HOME CHAT ROOM #1 CHAT ROOM #2 Forum Topics Within The Last 7 Days REGISTER ENTER FORUMS BIBLE SCHOOL CONTACT US

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine Christian Family Fellowship Forums
(formerly Maritime SDA OnLine)
Consisting mainly of both members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
Welcomes and invites other members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to join us!

Click Here To Read Legal Notice & Disclaimer
Suggested a One Time Yearly $20 or Higher Donation Accepted Here to Help Cover the Yearly Expenses of Operating & Upgrading. We need at least $20 X 10 yearly donations.
Donations accepted: Here
ShoutChat Box
Newest Members
ekoorb1030, jibb555, MBloomfield, Dina, Nelson
1323 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums118
Topics9,189
Posts195,525
Members1,323
Most Online5,850
Feb 29th, 2020
Seventh-day Adventist Church In Canada Links
Seventh-day Adventist Church in Canada

Newfoundland & Labrador Mission

Maritime Conference

Quebec Conference

Ontario Conference

Manitoba-Saskatchewan Conference

Alberta Conference

British Columbia Conference

7 Top Posters(30 Days)
Rick H 16
kland 15
Daryl 4
March
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Member Spotlight
Kevin H
Kevin H
New York
Posts: 625
Joined: November 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Live Space Station Tracking
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
Last 7 Pictures From Photo Gallery Forums
He hath set an harvest for thee
Rivers Of Living Water
He Leads Us To Green Pastures
Remember What God Has Done
Remember The Sabbath
"...whiter than snow..."
A Beautiful Spring Day
Who's Online
3 registered members (Karen Y, 2 invisible), 2,795 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 18 of 20 1 2 16 17 18 19 20
Re: Biblical Predictions of Antichrist & Sunday Laws [Re: kland] #167429
08/11/14 01:32 PM
08/11/14 01:32 PM
His child  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2020
Very Dedicated Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,673
TN, USA
Originally Posted By: kland
... if your years of study is based upon Luke 10:1, you might need to reconsider the conclusion.


The facts are:
1) there are 42 literal full months from 9/11/01 to 4/2/05.
2) There were 1260-days from 9/11/01 to 2/22/05 in which Pope John-Paul II was heading both church and state. After 2/22/05 Pope John-Paul II was in the dying process.

Originally Posted By: EGW
"The prophecies of Daniel and of John are to be understood. They interpret each other. They give to the world truths which every one should understand. These prophecies are to be witnesses in the world. By their fulfillment in these last days they will explain themselves. {7BC 949.6}


From the word of God, my witness is that the endtime meaning of Daniel and Revelation relating to Pope John-Paul II have been fulfilled. They have explained themselves. This is Truth which every one should understand but in spite of prophecy being fulfilled, Christ's Advent will come as an overwhelming surprise to the world and many in the church who claim to be waiting for Him.

And now that the prophecy has been fulfilled, the 42-months of revelation 13:5 were fulfilled as 42 + 2 months to the very day on the Hebrew calendar. Since that is how it happened, that is how Daniel and Revelation have explained themselves.


"Ignorance is sin, when knowledge can be obtained" (HR, September 1, 1866 par. 3). www.loudcry101.com
Re: Biblical Predictions of Antichrist & Sunday Laws [Re: APL] #167430
08/11/14 02:07 PM
08/11/14 02:07 PM
His child  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2020
Very Dedicated Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,673
TN, USA
Originally Posted By: APL
From the perspective of 1260-days. 
Pope John-Paul II had 1260-days from 9/11/01 to 2/22/05 at which time he began the dying process in the hospital where he neither headed church or state.


A bit arbitrary in time selection is seems.


Is God arbitrary in His reckoning of time?

How many months are in a year? Is it a solar year or a lunar year (some have 12 and some have 13)?

"But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year" (Genesis 17:21) Was Sarah's pregnancy 12 months instead of the customary 9? That is not indicated to be the case in the text.

The answer is not arbitrary, it is understanding the context of the statement instead of fitting the statement into our understanding.


Originally Posted By: APL
...And 9/11 is a bit arbitrary for a starting date!


That conclusion can only be reached when all the facts are not known or considered. Daniel 7 clearly identifies 9/11/01 in the context of Reagan, Bush 1, and Clinton being alive and out of office on that date. And Pope John-Paul II being the little horn that charmed them with his charisma while he spoke great things and blasphemes.

When Daniel and Revelation are prayerfully studied and compared to prophecy fulfilled, there is nothing arbitrary about it.

Originally Posted By: APL
And 1260 days and 42+2 does not equate. Are we to manipulate the data until we get what WE want???


What Scripture states that the 1260-days has to be the 42-months exactly? Because we know 30-days hath a month and 42 x 30 = 1260, we have a formula for explaining bible prophecy fulfilled in the past. 42-literal months have sufficient time to cover 1260-days. They can start on the same day and end on different days.

Bible study is not one size fits all. Scripture explains Scripture and context is important.


"Ignorance is sin, when knowledge can be obtained" (HR, September 1, 1866 par. 3). www.loudcry101.com
Re: Biblical Predictions of Antichrist & Sunday Laws [Re: James Peterson] #167432
08/11/14 03:56 PM
08/11/14 03:56 PM
APL  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2020

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
Originally Posted By: his child
Is God arbitrary in His reckoning of time?
No, which makes finagling the numbers suspect.

Originally Posted By: his child
"But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year" (Genesis 17:21) Was Sarah's pregnancy 12 months instead of the customary 9? That is not indicated to be the case in the text.
The text is not talking about the length of time of the pregnancy. What the text said was true. I would not even think that this text applies to the length of a pregnancy...

Originally Posted By: his child
What Scripture states that the 1260-days has to be the 42-months exactly? Because we know 30-days hath a month and 42 x 30 = 1260, we have a formula for explaining bible prophecy fulfilled in the past. 42-literal months have sufficient time to cover 1260-days. They can start on the same day and end on different days.
Yes, 30 days/month, works. You have a problem with JP-2 as it was 1299 days, not 1260, unless you want to finagle the data to attempt to make it work.


Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
Re: Biblical Predictions of Antichrist & Sunday Laws [Re: His child] #167452
08/12/14 03:01 PM
08/12/14 03:01 PM
K
kland  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2024

5500+ Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,416
Midland
Originally Posted By: His child
When the Scripture in question is clear, it is self-explanatory.
And that's clear to whom?

Quote:
When a thus saith the Lord is clear and man's interpretation has been added to it, the text becomes unclear.

When the rubbish that has been added is stripped away, the verse in its purity shines forth.
Let's see...

Quote:
Didn't Jesus teach that way? He did not ask what do folks say about this or that, but "how readest thou?"
But why do you say about this and that rather than what the scripture says?

Quote:
It is time to go back to the Scripture (the verse in question) and see what it says.

Revelation 13:1 clearly says a head was wounded.
Well, er, 13:3 does. Agreed.

Quote:
The Spirit of prophecy clarifies it when EGW says that Pope Pius VI was the head that was wounded.
Well, er, no.
No she doesn't.

She says: " We looked upon the bust of Pius VI. The marble statue beneath the bust contained the heart of the pope. This is the pope specified in prophecy, which received the deadly wound."

She's clearly saying that Pius VI was pope of the kingdom when it received the deadly wound.

Quote:
"And Moses chose able men out of all Israel, and made them heads over the people, rulers of thousands, rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens." (Exodus 18:25)
Does use the English term, "head". But not quite the same as Daniel does.

Da 2:37 "You, O king, are a king of kings. For the God of heaven has given you a kingdom, power, strength, and glory;
Da 2:38 "and wherever the children of men dwell, or the beasts of the field and the birds of the heaven, He has given them into your hand, and has made you ruler over them all-you are this head of gold.
Da 2:39 "But after you shall arise another kingdom inferior to yours; then another, a third kingdom of bronze, which shall rule over all the earth.


Only if you reject the kingdom sequence of Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome can you say that Nebuchadnezzar specifically and individually was the head of gold rather than his kingdom.

The Bible is clear. Ellen White is clear.

Quote:
Thus by misreading, misapplying and changing the context (taking Present Truth from the past and ridgedly applying it to the present) they become confused about the meaning of Scripture.
And that you have done.

By using fuzzy math, and fuzzy logic, you add confusion and a "thus saith me" to scripture.

Re: Biblical Predictions of Antichrist & Sunday Laws [Re: James Peterson] #167453
08/12/14 03:15 PM
08/12/14 03:15 PM
K
kland  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2024

5500+ Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,416
Midland
Quote:
So after looking at the 2 texts in question and consulting Strong's is your conclusion that "40 and duo" cannot or can never be read 40 2+2 in any situation without ana?

If that is your conclusion, then in spite of the evidence that Pope John-Paul II died (forty duo or 40 both or 40 the twain) 40 2 + 2 months to the very day from 9/11/01 to 4/2/05 on the Hebrew calendar, you still have 42-full months that are Present Truth. If you don't believe any of it, how will you be able to understand the endtime application of Daniel 12:11 or receive the blessing of Daniel 12:12?

But if in your judgment, the Lord did not intend that rendition (that fits the prophecy exactly), counting the 42 full months between 9/11/01 to 4/2/05 is sufficient to fulfill the prophecy.
I believe it is the kind of attitude expressed here that several have been objecting to. No matter what is pointed out or what happens, you say everything fits perfectly. And that is what several are suspecting when Obama leaves office. You will say, it's all predicted and fits perfectly. Math doesn't matter, facts don't matter. Kind of reminds me of the global warmists. If it's record warm, it's global warming. If it's record cold, it's global warming. If there are more hurricanes, it's global warming. If there are hardly any hurricanes, it's global warming, etc., etc.

If Ratzinger is pope, he's the last pope.
If Francis is pope, he's the last pope.
If Bush is president, he's the last president.
If Obama is president, he's the last president.
If the math doesn't come out, it's close enough.

But if Obama's term is up and we have the next president, nothing has changed, it's business as usual and he's the last president. It's all in scripture and completely clear to yourself. No need to question it because it is self-explanatory.

Re: Biblical Predictions of Antichrist & Sunday Laws [Re: kland] #167461
08/12/14 06:48 PM
08/12/14 06:48 PM
His child  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2020
Very Dedicated Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,673
TN, USA
Originally Posted By: His child
It is time to go back to the Scripture (the verse in question) and see what it says.

Revelation 13:1 clearly says a head was wounded.


Originally Posted By: kland
Well, er, 13:3 does. Agreed.[quote]

[quote=His child]The Spirit of prophecy clarifies it when EGW says that Pope Pius VI was the head that was wounded.

Originally Posted By: kland
Well, er, no.
No she doesn't.

She says: "We looked upon the bust of Pius VI. The marble statue beneath the bust contained the heart of the pope. This is the pope specified in prophecy, which received the deadly wound."

She's clearly saying that Pius VI was pope of the kingdom when it received the deadly wound.


Remove the aside explaining "The marble statue beneath the bust contained the heart of the pope."

This is what she said: "We looked upon the bust of Pius VI... This is the pope specified in prophecy, which received the deadly wound."

There is no mention of KINGDOM. But you are reading it as if it is saying "that Pius VI was pope of the kingdom when it received the deadly wound."

That is sufficient to answer Jesus' question, "How readest thou?" That is between you and the Holy Spirit.

That is clearly not how I read it. And based on my reading, the Holy Spirit enlightened me to the fact that Pope Benedict would not be pope after the Spring of 2013. He left office 28 Feb 2013, which aligns my reading with the prophecy.

Originally Posted By: kland
"And Moses chose able men out of all Israel, and made them heads over the people, rulers of thousands, rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens." (Exodus 18:25)

Does use the English term, "head". But not quite the same as Daniel does.

Da 2:37 "You, O king, are a king of kings. For the God of heaven has given you a kingdom, power, strength, and glory;
Da 2:38 "and wherever the children of men dwell, or the beasts of the field and the birds of the heaven, He has given them into your hand, and has made you ruler over them all-you are this head of gold.


I must agree that as Moses appointed the "rulers" heads over the people: God used a symbolic "head" to depict Nebuchadnezzar as the ruler over them.

Originally Posted By: kland
Da 2:39 "But after you shall arise another kingdom inferior to yours; then another, a third kingdom of bronze, which shall rule over all the earth.


The word kingdom that you cite here is not kingdom anywhere else in the Bible. In fact the same word kingdom when it appears in Daniel 5:20 is kingly, 6:3 realm, 6:28 reign.

So since the translators believed that the prophecy was fulfilled when the 1612 KJV was translated (230-years before Daniel was opened and unsealed) you apparently believe that they were correct in their translation.

They could have translated Da 2:39 "But after you shall arise another reign inferior to yours; then another, a third reign of bronze, which shall rule over all the earth.[/i]

That would have been more consistent with Da 2:44 "And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom <04437>, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom <04437> shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms <04437>, and it shall stand for ever."

When the facts are studied carefully: the translators are making Daniel speak of kingdoms (rather than the reigns of kings which harmonizes with the word Daniel actually wrote), and when Daniel concludes the matter; he clearly states in the days of these kings (not in the days of these kingdoms).

And when Heaven explains Daniel 7 that is an expanded view of Daniel 2, Heaven interprets the vision: Da 7:17 "These great beasts, which are four, are four kings, which shall arise out of the earth." Heaven does not say that they are 4 kingdoms as did the translators.

The kingdom view sealed the authenticity of Daniel's visions, but they are not the meaning that was sealed, closed, and shut up until the time of the end (cf Da 12:4 & 9)

Originally Posted By: kland
Only if you reject the kingdom sequence of Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome can you say that Nebuchadnezzar specifically and individually was the head of gold rather than his kingdom.


Nonsense: An assumption.

I believe that the 4-kingdoms sealed the validity of Daniel's prophecy as being inspired of God as the Present Truth in past ages. But that meaning was not closed until the endtime. It was was understood in the 4 century A. D., by Luther in the 1500's, and Newton in the 1600's long before Daniel was unsealed and opened. Thus to confuse the seal of authenticity that God placed on Daniel's prophecy with the meaning that was sealed until the the time of the end is confusion: it is not of God.

The Bible is clear. Ellen White is clear that more light will come before Christ comes, but not all will find it or follow it.


"Ignorance is sin, when knowledge can be obtained" (HR, September 1, 1866 par. 3). www.loudcry101.com
Re: Biblical Predictions of Antichrist & Sunday Laws [Re: James Peterson] #167463
08/12/14 07:25 PM
08/12/14 07:25 PM
APL  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2020

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
Originally Posted By: his child
This is what she said: "We looked upon the bust of Pius VI... This is the pope specified in prophecy, which received the deadly wound."
Did she or anyone identify this before the fact?

Originally Posted By: his child
The Bible is clear. Ellen White is clear that more light will come before Christ comes, but not all will find it or follow it.
Yes, she did. And what is to be the final message to the world? That we know who the last president is or who the last pope is? Nope. See Christ's Object Lessons page 415 for the real last message to the world. And I have not heard you speak of this at all. Why?


Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
Re: Biblical Predictions of Antichrist & Sunday Laws [Re: His child] #167472
08/12/14 10:27 PM
08/12/14 10:27 PM
J
James Peterson  Offline OP
NON-SDA
Active Member 2019

Dedicated Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,195
Canada
Originally Posted By: His child
I believe that the 4-kingdoms sealed the validity of Daniel's prophecy as being inspired of God as the Present Truth in past ages. But that meaning was not closed until the endtime. It was was understood in the 4 century A. D., by Luther in the 1500's, and Newton in the 1600's long before Daniel was unsealed and opened. Thus to confuse the seal of authenticity that God placed on Daniel's prophecy with the meaning that was sealed until the the time of the end is confusion: it is not of God.

That's not true. The Book of Daniel was accessible and understood by the first century readers. Jesus said so (Mat. 24:15). The fall of Jerusalem was the the time of the end for the people of Daniel, i.e. the Jews. Heb. 1:1 says so. "God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by His Son ...."

Again I say, and again I repeat: SDA, having buried their heads in the sand of false prophecy, are unable to see the light of truth. They cannot, though it be noon above; neither do they have any understanding of the things to befall them.

///

Re: Biblical Predictions of Antichrist & Sunday Laws [Re: James Peterson] #167487
08/13/14 01:29 PM
08/13/14 01:29 PM
His child  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2020
Very Dedicated Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,673
TN, USA
Originally Posted By: His child
I believe that the 4-kingdoms sealed the validity of Daniel's prophecy as being inspired of God as the Present Truth in past ages. But that meaning was not closed until the endtime. It was understood in the 4 century A. D., by Luther in the 1500's, and Newton in the 1600's long before Daniel was unsealed and opened. Thus to confuse the seal of authenticity that God placed on Daniel's prophecy with the meaning that was sealed until the time of the end is confusion: it is not of God.

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
That's not true. The Book of Daniel was accessible and understood by the first century readers.


I'm sorry. I must not have made myself clear as evidenced by your response.

I believe as you stated: "The Book of Daniel was accessible and understood by the first century readers." Yes and it was understood in the 4th century and by Luther (1500's) and by Newton in the 1600's. All of those folks understood Daniel. But Daniel was sealed with these words:

"But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased." (Daniel 12:4).

And these words:

" And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end." (Daniel 12:9)

"The Book of Daniel was accessible and understood by the first century readers." But was their understanding the understanding that was "closed up and sealed till the time of the end"?
Was their understanding the understanding that was
"shut up...and seal[ed]...even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased?

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
The Book of Daniel was accessible and understood by the first century readers.

Jesus said so (Mat. 24:15). The fall of Jerusalem was the the time of the end for the people of Daniel, i.e. the Jews. Heb. 1:1 says so. "God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by His Son ...."


That is all true. I believe it. But in those "last days" were "many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased"?

From Abraham to the days of Christ and His Disciples, did they run to and fro any differently than in Daniel's day? How do those days compare with the mid-1800's when the steam engine was put into use on trains and boats?

And there is even a bigger difference from how "many ran to and fro" in the mid-1800's and how we do it today.

And the promise that sealed Daniel: "many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased" is being realized today more than in any other time in history because we are running to and fro more than ever before and knowledge is being increased now faster than in any other time.

So when the promise is fulfilled "many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased" the book of Daniel is unsealed. Thus those having access to the book of Daniel in past ages (before the time specified for it to be unsealed) cannot be as knowledgeable of its endtime meaning as those who live when its meaning is unsealed and knowledge is increased.

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Again I say, and again I repeat: SDA, having buried their heads in the sand of false prophecy, are unable to see the light of truth. They cannot, though it be noon above; neither do they have any understanding of the things to befall them.///


Beware not to paint your canvas with to wide a brush. Lest the fine details get missed.

Even Jesus warned us: John 7:24 "Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment."


"Ignorance is sin, when knowledge can be obtained" (HR, September 1, 1866 par. 3). www.loudcry101.com
Re: Biblical Predictions of Antichrist & Sunday Laws [Re: APL] #167488
08/13/14 02:08 PM
08/13/14 02:08 PM
His child  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2020
Very Dedicated Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,673
TN, USA
Originally Posted By: his child
This is what she [EGW] said: "We looked upon the bust of Pius VI... This is the pope specified in prophecy, which received the deadly wound."


Originally Posted By: APL
Did she or anyone identify this before the fact?


Is your point that EGW recognized Bible prophecy when it was fulfilled?

Originally Posted By: his child
The Bible is clear. Ellen White is clear that more light will come before Christ comes, but not all will find it or follow it.


Originally Posted By: APL
Yes, she did. And what is to be the final message to the world? That we know who the last president is or who the last pope is? Nope. See Christ's Object Lessons page 415 for the real last message to the world. And I have not heard you speak of this at all. Why?


Originally Posted By: EGW
"As God's people approach the final crisis, they must with increasing power proclaim the message He has given them. The warning must be given to the churches. God's requirements must be laid before those who are transgressing His law. They must be made to understand that this is a life and death question. God's remnant people are to fill the earth with the cry of the third angel. {RH, July 16, 1901 par. 7}


Originally Posted By: EGW
"When we think we know all that is worth knowing, we are in a position where God cannot use us. The third angel's message is not a narrow message. It is world-wide; and we should be united, so far as possible, in the manner of presenting it to the world. {HS 124.4}


Originally Posted By: EGW
"The light we have received upon the third angel's message is the true light. The mark of the beast is exactly what it has been proclaimed to be. Not all in regard to this matter is yet understood, nor will it be understood until the unrolling of the scroll; but a most solemn work is to be accomplished in our world. The Lord's command to His servants is: "Cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and show My people their transgression, and the house of Jacob their sins." Isaiah 58:1. {6T 17.1}


So when the word of God declares that President Obama is the man who will be leading America when it enforces the mark of the beast and forms the "image to the beast;" why would you not want to know that? Why would you not want to give that warning to others with your means and influence? Why would you rise up against learning everything that God has revealed about endtime events to prepare for the last conflict? We must beware how we treat the light.

Originally Posted By: EGW
" It is not for lack of knowledge that God's people are now perishing. They will not be condemned because they do not know the way, the truth, and the life. The truth that has reached their understanding, the light which has shone on the soul, that has not been cherished, and which they have neglected, or refused to be led by, will condemn them. Those who never had the light to reject, will not be in condemnation. What more could have been done for God's vineyard than has been done? Light, precious light, shines upon them; but the light will not save them, unless they consent to be saved by it, and fully live up to it, and transmit that light to others who are in darkness. God calls upon his people to act. It is an individual work of confessing and forsaking sins and returning unto the Lord which is needed. One cannot do this work for another. Religious knowledge has accumulated, which has increased corresponding obligations. Great light has been shining upon the church, and they are condemned by the light, because they refuse to walk in it. If they were blind, they would be without sin. But they have seen light, and have heard much truth; yet they are not wise and holy. Many have not advanced in knowledge and true holiness from what they were years ago. They are spiritual dwarfs. Instead of going forward to perfection, they are taking back tracks to the darkness and bondage of Egypt. Their minds are not exercised unto godliness and true holiness." {RH, August 31, 1886 par. 4}


"Ignorance is sin, when knowledge can be obtained" (HR, September 1, 1866 par. 3). www.loudcry101.com
Page 18 of 20 1 2 16 17 18 19 20

Moderator  dedication, Rick H 

Sabbath School Lesson Study Material Link
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
Most Recent Posts From Selected Public Forums
Seven Trumpets reconsidered
by Karen Y. 03/27/24 09:35 AM
Are the words in the Bible "imperfect"?
by Kevin H. 03/24/24 09:02 PM
The Story of David and Goliath
by ProdigalOne. 03/23/24 08:06 PM
Global Warming Farce
by kland. 03/22/24 10:17 AM
Carbon Dioxide What's so Bad about It?
by kland. 03/21/24 12:34 PM
The Value of Bible Types
by TruthinTypes. 03/17/24 06:22 PM
Orion Which Every One on the Globe Can See
by Rick H. 03/16/24 06:26 PM
'Prophet' Summons UFOs
by ProdigalOne. 03/16/24 02:19 AM
Will You Take The Wuhan Virus Vaccine?
by dedication. 03/11/24 06:31 PM
Get That Razor Wire Up!
by kland. 03/05/24 12:49 PM
Messages for This Time
by ProdigalOne. 03/04/24 05:54 AM
The Lake of Fire is Hell
by Rick H. 03/02/24 05:01 PM
Adventist Agriculture
by kland. 02/29/24 12:33 PM
Most Recent Posts From Selected Private Forums of MSDAOL
The Wound Is Healed! The Mark Is Forming!
by Rick H. 03/27/24 10:36 PM
Are we seeing a outpouring of the Holy Spirit?
by Rick H. 03/24/24 06:50 PM
Time Is Short!
by Rick H. 03/24/24 06:45 PM
Climate Change and the Sunday Law
by Rick H. 03/24/24 06:42 PM
WHAT IS THE VERY END-TIME PROPHECY?
by Rick H. 03/23/24 06:03 PM
Digital Identity Control
by Rick H. 03/23/24 02:08 PM
A.I. - The New God?
by Rick H. 03/23/24 01:59 PM
Christian Nationalism/Sunday/C
limate Change

by ProdigalOne. 03/16/24 08:38 PM
Perils of the Emerging Church Movement
by Rick H. 03/16/24 06:30 PM
Is There A Connection Between WO & LGBTQ?
by Kevin H. 03/12/24 09:20 PM
A Second American Civil War?
by Daryl. 03/04/24 06:14 PM
Forum Announcements
Visitors by Country Since February 11, 2013
Flag Counter
Google Maritime SDA OnLine Public Forums Site Search & Google Translation Service
Google
 
Web www.maritime-sda-online.com

Copyright 2000-Present
Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine).

LEGAL NOTICE:
The views expressed in this forum are those of individuals
and do not necessarily represent those of Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine,
as well as the Seventh-day Adventist Church
from the local church level to the General Conference level.

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine) is also a self-supporting ministry
and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland
or any of its subsidiaries.

"And He saith unto them, follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men." Matt. 4:19
MARITIME 2ND ADVENT BELIEVERS ONLINE (FORMERLY MARITIME SDA ONLINE) CONSISTING MAINLY OF BOTH MEMBERS & FRIENDS
OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH,
INVITES OTHER MEMBERS & FRIENDS OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHO WISHES TO JOIN US!
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1