Forums118
Topics9,199
Posts195,641
Members1,323
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #6 - The Earth After the Flood
[Re: vastergotland]
#81000
11/11/06 06:23 AM
11/11/06 06:23 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,583
California, USA
|
|
The attitude we need to have is the attitude the disciples had. When Jesus found them, they were not saints. Even after 3.5 years, they were still not saints. But the secret of their success, which generally eluded both Pharisee and Sadducee, is that they 1) wanted to know God's will, 2) were willing to do God's will, and 3) did God's will in His strength. Essentially, they understood the truth, AND they stood under the truth.
And here I thought the secret of their success was somehow tied to the Holy Spirit and pentecost. But I guess that if you know God wants you to preach and you are willing to do so, 3000 people are going to ask you how they can be saved and will request baptism the very same day... Why dont more SDA pastors follow this 3 stepp plan to evangelistic success? If you dig a bit, you'll find that though it doesn't really have anything to do with Pentecost itself, each of the 3 steps has everything to do with the Holy Spirit: 1) the Spirit leads us into all truth, 2) the Spirit empowers us to will and to do of His good pleasure, and 3) only in submission to the Spirit can we be children of God. If a preacher was willing to do this, it is definitely possible for 3000 to be converted each time out. But the miracle is not that many are baptized, but that individuals are redeemed from slavery to self, sin, and Satan. Fundamentally, this is not a plan for evangelistic success, but for basic Christianity. Why don't more pastors follow this plan? Why don't more average-Joe "Christians" follow this plan? The answer is the same: self is alive and well. If we would allow self to be crucified by grace, there would be radical changes.
By God's grace, Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #6 - The Earth After the Flood
[Re: vastergotland]
#81025
11/12/06 04:12 AM
11/12/06 04:12 AM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,583
California, USA
|
|
That all humans are sinners and that those who walk by Gods spirit do not sin are irrelevant for the question of being drunk until it has been established if in fact being drunk is a sin or not. If Noah believed that God wanted him to be sober, yet he chose to be drunk, then it is definitely sin - sin as a choice. If God wanted Noah to be sober, and Noah had no idea about the topic, then it is not a sin of choice. But if his actions, regardless of his ignorance, conflicts with God's will, then it is a sin - sin as a state. So, is being drunk a sin? Yes and No, depending what you mean by sin.
By God's grace, Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #6 - The Earth After the Flood
[Re: Daryl]
#81055
11/12/06 08:30 PM
11/12/06 08:30 PM
|
SDA Active Member 2023
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,583
California, USA
|
|
What reason does God give for the strict prohibition regarding the taking of another human life? Here's an outline of how our class discussion went: - Meat-eating, which God allowed, shortened man's life.
- Man was created in God's image.
- By sin, that image has been marred and well-nigh obliterated.
- Even so, God forbade killing people because we were made in His image.
- God's laws included the death penalty for some sins.
- There were instances when God commanded that people be killed ("Sabbath stick gatherer", Amalekites, etc.).
What are the principles governing capital punishment and how do we apply them today?
By God's grace, Arnold
There is no excuse for any one in taking the position that there is no more truth to be revealed, and that all our expositions of Scripture are without an error. The fact that certain doctrines have been held as truth for many years by our people, is not a proof that our ideas are infallible. Age will not make error into truth, and truth can afford to be fair. No true doctrine will lose anything by close investigation. RH 12/20/1892
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
|
|