HOME CHAT ROOM #1 CHAT ROOM #2 Forum Topics Within The Last 7 Days REGISTER ENTER FORUMS BIBLE SCHOOL CONTACT US

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine Christian Family Fellowship Forums
(formerly Maritime SDA OnLine)
Consisting mainly of both members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
Welcomes and invites other members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to join us!

Click Here To Read Legal Notice & Disclaimer
Suggested a One Time Yearly $20 or Higher Donation Accepted Here to Help Cover the Yearly Expenses of Operating & Upgrading. We need at least $20 X 10 yearly donations.
Donations accepted: Here
ShoutChat Box
Newest Members
ekoorb1030, jibb555, MBloomfield, Dina, Nelson
1323 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums118
Topics9,199
Posts195,619
Members1,323
Most Online5,850
Feb 29th, 2020
Seventh-day Adventist Church In Canada Links
Seventh-day Adventist Church in Canada

Newfoundland & Labrador Mission

Maritime Conference

Quebec Conference

Ontario Conference

Manitoba-Saskatchewan Conference

Alberta Conference

British Columbia Conference

7 Top Posters(30 Days)
Rick H 21
kland 9
May
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Member Spotlight
Rick H
Rick H
Florida, USA
Posts: 3,123
Joined: January 2008
Show All Member Profiles 
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Live Space Station Tracking
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
Last 7 Pictures From Photo Gallery Forums
He hath set an harvest for thee
Rivers Of Living Water
He Leads Us To Green Pastures
Remember What God Has Done
Remember The Sabbath
"...whiter than snow..."
A Beautiful Spring Day
Who's Online
5 registered members (Karen Y, dedication, Nadi, 2 invisible), 3,429 guests, and 16 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 14 15
Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7198
03/01/06 03:30 AM
03/01/06 03:30 AM
D
D R  Offline OP
Charter Member
SDA
Active Member 2020

Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 719
East Coast Canada
It seems that many are taking any and all of EGWhites writtings and claiming that they are ALL inspired and are equal to the Bible. What is the churches view on this and what is EGWhites view on this and finally what is the Bible's view on this.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7199
03/01/06 04:19 AM
03/01/06 04:19 AM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Read Chapter 2 of 1SM (Selected Messages, Volume 1), and you will find a detailed answer to your question. In this chapter Ellen White answers a question very similar to yours.

Regarding the church's position, from the official website we find:

quote:
One of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is prophecy. This gift is an identifying mark of the remnant church and was manifested in the ministry of Ellen. G. White . As the Lord's messenger, her writings are a continuing and authoritative source of truth which provide for the church comfort, guidance, instruction, and correction. They also make clear that the Bible is the standard by which all teaching and experience must be tested. (Joel 2:28, 29; Acts 2:14-21; Heb. 1:1-3; Rev. 12:17; 19:10.)
Since the church recognizes Ellen White as the Lord's messenger, by reading her answer to your question you will also be getting the church's position.

You can find a link to Ellen White's writings on line here: http://egwdatabase.whiteestate.org/

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7200
03/01/06 04:31 AM
03/01/06 04:31 AM
D
Dr.Glenn  Offline
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 104
Nevada
Dear Snowman:
When Ellen White was a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, the first statement of faith was published in 1872. That statement said that the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments... are the only infallible rule of faith and practice. In 1888, Ellen White stated that God would have a people upon the earth to maintain the Bible and the Bible only as the standard of all doctrines and the basis of all reforms. (GC88 595). In 1980, the uninspired leaders of the Seventh-day Adventist church eliminated from the statement of faith the phrase "the only infallible rule of faith and practice". If the testimonies (the writings of Ellen White) speak not according to the word of God, we are to reject them. See 5T691

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7201
03/01/06 01:04 PM
03/01/06 01:04 PM
Darius  Offline
Dedicated Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,163
Muncie, IN
The OP assumes a treatment of the Bible that is not true. Christians, Adventists included, ignore many parts of the Bible. We are trying to deceive people when we give the impression that we follow everything the Bible teaches. The fact is that we don't follow everything the Bible teaches. Let's stop fronting and be honest with ourselves and with others.

When that is cleared the issue of how to treat EGW's writings goes away.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7202
03/01/06 06:57 PM
03/01/06 06:57 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Snowman, while the Bible is our infallible text (notwithstanding its inspired discrepancies), the Holy Spirit is our infallible guide (notwithstanding our uninspired discrepancies). Without the Holy Spirit guiding us in these last days, via the inspired writings of Sister White, I shudder to think of the shipwreck we would make of the Remnant Church (the SDA church).

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7203
03/01/06 11:30 PM
03/01/06 11:30 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
I shudder to think of the shipwreck uninspired use of Ellens writings has atempted/is atempting to make of the SDA church.

/Thomas

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7204
03/02/06 03:39 PM
03/02/06 03:39 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
Who wrote the Bible?

"For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." (2 Peter 1:21)

Who wrote Ellen White's counsels?

"I am just as dependent upon the Spirit of the Lord in relating or writing a vision, as in having the vision." (Spiritual Gifts, Vol. 2, pages 292-293)

Do we pit the Holy Spirit against the Holy Spirit?

"Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand: And if Satan cast out Satan (or in this case, the Holy Spirit cast out the Holy Spirit) he is divided aginst himself; how shall his kingdom stand?" (Matthew 12:25-26)

So which are more important, the writings of the Bible or the SOP?

In essence, neither is more important than the other. Neither is one above the other, having the same unchangable Author. But there are some differences.

The Bible presents the whole plan of salvation, the SOP does not change that fact.

The SOP makes the plan easier to understand and explains it with more detail.

I pity those who try to dicotimize between the two, for they shall have neither in the end. And even the little innuendoes I read here indicate that there are those who are subtly trying to make of no effect the SOP. Even true statements can be made into a lie depending on how they are used.

Are ALL Ellen White's writings inspired? Beware of your conclusions as, most likely, you will be wrong. The heart is deceitful above all things and loves unrighteousness. And those who find themselves in this position will soon learn to love the lie to suit their own position of worthiness.

And those who see discrepencies in the Bible itself, the SOP itself, or between the two; have not done their homework.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7205
03/02/06 03:42 PM
03/02/06 03:42 PM
Darius  Offline
Dedicated Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,163
Muncie, IN
Bill, what did your "homework" show you? How do you explain the discrepancies that exist?

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7206
03/02/06 03:46 PM
03/02/06 03:46 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Bill, if the Bible contains no inspired discrepancies, how, then, do you explain them? I'm sure you know which ones I'm referring to. For example, how many times did Jesus prophesy that Peter would deny Him relative to how many times the cock would crow?

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7207
03/03/06 04:41 AM
03/03/06 04:41 AM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
quote:
Are ALL Ellen White's writings inspired?
This reminds me of a conversation where someone asked if while at the dinner table Ellen White said, "Pass the potatoes" if that was inspired.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7208
03/02/06 05:10 PM
03/02/06 05:10 PM
Darius  Offline
Dedicated Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,163
Muncie, IN
I see we still refuse to correct our erroneous view of inspiration, even though it clearly does not work.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7209
03/02/06 06:38 PM
03/02/06 06:38 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
Are there discrepencies in the Bible? Apparant ones, obviously; but are there errors? Yes!

"I saw that God had especially guarded the Bible, yet when copies of it were few, learned men had in some instances changed the words, thinking that they were making it plain, when in reality they were mystifying that which was plain, by causing it to lean to their established views, which were governed by tradition". (Early Writings, pages 220-221)

Does this mean I agree with your definition? Only slightly as I see no error in the cock crowing story based on the Bibles own method of understanding (Isaiah 28:10-13).

Matthew states before the cock crows, Peter would deny Jesus thrice (26:34) and records the incident (26:69-74). Mark states that the cock would crow twice (14:30) and records the whole incident (14:66-72) with the cock crowing twice. Luke states the cock would NOT crow until Peter denied Jesus thrice (22:34) and records the incident (22:55-62). And John, likewise, states that the cock would NOT crow until Peter denied Jesus thrice, and records the incident (18:15-18; 25-27).

So which is it? Did the cock crow prior to the third denial or not?

To those who do not believe in the full inspiration of the Bible, there is a contradiction. Congratulations, if you see one here, you will continue to see them until the Bible no longer is trustworthy, nor can be with so many discrepencies.

To those who do believe in the full inspiration of the Bible, we need to apply the techniques as presented by the Bible and the SOP.

Are there more than one passage that sheds light on this topic? Yes, they have been quoted. Can they be made to harmonize? Yes, at least by inserting the word "twice" into some passages. Such as "The cock shall not crow (twice) before thou has denied me thrice". If we removed "twice" from Mark's passage, then we must logically remove his account of the cock crowing twice as well. But the Bible is a whole and can be made to harmonize on this topic.

I don't make myself an expert in this area, but I have posted extensively on this topic in other forums showing examples from both the Bible and the SOP where discrepencies were thought to exist. The point is we have the Bibles own example in this one that we can harmonize, it is not like we have external evidence showing a passage not to be true.

The point is, do we throw up our hands and say there is an error, or do we roll up sleeves, pray for enlightenment to our puny brains and work it out?

As far as the 'every word that Ellen White ever said' being inspired, do you really want such an example as "pass the potatoes" going down in the records as a mature example in this area? Obviously, we are referring to what has been written, especially to us on whom the ends of the world are come.

Are there errors in the Testimonies? Conflict of the Ages series? Any of the published works?

I wonder if there are not heathen masquerading themselves as Seventh-day Adventist, Bible-believing Christians that subtly want to make errors appear in the Bible and SOP as a way of avoiding their message. Jesus took His stand on them, and so do I.

"The writers of the Bible had to express their ideas in human language. It was written by human men. These men were inspired of the Holy Spirit. Because of the imperfections of human understanding and language, or the perversity of the human mind, ingenious at evading the truth, amny read and understand the Bible to please themselves. It is not that the difficulty is in the Bible" (1 Selected Messages, page 19)

"The Bible points to God as its author.." (ibid, page 25)

"The word of the Lord comes to us who have not resisted His Spirit by determining not to hear and obey..." (ibid, page 28)

"Some who are not willing to receive the light, but who prefer to walk in ways of their own choosing, will search the testimonies (or the Bible) to find something in them to encourage the spirit of unbelief and disobedience. Thus a spirit of disunion will be brought in; for the spirit which leads them to criticize the testimonies will also lead them to watch their brethren to find in them something to condemn." (ibid, page 48) bracketed "()" words supplied

Have any more discrepencies? I love to collect them and will try to answer all as best I can.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7210
03/02/06 08:55 PM
03/02/06 08:55 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Wennell:
Are there errors in the Testimonies? Conflict of the Ages series? Any of the published works?

What about the material Ellen did not publish but that has been collected and published by others, like the letter collections?
(The example of "pass the potatoes" unfortunately isnt as farfetched as one could wish when considering how some people quote Ellen.)

And what about the plentyfull flora of books prooftexting some topic based on Ellens writings, otherwise also known as compilations?

/Thomas

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7211
03/03/06 01:57 AM
03/03/06 01:57 AM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Ellen White never claimed to be infallible. There was a time she stated the wrong number of rooms in a hospital or something like that. She stated she got bad information from a human source. She erred like any other human would. Who cares how many rooms are in the hospital?

Regarding the cock crowing, the problem would be with what Jesus actually said, wouldn't it? The two accounts have slight differences. There are slight differences in many instances.

We are not fundamentalists. We do not believe in verbal inspiration. There's no need to "harmonize" these differences.

Consider the number of dead recorded in a battle. Suppose it says "100,000" died. Does that mean it wasn't 99,999? Or any other number? Would this also be an error?

IMO, the problem with taking this position, we make God to be arbitrary, One who majors in minors. But God is not like that. As a man thinks in his heart, so is he. God is concerned that our heart be right. That minor details match exactly makes no difference to the development of our character. Our trust in God, that He has attended to the Bible to give us that which is essential for us to know for our salvation, is.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7212
03/03/06 03:38 AM
03/03/06 03:38 AM
D
D R  Offline OP
Charter Member
SDA
Active Member 2020

Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 719
East Coast Canada
The main reason why I started this thread was for me to try to understand WHY we the SDA Church would need for so MUCH writting from a prophet in this day. EGW wrote and wrote and wrote. I have asked at church if anyone has read, and if they did if they understood ALL of her writtings. The responses that I have received are like Ivory soap 99.44% of the people state NO, that they have not read all (the vast majority have read VERY LITTLE) and about understanding...The church is divided more than the middle east on her statements. The Ultra Conservative state that we must become vegetarians OR be lost. The Liberals claim that it doesn't matter about the physical food, but it is rather the spiritual that is important! I am trying to understand WHY WHY WHY do we have so many volumes from EGW...more words in total than the Bible, quoted more often than the Bible in the Adult Sabbath School that I have been attending. And the kicker is that yes it is in the Baptismal questions about the fact that we believe that EGW had the Spirit of Prophecy (therefor EGW was a Prophet).
-So her is an added dimension to my original question:
Today Paul McCartney (sp) the former Beatle is on an ice flow not too far from my beach and he is voicing his views against CLUBBING seals: Why do we the SDA church allow the CLUBBING of people whom enter the Church, or are searching for truth, with the CLUB of the works of EGW?????
-Let's put her works where they were supposed to be! Council for the Church yes! BUT letter of the LAW, NO! The Bible must be the final word! For it is the GREATER light with EGW's SOP materials all being the lesser light, pointing to the greatest LIGHT!

-WENNELL: your judgement should best be left for the LORD. In no way would I, nor should we, state that people would end up with as in your words:

"I pity those who try to dicotimize between the two, for they shall have neither in the end. " (in reference to the BIBLE and EGW's SOP)

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7213
03/03/06 03:45 AM
03/03/06 03:45 AM
asygo  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,583
California, USA
quote:
If you had made God's word your study, with a desire to reach the Bible standard and attain to Christian perfection, you would not have needed the Testimonies. It is because you have neglected to acquaint yourselves with God's inspired Book that He has sought to reach you by simple, direct testimonies, calling your attention to the words of inspiration which you had neglected to obey, and urging you to fashion your lives in accordance with its pure and elevated teachings. {5T 664.3}

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7214
03/03/06 03:23 PM
03/03/06 03:23 PM
D
D R  Offline OP
Charter Member
SDA
Active Member 2020

Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 719
East Coast Canada
asygo, your quote is nice and all BUT what is the point??? If according to the quote , that people would not heed the call of the BIBLE what or why would they "soften their hearts" to the thousands of pages written by EGW?
-Please understand that these are just questions here. I am wondering how those people that do not strive to follow the SDA BIBLICAL teachings, look at the Seventh-day Adventist Church where some people strive to put EGW as high and in some cases even highr than the BIBLE.


-So this brings another question to the forefront. Do we need to study follow and believe the writtings of EGW to be saved?

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7215
03/03/06 03:54 PM
03/03/06 03:54 PM
Darius  Offline
Dedicated Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,163
Muncie, IN
quote:
Originally posted by Snowman:
So this brings another question to the forefront. Do we need to study follow and believe the writtings of EGW to be saved?

Another demonstration of the Fallacy of the Assumed Premise. When will we accept the fundamental teaching of the Bible that the human race was saved two thousand years ago, so that there is nothing we need to do to be saved? We continue to base our discussions on what we should certainly understand to be an untruth. We don't need to do anything to be saved. Christ did it all already.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7216
03/03/06 03:56 PM
03/03/06 03:56 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
The point was you asked the reason for her writings, and he provided a quote which gave the reason.

Regarding what we should do, we should be as little children, willing to receive light whereever God sees fit to have it shine. The fact that there are some who misuse her writings should not prevent us from getting a blessing out of it.

Regarding your original question, did you read the chapter I suggested you read? That should have answered it.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7217
03/03/06 05:06 PM
03/03/06 05:06 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
There are a number of different topics now being discussed, so let's deal with them one at a time.

1) Are Ellen White's writings on par with the Bible?

Yes, they have the same Author, so we make a mistake when we try to pit one against the other. If you disagree with this, then may I propose that the real question would be to ask God why He sent another prophet if one was not needed.

Furthermore, what group since Apostalic time has had the entire truths set out in the Bible? This demonstrates the need of Him sending Ellen White. Quit dichotomizing between Ellen White and the Bible, because we could do the same with any Bible writer. Can we do without Paul? or Isaiah? or Moses?

Quit applying Ellen White's words against her message. "She was only the lessor light", "she never claimed infallibility". No writer of the Bible ever claimed to be infallible. Do we discard Pauls writings because he was the less of the least of the Apostles? Or because he admittedly was the chiefest of sinners? All these claims show the humbleness of the writer, NOT the importance (or lack of) their message!

"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that receiveth WHOMEVER I send receiveth Me; and he that receiveth Me receiveth Him that sent Me." (John 13:20)

"He that heareth you hearth Me; AND HE WHO DESPISETH YOU DESPISETH ME; and he that despiseth Me dispiseth Him that sent Me." (Luke 10:16)

2) What about compilations?

What about them? Are they inspired as well? This depends on who made them and their intent. The EGW Estate has guidelines to go by in making compilations (write and ask before making judgments). Official EGW complilations MUST state the source of any and all quotations so readers can check the contents (whether they do or not is on them). Unofficial compilations are dependent on who made them.

Does this mean official compilations are error free?

The worst type of lie is an imbalance of truth. That is, overemphasising one truth over another. Why is this the worst? Because there is no lie in the statements themselves. Case point, the book Questions on Doctrine: it sought to project the view that Ellen White stated Christ came in Adam's nature BEFORE the fall by NOT quoting pertinent texts that would prove otherwise. In this case, one would have to dig for the quotes themselves in order to understand truth rather than rely on "force fed" quotations.

3) What about "clubbing" people with EGW statements?

We do the same with the Bible, why should EGW statements be different? Do we throw both out because people use them roughly? No matter how it is presented, the truth is still the truth!

4) Is everything Ellen White wrote or said inspired?

Again we see the statement, "pass the potatoes" and again I will say that this is an example of the most ignorant and immature mindset. Those who see this type of example are looking for a reason to disbelieve. The same could be said about ANY Bible writer while they were yet alive and the person inquiring would have the same, age-old mindset of wanting to undermine God's word that He is passing through His prophet.

5) Do we believe in "verbal" inspiration?

You better!

"Although I am dependent upon the Spirit of the Lord in writing my views as I receive them, yet the words I employ in describing what I have seen are my own, unless they be those spoken to me by an angel, WHICH I ALWAYS ENCLOSE IN MARKS OF QUOTATION." (R&H 10-8-1867)

Yes, read that quotation carefully and you will see that BOTH are correct, but there are places in both the Bible and the SOP that ARE verbally inspired! (The church's official view is against verbal inspiration, but it is quite clear from this statement that they are wrong).

6) What about discrepencies, rounding numbers, wrongly cited quotations about the number of rooms?

Show me a genuine descrepency! God does major in minors where salvation is concerned. "ALL scripture is given by inspiration of God..." What writings of Ellen White's may contain errors? How about Manuscript Releases! Why? Because it contains diary entries, meaningless letters (as far as salvation), etc. We need to be careful in these matters. But what about those I already mentioned? Testimonies, Conflict of the Ages, Publication articles? I would not expect to find any errors in them. What about her claim of not being infallible? Even the EGW Estate repeats this claim but does NOT list ONE documented error in her writings that she has not corrected herself. Do you know of any?

7) Do we need to follow the writings of Ellen White to be saved?

Are there conditions of salvation? Yes or no. What are those conditions? One of the highest should be that we strive with all our effort to know as much about God as we possibly can.

"My people are destroyed for a lack of KNOWLEDGE... because thou have rejected KNOWLEDGE I will also reject thee..." (Hosea 4:6)

The real question is not, do I have to read her writings as I presume you already have read at least some. The real question is do you have to follow those that you question are "Biblical" or not. If you never heard of Christianity, or the Bible, or Ellen White, can you be saved? Yes, according to Paul in Romans 2, as long as you follow the Spirit's leading in your heart (without ever even knowing about the Holy Spirit). But if you know of these, are you saved in your ignorance or in your disobedience?

Obviously people here are ostracized for condemning what God condemns ("Don't judge me"), while the Bible makes clear that we are to judge (John 7:24; 1 Corithians 6). But this also shows that one has trouble with what the Bible says, not the messenger.

8) Is there something we must do to be saved?

Loaded question. The answer is yes.

"The let none say there are no conditions to salvation. There are decided conditions, and everyone is put to the strenuous task of diligently inquiring and searching for the truth from God's word." (Manuscript Releases, Vol 13, page 22)

This does not mean we "earn" salvation, and to those who can't see a difference it is because "spiritual things are spiritually discerned". Noah was told to build an ark, did he do it? Would he have been saved if he said no? Would he been saved if he only built a canoe? But did his building the ark guarantee his spot on the ark? No.

Has far as being saved 2,00 years ago:

"The Spirit was to be given as a regenerating agent, and without this THE SACRIFICE OF CHRIST WOULD HAVE BEEN TO NO AVAIL". (Desire of Ages, page 671)

Darius, I see you are nothing but New Theology according to your posts here and elsewhere. PhD means you have wordly wisdom, but I see you have no Spiritual wisdom.
________________________________________________

In conclusion, we better be very, very careful how we handle God's word through whatever medium He chooses to send it. Either the Bible, or Ellen White, or the Spirit, or any other source - we need to recognize Truth as it is in Jesus and walk in that Truth, or we will be lost

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7218
03/03/06 05:31 PM
03/03/06 05:31 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
I did miss one question that comes out of the above posts,

9) Are EGW writings to be used as a theological "club" within the church?

It was put forth some years ago, and I won't give credit where credit is undue, that Ellen White's writings were NOT to be used doctrinally (a theological policewoman). Is this statement true?

"God has, in that Word (the Bible), promised to give visions in the last days, NOT FOR A NEW RULE OF FAITH, but for the comfort of His people, AND TO CORRECT THOSE WHO ERR FROM BIBLE TRUTH." (Early Writings, page 78)

"The Lord has given me much light that I want the people to have; for there is instruction that the Lord has given me for His people. It is light that they should have, line upon line and precept upon precept, here a little and there a little. This is now to come before the people, because IT HAS BEEN GIVEN TO CORRECT SPECIOUS ERRORS, AND TO SPECIFY WHAT IS TRUTH." (Selected Messages, Vol. 3, page 32)

"Serious errors in doctrine and practice were cherished...God revealed these errors to me in vision and sent me to His erring children to declare them." (Testimonies, Vol. 5, pages 655-656)
________________________________________________
"(A)ll who believe that the Lord has spoken through Sister White, and has given her a message, will be safe from the many delusions that will come in these last days." (Selected Messages, Vol. 3, page 83)

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7219
03/03/06 06:02 PM
03/03/06 06:02 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Salvation is by faith alone in Jesus Christ.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7220
03/03/06 06:17 PM
03/03/06 06:17 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
That is an unBiblical proposition.

"Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and NOT by faith ALONE." (James 2:24)

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7221
03/03/06 07:16 PM
03/03/06 07:16 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
I don't think it is.

quote:
There is not a point that needs to be dwelt upon more earnestly, repeated more frequently, or established more firmly in the minds of all than the impossibility of fallen man meriting anything by his own best good works. Salvation is through faith in Jesus Christ alone.. (FW 18)
I think Ellen White is correct.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7222
03/03/06 07:22 PM
03/03/06 07:22 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
Heading this off before it becomes misconstrued, there is NO PLACE in the Bible where it says we are saved by faith alone or faith only. That is a myth. However, it is also true that we are NOT saved by faith AND works (that is, a little faith and a little works). The Bible is consistently clear that we are saved by a faith THAT works.

Martin Luther is said to have formulated the doctrine that we are saved by faith alone, this was said as a contradiction to the Catholic stance of salvation by faith AND works. Their works, however, consisted of viewing relics, partaking of the sacraments, etc. Martin Luthers point was that these externals are not necessary for salvation. James statement does not contradict this. His premise is that I will show you my faith BY my works (faith THAT works).

Neither do I believe that Martin Luther meant for his statement that "sola fe" (faith alone) was to be taken as most Christians do today, as his writings are clear that he saw an obedience that was necessary towards salvation.

This idea, however, has evolved into a unBiblical stance toward salvation. Faith and belief are the same word in the Greek, yet we are told the devils "believe" (that is, they have faith) in God. Are they saved? No, because their "faith" in Him does not lead them toward obedience but toward disobedience.

"Let us not forget that in his conversion and sanctification man must cooperate with God. 'Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling,' the Word declares. 'For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.' (Phil. 2:12, 13). Man cannot transform himself by the exercise of his will. He possesses no power by which this change may be affected. The renewing energy must come from God. The change can be made only by the Holy Spirit. He who would be saved, high or low, rich or poor, must submit to the working of this power." {Heavenly Places, page 20.4} (This is only what I have near me, if you want I can quote quite literally hundreds of such statements).

We are NOT saved by Faith alone, grace alone, nor works alone but by a comingling of the three. By faith we experience the grace (power of God - 2 Corinthians 12:9) of God, which works out righteousness in our lives. Without this holiness, no man will see God (Hebrews 12:14). We are saved by both the imputed AND imparted righteousness (justification AND sanctification) of God.

The fact that this topic has digressed into this is because those who have trouble with Ellen White, in reality, have a problem with God's word in general. While there may be things that they can agree on, there are others they fight against. I'm sure we will now pit Paul's word against James. So I end with this: that the same Paul who wrote, "knowing that a man is not justified by works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ" (Galatians 2:16) in the SAME letter wrote, "For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which WORKETH by love." (ibid, 5:6)

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7223
03/03/06 07:25 PM
03/03/06 07:25 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
Tom,

Look at your own quote! The focus of the quote is on Christ ALONE, not faith alone!

It says we are saved by faith in Christ alone, not we saved by faith alone in Christ.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7224
03/03/06 07:32 PM
03/03/06 07:32 PM
Darius  Offline
Dedicated Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,163
Muncie, IN
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Wennell:
Darius, I see you are nothing but New Theology according to your posts here and elsewhere. PhD means you have wordly wisdom, but I see you have no Spiritual wisdom.

Is that why you choose to get nasty when you can't answer the challenge? How sweet and Christlike of you.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7225
03/03/06 07:35 PM
03/03/06 07:35 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
"The opposite and NO LESS DANGEROUS ERROR is that belief in Christ releases men fromm keeping the law of God; that since by faith alone we become partakers of the grace of Christ, our works have nothing to do with our redemption." (Steps to Christ, page 60)

Notice she says this view of believeing in faith alone (without the fruit of works) is a dangerous error.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7226
03/03/06 07:38 PM
03/03/06 07:38 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
Darius,

There has been no challenge, I asked for a contradiction, you provided none. However, what I said still stands - you are full of yourself but not Bible, as anyone who reads your posts can see. This is my last message to you personally as you have nothing to say that I care to hear.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7227
03/03/06 07:55 PM
03/03/06 07:55 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
My point of view at present is something like this. I have no problem with Ellen as an inspired author. If I dont remember very wrong, she wrote somewhere that it was the "conflict of ages" series and the testimonies series that ought to be read.
At the same time, I am very cautious towards anyone who has strong opinions about her writings, no matter wether they are against or for. If for no other reason than that making her a major leaves other points to minors that ought to be majors.

As for the salvation subtopic, I recently read in a commentary on Romans 2:5-11
quote:

"Some Christians, however, are immediately up in arms. Has the apostle taken leave of his senses? Does he begin by declaring that salvation is by faith alone (e.g. 1:16f.), and then destroy his own gospel by saying that it is by good works after all? No, Paul is not contradicting himself. What he is affirming is that, although justification is indeed by faith, judgement will be according to works. The reason for this is not hard to find. It is that the day of judgement will be a public occasion. Its purpose will be less to determine God's judgement than to announce it and to vindicate it. The divine judgement, which is a process of sifting and separating, is going on secretly all the time, as people range themselves for or against Christ, but on the last day its results will be made public. The day of God's wrath will also be the time when his righteous judgment will be revealed (5b)."

Italics in original. Bold mine.

/Thomas

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7228
03/03/06 07:59 PM
03/03/06 07:59 PM
Darius  Offline
Dedicated Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,163
Muncie, IN
Bill, you are only one of six billion. Most of those don't even know I exist. It is wonderful that you take such notice of me to single me out for special treatment. How sweet it is.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7229
03/03/06 08:21 PM
03/03/06 08:21 PM
asygo  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,583
California, USA
quote:
Originally posted by Snowman:
asygo, your quote is nice and all BUT what is the point???

You said, "The main reason why I started this thread was for me to try to understand WHY we the SDA Church would need for so MUCH writting from a prophet in this day."

That's the reason she gave (or at least one of them). Others might have different reasons for needing/using the SOP so much, but that's what she said. The testimonies are there to send us to the Bible truths that we have neglected or misunderstood.

quote:
Originally posted by Snowman:
If according to the quote , that people would not heed the call of the BIBLE what or why would they "soften their hearts" to the thousands of pages written by EGW?

Hearts are not softened by the words in the SOP, nor by the words in the Bible. Hearts are softened by the Holy Spirit, the Author of those words. Those who rebel against the Spirit's voice in the Bible will also reject the SOP, for it is the same voice.

But there are those who need a firmer, more definite "nudge" to wake them up. I do the same for my kids. They know that selfishness is unacceptable, but they still sometimes indulge in it. When confronted, they admit that it was selfish and that it was not a good thing to do. I often find myself merely laying out the same principles over and over, just applying it to varying circumstances, helping their immature minds to grasp the big picture. And to do that, I need the Spirit of prophecy working in me as much as EGW needed Him in writing those thousands of pages.

(Side note: I find in Revelation that the Spirit of Prophecy is to be possessed by each member of the remnant. Just as each individual is to keep the commandments of Jesus, so also each member is to have the Spirit of prophecy.)

quote:
Originally posted by Snowman:
I am wondering how those people that do not strive to follow the SDA BIBLICAL teachings, look at the Seventh-day Adventist Church where some people strive to put EGW as high and in some cases even highr than the BIBLE.

First of all, the Bible is the word of God, the only infallible rule of faith and practice. The Spirit Who inspired it will neither contradict nor supercede it.

Second, the SOP is, at least in the minds of some, an authoritative source of truth. This depends on its authorship. If you believe it has the same Author as the Bible, then it is just as authoritative.

Third, those who don't accept the Bible for what it says will not accept the SOP either. The gift of prophecy is for believers, not unbelievers. IOW, if one doesn't believe it, it won't help to keep quoting stuff he doesn't believe. The "softening" and convincing must come from another source.

Fourth, when there is error in understanding the Bible, the Bible is its own best expositor. If you cannot prove what you're saying from the Bible, then it might not be worth saying. This, in conjuntion with #3 above, leads me to avoid using the SOP when preaching to a mixed crowd.

Lastly, if one puts the SOP above the Bible, then he's got his foundation over the roof. If you've ever tried to build a house that way, you know that it cannot stand. How would you look at someonne building a house like that? That's how people look at those who put the SOP over the Bible.

Some Mormons came by to give me a Bible study one day. They claimed to believe the Bible, but wanted to study the Book of Mormon because "that's what we need today." I told them that we can study, but they have to pick from two options:
  1. We study the Bible only, since we agreed that it is inspired truth.
  2. We can study the Book of Mormon, but only after we study my 3-volume set of the SOP Library.
They said they'd get back to me, but they never did.

For those of us who accept the SOP, we have to always be careful that we always put the Bible first, we strive to know what it says, and most importantly, that we dedicate our lives to walking in its light.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7230
03/03/06 08:36 PM
03/03/06 08:36 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Here's the quote:

quote:
There is not a point that needs to be dwelt upon more earnestly, repeated more frequently, or established more firmly in the minds of all than the impossibility of fallen man meriting anything by his own best good works. Salvation is through faith in Jesus Christ alone.
You are suggesting that I gave the wrong meaning to the quote because I said, "salvation is by faith alone in Christ." You said the quote is saying faith in Christ alone, as if that meant something different, and suggest the different thing that it means is that salvation is by faith in Christ alone. Thus you understand that she is saying that salvation is by faith in Christ alone, as opposed to faith in something else.

However, your interpretation does not agree with the context. She was contrasting faith and works, not faith in Christ vs. faith in something else. She says the point that needs to be established is that we cannot merit anything by the good works we do. Salvation is by faith in Christ "alone". The "alone", by the context, is clearly modifying "faith", not "Christ."

Although the word order was different, the meaning was not. We are saved by faith. Not by works. Not faith and works, But by faith. (However, it's a faith which works).

If you look at the chapter heading, you will see it says, "THROUGH FAITH ALONE." Admitedly, she did not give this title herself, but it shows what the natural conclusion of what she wrote, taking into account the context.

This is from the same essay:

quote:
Let the subject be made distinct and plain that it is not possible to effect anything in our standing before God or in the gift of God to us through creature merit. Should faith and works purchase the gift of salvation for anyone, then the Creator is under obligation to the creature. Here is an opportunity for falsehood to be accepted as truth. If any man can merit salvation by anything he may do, then he is in the same position as the Catholic to do penance for his sins. Salvation, then, is partly of debt, that may be earned as wages. If man cannot, by any of his good works, merit salvation, then it must be wholly of grace, received by man as a sinner because he receives and believes in Jesus. It is wholly a free gift. Justification by faith is placed beyond controversy. And all this controversy is ended, as soon as the matter is settled that the merits of fallen man in his good works can never procure eternal life for him. (FW 19)
Througout the entire essay she is contrasting faith alone vs. works, not faith in Christ alone vs. faith in something else.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7231
03/03/06 08:50 PM
03/03/06 08:50 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
quote:
The opposite and NO LESS DANGEROUS ERROR is that belief in Christ releases men fromm keeping the law of God; that since by faith alone we become partakers of the grace of Christ, our works have nothing to do with our redemption." (Steps to Christ, page 60)

Notice she says this view of believeing in faith alone (without the fruit of works) is a dangerous error.

You're having her say something she didn't say. She didn't say there was anything wrong with believing that we are saved by faith alone! Indeed, she said that very thing throughout her ministry, and this is the Biblical teaching. She endorsed Luther's teaching of righteousness by faith, of which this is the cornerstone, not to mention that of Jones and Waggoner, Prescott too. Indeed throughout our entire history as a denomination we have taught that salvation is by faith alone in Christ. I sincerely hope you are not trusting even the minutest bit in your own works to save you, because that cannot be.

Here's how fundamental beliefs #10 puts is:

quote:
In infinite love and mercy God made Christ, who knew no sin, to be sin for us, so that in Him we might be made the righteousness of God. Led by the Holy Spirit we sense our need, acknowledge our sinfulness, repent of our transgressions, and exercise faith in Jesus as Lord and Christ, as Substitute and Example. This faith which receives salvation comes through the divine power of the Word and is the gift of God's grace. Through Christ we are justified, adopted as God's sons and daughters, and delivered from the lordship of sin. Through the Spirit we are born again and sanctified; the Spirit renews our minds, writes God's law of love in our hearts, and we are given the power to live a holy life. Abiding in Him we become partakers of the divine nature and have the assurance of salvation now and in the judgment.
Ok, returning to the Spirit of Prophecy quote, she said, "that since by faith alone we become partakers of the grace of Christ, our works have nothing to do with our redemption." She wasn't arguing against the premise, but against the conclusion. That since by faith alone we become partakers of the grace of Christ. This part is true. "our works have nothing to do with our redemption." This part is false.

Our works will demonstrate the genuineness of our faith. This has ever been the SDA position.

James was not saying anything contrary to Paul. Both taught that justification is by faith alone in Christ, a faith which works by love.

Here's a good explanation:

quote:
Paul and James. Here is where nearly everybody quotes the words of James, "Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?" James 2:21. Unfortunately this text is usually quoted as a disparagement of the words of Paul. It seems to be taken for granted that there is a contradiction between Paul and James; and sympathy naturally leans to James, because people like to believe that there is some merit in their own works, and they imagine that this is what James teaches. Indeed, there are some who hold that James wrote for the purpose of correcting Paul's "extreme views" of justification by faith.

We may well throw all such foolish and wicked ideas to the winds. No one need hope to come to an understanding of the Scriptures until he approaches them with the settled conviction that "all Scripture is given by inspiration of God." The Holy Spirit does not at one time inspire words which must later on be corrected.

Faith Working. The trouble with those who thus read the words of James is that they suppose that the apostle says that Abraham was justified by his own works of faith. "Seest thou how faith wrought?" That is ever the mark of living faith, as the apostle is showing. And that is just the statement of the apostle Paul. The last verse of the third chapter of Romans tells us that by faith we establish the law.

Moreover, the very term "justification" shows that faith performs the requirement of the law. Faith makes a man a doer of the law, for that is the meaning of the term "justification by faith." So in James we read that the works of Abraham simply showed the perfection of his faith. "And the Scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness." The apostle James, therefore, teaches the same kind of justification that Paul does. If he did not, one or the other or both of them would be discredited as apostles. Justification by faith which works is the only kind of justification known in the Bible.

Debt and Grace. "Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt." It is necessary to keep in mind what the apostle is writing about. The subject is the means by which a man is justified. To him that works for justification, the reward of righteousness is not a gift of grace, but the payment of a debt. That is, it would be so if there were any righteousness by works. In that case, the man would come to the Lord and demand of him his due.

But no man can put the Lord under obligation to him. "Who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again?" Rom. 11:35. If any one could do something for the Lord for which the Lord would be under obligation to him, then all things would not be from him. That is to say, the idea of justification by works is opposed to the fact that God is the Creator of all things. And, conversely, the recognition of God as Creator is the acknowledgement that righteousness comes from him alone. (Waggoner on Romans)


Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7232
03/03/06 08:51 PM
03/03/06 08:51 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
quote:
Hearts are not softened by the words in the SOP, nor by the words in the Bible. Hearts are softened by the Holy Spirit, the Author of those words. Those who rebel against the Spirit's voice in the Bible will also reject the SOP, for it is the same voice.

Well said. They'll also reject other messengers the Lord sends for the same reason.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7233
03/04/06 03:19 AM
03/04/06 03:19 AM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Bill, you're explanation of Jesus' prophecy and Peter's denial and the cock crowing requires us to add to the word of God - something God strictly forbids.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7234
03/04/06 01:33 PM
03/04/06 01:33 PM
Davros  Offline
Dedicated Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,009
Ohio
quote:
Originally posted by Darius:
Another demonstration of the Fallacy of the Assumed Premise. When will we accept the fundamental teaching of the Bible that the human race was saved two thousand years ago, so that there is nothing we need to do to be saved? We continue to base our discussions on what we should certainly understand to be an untruth. We don't need to do anything to be saved. Christ did it all already.

There is another slight error in this line of thinking. Humans today were not saved 2,000 years ago because there is condition to salvation. It only takes a very light reading of the New Testament to see that.

quote:
All people will hate you because you follow me, but those people who keep their faith until the end will be saved.
Mark 13:13 NCV

quote:
Anyone who believes and is baptized will be saved, but anyone who does not believe will be punished.
Mark 16:16 NCV

quote:
Then anyone who calls on the Lord will be saved.
Acts 2:21 NCV

quote:
Believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be saved -- you and all the people in your house.
Acts 16:31 NCV

quote:
and all need to be made right with God by his grace, which is a free gift. They need to be made free from sin through Jesus Christ.
Romans 3:24 NCV

quote:
Anyone who calls on the Lord will be saved.
Romans 10:13 NCV

quote:
And you are being saved by it if you continue believing what I told you.
1 Corinthians 15:2 NCV

quote:
Live in the right way so that you will be saved and your weakness will not cause you to be lost
Hebrews 12:13 NCV

So, a more accurate statement would be as follows:

When will we accept the fundamental teaching of the Bible that the human race was given the ability to be saved two thousand years ago, so that there is nothing, but accept God's free gift, that we need to do to be saved? We continue to base our discussions on what we should certainly understand to be an untruth. We don't need to do anything but accept the gift to be saved. Christ did everything else already.

You see, Christ did all but one thing for us; he could not make us accept His free gift just as he could not make Adam and Eve not eat the fruit. God puts a very high value on freedom. If indeed, “the human race was saved two thousand years ago,” then none would be lost; that makes one wonder why there is a need for church at all, and makes the urgency of the work in the New Testament seem a little silly.

Now I think it is pretty obvious that acceptance of the gift is going to make some changes in ones life. It is rather like being pulled over by a highway patrol officer. If he were to give me a warning and put me under grace, I am not going to peal out and take off at 120MPH and throw a bunch of gravel onto his car because I am under his grace. I would want to please him in my driving because he showed me that grace, and the same principal works for God.

see also John 4:10, Romans 4:16, Romans 5:15, Romans 6:23, and Revelation 22:17

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7235
03/04/06 03:14 PM
03/04/06 03:14 PM
Davros  Offline
Dedicated Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,009
Ohio
I wonder, is the argument about Ellen White coming after the Bible similar to saying Paul was not in the Old Testament?

Here is what I mean: I think most would agree that the same spirit inspired both Moses and Paul; I also think most would agree that the same spirit inspired EGW. Did the believers of the time treat Paul as inferior because his writings were not part of the "scriptures" at that time, or did they listen to what he had to say and attempt to change their lives by his words?

The similarity is quite striking. Paul always referred to the OT scriptures, and EGW is always referring to scripture. There are also a lot of letters that Paul wrote that we have not seen. We know this because he references some in the letters that are present in the Bible. I wouldn't be surprised if he actually wrote far more than EGW did, so I think it is rather unfair to say that her writings have more words in total than the Bible.

A good question came up a little while ago,

quote:
I started this thread was for me to try to understand WHY we the SDA Church would need for so MUCH writting from a prophet in this day.
I am of the opinion that a prophet for this day is more important than any other. We are very near the end; the signs are all around us, and we need to be guided home! If you are interested in just how near the time could be, pick up a copy of "The Appearing" DVD set from It Is Written. I think it's only $15, and it would be the best $15 you've ever spent.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7236
03/05/06 12:07 AM
03/05/06 12:07 AM
D
Dr.Glenn  Offline
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 104
Nevada
Dear Dave Hooper:
You ask "Are the writing of E.G. White equal to the Bible?". Another question should be: Should we hold as a doctrine before non- seventh-day adventists or before non - believers the doctrine that the writings of E.G. White are equal to or above the Holy Scriptures or be held to be the last word in regard to doctrine?

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7237
03/05/06 01:10 AM
03/05/06 01:10 AM
Will  Offline
Most Dedicated Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,332
BC, Canada
The problem is when people use SOP above Scripture, and as Scripture only, and disregard what the Bible says.
Are we backing up the Bible with what is written in Sister White's books, or are her books backed up by what the Bible & history has said?
Take for example chapter 10 of the Great Controversy, I took the liberty to look up Munzer, and found out who he was, also found out that a gentleman a contemporary of Luther was a Sabbath keeper, his name starts with a K its German. Luther said this man was more studied than he regarding the Bible.
I also learned that 100 years prior to the reformation there were Sabbath keepers throughout Europe, starting from the Waldensians, into Romania, Russia, and to the British Isles.
The most famous and celebrated Sabbath Keeper in the world is St.Patrick even though some scholars try and hide it, it is historically correct.
So whats this got to do with Ellen White? Well what she wrote is backed up by the Bible in other words. There is a remant that God has kept throughout time that keep His commandments.
Do I use this to shut down others who do not know about or have received the typical antisda information about Ellen White, no. If you cannot use the Bible to defend your faith, then you may want to revisit it and ask for wisdom and understanding, and show thyself approved by God, a workman that needeth not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
God Bless,
Will

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7238
03/05/06 05:19 PM
03/05/06 05:19 PM
D
Dr.Glenn  Offline
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 104
Nevada
Dear Will:
When we hold as a doctrine or statement of faith that the writings of E.G. White are equal to the Bible, non-SDAs and non-believers think that we are like the Latter day saints who hold that the writings of Joseph Smith are equal to the Bible and they reject our teachings are a cult.
We must do as E.G. White instructed us. We must hold that the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the only infallible rule of faith and practice. GC 595
Jesus asked his disciples who men say he is. They said that some believe him to be a prophet like John the Baptist, Elias, or Jeremiah. then, Simon Peter said that Jesus was the Son of the living God. Jesus said that flesh and blood had not revealed this to him, but his Father in heaven. Likewise, flesh and blood should not tell a non-SDA that the writings of E.G. White are thought inspired like the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New testaments, but the Father of Jesus who is in heaven should reveal this to the non-SDA or non-believer.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7239
03/05/06 06:10 PM
03/05/06 06:10 PM
Will  Offline
Most Dedicated Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,332
BC, Canada
I agree with you Dr.Glenn, the Bible is our rule of faith. Its a no brainer for me even when Sister White gives obvious statements to support it, yet people continue to use it as their standard.
God Bless,
Will

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7240
03/07/06 04:15 AM
03/07/06 04:15 AM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
It's interesting to me that SDAs can read the SOP and go away feeling that they've read something less inspired than the Bible. I have non-SDA friends who are more convinced that the SOP is divinely inspired than some of my SDA friends. Go figure.

Is the SOP just as inspired as the Bible? Of course!

Does this mean I also believe the SOP replaces the Bible? Of course not!

They go hand-in-hand.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7241
03/06/06 07:49 PM
03/06/06 07:49 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
Tom,

You are talking out of both sides of your mouth now. You started this by agreeing with Darius that we were saved 2,000 years ago. That is New Theology and evangelical Christianity and denies the investigative judgment. You have then argued the very points that I was arguing as if to make yourself in harmony with the very thing you were argueing against. One might logically wonder if you know what you believe!

1) If you look at my posts, especially the very last post at the bottom of page 1, you will see that I stated this is not an issue of Faith or Works, but faith THAT works. You have since argued that same point, however, that would be a contradiction of your first view that we are saved by faith ALONE. If you are now stating faith THAT works then you are necessarily agreeing that it IS more than just faith ALONE. Otherwise, as stated, you ARE talkning out of both sides of your mouth.

2) English dictates that the statements "faith in Christ alone" and "faith alone in Christ" are two different statements. While the context does show she was stating that it is NOT faith AND works, it is still presumptious to state she was saying "faith alone" when she had opportunity to say so herself, but didn't.

3) I did NOT overstate my opposition to "faith alone" in the Steps to Christ quote, but I did fail to state the whole context (I am typing these quotes in by hand). Her view was NOT that we are saved by faith ALONE but that we receive grace by faith alone and the grace makes us obedient as the quote finishes..."Instead of releasing man from obedience, it is faith, and faith ONLY, that makes us partakers of the grace of Christ, which ENABLES US TO RENDER OBEDIENCE. (Steps to Christ, page 60) This is the same as I stated earlier that by faith we experience the grace (power of God - 2 Corinthians 12:9) of God, which works out righteousness in our lives.

4) I am not disagreeing with Martin Luther, but clarifying that his view of sola fe is misunderstood as meaning that sanctified works have nothing to do with salvation. A view not found in his writings.

5)In your replies, I have not seen your answer to James premise that we are NOT justified by faith ONLY (or, alone). You are still out of harmony with the Scriptures. You will not, and cannot, produce a quote from either the Bible or the SOP of states we are saved by "faith alone", except the one you contort to say what it does not. While the context of your quote does say it is NOT faith AND works, it doesn't say it is by faith ALONE.

"The sanctification now gaining prominence in the religious world carries with it a spirit of self-exaltation and a disregard for the law of God that marks it foreign to the Bible. Its advocates teach that sanctification is an instantaneous work (THEREBY ACCOMPLISHED 2,000 YEARS AGO), by which, through FAITH ALONE, they attain to perfect holiness. "Only believe," (AGAIN, BELIEF AND FAITH ARE THE SAME WORD IN THE GREEK, "PISTOS") say they, "and the blessing is yours." No further EFFORT on the believer is supposed to be required. At the same time they deny the authority of God's law, urging that they are released from obligation to keep the commandments. But is it possible for men to be holy, in accord with the will and character of God, without coming into harmony with the principles which are an expression of His nature and will, and show what is well pleasing to Him? The desire for an EASY RELIGION that REQUIRES NO STRIVING, NO SELF-DENIAL, NO DIVORCE from the follies of the world, has made the doctrine of FAITH, AND FAITH ONLY, a popular doctrine; but what sayeth the word of God? (James 2:14-24 quoted, ending with...) Ye see then how that by works a man is justified and NOT by FAITH ONLY." (Great Controversy, page 471-472)

"As recipients of His grace, shall we not do our part by working out our salvation with fear and trembling? It is God that works in us both to will and to do of His good pleasure. MAN WORKS, AND GOD WORKS; but God can do NOTHING without Man's co-operation." (R&H 1/25/1898)

Man works, and God works. Man is called upon to strain every muscle, and to exercise every faculty, in the struggle for immortality; but it is God who supplies the efficiency." (R&H 4/28/1910)

A far cry from "faith ALONE!"

6)Mountain man - Adding to the Bible is placing something into the text that isn't there at all. What I demonstrated was how to use the Word to supplement itself by itself. I didn't add the word "twice", Mark did, and while talking about the SAME EVENT. But because the Bible is a whole we need to view every text that pertains to every or any other text. Moses tells us that the children of Israel wanted to return to Egypt when the going got tough but it takes Nehemiah to tell us that they came as far as selecting someone to lead them back. This is NOT adding to a text, it is using the Bible as a whole. While Ellen White tells us that in certain instances passages have been changed, the Bible as a whole is still the truth. This is a far cry from your insinuations that God is responsible for "inspired discrepencies". My Bible says that God is NOT the Author of confusion!

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7242
03/06/06 10:38 PM
03/06/06 10:38 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Splitting this up into two groups so as to not be too long...

You are talking out of both sides of your mouth now. You started this by agreeing with Darius that we were saved 2,000 years ago.

What are you talking about? Please quote something I wrote. I don't know what you're referring to here. I've read all my comments on this thread several times, and I have no clue as to what you're referring to. If you would quote what you have in mind, I wouldn't have to waste my time trying to hunt down something I didn't say.

That is New Theology and evangelical Christianity and denies the investigative judgment.

What is "that"? What specifically that I wrote are you disagreeing with? Instead of labeling something you disagree with, I would prefer you quoted it.

You have then argued the very points that I was arguing as if to make yourself in harmony with the very thing you were argueing against. One might logically wonder if you know what you believe!

Read my metanarative. That's what I believe. Please post yours as well.

1) If you look at my posts, especially the very last post at the bottom of page 1, you will see that I stated this is not an issue of Faith or Works, but faith THAT works. You have since argued that same point, however, that would be a contradiction of your first view that we are saved by faith ALONE.

This isn't my view. It's Biblical. It's in the Spirit of Prophecy. Consider the publican who wouldn't so much as lift his eyes to heaven but smote his breast and prayed, "God, be merciful to me a sinner." He want away justified.

If you are now stating faith THAT works then you are necessarily agreeing that it IS more than just faith ALONE. Otherwise, as stated, you ARE talkning out of both sides of your mouth.

Salvation is by faith in Christ alone. But it's a faith which works. Jones and Waggoner preached this. Luther preached it. Ellen White preached it. Paul preached it. Jesus preached it.

2) English dictates that the statements "faith in Christ alone" and "faith alone in Christ" are two different statements.

Not necessarily. They might or might not mean two different things. The context would have to decide. For example, I could say, "I went alone by car" meaning I went in a car by myself. I could say, "I went by car alone" meaning the same thing, although it could mean I only used a car as a means of transport. The first is more likely, but the second would be possible if the context warranted it.

While the context does show she was stating that it is NOT faith AND works, it is still presumptious to state she was saying "faith alone" when she had opportunity to say so herself, but didn't.

If you are that what I stated agrees with the context, how can you say my comment is presumptuous? Isn't is rather your comment about my comment being presumptuous which is presumptuous?

3) I did NOT overstate my opposition to "faith alone" in the Steps to Christ quote,

Did I say you had? What shout NOT?

but I did fail to state the whole context (I am typing these quotes in by hand).

I'm using a computer. Well, I guess I'm using my hands too.

Her view was NOT that we are saved by faith ALONE but that we receive grace by faith alone and the grace makes us obedient as the quote finishes..."Instead of releasing man from obedience, it is faith, and faith ONLY, that makes us partakers of the grace of Christ, which ENABLES US TO RENDER OBEDIENCE. (Steps to Christ, page 60) This is the same as I stated earlier that by faith we experience the grace (power of God - 2 Corinthians 12:9) of God, which works out righteousness in our lives.

When she wrote "salvation is by faith in Christ alone" (which you agree, by context, means "faith alone" and not "Christ alone") she didn't mean we are saved by faith alone? If she meant what you are saying instead of what she said, why didn't she say what you said instead of what she said?

4) I am not disagreeing with Martin Luther, but clarifying that his view of sola fe is misunderstood as meaning that sanctified works have nothing to do with salvation. A view not found in his writings.

If you are not disagreeing with Luther regarding justification, then you are agreeing that justification is by faith alone, since that's what he taught. Earlier you stated that I was talking out of both sides of my mouth, but it appears to me this shoe fits better on the foot of another. Honestly, I don't know what you believe. Sometimes you seem to be vehemently disagreeing with me, and others equally vehemently agreeing.

Do you believe that salvation is by faith alone or not? I say it is; the genuineness of the faith will be demonstrated by the works it produces.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7243
03/07/06 12:32 AM
03/07/06 12:32 AM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Continuing...

5)In your replies, I have not seen your answer to James premise that we are NOT justified by faith ONLY (or, alone).

I comment on this, and provided a detailed quote by Waggoner explaining it. It's ten posts above yours.

You are still out of harmony with the Scriptures.

Statements like this add absolutely nothing to the discussion.

You will not, and cannot, produce a quote from either the Bible or the SOP of states we are saved by "faith alone", except the one you contort to say what it does not.

You seem to be of the persuasion that just because you say something is true, that makes it true. Truth is established on the basis of evidence. Instead of stating what you think I can't do, why not just ask me to produce evidence for whatever position you want me to substantiate? Just because I only produced one statement, doesn't mean I can't produce more. I only produced one because one clear statement should be sufficient.

Well, this is an interesting challenge. I'll see how many I can come up with. I'll start with Scripture.

quote:
Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.
But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. (Romans 4:4,5)

quote:

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16)

quote:
17And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father's have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger!

18I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee,

19And am no more worthy to be called thy son: make me as one of thy hired servants.

20And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him.

21And the son said unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight, and am no more worthy to be called thy son.

22But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet:

23And bring hither the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be merry:

24For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry.

25Now his elder son was in the field: and as he came and drew nigh to the house, he heard musick and dancing.

26And he called one of the servants, and asked what these things meant.

27And he said unto him, Thy brother is come; and thy father hath killed the fatted calf, because he hath received him safe and sound.

28And he was angry, and would not go in: therefore came his father out, and intreated him.

29And he answering said to his father, Lo, these many years do I serve thee, neither transgressed I at any time thy commandment: and yet thou never gavest me a kid, that I might make merry with my friends:

30But as soon as this thy son was come, which hath devoured thy living with harlots, thou hast killed for him the fatted calf.

31And he said unto him, Son, thou art ever with me, and all that I have is thine.

32It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found. (Luke 15)

quote:
23Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, which would take account of his servants.

24And when he had begun to reckon, one was brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents.

25But forasmuch as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made.

26The servant therefore fell down, and worshipped him, saying, Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee all.

27Then the lord of that servant was moved with compassion, and loosed him, and forgave him the debt. (Matt. 18)

quote:
(10) Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican.
(11) The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican.
(12) I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess.
(13) And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.
(14) I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted. (Luke 18)

quote:
6Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,

7Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered.

8Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin. (Romans 4:6-8)

quote:
8But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;

9That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

10For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. (Romans 10)

quote:
23For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.(Romans 6)
quote:
6And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.(Romans 11)
quote:
8For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

9Not of works, lest any man should boast.

10For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.(Eph. 2)

quote:
23For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

24Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:

25Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

26To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. (Romans 3)

quote:
20Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

21But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;

22Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe.(Romans 3)

Here's some Spirit of Prophecy quotes

quote:
There is not a point that needs to be dwelt upon more earnestly, repeated more frequently, or established more firmly in the minds of all than the impossibility of fallen man meriting anything by his own best good works. Salvation is through faith in Jesus Christ alone. (FW 18; from the chapter titled "Through Faith Alone")
quote:
Our acceptance with God is sure only through His beloved Son, and good works are but the result of the working of His sin-pardoning love. They are no credit to us, and we have nothing accorded to us for our good works by which we may claim a part in the salvation of our souls. Salvation is God's free gift to the believer, given to him for Christ's sake alone. The troubled soul may find peace through faith in Christ, and his peace will be in proportion to his faith and trust. He cannot present his good works as a plea for the salvation of his soul.(3SM 199)
quote:
Man can be justified alone through the imputation of Christ's righteousness. Man is justified freely by God's grace through faith, and not by works, lest any man should boast. Salvation is the gift of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. (That I May Know Him 82)
quote:
It is impossible for man to save himself. Christ's righteousness alone can avail for his salvation, and this is the gift of God. This is the wedding garment in which you may appear as a welcome guest at the marriage supper of the Lamb. Let faith take hold of Christ without delay, and you will be a new creature in Jesus, a light to the world. Christ is called "The Lord our righteousness." And through faith each one should say, "The Lord my righteousness." When faith lays hold upon this gift, the praise of God will be upon our lips, and we shall be able to say, "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world."(BE 4/1/93)
quote:
When you turn away from the broken cisterns that can hold no water, and in the name of Jesus your Advocate come directly to God, asking for the things you need, the righteousness of Christ will be revealed as your righteousness, the virtue of Christ as your virtue. You will then understand that justification will come alone through faith in Christ; for in Jesus is revealed the perfection of the character of God; in His life is manifested the outworking of the principles of holiness.(1SM 330)
While the context of your quote does say it is NOT faith AND works, it doesn't say it is by faith ALONE.

Do you think it's by faith and something else which isn't works? Instering. I haven't heard that idea before. What would the something else be?

"The sanctification now gaining prominence in the religious world carries with it a spirit of self-exaltation and a disregard for the law of God that marks it foreign to the Bible. Its advocates teach that sanctification is an instantaneous work (THEREBY ACCOMPLISHED 2,000 YEARS AGO), by which, through FAITH ALONE, they attain to perfect holiness. "Only believe," (AGAIN, BELIEF AND FAITH ARE THE SAME WORD IN THE GREEK, "PISTOS") say they, "and the blessing is yours." No further EFFORT on the believer is supposed to be required. At the same time they deny the authority of God's law, urging that they are released from obligation to keep the commandments. But is it possible for men to be holy, in accord with the will and character of God, without coming into harmony with the principles which are an expression of His nature and will, and show what is well pleasing to Him? The desire for an EASY RELIGION that REQUIRES NO STRIVING, NO SELF-DENIAL, NO DIVORCE from the follies of the world, has made the doctrine of FAITH, AND FAITH ONLY, a popular doctrine; but what sayeth the word of God? (James 2:14-24 quoted, ending with...) Ye see then how that by works a man is justified and NOT by FAITH ONLY." (Great Controversy, page 471-472)

"As recipients of His grace, shall we not do our part by working out our salvation with fear and trembling? It is God that works in us both to will and to do of His good pleasure. MAN WORKS, AND GOD WORKS; but God can do NOTHING without Man's co-operation." (R&H 1/25/1898)

Man works, and God works. Man is called upon to strain every muscle, and to exercise every faculty, in the struggle for immortality; but it is God who supplies the efficiency." (R&H 4/28/1910)

A far cry from "faith ALONE!"

Not at all. It is faith alone; but salvific faith always produces works.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7244
03/07/06 02:52 PM
03/07/06 02:52 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
This has turned into total semantics. One would wonder why you logically chose to argue a differing point of view as I have stated over and over that it is faith that works myself.

You chose to stand opposite to a position I took to Darius' statement, so I was assummed you took the same stand as Darius. It should be noted that there have been bad connotations applied to the term "faith alone" since the days of the Apostles, and is probably why the Holy Spirit, in neither the Bible nor the SOP, ever used the term salvationally, instead choosing the exact opposite in James' statement that it is NOT by faith alone. Your arguments, however, show you are supportive of faith THAT works, so again I am at a loss from your confrontational attitude toward my remark to Darius. Do you do it just for arguments sake?

I am equally at a loss to explain the logic behind the disgressions you take with the English language as well, taking the view that

Saved by faith in Christ alone, is the same as
Saved by faith alone in Christ; and that

I went alone by car, is the same as
I went by car alone (the first being, I came by myself in a car; the second being, I came using only a car)

That is between you and your English teacher, as it is not good grammer no matter how to seek to explain it.

The main point is now blurred as I would agree with your statements that we are saved by a faith that works, which I have been saying from the beginning, that Noah would not have been saved in disobedience in building the ark, nor was his seat guaranteed by his building it.

So then, the only question remaining is, do you or do you not agree with Darius' statement that salvation was accomplished 2,000 years ago at the cross? You are good at answering in many words to cloud the issue, but it would probably be fruitless for me to get a plain yes or no answer to this.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7245
03/07/06 03:43 PM
03/07/06 03:43 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
This has turned into total semantics. One would wonder why you logically chose to argue a differing point of view as I have stated over and over that it is faith that works myself.

I've never met you. I don't know what your viewpoint is. You quoted a statement from James, apparently discrediting (it seemed to me) the idea that salvation is by faith alone. I made the simple statement, "Salvation is by faith alone" and you reacted strongly. I responded to your reaction.

You chose to stand opposite to a position I took to Darius' statement, so I was assummed you took the same stand as Darius.

That was a naive assumption. Have you been reading what Darius writes? No one here is going to agree with him, as a whole. That doesn't mean he might say some things which are right on.

I still don't know what you are referring to. What I remember writing was, "Salvation is by faith alone." How can this be construed as taking the same stand as Darius, or standing opposite to a position you took, especially if you agree with it?


It should be noted that there have been bad connotations applied to the term "faith alone" since the days of the Apostles, and is probably why the Holy Spirit, in neither the Bible nor the SOP, ever used the term salvationally, instead choosing the exact opposite in James' statement that it is NOT by faith alone. Your arguments, however, show you are supportive of faith THAT works, so again I am at a loss from your confrontational attitude toward my remark to Darius. Do you do it just for arguments sake?

No, Bill, it was you who brought up the argument. I responded to your points.

I take it from your comments here that you are in agreement with what I wrote. However, until your very last post, this was not clear to me.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7246
03/07/06 05:41 PM
03/07/06 05:41 PM
J
Jeff  Offline
Supporting Member 2007
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 231
Mississippi, USA
As an observer to this exchange, I can't help but think that it is becoming personal.

Jeff

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7247
03/07/06 05:58 PM
03/07/06 05:58 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
I can only speak for myself. I don't know Bill. I have no feelings of animosity towards him. I hope nothing I've written would lead one to think so. I was reacting to the ideas he expressed, and hope I've not written anything appropriate either in content or in spirit.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7248
03/07/06 07:44 PM
03/07/06 07:44 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
The fact that this is looked upon as a personal issue is because of the ignorance toward the prominent errors regarding salvation.

The "faith alone" error is so wide spread, it amazes me that any SDA clings to the statement with such tenacity. As mentioned above, the Holy Spirit seems to keep that terminology from ending up in inspired counsel, then one would wonder why anyone would tend to use it.

We can argue the point until it is beating a dead horse, as was done here, and never acknowledge that the Bible NEVER uses the term faith alone (or, only), except in the negative "NOT by faith only".

While examples have been cited to contrary this position, they themselves are evidence that there is no direct wording that does state otherwise. Examples prove nothing in and of themselves. When Sunday keepers are confronted, they strictly use example driven texts to prove their point (Paul preached on Sunday, donations were collected on Sunday, Jesus went against rabbinic sabbath teachings, etc.). Why is the same methodolgy being used here when we know this is not good Bible exegesis? Don't you think there is a good reason why neither the Bible nor the SOP use "faith alone", when applied to salvation, in a good light?

One can fit in very well with evangelical Christianity with these "key words", or one can use this as a way of being ambiguous. It was only after posting additional comments that one could be sure where Tom stood on this matter.

"Said the angel, 'God will sustain him. His faith must be made perfect by works, for FAITH ALONE IS DEAD. It must be sustained by works. A living faith is always manifested by works.' (Testimonies, vol 1, page 619 & quoted from Ellen White in her biography, vol. 2, page 130)

"On the other hand, those who claim that their faith alone will save them, are trusting to a rope of sand; for faith is strengthened and made perfect by works only." (Redemption, #7, page 63, also ST 4/20/1904 & R&H 4/13/1911 - slightly different wording)

"If we choose to disobey His commandments, we may cry, 'Faith, faith, only have faith,' and the response will come back from the sure word of God, 'Faith without works is dead' (James 2:20). (Faith & Works, page 47)

"The faith that does not produce good works does not justify the soul (James 2:24 quoted)." (The New Life, page 28)

"From the pulpits of today the words are uttered: 'Believe, only believe. Have faith in Christ; you have nothing to do with the old law, only trust in Christ.' How different is this from the words of the apostle who declares that faith without works is dead." (Faith & Works, page 89)

"There are many who cry, 'Beleive, only believe.' Ask them what you are to believe. Are you to believe the lies forged by Satan." (Selected Messages, Vol. 1, page 347)

"Many at the present day say, 'Believe, only believe, and live.' Faith and works must go together, believing and doing are blended." (Selected Messages, Vol. 1, page 373)

These examples are not to further this debate with Tom, but to show why neither the Bible nor the SOP generally use "faith alone" in a good light. It can be said that we are saved in faith alone since the real meaning of true faith implies an active, working faith; but this has been preverted for thousands of years. Gnosticism and the doctrine of the Nicolaitans were all about "faith alone", but they perverted it into a mental ascent that had nothing to do with behavior. One should be very wary of accepting the view of "faith alone" as it comes with different meanings to different people. Mostly bad.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7249
03/07/06 09:03 PM
03/07/06 09:03 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
The fact that this is looked upon as a personal issue is because of the ignorance toward the prominent errors regarding salvation.

I think Jeff was referring to the tone, which is at times quite sharp. In particular, you appear to be angry. That's my impression anyway. I wanted to assure him that I'm not angry. You may well not be either. In written discourse one does not have clues such as body language and voice inflection to help, so comments come accross as much stronger than they would in person. I try to adjust for this by editing my posts and dialing back the tone, but it's easy to miss something and come accross too sharply.

The "faith alone" error is so wide spread, it amazes me that any SDA clings to the statement with such tenacity. As mentioned above, the Holy Spirit seems to keep that terminology from ending up in inspired counsel, then one would wonder why anyone would tend to use it.

I don't know why you're insisting on this. I've already provided two examples where the Spirit of Prophecy used the phrase. Here's the second of two:

quote:
When you turn away from the broken cisterns that can hold no water, and in the name of Jesus your Advocate come directly to God, asking for the things you need, the righteousness of Christ will be revealed as your righteousness, the virtue of Christ as your virtue. You will then understand that justification will come alone through faith in Christ; for in Jesus is revealed the perfection of the character of God; in His life is manifested the outworking of the principles of holiness.(1SM 330)
"justification will come alone through faith in Christ." The heresy is not "faith alone" but "faith which isn't faith." True faith produces works. The works testify to the genuineness of the faith. But it's important that we understand that our salvation is a free gift, received by faith alone. Here's the other quote I referenced.

quote:
There is not a point that needs to be dwelt upon more earnestly, repeated more frequently, or established more firmly in the minds of all than the impossibility of fallen man meriting anything by his own best good works. Salvation is through faith in Jesus Christ alone. (FW 18)
So not only does inspired counself use the phrase, it tells us that there is nothing which needs to be repeated more frequently than this! We have a very strong disposition to want to make God a debtor to us. Also to be "holier than thou." Remembering that we are justified through faith alone can help us remember our condition is no better than anyone else, apart from the grace of God.

We can argue the point until it is beating a dead horse, as was done here, and never acknowledge that the Bible NEVER uses the term faith alone (or, only), except in the negative "NOT by faith only".

Paul writes the following:

quote:
4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.

5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,

If anything the expression Paul uses, "faith without works," is even stronger than "faith alone." Apparently the Holy Spirit is very desirous that we should understand this concept; what do you think?

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7250
03/07/06 09:49 PM
03/07/06 09:49 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
This is a complicated subject to study. Both sides of this can find prooftexts to support their view and the balanced biblical view requires all of them to be covered. This is of course one of the main themes in the bible and therefore requires the student to consider all parts of the scriptures. For instance the hall of faith in Hebrews 11.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7251
03/07/06 09:56 PM
03/07/06 09:56 PM
J
Jeff  Offline
Supporting Member 2007
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 231
Mississippi, USA
First, a word about tone. Bill I do think that your posts have been quite sharp and accusatory without due cause. I don’t think they reflect the compassion I’m sure you have towards others. It is the tone that makes me think it is getting personal, since the tone has gotten progressively sharper.

Now as for what you’ve been discussing…

Bill said
quote:
It can be said that we are saved in faith alone since the real meaning of true faith implies an active, working faith
Tom said
quote:
"justification will come alone through faith in Christ." The heresy is not "faith alone" but "faith which isn't faith." True faith produces works. The works testify to the genuineness of the faith. But it's important that we understand that our salvation is a free gift, received by faith alone.
You seem to be saying the same things yet getting hung up on semantics. The fact that “faith only” has been perverted for thousands of years does not mean that Tom is perverting it. So getting snagged on the phrase “faith alone”, knowing that neither of you believes anyone can be saved by a faith that does not produce works, is unproductive. That may be why it seems you’re beating a dead horse.

I think the point that Tom makes is that we can’t earn our own salvation just by works. We’ve already broken the law and deserve death. The only thing we can do to pay our own penalty is to die the second death. Through faith we are justified, and the evidence that we have a saving faith is manifest by our works. So we can say that if we don’t have works we also don’t have salvation since no works, no faith; no faith, no justification; no justification, no life; no life, death.

I think that a related heresy is that sanctification isn’t a necessary for salvation and it isn’t a component of grace in the same sense that justification is a component of grace.

Jeff

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7252
03/07/06 10:07 PM
03/07/06 10:07 PM
asygo  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2023

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,583
California, USA
I think this thread has gotten way off-topic. Soteriology is very important, but I don't think it was the intended topic here. It would be nice to split this up into more focused threads, but that may not be possible now.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7253
03/08/06 01:35 PM
03/08/06 01:35 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
Brother Arnold,

I would like to address your concern first: It appears the original issue has already died, unless you would like to revive it with an additional statement. It appears to me that if everyone had to sign what I did in order to begin posting, then some, at least, downright lied about their feelings toward Ellen White's writings. Others, even more insidious, only half believe it. Much has been said about descrepencies, both in the Bible and the SOP, but when pushed to produce any real ones, it suddenly got quiet. The problem with producing descrepencies is that it would show that we cannot trust the Bible or SOP in its totality, and gives people leeway to pick and choose what is and what is not inspired. I considered starting a topic here on this issue and transposing the posts from TRO, but as the issue died there as well, as no one wanted to produce descrepencies there either, I assummed it would do the same here.

Everybody else: I need to appologize for my posts, while I did not have any ill feelings, it appears many take it as so. I would state for the record that I attack issues and the forums, as well as e-mails, don't allow for ways in which non-verbal communication can be added to help others recognize how one is reacting, as Tom brings out above. For instance, I use all capital letters to highlight and one post Tom stated I was "shouting", I did not take offense at this but neither did I consider myself as shouting.

When posting, one regularly takes the shortest method to convey a thought and this can come across as being curt. The alternative being, "Hello Tom, how's the wife and kids? Now, about this 'faith alone' stuff..." I do admit, I have been frustrated in these posts, mainly due to calling things what set laws do not allow, specifically in English grammer. "Faith alone in Christ" is not the same as "faith in Christ alone", while it can be said the context supports this or that there is no other option, is not valid. The Catholics believe in faith in Christ AND (there I go shouting again!) Mary or faith in Christ AND the saints, ther are many errors possible which Ellen White would have known of, yet she choose to write the latter. I have consistently asked for a statement saying "faith alone" and instead get examples, which do not prove the point. I understand that Toma nd I are saying the same thing, even though I choose to not use the statement "faith alone" as I see obedience as necessary but not meritorious, I believe he would say the same, yet chooses to sate it is still by "faith alone". I would call this a misnomer which is only detectable after continued questioning. Ah, faith "alone" but yet includes obedience, how then is it alone?

My further examples, then, were to show how the Bible and SOP treats that verbage, which is not kindly, as if to say, "don't say 'faith alone' as people may misconstrue what you are really saying is necessary for salvation." But again, rather than confront the issue, we will quote texts that imply the usage, though they do not state it directly. It is a delicate balance that needs to be taught, it is not "faith and works", as if the works were meritorious. Nor is it (may I say this?) "faith alone" as if works didn't matter. But "faith that works", as she says in the posts above, where the two are blended. Paul says it best in Galatians 2:20-21, "I am crucified (dead) with Christ: nevertheless I live, yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me." This is salvation! We get it by faith, but it is not until we are empowered by the Spirit of the Son of God living in us, and doing I might add, are we truly saved. This doing within us is His doing, therefore it is not meritorious to us, yet it is required!

"There are conditions to our receiving justification and sanctification, and the righteousness of Christ. I know your (Elder AT Jones) meaning, but you leave the wrong impression upon many minds. While good works will save even one soul, yet it is impossible for even one soul to be saved without good works." (Faith & Works, page 111)

"The covenant of grace was first made with man in Eden, when after the Fall there was given a divine promise that the seed of the woman should bruise the serpent's head. To all men this covenant offered pardon and assisting grace of God for future obedience through faith in Christ. It also promised eternal life on condition of fidelity to God's law. Thus the patriarchs received the hope of salvation." (Patriarchs & Prophets, page 370)

"From a sense of thorough conviction, you can testify to men of the immutable character of the law manifested by the death of Christ on the cross, the malignate nature of sin, and the righteousness of God in justifying the believer in Jesus, on condition of his future obedience to the statutes of God's government in heaven and earth." (R&H 4/24/1888)

Faith Alone? Yes, you can stretch the concept and say that, but since the term is so misrepresented, why throw a possible stumbling block before your brother instead of calling it what is, "Faith THAT works!"

"In the gift of His only begotten Son He has insured to us eternal life upon condition of our faith and obedience." (ST 5/6/1889)

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7254
03/08/06 01:43 PM
03/08/06 01:43 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
Sorry, I see a misquote in the first SOP quotation,

"while good works will NOT save even one soul..."

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7255
03/08/06 02:32 PM
03/08/06 02:32 PM
J
Jeff  Offline
Supporting Member 2007
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 231
Mississippi, USA
quote:
Ah, faith "alone" but yet includes obedience, how then is it alone?
If obedience is a necessary and integral component of faith, then the statement “faith alone” is an accurate and complete statement, even though it has been misunderstood and misapplied over the centuries. I do agree that when using the term “faith alone” among people who mean it differently, i.e., don’t regard obedience as an integral component, we need to refer to the concept in clearer terms. I think “faith THAT works” is appropriate. But we can’t assume that when another person uses the term “faith alone” that he or she necessarily omits obedience as a component. We should first seek to know what is meant before concluding anything.

BTW, Bill, the tone in your last post is a marked improvement. The softer tone gives the impression that you respect those whom you are addressing.

As a side note, you can go to the EGW website, look the references up there, then cut and paste them to save you all the time of keying them in and perhaps missing key words. [Smile]

Jeff

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7256
03/08/06 03:07 PM
03/08/06 03:07 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Bill, I agree with Jeff. The last post was far more pleasant.

Capitilazation in net etiquette is considered shouting and is frowned upon (unless it's really your intention to do the equivalent of shouting). Instead there are other ways of emphasizing, two common ones being the use of "*" or italics. For example, faith *and* works, or faith and works. If you only use the caps ones in a post for the word "AND," no one will notice. BUT IF THERE IS A SENTENCE WITH A WHOLE LOT OF CAPS, IT LOOKS LIKE SHOUTING.

This is admitedly a minor point, but I thought you might be interested in this background.

You wrote:

quote:
"Faith alone in Christ" is not the same as "faith in Christ alone", while it can be said the context supports this or that there is no other option, is not valid.
I'm glad it appears you and I appear to be in agreement that it's by faith alone that we are justified, with the understanding the genuine faith is always evidenced by good works. Having said that, I don't understand your statement above. I showed the two statements may indeed mean the same thing, both by showing what her context was and by giving an analagous example. So why are you still disputing this point? I don't get it.

Here's a further example:
1.Only I wanted to get there on time.
2.I only wanted to get there on time.
3.I wanted only to get there on time.

These statements could mean either I was the only one who wanted to get there on time, or I wanted nothing other than to get there on time, with the exception that #3 could only be understood the second way. The way to know that 1 or 2 means is by the context. Only 3 is clear, without respect to context, as to the meaning. If the intent of the author is the that I wanted above all things to get there on time, 1 and 2 are for practical purposes equivalent. There would be no need to argue that they are different, except for the purposes of semantics.

Ellen White wrote, "Salvation is through faith in Christ alone." She meant "salvation is through faith alone in Christ" not "salvation is through faith in Christ only as opposed to faith in Christ and something else." Had she written "Salvation is through faith alone in Christ" (as I wrote it), the ambiguity would have been avoided, but the way she wrote it is clearly understandable by taking into account the context.

So given that you agree with me, what's your point? Thank you (and, by the way, how's the wife and kids?)

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7257
03/09/06 04:59 AM
03/09/06 04:59 AM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
One last post, then I am ready to hang this one up, as this topic has gone from SOP & the Bible, to Faith and/or Works, and now to grammatical English.

Tom, you listed three examples of English.

1) Faith alone in Christ vs Faith in Christ alone

2) I came by car alone vs I came alone by car

3) A.Only I wanted to get there on time.
B.I only wanted to get there on time.
C.I wanted only to get there on time.

In #1, "alone" is an adjective helping to clarify the noun, either "faith" or "Christ". Either way does make a difference. Context does not change the word usage enough to warrant a "definite" re-reading of the passage. (I do agree that the context is faith and/or works, but I believe she meant what she said and could have written it the other way, but didn't - was there a reason?)

In #2, "alone" is either an adjective helping to clarify the noun "car" (only used a car), or it is an adverb clarifying the verb "came" (came by myself). Either way does make a difference. (the use of the word "only" (instead of alone) in these sentences would make the statement more ambiguous if used either way - I only came by car or I came by car only; would more likely be viewed as saying the same thing)

In #3, the word order makes no difference since the adverb "only" applies to the verb "wanted" in all three clauses.

In 25 million words, Ellen White had ample opportunity to state that we are saved by faith alone in Christ. Where is a clear cut example, as this is not it? Is there a difference between the two statements? Yes, one says we are saved by only having faith, the other says we are saved only by Christ (as opposed to either works, or somebody else such as Mary). It is my belief that to say we are saved by faith alone, or even faith AND works, while both are technically correct, is something that the Holy Spirit seems to shy away from having anybody write. Why? Because it is a misconstrued statement. Read the above SOP quote, "it is impossible for even one soul to be saved without good works." But to say "faith and works" also can be a misconstrued statement. You have failed to produce one statement where she quite definitely says "faith alone (or, only)" in regards to salvation. If the Holy Spirit did not say it, why should we? Who are we to say, "I know I correctly understand faith to include (good works, obedience, etc) so therefore I can state we are saved by faith alone," when the Bible never says that. Semantics? Not necessarily, maybe the Holy Spirit knows better than we that people are more likely to confuse the issue than we would think. Meanwhile, there are multitudes of quotes against "faith alone", "belief only", etc. Now why is that? Are we trying to be more precise than the Bible? Are we trying to be more righteous than God? I can go through every one of the texts you quoted and show that they are either incomplete or that there is more to the text than a surface reading.

(example, John 3:16 - the same Jesus who said that also said, "he who believes and is baptised", same Jesus who said, "he who endures to the end shall be saved", etc)

Now I realize the point is no longer defining faith, it is whether saying "faith alone" is a complete statement. While Jeff would concur, I still do not. There are problems with the statement which is why you will not find a clear cut example in all those Bible or SOP quotes (but one, that I know of - I will quote it at the bottom). Keep in mind, I have been stating generalities, I tried hard to steer clear of saying "never" states "faith alone", but the vast majority of quotes that use this terminology are quite definitely negative, of that there can be no doubt!

"By faith only can we reach heaven" (ST 4/1/1880) This follows the sentence "Obedience towards God is sure to bring the victory", so it is a complete thought still.

Knowing now, that we do see this issue in the same light, I will not post regarding this again, but I will state for the record, that I disagree with the usage of the term "faith alone' as un-Biblical since the only time it occurs in Scripture is the statement "not by faith only", and I take my stand on what God says and how He says it.

BTW - The wife and kids are fine and, assuming you are married with children, I pray your's are as well. God bless!

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7258
03/08/06 05:48 PM
03/08/06 05:48 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
quote:
You have failed to produce one statement where she quite definitely says "faith alone (or, only)" in regards to salvation.
This is true. I produced two. The second one says, "You will then understand that justification will come alone through faith in Christ..." (1SM 330)

I can look for more if you wish. I also produced quite a number of Scripture references, including this one:

quote:
4Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.

5But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

6Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,

7Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered.

Here Paul uses the expression "righteousness without works" which, if it doesn't mean rightouesness is "faith alone" what does it mean?

On the one hand, you say you are agreeing with me, yet you keep arguing against something. What are you arguing against?

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7259
03/08/06 06:10 PM
03/08/06 06:10 PM
J
Jeff  Offline
Supporting Member 2007
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 231
Mississippi, USA
quote:
If the Holy Spirit did not say it, why should we? Who are we to say, "I know I correctly understand faith to include (good works, obedience, etc) so therefore I can state we are saved by faith alone," when the Bible never says that. Semantics? Not necessarily, maybe the Holy Spirit knows better than we that people are more likely to confuse the issue than we would think.
This argument makes no sense. Are we now limited in our speech to words translated from the original inspired text to English? The logical conclusion of what you’re saying seems to be so.

Jeff

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7260
03/08/06 08:21 PM
03/08/06 08:21 PM
B
Bill Wennell  Offline
Posting New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Augusta, KY
I really don't want to go back on my word of not posting here, but I remembered a letter I had from the EGW Estate on this matter and thought I should end on it.

It should be stated as well that a lot of this may depend on one's background. My first SDA pastor believed in "faith alone", or should I call it "justification alone". He also preached that Jesus could not die for your sins, quoting Ezekiel 18:20, "The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither the father bear the iniquity of the son" as his source. By the way, he is still a SDA pastor and has been promoted to a multi-church district. Being censored out of that church, I went to another where, guess what? The subject of "faith alone" was again raised. This was the subject of the following letters (in April 2003), but the matter doesn't stop there. The pastor of the church where I was an elder until the end of 2005 told me right before I left what his views of salvation were. Guess what? "Faith alone" citing Acts 16:31, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house" as his summation of the whole Bible, no obedience required!

So forgive me if your sterile environments leave you with nothing to do but post on nice cushy forums were errors are nowhere to be found, the church is running fine, and we can call things whatever we want, since everyone is on the same sheet of music. I have been to many churches in 3 different states and I don't believe anyone who tells me they subscribe to the 28 fundamental beliefs, the writings of Ellen White, or any of their definitions until they prove that they use the same terminology, otherwise they end up saying the same things but viewing them in entirely different points of view.

First letter to the Head Deacon from me:

Sorry, I shouldn't have left Sabbath with a misunderstanding of where I stand on how we are saved. The Bible makes it clear that we are saved by grace through a faith that works. So what exactly is "salvation by faith alone?"

Let us first look at the other two views of salvation:

1) Faith AND Works: This is a Jewish and Catholic belief. One is saved by faith and meritorious works that must be earned. The Catholics believe that you are saved by faith and that you must perform meritorious deeds such as viewing the relics of saints, confession to a priesthood, pilgrimages, etc. (Legalism)

2) Faith alone: Evangelical Christianity follows the beliefs of Martin Luther when he said "Sola fe" (Faith alone!). While Martin Luther was a great man in an era of spiritual darkness, he swung the pendulum of Catholic faith and works in the totally opposite direction too far. Martin Luther also quoted "Sola Scriptura" (The Bible and the Bible only!). However, he denied the inspiration of the books of Hebrews, James, Jude, and Revelation. Because he rejected the book of James, which he called an "epistle of straw," he failed to grasp the Biblical concept of a faith THAT works. Believing that the works Paul spoke of included ALL works, Luther disregarded any works of man has being part of his salvation regardless of it's being the cause or fruit of salvation. (Liberalism)

So what is salvation by "faith alone?" When Ellen White uses the term "faith alone (or only)" she is contrasting faith AND works, a meritorious view of working oneself to heaven. This is evidenced in the book Steps to Christ where she writes:

"There are two errors against which the children of God--particularly those who have just come to trust in His grace--especially need to guard. The first, already dwelt upon, is that of looking to their own works, trusting to anything they can do, to bring themselves into harmony with God. He who is trying to become holy by his own works in keeping the law, is attempting an impossibility. All that man can do without Christ is polluted with selfishness and sin. It is the grace of Christ alone, through faith, that can make us holy. {SC 59.4}
The opposite and no less dangerous error is that belief in Christ releases men from keeping the law of God; that since by faith alone we become partakers of the grace of Christ, our works have nothing to do with our redemption." {SC 60.1}

Faith and belief, in the New Testament are translated from the same Greek word, and therefore "to have faith" or "to believe" have the same meaning. Now the bible tells us explicitly that "Faith without works is dead" and there is no such thing as "Sola Fe."

KJV James 2:17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

KJV James 2:24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.

VUL James 2:24 videtis quoniam ex operibus iustificatur homo et non ex fide tantum.

KJV James 2:20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?

This is not different from what Paul teaches, although his quote from Ephesians chapter 2 is always used by those trying to establish Luther's idea of salvation.

KJV Ephesians 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

Proponents of this view also always leave off the last part of this thought found in verse 10:

KJV Ephesians 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them. {ordained: or, prepared}

Another of Paul's books used to substantiate Luther is Galatians, here again, however, Paul sums up his view of salvation by "faith alone" by stating:

KJV Galatians 5:6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.

So we see that the Bible presents a uniform picture of a faith that produces works. While we know that the works are the fruit of salvation there are times in the Bible when it appears to make no difference so long as the idea comes across that no one will be saved without works of faith.

KJV John 6:53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.

There are also other "requirements" of salvation such as the Lord's Supper, Baptism, Witnessing, etc. These concepts are part of the New Covenant in which we are a part of if we are Christ's. They are our part of this agreement, what we must do. If Noah had refused God's "request" to build an ark, would he have been saved? However, even after building the ark, was God obligated to save Noah? The answer to both is No!

Faith and works are two oars which we must use equally if we {would} press our way up the stream against the current of unbelief. {FLB 115.6}

I was attending a meeting, and a large congregation were present. In my dream you were presenting the subject of faith and the imputed righteousness of Christ by faith. You repeated several times that works amounted to nothing, that there were no conditions. The matter was presented in that light that I knew minds would be confused and would not receive the correct impression in reference to faith and works, and I decided to write to you. You state this matter too strongly. There are conditions to our receiving justification and sanctification, and the righteousness of Christ. I know your meaning, but you leave a wrong impression upon many minds. While good works will not save even one soul, yet it is impossible for even one soul to be saved without good works. God saves us under a law, that we must ask if we would receive, seek if we would find, and knock if we would have the door opened unto us. {FW 111.1}

There are conditions to the fulfillment of God's promises, and prayer can never take the place of duty. "If ye love Me," Christ says, "Keep My commandments." "He that hath My commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth Me; and he that loveth Me shall be loved of My Father, and I will love him, and will manifest Myself to him." John 14:15, 21. Those who bring their petitions to God, claiming His promise while they do not comply with the conditions, insult Jehovah. They bring the name of Christ as their authority for the fulfillment of the promise, but they do not those things that would show faith in Christ and love for Him. {COL 143.2}

Many concede that Jesus Christ is the Saviour of the world, but at the same time they hold themselves away from Him, and fail to repent of their sins, fail to accept of Jesus as their personal Saviour. Their faith is simply the assent of the mind and judgment to the truth; but the truth is not brought into the heart, that it might sanctify the soul and transform the character. "For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified" (Rom. 8:29, 30). Calling and justification are not one and the same thing. Calling is the drawing of the sinner to Christ, and it is a work wrought by the Holy Spirit upon the heart, convicting of sin, and inviting to repentance. {1SM 389.2}

Sorry if I misrepresented this idea in any way!

His reply:

The opposite and no less dangerous error is that belief in Christ releases men from keeping the law of God; that since by faith alone we become partakers of the grace of Christ, our works have nothing to do with our redemption. {FLB 93.5}

But notice here that obedience is not a mere outward compliance, but the service of love. The law of God is an expression of His very nature; it is an embodiment of the great principle of love, and hence is the foundation of His government in heaven and earth. . . . Instead of releasing man from obedience, it is faith, and faith only, that makes us partakers of the grace of Christ, which enables us to render obedience. {FLB 93.6}

As Jesus was in human nature, so God means His followers to be. In His strength we are to live the life of purity and nobility which the Saviour lived.

The work of conquering evil is to be done through faith. Those who go into the battlefield will find that they must put on the whole armor of God. The shield of faith will be their defense and will enable them to be more than conquerors. Nothing else will avail but this--faith in the Lord of hosts, and obedience to His orders. Vast armies furnished with every other facility will avail nothing in the last great conflict. Without faith, an angel host could not help. Living faith alone will make them invincible and enable them to stand in the evil day, steadfast, unmovable, holding the beginning of their confidence firm unto the end. {AG 33.4}

The fierce temptation that His own Father had forever left Him caused that piercing cry from the cross: "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" {AG 170.4}

In His dying agony, as He yields up His precious life, He has by faith alone to trust in Him whom it has ever been His joy to obey. . . . Denied even bright hope and confidence in the triumph which will be His in the future, He cries with a loud voice: "Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit" (Luke 23:46). He is acquainted with the character of His Father, with His justice, His mercy, and His great love, and in submission He drops into His hands. {AG 170.5}

This prompted the following letter to the White Estate from me:

Dear Sirs,

We are having a discussion at our church over the meaning of the phrase "faith only (or alone)" as it is found in the Bible and the writings of Ellen White. These apparently contradicting statements have led to some confusion.

There are places where she writes of "faith alone" as all that is necessary:

The work of conquering evil is to be done through faith. Those who go into the battlefield will find that they must put on the whole armor of God. The shield of faith will be their defense and will enable them to be more than conquerors. Nothing else will avail but this-- faith in the Lord of hosts, and obedience to His orders. Vast armies furnished with every other facility will avail nothing in the last great conflict. Without faith, an angel host could not help. Living faith alone will make them invincible and enable them to stand in the evil day, steadfast, unmovable, holding the beginning of their confidence firm unto the end. {CT 182.4}

There are other places where "faith alone" also incorporates corresponding works:

James writes of Abraham and says, "Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only" (James 2:21-24). In order for man to be justified by faith, faith must reach a point where it will control the affections and impulses of the heart; and it is by obedience that faith itself is made perfect. {1SM 366.2}

Now trying to be subjective, I see there are three possibilities:

1) We are saved by faith alone regardless of corresponding works either viewed as meritorious or as a "fruit" of that faith.

2) There can be times when faith alone is "alive" regardless of corresponding works either viewed as meritorious or as a "fruit" of that faith.

3) All references to faith alone must be viewed in regard to having corresponding "works" as a fruit of that faith.

I realize that this is a sore spot for most of the church, but was hoping you could shed some light on any references where Mrs. White provides a clear view on why she sometimes writes of having "faith alone" and other times of a "faith that works."

Thank you for your help in this matter.

Their reply:

Dear Brother Wennell,

Thank you for contacting the Ellen G. White Estate. I don't think I know the complete answer to your question. I know that Mrs. White believed that while it is faith in Jesus alone that makes His salvation effective for us, she also believed that a genuine faith would affect the life, making a decided difference in how one lives. Faith alone does not live alone--it results in works.

I did a search in Mrs. White's published writings for the expression "faith alone." There were only 45 occurrences, and many of them were duplicates. This did not seem to be a major theme of Mrs. White's.

I did notice something, though, in the examples you gave. You seemed to be asking about salvation "by faith alone" (this is explicit in your point #1 below), but the first statement from Mrs. White that you quoted did not appear to be addressing that specific issue. Rather, it was addressing the issue of victory, of conquering evil. In this instance she said, "Nothing else will avail but this-- faith in the Lord of hosts, and obedience to His orders." So here she connects faith with obeying Christ's orders, in close proximity to a "faith alone" reference. How would we obtain victory without obeying? "Living faith alone" makes the obedience possible, but faith is not alone, is it? In so saying, we are not ascribing any merit to obedience or giving it partial credit for our salvation. We are only saying that genuine faith will be accompanied by obedience.

So we should note whether Mrs. White is discussing how the sinner is made right with God (salvation) or how we may obtain victory (sanctification). Perhaps it would be more precise to say that we are not saved by faith. Rather, we are saved by grace, through faith (see Eph. 2:8). But faith is the key to victory. The Bible says that "this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith" (1 Jn 5:4).

You asked not only about Mrs. White's use of the expression "faith alone" but also of "faith only." I did a computer search for this, and the first example that came up was one in which she critiqued those who used this expression (though puncutated a little differently):

"Without faith it is impossible to please Him: for he that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him" (Hebrews 11:6). There are many in the Christian world who claim that all that is necessary to salvation is to have faith; works are nothing, faith is the only essential. But God's Word tells us that faith without works is dead, being alone. Many refuse to obey God's commandments, yet they make a great deal of faith. But faith must have a foundation. {FW 47.1}
God's promises are all made upon conditions. If we do His will, if we walk in truth, then we may ask what we will, and it shall be done unto us. While we earnestly endeavor to be obedient, God will hear our petitions; but He will not bless us in disobedience. If we choose to disobey His commandments, we may cry, "Faith, faith, only have faith," and the response will come back from the sure Word of God, "Faith without works is dead" (James 2:20). Such faith will only be as sounding brass and as a tinkling cymbal. In order to have the benefits of God's grace we must do our part; we must faithfully work and bring forth fruits meet for repentance. {FW 47.2}

We are workers together with God. You are not to sit in indolence, waiting for some great occasion, in order to do a great work for the Master. You are not to neglect the duty that lies directly in your pathway, but you are to improve the little opportunities that open around you. . . . (Faith and Works, p. 47)

This statement comes from the book "Faith and Works." It seems to me that, with your interest in this subject, you might find this book a "must read."

The second statement that came up in that search was a reference to James 2:24: "Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only."

The third connected faith with obedience:

But notice here that obedience is not a mere outward compliance, but the service of love. The law of God is an expression of His very nature; it is an embodiment of the great principle of love, and hence is the foundation of His government in heaven and earth. . . . Instead of releasing man from obedience, it is faith, and faith only, that makes us partakers of the grace of Christ, which enables us to render obedience. {The Faith I Live By, p. 93}

I did not take matters further, but you may wish to do so. I would suggest "Faith and Works," and you may also do searches such as I did, either on a computer with the CD-ROM (the CD-ROMs are being sold at 25% discount at the ABCs, by the way) or using the "Search the Writings" feature on our website, www.WhiteEstate.org.

I hope this is helpful. Thank you for writing, and God bless!

--------
William Fagal, Director
Ellen G. White Estate Branch Office
Andrews University
Berrien Springs, MI 49104-1400 USA
Phone: 269 471-3209
FAX: 269 471-2646
Website: www.WhiteEstate.org or www.egwestate.andrews.edu
E-mail: egw@aubranch.egwestate.andrews.edu

My initial reply to Elder Fagal:

Brother Fagal,
Thank you for your response and in such a timely manner. I really feel sorry to bother you with such a question that I feel is so clear in both the Bible and the SOP. The proponents of "Faith Only" happen to be all the church leaders, the elders, deacons, teachers, etc. They have many accumulated years in the church where I have only five. When I initially brought up James response it was meet with, "If there was a dead body here (in the church) true it is dead but it is still here." In essence, faith without works is "alive." I tried to make the e-mail as non-biased as possible, but I wrote because they are to a degree "respecters of persons" that is, an answer from the BRI or the EGW Estate carries more weight than an idea straight from the Bible without "interpretation." I didn't write the BRI as they have articles addressing the problem and I was expecting them to just refer to these articles (I already gave them the articles without response, maybe they don't like pre-prepared responses). Again, thank you for your time!

(By the way, NO this letter didn't help the matter)

His last reply:

Dear Brother Wennell,

In today's email someone asked me for a certain quote, and when I found it I thought of our correspondence yesterday. I'll share it here with you:

When it is in the heart to obey God, when efforts are put forth to this end, Jesus accepts this disposition and effort as man's best service, and He makes up for the deficiency with His own divine merit. But He will not accept those who claim to have faith in Him, and yet are disloyal to His Father's commandment. We hear a great deal about faith, but we need to hear a great deal more about works. Many are deceiving their own souls by living an easygoing, accommodating, crossless religion. But Jesus says, "If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me."--The Signs of the Times, June 16, 1890. {Selected Messages, book 1, p. 382}

For those interested, here are the links to the Biblical Research Institute regarding this issue:

http://biblicalresearch.gc.adventist.org/Biblequestions/JustificationWorksHeb%201135.htm

http://biblicalresearch.gc.adventist.org/documents/justification%20by%20faith.htm

http://biblicalresearch.gc.adventist.org/documents/Salvation%20by%20Faith.htm

http://biblicalresearch.gc.adventist.org/documents/index.html

Jeff,
I never said we could not use terminology not found in the Bible (such as the word Trinity, for example), what I am saying is, why are we using terms that are ambiguous, or downright misleading, when both Bible writers and Ellen White purposefully avoided such terms and/or spoke against those who them? The terminolgy of "faith alone" is misleading as the faith part is justification and the works part is sanctification and both are required for salvation. Therefore, it is more appropriate to say we are saved by faith and works, though no one would want to use that terminolgy because of the stigma associated with it. Works are required, but not meritorious. Faith is required, but it is not meritorious either (I have a quote on that one as well). I have the feeling one day you will have to rethink your terminology, or get lumped in with evangelical Christianity, they believe in "faith alone" as well!

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7261
03/08/06 09:14 PM
03/08/06 09:14 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
quote:
So forgive me if your sterile environments leave you with nothing to do but post on nice cushy forums were errors are nowhere to be found, the church is running fine, and we can call things whatever we want, since everyone is on the same sheet of music.
I didn't understand this. What exactly is it you are asking for forgiveness for?

Regarding sanctification, it is also by faith. Salvation is by faith alone in Christ, and sanctification is a part of salvation. Therefore it is by faith. This is born out by the words of Jesus who said:

quote:
To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. (Acts 26:18)
Regarding this quote:

quote:
But notice here that obedience is not a mere outward compliance, but the service of love. The law of God is an expression of His very nature; it is an embodiment of the great principle of love, and hence is the foundation of His government in heaven and earth.
This brings out that obedience is the service of love, and that love is the principle of God's government, the expression of His very nature. Since salvation is by faith alone, we can conclude that by faith alone we are bound to God and His holy law. As the New Covenant promise puts it, God writes His law in our heart. That is, he so transforms us that it becomes our desire to do His will, which is to live the service of love, which are what His law is all about. We are transformed into His image, and becoming like Him, His law becomes the expression of our nature as well.

That's a great quote Bill! Glad you included it.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7262
03/08/06 09:32 PM
03/08/06 09:32 PM
J
Jeff  Offline
Supporting Member 2007
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 231
Mississippi, USA
Bill, you have managed to convince me that I should avoid using the phrase "saved by faith alone" unless I also describe what comprises faith.

Jeff

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7263
04/21/06 04:39 PM
04/21/06 04:39 PM
DebbieB  Offline
Regular Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 53
United Kingdom
Quote:

There are a number of different topics now being discussed, so let's deal with them one at a time.

1) Are Ellen White's writings on par with the Bible?

Yes, they have the same Author, so we make a mistake when we try to pit one against the other. If you disagree with this, then may I propose that the real question would be to ask God why He sent another prophet if one was not needed.

Furthermore, what group since Apostalic time has had the entire truths set out in the Bible? This demonstrates the need of Him sending Ellen White.




Bill Wennell be careful!!!!! You are on very dangerous ground here! Revelation tells us clearly that there is no more to add to the bible! In fact we are cautioned that whoever adds to these words to him will be added the seven last plagues and whoever takes away from these words his name will be reoved from out of the book of life! By putting sister White in the level of the Bible you are on dangerous ground of adding to the scriptures!
Are we not allowed to have a prophet who EXPOUNDS on biblical truthes without bring in new truthes and thereby ADDING to the bible? Instead of condemning those who do not share your particular line of thought please consider this question: CAN the adventist truthes be proven from the Bible WITHOUT Mrs White? If your answer is no then I would really suggest that either you are making Mrs White a god OR that you are in the wrong church!
For myself I do believe that she was inspired in her writing, but also that she could make mistakes like anyone else and therefore I enjoy her works (now I'm old enough to appreciate them!), but I would have to disagree with you putting her on the level of the bible!
Of course in all ages and generations we have had ALL the truthes set out in the Bible, just we as fallible individuals have not made the use of such a wealthy resource! We rely on having others expund the scriptures for us. We want to be fed rather than to feed ourselves!
By the way if you believe so strongly about her being on the same level of the bible to you have a copy of the study bible put out the Seventh Day Adventist Reform Movement created with E G White commentary in it?

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7264
04/21/06 06:30 PM
04/21/06 06:30 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Ellen White didn't bring in any new truths? What about the idea that if one eats meat one won't be able to be translated? Is that truth in Scripture? Or how about that there are millions of worlds, which each had a tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and only this world fell? Is this truth in Scripture?

Why would the fact that God used a prophet to communicate truth specific to our time imply that the Bible was being added to?

Please be clear that I am not wishing to agree (or disagree) with Bill's statements, nor am I trying to argue that Ellen White is equal with Scripture; I'm simply questioning the logic that if Ellen White brought us new truth, then she is adding to the Bible.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7265
04/21/06 07:20 PM
04/21/06 07:20 PM
Darius  Offline
Dedicated Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,163
Muncie, IN
If we would only accept the Bible for what it is -- the history of an ancient people -- instead of trying to convince people that it is the "inerrant word of God," we would never have to worry whether EGW's writings are equal to the Bible.


Darius A. Lecointe, J.D., Ph.D.
No weapon formed against me shall prosper.
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7266
04/21/06 08:24 PM
04/21/06 08:24 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
Tom,
I dont quite see how "there was a tree of good and evil on every inhabited planet in the universe" qualifies as "truth specific to our time"? Im not here questioning its truthfullness, only its usefullness.

Also, if Ellen, as you imply, added conditions of works to human salvation during the last generation. Is this not a bigger problem for her credibility than anything else?

Darius
Of course you are right, if there is nothing special about the bible then only a professor of literature would have reason to compare it to other books. However, if the bible is the only book on earth that contains pure information about who the creator of our universe is and how this creator relates to humans. Then we would have reason to be carefull of what other literature we compare it to.

Thus the question, is there more to the bible than to Homers Illiad or Pliny the youngers Epistles?

/Thomas


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7267
04/22/06 02:36 AM
04/22/06 02:36 AM
J
Jeff  Offline
Supporting Member 2007
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 231
Mississippi, USA
Quote:

If we would only accept the Bible for what it is -- the history of an ancient people -- instead of trying to convince people that it is the "inerrant word of God," we would never have to worry whether EGW's writings are equal to the Bible.




If the Bible is just the history of an ancient people, then nothing says that the God they worshiped is real or especially that the God who died and rose to redeem us is real. If the Bible should really be written “bible”—as a mere collection of historical books—then there is no basis for our hope in the resurrection. “…and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins.” (1Co 15:17 NASB)

I think you have to make some stand for faith, because if empirical evidence is your only basis for belief, you might as well be agnostic. If that is the case, I don’t see the point in any of this.

Jeff


[i]...Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.</i]
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7268
04/22/06 04:11 PM
04/22/06 04:11 PM
D
Dr.Glenn  Offline
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 104
Nevada
DebbieB:
I agree.
EGW said: "Brother J would confuse the mind by seeking to make it appear that the light God has given through the Testimonies is an addition to the word of God, but he presents the matter in a false light. God has seen fit in this manner to bring the minds of His people to His word, to give them a clearer understanding or it. But notwithstanding all this, some who profess to make the word of God their study are found living in direct opposition to its plainest teachings. Then to leave men and women without excuse, God gives plain and pointed testimonies bringing them back to the word of God that they have neglected to follow." 5T663


grw
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7269
04/22/06 05:00 PM
04/22/06 05:00 PM
D
Dr.Glenn  Offline
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 104
Nevada
Dear BBD:
When the first statement of fundamental beliefs was published, Seventh-day Adventists believed this:
"XVI. That the Spirit of God has promised to manifest itself in the church through certain gifts, enumerated especially in 1 Cor.12 and Eph.4; that these gifts are not designed to supersede, or take the place of, the Bible, which is sufficient to make us wise unto salvation, any more than the Bible can take the place of the Holy Spirit; that, in specifying the various channels of its operation, that spirit has simply made provision for its own existence and presence with the people of God to the end of time, to lead us to an understanding of that word which it had inspired, to convince of sin, and to work a transformation in the heart and life; that those who deny to the Spirit its place and operation, do plainly deny that part of the Bible which assigns to it this work and position."
(the gift of prophecy and spiritual gifts were included in one paragraph in the original statement whereas the 1980 statement of beliefs it is set forth in two paragraphs: 17 and 18)
The writings of E.G. White are a gift given to the church by the Holy Spirit.
Do Seventh-day Adventists still believe this original statement of belief?


grw
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7270
04/26/06 01:58 AM
04/26/06 01:58 AM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
This is what it says now:

Quote:


18. Gift of Prophecy
One of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is prophecy. This gift is an identifying mark of the remnant church and was manifested in the ministry of Ellen G. White. As the Lord’s messenger, her writings are a continuing and authoritative source of truth which provide for the church comfort, guidance, instruction, and correction. They also make clear that the Bible is the standard by which all teaching and experience must be tested. (Joel 2:28, 29; Acts 2:14-21; Heb. 1:1-3; Rev. 12:17; 19:10.)




Isn't this new wording basically saying the same thing?


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7271
04/26/06 02:44 AM
04/26/06 02:44 AM
D
Dr.Glenn  Offline
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 104
Nevada
Quote:

This is what it says now:

Quote:


18. Gift of Prophecy
One of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is prophecy. This gift is an identifying mark of the remnant church and was manifested in the ministry of Ellen G. White. As the Lord’s messenger, her writings are a continuing and authoritative source of truth which provide for the church comfort, guidance, instruction, and correction. They also make clear that the Bible is the standard by which all teaching and experience must be tested. (Joel 2:28, 29; Acts 2:14-21; Heb. 1:1-3; Rev. 12:17; 19:10.)




Isn't this new wording basically saying the same thing?




I think the original statement makes it much clearer that the gifts of the Spirit of God which includes the writings of EGW are not to take the place of the Bible. Many people will quote EGW, but will not direct a person to the Bible. I get a different picture when I read the writings of EGW. If I read far enough, she always gives a Bible text to look up.


grw
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7272
04/26/06 07:08 AM
04/26/06 07:08 AM
Kevin H  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2024

Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 628
New York
In today's world we see prophecy as the Bible writers, then Mrs. White, but archaeologists tell us that there was a prophetic guild with differnt types of prophets. There were the prophets who's writings became the Bible, who tended to have a special relationship with Emperors and giving a very universal message. Then there were local prophets who would make local applications of the universal message to groups or to certan times in history.

We find this same issue in history. The early church had Bible writers, and also metions prohets who did not write the Bible. Then during the dark ages we find that there was a man (and I'm sorry but I keep mispelling his name) Jehocin of Flore, who the church had accepted as a prophet, and the pope who was living at that time also proclaimed him to be a true prophet. His prophecys laid the ground work for what later developed into the Protestant Reformation, and Adventism's approach to prophecy is fully based on his principles, and Dispensationalism is based on taking a portion of his message and building something new on only a portion of his message, but, like us, they still use his prophecys as their foundation.

We also see just before Ellen White the prophetic ministry of William Foy. Until the 1970s we thought that Foy had rejected the gift of prophey and soon died, but when he was researched, it was discovered that he was faithful in sharing his visions. Was the pastor of a large church in Boston which offered him a comfortable life. When Ellen Harmon started her ministry and he told how he saw the same things and how people ignored Mrs. White and crowded around him, he left Boston and moved to the backwoods of Maine pastoring small country churches and looking for people living in the back woods to minister to them, giving up a very comfortable life for a very hard life, but to minister in a place where people were off the beaten path and allow Mrs. White to have her ministry. In heaven his crown will share the stars with Mrs. White, as well as those from his ministry in Boston, but I believe that some of his stars are going to be a different color or have a unique glow or something that makes them stick out over the others, and they will be for the ones he found in the backwoods in Maine. He showed the same spirit as Jonathan showed to David.

Also, in the same time frame, Hariot Tubman was a conductor on the underground railroad. In a play I saw on Mrs. Tubman's life there was a scene where they were trapped by a river and she received a vision telling her how to escape. Now I have not come accross any place else about her having visions so I don't know where the play got it from, but if so, then she was a prophet who's visions were how to get through to freedom and safty.

We need to keep these other prophets in mind as we study Mrs. White's role as a prophet and not just limit prophecy to the few prophets who happened to have a small part of their ministry be universal enough to be the Bible, and pretend that that small part of the ministry of s few prophets be the whole of prophecy.

Now this point does not address a second issue that we need to deal with, in how the evidence says that prophecy/inspiration works (even Biblical prophecy)as opposed to how the Fundamentalism movement of the late 1800s to early 1900s say it is suposed to work.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7273
04/27/06 05:13 AM
04/27/06 05:13 AM
Larry Kirkpatrick  Offline
Pastor
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 817
Highland, CA, USA
The writings of EGW are inspired in equal measure to the Bible, for there are no degrees of inspiration. At the same timne, they are not intended to be added to the Bible. The Bible itself has two units (Tanakh or OT and Greek Scriptures or NT) which are composed of sub-units (Torah, Naviim, Ketuvim, i.e. law, prophets, writings, TNK=Tanakh, and the NT with its Gospels/historical, epistles, apocalyptic). Sixty-six books all told, all inspired.

However, In the Bible Nebuchadnezzar's name is spelled five different ways. Were four of them wrong? No. Spelling is probably not (in most cases at last) a key issue. Nevertheless, we understand that the phenomenon of inspiration operates such that inspired writings are protected from significant error. That is, if the prophet was about to use an expression that would basically be erroneous, the Holy Spirit is understood to have superintended and guided the mind of the prophet in order to prevent him from using the flawed expression. So we may operate on the assumption that the facts given in the Bible are indeed facts.

What we read in inspired writings therefore we may anticipate will be correct historically, scientifically, with regard to health principles, salvation, etc. Infallible means "cannot fail." I believe that the phenomenon of inspiration operates such that that which is truly inspired is infallible. This woudl go for all inspired writings, whether in Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, or English.

In any case, we should still remember that The Bible is viewed as a unit in itself and is what we should lead with. It remains true that in His mercy God has granted us enormous insights through the gift of prophecy via EGW and we would be inviting disaster if we thought we could ignore that which God reveals to us through this source.

Bottom line, I will labor to understand and rightly divide the Bible, even as I respect and heed His warning through the Spirit of Prophecy in all its manifestations, which certainly includes the writings of Ellen G. White.

As an aside, here is a link I did to a study concerning adding to God's word, while I was pastoring in Utah and surrounded by Mormons. It is abit dated, but I can tell you, it sometimes helps cut the ice, and also it helps to review assumptions we have held. Sometimes we get surprised.

http://www.greatcontroversy.org/documents/sermons/sermonsLK/kir-addg.html

LK


Hebrews 12:14 —I want to see God— —God wants to see me— Revelation 14:12
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7274
04/27/06 07:05 AM
04/27/06 07:05 AM
Kevin H  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2024

Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 628
New York
Yes Brother Kirtpatric, I want to come back and conferm that I do not believe in differences in degrees of inspriation. I hope that I did not make that impression in my last post.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7275
04/27/06 12:13 PM
04/27/06 12:13 PM
Darius  Offline
Dedicated Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,163
Muncie, IN
It is amazing that we cannot see how much this false view of inspiration to which we hold affects the way we see the world. We are blissfully comfortable in our ignorance.


Darius A. Lecointe, J.D., Ph.D.
No weapon formed against me shall prosper.
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7276
04/27/06 10:47 PM
04/27/06 10:47 PM
J
Jeff  Offline
Supporting Member 2007
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 231
Mississippi, USA
Darius, you’ve made statements like that before. But you’ve never enlightened us. Care to?

Jeff


[i]...Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.</i]
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7277
06/13/06 05:14 PM
06/13/06 05:14 PM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
Here is an interesting EGW quote pertaining to the Bible:

Quote:


But God will have a people upon the earth to maintain the Bible, and the Bible only, as the standard of all doctrines, and the basis of all reforms. The opinions of learned men, the deductions of science, the creeds or decisions of ecclesiastical councils, as numerous and discordant as are the churches which they represent, the voice of the majority,-- not one or all of these should be regarded as evidence for or against any point of religious faith. Before accepting any doctrine or precept, we should demand a plain "Thus saith the Lord" in its support. {GC88 595.1}



Sounds like EGW places the Bible only as "the standard of all doctrines, and the basis of all reforms."

I would say that EGW's writings should be tested by the Bible, rather than the Bible being tested by EGW's writings.

This means that the Bible is to be taken above the writings of EGW as stated by EGW herself, and rightfully so, don't you all agree?


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7278
06/13/06 10:43 PM
06/13/06 10:43 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
One could hope that this statement would conclude the issue, however, I have doubts it will. To much faith placed in Ellen to let her go so easily...

/Thomas


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7279
06/13/06 11:00 PM
06/13/06 11:00 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
All truth comes from God.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7280
06/14/06 08:45 AM
06/14/06 08:45 AM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
Thats where the bible enters the picture, by comparing with it we know if something is true or not.


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7281
06/14/06 01:17 PM
06/14/06 01:17 PM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
Quote:

One could hope that this statement would conclude the issue, however, I have doubts it will. To much faith placed in Ellen to let her go so easily...

/Thomas



What do you mean by "To much faith placed in Ellen to let her go so easily...???


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7282
06/14/06 01:29 PM
06/14/06 01:29 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
The argument as to whether or not the SOP is as inspired as the Bible reminds of the arguments that took place a long time ago as to whether or not the NT is as inspired as the OT. In the end it comes down to faith. But it even requires faith to believe the OT is inspired.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7283
06/14/06 02:24 PM
06/14/06 02:24 PM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
The issue in this topic isn't as much as inspiration as to equality.

I believe the writings of EGW and the Bible are both inspired, however, EGW herself said, in the quote I posted, that her writings are to be tested by the Bible, which she also said in that quote is "the standard of all doctrines, and the basis of all reforms."

This tells me that EGW places the Bible over her own writings in the sense that even her writings are to be tested by the Bible.


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7284
06/14/06 04:13 PM
06/14/06 04:13 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
True. But they are both (Bible and SOP) equally inspired and authoritative.

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7285
06/14/06 04:20 PM
06/14/06 04:20 PM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
Then, why did say EGW say what she said in the EGW quote I posted? Again, I am not questioning the inspiration aspect, however, I am trying to understand what and why EGW said what she said.


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7286
06/14/06 04:25 PM
06/14/06 04:25 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Peter, Paul, and John would have said the same thing about their inspired writings. They never set out to replace the OT scriptures. Under the guidance of the Holy Spirit they simply built upon them. Jesus used Sister White in the same way.

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7287
06/14/06 08:43 PM
06/14/06 08:43 PM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
But Peter, Paul, and John didn't say this in any of their writings, whereas Ellen White did, therefore, I think it is appropriate to heed her on this.

She obviously set the Bible as the test of her writings, whereas Peter, Paul, and John didn't, and they had the Old Testament Scriptures to say their writings should be tested against, but they didn't.


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7288
06/14/06 09:37 PM
06/14/06 09:37 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Daryl, nowhere do Peter, Paul, or John claim that their epistles were equal to Scripture. They always quoted Scripture to establish and to support the truths they taught. They never quoted themselves.

John
5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

Acts
18:28 For he mightily convinced the Jews, [and that] publicly, showing by the scriptures that Jesus was Christ.

Romans
15:4 For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope.

Romans
16:25 Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began,
16:26 But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith:

1 Corinthians
15:3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
15:4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

2 Timothy
3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

2 Peter
1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake [as they were] moved by the Holy Ghost.

2 Peter
3:15 And account [that] the longsuffering of our Lord [is] salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
3:16 As also in all [his] epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as [they do] also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7289
06/14/06 09:59 PM
06/14/06 09:59 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
Quote:

What do you mean by "To much faith placed in Ellen to let her go so easily...???



Daryl

It is illustrating itself in this thread.


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writtings of EGWhite equal to the BIBLE ? #7290
06/14/06 10:35 PM
06/14/06 10:35 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Thomas, what you're saying about the SOP is a prophecy:

LDE 177, 178
One thing is certain: Those Seventh-day Adventists who take their stand under Satan's banner will first give up their faith in the warnings and reproofs contained in the Testimonies of God's Spirit.--3SM 84 (1903). {LDE 177.4}

The very last deception of Satan will be to make of none effect the testimony of the Spirit of God. "Where there is no vision, the people perish" (Prov. 29:18). Satan will work ingeniously, in different ways and through different agencies, to unsettle the confidence of God's remnant people in the true testimony.--1SM 48 (1890). {LDE 177.5}

The enemy has made his masterly efforts to unsettle the faith of our own people in the Testimonies. . . . This is just as Satan designed it should be, and those who have been preparing the way for the people to pay no heed to the warnings and reproofs of the Testimonies of the Spirit of God will see that a tide of errors of all kinds will spring into life.--3SM 83 (1890). {LDE 178.1}

It is Satan's plan to weaken the faith of God's people in the Testimonies. Next follows skepticism in regard to the vital points of our faith, the pillars of our position, then doubt as to the Holy Scriptures, and then the downward march to perdition. When the Testimonies, which were once believed, are doubted and given up, Satan knows the deceived ones will not stop at this; and he redoubles his efforts till he launches them into open rebellion, which becomes incurable and ends in destruction.--4T 211. {LDE 178.2}

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7291
06/14/06 11:33 PM
06/14/06 11:33 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
But Peter, Paul, and John didn't say this in any of their writings, whereas Ellen White did, therefore, I think it is appropriate to heed her on this.

I'm not following this. Peter, Paul and John didn't say there writings should be checked by Scripture? Isn't this obvious? If they don't say something, it can't be true? Actually Paul *did* say what he communicated should be checked by Scripture:

11These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.(Acts 17:11)

She obviously set the Bible as the test of her writings, whereas Peter, Paul, and John didn't, and they had the Old Testament Scriptures to say their writings should be tested against, but they didn't.

First of all, even if this were true, it would mean nothing. An argument from silence depends upon a reasonble assumption that the thing being assumed could be expected with near certainty to be present.

To give a example of a good argument from silence, consider the fact that the Sabbath is never mentioned in the New Testatment. Can we argue that because it is never stated in the New Testament that the Sabbath should be kept what we don't have to keep it? No, because if the Sabbath had been changed or abolished, there would have been tons of things written about it, even more than was written about circumcision, because of the Sabbath being held in such high regard by the Jews, being a part of the decalogue.

This is a good argument from silence. However, there is no reason to expect that Paul, Peter, etc. would state that there writings should be tested by Scripture. Everybody knew this. Just like everybody knew that the Sabbath should be kept. The fact that they didn't mention something that everybody knew to be true doesn't prove anything.

And this is besides the point that Paul *did* say, in Acts 17, that what he said should be tested by Scripture.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7292
06/14/06 11:45 PM
06/14/06 11:45 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
How do we know what books form Scripture? Does the Bible tell us? No. We know by tradition. God communicated truth, and a consensus was formed as to which books should comprise the Bible.

When Ellen White suggested her writings should be compared to Scripture, this is exactly what one would expect. The Bible is what the community holds to be the Word of God. Since God does not contradict Himself, if the Bible is true, her writings should agree with the Bible. It wouldn't make sense for her to suggest otherwise.

As far as ranking truth, this seems to me to be useless. If God has communicated truth, it isn't any more or less true because it is in the Bible, or was stated by Ellen White, or anybody else. Truth is truth. There is no ranking of truth.

We judge what is true by the Holy Spirit, in conjunction with sources we judge to be worthy to be used to judge truth by. Once we have determined that something is true, we accept that truth. The source is irrelevant as to whether a thing is true or not; it helps us form a conviction about the thing, but doesn't determine if the thing is true or not.

So when we say the Bible is above Ellen White or not, that would only be in reference to judging truth. For someone who isn't familiar with Ellen White, it doesn't make any sense to refer to her as a judge of truth; we use the Bible. This is appropriate for any interdenominational communications or dealings with people that we have. Once we form a conviction about Ellen White's writings, it becomes appropriate to use her as a source of truth.

Being convicted that a source is worthy to be used as a source of truth doesn't seem to have much correlation to it's actually being used to determine truth anyway. That is, many claim to believe the Bible, but don't believe what it says. Similarly with Ellen White, many claim to believe her writings, but ignore what she says whenever it doesn't agree with what they think.

Actually we all do this, with any source of truth. It's just a question of degree.

Human beings are really headstrong and ignorant. It's a wonder God can convert any of us.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7293
06/15/06 12:56 AM
06/15/06 12:56 AM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
Here's an interesting question arising from all of this interesting discussion:

Is something that is equal tested by something else that is also equal to it, and vice-versa?


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7294
06/15/06 06:19 AM
06/15/06 06:19 AM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
As I have heard it, the "clear word" bible is a paraphrase made where the writings of Ellen are consistently allowed to determine how it should be written. If a) this is true, and b) Ellens books represent a source of truth that if not made equal with the bible will lead the person straight into the open arms of the devil, does it not follow then that the SDA denomination ought to be a "clear word" only denomination much in the same way that the JW are a "new world translation" only group?

/Thomas


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7295
06/15/06 01:35 PM
06/15/06 01:35 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
DF: Is something that is equal tested by something else that is also equal to it, and vice-versa?

MM: Consider the Word and Jesus.

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7296
06/15/06 02:07 PM
06/15/06 02:07 PM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
But even Christ Himself went with the It is written..... in the Scriptures in His encounter with the devil in the wilderness.


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7297
06/15/06 08:07 PM
06/15/06 08:07 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
So scripture was good enough for Jesus but we require more?


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7298
06/15/06 08:12 PM
06/15/06 08:12 PM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
We obviously needed the New Testament Scriptures, therefore, would you also ask whether the Old Testament Scriptures, which was all that existed back then, was also not good enough?


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7299
06/15/06 08:53 PM
06/15/06 08:53 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Truth is truth. The isn't truth that is greater than other truth. All truth comes from God. God has given us means to help us determine what is truth, including Scripture, but it doesn't make any sense to rank truth. What is greater than all others is God.

God is continually giving us truth. He didn't stop with the Old Testament, or the New, or with Ellen White.

As God is alive, so it truth. God is constantly seeking to give us truth, and only our unwillingness or incapacity to receive it prevents our receiving more of it than we receive.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7300
06/15/06 09:57 PM
06/15/06 09:57 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
The new testament is the eyewittnes records of the teachings of Jesus. God with man and some men listened and wrote down. Whom of you will be the first one to make direct quotes and eyewitness records of God walking with man equal to any other source?


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7301
06/15/06 10:00 PM
06/15/06 10:00 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
Since some here obviously think scripture is a work in progress, I find the silence on the "clear word 'bible'" interesting. If truth is truth is truth and scripture is a collection of truth equal to any other source of truth, this shouldnt be such a hard issue to touch should it?


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7302
06/15/06 10:04 PM
06/15/06 10:04 PM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
What does EGW herself say about her writings in relation to the Bible?

Doesn't what I already quoted answer this question, or did she say more that we should also quote here?


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7303
06/15/06 10:07 PM
06/15/06 10:07 PM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
I also like what somebody else also posted here in which they said that the Bible is accepted by all Christians, whereas the inspired writings of EGW are only accepted within the SDA church, and even then, sad to say, there is division in the SDA church over the inspiration of her writings.


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7304
06/15/06 10:52 PM
06/15/06 10:52 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
That was me.

The issue, it seems to me, is that God has truth which He wants to communicate to man, for the benefit of man. All truth comes from God. God communicates it us through different means. The Holy Spirit must be involved whatever the means, or we can't understand it.

The most precious truth I received from God was by way of God personally communicating to me. He told me all I needed was the cross. It was a very striking and moving experience, communicated at a time when I most needed it. It totally changed my life.

How will I communicate this truth? Do I speak of this experience I had? That probably wouldn't be too helpful for most (although it might be for some), because it is not an objective source. Anyone can have these experiences, and they are not necessarily from God. Drugs can induce them, Satan can do them, and so on. So I can tell you all day of my experience with God and what He said to me, and that is likely to have little effect on you. You are likely to treat it skeptically, as well you should, because who am I that you should consider me as a reliable medium to receive information from God?

Here comes the Scripture. Now I have a way to communicate with someone else. If I want to share the truth that all we need is the cross, I can find this truth in Scripture, share this truth, and there is an objective basis by which to communicate it.

This doesn't mean the truth found in Scripture is greater than the truth I received directly from God. It just means I have a means to communicate with another using a reference that the other accepts as a source of truth.

Similarly with Ellen White. The truth she communicated is just as true as the truth from the Bible. But to someone who doesn't accept her as a source of truth, one might be limited in communicating that truth. That really shouldn't be the case, because the Holy Spirit will enable anything to understand truth who is willing to, regardless of the source, but nevertheless many are unwilling to even consider something unless there is some source they consider authorative which says it.

So we must meet people where they are. Be all things to all people, as Paul says. If they prefer Scripture, use Scripture. If the prefer the Spirit of Prophecy, use that.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7305
06/15/06 11:05 PM
06/15/06 11:05 PM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Here's something from E. J. Waggoner I like a lot which ties into this subject:


Note how this epistle (Galatians) emphasizes the fact that the Gospel is divine, not human. In the first verse the apostle states that he was not sent by man, nor to represent any man. Again he says that he is not anxious to please men, but only Christ; and now it is made very clear that the message he bore was wholly from heaven. By birth and education he was opposed to the Gospel, and when he was converted it was by a voice from heaven. Read the accounts of his conversion in Acts 9:1-22; 22:3-16; 26:9-20. The Lord Himself appeared to him in the way as he was breathing threatening and slaughter against the saints of God.

There are no two persons whose experience in conversion is the same, yet the general principles are the same in all. In effect, every person must be converted just as Paul was. The experience will seldom be so striking, but if it is genuine, it must be a revelation from heaven as surely as Paul's was. "All thy children shall be taught of the Lord." Is.54:13; John 6:45. "Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto Me." "The anointing which ye have received of Him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you; but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in Him." 1John 2:27.

Do not make the mistake of supposing that this does away with the necessity for any human agency in the Gospel. If it did, then the apostles would have been self-condemned, because they were preachers of the Gospel. God has set apostles, prophets, teachers, etc., in the church (1Cor.12:28); but it is the Spirit of God that works in all these. "He whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God." John 3:34.

Therefore, no matter by whom anybody first hears the truth, he is to receive it as coming direct from heaven. The Holy Spirit enables those who wish to do God's will to tell what is truth as soon as they see or hear it, and they accept it, not on the authority of the man through whom it came to them, but on the authority of the God of truth. We may be as sure of the truth which we hold and teach as the apostle Paul was.

But whenever anybody cites the name of some highly-esteemed preacher or doctor of divinity, to justify his belief, or to give it more weight with some person whom he would convince, you may be sure that he himself does not know the truth of what he professes. It may be the truth, but he does not know for himself that it is true. It is everybody's privilege to know the truth (John 8:31,32); and when one holds a truth directly from God, ten thousand times ten thousand great names in its favor do not add a feather's weight to its authority; nor is his confidence in the least shaken if every great man on earth should oppose it. It is a grand thing to be built on the Rock.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7306
06/16/06 01:04 PM
06/16/06 01:04 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
TV: Whom of you will be the first one to make direct quotes and eyewitness records of God walking with man equal to any other source?

MM: I believe Paul was the first one to do it. He considered his epistles equal to Peter's and John's, etc. Luke was another one. Regrading truth being progressive and unmoveable listen what Sister Wite wrote about it:

CW 33
Maintaining Truth Not to Preclude New Light.-- It is a fact that we have the truth, and we must hold with tenacity to the positions that cannot be shaken; but we must not look with suspicion upon any new light which God may send, and say, Really, we cannot see that we need any more light than the old truth which we have hitherto received, and in which we are settled. {CW 33.1}

CW 35
Many Gems Yet to Be Discovered.--New light will ever be revealed on the word of God to him who is in living connection with the Sun of Righteousness. Let no one come to the conclusion that there is no more truth to be revealed. The diligent, prayerful seeker for truth will find precious rays of light yet to shine forth from the word of God. Many gems are yet scattered that are to be gathered together to become the property of the remnant people of God.--Counsels on Sabbath School Work, p. 34. (1892.) {CW 35.1}

CW 52
Landmarks of Truth, Experience, and Duty.-- Messages of every order and kind have been urged upon Seventh-day Adventists, to take the place of the truth which, point by point, has been sought out by prayerful study, and testified to by the miracle-working power of the Lord. But the waymarks which have made us what we are, are to be preserved, and they will be preserved, as God has signified through His word and the testimony of His Spirit. He calls upon us to hold firmly, with the grip of faith, to the fundamental principles that are based upon unquestionable authority.--Special Testimonies, Series B, No. 2, p. 59. (1904.) {CW 52.1}

LDE 178
It is Satan's plan to weaken the faith of God's people in the Testimonies. Next follows skepticism in regard to the vital points of our faith, the pillars of our position, then doubt as to the Holy Scriptures, and then the downward march to perdition. When the Testimonies, which were once believed, are doubted and given up, Satan knows the deceived ones will not stop at this; and he redoubles his efforts till he launches them into open rebellion, which becomes incurable and ends in destruction.--4T 211. {LDE 178.2}

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7307
06/16/06 01:12 PM
06/16/06 01:12 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Here is an extract of Sister White's compilation of her own writings regarding the inspiration and authority of her own writings (chapter 82 in 5T):

5T 564
As the end draws near and the work of giving the last warning to the world extends, it becomes more important for those who accept present truth to have a clear understanding of the nature and influence of the Testimonies, which God in His providence has linked with the work of the third angel's message from its very rise. In the following pages are given extracts from what I have written during the last forty years, relating to my own early experience in this special work, and also presenting what God has shown me concerning the nature and importance of the Testimonies, the manner in which they are given, and how they should be regarded. {5T 654.2}

5T 672-676
"It is Satan's plan to weaken the faith of God's people in the Testimonies." "Satan knows how to make his attacks. He works upon minds to excite jealousy and dissatisfaction toward those at the head of the work. The gifts are next questioned; then, of course, they have but little weight, and instruction given through vision is disregarded." "Next follows skepticism in regard to the vital points of our faith, the pillars of our position, then doubt as to the Holy Scriptures, and then the downward march to perdition. When the Testimonies, which were once believed, are doubted and given up, Satan knows the deceived ones will not stop at this; and he redoubles his efforts till he launches them into open rebellion, which becomes incurable and ends in destruction." [VOL. 4, P. 211; VOL. 1, P. 236]

"By giving place to doubts and unbelief in regard to the work of God, and by cherishing feelings of distrust and cruel jealousies, they are preparing themselves for complete deception. They rise up with bitter feelings against the ones who dare to speak of their errors and reprove their sins." [VOL. 3, P. 328.] {5T 672.1}

A testimony for certain young men, first published in 1880, speaks of this point as follows: "A prevailing skepticism is continually increasing in reference to the Testimonies of the Spirit of God; and these youth encourage questionings and doubts instead of removing them, because they are ignorant of the spirit and power and force of the Testimonies." [VOL. 4, P. 437.] {5T 672.2}

I was shown that many had so little spirituality that they did not understand the value of the Testimonies or their real object. They talked flippantly of the Testimonies given by God for the benefit of His people, and passed judgment upon them, giving their opinion and criticizing this and that, when they would better have placed their hands upon their lips, and prostrated themselves in the dust; for they could not appreciate the spirit of the Testimonies, because they knew so little of the Spirit of God. [VOL. 4, P. 443.] {5T 672.3}

"There are some in ----- who have never fully submitted to reproof. They have taken a course of their own choosing. They have ever, to a greater or less degree, exerted an influence against those who have stood up to defend the right and reprove the wrong. The influence of these persons upon individuals who come here and who are brought in contact with them . . . is very bad. They fill the minds of these newcomers with questionings and doubts in regard to the Testimonies of the Spirit of God. They put false constructions upon the Testimonies; and instead of leading persons to become consecrated to God and to listen to the voice of the church, they teach them to be independent and not to mind the opinions and judgment of others. The influence of this class has been secretly at work. Some are unconscious of the harm they are doing; but, unconsecrated, proud, and rebellious themselves, they lead others in the wrong track. A poisonous atmosphere is inhaled from these unconsecrated ones. The blood of souls is in the garments of such, and Christ will say to them in the day of final settlement: 'Depart from Me, all ye workers of iniquity.' Astonished they will be, but their professedly Christian lives were a deception, a fraud." [VOL. 4, PP. 513, 514 (1880).] {5T 673.1}

"Some express their views that the testimony of Sister White cannot be reliable. This is all that many unconsecrated ones want. The testimonies of reproof have checked their vanity and pride; but if they dared, they would go to almost any length in fashion and pride. God will give all such an opportunity to prove themselves and to develop their true characters." [VOL. 3, P. 313 (1873).] {5T 673.2}

"I saw that the reason why visions had not been more frequent of late is, they have not been appreciated by the church. The church have nearly lost their spirituality and faith, and the reproofs and warnings have had but little effect upon them. Many of those who have professed faith in them have not heeded them." [VOL. 1, P. 119 (1855).] {5T 674.1}

"If you lose confidence in the Testimonies you will drift away from Bible truth. I have been fearful that many would take a questioning, doubting position, and in my distress for your souls I would warn you. How many will heed the warning? As you now hold the Testimonies, should one be given crossing your track, correcting your errors, would you feel at perfect liberty to accept or reject any part or the whole? That which you will be least inclined to receive is the very part most needed." [VOL. 5, P. 98 (1882).] {5T 674.2}

"My brethren, beware of the evil heart of unbelief. The word of God is plain and close in its restrictions; it interferes with your selfish indulgence; therefore you do not obey it. The Testimonies of His Spirit call your attention to the Scriptures, point out your defects of character, and rebuke your sins; therefore you do not heed them. And to justify your carnal, ease-loving course you begin to doubt whether the Testimonies are from God. If you would obey their teachings you would be assured of their divine origin. Remember, your unbelief does not affect their truthfulness. If they are from God they will stand." [VOL. 5, P. 234.] {5T 674.3}

"I have been shown that unbelief in the testimonies of warning, encouragement, and reproof is shutting away the light from God's people. Unbelief is closing their eyes so that they are ignorant of their true condition." "They think the testimony of the Spirit of God in reproof is uncalled for or that it does not mean them. Such are in the greatest need of the grace of God and spiritual discernment, that they may discover their deficiency in spiritual knowledge." [VOL. 3, PP. 255, 253, 254 (1873).] {5T 674.4}

"Many who have backslidden from the truth assign as a reason for their course that they do not have faith in the Testimonies. . . . The question now is: Will they yield their idol which God condemns, or will they continue in their wrong course of indulgence and reject the light God has given them reproving the very things in which they delight? The question to be settled with them is: Shall I deny myself and receive as of God the Testimonies which reprove my sins, or shall I reject the Testimonies because they reprove my sins? {5T 675.1}

"In many cases the Testimonies are fully received, the sin and indulgence broken off, and reformation at once commences in harmony with the light God has given. In other instances sinful indulgences are cherished, the Testimonies are rejected, and many excuses which are untrue are offered to others as the reason for refusing to receive them. The true reason is not given. It is a lack of moral courage--a will, strengthened and controlled by the Spirit of God, to renounce hurtful habits." [VOL. 4, P. 32 (1876).] {5T 675.2}

"Satan has ability to suggest doubts and to devise objections to the pointed testimony that God sends, and many think it a virtue, a mark of intelligence in them, to be unbelieving and to question and quibble. Those who desire to doubt will have plenty of room. God does not propose to remove all occasion for unbelief. He gives evidence, which must be carefully investigated with a humble mind and a teachable spirit, and all should decide from the weight of evidence." [VOL. 3, P. 255 (1873).]

"God gives sufficient evidence for the candid mind to believe; but he who turns from the weight of evidence because there are a few things which he cannot make plain to his finite understanding will be left in the cold, chilling atmosphere of unbelief and questioning doubts, and will make shipwreck of faith." [VOL. 4, PP. 232, 233 (1876).] {5T 675.3}

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7308
06/16/06 08:55 PM
06/16/06 08:55 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
Quote:

Luk 1:1 Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us,
Luk 1:2 Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word;
Luk 1:3 It seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write unto thee in order, most excellent Theophilus,

Luk 1:4 That thou mightest know the certainty of those things, wherein thou hast been instructed.




Quote:

1Co 9:1 Am I not an apostle? am I not free? have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? are not ye my work in the Lord?
1Co 9:2 If I be not an apostle unto others, yet doubtless I am to you: for the seal of mine apostleship are ye in the Lord.




Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7309
06/17/06 02:42 PM
06/17/06 02:42 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Thomas, if you were to claim that your epistles are inspired would you expect anyone to believe you?

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7310
06/18/06 12:26 AM
06/18/06 12:26 AM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
Mike

Even I would doubt such a claim..

Are you comparing a theoretical epistle written by me with the gospel of Luke or the apostolic letters of Paul?

Honestly, we would likely have much less argument about this if you would just take the passage Daryl quoted to start this last round in this thread at face value. To insist at the same time the (infalliable?) inspiration of Ellen and that she didnt know what she was writing in this quote is one of those mysteries you refered to in other threads.


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7311
06/20/06 03:34 AM
06/20/06 03:34 AM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
TV: Are you comparing a theoretical epistle written by me with the gospel of Luke or the apostolic letters of Paul?

MM: Just because someone says their epistle is inspired does that make it so?

I find nothing wrong with this quote.

GC 595
But God will have a people upon the earth to maintain the Bible, and the Bible only, as the standard of all doctrines, and the basis of all reforms. The opinions of learned men, the deductions of science, the creeds or decisions of ecclesiastical councils, as numerous and discordant as are the churches which they represent, the voice of the majority,-- not one or all of these should be regarded as evidence for or against any point of religious faith. Before accepting any doctrine or precept, we should demand a plain "Thus saith the Lord" in its support. {GC88 595.1}

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7312
06/20/06 09:47 AM
06/20/06 09:47 AM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
It is good that we are in agreement on something.
The issue is that you seem to want to add to this, it appears you wish Ellen would here have written:

"But God will have a people upon the earth to maintain the Bible [and my books], and the Bible [and my books] only, as the standard of all doctrines, and the basis of all reforms."

She did not write the additions in the brackets and that is my entire case in this thread.

Quote:

MM: Just because someone says their epistle is inspired does that make it so?





Just wondering, where are you going with this question? I never claimed inspiration for anyone outside of the authors of the bible cannon did I?

/Thomas


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7313
06/20/06 03:01 PM
06/20/06 03:01 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
TV: She did not write the additions in the brackets and that is my entire case in this thread.

MM: True. But she did write that Jesus shared biblical truths with her that if rejected will result in the loss of salvation. Do you agree with her?

TV: I never claimed inspiration for anyone outside of the authors of the bible cannon did I?

MM: No. But my point is - just because Luke and Paul, according to the quotes you posted earlier, claim that their epistles are inspired doesn't make it so, does it?

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7314
06/20/06 06:59 PM
06/20/06 06:59 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
Well, there are biblical truths that leads to loss of salvaiton if rejected, and no doubt they are found in Ellens books, so yes, I agree with that. If on the other hand you(she?) is saying that a person must read these things in her writings or lose salvation, then I do not agree with it. The point about biblical truth is that it is first and formost found in the bible, its primary source. Other authors share their thoughts on them and reading these sermons/teaching may often be helpfull, but never mandatory.

Maybe not by themselves. But we also have the unified witness of 2000 years of christendom in favour of their inspiration. It has seemed good to the Spirit and to the church to canonise these gospels/letters.

/Thomas


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7315
06/21/06 02:26 PM
06/21/06 02:26 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
So, using this logic, when will it seem good to the church to canonize the SOP? Or, is the SOP no more inspired than you or me commenting on Bible truth?

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7316
06/21/06 04:00 PM
06/21/06 04:00 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
Im aware of the limmits of the canonisation argument. But if the closeness of the authors to Jesus (NT) isnt convincing, its the secound best I could think of.

Individual SDAs (such as, I believe, yourself) have already canonised Ellens writings, the denomination less so since it still upholds the bible as "The Holy Scriptures are the infallible revelation of His will. They are the standard of character, the test of experience, the authoritative revealer of doctrines, and the trustworthy record of God's acts in history.". If the church is to ever canonize them I dont know, though it doesnt look very likel at the moment.
Im still not comfortable with comparing any of the mentioned sources with myself, and Im neither sure about you. All teaching on these matters must be compared with the bible and only that which stands the test is to be keept. What is keept doesnt become equal with the bible in authority, it is just found to be good teaching that may be used to preach the gospel.
I would say the secound option if "you or me" was changed to for instance "J Wesley".
Why this difference? First that the comment should have passed the test of scripture, secound that while there is one Spirit behind all expressions of inspiration, not all are called to be teachers and a teacher would be more fit to teach than people gifted in other areas.

-Here defineing "church" as the body of all believers, the full extent and number only known in heaven.

/Thomas


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7317
06/23/06 02:01 PM
06/23/06 02:01 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Thomas, is there anything in the SOP that you believe is unbiblical? anything that leads you to believe she is less inspired than Peter, Paul, or John?

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7318
06/23/06 11:02 PM
06/23/06 11:02 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
I havent studied her books enough to say if they contain unbiblical concepts or not.

I would say Peter, Paul and John where inspired to write what would be "standard of character, test of experience, authorative revealer of doctrine and a trustworthy record of God's acts in history."

Paul wrote of prophets to come:

1Co 14:37 If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.

and

1Co 14:3 But he that prophesieth speaketh unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort.

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7319
06/27/06 03:58 PM
06/27/06 03:58 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Why do you believe Peter, Paul, and John's epistles contain inspired insights?

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7320
06/27/06 08:04 PM
06/27/06 08:04 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
Peter and John walked with Jesus for 3 years and then the rest of their lives with the Spirit. Paul as we know meet Jesus and was choosen as an apostle by Jesus. The bible witness is in their favour.
There are historians who have studied the historicity of the biblical books. I have read one of them that was conserned about the NT books. The author made a good cause for their authenticity(sic).
The unison of voices from church history testify in their favour.
But ultimately it is faith. I choose to believe that all these witnesses are telling the truth about these three people and I choose to believe that they where choosen by God to bring the truth about Him to all who would listen.

Why do you believe they wrote inspired epistles/gospels?


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7321
06/29/06 12:11 AM
06/29/06 12:11 AM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
I believe they are inspired because I want to believe. I choose to believe. The same thing applies to the SOP. I beliee she is inspired because I want to. Yes, there is evidence to support my belief. But in the end it is because I want to believe.

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7322
06/30/06 01:40 AM
06/30/06 01:40 AM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
The question isn't about inspiration as both the Bible and the writings of EGW are inspired.

The question isn't about inspiration, it's about authority.

All other inspired writings are to be examined by the Bible.

Further still, even the New Testament is to be examined by the Old Testament. Even Paul stated that to the Bereans.


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7323
06/30/06 02:23 AM
06/30/06 02:23 AM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
But why? Who said so? Why do you believe the OT is inspired and authoritative? Doesn't it boil down to faith? You want to believe. You choose to believe. The fruit of faith feels good. It rewards and satisfies.

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7324
06/30/06 02:24 AM
06/30/06 02:24 AM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
Christ, for One said so about the only Scriptures that existed back then.


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7325
06/30/06 07:54 AM
06/30/06 07:54 AM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Mike is bringing up a good point. The Scriptures nowhere say what the Scriptures are. This has come down to us by tradition. We read what tradition has said is inspired, and come to a conclusion as to whether it is inspired or not. We don't make this decision based on authority, because there is no authority to base the decision on until *after* we believe. So we make the choice to believe, based on whether we think we should or not.

Similarly with Ellen White. There's nothing in Scripture which tells us to believe in Ellen White's writings. Now we can compare them with Scripture, and should, to see if they agree or not, but that's not how people make the decision to believe in her. It's because there is something special about the writings which bears witness to our spirit that her words are not just human words. We sense the Spirit of God is involved, and choose to believe. We can't believe on the basis of authority, because there is no authority which tells us to believe her writings, outside of her writings themselves.


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7326
06/30/06 05:30 PM
06/30/06 05:30 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Amen, Tom. Reading what Jesus said about the OT requires faith, too. I choose to believe the NT writers quoted Jesus accurately, or close enough. There are as many Bible believing religions in the world as there are stars in the sky (not really). Each one believes their version or translation of the truth is right and correct. So, I have come to the conclusion that the SOP was necessary to get us on track and to keep us on track. Without it, we are no better off than any other religion.

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7327
06/30/06 08:11 PM
06/30/06 08:11 PM
V
vastergotland  Offline
Active Member 2011
3500+ Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Sweden
Quote:

There are as many Bible believing religions in the world as there are stars in the sky (not really). Each one believes their version or translation of the truth is right and correct. So, I have come to the conclusion that the SOP was necessary to get us on track and to keep us on track. Without it, we are no better off than any other religion.



Mike

To paraphrase you, Ellens writings makes SDAs "holier than them".
Quite honestly, ought not such a difference be about Jesus and nothing else?

/Thomas


Galatians 2
21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

It is so hazardous to take here a little and there a little. If you put the right little's together you can make the bible teach anything you wish. //Graham Maxwell
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7328
07/01/06 02:35 AM
07/01/06 02:35 AM
Gerry Buck  Offline
Charter Member
Very Dedicated Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,859
Benton Harbor, Mi.
If you read her writings, you will find she tells us to go to THE Book, the Bible, her writings are to steer us to reading God's word.
She always referred to her writings as 'the lesser light', pointing to the greater Light.

All too often we get bogged down in 'discussions' that lead nowhere.
At this time in history, we would be better to study and BE perpared for the return of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus THE Christ.


I have learned two things in this life: There is a God. and I am not Him.
[i]It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in men.</i>
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7329
07/01/06 04:48 AM
07/01/06 04:48 AM
Tom  Offline
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
Quote:

Quite honestly, ought not such a difference be about Jesus and nothing else?




I see things along these lines as well.

The following is from our official web site.

God's greatest desire is for you to see a clear picture of His character. When you see Him clearly, you will find His love irresistible.

For many, "seeing God clearly" requires that they see God's face. However, how He looks is not the issue. Seeing and understanding His character is what's most important. The more clearly we understand Him, the more we will find His love irresistible. As we begin to experience His love, our own lives will begin to make more sense.

God most clearly reveals His character in three great events. The first is His creation of man and woman--and His giving them the freedom of choice. He created humans with the ability to choose to love Him or to hate Him! The death of Jesus Christ, God's only Son, on the cross as our substitute is the second great event. In that act He paid the penalty we deserve for our hateful choices toward God and His ways. Jesus' death guarantees forgiveness for those choices and allows us to spend eternity with Him. The third event confirms the first two and fills every heart with hope: Christ's tomb is empty! He is alive, living to fill us with His love!

Jesus' disciple John wrote that if everyone wrote all the stories they knew about Jesus, the whole world could not contain them. Our knowledge of God helps us understand His love, character, and grace. Experiencing that love begins a lifelong adventure in growth and service. This knowledge and experience powers our mission to tell the world about His love and His offer of salvation.


I think that's pretty good!

God has given us a message of His character. It is the message of His true character that should mark our church. The doctrines we have we given us for the purpose of understanding Him. Our job is to learn the truth about God and share it with others.

Jesus Christ is the truth about God.

Here's one of my favorite quotes. I haven't read it in a long time, but this post made me remember it.

In common English there is a concise way of saying that a person knows little or nothing of a subject, in the expression, "He does not know the A B C of it." The Greeks had the same, "He does not know the Alpha Beta of it." On the other hand, there is a concise way of saying that a person is thoroughly informed, or knows all of a subject, in the expression, "He knows that subject from A to Z," or, old style, "from A to Izzard" The Greeks had the same, "He knows that subject from Alpha to Omega" -- he knows all there is to be known of it. And this is the basis and the thought in the expression of Christ in the book of Revelation several times, "I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last."

Jesus is the Alphabet of God. As the expression "Alpha and Omega" signifies the whole alphabet, and embraces all there is in the Greek language; and "A to Z" signifies the whole alphabet, all that there is in the English language; so Jesus Christ, the Alphabet of God, embraces all that there is of the language or knowledge of God. As in the twenty-four letters of the Greek Alphabet from Alpha to Omega there are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge in the world of that language; and as in the twenty-six letters of the English alphabet there are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge that there are in the world of the English language; so in Jesus Christ, the Alphabet of God, there are "hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" that there are in the universe of the language of God. (The Place of the Bible in Education by A. T. Jones)


Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? #7330
07/02/06 12:42 AM
07/02/06 12:42 AM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Anybody who thinks they can arrive at the fundamental truths without the SOP are wasting time catching up. With the SOP we can confidently learn testing truths and have time to discover New light.

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: Mountain Man] #151838
04/14/13 12:05 AM
04/14/13 12:05 AM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
Bumping this as it may be a good reference in relation to a similar active topic.


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: Daryl] #151886
04/15/13 02:48 PM
04/15/13 02:48 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE?

Equally inspired by the same Holy Spirit who inspired the people whose writings make up the Bible.

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: Mountain Man] #151912
04/16/13 11:08 AM
04/16/13 11:08 AM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
Equally inspired, yes, however, EGW herself referred to her writings as the lesser light (her writings) leading to the greater light (the Scriptures/Bible).


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: Daryl] #151914
04/16/13 12:39 PM
04/16/13 12:39 PM
Green Cochoa  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2021

5500+ Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,003
The Orient
Originally Posted By: Daryl
Equally inspired, yes, however, EGW herself referred to her writings as the lesser light (her writings) leading to the greater light (the Scriptures/Bible).

That's one of the greatest myths in Adventism. smile

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.


We can receive of heaven's light only as we are willing to be emptied of self. We can discern the character of God, and accept Christ by faith, only as we consent to the bringing into captivity of every thought to the obedience of Christ. And to all who do this, the Holy Spirit is given without measure. In Christ "dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And ye are complete in Him." [Colossians 2:9, 10.] {GW 57.1} -- Ellen White.
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: Green Cochoa] #151916
04/16/13 02:42 PM
04/16/13 02:42 PM
APL  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2020

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
Originally Posted By: Daryl
Equally inspired, yes, however, EGW herself referred to her writings as the lesser light (her writings) leading to the greater light (the Scriptures/Bible).

That's one of the greatest myths in Adventism. smile

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.

The Lord has sent his people much instruction, line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little, and there a little. Little heed is given to the Bible, and the Lord has given a lesser light to lead men and women to the greater light. O, how much good would be accomplished if the books containing this light were read with a determination to carry out the principles they contain! There would be a thousandfold greater vigilance, a thousandfold more self-denial and resolute effort. And many more would now be rejoicing in the light of present truth. {RH, January 20, 1903 par. 9}


Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: Daryl] #151921
04/16/13 03:10 PM
04/16/13 03:10 PM
J
JAK  Offline
FORMER-SDA
Active Member 2018
Banned
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 663
Canada
Originally Posted By: Daryl
Equally inspired, yes, however, EGW herself referred to her writings as the lesser light (her writings) leading to the greater light (the Scriptures/Bible).
I agree with this statement, which makes me wonder why there is such objection to my "inspiration continuum" theory. EGW herself recognized degrees of inspiration. Hers was not equal to the Bible.


"All that is Gold does not Glitter, Not all who Wander are Lost." (J.R.R.T.)
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: JAK] #151925
04/16/13 03:34 PM
04/16/13 03:34 PM
Green Cochoa  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2021

5500+ Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,003
The Orient
JAK,

This is one of the "myths" of Adventism that keeps people from comprehending the real truth. Don't accept something just because many people say it. Mrs. White never said what people say she said in this area. APL was nice enough to provide one of the quotes. Read it carefully. smile

Blessings,

Green Cochoa.


We can receive of heaven's light only as we are willing to be emptied of self. We can discern the character of God, and accept Christ by faith, only as we consent to the bringing into captivity of every thought to the obedience of Christ. And to all who do this, the Holy Spirit is given without measure. In Christ "dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And ye are complete in Him." [Colossians 2:9, 10.] {GW 57.1} -- Ellen White.
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: Green Cochoa] #151926
04/16/13 03:59 PM
04/16/13 03:59 PM
APL  Offline
SDA
Active Member 2020

5500+ Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,368
Western, USA
Green - it is not a "myth". But as you say, "read it carefully".


Oh, that men might open their minds to know God as he is revealed in his Son! {ST, January 20, 1890}
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: Daryl] #151928
04/16/13 04:16 PM
04/16/13 04:16 PM
Mountain Man  Offline
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Originally Posted By: Daryl
M: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE? Equally inspired by the same Holy Spirit who inspired the people whose writings make up the Bible.

D: Equally inspired, yes, however, EGW herself referred to her writings as the lesser light (her writings) leading to the greater light (the Scriptures/Bible).

And Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, James, Peter, and Jude all felt the same way about their contribution. It's either of God or it isn't. It's either inspired or it isn't. True, many authors are inspirational, but only a handful were inspired by God to write on His behalf.

Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: Green Cochoa] #151936
04/16/13 08:13 PM
04/16/13 08:13 PM
J
JAK  Offline
FORMER-SDA
Active Member 2018
Banned
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 663
Canada
Originally Posted By: Green Cochoa
JAK, Don't accept something just because many people say it.
I have been charged with many faults in my time; this was never among them.


"All that is Gold does not Glitter, Not all who Wander are Lost." (J.R.R.T.)
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: JAK] #151937
04/16/13 09:06 PM
04/16/13 09:06 PM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
I think the following quote is relevant to this thread:
Quote:
E. G. White Work Not Unlike That of Bible Prophets.--In ancient times God spoke to men by the mouth of prophets and apostles. In these days He speaks to them by the testimonies of His Spirit. There was never a time when God instructed His people more earnestly than He instructs them now concerning His will and the course that He would have them pursue.-- Testimonies, vol. 5, p. 661. {3SM 30.2}

Scripture and Spirit of Prophecy Have Same Author.--The Holy Ghost is the author of the Scriptures and of the Spirit of Prophecy. These are not to be twisted and turned to mean what man may want them to mean, to carry out man's ideas and sentiments, to carry forward man's schemes at all hazards.--Letter 92, 1900. {3SM 30.3}

Ellen White Calls Her Writings a Lesser Light.--Little heed is given to the Bible, and the Lord has given a lesser light to lead men and women to the greater light.--The Review and Herald, Jan. 20, 1903. (Quoted in Colporteur Ministry, p. 125.) {3SM 30.4}

Tested by the Bible.--The Spirit was not given--nor can it ever be bestowed--to supersede the Bible; for the Scriptures explicitly state that the Word of God is the standard by which all teaching and experience must be tested. . . . Isaiah declares, "To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them" (Isaiah 8:20).--The Great Controversy, Introduction, p. vii. {3SM 30.5}


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: Daryl] #152049
04/21/13 10:20 PM
04/21/13 10:20 PM
Daryl  Offline

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,122
Nova Scotia, Canada
Anybody have any thoughts on the EGW quote I provided in my previous post in regards to what she said about herself in relation to both her writings and the Bible?


In His Love, Mercy & Grace,

Daryl smile

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

http://www.christians-discuss.com/forum/index.php
Re: Are the writings of EG White equal to the BIBLE ? [Re: Daryl] #155117
08/16/13 09:23 PM
08/16/13 09:23 PM
J
James Peterson  Offline
NON-SDA
Active Member 2019

Dedicated Member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,195
Canada
Originally Posted By: Daryl
Anybody have any thoughts on the EGW quote I provided in my previous post in regards to what she said about herself in relation to both her writings and the Bible?


There is an interesting conversation between Daniel and the angel. It goes like this:

"Although I heard, I did not understand. Then I said, 'My lord, what shall be the end of these things?'
And he said, 'Go your way, Daniel, for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand.'" (Dan. 12:8-10)

But if you look carefully at why the wise understand, you would see something even MORE interesting, "many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase." In other words, the spirit of prophecy is given to the Church through diligent search and inquiry. The angel did not present a scenario of an end-time prophet guiding the understanding of the people. Rather God was going to stir up the interest of the people in His word in discussions and programs and papers and travel and events of a sudden nature. People were going to turn to the "fathers" for understanding.

This is what was meant in Matthew where it is written, "Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (whoever reads, let him understand) ... " (Mat. 24:15) The same advantage is said to be for those who seriously ponder the grand themes of the Revelation, "Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written in it; for the time is near." (Rev. 1:3)

But who is willing to take the Bible and the Bible only to the table of amicable discussion, earnest and sincere, to understand and grow in the wisdom of God? So many denominations have fallen away after one or other "prophet"!

....
...

Last edited by James Peterson; 08/16/13 09:27 PM.
Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 14 15

Moderator  dedication 

Sabbath School Lesson Study Material Link
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
Most Recent Posts From Selected Public Forums
The Gospel According To John
by dedication. 05/05/24 05:39 AM
2nd Quarter 2024 The Great Controversy
by dedication. 05/03/24 02:55 AM
Seven Trumpets reconsidered
by Karen Y. 04/30/24 10:34 PM
Are the words in the Bible "imperfect"?
by Rick H. 04/26/24 06:05 PM
Nebuchadnezzar Speaks: The Sunday Law
by dedication. 04/22/24 05:15 PM
Nebuchadnezzar Speaks: Part Two
by TruthinTypes. 04/21/24 11:14 PM
Where is the crises with Climate mandates?
by dedication. 04/21/24 09:25 PM
Iran strikes Israel as War Expands
by dedication. 04/21/24 05:07 PM
What Happens at the End.
by Rick H. 04/20/24 11:39 AM
Global Warming Farce
by kland. 04/18/24 05:51 PM
Will You Take The Wuhan Virus Vaccine?
by kland. 04/11/24 12:24 PM
Chinese Revival?
by ProdigalOne. 04/06/24 06:12 PM
Most Recent Posts From Selected Private Forums of MSDAOL
What Does EGW Say About Ordination?
by dedication. 05/05/24 05:07 AM
When Does Satan Impersonate Christ?
by Rick H. 05/03/24 10:09 AM
Is There A Connection Between WO & LGBTQ?
by dedication. 05/02/24 08:58 PM
The Papacy And The American Election
by Rick H. 04/30/24 09:34 AM
The Wound Is Healed! The Mark Is Forming!
by dedication. 04/22/24 06:04 PM
Christian Nationalism/Sunday/C
limate Change

by Rick H. 04/13/24 10:19 AM
A Second American Civil War?
by kland. 04/11/24 12:39 PM
A.I. - The New God?
by kland. 04/11/24 12:34 PM
Perils of the Emerging Church Movement
by ProdigalOne. 04/06/24 07:10 PM
Forum Announcements
Visitors by Country Since February 11, 2013
Flag Counter
Google Maritime SDA OnLine Public Forums Site Search & Google Translation Service
Google
 
Web www.maritime-sda-online.com

Copyright 2000-Present
Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine).

LEGAL NOTICE:
The views expressed in this forum are those of individuals
and do not necessarily represent those of Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine,
as well as the Seventh-day Adventist Church
from the local church level to the General Conference level.

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine) is also a self-supporting ministry
and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland
or any of its subsidiaries.

"And He saith unto them, follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men." Matt. 4:19
MARITIME 2ND ADVENT BELIEVERS ONLINE (FORMERLY MARITIME SDA ONLINE) CONSISTING MAINLY OF BOTH MEMBERS & FRIENDS
OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH,
INVITES OTHER MEMBERS & FRIENDS OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHO WISHES TO JOIN US!
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1