the end to sin and he is "punished for the sins that he has caused to be committed." GC p660 As our forgiven sins are placed on the head of the scapegoat, and, as you said, Mark, in the antitype, the sins are completely destroyed at the end of the 1000 years along with Satan.

But, by "His own blood, He entereth once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us." Heb.9:12 This, of course, is speaking of Jesus, our High Priest, and our Saviour.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/06/02 03:24 AM

Quote by Mark

"If we force fit our own ideas on the testimony of the scripture about the Law, and the Law givers, we are sure to loose our way. This is speculation and it leads to spiritualism."

Mark

I was recently confronted by a warlock, in front of others who also presumed to know what was in my mind...much like you intimate here about one of the participants. His little "trick" failed miserably, and people realized his facade.

This thread is supposed to be about the Atonement; and you would get a lot further with more intelligent presentations of truth.

There are people who do not understand all the points of doctrine you or I do; yet are closer to Christ than we are.

2T.215.001
We should take broader and deeper views of the life, sufferings, and death of God's dear Son. When the atonement is viewed correctly, the salvation of souls will be felt to be of infinite value. In comparison with the enterprise of everlasting life, every other sinks into insignificance. But how have the counsels of this loving Saviour been despised! The heart has been devoted to the world, and selfish interests have closed the door against the Son of God. Hollow hypocrisy and pride, selfishness and gain, envy, malice, and passion, have so filled the hearts of many that Christ can have no room.
Posted By: Charity

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/06/02 10:12 PM

John, I want to say thank you to you for joining us here. I am going to wrap up my thoughts now, and like you’ve done above give a short personal testimony. I’m sure others would like to continue the discussion. Again I’m sorry if I’ve been too direct. I hope you can appreciate the fact that I have a burdern for anyone who claims to know Christ as a personal savior but denies that He died for their sins. I hope I haven’t said anything that I would not want someone to say to me if I was in the same precarious position that I believe you are in. Where Chistian tact has been lacking on my part, I hope you’ll pray for me like Job whom God told to pray for his well meaning but misguided friends. Not that my advice is misguided, but I don’t claim to be sanctified in my choice of words or assessment of someone else's spiritual sojourn. I’ll be praying for myself the prayer of Jabaz, Lord don’t allow me to cause needless pain.

………………..

The term ‘heavenly sanctuary’ means that in heaven there is a place of refuge for sinners. Sanctuary means refuge. We need a refuge because we are fallen, guilty beings. So God has met us where we are and provided us with a refuge and a place of meeting. The refuge is from the guilt of sin that if we were left to bear alone would quickly crush out our lives. That the guilt of our sins does not crush us is an ongoing testimony to the grace of God. We know how terrible the load of guilt is from two things - how it crushed out the life of Christ, and how when Christ ends his intercessions, the guilt of sin will be the operative factor in bringing Satan to his end.

We know this from the Day of Atonement. The scapegoat is alive and well until the sins of Isreal are placed on his head. It is not long after this that his life expires. He simply can’t bear the weight of guilt for long.

The Levitical types make provision for the pardon of specific sins, but nothing is said about the consequences or results of sin. It is foreign to the sacrificial system to divide sin from its consequences. Sin is the focus. And because God deals directly with my sin and guilt, there is a close personal connection there. Christ bore my particular sins.

John, you turn this argument around and say the real problem is the results of sin, not the sin itself because sin causes an obliteration of the moral image of God in man. True. But regardless of what you or I say, no matter how the issues are portrayed, sin is still at the root. Facts are stubborn. In this case the fact is that sin is the disease, and the symptoms are what we see all around us.

If Christ did not initially bear our guilt can God hold Satan accountable? If we deny that God cannot put the guilt of our sins on Christ, He cannot ultimately put our sin on Satan. No provision is made for guilt. In effect John, you advocate a very different Law and a very different Law Giver. Your views lead away from the God of scripture and create a different God.

But His own Spirit convinces me that I am guilty. Not just once, and not just repeatedly, but all the more intensely as I grow in grace. I need a Savior from sin, from its thralldom, its chains, its guilt. The only solution is the great exchange. I’m a poor sinner. My prayer is “Lord I stand condemned by your Law. I am as you yourself have said, wretched, miserable, poor blind and naked. My righteousness is filth. But you have a righteousness to cloth me. Remember Lord I pray the blood of Christ your Son, remove my guilt and give me His righteousness. Restore me to the joy of your salvation and cloth me with the garments of praise. Lord, I believe. Now credit my belief for righteousness. You did this for Abraham. Now do it for me. Hear me Lord I pray. Be merciful unto me, a great sinner.”

[ October 06, 2002, 04:29 PM: Message edited by: Mark Shipowick ]
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/07/02 04:08 PM

DA.173.006
The Jews whom Jesus had driven from the temple claimed to be children of Abraham, but they fled from the Saviour's presence because they could not endure the glory of God which was manifested in Him. Thus they gave evidence that they were not fitted by the grace of God to participate in the sacred services of the temple. They were zealous to maintain an appearance of holiness, but they neglected holiness of heart. While they were sticklers for the letter of the law, they were constantly violating its spirit. Their great need was that very change which Christ had been explaining to Nicodemus,--a new moral birth, a cleansing from sin, and a renewing of knowledge and holiness.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/08/02 08:04 PM

David wrote:

"I am still waiting for you to address my question re the Desire Of Ages quote you made above. It would be helpful, I feel, to see where you were coming from there."

The Desire of Ages, page 758, paragraph 1
"Christ did not yield up His life till He had accomplished the work which He came to do, and with His parting breath He exclaimed, "It is finished." John 19:30. The battle had been won. His right hand and His holy arm had gotten Him the victory. As a Conqueror He planted His banner on the eternal heights. Was there not joy among the angels? All heaven triumphed in the Saviour's victory. Satan was defeated, and knew that his kingdom was lost."

This quote tells me that Jesus earned the right to own our sin and second death before He laid down His own life. He transferred our sin and second death to the heavenly sanctuary, where they remain to this day. From these thoughts I conclude that it is Jesus' responsibility to eventually eliminate sin and the second death. I believe He will accomplish this by placing them upon the head of Satan, who will perish with them in the lake of fire.

Satan plays an important role in the elimination of sin and the second death. Jesus earned the right to own them when He lived and died and the perfect life and death. But they still exist in the heavenly sanctuary. Without Satan perishing with them in place of the saved Jesus has no way of eliminating their sin and the second death.

The death of Satan in place of the saved has nothing to do with securing their salvation. Jesus did that all by Himself. The "atonement" Satan makes on their behalf is restricted to the elimination of their sin and second death in the lake of fire.

The fact Satan must die with the sins and second death of the saved is evidence Jesus did not do it for them. Instead, it was necessary for Jesus to become the lawful owner (not victim) of sin and the second death, which He did by defeating them before He laid down His own life on the cross, so that now He has the legal right to place them upon the head of Satan at the end of time.

I do not believe this interpretation of the scapegoat betrays the SDA understanding of the plan of salvation. Yes, Jesus had to die in order to secure our salvation. But He did not die the second death. That belongs to the scapegoat.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/12/02 08:20 AM

Peace be with you all

We have been doing some travel in the last two weeks so my answer has been delayed. I would like to answer/comment Mike, Mark, David and others.

David You asked me to explain from scripture how penalty and substitution denigrates God's character.

Since Penalty is not a scriptural term I cannot give you a scriptural definition of it, nor can I explain it to you from scripture.

I understand that penalty means 'an enforcement of an Arbitrary Law'. As the Law is Arbitrary therefore the enforcement is arbitrary. The concept in arbitrary enforcement is, and this is important, 'that the transgressor would not suffer or bear loss if the Authority would not get him and enforce penalty on him'. Further, the penalty deals only with a wrong deed done, but says nothing about the state of the transgressor. That is to say the transgressor sees that he did something wrong in the eyes of the authority, but does not see that he is wrong. The problem the transgressor sees then is the Authority and not himself. If the Authority were not there he would not have any problems. All penalties are exacted upon something that one did and not something that one is. Under arbitrary law to be penalised for what one is would be prejudice. So in effect if one is released from any penalty, such a one is really being set free from the authority. In such a concept a substitute payment of penalty does not alter the fact that one is being set free from the authority.

The point is that in the penalty concept, the sinner does not recognise the source of his problem, therefore the problem perpetuates. Instead he sees it as God's problem and how to appease God. This is why the concept that man would not die if God did not drive him out of the garden. Mike, it is true, sin and death are related, they are of Satan. God first declared the remedy, the crushing of Satan through Golgotha. Then he established the level of life under which conditions it would be possible to be accomplished. So that the scripture may be true which said that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is the devil, and deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage. Heb 2: 14-15. Man thinks selfishly, self-preservingly; God thinks salvation, self-denyingly. After all Mike, God gave man time to choose life, He did not give man eternity to suffer death. From this temporary death (which God established) there is a resurrection for everyone. From the spiritual death that Satan established there would be no salvation except through these means. Can we not see God positively? Why did Paul say, What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?

In much of the discussion here, the Levitical sanctuary service, particularly the day of the atonement, has been used as a carbon copy of what has, is, and shall transpire. I would like to draw attention to scripture position on this. In Hebrews 10:1 we read, for the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices, which they offered year by year continually, make the comers thereunto perfect.

Friends, let us realise what the scripture tells us of the law (of the levitical priesthood services). It says that in those is held a shadow of good things to come. Now a shadow is dark and does not give much information and it varies with the light shining on it. It can be stretched a long way when the sun is low while at high noon it is not to be seen. But what the scripture says next is more significant. I says, 'it is not the very image of the good things to come'. It is not the same image of the good that was to follow. Please give this some thought. The effort of bringing the imagery of the levitical priesthood into the priesthood of Melchisedec is eroneous.

We need to understand the principles upon which the Levitical priesthood is established in relation to those of the priesthood of Melchisedec. The two priesthoods deal with sin on an entirely different basis. This is what makes the first ineffective and the second effective. Hebrews 7:18. For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.

The confusion regarding the issue of sin as Mark stated
quote:
The Levitical types make provision for the pardon of specific sins, but nothing is said about the consequences or results of sin. It is foreign to the sacrificial system to divide sin from its consequences. Sin is the focus. And because God deals directly with my sin and guilt, there is a close personal connection there. Christ bore my particular sins.

John, you turn this argument around and say the real problem is the results of sin, not the sin itself because sin causes an obliteration of the moral image of God in man. True. But regardless of what you or I say, no matter how the issues are portrayed, sin is still at the root. Facts are stubborn. In this case the fact is that sin is the disease, and the symptoms are what we see all around us.

If Christ did not initially bear our guilt can God hold Satan accountable? If we deny that God cannot put the guilt of our sins on Christ, He cannot ultimately put our sin on Satan. No provision is made for guilt. In effect John, you advocate a very different Law and a very different Law Giver. Your views lead away from the God of scripture and create a different God.

In Mark's statement sin is defined as the specific sin (action, deed), while the result/consequence of these sins is defined as an obliteration of the moral image of God in man. There is something here to be understood. While this was true for Adam before he sinned. It is the reverse ever since Sin. Sin is fall from faith, that is: rejection of God's judgment and assertion of ones own judgment. Thus the spirit of God is dismissed and the carnal mind established, and the specific sins are the result. Before action there is thought and for thought there is a source.

Mark is correct when he said The Levitical types make provision for the pardon of specific sins, but nothing is said about the consequences or results of sin. This in essence is the shortcoming of the Levitical priesthood. The Levitical priesthood would have never been, had the children of Israel not said 'Let not God speak to us, lest we die. Let him speak to Moses, and he will tell us, and we will do.' In this request the issues are revealed. They, while being convicted of the Sin within themselves (the condemnation and guilt was so that they felt they would die) would not accept the conviction, and were unwilling to trust God though they had seen that God does speak with man and he liveth. Instead they offered outward obedience, at a distance. Thus the Levitical priesthood deals with outward disobedience. For it was manifest that their hearts were far from Him. A people in whom is no faith.
    Deuteronomy 32:20 And he said, I will hide my face from them, I will see what their end shall be: for they are a very froward generation, children in whom is no faith.
    Matthew 15:8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.
The Levitical priesthood was established on the basis of operation where there is no faith, because there was no faith. Romans 9:32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone; Why was then all this established?
    Romans 7:13 … that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
    Hebrews 9:8 The Holy Spirit this signifying, that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing:
When we look at the priesthood of Christ we see that it is separate from the Levitical priesthood and puts an end to it.
John the Baptist preaches in the wilderness, Luke 3:3 And he came into all the country about Jordan, preaching the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. He is not in the temple and has no part of the sanctuary services, yet he is ministering baptism of repentance for the forgiveness/remission of sins. Further he declared, Matthew 3:10 And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: ... As we look at the things that Jesus was pointing out to be the problem, we see that he always referred to the condition that man was in, the state of being, rather than the actions/the fruit. When speaking of the fruit he refers to the tree. In his own words he declares his ministry. Luke 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, In all these we see him dealing with the condition of man and not man's specific works. Following scriptures should make that evident.
    John 8:34 Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.Matthew 7:18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
    Matthew 12:33 Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit.
    Matthew 23:26 Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.
    John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. ...
    John 15:5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
    John 3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
    Matthew 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
    Luke 9:55 But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.John 9:39 And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind.
    John 8:36 If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

Again, we see that in all of the above scripture it is the state of being, the condition, the root, the tree, that is spoken of as that which is the problem and which he saves us from. He came to break the power of sin. He came to save us from our state.
    Romans 8:3,4 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
He reveals that we are of a different spirit than him.
    Luke 9:55 But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.Isaiah 55:8,9 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

We see that faith/trust is declared and established to be the means whereby the inner cleansing occurs. To trust him and receive his judgment, his spirit to live thereby, to cease to live by self, to abide in him and he in us. Thus Christ is the minister of Faith.
    Hebrews 12:2 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.
Christ came to redeem us from the enemy. He came to bring to us the glory of the Father, and to work in us the faith of the son. John 12
    27 … but for this cause came I unto this hour.
    28 Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.
    31 Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.
    32 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.
    Hebrews 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
He came to make us one with the Father and himself. John 17
    20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;
    21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.
    22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:
    23 I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.
There is much more that could be said but the thought should be understandable.
In answer to your second question David I wish to say, 'those who have been forgiven much love much'. But how many accept forgiveness? It is amazing how many rather want substitute payment of penalty.
Who has been reconciled to God except that he was first at odds with him? Paul declares that we were enemies of God! For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God. He who has seen the enmity that sin puts between man and God, has seen that the carnal mind is at enmity with God, has been crucified with Christ, that the body of sin might be destroyed, and has been raised in the newness of life, he has been reconciled.
All should ask themselves. Have we seen ourselves as enemies of God? If not, then we have never been reconciled. Then one has never seen the love that God commended to us. Man does not realise his condition, except in the light of God's love. Friends let us look at his Love who came and died to save us his enemies. Praying, Father, forgive them for they know not what they do. Who came to bring to us the glory of the Father that we may be reconciled with God, brought to at-one-ment. That as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God. For in that light of love our comeliness is turned in us into corruption, but we are raised by his grace.
    8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
    10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.
    11 And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement.
Yes, indeed we joy in God through our Lord Jesus by whom we have received the at-one-ment. And I wish to join with John in saying, that which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life. (For the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and show unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us;). That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that you also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ. And these things write we unto you, that your joy may be full.
Shalom

[ October 12, 2002, 11:33 PM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/15/02 05:13 PM

John, thank you for relating those thoughts. But I see a very deliberate connection between God forbidding access to the fruit of the tree of life and the reason why we die. I don't see death as arbitrary. I see it as the result of God disallowing us to eat of the fruit. From my perspective that is a form of punishment.

In a court of law I would be found guilty of murder if I starved my kids to death. Similarly God is responsible for why we die. True, it is a blessing, but it is also a penalty. Death is not the natural consequences of sin. Not eating the fruit is why we die. Even the second death is not the natural progression of sin, rather God raining down fire upon the unsaved is why they die at the end of time. It is the penalty for sin.

Do you see my point?
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/19/02 04:43 AM

Mike
What is the point? Let us suppose it is as you say. If death is the penalty for sin, and the death being spoken of is, as you say, the physical death resulting from 'not having access to the tree of life'. Then every one as they die has paid the penalty, and has satisfied the demands of the law, and the law has nothing more on them. Romans 6:7 For he that is dead is freed from sin. Having thus exhausted the penalty what is the point of resurrecting man again and then killing him again. Sounds sadistic to me. As if killing him once is not good enough. Moreover, to say the least, the sacrifice of Christ is then nonsense, since we all die anyway. Either it is penalty or it is not. If it is penalty then our death satisfies it and there is no salvation. If there is salvation then this death is not penalty but is something else. That this is deliberate is not the question, but deliberate what is the question? Mike judge not by appearance but judge righteous judgment.

Now I hope you see and agree that this physical death has a different meaning then penalty, just as the above scripture does not allow for the above meaning to be applied to that verse. For it is speaking of a spiritual death and not physical
    5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
    6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
    7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.
    8 Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:
    9 Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.
    10 For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God.
    11 Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.
    12 Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof.
Mike, really unless we get to the realization of the spiritual issues, the salvation of man becomes meaningless and impossible. 'TIME' has been given to man that his spirit might be restored to oneness with God. That God by his spirit may abide in his blessed place in his children. This TIME is now, not after the resurrection. Today is the day for us to be possessors of eternal life (spiritually). The physical immortality shall be given to those who are possessors of eternal life spiritually. For this purpose and to this end Christ came to redeem us from the power of sin unto the adoption of sons. This is what Christ was talking about in
    John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath (present tense) everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
In your thought it appears that all that Christ saves us from is the physical death (which is the penalty for sin, second death I presume). And what shall prevent sin from rising again? Sin is a spiritual act. You mentioned about death being the natural progression of sin. This is not the thought. Death is the immediate reality of sin. When man sinned he immediately fell under the domain of sin and death spiritually, and every one of us born since is born in that domain. In simple terms what that means is that the ultimate arbiter of all righteousness is death. This is the domain of Satan. On the other hand, in God's domain the ultimate expositor of righteousness is life.

In the judgment day it is not sin that has become bad enough to self-destruct that will happen, but it is God who will call all to judgment. It will be the facing of judgment. IN other words 'TIME' is up. Those who are partakers of God's judgment (righteousness) are partakers of the spirit of life and the second death has no power over them because there is no condemnation in them. Those who have refused to be partakers of God's judgment will face their own judgment (righteousness) which is the spirit of condemnation and death, upon themselves. That is wages of sin and not penalty, for it is the reaping of the fruit of one's own righteousness.

    Matthew 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
    Luke 19:22 And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant...

        God never called it penalty
        Why do we?
        None of the prophets ever said it's so
        Why do we?
        The Son of God never thought it so
        Why do we?
        The apostles never knew it so
        Why do we?

        The rise of the Papacy brought it to be
        Don't we see?
        The dark ages defined it
        Why do we?



Shalom

[ October 19, 2002, 09:32 AM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/20/02 06:26 AM

John, thank you. You are right. We must first die spiritually before we can receive the salvation Jesus wrought out for us on the cross. This spiritual death to sin, self and Satan is the most important thing we can say about death. God forbid that I should minimize or ignore this vital truth. Thank you so much for making it a significant part of this thread and dialogue. And most of all, thank you Lord!!!

I also agree with you that the first physical death we experience does not satisfy the demands of the broken law of God or the relationship our sin severed. Our first death has nothing to do with saving our own souls. Only Jesus saves! Only His incarnation, only His life, only His death, resurrection, ascension, intercession and second advent can save us.

However, the connection between death and sin is clearly revealed in the Word of God and the SOP. Yes, many inspired authors have employed death as a metaphor to help explain the plan of salvation. But metaphors are based upon a reality. What is the truth about death? What is the truth about sin? If we can grasp the truth about sin and death then we would be able to grasp the truth about the metaphors.

I believe we die because God will not allow us to eat of the fruit of the tree of life. The reason for this is because He does not want us to have to live eternally in a sinful state. It would be eternal misery even if we never chose to sin again. Death comes as a relief to those who have learned to loathe sin.

This first death, or soul sleep, is part of the penalty for sinning. But it does not secure our salvation. Nor does it completely satisfy the law. Therefore, a resurrection is necessary in order to address the unresolved issues relating to sin. In light of the great controversy, the accusations of Satan and the vindication of God must come to fruition.

However, the plan of salvation prevents us from experiencing the full force of our sin and guilt. Were it not for the life and death of Jesus the human race would not have survived the instant death of Adam and Eve as a result of their sin and guilt. Undiluted guilt kills like a nuclear bomb. The fact salvation protects us from the full force of our sin and guilt is cause for contention between Christ and Satan.

The Devil contends that if mankind were allowed to suffer the full force of their sin and guilt he would curse God and die. Such a reaction, says Satan, would prove the injustice of God and His law. For if the law of God is holy, just and good mankind would lament, not loathe, the full force of sin and guilt.

So the Devil accuses God of fighting unfairly by protecting man from succombing to the full force of his sin and guilt. Which is true. However, God will not allow the great controversy to end in a stalemate. For if Adam and Eve would have died immediately upon sinning the onlooking universe would have misunderstood it and the security of the unfallen worlds would have been jeopardized beyond repair.

But a time must come when mankind revisits his sin and guilt without the protecting shield of salvation. Which is what happens during judgment. The contrast between how the two classes of people (the saved and unsaved) respond as they face the true force of their sin and guilt will disprove Satan's accusations and establish the truth about the law, love and government of God.

However, before we can face our life record in judgment, to the honor and glory of God, we must first experience the salvation of Jesus. We must die to sin and expereince the miracle of rebirth. Otherwise, during judgment, we will confess our guilt, accept our condemantion and then curse God until the flames of hell consume us. It is this second death that satisfies the law, but from which there is no salvation.

What saves us from the second death is the perfect life and death of Jesus, our Lord and precious Saviour. Jesus consumed and conquered our sin and second death in our place, thereby earning the right to transfer them upon the head of Satan, who will be eliminated with them in our place. By facing the full force of the sin and guilt of the entire world Jesus demonstrated that it is possible for mankind to endure the full force of sin and guilt without cursing God to death.

He also proved that only born again believers can face the true force of sin and guilt without copping a death wish. Even if the human race had been allowed access to the fruit of the tree of life they would have rather rapidly annihilated themselves. The tree of life cannot perpetuate the life of a headless man.

But God cannot allow this to happen. He cannot allow sin and death to rule and ruin things. He must show Himself in control, otherwise the great controversy would end in a stalemate. Only God can eliminate sin and sinners and maintain the loyalty of His creatures. Any other outcome would result in cosmic chaos and complete devastation. If God is not in control, then how can He be trusted when He says affliction shall not arise a second time?

Do these thoughts make any sense?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/20/02 05:30 PM

Also, the three fold curse pronounced upon men, women and snakes testifies to the connection between sin, death and punishment.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/24/02 02:20 PM

Mike, I am sorry but this one really is confusing. While there are some good thoughts in your post they are desperately mingled with disaster.

You said that it is the second death that satisfies the law (of God I assume), but from which there is no salvation. I do not understand why God's Law (whoever that is) would be satisfied (only a person can be satisfied) in a death in which one 'confesses his guilt, accepts condemnation and then curses God until the flames consume him'. What is the virtue of that? Is that not the ultimate sin, to acknowledge one's wrong and then curse someone else for it? This sounds to me more like the 'law of sin and death' and that which the devil desires us to do. Is that not what he was tempting Job to do? Or is that how God's law is justified in having condemned the sinner? Is that not what Satan does; accuses and condemns and then tries to make the circumstances so averse as to make the victim commit that which he accused him of? Is God satisfied in that from which there is no salvation?

Next you said that Jesus consumed and conquered our sin and second death in our place, thereby earning the right to transfer them upon the head of Satan, who will die the above second death. Why would Jesus consume and conquer the 'righteous requirements of' (that which satisfies) God's law? In contrast to that, the scripture speaks of Christ conquering the 'law of sin and death'!
    Romans 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.

Your thought further indicates that the law of God is not satisfied with the death of Christ, and will not be satisfied until Satan dies the above second death. How then did he conquer it? What is the point? Did Christ come just for the purpose of transferring our sin and guilt to Satan? How does Christ obtain our sin and guilt in the first place? How were they transferred from us to him? How is the above law satisfied in this transfer? What force of sin and guilt are the saved facing, if they have been saved from sin? What does it mean to be saved from sin?

Then, you maintain the thought of penalty though it is not once named in the scriptures. You apparently (by what you have said) maintain it by the concept of deductive reasoning based on that whatever is negative to physical life and its enjoyment is a penalty. What is the virtue of God or his law (whoever that is) being satisfied by inflicting these penalties? How many penalties are there? Or if it is all one and the same, why is God gradually eking it out in various levels getting more fatal as we go along? I do not see what virtue that is supposed to reveal, considering He will only be satisfied in the end. What does the shield of salvation mean to you? I cannot see it meaning anything else than being saved from the above ultimate satisfaction of God's Law. Why does the law of God have any need to do all this requiring if undiluted guilt kills like a nuclear bomb? Is it not evident that God is seeking to prevent this death rather than require it? How is God's law then satisfied or WHO is satisfied in the final death of the sinner if God says that He is not?
    Ezekiel 33:11 Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?

Mike, there is no such thing with God. All the principles above are those of Satan's righteousness. God's righteousness is entirely contrary to these. In fact he sent his Son to save us from these. The ideas presented above as being of God's law are those of the 'law of sin and death' of which Satan is the author.

You said that the spiritual death to sin, self and Satan is the most important thing we can say about death. That is true, but you also said that we must first die spiritually before we can receive the salvation Jesus wrought out for us on the cross. That is an utter impossibility. Paul says,
    Romans 6:5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
    6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
    8 Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:
    9 Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.
    10 For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God.
    11 Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.
    Galatians 2:20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.

All of the spiritual death and birth and life can only be accomplished with Christ. For Christ said, without me ye can do nothing. Apart from the cosmic implications of Christ's life and death, there is nothing in his life, death and resurrection that benefits us except we are in it with him. Salvation from sin is only effected as we are in him and he in us. There is no abstract or theoretical salvation.

Satan does not understand repentance, forgiveness, death to self, and birth from above, neither does the law of sin and death. Only the law of life knows all about it. May God open our eyes to it.

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 10/24/02 07:05 PM

John, once again, thank you for sharing your thoughts on this deep discussion. I truly enjoy digging deeply with you. Although, sometimes it feels like two people trying to talk using differing definitions for key words.

Please, allow me to summarize what I hear you saying, and then correct me where I've gotten it wrong.

I think I hear you saying that God does not punish sinners with death. Instead death is the natural consequence of sin. Jesus saves sinners from death, not by dying in their place, but by motivating and empowering them to live without sin. Past sins are simply forgiven and forgotten.

Did I get it right?

P.S. I'm not avoiding the questions you raised in response to my last post. I will answer them once I'm sure I understand your position.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/03/02 11:14 AM

Mike, thank you for your patience. Your statement is precariously perched so as to confirm or deny it or any part of it would be misunderstood.

I have laboured since your last post to clarify the misconception. How do I answer your question when as you have said there are definitions that need to be realized? These definitions are not only yours or mine, but to understand the will and thought of God, his mind towards us. May his spirit illumine our eyes and open our ears to see the wonderful truths in his word. There is more than definitions, the perspective is very vital. In the following discussion I have set aside the question of temporal death as it is not definitive to salvation, for all die this death whether saved or lost.

The fundamental idea of life and death.
In your question there are two fundamental concepts involved. One deals with our understanding of God's righteousness, judgment and justice. The other by same implication deals with our understanding of unrighteousness, that is sin, the problem of sin, and salvation. The fundamental idea carried in your presentation and that of others here is that death is the satisfaction of God's righteousness and solves the sin problem. On the other hand, I testify and bear witness that it is LIFE that is the satisfaction of God's righteousness and solves the sin problem. I will quote scripture and then ask a few questions for thought and perspective. At the end I will make a summary which hopefully will be understood with meaning.
    John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

I would like to ask, since Satan is a murderer from the beginning, how is he a murderer if God is the one who holds the power of life, (and by inference death)? The Bible further tells us that Satan holds the power of death, shall we then also say that he by inference holds the power of life? If God is in charge of giving/maintaining life (and by inference death), how is Satan a murderer? Do we then assign Satan's acts to God? Am I asking strange questions? Is that not what it amounts to in the doctrines and thoughts of many? Did not God provide TIME and SPACE in order to allow for the free will of those made in his image to have a domain of operation?
    John 10:10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.

In the above verse Christ portrays the point as to who causes death and who gives life. Is that too difficult? Is the misunderstanding of God's righteousness so blinding that this cannot be seen? If God's righteousness is satisfied in death, is he not a murderer then? Does not Satan commit murder by accusations and finding fault? Shall God do the same? Does not the above scripture tell us that Christ came to save us from the murderer, and to give us life?

Death is not God's penalty for sin. Death is not part of God's righteousness. It is a reality, which God foretold would be the result of sin, not that God would cause it to be. It is part of Satan's righteousness, the murderer. When man fell under the domain of Satan, he became subject to Satan's law of sin and death. God sent his Son into the world, that the world through him might be saved.

Judgment
We need to define judgment. I would also like to draw specific attention to the thoughts that Jesus tied in with the meaning of murderer. He abode not in the truth, there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. Now I would like to consider a moment the implications of that thought. Why should the murderer aspect be tied in with no truth and lies? Where there is no truth but lies, there is no "judgment" but there are lusts. Now the word "judgment" here does not mean a judicial verdict of condemnation, but it means the ability to reason, judge, have "judgment" to reason by, such as is expressed in the following scriptures.
    Isaiah 59:8 The way of peace they know not; and there is no judgment in their goings: they have made them crooked paths: whosoever goeth therein shall not know peace.
    Proverbs 2:9 Then shalt thou understand righteousness, and judgment, and equity; yea, every good path.
    Proverbs 8:20 I lead in the way of righteousness, in the midst of the paths of judgment:
    Proverbs 28:5 Evil men understand not judgment: but they that seek the LORD understand all things.
    Isaiah 1:17 Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow.
    Isaiah 42:1 Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.
    Isaiah 42:3 A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth.

For our judgment to be brought unto truth means to pass from death to life; means to be set free from the dominion of Satan to the kingdom of God. Now truth here involves much more than technical 'knowledge'. Truth in judgment deals with the manner and means by which our judgment operates to arrive at the result. All Sinners, Satan, and fallen Angels operate by lust and not judgment, and they work desperately to avoid judgment, therefore the more lies. It makes no difference whether they are religious or not. Much of religion is an avoidance of judgment. What is the murderer part? It is that all Sinners, Satan, and fallen Angels nevertheless use their judgment to find fault, accuse and condemn others, while lust and avoidance of judgment govern their own selves.
    Isaiah 59:14 And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter.
    James 4:2-3 Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts.

Judgment is the way of eternal life and lust is the way of death. If we are to have fellowship with God we must have fellowship in judgment with him. He sent his Son to establish our judgment unto truth.
    Isaiah 42:3 A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth.
    Deuteronomy 32:4 He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he.
    Isaiah 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
    Isaiah 30:18 And therefore will the LORD wait, that he may be gracious unto you, and therefore will he be exalted, that he may have mercy upon you: for the LORD is a God of judgment: blessed are all they that wait for him.

We see that we are cleansed from sin through judgment with the Lord. Judgment is the path of LIFE. All of God's ways are judgment. This is the way of life, not death, but life. Judgment renders the result of one's righteousness. Therefore the nature of the righteousness determines the judgment. I have repeatedly said that God's righteousness is life-giving. Why are we to be 'clothed' in his righteousness, if it is not to be saved from death? If on the other hand his righteousness causes death in finding one fault what is the benefit to having it? Is not our righteousness which causes death, and therefore God invites us to forsake our filthy rags and take his glorious robe of righteousness, that we may be partakers of his glory, his everlasting life?

Forgiveness and Mercy
Without setting any aside, two of the most pertinent graces of God's righteousness are mercy and forgiveness. I have in previous posts shown that the righteousness established by sin is accusative and condemning, therefore the above graces are mandatory if we are to be set free from the condemnation of sin. Our spirit must become partaker of these graces of mercy and forgiveness. God's ability to forgive is not the problem. Sinner's inability to receive the forgiveness is the problem. Forgiveness is part of the glory of God. It is the glory of God to forgive. Yes the Lord does freely forgive iniquity and transgression and sin.
    Exodus 34:7 Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty;
    Luke 9:54 And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did?
    55 But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
    56 For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them.

Faith/trust is the foundation of God's glory, without it none of the fruits of the spirit are possible. When man fell under the dominion of sin, he departed from the glory of God. He became partaker of the spirit of Satan to a greater or lesser degree, but nevertheless of his spirit. That means that man became an accuser and self-justifier. Faith is necessary for forgiveness to be received.

Visiting the iniquity
    Ecclesiastes 12:14 For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.
    Psalms 9:16 The LORD is known by the judgment which he executeth: the wicked is snared in the work of his own hands.

In the Bible we find the word punish used in reference to God's reckoning with sinners. The Hebrew word 'paqad' , which has been so translated, is not inclined to mean 'punishment of penalty' since the word of God does not support the thought of penalty. It however does mean to 1) to attend to, muster, number, reckon, visit, appoint, look after, care for. Now these visits, reckoning and attending to, can be something positive or negative. When God 'visited' Israel in their distress in Egypt, it was redemptive. When God 'visited' Sarah she was blessed to have a child. These visits reveal God's righteousness. On the other hand when God 'visited' Sodom and Gomorrah the reckoning there was according to their perversion. When God visits the iniquity it is that persons own righteousness that is reckoned/exacted upon him.
    Psalms 18:26 With the pure thou wilt shew thyself pure; and with the froward thou wilt shew thyself froward.
    Proverbs 3:34 Surely he scorneth the scorners: but he giveth grace unto the lowly.
    James 2:13 For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy;
    Matthew 7:2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

The vital understanding here is to understand the separation between that which proceeds from God's righteousness, his glory, which is unto life; and the wages of sin's righteousness (unrighteousness) which sinner reaps. We have to realize here that God is not imitating sinners. What the word is telling us is that God offers us his righteousness that we may live with him forever. Those that refuse it and insist upon their own righteousness (unrighteousness) shall be judged by their own standard. All Sinners avoid judgment but God has declared that he shall bring every work into judgment. Each one will render his own judgment. An example of such is seen in Nathan's visit to David, though the LORD did not do according to David's judgment. (2 Sam 12: 1-13)

There is therefore a world of difference between God's judgment that is of his righteousness; and the judgment that is of our righteousness/unrighteousness. Which judgment do you want to be judged by? Let us therefore today become partakers of that righteousness. This is the difference between penalty and wages.
    Jeremiah 21:8 And unto this people thou shalt say, Thus saith the LORD; Behold, I set before you the way of life, and the way of death.
    Romans 2:4 Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?


To summarize then the principal definitions and perspective,
  • 1) Satan is murderer from the beginning and holds the power of death.
    2) He holds in bondage his subjects through fear that is established by a wicked righteousness within us.
    3) Satan, fallen Angels and Sinners live by lust and avoid judgment. Judgment is perverted to destruction.
    4) God is the giver of life and sent his Son into the world to save us from Satan's power of death.
    5) God's righteousness has no satisfaction in death, has no penalty, therefore Christ paid no such penalty.
    6) Judgment is fundamental element of God's righteousness, which he desires to impart to us that we may be saved
    7) God's call to his judgment is gospel and salvation so we may be saved from the judgment of sin and death.
    8) Those who refuse God's judgment and righteousness will have to face and reap their own judgment in the end.
To answer your question then
God does not have a penalty of death for sin. Instead death is the domain and power of sin and Satan. Jesus saves sinners from death and sin, not by dying as a substitute payment of penalty, but through the cross he defeated sin and him who holds the power of death that is Satan so as to set us free from fear of death. This enables faith so that we may cease to be afraid of God, so that we may come and be reconciled to God. He imparts to us life by imparting to us his Father's righteousness, which is eternal life. Forgiveness and mercy are eternal graces of God's righteousness of which we must be first recipients and partakers before we can be released from the condemnation of sin that is within us.

It is my hope that this may offer a glimpse of the scriptural perspective and definition. What do you hear?

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/03/02 08:24 PM

John, once again thank you for sharing. And please don't be frustrated with me because I'm not catching on quickly.

I am having a hard time giving up the unpopular idea that Jesus drank the cup of trembling for me and thereby earned the right to transfer my sin and second death upon the head of Satan. Also, I'm in a weird position since nobody that I know of agrees with my thoughts concerning sin and salvation. At least you have others who believe the same way as you do.

One thing that is difficult for me at this point is the idea that God will not punish sinners with death in the lake of fire. When I read about it in the Revelation I see God causing fire to rain down upon the insane throng of unsaved sinners, which is called the second death.

And all throughout the OT God ordained death as the punishment for sin. A brief perusal of the Levitical judicial system reflects the intimate relationship between sin and death and punishment.

Also, in the beginning when God promised - Obey and live, disobey and die - I find a connection between sin and death and punishment. The promise to bless and curse obedience and disobedience is a strong argument in favor of the relationship between sin and death and punishment.

I think it goes without saying that God is not willing that any should perish, and that He is doing everything He possibly can to save us from eternal death, but I don't see how this conflicts with the idea of God punishing the impenitent in the lake of fire at the end of time.

If death is the natural consequences of sin, or the capricious domain of the Devil, then why did God have to prevent mankind from eating the fruit of the tree of life? If death is the inevitable, inescapable product of sin, why worry about the tree of life?

Okay, can you please explain the judicial system implemented by God during the rule and reign of Israel? And, can you explain the lake of fire at the end of time?
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/04/02 07:46 AM

Thank you Mike. Did you take a good look at the section 'visiting the iniquity' in my last post. The way you are commenting is as if you missed it. If you give it some consideration, you might realize how serious and disastrous it can be if God were to visit the righteousness of the sinner upon him. Perhaps the problem lies in not realizing how sinful fallen man's righteousness is, that is how wicked and deadly. A sinner certainly has problems seeing that because he avoids judgment like the plague. But God has provided for a glimpse of it in the summary of the commandments; "do unto others as you would have them do unto you". Please give it some thought. So much of religion is based on fear.

In the situation with David and Nathan, David would have been a dead man had God visited him according to his (David's) judgment, not to speak about David's principle of killing Uriah in order to solve a sin problem. The question is not that God does not effect the judgment and the fulfillment of it. I have never said that, sorry if I was not clear. He certainly has and shall, and there is a definite need for God to bring every work into judgment, because the sinner would never of himself subject himself to his own judgment. That is the nature of sin, it avoids judgment and lives by lust. But the realization Mike is in the fact that what transpires is not God's righteousness applied, but the sinner's righteousness applied. If you realize the meaning of that, then you will understand truly why it is necessary for us to be saved from our righteousness and to receive God's righteousness that we may live. On the other hand failure to realize this leaves us with the inevitable position that Christ saves us from God's righteousness (judgment/penalty) and covers us with his blood (shed in payment), so that God's righteousness/judgment cannot harm us any more. We can throw in the transfer of our sins to Satan for good measure, so that God can still exact his penalty upon our sins on him.

You say you are alone in the unpopular idea that Jesus drank the cup of trembling for us. You know saying it in those words I agree with you that he did indeed. But what I know is the cup of trembling (being subjected to the power of Satan, and Satan being permitted to afflict his mind with his view of God) and what you have said it is, are two different things. I do not know that you are alone in your view, as I know of millions who are holding the same principles of substitute penalty payment, though not necessarily the same technical transaction, such as he died versus he suffered. The principle is the same; it is still penalty, regardless of how you expiate it.

You said: "I think it goes without saying that God is not willing that any should perish, and that He is doing everything He possibly can to save us from eternal death, but I don't see how this conflicts with the idea of God punishing the impenitent in the lake of fire at the end of time." If we understand the word punishing as above in 'visiting' there is no problem and no conflict. But however if it is a punishment/penalty of God's righteousness, and on top of that such a righteousness which cannot forgive the repentant ones, but had to exact it upon Christ as substitute, and is only satisfied in the shedding of blood; there is problems and conflicts irreconcilable. Then the problem is not with us but with him.

I have in my last post set aside this temporal death as immaterial to the question of punishment/penalty in salvation. It is obvious that you feel it is material, and that the temporal death is at least part of the penalty/punishment. Since I have previously commented on this, this time I would like to ask you how you consider let's say the death of Stephen. Is it part of punishment/penalty? If yes, how? If not, what is it? How about Peter, James and so on?

Your question: "If death is the natural consequences of sin, or the capricious domain of the Devil, then why did God have to prevent mankind from eating the fruit of the tree of life? If death is the inevitable, inescapable product of sin, why worry about the tree of life?" has mostly been already answered above; because sinner's avoid judgment God must impose it. But before imposing it God saw it prudent to limit/allow the domain and space of Sin and Satan to TIME rather than Eternity. This is the physical level. And in this space of TIME he works to save. This is the spiritual level. You are mixing both levels in your question.

I believe the lake of fire is explained above, and the judicial system of Israel is likewise covered in principle, for more we can cover later after I hear your thoughts here.

Shalom

[ November 04, 2002, 10:46 PM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/06/02 02:08 AM

John

I reread your thoughts on "visiting the iniquity" and I think I got confused over the idea you presented regarding our tendency to avoid judgment and the way you refer to sin as our righteousness. I guess you use common words in an uncommon way and that has me scratching my head.

It sounds like you're saying God has to step in and administer judgment because we are unwilling to do it ourselves. Does God ever capitulate like that? I thought He was more proactive. What good would it accomplish if I were to judge myself? How would that help settle the great controversy? Setting myself on fire would require judgment too, wouldn't it?

The death of Stephen and people murdered during random acts of violence, etc., are the results of sinners killing people. Like people who die of old age because God doesn't allow them access to the tree of life, so too all other forms of death can be laid at the feet of God because He did not intervene to prevent it. He doesn't cause it, but neither does He prevent it. That's culpable malfeasance.

Talking about "our righteousness" what is your take on these verses:

Rev 19:8
And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.

Mat 5:16
Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/07/02 07:56 AM

5T.144.001
Men professing to have new light, claiming to be reformers, will have great influence over a certain class who are convinced of the heresies that exist in the present age and who are not satisfied with the spiritual condition of the churches.

With true, honest hearts, these desire to see a change for the better, a coming up to a higher standard.

If the faithful servants of Christ would present the truth, pure and unadulterated, to this class, they would accept it, and purify themselves by obeying it.

But Satan, ever vigilant, sets upon the track of these inquiring souls.

Someone making high profession as a reformer comes to them, as Satan came to Christ disguised as an angel of light, and draws them still further from the path of right.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/08/02 02:36 PM

Thank you David for the advice. and thank you Mike for your post

You asked:
quote:
It sounds like you're saying God has to step in and administer judgment because we are unwilling to do it ourselves. Does God ever capitulate like that? I thought He was more proactive. What good would it accomplish if I were to judge myself? How would that help settle the great controversy? Setting myself on fire would require judgment too, wouldn't it?
1 Corinthians 11:31-32 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.

The section on Judgment in the previous post should help in understanding. The graphic example of David and Nathan covers all the aspects of the question. We first see the way that sin operates. Lust is the governing factor, then corrupt judgment seeks to cover-up the sin. Finding failure, corrupt judgment proceeds to look for ways to avoid the results, concluding into more evil. After having 'solved' the problem, David does not seem to be bothered any more. About 1 year passes, Nathan 'visits', call to judgment. David unwittingly passes judgment upon himself. God is justified. David is condemned. If this were where it ended, the execution would follow. However the following realisation by David of his own sin, corruption of judgment, and sin-righteousness which 'slew' him, is where many fall short. David's judgment is returned unto truth. Many in such instances are unable to lay hold of repentance and forgiveness. But David realises that his only hope is in God's truthful judgment/mercy becoming his.
    Psalm 51:
    2 Wash me throughly from mine iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin.
    3 For I acknowledge my transgressions: and my sin is ever before me.
    4 Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done this evil in thy sight: that thou mightest be justified when thou speakest, and be clear when thou judgest.
    5 Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.
    6 Behold, thou desirest truth in the inward parts: and in the hidden part thou shalt make me to know wisdom.
    7 Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean: wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.
    8 Make me to hear joy and gladness; that the bones which thou hast broken may rejoice.
    9 Hide thy face from my sins, and blot out all mine iniquities.
    10 Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me.
    11 Cast me not away from thy presence; and take not thy holy spirit from me.
    12 Restore unto me the joy of thy salvation; and uphold me with thy free spirit.
    13 Then will I teach transgressors thy ways; and sinners shall be converted unto thee.

Does this clarify?

Your statement:
quote:

The death of Stephen and people murdered during random acts of violence, etc., are the results of sinners killing people. Like people who die of old age because God doesn't allow them access to the tree of life, so too all other forms of death can be laid at the feet of God because He did not intervene to prevent it. He doesn't cause it, but neither does He prevent it. That's culpable malfeasance.

Mike I am very sad to hear you speak like this. The scriptures and God's children know no such thinking. What you are trying to accomplish by saying that? What is the purpose of making God culpable of these deaths? What is the meaning of this charge against God? Is God supposed to clear his name of this? Is that truth in judgment?

Stephen is of a different mind, he is sharing in his Father's mind, being a partaker of the Lord's suffering, for he is praying that God would not lay it to their charge.
    2 Peter 3:15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
    Romans 2:4 Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?


Far be it that our Father should be culpable, but rather the sinner is guilty of raising his hand against God. David realises: Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done this evil in thy sight. The Lord said unto Cain: What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.

Far be it that our Father should be culpable, but rather he suffers along with us. Our heavenly Father suffers long and forbears the iniquity and sin. He bears and suffers it.
    Matthew 25:40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

The Son of God bore our sins. We smote him. He suffered our iniquity. We gave him lashes, oppressed and afflicted him. He opened not his mouth. We brought him as a lamb to the slaughter. He opened not his mouth. We wagged our tongues at him. He reviled not. In Him is the instruction of peace and if we receive it then with his stripes we are healed!
    Isaiah 53:4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.
    1 Peter 2:23 Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously:
    Acts 26:23 That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should show light unto the people, and to the Gentiles.
    Hebrews 13:12 Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate.

All of God's children are partakers with the Lord in his sufferings
    Romans 8:17 And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.
    Acts 5:41 And they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for his name.
    1 Corinthians 4:12 …being reviled, we bless; being persecuted, we suffer it:
    Philippians 1:29 For unto you it is given in the behalf of Christ, not only to believe on him, but also to suffer for his sake;
    1 Peter 2:21 For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps:
    1 Peter 4:1 Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin;

God, willing to show and reveal wrath (the work of sin) for what it is, and at the same time to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the rebellious children (vessels of wrath fitted to destruction). So that he might make known the riches of his glory on those that are of faith (vessels of mercy), which he had purposed unto glory,
    1 Timothy 1:16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting.
    Ephesians 2:3-9 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;) And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus: That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus. For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.
    Romans 11:30 For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy …

It is my prayer Mike that none should remain a vessel of wrath (a rebellious child, filled with wrath/sin-righteousness), but that all should come to God and be made merciful. That all may obtain mercy and grace and become vessels of mercy. A vessel is something that is made for the purpose of containing something. Do we understand what we contain by nature? Do we understand what we may exchange our contents for? May the Lord cleanse our vessels of all wrath, and fill us with his grace.
    Colossians 3:12 Put on therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering;
    2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

In this manner we shall be clothed with his righteousness, such fine linen, such grace, such glory, such light
    2 Peter 1:4 Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.
    Rev 19:8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.
    Mat 5:16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
It is indeed our privilege and salvation to be partakers of his glory and righteousness. Christ said: John 17:22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; In the counsel to Laodicea Christ counsels us to buy of him white raiment. He also says that he stands at the door and is waiting to be let in.
    Revelation 3:18 I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.
    Revelation 3:20 Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.
    Colossians 1:27 To whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/08/02 05:45 PM

John, I thought you might misunderstand my thoughts on culpability. Sorry about that. I believe God is either directly or indirectly responsible for everything that happens throughout the universe.

The moment God chose to create free moral agents is the moment sin and death became inevitable. His choices were to create and deal with sin and death OR not to create and not deal with sin and death.

Because He chose to create He is now forced to deal with sin and death. Foreknowledge allowed for no other outcome. He couldn't hope it wouldn't happen. It was inevitable. He didn't make it happen, but by making free moral agents sin and death was inescapable.

The fact He chose to create free moral agents, who were destined to sin and die, makes God indirectly responsible for the existence of sin and death. If He had chosen not to create, there would be no sin and death. And if He refused to sustain the life of sinners, there would be no sin and death. Again, God does not cause sinners to sin, but He is indirectly responsible for the existence of sin and death.

Why God chose to create in the first place, knowing full well that they would sin, is a mystery to me. Perhaps the joy of spending eternity with loved ones offset the sadness of 6000 years of sin and death?

Since God is responsible for the existence of sin and death, He must also take responsibility for eliminating sin and death. He cannot allow this important work to fall into the wrong hands, i.e., sin, self or Satan. Only then could we trust God throughout eternity.

The imputed righteousness of Jesus accommodates sins confessed and forsaken, and sins committed unwittingly. But the imparted righteousness of Jesus is real righteousness. It is who we really are. It's not something we wear externally. We are righteous even as He is righteous.

1 John 3:7
Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.

I am not implying you don't already believe this. Nor am I suggesting that we should go around drawing attention to our Christlikeness. We must always point people to Jesus and His righteousness.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/11/02 06:56 AM

We have now arrived at the root of your thought Mike. There seems to be one aspect fairly clear, that of predestination. You said:
quote:

The fact He chose to create free moral agents, who were destined to sin and die, makes God indirectly responsible for the existence of sin and death.

This seems to answer why your thought has been pulling that route all along. I agree with you that if God had created anything that were destined to sin and die; he certainly would be responsible for it's doing so. However that would also mean that there is no such a thing as: a free moral agent, salvation, forgiveness, grace, mercy, love, sin, lies, truth, death. I can go on and on. Everything becomes unreal and impossible. In such a concept you can stage anything you wish to be the solution to something that does not exist.

You may not like me calling it predestination, but that is what it amounts to. Sin was not inevitable, nor was it inescapable, it was not even probable, it was only possible. The level of culpability (of God) equals the level of predestination. Where there is no predestination, there is no culpability.

Either one is a free moral agent or one is a robot destined to malfunction. The idea of a free moral agent that is destined to sin is self-defeating. One has to be free morally in order to be able to sin. One that is destined to sin cannot be free morally; therefore such cannot sin. The following thought is likely the perpetrator of this confused concept:
quote:

"Foreknowledge allowed for no other outcome".

This type of idea of Omniscience has been confused and distorted to serve the purpose of Satan. The nature of the foreknowledge espoused serves to remove responsibility from the "free moral agent", or otherwise declares that such is not free, therefore is not responsible even as you have so stated. Again in all this, sin is impossibility and everything else is nonsense. Make-believe games.

When a free moral agent is created, no amount of Foreknowledge or Omniscience can destine/foreknow the morality of such a being. Foreknowledge may know all the variables, and it is precisely the variables that establish the level of the 'freedom' that such a moral agent has. Where there is no variable there is no freedom. A foreknowledge that 'knows' the choice that a free moral agent will make establishes the fact that the agent was not free to choose, and therefore was not a free moral agent, and the idea of choice is illusionary.

Sin is not necessary; the moment it would be necessary it would not be sin. Sin is entirely unreasonable; the moment it would be reasonable it would not be sin. Sin is departure from reason and judgment unto lust.

The truth is that when God created free moral agents, everything was made good. Propensity to evil was not there. Without trammeling the freedom, everything was 'weighted and stacked' to promote good. Such was shown/taught what is good, was provided with good, and when necessary was warned of the evil. They were created in faith with faith and placed in a setting of faith. Faith is very reasonable. It is very reasonable to trust him who gave us life.

The kingdom of heaven is established upon faith. Morality is based on faith. Without faith morality cannot exist. Without faith relationships cannot exist. Without faith everything is but a mechanical interaction. God himself lives in faith. Faith is greater than all knowledge, and Love is the crown of faith. God created (with all wisdom) in faith. He knew the variables and was willing and ready to look after the worst of them. But by no means was any creation destined to sin. The truth is they were 'destined' to become sons of God. This was the purpose for which God created them and purposed them to become. As you can see the use of 'destined' here allows for freedom of exercise of faith and choice.
    Ephesians 1:3-5,9-11 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself: That in the dispensation of the fullness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him: In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:
God is ever working before and since sin to this purpose and this end, that his created moral agents should become the sons of God.

When God gave freedom, he gave responsibility. Where there is responsibility given there is also accountability. We did not give the responsibility to God, He gave it to us. He did not leave us alone in our responsibility. He established faith to be the connection between him and us so that all our responsibility would be fully met. By faith we had at our disposal all of heaven. By faith every power, virtue, knowledge, truth, ability, and so on was ours, and all our responsibility was infinitely provided for. In order to fail in our responsibility of sound judgment and truth in judgment, and to allow lust to rule, we needed to break faith, which was an unreasonable act. That is translated, it would have to be an intentionally purposed act of doing that, which is not sound judgment. We had the ability to do that. That is where the responsibility lay on our part: to be faithful. God requires truth in the inward parts. In falling from faith, judgment was turned unto lies. We also lost the freedom and became slaves; slaves of a corrupt judgment and a corrupt righteousness.

But God who is gracious in judgment and truth has not left us to destruction, but for the great love wherewith he loved us and the purpose which he purposed for us has done great and marvelous things to save us. That our judgment may return unto truth. That faith may be established so that the fulfillment of his purpose for us may be accomplished. That his free moral agents; created in his image, may become sons of God through the faith of the Son of God.
    Eph 2:1-10 And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;) And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus: That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus. For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
We fell from truth in judgment and faith through the hearing of lies. We are now saved through the hearing of faith: the faith of the Son of God.
    Galatians 3:2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?1 Corinthians 1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.Acts 26:18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.
    Romans 1:5 By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:
    Romans 1:17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.


Shalom

[ November 11, 2002, 12:12 AM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/12/02 01:14 AM

John, I do not believe in predestination which does not allow us the freedom to choose Jesus and salvation. In Christ we are predestined to be saved. I believe we are born unsaved and must be born again to be saved. But if we refuse to make the choice for Jesus and salvation then we remain lost and condemned.

Neither do I believe that God's foreknowledge eliminates our freedom of choice. Possessing a sinful nature is what restricts our freedom to choose. We are born in slavery to sin, self and Satan, and as such, our ability to exercise our freedom of choice is seriously limited. We cannot not sin. We must be born again and partake of the divine nature before we are able to choose Jesus and His righteousness.

Just because God knew created beings would fall, before He created them, does not mean He made them fall. God's ability to foresee the future choices of created beings does not rob them of their freedom to choose, not any more than someone saying what will happen in a story he's already seen or read.

If God does not know the choices people will make in the future, and the far reaching consequences, He could not predict the future (prophecy) or promise sin will not arise a second time. For God life is a rerun. He already knows what will happen, which doesn't make things boring for Him, instead the aniticipation of things to come makes life doubly fun for God.

Again, because God foresaw the fall of created beings, and chose to create them anyhow, makes Him indirectly responsible for the existence of sin and death. Thus, He's also responsible for the elimination of sin and death.

[ November 18, 2002, 01:10 PM: Message edited by: Mike Lowe ]
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/26/02 03:15 PM

Mike, I agree that since the fall man has become slave to sin and thus lost his freedom. This I have stated several times and also in my last post, but this was not so when God created him. When God created man, he was free. God was ready for the 'if man should sin', but he did not foresee that the 'if' will happen. If God foresaw that the 'if' will happen then it could not be an 'if', and his warning and instruction to man is mindless and meaningless. The dispute here is not God's omniscience, but the idea of a foreknowledge that knows the 'if' that will happen, which means there is no 'if', which means there is no freedom. Such foreknowledge and a free moral agent at creation are irreconcilable. That is not the way God created man, and we must not impute the fallen state of man which has no freedom upon that which God created. Therefore what God created was 'good' and there can be no culpability on God's part for man not having been faithful. God made man able to be faithful and gave man the responsibility of being so.

Mike you said
quote:

Just because God knew created beings would fall, before He created them, does not mean He made them fall. God's ability to foresee the future choices of created beings does not rob them of their freedom to choose, not any more than someone telling what will happen in a story he's already seen or read.
If God does not know the choices people will make in the future, and the far-reaching consequences, He could not predict the future (prophecy) or promise sin will not arise a second time. For God life is a rerun.
He already knows what will happen, which doesn't make things boring for Him, instead the anticipation of things to come makes life doubly fun for God.

Such a concept of foreknowledge is irreconcilable.

First, prophesy is not intended to tell us that God knows the future of the choices and actions of his creation as some skit or story read, that will be played out; nor that such type of foreknowledge is what ascertains that sin will rise no more. The scripture tells us:
    Daniel 4:17 This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men.
Prophesy is based and intended to reveal that God has mastery (rules) in the kingdom of men (this is the world course). We must realise that God did not and does not allow sin to go rampant and wild. God has limited the domain of sin. He also has purposed that the various dominions/deceptions of sin shall be revealed in the course of history and has given such and such a time for each to be manifested. So we may rest assured that though evil reigns in this world, God has mastery over it and will bring an end to it in due season. We can see this more fully in the following reason made by Gabriel to Daniel. God has to work to accomplish his purpose and rules (has mastery) over the kingdom of men.
    Daniel 10:13 But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.
This is not just the unfolding of something he 'saw or read - a rerun'. It is the active reality of something happening for the first time, yet realising that God says "thus far and no further". This interference of God we can also see plainly in Balaam's inability to curse Israel, and it can be seen all over this world's history.
God's foreknowledge is however based on his knowledge of what 'we are made of' as well as his purposes. He knows all the 'what ifs'. The issue of 'sin not rising again' does not have anything to do with God having read or seen the events of the future as in a book. It has to do with God knowing what 'son's of God' are made of. Just as it is known that pure gold does not rust, nor corrode, nor corrupt; so he knows that those who have been purified with fire and are become pure gold that has been tried in the fire, will not corrupt themselves.
    Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
Going back to the issues of the condition of man.
When God created man, man was made good and free. Since the fall however, man became a slave to sin and was no longer free. This is why man needs to be saved from sin. Man needs a Saviour from sin. God knows the workings of sin and he knows the way out. Consider this Mike, sin came by preaching; Satan preached to Eve and Eve to Adam; and salvation is likewise by preaching, preaching of the word of God.
    1 Corinthians 1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.
Christ is the 'living word'! He lives the word that he speaks. If there were nothing said, there would be nothing to believe. If he does not live it we would have no one to believe. Deception, darkness and blindness are an 'erroneous thought'. Truth, light and sight are a 'true thought'. God sent his Son to bear witness unto truth, to open the blind eyes, to set free them that are in bondage. The revelation of this 'truth, light, life' cost a tremendous sacrifice, for there is enmity on the side of error to truth. Christ endured much in order to bring us the light of life. I pray Mike that you no longer hold God culpable for sin. Christ, the living word of life, never thought such a thing, but he places the responsibility square on us, and says 'take heed therefore how you hear'.
    Hebrews 12:2 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.
    Hebrews 12:3 For consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners against himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds.
Christ's death has to do with him saving us from the dungeon of sin, and not from God's righteousness. Had Christ not spoken or preached the word of life he would never have suffered the cross. This has to do with the direct conflict of light with darkness, and not with substitute payment of penalty satisfying God's law. The concept of the substitute penalty payment is one of the aspects of the dungeon of sin. The transfer of responsibility of unfaithfulness/sin is another aspect of dungeon of sin. Coming to the light is taking up the responsibility of faithfulness that God originally gave us. Repentance from sin is 'bringing judgment unto truth'. Mercy, forgiveness and grace means living in the light, and becoming a partaker of God's righteousness.
Shalom

[ November 26, 2002, 08:26 AM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/26/02 05:53 PM

John, thank you for the study. It is apparent to me that we are both convinced of what we believe. I appreciate the emphasis you place on the love of God. I am willing to agree to disagree agreeably. We do not see eye to eye concerning the meaning and purpose of Jesus' death on the cross. Nor do we agree on the function of God's foreknowledge. I look forward to reading your posts in future.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 11/27/02 07:02 AM

John said:

quote:

God was ready for the 'if man should sin', but he did not foresee that the 'if' will happen.

Based on the above quote, I have created a new topic in this forum to study that aspect.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 12/08/02 10:55 PM

As far as this topic goes, have we found the truth of this matter?

Did Christ bear our sin/guilt?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/13/03 07:28 AM

Daryl

The enclosed Scripture seems to speak to your question best:

1 Pet.2:20 For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God.
21 For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps:
22 Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth:
23 Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously:
24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.
25 For ye were as sheep going astray; but are now returned unto the Shepherd and Bishop of your souls.

Verse 24 in particular tells us that Jesus did indeed "bare our sins," and so this is a point we should consider established well by Scripture.

What does not seem so well established, is what did God mean here when he said jesus bare these sins "in His own body on the tree?"

I would be very interested Daryl, to read your understanding of this point. I believe that this point would go a long ways in answering the question, if we can figure out what is being said in this passage.

I need to look a few things up; and I wil come back when I find them... [Smile]
Posted By: Charlene Van Hook

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/13/03 05:59 PM

Beings Jesus died of a "Broken Heart"....I would say he felt the magnitude of all the sins ever committed, plus the great disapointment in His created beings.....very deeply in His body, to the point of dying of a broken heart.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/14/03 02:27 AM

The text David provided seems very clear to me!

quote:

1 Peter 2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.

I guess I will need to re-read this topic to see where the problem or confusion is in the first place.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/14/03 05:03 AM

Yes Daryl & Amen!

I was also thinking that this text seems quite clear.

I also intend to re read this topic tonight, and comment further then.

But I will say, that when I read this text last night; it struck me that maybe, there is a part we have not really understood so well, within this topic.

I would be really interested to hear from others about the short phrase I bolded in the above, supplied text. It says that Jesus bore our sins "IN HIS OWN BODY. (on the cross.)" I think this may be one of the several important points that can help us to correctly understand the atonement Of Christ.

But yes, it is clear that Jesus did bear our sins on the cross. Does anyone have any thoughts on why sin is in the plural in the above text? Would there be a difference, if it was "sin," or "sins" here?

Charlene; if you have any quotes you can think of from Scripture; I would be very appreciative. I can think of a few things from S.O.P, but I would like to gather together some central Bible texts that would speak clearly to this point you have made. I am studying with some people who want to know the SDA views on this; and that is why I am asking for Scriptures right now. [Smile]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/16/03 12:49 AM

Paul wrote something very similar in Rom 8:3 when he said Jesus "condemned sin in the flesh." Both Paul and Peter seem to say that Jesus inherited sinful flesh, which is how and why He was tempted in all points and bore sin on the cross.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/16/03 01:48 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Mike Lowe:
Paul wrote something very similar in Rom 8:3 when he said Jesus "condemned sin in the flesh." Both Paul and Peter seem to say that Jesus inherited sinful flesh, which is how and why He was tempted in all points and bore sin on the cross.

Hello Mike

Are you sure that "inherit" is the right word to use in the above? It seems to me that that word would change the true meaning of "bearing our sins in His own body." Do you see a clash between the two words "bear" and "inherit?" I have been under the impression that Jesus' death on Calvary was completely volitional. Do you see any ways that use of the word "inherit" would change that?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/17/03 06:28 PM

David, good point. The words inherit and bore certainly have different meanings, but I didn't intend to imply Jesus inherited our history of sin and guilt. Like you, I also believe Jesus voluntarily bore the sins of the world, beginning in Gethsemane and ending on Golgotha, as our vicarious substitute.

However, it seems logical to me that in order for Jesus to be our substitute it was necessary for Him to become a human being because as purely God He was incapable of experiencing the wrath of God on our behalf. Since it was necessary for Him to become human in order to experience the wrath of God it stands to reason that He also had to inherit Adam's fallen flesh nature.

Thus, it would seem that Jesus had to possess sinful flesh nature in order to be tempted like us and in order to bear our sins on the cross. That's why I suggested the passages Paul and Peter wrote are similar. I cannot imagine Jesus vicariously bearing our sin on the cross if He hadn't inherited our fallen sinful flesh nature.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/18/03 09:02 PM

In other words, Jesus was able to bear our sins in His body because He inherited sinful flesh nature. He was born bearing our sins in His body, in His sinful flesh nature. He had to resist the sinful clamorings of His fallen flesh nature everyday of His life. During His 40 days and nights in the wilderness of temptation Jesus was keenly and acutely aware of the sinfulness of His fallen flesh nature. Jesus volunteered to bear our sins in His body before He became a human being, way before the Garden of Gethsemane.

But it wasn't until He hung nailed to the cross that He, for the first time, endured the wrath of God against the sin He bore in His body. It was there all along, from birth, but it wasn't until the cross that God caused Jesus to suffer the wrath of God against the sin in His flesh. God didn't wait until the cross to lay our sins upon Jesus, rather they became a part of Jesus when He was born. But what changed at the cross was that Jesus experienced, for the first and last time, the wrath of God against the sin He had been bearing in His body since birth.

That's also how it works for mankind. We are born bearing the sins of our fathers in our fallen flesh natures, and we go through life being tempted to sin and sinning, but not until we stand before the great white throne of judgment do we suffer the wrath of God against the sins we have committed. Hopefully we will accept Jesus as our Saviour and avoid having to stand before God to receive condemnation and wrath for the sins we ourselves have committed. Of course, we will never suffer for the sins our fathers committed in spite of the fact we were born with a record of their sins in our fallen flesh natures.

In fact Jesus still bears our sins for us in the heavenly sanctuary, but instead of bearing them "in" His body, He now bears them "on" His body. When Jesus lived and died the perfect life and death He became the lawful owner of our sin and second death. Our sins are with Jesus in the most holy place right now where they are safely contained or quarantined, which is also why they do not crush us to death the second we commit a sin. If we die saved or are sealed alive among the 144,000 Jesus will transfer all of our sins upon the head of Satan who will die in the lake of fire with them after the millennium. Satan will die our second death in our place.

[ February 18, 2003, 02:45 PM: Message edited by: Mike Lowe ]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/18/03 09:55 PM

David wrote:

"Does anyone have any thoughts on why sin is in the plural in the above text? Would there be a difference, if it was "sin," or "sins" here?"

I doubt the different spelling makes any real difference in this case. Peter and Paul seem to use them interchangeably in the same context.

2 Cor 5
21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.

Rom 8
3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

I believe the phrase "condemned sin in the flesh" could be translated "condemned the sin in His flesh." Which He did by resolutely resisting the unholy thoughts and feelings it generated and communicated, and by ultimately crucifying them on the cross.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/22/03 03:39 AM

Thankyou for your clarifications above Mike.

I hope it's OK for me to ask another question? [Smile]

You mentioned above how we are all born "bearing the sins of our fathers;" and I wanted to know if you have any Bible texts that would show the differences between Jesus "bearing our sins;" and us "bearing the sins of our fathers?"

Sin bearing in each of these two cases are two very different things; I would say.

Are you perhaps trying to portray what we are told in Galatians?

Ga 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,

Did Jesus "bear our sins" simply by undergoing the Incarnation?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/22/03 03:58 AM

As I see it we bear the sins of our fathers in our sinful flesh natures. We are not guilty of these sins, nor are we guilty of the sinful thoughts and feelings generated and communicated by our fallen flesh natures.

What Jesus experienced beginning in Gethsemane and ending on Golgotha was the wrath of God against the sin He inherited when He assumed Adam's fallen nature. Otherwise, the difference in how we bear the sins of our fathers and how Jesus bore the sin of mankind is not all that different - He and we bear them in our sinful flesh nature.

I believe this thought is developed by Paul in Romans 7 and 8, where he talks about the sinful clamorings of fallen flesh nature both in born again believers and in Jesus. Compare Rom 7:17-20 and 8:3. Of course, Jesus never cherished or acted out the unholy clamorings of His fallen flesh nature, thus He never developed sinful old man habits of character like we have.

What are your thoughts?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/22/03 07:39 AM

Interesting Study So Far Mike:

So are you trying to say that Jesus "bearing our sins" is different than Jesus atoning for our sins?

Notice in the text we started with:

1 Peter 2:24 "Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree,"

Does the Bible say that Jesus beared our sins in any other way, but on the cross? I would be interested to see the texts.

What is the relationship of Jesus on the cross; and Him bearing our sins there?

Sometimes, when I think of the Song: "Were You There When They Crucified My Lord?," I like to try and place myself there at the crucifixion scene - but in the shoes of the different people who were there, when Jesus was dying.

It is logical to see how each of the different ones may have viewed the death of Jesus...take the soldiers who cast lots for His clothes, and compare to Mary, the mother of Jesus. How would each of the faces about the cross have viewed His imminent death there?

As we see by our text which promted this thread; Peter obviously saw the aspect of Christ "bearing our sin." Why might this be?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/23/03 06:37 AM

Please reread EGW's description of Jesus in the wilderness of sin, there she plainly says that Jesus was bearing our sins then.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/24/03 01:29 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Mike Lowe:
Please reread EGW's description of Jesus in the wilderness of sin, there she plainly says that Jesus was bearing our sins then.

I am sorry Mike...

You lost me a bit. Can you tell me exactly where the quote is you are referring to? Also, what part of it you want me to note?

Thankyou.

David
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/24/03 01:33 AM

Quote by David above:

"Notice in the text we started with:

1 Peter 2:24 "Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree,"

Does the Bible say that Jesus beared our sins in any other way, but on the cross? I would be interested to see the texts.

What is the relationship of Jesus on the cross; and Him bearing our sins there?"

I was also wondering Mike, does the above which you are referring me to answer my questions, or are you making a different point?

Do you know of any Scripture to back up your point?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/24/03 08:16 PM

Sorry about the confusion. I was short on time, otherwise I would have included the quote with my post. Here it is:

The Story of Jesus, page 43, paragraph 5
Chapter Title: The Temptation
The sins of the world were upon Him, and His face showed such sorrow and anguish as man had never felt. He was suffering for sinners.

The Desire of Ages, page 116, paragraph 4
Chapter Title: The Temptation
Many look on this conflict between Christ and Satan as having no special bearing on their own life; and for them it has little interest. But within the domain of every human heart this controversy is repeated. Never does one leave the ranks of evil for the service of God without encountering the assaults of Satan. The enticements which Christ resisted were those that we find it so difficult to withstand. They were urged upon Him in as much greater degree as His character is superior to ours. With the terrible weight of the sins of the world upon Him, Christ withstood the test upon appetite, upon the love of the world, and upon that love of display which leads to presumption. These were the temptations that overcame Adam and Eve, and that so readily overcome us.

The Desire of Ages, page 117, paragraph 1
Chapter Title: The Temptation
Satan had pointed to Adam's sin as proof that God's law was unjust, and could not be obeyed. In our humanity, Christ was to redeem Adam's failure. But when Adam was assailed by the tempter, none of the effects of sin were upon him. He stood in the strength of perfect manhood, possessing the full vigor of mind and body. He was surrounded with the glories of Eden, and was in daily communion with heavenly beings. It was not thus with Jesus when He entered the wilderness to cope with Satan. For four thousand years the race had been decreasing in physical strength, in mental power, and in moral worth; and Christ took upon Him the infirmities of degenerate humanity. Only thus could He rescue man from the lowest depths of his degradation.

The Desire of Ages, page 117, paragraph 2
Chapter Title: The Temptation
Many claim that it was impossible for Christ to be overcome by temptation. Then He could not have been placed in Adam's position; He could not have gained the victory that Adam failed to gain. If we have in any sense a more trying conflict than had Christ, then He would not be able to succor us. But our Saviour took humanity, with all its liabilities. He took the nature of man, with the possibility of yielding to temptation. We have nothing to bear which He has not endured.

The Desire of Ages, page 117, paragraph 4
Chapter Title: The Temptation
From the time of Adam to that of Christ, self-indulgence had increased the power of the appetites and passions, until they had almost unlimited control. Thus men had become debased and diseased, and of themselves it was impossible for them to overcome. In man's behalf, Christ conquered by enduring the severest test. For our sake He exercised a self-control stronger than hunger or death. And in this first victory were involved other issues that enter into all our conflicts with the powers of darkness.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 02/24/03 08:20 PM

This passage demonstrates a couple of things important to this discussion. It clearly shows that Jesus possessed sinful flesh nature identical to ours, and it also teaches that Jesus bore our sins in His body from birth. But Jesus did not experience the wrath of God against the sin He bore on our behalf until He entered the garden of Gethsemane.

Selected Messages Book 3, page 129, paragraph 3
Chapter Title: The Incarnation
His human nature was created; it did not even possess the angelic powers. It was human, identical with our own.

Or are we talking about two separate issues?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/01/03 07:17 AM

Mike

Do you have any Bible texts to illustrate the point?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/01/03 09:52 PM

Yes, I believe all the texts which teach Jesus was tempted in all points like born again believers are tempted imply Jesus bore the burden of our sins in His sinful flesh nature from the moment He was born. Heb 2 and 4, Rom 8:3 and 1 Peter 2:24. Not to mention all the SOP quotes which clearly teach it. And then the fact He didn't begin suffering the wrath of God against the sin in His flesh until He entered Gethsemane clearly says it was in His flesh nature all along from the beginning.

What makes sense to you?
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/02/03 05:06 PM

Greetings everyone

Mike, you said,
quote:

What Jesus experienced beginning in Gethsemane and ending on Golgotha was the wrath of God against the sin He inherited when He assumed Adam's fallen nature.

But it wasn't until He hung nailed to the cross that He, for the first time, endured the wrath of God against the sin He bore in His body. It was there all along, from birth, but it wasn't until the cross that God caused Jesus to suffer the wrath of God against the sin in His flesh. God didn't wait until the cross to lay our sins upon Jesus, rather they became a part of Jesus when He was born. But what changed at the cross was that Jesus experienced, for the first and last time, the wrath of God against the sin He had been bearing in His body since birth.

Where does the scripture teach that the wrath of God was upon Christ? What is the wrath of God?

Jesus said,

    Luke 22:53 When I was daily with you in the temple, ye stretched forth no hands against me: but this is your hour, and the power of darkness.
    John 14:30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.
    John 7:19 Did not Moses give you the law, and yet none of you keepeth the law? Why go ye about to kill me?
    John 8:37 I know that ye are Abraham’s seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.
    John 8:40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.
    John 19:11 Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.
    John 10:17 Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.



Peter said,

    Acts 2:23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
    1 Peter 3:18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:
    1 Peter 4:1 Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin;

Paul said,

    Hebrews 2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;
    Romans 6:10 For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God.
    Hebrews 12:2 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.
    Hebrews 12:3 For consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners against himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds.


Shalom

Note, I will be away for three weeks.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/02/03 09:38 PM

John 3:26
He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

See also Rom 1:18; 5:9, Eph 5:6 and Rev 11:18 are also examples of what the unsaved must suffer. Jesus took this wrath upon Himself in our place.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/03/03 07:52 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Mike Lowe:
John 3:26
He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

See also Rom 1:18; 5:9, Eph 5:6 and Rev 11:18 are also examples of what the unsaved must suffer. Jesus took this wrath upon Himself in our place.

Mike

Are you saying to us, that "the wrath of God" as you have depicted here for us, is the same as Jesus "bearing our sins on the tree?"

John! How are you?! Maybe by the time you read this, it will be three weeks; but I wanted to thank you for your comments here. It looks like you are trying to balance out the equation here by showing how the wrath of God was not upon Jesus till He hung on the cross? Meanwhile; Mike is saying God's wrath was upon Jesus at Gesthemane.

I personally don't see a need at this point in the discussion to worry inordinately about that point. I believe the initial question of this thread was asking: "Did Jesus bear our sin/guilt?"

Mike, John, & others:

If you look through this thread; you won't find the answer to this question. Any thoughts as to why?

In the following text; let us note:

Rev.14:14 "And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud one sat like unto the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle.
15 And another angel came out of the temple, crying with a loud voice to him that sat on the cloud, Thrust in thy sickle, and reap: for the time is come for thee to reap; for the harvest of the earth is ripe.
16 And he that sat on the cloud thrust in his sickle on the earth; and the earth was reaped.
17 And another angel came out of the temple which is in heaven, he also having a sharp sickle.
18 And another angel came out from the altar, which had power over fire; and cried with a loud cry to him that had the sharp sickle, saying, Thrust in thy sharp sickle, and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth; for her grapes are fully ripe.
19 And the angel thrust in his sickle into the earth, and gathered the vine of the earth, and cast it into the great winepress of the wrath of God."

When did Jesus "trod the winepress alone?"

Isaiah 63:3 I have trodden the winepress alone; and of the people there was none with me: for I will tread them in mine anger, and trample them in my fury; and their blood shall be sprinkled upon my garments, and I will stain all my raiment.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/03/03 08:17 PM

Jesus trod the winepress alone from the moment He was born, especially beginning in Gethsemane and and ending on Golgotha.

God's Amazing Grace, page 163, paragraph 2
Chapter Title: Unutterable Loneliness
Through childhood, youth, and manhood, Jesus walked alone. In His purity and His faithfulness, He trod the winepress alone, and of the people there was none with Him. He carried the awful weight of responsibility for the salvation of men. He knew that unless there was a decided change in the principles and purposes of the human race, all would be lost. This was the burden of His soul, and none could appreciate the weight that rested upon Him.

God's Amazing Grace, page 163, paragraph 3
Chapter Title: Unutterable Loneliness
Throughout His life His mother and His brothers did not comprehend His mission. Even His disciples did not understand Him. He had dwelt in eternal light, as one with God, but His life on earth must be spent in solitude. As one with us, He must bear the burden of our guilt and woe. The Sinless One must feel the shame of sin. The peace lover must dwell with strife, the truth must abide with falsehood, purity with vileness. Every sin, every discord, every defiling lust that transgression had brought, was torture to His spirit.

God's Amazing Grace, page 163, paragraph 4
Chapter Title: Unutterable Loneliness
Alone He must tread the path; alone He must bear the burden. Upon Him who had laid off His glory and accepted the weakness of humanity the redemption of the world must rest. He saw and felt it all, but His purpose remained steadfast. Upon His arm depended the salvation of the fallen race, and He reached out His hand to grasp the hand of Omnipotent love.

Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, April 23, 1901, paragraph 13
Article Title: The Great Standard of Righteousness
"The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, . . . full of grace and truth." But the people He came to save refused to receive Him. They rewarded Him evil for good, and in Pilate's judgment hall He was condemned to death by crucifixion. "Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah? This that is glorious in His apparel, traveling in the greatness of His strength? I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save. Wherefore art thou red in thine apparel, and thy garments like him that treadeth in the wine fat? I have trodden the winepress alone, and of the people there was none with me."

The Signs of the Times, June 3, 1897, paragraph 12
Article Title: Gethsemane
"Then cometh he to his disciples, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest; behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners." The storm of the hellish host had in nowise abated, but he who was its subject was strengthened to meet its fury. He came forth calm and serene. He had borne that which no human being can ever bear; for he had tasted the sufferings of death for every man. "Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah? this that is glorious in his apparel, traveling in the greatness of his strength? I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save. Wherefore art thou red in thine apparel, and thy garments like him that treadeth in the wine fat? I have trodden the winepress alone; and of the people there was none with me."

The Signs of the Times, August 26, 1903, paragraph 8
Article Title: Our Helper
Only by bearing, on the cross, the punishment for our disobedience could Christ deliver us from eternal death. He became sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him. Repentant sinners stand before the Father justified, because the Innocent One has borne their guilt. [Isa 63:1-5 quoted].
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/06/03 04:23 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Mike Lowe:
Jesus trod the winepress alone from the moment He was born, especially beginning in Gethsemane and and ending on Golgotha.

Thankyou Mike;

Your quotes from Ellen White are interesting. Do you know where to back up the above portion of your post I have quoted from the Bible?

Also, if Jesus trod the winepress [of God's wrath] since He was born; how can we accept what was brought out in this thread that Jesus did not suffer the wrath of God till

a) Gesthemane
b) Golgotha (Calvary)

It seems to me that the deck is short a card or two here? What do you think? [Smile]
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/06/03 05:21 AM

What does the fact that Jesus trod the winepress alone actually mean?
Posted By: Claudia Thompson

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/06/03 05:37 AM

From the quotations below, I dont think that "jesus trod the winepress alone" just means "God's wrath" . That is surely part of it, but He bore many burdens alone that none other could bare or feel because of the nature of them:

Chapter Title: Unutterable Loneliness
Through childhood, youth, and manhood, Jesus walked alone. In His purity and His faithfulness, He trod the winepress alone, and of the people there was none with Him. He carried the awful weight of responsibility for the salvation of men. He knew that unless there was a decided change in the principles and purposes of the human race, all would be lost. This was the burden of His soul, and none could appreciate the weight that rested upon Him.

Throughout His life His mother and His brothers did not comprehend His mission. Even His disciples did not understand Him. He had dwelt in eternal light, as one with God, but His life on earth must be spent in solitude. As one with us, He must bear the burden of our guilt and woe. The Sinless One must feel the shame of sin. The peace lover must dwell with strife, the truth must abide with falsehood, purity with vileness. Every sin, every discord, every defiling lust that transgression had brought, was torture to His spirit. Alone He must tread the path; alone He must bear the burden. Upon Him who had laid off His glory and accepted the weakness of humanity the redemption of the world must rest.


God's Amazing Grace, page 179, paragraph 3
Chapter Title: So Costly--and Yet Free
For sinful men, the highest consolation, the greatest cause of rejoicing, is that Heaven has given Jesus to be the sinner's Saviour. . . . He offered to go over the ground where Adam stumbled and fell; to meet the tempter on the field of battle, and conquer him in man's behalf. Behold Him in the wilderness of temptation. Forty days and forty nights He fasted, enduring the fiercest assaults of the powers of darkness. He trod the "winepress alone; and of the people there was none with" Him (Isa. 63:3). It was not for Himself, but that He might break the chain that held the human race in slavery to Satan.

When my brother studied the sanctuary doctrine he found something about the oil in the sanctuary. I cant remember much about it but he said something like that the olive had to be "beaten" to make the oil as a symbolic thing about Jesus beaten. It meant that a person starts as himself and then submits to have every bit of "Self" "squeezed" out of him... till it becomes holy oil for a whole other purpose... to be used for God's purposes.

This is kind of like trodding the winepress...

I dont know if this is right, but I just remember that conversation from a long time ago about the oil.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/06/03 06:06 AM

Right on, Claudia! [Smile]

Jesus trod the winepress alone, not because of any wrath of God, but because of, in a sense, the wrath of man, and also, obviously, of the devil.

The very first chapter of the gospel of John says it all.

quote:

John 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
11
He came unto his own, and his own received him not.

He was all alone, for He was the sinless One, who had come to save His people from their sins.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/08/03 03:33 AM

David wrote:

"Your quotes from Ellen White are interesting. Do you know where to back up the above portion of your post I have quoted from the Bible?

Also, if Jesus trod the winepress [of God's wrath] since He was born; how can we accept what was brought out in this thread that Jesus did not suffer the wrath of God till

a) Gesthemane
b) Golgotha (Calvary)

It seems to me that the deck is short a card or two here? What do you think?"

David, again I would cite the texts I have already posted previously to substantiate the fact Jesus bore the burden of our sin, shame and guilt from the moment He was born. The EGW quotes make it possible for me to confidently believe this is true.

Ellen White used the expression "trodding the wine press alone" in many different ways. But the ultimate demonstration came when Jesus experienced the wrath of God against the sin He had been bearing in His body since birth.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/08/03 03:43 AM

Daryl wrote:

"Jesus trod the winepress alone, not because of any wrath of God, but because of, in a sense, the wrath of man, and also, obviously, of the devil."

Daryl, do the following quotes agree with this idea.

Matthew 27:46
"And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"

The Faith I Live By, page 101, paragraph 4
Chapter Title: God's Remedy For Sin
Behold Him in the wilderness, in Gethsemane, upon the cross! The spotless Son of God took upon Himself the burden of sin. He who had been one with God, felt in His soul the awful separation that sin makes between God and man. This wrung from His lips the anguished cry, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" Matt. 27:46. It was the burden of sin, the sense of its terrible enormity, of its separation of the soul from God--it was this that broke the heart of the Son of God.

[ March 09, 2003, 02:09 PM: Message edited by: Mike Lowe ]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/08/03 08:46 PM

Claudia, the same idea applies to grapes and grape juice. Like olives grapes must be pressed to extract the juice. That's what test, trial and temptation is all about. The squeezing process. But I look at it slightly differently than most people do. I believe the oil and the juice symbolize the love of God, the righteousness of Christ.

I believe the squeezing process, which releases the oil or the juice, illustrates the revelation of Christ's righteousness in our life. In other words, the love of God in our life is revealed when we are tempted, tested and tried, as opposed to saying the oil or juice is unknown sin being squeezed out of us during test, trial and temptation.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/11/03 09:48 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Daryl Fawcett:
Right on, Claudia! [Smile]

Jesus trod the winepress alone, not because of any wrath of God, but because of, in a sense, the wrath of man, and also, obviously, of the devil.

The very first chapter of the gospel of John says it all.

quote:

John 1:10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
11
He came unto his own, and his own received him not.

He was all alone, for He was the sinless One, who had come to save His people from their sins.
Daryl

I think you need a better context for the above Scripture quote. That text does not "say it all:"

John 8:16 And yet if I judge, my judgment is true: for I am not alone, but I and the Father that sent me.

Also, the text in Rev.14 very clearly says "the winepress of God's wrath." Where does the Bible teach "the winepress of man's wrath?"

Also for Mike:

Where does the Bible support your theory about "the juice?"

I quote:

"the squeezing process, which releases the oil or the juice, illustrates the revelation of Christ's righteousness in our life. In other words, the love of God in our life is revealed when we are tempted, tested and tried, as opposed to saying the oil or juice is unknown sin being squeezed out of us during test, trial and temptation."

The text we were discussing from Rev.14 is an end time scenario, God's righteousness has done it's work; and if you look closely, the juice is the blood of those destroyed by God's wrath; eg. the brightness of His coming. At the time of this winepress action in Rev.14, please note that the text itself tells us the fruit was already harvested from the "vine" and that it was the vine which was pressed here. If you correctly identify "the man with the sharp sickle," it is easy to see what I am saying.

Rev.14:19 - "the angel thrust in his sickle, and gathered the vine of the earth, AND CAST IT INTO THE GREAT WINEPRESS OF THE WRATH OF GOD.

Verse 20 states clearly that "BLOOD CAME OUT OF THE WINEPRESS."

Whose blood was that in the winepress?

It is a mistake at best, to deny that Jesus suffered God's wrath, or to promote the idea that the text I earlier brought up in this thread from Rev.14: 14-20 is talking about "the revelation of Christ's righteousness in our life," as you put it in your last post.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/12/03 04:49 AM

David, good point about the wine press mentioned in Revelation 14. It just goes to show that the same illustration can symbolize opposite truths. Like leaven - it symbolizes both sin and righteousness. See Mat 13:33 and 16:6. Thus, the context determines what the wine press and juice symbolizes.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/13/03 07:09 AM

Also, the wine press and blood of the marked followers of Babylon in Revelation 14 happens when Jesus returns, therefore, it is not referring to the lake of fire after the millennium, which is when they experience the wrath of God against sin.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/14/03 11:38 AM

Quote by Mike:

“David

Good point re the wine press mentioned in Revelation 14. It just goes to show that the same illustration can symbolize opposite truths. Like leaven - it symbolizes both sin and righteousness. See Mat 13:33 and 16:6. Thus, the context determines what the wine press and juice symbolizes. “ - end of quote

Mike :

Here are the texts you have referred to above:

Mat. 13:33 Another parable spake he unto them; The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.

Mat.16:6 Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.

Mike:

Your insinuations by the above comments and scripture are really abstract at best. While the two texts you supplied do show us that “leaven” can be used in two different ways; they utterly fail to make even one relevant point regarding the winepress of God’s wrath in Rev. 14, or how this winepress is also used to denote righteousness of God. In what way does Rev.14 need “context?” The text is so clear; it says “the winepress of GOD’S WRATH.” Can you at least show us where the Bible verifies your statement re a couple of posts ago about how the winepress, as used in Rev.14, also denotes “an opposite truth?” If the word “winepress” in Rev.14 were all by itself, and did not have the phrase “of God’s wrath” attached to it; you might be a bit closer to making a relevant point…But even then, there would be unanswered questions.


quote:
Originally posted by Mike Lowe:
Also, the wine press and blood of the marked followers of Babylon in Revelation 14 happens when Jesus returns, therefore, it is not referring to the lake of fire after the millennium, which is when they experience the wrath of God against sin.

Mike

The text in Revelation 14 is specific, and clear. It says "the winepress OF GOD'S WRATH."

Therefore, how can you say "God's wrath was not experienced then?"

We find agreement that this "winepress of God's wrath" occurs at Christ's second coming; but would that really prove God's real wrath was only felt by anyone "in the Lake of fire," as you appear to be suggesting?

I am having trouble grasping any solid Bible explanation for why it is so important to you to try and prove that Jesus did not suffer God's wrath until Calvary, and why you feel it so imperative to refute the fact that God's wrath, against sin, could have happened at a number of different points before the lake of fire culmination of His wrath…I see the context of the lake of fire wrath as a culmination of God’s wrath, denoting therefore, a process of God’s wrath, (manifestations of), before the Lake Of Fire.

Maybe, we are getting all the different "wraths" in the Bible mixed up? [Confused]

In addition to "the wrath of God," the Bible also speaks about "the wrath of man which worketh not the righteousness of God," (James 1:20). Did Jesus suffer this wrath? If so, when, how? Which Bible texts tell us about it?

Are you perhaps thinking that if God’s wrath ocurred too soon in the plan of salvation, before the cross, or before the lake of fire, that it would then be unjust somehow?

The Bible tells us that God’s wrath is always just. Whenever it occurs in this life – before the end of the millenium. (see Rom.3:5).

And in our daily lives, the Bible cautions us to “leave room for God’s wrath.” (Rom.12:19). God chooses to “show His wrath,” as a way to “make His powers known,” and He has consistently done this throughout the ages. (Rom.9:22).

“The wrath of God” is also coming in the future, as you had mentioned. (Col.3:6).
And thanks be to God for “His unspeakable gift,” and that His Jesus – our Jesus, is the One who rescues us all from this impending and dramatic fulfillment of God’s wrath.” (see 1 Thes.1:10). Rev.14:10 calls it “the full strength” of His wrath. Did Jesus bear the “full strength” of God’s wrath on Calvary, or in Gesthemane, as another poster here had said earlier? How is it possible that Jesus suffered “the full strength,” of God’s wrath,” if “the full strength didn’t happen till the Lake Of Fire? Did Jesus really “bear our sins,” if He did not suffer “the full strength” of God’s wrath? Is “bearing our sin” the same as bearing “the full strength” of God’s wrath?

The final manifestation of God’s wrath, actually comes from BOTH God and Jesus, His Son:

Rev.6: 16 And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb:
17 For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?

What are we to think regarding “the wrath of God,” as it relates to Jesus “bearing our sin?”

1 Peter 2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.

I hope I do not mix up this topic too much by introducing one other type of wrath that the Bible speaks about. It is the wrath of the devil himself:

Rev.12:10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.
11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.

In Summary:

1/ Did Jesus bear “the wrath of man?” (James 1:20).
2/ Did Jesus bear the “great wrath” of Satan? (Rev.12:10-12).
3/ Did Jesus bear “the great winepress of God’s wrath?” (Rev.14: 19)

4/ Is Jesus “bearing our sin” the same as Him bearing any or all of the above wraths?

I have asked you these questions several times now; did I miss the answers? [Reading]

Which Bible texts can you supply to answer the above?

I noticed that The Spirit of Prophecy has some interesting things to say re Jesus bearing our sins “in His own body on the tree:”

RH.1903-03-17.017
Remember that Christ is our only hope, our only refuge. He "bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness." "If the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh: how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God? And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance."

ST.1898-12-08.012
In the light and assurance of His Word, and through His atoning sacrifice, we may see how God can vindicate His justice. He opens our eyes to behold His holiness in its true luster, and yet justifies the sinner who comes to Him by Christ. In the pardon given to the dying thief, it was made manifest that Christ bore our sins in His own body on the tree. He bore our griefs and sorrows. That heart of human and divine love was exercised for the relief of the woes of the world. [Heart]

ST.1903-06-17.001
We can not understand the mystery of redemption. It is enough for us to know that God so loved the world that He gave His only-begotten Son to die for us. The penalty of our transgression fell upon a pure, holy, innocent Substitute, even the Son of God. He bore our sins in His own body on the tree, that we might at last stand before God clothed in the robe of sinlessness.
ST.1903-06-17.002
The Gospel is the hope of the world. The cross is God's agency for counterworking Satan's plans, and restoring man to his original purity. The plan of salvation devised by the Father and the Son will be a grand success. Christ's atoning sacrifice will arouse the sluggish mind, quickening into activity man's mental and spiritual powers.

It appears that by His bearing of “our sins on the tree;” that Jesus affected a change in sinful humans, who are open to His call: namely “the robe of sinlessnes.”

Any gospel about Jesus bearing our sins in His own body on the cross,” that falls short of the ensuing restoration of the helpless, sinful human agent; is anti-christ:

2 Corinthians 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/15/03 07:13 AM

David, great post. Whew! There's alot to think about. Thank you. I'm sorry my F.D. Nichol (he wrote the SDA "Answers to Objections") approach to understanding one symbolic passage by citing the similarities of another symbol - was utterly and absolutely useless to you. Better luck next time, eh?

I like how you introduced the many ways the Bible incorporates the concept of wrath. I believe Jesus experienced the wrath of man, Satan and God throughout His earthly sojourn. And yes, there are types and degrees of God's wrath mentioned in the Bible, and Jesus no doubt encountered every type of God's wrath possible by the time He died on the Cross.

But I also believe the ultimate expression of God's wrath will be fulfilled during the eradication of sin and sinners in the lake of fire at the end of time, after the millennium. I also believe Jesus endured this specific form of wrath on our behalf beginning in Gethsemane and ending on Golgotha. He drank the "cup of trembling" - God's unmingled wrath.

The winepress of God's wrath mentioned in Rev 14 is not the same thing as drinking the cup of trembling. See Isaiah 51:17-23 below. When Jesus returns the unsaved will merely melt in the presence of His glory and brightness. See Zech 14:12 and 2 Thes 2:8 below. They suffer the first death not the second death at this time.

But after the millennium the unsaved will not only suffer physically but also psychologically, which is drinking the cup of trembling, the cup of God's ultimate and unmingled wrath. They will experience, for the first and last time, the undiluted guilt and shame associated with their life of sin (the second death), and the awful realization they have forfeited eternal life with sweet Jesus.

Eternal separation from God is the ultimate wrath of God. Jesus experienced this separation for us in advance beginning in Gethsemane and ending on the Cross. The unsaved will suffer this same wrath of separation, and all the physical and mental agony that goes with it, as they are perishing in the lake of fire.

Isaiah 51:17-23
17 Awake, awake, stand up, O Jerusalem, which hast drunk at the hand of the LORD the cup of his fury; thou hast drunken the dregs of the cup of trembling, and wrung them out. 18 There is none to guide her among all the sons whom she hath brought forth; neither is there any that taketh her by the hand of all the sons that she hath brought up. 19 These two things are come unto thee; who shall be sorry for thee? desolation, and destruction, and the famine, and the sword: by whom shall I comfort thee? 20 Thy sons have fainted, they lie at the head of all the streets, as a wild bull in a net: they are full of the fury of the LORD, the rebuke of thy God. 21 Therefore hear now this, thou afflicted, and drunken, but not with wine: 22 Thus saith thy Lord the LORD, and thy God that pleadeth the cause of his people, Behold, I have taken out of thine hand the cup of trembling, even the dregs of the cup of my fury; thou shalt no more drink it again: 23 But I will put it into the hand of them that afflict thee; which have said to thy soul, Bow down, that we may go over: and thou hast laid thy body as the ground, and as the street, to them that went over.

Zech 14:12
And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.

2 Thes 2:8
And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/19/03 06:48 AM

Hello Mike

Thanks for explaining your views more...I can see better where you are coming from. [Smile]

Let me quote briefly something you just touched on:

"But after the millennium the unsaved will not only suffer physically but also psychologically, which is drinking the cup of trembling, the cup of God's ultimate and unmingled wrath."

Did Jesus also suffer this same wrath, (unmingled), on Calvary? If so, what Scripture do we use to show this?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/19/03 06:52 AM

Also, in what way is "bearing our sins in His own body on the tree" related to the "unmingled" cup of His wrath?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/19/03 05:49 PM

David, I believe it was because Jesus bore our sins in His sinful flesh nature that He was also able to finish experiencing drinking the cup of God's unmingled wrath on the Tree. He began drinking the cup in Gethsemane and He finished it on Calvary. He drained the cup dry and then He cried, It is finished. He conquered sin and the second death before He died the first death. He accomplished the work of redemption while He was still alive. See EGW quotes below.

Mat 20:22
But Jesus answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?

Mat 26:39
And he went a little further, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt.

John 18:11
Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath: the cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?

John 19:30
When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.

The Desire of Ages, page 759, paragraph 5
Chapter Title: "It Is Finished"
All heaven and the unfallen worlds had been witnesses to the controversy. With what intense interest did they follow the closing scenes of the conflict. They beheld the Saviour enter the garden of Gethsemane, His soul bowed down with the horror of a great darkness. They heard His bitter cry, "Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from Me." Matt. 26:39. As the Father's presence was withdrawn, they saw Him sorrowful with a bitterness of sorrow exceeding that of the last great struggle with death. The bloody sweat was forced from His pores, and fell in drops upon the ground. Thrice the prayer for deliverance was wrung from His lips. Heaven could no longer endure the sight, and a messenger of comfort was sent to the Son of God.

The Desire of Ages, page 758, paragraph 1
Chapter Title: "It Is Finished"
Christ did not yield up His life till He had accomplished the work which He came to do, and with His parting breath He exclaimed, "It is finished." John 19:30. The battle had been won. His right hand and His holy arm had gotten Him the victory. As a Conqueror He planted His banner on the eternal heights. Was there not joy among the angels? All heaven triumphed in the Saviour's victory. Satan was defeated, and knew that his kingdom was lost.

The Desire of Ages, page 758, paragraph 2
Chapter Title: "It Is Finished"
To the angels and the unfallen worlds the cry, "It is finished," had a deep significance. It was for them as well as for us that the great work of redemption had been accomplished. They with us share the fruits of Christ's victory.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/20/03 06:24 PM

The Desire of Ages, page 753, paragraph 1
Chapter Title: Calvary
Upon Christ as our substitute and surety was laid the iniquity of us all. He was counted a transgressor, that He might redeem us from the condemnation of the law. The guilt of every descendant of Adam was pressing upon His heart. The wrath of God against sin, the terrible manifestation of His displeasure because of iniquity, filled the soul of His Son with consternation. All His life Christ had been publishing to a fallen world the good news of the Father's mercy and pardoning love. Salvation for the chief of sinners was His theme. But now with the terrible weight of guilt He bears, He cannot see the Father's reconciling face. The withdrawal of the divine countenance from the Saviour in this hour of supreme anguish pierced His heart with a sorrow that can never be fully understood by man. So great was this agony that His physical pain was hardly felt.

The Desire of Ages, page 753, paragraph 2
Chapter Title: Calvary
Satan with his fierce temptations wrung the heart of Jesus. The Saviour could not see through the portals of the tomb. Hope did not present to Him His coming forth from the grave a conqueror, or tell Him of the Father's acceptance of the sacrifice. He feared that sin was so offensive to God that Their separation was to be eternal. Christ felt the anguish which the sinner will feel when mercy shall no longer plead for the guilty race. It was the sense of sin, bringing the Father's wrath upon Him as man's substitute, that made the cup He drank so bitter, and broke the heart of the Son of God.

The Desire of Ages, page 753, paragraph 4
Chapter Title: Calvary
In that thick darkness God's presence was hidden. He makes darkness His pavilion, and conceals His glory from human eyes. God and His holy angels were beside the cross. The Father was with His Son. Yet His presence was not revealed. Had His glory flashed forth from the cloud, every human beholder would have been destroyed. And in that dreadful hour Christ was not to be comforted with the Father's presence. He trod the wine press alone, and of the people there was none with Him.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/20/03 06:30 PM

Ellen White on Salvation
A Chronological Study by Woodrow W. Whidden II

http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/wws/salv07.htm

The Moral Influence Theory

This theory has in recent years grown in popularity among Seventh-day Adventists. In fact, this view has become so compelling for many that they have tried to make it the dominant, controlling view in Ellen White's presentations on the atonement.

The moral influence advocates lay great emphasis on Christ's death as a manifestation of God's love to a lost world. In its most extreme form it has been proclaimed that Christ's death as a requirement of God's justice (Christ's death satisfying divine justice) was not necessary. These advocates hold that Christ's death was given only to demonstrate God's love, which emanates in "moral influence" to an alienated world.

What are we to make of this theory?

It is certainly true that Ellen White saw the cross as the supreme manifestation of God's love. There are elements of loving moral influence that are communicated both to sinners and the unfallen beings of the universe: "Through the cross, man was drawn to God," and the sinner "was drawn from the stronghold of sin." The "cross speaks . . . to worlds unfallen . . . of His great love wherewith He has loved us" and "is the unanswerable argument as to the changeless character of the law of Jehovah" (7aBC 470, 471).

But the cross speaks of more than mercy. Among other things, it also speaks of a powerful condemnation of sin by the "holy love of a holy God" (Guy 10). Ellen White's comments make it clear that "moral influence" was always connected with this convicting holiness of God, not just some general expression of forgiving love that excludes the "satisfaction" of divine justice.

At the risk of being repetitious, let us get the point of God's holiness clear in our minds: The merciful "moral influence" of Christ's atoning death is beyond question, but such manifestations of "influential" love came through God's holy justice, not to its exclusion! Expressions of God's love are always based on both divine justice and mercy (not on mercy alone).

At this point it is important for us to ask What is "wrath"? It seems that what makes the more extreme forms of the moral influence theory attractive are the unsavory connotations that go along with God's justice being expressed as wrath. The word "wrath" seems to conjure up visions of God losing His temper, giving sinners "the back of His hand," suggesting that He gets some retaliatory, tit-for-tat satisfaction out of destroying sinners.

But Ellen White's view of God's wrath is that He must finally act to put an end to those who reject His offers of a just mercy. In the writings of Ellen White there are just too many indications of God's active wrath to say that He is too merciful to destroy sinners actively.

Now, there are certainly statements to the effect that sin is self-destructive (GC 35, 36). And sin is manifestly self-destructive. But let us pursue Ellen White's treatment of the theme of God's justice a bit further.

Is it not a fact that God is the source of all life? Is it not His restraining power over the forces of evil that gives us protection? Furthermore, is not God the one who temporarily grants self-destructing sinners life in probationary time? I do believe the answers are obvious.

Now let us go a step further. Doesn't it seem that God would be just as surely responsible for the death of sinners by withdrawing His life-giving power as He would be in directly destroying them by the fires of hell?

Since God is the source of all life, it is quite apparent that He is also ultimately the one who allows death! And whether such death is actively brought on or passively allowed really makes no difference if one wants to lift the ultimate responsibility for the death of sinners from God. The really definitive question is not whether God's justice is active or passive, but whether it is just and consistent with His character of merciful love.

Another nettlesome question rears its wondering head: Was the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah simply the chance circumstance of an unfortunate conspiracy of atmospheric conditions (Gen. 19:24)? Ellen White says, "The Lord rained brimstone and fire out of heaven" (PP 162). Again, was the judgment of God on Korah, Dathan, and Abiram only a tragic yawning of a long dormant seismic geological fault line in the Sinai desert (Num. 16:23-35)? Ellen White calls this judgment "the signal manifestation of God's power" (ibid. 401). Or were the deaths of Ananias and Sapphira only timely coronaries (Acts 5:1ff.)? Ellen White refers to their deaths as "the signal manifestation of the wrath of God" (AA 73) and goes on to say that "the same God who punished them, today condemns all falsehood" (ibid. 76). Will the lake of fire be merely a passive act on God's part? Referring to the lake of fire, Ellen White says that "God is to the wicked a consuming fire" (GC 673).

Was divine wrath manifested at the cross? Yes, what about the cross? Was it or was it not a manifestation of God's holy wrath against sin?

If the plain, straightforward words of Ellen White mean anything, the following challenge needs to be squarely faced: Any well-meaning person who feels that the moral influence theory cancels out the substitutionary theory of atonement as a manifestation of God's wrath against sin needs to be prepared to rip the chapter "Calvary" out of The Desire of Ages. I realize that my challenge is a bit shocking, but sometimes words are just too plain to be ignored!

Please carefully note the following citations from this climactic chapter of Ellen White's most spiritual work:

"Upon Christ as our substitute and surety was laid the iniquity of us all. . . . The guilt of every descendant of Adam was pressing upon His heart. The wrath of God against sin, the terrible manifestation of His displeasure because of iniquity, filled the soul of His Son with consternation. . . . Salvation for the chief of sinners was His theme. But now with the terrible weight of guilt He bears, He cannot see the Father's reconciling face. . . .

"Christ felt the anguish which the sinner will feel when mercy shall no longer plead for the guilty race. It was the sense of sin, bringing the Father's wrath upon Him as man's substitute, that made the cup He drank so bitter, and broke the heart of the Son of God" (753; italics supplied).

"He, the Sin Bearer, endures the wrath of divine justice, and for thy sake becomes sin itself" (756; italics supplied).

And is God's wrath active or passive? In addition to these forcefully clear statements, Ellen White makes it abundantly evident that there is precious little emphasis on God's passive justice.

"Justice demands that sin be not merely pardoned, but the death penalty must be executed. God, in the gift of His only begotten Son, met both these requirements. By dying in man's stead, Christ exhausted the penalty and provided a pardon" (7aBC 470; italics supplied).

"As Christ bore the sins of every transgressor so the sinner who will not believe in Christ as his personal Saviour . . . will bear the penalty of his transgression" (ibid. 471).

Is there any substantive difference between pulling a plug on somebody's life-support system and switching on the "juice" to an electric chair? Again, I believe the answer is self-evident! For Ellen White, our God is love, but His love is expressed actively in justice, not just passively. He is certainly our "friendly" and neighborly "God," * but He is more than just some benignantly concerned neighbor poignantly beckoning over the back fence and pleading with us to knock off the foolishness of our romp in the fields of sin. He is also the Holy God who has acted and will once again act in just wrath against the rejecters of His merciful offer of redemption. Again there are too many references to God's active execution of justice to say that justice is merely a passive "letting us go."

And then there is that matter of salvation and God's wrath. What does all this have to say about salvation? I would suggest that the redemptive message of God is this: Our rejection of His offer of life through the justifying merits of Christ's death will mean our eternal death. Without Christ's substitutionary death, sinners will receive just retribution.

Let me sum it up: It is God's just love, not some cheap, mushy mercy, that saves from eternal death.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/21/03 07:00 AM

The wages of sin is the second death. But the plan of salvation prevents us from experiencing this reality and the true force of sin, shame and guilt. Thus, it is not evident in our daily lives that sin is the source of all suffering, unrest and unhappiness. The undiluted results of sin has been temporarily suspended until the lake of fire.

In order to compensate for this problem inherent in the plan of salvation God became sin for us and demonstrated the true hideous nature of sin in the life of Jesus Christ. Especially on the cross of Calvary did Jesus expose the undiluted results of sin. Now, by beholding Christ and Him crucified, we can see for ourselves what would be our state if we were allowed to experience the true force of sin the moment we sin.

God made it possible for us to see sin in all of its hideousness, without having to die the second death, so that we can be motivated to trust Jesus with our lives and to set us free from sin. His life and death makes it possible for us to hate sin and to crave Christ and His righteousness. But the suffering and death of Jesus accomplishes more than merely helping us hate sin, it also paid the penalty for our sins. He paid the price of death for our sins so we can be pardoned and rewarded with eternal life.

Jesus earned the right to own our sin and second death when He lived and died the perfect life and death. As the lawful owner of the keys of hell and of death it rests with Jesus to eliminate our sin and second death in the lake of fire. This He will accomplish when He transfers our sins upon the head of Satan, who will perish with them in the lake of fire. Once the flames of hell fire have purified the earth from all traces of sin Jesus will recreate it anew. And we shall live happily ever after. Amen. Thank you Jesus.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/23/03 12:27 PM

Now I want to repeat Daryl’s question: (Dec.8th, end of page 7)

Have we figured out yet what did Jesus bear on the cross? The Scriptures seem so clear and simple on this matter; yet we have torn this beautiful doctrine of 1Pet.2:24 into unusable shreds of personal opinions, out of context quotes, and biased outlooks. Not one person has tried to approach unity on this subject; and inspite of reading this whole thread through twice; I have no idea what the point of it is.

1T.333.003
God will open the eyes of honest souls to understand the cruel work of those who scatter and divide. He will mark those who cause divisions, that every honest one may escape from Satan's snare.

Questions that have NOT been answered here:

Is God a murderer? Look at how sinners must all finally perish in the end. Why do we call a killer God a loving God? The wages of sin is death. To whom could such a debt ever be “paid?” To a blood-letting heavenly Father? To Satan? Who is the “debt” owed to that we can never pay? What really happened on Calvary? Is there a short, simple way to reconcile Biblically, the seemingly opposite characteristics of God’s great love and mercy, with His justice? Is it fair that God would “punish” Jesus for something He didn’t do? To punish someone who “knew no sin?” Did Christ’s death on the cross somehow give God license to suddenly switch from “wrath” to mercy?

Did Jesus have to convince God to forgive us? Does God’s attitude about us “sinners” need to be changed somehow before we can be “saved?” Does not God sit around frowning down on our failures; eagerly awaiting the deep-fry of “hell fire” to finally rid the world of all it’s filth and sin? Is it hell-fire, (God’s wrath), that rids the world of sin?
Posted By: Restin

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/23/03 02:51 PM

The Bible calls God's destruction of the wicked His "strange act". Not at all according to the true nature of a loving God. [Heart]
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/23/03 05:59 PM

I think Genesis 3:14, 15 and John 3:16, 17 in particular, as well as Romans 5:8 demonstrates God's love for His rebellious world.

quote:

Genesis 3:14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

John 3:16/b] For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
[b]17
For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

Romans 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

Then there are verses that deals with God's justice which also has been shown in the above verses which is why Christ had to die for us.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/23/03 06:33 PM

David, would you please take a minute or two to share your own answers to the many questions you asked? Then I will be happy to respond to them. I believe the wrath of God is love, but I cannot explain why or how. I trust and believe that my attitude toward the wrath of God is and will be the same as the holy angels:

Rev 16:5-7
And I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be, because thou hast judged thus. For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and thou hast given them blood to drink; for they are worthy. And I heard another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous are thy judgments.
Posted By: Boblee

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/24/03 08:51 AM

Permit me to suggest some answers to the perplexing questions asked above. First of all, let me suggest that the "wrath of God" may be an idiomatic expression which has nothing to do with either God or His emotions (just like "acts of God" in you insurance policy have nothing to do with either God or His activity). Just reading through the references to "wrath" from the concordance makes that clear to me. It's not clear what the expression does mean, however.

Second, just as today, the ancients attributed anything they didn't understand, good or bad, to the workings of God. If you examine those stories in which God supposedly destroyed some nation or city, an alternate explanation can be found for virtually every one of them. Consider, for instance, the final fire. Look what's happening in Baghdad right now, tonight. Many of those same people with those same weapons will be in the crowd surrounding the New Jerusalem. And they will have had an unknown amount of time to develop or dig up and reactivate the old ones before they make that final assault. PLUS atomic weapons, chemical weapons, biological weapons, and who knows what the antediluviens might have developed. When they launch those weapons on the Holy City and the weapons bounce off the force field God sets around the city, where do you think they will go? Obviously, they could start a conflagration that involves the whole Earth! That would be a hell of a fire (pun intended).

So permit me to suggest that it is SIN which destroys, not God. Or as Romans 6:23 states, it is sin which causes death, God brings life.

Bob Lee
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/24/03 10:12 AM

SAN.1900-01-01.019
Whether rich or poor, we must never forget that the poverty of Christ was part of His legacy to humanity. It was not alone His betrayal in the garden or His agony upon the cross that constituted the atonement. The humiliation of which His poverty formed a part was included in His great sacrifice. The whole series of sorrows which compassed humanity Christ bore upon His divine soul.

13 Behold, my servant shall deal prudently, he shall be exalted and extolled, and be very high.
14 As many were astonied at thee; his visage was so marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men:
15 So shall he sprinkle many nations; the kings shall shut their mouths at him: for that which had not been told them shall they see; and that which they had not heard shall they consider.
1 Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the LORD revealed?
2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.
3 He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.
5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.
8 He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken.
9 And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.
10 Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand.
11 He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.
12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors. (Isa.52:13-53:12).
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/24/03 05:43 PM

Boblee, where do we draw the line at spiritualizing the word of God? "And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them." Rev 20:9. What is it about the wording in this text that gives you the idea it's talking about bombs bouncing off a force shield and falling back upon the wicked and killing them in a lake of fire?

If we cannot read God's word literally then what is real? What's to stop me from spiritualizing the wording of the second coming and the new earth? "The kingdom of God is at hand." Mat 4:17. "The kingdom of God is within you." Luke 17:21 Thus, there is no literal coming or heaven?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/24/03 05:51 PM

David, do you have time to answer the questions you posted? I am very interested in pursuing them with you.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/27/03 06:03 AM

Greetings everyone,

Well I see a fair amount of discussion in the last three weeks.

David you raised some very valid points. It is true that the original question really has not been answered or dealt with, the question of 'did Christ bear our sin/guilt'. I would like to correct this failure on my part.

As we see from all the discussion here, that predominantly this topic in the minds of many means penalty, exaction, wrath of God being exercised upon Christ as a substitute for us, and that such satisfies God's justice and enables him to forgive us. That is where the problem is.

Now to the question. YES, indeed he did bear our sin/guilt. But unlike the above concept, it means something rather different.

Yes, he did bear our sins in his body from the beginning of his birth, for the scripture testifies;

    Hebrews 2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;
    15 And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.
    16 For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.
    17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.
    18 For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted.
    1 Peter 2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.
    Romans 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:


It appears from what I have read in this forum that we are agreed that he did indeed bear our sins.

For what purpose did he bear our sin?

    • that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.
    • that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people
    • so that he is able to succour them that are tempted
    • that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.
    • condemned sin in the flesh:

But the next part is where there is much confusion. There is not one scripture that teaches that the wrath of God was upon Christ, nor that God's justice was satisfied/appeased, nor our penalty exacted on him.

Mike, all the scripture you quoted shows the wrath of God that the unrighteous must suffer, but it in no wise intimates that such was ever upon Christ. The testimony is to the contrary.

    Matthew 3:17 And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.
    Luke 9:35 And there came a voice out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear him.
    2 Peter 1:17 For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.
    Isaiah 53:4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. 5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

Isaiah plainly states that man will think that it was the wrath of God, BUT he negates it and says that it is not!

Why was it that he suffered Gethsemane and Golgotha?

    John 12:27 Now is my soul troubled; and what shall I say? Father, save me from this hour: but for this cause came I unto this hour.
    28 Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.
    31 Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.
    32 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.
    John 14:30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.
    Luke 22:53 When I was daily with you in the temple, ye stretched forth no hands against me: but this is your hour, and the power of darkness.
    Hebrews 2:14 …that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;
    Hebrews 2:10 For it became him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings.
    Hebrews 2:9 But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man.

We see here that it was the grace of God by which he tasted death and not the wrath of God.

This is brief but hopefully it can clarify the original question.

Boblee, I understand what you are saying, but we cannot do away with the wrath of God. This however is not understood as to what it means. We will need to come back to this topic.

Mike, I agree that we must not and cannot spiritualize the word of God away, but we must not infer it saying what it does not say either.


    • Where does the scripture say that the wrath of God was upon Christ?
    • Where did a hand of God come down from heaven to crucify him?
    • Who did judge him worthy of death?
    • Who said " We have a law, and by our law he ought to die"
    • Who beat him?
    • Who stuck the crown of thorns on his brow?
    • Who impaled him?
    • Who was the spirit of that crowd?
    • How have we then turned it around to mean the wrath of God? Who is this God?
    • Is that not another form of spiritualizing away our (fallen man's, satan's) doings?
    • Can we do that on the basis of God allowing it to be?

If you can do the one, you can do the other.

No, we cannot ascribe what man does, to God, nor can we ascribe what God does, to man?


There needs to be a clean and clear distinction between the works of God and the works of darkness, between the spirit of this world and the spirit of God.


So to summarize it,

    1. Yes, Christ bore/suffered our sin/guilt. We need to understand what that means.
    2. Christ's death overthrew the power of Satan, sin and death. We need to understand what that means.
    3. No, he did not suffer the wrath of God, but rather was the outworking of the grace of God.

I hope we can address these points meaningfully.

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/27/03 07:24 AM

John, can you please answer the post on page 9 on 3-20-03 11:30 am. Thank you.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/27/03 03:53 PM

Well Mike that was your post. I see you bringing forward two major thoughts.

One,
quote:

Now let us go a step further. Doesn't it seem that God would be just as surely responsible for the death of sinners by withdrawing His life-giving power as He would be in directly destroying them by the fires of hell?

Since God is the source of all life, it is quite apparent that He is also ultimately the one who allows death! And whether such death is actively brought on or passively allowed really makes no difference if one wants to lift the ultimate responsibility for the death of sinners from God. The really definitive question is not whether God's justice is active or passive, but whether it is just and consistent with His character of merciful love

No, Mike this thinking is not sound. It negates the freedom and responsibilities that God gave man, whom he created in the image of God.

There is a great difference between the fact that God can prevent, can undo, can resurrect, can save, and that of laying on him the responsibility for the actions of someone else, who acted contrary to God’s will.

The commandment, ‘thou shalt not kill’ would be meaningless in your perspective. It is obvious that God gave the ability and responsibility of doing so.

We know that there comes a day when God will set things right, restore wrong. In the meantime he bids us to suffer it to be so now. A season of time has been given to the power of darkness/sin, and permitted its work. The account thereof will be required from the doers. In the meantime God suffers (longsuffering) it to be so now, and he bids us do the same. This is just and consistent with His character of merciful love.

Two,
Your quotations from EGW,DA, which are being used to establish your thought on the penalty, wrath of God being exercised on Christ.

Mike, the fact that there is no scripture teaching this, should question your understanding of what you read in DA. The way those quotes have been used (by so many, for so long a time) in an overwhelming way is entirely out of context and purpose. By God’s grace we will be able to see why this has been so, and to see the simple truth behind it.

Permit me a little folly. The scripture says: “there is no God”. Doesn’t it? Shall we leave it at that? There is no confusion in that statement, is there? It is simple. It is hard to misunderstand it. Is it truth? No! Why? Because of who says it? The scripture says it! It was a psalm of David. Surely it is reliable! Yet surely you will agree with me that it is not truth! Why? Because the setting of this statement establishes that ‘it is the fool that said it’.

Mike, you probably do not see it, but the same applies to your quotations from the DA. I invite you to check it out and pay special attention to the setting of whose thoughts, whose ideas these are being presented. I may suggest to begin with the chapter on Gethsemane.

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/27/03 05:49 PM

John, do you truly believe Ellen White supports the idea Jesus did not suffer the wrath of God on the cross? the wrath of God meaning giving up sinners to suffer the undiluted guilt and shame associated with their sins during intense physical and emotional agony. As you know, death is the end of their suffering, and as such is the end of sin and sinners.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/28/03 02:06 AM

Well Mike, your definition of the ‘wrath of God’ has taken a fair turn. That is good. We need to realize a few more things and call it by it’s right name and then we will have a clean and clear distinction between the works of God and the works of darkness, between the spirit of this world and the spirit of God.

So I would like to ask you, that which was exercised upon Christ from Gethsemane to the death on Golgotha, was it the work of God or the work of darkness?
Posted By: Doug Meister

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/28/03 10:26 AM

John, it was the work of the evil one, but The Father willed that Jesus die on the cross.
--Ðøug  -
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/29/03 05:26 AM

Doug, your answer is interesting, but it is hard to know how to hear it. The 'but' in your answer seems to negate the responsibility of the doer. What do you mean, 'The Father willed that Jesus die on the Cross'? The way you say it, it seems something that the Father wanted and planned.

Which do you mean:

1. The Father wanted it and planned it and Satan fulfilled God's will?
2. That it was the fulfillment of the Father's righteousness and Satan was his minister in the act?
3. That the Father’s righteousness required the death of his Son in order to be able to forgive man, and he used the enmity/hostility/antagonism of Satan to accomplish it?
4. That the Father understood the nature of sin/Satan/fallen man and so foreknew what they would do, and was nevertheless willing to suffer the atrocity upon his Son so that the power of sin/Satan would be broken?
5. Some other concept?

Appreciate your clarification

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/29/03 05:42 AM

Acts 2:22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:
23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
24 Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it.
Posted By: djconklin

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/30/03 03:12 AM

Going back to page 1:

>Thus in the substitute doctrine, man is saved from the penalty for sin, rather than from sin itself.

The "Thus" implies that what then follows logically follows from what was previously presented which is not the case here at all.

As the song says: "be of sin the double cure, cleanse me from its guilt and power."
Posted By: Doug Meister

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 03/30/03 09:59 AM

John, the devil inspired the people to kill Jesus. But God planned and willed that Jesus be offered as the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
--Ðøug  -
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/01/03 09:08 PM

John asked - "So I would like to ask you, that which was exercised upon Christ from Gethsemane to the death on Golgotha, was it the work of God or the work of darkness?"

The real issue was not the physical and verbal abuse Jesus suffered at the hands and mouth of men and demons. The wrath of God deals with the guilt and shame and eternal separation Jesus experienced on our behalf. He conquered and consumed our sin and second death before He died. His journey in and out of the tomb proves He is the lawful owner of the keys of hell and death.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/02/03 04:31 AM

Mike thanks for your comments, However you seem to have missed the point of my question.

2 Corinthians 6:14 …what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? 15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? There needs to be a clean and clear distinction between the works of God and the works of darkness, between the spirit of this world and the spirit of God.

Again I ask, that which was exercised upon Christ from Gethsemane to the death on Golgotha, was it the work of God or the work of darkness?"

I do not wish to minimise the guilt and horror of darkness that Christ experienced. But that which is important to understand it in truth, is to understand whose work it is. Then indeed we can understand what it is all about.

Whose work was it that was exercised on Job, whose thoughts, whose principles?
Whose work was it that was exercised on Christ, whose thoughts, whose principles?

Can we discern what is of God and what is of Satan?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/02/03 07:59 AM

"The real issue was not the physical and verbal abuse Jesus suffered at the hands and mouth of men and demons." This was Satan's work.

"The wrath of God deals with the guilt and shame and eternal separation Jesus experienced on our behalf." This was God's work.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/03/03 11:36 AM

"This was God's work."? ... Stunning… …shocking…
quote:

The wrath of God deals with the guilt and shame and eternal separation Jesus experienced on our behalf. He conquered and consumed our sin and second death before He died.

One more question. Please Mike, where and what was the sin, and how and what the victory?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/04/03 07:04 AM

The sin was all sin and it was in His flesh. The victory was won when He consumed the contents of the cup - the wrath of God exercised toward the sin in His flesh. He gained the victory by successfully enduring and conquering the cup of God's wrath, by not dying before the cup was finished.

The wrath of God is love. If God were to continue shielding us from the reality of sin and its consequences (shame and guilt) He would be guilty as charged. But by allowing Jesus to drink the cup of God's wrath they demonstrated the truth about sin. Had Jesus not done this none of us could learn to hate sin. By suffering the wrath of God Jesus displayed the true nature of sin and the second death.

It is a mistake though to assume that these consequences are inevitable and happen aside from God's direct involvement. If that were true then why don't we suffer similar effects each time we sin? Why did God prohibit access to the tree of life when Adam and Eve sinned?

Genesis
3:22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
3:23 Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
3:24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

God was forced, on account of sin, to drive them from the garden to prevent them from eating the fruit and living forever as sinners. The reason why we succumb to the first death is because we are unable to eat the fruit of life - not because we are sinful. But the reason the unsaved die the second death is because God kills them in the lake of fire.

The elimination of sin and sinners in the lake of fire will be attributed to the honor and glory of God - and not to chance or natural law. Nothing can rob God of the honor and glory due Him for the final elimination of sin because throughout eternity we shall sing His praises. Like the holy of heaven we shall praise God and rejoice that He has killed the sinners. We will not praise sin for eliminating itself. The wrath of God is love.

Revelation
16:5 And I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be, because thou hast judged thus.
16:6 For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and thou hast given them blood to drink; for they are worthy.
16:7 And I heard another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous [are] thy judgments.

Revelation
18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.
18:6 Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double.
18:7 How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.
18:8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong [is] the Lord God who judgeth her.

18:20 Rejoice over her, [thou] heaven, and [ye] holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her.

Revelation
19:1 And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God:
19:2 For true and righteous [are] his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand.
19:3 And again they said, Alleluia. And her smoke rose up for ever and ever.
19:4 And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia.
19:5 And a voice came out of the throne, saying, Praise our God, all ye his servants, and ye that fear him, both small and great.
19:6 And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth.

19:11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him [was] called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.
19:12 His eyes [were] as a flame of fire, and on his head [were] many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.
19:13 And he [was] clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
19:14 And the armies [which were] in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
19:15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.
19:16 And he hath on [his] vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.
19:17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God;
19:18 That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all [men, both] free and bond, both small and great.
19:19 And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.
19:20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
19:21 And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which [sword] proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.

Revelation
20:7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
20:8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom [is] as the sand of the sea.
20:9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.
20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet [are], and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
20:14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
20:15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/05/03 07:00 AM

quote:

Mike Lowe wrote:
The elimination of sin and sinners in the lake of fire will be attributed to the honor and glory of God - and not to chance or natural law. Nothing can rob God of the honor and glory due Him for the final elimination of sin because throughout eternity we shall sing His praises. Like the holy of heaven we shall praise God and rejoice that He has killed the sinners. We will not praise sin for eliminating itself. The wrath of God is love.

How does this fit into the picture of God loving the sinner but hating the sin?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/04/03 08:40 PM

The Wicked Are Slain

In the mad strife of their own fierce passions, and by the awful outpouring of God's unmingled wrath, fall the wicked inhabitants of the earth--priests, rulers, and people, rich and poor, high and low. "And the slain of the Lord shall be at that day from one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth: they shall not be lamented, neither gathered, nor buried" (Jer. 25:33). {LDE 278.3}

At the coming of Christ the wicked are blotted from the face of the whole earth--consumed with the spirit of His mouth and destroyed by the brightness of His glory. Christ takes His people to the city of God, and the earth is emptied of its inhabitants.--GC 657 (1911). {LDE 278.4}

To sin, wherever found, "our God is a consuming fire" (Heb. 12:29). In all who submit to His power the Spirit of God will consume sin. But if men cling to sin, they become identified with it. Then the glory of God, which destroys sin, must destroy them.--DA 107 (1898). {LDE 279.1}

The glory of His countenance, which to the righteous is life, will be to the wicked a consuming fire.--DA 600 (1898). {LDE 279.2}

Destruction of the Wicked an Act of Mercy

Could those whose hearts are filled with hatred of God, of truth and holiness, mingle with the heavenly throng and join their songs of praise? Could they endure the glory of God and the Lamb? No, no; years of probation were granted them, that they might form characters for heaven; but they have never trained the mind to love purity; they have never learned the language of heaven, and now it is too late. A life of rebellion against God has unfitted them for heaven. Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them. The destiny of the wicked is fixed by their own choice. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, and just and merciful on the part of God.--GC 542, 543 (1911). {LDE 279.3}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/07/03 08:24 PM

Daryl, do the passages above answer your question?
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/07/03 09:08 PM

Mike,

No they don't as I was referring specifically to the honour and glory part.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 02:43 AM

Daryl, when you asked - "How does this fit into the picture of God loving the sinner but hating the sin?" - I didn't realize you were asking specifically about the honor and glory of God associated with killing sinners in the lake of fire.

As I see it, throughout eternity God will be credited with honor and glory for being the One who eliminated sin. All the Bible passages posted above describe the honor and glory attributed to God for single handedly defeating sinners when Jesus returns and for eliminating sin in the lake of fire.

We will not praise sin, self or Satan throughout eternity for eliminating sin in the lake of fire. Forever and ever we will recall with joy and rejoicing that God Himself eliminated sin and restored Paradise Lost. No one or nothing can rob God of this honor and glory. When the war is finally over God and God alone will be hailed as a Hero!
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 06:09 AM

Dear Mike, your presentation of the honor and glory of God is very, very sad. That which will occupy the minds and hearts of the saved is not the horrible destruction of the lost. That is not what brings praise in the heart. Certainly not due to such darkness you described. God’s way of dealing with sin is very different.

That which will occupy the minds and hearts of the saved is the glory of God’s character, his righteousness, how marvelous his grace, how great a salvation.

They have seen the degradation of their own hearts. They have realized the vanity of their own mind. They have seen the brutality of sin. They have seen how self-justification accuses and kills. They have seen that the righteousness of sin destroys.

They have seen that God’s righteousness saves, lifts up, restores. They marvel as they behold the vastness and unreachable depth of his love that saved a wretch like them. All their comeliness in themselves has turned to corruption. And they behold the glory of God. They now behold and dwell in righteousness where there is no fear. Therefore there is praise.

Their praises have no part in what you wrote.

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 06:58 AM

Dear Mike
After reareading this whole topic from page one I have tried to summarize your understanding. I have found it a painful process. Your presentation of the character of God and his righteousness is disastrous. It establishes the picture of God which asks all the questions that David asked you in his post of March 23, 2003 05:27 AM, which you never answered.

Here is a summary of your thoughts in your own words.
quote:

1. The fact He chose to create free moral agents, who were destined to sin and die, makes God indirectly responsible for the existence of sin and death.

2. "The wrath of God deals with the guilt and shame and eternal separation Jesus experienced on our behalf." This was God's work.

3. the wrath of God meaning giving up sinners to suffer the undiluted guilt and shame associated with their sins during intense physical and emotional agony.

4. The sin was all sin and it was in His flesh.

5. The victory was won when He consumed the contents of the cup - the wrath of God exercised toward the sin in His flesh.

6. He gained the victory by successfully enduring and conquering the cup of God's wrath, by not dying before the cup was finished.

7. So the Devil accuses God of fighting unfairly by protecting man from succumbing to the full force of his sin and guilt. Which is true.

8. Undiluted guilt kills like a nuclear bomb. The fact salvation protects us from the full force of our sin and guilt is cause for contention between Christ and Satan.

9. However, God will not allow the great controversy to end in a stalemate. He cannot allow sin and death to rule and ruin things. He must show Himself in control, otherwise the great controversy would end in a stalemate.

10. The wrath of God is love. If God were to continue shielding us from the reality of sin and its consequences (shame and guilt) He would be guilty as charged. But by allowing Jesus to drink the cup of God's wrath they demonstrated the truth about sin. Had Jesus not done this none of us could learn to hate sin. By suffering the wrath of God Jesus displayed the true nature of sin and the second death.

Your view is very painful to my mind.

quote:

1. John, I believe Jesus is the lawful owner of sin and the second death for all mankind. I believe He earned the right to own our sin and second death when He consumed the cup of God's wrath beginning in Gethsemane and ending on Golgotha.

2. Because Jesus owns all sin and death, which He accomplished before He laid down His own life, we are able to sin without immediately incurring the consequences of sin, which is eternal death. Our Lord has quarantined sin and death within the most holy place of the heavenly sanctuary.

3. He will one day transfer the sin and death of the saved upon the head of Satan, the scapegoat. The devil will die with the sins of the saved in the lake of fire, the second death. This is the final process of the atonement for mankind.

4. Jesus is our substitute in the sense that He earned the right to own our sin and death, and to transfer it upon the head of Satan. Sin and death did not defeat Jesus on the cross, rather He defeated them, and became our substitute, which gives Him the legal right to eliminate them as He sees fit.

5. When we receive Jesus into our hearts and minds we are free from the guilt and condemnation that makes up the cup of God's wrath. It is the truth that sets us free, the truth as it is in Jesus, the truth concerning sin and salvation. There is no freedom if we do not believe that in Jesus we are free from sin.

Mike you have successfully proven what I have written in my first post, that the religion of today saves people from God and his wrath, and not from sin. Regardless of the slant of your view, it does not change the fundamental substance. Your idea of salvation from sin is but that of transferring the responsibility of sin from the sinner to Christ to Satan. I do not know what you do with the guilt of God himself who in your mind is indirectly responsible for all this. Satan is truly a scapegoat in your view, and the real culprit is God!

Everywhere I turn to look; your theory disintegrates on every side. I mention here just a few points.
quote:

As I see it we bear the sins of our fathers in our sinful flesh natures. We are not guilty of these sins, nor are we guilty of the sinful thoughts and feelings generated and communicated by our fallen flesh natures.
What Jesus experienced beginning in Gethsemane and ending on Golgotha was the wrath of God against the sin He inherited when He assumed Adam's fallen nature.

How could God's wrath be exercised on Christ for something of which neither Christ nor we are guilty?

Your definitions:

Our guilt and shame = God's wrath = God's love = what Christ overcame = what we are set free from.

These equivalents create such an unpallatable mixture of darkness and light. Since we are to have our heavenly Father's character, then we are to live God's love which is God's wrath which is our guilt and shame which is what we are set free from.?! What predicament! You call it salvation?

The following extension of your thought is fantastical!
quote:

The wages of sin is the second death. But the plan of salvation prevents us from experiencing this reality and the true force of sin, shame and guilt. Thus, it is not evident in our daily lives that sin is the source of all suffering, unrest and unhappiness. The undiluted results of sin have been temporarily suspended until the lake of fire.

In order to compensate for this problem inherent in the plan of salvation God became sin for us and demonstrated the true hideous nature of sin in the life of Jesus Christ. Especially on the cross of Calvary did Jesus expose the undiluted results of sin. Now, by beholding Christ and Him crucified, we can see for ourselves what would be our state if we were allowed to experience the true force of sin the moment we sin.

God made it possible for us to see sin in all of its hideousness, without having to die the second death, so that we can be motivated to trust Jesus with our lives and to set us free from sin. His life and death makes it possible for us to hate sin and to crave Christ and His righteousness. But the suffering and death of Jesus accomplishes more than merely helping us hate sin, it also paid the penalty for our sins. He paid the price of death for our sins so we can be pardoned and rewarded with eternal life.

Jesus earned the right to own our sin and second death when He lived and died the perfect life and death. As the lawful owner of the keys of hell and of death it rests with Jesus to eliminate our sin and second death in the lake of fire. This He will accomplish when He transfers our sins upon the head of Satan, who will perish with them in the lake of fire. Once the flames of hell fire have purified the earth from all traces of sin Jesus will recreate it anew

Your thought here proposes that for us who are steeped in sin, the problem that God has is that we do not see the true nature of sin. Fair enough. But to think that to dispel this darkness in our minds, God needs to himself commit the ultimate darkness, so that we may see is incredible. Since when does darkness enlighten? What can we think of a God who can do/commit such darkness?

The scripture tells us that Satan through the fear of death is the ruling power of this fallen world. That is, that every sinner is well acquainted with the fear of death; in fact it holds him hostage.

What need does God have to confirm to the uttermost such a fear? And then the fear is of whom? Is it not in such a case that this fear of death which keeps in bondage, is validly directed toward God who wields such dark penalties, and sent his Son into this world to be an example unto us of what he will do to us. And if he spared not his Son who was innocent and without sin, how could we expect any mercy for the sake of whatever belief you think we ought to have about this matter? This concept of God's glory is hideous. Why should we crave Christ and his righteousness if God did that to him?

Matthew 6:23 But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!
1 John 1:5 This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.

Mike the problem of sin is that it is darkness and the sinner is rendered blind because of the darkness. Christ came to 'lighten' every man that cometh into the world. While there is a problem of man not seeing the true nature of sin due to the very nature of its darkness; the infinitely greater problem is of man not seeing the glory of God; the problem of man not having light. Satan has misrepresented and maligned God; he has brought fear and distrust. Light is needed to dispel darkness and then all surroundings are seen. It is only when the fullness of light is that those, whose eyes have been opened, will see fully. When man sees the glory of God, then and only then can he realize the true nature of sin.

Please consider this. God's plan of salvation does not and has never posed any problem to truth.

I am sorry Mike I do not mean to be derogatory. I am stunned by the substance of your thought. Though I have presented in my first post here that this is the fundamental reality to the thoughts of many, seldom do most everthink it through to realize their thought, and when they do they are shocked at their own thought. You are the first that has actually spelled it out and seem to think it is fine.

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 07:33 AM

Dear Mike

Christ came and brought the light of God's Glory to this world, which is diametrically opposite to your story. I testify that the Father had no part in the work from Gethsemane to Christ's death. The Father had delivered/given his Son over, with great pain and suffering, allowing the enemy the hour of the power of darkness. The Father suffered with his Son. All that was exercised on Christ during that time, both spiritual and physical, was the work of darkness. Christ never succumbed to it; he never owned any of it. That is where the victory is over sin and death.

Satan was not able to cause him to own any sin, though he imposed upon him such horror of darkness with all the lies about his Father that he could conjure (what you call the wrath of God). Christ knew his Father better and would not buy Satan's insinuations. Though Satan disfigured his body with what torture he could muster, in order to support his spiritual insinuations about the Father, by causing him to see his Father as the one who is merciless and is exacting the sins upon him; that it was his Father who was doing it. That the wrath of God is so great towards sin that he is now laden with, that he would never see his Father again. Christ never partook of it. Oh the horror of that darkness that was so foreign to the Son of God who knew his Father differently; who lived in the light of his Fathers presence. Now he was subjected to such great darkness. In this manner he bore and suffered the sin and guilt of the whole world, in such a manner as Satan only can accuse and insinuate. He suffered it both physically and spiritually, but never for one moment did he fall under it, never did he agree with it, never did he own it.

Behold him who sweats blood as the thoughts of that darkness were pressed upon him. How he bid his disciples, pray that ye enter not in this temptation. How glibly and blatantly the religion of today professes that the horror of that darkness is the truth about God. Oh what darkness. What lies, from the Father of lies!

Christ had not fallen to the accusations of Satan. He resisted sin unto death. Satan's power was broken. His spell of darkness was vanquished. The light from Golgotha illuminated the universe, which saw the entire spiritual struggle between Christ and Satan under such adverse circumstances. The heavenly host cried out worthy, worthy is the lamb that was slain to receive power and glory and honor. There was no more room found in heaven for Satan and his angels. The prince of this world was judged. His accusations would never be heard again in heaven. None would listen to him any more. Satan was cast out of heaven. The Father gave all judgement to the Son. This was the victory that was wrought at the cross. Christ destroyed him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; and delivered them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage. All that will let the light of the Glory of God as it is in Jesus into their hearts are set free from that power of darkness.

Behold the thought and mind of his Father coming from the lips of his Son, "Father, forgive them for they know not what they do. How could one ever think that his Father was a partaker with them in the work of that darkness? The Father suffered with his Son, for HE LOVED, therefore HE GAVE.

The Father's work comes in to resurrect the Son, and bring back to life the shepherd who gave his life in battle with the wolf.

Please Mike consider that there is a light much more glorious in coming to know the truth about your heavenly Father that no darkness can overcome.

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
John 8:36 If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 08:09 AM

John, it is very clear you are offended by the idea that Jesus became sin for us in order to set us free from the condemnation of sin and the wrath of God. What you wrote about the love of God is true. But what the Bible says about the wrath of God is true too. No matter how much you detest it - the wrath of God is love.

Jesus incurred the wrath of God on our behalf. He earned the right to own our sin and second death by drinking the cup of God's wrath in our place. Satan will eventually die in the lake of fire with our sin and second death. Thus sin will be eliminated and the honor and glory belongs to God alone. Satan does not walk voluntarily into the lake of fire - he is cast into it, along with everyone else who despised the sacrifice of Jesus.

Please read the following passages and notice how the holy of heaven respond to the destruction of sin and sinners. Do you feel the same way about them as you do about me for believing the honor and glory belongs to God for eliminating sin and sinners in the lake of fire? Why do you think it is so hideous, so reprehensible, that all heaven rejoices at the destruction and elimination of sin and sinners?

Revelation
14:9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive [his] mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
14:10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
14:11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

Revelation
16:5 And I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be, because thou hast judged thus.
16:6 For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and thou hast given them blood to drink; for they are worthy.
16:7 And I heard another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous [are] thy judgments.


Revelation
18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.
18:6 Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double.
18:7 How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.
18:8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong [is] the Lord God who judgeth her.

18:20 Rejoice over her, [thou] heaven, and [ye] holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her.

Revelation
19:1 And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God:
19:2 For true and righteous [are] his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand.
19:3 And again they said, Alleluia. And her smoke rose up for ever and ever.
19:4 And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia.
19:5 And a voice came out of the throne, saying, Praise our God, all ye his servants, and ye that fear him, both small and great.
19:6 And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth.

19:11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him [was] called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.
19:12 His eyes [were] as a flame of fire, and on his head [were] many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.
19:13 And he [was] clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
19:14 And the armies [which were] in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
19:15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.
19:16 And he hath on [his] vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.
19:17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God;
19:18 That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all [men, both] free and bond, both small and great.
19:19 And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.
19:20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
19:21 And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which [sword] proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.

Revelation
20:7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
20:8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom [is] as the sand of the sea.
20:9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.
20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet [are], and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

20:14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
20:15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 08:29 AM

2T pages 209-212
Chapter 29 - The Sufferings of Christ

[Please read this entire passage].

Oh, was there ever suffering and sorrow like that endured by the dying Saviour! It was the sense of His Father's displeasure which made His cup so bitter. It was not bodily suffering which so quickly ended the life of Christ upon the cross. It was the crushing weight of the sins of the world, and a sense of His Father's wrath. The Father's glory and sustaining presence had left Him, and despair pressed its crushing weight of darkness upon Him and forced from His pale and quivering lips the anguished cry: "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?" {2T 209.1}

Jesus had united with the Father in making the world. Amid the agonizing sufferings of the Son of God, blind and deluded men alone remain unfeeling. The chief priests and elders revile God's dear Son while in His expiring agonies. Yet inanimate nature groans in sympathy with her bleeding, dying Author. The earth trembles. The sun refuses to behold the scene. The heavens gather blackness. Angels have witnessed the scene of suffering until they can look no longer, and hide their faces from the horrid sight. Christ is dying! He is in despair! His Father's approving smile is removed, and angels are not permitted to lighten the gloom of the terrible hour. They can only behold in amazement their loved Commander, the Majesty of heaven, suffering the penalty of man's transgression of the Father's law. {2T 209.2}

Even doubts assailed the dying Son of God. He could not see through the portals of the tomb. Bright hope did not present to Him His coming forth from the tomb a conqueror and His Father's acceptance of His sacrifice. The sin of the world, with all its terribleness, was felt to the utmost by the Son of God. The displeasure of the Father for sin, and its penalty, which is death, were all that He could realize through this amazing darkness. He was tempted to fear that sin was so offensive in the sight of His Father that He could not be reconciled to His Son. The fierce temptation that His own Father had forever left Him caused that piercing cry from the cross: "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?" {2T 209.3}

Christ felt much as sinners will feel when the vials of God's wrath shall be poured out upon them. Black despair, like the pall of death, will gather about their guilty souls, and then they will realize to the fullest extent the sinfulness of sin. Salvation has been purchased for them by the suffering and death of the Son of God. It might be theirs, if they would accept of it willingly, gladly; but none are compelled to yield obedience to the law of God. If they refuse the heavenly benefit and choose the pleasures and deceitfulness of sin, they have their choice, and at the end receive their wages, which is the wrath of God and eternal death. They will be forever separated from the presence of Jesus, whose sacrifice they had despised. They will have lost a life of happiness and sacrificed eternal glory for the pleasures of sin for a season. {2T 210.1}

Faith and hope trembled in the expiring agonies of Christ because God had removed the assurance He had heretofore given His beloved Son of His approbation and acceptance. The Redeemer of the world then relied upon the evidences which had hitherto strengthened Him, that His Father accepted His labors and was pleased with His work. In His dying agony, as He yields up His precious life, He has by faith alone to trust in Him whom it has ever been His joy to obey. He is not cheered with clear, bright rays of hope on the right hand nor on the left. All is enshrouded in oppressive gloom. Amid the awful darkness which is felt by sympathizing nature, the Redeemer drains the mysterious cup even to its dregs. Denied even bright hope and confidence in the triumph which will be His in the future, He cries with a loud voice: "Father, into Thy hands I commend My spirit." He is acquainted with the character of His Father, with His justice, His mercy, and His great love, and in submission He drops into His hands. Amid the convulsions of nature are heard by the amazed spectators the dying words of the Man of Calvary. {2T 210.2}

Nature sympathized with the suffering of its Author. The heaving earth, the rent rocks, proclaimed that it was the Son of God who died. There was a mighty earthquake. The veil of the temple was rent in twain. Terror seized the executioners and spectators as they beheld the sun veiled in darkness, and felt the earth shake beneath them, and saw and heard the rending of the rocks. The mocking and jeering of the chief priests and elders were hushed as Christ commended His spirit into the hands of His Father. The astonished throng began to withdraw and grope their way in the darkness to the city. They smote upon their breasts as they went and in terror, speaking scarcely above a whisper, said among themselves: "It is an innocent person that has been murdered. What if, indeed, He is, as He asserted, the Son of God?" {2T 211.1}

Jesus did not yield up His life till He had accomplished the work which He came to do, and exclaimed with His departing breath: "It is finished." Satan was then defeated. He knew that his kingdom was lost. Angels rejoiced as the words were uttered: "It is finished." The great plan of redemption, which was dependent on the death of Christ, had been thus far carried out. And there was joy in heaven that the sons of Adam could, through a life of obedience, be finally exalted to the throne of God. Oh, what love! What amazing love! that brought the Son of God to earth to be made sin for us, that we might be reconciled to God, and elevated to a life with Him in His mansions in glory. Oh, what is man, that such a price should be paid for his redemption! {2T 211.2}

When men and women can more fully comprehend the magnitude of the great sacrifice which was made by the Majesty of heaven in dying in man's stead, then will the plan of salvation be magnified, and reflections of Calvary will awaken tender, sacred, and lively emotions in the Christian's heart. Praises to God and the Lamb will be in their hearts and upon their lips. Pride and self-esteem cannot flourish in the hearts that keep fresh in memory the scenes of Calvary. This world will appear of but little value to those who appreciate the great price of man's redemption, the precious blood of God's dear Son. All the riches of the world are not of sufficient value to redeem one perishing soul. Who can measure the love Christ felt for a lost world as He hung upon the cross, suffering for the sins of guilty men? This love was immeasurable, infinite. {2T 212.1}

Christ has shown that His love was stronger than death. He was accomplishing man's salvation; and although He had the most fearful conflict with the powers of darkness, yet, amid it all, His love grew stronger and stronger. He endured the hiding of His Father's countenance, until He was led to exclaim in the bitterness of His soul: "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?" His arm brought salvation. The price was paid to purchase the redemption of man, when, in the last soul struggle, the blessed words were uttered which seemed to resound through creation: "It is finished." {2T 212.2}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 08:40 AM

Dear MSDAOL Members,

Please go back and finish reading the above post. It only takes a few minutes of your time. Okay, now that you have carefully and prayerfully read it, can you honestly say Jesus did not bear our sin and guilt on the Cross? Can you honestly say Jesus did not suffer the wrath of God on our behalf? And can you honestly say we will not appreciate His sacrifice throughout eternity, and praise God for eliminating sin and sinners in the lake of fire? because they despised His love and sacrifice?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 08:41 AM

Dear MSDAOL Member,

Before you make a post, please answer this question: Did you read the 2T passage quoted at the end of page 10?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 09:39 AM

{1SG 217.1}
Satan rushes into the midst, and tries to stir up the multitude to action. But fire from God out of heaven is rained upon them, and the great men, and the mighty men, and the noble, and poor and miserable men, are all consumed together. I saw that some were quickly destroyed, while others suffered longer. They were punished according to the deeds done in the body. Some were many days consuming, and just as long as there was a portion of them unconsumed, all the sense of suffering was there. Said the angel, The worm of life shall not die; their fire shall not be quenched as long as there is the least particle for it to prey upon.

{GC 673.1}
The wicked receive their recompense in the earth. Proverbs 11:31. They "shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the Lord of hosts." Malachi 4:1. Some are destroyed as in a moment, while others suffer many days. All are punished "according to their deeds." The sins of the righteous having been transferred to Satan, he is made to suffer not only for his own rebellion, but for all the sins which he has caused God's people to commit. His punishment is to be far greater than that of those whom he has deceived. After all have perished who fell by his deceptions, he is still to live and suffer on. In the cleansing flames the wicked are at last destroyed, root and branch--Satan the root, his followers the branches. The full penalty of the law has been visited; the demands of justice have been met; and heaven and earth, beholding, declare the righteousness of Jehovah.

{GC 674.2}
One reminder alone remains: Our Redeemer will ever bear the marks of His crucifixion. Upon His wounded head, upon His side, His hands and feet, are the only traces of the cruel work that sin has wrought. Says the prophet, beholding Christ in His glory: "He had bright beams coming out of His side: and there was the hiding of His power." Habakkuk 3:4, margin. That pierced side whence flowed the crimson stream that reconciled man to God--there is the Saviour's glory, there "the hiding of His power." "Mighty to save," through the sacrifice of redemption, He was therefore strong to execute justice upon them that despised God's mercy. And the tokens of His humiliation are His highest honor; through the eternal ages the wounds of Calvary will show forth His praise and declare His power.

{EW 294.1}
Satan rushes into the midst of his followers and tries to stir up the multitude to action. But fire from God out of heaven is rained upon them, and the great men, and mighty men, the noble, the poor and miserable, are all consumed together. I saw that some were quickly destroyed, while others suffered longer. They were punished according to the deeds done in the body. Some were many days consuming, and just as long as there was a portion of them unconsumed, all the sense of suffering remained. Said the angel, "The worm of life shall not die; their fire shall not be quenched as long as there is the least particle for it to prey upon."

{EW 294.2}
Satan and his angels suffered long. Satan bore not only the weight and punishment of his own sins, but also of the sins of the redeemed host, which had been placed upon him; and he must also suffer for the ruin of souls which he had caused. Then I saw that Satan and all the wicked host were consumed, and the justice of God was satisfied; and all the angelic host, and all the redeemed saints, with a loud voice said, "Amen!"

{GC 544.2}
But those who have not, through repentance and faith, secured pardon, must receive the penalty of transgression--"the wages of sin." They suffer punishment varying in duration and intensity, "according to their works," but finally ending in the second death. Since it is impossible for God, consistently with His justice and mercy, to save the sinner in his sins, He deprives him of the existence which his transgressions have forfeited and of which he has proved himself unworthy. Says an inspired writer: "Yet a little while, and the wicked shall not be: yea, thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be." And another declares: "They shall be as though they had not been." Psalm 37:10; Obadiah 16. Covered with infamy, they sink into hopeless, eternal oblivion.

{GC 545.1}
Thus will be made an end of sin, with all the woe and ruin which have resulted from it. Says the psalmist: "Thou hast destroyed the wicked, Thou hast put out their name forever and ever. O thou enemy, destructions are come to a perpetual end." Psalm 9:5, 6. John, in the Revelation, looking forward to the eternal state, hears a universal anthem of praise undisturbed by one note of discord. Every creature in heaven and earth was heard ascribing glory to God. Revelation 5:13. There will then be no lost souls to blaspheme God as they writhe in never-ending torment; no wretched beings in hell will mingle their shrieks with the songs of the saved.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 04:17 PM

Dear Mike and others

The correlation of the wrath of God (work of God) at the end of time and the death of the Savior is entirely amiss. Mike you cannot take what God will do at the end of time and say that he did it upon Christ. That is completely at cross-purposes. Nowhere does the scripture teach such a thought. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. God did not send his Son into the world to condemn him either. The work upon Christ at the cross was that of Satan. The work at the end of time upon the lost will be that of God.

The coming of the Messiah was not a saving from God and his wrath, but it was God saving his people from their sin.

Mike try and hear things that are somewhat different than your thoughts. The defeat of your thought is in your own quotations. I will answer them presently.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/09/03 06:05 AM

What a loving God did in the destruction of the wicked in the Lake of Fire, the Second Death, I thought I read somewhere as being God's strange act meaning that it was inconsistent of a loving God.

I picture God in tears over the destruction of the wicked just like Christ wept over Jerusalem while He was still on the earth.

I don't see anything to say amen about in the destruction of the wicked, however, there is a lot of amens to be said in the ending of sin.

When the Bible focuses on the destruction of the wicked, it does so in sadness, however, when the Bible focuses on the resulting wiping out of sin, there is a lot to be happy about. The resulting destruction of the wicked is the sad result of the happy wiping out of sin.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/09/03 06:44 AM

Daryl, which one of the following quotes gives you the impression the holy of heaven are not rejoicing over the punishment and destruction of sinners? And please provide the quote where it says the destruction of sinners, the strange act of God, is inconsistent with the love of God.

How can you have sympathy for those who despised the sacrifice of Jesus? How can you pity those who rejected the combined forces of heaven to serve the pleasures of sin for a season? How can you commiserate or show compassion for those who walked away from the beaten, bloody body of Jesus hanging on the cross of Calvary to pursue their own hedonistic selfish passions.

King David was reproved and reprimanded for mourning the death of Absalom. It was considered a capital offence, even treasonous, to mourn the loss of such an enemy of God. None of the following passages give any indication that the holy of heaven sympathize with the dying rejectors of God's golden grace. Would you lament the death of Osma bin Laden? or Saddam Hussien? Did you mourn the death of Hitler?

Revelation
14:9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive [his] mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
14:10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
14:11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

Revelation
16:5 And I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be, because thou hast judged thus.
16:6 For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and thou hast given them blood to drink; for they are worthy.
16:7 And I heard another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous [are] thy judgments.

Revelation
18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.
18:6 Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double.
18:7 How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.
18:8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong [is] the Lord God who judgeth her.

18:20 Rejoice over her, [thou] heaven, and [ye] holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her.

Revelation
19:1 And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God:
19:2 For true and righteous [are] his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand.
19:3 And again they said, Alleluia. And her smoke rose up for ever and ever.
19:4 And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia.
19:5 And a voice came out of the throne, saying, Praise our God, all ye his servants, and ye that fear him, both small and great.
19:6 And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/09/03 06:48 AM

Daryl, which one of the above quotes lead you to believe the holy of heaven are weeping for the destruction of the wicked? To reject the sacrifice of Jesus is to reject God, to spit in His face, to ridicule HIm, to scoff at Him, to despise Him, to hate Him in His dying moments.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/09/03 06:56 AM

The Strange Act of God

{FLB 338.1}
For the Lord shall rise up as in mount Perazim, he shall be wroth as in the valley of Gibeon, that he may do his work, his strange work; and bring to pass his act, his strange act. Isa. 28:21.

{FLB 338.2}
With unerring accuracy the Infinite One still keeps an account with all nations. While His mercy is tendered, with calls to repentance, this account will remain open; but when the figures reach a certain amount which God has fixed, the ministry of His wrath commences. The account is closed. Divine patience ceases. There is no more pleading of mercy in their behalf.

{FLB 338.3}
The prophet, looking down the ages, had this time presented before his vision. The nations of this age have been the recipients of unprecedented mercies. . . . But increased pride, covetousness, idolatry, contempt of God, and base ingratitude are written against them. They are fast closing up their account with God. . . .

{FLB 338.4}
The crisis is fast approaching. The rapidly swelling figures show that the time for God's visitation has about come.

{FLB 338.5}
To our merciful God the act of punishment is a strange act. "As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked." Eze. 33:11. . . . Yet He will "by no means clear the guilty." "The Lord is slow to anger, and great in power, and will not at all acquit the wicked." Ex. 34:6, 7; Nahum 1:3. By terrible things in righteousness He will vindicate the authority of His downtrodden law. The severity of the retribution awaiting the transgressor may be judged by the Lord's reluctance to execute justice. The nation with which He bears long, and which He will not smite until it has filled up the measure of its iniquity in God's account, will finally drink the cup of wrath unmixed with mercy.

{FLB 338.6}
After God has done all that could be done to save men, if they still show by their lives that they slight offered mercy, death will be their portion; and it will be a dreadful death, for they will have to feel the agony that Christ felt upon the cross. They will then realize what they have lost--eternal life and the immortal inheritance.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/09/03 06:59 AM

John, in light of what Sister White wrote above how can you say there is no comparison between Christ on the cross and the second death of the unsaved?

{FLB 338.6}
After God has done all that could be done to save men, if they still show by their lives that they slight offered mercy, death will be their portion; and it will be a dreadful death, for they will have to feel the agony that Christ felt upon the cross.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 07:24 PM

Mike, I said there is no correlation between the work of God at the time of the Christ's suffering, and his work at the time of the end.

The comparison is in the fact that the guilt and darkness that Christ suffered at the hand of Satan, that same and worse (because they will not have the truth of God, which is of faith) will be visited on Satan and his followers at the time of the end. But each one according to their own measure. With what measure you mete it shall be measured to you again!

Shalom
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 09:09 PM

Mike,

You said it yourself when you posted, "As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked." Eze. 33:11.

He said that He has no pleaseure in the death of the wicked. How can there be honour and glory in something that HE doesn't have any pleasure doing?
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 09:14 PM

Dear Mike and others,

I have previously stated and repeat myself that Christ did indeed bear our sin and guilt, but it was not the wrath of God. God is not the source of sin and guilt. It is not possible for God to do this work. It was Satan who imposed this upon Christ. It is only He who can be the source of sin and guilt. Christ was subjected to the power of darkness/Satan.

This is what Satan held the ransom out for. His hope was to overthrow Christ with his darkness. Christ suffered it but did not succumb to it, though Satan represented in the horror of that darkness that it was God hiimself who was doing this. Christ retained his Faith in God, he knew his Father differently, and commited himself to his Father. The essence of sin is distrust of God, Satan is the source of that distrust, and all that God does is interpreted in the most heinous way. The fact that God withdrew his light from Christ (which was neccessary to permit Satan his work, for darkness cannot be where there is light), Satan used that to say that God is against him and further insinuations about the righteusness of God. Christ felt all these, He was made to sense and suffer all this darkness. But it is of Satan and not of God.

There needs to be a clean and clear distinction between the works of God and the works of darkness, between the spirit of this world and the spirit of God.

1. Yes, Christ bore/suffered our sin/guilt. We need to understand what that means.
2. Christ's death overthrew the power of Satan, sin and death. We need to understand what that means.
3. No, he did not suffer the wrath of God, but rather was the outworking of the grace of God.

Whenever reading something consider the source. When temptations are being presented. Are they to be taken as truth from God. James 1:13 Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:

Below please find your quotations from EGW, I have added a few, They all testify to the truth of my statements. How do you read?

I have bolded the text, which is work of darkness, imposed upon Christ. Underlined bold tells you that it is the work of darkness. Underlined plain text is what Christ did. Italicised text is the work of the Father and heaven. The plain text is not considered irrelevant.
quote:

Even doubts assailed the dying Son of God. He could not see through the portals of the tomb. Bright hope did not present to Him His coming forth from the tomb a conqueror and His Father's acceptance of His sacrifice. The sin of the world, with all its terribleness, was felt to the utmost by the Son of God. The displeasure of the Father for sin, and its penalty, which is death, were all that He could realize through this amazing darkness. He was tempted to fear that sin was so offensive in the sight of His Father that He could not be reconciled to His Son. The fierce temptation that His own Father had forever left Him caused that piercing cry from the cross: "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?" {2T 209.3}

Christ felt much as sinners will feel when the vials of God's wrath shall be poured out upon them. Black despair, like the pall of death, will gather about their guilty souls,and then they will realize to the fullest extent the sinfulness of sin. Salvation has been purchased for them by the suffering and death of the Son of God. It might be theirs, if they would accept of it willingly, gladly; but none are compelled to yield obedience to the law of God. If they refuse the heavenly benefit and choose the pleasures and deceitfulness of sin, they have their choice, and at the end receive their wages, which is the wrath of God and eternal death. They will be forever separated from the presence of Jesus, whose sacrifice they had despised. They will have lost a life of happiness and sacrificed eternal glory for the pleasures of sin for a season. {2T 210.1}

Faith and hope trembled in the expiring agonies of Christ because God had removed the assurance He had heretofore given His beloved Son of His approbation and acceptance. The Redeemer of the world then relied upon the evidences which had hitherto strengthened Him, that His Father accepted His labors and was pleased with His work. In His dying agony, as He yields up His precious life, He has by faith alone to trust in Him whom it has ever been His joy to obey. He is not cheered with clear, bright rays of hope on the right hand nor on the left. All is enshrouded in oppressive gloom. Amid the awful darkness which is felt by sympathizing nature, the Redeemer drains the mysterious cup even to its dregs. Denied even bright hope and confidence in the triumph which will be His in the future, He cries with a loud voice: "Father, into Thy hands I commend My spirit." He is acquainted with the character of His Father, with His justice, His mercy, and His great love, and in submission He drops into His hands. Amid the convulsions of nature are heard by the amazed spectators the dying words of the Man of Calvary. {2T 210.2}
Oh, was there ever suffering and sorrow like that endured by the dying Saviour! It was the sense of His Father's displeasure which made His cup so bitter. It was not bodily suffering which so quickly ended the life of Christ upon the cross. It was the crushing weight of the sins of the world, and a sense of His Father's wrath. The Father's glory and sustaining presence had left Him, and despair pressed its crushing weight of darkness upon Him and forced from His pale and quivering lips the anguished cry: "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?" {2T 209.1}

Jesus had united with the Father in making the world. Amid the agonizing sufferings of the Son of God, blind and deluded men alone remain unfeeling. The chief priests and elders revile God's dear Son while in His expiring agonies. Yet inanimate nature groans in sympathy with her bleeding, dying Author. The earth trembles. The sun refuses to behold the scene. The heavens gather blackness. Angels have witnessed the scene of suffering until they can look no longer, and hide their faces from the horrid sight. Christ is dying! He is in despair! His Father's approving smile is removed, and angels are not permitted to lighten the gloom of the terrible hour. They can only behold in amazement their loved Commander, the Majesty of heaven, suffering the penalty of man's transgression of the Father's law. {2T 209.2}

Nature sympathized with the suffering of its Author. The heaving earth, the rent rocks, proclaimed that it was the Son of God who died. There was a mighty earthquake. The veil of the temple was rent in twain. Terror seized the executioners and spectators as they beheld the sun veiled in darkness, and felt the earth shake beneath them, and saw and heard the rending of the rocks. The mocking and jeering of the chief priests and elders were hushed as Christ commended His spirit into the hands of His Father. The astonished throng began to withdraw and grope their way in the darkness to the city. They smote upon their breasts as they went and in terror, speaking scarcely above a whisper, said among themselves: "It is an innocent person that has been murdered. What if, indeed, He is, as He asserted, the Son of God?" {2T 211.1}

Jesus did not yield up His life till He had accomplished the work which He came to do, and exclaimed with His departing breath: "It is finished." Satan was then defeated. He knew that his kingdom was lost. Angels rejoiced as the words were uttered: "It is finished." The great plan of redemption, which was dependent on the death of Christ, had been thus far carried out. And there was joy in heaven that the sons of Adam could, through a life of obedience, be finally exalted to the throne of God. Oh, what love! What amazing love! that brought the Son of God to earth to be made sin for us, that we might be reconciled to God, and elevated to a life with Him in His mansions in glory. Oh, what is man, that such a price should be paid for his redemption! {2T 211.2}

When men and women can more fully comprehend the magnitude of the great sacrifice which was made by the Majesty of heaven in dying in man's stead, then will the plan of salvation be magnified, and reflections of Calvary will awaken tender, sacred, and lively emotions in the Christian's heart. Praises to God and the Lamb will be in their hearts and upon their lips. Pride and self-esteem cannot flourish in the hearts that keep fresh in memory the scenes of Calvary. This world will appear of but little value to those who appreciate the great price of man's redemption, the precious blood of God's dear Son. All the riches of the world are not of sufficient value to redeem one perishing soul. Who can measure the love Christ felt for a lost world as He hung upon the cross, suffering for the sins of guilty men? This love was immeasurable, infinite. {2T 212.1}

Christ has shown that His love was stronger than death. He was accomplishing man's salvation; and although He had the most fearful conflict with the powers of darkness, yet, amid it all, His love grew stronger and stronger. He endured the hiding of His Father's countenance, until He was led to exclaim in the bitterness of His soul: "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?" His arm brought salvation. The price was paid to purchase the redemption of man, when, in the last soul struggle, the blessed words were uttered which seemed to resound through creation: "It is finished." {2T 212.2}

As Christ felt His unity with the Father broken up, He feared that in His human nature He would be unable to endure the coming conflict with the powers of darkness. In the wilderness of temptation the destiny of the human race had been at stake. Christ was then conqueror. Now the tempter had come for the last fearful struggle. For this he had been preparing during the three years of Christ's ministry. Everything was at stake with him. If he failed here, his hope of mastery was lost; the kingdoms of the world would finally become Christ's; he himself would be overthrown and cast out. But if Christ could be overcome, the earth would become Satan's kingdom, and the human race would be forever in his power. With the issues of the conflict before Him, Christ's soul was filled with dread of separation from God. Satan told Him that if He became the surety for a sinful world, the separation would be eternal. He would be identified with Satan's kingdom, and would nevermore be one with God. DA 686/687

But God suffered with His Son. Angels beheld the Saviour's agony. They saw their Lord enclosed by legions of satanic forces, His nature weighed down with a shuddering, mysterious dread. There was silence in heaven. No harp was touched. Could mortals have viewed the amazement of the angelic host as in silent grief they watched the Father separating His beams of light, love, and glory from His beloved Son, they would better understand how offensive in His sight is sin.
The worlds unfallen and the heavenly angels had watched with intense interest as the conflict drew to its close. Satan and his confederacy of evil, the legions of apostasy, watched intently this great crisis in the work of redemption. The powers of good and evil waited to see what answer would come to Christ's thrice-repeated prayer. Angels had longed to bring relief to the divine sufferer, but this might not be. No way of escape was found for the Son of God. In this awful crisis, when everything was at stake, when the mysterious cup trembled in the hand of the sufferer, the heavens opened, a light shone forth amid the stormy darkness of the crisis hour, and the mighty angel who stands in God's presence, occupying the position from which Satan fell, came to the side of Christ. The angel came not to take the cup from Christ's hand, but to strengthen Him to drink it, with the assurance of the Father's love. He came to give power to the divine-human suppliant. He pointed Him to the open heavens, telling Him of the souls that would be saved as the result of His sufferings. He assured Him that His Father is greater and more powerful than Satan, that His death would result in the utter discomfiture of Satan, and that the kingdom of this world would be given to the saints of the Most High. He told Him that He would see of the travail of His soul, and be satisfied, for He would see a multitude of the human race saved, eternally saved.

Christ's agony did not cease, but His depression and discouragement left Him. The storm had in nowise abated, but He who was its object was strengthened to meet its fury. He came forth calm and serene. A heavenly peace rested upon His bloodstained face. He had borne that which no human being could ever bear; for He had tasted the sufferings of death for every man. DA 693

Notice the difference between the thoughts of darkness and that light which the angel brought from the throne of God's presence. Do you not see the difference of what Satan’s thoughts would have been had he not fallen. Look at the great contrast between the darkness of Satan’s view of God and the angel’s that took his place. Which is truth?

Who is Christ battling with? Satan and his darkness, or his Father?

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 10:14 PM

Daryl, you're right - God will not take sick, sadistic pleasure in destroying sinners. None of the passages I quoted above teach we will take pleasure in the destruction of sinners. Rejoicing that God has eliminated sin and sinners in the lake of fire is not the same thing as taking pleasure in it. But you still haven't answered my question -

Daryl, which one of the following quotes gives you the impression the holy of heaven are not rejoicing over the punishment and destruction of sinners? And please provide the quote where it says the destruction of sinners, the strange act of God, is inconsistent with the love of God.

How can you have sympathy for those who despised the sacrifice of Jesus? How can you pity those who rejected the combined forces of heaven to serve the pleasures of sin for a season? How can you commiserate or show compassion for those who walked away from the beaten, bloody body of Jesus hanging on the cross of Calvary to pursue their own hedonistic selfish passions.

King David was reproved and reprimanded for mourning the death of Absalom. It was considered a capital offence, even treasonous, to mourn the loss of such an enemy of God. None of the following passages give any indication that the holy of heaven sympathize with the dying rejectors of God's golden grace. Would you lament the death of Osma bin Laden? or Saddam Hussien? Did you mourn the death of Hitler?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/08/03 10:30 PM

John wrote - "I have previously stated and repeat myself that Christ did indeed bear our sin and guilt, but it was not the wrath of God. God is not the source of sin and guilt. It is not possible for God to do this work. It was Satan who imposed this upon Christ. It is only He who can be the source of sin and guilt. Christ was subjected to the power of darkness/Satan."

John, I have never insinuated that God is the source of the sin, guilt and shame Jesus bore for us while on earth and on the Cross. The sin He bore for us was in His sinful flesh. But not until Gethsemane and the Cross did Jesus experience the wrath of God toward the sin He bore in His flesh for us. That's when Jesus felt the guilt and shame associated with the sin He bore in His flesh. The guilt and shame He felt was the result - not the cause - of the wrath of God He endured for us.

Satan has no power to cause Jesus or the unsaved at the end of time to suffer guilt and shame associated with sin. If the Devil were dead and gone the unsaved would suffer the wrath of God in exactly the same way. The existence of Satan has nothing to do with it. Yes, the Devil tempted Jesus to distrust the promises of God, but that had nothing to do with the guilt and shame He suffered as He endured the wrath of God. It was the separation and wrath of God that caused Jesus so much suffering.

What is about these two quotes that makes you think Jesus did not suffer the wrath of God like a guilty sinner facing death?

"Christ felt much as sinners will feel when the vials of God's wrath shall be poured out upon them. Black despair, like the pall of death, will gather about their guilty souls, and then they will realize to the fullest extent the sinfulness of sin."

"After God has done all that could be done to save men, if they still show by their lives that they slight offered mercy, death will be their portion; and it will be a dreadful death, for they will have to feel the agony that Christ felt upon the cross. They will then realize what they have lost--eternal life and the immortal inheritance."
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/09/03 05:14 AM

Mike said,
quote:

John, I have never insinuated that God is the source of the sin, guilt and shame Jesus bore for us while on earth and on the Cross. The sin He bore for us was in His sinful flesh. But not until Gethsemane and the Cross did Jesus experience the wrath of God toward the sin He bore in His flesh for us. That's when Jesus felt the guilt and shame associated with the sin He bore in His flesh. The guilt and shame He felt was the result - not the cause - of the wrath of God He endured for us.

Mike, we need to make sense when we speak. Your proposition above is an impossible feat. It is your definition that the wrath of God = our guilt and shame. While this is a conundrum of language, it can but possibly have two sources; one is God, the other we. You have defined it to be the work of God, which means that the source is God. This is what you have been trying so hard to establish.

In your above statement in your first sentence you deny that God is the source of the guilt and shame and in your last sentence you said, "The guilt and shame He felt was the result … of the wrath of God He endured for us". There is no difference in God being the source, or God's wrath resulting in guilt and shame, when it comes to spiritual matters. And the whole point of your view is that Christ overcame God's wrath, which pits Christ against God. Mike can't you see how wrong this is?

The other source possible is the sin He bore in His sinful flesh from birth. Now while this makes him one with us in the temptations he experienced, it does not establish guilt or shame. In your last sentence above you agree that it is not the cause.

Guilt is a product of self-justification and shame that of pride. Very simply, neither God nor Christ have ever produced these.

Again your statement in this regard
quote:

What Jesus experienced beginning in Gethsemane and ending on Golgotha was the wrath of God against the sin He inherited when He assumed Adam's fallen nature.

Now since neither Christ nor we have any guilt or shame regarding the sinful flesh we inherit, it follows that such would have to be superimposed by someone else. You said it is from God, the wrath of God.

As I believe you now agree that it is not possible for God to produce guilt and shame, we must realize that the source is someone else, and Christ said very plainly that it was the work of darkness, the work of Satan. John 14:30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

Mike only he who has such thoughts of God and guilt, could come and insinuate them on another.
Can you not grasp, that this thing you call the wrath of God is in reality the mind of Satan.

Here is a definition for thought; the mind of Satan = ultimate guilt and shame. Every sinner has partaken to an extent of his mind.


Mike said
quote:

Satan has no power to cause Jesus or the unsaved at the end of time to suffer guilt and shame associated with sin. If the Devil were dead and gone the unsaved would suffer the wrath of God in exactly the same way. The existence of Satan has nothing to do with it.

Partly wrong and partly right. Satan, as long as he is around, has as much power on his followers as he hath something in them. On the other hand it is true that the problem is not resolved by getting rid of Satan, for they have in themselves such equivalent portion as they have made their own. So each one according to their own measure.
And no, Satan will have no power over Christ. Christ has already overcome him.

Mike, the whole train of your thought in regards to the plan of salvation is misdirected. Did you give thought to what I wrote in the last few posts.

Hebrews 12:2 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

Shalom

P.S. I propose to lay out a summary of the plan of Salvation shortly.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/09/03 05:39 AM

Mike asked
quote:

How can you have sympathy for those who despised the sacrifice of Jesus? How can you pity those who rejected the combined forces of heaven to serve the pleasures of sin for a season? How can you commiserate or show compassion for those who walked away from the beaten, bloody body of Jesus hanging on the cross of Calvary to pursue their own hedonistic selfish passions.

It is for these that Christ prayed, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do".

Now Mike I know that our Father is Long-suffering and not forever-suffering, but you seem to have a strong desire for the wrath of God.

Remember that The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

I think that the realization needs to settle in that the coming of the Messiah was in the long-suffering of God. That it was not an example of his wrath to come.

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/09/03 06:06 AM

Mike asked'
quote:

What is about these two quotes that makes you think Jesus did not suffer the wrath of God like a guilty sinner facing death?

"Christ felt much as sinners will feel when the vials of God's wrath shall be poured out upon them. Black despair, like the pall of death, will gather about their guilty souls, and then they will realize to the fullest extent the sinfulness of sin."

"After God has done all that could be done to save men, if they still show by their lives that they slight offered mercy, death will be their portion; and it will be a dreadful death, for they will have to feel the agony that Christ felt upon the cross. They will then realize what they have lost--eternal life and the immortal inheritance."

Satan is a guilty sinner. There is none other that has as much guilt as he. There is none other who sees God as a greater enemy/threat/fear. All his cogitation is self-justification, which only increases his guilt. His pride makes his shame so great. His accusations are merciless; therefore he can see no mercy. When Satan had his time of his power on Christ, it was but natural for him to project his mind upon Christ. Thus Christ felt much as sinners will feel, once the influence of God' spirit is withdrawn from them. A big difference however is that Christ had none of that in him, thus he committed himself to his Father. He had faith in his Father.

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/15/03 07:15 AM

John, when you get the chance can you please compare our two points of view. Thank you. I'm having a hard time following your line of reasoning.
Posted By: Donovan Wallace

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/20/03 08:24 AM

Greetings,

Some of posts in this thread have been bewildering at times. I’ve been hesitant to jump in lest I drown in detail.

From what I’ve read in recent posts I believe that the main point of debate/question has changed from the original “Did Christ bear our sin/guilt” to “Did/Does Christ’s death pay the penalty for our sins to the Father”.

There is considerable ambivalence in SDA circles and indeed throughout all christendom regarding the character of God and the nature Christ’s mission on earth. Growing up in the SDA church I’ve heard talks and sermons that support both sides of this debate.

Two articles in the April-2003 issue of Sign of the Times give evidence to this. If you have access to the issue you might want to read the article “Your Friendly Judge” by Trudy Morgan-Cole. Trudy presents the case that the image we have of the Father “as an angry God who needs the spilled blood of his own son to restrain Him from wiping out the people he created” is an erroneous one. Trudy however avoids the issue of what such a statement does to the substitution doctrine.

This quarter’s SDA adult SS lesson focuses on the topic of forgiveness. It’s interesting that in the new testament (KJV) the word “guilt” appears 7 times while the word “forgiveness” appears 47 times. Why is it that the bible plainly, indeed emphatically, says that God forgives a repentant sinner yet we say that God demands blood?

quote:
Gal 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
Paul takes pains to explain that the law cannot save us. Are we not insisting that it does save us by saying that God demands restitution or payment for all broken laws?

I well understand the argument that says that “though the Father loves us yet he must administer justice and satisfy the requirements of the law”. If the law is a complete “transcription of God’s character” where then is forgiveness.. where is mercy? I fail to see the mercy in a proxy torture arrangement which is what I believe the substitution doctrine amounts to.

In many countries the head-of-state has the power to pardon or commute a sentence for any crime. If a head-of-state were to release a person on death row and execute an innocent third party would you call this mercy or forgiveness? Totalitarian regimes have been known to administer this type of justice – most regard it as barbaric. Would most people be drawn in love to a person who administered this form of justice? I’m certain that many would not want live under such an authority.

quote:
Matthew 9:13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
We can live with the Father in eternity not because he tolerates us by some technical satisfying of the law. The Father calls us to be with him. He sent his Son to make the way plain. John 16:27 For the Father himself loveth you

Don W
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/20/03 08:32 AM

Don, welcome to MSDAOL. Your comments suggest you favor the moral influence theory. If Jesus did not die in order to satisfy the just claims of the broken law and in order to grant us a probationary time to accept or reject God's love - then what purpose did Jesus' life and death serve?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/20/03 07:24 PM

"The wages of sin is death." Which death? Why? And how? According to the Bible sinners would have lived for ever had God not denied them access to the tree of life.

Genesis
3:22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
3:23 Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
3:24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/21/03 07:15 PM

Greetings to all,

I am sorry that the summary post is taking longer, but it is coming soon, and will answer the question as to what purpose Jesus' life and death served.

The death of Christ has nothing to do with enabling God to grant us probationary time. Time was given in the longsuffering of God, first to Lucifer, then his followers, and then to fallen man. To give time is part of God's justice. The truth is that Christ's coming and dying has tremendously shortened the time needed for the issues of sin and salvation to be resolved.

The casting out of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden, has nothing to do with penalty, but has to do with sound judgment and reality. Even so as Lucifer was denied the authority of his position, once he broke faith with God; in the same manner man was denied the privilege of access to the garden and its benefits after the fall. "The wages of sin is death." Which death? Why? And how? Yes, these are good questions to ask. We hope that they will be clarified soon.

It is not in God's purpose to either penalize sinners, or to promote sin, but that all should come to repentance. Therefore, their authority and position of service is removed from them. Time is given for them to sort themselves out and come to their senses.

In God's kingdom the one that is greatest is he that is the greatest servant. Thus one's position is dictated by one's service. The nature of sin is such that it is self-seeking. It seeks to manipulate, exercise authority over, and use others for it's own purposes. God cannot condone such activity under his umbrella of Government. Thus all such loose their place and authority in his kingdom by default. They come under God's longsuffering service of mercy to them. They who served now need to be served. However Satan complicated the matter by professing that what he was doing is for the benefit of the universe and that God was penalizing him. This confused the issues.

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/26/03 09:59 PM

I had proposed a summary of the plan of Salvation. It is indeed difficult to summarize something on which there is no consensus, as the meanings of words and thoughts are differing. I hope the following may serve to give meaning.


  • The fundamental element of righteousness is faith, which is result of and results in sound judgment in truth. He that lives in faith lives in reality and thus recognizes the true nature of God and his character, the true place for one self, and the true place of others.

  • The fundamental element of sin is the breaking of faith, which is result of and results in untrue judgment. That is a false view of reality, first about God, second one self, and last others. Everything else (disobedience, accusations, covetousness) is but simply the result of this.
Condition before sin
When God created, whether it be angels or man, he created them 'good'. None were ever destined to sin. Indeed they were destined to become sons of God (that is, not only by creation but also by birth). What is that 'good' wherein he created them? Faith establishes the fact that there is goodwill between one another. Without goodwill there can be no faith.

"In the image of God created he them". While each beast was created with various instincts of function, man and angels were created judicial beings. One of the meanings of the title 'God' is 'Judge'.

In this environment faith was natural, faith/trust in God (God's judgment) was way of life. Everyone grew in knowledge and wisdom with God and their fellow. There were no accusations and everyone worked in harmony. Love is the definition of this life. Each was living in the light of God's grace.

Since Faith and trust is a freewill and goodwill act, God knew that it is possible that some may choose to break faith/trust. God did not foreknow that any would sin but he knew that any could sin, and he was prepared and willing to deal with it.


Sin and the problem
As it is written, Whatsoever is not of faith is sin.
    Ezek. 28:15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee. Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness:
Sin began in heaven with Lucifer. He broke his faith/trust relationship with God by thinking of himself more highly than he ought. While sin did begin with Lucifer in heaven, it could have been anyone else. The magnitude of his position however made the problem more difficult.


Truth vs. Lies
Lucifer made himself the point of reference, thus everything began to be interpreted through his own eyes. God was standing in his way. God did not agree with him, therefore he was not fair. Lucifer was going to prove that he is right and that God is wrong. Indeed, he was going to show the whole universe what true freedom is, and he would set heaven on a higher pinnacle. He promoted that creation was not free since they all were looking/trusting to God. In this manner they were all restricted to what God gave them. If they looked/trusted to themselves they would indeed be free, he promoted. There would be a lot more creativity by which heaven would benefit, he proposed. So he made himself his own source, not realizing 'the way of life' and the proper use of his powers and abilities.

As Satan departed from truth in judgement to following after his desires and ambitions, God counseled with him and told him that his way was wrong. Satan now had a problem. He had to deal with what God had told him. Since his desires were to the contrary, he set about to justify himself and accuse God. Thus he discovered guilt and fear. Each time God counseled with him and warned him, Satan, instead of receiving the counsel, justified himself and multiplied his guilt and fear. Since he saw God through his own eyes he began seeing him as vengeful and exacting. He did not understand that guilt is result of being unfaithful in judgement, and fear the result of selfish desire. Satan blamed God for all his guilt and fears. He soon developed such an image of God and his righteousness as befitted his guilt and fears. When God warned that such way is death, he interpreted that God would kill him.

In this manner Satan began misrepresenting God to the universe. He represented God's righteousness and character as something that it was not. It was his version of God.

He declared that God could not forgive and be just. This is because Lucifer could not repent. He could not repent because he would not believe God, hence he could not see that he was wrong, hence he could not repent and thus could not see forgiveness. His own idea of justice/righteousness prevented him from receiving that which he desired. However finding this (his own) righteousness unforgiving, he blamed God for it and declared that God was such.

He declared that God is prejudiced and favoritises. This is because unlike himself, there were others that believed God and thus were able to repent and receive forgiveness, and were set free from their error. To Satan this was nothing but favoritism and he began about the business of finding fault and accusing in order to prove himself right and God wrong. This is the path of self-justification. Even when he did realize a degree of his wrong and proposed to repent, he did so without restoring faith, without believing God. He found that God had no respect to his "repentance". After such he resolved himself fully that God was unfair. This in reality proved that his repentance was not repentance, and that he did not restore his faith in God's judgment.

He declared that God is partial and biased. He alleged that Christ was only faithful because that God had favored him so. If God were to favor Lucifer in the same way, he would certainly be faithful too. But since Lucifer was in such disfavor with God, how could he have faith? Let Christ be in my place and we'll see how much faith he will have, was his challenge.

He declared that God's requirements were unattainable, therefore unfair. This is because he would not believe God, and without faith it is impossible to please God. Thus by making himself the reference of truth for all his judgments, he declared that God was such as he deemed him to be.

He declared that penalty must be exacted upon fallen man. Lucifer viewed himself under a penalty of death. It was his hope and purpose to take man hostage. He gambled on God's 'love for man'. In his mind he figured that because he is not being forgiven, God may not forgive man. If he forgives man then he also must forgive him and his followers, or else it is not fair. Naturally every hostage taker hopes to obtain his ransom, and not to meet the same fate as they threaten their hostages with.

In summary, in all his efforts Lucifer was completely at odds with God's justice. He promoted a justice, which never had existed. A negative form of justice.


Salvation from Sin & Lies
It was necessary to reveal the truth about God, that the darkness, which Satan spread, might be dispelled. It was necessary to bring judgement unto truth. To release from bondage those that were kept in the dungeon of fear. To open the eyes of those that were made blind with lies. To reveal that the goodness of God is greater than sin, that his mercy endures forever, and that his forgiveness is greater than guilt.

God's justice does not allow oppression to rule. He would not leave those who are being held as hostages to be used as such. Instead he sets every man free and gives each the opportunity to establish faith.

Satan's insinuations and misrepresentation of God's government, law, justice, forgiveness, mercy needed to be answered. Heaven needed to see that God's government was not such as Satan portrayed it to be. The universe needed to see that God does not have penalties, that he is not partial, that his bidding is not unreasonable, much less impossible. To reveal to the universe that God is merciful and that he can and does forgive iniquity, transgression, and sin. That indeed in this is the very heart of justice. That his mercy and forgiveness are not partial, but that they are distinctly and positively only possible to be realized under specific conditions, the which anyone may attain to (the broken and contrite heart). To see this takes time, and God was willing to suffer it to be so. More than that, he was willing to suffer unrighteousness and injustice, until every judicious being had opportunity to see the issues and choose whether to restore faith or not.

My ways are not your ways
The Universe needed to be brought back to the position where judgment in truth was returned unto faithfulness. This could only be done by the revelation of truth and reality and not by means which Satan used. Accusations, set-up artistry and insinuations were not possible for the king of life to use. God would not accuse Lucifer, he would not go around and spread 'counter-propaganda'. God loved Lucifer just as much as he loved man or any other being he created in the image of God. God's purpose is to return judgment unto truth (this cannot be done with malice, but can only be done with goodwill) so that every judicious being may freely choose whether to restore faith or not.


Cost of Salvation
Satan's challenges needed to be answered, in order for the truth to be established.

Satan's challenge of partiality needed to be answered by Christ. To answer this challenge was a horrific proposal and it was not undertaken lightly. The longsuffering heart of the Father was to suffer immeasurably, the Son was to suffer under the power of the enemy; only thus could the challenge be answered and it be revealed what the Son's faithfulness is based on and what the Father's favor is.

But this was not the only thing that would be accomplished. In one simple living the whole facade of sin would be swept aside. Christ would reveal that it is the glory of God to forgive. He would reveal that God's requirements are not only attainable, but that they make one free and raise him in glory. He would silence the accuser by subjecting himself under his power, allowing Satan to impose upon him his view of God, thus effectively being put in Satan's position (and even lower, for he came as a man, lower than the angels) yet triumphing in faith over that darkness.

Satan was allowed the ultimate that he can do. As he assailed upon Christ with the darkness of his mind, his views about God, his character, and his righteousness; he supported these by inducing every physical and circumstantial element that he could muster, even unto death. After that he could do no more. It was revealed that faithfulness is not based on the blessings/favors that God bestows, but upon judgment in truth of the Father's character.

Christ's life and death silenced every accusation, for he was faithful and obedient unto death (and not because he was favored) and the angels of heaven declared worthy, worthy is the lamb that was slain to receive power and glory and honor. Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name, which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Satan was cast out of heaven, and there was no more room found for him in heaven. The accuser was cast out; none will listen to him any more. In heaven, judgment has returned unto truth in every judicial being, and the prince of this world has been judged. God's judgment is not questioned any more in heaven.

Only on this earth, Satan still has sympathizers. On this earth, Satan still has many that hold his views of God. There are many that agree with him and partake of his spirit. To what purpose? They gather wrath to themselves against the day of wrath. Many will discover that the Christ they held to save them from the wrath of God is not there. When once the master has closed the door, and they begin to knock outside. They have not gone in and become part of God's Glory.


For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God.
It was revealed that forgiveness is not an unjust favor. It is the glory of God to forgive. Forgiveness is that element of God's glory that every judicial being must possess in order to be able to be a faithful judicial being in goodwill. Forgiveness is the restoration of the judicial being to faith and true judgment, which brings forth repentance and restores the original image of God (a faithful judicial being in goodwill). Here the mind of sin; (the unbelieving, unfaithful judgment) along with it's guilt, accusations and fear have been crucified.

It was revealed that mercy is not unmerited favor. Mercy is that element of God's glory that every judicial being must possess in order to be able to be a faithful judicial being in goodwill. It is that very aspect of God's glory that must enter the poor, guilty, accused and accusing sinner, that he may himself be set free, and that he may set others free from that bondage.

It was revealed that the goodness of God leads to repentance.
    Ephesians 4:8 Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.
Every fallen being is held in captivity (darkness) by fear. Fear is the ruling element of Satan. Satan keeps people afraid of God. When the goodness of God is realized, then the sinner comes to repentance

I will break here and see if there is any understanding

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/26/03 10:15 PM

After you have read the above, here is one statement that is very simple!?
    John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

However the reality of it is that it is among the most abused and misunderstood statements; not because there is anything wrong with the statement, but because the blindness of sin along with professed religion establishes all kind of false interpretations of it.

For God so loved
What does that mean? What picture of the 'so loved' do people have?

that he gave his only begotten Son
What does that mean? What does it mean 'he gave'? Why did he need to give? Give to whom?

that whosoever believeth in him
What does that mean? What does it mean to believe in him?

should not perish
Why should one perish? What is the problem? What is the cause of perishing? What about believing saves one from perishing?

But have everlasting life
What is this everlasting life? Why does one not have this life? What does believing have to do with everlasting life?


Shalom
Posted By: Donovan Wallace

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/28/03 08:10 AM

Hi Mike, In response to your direct question...I don’t profess to have the complete story on this but I’m constrained to accept the scripture on these points:

Col 2:15 And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.
Heb 2:14 .... that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;
1 John 3:8 For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil
Titus 2:14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people zealous of good works.

Other scriptures (some examples below) are usually taken to support Christ’s death as a payment for sin to the Father.

2Cor 5:21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.
Gal 1:4 Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the will of God our Father.
Ephesians 1:7 In whom we have redemption through his blood
1Peter 3:18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:

I expect that in the understanding of these scriptures is where the two views on this question differ.

Christ came to destroy the power of evil and to redeem us from it’s bondage. He bore with the evil/sin of this world until it killed him. After this the challenge of enemy no longer had any credibility. Christ’s life made it clear that Satan’s kingdom would ultimately destroy all goodness and purity if left unchecked.

John 1:4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
John 12:32 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth shall draw all men unto me.

His life sheds light on the path we are to walk….in faith and trust in God.

Of course there's more but I'll stop here

dw
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/29/03 07:48 PM

John and Don, I've been away on business since last week. I'll have some time to continue this duscussion later on. God bless.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 04/30/03 07:19 PM

John, thank you for sharing your thoughts on sin and salvation. I agree that sin creates a gulf between the sinner and God. But I also believe the "wages" of sin is death. Earlier I asked the question - Which death? Genesis 3:22 makes it clear that death is not the natural consequences of sin. It was possible to live "for ever" in a sinful state eating the fruit of the tree of life.

The wages of sin is, therefore, referring to something other than cause and effect results. The reason we die the first death is because we do not have access to the tree of life. And if simply dying the first death satisfied the just and loving demands of the broken law then there would be no reason for the second resurrection and the subsequent punishment in the lake of fire.

The purpose of the second resurrection (and the third in some cases) is to execute justice. Very obviously the first death does not serve to satisfy justice. Otherwise, why not leave them where they lay? Which is a good and necessary question to answer in light of God's law, love and character.

The first death is not the wages of sin. We do not and cannot pay the penalty for our sins in this lifetime. Why? Because Jesus paid the penalty for us! But the blood of Jesus does not justify unpardoned sinners after the close of probation. Thus, the only way the unsaved can pay the penalty for their sins is to be raised in the second resurrection.

If the second death is no different than the first death then why bother resurrecting the unsaved to die again? Since they clearly do not serve the same purpose it is necessary to discern how and why they are different. I submit the difference has to do with punishment.

Lamentations
3:39 Wherefore doth a living man complain, a man for the punishment of his sins?

4:22 The punishment of thine iniquity is accomplished, O daughter of Zion; he will no more carry thee away into captivity: he will visit thine iniquity, O daughter of Edom; he will discover thy sins.

Ezekiel
14:10 And they shall bear the punishment of their iniquity: the punishment of the prophet shall be even as the punishment of him that seeketh [unto him];

Matthew
25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

Hebrews
10:29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?

God must necessarily punish those who refuse the salvation of Jesus Christ, wrought out on the cross for them at such great cost. "All they that hate me love death." Proverbs 8:36. To allow sin to go unpunished is to condone sin itself. No one is innocent who clings to sin. They are guilty of crucifying Christ afresh. They are murderers.

God must punish sinners and eliminate sin in the lake of fire. If He doesn't then we shall forever doubt the promise - Sin shall not arise a second time. See Nahum 1:9. If sin and sinners are supposed to self-destruct in the lake of fire, while God stands by hopelessly lamenting the loss, whose to say they won't change their minds and demand a retrial?

And if God isn't actively involved in the destruction of sin and sinners then how do we account for the way angels and holy beings praise Him for it?

Revelation
16:5 And I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be, because thou hast judged thus.
16:6 For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and thou hast given them blood to drink; for they are worthy.
16:7 And I heard another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous [are] thy judgments.

18:20 Rejoice over her, [thou] heaven, and [ye] holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her.

19:1 And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God:
19:2 For true and righteous [are] his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand.
19:3 And again they said, Alleluia. And her smoke rose up for ever and ever.
19:4 And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia.
19:5 And a voice came out of the throne, saying, Praise our God, all ye his servants, and ye that fear him, both small and great.
19:6 And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 05/01/03 02:17 PM

Mike, Thank you for your post, but we seem to have missed the point.

I have purposely stopped in my summary and have not proceeded to the end time destruction of the wicked. Because that is not the reason that Christ came. The reason he came is to find and save that which is lost. The work of God was in the longsuffering of God. As I said before, I repeat. The correlation of the wrath of God (work of God) at the end of time and the death of the Savior is entirely amiss.

Mike you cannot take what God will do at the end of time and say that he did it upon Christ. That is completely at cross-purposes. Nowhere does the scripture teach such a thought. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. God did not send his Son into the world to condemn him either. The work upon Christ at the cross was that of Satan. It was not the wrath of God.

I know that you believe that the 'penalty for sin' is death, and that such is your understanding of the 'wages of sin' is death. We are not dealing here with the 'wages of sin'. We are dealing here with why Christ came, lived and died; more specifically 'Did he bear our sin and guilt, and what that means'. You can understand the true meaning of 'wages of sin' only after the true meaning of salvation is realized. I have shown you from all your quotations and scripture that it was not the work of God that was upon Christ from Gethsemane to the cross.

Only as one truly understands the salvation that Christ came to bring to us, will one understand what the 'wages of sin is death' means. Only as one understands God's work and is able to separate that from Satan's work will he begin to understand the issues. As long as one ascribes Satan's work to God; as long as one calls darkness light, how can he expect to know the truth.

Sin not only creates a gulf between the sinner and God; it creates enmity. The enmity is not on God's part; it is on the sinner's part. It is the sinner that becomes an enemy of God and not God that becomes the enemy of the sinner. Christ came to bring us salvation from that enmity, from sin. These issues are spiritual.

Mike, do you agree with my summary, but think there is more; or do you disagree with what is there?

Your preposition regarding the tree of life and our loss of access to it, makes your outlook primarily physical and secondarily, spiritual. That creates such a false view of the problem even so that the spiritual can never be accomplished. It establishes a justice that has nothing to do with God, and then creates a salvation from it. Thus the problem of sin still remains. And Christ who came to save us from sin is instead being used to save us from a fictitious penalty and a justice that does not exist. Thus the problem of sin still remains!

The scriptures you quoted in your last post re 'punishment' deal with those that reject the salvation from sin. They have nothing to do with God's work of salvation from sin.

Shalom
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 05/01/03 02:25 PM

Here is a few more scriptures Donovan.

Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
Psalms 68:18 Thou hast ascended on high, thou hast led captivity captive: thou hast received gifts for men; yea, for the rebellious also, that the LORD God might dwell among them.
Isaiah 49:24 Shall the prey be taken from the mighty, or the lawful captive delivered?
Isaiah 49:25 But thus saith the LORD, Even the captives of the mighty shall be taken away, and the prey of the terrible shall be delivered: for I will contend with him that contendeth with thee, and I will save thy children.
Isaiah 53:12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.
Matthew 12:29 Or else how can one enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house.
Luke 10:18 And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.
Luke 11:22 But when a stronger than he shall come upon him, and overcome him, he taketh from him all his armour wherein he trusted, and divideth his spoils.
John 12:31 Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.
John 16:11 Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.
Ephesians 4:8 Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.
Colossians 2:15 And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.
Hebrews 2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;
Revelation 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
2 Corinthians 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.
Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
John 12:32 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.
Acts 2:23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
Acts 2:24 Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it.
Acts 2:32 This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses.
Acts 2:33 Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear.
Acts 2:34 For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,
Acts 2:35 Until I make thy foes thy footstool.
Acts 2:36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ.
John 3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 05/01/03 05:33 PM

John, I appreciate your emphasis on the nature of God's redemptive love as demonstrated in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, His only begotten Son, and God forbid that I should underestimate it. Truly one of the most important things we can learn from God's love is that it sets us free to serve Him with our whole being. Thank you Jesus.

But it's not the only thing we can learn from God's love. The wrath of God is love. It was first displayed when Satan and his followers were cast out of Heaven. It was seen again when Adam and Eve were driven from the Garden of Eden. And again and again at the Flood, Babel, Sodom and Gomorrah, Egyptians, Cananites, Nineveh, etc. When the cup of iniquity is full God does not hesitate to pour out His wrath.

Upon the cross of Calvary Jesus did not suffer the wrath of God as a sinless saint. He suffered the fate of hopeless sinners, the same fate of those who must perish in the lake of fire. This wrath was unmixed with mercy. It was poured out upon Jesus in full strength. He felt the awful weight of God's wrath toward sin and hopeless sinners, as though He was guilty of the unpardonable sin, as though He despised the love of God, and as though He loved sin more than righteousness and salvation.

I realize you believe these ideas and insights are heretical and that they misrepresent the wrath of God. I am sorry, but I cannot believe otherwise. I do not agree with how you interpret the Bible and SOP quotes I shared earlier. I believe Jesus suffered the wrath of God in the same way I would have suffered in the lake of fire. He came to take my place, to pay the penalty for my sin, to deliver me from the lake of fire.

Yes, He also came to show me how to have faith in my heavenly Father, so that I can experience His love and goodness, so that the Holy Spirit can empower me to live without sinning, so that I can honor and glorify Him. All these things are true and awesome. But they do not take away from the fact that Jesus took my place in the lake of fire.

I deserve to die eternally because I have sinned and come short of the glory of God. In fact, none of the human race deserved to be born because our first parents should have died in the day they ate the forbidden fruit. But the plan of salvation gave us and God probationary time to accept Jesus as our personal Saviour. To reject Jesus is accept the death penalty for sinning.

Given everything God has done to save us from sin and the second death - if we reject Jesus we deserve to die the most horrible of all deaths. To sin in the face of salvation, which cost God so much, is to crucify Jesus afresh. Anybody who loves sin more than Jesus, anybody who carelessly crucifies Jesus daily, anybody who doesn't think twice about killing Jesus over and over again - deserves to punish in the lake of fire. A speedy, painless death is too good for them. It would be an insult to the love of God. And it would threaten the eternal security of the universe.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 05/03/03 05:02 PM

I am happy Mike that you agree that the 'love of God' (as I have presented it here) is redemptive and is demonstrated in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, His only begotten Son, and that truly it is that that sets us free. I am also happy that you agree that the faith of the Son (as we partake of that faith) establishes in us the means whereby we can experience the reality of our Father's love and goodness. That such faith makes our heart his dwelling place so that he may dwell in us by his spirit, so that we may have his mind and heart and live his glory. This is eternal life.

This 'love of God' that is redemptive, and saves us from sin and death, has been further defined in the scriptures to be the fruit of his spirit and his glory. It is this glory that we have all come short of, but he has sent us his Son that he may restore us back to his glory.
    Galatians 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
    Ephesians 5:9 (For the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness and truth;)

    Exodus 33:22 And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by… 6 And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth
Christ came into this world and suffered the 'sinner's mind' (sinner's view of God and righteousness) so that we may have 'his mind' (the Son's view of God and his righteousness).
Thus he bore our sin and guilt, our infirmities, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him. Thus he suffered the wrath of sinners that we might perceive the love of God, so that we may be called the children of God.
    Matthew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
This redemptive love of God then is the love of God that sent his Son into the world so that the world through him might be saved. It is this love that he lived (his Father living in him). It is to this love that Christ bore witness to. It is of this love that he preached the gospel of the kingdom of heaven. It is to this love of the kingdom of heaven that he calls us to.
    John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

It is my prayer that all may enter into this faith and experience the love of God that saves and redeems a sinner and makes him a son.


-----------------------------------------


I am sorry that you still find the need to hold on to another kind of 'love of God' which is 'wrath of God' which is 'our guilt and shame'. That kind of 'love of God' has penalties, is not redemptive, does not save, and accuses and condemns. It should be evident that such was not the love of God that sent his Son into the world so that the world through him might be saved.

As the support for your thought in this matter is death, destruction and lake of fire, and not the first advent of Christ, his life and salvation, I have opened up a new topic for discussion called: "Wages of sin OR wages for sin!" I will be happy to discuss this topic there, and perhaps as we come to a resolution there we may return back here.

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 05/09/03 06:12 AM

Here's another quote to consider in light of this study. It says Jesus stepped between the wrath of God and man to save him from the sentence of the death pronounced upon him by God on account of sin.

1. The Son of God, undertaking to become the Redeemer of the race, placed Adam in a new relation to his Creator. He was still fallen; but a door of hope was opened to him. The wrath of God still hung over Adam, but the execution of the sentence of death was delayed, and the indignation of God was restrained, because Christ had entered upon the work of becoming man's Redeemer. Christ was to take the wrath of God, which in justice should fall upon man. He became a refuge for man, and, although man was indeed a criminal, deserving the wrath of God, yet he could, by faith in Christ, run into the refuge provided and be safe. In the midst of death there was life if man chose to accept it. The holy and infinite God, who dwelleth in light unapproachable, could no longer talk with man. No communication could now exist directly between man and his Maker. {Con 19.4}

God forbears, for a time, the full execution of the sentence of death pronounced upon man. Satan flattered himself that he had forever broken the link between heaven and earth. But in this he was greatly mistaken and disappointed. The Father had given the world into the hands of His Son for Him to redeem from the curse and the disgrace of Adam's failure and fall. Through Christ alone can man now find access to God. And through Christ alone will the Lord hold communication with man. {Con 20.1}
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 05/25/03 02:43 PM

Mike, you have successfully proven (what I have stated in my first post here) that the religion of today believes, attests to, teaches and contends for the fact that Christ saves man from God. Christ is the one that restrains the Father from executing us. Christ is the one who absorbs the Father's wrath. Christ redeems us from the Father. The Sinner must hide behind Christ to be safe from God. That man needed a refuge from God. That if we believe Christ we can be safe from God. That reconciliation was impossible for God would no longer talk with man. That Satan flatters himself (takes the credit) for having successfully caused God to be like that.

(Though you did not mention in it in your post.) That the problem was still not resolved on Calvary, but the wrath of God still hangs over man for Christ still today has to plead with the Father on behalf of the sinner, "my blood, my blood" so that he would "spare" them. God forbears, for a time, the full execution of the sentence of death pronounced upon man. (Who is to say that God will ever change his mind, for he is a God that changes not?)


What shall we say to these things; if God is against us, who can be for us.
And who shall be able to separate us from the wrath of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.


No sinner can ever be reconciled to God with this view of God, and Satan exults because he has successfully created a gulf between man and God. Christ came to reveal to us that the Father is the opposite of that.

    Hebrews 11:6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.

    John 16:26 At that day ye shall ask in my name: and I say not unto you, that I will pray the Father for you: For the Father himself loveth you.

Shalom

[ May 25, 2003, 10:01 AM: Message edited by: John Boskovic ]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 05/28/03 06:38 AM

John, please don't fault me for the EGW quote I shared above. But I do not see a contradiction between what she wrote and the scriptures you posted. The plan of salvation delays the wrath of God while the love of Jesus displays the love of God. Wrath and love are inseparable. God does not have to change His mind in order to save us from His wrath. He has promised to save us from His wrath in Christ. Probation is part of the package. We have nothing to fear if we comply with the conditions of salvation. And we have every reason to fear the wrath of God if we don't.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 07/02/03 07:07 PM

I can't remember whether or not the following text was used previously, however, it seems to be very clear to me:

quote:

1 Peter 2:24 Who his (referring to Christ) own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree (referring to the Cross of Calvary), that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.

The above verse tells me that, YES, Christ did bare our sins in His own body on the Cross.

If anybody thinks they can dispute this text, I would like to know how!
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 07/03/03 01:04 AM

Is it ok if I agree with you?

Isaiah 53
1 Who has believed our message and to whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed? 2 He grew up before him like a tender shoot, and like a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. 3 He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows, and familiar with suffering. Like one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we esteemed him not.

4 Surely he took up our infirmities and carried our sorrows, yet we considered him stricken by God, smitten by him, and afflicted. 5 But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed[b]. 6 We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all.

7 He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth. 8 By oppression and judgment he was taken away. And who can speak of his descendants? For he was cut off from the land of the living; [b]for the transgression of my people he was stricken
. 9 He was assigned a grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death, though he had done no violence, nor was any deceit in his mouth.

10 Yet it was the LORD's will to crush him and cause him to suffer, and though the LORD makes his life a guilt offering, he will see his offspring and prolong his days, and the will of the LORD will prosper in his hand. 11 After the suffering of his soul, he will see the light of life and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities. 12 Therefore I will give him a portion among the great, and he will divide the spoils with the strong, because he poured out his life unto death, and was numbered with the transgressors. For he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 07/03/03 02:49 PM

Hi Darryl and Lobo, yes we are agreed about that. Back on page nine of this thread I brought that out, I quote
quote:
Yes, he did bear our sins in his body from the beginning of his birth, for the scripture testifies;
    Hebrews 2:14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;
    15 And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.
    16 For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.
    17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.
    18 For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted.
    1 Peter 2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.
    Romans 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
It appears from what I have read in this forum that we are agreed that he did indeed bear our sins.

For what purpose did he bear our sin?
    • that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.
    • that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people
    • so that he is able to succour them that are tempted
    • that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.
    • condemned sin in the flesh:
But the next part is where there is much confusion. There is not one scripture that teaches that the wrath of God was upon Christ, nor that God's justice was satisfied/appeased, nor our penalty exacted on him.
    Isaiah 53:4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. 5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
Isaiah plainly states that man will think that it was the wrath of God, BUT he negates it and says that it is not!

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 07/04/03 06:40 AM

Jesus began bearing our sin in His sinful flesh from conception. He suffered being tempted by His fallen flesh nature. But He did not begin experiencing the penalty for our sin until He began drinking the cup of God's wrath in Gethsemane. He conquered the second death on our behalf when He drained the dregs of the cup on Calvary and cried - It is finished. Contrary to popular belief Jesus did not die the second death on the cross, instead He tasted and defeated it on our behalf. It is the scapegoat (Satan) who dies the second death with our sins in the lake of fire in our place.

That God is directly responsible for Jesus' experience with sin and the wrath of God while drinking the cup of trembling is clear from the fact His walk while bearing sin in His body changed radically the moment He began drinking the cup. His relationship to the sin He bore in His sinful flesh nature changed the second He began drinking the cup of God's wrath. So much did it change that Jesus cried - My God why have you forsaken Me. What accounts for this drastic change?
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 07/05/03 02:37 PM

By coming to dwell with us, Jesus was to reveal God both to men and to angels. He was the Word of God,--God's thought made audible. In His prayer for His disciples He says, "I have declared unto them Thy name,"--"merciful and gracious, long-suffering, and abundant in goodness and truth,"--"that the love wherewith Thou hast loved Me may be in them, and I in them." But not alone for His earthborn children was this revelation given. Our little world is the lesson book of the universe. God's wonderful purpose of grace, the mystery of redeeming love, is the theme into which "angels desire to look," and it will be their study throughout endless ages. Both the redeemed and the unfallen beings will find in the cross of Christ their science and their song. It will be seen that the glory shining in the face of Jesus is the glory of self-sacrificing love. In the light from Calvary it will be seen that the law of self-renouncing love is the law of life for earth and heaven; that the love which "seeketh not her own" has its source in the heart of God; and that in the meek and lowly One is manifested the character of Him who dwelleth in the light which no man can approach unto.

But turning from all lesser representations, we behold God in Jesus. Looking unto Jesus we see that it is the glory of our God to give. "I do nothing of Myself," said Christ; "the living Father hath sent Me, and I live by the Father." "I seek not Mine own glory," but the glory of Him that sent Me. John 8:28; 6:57; 8:50; 7:18. In these words is set forth the great principle which is the law of life for the universe. All things Christ received from God, but He took to give. So in the heavenly courts, in His ministry for all created beings: through the beloved Son, the Father's life flows out to all; through the Son it returns, in praise and joyous service, a tide of love, to the great Source of all. And thus through Christ the circuit of beneficence is complete, representing the character of the great Giver, the law of life.

In heaven itself this law was broken. Sin originated in self-seeking. Lucifer, the covering cherub, desired to be first in heaven. He sought to gain control of heavenly beings, to draw them away from their Creator, and to win their homage to himself. Therefore he misrepresented God, attributing to Him the desire for self-exaltation. With his own evil characteristics he sought to invest the loving Creator. Thus he deceived angels. Thus he deceived men. He led them to doubt the word of God, and to distrust His goodness. Because God is a God of justice and terrible majesty, Satan caused them to look upon Him as severe and unforgiving. Thus he drew men to join him in rebellion against God, and the night of woe settled down upon the world.

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 07/06/03 06:28 AM

John, thank you for sharing those quotes from DA 19-22. Indeed, the love of God is manifested in the life and death of Jesus Christ.

John
10:17 Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.

John
15:13 Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.

1 John
3:16 Hereby perceive we the love [of God], because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down [our] lives for the brethren.

"And all that He endured--the blood drops that flowed from His head, His hands, His feet, the agony that racked His frame, and the unutterable anguish that filled His soul at the hiding of His Father's face--speaks to each child of humanity, declaring, It is for thee that the Son of God consents to bear this burden of guilt; for thee He spoils the domain of death, and opens the gates of Paradise. He who stilled the angry waves and walked the foam-capped billows, who made devils tremble and disease flee, who opened blind eyes and called forth the dead to life,--offers Himself upon the cross as a sacrifice, and this from love to thee. He, the Sin Bearer, endures the wrath of divine justice, and for thy sake becomes sin itself. {DA 755.1}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 07/06/03 06:36 AM

Did Jesus endure the wrath of God in our place? Please carefully read the following quote:

In the Garden of Gethsemane Christ suffered in man's stead, and the human nature of the Son of God staggered under the terrible horror of the guilt of sin, until from His pale and quivering lips was forced the agonizing cry, "O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me." . . . Human nature would then and there have died under the horror of the sense of sin, had not an angel from heaven strengthened Him to bear the agony. . . . Christ was suffering the death that was pronounced upon the transgressors of God's law. {AG 168.2}

It is a fearful thing for the unrepenting sinner to fall into the hands of the living God. This is proved by the history of the destruction of the old world by a flood, by the record of the fire which fell from heaven and destroyed the inhabitants of Sodom. But never was this proved to so great an extent as in the agony of Christ, the Son of the infinite God, when he bore the wrath of God for a sinful world. It was in consequence of sin, the transgression of God's law, that the Garden of Gethsemane has become pre-eminently the place of suffering to a sinful world. No sorrow, no agony, can measure with that which was endured by the Son of God. {AG 168.3}

Man has not been made a sin-bearer, and he will never know the horror of the curse of sin which the Saviour bore. No sorrow can bear any comparison with the sorrow of Him upon whom the wrath of God fell with overwhelming force. Human nature can endure but a limited amount of test and trial. The finite can only endure the finite measure, and human nature succumbs; but the nature of Christ had a greater capacity for suffering. . . . The agony which Christ endured, broadens, deepens, and gives a more extended conception of the character of sin, and the character of the retribution which God will bring upon those who continue in sin. The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ to the repenting, believing sinner. {AG 168.4}

The sword of justice was unsheathed, and the wrath of God against iniquity rested upon man's substitute, Jesus Christ, the only begotten of the Father. {AG 168.5}
Posted By: John Boskovic

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 07/05/03 08:15 PM

Therefore Sartan misrepresented God, attributing to Him the desire for self-exaltation. With his own evil characteristics he sought to invest the loving Creator. Thus he deceived angels. Thus he deceived men. He led them to doubt the word of God, and to distrust His goodness. Because God is a God of justice and terrible majesty, Satan caused them to look upon Him as severe and unforgiving. Thus he drew men to join him in rebellion against God, and the night of woe settled down upon the world.


"the horror of the curse of sin which the Saviour bore."

That is indeed what the Saviour endured. All that you have quoted above is indeed that darkness which Satan causes to be looked upon and seen in God, this was the work of Satan, and as you quoted.
    The agony which Christ endured, broadens, deepens, and gives a more extended conception of the character of sin, and the character of the retribution which God will bring upon those who continue in sin. The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ to the repenting, believing sinner. {AG 168.4}
In this the character of sin was revealed. But that was not God's work, it was the work of darkness. But in the end the lost will experience it; For with what judgment you judge you shall be judged.
    Luke 19:22 And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow:
As one regards God, so shall it be unto him. Let us now while there is still time of obtaining mercy, obtain it and become partakers of it, so that we may judge with God's righteous and true judgment and be partakers of God's glory. He who partakes of God's judgment shall have nothing to fear, for he is filled with faith and sees God character in heaven's light, the light of love, the light of life.

Shalom
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 07/05/03 10:09 PM

John, there is no contradiction in the quotes we've been sharing. Would you agree? Satan is trying to make it seem as though God is severe and devoid of mercy and love. Yet the truth is - God is love and loving. And no less loving when He punishes those who cling to sin when they might have been saved. The wrath of God is love.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Did Christ bear our sin/guilt? A dialogue with SDA's who say 'No'. - 07/06/03 12:46 AM

Seeing we are agreed on the answer to this topic, I am going to close it down and create a new topic that will focus on the wrath of God aspect of this topic.

See you there, I hope. [Smile]