HOME CHAT ROOM #1 CHAT ROOM #2 Forum Topics Within The Last 7 Days REGISTER ENTER FORUMS BIBLE SCHOOL CONTACT US

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine Christian Family Fellowship Forums
(formerly Maritime SDA OnLine)
Consisting mainly of both members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
Welcomes and invites other members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to join us!

Click Here To Read Legal Notice & Disclaimer
Suggested a One Time Yearly $20 or Higher Donation Accepted Here to Help Cover the Yearly Expenses of Operating & Upgrading. We need at least $20 X 10 yearly donations.
Donations accepted: Here
ShoutChat Box
Newest Members
Andrew, Trainor, ekoorb1030, jibb555, MBloomfield
1325 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums118
Topics9,224
Posts196,101
Members1,325
Most Online5,850
Feb 29th, 2020
Seventh-day Adventist Church In Canada Links
Seventh-day Adventist Church in Canada

Newfoundland & Labrador Mission

Maritime Conference

Quebec Conference

Ontario Conference

Manitoba-Saskatchewan Conference

Alberta Conference

British Columbia Conference

7 Top Posters(30 Days)
kland 19
Rick H 15
asygo 8
Daryl 2
October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Member Spotlight
Kevin H
Kevin H
New York
Posts: 635
Joined: November 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Live Space Station Tracking
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
Last 7 Pictures From Photo Gallery Forums
He hath set an harvest for thee
Rivers Of Living Water
He Leads Us To Green Pastures
Remember What God Has Done
Remember The Sabbath
"...whiter than snow..."
A Beautiful Spring Day
Who's Online
5 registered members (dedication, Karen Y, 3 invisible), 1,999 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Re: Who is the Fit Man of Leviticus 16? [Re: Alchemy] #174214
06/14/15 02:25 PM
06/14/15 02:25 PM
G
glenm  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2018
Posting New Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 45
Colorado, USA
Originally Posted By: Alchemy
I was listening to a sermon by Pastor Bill Hughes yesterday and heard him say he didn't know who the Fit Man was. I was surprised because I didn't realize this was so difficult.

1) The Fit Man can not be a member of the angelic host.

2) The Fit Man can not be a member of the human race.

3) The Fit Man must be a member of both, the angelic host and the human race.

I believe the Fit Man is Jesus Christ.

What do you believe?

A good case can be made that the fit man represents the 144,000.

Re: Who is the Fit Man of Leviticus 16? [Re: Alchemy] #174216
06/14/15 02:45 PM
06/14/15 02:45 PM
E
Elle  Offline
Active Member 2019
Died February 12, 2019

2500+ Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,536
Canada
Johann and Alchemy, there's a very severe mis-translation that is replicated in many version of the Bible. The second goat of Lev 16 IS NOT Azazel which is also mistranslated as scapegoat(detail on this below). These mis-translations brought a lot of confusion to everyone for centuries.

Below is a Post done in the Is the Scapegoat Jesus or Satan? discussion. That will explain in detail the 4 aspects of mis-translations done in Lev 16.

======== Post # 13861 ===================

...
The point is the KJV and other version has added more words ...

Let's start from Lev 16:8 “Av Lv 16:8 And Aaron shall cast lots upon the two goats; one lot for the LORD, and the other lot for the scapegoat(Azazel).”

A. Let’s make a note on the word “the”. Highlited in red above is ADDED text. In Hebrew when they want to emphasize on a noun the Hebrew letter Hey is used as a prefix which is translated as "the". The masoretic text have put a Hey before sa’iyr(H8163, Shaggy, a he-goat), however none is put in front of Y-hv-h(3068,self Existent) nor in front of azaz’el(5799, stout goat). However the KJV has added in each of these noun a “the” in the translation for the sake of easy English flowing sentences. That’s fine as long as the intended meaning is not distorted.

B. In this text, Lamed was only used in front of both Y-hv-h and azaz’el to mean “for”. Following the flow and the context in this sentences there was one sin-offering that was for the Lord, and the other was for Azazel(the stout goat). By preserving the name Azazel as a stout goat, we see here that the second goat (live one of the sin offering) is i)for the stout goat and ii)is not the stout goat itself. i) and ii) has two complete different meanings. We lost the intend meaning by translating it as ii). The way they did it is as followed:

  • #1.First Srong has incorrect defined the origin of the word azaz’el. ".
    Originally Posted By: elle
    The Hebrew word “aza’zel” is best translated as “Azazel” and not as “goat of departure”.
    • i) Strong has erroneously defined it as deriving from ‘ez (h5795 – she goat ) and ‘azal (h235 – to go away). azal-ez does not fit together well and does not make up azazel.

    • ii)It better derives from ‘azaz (h5810 -- to be stout ) and ‘el (h410 – god) -- fitting together perfectly azaz-el meaning a goat god also known as Pan, by which the Isreaelites where worshipping also in all their high places.

  • #2. The KJV and other version has added “the” in front of the incorrect definition of azaz’el, and voila, they have transformed the second goat of the sin offering into being Azaz’el instead of being sent To Azaz’el. This has totally distorted the intended meaning.

  • #3. And we have not tested nor verified the soundness of this translation. Also we have disregarded other segment in Lev 16 that is in disharmony with this translation. Here’s how :
    i) the two goats were to be sin-offering (Lev 16:5)
    ii) All sin offering needed to be without blemish, that means the second goat cannot represent Satan because Satan is full of blemish.
    iii) it is not in harmony with the second witness of this law that the Lord provided in Lev 14.
    iv) it is not in harmony with the laws of liability
    v) It is not in harmony with other scriptures revealing the fulfillment of the day of atonement.


  • Now let’s look at Lev 16:10 again.

    In Blue -- regular KJV.
    [In red]-- incorrect KJV translation.
    (In green) -- what the Masoretic text read.

    Lev 16:10 "But the goat, on which the lot fell [to be the] (for) Azazel, shall be presented alive before the Lord, to make an atonement with him, and to let him go [for a ] (to) Azazel into the wilderness. "

    To translate ...
    • a)"to be the" Azazel ... instead of " for" Azazel,
    • b)" for a " Azazel into the wilderness ... instead of "to" Azazel into the wilderness

  • ...a) & b) in red changes the whole meaning. They have turn the 2nd goat of the sin offering into being Azazel instead of being sent To Azazel.

    It is not a question of changing lamed to a different translation, it is a question that in a)
    • 1. They incorrectly translated azaz’el into scapegoat
    • 2. they have added the word “the” to go with “scapegoat
    • 3. and they have added the verb “be

      the” and “be” are added words and are not in the original text. 1. 2. And 3. has changed the whole meaning of the text.

    • 4. Also in the section b) they have added the word "a" which again was not in the original text and have distorted the intended meaning with it.


  • ... The problem lies in all the points that I have brought above.

    I’m not saying that Strong or whoever wrote KJV and whoever else who wrote the other translations, had a malintent. They tried to translate as best as they knew and that’s how they understood the gospel in their days and personally. Translation cannot be totally devoided from personal biases or from the influences of the current understanding of the time. They try as much as they could, however, personal understanding does come out through the translation. That’s why there are many different translation today. Not one is that much better than the other. At times the original text needs to be verified, word studies needs to be done to extract G-d's true intended meaning, and we need to test all things with the Law and the manner of the law(Is 8:20).

  • Last edited by Elle; 06/14/15 03:07 PM. Reason: remove irrelevant text that was a respond to another post in that discussion.

    Blessings
    Re: Who is the Fit Man of Leviticus 16? [Re: glenm] #174218
    06/14/15 02:50 PM
    06/14/15 02:50 PM
    A
    Alchemy  Offline OP
    SDA
    Active Member 2018

    Most Dedicated Member
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 2,264
    Asia
    Originally Posted By: glenm
    Originally Posted By: Alchemy
    I was listening to a sermon by Pastor Bill Hughes yesterday and heard him say he didn't know who the Fit Man was. I was surprised because I didn't realize this was so difficult.

    1) The Fit Man can not be a member of the angelic host.

    2) The Fit Man can not be a member of the human race.

    3) The Fit Man must be a member of both, the angelic host and the human race.

    I believe the Fit Man is Jesus Christ.

    What do you believe?

    A good case can be made that the fit man represents the 144,000.


    Blessings glenm,

    Welcome to Maritime 2nd Advent.

    Well, I have never seen a good case for the 144,000. Please, feel free to show us here.

    Re: Who is the Fit Man of Leviticus 16? [Re: glenm] #174219
    06/14/15 02:51 PM
    06/14/15 02:51 PM
    Johann  Offline
    SDA
    Active Member 2014

    Retired Pastor
    3000+ Member
    Joined: Jul 2006
    Posts: 3,014
    Iceland
    Originally Posted By: glenm
    Originally Posted By: Alchemy
    I was listening to a sermon by Pastor Bill Hughes yesterday and heard him say he didn't know who the Fit Man was. I was surprised because I didn't realize this was so difficult.

    1) The Fit Man can not be a member of the angelic host.

    2) The Fit Man can not be a member of the human race.

    3) The Fit Man must be a member of both, the angelic host and the human race.

    I believe the Fit Man is Jesus Christ.

    What do you believe?

    A good case can be made that the fit man represents the 144,000.


    Welcome back!

    Quite a point!

    When will the 144,000 appear?

    When will their cleansing take place as required by the Fit Man in Leviticus 16?

    Will the 144,000 be chasing the devil into the "wilderness" at the beginning or close of the millenium?


    "Here is a last piece of advice. If you believe in goodness and if you value the approval of God, fix your minds on the things which are holy and right and pure and beautiful and good. Model your conduct on what you have learned from me, on what I have told you and shown you, and you will find the God of peace will be with you."
    Re: Who is the Fit Man of Leviticus 16? [Re: Elle] #174220
    06/14/15 02:56 PM
    06/14/15 02:56 PM
    A
    Alchemy  Offline OP
    SDA
    Active Member 2018

    Most Dedicated Member
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 2,264
    Asia
    Blessings Elle,

    The scapegoat does represent Satan. I believe Strong's and the english/greek lexicon of the nineteenth century to be very reliable and accurate.

    Re: Who is the Fit Man of Leviticus 16? [Re: Alchemy] #174221
    06/14/15 03:19 PM
    06/14/15 03:19 PM
    E
    Elle  Offline
    Active Member 2019
    Died February 12, 2019

    2500+ Member
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 2,536
    Canada
    Originally Posted By: Alchemy
    Blessings Elle,

    The scapegoat does represent Satan. I believe Strong's and the english/greek lexicon of the nineteenth century to be very reliable and accurate.

    Well, other scholar differ from Strong's definition of Azazel. Then of course many scholar differ in translations(that's why we have many different translations). Actually, most of those translations of Lev 16 are not in harmony with the masoretic text. If I were to choose over a translation and the source text, I would choose the source text to be correct over a translation of the source text.


    Also, if you speak to any practicing Jews who keep the law, they will tell you that the second goat is NOT Azazel. They can read Hebrew and know how the text obviously read. I have verified this with a rabbi and with a practicing Jew. Both said that Azazel was a mountain that the "fit man" brought the second goat to. And I have verified on a map if there was a mountain called Azazel...and there is one.

    So our understanding and translation of that text is totally false on many levels, mainly we are not in harmony with the source text itself.


    Blessings
    Re: Who is the Fit Man of Leviticus 16? [Re: Alchemy] #174222
    06/14/15 03:42 PM
    06/14/15 03:42 PM
    Johann  Offline
    SDA
    Active Member 2014

    Retired Pastor
    3000+ Member
    Joined: Jul 2006
    Posts: 3,014
    Iceland
    Elle,

    Etymologically you have a point, and you emphasize a danger with Strong: Many unskilled Bible students use Strong as a final authority not realizing that Strong often gives but the "face" meaning of a word, often with little consideration to the Hebrew or Greek grammar, which is so different from regular English grammar.

    As for the KJV you do have all these words in italics which show that these are words added by the translators to make the text comply with the [Catholic] teachings of the Church of England - or what the translators thought should be the right meaning.

    By stating that I hold that God used the KJV as a mighty tool for the salvation of souls.

    In this case your case is as strong as the KJV text, but it does not fully void the meaning given by the KJV. This is one more case where we cannot depend fully on the single text but we have to get our true meaning by comparing what is said by the teachings of the Bible and the symbolism used in this case.

    Last edited by Johann; 06/14/15 04:05 PM.

    "Here is a last piece of advice. If you believe in goodness and if you value the approval of God, fix your minds on the things which are holy and right and pure and beautiful and good. Model your conduct on what you have learned from me, on what I have told you and shown you, and you will find the God of peace will be with you."
    Re: Who is the Fit Man of Leviticus 16? [Re: Johann] #174227
    06/14/15 04:52 PM
    06/14/15 04:52 PM
    E
    Elle  Offline
    Active Member 2019
    Died February 12, 2019

    2500+ Member
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 2,536
    Canada
    Originally Posted By: Johann
    Etymologically you have a point, and you emphasize a danger with Strong: Many unskilled Bible students use Strong as a final authority not realizing that Strong often gives but the "face" meaning of a word, often with little consideration to the Hebrew or Greek grammar, which is so different from regular English grammar.

    ??? I don't know what exactly what your refering to. I did not use Strong as a final authority in looking at the word Azazel. I did the opposite by challenging his definition. Maybe you mis that part.

    Strong was not a linguistic. He had a large team working under him to produce that work. I'm not saying that Strong's work is all wrong. I think most of it is right. But I know that no scholar or man has it all right. That's why I will not take any scholar as an authority. However I do refer to many scholar's work with the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

    Originally Posted By: Johann
    As for the KJV you do have all these words in italics which show that these are words added by the translators to make the text comply with the [Catholic] teachings of the Church of England - or what the translators thought should be the right meaning.


    I don't know what you mean with the teachings of the Church of England here. All I know is that many English Bible version does not comply with the original Masoretic text. The Tanakh(Jewish Bible that is also translated in English) has translated this text correctly, and some other English translations.

    Originally Posted By: Johann
    By stating that I hold that God used the KJV as a mighty tool for the salvation of souls.

    I personally prefer the KJV because that's the version I'm accustom to; however I do know its limitation and have seen many faults(errors) in that version as it is found in any versions. All English translation fall short of the correct translation for these are all done by men who fall short in understanding all of the plan of salvation. So there's always some trouble texts where personal view leaks thru the translation.

    Originally Posted By: Johann
    In this case your case is as strong as the KJV text, but it does not fully void the meaning given by the KJV. This is one more case where we cannot depend fully on the single text but we have to get our true meaning by comparing what is said by the teachings of the Bible and the symbolism used in this case.


    Well, 4 mistakes by comparing to the Masoretic text found in these 2 texts is strong enough; but yes I agree the translated text needs to be in harmony with other texts. Which I have brought the parallele given in Lev 14 that is in harmony with the Masoretic text translation of Lev 16, besides how Jesus fulfilled it, beside how Jesus fulfills (the atonement) with the Israelites and with us today. Basically Lev 14 and Lev 16 describe the cleansing process that takes place in the two works of Christ: the justification and sanctification work.


    Blessings
    Re: Who is the Fit Man of Leviticus 16? [Re: Alchemy] #174228
    06/14/15 04:59 PM
    06/14/15 04:59 PM
    G
    glenm  Offline
    SDA
    Active Member 2018
    Posting New Member
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 45
    Colorado, USA
    Originally Posted By: Alchemy
    Originally Posted By: glenm
    Originally Posted By: Alchemy
    I was listening to a sermon by Pastor Bill Hughes yesterday and heard him say he didn't know who the Fit Man was. I was surprised because I didn't realize this was so difficult.

    1) The Fit Man can not be a member of the angelic host.

    2) The Fit Man can not be a member of the human race.

    3) The Fit Man must be a member of both, the angelic host and the human race.

    I believe the Fit Man is Jesus Christ.

    What do you believe?

    A good case can be made that the fit man represents the 144,000.


    Blessings glenm,

    Welcome to Maritime 2nd Advent.

    Well, I have never seen a good case for the 144,000. Please, feel free to show us here.

    Let me outline some of the key points.

    1. The fit man is distinguished from the high priest, and we know the latter is Christ.

    2. The fit man doesn't seem to be an angel, based on the description in 16:21 and 16:26.

    3. It can be shown in various ways that the scapegoat is Satan. See for example GC 658.1.

    4. Given this, it's the role of the fit man (human) to bind Satan. In what way do the 144,000 enter into this picture?

    5. Before going further, there are a couple of foundational points that need to be mentioned.

    In the first place, the 144,000 are NOT he-men and he-women who stand up and throw their weight around in their own strength. Anything they do in the closing work is based on them first learning to depend fully on Christ.

    Another foundational point here is how to answer the question,
    "Does God need humans?" In some deep absolute sense the answer is "no". However, God has deliberately chosen to make humans integral to the plan of salvation, and thus He has chosen to need humans to complete that plan. We see this principle at work in stories like that of Job, and the SOP says that Job vindicated God by his actions (Ed 156.1).

    6. So how do the 144,000 serve to bind Satan? One clue can be found in Revelation 7:1-4, which says that the 144,000 must be sealed before the great time of trouble commences. In other words, God is waiting on this sealing.

    Why does the sealing matter? It matters in part because Satan's hold on this world is based on inducing men and women to sin (John 12:31), and Satan had no hold on Christ for the same reason (John 14:30).

    The SOP directly applies this to the role of the 144,000:

    Quote:
    Now, while our great High Priest is making the atonement for us, we should seek to become perfect in Christ. Not even by a thought could our Saviour be brought to yield to the power of temptation. Satan finds in human hearts some point where he can gain a foothold; some sinful desire is cherished, by means of which his temptations assert their power. But Christ declared of Himself: "The prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in Me." John 14:30. Satan could find nothing in the Son of God that would enable him to gain the victory. He had kept His Father's commandments, and there was no sin in Him that Satan could use to his advantage. This is the condition in which those must be found who shall stand in the time of trouble. {GC 623.1}

    The SOP goes on to say that Christ's honor in directly involved in bringing His people to perfection:

    Quote:
    The honor of God, the honor of Christ, is involved in the perfection of the character of His people. {DA 671.3}

    7. For Satan to be vanquished, his hold must be broken on at least some group of people in this world. It's not just a matter of the Father and Son arbitrarily binding him at some random point; this process requires the involvement of some group of redeemed humans.

    8. There's a lot more that could be said here. However, it may be best to wrap up this post, and to do so there's another quite fascinating SOP quote that talks directly about the fit man:

    Quote:
    Then I saw that Jesus' work in the sanctuary will soon be finished. And after His work there is finished, He will come to the door of the first apartment, and confess the sins of Israel upon the head of the Scape Goat. Then He will put on the garments of vengeance. Then the plagues will come upon the wicked, and they do not come till Jesus puts on that garment, and takes His place upon the great white cloud. Then while the plagues are falling, the Scape Goat is being led away. He makes a mighty struggle to escape, but he is held fast by the hand that leads him. If he should effect his escape, Israel would lose their lives. I saw that it would take time to lead away the Scape Goat into the land of forgetfulness after the sins were put on his head. {SpM 2.1}

    Re: Who is the Fit Man of Leviticus 16? [Re: Elle] #174230
    06/14/15 05:20 PM
    06/14/15 05:20 PM
    Johann  Offline
    SDA
    Active Member 2014

    Retired Pastor
    3000+ Member
    Joined: Jul 2006
    Posts: 3,014
    Iceland
    Originally Posted By: Elle

    ??? I don't know what exactly what your refering to. I did not use Strong as a final authority in looking at the word Azazel. I did the opposite by challenging his definition. Maybe you mis that part.

    Strong was not a linguistic. He had a large team working under him to produce that work. I'm not saying that Strong's work is all wrong. I think most of it is right. But I know that no scholar or man has it all right. That's why I will not take any scholar as an authority. However I do refer to many scholar's work with the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
    I am in agreement with you on this point.
    Quote:


    Originally Posted By: Johann
    As for the KJV you do have all these words in italics which show that these are words added by the translators to make the text comply with the [Catholic] teachings of the Church of England - or what the translators thought should be the right meaning.


    I don't know what you mean with the teachings of the Church of England here. All I know is that many English Bible version does not comply with the original Masoretic text. The Tanakh(Jewish Bible that is also translated in English) has translated this text correctly, and some other English translations.
    Those were the orders King James gave to his translators, that their wording had to comply with the teachings of the Church of England. Many miss this point.
    Quote:


    Originally Posted By: Johann
    By stating that I hold that God used the KJV as a mighty tool for the salvation of souls.

    I personally prefer the KJV because that's the version I'm accustom to; however I do know its limitation and have seen many faults(errors) in that version as it is found in any versions. All English translation fall short of the correct translation for these are all done by men who fall short in understanding all of the plan of salvation. So there's always some trouble texts where personal view leaks thru the translation.

    Originally Posted By: Johann
    In this case your case is as strong as the KJV text, but it does not fully void the meaning given by the KJV. This is one more case where we cannot depend fully on the single text but we have to get our true meaning by comparing what is said by the teachings of the Bible and the symbolism used in this case.


    Well, 4 mistakes by comparing to the Masoretic text found in these 2 texts is strong enough; but yes I agree the translated text needs to be in harmony with other texts. Which I have brought the parallele given in Lev 14 that is in harmony with the Masoretic text translation of Lev 16, besides how Jesus fulfilled it, beside how Jesus fulfills (the atonement) with the Israelites and with us today. Basically Lev 14 and Lev 16 describe the cleansing process that takes place in the two works of Christ: the justification and sanctification work.


    True, and yet we are now facing a strong point in connection with the 144,000 which I am not prepared to reject. I think this is a question we have to consider from various angles.

    Last edited by Johann; 06/14/15 05:24 PM.

    "Here is a last piece of advice. If you believe in goodness and if you value the approval of God, fix your minds on the things which are holy and right and pure and beautiful and good. Model your conduct on what you have learned from me, on what I have told you and shown you, and you will find the God of peace will be with you."
    Page 2 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    Moderator  dedication, Rick H 

    Sabbath School Lesson Study Material Link
    Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
    Most Recent Posts From Selected Public Forums
    Fourth quarter, 2024, The Gospel of John
    by asygo. 10/31/24 12:59 PM
    A god whom his fathers knew not..
    by Kevin H. 10/27/24 09:03 PM
    Understanding the Battle of Armageddon
    by Rick H. 10/25/24 08:25 PM
    Global Warming Farce
    by kland. 10/23/24 11:55 AM
    Profiles Of Jesus In Zecharia
    by dedication. 10/15/24 12:56 AM
    Seven Trumpets reconsidered
    by Karen Y. 10/14/24 12:13 PM
    The October 7th Massacre and Zechariah 9 Prophecy
    by dedication. 10/08/24 05:41 PM
    Most Recent Posts From Selected Private Forums of MSDAOL
    Perils of the Emerging Church Movement
    by asygo. 10/31/24 07:32 PM
    Understanding the 1,260-year Prophecy
    by kland. 10/30/24 12:20 PM
    Understanding the 1290 & 1335 of Daniel 12?
    by dedication. 10/29/24 01:14 AM
    Dr Conrad Vine Banned
    by Rick H. 10/25/24 08:01 PM
    The 1260 Year Prophecy & The Roman Catholic Church
    by dedication. 10/22/24 02:32 PM
    What Should Be Our Response to the "Sunday Laws"?
    by dedication. 10/13/24 01:08 AM
    Are The Prophecies Important?
    by dedication. 10/08/24 04:18 PM
    The Beast and the Image Beast
    by Rick H. 10/05/24 04:40 AM
    A campaign against the church
    by dedication. 10/03/24 11:50 PM
    Why Is Papacy Uniting COVID/Climate Change
    by kland. 10/03/24 12:06 PM
    Forum Announcements
    Visitors by Country Since February 11, 2013
    Flag Counter
    Google Maritime SDA OnLine Public Forums Site Search & Google Translation Service
    Google
     
    Web www.maritime-sda-online.com

    Copyright 2000-Present
    Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine).

    LEGAL NOTICE:
    The views expressed in this forum are those of individuals
    and do not necessarily represent those of Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine,
    as well as the Seventh-day Adventist Church
    from the local church level to the General Conference level.

    Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine) is also a self-supporting ministry
    and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
    The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland
    or any of its subsidiaries.

    "And He saith unto them, follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men." Matt. 4:19
    MARITIME 2ND ADVENT BELIEVERS ONLINE (FORMERLY MARITIME SDA ONLINE) CONSISTING MAINLY OF BOTH MEMBERS & FRIENDS
    OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH,
    INVITES OTHER MEMBERS & FRIENDS OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHO WISHES TO JOIN US!
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1