Expect death counts to go down as of September 1. New rules and promise of audits to hospitals for reimbursements.

Speaking of planned chaos....

New Court Filings of Autopsy Examiner Say George Floyd Likely Died of Overdose, Not Strangulation

'I hate the truth. Fire him!'

Could someone explain what I think I'm seeing here on the ILINet chart:
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm#ILINet

It appears that masking, social distancing, and the financial gutting of the middle class has miraculously succeeded in virtually eliminating the flu, while having zero effect on its purported target Covid. A suspicious mind would be forgiven for concluding that generic flu cases are being deliberately mislabeled as Covid in order to continue inflating the numbers...

It's never made sense as to why this infatuation of preventing all "cases" of this cold virus. What difference in their life does it make if I get sick? What if I die? Why should they care?
They certainly don't care if I smoke.
They certainly don't care if I drink.
They certainly don't care if I eat sugar.
They certainly don't care if I eat junk food.
They certainly don't care if I become obese.

The "opium" of the people, to keep them calm and submissive.

But yet they care I may "catch" a disease that the only way they can determine if I have it is to amplify it many times.
Why?

Consider animal tracing.
It serves to trace diseases in livestock so it can prevent market loss for producers. The idea to detect quickly the source and prevent the spread.
However, one cow doesn't care if another gets a disease.
But.... the producers do. Other countries may not buy their product like happened in past years.

So... All this can make sense if the "producers", the "owners", see us as livestock, that if we get sick, they will somehow suffer financial loss.

And if you have been contaminated with a patented mRNA, (think fields contaminated with GMO corn and the lawsuits), are you not considered owned?

Provisional Mortality Data ? United States, 2020
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7014e1.htm#F1_down

"Please note:. This report has been corrected."
Corrected?...

"COVID-19 was the third leading cause of death"
Third? You mean there were two other causes higher? Even twice the number of covid deaths? And what are we doing about those?

Heart disease and cancer.
But yet no lockdowns of junk food dispensers, no restrictions at schools limiting sugar intake, no change in food menus. No intent to change some of the underlying risk factors of catching the virus.

"COVID-19 death rates were highest among adults aged ≥85 years, AI/AN and Hispanic persons, and males."
Now what was the average age of death for most years? Something like 78?

Now there's less old unhealthy people costing social security.

Do not get lost in the false-positives of engineered propaganda (SARS-CoV-2, CoV-19, etc). What needs to be done, is examine closely the real pandemic - sin, and the first of the 7 last plagues that is coming. An incurable disease of the flesh:

Rev 16:1? And I heard a great voice out of the temple saying to the seven angels, Go your ways, and pour out the vials of the wrath of God upon the earth.?

Rev 16:2? And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.

Ah, a rejection of the health message (Body, Mind/Spirit (heart) and Soul (whole person) of the 3 Angels?Messages, will lead to never being healed of sin, and as such a result, consider the first plague carefully - "a grievous sore" (an outward physical manifestation of the flesh) for which there will be no balm in Gilead, for they had rejected Him (Jesus) already. How this will be tied into the NSL and global climate, etc will be very interesting.

Think also, of the present world-wide push for mRNA vaccination which alters the cells instructions at a genetic level, which cannot be undone, and for which mutations are already arising. A disease for which there will be no cure, no going back.

We are told to wear masks to protect others.
We are told to take the experimental gene therapy to protect others.
But we cannot protect others from sin. We can't blame others for our sins.

It is interesting that those who reject the health message (though some have not heard), who partake of their choices, will then push to persecute others, to blame them for their health problems.

I see it at church. The ones who say it's ok to bring meat, cheese, sugar to potlucks are some of the same ones who's trying to force others to wear masks so that they are "protected". Blame others. Force others. But don't force me to eat healthy!

Now comes the real test of the remainder of us. At what cost are you willing to give up to protect your health? No traveling? No concerts? And if you are willing to give up your health for "convenience", are you willing to give up your religion, also?

Good points. What I see happening is the Phariseeism, of making many burdens, and then not lifting a finger to help those struggling with their man-made and unscientific nonsense.

Mat 23:2? Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:?
Mat 23:3? All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.?
Mat 23:4? For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.?
Mat 23:5? But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,?
Mat 23:6? And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,?
Mat 23:7? And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.

I have had my old (original) church (at which I was baptized) disregard the warnings I sent about the abuse of scripture (Leviticus, Romans 13, Revelation, etc) and the SoP/ToJ in trying to justify church closures, based on 0 (that's ZERO) actual scientific evidence and 0 (ZERO) actual law. I even heard one specific present-truther, a medical missionary of the citrus kind (and one I have admired over the years), say it was the churches 'duty' to close even before being asked by the states-side (USA) government. That the church was to be 'first' in presenting itself as humble and caring! As if! I nearly had apoplexy! I couldn't believe what I heard from this man/preacher who is normally spot on, being so far afield of truth, catering to the greater fear-mongering of this age (Luke 21:26).

The church was made (forced) to say, "Unclean, unclean ..." and distance itself from those needing the truth for this time.

By any chance are those saying it was the church's duty to close, were the individuals overweight or otherwise not embracing health?