|
Forums118
Topics9,199
Posts195,594
Members1,323
| |
Most Online5,850
Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
|
Re: Are The Feast Days & Sabbaths Still Binding?
[Re: Daryl]
#178450
11/25/15 01:57 AM
11/25/15 01:57 AM
|
SDA
Active Member 2018
Most Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,264
Asia
|
|
I believe some may be loosing sight of the level of importance whiten the laws.
The Moral Law is the primary law. While the ceremonial law is the secondary law. This keeping of the ceremonial law was temporary whereas the Moral Law is eternal.
I do agree that both of these laws make up the schoolmaster in Galatians 3:24, but, the Moral Law is of supreme importance.
Can we agree on just these points here at this time?
|
|
|
Re: Are The Feast Days & Sabbaths Still Binding?
[Re: Daryl]
#178458
11/25/15 05:32 AM
11/25/15 05:32 AM
|
SDA
Active Member 2024
Supporting Member 2023
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,183
Alberta, Canada
|
|
Absolutely correct, Alchemy!
If sin had never entered our world, the Ten Commandments would still have shed their Light through eternal ages; while, the ceremonial laws would have never existed.
"...I will not forget you.
Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands..."
Isaiah 49:15-16
|
|
|
Re: Are The Feast Days & Sabbaths Still Binding?
[Re: Daryl]
#178462
11/25/15 07:10 AM
11/25/15 07:10 AM
|
SDA
Active Member 2020
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
|
|
The Moral Law is the primary law. While the ceremonial law is the secondary law. This keeping of the ceremonial law was temporary whereas the Moral Law is eternal.
I do agree that both of these laws make up the schoolmaster in Galatians 3:24, but, the Moral Law is of supreme importance.
Can we agree on just these points here at this time? Has the ceremonial law now ended when type met antitype? Yes. And along with it the Levitical priesthood which was also a type which met antitype in the ministry and death of Christ.
Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
|
|
|
Re: Are The Feast Days & Sabbaths Still Binding?
[Re: Charity]
#178487
11/26/15 11:38 AM
11/26/15 11:38 AM
|
Active Member 2019
Died February 12, 2019
2500+ Member
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,536
Canada
|
|
Good, helpful summary of the 8th day law Elle. I've never given that much thought. I've been interested in broadening my understanding of the 8th day at the end of the Feast of Tabernacles but hadn't gone to the trouble of reviewing all of the similar occurances. This will help. If you have any thoughts please post them. To list them like that helped me also to take a step back and viewing them as a whole. Also ProdigalOne timely comment about the Lord quadesh-sanctify the Sabbath -- did help also to view the relationship between the Sabbaths and the 8th days laws. For me it seems that I'm having a little break thru as I long have struggled to link these to have some level of understanding. I'm currently working on a post to reply to ProdigalOne Sabbath-quadesh comment. I think that will help and lead to your inquiry. After that Post, I will work to share my thoughts(which is not complete and a working progress) about the Feast of Tabernacle in relation with the 8th days laws which in brief is all about Sonship. Tx for asking.
Blessings
|
|
|
Re: Are The Feast Days & Sabbaths Still Binding?
[Re: Elle]
#178501
11/26/15 09:37 PM
11/26/15 09:37 PM
|
SDA
Active Member 2024
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,425
Midland
|
|
The thing is -- those laws were very specific and very literal. I agree and it was necessary to teach babes in such ways because they couldn’t understand spiritual things.(Gal 4:1-9, 1Cor 3:1; Heb 8:5; 9:10; 10:1; Col 2:17; etc… ) Those laws are NO longer binding. It’s ironic that we, as SDAs supposively are LAW ABIDING believers, say such thing. So are you saying that those very specific and very literal laws are still binding?
|
|
|
Re: Are The Feast Days & Sabbaths Still Binding?
[Re: dedication]
#178502
11/26/15 09:39 PM
11/26/15 09:39 PM
|
SDA
Active Member 2024
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,425
Midland
|
|
2 Corinthians 3.12 refers to seeing Jesus the Messiah in scripture. It's not talking about all manner of possibilities of transforming clear words into something mystical.
That is beautiful!
|
|
|
Re: Are The Feast Days & Sabbaths Still Binding?
[Re: kland]
#178503
11/26/15 09:47 PM
11/26/15 09:47 PM
|
SDA
Active Member 2024
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,425
Midland
|
|
In light of your last bit about laws are to be kept and will always be the same, I present the following again for your answer: Of course, the prophesy is given in the same symbology language used in the OT -- meaning we will keep(apply) their spiritual and prophetic meanings. We won't revert back to the killing of lambs, bulls but we will be expected to carry out their legal requirements that these sacrifices describes. All different sacrifices(burnt, meat, drink, peace, sin, etc...) describe different legal aspect in bringing us to reconciliation with the Lord.
Legal requirements? Spiritual legal requirements? That will be interesting to find out what you mean by that. As asked elsewhere, but stating it briefly, killing and eating the passover, how can that be done without killing and eating it? What does the following mean to you? This ordinance does not speak so largely to man's intellectual capacity as to his heart. His moral and spiritual nature needs it. If His disciples had not needed this, it would not have been left for them as Christ's last established ordinance in connection with, and including, the last supper. It was Christ's desire to leave to His disciples an ordinance that would do for them the very thing they needed--that would serve to disentangle them from the rites and ceremonies which they had hitherto engaged in as essential, and which the reception of the gospel made no longer of any force. To continue these rites would be an insult to Jehovah. Eating of the body, and drinking of the blood, of Christ, not merely at the sacramental service, but daily partaking of the bread of life to satisfy the soul's hunger, would be in receiving His Word and doing His will (RH June 14, 1898). {5BC 1139.6} {RH, June 14, 1898 par. 16}
|
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|
