Forums118
Topics9,199
Posts195,632
Members1,323
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Daryl]
#126638
08/04/10 06:41 PM
08/04/10 06:41 PM
|
|
I like the following EGW quote taken from Thursday's material: “The second Adam was a free moral agent, held responsible for his conduct. Surrounded by intensely subtle and misleading influences, He was much less favorably situated than was the first Adam to lead a sinless life. Yet in the midst of sinners He resisted every temptation to sin, and maintained His innocency. He was ever sinless.”—Ellen G. White Comments, The SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 6, p. 1074.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Tom]
#126660
08/09/10 04:32 PM
08/09/10 04:32 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
What was the position before the 1950's and what is the position now? In fact, I wonder if there is any position now.
I don't think Paul is being made to deal with an issue he is not dealing with. In fact, Ellen White expands on Paul in quotes like the following ones:
"The inheritance of children is that of sin. Sin has separated them from God. Jesus gave His life that He might unite the broken links to God. As related to the first Adam, men receive from him nothing but guilt and the sentence of death." {9MR 236.1}
"Christ volunteered to come to this earth and stand at the head of fallen human beings, who were heirs of guilt, under sentence of eternal death. We must have perished had He not borne our guilt and the wrath of God." {12MR 61.1}
"We have reason for ceaseless gratitude to God that Christ, by His perfect obedience, has won back the heaven that Adam lost through disobedience. Adam sinned, and the children of Adam share his guilt and its consequences; but Jesus bore the guilt of Adam, and all the children of Adam that will flee to Christ, the second Adam, may escape the penalty of transgression." {FW 88.3}
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Rosangela]
#126667
08/09/10 10:51 PM
08/09/10 10:51 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
What was the position before the 1950's and what is the position now? In fact, I wonder if there is any position now. Before the 1950's, it was basically what Jones and Waggoner taught. "Bible Reading for the Home" quoted from Waggoner in regards to the questions related to Christ's humanity. I think the Palmdale Conference in around 1976 said that either pre or post positions were acceptable. How that works out varies from place to place. In the U.S., I would say one could hold either position as an employee without a problem. In Brazil, it appeared to me that if you were a post, you'd better be very careful. Since you're living there, I'd be interested in your perspective. At any rate, opinion in the U.S. is much more divided than there. In Brazil, what I perceived, rightly or wrongly, was that many of the posts were negative in regards to the organization. I don't see that so much here. There are some like that, but there are many just "regular" SDA's who are posts, who have no issues with leadership. I don't think Paul is being made to deal with an issue he is not dealing with. I think most people have very little idea, if even that, as to what the culture was like in Paul's time, or the issues he was dealing with. He is interpreted with post-reformation lenses, and pretty much totally without regard to historical considerations. I don't see that the EGW quotes have anything to do with either Paul's culture or the issues he was facing. I don't think it was her function to do this (to be a Pauline scholar) however. If you recall what Kevin wrote (Kevin H.) in regards to EGW's ministry and writings, I thought he did a good job explaining it.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Tom]
#126682
08/10/10 02:54 PM
08/10/10 02:54 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
R: What was the position before the 1950's and what is the position now? In fact, I wonder if there is any position now. T: Before the 1950's, it was basically what Jones and Waggoner taught. ... I think the Palmdale Conference in around 1976 said that either pre or post positions were acceptable. In fact, I was just taking issue with their assertion: One point they argue over is: in what way was Adam’s sin passed on to his posterity? Did Adam’s descendants share the guilt of Adam’s sin, or are they guilty before God because of their own sin? Though folk have tried to get the answer to that question from this text, that’s not the issue Paul was dealing with. To me, trying to evade the implications of what Paul is saying is, as we say here, trying to block the sunlight with a sieve. It's obvious we share Adam's guilt. Ellen White says this clearly. I hadn't yet realized why SDA theologians stay on the fence about this subject, but what you said opened my eyes. If sin is just an act of the will, nobody is born in sin, and if theologians assume the position that man is born in sin they will automatically be assuming the pre-fall position, and they can't do that, since the Church allows for both positions. Therefore, they contradict themselves all the time. In the section on "Sin" in the Handbook of Seventh-Day Adventist Theology, for instance, John Fowler says that sin is a state (p. 246), a state of rebellion, and then says that "tendency to sin ... is not sin" (p. 257). But of course tendencies to sin are rebellious tendencies. In Brazil, it appeared to me that if you were a post, you'd better be very careful. Since you're living there, I'd be interested in your perspective. At any rate, opinion in the U.S. is much more divided than there. In Brazil, what I perceived, rightly or wrongly, was that many of the posts were negative in regards to the organization. I don't see that so much here. There are some like that, but there are many just "regular" SDA's who are posts, who have no issues with leadership. I would say your assessment of the situation is correct. Since most posts are negative in regards to the organizations, those in the post camp are viewed suspiciously.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Rosangela]
#126686
08/10/10 03:36 PM
08/10/10 03:36 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
As it obviously can't be both pre and post, how can the belief of both be advocated in allowing both to be believed? There are many issues the church allows for differences of opinion. The SDA church has had a history of not wanting to set things in stone, in order to allow for growth. Regarding this particular issue, if the church made a pronouncement of some sort, it would cause a terrific division.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Rosangela]
#126687
08/10/10 03:39 PM
08/10/10 03:39 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
So when the sinner burns in hell - the sins he pays for via the torment of fire and brimstone Rev 14:10 - is not the sin of Adam - but his own sin. Sin is not something one "pays for" by way of "torment of fire and brimstone." Sin causes suffering, misery and pain by virtue of what it is. Sin is transgression of the law, which is agape, putting self first, instead of others (primarily God). Selfishness can do no other but lead to suffering, misery and death. If we consider how Christ died, we can see what the impact of sin is. Note that Christ did not suffer the "torment of fire and brimstone" to "pay for" sin.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Rosangela]
#126692
08/10/10 03:50 PM
08/10/10 03:50 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
To me, trying to evade the implications of what Paul is saying is, as we say here, trying to block the sunlight with a sieve. I don't think Paul had in mind anything like the theological discussions that we are dealing with. I think he would be (amused/horrified) to see his words taken as they have been, to build the sort of doctrines that have been built. It's obvious we share Adam's guilt. It's not obvious what this means though. Ellen White says this clearly. My memory of this quote is that she is not speaking in the sense that a Catholic would, or in the Catholic sense of "original sin," but in terms of the effect of Adam's sin. I hadn't yet realized why SDA theologians stay on the fence about this subject, but what you said opened my eyes. If sin is just an act of the will, nobody is born in sin, and if theologians assume the position that man is born in sin they will automatically be assuming the pre-fall position, and they can't do that, since the Church allows for both positions. The idea that sin is just an act of the will is not a necessary result of holding to the post position in regards to Christ's human nature. For example: Sin is a personal matter. A man is guilty only of his own sins, and not of those which another has committed. Now I can not sin where I am not, but only where I am. Sin is in the heart of man; "for from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness; all these evil things come from within." Mark 7:21-23. "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked." Jer.17:9. Sin is in every fiber of our being by nature. We are born in sin, and our life is sin, so that sin can not be taken from us without taking our life. What I need is freedom from my own personal sin,--that sin which not only has been committed by me personally, but which dwells in the heart,--the sin which constitutes the whole of my life.
"His own iniquities shall take the wicked himself, and he shall be holden with the cords of his sins." Prov.5:22. "For though thou wash thee with niter, and take thee much soap, yet thine iniquity is marked before Me, saith the Lord." Jer.2:22. My sin is committed by myself, in myself, and I can not separate it from me. Cast it on the Lord? Ah, yes, that is right, but how? Can I gather it up in my hands, and cast it from me, so that it will light upon Him?--I can not. If I could separate it but a hair's breadth from me, then I should be safe, no matter what became of it, since it would not be found in me. In that case I could dispense with Christ; for if sin were not found on me, it would make no matter to me where it was found. If I could gather up my sins so as to lay them upon Christ crucified apart from me, then I would not need to put them on Him. They would then be away from me, and that would clear me. But no works of any kind that I can do can save me; therefore, all my efforts to separate myself from my sins are unavailing.
Christ Bears the Sin in Us.
It is evident from what has been said that whoever bears my sins must come where I am, yea, must come into me. And this is just what Christ does. Christ is the Word, and to all sinners, who would excuse themselves by saying that they can not know what God requires of them, He says, "The Word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it." Deut.30:11-14. Therefore, He says, "If thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised Him from the dead, thou shalt be saved." Rom.10:9. What shall we confess about the Lord Jesus?--Why, confess the truth, that He is nigh thee, even in thy mouth and in thy heart, and believe that He is there risen from the dead. "Now that He ascended, what is it but that He also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?" Eph.4:9. The risen Saviour is the crucified Saviour. As Christ risen is in the heart of the sinner, therefore, Christ crucified is there. If it were not so, there would be no hope for any. A man may believe that Jesus was crucified eighteen hundred years ago, and may die in his sins; but he who believes that Christ is crucified and risen in him, has salvation.
All that any man in the world has to do in order to be saved, is to believe the truth, that is, to recognize and acknowledge facts, to see things just as they actually are, and to confess them. Whoever believes that Christ is crucified in him, which is the fact in the case of every man, and confesses that the crucified Christ is also risen, and that He dwells in him by and with the power of the resurrection, is saved from sin, and will be saved as long as he holds fast his confession. This is the only true confession of faith. (Waggoner, the Glad Tiding) This is a long quote, which I quoted to get the whole thought, but the really relevant part to the point I was making is this: Sin is in every fiber of our being by nature. We are born in sin, and our life is sin ... It seems evident to me that Waggoner conceived of sin as more than simply an act of the will, yet Waggoner was postlapsarian. So it wouldn't follow that one could take issue with the idea that sin is not merely an act of the will and yet not be postlapsarian. (triple negative!)
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Mountain Man]
#126701
08/10/10 06:22 PM
08/10/10 06:22 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
If we are born in sin, could you define what sin is in a baby? The preceding sentence was that sin is in every fiber of our being by nature, so I'd assume that's what Waggoner had in mind.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Tom]
#126702
08/10/10 06:23 PM
08/10/10 06:23 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
"All have sinned" includes infants. It even includes infants still in the womb. Starting when? At the moment of conception? Or some time after that? If after the point of conception, when?
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Mountain Man]
#126708
08/10/10 07:47 PM
08/10/10 07:47 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
So, in your view, in the third trimester fetuses start sinning, because of the way they respond to stimuli. Before this time, they are not sinning, because they do not respond to stimuli. This is correctly representing your idea?
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Bobryan]
#126732
08/14/10 12:20 AM
08/14/10 12:20 AM
|
Active Member 2012
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,826
E. Oregon, USA
|
|
Romans 5 -- all died for all sinned. Romans 3 -- all have sinned.
So when the sinner burns in hell - the sins he pays for via the torment of fire and brimstone Rev 14:10 - is not the sin of Adam - but his own sin.
However as we see in Romans 3 - every human has a depraved sinful nature EVEN before they commit their first sin -- and for that we need a savior, we need the new birth, the Gospel. Yes, sinful nature, common to all of us, is degenerate and condemned for its sinfulness. Each wicked unbeliever ending up in hell is punished there for his own sin and sinfulness, alongside Satan. By contrast Ellen White is clear that Christ came with the sinless nature of Adam before the fall - but with the fallen physical nature of mankind in his day (4,000 years of physical devolution) - not of Adam after the fall..... Thank you for quoting the official church position on Christ's humanity. No more books favouring that view came out after Roy Adam's "The Humanity of Christ" (1994)... "Touched with Our Feelings", by the late Prof. Jean Zurcher of our Collonge Seminary in France, and of the Euro-Africa Division BRI, in Switzerland, came out in 1999 through the Review (it was translated from his original French), documenting the change by the church on Christ's humanity from sinful to sinless, in 1949. The church's position is wrong in interpreting Ellen White as it does, therefore. The official position is a variation on the 1949 position, since that position is now the other minority of the three positions in the church. It is critical to gospel truth to hold to the original, true position - as our current leading scholars concede it is the original position.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Tom]
#126734
08/14/10 12:34 AM
08/14/10 12:34 AM
|
Active Member 2012
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,826
E. Oregon, USA
|
|
So when the sinner burns in hell - the sins he pays for via the torment of fire and brimstone Rev 14:10 - is not the sin of Adam - but his own sin. Sin is not something one "pays for" by way of "torment of fire and brimstone." Sin causes suffering, misery and pain by virtue of what it is. Sin is transgression of the law, which is agape, putting self first, instead of others (primarily God). Selfishness can do no other but lead to suffering, misery and death. If we consider how Christ died, we can see what the impact of sin is. Note that Christ did not suffer the "torment of fire and brimstone" to "pay for" sin. Note, Tom, Christ tasted death for every man. The condemnation every man is under is not from personal guilt but from being a sinful human: that requires eternal death to extinguish it and free us from it - free & redeem us from our sinful human nature which is condemned. This is the basic legal bondage we have which Rom 7:1-4 deals with: Christ took our sinful nature as his own, and died the death due it, freeing us from our sinfulness to his righteousness - living to God, despite being trapped in our flesh still. Thus he lived by faith, and so do we.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Colin]
#126737
08/14/10 01:58 AM
08/14/10 01:58 AM
|
Active Member 2012
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,826
E. Oregon, USA
|
|
Rom 7 is about the two Adams. They are similar for their positions as heads of the same race, not for sharing the innocency of Adam's created humanity: Christ was born under the law - that involves sinful flesh.
The main point of this chapter is that Adam's fall into sin affected all men, and Christ's meritoriously righteous life affected all men. It's not just a gift for all men, it's given to all men: "came upon all men."
The German Quarterly says about Rom 5:18 particularly is that there's nothing "automatic" in salvation. Clearly there is, actually, as by grace we saved through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus - without our involvement! We automatically have a Saviour, who is Saviour of the world, too.
The depth of Rom 5 is simply that Adam caused by his action a condemnation for his descendants, and Christ, the second Adam, justified the world by his action, in his person. Therefore, sinners may believe, since in Christ they are linked by his sinful humanity which he took to become a man to their Redeemer.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Rosangela]
#126741
08/15/10 05:22 AM
08/15/10 05:22 AM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
(Christ) took in His grasp the world over which Satan claimed to preside as his lawful territory, and by His wonderful work in giving His life, He restored the whole race of men to favor with God. . . . {1SM 343.2} Many places in Scripture speak of the corporate work which Christ did for humanity. I think Prescott, in the 1895 GCB, was the first Adventist to speak of the different ways "justification" is used in Scripture.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Mountain Man]
#126784
08/18/10 11:58 AM
08/18/10 11:58 AM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
Are people guilty of something even if they never indulge it? If so, what are they guilty of? They are guilty of selfishness, for they have selfish inclinations. The problem is not just in acting selfishly, but in being selfish, whether one is aware of this or not. What about Adam and Eve? Were they guilty of something because they possessed the potential to sin? They weren't selfish, there was nothing wrong at the core of their being.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Mountain Man]
#126803
08/19/10 08:12 PM
08/19/10 08:12 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
That's because my position is that we are born with a character (just like Adam was created with a character), and I see no difference between inherited sinful traits of character and cultivated sinful traits of character.
There is a wide field of usefulness before all who will work for the Master in caring for these children and youth who have been deprived of the watchful guidance of parents and the subduing influence of a Christian home. Many of them have inherited evil traits of character; and if left to grow up in ignorance, they will drift into associations that lead to vice and crime. These unpromising children need to be placed in a position favorable for the formation of a right character, that they may become children of God. {AH 167.3}
When a child reveals the wrong traits which it has inherited from its parents, shall they storm over this reproduction of their own defects?--No, no! Let parents keep a careful watch over themselves, guarding against all coarseness and roughness, lest these defects be seen once more in their children. {ST, September 25, 1901 par. 16}
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Mountain Man]
#126820
08/20/10 11:14 PM
08/20/10 11:14 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
To me it's clear that traits of character and tendencies are one and the same thing.
A noble character is earned by individual effort through the merits and grace of Christ. ... Conflict after conflict must be waged against hereditary tendencies. We shall have to criticize ourselves closely, and allow not one unfavorable trait to remain uncorrected. {AG 112.4}
"And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me." The question is asked, Why then are all not drawn to Christ?--It is because they will not come; because they do not choose to die to self; because they wish, as did Judas, to retain their own individuality, their own natural and cultivated traits of character. Altho they are given every opportunity, every privilege, yet they will not give up those tendencies which, if not cut away from the character, will separate them from Christ. If, continuing to cherish these traits of character, they were admitted to heaven, they would cause a second rebellion. {ST, July 8, 1897 par. 7}
Each soul inherits certain un-Christlike traits of character. It is the grand and noble work of a lifetime to keep under control these tendencies to wrong. {HP 231.2}
Also, I don't see a difference, in practical terms, between inherited and cultivated tendencies of character.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 - Expounding the FAITH
[Re: Mountain Man]
#126847
08/22/10 05:59 PM
08/22/10 05:59 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
Let's analyze an example. EGW says:
The great hereditary and cultivated tendency to evil with Judas was covetousness. {2MCP 598.3}
The leading traits in the character of Judas were covetousness and self-esteem. {ST, June 5, 1884 par. 3}
What is the difference between covetousness as a tendency and as a trait of character?
If a tendency was something people inherited and trait was something people cultivated, what you said would make sense. But Ellen White speaks indistinctly of hereditary and cultivated traits of character and of hereditary and cultivated tendencies of character, so I don't see how these could be different. There are many quotes that could be cited, but just two will suffice:
Objectionable traits of character, whether hereditary or cultivated, must be compared with the great rule of righteousness, and then conquered in the strength of Christ. {CT 449.1}
So long have they chosen to follow their own way and their own wisdom, so long have they cherished defective hereditary and cultivated tendencies of character, that they are blind and cannot see afar off. {1MCP 38.3}
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
|
|