Forums118
Topics9,199
Posts195,597
Members1,323
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
4 registered members (Karen Y, Daryl, dedication, 1 invisible),
3,139
guests, and 19
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Was Donald Trumps election over Hillary Clinton divine intervention?
#181970
11/24/16 11:51 AM
11/24/16 11:51 AM
|
OP
Group: Admin Team
3000+ Member
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,114
Florida, USA
|
|
Hillary was all but set to be elected as President according to the pollsters, the pundits, the newscasts and other news sources, and yet something happened to turn aside what appeared to a unstoppable assured victory. How could it have happened, and why, well lets take a look to see. "Mrs. Clinton appears to have converted the office of secretary of state into a racketeering enterprise...Hillary and her husband, former president Bill Clinton, operated the Clinton Foundation. Ostensibly a charity, the foundation was a de facto fraud scheme to monetize Hillary’s power as secretary of state (among other aspects of the Clintons’ political influence). The scheme involved (a) the exchange of political favors, access, and influence for millions of dollars in donations; (b) the circumvention of campaign-finance laws that prohibit political donations by foreign sources; (c) a vehicle for Mrs. Clinton to shield her State Department e-mail communications from public and congressional scrutiny while she and her husband exploited the fundraising potential of her position; and (d) a means for Clinton insiders to receive private-sector compensation and explore lucrative employment opportunities while drawing taxpayer-funded government salaries.".. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/441573/Bill and Hillary's corruption was not the only issue, read below: http://www.despatch.cth.com.au/Misc/famous_2.htm•Bill Clinton, 33rd Degree Freemason, President of the United States Of America. and more... •Bill and Hillary Clinton's Criminal Background. https://americanmediainstitute.com/inves...CFZNZhgodMBsPiw•The Clinton Foundation http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arch...enghazi/396182/•From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Clinton-Scandal Primer
Last edited by Rick H; 11/24/16 12:03 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Was Donald Trumps election over Hillary Clinton divine intervention?
[Re: Rick H]
#181971
11/24/16 02:36 PM
11/24/16 02:36 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2024 Supporting Member 2023
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,183
Alberta, Canada
|
|
The more closely I examine the Trump victory, the more it does appear to be part of a larger plan, especially considering the long list of Clinton crimes: fraud, theft, drug deals (back in Little Rock), the convenient deaths of dozens of enemies over the years (some as recently as a few weeks ago), the probable blackmail of strategic figures such as the FBI director, the long list of sexual scandles, the cover up of rapes, the child abuse accusations, and of course Hillary's involvement in witchcraft, Bill's fascination with Haitian voodoo rituals, and Clinton's campaign manager's fondness for spirit cooking (grotesque!). Clinton appears to be everything the political right despises, disguisting enough to push the center into Republican territory, and even repel many leftists. Then we have Trump the self-made billionaire (sort of) promising to wall off the Mexican horde, stem the flow of "evil" Muslims, and return prosparity to the land. Along the way, Trump has made some statements and promises that seem to go a long way toward the fulfillment of biblical prophesy. Some of this is being discussed in the "Will Trump Pass the Sunday Law" thread. Here is a link dedication provided in that discussion: "If I'm president, Christianity will have power"- http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-christianity-merry-christmas-2016-1Only time will tell for certain, but I believe that there is a very real possibility that Donald Trump will be the one to unite the political right and reverse the decades long liberal culture pendulum swing. Conditions worldwide are ripe for a return to "traditional" values. It would be a perfectly logical choice for Trump to seek to solidify his support among the huge Christian Right and Center voting block by instigating a morally edifying, family friendly, labor backed, Papal endorsed, Sunday Law, thus ensuring himself a second term presidency... "To secure popularity and patronage, legislators will yield to the demand for a Sunday law.... On this battlefield comes the last great conflict of the controversy between truth and error."—Testimonies for the Church 5:450, 451. – {ChS 158.3}
Yes, I believe Donald Trump's election over Hillary Clinton was Devine intervention.
"...I will not forget you. Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands..."
Isaiah 49:15-16
|
|
|
Re: Was Donald Trumps election over Hillary Clinton divine intervention?
[Re: Rick H]
#181972
11/24/16 03:18 PM
11/24/16 03:18 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2024 Supporting Member 2023
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,183
Alberta, Canada
|
|
By the way, isn't it interesting that one of Trump's most trusted insiders is the SDA, Ben Carson?
"...I will not forget you. Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands..."
Isaiah 49:15-16
|
|
|
Re: Was Donald Trumps election over Hillary Clinton divine intervention?
[Re: Rick H]
#181973
11/24/16 03:23 PM
11/24/16 03:23 PM
|
Active Member 2019 Died February 12, 2019
2500+ Member
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,536
Canada
|
|
I agree ... a divine intervention and, I would ADD, also it is part of the great divine PLAN.
Blessings
|
|
|
Re: Was Donald Trumps election over Hillary Clinton divine intervention?
[Re: ProdigalOne]
#181985
11/26/16 10:24 AM
11/26/16 10:24 AM
|
OP
Group: Admin Team
3000+ Member
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,114
Florida, USA
|
|
The more closely I examine the Trump victory, the more it does appear to be part of a larger plan, especially considering the long list of Clinton crimes: fraud, theft, drug deals (back in Little Rock), the convenient deaths of dozens of enemies over the years (some as recently as a few weeks ago), the probable blackmail of strategic figures such as the FBI director, the long list of sexual scandles, the cover up of rapes, the child abuse accusations, and of course Hillary's involvement in witchcraft, Bill's fascination with Haitian voodoo rituals, and Clinton's campaign manager's fondness for spirit cooking (grotesque!). Clinton appears to be everything the political right despises, disguisting enough to push the center into Republican territory, and even repel many leftists. Then we have Trump the self-made billionaire (sort of) promising to wall off the Mexican horde, stem the flow of "evil" Muslims, and return prosparity to the land. Along the way, Trump has made some statements and promises that seem to go a long way toward the fulfillment of biblical prophesy. Some of this is being discussed in the "Will Trump Pass the Sunday Law" thread. Here is a link dedication provided in that discussion: "If I'm president, Christianity will have power"- http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-christianity-merry-christmas-2016-1Only time will tell for certain, but I believe that there is a very real possibility that Donald Trump will be the one to unite the political right and reverse the decades long liberal culture pendulum swing. Conditions worldwide are ripe for a return to "traditional" values. It would be a perfectly logical choice for Trump to seek to solidify his support among the huge Christian Right and Center voting block by instigating a morally edifying, family friendly, labor backed, Papal endorsed, Sunday Law, thus ensuring himself a second term presidency... "To secure popularity and patronage, legislators will yield to the demand for a Sunday law.... On this battlefield comes the last great conflict of the controversy between truth and error."—Testimonies for the Church 5:450, 451. – {ChS 158.3}
Yes, I believe Donald Trump's election over Hillary Clinton was Devine intervention. I look at it as a divide and conquer strategy that Satan has used throughout history. As a Christian nation we were split in two since the civil war from right around the time the Adventist church formed. Remember it was in In 1860, the Adventist movement finally settled on the name, Seventh-day Adventist, representative of the church's distinguishing beliefs. Three years later, on May 21, 1863, the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists was formed and the movement became an official organization. These lines of division have continued to this day, and now they are gathering around the political parties. The same hate and visceral feelings are being used to cause conflict, and when the time comes, I think it will be used to emotionally drive people to judgment including against our religious liberty. Supreme Court judges will be put in from one faction or the other, laws will be forced through, affecting our Constitutional rights and religious freedom. Prophecy will be fulfilled right before us and the mobs will form from one faction or the other to implement them.
Last edited by Rick H; 11/26/16 10:25 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Was Donald Trumps election over Hillary Clinton divine intervention?
[Re: Rick H]
#181988
11/26/16 02:41 PM
11/26/16 02:41 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2024 Supporting Member 2023
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,183
Alberta, Canada
|
|
I agree, the division engendered by this election has been breathtaking. It was easily one of the most emotionally charged votes in US history. The corporately funded and institutionally indoctrinated protest groups such as BLM, Third Wave Feminism, and the militant LGBT are being wielded as weapons of societal mass destruction.
It would appear that the Jesuit forces are once again employing their time tested strategy of Hegelian Dialectic: first, infiltrate both sides; second, through manipulation of various educational, entertainment, and governmental institutions create the problem or thesis (far left society, eschewing God, embracing every imaginable sin as not only acceptable, but a desirable and fashionable expression of freedom); third, present the solution or antithesis through the introduction of a sensible, selfless, fearless hero figure, whose altruistic motive is to return the nation to sanity (far right society, seeking God, rejecting sin as unwholesome, and un-American); fourth, fan the flames of factional hatred on both sides to the point of nationwide violence at which time the desired outcome or synthesis is achieved, martial law is declared, armed forces and militarized police are mobilized to quell the violence, peace is restored (fascist society, permanent martial law easily maintained and steadily intensified by the occasional "domestic terror incident", enforcement of state defined moral codes including a national Sunday law, completely deregulated corporate profit taking, "Order Out of Chaos" is created as the United States firmly clasps the hand of Rome).
"...I will not forget you. Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands..."
Isaiah 49:15-16
|
|
|
Re: Was Donald Trumps election over Hillary Clinton divine intervention?
[Re: ProdigalOne]
#182000
11/27/16 06:55 AM
11/27/16 06:55 AM
|
OP
Group: Admin Team
3000+ Member
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,114
Florida, USA
|
|
I agree, the division engendered by this election has been breathtaking. It was easily one of the most emotionally charged votes in US history. The corporately funded and institutionally indoctrinated protest groups such as BLM, Third Wave Feminism, and the militant LGBT are being wielded as weapons of societal mass destruction.
It would appear that the Jesuit forces are once again employing their time tested strategy of Hegelian Dialectic: first, infiltrate both sides; second, through manipulation of various educational, entertainment, and governmental institutions create the problem or thesis (far left society, eschewing God, embracing every imaginable sin as not only acceptable, but a desirable and fashionable expression of freedom); third, present the solution or antithesis through the introduction of a sensible, selfless, fearless hero figure, whose altruistic motive is to return the nation to sanity (far right society, seeking God, rejecting sin as unwholesome, and un-American); fourth, fan the flames of factional hatred on both sides to the point of nationwide violence at which time the desired outcome or synthesis is achieved, martial law is declared, armed forces and militarized police are mobilized to quell the violence, peace is restored (fascist society, permanent martial law easily maintained and steadily intensified by the occasional "domestic terror incident", enforcement of state defined moral codes including a national Sunday law, completely deregulated corporate profit taking, "Order Out of Chaos" is created as the United States firmly clasps the hand of Rome). Also have you noticed they have taken over the Supreme Court, all the Protestants are gone. The list below shows the religious affiliation of each of the justices sitting as of 2016: John Roberts (Chief Justice) Roman Catholic Anthony Kennedy Roman Catholic Clarence Thomas Roman Catholic Ruth Bader Ginsburg Judaism Stephen Breyer Judaism Samuel Alito Roman Catholic Sonia Sotomayor Roman Catholic Elena Kagan Judaism "the nation's high court ...for the first time in its history, devoid of Protestants. Kagan is Jewish, as are Justices Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. All of the other justices—Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Sonia Sotomayor—are Catholic. How did this situation come about in a historically Protestant-dominated country?" http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/mayweb-only/29-22.0.html
Last edited by Rick H; 11/27/16 06:57 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Was Donald Trumps election over Hillary Clinton divine intervention?
[Re: Rick H]
#182005
11/27/16 09:57 PM
11/27/16 09:57 PM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,430
Canada
|
|
Very interesting, thought provoking comments in the posts above! I have noticed for many years now that the republican side is building up for the "religious" crises, while the democrats are building up the "reign of trouble" side. With both sides contributing to the break down of the constitution. Just a few notes: Regan -- republican, sends diplomatic to Vatican, works with pope to bring down communism in Russia. Well know for his so called "holy alliance" with the papacy. Bill Clinton -- test runs on terror, 1) in the Wacko massacre which, even though we do not agree with the Koresh group, still was handled in a terrible brutally unnecessary manner with military might by the government. It would have been so easy to just capture Koresh and try him in a court if that's what they really wanted. 2) The Weaver case, another military might rampage by government against a family group of religious people on false charges. The B. Clinton reign was filled with evidence of setting things up for coming time of trouble in a physical sense. The Bush reigns --republican introduce the "Faith based initiative" government funding program of religious charities and organizations. Federal assistance to faith-based organizations was a priority on Bush’s political agenda. Bush authorized a ban on all U.S. funding of abortion right groups internationally. Opposed stem cell research, and same sex marriage. Wars against Iraq, etc. Bush used 9/11 to "go out" to remake the world, explaining that his mission was to “make the world safe for democracy” and this included a Christianization influence of Christian morals. There were numerous people declaring him the "antichrist" of scripture. Obama - democrat When Obama became president there was a sigh of relief in many Adventist voices. I still remember the same remarks being made -- his election being called a divine intervention giving the world more time -- Bush's agenda was pushing alarmingly toward a religious world crises, Obama, seemed to be a lull in that push. But his popularity soon changed. Some accused Obama of being a Muslim since he has Muslim background and seemed soft on Muslim terrorism. He wasn't really interested in promoting Christianity as such. Evangelicals tended to call him "antichrist" due to his lack of active support of Israel. However, now the push was again on the other side -- increase the amoral aspects, and rejection of moral Biblical principles. Another Clinton reign (democrat) probably would have plunged the nation into immoral chaos and trouble, while a republican reign will probably give the religious side an upswing (which was down played in Obama's reign) Now the question is -- how powerful will that upswing be? We realize a certain amount of an upswing would be beneficial, but will it go over the wall of separation of church and state bringing in the last great religious persecution as a state religion is established? Both sides have been setting the stage for the time of trouble as never was to come about-- eroding the constitution of freedom, bringing in laws making a totalitarian government possible at the stroke of a pen. Prophecy shows it will be the religious oppression that brings in the final showdown.
|
|
|
Re: Was Donald Trumps election over Hillary Clinton divine intervention?
[Re: Rick H]
#182007
11/27/16 11:39 PM
11/27/16 11:39 PM
|
Global Moderator Supporting Member 2022
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,430
Canada
|
|
Green Party Leader and Hillary Clinton urging a recount in three states.
|
|
|
Re: Was Donald Trumps election over Hillary Clinton divine intervention?
[Re: Rick H]
#182016
11/28/16 03:20 PM
11/28/16 03:20 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2024 Supporting Member 2023
Dedicated Member
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,183
Alberta, Canada
|
|
I agree, the division engendered by this election has been breathtaking. It was easily one of the most emotionally charged votes in US history. The corporately funded and institutionally indoctrinated protest groups such as BLM, Third Wave Feminism, and the militant LGBT are being wielded as weapons of societal mass destruction.
It would appear that the Jesuit forces are once again employing their time tested strategy of Hegelian Dialectic: first, infiltrate both sides; second, through manipulation of various educational, entertainment, and governmental institutional ons create the problem or thesis (far left society, eschewing God, embracing every imaginable sin as not only acceptable, but a desirable and fashionable expression of freedom); third, present the solution or antithesis through the introduction of a sensible, selfless, fearless hero figure, whose altruistic motive is to return the nation to sanity (far right society, seeking God, rejecting sin as unwholesome, and un-American); fourth, fan the flames of factional hatred on both sides to the point of nationwide violence at which time the desired outcome or synthesis is achieved, martial law is declared, armed forces and militarized police are mobilized to quell the violence, peace is restored (fascist society, permanent martial law easily maintained and steadily intensified by the occasional "domestic terror incident", enforcement of state defined moral codes including a national Sunday law, completely deregulated corporate profit taking, "Order Out of Chaos" is created as the United States firmly clasps the hand of Rome). Also have you noticed they have taken over the Supreme Court, all the Protestants are gone. The list below shows the religious affiliation of each of the justices sitting as of 2016: John Roberts (Chief Justice) Roman Catholic Anthony Kennedy Roman Catholic Clarence Thomas Roman Catholic Ruth Bader Ginsburg Judaism Stephen Breyer Judaism Samuel Alito Roman Catholic Sonia Sotomayor Roman Catholic Elena Kagan Judaism "the nation's high court ...for the first time in its history, devoid of Protestants. Kagan is Jewish, as are Justices Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. All of the other justices—Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Sonia Sotomayor—are Catholic. How did this situation come about in a historically Protestant-dominated country?" http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/mayweb-only/29-22.0.html Good point Rick! I have been watching the SC for some time, wondering the same thing. The fact that the Justices are all Catholics and Jews is quite remarkable and most certainly points to a deliberate strategy. It will be interesting to see who Trump appoints to replace the Catholic, Scalia. Even if the new appointee is a Protestant it will not matter, since he or she will undoubtedly be Jesuit educated. Just like Trump and his devout Evangelical Catholic vice-president Pence.
"...I will not forget you. Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands..."
Isaiah 49:15-16
|
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
|