Actually, that was the err I was pointing out that you were doing. That you were saying I said it meant kingdom when that wasn't even the verse being talked about. But you redefine all of them to mean king, even when the underlying word is different. Which is a mistake you make. It's a repeating pattern that the details you don't seem to worry about.

It is true, and it does become very opaque, but yet the result comes through clear, when I try to hold you to your statements. They seem to fall apart, don't they?



Seems like I had asked you to outline your belief on that:

Who is the third kingdom/king and why is he likened to bronze?
Why is the forth likened to iron?

I'd be surprised anyone would say Belshazar was represented by iron. Perhaps clay, yes. Wet clay.


Then there's the problem of who came after Belshazar and was that not predicted? Unless you are mixing your local and foundation applications together at the same time?.....


It is my impression that you had a thought and then try to make the Bible support it. Many people do do that. But when your errors are pointed out, rather than taking time to check yourself out, you say we are trampling and twisting them. When several point out your statements don't hold true, have you considered the possibility that you are mistaken?

It is obvious to anyone reading this thread that when you raise a concern, I answer it: and you ignore the answer in favor of the concern that you raised. Thus you attempt to distort what I said because it cuts across your pet ideas. You change light into darkness.

If darkness is what you want, who am I that I should disturb your comfort zone?

As formerly mentioned this type of light has been blinking on and off and on and off for many years.
Each new president and new pope requires the re-working of the whole presentation. How can such be light to follow.

Yes, one of these times it will be the last president, not because the study was correct but because if one keeps on rearranging the symbols and calling every successive president the last one, one is bound to name the right one sooner or later.

However, chances are that in two years this whole study will again have to be reworked, just like it was after Bush 1 and after Clinton and after Bush 2.

But then, maybe not, it could be the last one -- Remember the times and seasons are in the hands of God.
We can know that the end of the world is very near -- even if presidents change. We do not build our faith on presidents.

The important thing is that
TODAY IS THE DAY OF SALVATION
We are only guaranteed this moment, today.

Who is doing the work of Antichrist today by killing the Christians?

The zionist today! They are the antichrist, like the Jewish leaders where the antichrist in Jesus days, like Absalom was the antichrist in David days.

The Greek term, “antichrist,” is composed of two Greek words: anti and christos. In Matt. 2:22 gives us the meaning of anti.

Mat 2:22 "But when he heard that Archelaus was reigning over Judea in place of [anti] his father Herod, he was afraid to go there."

The word anti means “in place of” in the sense of someone replacing another. Here Archelaus replaced his father Herod, who had died. If Archelaus had overthrown his father Herod and then ruled over Judea “in place of” his father Herod, then we would of said that he had usurped the throne unlawfully. That was not the case.

So ruling "in place of" can be either positive or negative. In Archelaus case he ruled "in place of"(anti) his father. And David rule "in place of"(anti) Christ in a positive way. For He didn't rule with own laws; but ruled "in the place of Christ" with Christ laws. David was not a usurper.

But Absalom was an antichrist is the negative sense for He usurped His Father David's throne. Just like the Jewish Leaders have usurped Jesus rightful throne of David by killing Him.

In the story of Absalom and David,there was another important player that was a Type in Jesus throne usurpation. Ahithophel, who was David friend betrayed David like Judas betrayed Jesus. Ahithopel hanged himself shortly after his betrayal (2 Sam 17:23) like Judas did(Matt. 27:5).

Now the story of David & Absalom was the TYPE portraying the definition of antichrist in a negative way and was repeated in Jesus betrayal and usurpation of throne, and it will be repeated once again before His 2nd coming.

At His 2nd coming it is the Zionist who have illegally taken the name ISRAEL, have plans to reconstruct the Temple and retake the sacrificial riturals and take the crown to rule the world. The Zionists play the same role of Absalom, and the religious leaders in Christ days. So they are the antichrist today that we clearly see at play in the news and behind the wars.

The one that are playing the betrayers role today are the Christians zionist who support their position. They, like Judas and Ahithophel, are Jesus' friend but are supporting the Zionist plans to usurp Jesus throne.


Now all this talk about the antichrist being a secular ruler is not supported by the TYPE established by the Lord or other scriptures.

This thread has laid dormant for a while, but I stand by the post I made 2 years ago: 6/21/2014

Clarification If Trump is sworn in as President Christ will come before 28 March 2017