Why do our Modern SDA pastors teach the exact opposite than the Testimonies do on this subject?





Strongs Concordance says that the word used for "taken", the Greek word paralambano means to "receive something transmitted"; or to "join to one's self" to the message. This fits perfectly with what Sister White says that to be taken means to have your name remain in the book of life and be part of the angelic harvest. But the pastors of our denomination today say that the ones who are "taken" are the wicked who die at the second coming of Christ, contradicting the Testimonies of Christ. Is this acceptable? While they are correct that this has nothing to do with a secret rapture, they are trying so hard to disassociate themselves from the Rapture Theory that they are neglecting the Testimonies here and shame the message, causing confusion.

The ones that are taken are marked for Christ in the Harvest. They reject the mark of the beast and will be taken as prisoners by the wicked for rejecting the Mark of the Beast. Those who accept the Mark will be left to continue to work in the field and be able to buy and sell.

Now, look at the context of where this is listed in the scripture. Matthew 24:28 & Luke 17:37 is following the timeline of events that will occur just before the second coming of Christ. In Matthew 24 Verse 3 the disciples ask what the "sign of the end" would be, and Jesus responds by giving a series of events that first correspond the to the destruction of Jerusalem, then with the end of the world, and He concludes by giving the very last sign before the Mark of the Beast.

The end of Luke 17 is the perfect example of what I was inspired to convey here.



Pope Francis is the Jesuit "CORPSE" of Matthew 24:28 & Luke 17:37. Jesuits swear an oath to be "perinde ac cadaver" or to be "like a CORPSE" to do the will of the pope. Pope John Paul II made the Jesuits reaffirm this oath before permitting them back into Rome.

This is a direct quote from 'the Extreme Oath of the Jesuits' which was on record at the US library of congress until it was stolen.


So the CORPSE is directly associated with the events to mark the ones who are taken and left. The Mark of the Beast is what sifts the wheat and the Tares, the Sheep and the Goats.

Pope Francis is the first Jesuit Pope. On the day that he was elected, God told me that he fulfills the eighth king of Revelation 17:11, the "CORPSE" that Jesus said would be the last sign before the Mark of the beast is enforced. As Matthew 24 and Luke 17 read "Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken (prisoner), and the other left. 37 And they answered and said unto him, Where, Lord? And he said unto them, Wheresoever the body (Corpse) is, thither will the eagles be gathered together." Pope Francis was the first pope to speak from the US congress, so the eagles have gathered to the corpse.

The mark of the Beast will be enforced in Pope Francis, the eighth papal king,'s reign. He is the Jesuit CORPSE of Matthew 24 and Luke 17.
.
Teach this to your pastors in the name of Jesus. Amen.

You might answer your own "why" question if you check your concordance for the other word: aphiemi (left). Paralambano is neutral in usage, sometimes being positive, sometimes negative. As such, it is somewhat ambiguous. But aphiemi is not so ambiguous. Check it out.

Mrs. White was not making a Biblical exegetical remark in her statement, from what I can tell. She's simply following the same "paralambano" concept used in John 14:1-3--in that case, the "paralambano" is usually translated as "receive" but could be translated as "taken" as well.

The remnant are those that remain.

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.

Have you even read this quote?

Seriously, who are you, people? You could not possibly be Seventh Day Adventists because you twist the Testimonies like they are insignificant. A truly Spirit-filled child of God would listen to reason.

It is a reference to the HARVEST.