HOME CHAT ROOM #1 CHAT ROOM #2 Forum Topics Within The Last 7 Days REGISTER ENTER FORUMS BIBLE SCHOOL CONTACT US

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine Christian Family Fellowship Forums
(formerly Maritime SDA OnLine)
Consisting mainly of both members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
Welcomes and invites other members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to join us!

Click Here To Read Legal Notice & Disclaimer
Suggested a One Time Yearly $20 or Higher Donation Accepted Here to Help Cover the Yearly Expenses of Operating & Upgrading. We need at least $20 X 10 yearly donations.
Donations accepted: Here
ShoutChat Box
Newest Members
ekoorb1030, jibb555, MBloomfield, Dina, Nelson
1323 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums118
Topics9,186
Posts195,505
Members1,323
Most Online5,850
Feb 29th, 2020
Seventh-day Adventist Church In Canada Links
Seventh-day Adventist Church in Canada

Newfoundland & Labrador Mission

Maritime Conference

Quebec Conference

Ontario Conference

Manitoba-Saskatchewan Conference

Alberta Conference

British Columbia Conference

7 Top Posters(30 Days)
Rick H 21
kland 17
Daryl 4
March
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Member Spotlight
ProdigalOne
ProdigalOne
Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,166
Joined: June 2015
Show All Member Profiles 
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Live Space Station Tracking
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
Last 7 Pictures From Photo Gallery Forums
He hath set an harvest for thee
Rivers Of Living Water
He Leads Us To Green Pastures
Remember What God Has Done
Remember The Sabbath
"...whiter than snow..."
A Beautiful Spring Day
Who's Online
8 registered members (Kevin H, TruthinTypes, Wendell Slattery, Daryl, ProdigalOne, TheophilusOne, 2 invisible), 3,009 guests, and 6 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 6 of 22 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 21 22
Re: Is the Investigative Judgement Biblical? [Re: Nadi] #184194
06/20/17 04:11 PM
06/20/17 04:11 PM
E
Elle  Offline
Active Member 2019
Died February 12, 2019

2500+ Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,536
Canada
Originally Posted By: Nadi
Perhaps start another thread...

I think this is on-subject. What Gary K expressed was answering your IJ question. But if you and others want to move this into another discussion...I will be ok with your decision.


Blessings
Re: Is the Investigative Judgement Biblical? [Re: Elle] #184196
06/20/17 06:25 PM
06/20/17 06:25 PM
G
Garywk  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 982
Colville, Wa
Quote:
Let's stick to what scripture says and not confuse the issue with our limited opinions or others opinions & interpretations. Our perception of what we think what is and what is not is most likely delusional. Only scriptures can define what is and what is not correctly. We are to submit our perception to the expressed word of God and not vice versa. I rather rely on what scriptures says if you don't mind.


Say what? Really? Then what is the point of studying the Bible, or even discussion of the conclusions we come to or what ideas we hold, if what everyone thinks is most likely delusional?

I'm sorry, but I find that so off-the-wall that it just flabbergasts me. You have opinions of a spiritual nature, but even you think your own opinions formed by your own Bible study are delusional? And this in response to questions as to how you view the world around you in spiritual terms, and what you think of a specific Biblical passage--the devil's temptation of Eve?

If this is really how you view things I don't know how I can have a rational discussion with you as you yourself think your opinions of scriptural concepts are delusional.

Re: Is the Investigative Judgement Biblical? [Re: dedication] #184198
06/20/17 07:49 PM
06/20/17 07:49 PM
N
Nadi  Offline OP
NON-SDA
Active Member 2020
Full Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 288
Canada
Originally Posted By: dedication
That the judgment [the IJ] began in 1844.
Originally Posted By: dedication
Daniel is NOT talking about sacrifices here, he is talking about evening and morning DAYS.

The Bible tells us that evening/mornings are DAYS. Therefore the translation:
8.14
And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed. This is in agreement with Biblical usage of the term. EVENING/MORNING = 1 day.

The evening and the morning were the first day
The evening and the morning were the second day
The evening and the morning were the third day
ETC. (Gen. 1)

You will notice that when the Bible uses evening/morning it is speaking of days.


So then, these "days" (evening and morning) now become "years" according to the day/year principle. Which then brings up the clarification of the "days" (evening/morning) of creation. Were these literal 24 hour periods, or did each "evening/morning" represent a year?



Originally Posted By: dedication
So how to we arrive at that date -- 1844


Daniel 9 details the point in Persian history is linked to a certain decree being issued for the restoration of Jerusalem).
Thus the 2300 years takes us to a point in the 1800's.

So when did the vision begin?
457 BC plus 2300 years takes us to 1843.
Add the missing year 9 which isn't counted in the dating scheme and you come to 1844.


So it seems you have linked the vision in Daniel 8 and the 2300 days there, (which is not given a start date), with the 70 weeks of Daniel 9, which has a start date of "the command to restore Jerusalem."

I see this association as weak and unsupported given the number of assumptions needed for it to work:

1. The explanation talks about the vision of Daniel 8, despite the fact that it comes 11 years after the vision.
2. Daniel 8 and 9 are related and refer to the same vision.
3. The elaborate explanation that the 70 weeks are part of the 2300 days based on "determined" meaning "cut off." This, although allowed, is not the primary meaning of the Hebrew.

Since the angel Gabriel specifically states WHAT starts at the decree to rebuild Jerusalem, I find it unjustified to assign that start date to another time prophecy on such shaky support.

So I do not see the validity of a 457 BCE start date for the 2300 day prophecy.


"Our vision is often more obstructed by what we think we know than by our lack of knowledge." K. Stendahl
Re: Is the Investigative Judgement Biblical? [Re: ] #184199
06/20/17 08:00 PM
06/20/17 08:00 PM
N
Nadi  Offline OP
NON-SDA
Active Member 2020
Full Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 288
Canada
Originally Posted By: Gary K
Quote:
Let's stick to what scripture says and not confuse the issue with our limited opinions or others opinions & interpretations. Our perception of what we think what is and what is not is most likely delusional. Only scriptures can define what is and what is not correctly. We are to submit our perception to the expressed word of God and not vice versa. I rather rely on what scriptures says if you don't mind.


Say what? Really? Then what is the point of studying the Bible, or even discussion of the conclusions we come to or what ideas we hold, if what everyone thinks is most likely delusional?

I'm sorry, but I find that so off-the-wall that it just flabbergasts me. You have opinions of a spiritual nature, but even you think your own opinions formed by your own Bible study are delusional? And this in response to questions as to how you view the world around you in spiritual terms, and what you think of a specific Biblical passage--the devil's temptation of Eve?

If this is really how you view things I don't know how I can have a rational discussion with you as you yourself think your opinions of scriptural concepts are delusional.



Gary, I also think that Elle's theology is highly suspect, and I have indicated this to her. She makes "laws" and "principles of interpretation" and other such things that I find unwarranted.

HOWEVER

1. Elle ALWAYS responds in a kind and Christ-like manner, and is always willing to admit that perhaps she didn't understand well or explain herself well. This is far more "Christian" than the responses of some others on this forum who may or may not have (in their opinion) more "correct" theology.

2. I always read all of her posts, because:
a. She will always make you think.
b. If you only read stuff you agree with, you will never challenge your beliefs.


"Our vision is often more obstructed by what we think we know than by our lack of knowledge." K. Stendahl
Re: Is the Investigative Judgement Biblical? [Re: Nadi] #184201
06/21/17 07:32 AM
06/21/17 07:32 AM
A
Alchemy  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2018

Most Dedicated Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,264
Asia
Originally Posted By: Nadi
Originally Posted By: dedication
That the judgment [the IJ] began in 1844.
Originally Posted By: dedication
Daniel is NOT talking about sacrifices here, he is talking about evening and morning DAYS.

The Bible tells us that evening/mornings are DAYS. Therefore the translation:
8.14
And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed. This is in agreement with Biblical usage of the term. EVENING/MORNING = 1 day.

The evening and the morning were the first day
The evening and the morning were the second day
The evening and the morning were the third day
ETC. (Gen. 1)

You will notice that when the Bible uses evening/morning it is speaking of days.


So then, these "days" (evening and morning) now become "years" according to the day/year principle. Which then brings up the clarification of the "days" (evening/morning) of creation. Were these literal 24 hour periods, or did each "evening/morning" represent a year?



Originally Posted By: dedication
So how to we arrive at that date -- 1844


Daniel 9 details the point in Persian history is linked to a certain decree being issued for the restoration of Jerusalem).
Thus the 2300 years takes us to a point in the 1800's.

So when did the vision begin?
457 BC plus 2300 years takes us to 1843.
Add the missing year 9 which isn't counted in the dating scheme and you come to 1844.


So it seems you have linked the vision in Daniel 8 and the 2300 days there, (which is not given a start date), with the 70 weeks of Daniel 9, which has a start date of "the command to restore Jerusalem."

I see this association as weak and unsupported given the number of assumptions needed for it to work:

1. The explanation talks about the vision of Daniel 8, despite the fact that it comes 11 years after the vision.
2. Daniel 8 and 9 are related and refer to the same vision.
3. The elaborate explanation that the 70 weeks are part of the 2300 days based on "determined" meaning "cut off." This, although allowed, is not the primary meaning of the Hebrew.

Since the angel Gabriel specifically states WHAT starts at the decree to rebuild Jerusalem, I find it unjustified to assign that start date to another time prophecy on such shaky support.

So I do not see the validity of a 457 BCE start date for the 2300 day prophecy.


Your reasoning is what is shaky.

We know from Daniel 8:16 that Gabriel was the angel that brought the interpretation of Daniel 8 to Daniel. This interpretation was not completed because Daniel fainted. Daniel 8:27

In Daniel 9:21 Daniel is the one who says this same Gabriel was the one who was "in the vision at the beginning"! Referring to the vision in chapter 8. This is obvious since there isn't a vision in Daniel chapter 9. So, there isn't any assumption on this point. You will find the same thing in Daniel chapter 11 as well. All this is interpreting Daniel chapter 8.

Re: Is the Investigative Judgement Biblical? [Re: ] #184202
06/21/17 12:58 PM
06/21/17 12:58 PM
E
Elle  Offline
Active Member 2019
Died February 12, 2019

2500+ Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,536
Canada
Originally Posted By: Gary K
Quote:
Let's stick to what scripture says and not confuse the issue with our limited opinions or others opinions & interpretations. Our perception of what we think what is and what is not is most likely delusional. Only scriptures can define what is and what is not correctly. We are to submit our perception to the expressed word of God and not vice versa. I rather rely on what scriptures says if you don't mind.


Say what? Really? Then what is the point of studying the Bible, or even discussion of the conclusions we come to or what ideas we hold, if what everyone thinks is most likely delusional?

I'm sorry, but I find that so off-the-wall that it just flabbergasts me. You have opinions of a spiritual nature, but even you think your own opinions formed by your own Bible study are delusional? And this in response to questions as to how you view the world around you in spiritual terms, and what you think of a specific Biblical passage--the devil's temptation of Eve?

If this is really how you view things I don't know how I can have a rational discussion with you as you yourself think your opinions of scriptural concepts are delusional.


I hope the above is not only a means to evade to support your 2 statements made in your post stated above that I ask Biblical support for in the Protestants renounce Protestanism discussion #Post184189.

In that discussion, Nadi said by which I agreed that "The Seventh-day Adventist church IS NOT a Bible and Bible only church. This puts them DIRECTLY in bed with the Catholic Church. Sorry."

Then the IJ came up to be supported with the Bible. You, Gary K, made an IJ blur that is quoted below:
Originally Posted By: GaryK IJ blur
Nadi,

I went back and looked at that thread. Sorry, I wasn't trying to derail it for you. I had only meant what I said as an aside to the discussion.

I think your view vs the SDA view boils down to a basic difference in how the plan of salvation is viewed. In the historic SDA view God is as much on trial before the universe as we are on trial before God. Why? Because God's character was attacked by the devil and 1/3 of the angels and the human race accepted the lie about who God really is and what is He really like.

The devil is the universe's, not just this world's, greatest scam artist. His powers of deceit are immense and as God wants to wipe out sin completely, and sin is simply not trusting God, then God has to have a way of convincing everyone that He is just. Revelation 14:7 occurs before the 2nd coming and yet it says that the "hour of His judgment is come". Hour of whose judgment? God's. The "hour" of our judgment--our reading of the books and investigating the lives of those who made it to heaven and those who didn't comes after the 2nd coming. We simply verify through the meticulous record keeping of God that God has always been just, fair, and righteous.

The entire plan of salvation is the story of the war--the great controversy--between God and the devil. If someone rejects that paradigm then they will never accept the SDA point of view. They cannot because it cuts the foundation of their beliefs off at the knees. Only if a person is willing to look at the entire Bible through this paradigm, and the Bible supports this paradigm from Genesis to Revelation, can SDA theology be really understood and accepted.

This is why SDA theology is so distinctive. No other church accepts the paradigm of the great controversy between good and evil. I don't know why as the evidence for this paradigm surrounds us daily. There is always a struggle between good and evil and it is constant and ongoing. To me it is the greatest evidence that the SDA theology on this is correct. And, it is also the only paradigm that, to me, makes sense out of our completely out of control and insane world.


I said the following about your IJ blur:
Originally Posted By: Elle
In regards to Gary K post above, like Nadi correctly quoted before "YOUR saying so don't make it so." Tom Sawyer.

We should be able to support from scriptures our beliefs.


And ask for you to support 2 of your statements in that IJ blur.
And I'm still waiting for your Biblical support.

I perceived you do not have the adequate Biblical support require for those two simple statements. And if that is the case, then there's no need to continue with your line of arguments is there?

Please give Biblical support for the two statements in your Nadi IJ blur :

Here is the first one :
Originally Posted By: Elle
Originally Posted By: Gary K
In the historic SDA view God is as much on trial before the universe as we are on trial before God.

Please provide Biblical support that God is on trial.


Here is the second one :
Originally Posted By: Elle
Originally Posted By: Gary K
the great controversy between good and evil

Please provide Biblical support for that.


For convenience sake and for efficiency to move this discussion forward....I have given my Biblical view with some texts of the question of evil that challenges your 2nd statement above.

Originally Posted By: Elle
Here's a short respond of what I see what scripture is saying about the question of evil.

1. According to Is 45:7 God says He created evil

2. In Lev 26 we have very explicit repeated language that The Lord is the one that brings unto us "evil" in the form of all those calamities listed in that chapter.

3. Any immature children being corrected perceived their parent's judgment as "evil" or unfair. It's only when we grow that our childhood perception of our parents comes to change.

4. Us as Christians we often mistakenly perceived God's judgments and disciplines as coming from the devil. However, it is the Lord that brings all these judgments and events in our lives. Not the devil.(Heb 12:1-17; Ep 1:11)

5. Also the Lord's judgments and disciplines are always correctional in the aim to restore the individual and are never punitive nor have a "forever" destruction end. (Is 26:9,10..study the Hebrew & Greek word definition of "forever")

6. The scripture doesn't say it's Satan or the devil that brings evils. God may use Satan to bring about some "evil" --calamities to bring us to a higher spiritual plane like we see in the story of Job who did nothing wrong. Or when the Lord used King Nebuchadnezzar and called him "my servant" to bring on COI (the Church) some form of judgment for things the Church did do wrong. But in both of these situation, it is the Lord that initiated these decision and judgments...not Satan.

We read in Job 42:11 "Then came there unto him all his brethren, and all his sisters, and all they that had been of his acquaintance before, and did eat bread with him in his house: and they bemoaned him, and comforted him over all the evil that the LORD had brought upon him: every man also gave him a piece of money, and every one an earring of gold."

7. Satan is an accuser of the brethren. Yes. That's his job. And he's a deceiver that will deceive us into doing lawlessness. But it is the Lord that brings on all judgment on His own timing when we (as individuals or as a nation) break the law. Not Satan. And it's only when God brings on judgment that we experience this "evilness" in our life that it's purpose is to correct us. (Lot's of scriptures saying God brought judgment...but I don't know of any text where Satan brought judgment. show me some if you know of some).


Blessings
Re: Is the Investigative Judgement Biblical? [Re: Elle] #184205
06/22/17 04:48 PM
06/22/17 04:48 PM
N
Nadi  Offline OP
NON-SDA
Active Member 2020
Full Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 288
Canada
Just a note of encouragement to those struggling to support the SDA doctrine of an Investigative Judgement.

You are not alone in your struggles.

I have just read the pertinent sections of T.H. Jemison's book Christian Beliefs, and questions 24-28 and question 36 in Questions on Doctrine, by "a Representative Group of Seventh-day Adventist Leaders, Bible Teachers, and Editors." Both books are long on beliefs and short on support.

Since Jemison's book was the de facto textbook for Bible Doctrines classes in SDA colleges for many years, it is no wonder there is so little understanding of the SDA position on this doctrine.


"Our vision is often more obstructed by what we think we know than by our lack of knowledge." K. Stendahl
Re: Is the Investigative Judgement Biblical? [Re: Alchemy] #184206
06/23/17 04:00 AM
06/23/17 04:00 AM
A
Alchemy  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2018

Most Dedicated Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,264
Asia
Originally Posted By: Alchemy
Your reasoning is what is shaky.

We know from Daniel 8:16 that Gabriel was the angel that brought the interpretation of Daniel 8 to Daniel. This interpretation was not completed because Daniel fainted. Daniel 8:27

In Daniel 9:21 Daniel is the one who says this same Gabriel was the one who was "in the vision at the beginning"! Referring to the vision in chapter 8. This is obvious since there isn't a vision in Daniel chapter 9. So, there isn't any assumption on this point. You will find the same thing in Daniel chapter 11 as well. All this is interpreting Daniel chapter 8.


Since this very important and clear point has been made, we now know the interpretation of Daniel chapter 8 is partly in Daniel 8,9 and 11:2-12:4. All of this is the interpretation given from the angel Gabriel to Daniel. Daniel 11:1 is where Gabriel makes clear his identity.

In Daniel chapter 9:21-27 is where the start date is given us. It is given in an event that took place in 457 B.C.. 2300 years from that point takes us to exactly 1844 A.D.. This really is very simple at its core.

Re: Is the Investigative Judgement Biblical? [Re: Nadi] #184210
06/23/17 08:25 PM
06/23/17 08:25 PM
G
Garywk  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 982
Colville, Wa
Elle,

If you want me to answer your questions it is only fair that you answer mine.

My response to you saying that you weren't going to answer my questions because you believe that whatever you believe is most likely delusional is not a dodge. My question is a real one. What is the purpose of studying the Bible if at most all you get are delusions? And, why should I discuss issues with someone who believes that what they are going to take away from that discussion is delusional? It makes absolutely no sense to me to do that.

As far as I'm concerned your response to my 4 questions is a dodge. They are simple questions that you should be able to answer based upon what you know of the Bible, history, and human nature. Like I told alchemy in our economic discussions, I'm not just going to let someone pound me with questions while they answer none of mine.

So, if you actually want a discussion that is give-and-take on both sides, answer the questions and we will go from there. If all you want is a one-sided pounding of my view of the issue, forget it. I am not interested in that kind of one-sided conversation.

Re: Is the Investigative Judgement Biblical? [Re: Nadi] #184211
06/23/17 08:34 PM
06/23/17 08:34 PM
G
Garywk  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 982
Colville, Wa
Originally Posted By: Nadi




Gary, I also think that Elle's theology is highly suspect, and I have indicated this to her. She makes "laws" and "principles of interpretation" and other such things that I find unwarranted.

HOWEVER

1. Elle ALWAYS responds in a kind and Christ-like manner, and is always willing to admit that perhaps she didn't understand well or explain herself well. This is far more "Christian" than the responses of some others on this forum who may or may not have (in their opinion) more "correct" theology.

2. I always read all of her posts, because:
a. She will always make you think.
b. If you only read stuff you agree with, you will never challenge your beliefs.


My answer to Elle has nothing to do with her theology, other than at a tangential angle. If she believes that most of what she takes away from studying the Bible is delusional, which means divorced from reality, then what is the point of Bible study? I simply cannot see one.

I study the Bible to find reality in this sin-sick world of ours, not to leave reality behind.

And as an aside, why don't you answer my 4 questions as they are just as relevant to you as they are to Elle? You asked me a question and I answered you. You have ignored that answer up to this point. Why?

Page 6 of 22 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 21 22

Sabbath School Lesson Study Material Link
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
Most Recent Posts From Selected Public Forums
The Value of Bible Types
by TruthinTypes. 03/17/24 06:22 PM
Orion Which Every One on the Globe Can See
by Rick H. 03/16/24 06:26 PM
Carbon Dioxide What's so Bad about It?
by Rick H. 03/16/24 06:23 PM
'Prophet' Summons UFOs
by ProdigalOne. 03/16/24 02:19 AM
Are the words in the Bible "imperfect"?
by Rick H. 03/15/24 08:53 PM
Will You Take The Wuhan Virus Vaccine?
by dedication. 03/11/24 06:31 PM
Get That Razor Wire Up!
by kland. 03/05/24 12:49 PM
Messages for This Time
by ProdigalOne. 03/04/24 05:54 AM
The Lake of Fire is Hell
by Rick H. 03/02/24 05:01 PM
Adventist Agriculture
by kland. 02/29/24 12:33 PM
How tall were Adam and Eve?
by dedication. 02/28/24 07:30 PM
Hebrew word YOM or yowm meaning?
by dedication. 02/26/24 05:42 AM
The Book of Job
by teresaq. 02/22/24 04:43 AM
Most Recent Posts From Selected Private Forums of MSDAOL
Christian Nationalism/Sunday/C
limate Change

by ProdigalOne. 03/16/24 08:38 PM
Perils of the Emerging Church Movement
by Rick H. 03/16/24 06:30 PM
Is There A Connection Between WO & LGBTQ?
by Kevin H. 03/12/24 09:20 PM
Climate Change and the Sunday Law
by kland. 03/05/24 01:37 PM
A Second American Civil War?
by Daryl. 03/04/24 06:14 PM
WHAT IS THE VERY END-TIME PROPHECY?
by Daryl. 02/29/24 11:21 AM
Should Walter Veight have preached this sermon?
by dedication. 02/21/24 05:28 PM
Labor Unions and Adventist
by Rick H. 02/20/24 01:59 PM
Spiritualism: Across The Gulf...
by Rick H. 02/20/24 01:52 PM
Samuele Bacchiocchi & Recent Article Concerns
by dedication. 02/20/24 01:39 AM
Forum Announcements
Visitors by Country Since February 11, 2013
Flag Counter
Google Maritime SDA OnLine Public Forums Site Search & Google Translation Service
Google
 
Web www.maritime-sda-online.com

Copyright 2000-Present
Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine).

LEGAL NOTICE:
The views expressed in this forum are those of individuals
and do not necessarily represent those of Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine,
as well as the Seventh-day Adventist Church
from the local church level to the General Conference level.

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine) is also a self-supporting ministry
and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland
or any of its subsidiaries.

"And He saith unto them, follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men." Matt. 4:19
MARITIME 2ND ADVENT BELIEVERS ONLINE (FORMERLY MARITIME SDA ONLINE) CONSISTING MAINLY OF BOTH MEMBERS & FRIENDS
OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH,
INVITES OTHER MEMBERS & FRIENDS OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHO WISHES TO JOIN US!
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1