Looking back at one of my physics books I found this silly statement:



It's no wonder I confused the two. Perhaps I should avoid using books like "Physics Demystified" for study aids. I doubt the writer was expecting someone to use such a book to aid in properly unifying laws in Special Relativity with General Relativity.

I sourced some very core fundamentals (that were simplified) from this book to visualize more complex concepts that would build on them. Trying to visualize something more complicated than GR, SR, and QM combined using a hybrid polytensor math without simplifing is too much for my mind to handle.

I may be mathematicly lazy like Einstien was, but I prefer to leave all of that precision math for the true egg heads out there.

This reminds me of something I wanted to point out about the expanded energy equation.

First we have the E=mc^2

I expanded c^2 to be d/t * D/T
d= linear space
t= linear time
D= curved space
T= curved time

E also =W+K+V

W= rest mass energy
K= kinetic energy
V= potential energy

Something I never showed here was that m (rest mass)can be defined as X/a.

X= remaining mass
a= inverse average time = 1/sqrt(t*T)

This is derived from the nuclear decay rate equation m/M*A= decay rate.

M= total mass
A= average time = sqrt(t*T)

another layer to this is (M^2*A)-m/MA=X

I can only include this into the equation if I have E/A.

Getting back to the point. If I ever cared to try, I could probably fit every form of field equation in to this energy equation right now. Chances are, however, that if I did try it wouldn't come out quite right due to my rusty algebraic skills.

I guess I neglected to show the left side of the equation.

W=X/a(((d/t)*(D/T))/3)
K=d/t(((X/a)*(D/T))/3)
V=D/T(((X/a)*(d/t))/3)

I still find it dumbfounding that algebra and precision math apparently are optional knowledge when trying to revolutionize modern physics.

Think of it as a rough draft. A good writer will go through serveral rough drafts before writing the final draft. It's also like how a movie director uses screenplays and scripts to aid in creating a film. There's alot of work involved with this.

As per your statement of not using Algebra, not so. The work presented proves that. I never said that algebra and precision math are optional. I do use advanced forms of math like Clifford Algebra and Kerr-Newman geometry when I have to.

After some indepth physics reading I realised another geometric parallel. Einstien's work showed that energy/matter density curves time-space. The First Flash model in tandem with the expanded energy equation shows that the temporal density of light/energy curves resultant time-space. I think I said that right.

Einstein dreamed of unifying the fields of gravitation, light, matter, and nuclear force together. I've already illustrated that the expanded energy equation may be able to do it. This is not enough. With the expanded knowledge of particles like quarks, bosons, and leptons, I would need to add all of the field equations describing these things as well. The biggest problem is coming up with a common value system for all the values. (like getting a large group of children to get along without fighting with each other.)

Anyone who thinks this is a simple task doesn't know what they're talking about. I have all of the field equations for gravitation, inertia, light, and some of the nuclear field equations like half life, weak nulear force, strong nuclear force, electro weak, and then there's stuff like EWT, QED.

I also need to expand on Hawking's theory of decaying black holes (to fill the gap between gravitation and weak nuclear force) and polish off my work with what I call the Bohr Inertial field describing inertia relative to SR and energy. There's tons of work needing to be done and tested before FF can go from model to Quantum Gravitation to a unified theory, finally reaching what's called TOE (theory of everything).

By my self this will never happen. (Way too much work involved)

Another off subject topic:

I recently skimmed through a book online called "Prophet's Manual, (fractal supersymmetry of double helix)" by Daniel Srsa.

Don't let the name of the book fool you. It has absolutely nothing to do with prophecy, and it isn't a bunch of new age garbage either.

I take it back, there is some weird 2012 goofyness in this. Oh well.

Daniel's work here is (nearly) pure physics with a slight push toward a strange idea interrelating DNA geometry with time spacial physics. I don't believe in the DNA time-space stuff but who knows.

Anyway, this guy has brought out several key concepts to FF except that he blazed over the dimensional dynamics of gravitational acceleration too quicky and ended up basicly stating that it's linear time-space times curved time-space instead of linear time-space times curved time. (If I'm understanding his work correctly.)

here's some stuff I found in his book:


I found this book so intriguing that I may have to hunt down a copy even though I do not agree with all of his conclusions.

Some good news! A friend of mine has crossed paths with a retired physicist from Los Alamos who has shown some interest in my work and I've discovered a fellow Adventist with a strong academic background in physics, General Relativity, and nuclear physics who understands the foundational laws governing how my First Flash model works (seemingly even better than I do). I was explaining to him my FF concept and this guy would repeatedly interupt to finish what I was saying.

This is the first time I've met someone that could truly comprehend my work. I know that somewhere along the way, there will most assuredly be needing to be corrections made and have no problem with that. (accuracy is the essence of true science)

JCS,

Invite this SDA to register here and, once approved, to then join in on this thread.

He is already part of the thread here. But I would like to maintain his anonymity.