Forums118
Topics9,199
Posts195,619
Members1,323
|
Most Online5,850 Feb 29th, 2020
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
|
|
5 registered members (Karen Y, dedication, Nadi, 2 invisible),
3,500
guests, and 16
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #3 - Jesus and the HOLY SPIRIT
#73211
04/14/06 02:35 AM
04/14/06 02:35 AM
|
|
Colin, New membership in the church in 2006 is predicated on acceptance of the current set of Fundamental Beliefs, a present conversion experience with the Holy Spirit inside, adherance to what we call church standards, and affirmation via the baptismal vow of 13 points. Upholding these has been my practice as a minister since I began in the ministry in 1994. In my understanding, this is the minimum expected by the world church. By the grace of God I have seen a consistent successful ministry and a steady train of baptisms. I invest considerable energy in baptismal preparation. It makes for a stronger Christian experience for the candidate and a stronger church.
It is beside the point to compare church membership a century ago with church membership today in terms of doctrine. The world church from time to time adjusts its understanding and its statement of beliefs. No one can know for certain, given all the variables, whether a church leader who lived a century ago, in light of the development of the church's thought, would refuse to accept the current statement of beliefs, or view them as satisfactory. We are responsible for our interaction with the light currently available to us.
Nor is my intention to assert the perfection of the current statement. I believe it could be improved but that it is satisfactory.
My intent is not to challenge one's church membership, but to seek to understand what changed from that time to the present.
I have never liked the word "Trinity" and prefer the word "Godhead." FWIW the current baptismal vow requires affirmation of this statement:
"1. Do you believe there is one God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, a unity of three coeternal Persons?" LK
Hebrews 12:14 —I want to see God— —God wants to see me— Revelation 14:12
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #3 - Jesus and the HOLY SPIRIT
#73212
04/14/06 02:50 AM
04/14/06 02:50 AM
|
|
Quote:
Dear Larry: Then, why is there a separate fundamental belief number for each God. See fundamental beliefs 3, 4 and 5. As I read it, "God the Father" is different than "God the Son" or "God the Holy Spirit". and "God the Son" is different than "God the Father" or "God the Holy Spirit" and "God the Holy Spirit" is different than "God the Father" or "God the Son". Is this how you read?
Dr Glenn:
Larry's point of clarification was not to say that God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are the same person, but to say that they are one God.
We do not worship many gods, as do the heathen (the sun god, the moon god, etc). We worship one God, revealed in three Persons who are eternally distinct.
Your original comment, whether intentionally or mistakenly, called each member of the Godhead a different god from the other two. It was this point that Larry was commenting on, not the fact they are different Persons in the same Godhead.
There is a distinction between different members of the Godhead and different gods. The fact that They are distinct Persons does not make them distinct gods.
Does that help?
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #3 - Jesus and the HOLY SPIRIT
#73214
04/14/06 02:43 PM
04/14/06 02:43 PM
|
Full Member
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 104
Nevada
|
|
Quote:
GRW, Of course, you accepted the Seventh-day Adventist position as being biblically correct before you were baptized. What then has led you to change your views since that time, or do I misread you? Also, do I correctly understand that you are presently a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.
Dear Larry: Yes, I am a baptized member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. But, I was baptised before the 1980 Dallas General Conference Sesson. The current statement of beliefs was adopted in 1980. Until about 5 years ago, I accepted the trinity doctrine and did not question it because the Bible mentioned three: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Matt. 28:19. 5 years ago, I became acquainted with a person who showed me the errors in the trinity doctrine. I do believe in the pillars of our faith which are: the ten commandments including the fourth commandment; the three angels messages; the sanctuary message; the literal and visible second coming; and the state of the dead. The first angel's message says: Fear God, and give glory to him: for the hour of his judgment is come; and worship him that made heaven and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of water. I believe that the "God" described here is the Father only. The person who made the heaven and earth is the Son. Our worship is to be done to the glory of God the Father. See Philippians 2:10 and 11. You state that you are a minister of the gospel. Have you read this: "Our ministers must be very careful not to enter into controversy in regard to the personality of God. This is a subject that they are not to touch. It is a mystery, and the enemy will surely lead astray those who enter into it. We know that Christ came in person to reveal God to the world. God is a person and Christ is a person. Christ is spoken of in the Word as "the brightness of His Father's glory, and the express image of His person." The trinity doctrine that some ministers advocate is that Christ was not a person and was not "the brightness of His Father's glory, and the express image of His person" before he was born of Mary in Bethleham. I believe this is false doctrine. The trinity doctrine that some ministers advocate is that who are to worship and exalt "God the Holy Spirit". I find no verse in the Bible where it says that we are to worship "God the Holy Spirit". E.G. White wrote: "The Father and the Son alone are to be exalted." See Youth Instructor, 7 July 1898, page 2. As I understand from extensive reading, the pioneers, including E.G. White, believed that there was one God, the Father, who is, a personal, spiritual being, the creator of all things, omnipotent, omniscient, and eternal, infinite in wisdom, holiness, justice, goodness, truth, and mercy; unchangeable, and everywhere present by his representative, the Holy Spirit. And, one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Eternal Father, the one by whom God, the Father, created all things. There is a Holy Spirit who is the representative of God the Father. E.G. White talks about the "Agency of the holy spirit" and the Holy Spirit as a "representative", but never talks the Holy Spirit as "God the Holy Spirit" and I have found absolutely no statement where she says that we are to pray to "God the Holy Spirit" or to worship "God the Holy Spirit". Larry if you can give me one Bible verse that says that I am to worship or pray to "God the Holy Spirit", I will change what I now believe to be the truth. In regard to the sanctuary message. It is the Father who sits on the mercy seat in the Most Holy Place. Our mediator, Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father, does not sit on the mercy seat since he is our high priest. I believe we have only one mediator between us and God, the Father. The trinity doctrine teaches we have one mediator between us and the triune God (God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit). If our mediator is "God the Son" in regard to the sanctuary message, then we really do not have a mediator since we can go directly to "God the Son". If "God the Holy Spirit" is our mediator, in regard to the sanctuary message, we really do not have a mediator because we can go directly to what the trinity doctrine advocates call "God the Holy Spirit". The Holy Spirit lives inside of us and if it is "God the Holy Spirit" inside of us, then we do not need a mediator to have access to this god. The errors in the trinity doctrine come from the "mother of harlots" who teaches that we have several mediators, including the spirits of dead saints, to have access to God and that the Church of Jesus Christ is built upon the principle that Peter is the first pope and the revelation of truth comes to us through the pope. Jesus Christ, the Son of God the Father, taught us the principle that truth comes to us from the Father which is in heaven and who is not flesh and blood. See Matthew 16:17. Truth comes to us from the Father which is in heaven. The Father has a "spirit" which is part of the Father and which belongs to the Father. Truth is revealed to us from this "spirit". On this principle (rock), Jesus Christ built his church.
grw
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #3 - Jesus and the HOLY SPIRIT
#73215
04/14/06 03:18 PM
04/14/06 03:18 PM
|
5500+ Member
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,154
Brazil
|
|
Dr. Glenn:
The problem is that the text says, “You shall worship the Lord your God, and him only shall you serve”.
The word “only”, Gr. monos, means
1) alone (without a companion), forsaken, destitute of help, alone, only, merely
Was Jesus wrong in using the word “only”?
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #3 - Jesus and the HOLY SPIRIT
#73216
04/14/06 03:22 PM
04/14/06 03:22 PM
|
Active Member 2012
14500+ Member
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,795
Lawrence, Kansas
|
|
Dr. Glenn, I agree with much of what you write. I have a couple of questions. First of all, Rosangela cited the following from the other thread: Quote:
"‘The Spirit also helpeth our infirmities;’ and the Spirit, being God, knoweth the mind of God." {ST, October 3, 1892}.
I agree that we are not told to exalt the Holy Spirit, but my understanding of this is that this is not because He is not God, but because it is God's nature not to exalt Himself. The Father exalts the Son, and the Son exalts the Father. The Spirit exalts both, especially the Son since Christ's incarnation (or so it seems to me).
I really had trouble understanding this:
Quote:
In regard to the sanctuary message. It is the Father who sits on the mercy seat in the Most Holy Place. Our mediator, Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father, does not sit on the mercy seat since he is our high priest. I believe we have only one mediator between us and God, the Father. The trinity doctrine teaches we have one mediator between us and the triune God (God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit). If our mediator is "God the Son" in regard to the sanctuary message, then we really do not have a mediator since we can go directly to "God the Son". If "God the Holy Spirit" is our mediator, in regard to the sanctuary message, we really do not have a mediator because we can go directly to what the trinity doctrine advocates call "God the Holy Spirit". The Holy Spirit lives inside of us and if it is "God the Holy Spirit" inside of us, then we do not need a mediator to have access to this god.
Jesus Christ is our mediator in the sense that He reveals God to us. No man has seen God at any time. The One who knew Him best, at the Father's side, has shown us what He is like.
Jesus said, "At that day ye shall ask in my name: and I say not unto you, that I will pray the Father for you: For the Father himself loveth you." (John 16:26, 27)
Jesus taught that we can go directly to the Father, because the Father Himself loves us. Our need for a Mediator stems from our unbelief.
A lot of what you wrote in the paragraph cited above seems founded on mysticism. For example, the Holy Spirit does not literally live inside of us; He illuminates our minds so we can understand the things of God.
The problem of our access to God has nothing to do with anything imposed upon us by God, but has to do with our sin and unbelief.
Those who wait for the Bridegroom's coming are to say to the people, "Behold your God." The last rays of merciful light, the last message of mercy to be given to the world, is a revelation of His character of love.
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #3 - Jesus and the HOLY SPIRIT
#73217
04/14/06 04:35 PM
04/14/06 04:35 PM
|
|
Glenn, Thank you for your very straightforward and fair answer. There is much in your present belief that I cannot agree with but I appreciate the straightforward response.
1. The difference between the previous statement (1931) and 1980 on this point is limited.
2. It is true that on occasion when the statement of belief changes as in 1980 and in 2005 everyone who entered under the previous statement has not directly agreed to the newest statement. In such cases it is good to allow a certain latitude so that pre and post folk are viewed as full members of the community.
3. I have no burden to urge you to pray to the Holy Spirit or even to Jesus. Jesus taught that we are to pray to the Father.
4. It remains true that Jesus taught equivalent honor of Father and Son (John 5:21-23), while Paul joins in affirming equality (John 17:5; Philippians 2:6). Also, that Jesus accepted worship of Himself (John 20:28).
5. I am not clear what your position is. It seems to be that the Holy Spirit is not a distinct, separate person, and that Jesus is not fully God in the sense that the Father is God? Please correct me if I am mistaken of your present views.
6. Observant Jews reject Jesus as Messiah in connection with their expectation which is of a non-divine Messiah. They think that calling Jesus God is idolatry. I think we will find that either we must uphold Jesus as fully God or else hold to the Jewish viewpoint, but that intermediate positions will be found to be untenable; e.g. Jesus is not God Jr. or a seperate being from God or a shade less than God (as the JW's have it, God the Father is God Almighty, Jesus only God not-almighty). My understanding is that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit all have always existed and have life in themselves original, unborrowed, and underived. They constitute one God yet exist as three distinct persons.
7. I have observed that others who have changed their viewpoint on these points have eventually lost faith in the inspiration of the writings of Ellen G. White. I am curious where you presently stand on that point. I wonder too whether you could share what is the situation of the person who shared this new understanding with you. Is he still a member of the church? Does he still accept the inspiration of EGW?
8. One further question. How has this situation impacted your relationship with others in your church? LK
Hebrews 12:14 —I want to see God— —God wants to see me— Revelation 14:12
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Lesson Study #3 - Jesus and the HOLY SPIRIT
#73219
04/15/06 04:17 PM
04/15/06 04:17 PM
|
Full Member
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 104
Nevada
|
|
Dear Larry: Thank you for you much appreciated response. You state: "I am not sure what your position is. It seems to be that the Holy Spirit is not a distinct, separate person, and that Jesus is not fully God in the sense that the Father is God?"
You also state: "I have observed that others who have changed their viewpoint on these points have eventually lost faith in the inspiration of the writings of Ellen G. White. I am curious where you presently stand on this point. I wonder too whether you could share what is the situation of the person who shared this understanding with you. Is he still a member of the church? Does he still accept the inspiration of EGW?"
You also state: "One further question. How has this situation impacted your relationship with others in your church?"
First, of all I have full confidence in the inspiration of EGW. In 1975, when attending College in Keene, Texas, I attended campmeeting there. Ben Roden of the Branch Davidians or Shephard Rod came. He was trying to pursuade me to keep all the feast days of the old testament. But, one thing I noted is that he selectively quoted EGW. He didn't put much confidence in the statements of EGW that conflicted with his doctrinal theory. I have found a similar thread among some who have tried to pursuade me to accept every point in regard to the trinity doctrine such as: "Jesus Christ was 100% God as the Father is God and he is 100% human as we are human" and Jesus Christ was not the literal divine SON before he was born of Mary. The persons who are trying to pursuade me on this point have no Bible text to provide, but only EGW statements and then only those EGW statements that agree with their theory and they reject the other EGW statements. EGW said: "The Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of the Father, is truly God in infinity, but not in personality." (if He is not God in personality how can he be 100% God in the sense the Father is God?) EGW said: "Avoid every question in relation to the humanity of Christ which is liable to be misunderstood. Truth lies close to the track of presumption......The incarnation of Christ has ever been, and will ever remain a mystery. That which is revealed, is for us and for our children, but let every human being be warned from the ground of making Christ altogether human, such as one of ourselves; for it cannot be..." See 5BC 1128-1130. (I have limited space here. you need to read the full context). If Jesus Christ is not "altogether human" and I believe in the inspiration of EGW, then how can I adopt the teaching that he was 100% human when EGW said that he was not 100% (altogether) human? You state: "My understanding is that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit have always existed and have life in themselves original, unborrowed, and underived." Jesus said: "For as the Father hath life in himself, so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself." John 5:26. The "original, unborrowed,and underived life" was given to the Son from his Father. Larry, do you accept this teaching? I can find no statement in regard to whether or not the Holy Spirit has life "original, unborrowed, and underived". If he is not a separate being or person than that of the Father then he would have the same "original, unborrowed, and underived" as the Father because they cannot be separated just like my head cannot be separated from the rest of my body and then call either the head or the rest of the body as being a human being. If he is a separate being and separate person than that of the Father, I can't answer that question because I do not have any Bible verse or EGW statement to base my belief upon. In regard to the divinity of Christ, I am not of the observant Jews who think that calling Jesus God is idolatry. The Father called his Son "God" (see Hebrew 1:8). Is the Father involved in idolatry? certainly not. I certainly believe in the divinty of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, but not in the same way that some trinity doctrine advocates do. They believe that there were three divine beings and each acted a role [but really are not who they say they are]- one acted the Father, one of the Son, and one of the Holy Spirit. They do not believe that Jesus Christ was the literal begotten Son of God before he was born of Mary in Bethlehem. I believe that Jesus Christ is divine because he is the literal Son of the Father -yesterday, today and he is the "express image of his Father's person" -yesterday, today, and forevermore. I believe that this was also the position of EGW under inspiration. See the comments of EGW on Daniel 3:25. 4BC1170. See also 1SM226-227. You state: "I am not clear what your position is. It seems to be that the Holy Spirit is not a distinct separate person...." Well, I am still trying to form a clear opinion on this. The statments in John chapters 14 to 16 made by Jesus himself seem to indicate that the Holy Spirit is a separate person who proceeds from the Father. But then the statement of Jesus himself in Matthew 16:17 indicates that it is the Father himself who directly reveals truth to the believer. The Holy Spirit is not mentioned as a separate person. In John 4:21-24, Jesus seems to indicate that God is a Spirit and they that worship him must worship him inspirit and in truth. He talks about worshiping the Father, not the Holy Spirit. He does not mention the Holy Spirit as being a separate being or person that that of the Father. Anyway, I do not believe that the belief one way or the other is important for salvation. Jesus himself said: "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." To obtain eternal life, I only need to know the Father, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom he has sent. You ask: "I wonder too whether you could share what is the situation of the person who shared this new understanding with you." I will not give the name of the person. This person is an advocate of the teachings of Jones and Waggoner, but they carry those teaching to their apostacy from the SDA truths. As a historical point, Jones and Waggoner (who presented the Christ our Righteousness message in 1888) later in life rejected the sanctuary message and rejected the teaching on the investigative judgment. The person who introduced me to the new understanding regarding the trinity doctrine errors is now teaching that Jones and Waggonner later in life were correct and it is error to teach the investigative judgment and the sanctuary message and also teaching that EGW was in error. Just because Jones and Waggoner later in life rejected the investigative judgment and the sanctuary message, does not mean that the message they brough in 1888 is not the truth. The same is for the new understanding this person brought to me regarding the errors in the trinity doctrine. I cannot say that this new understanding is not truth. In fact, the person who taught the person who introduced me to the new understanding still believes in the full inspiration of EGW and rejects the teachings of Jones and Waggonner later in life when they rejected the sanctuary and investigative judgment. He still teaches all the pillars of the SDA truths. You ask: "How has this situation impacted your relationship with others in your church?" I do not force my new understanding upon any other church member. Some members of my church have agreed with my new understanding. Others recognize that my understanding is different than their understanding and do not let this bother them. It has not caused anyone to seek removing my name from the church books. I hope this has been helpful.
grw
|
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
|
|