Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2

Posted By: Charity

Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 07/28/18 09:31 PM

In my initial thread on this I shared a prophecy released by the Ellen White Estate in 2015 that foretells the rejection of the Testimonies by the Seventh-day Adventist Church. Since then I've found that many of us find it hard to accept this because it appears to contradict her statements that assure us of the final triumph of the church. So I revised my earlier paper on it to help explain the underlying harmony of both statement.
Quote:
The Death of the Testimonies
And the Triumph of the Church


Sabbath, September 17, 2016 I came across this statement below by Ellen White which was released for the first time in July of 2015. This prediction has never been publicly published and is nestled in among the 50,000 pages released by the White Estate so it's hard to say how many are aware of it now but probably few. Her statement struck me with force. Here Ellen White is writing to G.I. Butler who had recently resigned from the presidency of the General Conference (he would resume that position in 1877) and was at this time in denial of her testimony:

Quote:
I am now of the opinion that the Testimonies will not live among God’s people. They will be removed. I have some light on this point but cannot now give it. Said Christ, “I have many things to say unto you but ye cannot bear them now.” {Lt16-1875}


In her later writings she makes statements warning that this is entirely possible but none of her subsequent statements are so direct.

Notice above that in 1875 she had “more light on this point but cannot now give it”. Did she give more light on it later? She did. We'll look at some of it below. But first you might ask, doesn't Ellen White also say that the church will go through, that God's denominated people will remain faithful to the end? She does. So how can both statements be true?

Many of us unfortunately do not understand what she means by “denominated people” or “the church”. The scripture, the statements of Christ and those of Ellen White agree that the church, God's denominated people are those who maintain a vital connection with Him whose names are written in the book of life. Sown in among the faithful wheat are the tares that also grow with the wheat until the harvest, but they are not part of the true spiritual church. Notice:

Quote:
God has a church. It is not the great cathedral, neither is it the national establishment, neither is it the various denominations; it is the people who love God and keep His commandments. “Where two or three are gathered together in My name, there am I in the midst of them.” [Matthew 18:20.] Where Christ is even among the humble few, this is Christ’s church, for the presence of the high and holy One who inhabiteth eternity can alone constitute a church.

Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom. Luke 12:32
Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. Gal 3:6, 7.

“And there shall be no more curse; but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and His servants shall serve Him; and they shall see His face; and His name shall be in their foreheads.” [Revelation 22:3, 4.] Who are these?—God’s denominated people; those who on this earth have witnessed to their loyalty. Who are they?—those who have kept the commandments of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ; those who have owned the crucified One as their Saviour. {Ms132-1903.25}

The church may appear as about to fall, but it does not fall. It remains, while the sinners in Zion will be sifted out—the chaff separated from the precious wheat. This is a terrible ordeal, but nevertheless it must take place. None but those who have been overcoming by the blood of the Lamb and the word of their testimony will be found with the loyal and true, without spot or stain of sin, without guile in their mouths. We must be divested of our self-righteousness and arrayed in the righteousness of Christ. {2SM 380.2}

So what about this last, well known statement above – who is she referring to? The church that appears as though it is about to fall but does not and goes through to victory are not those among us who have never been converted but instead are the faithful who under intense persecution appear to be on the verge of letting go of all hope and capitulating in despair. It is these that finally press through the darkness by faith and overcome by the blood of the Lamb and the word of their testimony because they loved not their lives unto the death. Adventists who have been unfaithful are generally not a part of this group. Some of them, thank the Lord, will repent at the eleventh hour and join those who contend for the faith once delivered to the saints. But do you think those who have been unfaithful habitually will do this? Can character be formed in an instant?

Those who press through the darkness described in inspiration (See Early Writings p. 269.) are anything but anarchists. By overcoming the darkness, the threatenings and the realities of persecution, they heed the call to “Come into line” under the Generalship of Christ. Because of their victory over the fear of persecution and death even if it be at the hands of loved ones, they are now fearless and there is perfect unity resulting in perfect organization among them. Many of us would say that this order will primarily be the organizational structure of Adventism. That there will be perfect order and discipline in the ranks of the remnant is clear, but it will be based primarily, not on a mechanical structure of an organization but on the bond of unity of the believers themselves who are cemented together by the love of the Truth.

Isn't it time friends that we wake up to the reality of the situation: Regarding the Testimonies we've been plainly told that “they will no longer live among God's people. They will be removed.” Now the next question is, in what way will they be removed? Consider carefully some of the poignant warnings that explain the process of their removal below.

Before quoting these, first an observation and then some background: The Testimonies explain and recommend themselves so it is wisdom to keep our commentary on these inspired topics to a minimum. Instead, here are excerpts from later testimonies that shed more light on the one above. The first one below was written to the church at Battle Creek, many of whom, like Elder Butler, were in denial at this point regarding the Testimonies. Written in June, 1882, originally this testimony was numbered 31 and was titled “The Testimonies Rejected”. It was renamed “The Testimonies Slighted” when it was republished in Testimonies Vol 5. As you read the following quote, notice not only the process of removal but also the hopeful outcome she describes as she concludes.

Quote:
I have been shown that the spirit of the world is fast leavening the church. You are following the same path as did ancient Israel. There is the same falling away from your holy calling as God's peculiar people. You are having fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness. Your concord with unbelievers has provoked the Lord's displeasure. You know not the things that belong to your peace, and they are fast being hid from your eyes. Your neglect to follow the light will place you in a more unfavorable position than the Jews upon whom Christ pronounced a woe. . . .

I have been shown that unbelief in the testimonies has been steadily increasing as the people backslide from God. It is all through our ranks, all over the field. But few know what our churches are to experience. I saw that at present we are under divine forbearance; but no one can say how long this will continue. . . .

The patience of God has an object, but you are defeating it. He is allowing a state of things to come that you would fain see counteracted by and by, but it will be too late. God commanded Elijah to anoint the cruel and deceitful Hazael king over Syria, that he might be a scourge to idolatrous Israel. Who knows whether God will not give you up to the deceptions you love? Who knows but that the preachers who are faithful, firm, and true may be the last who shall offer the gospel of peace to our unthankful churches? It may be that the destroyers are already training under the hand of Satan and only wait the departure of a few more standard-bearers to take their places, and with the voice of the false prophet cry, Peace, peace, when the Lord hath not spoken peace. I seldom weep, but now I find my eyes blinded with tears; they are falling upon my paper as I write. It may be that ere long all prophesyings among us will be at an end, and the voice which has stirred the people may no longer disturb their carnal slumbers. . . .

I know that many think far too favorably of the present time. These ease-loving souls will be engulfed in the general ruin. Yet we do not despair. We have been inclined to think that where there are no faithful ministers, there can be no true Christians; but this is not the case. God has promised that where the shepherds are not true he will take charge of the flock himself. God has never made the flock wholly dependent upon human instrumentalities. But the days of purification of the church are hastening on apace. God will have a people pure and true. In the mighty sifting soon to take place, we shall be better able to measure the strength of Israel. The signs reveal that the time is near when the Lord will manifest that his fan is in his hand, and he will thoroughly purge his floor. . ..

The Lord has faithful servants, who in the shaking, testing time will be disclosed to view. There are precious ones now hidden who have not bowed the knee to Baal. . . But it may be under a rough and uninviting exterior the pure brightness of a genuine Christian character will be revealed. In the day-time we look toward heaven, but do not see the stars. They are there, fixed in the firmament, but the eye cannot distinguish them. In the night we behold their genuine lustre. . . . Then will the church of Christ appear "fair as the moon, clear as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners." . . .

The church cannot measure herself by the world nor by the opinion of men nor by what she once was. Her faith and her position in the world as they now are must be compared with what they would have been if her course had been continually onward and upward. The church will be weighed in the balances of the sanctuary. If her moral character and spiritual state do not correspond with the benefits and blessings God has conferred upon her, she will be found wanting. Source: Ellen White, Testimonies Vol. 5, The Testimonies Slighted, Pages 62 – 84.


Six years later she warned again:

Quote:
There will be a hatred kindled against the testimonies which is satanic. The workings of Satan will be to unsettle the faith of the churches in them, for this reason: Satan cannot have so clear a track to bring in his deceptions and bind up souls in his delusions if the warnings and reproofs and counsels of the Spirit of God are heeded.-- Letter 40, 1890. {1SM 48.4}


The Testimonies are not to be re-interpreted and wrested so as to make them of no effect. They are to interpret themselves just as the Bible is to be it's own interpreter. So there should be no committees, no official statements from the White Estate, and no dissection by the scholars. We've seen the results of these in the ineffective course the church has taken on women's ordination. As a courtesy to the leadership, they should be informed in case they are not already aware of this particular warning of the removal of the testimonies which plainly states that the church will reject them.

As Adventists our mutual obligation to one another is to be good stewards of our finds of truth. This find is like when the priests under Joash found the scroll of the law and realized that Israel was under God's judgment and would be rejected and dispossessed as God had said through Moses unless they repented. What if the priests had been unfaithful and not shared the warning? Aren't we under obligation to share this? Look at what Moses wrote in Deuteronomy 32 and how he riveted by a song his warning in the minds of the men of Israel that apostasy would indeed occur. This was as much his parting legacy as the blessings he pronounced on the twelve tribes that same day, but the record says that his warning was fully accepted by the men of Israel that day and they mourned the death of Moses for a full month. Similarly, shouldn't this warning and these promises of a remnant from our prophet be made as public as possible to all Adventists?

In a way, I wish I was wrong about these things and I could go along with those in the church who claim that Ellen White teaches the triumph of the Seventh-day Adventist Corporation – except at the very end when it will be illegal to be an Adventist. I'd remind those who teach this that during the first and second world wars the German branch of Adventism proclaimed it's allegiance to their government and betrayed faithful brothers to the authorities and to death who could not conscientiously bare arms for the Kaiser or the Nazi's. Today those who teach such things are like the Jews who, denying the prophecies of Moses said “The temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord”. So, while it's clear that we are to remain connected to the church through membership wherever possible, we need to also be prepared for the fulfillment of the prophecy so that we're not surprised if one day, we find ourselves, like the Apostles, the reformers and our German brothers, on the outside, our testimony silenced within Adventism, despite our best efforts to maintain the bond of love and unity among us.

But, “Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom.” Luke12:32

Post Script by Ellen White:

God has a church. It is not the great cathedral, neither is it the national establishment, neither is it the various denominations; it is the people who love God and keep His commandments. “Where two or three are gathered together in My name, there am I in the midst of them.” [Matthew 18:20.] Where Christ is even among the humble few, this is Christ’s church, for the presence of the high and holy One who inhabiteth eternity can alone constitute a church. Where two or three are present who love and obey the commandments of God, Jesus there presides; let it be in the desolate place of the earth, in the wilderness, in the city enclosed in prison walls. The glory of God has penetrated the prison walls, flooding with glorious beams of heavenly light the darkest dungeon. His saints may suffer, but their sufferings will, like the apostles of old, spread their faith and win souls to Christ and glorify His holy name. The bitterest opposition expressed by those who hate God’s great moral standard of righteousness should not and will not shake the steadfast soul who trusts fully in God. All things shall work together for good to those who love God. “This is the love of God, that ye keep His commandments.” [1 John 5:3.] They that will be doers of the Word are building securely, and the tempest and storm of persecution will not shake their foundation, because their souls are rooted to the eternal rock. {Lt108-1886.17}



Posted By: JAK

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 07/29/18 08:43 PM

Originally Posted By: Charity
Many of us unfortunately do not understand what she means by “denominated people” or “the church”.


In this point you are absolutely correct. Adventists universally think that they are "The Church." (Oh, yes, and with a token Catholic or Lutheran or Buddhist thrown in to demonstrate "God's universal love.") This could not be further from the truth. EGW herself says this but no one believes her:

Originally Posted By: EGW
God has a church. It is not the great cathedral, neither is it the national establishment, neither is it the various denominations; it is the people who love God and keep His commandments. “Where two or three are gathered together in My name, there am I in the midst of them.” [Matthew 18:20.] Where Christ is even among the humble few, this is Christ’s church, for the presence of the high and holy One who inhabiteth eternity can alone constitute a church.


A. In the first place, denominations for any reason are patently un-Christian. (I Corinthians 1:13)

B. I have worked for the SDA organization for more than 20 years in several provinces and countries at the local level (holding church offices from Bulletin Secretary to Elder) to the Union level and the Divisional level (as an IDE) and I have universally found self-serving, corruption, backstabbing, retaliation, and a head-in-the-sand approach to problem solving, church issues, and care of the members at all levels. The church is solely concerned with self-preservation, money, and control.

Read about the SDA's collaboration with the Nazis in Germany during WWII. This is NOT God's church.

I personally know members who, working for an SDA entity, had to SUE THE CHURCH TO GET SABBATH OFF!!!! The settlement is then tied to a gag order in order to keep the details from church members and reveal the hypocrisy of the SDA Church.

It's not enough to say "We're all human and make mistakes." While that is true, it is NOT a "mistake" to sit in committee and intentionally take a decision that goes against Christian principles AND established church protocols and guidelines. THAT'S just bad religion.

No, GOD'S church is made up of humble believers who do their best to help their fellow humans and treat others respectfully and honestly.
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 07/29/18 11:21 PM

As this is the 'Part 2" thread, here is the link to the "Part 1" thread:

http://www.maritime-sda-online.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=181519#Post181519
Posted By: kland

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 07/31/18 02:36 AM

Charity, not to diminish what you're saying, but I'm confused as to your main point. Ellen White has said that not one in twenty will be saved, and I believe that is in reference to Adventists. So I had never assumed most Adventists would be saved, and saw evidence as to such. Had you thought most would be?
Posted By: Charity

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/02/18 02:42 AM

Originally Posted By: kland
Charity, not to diminish what you're saying, but I'm confused as to your main point. Ellen White has said that not one in twenty will be saved, and I believe that is in reference to Adventists. So I had never assumed most Adventists would be saved, and saw evidence as to such. Had you thought most would be?


Fair question Kland. I'm 59, a pastor's son and lifetime Adventist. In my lifespan the great majority of conservative Adventists who I've met and read think that the Adventist Church as a body will never reject the Testimonies. Like you and me, they are all aware of the "not one in twenty" and "not one in a hundred" statements but almost without exception the commonly held view is that our numbers may thin under persecution but the General Conference or whatever official organ represents Seventh-day Adventists will always remain true to scripture and the SOP. It will go through. This prophecy says that's incorrect.

My point in writing the paper is that we need to nerve ourselves for the eventuality that the cycle of purging that always spawns the remnant will be repeated at the end. The shaking results in the expulsion of the true believers, the "not one in twenty" who remain faithful. Because the unfaithful retain the assets and the structure they believe that by expelling the faithful men and women among them they've shaken and rid themselves of a pesky extreme and dangerous element. They'll exclaim, "Thank God!, Let the Lord be glorified!" as it says in Isaiah:

Quote:
Isa 66:5 Hear the word of the LORD, ye that tremble at his word; Your brethren that hated you, that cast you out for my name's sake, said, Let the LORD be glorified: but he shall appear to your joy, and they shall be ashamed.
So it would be good to memorize this entire chapter because although there is this painful reality check here, it is a glorious prospect that the Lord holds out to us.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/02/18 03:31 AM

Originally Posted By: Charity
Originally Posted By: kland
Charity, not to diminish what you're saying, but I'm confused as to your main point. Ellen White has said that not one in twenty will be saved, and I believe that is in reference to Adventists. So I had never assumed most Adventists would be saved, and saw evidence as to such. Had you thought most would be?


Fair question Kland. I'm 59, a pastor's son and lifetime Adventist. In my lifespan the great majority of conservative Adventists who I've met and read think that the Adventist Church as a body will never reject the Testimonies. Like you and me, they are all aware of the "not one in twenty" and "not one in a hundred" statements but almost without exception the commonly held view is that our numbers may thin under persecution but the General Conference or whatever official organ represents Seventh-day Adventists will always remain true to scripture and the SOP. It will go through. This prophecy says that's incorrect.

My point in writing the paper is that we need to nerve ourselves for the eventuality that the cycle of purging that always spawns the remnant will be repeated at the end. The shaking results in the expulsion of the true believers, the "not one in twenty" who remain faithful. Because the unfaithful retain the assets and the structure they believe that by expelling the faithful men and women among them they've shaken and rid themselves of a pesky extreme and dangerous element. They'll exclaim, "Thank God!, Let the Lord be glorified!" as it says in Isaiah:

Quote:
Isa 66:5 Hear the word of the LORD, ye that tremble at his word; Your brethren that hated you, that cast you out for my name's sake, said, Let the LORD be glorified: but he shall appear to your joy, and they shall be ashamed.
So it would be good to memorize this entire chapter because although there is this painful reality check here, it is a glorious prospect that the Lord holds out to us.

INTERESTING!

When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. And He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left.

Then the King will say to those on His right hand, "Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: for ye believed in Ellen White and didst treasure Her Testimonies."

But He will say to those on the left hand, "Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: for ye didst not do like these on my right. Ye didst NOT believe in Ellen White nor didst thou think in thine heart to treasure Her Testimonies!"

Mat. 25:31-46

///
Posted By: kland

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/04/18 01:14 AM

Quote:
There will be a hatred kindled against the testimonies which is satanic. -- Letter 40, 1890. {1SM 48.4}
Posted By: His child

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/04/18 03:24 PM

Originally Posted By: Charity
The Testimonies are not to be re-interpreted and wrested so as to make them of no effect.



Unfortunately, that has already been done and those who are going back to the Testimonies are spoken evil of
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/06/18 01:34 AM

Originally Posted By: kland
Quote:
There will be a hatred kindled against the testimonies which is satanic. -- Letter 40, 1890. {1SM 48.4}

  • It doesn't matter. It is of no consequence.
     
  • Jesus Christ Himself established the dividing line and test. "For God so loved the world," He said, "that He gave His Only-begotten Son that whosoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life." Is there anyone bold and audacious enough to change the dividing line and test, saying, "no but such and such are the goals"?
     
  • Who has deceived you to cause you to study a different text from the one recommended by the Teacher of the class? Surely you must know that such a thing leads only to failure, to everlasting shame and contempt.
     
  • Of every human being it will be asked, "Do you believe in the One whom God gave for a test, His Only-begotten Son, that you may follow and learn from; or not?" Therefore, do not change the text crying aloud in the streets, "THESE TESTIMONIES!"
     
  • Prov. 30:5-6
///
Posted By: His child

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/07/18 04:01 AM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: kland
Quote:
There will be a hatred kindled against the testimonies which is satanic. -- Letter 40, 1890. {1SM 48.4}

  • It doesn't matter. It is of no consequence.
     
  • Jesus Christ Himself established the dividing line and test. "For God so loved the world," He said, "that He gave His Only-begotten Son that whosoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life." Is there anyone bold and audacious enough to change the dividing line and test, saying, "no but such and such are the goals"?
     
  • Who has deceived you to cause you to study a different text from the one recommended by the Teacher of the class? Surely you must know that such a thing leads only to failure, to everlasting shame and contempt.
     
  • Of every human being it will be asked, "Do you believe in the One whom God gave for a test, His Only-begotten Son, that you may follow and learn from; or not?" Therefore, do not change the text crying aloud in the streets, "THESE TESTIMONIES!"
     
  • Prov. 30:5-6
///


Those who reject the Lord's invitation are destroyed for lack of knowledge.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/08/18 08:24 PM

Originally Posted By: His child
Those who reject the Lord's invitation are destroyed for lack of knowledge.

That is true. John 3:16.

///
Posted By: Daryl

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/09/18 12:58 AM

Originally Posted By: JAK
Adventists universally think that they are "The Church."

In all my years in the SDA Church, at least in my neck of the woods, I never heard anybody say that the SDA Church is "The Church." Instead, I heard that "The Church" is made up of true believers (true Christians) in all the different churches.

After saying this, I do believe that the Lord raised up the SDA Church to proclaim truths that have been almost lost over the centuries, some of them being the seventh-day Sabbath and the State of the Dead.
Posted By: APL

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/09/18 07:43 AM

Originally Posted By: Daryl
Originally Posted By: JAK
Adventists universally think that they are "The Church."

In all my years in the SDA Church, at least in my neck of the woods, I never heard anybody say that the SDA Church is "The Church." Instead, I heard that "The Church" is made up of true believers (true Christians) in all the different churches.

After saying this, I do believe that the Lord raised up the SDA Church to proclaim truths that have been almost lost over the centuries, some of them being the seventh-day Sabbath and the State of the Dead.
Daryl - do you believe the Testimonies? God destroys no one. {5T 120.1}
Posted By: Elle

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/09/18 07:51 AM

Originally Posted By: Daryl
Originally Posted By: JAK
Adventists universally think that they are "The Church."

In all my years in the SDA Church, at least in my neck of the woods, I never heard anybody say that the SDA Church is "The Church." Instead, I heard that "The Church" is made up of true believers (true Christians) in all the different churches.


I would disagree with you Daryl. It's in our teachings. We believe that other Christians will come in our church during the shaking and a lot of SDAs will be shaken out...but our "boat" [church] is going to make it.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/09/18 07:54 AM

Originally Posted By: APL

Daryl - do you believe the Testimonies? God destroys no one. {5T 120.1}

I'm glad you brought it up.

Shall we open a new thread for that?
Posted By: His child

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/09/18 04:34 PM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: His child
Those who reject the Lord's invitation are destroyed for lack of knowledge.

That is true. John 3:16.

///


Remember the FLOOD. They rejected knowledge even though God LOVED them. They perished (were destroyed)

Remember Christ. God loved Him, but did not spare Him from dying.

Those who reject knowledge reject God's love. They will face the consequences

Does God pour out His wrath or allow people to reap what they have sown?
Posted By: APL

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/09/18 05:55 PM

Originally Posted By: Elle
Originally Posted By: APL

Daryl - do you believe the Testimonies? God destroys no one. {5T 120.1}

I'm glad you brought it up.

Shall we open a new thread for that?
No. This is about the testimonies, and now they are rejected, and they are being rejected in the most obvious ways and most don't want to see it.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/09/18 07:23 PM

Originally Posted By: His child
Originally Posted By: James Peterson
Originally Posted By: His child
Those who reject the Lord's invitation are destroyed for lack of knowledge.

That is true. John 3:16.

///


Remember the FLOOD. They rejected knowledge even though God LOVED them. They perished (were destroyed)

Remember Christ. God loved Him, but did not spare Him from dying.

Those who reject knowledge reject God's love. They will face the consequences

Does God pour out His wrath or allow people to reap what they have sown?

That is why:
  • Jesus told Nicodemus in John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that He gave His Only-begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him should have everlasting life, and not perish."
     
  • And told His disciples in Acts 1:8, "... you shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth."
     
  • So that Paul reminded the Corinthians , "And I, brethren, when I came to you, did not come with excellence of speech or of wisdom declaring to you the testimony of God. For I determined not to know anything among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified." 1 Cor. 2:1-2
Jesus Christ is the test, the dividing line, the Judge, the lightning rod and the hope of salvation. It is not right that anyone should supplant this test with something else or any other, saying, "Either you affirm this or that or you are anathema!"1

----------------------------

1 List of excommunicable offences from the Council of Trent of the Roman Catholic Church.

///
Posted By: Elle

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/10/18 03:48 PM

Originally Posted By: APL
Originally Posted By: Elle
Originally Posted By: APL

Daryl - do you believe the Testimonies? God destroys no one. {5T 120.1}

I'm glad you brought it up.

Shall we open a new thread for that?
No. This is about the testimonies, and now they are rejected, and they are being rejected in the most obvious ways and most don't want to see it.

Well when you have statements from the testimonies that oppose what scripture says and even oppose what the Church believes... like "God destroys no one" when SDA believe that at the Great White throne God will trow more than 90% of all the people that existed in a LITERAL lake of fire and will completely annihilate them....

Don't you see any problems with that statement? Isn't it a good reason for people to come to reject the testimonies?

BTW. I do believe that that statement has some truth; but only by properly defining the word "destroy" according to scriptures and knowing the full plan of salvation that includes the first stage that the seeds must die (be destroy) before it can resurrect into a new creature. That's why scriptures says in many places "God destroys" whereas no where we can find "Satan [or the devil] destroy". Do the search yourself and see what scriptures says.

Perhaps this "foretelling of the rejection of the Testimonies" has been made not by Ellen White but by those that infiltrated the Church after 1888 and earlier so to keep the people inside with fear to come to reject the testimonies.
Posted By: APL

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/10/18 05:06 PM

Originally Posted By: elle
Well when you have statements from the testimonies that oppose what scripture says and even oppose what the Church believes... like "God destroys no one" when SDA believe that at the Great White throne God will trow more than 90% of all the people that existed in a LITERAL lake of fire and will completely annihilate them....

Don't you see any problems with that statement? Isn't it a good reason for people to come to reject the testimonies?
Literal lake of fire - is that what happened to Christ?

elle - EGW is right. You are not. your trust is in "god-kingdom-ministries.com" and paving material.

And just because a majority of the SDA church sees God as a destroying god, does not make it truth. We have ample evidence in the Bible what God is really like. You should get to know Him, as He is!
Posted By: kland

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/10/18 11:57 PM

Originally Posted By: Elle
That's why scriptures says in many places "God destroys" whereas no where we can find "Satan [or the devil] destroy". Do the search yourself and see what scriptures says.

Re 9:11 And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

What is Apollyon?
active participle of 622; a destroyer (i.e. Satan):--Apollyon.

622. apollumi
to destroy fully (reflexively, to perish, or lose), literally or figuratively:--destroy, die, lose, mar, perish.

Elle, do you think Rev 9:11 says the angel of the bottomless pit is a destroyer?


1Pe 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

Does devour, gulp, swallow, drown count as destroying?
Posted By: His child

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/11/18 05:20 AM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson

That is why:
  • Jesus told Nicodemus in John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that He gave His Only-begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him should have everlasting life, and not perish."
     
  • And told His disciples in Acts 1:8, "... you shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth."
     
  • So that Paul reminded the Corinthians , "And I, brethren, when I came to you, did not come with excellence of speech or of wisdom declaring to you the testimony of God. For I determined not to know anything among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified." 1 Cor. 2:1-2
Jesus Christ is the test, the dividing line, the Judge, the lightning rod and the hope of salvation. It is not right that anyone should supplant this test with something else or any other, saying, "Either you affirm this or that or you are anathema!"1

----------------------------

1 List of excommunicable offences from the Council of Trent of the Roman Catholic Church.

///


Is it not also written: And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 2Th 2:11, 12 KJV
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/11/18 08:23 PM

Originally Posted By: His child
Originally Posted By: James Peterson

That is why:
  • Jesus told Nicodemus in John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that He gave His Only-begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him should have everlasting life, and not perish."
     
  • And told His disciples in Acts 1:8, "... you shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth."
     
  • So that Paul reminded the Corinthians , "And I, brethren, when I came to you, did not come with excellence of speech or of wisdom declaring to you the testimony of God. For I determined not to know anything among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified." 1 Cor. 2:1-2
Jesus Christ is the test, the dividing line, the Judge, the lightning rod and the hope of salvation. It is not right that anyone should supplant this test with something else or any other, saying, "Either you affirm this or that or you are anathema!"1

----------------------------

1 List of excommunicable offences from the Council of Trent of the Roman Catholic Church.

///


Is it not also written: And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 2Th 2:11, 12 KJV

Therefore do not walk in the way of the Roman Catholic Church, lest you also be blinded and persecute the righteous. Mat. 12:7
  • Do not change the gospel crying aloud in the streets, "THESE TESTIMONIES! The Testimonies of Ellen White are these!"
     
  • Of every human being it will be asked, "Do you believe in the One whom God gave for a test, HIS ONLY-BEGOTTEN SON, that you may follow and learn from; or not?" There is salvation in no other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved. Acts 4:12 Around and about Him, and Him only, the world would be divided and shaken. Haggai 2:6-9
     
  • Prov. 30:5-6
///
Posted By: Elle

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/12/18 06:39 PM

Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: Elle
That's why scriptures says in many places "God destroys" whereas no where we can find "Satan [or the devil] destroy". Do the search yourself and see what scriptures says.

Re 9:11 And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

What is Apollyon?
active participle of 622; a destroyer (i.e. Satan):--Apollyon.

622. apollumi
to destroy fully (reflexively, to perish, or lose), literally or figuratively:--destroy, die, lose, mar, perish.

Elle, do you think Rev 9:11 says the angel of the bottomless pit is a destroyer?


Tx kland for moving the discussion forward. I will come back addressing the angel of the bottomless pit of Rev 9 as this is an important text to understand the true Biblical definition of Appolumi and Abad by which is translated at times as "destroy". But note that this angel is not identified as Satan.

Originally Posted By: kland
1Pe 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary[antidikos,G476, an opponent (in a lawsuit)] the devil[diabolos,G1228,prone to slander, slanderous, accusing falsely], as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

Does devour, gulp, swallow, drown count as destroying?

Your over-extending the lion example while ignoring the context of the text. The lion picture is used to qualify the devil work as an ACCUSER, not as an destroyer. See the context as it is used above. See what accuser means and the devil means in this context. The devil accuses us in God's court of law or elsewhere. That's his job. Without an adversary or an accuser in a court of law would make Jesus job too easy. So that's Satan's job that God gave him. He's our adversary or prosecutor who uses partial law to make us look guilty by not presenting all the facts or bringing all the laws in our favors. However, Jesus our defender and advocate knows all the facts and all the law to set us free.

Also the Bible defines satan, the devil as a liar and a deceiver.
Of course Satan's lies and deceits does lead to many people getting "lost", or "perish" or be "destroyed" in their lifetime.

But the main point is the Bible doesn't define Satan as a destroyer despite he or other entities are used to execute God's divine judgment that results in some destruction.

For example King Nebuchadnezzar was called to execute God's judgment to destroy Jerusalem. It was God's judgment that destroyed Jerusalem. Nebuchadnezzar was only God's servant in this and was sent to do His bidding despite Nebuchadnezzar had no knowledge of this. The same with satan, God will use him to do some "destructive" work but it is God that sets the timing with limitation as we read in Job and other places. Satan cannot make one of our hair fall without God's calling it.

That's why we find in the Bible many texts saying that God destroys. God is Sovereign above Satan and all the others that exist. He calls the shots while the others below Him executes the shots. It is His plan that is unfolding, not Satan's. God is in control and has never lost control of His plan.

However the Hebrew word Abad and the Greek word Appolumi translated as "lost", "perish", or "destroy" has to be understood within how God uses it in His scriptures and how it fits in His plan of salvation in mind.

I don't know what Ellen White meant with her statement "God destroys no one". Depending what is her definition of "destroy" this statement could be true or be false. But reading that statement as it is while taking "destroy" as we define it in our language today; I would say that this is a true statement as I believe that scriptures teaches us that everybody will be saved. So yes God deosn't destroy no one in the long run, but in the short run there's lots of "destruction" or "losing" or "perishing" going on.

However, as far as I know Ellen White didn't receive the "everyone is saved" revelation but instead believed that over 90% of all that ever existed will be completely annihilated; thus there's severe contradiction in that statement -- that is if she wrote that statement herself.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/13/18 08:57 AM

Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: Elle
That's why scriptures says in many places "God destroys" whereas no where we can find "Satan [or the devil] destroy". Do the search yourself and see what scriptures says.

Re 9:11 And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

What is Apollyon?
active participle of 622; a destroyer (i.e. Satan):--Apollyon.

622. apollumi
to destroy fully (reflexively, to perish, or lose), literally or figuratively:--destroy, die, lose, mar, perish.


The better question would be -- what is Abaddon?

Apollumi is the Greek translation of the Hebrew word Abad. So to get a truer definition of any Greek word is to seek out its Hebrew equivalent. Rev 9:11 spelled it directly by linking apollumi with abad.

Originally Posted By: Strong's definition
ʼâbad, aw-bad'; a primitive root; properly, to wander away, i.e. lose oneself; by implication to perish (causative, destroy):

I find Strong did bring out a truer definition with the Hebrew word 'abad than the Greek word apolumi. Strong was not a linguistic; so I did find him incorrect at some places but most of the time, he did a pretty good job overall.

One way to check the Hebrew definition is to look at each consonant letter definition. The composition of the letters definition equals the word definition. So let's look at 'abad more closely :

'a = alef literally means an ox that has to do with strenght or being first.
b = beth means house or household.
d = daleth means door or opening.

The word picture by combining these letters shows someone who has wandered out from the strength (security) of the house. So, Strong’s definition “to wander away; i.e., lose oneself, by impl. To perish.” I think is spot on.

So in 1 Samuel 9:3 we find Saul seeking out to find his father's donkeys that had wandered away and were “lost” (abad).

We find a very important law in Deuteronomy 22:1-3 that uses abad in speaking of lost sheep and how we are to care for them until the owner can be located. Basically, the people are a "lost[abad] sheep" and the ones in God's Church are responsible to care for them until Jesus, the owner, comes back.

If we look back when the house of Israel entered the promised land -- for many centuries they did not observe many laws including caring for the lost sheep inside their own nations and outside among the nations. So God sent out the Assyrians to bring judgment by destroying the house of Israel by which at that time represented the 10 northern tribes. Some were killed; but many were deported out of the promised land and they themselves became "the lost sheep of the house of Israel"

So we read in Ezk 34:4 that God chides the shepherds [of Judah] who abused the lost sheep of the house of Israel. In verse 6 they "wondered through the mountains" and became prey to wild beast. Basically the shepherds(pastors) refused to keep the Deut 22:1-3 law by caring for them until the owner came to claim them.

So because the shepherds (pastors) failed to seek for the lost sheep and care for them we read in Ezk 34:11 "For thus says the Lord God, “Behold, I Myself will search for My sheep and seek them out.” I believe this prophecy and work will only start at His 2nd coming.

So coming back to the proper definition of abad or apollumi, we see in this example that the nation of Israel as a national unit was destroyed but the sheep(people) itself were lost and wandered among the nations. These lost sheep are not dead nor or they beyond the reach of the Great Shepherd. Even if they die God provided another way to recover them which is call the resurrection.

So many Christian defines abad or apollumi as "destroyed fully". I do not agree with that definition. I believe they are only lost temporarily for Jesus said himself : "For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost [apollumi]."

Jesus real work "to seek and to save" by Jesus himself as according to Ezk 34:11 prophecy have not even started. I believe it will start at Jesus 2nd coming when He and the 144k (his body) will be united and succeed in that work that the other Shepherds (Pastors) has failed to accomplish during the first 6000 years.

Originally Posted By: kland
Elle, do you think Rev 9:11 says the angel of the bottomless pit is a destroyer?

No. Based on the proper definition of 'abad I would not define Abaddon as "the one who destroy" but more accurately as "the one who loses".

Rev 9:1-12 relates to the 5th trumpet where God called out the angel of the abyss who inspired Islam to bring judgment on the Catholic church. In verse 4 & 5 God set up limitation that men should not be killed but tormented for 5 months (5x30=150years). During those years this caused many to be lost.

I believe this same angel was called to bring judgment on the House of Israel via inspiring the Assyrians. That angel caused the nation of Israel to be lost and dispersed them among the nations.

So in another word this angel from the abyss job or mission is to disperse the people and cause them to be lost. The keys of the bottomless pit that was given to him for a time in Rev 9 to bring out the army of locust(Islam) from the bottomless pit; we read in Rev 20:1 another angel [a good one] has these keys. The keys of the bottomless pit is not in satan's hand but in a good angel's hand that hands it to the angel of the abyss when it is time for him to do his work. But when the millennium comes the keys of the bottomless pit is back in the good angel's possession where he uses it to open the bottomless pit up to cast satan in it; but that good angel also has a chain to bond satan up during the millennium. So to me this means that the work to cause the people to be lost is finish before the millennium. During the millennium I believe a counterpart good angel will be called to gather back the lost sheep to Jesus.

All of these angels whether evil or good always works according to God's plan at His timing. God is always in control.

Thus, I don't believe this angel in Rev 9 is satan as the text doesn't qualify him as such; but for sure I would say he is one of satan's hi-ranked generals.
Posted By: kland

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/13/18 08:09 PM

Originally Posted By: Elle
Tx kland for moving the discussion forward.
You're welcome.
Yes, I figured you were laying out the bait so I gladly obliged.

Quote:

Originally Posted By: kland
1Pe 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary[antidikos,G476, an opponent (in a lawsuit)] the devil[diabolos,G1228,prone to slander, slanderous, accusing falsely], as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

Does devour, gulp, swallow, drown count as destroying?

Your over-extending the lion example while ignoring the context of the text. The lion picture is used to qualify the devil work as an ACCUSER, not as an destroyer.
"Over-extending"? Hmmm.....
I'll remember that use when someone points out something to me I don't like.

as a roaring lion,
seeking whom he may devour.

Sorry Elle, no over extension there. That's the main point of the verse.

Quote:
That's why scriptures says in many places "God destroys" whereas no where we can find "Satan [or the devil] destroy". Do the search yourself and see what scriptures says.
Elle, you have just said/demonstrated, Satan does not destroy and nothing can disprove it.

So if something is disprovable, then it's merely a personally held opinion.
Posted By: dedication

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/14/18 04:46 AM

Seems several on this thread have rejected the testimonies as being God's gift to light the way through the final great conflict.

But to answer one question:
What did EGW mean by "God destroys no man"?
The context explains it.
Man fixes his own destiny.


" God destroys no one. The sinner destroys himself by his own impenitence...We want all to understand how the soul is destroyed. It is not that God sends out a decree that man shall not be saved. He does not throw a darkness before the eyes which cannot be penetrated. But man at first resists a motion of the Spirit of God, and, having once resisted, it is less difficult to do so the second time, less the third, and far less the fourth. Then comes the harvest to be reaped from the seed of unbelief and resistance. Oh what a harvest of sinful indulgences is preparing for the sickle! {5T 120.2}


"A life of rebellion against God has unfitted them for heaven. Its purity, holiness, and peace would be torture to them; the glory of God would be a consuming fire. They would long to flee from that holy place. They would welcome destruction, that they might be hidden from the face of Him who died to redeem them. The destiny of the wicked is fixed by their own choice. Their exclusion from heaven is voluntary with themselves, and just and merciful on the part of God…. {DD 16.5}

Obviously the belief that all will eventually be saved and that the resurrection, rather than the time of rewards, is the means of then preparing people who rejected salvation in life to be put through a program whereby they are prepared to be saved, and eventually fitted for heaven --- all that is "rejecting the testimonies".

EGW writes that "Jesus Christ has died in order that all men may have a chance to make their calling and election sure." {RH, September 28, 1897 par. 5}
So the door is open to all -- but all will not enter.

Some flatter themselves that the Lord will give them another chance, that there will be a second probation. Fatal delusion! Just now, day by day, hour by hour, we are building for the last great day.{RH, January 22, 1901 par. 10}

The formation of character is the work of a lifetime, and it is for eternity. If all could realize this, if they would awake to the thought that we are individually deciding our own destiny for eternal life or eternal ruin, what a change would take place! How differently would this probationary time be occupied, and what different characters would fill our world! {CG 162.2}


Posted By: kland

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/14/18 04:35 PM

Quote:
Obviously the belief that all will eventually be saved and that the resurrection, rather than the time of rewards, is the means of then preparing people who rejected salvation in life to be put through a program whereby they are prepared to be saved, and eventually fitted for heaven --- all that is "rejecting the testimonies".
Oh, but your "over-extending" things. See, killing means saved. Destroy means create. We just change the meanings of words, and nothing can be refuted....

Quote:
But to answer one question:
What did EGW mean by "God destroys no man"?
The context explains it.
Man fixes his own destiny.
Amen!
Posted By: Elle

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/14/18 05:07 PM

Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: Elle
Tx kland for moving the discussion forward.
You're welcome.
Yes, I figured you were laying out the bait so I gladly obliged.

Thanks for the kind joke. I had a little giggle out of it. So tx for the little good medicine.

But really I did hoped that APL would of started a new thread because this type of discussion can get long. I was hesitant to get into this because I like how Charity started this discussion, the direction it was taking and the many good points made by a few. I was hesitant to reply to APL as I really don't want to go off-topic. So be ready to be ignore if I see you don't bring any sensible points-arguments.

Originally Posted By: kland
Quote:

Originally Posted By: kland
1Pe 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary[antidikos,G476, an opponent (in a lawsuit)] the devil[diabolos,G1228,prone to slander, slanderous, accusing falsely], as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

Does devour, gulp, swallow, drown count as destroying?

Your over-extending the lion example while ignoring the context of the text. The lion picture is used to qualify the devil work as an ACCUSER, not as an destroyer.
"Over-extending"? Hmmm.....
I'll remember that use when someone points out something to me I don't like.

as a roaring lion,
seeking whom he may devour.

Sorry Elle, no over extension there. That's the main point of the verse.

No, it's definetly a case of over-extending the lion qualification to destruction and trying to attribute 1Pe 5:8 as saying "Satan is the Destroyer". 1Pe 5:8 says Satan is the adversary...normally in a court room. So in the court room satan will be like a devouring lion....meaning he will slander, falsely accuse you, not present all the facts, only bring part of the laws that will condemn you, etc... he will use anything he can use against you without mercy. But we have Jesus as an advocate.

Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: elle
That's why scriptures says in many places "God destroys" whereas no where we can find "Satan [or the devil] destroy". Do the search yourself and see what scriptures says.
Elle, you have just said/demonstrated, Satan does not destroy and nothing can disprove it.


I said :
#1. Kland usage of 1Pe 5:8 to prove text that Satan is the destroyer is not valid as the context does not say what kland suggest it says. See above, as I've already detailed what the context reads.

#2. Kland quoting Rev 9:11 as a proof text that satan is the destroyer.... Rev 9 doesn't say that the angel that was given the keys is Satan. So you are speculating there.

#3. Kland preferred definition of apollumi == "to destroy fully" does not match with the true definition of it and it's Hebrew word equivalence 'abad. The proper definition of 'abad is "properly, to wander away, i.e. lose oneself; by implication to perish (causative, destroy):"

#4. Elle said that the Bible does not qualify satan as the destroyer despite he may be used directly to do some destructive work as in the case of Job. Right now, I can't think of another example where Satan is used directly...so there must be very few. However, God is above Satan and has to give Satan permission to do such work always with specified limitation as we read in Job.

Often the destructive work read in the Bible is a result of God's divine judgment brought forth by some human agencies like it was in the case of Nebuchadnezzar was sent to bring divine judgment on Jerusalem and the house of Judah. This is why we read in the Bible many texts God taking the credit of these destruction/judgment. That's why we read in many places in scriptures "God destroys". But always keep in mind the true definition of 'abad. Destruction doesn't necessarily means "fully destroyed" in God's mind and long term plan.

So, kland, you haven't disproved anything yet.

Originally Posted By: kland
So if something is disprovable, then it's merely a personally held opinion.

I really don't care about my personal views or my pre-conceived ideas wherever they come from. We all have some that needs to be shed.

Obviously everyone should of figured out by now that I'm not bound by the SDA Church or EGW views.

If my personal opinions wherever they came from -- aren't in harmony with the Lords true view found in scriptures...then I won't hold on to them and will be happy to let them go. That's why these studies are mostly for me. I expect to still have some false views in my head and expect to be corrected some more. I am corrected a little here and there, every time I engage to do a study before posting my reflections.
Posted By: APL

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/14/18 11:04 PM

Originally Posted By: elle
Obviously everyone should of figured out by now that I'm not bound by the SDA Church or EGW views.
That may be the ONLY thing you've said that I could agree with.
Posted By: His child

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/15/18 03:40 PM

Originally Posted By: dedication
Seems several on this thread have rejected the testimonies as being God's gift to light the way through the final great conflict...


Unfortunately of those who profess to believe the testimonies, there is a class that only adheres to their personal favorite "selected messages" … They select what they like and disregard everything else.

Instead of disregarding the Testimonies another class reads them in the light of a popular private understanding which is not the reading that EGW had in mind when she penned them. (The worst offenders often accuse me of doing that.)
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/15/18 08:21 PM

Originally Posted By: His child
Originally Posted By: dedication
Seems several on this thread have rejected the testimonies as being God's gift to light the way through the final great conflict...


Unfortunately of those who profess to believe the testimonies, there is a class that only adheres to their personal favorite "selected messages" … They select what they like and disregard everything else.

Instead of disregarding the Testimonies another class reads them in the light of a popular private understanding which is not the reading that EGW had in mind when she penned them. (The worst offenders often accuse me of doing that.)

INTERESTING!

God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by Ellen White, whom He has appointed heir of His Spirit of Prophecy, through whom also He made available to us the Testimonies because of which His Church shall be purged of her rejectors, shaken out that those who remain shall be safe in the glory of her excellent name. Heb. 1:1-4

:: From Saturday to Sunday

///
Posted By: kland

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/16/18 01:06 AM

Elle, I'm trying to say, you often focus on the wrong thing.
1 Peter 5:8: seeking whom he may devour.

You focused on description.
The action is: Seeking to devour.


And Elle, another lost focus, the angel of the bottomless pit is not the same thing as having the keys to it.
Re 20:1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

So does Satan have an evil angel over him?
Posted By: dedication

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/16/18 05:53 AM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson



God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by Ellen White, whom He has appointed heir of His Spirit of Prophecy, through whom also He made available to us the Testimonies because of which His Church shall be purged of her rejectors, shaken out that those who remain shall be safe in the glory of her excellent name. Heb. 1:1-4

///


I think it would be wiser to leave the text as it reads.

In many and various ways God spoke of old to our fathers by the prophets; in these last days he has spoken to us by His Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world.

God speaks to people through prophets.
The purpose is to reveal to man the truth of God and the rightness and goodness of His ways, calling on people to worship and serve God.

There is nothing wrong with prophets -- they are God's messengers.

However, God went a step further --
He sent His Son into the world -- Emmanuel -- God with us.

The people distorted the message of the prophets. The people had a distorted view of God, of salvation, and of what it means to live a righteous life.

Jesus is the most profound and accurate source of all truth, no prophet can ever equal Him, He IS the truth, the light and the way!!!
The Son is the greatest and highest manifestation of God! Prophets are only messengers to give glimpses and point us to Christ and the Father. (Acts 10:43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believes in him shall receive remission of sins.

On the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus contrasted their interpretations of what God said through the prophets, to what God actually meant when He said it. His whole life revealed the character of God, and He unceasingly taught about what God means by "the kingdom of God".

But what about now?
2000 years have passed.
Our revelation of Jesus is again given to us by the prophets.
Men, inspired and directed by the Holy Spirit wrote down the sayings and activities of Christ while He was on earth. -- Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, did their best to present what they had witnessed and heard. We have their testimonies -- The Bible is God's Word yet written in the words of "prophets".

Now, in our time, we again see all manner of distortions and interpretations. Hundreds of religious communities hold the Bible as truth, yet they do not agree with each other as to what that truth might be! They may converge on a general historical event, yet diverge widely as to what the event meant, how it affects us today, and how it will affect us in the future.

Why would a God of love NOT send a prophet, as He did in olden times?

There are promises in scripture that at the end of time God will send Prophets. (Malachi four, has such a promise.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/16/18 09:54 PM

Originally Posted By: kland
Elle, I'm trying to say, you often focus on the wrong thing.
1 Peter 5:8: seeking whom he may devour.

You focused on description.
The action is: Seeking to devour.

Yes....the adversary in a court of law is like a lion who seeks to devour(figuratively) you like an opponent in a court of law would. That's the context & setting of the adversary we deal with in 1Pet 5:8.
Originally Posted By: kland
And Elle, another lost focus, the angel of the bottomless pit is not the same thing as having the keys to it.
Tx for bringing this up and a good point. Yes I agree.

Originally Posted By: kland
Re 20:1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

So does Satan have an evil angel over him?

Rev 20 does not qualify that the angel of the bottomless pit of Rev 9 is Satan. Rev 20 doesn't even talk about the angel of the bottomless at all.

It only says that there's an angel with the key of the bottomless pit and he opened it up and chain satan -- so he wouldn't deceive the nations for a thousand years.

The bottomless pit is define as "the abode of the demons". Satan is in there as all other demon characters are there also. Also Rev7 says a bunch of locust came out of the smoke of the bottomless pit. Rev 11:7; 17:8 says there's beasts are from there too. So all kind of things comes out of the bottomless pit.

These locusts(symbolic term that represents in this case Islam) had a king over them that was said to be an "angel of the bottomless pit". So this angel can merely be "of" the bottomless pit and not necessarily THE angel of the bottomless pit, meaning he is the ruling angel over the bottomless pit. So that angel is not qualify as Satan in Rev 7 but only qualifies this angel as being the king over the bunch of locust.

So since Rev 20 doesn't talk about the angel of the bottomless pit no where, you have absolutely no Biblical text supporting your deduction.

Then I repeat....your word definition of abad and apollumi needs revising by re-reading how the Bible uses these words. It is by far only used to mean "destroy" but equally used as "lost" and "perish". So Abaddon is more accurately by its proper definition of 'abad as "the one that loses" than like you like to define it as "the one that destroys".

Originally Posted By: kland
So does Satan have an evil angel over him?

I really don't know. Something I haven't studied and I refuse to make assumptions. I know that you believe as we have been taught how to view some scriptures as Satan is the head. Maybe he is but since I haven't studied this I cannot answer. He could be the head and maybe he has someone else evil above him. But for sure the good angel that was given the key in Rev 20 is above Satan.

In the Book of Enoch Chapter 6 v.3 says Semjaza was the head of the fallen angels. I don't know if Satan is Semjaza or the Azazel character described in Chapter 8 and 9. For sure Semjaza and Azazel are two seperates angels. So I really don't know how to view this and I do need to study that question from scriptures alone.

But regardless if Satan is the head or not....coming back to Rev 20, it doesn't say anything about the angel of the bottomless pit. For sure Satan is an angel of the bottomless pit like any other angels that lives there.

What Rev 20 says is Satan got chained up because "that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season."

Again, the bible doesn't qualify Satan in Rev 20 as "the destroyer" but instead as the "deceiver" and that's why he is chained up and bound for a thousand years so he won't deceive the nations during the millennium.
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/17/18 07:45 AM

Originally Posted By: Elle
Originally Posted By: kland
Elle, I'm trying to say, you often focus on the wrong thing.
1 Peter 5:8: seeking whom he may devour.

You focused on description.
The action is: Seeking to devour.

Yes....the adversary in a court of law is like a lion who seeks to devour(figuratively) you like an opponent in a court of law would. That's the context & setting of the adversary we deal with in 1Pet 5:8.
Originally Posted By: kland
And Elle, another lost focus, the angel of the bottomless pit is not the same thing as having the keys to it.
Tx for bringing this up and a good point. Yes I agree.

Originally Posted By: kland
Re 20:1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

So does Satan have an evil angel over him?

Rev 20 does not qualify that the angel of the bottomless pit of Rev 9 is Satan. Rev 20 doesn't even talk about the angel of the bottomless at all.

It only says that there's an angel with the key of the bottomless pit and he opened it up and chain satan -- so he wouldn't deceive the nations for a thousand years.

The bottomless pit is define as "the abode of the demons". Satan is in there as all other demon characters are there also. Also Rev7 says a bunch of locust came out of the smoke of the bottomless pit. Rev 11:7; 17:8 says there's beasts are from there too. So all kind of things comes out of the bottomless pit.

These locusts(symbolic term that represents in this case Islam) had a king over them that was said to be an "angel of the bottomless pit". So this angel can merely be "of" the bottomless pit and not necessarily THE angel of the bottomless pit, meaning he is the ruling angel over the bottomless pit. So that angel is not qualify as Satan in Rev 7 but only qualifies this angel as being the king over the bunch of locust.

So since Rev 20 doesn't talk about the angel of the bottomless pit no where, you have absolutely no Biblical text supporting your deduction.

Then I repeat....your word definition of abad and apollumi needs revising by re-reading how the Bible uses these words. It is by far only used to mean "destroy" but equally used as "lost" and "perish". So Abaddon is more accurately by its proper definition of 'abad as "the one that loses" than like you like to define it as "the one that destroys".

Originally Posted By: kland
So does Satan have an evil angel over him?

I really don't know. Something I haven't studied and I refuse to make assumptions. I know that you believe as we have been taught how to view some scriptures as Satan is the head. Maybe he is but since I haven't studied this I cannot answer. He could be the head and maybe he has someone else evil above him. But for sure the good angel that was given the key in Rev 20 is above Satan.

In the Book of Enoch Chapter 6 v.3 says Semjaza was the head of the fallen angels. I don't know if Satan is Semjaza or the Azazel character described in Chapter 8 and 9. For sure Semjaza and Azazel are two seperates angels. So I really don't know how to view this and I do need to study that question from scriptures alone.

But regardless if Satan is the head or not....coming back to Rev 20, it doesn't say anything about the angel of the bottomless pit. For sure Satan is an angel of the bottomless pit like any other angels that lives there.

What Rev 20 says is Satan got chained up because "that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season."

Again, the bible doesn't qualify Satan in Rev 20 as "the destroyer" but instead as the "deceiver" and that's why he is chained up and bound for a thousand years so he won't deceive the nations during the millennium.

  • There are many ways to destroy; and one of the ways the devil destroys is through deception that causes one to lose life. In this way, the devil destroyed Judas.

    Then Judas, His betrayer, seeing that He had been condemned, was remorseful and brought back the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, saying, "I have sinned by betraying innocent blood." And they said, "What is that to us? You see to it!" Then he threw down the pieces of silver in the temple and departed, and went and hanged himself. Mat. 27:3-5

    In fact, the reason why we experience death today is because our first parents were deceived by the devil into turning against God.

    To Adam GOD said, "Because you have heeded the voice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree of which I commanded you, saying, You shall not eat of it: Cursed is the ground for your sake ... And to dust you shall return." Gen. 3:17-19
     
  • If the argument is whether the devil or God PERSONALLY kills or destroys anyone, then you are walking in absolute darkness. But if you ask whether men or animals can be persuaded to murder or kill or create or heal by either of them, then you are walking in the light. Deut. 29:29 We can neither see nor fully comprehend the things beyond our material realm.
     
  • Interestingly however, Jesus said, "Do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. But rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell." Mat. 10:28 And again, "The devil, who deceived them, was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone where the beast and the false prophet are." Rev. 20:10

    Clearly, at the end of all things, God Himself disposes of every evil being, forever.
///
 
Posted By: kland

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/17/18 11:15 PM

Originally Posted By: Elle
Originally Posted By: kland
Elle, I'm trying to say, you often focus on the wrong thing.
1 Peter 5:8: seeking whom he may devour.

You focused on description.
The action is: Seeking to devour.

Yes....the adversary in a court of law is like a lion who seeks to devour(figuratively) you like an opponent in a court of law would. That's the context & setting of the adversary we deal with in 1Pet 5:8.
Again Elle, is that idea disprovable?

If not, then it's merely a personally held opinion.
Posted By: Elle

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/20/18 08:38 AM

Originally Posted By: kland
Originally Posted By: Elle
Originally Posted By: kland
Elle, I'm trying to say, you often focus on the wrong thing.
1 Peter 5:8: seeking whom he may devour.

You focused on description.
The action is: Seeking to devour.

Yes....the adversary in a court of law is like a lion who seeks to devour(figuratively) you like an opponent in a court of law would. That's the context & setting of the adversary we deal with in 1Pet 5:8.
Again Elle, is that idea disprovable?

If not, then it's merely a personally held opinion.

No. That's the proper definition of adversary in 1Pe 5:8. You probably didn't bother checking out the convenient link of the Greek word antidikos, G476 that I provided you on my first post to make it easy to check my source. Most people don't check the Greek or Hebrew word behind the English translation. A lot of mis-interpretation derives from this and do end up with personally held opinion. So you are projecting yourself on me.

Quote:
[i]1Pe 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary[antidikos,G476, an opponent (in a lawsuit)] the devil[diabolos,G1228,prone to slander, slanderous, accusing falsely], as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:


God never issue a judgment outside from His court. The devil(see definition link of devil also) is our adversary in God's court of law. That's his main job. See the context of adversary in Matthew 5:25; Luke 12:58; Luke 18:3. All these texts show the context is in a court of law. Another biblical example we have Joshua the high Priest in Zec 3 was accused by satan. This concept is very Biblical; and not my personal opinion.
Posted By: kland

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/21/18 01:08 AM

Let's all do the side step.

Elle, Elle, Elle,
We are not talking about whether I disagree with your definition of some word.

What we're talking about is your twisting scripture of "seeking to devour" into merely a court case. Which, your answer of "No" does belong to the question of, is your opinion disprovable. 'nuff said.

I can see why you would take the position of distracting with a detail definition of something else....
Posted By: JAK

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/22/18 07:32 AM

Originally Posted By: dedication
Seems several on this thread have rejected the testimonies as being God's gift to light the way through the final great conflict.
I believe you be speaking of me.
Posted By: JAK

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 08/22/18 07:35 AM

Originally Posted By: James Peterson
God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by Ellen White, whom He has appointed heir of His Spirit of Prophecy, through whom also He made available to us the Testimonies because of which His Church shall be purged of her rejectors, shaken out that those who remain shall be safe in the glory of her excellent name. Heb. 1:1-4

ROFL
Posted By: dedication

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 09/02/18 03:29 AM

Jesus came to this earth in order to save us --

Acts 4:12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.

That is the basic foundation!

A prophet is simply a messenger pointing us to Jesus and eternal realities. They are simply human beings like everyone else with a special work to do for God.

Jesus being our Savior doesn't mean God no longer speaks to us through prophets.
He has spoken through prophets in many different times and ways.

And God promised to send messages through the prophets:



Mainstream Christians look at us askew and tell us that God no longer speaks through prophets since the time of the apostles.

Yet the Bible says:
"Do not despise prophesying, but test everything; hold fast what is good. 1 Thess. 5:20,21. (RSV)
Yes, it behooves us to be cautious when it comes to modern prophets for Matthew 24:24 tells us that many false prophets will arise to deceive. However, Christ does not warn us against all prophets, but only false prophets. We are admonished to "test" prophesying. We are counseled not to despise prophesying. We are urged to hold fast to the true.


Now let's look at Revelation 1:1-3 here we read that "The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave to Him, to show to His servants things which must shortly come to pass" "given to his servant John" (the prophet) "who bare record of the word and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of the things he saw. Blessed is he that reads and they that hear the words of this prophecy and keep those things which are written therein..."

Here the sequence is plain. The testimony of Jesus Christ is clearly linked to the prophecies of things that must come to pass, it is linked to God sending a message through a prophet (John in this case) that people may read and know and understand what must soon come to pass. Coupled with this is the admonition that this knowledge will change the person and they will "keep those things which are written."

If the testimony of Jesus is a gift to confirm the church looking for the coming of the Lord, (1 Cor.1:6,7) and if the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy (Rev. 19:10) and if the gift of prophecy is one of the gifts the Holy Spirit bestows upon a church to edify the church for "he that prophesies edifies the church, (1 Cor. 14:4) would it not be reasonable to expect God to give His last day church a prophet?


How has God dealt with people in the past? Before any great calamity struck, God always sent a message of warning to His people. "Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he reveals his secret unto his servants the prophets," says Amos 3:7. The old testament prophets faithfully warned and entreated the people as destruction was descending upon them. Most all of these spokesmen for God were scorned, ridiculed, persecuted and some were even killed. Rarely was a prophet who predicted the end of worldly prosperity and called for a forsaking of sins, welcomed by either the majority of the people or even the popular religious leader. The religious leaders would usually rather take the old writings and interpret them in a pleasing fashion, then listen to the warnings and reproofs of a present day prophet.

Yet God sent these men to His people to warn them. This gives us another reason to believe that God would not allow the horrendous predictions of Revelation to come to pass before sending strong prophetic messages to warn the people. Revelation speaks of a massive deception to sweep the world. It warns of terrible things to befall those who follow the beast and his image. It speaks of only a remnant of faithful clinging to God's commandments and the faith and testimony of Jesus. Would not God make it plain to the people how to avoid the deceptions of the last days which Revelation predicts?
Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 09/03/18 12:04 AM

Originally Posted By: dedication
Jesus came to this earth in order to save us --

Acts 4:12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.

That is the basic foundation!

A prophet is simply a messenger pointing us to Jesus and eternal realities. They are simply human beings like everyone else with a special work to do for God.

Jesus being our Savior doesn't mean God no longer speaks to us through prophets.
He has spoken through prophets in many different times and ways.

And God promised to send messages through the prophets:



Mainstream Christians look at us askew and tell us that God no longer speaks through prophets since the time of the apostles.

Yet the Bible says:
"Do not despise prophesying, but test everything; hold fast what is good. 1 Thess. 5:20,21. (RSV)
Yes, it behooves us to be cautious when it comes to modern prophets for Matthew 24:24 tells us that many false prophets will arise to deceive. However, Christ does not warn us against all prophets, but only false prophets. We are admonished to "test" prophesying. We are counseled not to despise prophesying. We are urged to hold fast to the true.


Now let's look at Revelation 1:1-3 here we read that "The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave to Him, to show to His servants things which must shortly come to pass" "given to his servant John" (the prophet) "who bare record of the word and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of the things he saw. Blessed is he that reads and they that hear the words of this prophecy and keep those things which are written therein..."

Here the sequence is plain. The testimony of Jesus Christ is clearly linked to the prophecies of things that must come to pass, it is linked to God sending a message through a prophet (John in this case) that people may read and know and understand what must soon come to pass. Coupled with this is the admonition that this knowledge will change the person and they will "keep those things which are written."

If the testimony of Jesus is a gift to confirm the church looking for the coming of the Lord, (1 Cor.1:6,7) and if the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy (Rev. 19:10) and if the gift of prophecy is one of the gifts the Holy Spirit bestows upon a church to edify the church for "he that prophesies edifies the church, (1 Cor. 14:4) would it not be reasonable to expect God to give His last day church a prophet?


How has God dealt with people in the past? Before any great calamity struck, God always sent a message of warning to His people. "Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he reveals his secret unto his servants the prophets," says Amos 3:7. The old testament prophets faithfully warned and entreated the people as destruction was descending upon them. Most all of these spokesmen for God were scorned, ridiculed, persecuted and some were even killed. Rarely was a prophet who predicted the end of worldly prosperity and called for a forsaking of sins, welcomed by either the majority of the people or even the popular religious leader. The religious leaders would usually rather take the old writings and interpret them in a pleasing fashion, then listen to the warnings and reproofs of a present day prophet.

Yet God sent these men to His people to warn them. This gives us another reason to believe that God would not allow the horrendous predictions of Revelation to come to pass before sending strong prophetic messages to warn the people. Revelation speaks of a massive deception to sweep the world. It warns of terrible things to befall those who follow the beast and his image. It speaks of only a remnant of faithful clinging to God's commandments and the faith and testimony of Jesus. Would not God make it plain to the people how to avoid the deceptions of the last days which Revelation predicts?






So how do you interpret Heb. 1:1, "God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, HAS IN THESE LAST DAYS spoken to us by Ellen White"?

If you were to reject her testimonies, would you be eternally lost?

///
Posted By: dedication

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 09/03/18 06:39 AM

The text says God has spoken to us through His Son!

We do need to focus much more on the words of Christ (which we generally find printed in red in our Bibles).

I thoroughly enjoy how the books --(Desire of Ages, Christ's Object Lessons, Thoughts from the Mount of Blessings) really bring the life and teachings of Jesus to our hearts.


As to your question --
if we reject the testimonies would we be lost?

It depends --
There is no merit to be earned or lost by our accepting or rejecting. Our only merits for salvation are from Christ.
But we do need to be serious as to WHAT about the message is being rejected, for it can affect our lives physically and spiritually.

How do you interprete the following?

Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because you have rejected knowledge, I will also reject you, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I

Zachariah 1:4 Be ye not as your fathers, unto whom the former prophets have cried, saying, Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Turn ye now from your evil ways, and [from] your evil doings: but they did not hear, nor hearken unto me, saith the LORD.
1:5 Your fathers, where are they? and the prophets, do they live for ever?
1:6 But my words and my statutes, which I commanded my servants the prophets, did they not take hold of your fathers?

Posted By: James Peterson

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 09/03/18 06:54 PM

Originally Posted By: dedication

How do you interprete the following?

Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because you have rejected knowledge, I will also reject you, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God

  • It is imperative that you understand the context of that dire warning. At the beginning, the actions of Israel were listed:
     
    There is no truth or mercy
    Or knowledge of God in the land.
    By swearing and lying,
    Killing and stealing and committing adultery,
    They break all restraint,
    With bloodshed upon bloodshed.

     
  • The passage you quoted is expressed more clearly immediately following the list above:

    THEREFORE the land will mourn;
    And everyone who dwells there will waste away
    With the beasts of the field
    And the birds of the air;
    Even the fish of the sea will be taken away.

     
  • God is not destroying anyone for refusing to read the testimonies of Ellen White.1 Rather, SDA are like dumb dogs against the immorality of Las Vegas and Hollywood. They sleep while sin dances and sings in their country. Bigotry and violence have taken hold of the people. For which reason God says through Hosea:

    Now let no man contend, or rebuke another;
    For your people are like those who contend with the priest.
    Therefore you shall stumble in the day;
    The prophet also shall stumble with you in the night;
    And I will destroy your mother.

-----------------

1 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because you have rejected knowledge, I will also reject you, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I also will forget your children. Hosea 4:6

///
Posted By: His child

Re: Rejection of the Testimonies Foretold, Part 2 - 09/29/18 02:15 PM

Regarding...Hosea 4:6
Quote:
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because you have rejected knowledge, I will also reject you, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God"


It is the message to Laodicea...those who claim to be God's people and who claim to be rich and in need of nothing. They reject the messages that God gives at the time of His appointing. And Revelation is clear that the rich men will cry for the rocks to fall on them. Those who reject the knowledge that God sends them in mercy and love are destroyed because of their own choices.
© 2024 Maritime 2nd Advent Christian Believers OnLine Forums Consisting Mainly of Both Members & Friends of the SDA (Seventh-day Adventist) Church