Forums118
Topics9,224
Posts196,102
Members1,325
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
5 registered members (dedication, Karen Y, 3 invisible),
2,231
guests, and 8
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: substitution
[Re: Elle]
#114538
06/10/09 09:05 PM
06/10/09 09:05 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
Elle,
This was before his fall, during his questioning time, before he saw things completely in their true light, before his final decision.
In great mercy, according to His divine character, God bore long with Lucifer. The spirit of discontent and disaffection had never before been known in heaven. It was a new element, strange, mysterious, unaccountable. Lucifer himself had not at first been acquainted with the real nature of his feelings; for a time he had feared to express the workings and imaginings of his mind; yet he did not dismiss them. He did not see whither he was drifting. But such efforts as infinite love and wisdom only could devise, were made to convince him of his error. His disaffection was proved to be without cause, and he was made to see what would be the result of persisting in revolt. Lucifer was convinced that he was in the wrong. He saw that "the Lord is righteous in all His ways, and holy in all His works" (Psalm 145:17); that the divine statutes are just, and that he ought to acknowledge them as such before all heaven. Had he done this, he might have saved himself and many angels. He had not at that time fully cast off his allegiance to God. Though he had left his position as covering cherub, yet if he had been willing to return to God, acknowledging the Creator's wisdom, and satisfied to fill the place appointed him in God's great plan, he would have been reinstated in his office. The time had come for a final decision; he must fully yield to the divine sovereignty or place himself in open rebellion. He nearly reached the decision to return, but pride forbade him. It was too great a sacrifice for one who had been so highly honored to confess that he had been in error, that his imaginings were false, and to yield to the authority which he had been working to prove unjust. {PP 39.1}
|
|
|
Re: substitution
[Re: Rosangela]
#114548
06/10/09 10:25 PM
06/10/09 10:25 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
This was before his fall, during his questioning time, before he saw things completely in their true light, before his final decision. "During his questioning time" sounds like something he would say! His workings at this time were hardly innocuous. Here are the paragraphs immediately preceding what Rosangela wrote: "Leaving his place in the immediate presence of the Father, Lucifer went forth to diffuse the spirit of discontent among the angels. He worked with mysterious secrecy, and for a time concealed his real purpose under an appearance of reverence for God. He began to insinuate doubts concerning the laws that governed heavenly beings, intimating that though laws might be necessary for the inhabitants of the worlds, angels, being more exalted, needed no such restraint, for their own wisdom was a sufficient guide. They were not beings that could bring dishonor to God; all their thoughts were holy; it was no more possible for them than for God Himself to err. The exaltation of the Son of God as equal with the Father was represented as an injustice to Lucifer, who, it was claimed, was also entitled to reverence and honor. If this prince of angels could but attain to his true, exalted position, great good would accrue to the entire host of heaven; for it was his object to secure freedom for all. But now even the liberty which they had hitherto enjoyed was at an end; for an absolute Ruler had been appointed them, and to His authority all must pay homage. Such were the subtle deceptions that through the wiles of Lucifer were fast obtaining in the heavenly courts.
There had been no change in the position or authority of Christ. Lucifer's envy and misrepresentation and his claims to equality with Christ had made necessary a statement of the true position of the Son of God; but this had been the same from the beginning. Many of the angels were, however, blinded by Lucifer's deceptions.
Taking advantage of the loving, loyal trust reposed in him by the holy beings under his command, he had so artfully instilled into their minds his own distrust and discontent that his agency was not discerned. Lucifer had presented the purposes of God in a false light--misconstruing and distorting them to excite dissent and dissatisfaction. He cunningly drew his hearers on to give utterance to their feelings; then these expressions were repeated by him when it would serve his purpose, as evidence that the angels were not fully in harmony with the government of God. While claiming for himself perfect loyalty to God, he urged that changes in the order and laws of heaven were necessary for the stability of the divine government. Thus while working to excite opposition to the law of God and to instill his own discontent into the minds of the angels under him, he was ostensibly seeking to remove dissatisfaction and to reconcile disaffected angels to the order of heaven. While secretly fomenting discord and rebellion, he with consummate craft caused it to appear as his sole purpose to promote loyalty and to preserve harmony and peace.
The spirit of dissatisfaction thus kindled was doing its baleful work. While there was no open outbreak, division of feeling imperceptibly grew up among the angels. There were some who looked with favor upon Lucifer's insinuations against the government of God. Although they had heretofore been in perfect harmony with the order which God had established, they were now discontented and unhappy because they could not penetrate His unsearchable counsels; they were dissatisfied with His purpose in exalting Christ. These stood ready to second Lucifer's demand for equal authority with the Son of God. But angels who were loyal and true maintained the wisdom and justice of the divine decree and endeavored to reconcile this disaffected being to the will of God. Christ was the Son of God; He had been one with Him before the angels were called into existence. He had ever stood at the right hand of the Father; His supremacy, so full of blessing to all who came under its benignant control, had not heretofore been questioned. The harmony of heaven had never been interrupted; wherefore should there now be discord? The loyal angels could see only terrible consequences from this dissension, and with earnest entreaty they counseled the disaffected ones to renounce their purpose and prove themselves loyal to God by fidelity to His government. (PP 37-38)"We can see he was doing a lot more than simply "questioning"!
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: substitution
[Re: Tom]
#114555
06/10/09 11:15 PM
06/10/09 11:15 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2024
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,984
CA, USA
|
|
Very interesting! I'm sure I've read this, but somehow missed this part: Nothing less than this plan of atonement could convince the whole universe of God's justice.{4SP 323.2} Is this implying that had man not sinned that the Plan of Atonement would still have had to have been enacted? Seems to be, doesn't it? Or perhaps the context is taking into account the sin of man, so this statement cannot be generalized to the case where man did not sin? after satans lies. no insinuations, no doubts, no need....i would think.
Psa 64:5 ...an evil matter: they commune of laying snares privily; they say, Who shall see them?
Psa 7:14 Behold, he travaileth with iniquity, and hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood. 15 He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made. 16 His mischief (and his violent dealing) shall return upon his own head.
Psa 7:17 I will praise the LORD according to his righteousness: and will sing praise to the name of the LORD most high.
|
|
|
Re: substitution
[Re: Tom]
#114559
06/11/09 12:47 AM
06/11/09 12:47 AM
|
Active Member 2019 Died February 12, 2019
2500+ Member
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,536
Canada
|
|
This was before his fall, during his questioning time, before he saw things completely in their true light, before his final decision. "During his questioning time" sounds like something he would say! His workings at this time were hardly innocuous. Here are the paragraphs immediately preceding what Rosangela wrote: "Leaving his place in the immediate presence of the Father, Lucifer... (PP 37-38)"We can see he was doing a lot more than simply "questioning"! Tx Tom for bringing the quote here. For sure Lucifer was doing much more than questioning. I see at least 2 commandments broken. #1. Coveting, and #2. lying. So the law was broken and Christ offered pardon without the shedding of blood. Would that mean there's no Penal substitution required? Is there another way to view this? Is this in harmony with scripture?
Blessings
|
|
|
Re: substitution
[Re: Elle]
#114561
06/11/09 01:02 AM
06/11/09 01:02 AM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2024
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,984
CA, USA
|
|
[quote=Tom] There could be no penal substitution for Lucifer, because there was no way to save him. Au contraire! God in His great mercy bore long with Lucifer. He was not immediately degraded from his exalted station when he first indulged the spirit of discontent, nor even when he began to present his false claims before the loyal angels. Long was he retained in heaven. Again and again he was offered pardon on condition of repentance and submission. (GC 496) All he had to do was repent and submit and he would have been saved. SOP has helped establish doctrine after deadlock in Bible study, so it's not altogether true it played no part: SOP is a "continuing source of authority and truth": isn't that what it says in our beliefs? Hi Colin, I haven't read the whole context of the quote Tom brought here, however, this quote does say that Lucifer could of been pardon without the shedding of the blood of Christ. So that is quite a strong EGW quote that can negate the belief of "penal substitution". [/quote] teresa: the question, elle, is, is penal substitution biblical? have we been taught penal substitution and therefore read the bible in that light?
Last edited by teresaq; 06/11/09 01:04 AM. Reason: to mark start of my comments
Psa 64:5 ...an evil matter: they commune of laying snares privily; they say, Who shall see them?
Psa 7:14 Behold, he travaileth with iniquity, and hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood. 15 He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made. 16 His mischief (and his violent dealing) shall return upon his own head.
Psa 7:17 I will praise the LORD according to his righteousness: and will sing praise to the name of the LORD most high.
|
|
|
Re: substitution
[Re: teresaq]
#114568
06/11/09 02:29 AM
06/11/09 02:29 AM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
I was going to say the same thing. There's nothing in Scripture that teaches the penal substitution idea.
I think an excellent way to study this is to look at the teachings of Christ, especially in relation to His death.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: substitution
[Re: teresaq]
#114574
06/11/09 05:04 AM
06/11/09 05:04 AM
|
Active Member 2012
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,826
E. Oregon, USA
|
|
Hi Colin, I haven't read the whole context of the quote Tom brought here, however, this quote does say that Lucifer could of been pardon without the shedding of the blood of Christ. So that is quite a strong EGW quote that can negate the belief of "penal substitution". teresa: the question, elle, is, is penal substitution biblical? have we been taught penal substitution and therefore read the bible in that light?[/quote] Elle, it's not a relevant quote because she doesn't exclude it, and she's only talking of God being fair to Lucifer, which is her context. Teresa, Sister White could not be more explicit about the penalty of the law being applied for any transgression, however slight, so that God's holy & just law be vindicated. We are speculating on very dangerous ground with Lucifer, since the lesson on our own penal punishment of eternal death under the law of God is so clear: God's whole plan for restoring Lucifer is unknown to us, even from Sister White. The fire of hell is only reserved already for Satan & co: that means, given that wicked humans are landing up there too, that Lucifer and his angels' options were the same as ours, but they turned it down. Lucifer broke God's law, claiming it "unfair" and God in response was only being "fair" to him: that's all we're told. Beyond that we are fishing. As for Christ's death itself: should God not need to execute sinners under penalty for sin, in order to pardon - despite SOP spelling it out very clearly that this is necessary, why, just to alert us fully to his love and that we can come back should we wish, put his own beloved Son through a CRUCIFIXION...?????? That's mind numbingly cruel in my book: doesn't put God is a good light at all! Where's the wisdom of God finding an easier way to prove his love for us: wasn't Jesus' 3 year ministry sufficient, as Jesus himself said it was clear proof he was doing the works of God.? Only should death justly be required of the sinner, as the applied penalty of God's government, is there any point in having a substitutionary death at all: dying for us under God's justice makes sense for Jesus, but dying for the sake of evil to be displayed - whatever God thought he was doing in all that! - saves no-one from death under God's regime...: death under judgement is hell fire, which Ellen White clearly also speaks to, in some detail too! The substitute for suffering our penalty for sin - penal substitution - is Jesus.
|
|
|
Re: substitution
[Re: Colin]
#114587
06/11/09 12:56 PM
06/11/09 12:56 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
It's clearly a relevant quote, and I'm glad Elle sees it. The argument is very powerful. We see the hideous things Lucifer was doing, yet God was willing to pardon him for it. The conditions were so simple a child can understand it: repentance and submission. Christ's death was not necessary in Lucifer's case for the reasons brought out here: But even as a sinner, man was in a different position from that of Satan. Lucifer in heaven had sinned in the light of God's glory. To him as to no other created being was given a revelation of God's love.
Understanding the character of God, knowing His goodness, Satan chose to follow his own selfish, independent will. This choice was final. There was no more that God could do to save him. But man was deceived; his mind was darkened by Satan's sophistry. The height and depth of the love of God he did not know. For him there was hope in a knowledge of God's love. By beholding His character he might be drawn back to God. (DA 761) The sacrifice was never necessary to enable God to do something He wasn't able to do before the sacrifice, but was necessary for man. God so loved the world that He gave His Son; this is the sacrifice that man needed. "For him there was hope in a knowledge of God's love. By beholding His character he might be drawn back to God." The legal matters were no different for Lucifer than for with man. Lucifer had sinned, and needed to be pardoned. God offered him that pardon, again and again. Had Lucifer accepted the pardon, he would have been reconciled with God and reinstated in his former position, even after he had left the presence of the Father (before he had made his final decision). I'd really like to see someone present a case for penal substitution from the teachings of Christ.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: substitution
[Re: Tom]
#114588
06/11/09 01:03 PM
06/11/09 01:03 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
As for Christ's death itself: should God not need to execute sinners under penalty for sin, in order to pardon - despite SOP spelling it out very clearly that this is necessary, why, just to alert us fully to his love and that we can come back should we wish, put his own beloved Son through a CRUCIFIXION...??????
Why would you think that God "put His own beloved Son through a crucifixion"? The Scriptures don't teach this. 22Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:
23Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
24Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it. (Acts 2:22-24) Wicked beings crucified Christ, not God. God raised Him up. God was crucified with Christ. He wasn't the crucifier but the crucifiee. God did not "put" Christ through crucifixion, but permitted it to happen.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
|
|
Re: substitution
[Re: Tom]
#114592
06/11/09 02:22 PM
06/11/09 02:22 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2024
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,984
CA, USA
|
|
As for Christ's death itself: should God not need to execute sinners under penalty for sin, in order to pardon - despite SOP spelling it out very clearly that this is necessary, why, just to alert us fully to his love and that we can come back should we wish, put his own beloved Son through a CRUCIFIXION...??????
Why would you think that God "put His own beloved Son through a crucifixion"? The Scriptures don't teach this. 22Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:
23Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
24Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it. (Acts 2:22-24) Wicked beings crucified Christ, not God. God raised Him up. God was crucified with Christ. He wasn't the crucifier but the crucifiee. God did not "put" Christ through crucifixion, but permitted it to happen. instigated by satan. And when the devil comes and points to your sins and hateful crimes, tell him, "Yes, I am a sinner, but Christ is a Saviour, and He says, 'I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance'" [Matthew 9:13]. Thus you arm yourself with the whole armor of Christ's righteousness. How is it you have not on the armor of Christ's righteousness? What did He come to this world for? Why, if it had been a possible thing for us to have been brought back to keeping God's commandments, He never would have come to this world; but He came here because it was impossible for man to redeem himself and bring himself into a position where Adam stood before the fall. Then what was he to do? Christ came, our substitute and surety. {1SAT 108.1} Before He came they were under a yoke; but Christ was above law, He was the originator of the law, so there was no yoke upon Him; and the angels were in obedience to Christ, who was not under the yoke. He could come as one equal with the Father, and He could open His breast to the whole woe, grief, sin, and misery, and by an offering of Himself He could bring life and immortality to light through the gospel. This is the only hope of life, and when Christ cried out, "It is finished," He carried out the devised plan. He had died in behalf of the race, as a freewill offering to God. He was not urged to do it, but He took it upon Himself that He might save the fallen race. He goes down into the grave and comes up out of the grave. {1SAT 108.2} As Satan was triumphing in His death, it was not long before he found out he had overstepped the boundary. In seeking to cause the death and crucifixion of the Son of God, what did he do? He claimed in heaven, and he claims today among the Christian world, that in taking away the law of God they could establish one of their own that would be better. All the universe of heaven were looking to see what would come out of it. {1SAT 108.3} Why did not God blot Satan out of existence? Why did He not blot sin out? Satan was permitted to develop his character, and unless he had had this opportunity, he would have laid the whole cause of his disaffection upon Christ and the Father. But he had an opportunity here in this world to develop his new principles, and he did it when he crucified the Lord of glory. He acted out his principles, and showed what they would lead to, and we see the same acted out in our world today--what these lawless principles will lead to. {1SAT 109.1} The enemy has worked, and he is working still. He is come down in great power, and the Spirit of God is being withdrawn from the earth. God has withdrawn His hand. We have only to look at Johnstown [Pennsylvania]. He did not prevent the devil from wiping that whole city out of existence. And these very things will increase until the close of this earth's history, because he has come down in great power, and he works with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish. What is he doing? Going about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour. And when he sees those who are resisting the light, and that God does not shelter them, he will exercise his cruel power upon them. This is what we may expect. {1SAT 109.2} What is God going to do for His people--leave them with no new light? "Ye are," says He, "the light of the world." Then we are to get more light from the throne of God, and have an increase of light. Now, we do not tell you in the message that has been given to you here and in other places that it is a grand new light, but it is the old light brought up and placed in new settings. Jesus gave light, the most wonderful light, as He spoke from that cloudy pillar. And just prior to the time when the children of Israel left Egypt, one plague after another was brought upon the Egyptians, because Pharaoh refused to let the Israelites go to worship God. Finally, the God of heaven suffered the firstborn of both man and beast to be slain, and when Pharaoh looked upon their dying forms he began to understand who the great I AM was--that there was a power above, whom Pharaoh, the king of Egypt, could not compete with or overcome with all his experience and resistance. Therefore he said to the children of Israel, "Go." {1SAT 109.3}
Psa 64:5 ...an evil matter: they commune of laying snares privily; they say, Who shall see them?
Psa 7:14 Behold, he travaileth with iniquity, and hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood. 15 He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made. 16 His mischief (and his violent dealing) shall return upon his own head.
Psa 7:17 I will praise the LORD according to his righteousness: and will sing praise to the name of the LORD most high.
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|