HOME CHAT ROOM #1 CHAT ROOM #2 Forum Topics Within The Last 7 Days REGISTER ENTER FORUMS BIBLE SCHOOL CONTACT US

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine Christian Family Fellowship Forums
(formerly Maritime SDA OnLine)
Consisting mainly of both members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
Welcomes and invites other members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to join us!

Click Here To Read Legal Notice & Disclaimer
Suggested a One Time Yearly $20 or Higher Donation Accepted Here to Help Cover the Yearly Expenses of Operating & Upgrading. We need at least $20 X 10 yearly donations.
Donations accepted: Here
ShoutChat Box
Newest Members
ekoorb1030, jibb555, MBloomfield, Dina, Nelson
1323 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums118
Topics9,199
Posts195,597
Members1,323
Most Online5,850
Feb 29th, 2020
Seventh-day Adventist Church In Canada Links
Seventh-day Adventist Church in Canada

Newfoundland & Labrador Mission

Maritime Conference

Quebec Conference

Ontario Conference

Manitoba-Saskatchewan Conference

Alberta Conference

British Columbia Conference

7 Top Posters(30 Days)
Rick H 14
kland 9
Daryl 3
April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Member Spotlight
ProdigalOne
ProdigalOne
Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,183
Joined: June 2015
Show All Member Profiles 
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Live Space Station Tracking
Here is a link to show exactly where the Space Station is over earth right now: Click Here
Last 7 Pictures From Photo Gallery Forums
He hath set an harvest for thee
Rivers Of Living Water
He Leads Us To Green Pastures
Remember What God Has Done
Remember The Sabbath
"...whiter than snow..."
A Beautiful Spring Day
Who's Online
4 registered members (Karen Y, Daryl, dedication, 1 invisible), 3,252 guests, and 14 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Re: SIN (singular) and sins (plural) - Hogwash or Whitewash? #45088
05/05/02 05:48 PM
05/05/02 05:48 PM
Mountain Man  Offline OP
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Amen. So what ever other definitions of sin given in the Bible, the one that most fully represents the truth is 1 John 3:4. That's not to say that the others are wrong (Rom 14:23, Jam 4:17 and 1 John 5:17) it's just that they are based on 1 John 3:4.

But what about the idea that sin is two things - 1) SIN singular (a state of being), and 2) sin plural (a state of doing)?


Re: SIN (singular) and sins (plural) - Hogwash or Whitewash? #45089
05/05/02 06:11 PM
05/05/02 06:11 PM
Mountain Man  Offline OP
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Pastor Ikan, have you read those Ellen White quotes where she essentially says the Sabbath did not exist as a commandment before Jesus created it on the 7th day? I suspect this is also true of the 5th and 7th commanments (which were not possible before the creation of mankind). What do you think?

The Spirit of Prophecy Volume One, page 261
"The law of God existed before man was created. The angels were governed by it. Satan fell because he transgressed the principles of God's government. After Adam and Eve were created, God made known to them his law. It was not then written, but was rehearsed to them by Jehovah.

"The Sabbath of the fourth commandment was instituted in Eden. After God had made the world, and created man upon the earth, he made the Sabbath for man. After Adam's sin and fall, nothing was taken from the law of God. The principles of the ten commandments existed before the fall, and were of a character suited to the condition of a holy order of beings. After the fall, the principles of those precepts were not changed, but additional precepts were given to meet man in his fallen state."

S.D.A. Bible Commentary Vol. 1, page 1104, paragraph 5
"The law of God existed before the creation of man or else Adam could not have sinned. After the transgression of Adam the principles of the law were not changed, but were definitely arranged and expressed to meet man in his fallen condition."


Re: SIN (singular) and sins (plural) - Hogwash or Whitewash? #45090
05/11/02 10:20 PM
05/11/02 10:20 PM
B
Boblee  Offline
Full Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 139
Keene, TX, USA
In the above posts, there is a major problem with translation. Yes, the KJV says "sin is the transgression of the law," but that is not what the Greek says. It is a mistranslation of the Greek that has caused a lot of misunderstanding in Christianity in general and Adventism in particular.

The Greek and all modern translations say "sin is lawlessness." Lawlessness is an attitude, not an activity as the word "transgression" implies. Thus the basic definition of sin is an attitude, specifically an attitude of rebellion against God.

It is obvious, however, that the word "sin" is also used in much of scripture as the unlawful deeds that we do, so the differentiation which Mike was making is probably correct except that the capitalization and pluralization is not supplied. It must be deduced from the context.

Bob Lee


Re: SIN (singular) and sins (plural) - Hogwash or Whitewash? #45091
05/13/02 04:22 PM
05/13/02 04:22 PM
Mountain Man  Offline OP
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Bob, welcome back. In the last year and a half we have had the privilege of reading your posts only 5 times. I hope we hear from you more often.

Yes, lawlessness certainly says it all, doesn't it! It's an all emcompassing condition begining with the root of sin (attitude) and producing the fruits of sin (thoughts, words and deeds). Thank you for sharing those insights.


Re: SIN (singular) and sins (plural) - Hogwash or Whitewash? #45092
06/05/02 01:01 PM
06/05/02 01:01 PM
J
James Saptenno  Offline
Charter Member
Active Member 2012
Dedicated Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,157
Jakarta, Indonesia
Quote.
The Bible and the SOP clearly teach that sin is the transgression of the law. Sin is not a state of being. It's not who or what we are. Sin is any thought, word or deed that violates the law of God. All other definitions are manmade and must lead to sin.
Uquote.

Mike.

SIN (singular) is indeed a transgression of the law. Men’s sinful nature that was based on their “love for self” is against the principle of the law “love that seeks no self.”

And since ‘self-love” is our nature, we were already under condemnation of the law even though we keep the law perfectly without breaking the letter, because what we break is the spirit of the law.

Can a man change his nature? Can an Ethiopian change the color of his skin? Can a leopard change the dots of his skin? Nope! So, how can you do good if the nature is evil?

That is the reason Christ must come to die for men, not only to redeem them from this SIN they never committed and the death they are not responsible for, but also to release men from the power of SIN (through His Spirit), just then can a man have a change of nature, a change of character that fits the principle of the law which is the principle of heaven it self.

In His love

James S.

Re: SIN (singular) and sins (plural) - Hogwash or Whitewash? #45093
06/05/02 01:11 PM
06/05/02 01:11 PM
Daryl  Online Canadian

Site Administrator
23000+ Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,121
Nova Scotia, Canada
And the result of this "change of nature, a change of character that fits the principle of the law which is the principle of heaven it self" is in keeping "the commandments of God" because the law is now not only written on tablets of stone, but is especially and more importantly now written in the heart.

[ June 05, 2002, 10:12 AM: Message edited by: Daryl Fawcett ]

Re: SIN (singular) and sins (plural) - Hogwash or Whitewash? #45094
06/05/02 02:50 PM
06/05/02 02:50 PM
Charlene Van Hook  Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 603
North Carolina, USA
There has been a "decalogue" from the beginning of time...it just doesn't read like the Ten commandments written on the 2 tables of stone. God's Character was revealed in person to all the inhabitants of heaven. But....

There was war in heaven, remember....Satan broke the "laws of heaven". His heart was lifted up and self was the God of his life....then he lied to the Angels and finaly all were cast out of heaven. God's character was brought under a challenge and the accusers had to be cast out.

Now here is Satan in the garden and again he is bringing doubt upon the goodness of God's character and again he lies about God and His teachings...The laws of Eden..Eve was decieved, commited sin...."sin is breaking a law of God"....no matter where in time of our History, there has always been God's laws, Those pertaining to us now were written down at Sinai, but they existed from the beginning.... and the rest is very well known to us.

Did we in herit sin "original sin" no, that is the catholic doctrine, and the reason why they baptize babies. Did we inherit a natural tendency to sin and sinful flesh from Adam that is subject to the first death? Yes, but the second death, eternal destruction, no, that is a choice.

When we understand what right is from wrong, good from evil, sin from sinless, we make informed choices. We are guilty of the choices we make and pay the consequences of our choices. If we are to spend eternity with our Redeemer Saviour...we will choose to be with him and sooperated with Him in all His plans for us. We surrender our will to His will and He will save us. This is the most important choice we have to make. We work to this end, seek, strive, resist the Devil and He will flee from us.

To Sin or not to sin.....if we know the difference we will make the desired choice.

Re: SIN (singular) and sins (plural) - Hogwash or Whitewash? #45095
06/05/02 04:37 PM
06/05/02 04:37 PM
Mountain Man  Offline OP
SDA
Charter Member
Active Member 2019

20000+ Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 22,256
Southwest USA
Amen. The "SIN vs. sin" concept confuses the truth about sin. The idea that we possess SIN in the form of fallen nature condemns us by default, a Catholic abberation of the truth.

We are not guilty of sin until we commit a sin. And furthermore we are not held accountable for the sins we commit unwittingly. Although Jesus paid the penalty for sins committed unwittingly, which is why we are not held accountable for them.

Sinful flesh cannot commit a sin. It can only communicate sinful suggestions, in the form of unholy thoughts and feelings. But these are not a sin, they are only temptations.

[ June 05, 2002, 01:39 PM: Message edited by: Mike Lowe ]

Re: SIN (singular) and sins (plural) - Hogwash or Whitewash? #45096
06/12/02 01:54 PM
06/12/02 01:54 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered

And the result of this "change of nature, a change of character that fits the principle of the law which is the principle of heaven it self" is in keeping "the commandments of God" because the law is now not only written on tablets of stone, but is especially and more importantly now written in the heart.

[ June 05, 2002, 10:12 AM: Message edited by: Daryl Fawcett ]

___________________
In His Love, Mercy & Grace

Daryl

= = = = =

A classic concept that I believe is not according to the gospel of Christ.

Love is a character and not a law that could judge and condemn men, because love is not a written law that have authority upon men to judge and condemn them. Remember what the Scripture said: “When there is no law there is no transgression.”

The Ten Commandments was a written law that has authority upon men to judge and condemn those who break it.

The Scripture said that “the law kills”, the “Ten Commandments engraved on stone tablets kill because it lead to condemnation and death.”

On the contrary, love gives life.
Love is fruit of the Spirit, fruit of a believer who were led by the Spirit. The Scripture said that “the ministry of the Spirit lead to righteousness and brings life.”

So, how could a law that once engraved on stone tablets, which lead to condemnation and death be implanted in our heart. If it leads to condemnation and death when written on a stone tablet, the more it will be when it is written in our heart.

What is written in our heart is LOVE, a character imparted by the Spirit when a believer is led by the Spirit. And LOVE is not the Ten Commandments, there is a BIG gap and difference between them.

In His love

James S.

Re: SIN (singular) and sins (plural) - Hogwash or Whitewash? #45097
06/12/02 01:56 PM
06/12/02 01:56 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered

Mike Lowe
posted June 05, 2002 01:37 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amen. The "SIN vs. sin" concept confuses the truth about sin. The idea that we possess SIN in the form of fallen nature condemns us by default, a Catholic abberation of the truth.

We are not guilty of sin until we commit a sin. And furthermore we are not held accountable for the sins we commit unwittingly. Although Jesus paid the penalty for sins committed unwittingly, which is why we are not held accountable for them.

Sinful flesh cannot commit a sin. It can only communicate sinful suggestions, in the form of unholy thoughts and feelings. But these are not a sin, they are only temptations.

Unquote.

Mike.

What does this verse means to you?

“Because all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God?”

Why did Christ come and die for us? To redeem the sins we committed? Then the whole world might enter heaven and live in heaven!

Once under the law, no matter you break a law willfully or unwittingly, you will be condemned by the law.

Christ came to redeem men from the wages of SIN, a death they didn’t deserve, because they were born in SIN, a SIN they never committed.

Christ also came to redeem those who were under the law from the curse of the law. But those who were not under the law because they has not the law, were not redeemed from the curse of the law but from the SIN they were born with. They were justified by Christ righteousness, but condemnation and death came through Adam.

Sinful flesh can not commit a sin, but men were under the dominion of their sinful flesh. They are dominated by the SIN in their flesh that sends sinful suggestion called the desire of the flesh. This condition make a man can do nothing good (Read Romans 7:14-23).

In His love

James S.

Page 2 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderator  dedication, Rick H 

Sabbath School Lesson Study Material Link
Here is the link to this week's Sabbath School Lesson Study and Discussion Material: Click Here
Most Recent Posts From Selected Public Forums
Are the words in the Bible "imperfect"?
by Rick H. 04/26/24 06:05 PM
Seven Trumpets reconsidered
by Karen Y. 04/25/24 09:37 AM
Nebuchadnezzar Speaks: The Sunday Law
by dedication. 04/22/24 05:15 PM
Nebuchadnezzar Speaks: Part Two
by TruthinTypes. 04/21/24 11:14 PM
Where is the crises with Climate mandates?
by dedication. 04/21/24 09:25 PM
2nd Quarter 2024 The Great Controversy
by dedication. 04/21/24 06:41 PM
Iran strikes Israel as War Expands
by dedication. 04/21/24 05:07 PM
What Happens at the End.
by Rick H. 04/20/24 11:39 AM
Global Warming Farce
by kland. 04/18/24 05:51 PM
Will You Take The Wuhan Virus Vaccine?
by kland. 04/11/24 12:24 PM
Chinese Revival?
by ProdigalOne. 04/06/24 06:12 PM
Carbon Dioxide What's so Bad about It?
by Daryl. 04/05/24 12:04 PM
Destruction of Canadian culture
by ProdigalOne. 04/05/24 07:46 AM
Most Recent Posts From Selected Private Forums of MSDAOL
Is There A Connection Between WO & LGBTQ?
by dedication. 04/24/24 02:15 PM
The Wound Is Healed! The Mark Is Forming!
by dedication. 04/22/24 06:04 PM
Christian Nationalism/Sunday/C
limate Change

by Rick H. 04/13/24 10:19 AM
A Second American Civil War?
by kland. 04/11/24 12:39 PM
A.I. - The New God?
by kland. 04/11/24 12:34 PM
Perils of the Emerging Church Movement
by ProdigalOne. 04/06/24 07:10 PM
Are we seeing a outpouring of the Holy Spirit?
by dedication. 04/01/24 07:48 PM
Time Is Short!
by ProdigalOne. 03/29/24 10:50 PM
Forum Announcements
Visitors by Country Since February 11, 2013
Flag Counter
Google Maritime SDA OnLine Public Forums Site Search & Google Translation Service
Google
 
Web www.maritime-sda-online.com

Copyright 2000-Present
Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine).

LEGAL NOTICE:
The views expressed in this forum are those of individuals
and do not necessarily represent those of Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine,
as well as the Seventh-day Adventist Church
from the local church level to the General Conference level.

Maritime 2nd Advent Believers OnLine (formerly Maritime SDA OnLine) is also a self-supporting ministry
and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland
or any of its subsidiaries.

"And He saith unto them, follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men." Matt. 4:19
MARITIME 2ND ADVENT BELIEVERS ONLINE (FORMERLY MARITIME SDA ONLINE) CONSISTING MAINLY OF BOTH MEMBERS & FRIENDS
OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH,
INVITES OTHER MEMBERS & FRIENDS OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHO WISHES TO JOIN US!
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1