Forums118
Topics9,199
Posts195,600
Members1,323
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
6 registered members (Karen Y, dedication, ProdigalOne, Kevin H, Daryl, 1 invisible),
3,165
guests, and 20
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 (4th Quarter 2011): The Priority of the Promise
[Re: Colin]
#137485
11/13/11 08:36 AM
11/13/11 08:36 AM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,583
California, USA
|
|
The covenant God made with Abraham concerns justification by faith Doesn't justification have conditions?
By God's grace, Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 (4th Quarter 2011): The Priority of the Promise
[Re: Mountain Man]
#137503
11/14/11 06:49 PM
11/14/11 06:49 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,583
California, USA
|
|
Aren't you talking about a different situation? Pronouncing what will surely happen (i.e. the birth and ministry of John) isn't the same as offering salvation on condition. Yes, they are different situations. That's the point. When we are talking about salvation - justification, sanctification, glorification - there are conditions to be met. There is no safety for the people of God except in implicit obedience to his word. All his promises are made upon conditions of faith and obedience, and failure to comply with the expressed commands necessitates the failure of your experiencing the fulfillment of the rich provisions of the Scriptures. {ST, May 11, 1888 par. 7} When you are talking about things that have no conditions, that's a different situation.
By God's grace, Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 (4th Quarter 2011): The Priority of the Promise
[Re: asygo]
#137508
11/15/11 02:12 AM
11/15/11 02:12 AM
|
Active Member 2012
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,826
E. Oregon, USA
|
|
The covenant God made with Abraham concerns justification by faith Doesn't justification have conditions? What condition could be for conversion but faith to start as we are born again??? That's what Abraham did - he believed God's stupendous promise. In justification we are made alive spiritually because we accept Jesus as Saviour from sin: a new heart - no conditions other than choosing faith, so...no. Conditions of obedience characterise the life of faith, exercising our justified, new heart, which is the mind of Christ: otherwise called sanctification. Justification itself - the moment of choosing faith and experiencing rebirth of the Spirit - has no conditions, but continuing beyond the choice is conditional.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 (4th Quarter 2011): The Priority of the Promise
[Re: asygo]
#137509
11/15/11 03:53 PM
11/15/11 03:53 PM
|
SDA Charter Member Active Member 2019
20000+ Member
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
|
|
M: Aren't you talking about a different situation? Pronouncing what will surely happen (i.e. the birth and ministry of John) isn't the same as offering salvation on condition. A: Yes, they are different situations. That's the point. When we are talking about salvation - justification, sanctification, glorification - there are conditions to be met. There is no safety for the people of God except in implicit obedience to his word. All his promises are made upon conditions of faith and obedience, and failure to comply with the expressed commands necessitates the failure of your experiencing the fulfillment of the rich provisions of the Scriptures. {ST, May 11, 1888 par. 7} When you are talking about things that have no conditions, that's a different situation. Thank you for clarifying the two different points. I agree with you. However, what does it say about freewill in cases where Jesus pronounces how the future will play out? Let's consider a different sample. In the Revelation Jesus pronounces how the future will play out in surprising detail. How can He know the future choices of so many people spread out over hundreds of years in advance? Also, has He known for eternity who will make up the 144,000? If so, what does that say about freewill?
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 (4th Quarter 2011): The Priority of the Promise
[Re: Colin]
#137530
11/16/11 08:58 PM
11/16/11 08:58 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,583
California, USA
|
|
Justification itself - the moment of choosing faith and experiencing rebirth of the Spirit - has no conditions, but continuing beyond the choice is conditional. Perhaps this is what you're saying: God requires the entire surrender of the heart, before justification can take place; and in order for man to retain justification, there must be continual obedience, through active, living faith that works by love and purifies the soul. {FW 100.1}The way I see it is that justification is conditioned upon entire surrender of the heart, and continued justification is conditioned upon continual obedience and living faith.
By God's grace, Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 (4th Quarter 2011): The Priority of the Promise
[Re: Mountain Man]
#137531
11/16/11 09:00 PM
11/16/11 09:00 PM
|
OP
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,583
California, USA
|
|
How can He know the future choices of so many people spread out over hundreds of years in advance?
Also, has He known for eternity who will make up the 144,000? If so, what does that say about freewill? I don't see freewill as being obstructed by God's perfect knowledge of how we will exercise our free will.
By God's grace, Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson #6 (4th Quarter 2011): The Priority of the Promise
[Re: asygo]
#137605
11/19/11 10:44 PM
11/19/11 10:44 PM
|
Active Member 2012
Very Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,826
E. Oregon, USA
|
|
Justification itself - the moment of choosing faith and experiencing rebirth of the Spirit - has no conditions, but continuing beyond the choice is conditional. Perhaps this is what you're saying: God requires the entire surrender of the heart, before justification can take place; and in order for man to retain justification, there must be continual obedience, through active, living faith that works by love and purifies the soul. {FW 100.1}The way I see it is that justification is conditioned upon entire surrender of the heart, and continued justification is conditioned upon continual obedience and living faith. Pretty much, yes: that heart action is in reality a heart response and a decision for God's truth. Are you aware that teaching a purely forensic justification by faith bars Gospel mandated, sanctified obedience from the life based on such a teaching? Full submission to Christ is the rebirth, not so? - that rebirth is the heart of the experience of justification, opening the way to full righteousness by faith, in a life obedience. Are we clear on that basis for obedience, in the church? - not that I've seen and heard! Unless it's clear that justification is the experience of the new birth, sanctified obedience cannot practically be included in the gospel required of us, hence perfect obedience is totally abandoned and it's just try your best. Without God giving us a new heart at the start, we cannot live that new life at all. Obedience is possible at all only as justification is taught to include the regeneration of the Spirit; else, obedience is but our best efforts....filthy rags. The genuine article needs the genuine foundation of the experience of justification.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
|
|