2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law

Posted By: dedication

2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/01/14 06:20 AM

"From the very beginning of the great controversy in heaven it has been Satan's purpose to overthrow the law of God." GC 582

WHY?

Because God's law is the foundation of his government. To overthrow it would be to overthrow God's government.

The law expresses the moral integrity of the cosmos and to overthrow that law would be to overthrow the moral order of creation.

But what is morality?

Morality involves the power of thinking and the ability to choose. Morality differentiates between right and wrong.

But what is right and what is wrong?

Is it love -- just love?

But what defines love?
"Love can't exist without freedom, moral freedom. And moral freedom can't exist without law, moral law".

Quote:
The law of God is as sacred as Himself. It is a revelation of His will, a transcript of His character, the expression of divine love and wisdom. Through the ages that law has been preserved as the highest standard of morality. Not all the inventions of science or the imaginations of fruitful minds have been able to discover one essential duty not covered by this code. {ST, February 1, 1910 par. 6}
God's law is the security of life and property, of peace and happiness. It was given to secure our present and eternal good. A thoughtful kindness runs through every enactment. Each commandment is an enactment of mercy, love, and saving power. {ST, February 1, 1910 par. 7}



Link to Introduction to this quarters lessons
Posted By: Daryl

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/01/14 05:58 PM

TY for creating this thread. smile
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/01/14 08:23 PM

Lesson 1

Laws in Christ's Day.

The lesson lists several different sets of laws in existence in Christ's day.

A. Roman law
---issues of government
---behavior in domestic arena
---social codes

B. Mosaic Law
---Civic laws governing Jewish society
---Ceremonial centering around the sanctuary and its services
---Moral law based mainly upon the ten commandments

C. Rabbinic Law
---laws interpreting and adding details to the Mosaic law.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/01/14 08:25 PM

Here also is the link to Lesson #1:

http://www.ssnet.org/lessons/14b/less01.html#sab
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/01/14 08:29 PM

Discussion Question

Long before Moses penned the laws that were to govern Israel, Egyptians, Babylonians and other societies had their systems of societal laws that were in some cases similar in content to some of God's laws.
From where do societies get their sense of good and evil?
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/01/14 08:49 PM

Some of my thoughts pertaining to the discussion question.

In the garden of Eden, God communicated directly with Adam and Eve, thus they were acquainted with God's ways.

After the fall this statement was made:

Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed;

"God pledged Himself to introduce into the hearts of human beings a new principle—a hatred of sin, of deception, of pretense, of everything that bears the marks of Satan’s guile."
Manuscript 72, 1904


This enmity against sin is the work of the Holy Spirit in the minds of people, for Paul writes:

Romans 2:14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
2:15 Which show the work of the law written in their hearts,


It is the work of the Holy Spirit to write God's law upon our hearts and minds. (see Jer. 31:33, Romans 8 and Heb. 8:10)



Yet the human heart is deceitful according to scripture, and can quench the true voice of the Holy Spirit, rationalizing evil, till they call good,evil, and evil, good, thus God gave mankind his law in written form as well, for the standard by which to know what is good and what is evil.
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/02/14 02:04 AM

Why does the Old Testament refer to the commandments as a "Covenant"?

Some Bible students have noticed that the language used in the Ten Commandment is the language of a covenant.

What is the difference between commandments and a covenant?
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/02/14 08:14 AM

Good question.

I well remember my first Bible study given me by a person who left the church back in the 1970's. It went something like this.

Exodus 34:28 And he (Moses) was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread, nor drink water. And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten commandments.

Hebrews 8:13 In that he said, A new covenant, he has made the first old. Now that which decays and waxes old is ready to vanish away.

John 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.


Thus he maintained -- the old ten commands have vanished away and we are now under the new commandments of "love".

It is a popular teaching. Yet it is a teaching that is used mainly by people who wish to get away from the Sabbath! Ever notice that? I mean, Christian denominations are having special days called "ten commandment days". They are fighting to have the ten commandments posted in schools and court rooms. So what is really going on? It's basically a battle against the 7th day, Sabbath!

Now the ten commandments are very much part of the covenant. Paul makes several statements that breakers of the commandments cannot inherit the kingdom of God. (1 Cor. 6:9-10, Galatians 5:19-21)
The covenant was given because
God's law was broken -- sin was everywhere.
It was given so covenant breakers could find forgiveness -- Christ took their punishment,
and be restored back into image of God -- living righteously.

The ten commandments remain the foundation of God's government, the standard of right and wrong. They are part of the everlasting covenant.

So the question is really -- what is the role of the commandments in the new covenant, is it different from the old covenant?

Without Christ, the law brings death, for all have sinned, transgressing the law, and the wages of sin is death.
But Christ has paid that price at Calvary, and He offers us life. We are freed from the condemnation of the law through Christ, but what now? What role do the commandments have now?

We can look at almost identical verses in Jeremiah and Hebrews.

Jeremiah 31:31-33

Quote:
“Behold, days are coming,” declares the LORD, “when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them,” declares the LORD. “But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days,” declares the LORD, “I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.”


At Sinai, God wrote his commandments on two tablets of stone. The people declared, "all God has commanded we will do", thinking they themselves could do it. They of course failed.

Yet when people turn to God and give their lives into His control, they partake of the new covenant in which God has promised:

"“I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.”

Thus the law is internalized -- that is, it becomes part of our very nature. Through the work of the Holy Spirit and our co-operation with His leading a transformation takes place in the character and life of the believer.

2 Cor.3: 3 "written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshly tables of the heart."
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/02/14 10:20 AM

Originally Posted By: Johann
Why does the Old Testament refer to the commandments as a "Covenant"?

Some Bible students have noticed that the language used in the Ten Commandment is the language of a covenant.

What is the difference between commandments and a covenant?


The commandments are part of God's covenant relationship with us. When we enter His covenant, we obey those commandments. The commandments are written in future tense. This means each of them is essentially a promise God makes with us, that when we enter into this covenant relationship with Him, we will cease to do those things which are sinful.

Picking out some of them for an example, and for the sake of brevity:

"You will not have any other gods...."
...
"You will not take the name of your Lord God in vain...."
...
"On the seventh day you will not do any work...."
...
"You will will not murder."
"You will not commit adultery."
"You will not steal."
...

Each one is a promise. The whole is a covenant, and God keeps His promises. We have only to keep our side of the bargain, and the covenant is sure to be fulfilled--Christ's character will be seen in us.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/03/14 08:49 AM

Read Matthew 19:16-19, Romans 13:8-10, and James 2:8-12. What do these verses say about the role that the Ten Commandments played in the lives of those who are followers of Christ?


How do we connect "love" with "commandments"?

Can one function without the other in a true Christians life?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/03/14 08:05 PM

The fruit of the Spirit is command keeping - love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance. The Sermon on the Mount is a wonderful description of command keeping.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/05/14 05:40 AM

The Holy Spirit leads people into keeping God's commandments. And when we delight ourselves in the ways of God's righteousness, we will also have the fruit of the Spirit which is love, joy, peace, kindness, etc.

Yet, love, as a word by itself does not really define God's law. We need God's law to define love!

The "law of the flesh" breaks those commandments even when they claim they are acting in love.
Ever hear the excuses of people caught in adultery? "Oh, but we love each other, it's so beautiful, how can such delightful love be wrong?"

But God's commandments defines love.
How can such adulterous love be beautiful to the partner who is being betrayed, and if children are involved, they generally suffer due to the tensions created in the home. What is beautiful about a broken promise, a trust betrayed, a home broken?


Galatians defines the fruits of the spirit, but notice what those fruits are contrasted with.
It becomes pretty obvious that those who walk in the flesh in contempt of God's commandments will not enjoy the fruits of the Holy spirit.

Quote:
Galatians 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
5:20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
5:21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
5:23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
5:24 And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
5:25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/05/14 09:13 PM

Amen. The link between love and law and obedience is beautiful. "Love is the fulfilling of the law." Rom 13:10.

Deuteronomy 11:1 Therefore thou shalt love the LORD thy God, and keep his charge, and his statutes, and his judgments, and his commandments, alway.

Deuteronomy 30:16 In that I command thee this day to love the LORD thy God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgments, that thou mayest live and multiply: and the LORD thy God shall bless thee in the land whither thou goest to possess it.

John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

John 14:21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.

John 15:10 If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.

John 15:17 These things I command you, that ye love one another.

1 John
5:2-3 By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/06/14 01:23 AM

And if you don't keep His commandments - he will kill you! Watch out!
Posted By: Daryl

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/06/14 01:53 AM

ADMIN HAT ON!!!!!

I want to make it clear that this is not a "Does God Kill?" thread, therefore, any further posts going in that direction will be removed.

ADMIN HAT OFF!!!!!
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/06/14 02:35 AM

We had a good Sabbath School Discussion this morning. Hopefully the rest of you also enjoyed the fellowship and discussion in your churches.

The second lesson for this quarter is called

Christ and the law of Moses.
You can find lesson two by clicking HERE

Memory Verse:
"If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me." John 5:46

I just wish Jesus talk with the two men on the road to Emmaus would have been recorded.
Luke 24:26 Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?
24:27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.


Could we construct a Bible study from the books of Moses that outlined the coming Christ?
Posted By: Daryl

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/06/14 02:08 PM

Originally Posted By: dedication
Could we construct a Bible study from the books of Moses that outlined the coming Christ?

Sounds like a new thread idea. smile
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/10/14 05:00 AM

Sunday's lesson begins with a subject of circumcision.

The point is made that Mary and Joseph dutifully followed all the prescribed rituals in the Mosaic law for new mothers and their baby boy.

Yet the question is bound to arise --
Why would God require such a sign as the sign of the covenant with Abraham and his descendants?

Quote:
9 And God said to Abraham: “As for you, you shall keep My covenant, you and your descendants after you throughout their generations. 10 This is My covenant which you shall keep, between Me and you and your descendants after you: Every male child among you shall be circumcised; 11 and you shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskins, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between Me and you. 12 He who is eight days old among you shall be circumcised, every male child in your generations, he who is born in your house or bought with money from any foreigner who is not your descendant. 13 He who is born in your house and he who is bought with your money must be circumcised, and My covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.



It's interesting that this "sign" was given to Abraham AFTER he had begotten a son, Ishmael, by taking a young servant woman and "doing it his way", rather than trusting in God to give him that promised son.

There always seems to be a tendency for humans to "do it my way". Yet, scriptures make it plain that we cannot save ourselves. God takes the initiative, God provides the means.

The promised heir was born to Sarah, who was well passed the child bearing stage. A miracle. And for all generations thereafter, the sign depicted that it is God Who provided the promised Son.

Years later -- the Messiah came, again a miracle birth.

God provided a Redeemer.

Quote:
the birth of the child of Abraham, and that of Mary, was to teach a great spiritual truth, a truth that we are slow to learn and ready to forget. In ourselves we are incapable of doing any good thing; but that which we cannot do will be wrought by the power of God in every submissive and believing soul. It was through faith that the child of promise was given. It is through faith that spiritual life is begotten, and we are enabled to do the works of righteousness. {DA 98.3}


Circumcision as practiced back then is no longer required.

Yet there is a circumcision which needs to take place in our lives -- the circumcision of the heart.

Through the Holy Spirit, malice, envy, covetousness and selfishness are cut away, while peace, joy, faith, hope,
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/11/14 07:14 AM

Tuesday's lesson April 8, 2014
Jesus in the Temple

THE BIBLE STORY
And the child grew, and waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom: and the grace of God was upon him. Now his parents went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of the passover. And when he was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the feast. And when they had fulfilled the days, as they returned, the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem; and Joseph and his mother knew not of it. But they, supposing him to have been in the company, went a day’s journey; and they sought him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance. And when they found him not, they turned back again to Jerusalem, seeking him. And it came to pass, that after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions. And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers. And when they saw him, they were amazed: and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing. And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father’s business? And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them. And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them: but his mother kept all these sayings in her heart. And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man. Luke 2:40-52

SOME INTERESTING REMARKS FROM DESIRE OF AGES:

"With most of the people in the days of Christ, the observance of this feast had degenerated into formalism. But what was its significance to the Son of God! {DA 77.2}
For the first time the child Jesus looked upon the temple. He saw the white-robed priests performing their solemn ministry. He beheld the bleeding victim upon the altar of sacrifice. With the worshipers He bowed in prayer, while the cloud of incense ascended before God. He witnessed the impressive rites of the paschal service. Day by day He saw their meaning more clearly. Every act seemed to be bound up with His own life. New impulses were awakening within Him. Silent and absorbed, He seemed to be studying out a great problem. The mystery of His mission was opening to the Saviour. {DA 78.1}
Rapt in the contemplation of these scenes, He did not remain beside His parents. He sought to be alone. When the paschal services were ended, He still lingered in the temple courts; and when the worshipers departed from Jerusalem, He was left behind. {DA 78.2}

At that day an apartment connected with the temple was devoted to a sacred school, after the manner of the schools of the prophets. Here leading rabbis with their pupils assembled, and hither the child Jesus came. Seating Himself at the feet of these grave, learned men, He listened to their instruction. As one seeking for wisdom, He questioned these teachers in regard to the prophecies, and to events then taking place that pointed to the advent of the Messiah. {DA 78.4}

The words of Jesus had moved their hearts as they had never before been moved by words from human lips. God was seeking to give light to those leaders in Israel, and He used the only means by which they could be reached. In their pride they would have scorned to admit that they could receive instruction from anyone. If Jesus had appeared to be trying to teach them, they would have disdained to listen. But they flattered themselves that they were teaching Him, or at least testing His knowledge of the Scriptures. The youthful modesty and grace of Jesus disarmed their prejudices. Unconsciously their minds were opened to the word of God, and the Holy Spirit spoke to their hearts. {DA 80.2}

They could not but see that their expectation in regard to the Messiah was not sustained by prophecy; but they would not renounce the theories that had flattered their ambition. They would not admit that they had misapprehended the Scriptures they claimed to teach. From one to another passed the inquiry, How hath this youth knowledge, having never learned? The light was shining in darkness; but "the darkness apprehended it not." John 1:5, R. V. {DA 80.3}
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/11/14 07:41 AM

Questions from the Quarterly:

HOW does this story help to illustrate the decidedly Jewish character of the Gospels and how central the religion was to all that took place?

The Jewish rituals all pointed to Christ and the gospel. Though the earthly priests seemed to have lost this connection, Jesus, as a child of but 12 years, was being awakened to His mission by attending this feast, observing and participating in the rituals.

We too, by looking at the Jewish ceremonial laws which God gave them, can find deeper meaning in the sacrifice at Calvary and the Priestly ministry of Jesus in the heavenly sanctuary.


How is it significant that this story took place during the Passover?

The Jewish feasts give an outline of Christ's ministry for lost mankind.
The Passover is symbolic of Christ's sacrifice.

Phil. 2:7-8 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.

As He watched the Passover sacrifice being offered, the realization began to dawn that 21 years later, He, Himself would be that Passover Lamb.


FOR how many days were Jesus' parents looking to find him?

Three days -- probably parts of three days. When they discovered Him missing after a days journey from Jerusalem, the day they traveled back, and found Him the third morning.

This reminds us of the three days when the disciples thought they had lost Jesus. When He was taken and crucified, the day He spent in the tomb, and rose in triumph the third morning.

What does Jesus reply to His parents tell us what must have top priority in our lives?

Though obedient to His parents, His first priority was obedience to His heavenly Father.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/13/14 07:12 AM

THIRD LESSON April 12-19

Christ and Religious Tradition

http://www.ssnet.org/lessons/14b/less03.html

What is tradition?

It is defined as the transmission of customs or beliefs from generation to generation.

Are "traditions" and the "commandments of men" the same thing?

This is a question that often comes up.
There are some who look to long established truths and practices -- which are, according to the definition, "traditions", as being the same as the commandments of men.

Yet when Jesus says "In vain you worship me teaching for doctrines the traditions of men" was He speaking of Biblical truths long established?
Or was he talking about human rules that were actually in contradiction to the Biblical truths?

The context in which Jesus says these words, tells us the temple authorities had made a law that excused someone who bequeathed his inheritance to the temple from taking care of His parents. Thus a human command had made one of God's commandments (the 5th) void.

Both laws could be considered "traditions" as both were long standing. But one was based on human commands, while the other was based on God's commands.


Paul uses the word "traditions" twice,
once in a positive manner and the other time in negative manner.

The negative:
Galatians 1:13-14 I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it: And profited in the Jews' religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.

The positive:
2 Thess. 2:15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/13/14 09:04 AM

What is EGW referring to in this quote:

Quote:
In reviewing our past history, having traveled over every step of advance to our present standing, I can say, Praise God! As I see what God has wrought, I am filled with astonishment, and with confidence in Christ as leader. We have nothing to fear for the future, except as we shall forget the way the Lord has led us, and His teaching in our past history. {CET 204.1}


And how does it compare to this quote:

Quote:
"We are not to inquire, What is the practice of men? or, What is the custom of the world? We are not to ask, How shall I act in order to have the approval of men? or, What will the world tolerate? The question of intense interest to every soul is, What has God said? We are to read his word and obey it, not swerving one jot or tittle from its requirements, but acting irrespective of human traditions and jurisdiction."{RH, October 1, 1895 par. 3}
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/14/14 07:15 AM

Multiplicity of rules.

Rules can benefit in many ways when a problem must be met, or confusion needs to be redirected. Programs run smoother when everyone abides by the same rules.

Yet rules can become traditions and be elevated to a point where they become a burden or even in conflict with the principles of God's law.

Why do we need so many rules?

The Pharisees in Christ's day had a great many rules.
On the one hand they were the ones who resisted the infiltration of Hellenization and tried to keep the Jewish "church" distinct. "The name Pharisees is derived from the Hebrew paras, which means “to separate.” In an age when many Jews had become greatly influenced by pagan cultures, the Pharisees saw it as their duty to ensure that every Jewish male was taught the law."

What was Jesus concern for the Pharisees?

Matthew 23

His concern was that they had a lot of rules to govern the outward actions, but the heart was not in tune with God.

Basically to concern is when the heart is not right with God and church becomes a mere form without the power, that a host of rules have to be made to govern the church. The carnal heart always looks for a loop hole, so a new rule has to be made to cover that loop hole!

But when a person is "born again" and committed to Christ, they live by the principle of the law. It is written in the hearts and minds by the holy spirit. They don't need a magnitude of rules.

Another problem in a host of rules is that people who meticulously follow them, think it's their ticket to heaven, and they aren't searching for Him.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/17/14 12:33 AM

An EGW quote from Wednesday's study:
Quote:

The substitution of the precepts of men for the commandments of God has not ceased. Even among Christians are found institutions and usages that have no better foundation than the traditions of the fathers. Such institutions, resting upon mere human authority, have supplanted those of divine appointment. Men cling to their traditions, and revere their customs, and cherish hatred against those who seek to show them their error. . . . In place of the authority of the so-called fathers of the church, God bids us accept the word of the eternal Father, the Lord of heaven and earth.-Ellen G. White, The Desire of Ages, p. 398.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/20/14 02:29 AM

FOURTH LESSON April 19-25
Christ and the Law in the Sermon on the Mount

Click here for lesson #4

The Sermon on the Mount covers four basic sections:

1. The Beatitudes (Matt. 5:1-12)
2. Christianity is compared with light and salt (Matt. 5:13-16)
3. Magnifying the Law (Matt. 5:17-48)
4. Christian Behavior (Matt. 6 and 7)


The lesson focuses mainly on the third section:
Magnifying the Law (Matt. 5:17-48
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/20/14 02:53 AM

Some questions that came up in discussions concerning this chapter:

Matt. 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach [them], the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

Doesn't this say even those who break the commandments and teach others to break them will still be in the kingdom of heaven, they just won't have high position, but be among the "least"? In a lower level in heaven?

.


EGW comments: "Whosoever . . . shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so,
he shall be called the least in the kingdom
of heaven." Matthew 5:19 That is, he shall have no place therein. For he who willfully breaks one commandment, does not, in spirit and truth, keep any of them. "Whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all." James 2:10.
It is not the greatness of the act of disobedience that constitutes sin, but the fact of variance from God's expressed will in the least particular; for this shows that there is yet communion between the soul and sin. The heart is divided in its service. There is a virtual denial of God, a rebellion against the laws of His government. {MB 51.2-3}
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/20/14 03:40 AM

Does temper equal murder?
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/20/14 05:10 AM

Originally Posted By: Johann
Does temper equal murder?


Matt. 5:21 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
5:22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.


From Bible Answers, got questions:
Quote:
Murder begins in the heart, and epithets such as “raca” (empty head, stupid) are signs that there is hatred lurking within. The hatred that causes one person to hurl insults is the same hatred that causes another to commit murder. The attitude of the heart is the same, and it’s this attitude that makes a person morally guilty before God.

Jesus not only warns us against expressing unrighteous anger, which can lead to murder, but clearly commands that disparaging denunciations and name-calling be avoided. Such abusive words reveal the true intents of one’s heart and mind for which we will be held in judgment: “I the LORD search the heart and examine the mind, to reward each person according to their conduct, according to what their deeds deserve” (Jeremiah 17:10; cf. 1 Samuel 16:7; 1 Chronicles 28:9).


An uncontrolled temper can very easily fall into all three categories warned against in this Bible passage.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/20/14 10:01 PM

Last week we studied some about the Pharisees who were very zealous for the law. With all the Greek Hellenization and other "worldly" things entering the Jewish Community, these Pharisees wanted to stay with God's law. However they made so many rules as to how to keep that law, that it became an unbearable burden. Jesus worked to unravel God's commandments from these traditions.

In this weeks lesson Jesus makes a very strong statement.
Not one jot or tittle was to be removed from the law.
And
Unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the Pharisees you can't enter the kingdom of heaven. Matt. 5:20

What important lesson do these passages teach about true obedience to the law?


Quote:
"The righteousness of Christ, as a pure white pearl, has no defect, no stain, no guilt. This righteousness may be ours. Salvation, with its blood-bought, inestimable treasures, is the pearl of great price. {FLB 111.5}
The thought that the righteousness of Christ is imputed to us, not because of any merit on our part, but as a free gift from God, is a precious thought. The enemy of God and man is not willing that this truth should be clearly presented; for he knows that if the people receive it fully, his power will be broken. {FLB 111.6}
Only the covering which Christ Himself has provided can make us meet to appear in God's presence. This covering, the robe of His own righteousness, Christ will put upon every repenting, believing soul. "I counsel thee," He says, "to buy of me . . . white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed. . . ." Revelation 3:18. {FLB 113.2}
By His perfect obedience He has made it possible for every human being to obey God's commandments. When we submit ourselves to Christ, the heart is united with His heart, the will is merged in His will, the mind becomes one with His mind, the thoughts are brought into captivity to Him; we live His life. This is what it means to be clothed with the garment of His righteousness. Then as the Lord looks upon us He sees, not the fig-leaf garment, not the nakedness and deformity of sin, but His own robe of righteousness, which is perfect obedience to the law of Jehovah. {FLB 113.4}

While God can be just, and yet justify the sinner through the merits of Christ, no man can cover his soul with the garments of Christ's righteousness while practicing known sins, or neglecting known duties. {FLB 115.4}
The apostle James saw that dangers would arise in presenting the subject of justification by faith, and he labored to show that genuine faith cannot exist without corresponding works. The experience of Abraham is presented. "Seest thou," he says, "how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?" James 2:22. Thus genuine faith does a genuine work in the believer. Faith and obedience bring a solid, valuable experience. {FLB 115.5}
Faith and works are two oars which we must use equally if we [would] press our way up the stream against the current of unbelief. {FLB 115.6}
The so-called faith that does not work by love and purify the soul will not justify any man. "Ye see," says the apostle, "how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only." James 2:24. Abraham believed God. How do we know that he believed? His works testified to the character of his faith, and his faith was accounted to him for righteousness. We need the faith of Abraham in our day, to lighten the darkness that gathers around us, shutting out the sweet sunlight of God's love, and dwarfing spiritual growth. Our faith should be prolific of good works; for faith without works is dead. {FLB 115
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/24/14 08:33 AM

At least some of the Pharisees were blameless outwardly. If we are to "exceed" that level of righteousness, Jesus must not have been talking about our outward compliance. Right?
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/25/14 12:35 PM

This lesson starts with Matthew 5:17. "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill."

The verbs are the action words in a sentence. Here the verbs are "think" and "come" and "destroy" and "fulfill", so there is plenty of action. It is amazing to see what some of these action words are in the original Greek of the Gospel.

The lessons have shown us that the original word for "law" is "nomos". In Greek there is also a verb based on nomos which is "nomitzo" but here rendered "nomisete" which is the 2 aorist tense of the verb. The translators have conveniently translated the word with the English word "think" while in Greek it has a much richer meaning because in English there is no such word as "make it a law - or a custom - in your proclamation" The aorist tense which is rare in any other languages than ancient Greek, denotes that it is not only an action in the past, but something that is still effective.

Jesus had not come to make new laws or customs, but to reveal the deeper meaning of the basic laws and rules.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/25/14 06:23 PM

Originally Posted By: Johann
This lesson starts with Matthew 5:17. "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill."

The verbs are the action words in a sentence. Here the verbs are "think" and "come" and "destroy" and "fulfill", so there is plenty of action. It is amazing to see what some of these action words are in the original Greek of the Gospel.

The lessons have shown us that the original word for "law" is "nomos". In Greek there is also a verb based on nomos which is "nomitzo" but here rendered "nomisete" which is the 2 aorist tense of the verb. The translators have conveniently translated the word with the English word "think" while in Greek it has a much richer meaning because in English there is no such word as "make it a law - or a custom - in your proclamation" The aorist tense which is rare in any other languages than ancient Greek, denotes that it is not only an action in the past, but something that is still effective.

Jesus had not come to make new laws or customs, but to reveal the deeper meaning of the basic laws and rules.



It's characteristic of SDA that they, extremely sensitive about and defensive of LAW AND ORDER (indeed, they are zealous for it), see every mention of LAW as being ultimately about the fourth commandment of the Decalogue and how righteous they are.

Jesus was NOT talking about LAW and ORDER, but saying in effect, "Think not that I am come to CAST ASIDE THE OLD TESTAMENT AND START A NEW RELIGION: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." He came to be the King of the Jews, to inherit the Throne of his father, David; and to fulfill the promise of the Messiah to the world, to be the Savior of humanity.

He was going to build on the foundations set by all those who had gone before him, to sweep aside the dross of modern interpretation and make the old ways shine again. That's all. "Therefore whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock: and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it did not fall, for it was founded on the rock." (Mat. 7:24-25)

///
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/25/14 07:22 PM

How very "SDA" of you to say that.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/25/14 07:22 PM

If one sin is cherished in the soul, or one wrong practice retained in the life, the whole being is contaminated. The man becomes an instrument of unrighteousness. – {DA 313.1}
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/25/14 11:06 PM

Quote:
It's characteristic of SDA that they, extremely sensitive about and defensive of LAW AND ORDER (indeed, they are zealous for it), see every mention of LAW as being ultimately about the fourth commandment of the Decalogue and how righteous they are.

It's characteristic of non-SDAs that they, acting defensive about the law (trying to protect or justify themselves for not observing it), see every positive mention of the law as being ultimately about anything but the decalogue. smile
The law (the decalogue) and the gospel constitute the center of the Old Testament (as well as of the New). So yes, the passage does refer to the decalogue.

Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/26/14 05:03 PM

Many look at God's commands as impeding their happiness, as if God is keeping away something that would be for their good. They do not trust God's love and wisdom. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that saving faith leads to obedience and that disobedience leads to death, even under grace.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/26/14 06:53 PM

Joshua
22:5 But take diligent heed to do the commandment and the law, which Moses the servant of the LORD charged you, to love the LORD your God, and to walk in all his ways, and to keep his commandments, and to cleave unto him, and to serve him with all your heart and with all your soul.

Psalm
119:97 O how love I thy law! it [is] my meditation all the day.
119:113 I hate [vain] thoughts: but thy law do I love.
119:163 I hate and abhor lying: [but] thy law do I love.
119:165 Great peace have they which love thy law: and nothing shall offend them.

Romans
13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if [there be] any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love [is] the fulfilling of the law.

James
2:8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/26/14 06:55 PM

It's difficult too diss on the law when the Bible speaks so highly of it. Can't imagine which one of the ten commandments I'd rather live without.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/27/14 04:39 AM

Our next study is on Christ and the Sabbath:

http://www.ssnet.org/lessons/14b/less05.html
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/27/14 03:54 PM

Quote:
Genesis 2:1-3

King James Version (KJV)

2 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.

3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.


This text tells us that God completed His creative work on the seventh day. This makes the sanctity of the seventh day a part of creation and not an addition to the creation.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/27/14 06:04 PM

How would you answer this part from Sunday's study?
Quote:
Compare the two Sabbath commandments in Exodus 20:8-11 and Deuteronomy 5:12-15. In what ways do these relate to the theory that the Sabbath is not only for Jews?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/27/14 06:50 PM

Jesus created the seventh-day. It's not merely the day after the sixth-day. He created it for a specific purpose - to be observed as a Sabbath day. And what a special day! Yesterday is proof. Had a wonderful day. Thank you, Jesus.
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/27/14 09:22 PM

Originally Posted By: Daryl
How would you answer this part from Sunday's study?
Quote:
Compare the two Sabbath commandments in Exodus 20:8-11 and Deuteronomy 5:12-15. In what ways do these relate to the theory that the Sabbath is not only for Jews?


The two different renderings of the ten commandments is a strong support of the SDA idea of inspiration. Here we have two renderings of the same ten commandments but they do not have the same wording. Just like Jesus Christ in Matthew 5 shows us how to dig into the text to get a general idea of what God is telling us.

The one in Exodus gives the creation as the reason for keeping the seventh day, which is in harmony with the story in Genesis 2. The Deuteronomy rendering gives the release from slavery as the reason for keeping a special day. Does God have more that one purpose in what He is teaching us?

Jesus made it clear that the commandments have a much deeper meaning than what the Jews were teaching, and thus we see that the commandments have a universal meaning for all of mankind.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/28/14 12:31 AM

Originally Posted By: Daryl
How would you answer this part from Sunday's study?
Quote:
Compare the two Sabbath commandments in Exodus 20:8-11 and Deuteronomy 5:12-15. In what ways do these relate to the theory that the Sabbath is not only for Jews?

Ruth 1:16-17, "And Ruth said, Intreat me not to leave thee, or to return from following after thee: for whither thou goest, I will go; and where thou lodgest, I will lodge: thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God: Where thou diest, will I die, and there will I be buried: the Lord do so to me, and more also, if ought but death part thee and me." Do we not become citizens of the Kingdom of God; and are therefore required to live by the laws of the King? What say you?

However, the controversy is not over whether the Sabbath is only for the Jews or not - period -, but whether, with Christ and the dispersion of the gospel in each and every OTHER culture, the Sabbaths of the Jews were to be carried over as well.

After all, Canada, as a nation, like every other nation, has statutory Sabbaths too:

1. Christmas
2. Easter
3. Independence Day
4. Labour day
5. Family day
6. Thanksgiving
7. (Weekends)

And so forth ...

///
Posted By: Daryl

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/28/14 01:19 AM

Isn't there a difference between the ceremonial sabbaths and the weekly 7th day sabbaths?
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/28/14 01:39 AM

Quote:
The Lost Meaning of the Seventh Day, by Sigve Tonstad, pages 183 and 197, are quoted in the teacher's edition of the current SS lesson, Christ and His Law, p. 63, chapter on the Sabbath. The point is that Sabbath healings are God's signature statement.


I think some of you have this book.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 04/28/14 02:00 AM

There is also this from Sunday's study:
Quote:
The most notable difference between the two commandments is the rationale for Sabbath observance. Exodus makes a direct reference to Genesis 2:3 as it elevates the fact that God both blessed and made holy the Sabbath day. On the other hand, Deuteronomy 5:15 points to Israel's divine deliverance from Egyptian bondage as being a rationale for Sabbath keeping. On the basis of the Deuteronomy text, many believe the Sabbath is only for the Jews. However, this argument totally ignores the fact that the Exodus text points to the Creation, when God established Sabbath for all humanity.

Furthermore, the Deuteronomy 5:15 reference to deliverance from Egypt is symbolic of the salvation we have in Christ. Hence, the Sabbath is a symbol not only of Creation but of Redemption, two themes that are linked with each other in the Bible (Heb. 1:1-3), Col. 1:13-20), John 1:1-14). Only by the fact that Jesus is our Creator could He also be our Redeemer, and the seventh-day sabbath is symbol of His work as both.
Posted By: Rick H

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/03/14 04:42 PM

Here is a few things I came across...

In Genesis 2:1-3 we read that God blessed and sanctified the seventh day:

"Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made."

The Hebrew word translated "sanctified" in Genesis 2:3 and "hallowed" in Exodus 20:11 is qadash, a word meaning "to hallow, to pronounce holy, to consecrate, to set apart for holy use."

Genesis 4:2-4
King James Version (KJV)

2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.
3 And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord.
4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering:

The words "in process of time" are translated from the Hebrew mikkets yamim, meaning "at the end of the days." This can only be telling us that on the Sabbath, Cain and Abel, with the rest of Adam's family, gathered to worship God.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/10/14 08:21 AM

Quote:
Paul then emphasizes that it is impossible for the "mind set on the flesh" to submit to God's law, or even to please Him (Rom. 8:7-8, NASB). This is obviously not a reference to the struggling individual of Romans 7:13-25, since that person serves the law of God "with my mind" (Rom. 7:25, NASB).

We are more familiar with "carnal mind" for Rom 8:7. But given that Rom 7:25 says he serves the law of God with his mind, does the man of Rom 7:25 have a carnal mind?
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/10/14 10:53 PM

From the quarterly
Quote:
Instead, God chose to send His Son as a Substitute for us, in that He received the just penalty for sin as required by the law on behalf of all people.
Say what? How does that save me? What we need is real substitution.

As I have posted before, in the fullest sense of the word, and to a degree that is seldom thought of when the expression is used, He became man's substitute. That is, He permeates our being, identifying Himself so fully with us that everything that touches or affects us touches and affects Him. He is not our substitute in the sense that one man is a substitute for another, in the army, for instance, the substitute being in one place, while the one for whom he is substitute is somewhere else, engaged in some other service. No; Christ's substitution is far different. He is our substitute in that He substitutes Himself for us, and we appear no more. We drop out entirely, so that it is "not I, but Christ." Thus we cast our cares on Him, not by picking them up and with an effort throwing them on Him, but by humbling ourselves into the nothingness that we are, so that we leave the burden resting on Him alone.

Further, G.E. Fifield, writing in the General Conference Daily Bulletin on Isaiah 53. The third verse (Isaiah 53:3-4) states and vividly contrasts the true and the false idea of Christ's mission, and of his work, and of the atonement. One is what was, and the other is what we thought was; one is truth, the other is falsehood; one is Christianity, the other is paganism. We would do well to study every thought in that text. "Surely he hath borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; he was pierced through by our misdeeds, and God permitted it because in his stripes there was healing for us. But we esteemed him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. Whose griefs? Whose sorrows? - Ours. The grief and the sorrow that crushed the heart of Christ, and took him from among the living, so that he died of a broken heart, was no strange, new grief or sorrow. It was not something unlike what we have to bear; it was not God arbitrarily putting upon him our sins, and thus punishing our sins in him to deliver us. He took no position arbitrarily that we do not have to suffer. It was our griefs and our sorrows that pierced him through. He took our sinful natures, and our sinful flesh, at the point of weakness to which we had brought it, submitting himself to all the conditions of the race, and placing himself where we are to fight the conflict that we have to fight, the fight of faith. And he did this by the same power to which we have access. By the Spirit of God he cast out devils; through the eternal Spirit he offered himself without spot; and the Spirit of God rested upon him, and made him of quick understanding in the things of God. It was our sins that he took; our temptations. {February 12, 1897 N/A, GCDB 13.1}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/11/14 08:18 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Quote:
Paul then emphasizes that it is impossible for the "mind set on the flesh" to submit to God's law, or even to please Him (Rom. 8:7-8, NASB). This is obviously not a reference to the struggling individual of Romans 7:13-25, since that person serves the law of God "with my mind" (Rom. 7:25, NASB).

We are more familiar with "carnal mind" for Rom 8:7. But given that Rom 7:25 says he serves the law of God with his mind, does the man of Rom 7:25 have a carnal mind?

Yes, of course, but he subdues it - "I allow not". Sinful flesh wars against the Spirit and mind of the new man, tempting him from within to indulge his innocent and legitimate needs in sinful ways. But while abiding in Jesus he does not sin, he cannot sin.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/13/14 04:44 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Yes, of course, but he subdues it - "I allow not". Sinful flesh wars against the Spirit and mind of the new man, tempting him from within to indulge his innocent and legitimate needs in sinful ways. But while abiding in Jesus he does not sin, he cannot sin.

I wonder, then, what is sin: "while abiding in Jesus he does not sin, he cannot sin." Really?

///
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/13/14 05:03 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Quote:
Paul then emphasizes that it is impossible for the "mind set on the flesh" to submit to God's law, or even to please Him (Rom. 8:7-8, NASB). This is obviously not a reference to the struggling individual of Romans 7:13-25, since that person serves the law of God "with my mind" (Rom. 7:25, NASB).

We are more familiar with "carnal mind" for Rom 8:7. But given that Rom 7:25 says he serves the law of God with his mind, does the man of Rom 7:25 have a carnal mind?

It seems Paul in Romans 7 is describing the process of conversion. So perhaps the carnal mind is dying but the person hasn't yet achieved victory in Christ?
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/13/14 10:58 AM

I had a short chat with LeRoy Moore this weekend on this very topic. I'll elaborate when I get a better internet connection.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/13/14 07:44 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Yes, of course, but he subdues it - "I allow not". Sinful flesh wars against the Spirit and mind of the new man, tempting him from within to indulge his innocent and legitimate needs in sinful ways. But while abiding in Jesus he does not sin, he cannot sin.

I wonder, then, what is sin: "while abiding in Jesus he does not sin, he cannot sin." Really?

How do you interpret what John wrote in his first epistle?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/13/14 07:49 PM

Rosangela, I believe Romans 7:14-25 describes thoroughly converted Christians who are successfully fighting the good fight of faith - resisting the unholy clamorings of sinful flesh. "I allow not." "So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God."
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/13/14 10:44 PM

MM, I agree.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/13/14 11:21 PM

Rom 8:7 says the carnal mind is enmity to God, while Rom 7:25 says he serves the law of God with his mind. Since the carnal mind cannot be subject to the law of God, we must conclude that these two minds are not the same.

Is the man of Rom 7 converted? He is definitely struggling against the flesh. He wants to do good, but there is a warring element in his members. Is this the condition of the unconverted? No. Only the converted wars against the flesh; there is no such conflict in the unconverted. Those who are in the flesh mind the things of the flesh. But Rom 7 minds the things of the Spirit, imperfect as his efforts may be.

One thing I spoke with Dr. Moore about was the definition of sin. He is concerned about our dear brethren who look at sin as merely an action. He includes those who say that sinful thoughts count as actions, even mentioning one minister as a prominent proponent.

Rather, he sees sin as a state of selfishness, when one's motives and propensities are pointed to self. He says that the problem happens before actions and even thoughts come into play.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/14/14 01:09 AM

Take a look at these quotes. The first part of Romans 7 speaks about Paul's conversion:

The apostle Paul, in relating his experience, presents an important truth concerning the work to be wrought in conversion. He says, "I was alive without the law once,"--he felt no condemnation; "but when the commandment came," when the law of God was urged upon his conscience, "sin revived, and I died." [Romans 7:9.] Then he saw himself a sinner, condemned by the divine law. Mark, it was Paul, and not the law, that died. He says, further, "I had not known sin, but by the law; for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." [Romans 7:7.] "The commandment which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death." [Romans 7:10.] The law which promised life to the obedient, pronounced death upon the transgressor. "Wherefore," he says, "the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good." [Romans 7:12.] {4SP 297.1}


But here EGW seems to imply that in the second part of Romans 7 Paul is still speaking about his conversion:

It is not enough to perceive the loving-kindness of God, to see the benevolence, the fatherly tenderness, of His character. It is not enough to discern the wisdom and justice of His law, to see that it is founded upon the eternal principle of love. Paul the apostle saw all this when he exclaimed, "I consent unto the law that it is good." "The law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good." But he added, in the bitterness of his soul-anguish and despair, "I am carnal, sold under sin." Romans 7:16, 12, 14. He longed for the purity, the righteousness, to which in himself he was powerless to attain, and cried out, "O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from this body of death?" Romans 7:24, margin. Such is the cry that has gone up from burdened hearts in all lands and in all ages. To all, there is but one answer, "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29. {SC 19.1}
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/14/14 01:15 AM

Quote:
Is the man of Rom 7 converted? He is definitely struggling against the flesh. He wants to do good, but there is a warring element in his members. Is this the condition of the unconverted? No. Only the converted wars against the flesh; there is no such conflict in the unconverted.

There is such a conflict in the person who is in the process of conversion.
Does the converted person war against the flesh? Sometimes, but not in such a dramatic way as is presented here. Otherwise the converted person knows no victory.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/14/14 01:23 AM

Quote:
Rosangela, I believe Romans 7:14-25 describes thoroughly converted Christians who are successfully fighting the good fight of faith - resisting the unholy clamorings of sinful flesh. "I allow not." "So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God."

"I am carnal, sold under sin"
"For I do not do the good that I desire"
"bringing me into captivity to the law of sin being in my members"

Does this describe the experience of the born-again, victorious Christian?
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/14/14 01:29 AM

The whole heart must be yielded to God, or the change can never be wrought in us by which we are to be restored to His likeness. By nature we are alienated from God. The Holy Spirit describes our condition in such words as these: "Dead in trespasses and sins;" "the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint;" "no soundness in it." We are held fast in the snare of Satan, "taken captive by him at his will." Ephesians 2:1; Isaiah 1:5, 6; 2 Timothy 2:26. God desires to heal us, to set us free. But since this requires an entire transformation, a renewing of our whole nature, we must yield ourselves wholly to Him. {SC 43.2}

The warfare against self is the greatest battle that was ever fought. The yielding of self, surrendering all to the will of God, requires a struggle; but the soul must submit to God before it can be renewed in holiness. {SC 43.3}
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/14/14 06:53 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
Is the man of Rom 7 converted? He is definitely struggling against the flesh. He wants to do good, but there is a warring element in his members. Is this the condition of the unconverted? No. Only the converted wars against the flesh; there is no such conflict in the unconverted.

There is such a conflict in the person who is in the process of conversion.
Does the converted person war against the flesh? Sometimes, but not in such a dramatic way as is presented here. Otherwise the converted person knows no victory.

I want to dig deeper into this, but can't do it at the moment. Just some quotes for now.

Unless man is given the converting grace of heaven, he will have no disposition to oppose Satan’s counsels, and will become the enemy’s willing dupe. It is God alone who puts enmity to sin in the human heart. The Lord gives man a new mind. He causes the conflict that will not submit to Satan’s deceptive reasoning. It is God who makes a conflict where heretofore there has been unity of action. It is the Lord’s purpose that depraved human nature should, through His divine power, be provided with a renovating energy. – {13MR 383.1}

Galatians 5:17 For the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to one another, so that you do not do the things that you wish.

Philippians 3:6 concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.

Paul says that as “touching the righteousness which is in the law”—as far as outward acts were concerned—he was “blameless” (Philippians 3:6); but when the spiritual character of the law was discerned, he saw himself a sinner. Judged by the letter of the law as men apply it to the outward life, he had abstained from sin; but when he looked into the depths of its holy precepts, and saw himself as God saw him, he bowed in humiliation and confessed his guilt. He says, “I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.” Romans 7:9. When he saw the spiritual nature of the law, sin appeared in its true hideousness, and his self-esteem was gone. – {SC 29.3}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/14/14 07:47 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
"I am carnal, sold under sin" "For I do not do the good that I desire" "bringing me into captivity to the law of sin being in my members" Does this describe the experience of the born-again, victorious Christian?

Yes. The warfare against sinful flesh continues until the day Jesus returns and replaces it with a sinless flesh. Remember, the "flesh of itself cannot act contrary to the will of God." It can tempt, but it cannot sin. Neither can it corrupt or contaminate. It is not a sin to be tempted.

Quote:
There is earnest warfare before all who would subdue the evil tendencies that strive for the mastery. {GC 489.3}

Each day he must renew his consecration, each day do battle with evil. Old habits, hereditary tendencies to wrong, will strive for the mastery, and against these he is to be ever on guard, striving in Christ's strength for victory. {AA 476.3}

Self will strive for the mastery and will be opposed to the work of bringing the life and thoughts, the will and affections, into subjection to the will of Christ. Self-denial and the cross stand all along in the pathway to eternal life, and, because of this, "few there be that find it." {2T 687.3}

He who determines to enter the spiritual kingdom will find that all the powers and passions of an unregenerate nature, backed by the forces of the kingdom of darkness, are arrayed against him. Selfishness and pride will make a stand against anything that would show them to be sinful. We cannot, of ourselves, conquer the evil desires and habits that strive for the mastery. We cannot overcome the mighty foe who holds us in his thrall. God alone can give us the victory. He desires us to have the mastery over ourselves, our own will and ways. But He cannot work in us without our consent and co-operation. The divine Spirit works through the faculties and powers given to man. Our energies are required to co-operate with God. {MB 141.3}
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/14/14 01:05 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Rosangela, I believe Romans 7:14-25 describes thoroughly converted Christians who are successfully fighting the good fight of faith - resisting the unholy clamorings of sinful flesh. "I allow not." "So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God."


Paul is speaking metaphorically.

1. Sin and death is the devil
2. The Law is the word of God
3. The Spirit is your faith in God (occasioned by His love He implanted in you because of Calvary)

"I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin." (Rom. 7:25)

Is Paul advocating a double-standard? No, but an acceptance of the reality that we live in this world, yet with hope of another one to come "wherein righteousness dwells". He THANKS God, remember? He says immediately afterwards, "There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death." (Rom. 8:1-2)

In another place he says, "For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit." (Rom. 8:5) And again, "But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you." (Rom. 8:11)

Still further, and more tellingly, "Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ Jesus. Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended:but this one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before, I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus." (Philippians 3:12-14)

In other words, do not be discouraged; and keep yourself from the path of temptation.

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/14/14 07:46 PM

James, it sounds like we agree. The lusts, desires, affections of the flesh tempt us from within to be unlike Jesus. While abiding in Jesus, while partaking of the divine nature, the Holy Spirit empowers us to recognize and resist the unholy temptations that come to mind.

Galatians
5:24 And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
5:25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.

1 Peter
2:11 Dearly beloved, I beseech [you] as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against the soul;
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/14/14 08:00 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
James, it sounds like we agree. The lusts, desires, affections of the flesh tempt us from within to be unlike Jesus. While abiding in Jesus, while partaking of the divine nature, the Holy Spirit empowers us to recognize and resist the unholy temptations that come to mind.

Galatians
5:24 And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
5:25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.

1 Peter
2:11 Dearly beloved, I beseech [you] as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against the soul;

But I thought you said you do not sin since you are "in Christ" ... ???

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/14/14 09:01 PM

Born-again believers, while abiding in Jesus, while walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, while partaking of the divine nature - do not sin and cannot sin. The Holy Spirit empowers them to recognize and resist the unholy temptations that come to mind - the lusts, desires, affections of the flesh that tempt them from within to be unlike Jesus.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/14/14 11:26 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Born-again believers, while abiding in Jesus, while walking in the Spirit and mind of the new man, while partaking of the divine nature - do not sin and cannot sin. The Holy Spirit empowers them to recognize and resist the unholy temptations that come to mind - the lusts, desires, affections of the flesh that tempt them from within to be unlike Jesus.

Are you therefore walking continually IN AND OUT "of the Spirit" during the course of the day?

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/15/14 01:13 AM

I guess it depends on whether or not the born-again believer is consciously, deliberately choosing to abide in Jesus, to walk in the Spirit. Neglecting to abide in Jesus results in dethroning the Holy Spirit. Without the indwelling presence of the Holy, they cannot resist sin, self, or Satan. Without the Holy Spirit, they are as powerless as unbelievers. They are incapable of imitating the example of Jesus. They must continually, moment by moment, choose Jesus. Otherwise, by default, they fail and fall.

Galatians
5:16 [This] I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/15/14 02:54 AM

Rom 7:23 making me captive to the law of sin
Rom 8:2 has set you free from the law of sin

So your contention is that Paul is describing the same person in the two verses?
Either you are captive or you are free. It cannot be both.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/15/14 02:56 AM

I see you guys did not address the EGW quotes I posted.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/15/14 03:19 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I guess it depends on whether or not the born-again believer is consciously, deliberately choosing to abide in Jesus, to walk in the Spirit. Neglecting to abide in Jesus results in dethroning the Holy Spirit. Without the indwelling presence of the Holy, they cannot resist sin, self, or Satan. Without the Holy Spirit, they are as powerless as unbelievers. They are incapable of imitating the example of Jesus. They must continually, moment by moment, choose Jesus. Otherwise, by default, they fail and fall.

Galatians
5:16 [This] I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.

I understand that; but that doesn't answer my question, "Are you therefore walking continually IN AND OUT 'of the Spirit' during the course of the day?"

Are you ALWAYS IN THE SPIRIT? OR does the Spirit come to and go from you many times during the day?

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/15/14 04:45 AM

James, the Holy Spirit cannot dwell within people who are not consciously, continually choosing to abide in Jesus. Repentance restores the relationship sin severs. So, yes, it means the Holy Spirit is in and out. His location, however, does not undo rebirth or the maturation achieved while abiding in Jesus. Of course, if the Holy Spirit is forced out for a long period of time, ground gained is lost and rebirth is necessary.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/15/14 04:49 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Rom 7:23 making me captive to the law of sin. Rom 8:2 has set you free from the law of sin. So your contention is that Paul is describing the same person in the two verses? Either you are captive or you are free. It cannot be both.

Adam sold out the human race. We are captive in sinful flesh until the day Jesus returns and replaces it with sinless flesh. However, in Christ, we are free from sin. We are also free to sin (before rebirth we cannot not sin).
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/15/14 05:00 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Take a look at these quotes. The first part of Romans 7 speaks about Paul's conversion:

The apostle Paul, in relating his experience, presents an important truth concerning the work to be wrought in conversion. He says, "I was alive without the law once,"--he felt no condemnation; "but when the commandment came," when the law of God was urged upon his conscience, "sin revived, and I died." [Romans 7:9.] Then he saw himself a sinner, condemned by the divine law. Mark, it was Paul, and not the law, that died. He says, further, "I had not known sin, but by the law; for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." [Romans 7:7.] "The commandment which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death." [Romans 7:10.] The law which promised life to the obedient, pronounced death upon the transgressor. "Wherefore," he says, "the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good." [Romans 7:12.] {4SP 297.1}


But here EGW seems to imply that in the second part of Romans 7 Paul is still speaking about his conversion:

It is not enough to perceive the loving-kindness of God, to see the benevolence, the fatherly tenderness, of His character. It is not enough to discern the wisdom and justice of His law, to see that it is founded upon the eternal principle of love. Paul the apostle saw all this when he exclaimed, "I consent unto the law that it is good." "The law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good." But he added, in the bitterness of his soul-anguish and despair, "I am carnal, sold under sin." Romans 7:16, 12, 14. He longed for the purity, the righteousness, to which in himself he was powerless to attain, and cried out, "O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from this body of death?" Romans 7:24, margin. Such is the cry that has gone up from burdened hearts in all lands and in all ages. To all, there is but one answer, "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29. {SC 19.1}

"I am carnal, sold under sin." Adam sold out the human race. It is universally true. "O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from this body of death?" This is the language of both the saved and the unsaved. It is a timeless truth. "Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me (that is, in my flesh)". The "flesh of itself cannot act contrary to the will of God." "Do it" refers to the lusts, desires, affections, clamorings of sinful flesh tempting us from within to be unlike Jesus.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/15/14 01:00 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
James, the Holy Spirit cannot dwell within people who are not consciously, continually choosing to abide in Jesus. Repentance restores the relationship sin severs. So, yes, it means the Holy Spirit is in and out. His location, however, does not undo rebirth or the maturation achieved while abiding in Jesus. Of course, if the Holy Spirit is forced out for a long period of time, ground gained is lost and rebirth is necessary.

That's not true.

1. The Holy Spirit pleads with us to do what is right; and leaves ONLY when there is no hope of our reconciliation to Him. The very way Jesus walked with His disciples (broken and imperfect as they were - for He even partook of the Last Supper with Judas) was illustrative of the Holy Spirit dwelling with us and in us. There is no coming and going, staying and leaving: but rather, an earnest whisper always near us to walk in the path of righteousness. For this reason many are not cut down when they turn away, and many repent weeping.

2. When Paul speaks of walking in the Spirit (Gal. 5:16), he is merely saying that we should obey God. The "Spirit" there is the word of God, so that we live ACCORDING to the truth contained in the Bible. He urges us to do what is right always, to seek the company of the righteous, to rejoice in The Lord, "to dwell in His sanctuary", as it were.

Paul is NOT talking about a spirit coming and going, or sinless perfectionism or the nature of man and of Christ. He is rather advocating a consistently Christian life-style whose enjoyment, hope and end is eternal life with God in the age to come, even as we fight the good fight here in this world, falling and rising, bruised and calloused, broken yet hopeful.

As it is written, "You shall love The Lord with all your heart and with all your mind; and your neighbour as yourself. Upon these two hang all that God has ever said or shown to us in the Scriptures."

///

Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/15/14 07:28 PM

James, it looks like we disagree on a fundamental truth.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/16/14 12:53 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
James, it looks like we disagree on a fundamental truth.

That is because you do NOT know God; but have buried your head in many books other than His WORD. Indeed, GOD Himself said, "I will NEVER leave you nor forsake you."

Deuteronomy 31:6, "Be strong and of good courage, do not fear nor be afraid of them; for the Lord your God, He is the One who goes with you. He will not leave you nor forsake you." Deuteronomy 31:8, "And the Lord, He is the One who goes before you. He will be with you, He will not leave you nor forsake you; do not fear nor be dismayed." Joshua 1:5, "No man shall be able to stand before you all the days of your life; as I was with Moses, so I will be with you. I will not leave you nor forsake you." 1 Kings 8:57, "May the Lord our God be with us, as He was with our fathers. May He not leave us nor forsake us." 1 Chronicles 28:20, "And David said to his son Solomon, 'Be strong and of good courage, and do it; do not fear nor be dismayed, for the Lord God—my God—will be with you. He will not leave you nor forsake you, until you have finished all the work for the service of the house of the Lord.'" Psalm 27:9, "Do not hide Your face from me; Do not turn Your servant away in anger; You have been my help; Do not leave me nor forsake me, O God of my salvation." Hebrews 13:5, "Let your conduct be without covetousness; be content with such things as you have. For He Himself has said, 'I will never leave you nor forsake you.'"

Do you know what is love; and the love with which He loves us? Have you ever heard Him speak? Did you ever meet him and sat and spoke with Him? DO YOU KNOW HIM AT ALL? See, it is written of Him:

Originally Posted By: Exodus 34
Now the Lord descended in the cloud and stood with him there, and proclaimed the name of the Lord. And the Lord passed before him and proclaimed, "The Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious, long-suffering, and abounding in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, by no means clearing the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children and the children’s children to the third and the fourth generation."

So Moses made haste and bowed his head toward the earth, and worshiped. Then he said, "If now I have found grace in Your sight, O Lord, let my Lord, I pray, go among us, even though we are a stiff-necked people; and pardon our iniquity and our sin, and take us as Your inheritance."

And He said: "Behold, I make a covenant. Before all your people I will do marvels such as have not been done in all the earth, nor in any nation; and all the people among whom you are shall see the work of the Lord. For it is an awesome thing that I will do with you .... "


///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/16/14 06:09 AM

Yes, I do know Jesus.
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/16/14 09:08 PM

This lesson indicates some have made wrong conclusions based on the KJV:

Quote:
Influenced by the translation of 1 John 3:4 in the King James Version ("sin is the transgression of the law"), many restrict sin to the violation of the Ten Commandments alone. However, a more literal translation is: "sin is lawlessness" (NKJV) (anomia). Anything that goes against the principles of God is sin. Hence, although the Ten Commandments had not yet been formally revealed when Adam ate the forbidden fruit, he violated a command of God (Gen. 2:17) and was consequently guilty of sin. Indeed, it is through the sin of Adam that the curse of death has affected all generations of humanity (Rom. 5:12, 17, 21).
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/17/14 01:14 AM

When one considers that the law is simply a transcript of God's character, "sin is anomia" teaches us that sin is anything against God's character.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/17/14 04:08 AM

Are you saying that the Holy Spirit actually enters us and leaves us like a yo yo each time we sin?
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
James, the Holy Spirit cannot dwell within people who are not consciously, continually choosing to abide in Jesus. Repentance restores the relationship sin severs. So, yes, it means the Holy Spirit is in and out. His location, however, does not undo rebirth or the maturation achieved while abiding in Jesus. Of course, if the Holy Spirit is forced out for a long period of time, ground gained is lost and rebirth is necessary.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/17/14 05:32 AM

Originally Posted By: Daryl
M: James, the Holy Spirit cannot dwell within people who are not consciously, continually choosing to abide in Jesus. Repentance restores the relationship sin severs. So, yes, it means the Holy Spirit is in and out. His location, however, does not undo rebirth or the maturation achieved while abiding in Jesus. Of course, if the Holy Spirit is forced out for a long period of time, ground gained is lost and rebirth is necessary.

D: Are you saying that the Holy Spirit actually enters us and leaves us like a yo yo each time we sin?

People who are abiding in Jesus do not sin. They cannot sin while abiding in Jesus. They must neglect or refuse to abide in Jesus and then all they can do is sin. The Holy Spirit cannot dwell within them while they are thus divorced from Jesus.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/17/14 09:50 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: Daryl
M: James, the Holy Spirit cannot dwell within people who are not consciously, continually choosing to abide in Jesus. Repentance restores the relationship sin severs. So, yes, it means the Holy Spirit is in and out. His location, however, does not undo rebirth or the maturation achieved while abiding in Jesus. Of course, if the Holy Spirit is forced out for a long period of time, ground gained is lost and rebirth is necessary.

D: Are you saying that the Holy Spirit actually enters us and leaves us like a yo yo each time we sin?

People who are abiding in Jesus do not sin. They cannot sin while abiding in Jesus. They must neglect or refuse to abide in Jesus and then all they can do is sin. The Holy Spirit cannot dwell within them while they are thus divorced from Jesus.

What would it take for you to understand ONE important principle: that just as Jesus was IMMANUEL, and even washed the feet of his disciples who would later betray, deny and forsake him, so the Spirit dwells with you.

There is no coming and going and demanding perfection or else .... Rather, He is ever leading you through the Bible in the path of righteousness; and it is your responsibility to follow and not draw back. Again I ask you, "Do you really KNOW God?" Consider the way He lead those of old and be wise; for He is the same, yesterday, today and forever.

///
Posted By: Daryl

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/17/14 02:02 PM

How does Ephesians 4:30 fit into these last few posts?
Quote:
Eph 4:30 AKJV And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby you are sealed to the day of redemption.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/17/14 03:45 PM

Originally Posted By: Daryl
How does Ephesians 4:30 fit into these last few posts?
Quote:
Eph 4:30 AKJV And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby you are sealed to the day of redemption.

Much like a teenager who causes sorrow for his father, but who is not put out the house for the least infraction. His father has compassion on him, does he not? He wonders how he would live if he had no home; and so he bears the pain and seeks to bring his son back instead.

But should the son be grown, and set in his ways and offends even more, then regretably, he lets him go. Is it not written, "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it! How often would I have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing! See, your house is left to you desolate." The Jews, as a nation, had grieved the Holy Spirit many times; yet He stretched out His hand all the more until, seeing there was no hope anymore, He gave them up and walked away. He wept over the city.

JUST AS JESUS CHRIST WALKED WITH HIS DISCIPLES, so the Holy Spirit is with you. Look at who they were, how he guided them, how he spoke to them, what he said and did, who denied him and how he responded, who betrayed him and what he said. Because, that is EXACTLY the same way the Holy Spirit walks and talks with you. Are you His disciple in truth? If you are, then "you are sealed to the day of redemption."

So much of what is said in churches today, arguments over supposedly obscure oracles, is so easy to grasp and understand if looked through the lens of Christ's public ministry. He was the living, breathing, visibly real revelation of God with us. Now we know Him.

///
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/17/14 07:10 PM

James, neglecting or refusing to abide in Jesus results in sinning. The Holy Spirit does not forsake of abandon; instead, He works to impress, inspire and offers repentance.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/19/14 02:13 AM

God is omnipresent - He's everywhere. But sometimes, His presence is ignored.

Here's something I wrote a while back that touches on this.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=232720450206766&id=100004064395239
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/19/14 08:19 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
James, neglecting or refusing to abide in Jesus results in sinning. The Holy Spirit does not forsake of abandon; instead, He works to impress, inspire and offers repentance.

I'm happy you've come to realize that. Nevertheless, when He leaves you, you become the "son of the evil one". For that reason, Jesus referred to the Scribes and Pharisees as "brood of vipers and serpents", and said plainly that their father was the devil. In other words, there comes a point beyond which the persistent sinner is irredeemable.

To prevent yourself from even reaching that threshold, it is advisable that you minister to the less fortunate and willingly, helpfully bear the burden of others. Your heart will be touched and you will, through your ministry, become in character, just like God. But there are many who merely speak empty words in futile debates and they love that and think themsleves to have arrived with their knowledge.

///
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/19/14 08:42 AM

Originally Posted By: Johann
This lesson indicates some have made wrong conclusions based on the KJV:

Quote:
Influenced by the translation of 1 John 3:4 in the King James Version ("sin is the transgression of the law"), many restrict sin to the violation of the Ten Commandments alone. However, a more literal translation is: "sin is lawlessness" (NKJV) (anomia). Anything that goes against the principles of God is sin. Hence, although the Ten Commandments had not yet been formally revealed when Adam ate the forbidden fruit, he violated a command of God (Gen. 2:17) and was consequently guilty of sin. Indeed, it is through the sin of Adam that the curse of death has affected all generations of humanity (Rom. 5:12, 17, 21).


The lesson is wrong on this point. The lesson quotes the KJV wording which says that "sin is the transgression of the law." The lesson then tries to redefine sin based on modern translations of the Bible. In this, the lesson authors show either their ignorance of Ellen White's writings, or disregard of them.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
The commandments of God are comprehensive and far reaching; in a few words they unfold the whole duty of man. "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength. . . . Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself" (Mark 12:30, 31). In these words the length and breadth, the depth and height, of the law of God is comprehended; for Paul declares, "Love is the fulfilling of the law" (Romans 13:10). The only definition we find in the Bible for sin is that "sin is the transgression of the law" (1 John 3:4). The Word of God declares, "All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23). "There is none that doeth good, no, not one" (Romans 3:12). Many are deceived concerning the condition of their hearts. They do not realize that the natural heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked. They wrap themselves about with their own righteousness, and are satisfied in reaching their own human standard of character; but how fatally they fail when they do not reach the divine standard, and of themselves they cannot meet the requirements of God. {1SM 320.1}


The lesson authors want a new definition of sin. Why? Ellen White declares to us that the lesson's philosophy is error. In fact, she chose the KJV over the Revised Version (RV) which was available to her at that time. The RV stated:

Originally Posted By: Revised Version
Every one that doeth sin doeth also lawlessness: and sin is lawlessness. (1 John 3:4; 1881 edition)

Every one who commits sin is guilty of lawlessness; sin is lawlessness. (1 John 3:4, current edition)


Ellen White could have quoted from that (the 1881 edition). But she didn't! Furthermore, she said the ONLY definition in the Bible is that "sin is the transgression of the law." Ellen White adhered to the KJV on this point. So will I.

The problem with "lawlessness" is that it can have two distinct meanings. To use such a word, then, introduces an ambiguity which is distasteful in such an elevated position as the Word of God. To be "lawless" can mean to be without law, OR to be in disobedience to the law. That first meaning, however, is complete heresy in terms of the Bible, because Paul teaches us that without the law there would be no sin; therefore, to be "lawless" in this sense would be the very opposite of sin. This kind of ambiguity is intolerable in a "definition."

Thankfully, we have Mrs. White's light to keep us on the straight and narrow. Modern scholars must be subjected to scrutiny, even as the Bereans carefully researched Paul's words for themselves. In this instance, the scholars have failed us.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/19/14 09:06 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
When one considers that the law is simply a transcript of God's character, "sin is anomia" teaches us that sin is anything against God's character.

Anything against God's character is a transgression of His law.

The lesson conflated "anomia" (transgression) with "anomos" (lawlessness). Their agenda was clear. They were simply trying to promote the modern versions and attack the KJV. The KJV, however, stands the test. It is solid. They can try to defeat it, and they will succeed in persuading many, but the facts are against them and can speak for themselves.

Don't believe me? Look up "anomia" in your Greek lexicon/dictionary. That is the word that appears in 1 John 3:4, correctly mentioned in the lesson, but incorrectly said to mean "lawlessness." They have twisted this one. Anomia and anomos are two different words, each with distinct, albeit related/similar, meanings.

The modern lack of ability to discriminate, even to call discrimination evil, seems to fulfill the Bible's words regarding those who will call evil good and good evil. We must study to show ourselves approved unto God, and "rightly divide" the Word of truth.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: kland

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/19/14 05:19 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: Daryl
M: James, the Holy Spirit cannot dwell within people who are not consciously, continually choosing to abide in Jesus. Repentance restores the relationship sin severs. So, yes, it means the Holy Spirit is in and out. His location, however, does not undo rebirth or the maturation achieved while abiding in Jesus. Of course, if the Holy Spirit is forced out for a long period of time, ground gained is lost and rebirth is necessary.

D: Are you saying that the Holy Spirit actually enters us and leaves us like a yo yo each time we sin?

People who are abiding in Jesus do not sin. They cannot sin while abiding in Jesus. They must neglect or refuse to abide in Jesus and then all they can do is sin. The Holy Spirit cannot dwell within them while they are thus divorced from Jesus.
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
James, neglecting or refusing to abide in Jesus results in sinning. The Holy Spirit does not forsake of abandon; instead, He works to impress, inspire and offers repentance.
The Holy Spirit cannot dwell, but does not abandon?

Yeah, we must be missing your point again. So what are you saying?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/19/14 07:03 PM

GC, I agree with you. Thank you.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/19/14 07:29 PM

Kland, there is a huge between the Holy Spirit outside impressing and the Holy Spirit inside empowering. "When Christ abides in the heart by faith, the Christian is the temple of God. Christ does not abide in the heart of the sinner, but in the heart of him who is susceptible to the influences of heaven." {RC 107.3} "They may have a theory of the truth, but they are not thoroughly converted. Their hearts are carnal; they do not abide in Christ and he in them." {GW92 40.2}

Quote:
It is through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit that the Christian is enabled to resist temptation and to work righteousness. {Messenger, April 26, 1893 par. 4}

The soul must be surrendered to God, submitted to be purified and made fit for the indwelling of his Holy Spirit. {ST, November 20, 1884 par. 5}

The perfection of character which God requires is the fitting up of the whole being as a temple for the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. {OFC 295.8}

My brother, if you open your heart to envy and evil surmising, the Holy Spirit cannot abide with you. {CCh 175.3}

If worldliness is allowed to come in, if we have no desire to pray, no desire to commune with Him who is the source of strength and wisdom, the Spirit will not abide with us. {OHC 154.4}

Those who are devoid of the Holy Spirit cannot be faithful watchmen upon the walls of Zion; for they are blind to the work that ought to be done, and do not give the trumpet a certain sound. {1888 1249.2}

If the heart is not kept under the control of God, if the Holy Spirit does not work unceasingly to refine and ennoble the character, the old habits will reveal themselves in the life. {CSA 21.5}

An indwelling Saviour is revealed by the words. But the Holy Spirit does not abide in the heart of him who is peevish if others do not agree with his ideas and plans. {CS 115.2}

God will not dwell with those who reject his truth; for all who disregard truth dishonor its Author. {HL 291.3}

Satan makes the idle man a partaker and co-worker in his schemes, and the Lord Jesus does not abide in the heart by faith. {FE 320.3}
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/19/14 07:55 PM

If you check ἀνομία - anomia - in Greek dictionaries they usually give the definition as lawlessness. Dictionaries based on the KJV will inevitably give the KJV rendering.

When Ellen White had her sermon at Williamstown (a suburb of Melbourne), Victoria Sunday, 4:00 p.m., February 11, 1894, she said:

Quote:
“Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.” Where there is no law there is no sin. What kind of world have we? What kind of world is it that will people heaven in their lawlessness? {1SAT 230.1}


By her use of both terms doesn't she indicate she was fully aware of the RV rendering? And she used it without stating it was wrong, didn't she?

Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/19/14 09:28 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Originally Posted By: asygo
When one considers that the law is simply a transcript of God's character, "sin is anomia" teaches us that sin is anything against God's character.

Anything against God's character is a transgression of His law.

The lesson conflated "anomia" (transgression) with "anomos" (lawlessness). Their agenda was clear. They were simply trying to promote the modern versions and attack the KJV. The KJV, however, stands the test. It is solid. They can try to defeat it, and they will succeed in persuading many, but the facts are against them and can speak for themselves.

Don't believe me? Look up "anomia" in your Greek lexicon/dictionary. That is the word that appears in 1 John 3:4, correctly mentioned in the lesson, but incorrectly said to mean "lawlessness." They have twisted this one. Anomia and anomos are two different words, each with distinct, albeit related/similar, meanings.

The modern lack of ability to discriminate, even to call discrimination evil, seems to fulfill the Bible's words regarding those who will call evil good and good evil. We must study to show ourselves approved unto God, and "rightly divide" the Word of truth.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.

Have you ever wondered what is sin? It says, "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth ALSO the law: for sin is the transgression of the law." So there are sins which do not IMMEDIATELY appear to be infractions of the law, but ultimately are.

And then John tells you plainly what IS the law. And it is this: "You shall love God with all your heart and mind, and your neighbour (your brother) as yourself." See? Therefore, when you do anything against God or man, whether it be explicitly prohibited or not, you have broken THE LAW OF LOVE.

Dear SDA, unlike what you have been fed, the Ten Commandments as all the rest of the Jewish Old Testament laws as given by God served only to teach us how to express that love. Doing them and marking up a chalkboard of merits in no way commends you to God. Rather out of the sanctified heart will pour rivers of living water, and your life will bear the fruit of the Spirit abiding in you. You will naturally be righteous, falling yes, but ever rising, ever hopeful, ever longing for the glory to come. Love will be your food and drink and you will grow thereby.

Do not return to the vomit of pride in Sabbath-keeping again, please. For the end thereof is death. (Mark 3:1-6)

///


Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 01:01 AM

Interesting observation James. It is the word kai in the Textus Receptus which the KJV usually translates and but here renders as also.

Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 03:07 AM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Dear SDA, unlike what you have been fed, the Ten Commandments as all the rest of the Jewish Old Testament laws as given by God served only to teach us how to express that love. Doing them and marking up a chalkboard of merits in no way commends you to God. Rather out of the sanctified heart will pour rivers of living water, and your life will bear the fruit of the Spirit abiding in you. You will naturally be righteous, falling yes, but ever rising, ever hopeful, ever longing for the glory to come. Love will be your food and drink and you will grow thereby.

Do not return to the vomit of pride in Sabbath-keeping again, please. For the end thereof is death. (Mark 3:1-6)

You have been fed the error that partial obedience is acceptable. God taught us how to love. Don't return to the vomit of pride in thinking man has come up with a better plan.

You have so many good things to offer, but your pride makes it stink. That just goes to show that knowledge tends to puff one up unless filled with the Holy Spirit. He didn't go away, but you have to start listening.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 04:11 AM

Quote:
Have you ever wondered what is sin? It says, "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth ALSO the law: for sin is the transgression of the law." So there are sins which do not IMMEDIATELY appear to be infractions of the law, but ultimately are.

They do not appear to be infractions of the law because of the person's ignorance of the law. Every sin is covered by the Ten Commandments.

Thayer's definition of anomia:

1) the condition of without law
1a) because ignorant of it
1b) because of violating it
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 06:13 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Dear SDA, unlike what you have been fed, the Ten Commandments as all the rest of the Jewish Old Testament laws as given by God served only to teach us how to express that love. Doing them and marking up a chalkboard of merits in no way commends you to God. Rather out of the sanctified heart will pour rivers of living water, and your life will bear the fruit of the Spirit abiding in you. You will naturally be righteous, falling yes, but ever rising, ever hopeful, ever longing for the glory to come. Love will be your food and drink and you will grow thereby.

Do not return to the vomit of pride in Sabbath-keeping again, please. For the end thereof is death. (Mark 3:1-6)

You have been fed the error that partial obedience is acceptable. God taught us how to love. Don't return to the vomit of pride in thinking man has come up with a better plan.

You have so many good things to offer, but your pride makes it stink. That just goes to show that knowledge tends to puff one up unless filled with the Holy Spirit. He didn't go away, but you have to start listening.

Did you read Mark 3:1-6? I don't think so. And lest you be hasty in your self-righteous judgement, consider 1 John 2:1, "My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. AND IF ANY MAN SIN, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous."

///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 06:39 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
Have you ever wondered what is sin? It says, "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth ALSO the law: for sin is the transgression of the law." So there are sins which do not IMMEDIATELY appear to be infractions of the law, but ultimately are.

They do not appear to be infractions of the law because of the person's ignorance of the law. Every sin is covered by the Ten Commandments.

Thayer's definition of anomia:

1) the condition of without law
1a) because ignorant of it
1b) because of violating it

1. Thayer doesn't know what he is talking about.

2. Every sin is NOT covered by the Ten Commandments. For example, if you asked your sibling to do something for you, to which he agreed, yet reneged on his promise, he has sinned against you. That has nothing to do with the Decalogue. For him it is a sin, and a sin before you. Similarly, if you deliberately jumped a red light while driving, you are guilty of sin against society. There is no law in the Scriptures against jumping a red light, but by being granted a license to drive, you entered into an agreement to obey all the traffic laws of the land. You have sinned against the Board. That has nothing to do with the Decalogue.

For those reasons, there is another definition for sin, given by Paul, "he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for WHATSOEVER IS NOT OF FAITH IS SIN." (Rom. 14:23) In other words, if you dismiss your conscience, you will be found guilty; whether what you believe is true or not.

///
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 08:27 AM

Originally Posted By: james
For example, if you asked your sibling to do something for you, to which he agreed, yet reneged on his promise, he has sinned against you. That has nothing to do with the Decalogue.
Nothing? NOTHING?
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 02:25 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: james
For example, if you asked your sibling to do something for you, to which he agreed, yet reneged on his promise, he has sinned against you. That has nothing to do with the Decalogue.
Nothing? NOTHING?

Exodus 20

12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.
13 Thou shalt not kill.
14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.
15 Thou shalt not steal.
16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.

///
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 03:39 PM

NOTHING? Your example fits the ninth.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 04:46 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
NOTHING? Your example fits the ninth.

In what way, pray tell?

///
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 07:03 PM

Quote:
1. Thayer doesn't know what he is talking about.

I've never read anything so absurd! How long have you studied Greek? So a Greek scholar, who wrote a Greek lexicon, doesn't know what he is talking about?

Quote:
Every sin is NOT covered by the Ten Commandments. For example, if you asked your sibling to do something for you, to which he agreed, yet reneged on his promise, he has sinned against you. That has nothing to do with the Decalogue. For him it is a sin, and a sin before you. Similarly, if you deliberately jumped a red light while driving, you are guilty of sin against society. There is no law in the Scriptures against jumping a red light, but by being granted a license to drive, you entered into an agreement to obey all the traffic laws of the land. You have sinned against the Board. That has nothing to do with the Decalogue.

Not fulfilling a promise is lying, wherher to a sister or to society; it's bearing a false witness against (to the detriment of) your neighbor. Besides, you are robbing them from the loyalty/veracity/honesty you owe to them as a fellow human being. It's easy (for those who can see the far-reaching claims of the law) to see that these are transgressions of the law.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 07:32 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Did you read Mark 3:1-6? I don't think so. And lest you be hasty in your self-righteous judgement, consider 1 John 2:1, "My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. AND IF ANY MAN SIN, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous."

There's no problem with the verses. The problem is your being obnoxious and arrogant. That says much more about your teachings than the verses you cite in vain.

If someone is wrong, just point it out and we can learn truth. But if you stand as an accuser of the brethren, we just learn that you're a jerk. It's up to you what you want us to learn.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 08:25 PM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
1. Thayer doesn't know what he is talking about.

I've never read anything so absurd! How long have you studied Greek? So a Greek scholar, who wrote a Greek lexicon, doesn't know what he is talking about?

Rosangela, not sure if you really intend to endorse Thayer, or any scribe, whatever their expertise - many spring from Rome as you know.
Bible scholars are frequently wrong on fundamental issues.
Thayer was a contemporary (1828-1901) of the Great Advent Movement, living in Massachusetts, a Harvard graduate immersed in the church. He surely heard of W. Miller and Joshua Himes, yet probably remained a Sunday keeper despite his Greek scholarship, or because of it.

Since lexicons and dictionaries contain men's definitions, we shouldn't lean upon them for Bible understanding.
__________________________________________
Posted By: gordonb1

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 08:50 PM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
1. Thayer doesn't know what he is talking about.

I've never read anything so absurd! How long have you studied Greek? So a Greek scholar, who wrote a Greek lexicon, doesn't know what he is talking about?

Not sure if you really mean that Rosangela. Many Bible scholars have been wrong on fundamental points. Thayer was a contemporary (1828-1901) of the the Great Advent Movement, a Harvard grad immersed in the church. He'd surely heard of William Miller and Joshua Himes, yet probably lived his life as a Sunday keeper despite his Greek scholarship, or due to it.

Since lexicons and dictionaries contain men's definitions,
we can't lean upon them for Bible understanding.
_______________________________
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 08:57 PM

Gordon,

You said Thayer was a contemporary of the Great Advent Movement. If he was born in 1828, this means he was only 16 in 1844, and of course was neither a Greek scholar nor a Harvard graduated by then.
Gordon, if you can't trust Greek and Hebrew scholars, you can't trust any Bible version, and you must be able to read the Bible in the original languages. Even the apostles trusted the Greek scholars, as they many times relied on the text of the LXX.
Posted By: gordonb1

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 09:42 PM


Correct Rosangela - Thayer was born the year after Ellen White.
She embraced the Advent Movement which carried for decades following the Great Disappointment. (see The Great Second Advent Movement by Loughborough)

Thayer died in 1901, but did his Greek lead him into present truth?

One cannot rely upon mens' definitions (lexicons & dictionaries)
to discern Bible truth, even less so men who walk not in the light.
____________________________
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 10:02 PM

Gordon, Luther translated the Bible to German. His Greek and his Hebrew didn't lead him to accept the Sabbath. Yet you can't say he was lost, neither can you say his Bible version can't be trusted.
As I said, if you can't trust Greek scholars, then you must be able to read the Bible in Greek - and the Greek used in the Bible is a dead language, so you will have to learn it with a Greek scholar.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 10:22 PM


As you wish Rosangela.
__________
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/20/14 11:42 PM

And don't forget Charles Fitch, who never walked in the light of the sanctuary truth.
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 12:26 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Gordon, Luther translated the Bible to German. His Greek and his Hebrew didn't lead him to accept the Sabbath. Yet you can't say he was lost, neither can you say his Bible version can't be trusted.
As I said, if you can't trust Greek scholars, then you must be able to read the Bible in Greek - and the Greek used in the Bible is a dead language, so you will have to learn it with a Greek scholar.


So true
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 01:08 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
1. Thayer doesn't know what he is talking about.

I've never read anything so absurd! How long have you studied Greek? So a Greek scholar, who wrote a Greek lexicon, doesn't know what he is talking about?

Be careful ...

Quote:
Joseph Henry Thayer (November 7, 1828—November 26, 1901), US biblical scholar, was born in Boston, Massachusetts. ... Beginning in 1870, Thayer was a member of the American Bible Revision Committee and recording secretary of the New Testament company (working on the Revised Version). Thayer's chief works were his translation of Grimm's Wilke's Clavis Novi Testamenti (1886; revised 1889) as A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, and his New Testament Bibliography (1890). Thayer spent 25 years working on his Lexicon, and made thousands of revisions from Grimm's Wilke's Clavis. Rather unfortunately, Thayer's Lexicon became obsolete quickly.

Gustav Adolf Deissmann's work with the Egyptian papyri was soon to revolutionize New Testament and Koine Greek Lexicography with the publication of his: [1] Bible Studies: Contributions Chiefly from Papyri and Inscriptions to the History of the Language, the Literature, and the Religion of Hellenistic Judaism and Primitive Christianity published in 1901 (2nd edition 1909) and also, [2] Light from the Ancient East: the New Testament Illustrated by Recently Discovered Texts of the Graeco-Roman World London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1910.

These books and similar ones that followed helped confirm and sometimes correct inadequate definitions of many words in the Greek New Testament. With this new and valuable information for studying the Greek of the New Testament, Thayer's Lexicon became a victim of history, being published less than a decade before this papyri revolution.

In February 1891 Thayer published a lecture in which he expressed disagreement with the position of Biblical inerrancy, asserting that his own acceptance of various errors of history and science in the Bible did not materially detract from his belief in the overall soundness of Christianity.

---- Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Henry_Thayer


///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 01:45 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
Every sin is NOT covered by the Ten Commandments. For example, if you asked your sibling to do something for you, to which he agreed, yet reneged on his promise, he has sinned against you. That has nothing to do with the Decalogue. For him it is a sin, and a sin before you. Similarly, if you deliberately jumped a red light while driving, you are guilty of sin against society. There is no law in the Scriptures against jumping a red light, but by being granted a license to drive, you entered into an agreement to obey all the traffic laws of the land. You have sinned against the Board. That has nothing to do with the Decalogue.

Not fulfilling a promise is lying, wherher to a sister or to society; it's bearing a false witness against (to the detriment of) your neighbor. Besides, you are robbing them from the loyalty/veracity/honesty you owe to them as a fellow human being. It's easy (for those who can see the far-reaching claims of the law) to see that these are transgressions of the law.

I gave two examples. The first one, you answered. What of the second? "Similarly, if you deliberately jumped a red light while driving, you are guilty of sin against society. There is no law in the Scriptures against jumping a red light, but by being granted a license to drive, you entered into an agreement to obey all the traffic laws of the land. You have sinned against the Board. That has nothing to do with the Decalogue."

Returning to your answer to the first example: Reneging on a promise is NOT "bearing false witness against your neighbour"; and neither is it lying. You are just hell-bent on shoe-horning the action into the ninth commandment. Rather, it is causing someone to hope in vain. The LAW broken is the LAW OF LOVE which God designed to bind and strengthen relationships. A broken promise strains relationships.

The Ten Commandments merely teaches you how to love. It's fulfillment and ultimate goal is to encourage love, to lead you to the LAW OF LOVE (of which John was speaking in 1 John 3) It was this point Jesus was making when he told the rich youth, "One thing you lack: Go your way, sell whatever you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, take up the cross, and follow Me." (Mark 10:21)

Again, I direct you to Mark 3:1-6.

///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 02:13 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Did you read Mark 3:1-6? I don't think so. And lest you be hasty in your self-righteous judgement, consider 1 John 2:1, "My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. AND IF ANY MAN SIN, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous."

There's no problem with the verses. The problem is your being obnoxious and arrogant. That says much more about your teachings than the verses you cite in vain. If someone is wrong, just point it out and we can learn truth. But if you stand as an accuser of the brethren, we just learn that you're a jerk. It's up to you what you want us to learn.

Is asking that SDA do "NOT return to the vomit of pride in Sabbath-keeping", making myself an accuser of the brethren? Why do you refuse to heed the salient message in Mark 3:1-6? Sin is much more than the transgression of the Ten Commandments. It encompasses all that one may do against God or neighbour, whether it be explicitly prohibited or not. As it is written:

"Then one of them, a lawyer, asked Him a question, testing Him, and saying, 'Teacher, WHICH IS THE GREAT COMMANDMENT IN THE LAW?'

Jesus said to him, 'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.'" (Mat. 22:35-40 cf. Mark 3:1-6)

///

Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 03:32 AM

Quote:
Be careful

James, Thayer's lexicon became obsolete because of new archaeological evidence which brought light upon some words, but obviously this is not the case with anomia, whose meaning has always been well known.
About the Bible, it's inerrant in religious matters, but it may have small incorrections in the realm of history and science.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 03:44 AM

Quote:
I gave two examples. The first one, you answered. What of the second?

James, both examples are similar, as I said.

Quote:
Returning to your answer to the first example: Reneging on a promise is NOT "bearing false witness against your neighbour"; and neither is it lying. You are just hell-bent on shoe-horning the action into the ninth commandment. Rather, it is causing someone to hope in vain.

Of course breaking a promise is lying, of course it's saying something which will bring disadvantage or damage to the other person because of its nonfulfillment. Please read Numbers 23:19 and Hebrews 6:18.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 03:51 AM

Quote:
Again, I direct you to Mark 3:1-6.

What is the problem with Mark 3:1-6?
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 04:04 AM

Quote:
"Then one of them, a lawyer, asked Him a question, testing Him, and saying, 'Teacher, WHICH IS THE GREAT COMMANDMENT IN THE LAW?'

Jesus said to him, 'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.'" (Mat. 22:35-40 cf. Mark 3:1-6)

The ten commandments can be summarized in the two commandments of love to God and love to men, and these two can be summarized in just one word - love. This doesn't mean that love makes the two commandments unnecessary, or that the two make the ten unnecessary. After the fall, specific sins had to be spelled out as violations of the law of love. It doesn't make sense to command unfallen creatures to not kill, to not steal, to not commit adultery, etc., but it does make sense to say this clearly to sinful creatures who would have a deadened sensitivity to sin and a twisted notion of love.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 06:17 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
Be careful

James, Thayer's lexicon became obsolete because of new archaeological evidence which brought light upon some words, but obviously this is not the case with anomia, whose meaning has always been well known.
About the Bible, it's inerrant in religious matters, but it may have small incorrections in the realm of history and science.

You may want to begin your studies here: Biblical hermeneutics

Or you may want to start reading the Bible for yourself. You have a very naive approach to the text.

///
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 07:57 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Gordon, Luther translated the Bible to German. His Greek and his Hebrew didn't lead him to accept the Sabbath. Yet you can't say he was lost, neither can you say his Bible version can't be trusted.
As I said, if you can't trust Greek scholars, then you must be able to read the Bible in Greek - and the Greek used in the Bible is a dead language, so you will have to learn it with a Greek scholar.

Who proclaimed the Sabbath truth in Luther's day? Thayer, on the other hand, would have been confronted with the concept of the Sabbath in the newspaper. Furthermore, it was Thayer who was writing his commentaries on the Bible, thus requiring close textual comparisons and study. Luther was not doing this type of study to the same degree. He was simply translating using his knowledge of the Greek and Hebrew. Luther wrote no concordance, lexicon, nor commentary on the Bible (as far as I'm aware--though others compiled a "commentary" based on his sermons and called it his commentary, e.g. for the book of Galatians: see here for more about this). He was given certain truths to teach the people in his time, and he did his duty well. The Sabbath was not given him, nor are we aware of anyone having ever brought the matter to Luther's attention.

Thayer had the possibility of accepting that to which Luther was never exposed.

I have, personally, seen a number of errors in Thayer's perspective, and I don't put much trust in his commentary. Those who like to lean on the commentaries most are generally those who have desired to take a shortcut in their own study of the Bible for themselves. If we study it for ourselves, we soon find the commentaries are no better than what we can find through God's Spirit to us individually. Sometimes the commentaries may be helpful, but other times they are erroneous. It is not wise to place undue confidence in them. They are not inspired. We must be Bereans and find the facts for ourselves.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 12:37 PM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
"Then one of them, a lawyer, asked Him a question, testing Him, and saying, 'Teacher, WHICH IS THE GREAT COMMANDMENT IN THE LAW?'

Jesus said to him, 'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.'" (Mat. 22:35-40 cf. Mark 3:1-6)

The ten commandments can be summarized in the two commandments of love to God and love to men, and these two can be summarized in just one word - love. This doesn't mean that love makes the two commandments unnecessary, or that the two make the ten unnecessary. After the fall, specific sins had to be spelled out as violations of the law of love. It doesn't make sense to command unfallen creatures to not kill, to not steal, to not commit adultery, etc., but it does make sense to say this clearly to sinful creatures who would have a deadened sensitivity to sin and a twisted notion of love.

You are unduly obsessed with the letter of the Decalogue. When the lawyer asked him which was THE GREAT commandment in the Law, Jesus did not quote the Decalogue, nor did he point to it. He said rather, "YOU SHALL LOVE," and then again, "IT is everything." The Law of love and faith is the one consistently being established in the New Testament as the foundation of the Church, not the Decalogue. The latter served merely to teach the Hebrews how to love by prohibition against common vile practices in their day. Their heart, as a people, was a heart of stone; and so that generation ended up wasting away in the wilderness.

Mark 3:1-6 unequivocally demonstrates this.

///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 01:22 PM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
I gave two examples. The first one, you answered. What of the second?

James, both examples are similar, as I said.

Quote:
Returning to your answer to the first example: Reneging on a promise is NOT "bearing false witness against your neighbour"; and neither is it lying. You are just hell-bent on shoe-horning the action into the ninth commandment. Rather, it is causing someone to hope in vain.

Of course breaking a promise is lying, of course it's saying something which will bring disadvantage or damage to the other person because of its nonfulfillment. Please read Numbers 23:19 and Hebrews 6:18.

In the passages that you quoted, we are being assured of the things God has promised. That has nothing to do with having reneged, but with making the promise (hence the reference to God not lying). As I said, reneging on a promise is "NOT 'bearing false witness against your neighbour'; and neither is it lying. You are just hell-bent on shoe-horning the action into the ninth commandment. Rather, it is causing someone to hope in vain." Expressed positively, "you shall keep your vows, even if it hurts."

Also: "if you deliberately jumped a red light while driving, you are guilty of sin against society. There is no law in the Scriptures against jumping a red light, but by being granted a license to drive, you entered into an agreement to obey all the traffic laws of the land. You have sinned against the Board. That has nothing to do with the Decalogue."

The Law of Love and faith is the fundamental and eternal principle of God"s Throne and character. It is the law by which we shall be judged in the last day. See Mat. 25:31-46.

///
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 07:07 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: asygo
Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Did you read Mark 3:1-6? I don't think so. And lest you be hasty in your self-righteous judgement, consider 1 John 2:1, "My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. AND IF ANY MAN SIN, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous."

There's no problem with the verses. The problem is your being obnoxious and arrogant. That says much more about your teachings than the verses you cite in vain. If someone is wrong, just point it out and we can learn truth. But if you stand as an accuser of the brethren, we just learn that you're a jerk. It's up to you what you want us to learn.

Is asking that SDA do "NOT return to the vomit of pride in Sabbath-keeping", making myself an accuser of the brethren? Why do you refuse to heed the salient message in Mark 3:1-6?

No, that part was good. The jerk part was, "Dear SDA, unlike what you have been fed, the Ten Commandments as all the rest of the Jewish Old Testament laws as given by God served only to teach us how to express that love. Doing them and marking up a chalkboard of merits in no way commends you to God."

You speak as if you can read the heart. But it comes from the father of lies. You clearly have no clue about what Adventism teaches.

And if you think the Pharisees were the gold standard on Sabbath keeping in Mark 3, then you are equally clueless on what the Bible teaches about Sabbath observance. Had you been "fed" with the truths of Adventism, you would know that Jesus was the example of true Sabbath keeping, not the Pharisees.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/21/14 09:11 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Who proclaimed the Sabbath truth in Luther's day?

He may not have been as ignorant of it as we often think.

Originally Posted By: http://www.remnantofgod.org/sabhist.htm#16
"I find from a passage in Erasmus that at the early period of the Reformantion when he wrote, there were Sabbatarians in Bohemia, who not only kept the seventh day, but were said to be...scrupulous in resting on it." Literature of the Sabbath Question, Cox, Vol. II, pp. 201, 202

Originally Posted By: https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1955/07/is-there-a-relationship-between-luther-and-seventh-day-adventists
He argued repeatedly that those who kept the "Jewish Sabbath" should also practice cir­cumcision. He said, "If Carlstadt writes more about the Sabbath, Sunday must give way and the Sabbath—that is, Saturday—must be kept holy. He would really in all things make Jews out of us and require circumcision." Luther quoted in this connection Galatians 5:3, "For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law."

Luther believed that the Sabbath must be kept, but that Christians were free to observe any day as the Sabbath. It is difficult to assert precisely what Carlstadt's beliefs and practices were. "We do not know whether Carlstadt ever took a positive stand for the seventh-day Sab­bath. But we do know that many groups of Sabbath keepers were in existence in various places of Central Europe after he began to write on Sabbath observance." 2 There were Christians who kept the seventh-day Sabbath in Luther's time, and he referred to them on several occasions. In discussing them, he was so convinced that the seventh-day Sabbath was not the true day of rest that he went so far as to say that even the patriarchs did not keep the Sabbath.' Concerning the Sabbathkeepers, or "Sabbathers," Luther said this:

"We find in our day in Moravia a foolish rabble folk that call themselves the Sabbathers. They con­tend that we must, according to the Jewish regula­tions and customs, keep the Sabbath; and perhaps they will yet in time lay a similar requirement for circumcision.

"There are in Austria and Moravia, as it is re­ported to me, people at this time that in Jewish manner keep the Sabbath and compel circumcision. If these people come in contact with people that are not properly instructed in God's Word, they will do great damage."
Martin Luther, "Auslegung von 1. Mose" (Genesis), Schriften (Walch ed.), vol. 1, cols. 873, 1009-1010.

Originally Posted By: https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1955/07/is-there-a-relationship-between-luther-and-seventh-day-adventists
Those who judge that by the authority of the church the observance of the Lord's day instead of the Sabbath day was ordained as a thing necessary, do greatly err. Scripture has abrogated the Sabbath day; for it teaches that since the gospel has been revealed, all the ceremonies of the old law can be omitted. And yet, because it was necessary to appoint a certain day that the people might know when they ought to come together, it appears that the church [the apostles] designated the Lord's day for this purpose; and this day seems to have been chosen all the more for this additional reason, that mess might have an example of Christian liberty and might know that the keeping neither of the Sabbath nor of any other day is necessary.
Augsburg Confession, Article 28

But more importantly, did not the Holy Spirit lead men to truth through His word in Luther's day as He did in Bates' day? Are we to be dependent on man's proclamation more than God's word? To be clear, it doesn't matter if any person proclaimed the Sabbath in Luther's day because he could read the Bible for himself and the Holy Spirit could teach him just as well then as now.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/22/14 01:01 AM

Quote:
You may want to begin your studies here: Biblical hermeneutics

Or you may want to start reading the Bible for yourself. You have a very naive approach to the text.

I have a naive approach to the text? Let me ask you something.

Matt. 23:35 says: so that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah the son of Berachiah, whom you killed between the temple and the altar.

Please tell me, is this historical information correct according to the OT? Please read 2 Chron. 24.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/22/14 01:09 AM

Quote:
You are unduly obsessed with the letter of the Decalogue. When the lawyer asked him which was THE GREAT commandment in the Law, Jesus did not quote the Decalogue, nor did he point to it. He said rather, "YOU SHALL LOVE,"

This is interesting, because when the rich young ruler asked Him, "Good Master, what good thing shall I do that I may have eternal life?" Jesus answered, "But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments." "He said to Him, Which? Jesus said, You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not bear false witness, honor your father and mother, and, you shall love your neighbor as yourself."
So here He quoted the Decalogue and pointed to it. What do you say about this?
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/22/14 01:20 AM

Quote:
In the passages that you quoted, we are being assured of the things God has promised. That has nothing to do with having reneged, but with making the promise (hence the reference to God not lying).

Either you didn't read the passage or you didn't pay attention to it.
Num 23:19 God is not a man that He should lie, neither the son of man that He should repent. Has He said, and shall He not do it? Or has He spoken, and shall He not make it good?
The text is clear: God doesn't lie; if He said, He will do it; if He has spoken, He will make it good. Which means that in case He didn't do it after He had said it, in case He didn't make it good, He would have lied.
Any unbiased person would see this.
I suppose that in your opinion Ananias and Sapphira didn't lie when they failed to fulfill their promise. However the Bible says otherwise. Just read Acts 5.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/22/14 01:37 AM

Quote:
I have, personally, seen a number of errors in Thayer's perspective, and I don't put much trust in his commentary.

But who is speaking about commentaries here? Friends, I'm simply speaking about Greek grammar; I'm simply speaking about a lexicon, which is a kind of Greek-English dictionary; I'm speaking about the meaning of a word.
If Webster was a catholic, a protestant, a buddhist, or an atheist, would there be any reason for not trusting his dictionary because of his profession?
And how could Thayer or anyone else have read about the Sabbath in a newspaper? Please, remember that the Advent Movement had nothing to do with the Sabbath. The Sabbath truth was discovered some years later.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/22/14 08:50 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
And how could Thayer or anyone else have read about the Sabbath in a newspaper? Please, remember that the Advent Movement had nothing to do with the Sabbath. The Sabbath truth was discovered some years later.

Rosangela,

Perhaps you are not as aware of the religious background of the "secular" world in the United States. Newspapers and other public magazines and journals do often touch on religious topics, especially when they are considered newsworthy. Harold Camping, televangelists, Ben Carson, and many others are modern examples of religious persons who have appeared in the news for legitimate and religious reasons. But in the days of Mrs. White, William Miller, Josiah Litch, the National Religious Liberty Association (founded around 1893 by Seventh-day Adventists) and Mrs. White herself were all subjects for the newspapers.


Originally Posted By: EGW CD
THE NAME OF MRS. ELLEN G. WHITE IS WIDELY KNOWN IN CONSEQUENCE OF HER WRITINGS AND HER PUBLIC LABORS AS A SPEAKER IN NINETEEN OF THE STATES AND IN THE CANADAS. HER BOOKS IN PRINT AMOUNT TO ABOUT FOUR THOUSAND PAGES WHICH HAVE HAD AN EXTENSIVE CIRCULATION. AND HER LABORS AS A SPEAKER COVER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN THIRTY YEARS. BUT IN THE LAST TEN YEARS THE PROVIDENCE OF GOD, IN HARMONY WITH THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE WITH WHOM SHE HAS BEEN CONNECTED, HAS MOVED HER OUT TO SPEAK TO THE CROWDS AT OUR ANNUAL CONFERENCES AND CAMP-MEETINGS IN THE SEVERAL STATES WHERE THEY HAVE BEEN HELD. NEWSPAPER REPORTERS HAVE GIVEN SKETCHES OF HER ADDRESSES, AND HAVE MADE STATEMENTS OF THEIR EFFECTS UPON AUDIENCES WHICH HAVE GIVEN HER PROMINENCE IN THE MINDS OF THOUSANDS WHO HAVE NEITHER READ HER BOOKS NOR HEARD HER SPEAK. AND THE FACT WHICH IS MADE PROMINENT IN HER BOOKS THAT MRS. WHITE HAS RECEIVED THE SENTIMENTS SHE HAS TAUGHT BY DIRECT REVELATION FROM GOD, HAS MADE HER A PERSON OF PECULIAR INTEREST TO ALL THOSE WHO HAVE RECEIVED HER AS ONE THUS FAVORED OF THE LORD. AND, ON THE OTHER HAND, PERSONS HAVE NOT BEEN WANTING AMONG THOSE WHO REJECT HER TESTIMONY AND HER WORK, TO MENTION HER NAME UNFAVORABLY THROUGH THE PRESS, AND IN THE SPIRIT OF PERSECUTION SEEK TO EXCITE PREJUDICE AGAINST HER. THIS, HOWEVER, HAS SERVED AS AN ADVERTISEMENT, AND HAS GREATLY INCREASED THE DESIRE OF THE PEOPLE TO HEAR HER SPEAK, AND TO READ HER BOOKS. {ST, January 6, 1876 par. 1}


It is certain that the fact of Mrs. White's church affiliation would have been included in the newspaper articles about her which also presented her views; so, if for no other reason, the name "Seventh-day Adventist" would have brought the Sabbath question to the minds of the public who were reading the newspaper.

Remember, this was in 1876 when the above quote was published--well after the "Seventh-day Adventist" church had officially formed (this church name appears as early as 1864 in Mrs. White's writings).

As for Thayer, anyone can read about him in an encyclopedia or online. The following, published online via Wikipedia, is said to contain material from Encyclopædia Britannica, 1911.

Originally Posted By: Wikipedia
Joseph Henry Thayer (November 7, 1828—November 26, 1901), US biblical scholar, was born in Boston, Massachusetts.

He studied at the Boston Latin School, and graduated from Harvard in 1850. Subsequently he studied theology at the Harvard Divinity School, and graduated from Andover Theological Seminary in 1857.

He served as a minister in Quincy, in 1859–64 in Salem, Massachusetts, and in 1862–63 was chaplain of the 40th Massachusetts Volunteers during the US Civil War. He was professor of sacred literature at Andover Seminary in 1864–82, and in 1884 succeeded Ezra Abbot as Bussey professor of New Testament criticism in the Harvard Divinity School. He died soon after his resignation from the Bussey professorship.

Beginning in 1870, Thayer was a member of the American Bible Revision Committee and recording secretary of the New Testament company (working on the Revised Version). Thayer's chief works were his translation of Grimm's Wilke's Clavis Novi Testamenti (1886; revised 1889) as A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, and his New Testament Bibliography (1890). Thayer spent 25 years working on his Lexicon, and made thousands of revisions from Grimm's Wilke's Clavis.
...
In February 1891 Thayer published a lecture in which he expressed disagreement with the position of Biblical inerrancy, asserting that his own acceptance of various errors of history and science in the Bible did not materially detract from his belief in the overall soundness of Christianity.


Notice the dates in the above. Thayer would have been exposed to the Sabbath truth before he finished his Greek lexicon. Also, I wonder if you realize that Mrs. White was given the Sabbath truth, in vision, in 1848. Adventists began keeping the Sabbath over 15 years before the Seventh-day Adventist church officially formed.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/22/14 02:35 PM

Arnold,

I just saw your response to me in post #165265. I would go on Mrs. White more than those other authors. She said that Luther had not discovered the truth of the Sabbath. I suppose being exposed to it and realizing the truth of it might be separate things. In any case, he did not "discover" the Sabbath.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
Luther and his co-laborers accomplished a noble work for God; but, coming as they did from the Roman Church, having themselves believed and advocated her doctrines, it was not to be expected that they would discern all these errors. It was their work to break the fetters of Rome and to give the Bible to the world; yet there were important truths which they failed to discover, and grave errors which they did not renounce. Most of them continued to observe the Sunday with other papal festivals. They did not, indeed, regard it as possessing divine authority, but believed that it should be observed as a generally accepted day of worship. There were some among them, however, who honored the Sabbath of the fourth commandment. ... {SR 353.2}


Obviously, the Bohemians would have been among the "some" who kept the Sabbath.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/22/14 02:55 PM

GC, I wish I could understand yours and Gordon's viewpoint. Do you mean you will only believe a dictionary (which is not even a theological dictionary), if it's written by an SDA? I find this strange, because EGW's personal and office library was largely composed of non-SDA authors, many of them her contemporaries.
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/22/14 05:01 PM

This is a valid point, Rosangela. We must beware that we do not make Gail Riplinger and others have too much influence on our views.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/22/14 05:17 PM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
GC, I wish I could understand yours and Gordon's viewpoint. Do you mean you will only believe a dictionary (which is not even a theological dictionary), if it's written by an SDA? I find this strange, because EGW's personal and office library was largely composed of non-SDA authors, many of them her contemporaries.


I can tell you that Mrs. White might have had books like John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress in her library, but she probably did not have any books by Thomas Paine. Neither, of course, was an Adventist. So, what is the difference between them? Both were scholars. Both were authors. But one was a sincere, truth-loving, law-abiding Christian while the other was a spiritualist. Interestingly, while Thomas Paine wrote in favor of deism, some of the same views which he held, such as that the scriptures were not inerrant, were views held by Thayer. Thayer was a unitarian, and had a big hand in making changes to the Bible through the translation of the corrupted manuscripts of Westcott and Hort.

The link below provides a good background into all of this, and shows the relationship each one has to the matter of Bible doctrines. It is noteworthy that Paine, Hort, and Thayer are all mentioned on the same page.

http://textualcriticism.scienceontheweb.net/AA/Unitarians.html

To answer your question more directly, Rosangela, I have no problem accepting a dictionary that is written by one who is following God's Spirit, regardless of their professed religious affiliation. However, by the same token, I would not follow the writings of even a Seventh-day Adventist who is not following God's Spirit. I would ask questions like these: How faithful is the man? What is his character and what are his fruits? What agenda does he have? What purpose does he have for writing what he does?

When I study the Bible, I want to know that the interpretation I make of it is not tainted by human corruptions of any kind, whether it be from adulterated Hebrew and Greek manuscripts, corrupted translations, or lexicons tainted by those willing to "bend" the truth to fit their own dogmas. I don't even want the interpretation I make of it to be tainted by my own opinion, pride, or prejudice.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/22/14 10:26 PM

Commentaries sometimes must be taken with a grain of salt, but lexicons? There are no lexicons written by SDAs. If you can't trust a lexicon, you can't read the Bible in the original languages - not even if your mother tongue is Greek or Hebrew, for ancient Greek and Hebrew are very different from modern Greek and Hebrew. For those who have studied Greek and Hebrew, mere versions of the Bible are not enough, and lexicons are very useful tools.
As to Ellen White, she not only read but also quoted many Sundaykeepers - and many of them were her contemporaries. She had in her library, for instance, the Analytical Concordance of Robert Young, a biblical scholar (1822-1888). Surprisingly, she had in her library many books written by Brooke F. Westcott.
I didn't understand the reaction against Thayer. By the way, the definition he gave of the word anomia is biblically correct.
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/22/14 11:07 PM

GC - do you ask the same questions when you introduce to us the views of Gail Riplinger?
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/23/14 08:32 AM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Commentaries sometimes must be taken with a grain of salt, but lexicons? There are no lexicons written by SDAs. If you can't trust a lexicon, you can't read the Bible in the original languages - not even if your mother tongue is Greek or Hebrew, for ancient Greek and Hebrew are very different from modern Greek and Hebrew. For those who have studied Greek and Hebrew, mere versions of the Bible are not enough, and lexicons are very useful tools.
As to Ellen White, she not only read but also quoted many Sundaykeepers - and many of them were her contemporaries. She had in her library, for instance, the Analytical Concordance of Robert Young, a biblical scholar (1822-1888). Surprisingly, she had in her library many books written by Brooke F. Westcott.
I didn't understand the reaction against Thayer. By the way, the definition he gave of the word anomia is biblically correct.


Rosangela,

Lexicons are the new battlefield. Satan can change our doctrines by changing the definitions. It's as simple as that. Consider some of the definition problems we've run into here on this forum, e.g. "arbitrary." When we cannot agree on a definition, confusion results. Satan is the author of confusion.

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
By the way, the definition he gave of the word anomia is biblically correct.


Based on what? How would you know? What is your standard? If Thayer's dictionary is used as your standard, that would be circular reasoning.

Thayer was a revisionist. The more I have learned about these men, the more I have seen their disregard of the jots and tittles that are so important to God. How can I, then, trust him to be faithful in other "tittles" when it comes to meanings or such?

I'm not at all surprised if Thayer presents a lot of truth. That is the devil's best way of introducing error--mix it with a larger dose of genuine truth so that people see the truth and assume the whole is truth.

As for "anomia," it means: "transgression of the law," not "lawlessness." I could see phrasing it as "against the law." That might be nearly the same as "transgression." But "lawlessness" is too ambiguous.

Consider: "And because iniquity G458 shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold." The "iniquity" here is "anomia." But it is NOT telling us that the love of many will grow cold for lack of laws!

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/23/14 09:02 AM

I just took a peek at the list of books in the Ellen G White libraries. She did have a number of Bible Commentaries, and would you believe it: A Greek Grammar.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/23/14 10:19 AM

Sounds good. I noticed there was nothing attributed to Thayer in her library. Of course, would it have mattered? Having something in one's library is no indication of one's own views. As an example, I keep a "Book of Mormon" for reference when working with Mormons, but I am hardly a believer in it. Far from it. I expect most everyone, including Mrs. White, would find utility in some books that were not believed/accepted as truth.

As for Mrs. White, she had books containing writings of such men as Thomas Paine, Plato, Machiavelli, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Aristotle, and many others whom Mrs. White would probably not recommend that we should read.

So, what is the point of seeing what she had in her library? This is just an attempt to put up a strawman argument, I think.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/23/14 11:56 AM

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
Originally Posted By: Martin Luther
Originally Posted By: St. Augustine
I have learned to render to the inspired Scriptures alone the homage of a firm belief that they have never erred: as to others, I do not believe in the things they teach, simply because it is they who teach them.


As for Thayer, he did not believe that the scriptures never erred. Perhaps he helped them err.

smile

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/23/14 03:43 PM

.
.
.
Haven't we strayed somewhat from the topic: "2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law"?
.
.
.

Now, I contend:

1. that the Law of Christ is the LAW OF LOVE,
2. that the Ten Commandments (as all of the OT) were given to teach LOVE,
3. that Christ revealed that LOVE, for our example,
4. that we who believe will not be judged (having passed from the condemnation of death to the hope of eternal life through our faith by the grace of God),
5. that, being full of LOVE, we naturally do not sin, hence the commandment that "Ye love one another as I have loved you" and again, "By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one for another",
6. that specifically about the Sabbath:

a) it was given as a safeguard against forgetfulness of our Creator, and
b) it remains forever among His people, for those who LOVE HIM.

The very foundation of THE THRONE OF OUR GOD IS LOVE (Rev. 22:1), not the Decalogue, not legalism and certainly not fear (2 Cor. 13:11, 1 John 4:17-18).

///
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/24/14 12:17 AM

Quote:
Lexicons are the new battlefield.

GC, I see the perspective of someone who has studied biblical languages and the perspetive of someone who hasn't is completely different, so sincerely I don't think it's worthwhile going on with this discussion about Thayer and lexicons. About the word anomia, just a few remarks. The prefix "a" is a negation; it means "not," "without," and expresses the opposite meaning. For instance, the noun acephaly comes from the ancient Greek akephalia, a (not) + kephale (head) = the opposite of having a head; headlessness.
Adikia - a feminine noun, formed by a (not) + dike (justice) = the opposite of justice or righteousness; injustice; without justice; unrighteousness.
Thus,
Anomia - a feminine noun, formed by a (not) + nomos (law) = the opposite of law; lawlessness; without law; illegality; iniquity.
In fact, adikia and anomia are synonims.
The fact of being without righteousness (adikia) doesn't mean that righteousness doesn't exist; it means that the person is ignorant of righteousness, and so lives naturally in unrighteousness; or that the person despises righteousness, and lives voluntarily in unrighteousness. The same applies to anomia. Either the person is ignorant of the law, and so lives naturally in discrepancy with it (see Romans 2); or the person lives voluntarily in discrepancy with, or transgression of, it.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/24/14 01:19 AM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
As for "anomia," it means: "transgression of the law," not "lawlessness." I could see phrasing it as "against the law." That might be nearly the same as "transgression." But "lawlessness" is too ambiguous.

Consider: "And because iniquity G458 shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold." The "iniquity" here is "anomia." But it is NOT telling us that the love of many will grow cold for lack of laws!

Anomia is translated "transgression" only in 1Jn 3:4. It's translated once as "unrighteousness" (2Cor 6:14). The other dozen times it is translated "iniquity."

Given that, I believe it is more a state than an action. Lawlessness expresses that better than transgression.

Furthermore, I don't know that any student will conclude that "hamartia is anomia" means "sin is without law" given the Biblical context. Even in English, I don't remember ever seeing "lawlessness" used to mean "without law;" rather, it means "being against the law."
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/24/14 01:32 AM

Quote:
#4. that we who believe will not be judged.
We will not be condemned, but certainly we will be judged.
2Co 5:10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil.
Jas 2:8-12 If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself," you are doing well. But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors. For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become accountable for all of it. For he who said, "Do not commit adultery," also said, "Do not murder." If you do not commit adultery but do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. So speak and so act as those who are to be judged under the law of liberty.

Quote:
#5. that, being full of LOVE, we naturally do not sin.

You don’t sin? Every day we grow in love, but this is a process, not a goal we have already achieved, and we will occasionally fail along the process.

Quote:
#6. b) it remains forever among His people, for those who LOVE HIM.

But how does it remain forever? Do you believe the seventh-day sabbath should be kept by those who love Him?

Quote:
The very foundation of THE THRONE OF OUR GOD IS LOVE (Rev. 22:1), not the Decalogue, not legalism and certainly not fear

The foundation of the throne of God is love in its several aspects – truth, mercy, righteousness, justice (Ps 89:14; 97:2). And God’s righteousness is revealed through His law.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/24/14 01:47 AM

Quote:
Furthermore, I don't know that any student will conclude that "hamartia is anomia" means "sin is without law" given the Biblical context. Even in English, I don't remember ever seeing "lawlessness" used to mean "without law;" rather, it means "being against the law."

Yes, "without law" is a literal translation. It could mean "the state of being without law" in the sense of refusing to be ruled by the law. It could also be anti-law or against the law.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/24/14 05:15 AM

Yes, refusing the obey the law. That's lawlessness.

I have never seen "lawlessness" used to mean "lacking law" or "the law doesn't exist."
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/24/14 06:06 AM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
.
1. that the Law of Christ is the LAW OF LOVE,
2. that the Ten Commandments (as all of the OT) were given to teach LOVE,
3. that Christ revealed that LOVE, for our example,
4. that we who believe will not be judged (having passed from the condemnation of death to the hope of eternal life through our faith by the grace of God),
5. that, being full of LOVE, we naturally do not sin, hence the commandment that "Ye love one another as I have loved you" and again, "By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one for another",
6. that specifically about the Sabbath:

a) it was given as a safeguard against forgetfulness of our Creator, and
b) it remains forever among His people, for those who LOVE HIM.

The very foundation of THE THRONE OF OUR GOD IS LOVE (Rev. 22:1), not the Decalogue, not legalism and certainly not fear (2 Cor. 13:11, 1 John 4:17-18).

This is good, with some caveats:

All will be judged, but believers will not be condemned. Everyone lives and dies, then the judgement. But there is no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus.

Even though we can be filled with love, we cannot say that "we naturally do not sin." In fact, if we say we have no sin, the truth is not in us. We can say that we supernaturally do not sin, but even that must be tempered. Yes, we can love each other, but it's not a sinless love.

God's kingdom is founded on love. God gave us the Decalogue to teach us love. We agree so far. But to say that the foundation is love and not the Decalogue presumes that they contradict. To claim to love while disobeying the law is an empty claim.

Otherwise, it's pretty good.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/24/14 06:29 AM

In the context of this week's lesson, how did Jesus relate to the law given in the OT?

"You have heard it said.... but I say....." Was Jesus throwing out the lessons He had given to man? Did He realize He had made a mistake and so gave us different instructions on how to love?

Or was He changing, not His mind, but the misunderstandings of man regarding His will?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/24/14 05:56 PM

He changing, not His mind, but the misunderstandings of man regarding His will.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/24/14 07:18 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
In the context of this week's lesson, how did Jesus relate to the law given in the OT?

"You have heard it said.... but I say....." Was Jesus throwing out the lessons He had given to man? Did He realize He had made a mistake and so gave us different instructions on how to love?

Or was He changing, not His mind, but the misunderstandings of man regarding His will?


The Bible is written by inspired men, but it is not God's mode of thought and expression. It is that of humanity. God, as a writer, is not represented. Men will often say such an expression is not like God. But God has not put Himself in words, in logic, in rhetoric, on trial in the Bible. The writers of the Bible were God's penmen, not His pen. Look at the different writers. {1SM 21.1}

It is not the words of the Bible that are inspired, but the men that were inspired. Inspiration acts not on the man's words or his expressions but on the man himself, who, under the influence of the Holy Ghost, is imbued with thoughts. But the words receive the impress of the individual mind. The divine mind is diffused. The divine mind and will is combined with the human mind and will; thus the utterances of the man are the word of God.-- Manuscript 24, 1886 (written in Europe in 1886). {1SM 21.2}

Hebrews 1:1-3 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, 2 Has in these last days spoken to us by his Son, whom he has appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; 3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high:

Mark 9:7 And there was a cloud that overshadowed them: and a voice came out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear him.

Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! Truth came forth from the lips of Jesus, uncorrupted with human philosophy. His words were from heaven, such as mortal lips had never spoken nor mortal ears ever heard. His heart was an altar on which burned the flames of infinite love. Goodness, mercy, and love were enthroned in the breast of the Son of God. He set up his tabernacle in the midst of our human encampment, pitched his tent by the side of the tents of men, that he might dwell among them and make them familiar with his divine character and love. {ST, January 20, 1890 par. 9}
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/25/14 01:48 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
In the context of this week's lesson, how did Jesus relate to the law given in the OT?

"You have heard it said.... but I say....." Was Jesus throwing out the lessons He had given to man? Did He realize He had made a mistake and so gave us different instructions on how to love?

Or was He changing, not His mind, but the misunderstandings of man regarding His will?


Christ was MAGNIFYING THE LAW.

It's like looking at a leaf. A real leaf doesn't look that much different from a well made artificial leaf until one looks at it with a magnifying glass. Then one sees the complexity of the living leaf, while the artificial one is just a bunch of coarse threads.

The law says, "Do not murder"
but let's look at that law with a magnifying glass.
If you have hate in heart against someone you are already guilty of murder in your heart.

The law says "Do not commit adultery"
but let's look at that law with a magnifying glass.
If you are lusting after someone you are already guilty of adultery in your heart.

The command says "An eye of an eye, a tooth for a tooth"
But people used that command to excuse their revengefully thoughts and actions, thus using this command to excuse their breaking of the sixth commandment . There is nothing wrong with the command in it's rightful use (judges who must deal with criminals need to be sure the punishment fits the crime and never exceeds it) however, this is no excuse or license to excuse revengeful thoughts and actions.
" but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. "
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/26/14 09:52 AM

The quarterly says: Israel would be the people through whom the nations of the earth received the blessings promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. However, the blessings were by no means automatic. As a chosen nation, Israel was expected to walk in harmony with the Lord's will.

We often think of walking in God's will as the prerequisite to receiving His blessings. But what if walking in His will constituted the blessing? What if the blessing was that God would enable us, once again, to live according to His plan for us? How does that change of paradigm affect our outreach and our nurture activities?
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/26/14 07:45 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
The Bible is written by inspired men, but it is not God's mode of thought and expression. It is that of humanity. God, as a writer, is not represented. Men will often say such an expression is not like God. But God has not put Himself in words, in logic, in rhetoric, on trial in the Bible. The writers of the Bible were God's penmen, not His pen. Look at the different writers. {1SM 21.1}

It is not the words of the Bible that are inspired, but the men that were inspired. Inspiration acts not on the man's words or his expressions but on the man himself, who, under the influence of the Holy Ghost, is imbued with thoughts. But the words receive the impress of the individual mind. The divine mind is diffused. The divine mind and will is combined with the human mind and will; thus the utterances of the man are the word of God.-- Manuscript 24, 1886 (written in Europe in 1886). {1SM 21.2}

Hebrews 1:1-3 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, 2 Has in these last days spoken to us by his Son, whom he has appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; 3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high:

Mark 9:7 And there was a cloud that overshadowed them: and a voice came out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear him.

Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! Truth came forth from the lips of Jesus, uncorrupted with human philosophy. His words were from heaven, such as mortal lips had never spoken nor mortal ears ever heard. His heart was an altar on which burned the flames of infinite love. Goodness, mercy, and love were enthroned in the breast of the Son of God. He set up his tabernacle in the midst of our human encampment, pitched his tent by the side of the tents of men, that he might dwell among them and make them familiar with his divine character and love. {ST, January 20, 1890 par. 9}

You're confused. Either it was inspired (without fault) or not (susceptible to errors). Make up your mind.

///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/26/14 07:57 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
All will be judged, but believers will not be condemned. Everyone lives and dies, then the judgement. But there is no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus.

Do you have eternal life?

Originally Posted By: asygo
Even though we can be filled with love, we cannot say that "we naturally do not sin." In fact, if we say we have no sin, the truth is not in us. We can say that we supernaturally do not sin, but even that must be tempered. Yes, we can love each other, but it's not a sinless love.

He who truly loves cannot and does not sin. Hence the commandment to love. Have you ever been in love?

Originally Posted By: asygo
God's kingdom is founded on love. God gave us the Decalogue to teach us love. We agree so far. But to say that the foundation is love and not the Decalogue presumes that they contradict. To claim to love while disobeying the law is an empty claim.

"Have you never read what David did when he was in need and hungry, he and those with him: how he went into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the showbread, WHICH IS NOT LAWFUL TO EAT EXCEPT FOR THE PRIESTS, and also gave some to those who were with him?" (Mark 2:25-26) Was Abiathar guiltless in this matter?

///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/26/14 08:07 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
In the context of this week's lesson, how did Jesus relate to the law given in the OT?

"You have heard it said.... but I say....." Was Jesus throwing out the lessons He had given to man? Did He realize He had made a mistake and so gave us different instructions on how to love?

Or was He changing, not His mind, but the misunderstandings of man regarding His will?

He said, "I came to live it out before you." As John testified, "For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ." (John 1:17) In other words, Jesus was saying, "You have heard a certain interpretation of the text before, but I tell you: this is the true meaning of it all: LET LOVE REIGN IN YOUR HEARTS FOR GOD, AND ONE FOR ANOTHER."

///
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/27/14 05:01 AM

LESSON 9
Christ, the Law and the Gospel


Memory Text: For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ (John 1:17, NKJV).

The law is an important part of the topic of Christ our righteousness. Yet it is often a controversial subject. There are some who speak little of Christ, while they spend much time preaching the law and profess to honor God's law. There are others who speak much of believing in Christ but to a large extent reject the law spoken by His own voice on Mount Sinai.

We must preach CHRIST in the law, for only this will bring home the truth of the wonderful gift of salvation from sin, and give power and nourishment in the message that will feed the spiritual life and growth of the people.


So what does it mean -- the law came through Moses?

It does NOT mean Moses originated the law, for we know God Himself spoke the commands from Mount Sinai.
God Himself wrote that law on tables of stone with His own finger.

Yet it was Moses who brought those tablets of stone down to the people. But sadly, for many it remained only the commandments written on the tablets of stone.

but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ


We can give a fine talk on the commandments of God, but it will not accomplish a truly reformed life, UNLESS Christ dwells in the heart and writes His magnified law upon our hearts and minds.

Through the presence of Christ in our lives and thoughts, His law is written upon the fleshly tablets of our hearts thus transforming our very lives.

Thus Christ, the gospel, His law, are intermingled as one in the Christ Our Righteousness. When we receive Christ, we receive righteousness, we receive His law magnified by the law of love, we receive godly love.

Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/27/14 07:35 AM

Originally Posted By: dedication
LESSON 9
Christ, the Law and the Gospel


Memory Text: For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ (John 1:17, NKJV).

The law is an important part of the topic of Christ our righteousness. Yet it is often a controversial subject. There are some who speak little of Christ, while they spend much time preaching the law and profess to honor God's law. There are others who speak much of believing in Christ but to a large extent reject the law spoken by His own voice on Mount Sinai.

We must preach CHRIST in the law, for only this will bring home the truth of the wonderful gift of salvation from sin, and give power and nourishment in the message that will feed the spiritual life and growth of the people.


So what does it mean -- the law came through Moses?

It does NOT mean Moses originated the law, for we know God Himself spoke the commands from Mount Sinai.
God Himself wrote that law on tables of stone with His own finger.

Yet it was Moses who brought those tablets of stone down to the people. But sadly, for many it remained only the commandments written on the tablets of stone.

but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ


We can give a fine talk on the commandments of God, but it will not accomplish a truly reformed life, UNLESS Christ dwells in the heart and writes His magnified law upon our hearts and minds.

Through the presence of Christ in our lives and thoughts, His law is written upon the fleshly tablets of our hearts thus transforming our very lives.

Thus Christ, the gospel, His law, are intermingled as one in the Christ Our Righteousness. When we receive Christ, we receive righteousness, we receive His law magnified by the law of love, we receive godly love.


When he says, "For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ," he is not referring to the Decalogue, but the Pentateuch. In other words he is saying, "Moses told us ABOUT God; but we have seen, walked and talked with Him!"

///
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/27/14 04:57 PM

Quote:
You're confused. Either it was inspired (without fault) or not (susceptible to errors). Make up your mind.

The Bible is infallible as a rule of faith.
By the way, you didn’t answer my question about Matt. 23:35 (post #165278) in relation to 2 Chron. 24.
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/27/14 06:30 PM

Quote:
Do you have eternal life?

Sorry to jump in. I know the replies were addressed to Arnold, but since I had given basically the same replies as he (post #165346), I'll give my $0.2 on this. You have eternal life as long as you have Christ (1Jo 5:12). The judgment will determine whether someone really has Him, or if it's a false profession.

1Jo 4:17 (BBE) In this way love is made complete in us, so that we may be without fear on the day of judging, because as he is, so are we in this world.

Why would someone need confidence on the Day of Judgment if they won't be judged?

Quote:
He who truly loves cannot and does not sin. Hence the commandment to love. Have you ever been in love?

So we should suppose that you do not sin?

Quote:
"Have you never read what David did when he was in need and hungry, he and those with him: how he went into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the showbread, WHICH IS NOT LAWFUL TO EAT EXCEPT FOR THE PRIESTS, and also gave some to those who were with him?" (Mark 2:25-26) Was Abiathar guiltless in this matter?

The question is, is it lawful to save life, to preserve life on the Sabbath?

Read the whole account in Matthew 12:2-12, where the words LAWFUL and NOT LAWFUL are used several times.

Jesus’ cleverness amazes me.

The Pharisees said the disciples were doing what was NOT LAWFUL on the Sabbath (v. 2).

They were doing a LAWFUL thing (Deut 23:25). The question is, was it lawful to do that lawful thing on the Sabbath?

So Jesus cited David’s example. David did and UNLAWFUL thing (Lev. 24:8, 9). But was it lawful to do that unlawful thing on the Sabbath?

Both things were done to preserve life, which is a lawful thing to to on the Sabbath (v. 11, 12).

Jesus’ reasoning was, if it was lawful to do an UNLAWFUL thing on the Sabbath to preserve life (David's case), why would it be unlawful to do a LAWFUL thing on the Sabbath, also to preserve life (the disciples' case)? In this way, Jesus demonstrated that the charge of the Pharisees was false.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/28/14 08:46 AM

According to Romans 6:23 and Ephesians 2:8, what is the nature of the grace that originates in Jesus? How did Jesus supply grace for humans?


Romans 6:23 For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Ephesians 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God.


All have sinned and are worthy of death.
But Christ took upon Himself the sins of us all, and bore them to the cross.

1 Peter 2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.
2:25 For ye were as sheep going astray; but are now returned unto the Shepherd and Bishop of your souls.

The law condemns the sinner, but Christ took our condemnation upon Himself and died our death.

What now? Do we disregard the law that defines sin?
No!

"Further, grace manifests itself as the indwelling presence of Christ that enables the individual to participate in the righteousness that the law promotes. Paul states that in condemning sin in the flesh, Jesus has made it possible for the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us (Rom. 8:4, NKJV). Grace not only frees us from the condemnation of the law, but it enables us to keep the law in the way that we are called to do." (Wednesday Lesson)

Ephesians 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/28/14 07:22 PM

It seems the lesson is implying that the law can be fulfilled BY us if we have grace. Is anyone else getting the same thing?
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/28/14 07:24 PM

The quarterly asks: John 1:17 states that grace and truth originated with Jesus Christ. Using that text, many people place the law in opposition to the grace and truth. Why is this a false dichotomy? In what ways do the law and grace and truth all work together to reveal to us the character of God as seen in the plan of salvation?
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/28/14 08:18 PM

Quote:
It seems the lesson is implying that the law can be fulfilled BY us if we have grace. Is anyone else getting the same thing?

I think the lesson is saying that grace is both God's unmerited gift of eternal life and God's enabling us to do His will. It says:
"Grace not only frees us from the condemnation of the law, but it enables us to keep the law in the way that we are called to do."
Posted By: gordonb1

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/28/14 09:17 PM


Unfortunately the thread title is misleading.
Christ came to vindicate His Father's Law.

"Amid the awful glory of Sinai, Christ declared
in the hearing of all the people the ten precepts
of His Father's law." (Patriarchs & Prophets 366)
___________________________________
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/28/14 10:42 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
The quarterly asks: John 1:17 states that grace and truth originated with Jesus Christ. Using that text, many people place the law in opposition to the grace and truth. Why is this a false dichotomy? In what ways do the law and grace and truth all work together to reveal to us the character of God as seen in the plan of salvation?


Keith Augustus Burton, the author of the lesson ( here ) is a bit misguided. SDA obsession with the Decalogue is causing them to stumble. Read all of John's introduction to the gospel and you will see that the "law" John speaks of is not the laws but all of "Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy" as the LAW in "THE LAW and the prophets". He says:

Originally Posted By: John 1:14-18
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

That "grace and truth" of which he speaks is the "glory as of the only begotten of the Father" which they beheld for themselves. In other words, they had walked and talked with the Son of the Living God. Wonder of wonders! They had looked upon Him and had not died. They had learnt of Him and, instead, had been blessed. This is the one "about whom we testify to you today and our testimony is sure. We have met the one spoken of by Moses in the Law. Him, we declare to you!"

"Grace" = love and compassion
"Truth" = perfection, consistency of character to the point of being completely flawless

As it is written, "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." (Mat. 5:48)

///
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/29/14 07:05 PM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
It seems the lesson is implying that the law can be fulfilled BY us if we have grace. Is anyone else getting the same thing?

I think the lesson is saying that grace is both God's unmerited gift of eternal life and God's enabling us to do His will. It says:
"Grace not only frees us from the condemnation of the law, but it enables us to keep the law in the way that we are called to do."

I remember reading that, and I wasn't comfortable with it. Does grace enable US to KEEP the law as GOD requires? Or does grace enable us to RECEIVE CHRIST'S acceptable obedience as ours? Yes, grace teaches us to live godly lives, but is our godliness acceptable as-is?

The leason seems to swing from one side to the other, rather than keeping an even keel.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/29/14 07:09 PM

Originally Posted By: gordonb1

Unfortunately the thread title is misleading.
Christ came to vindicate His Father's Law.

"Amid the awful glory of Sinai, Christ declared
in the hearing of all the people the ten precepts
of His Father's law." (Patriarchs & Prophets 366)
___________________________________

What did you think of the previous lesson on God's law vs Christ's law? Do you believe they are different? Or is Christ's law the same as His Father's law?
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/29/14 08:00 PM

Quote:
Quote:
"Grace not only frees us from the condemnation of the law, but it enables us to keep the law in the way that we are called to do."

I remember reading that, and I wasn't comfortable with it. Does grace enable US to KEEP the law as GOD requires? Or does grace enable us to RECEIVE CHRIST'S acceptable obedience as ours? Yes, grace teaches us to live godly lives, but is our godliness acceptable as-is?

Isn't it both? Grace enables us to receive Christ's acceptable obedience as ours (justification - pardon - it doesn't involve our works) and it enables us to keep the law as God requires (sanctification - it involves our works). Of course our imperfect obedience in sanctification is also covered by Christ's perfect obedience to be acceptable (as per the famous quote: "O, that all may see that everything in obedience, in penitence, in praise and thanksgiving must be placed upon the glowing fire of the righteousness of Christ." {AG 154.5}), but it is then considered perfect - as God requires.
WDYT?
Posted By: gordonb1

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/29/14 11:29 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
What did you think of the previous lesson on God's law vs Christ's law? Do you believe they are different? Or is Christ's law the same as His Father's law?

Hi Arnold, on the face of it, one would be presumptuous to consider another law (or another gospel) than the Ten Commandments established by Christ's Father, the Ancient of Days.
As God is perfect, so must be His Law for His Creation.

Christ's mission as the Angel of God (Ex. 14:19), aka the Angel of the Covenant, was to vindicate His Father's Law. As God's chief Messenger (at the same time God's Son!), it's unlikely that He changed His tune. A faithful messenger delivers the message, even if it costs his life.

(see Hebrew #4397)

But I have not read the lesson, so will have a look.
_______________________________
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/30/14 03:40 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
It seems the lesson is implying that the law can be fulfilled BY us if we have grace. Is anyone else getting the same thing?

I think the lesson is saying that grace is both God's unmerited gift of eternal life and God's enabling us to do His will. It says:
"Grace not only frees us from the condemnation of the law, but it enables us to keep the law in the way that we are called to do."

I remember reading that, and I wasn't comfortable with it. Does grace enable US to KEEP the law as GOD requires? Or does grace enable us to RECEIVE CHRIST'S acceptable obedience as ours? Yes, grace teaches us to live godly lives, but is our godliness acceptable as-is?

The leason seems to swing from one side to the other, rather than keeping an even keel.


It is grace that is the regenerating power that transforms the character.

Grace forgives - justifies and removes our unworthiness to be in connection with God, and imputes Christ's worthiness to us, so we can be in communion with God!
Grace gives us the Holy Spirit so we can walk in newness of life as we are lead by His Spirit!
Grace regenerates and transforms our character.

Thus yes, by God's grace we live according to God's law. Not that we earn any merit, but because God's grace is active in our lives.

Acts 20:32 And now, brethren, I commend you to God, and to the word of his grace, which is able to build you up, and to give you an inheritance among all them which are sanctified.

"we are not saved by the works of the law, yet we cannot be saved without obedience. The law is the standard by which character is measured. But we cannot possibly keep the commandments of God without the regenerating grace of Christ. Jesus alone can cleanse us from all sin. He does not save us by law, neither will He save us in disobedience to law. {FW 95.3}
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/30/14 04:52 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Originally Posted By: gordonb1

Unfortunately the thread title is misleading.
Christ came to vindicate His Father's Law.


What did you think of the previous lesson on God's law vs Christ's law? Do you believe they are different? Or is Christ's law the same as His Father's law?


I was a little surprised there was an implied thought in the lesson putting a difference between Christ's law and God's law. I do not believe there is a difference.

Jesus said: "I and my Father are One". John 10:30
They don't have different laws.
To keep the law of God is to keep the law of Christ; and to keep the law of Christ is to keep the law of God.

The only difference is that Christ came and demonstrated the keeping of that law.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/30/14 07:59 PM

Originally Posted By: Rosangela
Quote:
Quote:
"Grace not only frees us from the condemnation of the law, but it enables us to keep the law in the way that we are called to do."

I remember reading that, and I wasn't comfortable with it. Does grace enable US to KEEP the law as GOD requires? Or does grace enable us to RECEIVE CHRIST'S acceptable obedience as ours? Yes, grace teaches us to live godly lives, but is our godliness acceptable as-is?

Isn't it both? Grace enables us to receive Christ's acceptable obedience as ours (justification - pardon - it doesn't involve our works) and it enables us to keep the law as God requires (sanctification - it involves our works). Of course our imperfect obedience in sanctification is also covered by Christ's perfect obedience to be acceptable (as per the famous quote: "O, that all may see that everything in obedience, in penitence, in praise and thanksgiving must be placed upon the glowing fire of the righteousness of Christ." {AG 154.5}), but it is then considered perfect - as God requires.
WDYT?

I believe we are on the same page.

Grace enables us to obey, but it is an imperfect obedience that requires the covering of Christ's righteousness. If we have grace, we obey, but our obedience does not meet the law's perfect claims. Rather, Christ's perfect obedience meets those claims as we abide in Him. Therefore, the righteous requirements of the law are fulfilled IN us, not BY us; by Christ's work FOR us, not His work IN and THROUGH us.

How does that sound?
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 05/31/14 05:27 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Grace enables us to obey, but it is an imperfect obedience that requires the covering of Christ's righteousness. If we have grace, we obey, but our obedience does not meet the law's perfect claims. Rather, Christ's perfect obedience meets those claims as we abide in Him. Therefore, the righteous requirements of the law are fulfilled IN us, not BY us; by Christ's work FOR us, not His work IN and THROUGH us.

What does this mean: "AND of His fullness we have all received, AND grace for grace" (John 1:16)? What does "AND grace for grace" mean?

///
Posted By: Rosangela

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/01/14 05:37 PM

Quote:
Grace enables us to obey, but it is an imperfect obedience that requires the covering of Christ's righteousness. If we have grace, we obey, but our obedience does not meet the law's perfect claims. Rather, Christ's perfect obedience meets those claims as we abide in Him. Therefore, the righteous requirements of the law are fulfilled IN us, not BY us; by Christ's work FOR us, not His work IN and THROUGH us.

How does that sound?

It seems we are in agreement.
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/02/14 01:20 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo

Grace enables us to obey, but it is an imperfect obedience that requires the covering of Christ's righteousness. If we have grace, we obey, but our obedience does not meet the law's perfect claims. Rather, Christ's perfect obedience meets those claims as we abide in Him. Therefore, the righteous requirements of the law are fulfilled IN us, not BY us; by Christ's work FOR us, not His work IN and THROUGH us.

How does that sound?


AMEN!
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/02/14 06:32 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Grace enables us to obey, but it is an imperfect obedience that requires the covering of Christ's righteousness. If we have grace, we obey, but our obedience does not meet the law's perfect claims. Rather, Christ's perfect obedience meets those claims as we abide in Him. Therefore, the righteous requirements of the law are fulfilled IN us, not BY us; by Christ's work FOR us, not His work IN and THROUGH us.

How does that sound?


John 15:5 I am the vine, you are the branches: He that stays in me, and I in him, the same brings forth much fruit: for without me you can do nothing.

Are you saying that the work through us and in us is imperfect such that we will only give imperfect obedience? Is the covering of Christ a cloak for iniquity?
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/02/14 08:35 PM

A million years from now we will still be forgiven sinners, and His righteousness covers us and we are admitted by His grace. We will never have anything in us throughout eternity that entitles us to eternal life with Him except His grace, accepted by faith.

Through His grace and sin offering we will have a perfect

koiononea

one with another and with Jesus Christ.

There is no English Bible which gives a perfect translation of koinonea, but the closest is fellowship.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/03/14 07:52 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Grace enables us to obey, but it is an imperfect obedience that requires the covering of Christ's righteousness. If we have grace, we obey, but our obedience does not meet the law's perfect claims. Rather, Christ's perfect obedience meets those claims as we abide in Him. Therefore, the righteous requirements of the law are fulfilled IN us, not BY us; by Christ's work FOR us, not His work IN and THROUGH us.

How does that sound?


"Obedience and submission to God's requirements are the conditions given by the inspired apostle by which we become children of God, members of the royal family." -- Ellen White.

The Bible is clear that only the obedient are called children of God. The disobedient are children of the devil. Therefore, the above statement cannot be referring to Christ's obedience, for then everyone would be a child of God.

Just a point of clarification. Obviously, there is a certain "obedience" which must be our own.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/03/14 06:06 PM

By perfect obedience to the law of Jehovah we are to magnify the law and make it honorable. {CW 100.1}

The very image of God is to be reproduced in humanity. The honor of God, the honor of Christ, is involved in the perfection of the character of His people. {DA 671.3}

Quote:
Christ became the sinless sacrifice for a guilty race, making men prisoners of hope, so that through repentance toward God because they had broken His holy law, and through faith in Christ as their Substitute, Surety, and righteousness, they might be brought back to loyalty to God and to obedience to His holy law. {FW 117.3}

As the sinner, drawn by the power of Christ, approaches the uplifted cross, and prostrates himself before it, there is a new creation. A new heart is given him. He becomes a new creature in Christ Jesus. Holiness finds that it has nothing more to require. God Himself is "the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus." Romans 3:26. And "whom He justified, them He also glorified." Romans 8:30. {COL 162.4}

That which God required of Adam before his fall was perfect obedience to His law. God requires now what He required of Adam, perfect obedience, righteousness without a flaw, without shortcoming in His sight. God help us to render to Him all His law requires. We cannot do this without that faith that brings Christ's righteousness into daily practice. {2SM 380.4}

God requires of all His subjects obedience, entire obedience to all His commandments. He demands now as ever perfect righteousness as the only title to heaven. Christ is our hope and our refuge. His righteousness is imputed only to the obedient. Let us accept it through faith, that the Father shall find in us no sin. {6BC 1072.8}

God could not bring down his law to meet the standard of wicked men, neither could man, fallen by sin, meet the demands of the law by a blameless character and life. But by faith in Christ the sinner could be cleansed from his guilt, and he enabled to render obedience to the law of his Maker. {LP 242.2}

Christ has paid all that man owes to God from the beginning of his life. Sin is the transgression of the law, and through Christ man must now render perfect obedience to that law. By his righteousness of active obedience, Christ clothes me with his righteousness, in order that I shall not continue in sin, but perfect a character after the similitude of Christ. {HM, November 1, 1897 par. 10}

From a sense of thorough conviction, you can then testify to men of the immutable character of the law manifested by the death of Christ on the cross, the malignant nature of sin, and the righteousness of God in justifying the believer in Jesus, on condition of his future obedience to the statutes of God's government in heaven and earth. {RH, April 24, 1888 par. 15}

Christ bore the penalty that would have fallen upon the transgressor; and through faith the helpless, hopeless sinner becomes a partaker of the divine nature, escaping the corruption that is in the world through lust. Christ imputes his perfection and righteousness to the believing sinner when he does not continue in sin, but turns from transgression to obedience of the commandments. {RH, May 23, 1899 par. 8}

In everything Christ sought first the kingdom of God and his righteousness; and that which he did he commands his followers to do. This example he gave to the human race that they might in his strength render to God the obedience he requires, and in the end present themselves perfect before his throne. He was one with the Father. His life was a fulfilling of the law, a continual obedience to God's commands. {RH, October 2, 1900 par. 14}

God requires the entire surrender of the heart, before justification can take place; and in order for man to retain justification, there must be continual obedience, through active, living faith that works by love and purifies the soul. {FW 100.1}

Christ imputes his perfection and righteousness to the believing sinner when he does not continue in sin, but turns from transgression to obedience of the commandments.

The righteousness of God in justifying the believer in Jesus, on condition of his future obedience to the statutes of God's government in heaven and earth.

God requires the entire surrender of the heart, before justification can take place; and in order for man to retain justification, there must be continual obedience, through active, living faith that works by love and purifies the soul.

Holiness finds that it has nothing more to require.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/03/14 06:13 PM

Man's obedience can be made perfect only by the incense of Christ's righteousness, which fills with divine fragrance every act of obedience.

Only the covering which Christ Himself has provided can make us meet to appear in God's presence.

Quote:
In Christ we are as if we had suffered the penalty we have incurred. In Christ I am as if I had obeyed, and rendered perfect obedience to the law, which we can not perfectly obey without Christ imparts to us His merits and His righteousness. {PUR, September 4, 1913 par. 3}

Man's obedience can be made perfect only by the incense of Christ's righteousness, which fills with divine fragrance every act of obedience. The part of the Christian is to persevere in overcoming every fault. Constantly he is to pray to the Saviour to heal the disorders of his sin-sick soul. He has not the wisdom or the strength to overcome; these belong to the Lord, and He bestows them on those who in humiliation and contrition seek Him for help. {AA 532.1}

Every soul may say: "By His perfect obedience He has satisfied the claims of the law, and my only hope is found in looking to Him as my substitute and surety, who obeyed the law perfectly for me. By faith in His merits I am free from the condemnation of the law. He clothes me with His righteousness, which answers all the demands of the law. I am complete in Him who brings in everlasting righteousness. He presents me to God in the spotless garment of which no thread was woven by any human agent. All is of Christ, and all the glory, honor, and majesty are to be given to the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sins of the world." {NL 27.2}

Knowing himself to be a sinner, a transgressor of the holy law of God, he looks to the perfect obedience of Christ, to His death upon Calvary for the sins of the world; and he has the assurance that he is justified by faith in the merit and sacrifice of Christ. He realizes that the law was obeyed in his behalf by the Son of God, and that the penalty of transgression cannot fall upon the believing sinner. The active obedience of Christ clothes the believing sinner with the righteousness that meets the demands of the law. {SD 240.4}

Christ perfected a righteous character here upon the earth, not on His own account, for His character was pure and spotless, but for fallen man. His character He offers to man if he will accept it. The sinner, through repentance of his sins, faith in Christ, and obedience to the perfect law of God, has the righteousness of Christ imputed to him; it becomes his righteousness, and his name is recorded in the Lamb's book of life. He becomes a child of God, a member of the royal family. {3T 371.2}

Only the covering which Christ Himself has provided can make us meet to appear in God's presence. This covering, the robe of His own righteousness, Christ will put upon every repenting, believing soul. "I counsel thee," He says, "to buy of Me . . . white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear." Revelation 3:18. {COL 311.3}

By His perfect obedience He has made it possible for every human being to obey God's commandments.

Quote:
This robe, woven in the loom of heaven, has in it not one thread of human devising. Christ in His humanity wrought out a perfect character, and this character He offers to impart to us. "All our righteousness are as filthy rags." Isaiah 64:6. Everything that we of ourselves can do is defiled by sin. But the Son of God "was manifested to take away our sins; and in Him is no sin." Sin is defined to be "the transgression of the law." 1 John 3:5, 4. But Christ was obedient to every requirement of the law. He said of Himself, "I delight to do Thy will, O My God; yea, Thy law is within My heart." Psalm 40:8. When on earth, He said to His disciples, "I have kept My Father's commandments." John 15:10. By His perfect obedience He has made it possible for every human being to obey God's commandments. When we submit ourselves to Christ, the heart is united with His heart, the will is merged in His will, the mind becomes one with His mind, the thoughts are brought into captivity to Him; we live His life. This is what it means to be clothed with the garment of His righteousness. Then as the Lord looks upon us He sees, not the fig-leaf garment, not the nakedness and deformity of sin, but His own robe of righteousness, which is perfect obedience to the law of Jehovah. {COL 311.4}

Christ does not lessen the claims of the law. In unmistakable language He presents obedience to it as the condition of eternal life--the same condition that was required of Adam before his fall. The Lord expects no less of the soul now than He expected of man in Paradise, perfect obedience, unblemished righteousness. The requirement under the covenant of grace is just as broad as the requirement made in Eden--harmony with God's law, which is holy, just, and good. {COL 391.2}

True sanctification is a Bible doctrine. The apostle Paul, in his letter to the Thessalonian church, declares: "This is the will of God, even your sanctification." And he prays: "The very God of peace sanctify you wholly." 1 Thessalonians 4:3; 5:23. The Bible clearly teaches what sanctification is and how it is to be attained. The Saviour prayed for His disciples: "Sanctify them through Thy truth: Thy word is truth." John 17:17. And Paul teaches that believers are to be "sanctified by the Holy Ghost." Romans 15:16. What is the work of the Holy Spirit? Jesus told His disciples: "When He, the Spirit of truth, is come, He will guide you into all truth." John 16:13. And the psalmist says: "Thy law is the truth." By the word and the Spirit of God are opened to men the great principles of righteousness embodied in His law. And since the law of God is "holy, and just, and good," a transcript of the divine perfection, it follows that a character formed by obedience to that law will be holy. Christ is a perfect example of such a character. He says: "I have kept My Father's commandments." "I do always those things that please Him." John 15:10; 8:29. The followers of Christ are to become like Him--by the grace of God to form characters in harmony with the principles of His holy law. This is Bible sanctification. {GC 469.2}
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/04/14 07:00 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
What does this mean: "AND of His fullness we have all received, AND grace for grace" (John 1:16)? What does "AND grace for grace" mean?

It could mean that the grace we have received is being replaced by another kind of grace. Perhaps something akin to the glory of the Old Covenant being replaced by the glory of the New Covenant.

Or it could mean, as some translations suggest, that more grace is added to grace previously received. As Paul put it, grace abounds much more.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/04/14 07:04 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: asygo
Grace enables us to obey, but it is an imperfect obedience that requires the covering of Christ's righteousness. If we have grace, we obey, but our obedience does not meet the law's perfect claims. Rather, Christ's perfect obedience meets those claims as we abide in Him. Therefore, the righteous requirements of the law are fulfilled IN us, not BY us; by Christ's work FOR us, not His work IN and THROUGH us.

How does that sound?


John 15:5 I am the vine, you are the branches: He that stays in me, and I in him, the same brings forth much fruit: for without me you can do nothing.

Are you saying that the work through us and in us is imperfect such that we will only give imperfect obedience? Is the covering of Christ a cloak for iniquity?

The work done in and through us may be perfect, but the vessel defiles it. But Jesus makes up for our unavoidable deficiencies.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/04/14 07:11 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
"Obedience and submission to God's requirements are the conditions given by the inspired apostle by which we become children of God, members of the royal family." -- Ellen White.

The Bible is clear that only the obedient are called children of God. The disobedient are children of the devil. Therefore, the above statement cannot be referring to Christ's obedience, for then everyone would be a child of God.

Just a point of clarification. Obviously, there is a certain "obedience" which must be our own.

Yes, there is definitely obedience that is our own. But we owe even that to Jesus, as it is His imparted righteousness. And it still does not entitle us to heaven, as that is by His imputed righteousness.

I hope to spend some time this week discussing the role of obedience in the covenants.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/04/14 07:23 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
"By His perfect obedience He has satisfied the claims of the law, and my only hope is found in looking to Him as my substitute and surety, who obeyed the law perfectly for me. By faith in His merits I am free from the condemnation of the law. He clothes me with His righteousness, which answers all the demands of the law. I am complete in Him who brings in everlasting righteousness. He presents me to God in the spotless garment of which no thread was woven by any human agent. All is of Christ, and all the glory, honor, and majesty are to be given to the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sins of the world." {NL 27.2}

I concur.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/04/14 10:11 PM

"By His perfect obedience He has satisfied the claims of the law, and my only hope is found in looking to Him as my substitute and surety, who obeyed the law perfectly for me.

How is Christ our substitute?
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 12:31 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
"By His perfect obedience He has satisfied the claims of the law, and my only hope is found in looking to Him as my substitute and surety, who obeyed the law perfectly for me.

How is Christ our substitute?

***** STAFF EDIT *****

Christ did not obey the law for anybody. It is written, "the soul that sinneth, it shall die." Christ forgives your sin if you ask him. And once forgiven, you return into the family of God and are assured of salvation. How hard is that to understand? WOW! That is the whole reason for the Bible: to assure you of the love of God.

God forgives and will save all those who come to Him asking for forgiveness. PERIOD.

///
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 12:53 AM

James Peterson, do you love the deeds of the Nicolaitans? Sure sounds like it. Are you saying the gospel of Christ has made the law of God of none effect; that by "believing" we are released from the necessity of being doers of the word. But this is the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which Christ so unsparingly condemned.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 03:02 AM

Originally Posted By: james peterson
Christ did not obey the law for anybody.
Romans 5:18-21 AKJV
18 Therefore as by the offense of one judgment came on all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came on all men to justification of life.
19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.
20 Moreover the law entered, that the offense might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
21 That as sin has reigned to death, even so might grace reign through righteousness to eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 05:44 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: james peterson
Christ did not obey the law for anybody.
Romans 5:18-21 AKJV
18 Therefore as by the offense of one judgment came on all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came on all men to justification of life.
19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.
20 Moreover the law entered, that the offense might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
21 That as sin has reigned to death, even so might grace reign through righteousness to eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.


Grace is loving forgiveness. That is what Christ provided. PERIOD.

Christ did not "obey the law for anybody". And that is true because you ask for forgiveness which means that YOU are the one who is living either righteously or unrighteously. And when you sin, YOU SIN, and therefore YOU must ask for forgiveness because YOU are the one who lived and fell.

Nevertheless, because there was none righteous when God looked upon humanity, and because He found only Christ as perfect ... FOR CHRIST'S SAKE AND BECAUSE OF CHRIST ALONE AND BECAUSE CHRIST PLEADED ON OUR BEHALF, we are all saved all whosoever believes in HIM.

The gospel of the Kingdom of God is very simple.

///
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 05:54 AM

Did you ignore the It is written?

Do you know what Forgiveness is? There are two Green word translated into English as forgive. Do you know what they are and what the difference between them is?

God does not hold anything against any one. God is forgiveness (Charizomai) personified. Sinners that parish, will parish forgiven by God. What we need is forgiveness (Aphiemi) as in 1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 08:31 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
"Obedience and submission to God's requirements are the conditions given by the inspired apostle by which we become children of God, members of the royal family." -- Ellen White.

The Bible is clear that only the obedient are called children of God. The disobedient are children of the devil. Therefore, the above statement cannot be referring to Christ's obedience, for then everyone would be a child of God.

Just a point of clarification. Obviously, there is a certain "obedience" which must be our own.

Yes, there is definitely obedience that is our own. But we owe even that to Jesus, as it is His imparted righteousness. And it still does not entitle us to heaven, as that is by His imputed righteousness.

I hope to spend some time this week discussing the role of obedience in the covenants.


Arnold, be careful here. If Jesus has power to save to the uttermost, and if His grace is sufficient for all, your theology, given the sentiments expressed in your comment above, would lead you necessarily to the point of saying everyone will have to be saved. It's either that, or you make God show partiality.

If God has no "partiality," then what is the difference between "saved" and "lost?"

I say, the difference is us. We make the difference, not God. How do we make the difference? There is a work of faith which we must do. There is an "obedience" which God does not do for us and which we must do for ourselves, or lose Heaven. Mrs. White says "Those who merely seek to enter in will never be able." What's that? What happened to "seek and ye shall find?"

She says, along with that statement, "The agonizing ones are the only ones who will urge their passage through the strait gate and narrow way that lead to life eternal, to fullness of joy and pleasures forevermore."

Agonizing is one of the works of God which God will not do on our behalf. We must do it. More to the topic of imputed righteousness, look carefully at the following statement.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
The sinner, through repentance of his sins, faith in Christ, and obedience to the perfect law of God, has the righteousness of Christ imputed to him; it becomes his righteousness, and his name is recorded in the Lamb's book of life. He becomes a child of God, a member of the royal family. {3T 371.2}


Notice that in order to have Christ's righteousness imputed, three things are mentioned as being required of the sinner:

1) repentance of his sins,
2) faith in Christ, and
3) obedience to the perfect law of God.

It's a bit like saying "it takes money to make money." In order to have Christ's righteousness imputed to us, we must first obey His law.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 06:47 PM

GC, I agree that the difference is in us. However, the difference is NOT that the obedience of the saved is worthy of eternal life. We are righteous because of ONE MAN'S obedience, not our own.

On the other hand, none will be saved in disobedience. Our imperfect obedience is required, but not sufficient.

Here's one of the most balanced and complete treatments I know:

There is no excuse for sin or for indolence. Jesus has led the way, and He wishes us to follow in His steps. He has suffered, He has sacrificed as none of us can, that He might bring salvation within our reach. We need not be discouraged. Jesus came to our world to bring divine power to man, that through His grace, we might be transformed into His likeness. – {FW 49.4}

When it is in the heart to obey God, when efforts are put forth to this end, Jesus accepts this disposition and effort as man’s best service, and He makes up for the deficiency with His own divine merit. But He will not accept those who claim to have faith in Him and yet are disloyal to His Father’s commandment. We hear a great deal about faith, but we need to hear a great deal more about works. Many are deceiving their own souls by living an easy-going, accommodating, crossless religion. – {FW 50.1}

But Jesus says, “If any man will come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me” (Matthew 16:24). – {FW 50.2}
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 07:00 PM

Galatians 3:16 (KJV) 16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.

Galatians 3:19 (KJV) 19 Wherefore then [serveth] the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; [and it was] ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.

Galatians 3:26 (KJV) 26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.

Galatians 3:29 (KJV) 29 And if ye [be] Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.


It seems like the covenant promises are made to the Seed - Jesus. We don't get the promises by meeting the covenant conditions, since those promises were made to Jesus, not us.

However, if we are His children, we are heirs to the promises of the covenant. Therefore, our task is to be His children.

WDYT?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 07:21 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
"By His perfect obedience He has satisfied the claims of the law, and my only hope is found in looking to Him as my substitute and surety, who obeyed the law perfectly for me. By faith in His merits I am free from the condemnation of the law. He clothes me with His righteousness, which answers all the demands of the law. I am complete in Him who brings in everlasting righteousness. He presents me to God in the spotless garment of which no thread was woven by any human agent. All is of Christ, and all the glory, honor, and majesty are to be given to the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sins of the world." {NL 27.2}

I concur.

A huge shout - AMEN!

Quote:
Christ imputes his perfection and righteousness to the believing sinner when he does not continue in sin, but turns from transgression to obedience of the commandments.

God requires the entire surrender of the heart, before justification can take place; and in order for man to retain justification, there must be continual obedience, through active, living faith that works by love and purifies the soul.

Righteousness within is testified to by righteousness without. He who is righteous within is not hard-hearted and unsympathetic, but day by day he grows into the image of Christ, going on from strength to strength. He who is being sanctified by the truth will be self-controlled, and will follow in the footsteps of Christ until grace is lost in glory. The righteousness by which we are justified is imputed; the righteousness by which we are sanctified is imparted. The first is our title to heaven, the second is our fitness for heaven. {RH, June 4, 1895 par. 7}

You wrote - "Our imperfect obedience is required, but not sufficient." You applied the expression - "imperfect obedience" to the results of abiding in Jesus. Here is how Ellen White used the phrase:

Quote:
Without Christ it is impossible for him to render perfect obedience to the law of God; and heaven can never be gained by an imperfect obedience; for this would place all heaven in jeopardy, and make possible a second rebellion. {ST, December 30, 1889 par. 4}

On the other hand, referring to the fruit of abiding of Jesus, Ellen White wrote - "Holiness finds that it has nothing more to require." True, it lacks merit; therefore, Jesus adds it. ". . . He makes up for the deficiency with His own divine merit."
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 07:44 PM

Originally Posted By: green
In order to have Christ's righteousness imputed to us, we must first obey His law.
we can not obey unless we have Christ's righteousness.


Christ our Substitute
Being born of a woman, Christ was necessarily born under the law, for such is the condition of all mankind, and "in all things it behooved Him to be made like unto His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people." Hebrews 2:17. He takes everything on Himself. "He hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows." "Himself took our infirmities, and bare our disease." Matthew 8:17, R.V. "All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on Him the iniquity of us all." He redeems us by coming into our place literally, and taking our load off our shoulders. "Him who knew no sin He made to be sin on our behalf; that we might become the righteousness of God in Him." 2 Corinthians 5:21, R.V. In the fullest sense of the word, and to a degree that is seldom thought of when the expression is used, He became man's substitute. That is, He permeates our being, identifying Himself so fully with us that everything that touches or affects us touches and affects Him. He is not our substitute in the sense that one man is a substitute for another, in the army, for instance, the substitute being in one place, while the one for whom he is substitute is somewhere else, engaged in some other service. No; Christ's substitution is far different. He is our substitute in that He substitutes Himself for us, and we appear no more. We drop out entirely, so that it is "not I, but Christ." Thus we cast our cares on Him, not by picking them up and with an effort throwing them on Him, but by humbling ourselves into the nothingness that we are, so that we leave the burden resting on Him alone. Thus we see already how it is that He came {1900 EJW, GTI 168.2}
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 08:21 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
However, if we are His children, we are heirs to the promises of the covenant. Therefore, our task is to be His children.

WDYT?


I agree with this. And in order to be His children, we must obey. That is what Ellen White is saying in the quote I posted earlier. That is also what John tells us.

Originally Posted By: The Bible
1 John
3:7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
3:8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
3:9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
3:10 In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.


Mrs. White also tells us obedience is required to become children of God.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
"Without holiness no man shall see the Lord." Holiness does not consist in profession, but in doing the will of our Father which is in heaven. The crying of "Lord! Lord!" will not secure for us an entrance into the kingdom of heaven. Let no man cheat his soul with the delusion that he is saved simply because he can talk of faith and repentance. There are those who exclaim, "I am saved! I am saved!" who yet walk contrary to the doctrine of Christ. The word of God declares, "He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him." Obedience must be rendered to all God's commandments in this world before a soul will be chosen as a safe member of the kingdom of heaven, one of the royal children of God. Mrs. E. G. White. {YI, February 10, 1898 par. 6}


And Mrs. White says the following regarding the requirement of obedience in order to be saved.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
While we are to be in harmony with God's law, we are not saved by the works of the law, yet we cannot be saved without obedience. The law is the standard by which character is measured. But we cannot possibly keep the commandments of God without the regenerating grace of Christ. Jesus alone can cleanse us from all sin. He does not save us by law, neither will He save us in disobedience to law. {FW 95.3}


She also says this about the relationship of belief and works in our salvation.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
"Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only. . . . For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also" (James 2:24-26). It is essential to have faith in Jesus, and to believe you are saved through Him; but there is danger in taking the position that many do take in saying, "I am saved." Many have said: "You must do good works, and you will live"; but apart from Christ no one can do good works. Many at the present day say, "Believe, only believe, and live." Faith and works go together, believing and doing are blended. The Lord requires no less of the soul now, than He required of Adam in Paradise before he fell-- perfect obedience, unblemished righteousness. The requirement of God under the covenant of grace is just as broad as the requirement He made in Paradise--harmony with His law, which is holy, and just, and good. The gospel does not weaken the claims of the law; it exalts the law and makes it honorable. Under the New Testament, no less is required than was required under the Old Testament. Let no one take up with the delusion so pleasant to the natural heart, that God will accept of sincerity, no matter what may be the faith, no matter how imperfect may be the life. God requires of His child perfect obedience. {1SM 373.1}


The way I see it, this is akin to the parable of the talents. The one who hid his in the ground had no works of his own by which to merit his lord's favor. The others, who had made good use of their talents and multiplied them for their master, were rewarded. The reward was purely a gift. Their multiplied talents, however, represented efforts on their own part--efforts not "given" them. These efforts were the result of their own decisions, and resulted in acts of faith (works). Those works placed them in favor with their master, who then gave them their reward.

No one is worthy of the reward. The reward is a gift. But without works, we are ineligible for the gift. With works, whether we worked all day, or only the late afternoon, the master will reward us according to His good pleasure.

Notice that our Master does not look merely upon the works which we do. He looks upon the heart. If we do the works for the right motivation/reason, He can accept our works. If not, even though we do the works expected of us, He cannot accept them.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
His commandments and grace are adapted to our necessities, and without them we cannot be saved, do what we may. Acceptable obedience He requires. The offering of goods, or any service, will not be accepted without the heart. The will must be brought into subjection. The Lord requires of you a greater consecration to Him and a greater separation from the spirit and influence of the world. {2T 169.1}


Here's an especially pertinent statement regarding the role of faith and works.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
Faith does not make void the law, and though there are persons who insist that through faith in Christ they are freed from obligation to keep the law, yet the teaching of prophets and apostles contradicts their position. "Faith without works [obedience] is dead." Men's characters are estimated according to their works. James says, "Show me thy faith without thy works [if it were possible], and I will show thee my faith by my works." Faith in the great plan of redemption without corresponding works is not reckoned as faith. Christ our Redeemer did not suffer the penalty of the law for our sins in order to deliver us from obligation to keep God's commandments. Christ suffered the penalty of the law, which was death, in order to give to man another trial, to provide for him another probation, and allot to him another opportunity of proving loyal to the authority of God. Every soul is to be tested, for he is held responsible for obedience to the divine law, and, although Christ has died for man's transgression, those who continue in disobedience will suffer the penalty of their sin. The condition upon which men will be offered the benefits of salvation is through repentance toward God, because of transgression of his holy law, faith in Christ, by which he receives power from on high to become an obedient subject of the government of God. Those who would be saved must take Christ as their personal Saviour, and become not only hearers, but doers of his words. "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." {ST, September 24, 1894 par. 9}


Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 08:32 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: green
In order to have Christ's righteousness imputed to us, we must first obey His law.
we can not obey unless we have Christ's righteousness.


You have things out of their proper order. If what you said were true, it would mean that at least one of the following must also be true:

1) all sinners have Christ's righteousness; or
2) we are unable to obey through the God-given freedom of choice and exercise of our will unless/until we have Christ's righteousness.

While I would not say our obedience is perfect without Christ's righteousness, and certainly our obedience will never save us, we most certainly can choose to obey before we see Christ's righteousness applied in our behalf. Our obedience shows our faith. God rewards faith. There is no faith without obedience. "Without faith it is impossible to please [God]." If faith only exists in the presence of obedience, the above could be restated as "without obedience it is impossible to please God." We do not have Christ's merits on our behalf before we have accepted them by faith, and faith itself must be demonstrated in obedience. Therefore, Christ's righteousness is obtained by our own obedience. His perfect obedience covers our feeble and imperfect obedience. It does not, however, cover wickedness and known sin...not all will be saved by Christ's obedience.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 08:58 PM

The Saviour took upon Himself the infirmities of humanity and lived a sinless life, that men might have no fear that because of the weakness of human nature they could not overcome. Christ came to make us "partakers of the divine nature," and His life declares that humanity, combined with divinity, does not commit sin. {MH 180.5}

Imperfect obedience? Not according to the Bible or the SOP!
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 09:03 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Therefore, Christ's righteousness is obtained by our own obedience.

But while God can be just, and yet justify the sinner through the merits of Christ, no man can cover his soul with the garments of Christ's righteousness while practicing known sins or neglecting known duties. God requires the entire surrender of the heart, before justification can take place; and in order for man to retain justification, there must be continual obedience, through active, living faith that works by love and purifies the soul. {FW 100.1}

The righteousness of Jesus covers pardoned sins - not the fruit of abiding in Him. The only thing Jesus adds to the fruit of abiding in Him is - merit. He doesn't make sin meritorious. Instead, He makes the fruit of abiding in Him meritorious.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/05/14 09:14 PM

God has given to the world and to angels the evidence of the changeless character of His love. He would part with His only begotten Son, send Him into the world, clothed in the likeness of sinful flesh, to condemn sin and to die upon Calvary's cross to make it manifest to men that there is provision in the counsels of heaven for those who believe in Christ, to keep the commandments of God. Aside from Christ, man cannot in spirit and in truth keep one of the commandments of God, but in Christ Jesus the claims of the law are met, because He transforms the nature of man by His grace, creates in the heart a new spiritual life, implants a holy nature, and men become Christlike in character. {14MR 86.1}
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 01:05 AM

Originally Posted By: green

In order to have Christ's righteousness imputed to us, we must first obey His law.
we can not obey unless we have Christ's righteousness.

Originally Posted By: apl
we can not obey unless we have Christ's righteousness.


Originally Posted By: green
You have things out of their proper order. If what you said were true, it would mean that at least one of the following must also be true:

1) all sinners have Christ's righteousness; or
2) we are unable to obey through the God-given freedom of choice and exercise of our will unless/until we have Christ's righteousness.


So green, you suggest we can obey by exercise of our free choice. What then do we need Christ? It is only Christ that has made it possible for us to obey.
Originally Posted By: EGW
This robe [spotless character], woven in the loom of heaven, has in it not one thread of human devising. Christ in His humanity wrought out a perfect character, and this character He offers to impart to us. "All our righteousness are as filthy rags." Isaiah 64:6. Everything that we of ourselves can do is defiled by sin. But the Son of God "was manifested to take away our sins; and in Him is no sin." Sin is defined to be "the transgression of the law." 1 John 3:5, 4. But Christ was obedient to every requirement of the law. He said of Himself, "I delight to do Thy will, O My God; yea, Thy law is within My heart." Psalm 40:8. When on earth, He said to His disciples, "I have kept My Father's commandments." John 15:10. By His perfect obedience He has made it possible for every human being to obey God's commandments. [yet is green really saying we can keep the law by ourselves??? He has said we need to obey before we can get Christ's righteousness. Perhaps green is confused by the terms obey and submit, who knows?] When we submit ourselves to Christ, the heart is united with His heart, the will is merged in His will, the mind becomes one with His mind, the thoughts are brought into captivity to Him; we live His life. This is what it means to be clothed with the garment of His righteousness. Then as the Lord looks upon us He sees, not the fig-leaf garment, not the nakedness and deformity of sin, but His own robe of righteousness, which is perfect obedience to the law of Jehovah. {COL 311.4}
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 01:33 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
You wrote - "Our imperfect obedience is required, but not sufficient." You applied the expression - "imperfect obedience" to the results of abiding in Jesus. Here is how Ellen White used the phrase:

Quote:
Without Christ it is impossible for him to render perfect obedience to the law of God; and heaven can never be gained by an imperfect obedience; for this would place all heaven in jeopardy, and make possible a second rebellion. {ST, December 30, 1889 par. 4}

That's why we don't gain heaven by OUR obedience.

Romans 5:18 Therefore, as through one man’s offense judgment came to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one Man’s righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in justification of life.

Heaven is gained by our acceptance of someone else's obedience, character, life. We are heirs of the promise, not earners.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 01:39 AM

But asygo, green said, "In order to have Christ's righteousness imputed to us, we must first obey His law.". He can't be wrong, can he???
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 04:36 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Without Christ it is impossible for him to render perfect obedience to the law of God; and heaven can never be gained by an imperfect obedience; for this would place all heaven in jeopardy, and make possible a second rebellion. {ST, December 30, 1889 par. 4}

That's why we don't gain heaven by OUR obedience.

Are you suggesting - "imperfect obedience" - is referring to the fruit of abiding in Jesus? Doesn't - "without Christ it is impossible for him to render perfect obedience" - imply with Christ it is possible to render perfect obedience? There is much written about "perfect obedience" -

Quote:
True sanctification means perfect love, perfect obedience, perfect conformity to the will of God. We are to be sanctified to God through obedience to the truth. {AA 565.1}

Only for those who return to their allegiance to God, only for those who obey the law that they have violated, will the blood of Christ avail. Christ will never become a party to sin. (MR 900.37).

Whenever one renounces sin, which is the transgression of the law, his life will be brought into conformity to the law, into perfect obedience. This is the work of the Holy Spirit. {Ev 308.4}

The moment the sinner believes in Christ, he stands in the sight of God uncondemned; for the righteousness of Christ is his: Christ's perfect obedience is imputed to him. But he must co-operate with divine power, and put forth his human effort to subdue sin, and stand complete in Christ. {FE 429.3}

In perfect obedience to His holy will, we are to manifest adoration, love, cheerfulness, and praise, and thus honor and glorify God. {AG 58.5}

Under the new covenant, perfect obedience is the condition of life. {AG 138.4}

But by perfect obedience to the requirements of the law, man is justified. {HP 146.4}

We would invite all to come, all to abide in Christ, to advance daily in the perfection of character by abiding in Christ. As they do this, they find that rest that can come only through perfect obedience. {HP 277.4}

This is true sanctification, for sanctification consists in the cheerful performance of daily duties in perfect obedience to the will of God. {ML 250.5}

Do you believe these statements imply "imperfect obedience"?
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 04:55 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
Did you ignore the It is written?

Do you know what Forgiveness is? There are two Green word translated into English as forgive. Do you know what they are and what the difference between them is?

God does not hold anything against any one. God is forgiveness (Charizomai) personified. Sinners that parish, will parish forgiven by God. What we need is forgiveness (Aphiemi) as in 1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.


Do YOU need to know the difference between "Charizomai" and "Aphiemi" in order to forgive someone? Do YOU think God consults his Greek lexicon before deciding whether to "Charizomai" you or to "Aphiemi" you?

Quote:
The whole Talmud consists of 63 tractates, and in standard print is over 6,200 pages long. It is written in Tannaitic Hebrew and Aramaic. The Talmud contains the teachings and opinions of thousands of rabbis on a variety of subjects, including Halakha (law), Jewish ethics, philosophy, customs, history, lore and many other topics. The Talmud is the basis for all codes of Jewish law and is much quoted in rabbinic literature.

Such is how SDA have become!

Nevertheless, at the first Jerusalem council of the Christian Church it was observed and agreed, "God, who knows the heart, acknowledged [the Gentiles] by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to [the Jews], and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. Now therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved in the same manner as they." (Acts 15:8-11)

I long to break the bonds of the captives, set the prisoners free, open the eyes of the blind and the ears of the deaf, to make whole again the lame and the bedridden that they all may rejoice in the presence of MY God and MY Saviour, Jesus Christ! Is it not written, "The Kingdom of God is at hand! Repent and believe the gospel"?

Of what value is a gospel (GOOD NEWS) that is bogged down wearily with indecisions, uncertainties, arguments, philosophies and nebulous nuances of the advantages and disadvantages, fullness and/or limitations inherent in decisions about the use/s of "Charizomai" and "Aphiemi" in the Biblical text, principally the Greek original? Then you turn to him who thirst and say, "Son, do you know the differences? Please elucidate!"

SHUTDOWN THE COMPUTER, GO OUTSIDE AND SPEAK A WORD OF KINDNESS TO SOMEONE WALKING BY!

///
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 06:52 AM

Originally Posted By: james peterson
Do YOU need to know the difference between "Charizomai" and "Aphiemi" in order to forgive someone? Do YOU think God consults his Greek lexicon before deciding whether to "Charizomai" you or to "Aphiemi" you?
Meanings can get lost in translation. God does not hold anything against anyone. I don't have to beg God to "forgive" Me. While we were sinners, Christ died for us! Being forgiven in the usual meaning of the English word is NOT the problem. Change your mind (repent) and believe the Good News (gospel). What we need is the law written on the heart, this is the forgiveness spoken about in 1 John 1:9
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 07:05 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
But asygo, green said, "In order to have Christ's righteousness imputed to us, we must first obey His law.". He can't be wrong, can he???


I'm not wrong on this one, APL, because Mrs. White said it. If it's wrong, take this up with her and with God who inspired her.

Let me quote that one again for your review.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
The sinner, through repentance of his sins, faith in Christ, and obedience to the perfect law of God, has the righteousness of Christ imputed to him; it becomes his righteousness, and his name is recorded in the Lamb's book of life. He becomes a child of God, a member of the royal family. {3T 371.2}


Mrs. White lists three prerequisites to receiving Christ's imputed righteousness. Obedience is one of them.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 09:04 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
Meanings can get lost in translation.

So you need a Greek lexicon to find out whether you should "Charizomai" OR "Aphiemi" your neighbour. Ok.

Nevertheless, at the first Jerusalem council of the Christian Church it was observed and agreed, "God, who knows the heart, acknowledged [the Gentiles] by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to [the Jews], and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. Now therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved in the same manner as they." (Acts 15:8-11)

Just remember that.

///
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 11:08 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Heaven is gained by our acceptance of someone else's obedience, character, life. We are heirs of the promise, not earners.


Yes. And we accept Jesus' obedience by obeying His commandments for ourselves. Without obedience, it is impossible to please God. He will not accept us without an effort on our part. God works and man works. God's works save, man's works show who has his heart.

God helps those who help themselves.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
...Jesus will not commission holy angels to extricate those who make no effort to help themselves. {1T 345.2}

...Every effort within their power must be put forth to avert destruction; for God helps those only who help themselves. {LP 267.1}

...The Lord helps those who seek to help themselves; but when men will not take special pains to follow out the mind and will of God, how can he work with them? Let us act our part, working out our salvation with fear and trembling.... {GCB, May 30, 1909 par. 14}

... For the Lord always helps those who help themselves. The Lord is acquainted with all the circumstances, and will work for those who do their very best. ... {RH, September 27, 1887 par. 11}


Our love and acceptance of Christ and His obedience is proven through our own obedience.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
But to pray in Christ's name means much. It means that we are to accept His character, manifest His spirit, and work His works. The Saviour's promise is given on condition. "If ye love Me," He says, "keep My commandments." He saves men, not in sin, but from sin; and those who love Him will show their love by obedience. {DA 668.2}


If Christ will not save us "in sin," that means only those who have escaped sin are saved. I would readily agree that the escape is made possible through the grace of God, yet it is a decision we must make on our part. God will not make our choices for us, and it takes real work to make these choices to obey Him. Once our choice is made, He helps us follow through by His grace. Our obedience may never be perfect, and can never save us--for all have sinned and come under the penalty of death as a result--but when we do all in our power, God will then work in our behalf to save us from sin and destruction.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 03:39 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Originally Posted By: APL
But asygo, green said, "In order to have Christ's righteousness imputed to us, we must first obey His law.". He can't be wrong, can he???


I'm not wrong on this one, APL, because Mrs. White said it. If it's wrong, take this up with her and with God who inspired her.

Let me quote that one again for your review.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
The sinner, through repentance of his sins, faith in Christ, and obedience to the perfect law of God, has the righteousness of Christ imputed to him; it becomes his righteousness, and his name is recorded in the Lamb's book of life. He becomes a child of God, a member of the royal family. {3T 371.2}


Mrs. White lists three prerequisites to receiving Christ's imputed righteousness. Obedience is one of them.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.


We can not obey on our own. We have not the power. We can only obey because of what Christ does for us and to us. I hear you saying that we can obey on our own. If you are not saying that, then pardon me.

The law requires righteousness,--a righteous life, a perfect character; and this man has not to give. He cannot meet the claims of God's holy law. [He can not obey] But Christ, coming to the earth as man, lived a holy life, and developed a perfect character. These He offers as a free gift to all who will receive them. His life stands for the life of men. Thus they have remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God. More than this, Christ imbues men with the attributes of God. He builds up the human character after the similitude of the divine character, a goodly fabric of spiritual strength and beauty. Thus the very righteousness of the law is fulfilled in the believer in Christ. God can "be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus." Romans 3:26. {DA 762.2}
Posted By: kland

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 05:35 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
I'm not wrong on this one, APL, because Mrs. White said it.
I've heard that before.

Without knowing what was said, and based upon past such statements, I can feel very confident that Mrs. White did not say what Green says she did. Patterns repeat themselves.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 06:46 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Our obedience may never be perfect, and can never save us--for all have sinned and come under the penalty of death as a result--but when we do all in our power, God will then work in our behalf to save us from sin and destruction.

I was praising God for your post until you finished with the words above. Too bad. Nowhere in the Bible or the SOP does it say the fruit of abiding in Jesus is sinful or imperfect. Jesus is not party to sin. Sin cannot abide in the heart wherein Christ reigns supreme. Sin and Jesus cannot cohabitate. "If his Spirit abides in the heart, sin cannot dwell there." {RH, March 16, 1886 par. 2} The fruit of abiding in Jesus is "perfect obedience" - not sin-stained imperfect obedience.

Quote:
The love of Jesus and the love of money cannot dwell in the same heart. {CS 157.3}

God cannot dwell in your heart or thoughts where self rules supreme. {DG 122.2}

Envy, malice, jealousy, and distrust are cherished, and Jesus cannot dwell where these traits are entertained. {GW92 459.2}

If suspicions and envy and jealousies and evil surmisings are cherished, these will exclude the blessing of God, for Jesus cannot dwell in a heart where these things are cherished. The soul temple must be cleansed of every defilement. {RC 277.2}

Selfishness must be put away; for the love of God cannot dwell in the heart where self is enshrined. The inclinations which war against the holy principles of purity and godliness must be wholly given up. {RH, December 1, 1896 par. 14}

"Only for those who return to their allegiance to God, only for those who obey the law that they have violated, will the blood of Christ avail. Christ will never become a party to sin. {6BC 1092.7} Jesus enables us to crucify self. And then He empowers us to use our faculties of mind and body to reproduce His lovely traits of character. He equips us at the miraculous moment of rebirth with His traits and attributes - not one is missing. These enable us to honor and glorify Him in all our habits and practices.

Quote:
The life of the vine will be manifest in fragrant fruit on the branches. "He that abideth in Me," said Jesus, "and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without Me ye can do nothing." When we live by faith on the Son of God, the fruits of the Spirit will be seen in our lives; not one will be missing. {DA 676.4}

We need to understand that imperfection of character is sin. All righteous attributes of character dwell in God as a perfect, harmonious whole, and every one who receives Christ as a personal Saviour is privileged to possess these attributes. {COL 330.2}

The leaven hidden in the flour works invisibly to bring the whole mass under its leavening process; so the leaven of truth works secretly, silently, steadily, to transform the soul. The natural inclinations are softened and subdued. New thoughts, new feelings, new motives, are implanted. A new standard of character is set up--the life of Christ. The mind is changed; the faculties are roused to action in new lines. Man is not endowed with new faculties, but the faculties he has are sanctified. The conscience is awakened. We are endowed with traits of character that enable us to do service for God. {COL 98.3}

The Spirit of God does not propose to do our part, either in the willing or the doing. This is the work of the human agent in cooperating with the divine agencies. As soon as we incline our will to harmonize with God's will, the grace of Christ stands to cooperate with the human agent; but it will not be the substitute to do our work independent of our resolving and decidedly acting. {2MCP 691.3}

To make God's grace our own, we must act our part. The Lord does not propose to perform for us either the willing or the doing. His grace is given to work in us to will and to do, but never as a substitute for our effort. Our souls are to be aroused to co-operate. The Holy Spirit works in us, that we may work out our own salvation. This is the practical lesson the Holy Spirit is striving to teach us. "It is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of His good pleasure." {MYP 147.2}

To say the fruit of abiding in Jesus is sinful or sin-stained or imperfect is to deny the testimonies posted above. The only thing lacking is merit - and only Jesus supply it. He doesn't change it from sin to righteousness. He adds merit - that's it.

Quote:
The old nature, born of blood and the will of the flesh, cannot inherit the kingdom of God. The old ways, the hereditary tendencies, the former habits, must be given up; for grace is not inherited. The new birth consists in having new motives, new tastes, new tendencies. Those who are begotten unto a new life by the Holy Spirit, have become partakers of the divine nature, and in all their habits and practices, they will give evidence of their relationship to Christ. When men who claim to be Christians retain all their natural defects of character and disposition, in what does their position differ from that of the worldling? They do not appreciate the truth as a sanctifier, a refiner. They have not been born again. {RH, April 12, 1892 par. 9}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 06:54 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
We can not obey on our own. We have not the power. We can only obey because of what Christ does for us and to us. I hear you saying that we can obey on our own. If you are not saying that, then pardon me.

He is not at all saying we can obey without Jesus' supernatural aid. He is saying the following:

Quote:
When the soul surrenders itself to Christ, a new power takes possession of the new heart. A change is wrought which man can never accomplish for himself. It is a supernatural work, bringing a supernatural element into human nature. The soul that is yielded to Christ becomes His own fortress, which He holds in a revolted world, and He intends that no authority shall be known in it but His own. A soul thus kept in possession by the heavenly agencies is impregnable to the assaults of Satan. But unless we do yield ourselves to the control of Christ, we shall be dominated by the wicked one. We must inevitably be under the control of the one or the other of the two great powers that are contending for the supremacy of the world. It is not necessary for us deliberately to choose the service of the kingdom of darkness in order to come under its dominion. We have only to neglect to ally ourselves with the kingdom of light. If we do not co-operate with the heavenly agencies, Satan will take possession of the heart, and will make it his abiding place. The only defense against evil is the indwelling of Christ in the heart through faith in His righteousness. Unless we become vitally connected with God, we can never resist the unhallowed effects of self-love, self-indulgence, and temptation to sin. We may leave off many bad habits, for the time we may part company with Satan; but without a vital connection with God, through the surrender of ourselves to Him moment by moment, we shall be overcome. Without a personal acquaintance with Christ, and a continual communion, we are at the mercy of the enemy, and shall do his bidding in the end. {DA 324.1}

Again, the idea that the fruit of Jesus' supernatural assistance yields imperfect obedience is not supported in the Bible or in the SOP.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 07:10 PM

I have an idea. How about everyone shut down their SOP software and let's just go to the Bible? I saw somehing in Galatians that I had never really noticed before, and I would like to get a better handle on the Scriptures before going into the SOP. I want to use the SOP as a guide to my studies, not as its foundation.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/06/14 07:18 PM

Originally Posted By: mm
He is not at all saying we can obey without Jesus' supernatural aid. He is saying the following:
That is not what I hear him saying. Granted, this form of communication (forums) one looses much in the communication process. Without Christ, we can do nothing.
Originally Posted By: mm
Again, the idea that the fruit of Jesus' supernatural assistance yields imperfect obedience is not supported in the Bible or in the SOP.
See COL 331 quote above...
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 05:23 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
I have an idea. How about everyone shut down their SOP software and let's just go to the Bible? I saw somehing in Galatians that I had never really noticed before, and I would like to get a better handle on the Scriptures before going into the SOP. I want to use the SOP as a guide to my studies, not as its foundation.


Amen!
We are far to prone to take sentences from EGW's writings and use them as "proof texts" to bolster our own ideas, and thereby totally miss the bigger picture.

There is very little real Bible study here.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 07:06 AM

Jesus came to give us a clear understanding of the scriptures and we reject the truth as He has revealed it. Why?
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 02:51 PM

Christ the Covenant and the Law

Hebrews 9:15 And for this cause he is the mediator of the new covenant, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

Hebrews 10:16 This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, says the Lord: I will put My laws into their hearts, and in their minds I will write them,” 17 then He adds,“Their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more.”


Hebrews 8:6 But now [Christ] obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.
8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
8:8 For finding fault with them, he said, Behold, the days come, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
8:9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, says the Lord.
8:10 For this [is] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
8:11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.
8:12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.


Galatians 3:2 This only would I learn of you, did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
3:3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are you now made perfect by the flesh?

3:11 But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, [it is] evident: for, The just shall live by faith.
3:12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that does them shall live in them.
3:13 Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that hangs on a tree:
3:14 That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

3:21 [Is] the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
3:22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

Galatians 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,
4:5 To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.
4:6 And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.
4:7 Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 03:37 PM

Christ FIRST gives believers His righteousness --
Cleanses our record completely, justifies -- as if we had never sinned.
Now that we are CLEAN, He calls us to walk WITH HIM in faith, with the power of the Holy Spirit, in the path of righteousness.

It is the righteousness of Christ all the way.



That is the difference between every false religion and the true.
All false religions teach that one must first rid oneself of all that is considered unacceptable and then one advances to a high level of existence, but God's way is first God gives His righteousness and then dwells with us, in our hearts changing us from the inside out.
Thus from the moment we accept Christ, and as we continually surrender ourselves to Him, and walk with Him in humble obedience we are saved.
We are not trying to "get saved" but can know that we "are saved".

Quote:
1 Tim. 1:9 Who has saved us, and called [us] with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began,

Titus 3:5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;
3:6 Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour;
3:7 That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.
3:8 [This is] a faithful saying, and these things I would like that you affirm constantly, that they which have believed in God might be careful to maintain good works. These things are good and profitable unto men.


Consider a measuring cup of righteousness.
Some think they can fill that cup with their own righteousness.
New Christian according to that theory may fill it 20% and Christ must add 80%
But as they mature they should be contributing more and more of the percentage till they contribute 100% and Christ no longer contributes anything.
That is false religion.

Christ fills that cup 100% with HIS RIGHTEOUSNESS.
And we walk in that righteousness to His glory.

This changes the whole focus from "I must clean up my act in order to be acceptable to God"
TO
I am His child, how can I dishonor Him by doing this sin, I want to maintain righteousness which is shown by doing the will of God, I want to be close to Him!
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 05:24 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
I have an idea. How about everyone shut down their SOP software and let's just go to the Bible? I saw somehing in Galatians that I had never really noticed before, and I would like to get a better handle on the Scriptures before going into the SOP. I want to use the SOP as a guide to my studies, not as its foundation.

I thought we were doing that already. I thought it was clear to everyone here that the SOP supports, clarifies the Bible testimony. The same Holy Spirit inspired them all - the authors of the Bible and the author of the SOP.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 05:34 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
M: Again, the idea that the fruit of Jesus' supernatural assistance yields imperfect obedience is not supported in the Bible or in the SOP.

A: See COL 331 quote above...

Are you referring to the following quote you posted?

Originally Posted By: APL
This robe [spotless character], woven in the loom of heaven, has in it not one thread of human devising. Christ in His humanity wrought out a perfect character, and this character He offers to impart to us. "All our righteousness are as filthy rags." Isaiah 64:6. Everything that we of ourselves can do is defiled by sin. But the Son of God "was manifested to take away our sins; and in Him is no sin." Sin is defined to be "the transgression of the law." 1 John 3:5, 4. But Christ was obedient to every requirement of the law. He said of Himself, "I delight to do Thy will, O My God; yea, Thy law is within My heart." Psalm 40:8. When on earth, He said to His disciples, "I have kept My Father's commandments." John 15:10. By His perfect obedience He has made it possible for every human being to obey God's commandments. [yet is green really saying we can keep the law by ourselves??? He has said we need to obey before we can get Christ's righteousness. Perhaps green is confused by the terms obey and submit, who knows?] When we submit ourselves to Christ, the heart is united with His heart, the will is merged in His will, the mind becomes one with His mind, the thoughts are brought into captivity to Him; we live His life. This is what it means to be clothed with the garment of His righteousness. Then as the Lord looks upon us He sees, not the fig-leaf garment, not the nakedness and deformity of sin, but His own robe of righteousness, which is perfect obedience to the law of Jehovah. {COL 311.4}

If so, do the insights above contradict what I posted?
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 05:39 PM

Originally Posted By: dedication
We are far to prone to take sentences from EGW's writings and use them as "proof texts" to bolster our own ideas, and thereby totally miss the bigger picture. There is very little real Bible study here.

I hear what you are saying. However, including inspired insights and testimonies here hardly counts against "real Bible study". If Ellen White were alive and posting here I doubt we would feel like "very little real Bible study" is happening. Many of the SOP quotes posted here include Bible texts.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 05:53 PM

Originally Posted By: dedication
Christ fills that cup 100% with HIS RIGHTEOUSNESS. And we walk in that righteousness to His glory. This changes the whole focus from "I must clean up my act in order to be acceptable to God" TO I am His child, how can I dishonor Him by doing this sin, I want to maintain righteousness which is shown by doing the will of God, I want to be close to Him!

While in abiding in Jesus our righteousness is of the same origin and quality as the righteousness He experienced while here in "the likeness of sinful flesh" - it is the righteous result of "partaking of the divine nature". They "walk, even as he walked." They are pure "even as he is pure." They are righteous "even as he is righteous."

All this is possible for us only after Jesus implants within us a new and holy nature, a new heart, a new mind, which comes complete with new tastes, new motives, new tendencies, new traits of character. He empowers us to use our faculties of mind and body, our sanctified higher powers, to develop, nurture, mature in the fruits of the Spirit "more and more unto the perfect day". The truth is - "the fine linen is the righteousness of saints."

The problem is - some people believe the fruit of abiding in Jesus yields sin-stained, imperfect obedience. Whereas in reality the only thing it lacks is merit - and only Jesus can supply the merit.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 06:01 PM

Originally Posted By: green
Arnold, be careful here. If Jesus has power to save to the uttermost, and if His grace is sufficient for all, your theology, given the sentiments expressed in your comment above, would lead you necessarily to the point of saying everyone will have to be saved. It's either that, or you make God show partiality.


Jesus does not have the power to save to the uttermost? YES HE DOES! Hebrews 7:25 Why he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come to God by him, seeing he ever lives to make intercession for them.

By His sacrifice, Christ has given every one of us the freedom to resist and reject what He has given us. And sadly, many do. The lost want their own final end; at the judgment at the end of the thousand years of Revelation 20, they will ask for destruction. Those who are saved at last are simply those who gladly received the gift. That simple.

Originally Posted By: green
If God has no "partiality," then what is the difference between "saved" and "lost?"


God is not partial. If He were, then there would be grounds for separation of Jew and Greek, slave and free, male and female, saved and lost.

Originally Posted By: green
I say, the difference is us. We make the difference, not God. How do we make the difference? There is a work of faith which we must do. There is an "obedience" which God does not do for us and which we must do for ourselves, or lose Heaven.


Do you define the "work" we do actually "choosing"? All of our righteousness is like filthy menstrual rags. We cannot obey. Only by the righteousness of Christ can be obey.

You are weak in moral power, in slavery to doubt, and controlled by the habits of your life of sin. Your promises and resolutions are like ropes of sand. You cannot control your thoughts, your impulses, your affections. The knowledge of your broken promises and forfeited pledges weakens your confidence in your own sincerity, and causes you to feel that God cannot accept you. What you need to understand is the true force of the will. This is the governing power in the nature of man, the power of decision, or of choice. Everything depends on the right action of the will. You can choose to serve Him. {SC 471.}

The children of Israel failed at Sinai. They said, Exodus 19:8 And all the people answered together, and said, All that the LORD has spoken we will do. They promises were ropes of sand. This is old covenant. This is Hagar, bondage (Galatians 4:24-25). This is what the brethern chose after 1888 instead of accepting the truth. The nature of Christ was also clearly proclaimed by Jones and Waggoner to counteract Romanism (Babylon) and its immaculate conception of Mary and thus the unfallen nature of Christ. We need to come out of Babylon!
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 06:03 PM

Subjection to God is restoration to one's self,--to the true glory and dignity of man. The divine law, to which we are brought into subjection, is "the law of liberty." James 2:12. {DA 466.5}

We are to do all that we can do on our part to fight the good fight of faith. We are to wrestle, to labor, to strive, to agonize to enter in at the strait gate. We are to set the Lord ever before us. With clean hands, with pure hearts, we are to seek to honor God in all our ways. Help has been provided for us in Him who is mighty to save. The spirit of truth and light will quicken and renew us by its mysterious workings; for all our spiritual improvement comes from God, not from ourselves. The true worker will have divine power to aid him, but the idler will not be sustained by the Spirit of God. {FW 48.1}

In one way we are thrown upon our own energies; we are to strive earnestly to be zealous and to repent, to cleanse our hands and purify our hearts from every defilement; we are to reach the highest standard, believing that God will help us in our efforts. We must seek if we would find, and seek in faith; we must knock, that the door may be opened unto us. The Bible teaches that everything regarding our salvation depends upon our own course of action. If we perish, the responsibility will rest wholly upon ourselves. If provision has been made, and if we accept God's terms, we may lay hold on eternal life. We must come to Christ in faith, we must be diligent to make our calling and election sure. {FW 48.2}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 06:12 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
Do you define the "work" we do actually "choosing"? All of our righteousness is like filthy menstrual rags. We cannot obey. Only by the righteousness of Christ can be obey.

Some people believe - "all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags" - includes the fruit of abiding in Jesus, the fruit of partaking of the divine nature.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/07/14 07:03 PM

Originally Posted By: dedication
Christ fills that cup 100% with HIS RIGHTEOUSNESS.

I agree.

But do we have a part to play? I believe our part is to open the cup so we can receive His righteousness. The righteousness is all His, but we must be willing to be made righteous.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 05:59 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Our obedience may never be perfect, and can never save us--for all have sinned and come under the penalty of death as a result--but when we do all in our power, God will then work in our behalf to save us from sin and destruction.

I was praising God for your post until you finished with the words above. Too bad. Nowhere in the Bible or the SOP does it say the fruit of abiding in Jesus is sinful or imperfect. Jesus is not party to sin. Sin cannot abide in the heart wherein Christ reigns supreme. Sin and Jesus cannot cohabitate. "If his Spirit abides in the heart, sin cannot dwell there." {RH, March 16, 1886 par. 2} The fruit of abiding in Jesus is "perfect obedience" - not sin-stained imperfect obedience.


Perhaps you're misunderstanding my meaning. I may not have been clear. To clarify this, let me ask a simple question. Have you been perfect from birth? If not, even if you are perfect now, you are still under the penalty of death. Because even one sin causes a debt so great it cannot be paid by any other than the perfect life of our Substitute.

Our works will never be perfect, because we have already sinned. We can, however, become sanctified to a point where we perfectly reproduce the character of Christ. This perfection, though wonderful and marvelous and achieved by God's grace and Spirit working in our hearts, to will and to do of His good pleasure, cannot save us. We are not saved by any obedience other than the life of Christ. We, however, cannot be saved without obedience on our part. Without obeying, we are lost. Our works do not save, but a lack of them will cause us to perish.

I hope this is more clear.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 06:03 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
I have an idea. How about everyone shut down their SOP software and let's just go to the Bible? I saw somehing in Galatians that I had never really noticed before, and I would like to get a better handle on the Scriptures before going into the SOP. I want to use the SOP as a guide to my studies, not as its foundation.


The Bible IS the spirit of prophecy. In fact, unless you expand the meaning of the phrase to include Mrs. White, the term "spirit of prophecy," most narrowly applied, is applied to the Book of Revelation.

Galatians IS the "spirit of prophecy." Now, if you like Paul more than Mrs. White, just say so. I take them both to be inspired by God.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 06:06 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: dedication
We are far to prone to take sentences from EGW's writings and use them as "proof texts" to bolster our own ideas, and thereby totally miss the bigger picture. There is very little real Bible study here.

I hear what you are saying. However, including inspired insights and testimonies here hardly counts against "real Bible study". If Ellen White were alive and posting here I doubt we would feel like "very little real Bible study" is happening. Many of the SOP quotes posted here include Bible texts.


Amen, Mike. Well said.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 06:16 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: green
Arnold, be careful here. If Jesus has power to save to the uttermost, and if His grace is sufficient for all, your theology, given the sentiments expressed in your comment above, would lead you necessarily to the point of saying everyone will have to be saved. It's either that, or you make God show partiality.


Jesus does not have the power to save to the uttermost? YES HE DOES! Hebrews 7:25 Why he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come to God by him, seeing he ever lives to make intercession for them.

By His sacrifice, Christ has given every one of us the freedom to resist and reject what He has given us. And sadly, many do. The lost want their own final end; at the judgment at the end of the thousand years of Revelation 20, they will ask for destruction. Those who are saved at last are simply those who gladly received the gift. That simple.

Originally Posted By: green
If God has no "partiality," then what is the difference between "saved" and "lost?"


God is not partial. If He were, then there would be grounds for separation of Jew and Greek, slave and free, male and female, saved and lost.

Originally Posted By: green
I say, the difference is us. We make the difference, not God. How do we make the difference? There is a work of faith which we must do. There is an "obedience" which God does not do for us and which we must do for ourselves, or lose Heaven.


Do you define the "work" we do actually "choosing"? All of our righteousness is like filthy menstrual rags. We cannot obey. Only by the righteousness of Christ can be obey.

You are weak in moral power, in slavery to doubt, and controlled by the habits of your life of sin. Your promises and resolutions are like ropes of sand. You cannot control your thoughts, your impulses, your affections. The knowledge of your broken promises and forfeited pledges weakens your confidence in your own sincerity, and causes you to feel that God cannot accept you. What you need to understand is the true force of the will. This is the governing power in the nature of man, the power of decision, or of choice. Everything depends on the right action of the will. You can choose to serve Him. {SC 471.}

The children of Israel failed at Sinai. They said, Exodus 19:8 And all the people answered together, and said, All that the LORD has spoken we will do. They promises were ropes of sand. This is old covenant. This is Hagar, bondage (Galatians 4:24-25). This is what the brethern chose after 1888 instead of accepting the truth. The nature of Christ was also clearly proclaimed by Jones and Waggoner to counteract Romanism (Babylon) and its immaculate conception of Mary and thus the unfallen nature of Christ. We need to come out of Babylon!


APL,

You misunderstood my post. I am using the FACTS that Jesus does have the power to save to the uttermost and that God is not partial to support my question to Arnold. I presume he understood it, but he has not responded. In other words, I'm not questioning those facts, I'm using them to support the logic of my question.

Arnold was saying that God gives us the obedience of Christ. If we can only obey when the obedience is given us, why should God, who has the power to do so, as I see you agreed as well, not give His obedience to everyone? Wouldn't that be "partial?" If God picks on a few people to give His saving obedience to, why is that not partial?

That is the question. If you wish to defend Arnold on this, perhaps you can help him answer that question.

I understand that God gives His salvific obedience to those who show by their own obedience that they love and accept Him as their Lord and Savior. Without obedience on our part, the obedience of Christ is not imputed to us. Ellen White tells us this. This is not partiality, this is justice and love.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 06:26 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Originally Posted By: dedication
Christ fills that cup 100% with HIS RIGHTEOUSNESS.

I agree.

But do we have a part to play? I believe our part is to open the cup sonwe can receiveHis righteousness. The righteousness is all His, but we must be willing to be made righteous.


Fully agree.

We must walk WITH Christ on His path of righteousness and be fully open to His guidance.
Jesus says in Rev. 3:20 Behold I stand at the door and knock, if anyone hears my voice and opens the door I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.

We must be lead of the Holy Spirit.
Romans 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

The "fight of faith" is to stay close to Christ, and not let satan and the things of this world distract us.

We are to reflect Christ's character (not become Christ's character)
A mirror reflects an image close to it,
If we walk closely with Christ through much prayer, daily surrender, genuine seeking word from Him in His scripture and meditating upon it; we will start to reflect HIS image, (not our image, but HIS image) When we wander away and walk apart from Him, we show our own image instead of reflecting His.

Our goal is not to reach a point where we can stand up
and pray. "God I am thankful that I am not like other people, I don't smoke, I go to church on Sabbath, I haven't lost my temper in a week....

Rather, we must be totally aware of our helplessness and complete dependence upon Christ, and humbly walk with Him in obedience knowing that without Him we can do nothing.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 06:43 AM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa

Arnold was saying that God gives us the obedience of Christ. If we can only obey when the obedience is given us, why should God, who has the power to do so,not give His obedience to everyone? Wouldn't that be "partial?" If God picks on a few people to give His saving obedience to, why is that not partial?


"Behold I stand at the door and knock, if any man hear my voice and open the door, I will come and sup with him, and he with me."

To receive we must open the door of faith, and allow Christ into our lives.



Originally Posted By: Green C
I understand that God gives His salvific obedience to those who show by their own obedience that they love and accept Him as their Lord and Savior. Without obedience on our part, the obedience of Christ is not imputed to us.


That's like saying a parent helps a baby to walk only after they have shown their own walking ability.

No, the first thing one needs to do is respond to the call of the Holy Spirit and come to Christ.
The first step and focus must be in inviting Christ into our lives. Accept His merits -- His justification "just as if you never sinned" and count yourself dead to sin and alive in Christ. (See Romans 6) And yes, He will give you His gift of obedience as you continue to stay close to Him.

Satan loves it when we think we are not good enough to accept Christ's gifts of salvation, because he knows we will either give up in frustration or develop dead self-righteousness that avails nothing, while trying to "prepare ourselves" in the hopes that we will become good enough for Christ to give us those gifts.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 07:27 AM

Dedication,

What is "faith?"

Read James chapter 2.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 07:50 AM

Faith is believing in God, believing in His promises.
Inviting Him into one's life, and trusting Him enough to surrender all to Him.

Faith is manifested by works, that is --true faith will reveal itself in a changed life, eager to do God's will, which one may call "works", but that does not elevate works into the means to obtain salvation or the gifts of God.

James says works show that he has faith. No contradiction there. If someone claims to have "faith" but it does not show itself in a changed life (eager to obey and do work for God) then it isn't faith at all -- but dead. No connection.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 07:59 AM

Originally Posted By: dedication
Faith is believing in God, believing in His promises.


James says the devils also believe and tremble. (See James 2:19.)

Originally Posted By: dedication
Inviting Him into one's life, and trusting Him enough to surrender all to Him.

Faith is manifested by works, that is true faith will reveal itself in a changed life, eager to do God's will, which one may call "works", but that does not elevate works into the means to obtain salvation or the gifts of God.


No? What does the Bible say? Are we not "saved through faith?" If we have no faith (manifested in works, as you put it), we have no salvation. If we have no works, we have no faith. Faith IS action. A mere belief will save no one.

Originally Posted By: dedication
James says works show that he has faith. No contradiction there. If his "faith" does show itself in a changed life (eager to do works for God) then it isn't faith at all -- but dead.


I assume you meant "doesn't." I'll post more on this in the next post.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 08:06 AM

Originally Posted By: dedication
To receive we must open the door of faith, and allow Christ into our lives.


I agree. Faith is obedience. To receive, we must be obedient.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
The so-called faith in Christ which professes to release men from the obligation of obedience to God is not faith, but presumption. "By grace are ye saved through faith" (Ephesians 2:8). But "faith, if it hath not works, is dead" (James 2:17). Jesus said of Himself before He came to earth, "I delight to do thy will, O my God: yea, thy law is within my heart" (Psalm 40:8). And just before He ascended again to heaven, He declare, "I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love" (John 15:10). The Scriptures says, "Hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments" (1 John 2:3). . . . {RC 274.4}


Grace is God's gift. Faith is our own action. Those who have not faith will not be saved. While God gives every person a measure of faith, it is only our choice which can exercise it. We must be obedient, through submission to God's requirements. Faith, without this obedience, is dead. It's a bit like saying God grants us the spark, and we must keep the flame alive through our own obedience.

Originally Posted By: dedication
That's like saying a parent helps a baby to walk only after they have shown their own walking ability.


That's not an accurate illustration. Here's one that's better:

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
If you are sowing faith, rendering obedience to Christ, you will reap faith and power for future obedience. If you are seeking to be a blessing to others, God will bless you. . . . The joy we give to others will be reflected upon us again, for as we sow, we shall reap. . . . {TMK 92.4}


We sow faith through obedience, and God gives us power for future obedience. We merely seek to bless others, and God blesses us so that we can be a blessing to them. We may sow, but God gives the harvest.

If we compare to the child walking, we are comparing apples and oranges. I might say that when the child seeks to walk, by beginning to try to stand up and move forward, that is when the parent also begins to help. No parent that I know would force a crawling baby who had not begun to stand to get up and walk. The baby must make an effort first on his or her own. But, again, this is all "apple." The "orange" is when in court, the father stands in the place of the baby and the baby's imperfections are overlooked on account of the father's impeccable record.

Jesus substitutes His perfect record for our flawed and imperfect one. Even if the baby learns to walk perfectly, by the father's help, the baby will still have an imperfect record from the prior falls and mistakes. The father's record substitutes for that of the child. However, if the child refuses to exercise his or her limbs, never even attempts to stand or to perfect his or her character traits, the baby will find that the "obedience" of walking never becomes his or hers, neither on his/her own, nor in the record book--for the Substitute's record does not apply. The record, it seems, is a measure of how well the individual obeyed, not if.

Mrs. White says to be saved, we must act out our faith in obedience. "Obey and be saved" is the message we see. We obey, and God saves us. God does not save those who do not obey. Our obedience does not save us nor make us worthy--salvation is a gift of grace--but our obedience is a prerequisite to God's ability to make His salvation available to us. God cannot save the disobedient. They would not be safe to save.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
Those who have had living faith in the messages of God for the time in which they have lived, and who have acted out their faith in obedience to his commands, have been accepted of God, and have escaped the judgments that were to fall upon the disobedient and unbelieving. The word came to Noah, "Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me." Noah obeyed and was saved. The message came to Lot, "Up, get you out of this place; for the Lord will destroy this city." He placed himself under the guardianship of the heavenly messengers, and was saved. Those who obeyed the warning of Christ in marking the sign of the coming ruin, and in fleeing from Jerusalem, were not involved in her destruction. The message comes in our own time, "Babylon is fallen, is fallen. . . . Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." Those who obey this message will escape the terrible plagues that will surely be visited upon her. {RH, November 5, 1889 par. 11}


God bless,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 08:47 AM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
Originally Posted By: dedication
We are far to prone to take sentences from EGW's writings and use them as "proof texts" to bolster our own ideas, and thereby totally miss the bigger picture. There is very little real Bible study here.

I hear what you are saying. However, including inspired insights and testimonies here hardly counts against "real Bible study". If Ellen White were alive and posting here I doubt we would feel like "very little real Bible study" is happening. Many of the SOP quotes posted here include Bible texts.


But EGW isn't here -- I wonder if she would read these threads if she would faint in agony of spirit realizing how her writings were being used.
How is it that two opposing sides on so many issues can both quote her so much each thinking they have the "authority" of a prophet on their side?

She wrote a caution concerning this matter:
Quote:
Many from among our own people are writing to me, asking with earnest determination the privilege of
using my writings to give force to certain subjects that they wish to present to the people...I dare not give the least license for using my writings in the manner which they propose. In taking account of such an enterprise, there are many things that must come into consideration; for in using the testimonies to bolster up some subject which may impress the mind of the author, the extracts may give a different impression than that which they would were they read in their original connection. {Christian Writers 152.3}and {1SM 58.3}



Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 08:55 AM

The extracts - but today we can read the original printed material in context for free on the web or for $20 on our computers. And next year, we will have all her material available.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 09:09 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
And next year, we will have all her material available.
This is topic, but can you PM me more about this or start another thread with more info? I haven't heard anything about this. Thank you!

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: dedication

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 09:36 AM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Originally Posted By: dedication
To receive we must open the door of faith, and allow Christ into our lives.


I agree. Faith is obedience. To receive, we must be obedient.

No, you are not agreeing at all.
Faith precedes obedience, faith manifests itself in obedience, but faith is not synonymous with obedience.

Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
11:3 Through faith we understand .....

Faith is believing, faith is trusting, faith is understanding and believing God's word.

True faith leads to obedience, as the chapter continues to point out, but you are saying
we must first produce the obedience and then God will give us the "gift of obedience". That is backwards and doesn't work.



Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Ellen White quote:
The so-called faith in Christ which professes to release men from the obligation of obedience to God is not faith, but presumption.


I didn't say faith releases people from the obligation of obedience.
What I'm saying is without faith and the gift of obedience from God IT IS IMPOSSIBLE to render obedience to God.

It is of utmost importance to understand one must FIRST ACCEPT the gift of grace and acceptance by God, BEFORE it is possible to render the type of obedience that God desires.


Originally Posted By: Green
Grace is God's gift. Faith is our own action. It's a bit like saying God grants us the spark, and we must keep the flame alive through our own obedience.


Faith is part of God's gift of grace as well.
Yes, there is a growth of faith as we exercise faith. Learning to rely fully upon God and walk with Him in obedience increases faith.
Yet, why do you say "our own obedience"?

Where is the "walking with God" in that?
Why are we walking on our own here?
We walk on our own and we disconnect from the power.

Originally Posted By: green
[quote=dedication]That's like saying a parent helps a baby to walk only after they have shown their own walking ability.


That's not an accurate illustration.

No parent that I know would force a crawling baby who had not begun to stand to get up and walk. The baby must make an effort first on his or her own. [quote]

You're right, it is not an accurate illustration. For babies can learn to walk on their own if they have the initiative to do so.
But we can NEVER render true obedience of real righteousness on our own.
Probably a better illustration would be a baby born with deformed legs, who needs the professional assistance to correct that problem before he can walk.
Thus we need Christ before it's even possible for us to walk on the genuine paths of righteousness.

But even that illustration is not adequate, for we ALWAYS need to be walking with Christ in the paths of righteousness, and can not walk on own. Without Him we can do nothing, with Him all things are possible.

Originally Posted By: green
God does not save those who do not obey. Our obedience does not save us nor make us worthy--salvation is a gift of grace--but our obedience is a prerequisite to God's ability to make His salvation available to us.


Right, God does not save those who do not obey, because they didn't believe in Him and trust Him, so He could not raise them to newness of life.

But obedience is NOT prerequisite to God's ability to make salvation available to us.

God first makes His salvation available to us, and we MUST believe that in order to have the faith and trust in God that manifests itself in obedience.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 11:41 AM

Here's a couple of statements that express the truth better than I can.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
Self-denial will enable those who have done nothing in the past to do something tangible, and show that they believe the teachings of the word, that they believe the truth for this time. All, both old and young, parents and children, are to show their faith by their works. Faith is made perfect by works. We are in the very closing scenes of this earth's history; yet there are but few who realize this because the world has come in between God and the soul.--Letter 81, 1897.

It is true that there are many who have never had the light of present truth, who, through the grace given them of Christ, are keeping the law as far as they understand it. Those who are thus living up to the best light they have, are not of the class whom the apostle John condemns. His words apply to those who boast of believing in Jesus, who claim holiness, while they lightly regard the requirements of the law of God. While they talk of the love of Jesus, their love is not deep enough to lead to obedience. The fruit they bear, shows the character of the tree. It proves that their faith is not genuine. Yet this class, though entitled to nothing, though they have no right to the promises of God, boldly claim all His blessings. While they give nothing, they claim everything. They close their ears to the truth, refuse to listen to the plain "Thus saith the Lord," but by professing holiness they deceive many, leading souls away by their pretentious faith that has no foundation.--Gospel Workers, pp. 226, 227. (1892) {Ev 596.3}


And here's the best one.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
"Without faith it is impossible to please Him: for he that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him" (Hebrews 11:6). There are many in the Christian world who claim that all that is necessary to salvation is to have faith; works are nothing, faith is the only essential. But God's Word tells us that faith without works is dead, being alone. Many refuse to obey God's commandments, yet they make a great deal of faith. But faith must have a foundation. {FW 47.1}

God's promises are all made upon conditions. If we do His will, if we walk in truth, then we may ask what we will, and it shall be done unto us. While we earnestly endeavor to be obedient, God will hear our petitions; but He will not bless us in disobedience. If we choose to disobey His commandments, we may cry, "Faith, faith, only have faith," and the response will come back from the sure Word of God, "Faith without works is dead" (James 2:20). Such faith will only be as sounding brass and as a tinkling cymbal. In order to have the benefits of God's grace we must do our part; we must faithfully work and bring forth fruits meet for repentance. {FW 47.2}

We are workers together with God. You are not to sit in indolence, waiting for some great occasion, in order to do a great work for the Master. You are not to neglect the duty that lies directly in your pathway, but you are to improve the little opportunities that open around you. . . . {FW 47.3}


Now, if it is true that God will not bless us in disobedience, how will He bless us with obedience who are still in disobedience? That kind of thinking creates an unsolvable cycle of sin, a catch 22.

We must put forth some effort, demonstrating through action that we do have faith (without which we would not have faith), before God can grant us the promised blessing.

Remember the priests who put their feet in the water before it parted. Remember the lame man who chose to stand, and tried, before his legs made him able to do so. Remember Abraham whose hand was already committed to the slaying of his son in obedience to God's directions before God lauded his "faith." These people acted before the reality of the blessing had even come to them. It is this action which the Bible terms "faith." Faith is not a mere assent to the truth. It is not a mere belief. It is an action that demonstrates that one truly believes.

Look closely at God's words to Abraham in the following:

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
Abraham did not stop to question how God's promises could be fulfilled if Isaac were slain. He did not stay to reason with his aching heart, but carried out the divine command to the very letter, till, just as the knife was about to be plunged into the quivering flesh of the child, the word came: "Lay not thine hand upon the lad;" "for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me." {CC 56.4}


Only after this obedience did God credit Abraham with "fearing" Him. (The term "fear" is a mix of obey, honor, and worship, as I understand it.) If God is testing Abraham here, as we all know He was, why would this "test" have been a true test if God were "giving" Abraham this obedience? Obviously, Abraham is acting of his own will. He is demonstrating his faith on his own as best he can. We must do likewise. God helps those who help themselves.

Now, getting closer to the point of this discussion, our faith is shown in our effort to obey--which then unlocks heaven's storehouse of blessing and strength to help us obey more perfectly.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 05:54 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Our obedience may never be perfect, and can never save us--for all have sinned and come under the penalty of death as a result--but when we do all in our power, God will then work in our behalf to save us from sin and destruction.

To clarify this . . . Our works will never be perfect, because we have already sinned. We can, however, become sanctified to a point where we perfectly reproduce the character of Christ. . . I hope this is more clear.

Yes, very clear. I totally agree. Again, on this thread, it is important to stress the reason our works cannot save us is due to the plain and simple fact it lacks merit. We are saved "unto" good works - not "by" our good works. "For by grace are ye saved through faith . . . in Christ Jesus unto good works". Eph 2:8-10.

It is also important, on this thread, to emphasize that the fruit of abiding in Jesus is "righteousness and true holiness" - not sin stained, defiled, defective, imperfect fruit. "A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit". Mat 7:18. "The blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin." 1 John 1:7. "He that committeth sin is of the devil". 1 John 3:8. "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God." 1 John 3:9. "We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not". 1 John 5:18.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 06:13 PM

Subjection to God is restoration to one's self,--to the true glory and dignity of man. The divine law, to which we are brought into subjection, is "the law of liberty." James 2:12. {DA 466.5}

We are to do all that we can do on our part to fight the good fight of faith. We are to wrestle, to labor, to strive, to agonize to enter in at the strait gate. We are to set the Lord ever before us. With clean hands, with pure hearts, we are to seek to honor God in all our ways. Help has been provided for us in Him who is mighty to save. The spirit of truth and light will quicken and renew us by its mysterious workings; for all our spiritual improvement comes from God, not from ourselves. The true worker will have divine power to aid him, but the idler will not be sustained by the Spirit of God. {FW 48.1}

In one way we are thrown upon our own energies; we are to strive earnestly to be zealous and to repent, to cleanse our hands and purify our hearts from every defilement; we are to reach the highest standard, believing that God will help us in our efforts. We must seek if we would find, and seek in faith; we must knock, that the door may be opened unto us. The Bible teaches that everything regarding our salvation depends upon our own course of action. If we perish, the responsibility will rest wholly upon ourselves. If provision has been made, and if we accept God's terms, we may lay hold on eternal life. We must come to Christ in faith, we must be diligent to make our calling and election sure. {FW 48.2} [/quote]
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 06:37 PM

1) God requires the entire surrender of the heart, before justification can take place; and in order for man to retain justification, there must be 2) continual obedience, through active, living faith that works by love and purifies the soul. {FW 100.1}

There are many who want to know what they must do to be saved. They want a plain and clear explanation of the steps requisite in conversion . . . {Ev 188.1}

Unless we accept divine aid we cannot take the first step toward the Saviour. {1SM 381.2}

The first step toward salvation is to respond to the drawing of the love of Christ. {AG 99.5}

Repentance is the first step that must be taken by all who would return to God. {PP 590.2}

The first step toward restoration is obedience to [the] words, "Let him take hold of my strength, that he may make peace with Me, and he shall make peace with Me." {BCL 116.4}

Conviction of sin is the first step in conversion, and by the law is the knowledge of sin. When the sinner has a realization of his sin, he is in a condition to be drawn to Christ by the amazing love that has been shown for him on the cross of Calvary. {ST, July 7, 1890 par. 5}

The following short article is the best, the most concise explanation of the steps we must take to be saved and to stay saved:

Quote:
Many think that repentance is a work which devolves wholly upon man, but this is an error. The Bible does not teach that man must repent before he comes to Christ. Repentance must precede forgiveness; but the sinner does not repent till he has faith in Christ as his mediator. Christ is the author and finisher of our faith. His love, shining from the cross, speaks eloquently of the sufferings of the only-begotten Son of God for fallen man. This love draws sinners to Him. The transgressor may resist this love; he may refuse to be drawn to Christ; but if he does not resist, he will be led to the foot of the cross, in repentance for the sins that caused the death of the Son of God. {ST, March 18, 1903 par. 1}

If it were possible for man of himself to repent, Christ's atoning sacrifice would be in vain. But this is not possible. Repentance comes from Christ just as verily as does pardon. It is a false theory which teaches that repentance is a work which man must do himself, without any special help from Christ. If one step in the way of salvation could be taken without Christ, every step could be taken without Him. But without His help, the sinner can not take the first step in this way. The grace that brings forgiveness brings also contrition and repentance. {ST, March 18, 1903 par. 2}

It is true that great reformations in outward conduct are made by those who have never expressed faith in Christ, and who may not have even a knowledge of Him. But it is none the less true that it is the influence of His grace that put into their hearts the desire to reform. The change in their life is the result of a blind faith. Ignorantly they worship that which leads them to respect true manhood. If they continue to walk toward the light, increased light will shine upon them; and they will bow in adoration before God, filled with gratitude for the love that led Him to give His only-begotten Son as a sacrifice for the lost race. {ST, March 18, 1903 par. 3}

The repentance that God accepts is a repentance that needs not to be repented of,--a repentance revealed by a radical change of mind and heart. The heart must be brought into subjection to Christ, and a repentance that brings about such a change can never originate with man. Only from Him who declared, "I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto Me," can such repentance proceed. As the sinner yields to the drawing power of Christ's love, sorrow for sin and a desire to turn from his evil ways fill his heart, and as he seeks help from God, strength from on high is given him. The Saviour says, "Let him take hold of My strength, that he may make peace with Me; and he shall make peace with Me." {ST, March 18, 1903 par. 4}

Those whom God pardons He first makes penitent. Some will say that this leaves man with nothing to do, with no part in the struggle against sin. This is not so; all the powers with which man has been entrusted must be employed in the effort to do the will of God. Man can never be saved in indolence. Christ declared, "My Father worketh hitherto, and I work;" and those for whom He has given His life are to be co-workers with Him. We must watch and pray, lest we enter into temptation. We must fight against pride, self-exaltation, jealousy, evil thinking, and evil-speaking. Our earnest effort to overcome the evil in our characters will make manifest the sincerity of our prayers. {ST, March 18, 1903 par. 5}

We must exercise faith in God. "Without faith it is impossible to please Him; for he that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him." It is by faith alone that we can claim His promise, saying, "I receive the things I ask for; Thy Word is sure; it can not fail." {ST, March 18, 1903 par. 6}

We must be willing to realize our need. Those who feel that they are sinful and poor and wretched are the very ones to whom the invitation of mercy is extended. Jesus says, "I came not to call the righteous,"--those who are clothed with the garments of their own righteousness,--"but sinners to repentance." Those who are rich and honorable in their own estimation do not hunger and thirst after righteousness. They feel no need; therefore they do not ask for and receive the blessing of God. {ST, March 18, 1903 par. 7}

Without the help of the Saviour, fallen man could never keep the law of God. But how glorious is the truth of the atonement? What a firm foundation have the saints of the Most High on which to place their hope of salvation! Not one of God's promises can fail. Through the righteousness of Christ the condemned sinner may be purified and made white. The Redeemer has carried the world's burden of guilt and woe, and He is able to strengthen His children for the conflicts that day by day they will meet in the path to heaven. {ST, March 18, 1903 par. 8}

Thus the plan of redemption is laid open to us, so that every soul may see the steps he is to take in repentance toward God and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ, in order to be saved in God's appointed way . . . {SC 107.2}
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/08/14 06:42 PM

Dedication, I seriously doubt Sister White would be upset about the post above.
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/09/14 12:54 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa


Now, getting closer to the point of this discussion, our faith is shown in our effort to obey--which then unlocks heaven's storehouse of blessing and strength to help us obey more perfectly.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.


Quote:
"The religious services, the prayers, the praise, the penitent confession of sin ascend from true believers as incense to the heavenly sanctuary; but passing through the corrupt channels of humanity, they are so defiled that unless purified by blood, they can never be of value with God. They ascend not in spotless purity, and unless the Intercessor who is at God’s right hand presents and purifies all by His righteousness, it is not acceptable to God. All incense from earthly tabernacles must be moist with the cleansing drops of the blood of Christ. He holds before the Father the censer of His own merits, in which there is no taint of earthly corruption. He gathers into this censer the prayers, the praise, and the confessions of His people, and with these He puts His own spotless righteousness. Then, perfumed with the merits of Christ’s propitiation, the incense comes up before God wholly and entirely acceptable", sda bible commentary 6:1078... {1SM 344.2}


Even our prayers need to be cleansed before they are acceptable.

Passing through our corrupt humanity everything we do is defiled.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/09/14 03:30 PM

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
The pastor who fulfills his high commission must give his people faithful instruction on every point of the Christian faith, showing them what they must be and do in order to stand perfect in the day of God. He only who is a faithful teacher of the truth will at the close of his work be able to say with Paul, "I am pure from the blood of all men." {AA 393.4}


We are not forced to keep the character we have now. On the contrary, it is our privilege to see our character progress until we "should come into the full noontide of a perfect gospel faith."

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
The Corinthian believers needed a deeper experience in the things of God. They did not know fully what it meant to behold His glory and to be changed from character to character. They had seen but the first rays of the early dawn of that glory. Paul's desire for them was that they might be filled with all the fullness of God, following on to know Him whose going forth is prepared as the morning, and continuing to learn of Him until they should come into the full noontide of a perfect gospel faith. {AA 307.2}


Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/09/14 06:49 PM

Is perfect obedience a requirement of the New Covenant or a promise? If it is a requirement, from whom is it required? If it is a promise, by whom and to whom is it promised?
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/09/14 07:35 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Is perfect obedience a requirement of the New Covenant or a promise? If it is a requirement, from whom is it required? If it is a promise, by whom and to whom is it promised?

It is both a requirement and a promise. Look at the Ten Commandments. They are part of this covenant. Are they a requirement or a promise? I say both.

When we love God, we will not do those things that are forbidden by the law, and we will do those things which are commanded. "If ye love me, keep my commandments." We love Him because He first loved us--by our own choice. In the same manner, obedience by choice becomes our character in time. We choose to obey, and God gives us strength to follow through on that choice. He has promised to strengthen us.

The promise is God's promise given to us. We accept it by faith, which in turn is made faith through our obedience in response to our belief. Faith equals belief plus obedience. Without faith it is impossible to please God. The promise is conditional upon our obedience.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/09/14 09:13 PM

Green - you speak Old Covenant, where the people promised to keep the law, and our promises are ropes of sand.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/09/14 09:25 PM

Originally Posted By: Johann
Even our prayers need to be cleansed before they are acceptable. Passing through our corrupt humanity everything we do is defiled.

Pastor, a few people have been advocating a similar view. Where in the Bible does it say so? That is, where in the Bible does it say the fruit of abiding in Jesus, the fruit of partaking of the divine nature is defiled and unacceptable? I believe the SOP is harmony with the Bible.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/10/14 01:53 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
1. Is perfect obedience a requirement of the New Covenant or a promise?
2. If it is a requirement, from whom is it required?
3. If it is a promise, by whom and to whom is it promised?

1. A promise. It was premised on genuine love. "IF YOU LOVE ME," Jesus said, "keep my commandments." Love was going to impel obedience. It was going to be the motivation for pleasing God. And indeed, genuine love reconciles and heals and strengthens.

2. See #1

3. By Jesus Christ, to every believer.

///
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/10/14 02:47 AM

Originally Posted By: Johann
Even our prayers need to be cleansed before they are acceptable. Passing through our corrupt humanity everything we do is defiled.

Do you say to your children, "until you are perfect, don't speak to me"? How then is it written, "if you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, HOW MUCH MORE will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask Him"? (Mat. 7:11)

See, even before we ask, he answers. For it is also written, "that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust." (Mat. 5:45)

Perfection and perfect obedience is NOT the key that opens the door of God's heart, but humility: repentance and love. "on this one will I look, " He says, "on him who is poor and of a contrite spirit, and who trembles at My word." (Is. 66:2)

///
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/10/14 06:02 AM

Originally Posted By: APL
Green - you speak Old Covenant, where the people promised to keep the law, and our promises are ropes of sand.


I am speaking of the New Covenant, APL. The Ten Commandments are part of it.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
The new-covenant promise is, "I will put My laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them." Hebrews 10:16. While the system of types which pointed to Christ as the Lamb of God that should take away the sin of the world was to pass away at His death, the principles of righteousness embodied in the Decalogue are as immutable as the eternal throne. Not one command has been annulled, not a jot or tittle has been changed. Those principles that were made known to man in Paradise as the great law of life will exist unchanged in Paradise restored. When Eden shall bloom on earth again, God's law of love will be obeyed by all beneath the sun. {MB 50.2}


Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/10/14 07:14 AM

I was repeating the thoughts of Ellen G White, based on Scripture. Not many people today accept fully Ellen. They replace her with new interpretations by powerful TV speakers and adjust their doctrines accordingly.

Back in the days when we still had the faith which Jesus predicts will almost disappear by the time He returns, my mother held me on her knees as we went through these truths, reading both in the writings of EGW and Scripture.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/10/14 10:28 AM

Hello Green - the 10C are part of BOTH. What is the difference between the Old and the New? This was hash out long ago and the false view dominates contrary to EGW. One covenant proclaims the ten commandments as ten promises, the other as ten fear-laden negative burdens. Hm - who here preaches fear? GREEN! Ok - that is Old Covenant theology. Green, does this sound like something you might say? "Everything That the Lord says, we will do"? Old Covenant.

Old Covenant is the promise of the people to do everything right so they can be saved.

The New Covenant is God’s promise of blessings and salvation in Christ.

Fear, our promises which are ropes of sand, are all OLD Covenant. Why are most stuck in the Old Covenant?
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/10/14 08:31 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Originally Posted By: asygo
Is perfect obedience a requirement of the New Covenant or a promise? If it is a requirement, from whom is it required? If it is a promise, by whom and to whom is it promised?

It is both a requirement and a promise. Look at the Ten Commandments. They are part of this covenant. Are they a requirement or a promise? I say both.

I agree that it is both, but it may be for a different reason.

Perfect obedience cannot be a requirement for us to participate in the New Covenant. We do not have it in us to obey perfectly. If we had to perfectly obey first, we would all be lost.

However, the New Covenant requires perfect obedience from Jesus. His obedience is both imputed and imparted to us. His obedience meets the standard.

Jeremiah 31:33 (KJV) But this [shall be] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.

God promises to put the law in our hearts. Why? Because it is not naturally there. We are, by nature, children of wrath and enmity to God. And without supernatural grace, we cannot counteract it, nor do we want to. Any good thing we do is initiated by God. God's promise and power come first.

Is there nothing for us to do? Why are not all people saved? We must be His people - we must *accept* His promises. He promises to write His law in our hearts and minds, but we don't have to accept the promise. But if we reject that part, we also reject the rest of the package, including eternal life.

Look at the promises of the New Covenant. They all come from God. While both covenants are based on the law, the key distinction is who is promising to keep the law. In the OC, man promises to keep the law and God blesses. In the NC, God promises to cause us to walk in His statutes and we accept.

Just think about it for a moment. Can anyone truly obey - actions, words, thougts, and feelings - unless God writes His law in the heart and mind first? Our Christless offerings, even if they are called righteous, are filthy rags.
But once we accept God's offer, Christ's righteousnes shines through us.

Yes, we must choose. But the choice is to receive Him as our Lamb, rather than choosing to offer Him our best fruits.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/10/14 08:41 PM

Arnold,

Think about it...can God write His law on our heart and mind without an action of repentance on our part first? Choosing Jesus is our first work. Without this, God cannot give us His righteousness. We receive His grace through faith, and faith itself involves an action on our part. Without this action, God cannot give us His righteousness.

I recommend Christ's Object Lessons, chapter 28: "The Reward of Grace."

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/10/14 08:44 PM

God brought them to Sinai; He manifested His glory; He gave them His law, with the promise of great blessings on condition of obedience: “If ye will obey My voice indeed, and keep My covenant, then ... ye shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation.” Exodus 19:5, 6. The people did not realize the sinfulness of their own hearts, and that without Christ it was impossible for them to keep God’s law; and they readily entered into covenant with God. Feeling that they were able to establish their own righteousness, they declared, “All that the Lord hath said will we do, and be obedient.” Exodus 24:7. They had witnessed the proclamation of the law in awful majesty, and had trembled with terror before the mount; and yet only a few weeks passed before they broke their covenant with God, and bowed down to worship a graven image. They could not hope for the favor of God through a covenant which they had broken; and now, seeing their sinfulness and their need of pardon, they were brought to feel their need of the Saviour revealed in the Abrahamic covenant and shadowed forth in the sacrificial offerings. Now by faith and love they were bound to God as their deliverer from the bondage of sin. Now they were prepared to appreciate the blessings of the new covenant. – {PP 371.4}

The terms of the “old covenant” were, Obey and live: “If a man do, he shall even live in them” (Ezekiel 20:11; Leviticus 18:5); but “cursed be he that confirmeth not all the words of this law to do them.” Deuteronomy 27:26. The “new covenant” was established upon “better promises”—the promise of forgiveness of sins and of the grace of God to renew the heart and bring it into harmony with the principles of God’s law. “This shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts.... I will forgive their iniquity, and will remember their sin no more.” Jeremiah 31:33, 34. – {PP 372.1}

The same law that was engraved upon the tables of stone is written by the Holy Spirit upon the tables of the heart. Instead of going about to establish our own righteousness we accept the righteousness of Christ. His blood atones for our sins. His obedience is accepted for us. Then the heart renewed by the Holy Spirit will bring forth “the fruits of the Spirit.” Through the grace of Christ we shall live in obedience to the law of God written upon our hearts. Having the Spirit of Christ, we shall walk even as He walked. Through the prophet He declared of Himself, “I delight to do Thy will, O My God: yea, Thy law is within My heart.” Psalm 40:8. And when among men He said, “The Father hath not left Me alone; for I do always those things that please Him.” John 8:29. – {PP 372.2}
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/10/14 08:48 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Arnold,

Think about it...can God write His law on our heart and mind without an action of repentance on our part first? Choosing Jesus is our first work. Without this, God cannot give us His righteousness. We receive His grace through faith, and faith itself involves an action on our part. Without this action, God cannot give us His righteousness.

That is all true. But all of that combined still does not meet the requirements of the law. Now, as in Eden, the requirement is perfect obedience. But sinful man cannot give it. Only Jesus has the required perfect obedience.

If righteousness could be found in the law, then we would not need grace.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/11/14 12:41 AM

Originally Posted By: Johann
I was repeating the thoughts of Ellen G White, based on Scripture. Not many people today accept fully Ellen. They replace her with new interpretations by powerful TV speakers and adjust their doctrines accordingly.

Back in the days when we still had the faith which Jesus predicts will almost disappear by the time He returns, my mother held me on her knees as we went through these truths, reading both in the writings of EGW and Scripture.


I agree with you.

Since God never spoke to either of us by vision, we know what we know through reading the Bible for ourselves and listening to others. For many, the Pope is authoritative, for you Ellen White, and for the rest some other person(s). I fall in the latter category. I strongly believe that through discussion, without fear or favour, I could learn quite a lot not only by sharing but by receiving as well.

The culture of open discussion is unique in the West. The Eastern Islamic republics are no different to Catholic Europe before the Renaissance: they bluntly and blindly hold fast to their singular authority and will not discuss anything except it were based on their fundamental source of doctrine. The Catholics, further, are like a two-horned beast: having both the Bible and their Magisterium upon the head. Sometimes, I think that SDA have reached that point of no return. No longer is "sola scriptura" sacrosanct, but this: "reading both in the writings of EGW and Scripture."

Do you know what this means, "wisdom is justified by her children"? Jesus said so. (Mat. 11:19) There is an equivalent expression He repeated at the end of every message to the Church in Rev. 2-3, "He who has ears to hear," he said, "let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches."

///
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/11/14 09:44 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Arnold,

Think about it...can God write His law on our heart and mind without an action of repentance on our part first? Choosing Jesus is our first work. Without this, God cannot give us His righteousness. We receive His grace through faith, and faith itself involves an action on our part. Without this action, God cannot give us His righteousness.

That is all true. But all of that combined still does not meet the requirements of the law. Now, as in Eden, the requirement is perfect obedience. But sinful man cannot give it. Only Jesus has the required perfect obedience.

If righteousness could be found in the law, then we would not need grace.


Arnold, perhaps we are in agreement then. It is certainly only Jesus who saves us. The best analogy I can think of at the moment is that of Moses in holding up his arms.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
Moses lifted up his hands toward heaven when Israel and the opposing power were in warfare. Before all Israel he stood with his hands uplifted toward heaven. As soon as they began to drop the enemy gained the victory, and every time his hands were uplifted toward heaven the forces of Israel gained the victory. So Aaron and Hur stood on each side and held his hands toward heaven as a symbol, signifying that he was laying hold of the God of heaven as they must do. They must stretch their arms toward heaven. Christ is their helper. {1SAT 244.2}


This is our example. God did not hold up Moses' arms. That was Moses' part. We must also do likewise. When we have done all we can, God steps in and does the rest.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/11/14 10:10 AM

Yes, we do as much as we can, not as a vain attempt to gain any credit, but as a loving response to what Jesus has already done for us. We faithfully and diligently do our part knowing that it is exceedingly small, yet crucial to the process.
Posted By: Johann

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/11/14 10:04 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Originally Posted By: asygo
Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Arnold,

Think about it...can God write His law on our heart and mind without an action of repentance on our part first? Choosing Jesus is our first work. Without this, God cannot give us His righteousness. We receive His grace through faith, and faith itself involves an action on our part. Without this action, God cannot give us His righteousness.

That is all true. But all of that combined still does not meet the requirements of the law. Now, as in Eden, the requirement is perfect obedience. But sinful man cannot give it. Only Jesus has the required perfect obedience.

If righteousness could be found in the law, then we would not need grace.


Arnold, perhaps we are in agreement then. It is certainly only Jesus who saves us. The best analogy I can think of at the moment is that of Moses in holding up his arms.

Originally Posted By: Ellen White
Moses lifted up his hands toward heaven when Israel and the opposing power were in warfare. Before all Israel he stood with his hands uplifted toward heaven. As soon as they began to drop the enemy gained the victory, and every time his hands were uplifted toward heaven the forces of Israel gained the victory. So Aaron and Hur stood on each side and held his hands toward heaven as a symbol, signifying that he was laying hold of the God of heaven as they must do. They must stretch their arms toward heaven. Christ is their helper. {1SAT 244.2}


This is our example. God did not hold up Moses' arms. That was Moses' part. We must also do likewise. When we have done all we can, God steps in and does the rest.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.


The full story tells us that even Moses was not able to hold up his hands. He needed help for that.
Posted By: APL

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/11/14 10:41 PM

"look and live".
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/12/14 06:48 PM

Eventually we need to reconcile the Bible and SOP statements that say the fruit of abiding in Jesus is "pure and holy and undefiled" and "pleasing and acceptable" to God with the one or two SOP statements which seem to imply such fruit is defiled, in need of cleansing, and displeasing and unacceptable to God. So far we have not addressed it.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/12/14 09:39 PM

I addressed it but you ignored it as irrelevant. And in this case, this sub-topic IS irrelevant.

The question is this: Is perfect obedience a requirement for the sinner to participate in the New Covenant? Or is perfect obedience a gift from God to those who are already participating in the New Covenant?

IOW, is perfect obedience our offering to God, or God's gift to us. I think the answer distinguishes between the Old and New Covenant.
Posted By: Green Cochoa

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/13/14 06:40 AM

I think perfect obedience is both a gift AND a requirement of God. The "requirement" portion can only be fulfilled by Christ, since we have all sinned. Regardless of whether or not we can reach a point of sinlessness, sin is already a blight upon our record from the past, which can only be erased by blood. Jesus' blood can do that for us--this is the "gift."

The "gift" portion includes the ability to live a sinless life. It includes the desire to live such a life. It includes the seed of faith to start us on this journey.

What does the "gift" NOT include? This is where we may see things differently.

I believe God's gift of grace leaves some portions to us, including "acceptance," which is more than a mere "assent" to the truth (as Mrs. White would have put it). Our part also includes the exercise of faith, which includes obedience on our part as an act of reciprocal love. It is our part to resist the devil and his temptations. God will not do the resisting for us. Once we resist, however, He will help us in the fight.

Basically, while it is true that God is in a sense 100% responsible for our salvation, and we do not deserve it in the least, it is also true that God does not just "give" His salvation to everyone. God extends His salvation to those who prize it, seek for it, and work for it. Only those who are thus seeking with all their hearts will find it.

That is the New Covenant. In the New Covenant, the heart is in it. God's laws are treasured, loved, and obeyed from the heart.

The "Old Covenant" was an unfortunate no-man's land of knowing the law, recognizing its validity and understanding its import, but no true desire of the heart to follow it. It consisted in a head knowledge and vain promise to follow the law, without any real motivation or strength to follow through on that promise. In this scenario, it is impossible to keep the law for any length of time.

God says, in the New Covenant, that He will write His law upon our hearts. That's what we need. When we love the law, we will obey it.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/13/14 06:37 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
I think perfect obedience is both a gift AND a requirement of God. The "requirement" portion can only be fulfilled by Christ, since we have all sinned. Regardless of whether or not we can reach a point of sinlessness, sin is already a blight upon our record from the past, which can only be erased by blood. Jesus' blood can do that for us--this is the "gift."

The "gift" portion includes the ability to live a sinless life. It includes the desire to live such a life. It includes the seed of faith to start us on this journey.

What does the "gift" NOT include? This is where we may see things differently.

I believe God's gift of grace leaves some portions to us, including "acceptance," which is more than a mere "assent" to the truth (as Mrs. White would have put it). Our part also includes the exercise of faith, which includes obedience on our part as an act of reciprocal love. It is our part to resist the devil and his temptations. God will not do the resisting for us. Once we resist, however, He will help us in the fight.

Basically, while it is true that God is in a sense 100% responsible for our salvation, and we do not deserve it in the least, it is also true that God does not just "give" His salvation to everyone. God extends His salvation to those who prize it, seek for it, and work for it. Only those who are thus seeking with all their hearts will find it.

That is the New Covenant. In the New Covenant, the heart is in it. God's laws are treasured, loved, and obeyed from the heart.

I agree with all that. Our differences may simply be in emphasis and/or presentation.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/13/14 07:11 PM

Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
The "Old Covenant" was an unfortunate no-man's land of knowing the law, recognizing its validity and understanding its import, but no true desire of the heart to follow it. It consisted in a head knowledge and vain promise to follow the law, without any real motivation or strength to follow through on that promise. In this scenario, it is impossible to keep the law for any length of time.

I would say that in this scenario it is impossible to keep the law at all, since the law is primarily a matter of the heart.

But it is possible that there are some who truly desire to keep the law, but are stuck in the OC. I believe the distinction between the covenants lies in the motives.

Galatians 4:21-23 ¶ Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, have ye not heard the law? For it is written that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. But he who was of the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, but he of the freewoman was born through the promise.

Paul uses Abraham's experience to distinguish between the Old and New Covenants. But can we say that, when Abraham fell into the OC, he did not really want to keep the law? Or IOW, was Abraham not trying to keep his end of the deal?

Remember that the Abrahamic covenant was the NC. When God made a covenant with Abraham, it was the NC. Abraham believed God's promise and it was accounted to him as righteousness.

But what was the fundamental problem with the Hagar fiasco? Abraham attempted to help God keep His promise by the power of his own flesh. He went wih the "I'll do my best and God will do the rest" plan. He thought that he could contribute to the promises of the NC. And with that, he fell into Satan's OC trap.

The NC requires that we trust God completely with keeping His end of the deal. If we try to help Him, we show unbelief. Only after Abraham and Sarah arrived at the conclusion that it was impossible for them to have a son did God give them Isaac. We need to realize that it is impossible for us to keep the law perfectly, then God will do for us what is impossible for us to do for ourselves.

But keep in mind that Isaac was not a virgin birth. Abraham and Sarah had work to do. And it was work that was futile from the natural perspective. But it was a work that was used for supernatural accomplishments. This plan is what I call "I'll do my best and God does it ALL."

Remember also that when God made the covenant with Abraham in the first place, he didn't just sit around doing nothing. He sacrificed animals, he kept the birds away, etc. There is work for us to do, but let's not confuse it with God's work.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/13/14 07:55 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
M: Eventually we need to reconcile the Bible and SOP statements that say the fruit of abiding in Jesus is "pure and holy and undefiled" and "pleasing and acceptable" to God with the one or two SOP statements which seem to imply such fruit is defiled, in need of cleansing, and displeasing and unacceptable to God. So far we have not addressed it.

A: I addressed it but you ignored it as irrelevant. And in this case, this sub-topic IS irrelevant. The question is this: Is perfect obedience a requirement for the sinner to participate in the New Covenant? Or is perfect obedience a gift from God to those who are already participating in the New Covenant? IOW, is perfect obedience our offering to God, or God's gift to us. I think the answer distinguishes between the Old and New Covenant.

I don't recall you explaining why Adam's pre-fall sinlessness is relevant. Yes, perfect obedience is required to maintain justification. The fruit of abiding in Jesus does not require justification. The only thing it lacks is merit. Jesus supplies the merit. But in so doing He does not change it from sin to righteousness.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/13/14 11:16 PM

Originally Posted By: Mountain Man
I don't recall you explaining why Adam's pre-fall sinlessness is relevant. Yes, perfect obedience is required to maintain justification. The fruit of abiding in Jesus does not require justification. The only thing it lacks is merit. Jesus supplies the merit. But in so doing He does not change it from sin to righteousness.

You keep saying the problem is lack of merit. However you also say that sinless Adam had no merit, and had no problem. That you do not see its relevance to your theory, namely that it reveals a fatal inconsistency, is beyond my ability to remedy.

But, let's get back to Christ and His Law.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/14/14 01:34 AM

Quote:
RE: http://www.ssnet.org/lessons/14b/less11.html

The last question for Friday (June 13) is, "How does the denial of the law, or even of one of the commandments, play into Satan's hands as he seeks to overthrow the law of God?"

Satan does not seek to overthrow the law of God. We know this because his greatest instruments are those who keep the law of God. This is what Jesus said of the "church" of his day, "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs which indeed appear beautiful outwardly, but inside are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness. Even so you also outwardly appear righteous to men, but inside you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness." (Mat. 23:27-28)

Satan's whole purpose is to have you become self-reliant, independent of God, just like him. He wants you to keep the law of God, but only in so far as it is advantageous to you and to your livelihood. If it is not in any way, then he suggests ways and means to circumvent the law of God without directly challenging it, but enough to suit your own "well-being" in this life.

Satan is God's greatest law keeper. Remember when Aaron had made a golden calf, what the people said? "This is your god, O Israel, that brought you out of the land of Egypt!" So when Aaron saw it, he built an altar before it. And Aaron made a proclamation and said, "Tomorrow is a feast to the Lord." Then they rose early on the next day, offered burnt offerings, and brought peace offerings; and the people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play. (Exod. 32:4-6) Listen carefully to the subtext of the words Satan put into their mouths: "We do not need God. We can make it on our own! Yet, we will do everything God has taught us." A great many SDA are like that. They pride themselves as law-keepers, honouring God with their lips, but the love of God is not in them really.

And this is the law of God which Satan is adamant is worthless: LOVE. A heart that is full of empathy, sympathy, unselfishness, desire to give, to listen, to judge righteously .... does not seek its own. Such a thing is anathema to Satan. A heart that is cold and of stone: calculating, judgmental, cultic, ruthlessly narrow-minded, and selfish ... this is his objective in his instruments, whether among the Jews, SDA or Catholics.

But Jesus said, "IF .... IF YOU LOVE ME .... IF YOU LOVE ME .... keep my commandments." (cf. Jude 21)

///
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/14/14 05:38 AM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Satan does not seek to overthrow the law of God. We know this because his greatest instruments are those who keep the law of God.
...
Satan is God's greatest law keeper.
...
And this is the law of God which Satan is adamant is worthless: LOVE.

I don't think you know anything about God's law. "Satan is God's greatest law keeper." Really?

Try this instead: "Love is the fulfilling of the law," courtesy of Paul.

God's law is ALL about love, no more, no less. You like to belittle other religions, especially Adventists. Yet, you are utterly, incredibly, mind-numbingly clueless. You are neck-deep in a false dichotomy that Satan has used for ages.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/14/14 12:50 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Satan does not seek to overthrow the law of God. We know this because his greatest instruments are those who keep the law of God.
...
Satan is God's greatest law keeper.
...
And this is the law of God which Satan is adamant is worthless: LOVE.

I don't think you know anything about God's law. "Satan is God's greatest law keeper." Really?

Try this instead: "Love is the fulfilling of the law," courtesy of Paul.

God's law is ALL about love, no more, no less. You like to belittle other religions, especially Adventists. Yet, you are utterly, incredibly, mind-numbingly clueless. You are neck-deep in a false dichotomy that Satan has used for ages.

Judge righteously, my friend. Read, think and consider the matter. Do not be in haste to condemn. Look at how Paul demonstrates the contrast between law-keeping and true Christianity by his own life.

Originally Posted By: Philippians 3
5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;
6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.

7 But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.

Do you see the difference in living which he describes between that of verses 5 to 6, and that of verse 7?

///
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/14/14 05:16 PM

Yes, there is a big difference. The first verses describe Paul's experience without Jesus, the last his experience after conversion.

So why do you take your instruction from lost Pharisees? Why get your clues from the clueless? You will be more successful getting speech lessons from a mime. Can't you find better teachers?

Matthew 22:37-40 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

We Adventists, silly as we are, think that Jesus was the best teacher. We also have reason to believe that He taught that love is the foundation of the law, and that He kept the law His whole life. Call us crazy, but we think Jesus was the greatest law-keeper, not Satan. We study His ways, not the Pharisees' ways.

Romans 7:7-13 ¶ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? No, in no wise. But, I did not know sin except by the law; for neither would I have known lust if the law did not say, Thou shalt not covet. Then sin, when there was occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of lust. For without the law sin was as if it were dormant. So that without the law I lived for some time; but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died. And I found that the same commandment, which was unto life, was mortal unto me. For sin, having had occasion, deceived me by the commandment and by it killed me. So the law is truly holy, and the commandment holy and just and good. Was then that which is good made death unto me? No, in no wise. But sin, to show itself sin by that which is good, worked death in me, making sin exceedingly sinful by the commandment.

What about Paul? He eventually discovered the Great Teacher (better than the Pharisees, including Gamaliel), the Great Law-Keeper (better than Satan), the Law-Giver Himself. Then his eyes were opened, seeing things the Pharisees never taught him.

What did he see? "Thou shalt not covet." Surely, he must have memorized that in his youth. What was different? He saw that the law was primarily a matter of the desires of the heart, not the actions of the body.

As a blind Pharisee, he saw himself blameless in law-keeping. But when his eyes were opened, sin revived and he died. Externally, he could claim perfection, but a true understanding of the claims of the law revealed him to be dead in trespasses and sins.

That's what happens when one is taught by Jesus, not Pharisees. Choose wisely.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/16/14 07:30 AM

Originally Posted By: asygo
As a blind Pharisee, he saw himself blameless in law-keeping. But when his eyes were opened, sin revived and he died. Externally, he could claim perfection, but a true understanding of the claims of the law revealed him to be dead in trespasses and sins.

That's what happens when one is taught by Jesus, not Pharisees. Choose wisely.

You have a theoretical perspective of the word of God: "eyes open, sin revive, death"? You don't understand anything you are reading, and to prove it, I would like you to tell us what Paul meant when he said:

"So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin." (Rom. 7:35)

What is the law of God and what is the law of sin and how is it that Paul admits to serving two opposing laws? What is the distinction between the mind and the flesh of man?

///
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/16/14 08:23 AM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
You don't understand anything you are reading, and to prove it, I would like you to tell us what Paul meant when he said:

I don't understand anything? Coming from one who thinks Satan is the greatest keeper of God's law, which Jesus summarized as "Love everyone," I'll take it as a compliment.

As for your request for an explanation of Romans 7: you must have milk before meat. You need to upgrade your teachers from Pharisees to God. Otherwise, everything you say is just blah, blah, blah.
Posted By: asygo

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/21/14 05:52 PM

The lesson asks, "Why can't we really be keeping the commandments if we don't show love?"

We spent most of our time in class last week clarifying the fact that God's law is primarily a matter of internal thougts and feelings, rather than external actions. Paul could claim to be blameless as a Pharisee because his focus was on external obedience. But when he realized the implications of "Thou shalt not covet," that the law reached into his inner desires, he realized that he was still dead in sin.

Jesus summarized the law and the prophets in one word: love. This is the fundamental requirement of the law. Without love, we are just noisy brass and cymbals. Love fulfills the law.
Posted By: Mountain Man

Re: 2nd Quarter 2014 Christ and His Law - 06/21/14 06:32 PM

Originally Posted By: asygo
The lesson asks, "Why can't we really be keeping the commandments if we don't show love?"

Showing love = commandment keeping. Faith works by love - "that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven."
© 2024 Maritime 2nd Advent Christian Believers OnLine Forums Consisting Mainly of Both Members & Friends of the SDA (Seventh-day Adventist) Church